►
From YouTube: Pittsburgh City Council Standing Committees - 3/11/20
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Hello
and
welcome
to
Pittsburgh
City
Council's
standing
committees,
meeting
for
Wednesday
March
11th
2020.
My
name
is
Kim
Clark,
Baskin
and
I
am
the
assistant
city
clerk
with
us.
Today
we
have
our
sign
language
interpreter
Sarah,
Pell
the
following
is
a
list
of
legislation
up
for
preliminary
approval
by
Pittsburgh,
City,
Council,
finance
and
law
committee.
Mr.
Laval
is
the
chair.
A
This
bill
is
sponsored
by
Councilman,
bruce
kraus,
Public,
Works
Committee.
Mr.
Coghill
is
the
chair.
We
have
built
number
157
resolution
amending
resolution,
830
of
2018
entitled
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
the
director
of
the
department
of
mobility
and
infrastructure,
on
behalf
of
the
city,
to
enter
into
an
agreement
to
complete
engineering
design
for
a
new
multimodal
connection
of
Hazelwood
Greenfield.
A
Certain
property
in
18th,
ward
of
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
owned
by
28:26
Edwards
way
and
Associates,
LLC
known
as
322
to
324
Arlington
Avenue
authorizing
the
payment
of
just
compensation
and
necessary
and
incidental
acquisition
costs
related
thereto
bill
number
181
resolution
authorizing
the
Department
of
mobility
and
infrastructure
to
enter
into
a
contract
with
the
Kittleson
team
to
conduct
a
parking
and
transportation
demand.
Management
study
for
the
Uptown
neighborhood
cost
not
to
exceed
$60,000,
and
this
bill
is
sponsored
by
Councilman
Daniel
LaValle.
A
We
have
a
deferred
paper
bill
number
2019,
22:49,
ordinance,
amending
the
pittsburgh
Code
title
9
zoning
article
1
section
9,
a
2.03
zoning
map
by
changing
from
CP
commercial
Planned,
Unit
development
to
UNC
urban
neighborhood
commercial
for
two
parcels
at
a
portion
of
two
parcels
in
Allegheny,
County
block
and
light
system
in
the
seventh
Ward
in
changing
from
l,
NC,
local
neighborhood,
commercial
to
UNC
urban
neighborhood,
commercial,
six
parcels
and
a
portion
of
two
parcels
in
the
Allegheny
County
block
and
light
system
in
the
seventh
Ward
urban
recreation
committee.
Reverend
Burgess
is
the
chair.
A
We
have
bill
number
156
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
the
director
of
the
Department
of
Parks
and
Recreation
to
execute
relevant
agreements
to
receive
grant
funding
from
the
digital
Harbor
foundation,
to
expand
rec
to
tech
programming
into
Jefferson
recreation
center
and
further
providing
for
an
agreement
not
to
exceed
$10,000.
For
this
stated
purpose
in
our
governmental
affairs
committee,
miss
gross
as
a
chair.
We
have
bill
number
19
resolution,
adopting
plan
revision
to
the
city
of
Pittsburgh's
official
sewage
facilities
plan
for
the
district
15
beta
development.
A
At
14,
65,
Smallman
Street
and
bill
number
141
resolution
adopting
plan
revision
to
the
city
of
Pittsburgh's
official
sewage
facilities
plan
for
the
29:26,
a
small
Minh
Street
land
development
project
located
at
2920
in
2930
smallman
street
in
the
city
of
pittsburgh.
That
concludes
the
reading
of
the
legislation.
Today,
thank
you
and
have
a
wonderful
day.
B
Good
morning
and
welcome
to
the
Standing
Committee
meeting
for
Wednesday
March
11th
2020,
our
first
order
of
business
is
public
comment.
Anyone
wishing
to
comment
before
City
Council
has
three
minutes
to
speak.
Please
give
your
name
and
neighborhood
for
the
record.
The
green
light
will
indicate
the
start
of
three
minutes
when
the
yellow
light
comes
on.
You
have
one
minute
to
summarize
and
when
the
red
light
comes
on,
your
time
is
up.
I
would
also
like
to
remind
everyone
that
rules.
A
council
state
that
comment
comment
is
limited
to
matters
of
concern.
B
C
My
name
is
Devon
Neff
Brown
I
live
in
the
Hill
District
I've
come
again
to
complain
to
bring
out
some
of
the
things
that
I
have
went
through,
I've
been
coming
for
over
27
years,
and
now
it's
gotten
so
that
mr.
Burgess
can
tell
me
when
Miss
cross
starts
talking
to
him.
My
three
minutes
for
me
to
be
quiet,
I
cannot
talk
to
her
and
mr.
C
mr.
Krause
should
be
fine.
He's
got
his
computer.
While
we
talk
he
works
on
the
computer
they're
supposed
to
listen
to
us.
They
don't
know
what
we're
talking
about
see
what
you
need
to
understand
that
we
live
in
a
neighborhood
different
from
you
and
mr.
Krause
you're
not
supposed
to
be
working
on
the
computer.
He
should
be
fine,
a
hundred
dollars
any
time
he
pushes
that
button.
So
let's
watch
and
see
if
he
pushes
it
because
he
needs
to
pay
a
fine.
Do
you
understand
they're,
not
representing
us?
They
represent
themselves.
C
It's
only
here
in
the
United
States
that
they
make
the
police
that
the
police
dog
becomes
a
human
being
dogs.
God
didn't
put
a
dog
over
us
human
beings,
especially
you
have
to
look
at
who's
training,
the
dogs,
especially
when
you're
training
with
black
hands
and
a
white
face.
We
told
him
that
the
black
hands
that
the
dogs
automatically
jumped
that
black
people,
no
no,
they
said
they're
looking
at
the
face.
No,
you
know
that
and
they'll
look
at
the
face.
That's
how
we
as
a
black
person,
would
never
be
able
to
kill
a
dog.
C
Please
don't,
but
the
white
man
did
even
in
Wilkinsburg
they
had
that
police
dog
we
found
out,
he
got
killed.
They
did
not
put
any
armor
on
that
dog
at
all.
Nothing
to
protect
him.
I
said
if
he
had
had
it
it.
Wouldn't
it
still
was
got
passed.
You
know.
We
don't
believe
that
those
police
should
be
charged
any
time.
They
don't
protect
their
own
policemen.
They
made
the
dog
a
policeman,
so
he
should
be
protected
too
I
come
down
here
every
day.
C
Every
time
I
can't
possibly
can,
because
we
have
a
group
that
feel
that
they
know
more
than
what
we
do.
If
you
listen
to
the
radio,
in
fact,
I
want
to
say
really
learn:
90.5
is
having
their
fundraiser
I
even
sent
in
the
day.
I
took
him.
Call
him,
because
this
radio,
station
aerial
and
seer
was
able
to
tell
me
that
we
were
having
a
meeting
at
the
school
board
which
I
couldn't
couldn't
find
out.
C
I
was
able
to
go
and
speak
to
the
superintendent,
to
tell
the
superintendent
how
we,
the
black
people,
felt
about
him
being
hired.
We
felt
that
he
shouldn't
have
been
hired.
He
embellished
his
embellished,
what
he
did
and
I
told
him
to,
but
you
know
something
look
at
this
man.
I
talked
back
to
him,
told
him
he
shouldn't
have
never
been
and
he
should
be
fired.
Why
did
he
go
to
Cuba?
But
when
I
came
when
he
came
here
the
other
day,
I
thanked
him.
C
D
My
name
is
dawn
marie
smith.
I
live
in
Squirrel,
Hill
and
I'm
here,
representing
just
harvest
on
the
matter
of
the
giant
eagle
at
Shakespeare
Street
zoning
change.
When
we
spoke
on
this
issue
before
council
in
December,
we
said
that
the
zoning
change
wasn't
in
the
best
interest
of
the
community,
and
that
remains
our
opinion.
The
developer
has
made
no
changes
or
even
loose
commitments
to
changes
that
would
adequately
alleviate
the
impact
of
closing
the
giant
eagle
on
the
property
for
a
minimum
of
18
months.
D
This
closure
would
disrupt
food
access
for
residents
of
multiple,
low-income
communities,
increasing
hardship
for
hundreds
of
Wick
and
thousands
of
food
stamp
shoppers
and
disproportionately
impacting
black
Pittsburghers.
In
light
of
the
developer's
failure
to
address
these
concerns
in
an
impactful
way,
we
ask
that
the
council
reject
the
proposed
zoning
change.
E
Hello,
my
name
is
Josh
Malloy
I'm
from
Garfield
I'm,
the
community
organizer
for
Pittsburghers
for
public
transit
I
would
like
to
begin
my
statement
by
thanking
Councilwoman
Erica
Strassburger
on
her
leadership
and
gathering
stakeholders
from
inside
and
outside
of
her
district,
to
ensure
that
oh
yeah
I'm,
talking
about
Daniel
Shakespeare,
then
ensure
that
all
those
who
are
affected
by
this
development
have
a
voice
in
making
sure
this.
This
would
have
the
best
possible
outcome
for
them.
E
I
would
like
to
thank
Celeste
from
Pittsburgh
United
for
her
work
and
gathering
consensus
from
advocates
in
what
direction
we
should
be
demanding
with
them.
We
should
be
demanding
of
this
developer
without
the
work
of
Erica
or
Celeste.
We
would
not
be
where
we
are
today.
We
have
moved
the
developer
on
the
amount
of
affordable
housing
on
the
site.
We
have
reduced
amount
of
parking
on
the
site.
E
There
are
many
ways
to
cause
harm
and
adjusting
some
of
our
concerns
with,
while
leaving
others
unanswered
or
inadequately
answered
will
cause
harm
today,
I'm
sending
and
so
our
solidarity
with
just
harvests
and
longtime
shoppers
that
China
legal
and
calling
for
a
delay
in
the
vote
or
a
vote
against
the
proven
design
and
change.
It's
not
enough
to
say
you
will
do
these
things.
E
F
Morning
my
name
is
Celestia
and
the
housing
justice
organizer
at
Pittsburg,
United
I
stand
with
my
comrades.
We
do
work
in
coalition
together,
there
has
been
a
lot
of
energy
around
this
development
around
food
justice,
environmental
justice,
their
housing,
justice
being
inextricably
inextricably
linked.
I
was
in
DC
this
past
weekend
protested
at
HUD.
F
We
released
a
national
platform
that
really
is
robust,
the
first
national
housing
platform
from
grassroots
organizations,
and
so
one
of
the
things
I
said
there
was
a
quote
from
Audrey
Lord
about
us
not
leaving
living
single-issue
lives
and
about
housing,
not
being
a
single
issue
thing
so
I
stand
here
also
in
solidarity
with
my
comrades.
I
know
that
I'm
that
you
may
have
seen
this
letter,
and
we
understand
this
is
a
letter
of
intent.
F
Our
concern
is
that
we
were
calling
for
this
to
be
edit
into
public
record,
so
that
would
be
enforceable
because
we
feel,
like
council,
has
the
power
here,
we're
very
unsettled,
of
course,
by
the
things
that
happen
with
Penn
Plaza
at
the
Planning
Commission.
Even
though
there
was
good
intent-
and
that
was
a
horrible
development,
it
still
was
able
to
be
passed
through.
F
So
that's
a
concern
that
we
have
here
as
a
coalition
I'm,
also
going
to
quickly
read
our
housing
demands,
which
are
we're
very
close
to
and
we're
hoping
that
the
dialogue
stays
open
around
housing,
around
transit
and
also
around
the
real
equity
piece
we
see
for
marginalized
folks,
which
is
food
justice.
We
have
a
grocery
store
that
will
be
closed
for
maybe
over
18
months
we
have
disabled
folks,
we
have
veterans,
we
have
children
that
will
not
be
able
to
access
food
and
water
and
WIC,
and
that's
very
important
that
cannot
be
ignored.
F
So
when
we
talk
about
housing
when
we
talk
about
transit,
when
we
talk
about
environmentalism,
we're
talking
about
all
these
things,
we're
talking
about
centering
people
in
development,
we're
talking
about
development
without
displacement,
we're
talking
about
all
of
that,
and
so
I
will
try
to
quickly
read
this
I
know.
I
only
have
three
minutes,
so
we
know
we
need
at
least
70
units
of
affordable
housing
at
50%
area
media
and
coming
below,
and
that's
around
thirty.
Eight
thousand
nine
hundred
dollars
a
year
for
a
family
of
four
right
now
this
project
will
give
us
35.
F
That
means
we're
leaving
35
families
without
an
affordable
place
to
live
in
a
neighborhood
that
has
historically
seen
gentrification
and
displacement
with
a
citywide
shortage
of
20,000,
affordable
units
at
30%
area
median
income
here
below.
We
are
also
calling
for
these
units
to
remain
affordable
at
these
levels.
For
at
least
forty
years,
the
development
team
has
said
they
are
open
to
dialogue.
But
we
know
the
time
is
now
to
get
a
written,
enforceable
commitment
that
benefits
all
of
our
neighbors
and
community
members.
F
We
were
calling
for
at
least
50%
affordability
at
two-thirds
of
50%
area,
median
income
and
one-third
at
the
current
small
area,
fair
market
rate
for
Shadyside,
as
well
as
5%
project-based
vouchers,
which
allows
deeper
affordability
and
market
rate
units
and
again,
we've
looked
at
these
things.
They
do
not
effect
bottom
lines,
but
we
also
have
not
seen
the
pro
forma.
We
know.
F
Hill
CDC
requires
that
we
take
every
development
in
our
community
should
be
able
and
should
have
to
release
the
pro
forma
for
us
to
be
able
to
to
intervene
as
the
community,
so
in
closing,
I
said
with
just
harvest,
as
there
was
Pittsburgh
for
public
transit
actually
has
to
either
hold
the
votes
until
we
could
get
something
enforceable,
and
we
look
forward
to
the
discussion
at
the
table
about
this
letter
being
able
to
be
edited.
Thank
you.
G
Good
morning,
I'm
Lauren
Connolly
I'm
the
executive
director
of
the
Lawrenceville
corporation.
Thank
you
for
hearing
me
today,
I'm
here
today
to
support
the
movement
of
funds
into
the
Complete
Streets
initiatives
and
specifically
to
support
those
funds
being
used
for
the
green
boulevard
project
in
Lawrenceville.
We
began
working
on
this
project
in
2009,
so
for
over
a
decade
we've
been
waiting
for
our
green
boulevard
in
our
community
as
part
of
the
Allegheny
Green
Vision
Plan
and
green
boulevard
plan.
G
We've
made
recommendations
for
enhanced
ecological
systems,
market-based
land
uses,
neighborhood
connections,
open
space
infrastructure
and
pedestrian
and
transit
opportunities
through
public
and
private
partnerships.
We've
been
able
to
implement
elements
of
the
plan
and
we're
more
than
ready
to
see
the
green
Boulevard
move
forward.
The
green
Boulevard
as
it
can
exist
today,
has
the
potential
to
connect
our
neighborhoods
to
the
riverfront
unlock
economic
potential
of
our
community
and
reimagine
our
communities
in
Pittsburgh
as
a
River
City.
G
The
original
plan
called
for
commuter
rail,
but
given
issues
with
the
railroad,
we
are
now
focused
on
creating
a
connected
bike,
ped
path
that
will
connect
Lawrenceville
with
the
strip
in
downtown
neighborhoods
with
potential
for
this
to
expand
to
other
existing
trails.
We've
leveraged
private
investment
with
private
developers,
building
out
their
own
segments
of
the
green
boulevard
and
we're
appreciative
that
the
city
and
domi
have
stepped
up
to
own
and
manage
the
project.
G
The
funds
will
make
Green
Boulevard
a
reality
by
creating
a
connection
underneath
the
40th
Street
bridge
that
will
ultimately
connect
the
existing
existing
trail
at
43rd
Street,
as
our
community
continues
to
grow,
it's
imperative
that
we
secure
publicly
accessible
riverfront
space
by
building
out
the
green
Boulevard
that
will
encourage
connectivity
and
mobility
to
and
throughout
the
riverfront
and
River
adjacent
communities.
It
also
provides
safer
connections
for
bikes
and
pedestrians.
We
want
to
thank
the
mayor,
Councilwoman
gross
and
domi
for
their
leadership
and
partnership
on
this
project.
We
look
forward
to
our
continued
work
on
this.
G
H
My
name
is
Matthew
Kalu's,
oh
I
am
the
president
and
CEO
of
river
life
were
a
nonprofit
organization
with
the
mission
to
reclaim
restore
and
promote
Pittsburgh's
riverfronts
over
the
past
20
years,
we've
overseen
a
hundred
and
thirty-two
million
dollars
in
investment
in
riverfront
parks
trails
and
like
open
spaces.
This
investment
has
catalyzed
4.2
billion
dollars
in
adjacent
real
estate,
development
and
economic
activity,
beginning
in
2009,
River
life
and
our
partners.
At
the
city.
H
First
through
the
Allegheny
River
front
vision
and
then
through
the
Allegheny,
River
front,
Green
Boulevard
plan
the
planning
efforts
yielded
community
oriented
recommendations
about
real
estate
development,
environmental
reclamation
and
open
space,
with
specific
attention
paid
to
multimodal
non
motorized
transportation,
known
colloquially
as
the
green
boulevard.
The
idea
is
to
create
a
dedicated
corridor
for
bicycles,
non
motorized
vehicles
and
pedestrian
pedestrians
that
extends
from
the
Strip
District
through
Lawrenceville
and
out
toward
the
city's
eastern
edge.
Hundreds
of
residents
and
stakeholders
attended
community
meetings
to
express
their
support
for
the
green
boulevard.
H
We're
grateful
for
our
partners
in
Lawrenceville
who
have
continued
to
advance
creative
solutions
to
align
with
the
recommendations
and
are
in
created,
really
excited
about
the
mayor's
commitment
to
Complete
Streets
and
seeing
the
green
boulevards
transportation.
Alternatives
become
a
reality
and
the
leadership
of
Councilman
grosses.
On
this
issue.
H
We
commend
the
Department
of
mobility
and
an
infrastructure
for
elevating
this
as
a
priority,
as
evidenced
by
the
proposed
reallocation
of
funding
to
support
construction
and
design
at
a
key
note
around
the
40th
Street
bridge,
and
we
look
forward
to
working
with
partners
as
this
project
moved
forward.
We
respectfully
request
that
council
approve
this
request.
Thank
you.
I
Hi
Dave
bring
in
executive
director
Lawrenceville
United
I
live
in
Lawrenceville,
just
reiterating
my
colleagues
Lawrenceville
corporation
and
river
life,
to
say
that
you
know,
residents
in
Lawrenceville
also
really
support
the
green
Boulevard.
It's
you
know
we
want
to
be
creating
alternatives
to
single
occupancy
vehicles
in
Lawrenceville.
This
would
be
a
really
big
step
forward,
so
totally
supportive
of
that
kind
of.
I
Currently
developers,
you
know,
building
integral
garages
all
over
our
row.
House
neighborhoods
is
really
disrupting
the
walkability
of
many
of
our
streets,
its
privatizing
public
on
street
parking,
and
it's
further
encouraging.
You
know,
residents
to
to
use
single
occupancy
vehicles
instead
of
public
transit
and
other
forms
of
transportation.
So
I
want
to
commend
the
city
for
for
doing
it.
I
also
want
to
point
out
that
I
do
believe
it
does
not
go
far
enough,
because
the
main
driver
frankly
for
developers,
including
these
integral
garages,
is
not
the
zoning
code.
I
To
be
honest,
they
go
to
the
fair.
They
go
to
the
Zoning
Board,
all
the
time
to
get
variances
for
everything
else.
The
the
main
driver
as
they
understand
it
and
and
and
as
I
understand
it
from
speaking
to
them,
is
that
they
believe
their
perspective.
Buyers
demand
those
off
street
parking
options,
so
I
just
want
to
I
want
to
commend
Council
on
the
city
for
for
introducing
it
and
I.
I
I
The
one
thing
that
I'll
just
point
out
there
is
that
there
is
a
huge
shortage
of
supply
for
section
8
vouchers.
If
you're
lucky
enough
to
have
a
section
8.
We
have
a
huge
shortage
of
supply
in
that.
So
we
really
need
to
be
getting
more
developers
to
include
that
so
I
for
that
80%
ami,
you
know
if
they
can
get
additional
units
to
be
willing
to
accept
the
Housing
Choice
vouchers
in
that
project.
I
It's
really
important,
so
not
just
the
50%
you're
good,
but
that
80%
I
know
there's
like
a
little
room
space
between
the
voucher
payment
standard
and
that
80%,
ami
and
I.
Think
that
makes
an
important
difference,
because
it's
something
we're
working
on
in
Lawrenceville.
It's
that
really
tried
to
increase
voucher
usage
in
the
neighborhood.
Thank
you.
B
J
J
B
K
You
mr.
chair
I
was
the
one
that
we
suggested
be
committing
this
bill
from
yesterday
we
discussed
it.
Last
week
we
had
a
volley
of
emails
back
and
forth
with
the
administration's
I'd
like
to
ask
OMB
to
come
back
up
and
see
if
there's
more
information
that
can
help
us
understand
why
this
bill
looks
to
propose
a
net
loss
to
the
taxpayer
on
a
lease
for
compressed
natural
gas,
filling
station,
I
hope
I'm.
K
Reviewing
this
and
just
as
a
reminder
in
the
discussion,
we
even
had
a
series
of
emails
going
back
last
night,
so
I
think
it's
still
kind
of
open-ended
and
we're
wondering
if
there's
more
information.
So
if
you
want
to
introduce
yourself
and
and
and
maybe
give
a
better
review
than
I
just
did
they'll
be
great
sure.
M
L
So
what
this
would
do
is
it
would
give
us
authorization
to
have
a
more
accessible
fueling
station
for
the
CNG
trucks
that
we
currently
have
in
the
environmental
services
fleet.
We
have
four
more
ordered
in
2020
and
we
plan
to
order
four
more
in
each
of
the
next
two
years.
Right
now
operationally.
We
feel
it
would
help
us
achieve
a
lot
of
operational
efficiencies.
L
K
K
So
that
you're
asking
the
taxpayer
to
pay
about
double
what
it's
paying
today
for
those
six
trucks
to
operate
so,
and
you
know,
given
that
it's
a
three
year
lease
for
three
hundred
and
eighty
six
dollars
I'm,
not
looking
at
my
paper
I'm
looking
to
apologize,
that's
about
120
thousand
dollars
a
year
and
the
last
email
that
budget
sent
to
all
members
shows
it
to,
even
with
all
of
the
staff
time,
even
with
there
being
less
maintenance,
even
with
paying
out
right.
You
didn't
fold
in
the
cost
of
buying
for
more
CNG
trucks.
K
But
let's
say
you
know,
let's
say
hypothetically,
they
were
free,
which
they're
not
that
you're
look
you're,
asking
the
taxpayers
arson
council
to
approve
an
expenditure
with
my
you
know,
back
of
the
napkin
math
or
back
the
envelope
math
of
about
a
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
dollars
a
year
to
save
sixty
thousand
dollars
for
as
much
as
you
could
think
of
you're.
Talking
like
every
minute
of
possible
staff
time
that
could
possibly
be
every
extra
vehicle
mile
traveled
every
gallon
of
you
know
and
and
to
pay
more
at
this
leased
facility.
K
L
L
L
The
cost
savings
are
provided
in
the
memo
queue
all
on
Friday
was
just
as
of
now
at
the
end,
at
this
point
of
time,
with
the
ten
CNG
trucks,
what
we
would
save
with
staff
time.
Obviously,
as
we
continue
to
purchase
more
that
staff
time
savings
will
increase.
But
again
this
is
an
investment
that
we
can,
that
we
feel
will
help.
Operations
will
become,
will
make
us
more
efficient.
So,
at
the
end
of
the
day
we
felt
it
was.
It
was
a
viable
option
to
move
forward
with
Oh.
K
K
Would
be
working
and
like
a
extra
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
over
what?
If
we
do
nothing
literally
out
of
the
$386,000
resolution
that
you
have
in
front
of
us
today,
that
is
it
for
three
years:
it's
it's
such
a
huge
loss
in
year,
one
and
two
at
least,
and
that
and
you're
gambling
on
getting
grant
to
buy
the
trucks
in
your
two
and
three
for
free
right.
Your
you've
cost
it
out
and
you
don't
have
fold
those
costs
in,
but
so
there's
additional
costs,
because
how
much
for
one
of
these
trucks.
N
It
averages
to
about
sixty
to
seventy
thousand
dollars
more
per
truck.
That's.
K
You
know
what
I'm
guessing
that
a
couple
of
years
ago,
when
we
said
look,
our
particulate
matter
is
horrendous
and
it
is,
and
I
want
to
I
want
the
public
to
understand
that
we
wouldn't
even
be
having
this
discussion
except
that
for
each
one
of
these
trucks,
each
one
of
our
diesel
trucks.
It's
like
100
cars
on
the
road
for
each
of
its
vehicle,
miles,
traveled,
right
and
so
I
just
want
everyone
to
understand
that
the
motivation
here
is.
This
fleet
is
terrible
right.
K
You
know
I'm,
not
the
equipment,
leasing,
authority,
I'm,
not
OMB
or
or
DPW,
but
you
know
I
only
spent
about
five
minutes.
Googling
on
my
phone
and
Los
Angeles
is
going
electric
for
its
refuse
vehicles
and
New
York
is
going
electric
for
its
refuse
vehicles.
The
last
week
you
told
us
those
were
at
least
three
years
out,
but
but
cities
are
buying
them
right
now
and
so
what
I?
What
I'm?
N
If
I
can
add
so
I've
actually
been
meeting
with
different
companies
on
electric
vehicles
and
New
York
is
testing
one
with
Mack
right
now.
But
it's
it
it's
not
it's
not
capable
or
100%
ready.
Yet
they
are
still
three
to
five
years
out
and
in
terms
of
the
the
emissions
reductions
that
we
see
with
CNG.
The
city
had
a
study
done
back
in
2014
that
showed
our
refuse
fleet
actually
accounts
for
4.8
tons
of
NOx
emissions.
M
N
If,
if
we
continue
on
the
path
of
bionis
CNG
vehicles,
we're
estimating-
and
we
just
actually
put
in
for
a
grant
with
the
county-
that
we
can
reduce
emissions
by
forty
five
to
fifty
percent,
just
in
the
next
couple
years
about
continued
on
the
current
path
that
we're
on
our
biggest
fear
is
if
the
CNG
site
that
we're
using
right
now
closes,
we
have
nowhere
to
fuel
our
vehicles,
so
the
money
that
we've
already
invested
we
lose
and
any
further
grant
opportunities
or
emissions
reductions
that
we
continue
to
go
for.
We
also
lose.
We
had.
N
K
K
K
So
we
had
six
vehicles,
they
may
or
may
not
have
a
place
to
fuel
and
out
of
a
fleet
of
65
I.
Just
still
think
this
lease
is
not
good
math,
not
by
longshot
over
every
single
thing.
I
know
you
sent
several
emails
over
the
last
week
and
it
has
just
you
know:
it's
pennies
more
savings.
I
mean
we
can
try
to
keep
thinking.
K
Well,
you
know
how
many
right-hand
turns
are
they
taking
your
left-hand,
turns
I
mean
you
could
try
to
keep
eking
out
more
savings
that
just
doesn't
even
come
close
to
the
expenditure
you're
asking
us
to
double
the
expense
of
running
these
trucks
for
the
next
three
years.
That's
what
that's
the
question
on
the
table.
Should
we,
instead
of
paying
120
thousand
dollars
over
the
next
three
years,
should
we
pay
three
hundred
eighty
six
thousand
dollars?
B
O
G
O
That
prices
Louis
has
ninety
thousand
dollars
a
year.
Yes,
so
then
the
other
question
I
was
so
that
that
cost
is
already
lower,
so
I
understand
the
goal
is
to
get
to.
You
know
that
twenty
thirty
goal
and
people
in
the
people
in
the
east
deserve
air.
Better
air
quality
is
just
like
people
in
the
West.
So
as
we
increase
the
amount
of
like
fleet,
you
know,
increase
the
numbers
in
the
fleet.
I
would
imagine
that
we'd
be
able
to
send
those
other
places
and
it
could
be
used
elsewhere
in
the
city.
O
L
It
was
calculated
that
way
and
Shawn
can
speak
to
the
upper
actual
operational
oftentimes.
When
the
driver
will
go
to
fuel,
the
helpers
will
stay
behind.
So
if
the
truck
asks
you
fuel
in
the
morning,
you
would
achieve
savings
because
their
staff
time
savings
as
well,
because
then
the
helpers
could
not
start
their
route
as
soon
as
they
would,
but
if
it
happens,
half
of
the
day
or
even
at
the
end
of
the
day,
maybe
when
they're
on
their
way
back
from
the
Imperial
landfill,
those
drivers
are
not
with
that.
L
O
M
The
way,
unfortunately,
with
it
now
we're
very
limited
where
we
can
fuel
so
we're
trying
our
best
to
do
it
on
the
way
to
the
landfill
every
day.
Ideally
we're
only
making
one
trip
to
the
landfill
and
requiring
to
fuel
the
vehicle
one
time
so
that
that's
why
we
have
the
one
driver.
If,
for
some
reason
we
were
not
able
to
get
a
fuel,
full
load
of
fuel
we've
been,
maybe
have
to
go
in
the
middle
of
the
day
with
it
with
CNG.
M
O
Helpful
so
so
there
will
be
a
loss
of
I
guess
since
the
the
monthly
cost
is
lower
in
there
and
the
gas
price
is
slightly
higher,
so
I
don't
know,
I
guess
roughly
is
fifty
thousand
that
we
would
just
like
your
calculation.
We
would
be
paying
fifty
thousand
more
per
year.
How
much
we
pay
more
per
year
for,
like,
let's
say,
a
net
zero
building
that
we're
gonna
go
forward
with
I.
O
Okay,
I'll
just
one
hour
on
how
we
get
to
that
23rd
goal
without
really
spending
more
money,
because
I
was
looking
at
some
of
those
costs
at
some
of
these
other
briefings
and
seems
like
there
will
be
a
cost.
Regardless
of
you
know,
just
in
terms
of
getting
to
this
20
30
goals,
but
I
mean
I,
do
see
the
concern,
but
it
does
guarantee
that
we
would
have
a
fleet.
O
N
Actually,
we
have
to
use
our
credit
cards.
Our
wax
credit
cards
are
what
we
use
there
and
also
having
this.
This
fuel
station
would
also
it
would.
It
would
allow
us
to
continue
to
grow
the
fleet
and
that's
that's
kind
of
important
thing
which
helps
us,
reduce
the
emissions
and
could
qualify
us
for
further
grants
down
the
road
that
would
allow
us
to
build
an
orangy
fueling
station,
which
is
the
ultimate
goal,
which
would
be
a
completely
renewable
fuel.
O
B
P
P
Answer
that
you
are
councilor
is
DZ
and
motts
Nick
passed
that
in
the
90s,
so
CNG
is
not
perfect,
as
I
mentioned
last
week.
Fracking
is
a
dirty
business.
It
pollutes
air
and
water,
and
you
know
the
production
part
of
fracking
and
getting
gas
to
market
is
not
perfect,
but
the
emissions
are
much
much
cleaner.
P
K
P
And,
frankly,
that's
not
your
fault,
that's
not
anyone's
fault.
It's
the
society.
It's
just
the
way
that
it
works.
Those
are
external
rather
than
internalized
costs.
So
as
I
see
it
we're
spending
more
money.
Yes,
but
what
is
the
cost
to
the
real
cost,
to
taxpayers,
to
continue
on
the
same
path
with
continuing
to
buy
dirty
diesel
vehicles
when
we
have
the
option
to
buy
not
a
perfect
but
a
cleaner
vehicle
until
the
point
when
we
can
then,
as
mandated
by
mandated
by
code
eel-like
and
then
purchase
the
hybrid
and
eventually
fully
electric
vehicles?
P
It's
actually
a
bridge
to
a
cleaner
source,
so
I'm
in
favor
of
spending
the
money
I
know
it's
upfront
costs,
but
we
have
to
be
chipping
away
at
what
we
can
do,
let
alone
what
the
community
can
do
to
reduce
climate
change
and
to
reduce
their
emissions.
Given
that
as
such
a
big
problem
in
this
region,
thank
you.
Q
Q
Q
Three
eighty
six
compared
to
a
traditional
diesel
that
three
hundred
and
twelve
thousand,
so
it's
not
that
much
greater,
so
I
guess
I,
guess
my
real
concern
is,
you
know:
I've
been
reading
a
lot.
Councilwoman
grouse
has
sent
me
some
articles.
It
seems
it's.
The
way
to
really
get
on
top
of
this
is,
as
Councilwoman
Strassburger
said.
Is
the
electric
vehicles
and
I
read
a
couple
of
articles,
a
guy
in
Brooklyn?
N
Q
So
so,
and
that's
my
next
question
I
know:
maybe
the
technology
isn't
quite
there
yet
for
for
electric
I
did
read
the
story
of
Mack
and
what
they
were
doing.
Obviously,
once
they
perfect
it,
and
hopefully
it
happened
sooner
than
later.
I
guess.
My
question
is
how
long
in
the
future,
we
you
know,
we
we
figure
in
to
be
CNG,
driven
trucks
versus.
Are
we
just
hopeful
that
it
goes
electric
or
is
that
day
coming
in
your
opinion,
I
would.
N
Q
Parkway,
you
know
how
to
Imperial
it's
so
so
we're
looking
at
when
electric
vehicles
are
on
the
market.
I
guess
Mac
would
be
the
ones
who
should
be.
You
know
giving
me
this
figure
what
they
think
they
can
mass-produce
a
map
right
now,
Brandon
a
$800,000,
but
if
they
can
do
it
right
and
put
it
on
an
assembly
line,
much
like
before
did
so
long
ago,
we're
hoping
that
cost
isn't
quite
as
high
or
would
always
be
in
your
opinion,
I
think.
N
Q
N
N
Q
N
N
N
Q
N
A
full
mobile
fueling
station,
it's
actually
on
a
tractor-trailer,
they
deliver
them
when
they,
when
it's
empty,
they
bring
a
new
one.
You're.
Q
N
Q
N
Not
a
smaller
fueling
station
that
would
work
for
that
size,
vehicles
that
are
being
used
that
often
there
are
slow,
fill
type
things
that
you
can
put
like
at
your
home.
If
you
had
a
CNG
pickup
truck,
but
it
would
be
just
like
charging
an
electric
vehicle
would
have
to
charge
overnight
and
it
would
only
get
so
much
so.
Q
N
Q
B
M
N
Q
And
the
traditional
vehicle
is
the
same
size
or
CNG
vehicles
smaller
by
any
chance,
they're
the
same
size
same
size,
how
were
the
same
load
and
they
all
the
same
way?
Yes,
closest
landfills
are
imperial,
which
is
kind
of
convenient
for
ferry,
wood
right
and
the
other
one
is
Monroeville.
Yes,
okay,
okay,
that's
that's!
All
I
got
thanks.
R
S
Bill
Rebennack,
City
Council
budget
director
also
treasurer
on
the
equipment,
leasing,
Authority
board,
more
I'll
refer
to
to
some
of
the
things,
some
of
the
knowledge
that
brandon
has,
but
overall,
the
Councilwoman
is
correct
about
the
cost.
This
is
more
of
a
long-term
investment
and
I've
done
a
significant
study
and
and
keep
badgering
branded
with
questions
about
electric
refuse
vehicles.
S
Company
called
BYD,
which
Chinese
company,
which
we
you
wouldn't
purchase
off
of
due
to
our
rules
in
the
LA,
had
the
electric
vehicles
in
for
a
private
company
in
both
Tacoma
and
Seattle
those
vehicles,
even
though
they're
electric.
Now
they
still
don't
go
for
and
I
think
they
do
about
fifty
to
sixty
miles
which
wouldn't
allow
us
to
get
to
back
and
forth
to
the
fill.
S
Also
I,
don't
think
they
have
the
right
size
cap
at
this
point
to
the
only
fit
to
two
folks,
as
opposed
to
the
the
three
people
refuse
workers.
We
would
need
to
have
accommodated
so
there's
a
long
wait
before
we
get
there.
Additionally,
with
the
electric
vehicles,
we're
also
going
to
have
to
develop
the
infrastructure,
it's
going
to
be
a
large
expense
as
well
to
well
we'll
need
the
charging
stations.
S
We
looked
at
a
number
of
different
options
to
try
to
make
sure
our
C
and
G
was
maintained,
mainly
because
of
the
pollution
that
these
vehicles
provide
as
well
to
the
amount
of
co2
is
just
ridiculous.
That's
one
of
the
questions
I
had
typically
in
the
wintertime.
How
long
does
it
take
Brandon
for
our
vehicles
to
become
operational?
They
have
to
heat
up.
First
warm
up.
First
correctly.
Yes,.
M
S
They're
all
starting
they're
spewing,
unfortunately,
yes
in
the
same
area,
so
that's
that's
one
of
the
things
we
want
to
get
away
from
as
well
too
so
long
term
investment
not
only
to
to
save
money,
potentially
in
the
long
term,
I
think
it's.
It
was
a
worthwhile
endeavor.
Now
there
were
a
couple
things
I
wish.
We
would
have
done.
I
wish,
when
the
station
initially
closed
the
CNG
station,
that
we
went
to
them
and
maybe
use
some
something
on
the
table
that
we
have
to
try
to
get
them
to
do
a
private
partnership
with
us.
S
Maybe
subsidized
them
to
stay
open
to
allow
us
to
be
able
to
continue
to
fuel
their
that
didn't
happen.
So
we
we
were
sort
of
left
flat-footed
and
had
to
look
for
a
way.
This
is
an
innovative
method
to
be
able
to
find
someone
to
bring
in
the
mobile
CNG
to
do
it.
Dad
cost
money
but
I,
think
long
term
I
think
we're
gonna
end
up
saving
a
bit
also
law
with
the
CNG
vehicles
versus
our
vehicles,
that
you
know
our
current
diesel
vehicles
long
term.
S
S
Our
fleet-
it's
not
in
good
condition-
I
know
that
we
just
recently
purchased
three
used
diesel
vehicles,
because
we
have
problems
with
breakdowns.
We
need
to
get
the
trash
off
the
streets.
So
how
old
is
our
fleet?
How
many
vehicles
do
we
have
that?
Are
that
should
be
out
of
service
there?
The
average
lifespan
is
what
10
years
so.
N
We
still
have
some
two
thousand
twos
I
think
we
just
decommissioned
this
year.
We
have
some
2004
still
running
some
fives
and
some
sixes,
so
we
have
a
lot
of
vehicles
and
and
these
vehicles
that
are
older,
that
we
have
to.
We
have
to
continue
to
maintain
they're,
actually
pre
EPA,
which
they're
actually
dirtier
than
than
the
diesel
vehicles
that
they're
so
nowadays
so.
R
Know
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
hybrids
and
you
know:
are
there
any
hybrids
on
the
market?
I
had
some
minor
reservation
about
completely
committing
to
all
CNG
or
all-electric,
and-
and
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
the
possibility
of
having
hybrid
vehicles
but
I,
don't
think
those
are
quite
possible.
Can
you
talk
about
that?
A
little
bit.
S
My
research
I
found
some
that
were
first
on
the
market
in
2014
and
they
were
diesel
hybrids.
I,
don't
know
if
Brandon,
if
you
have
looked
at
those
at
all
as
being
a
potential
because
they
I
think
their
fuel
difference
is
about
30%.
It's
a
30%
savings
which
then
would
be
exponential
with
co2
emissions.
S
N
S
I
don't
know
if
this
is
the
right
thing
to
do
or
not,
but
there
has
been
a
lot
of
grants
offered
by
the
show
industry
in
the
state
of
Pennsylvania
I.
Think
80
million
dollars
went
into
the
state
for
for
various
grants,
including
stations,
and
things
like
that.
So
I
think
those
those
make
whether
that's
good
or
bad.
These
these
things
make.
N
Are
getting
grants
to
help
pay
for
the
trucks?
Are
we've
gotten
the
two
that
just
went
into
service?
We
got
grants
for
it
covered
actually
the
entire
cost
of
the
upgrade
to
CNG,
and
then
we
applied
again
for
the
same
grant
this
year.
If
we
get
approved
for
it
it
it's
25%
of
the
cost
of
the
vehicle,
so
it
would
cover
the
the
upgrade
and
we
don't
qualify
for
any
fueling
site
grants.
Yet
you
have
to
have
at
least
10
vehicles
which
will
have
this
year.
R
R
K
The
and
the
staffing
of
the
fleet
and
and
the
logistics
of
daily
operations,
so
trying
to
get
garbage
picked
up
with
the
challenge
that
we've
set
valid
and
publicly
supported
goals
on
reducing
not
just
carbon
emissions,
but
all
of
the
particular
matter,
and
that
the
goals
of
getting
cleaner
air
and
doing
our
part
and
in
trying
to
get
there
just
even
within
the
city
fleet.
As
we
heard
testimony
from
this
morning
from
my
district
but
I
know
from
across
the
city.
K
There's
support
as
well
too
for
the
city
to
do
all
of
the
things
that
can
do
to
reduce
all
of
the
kinds
of
vehicles
that
are
on
the
road,
not
just
its
own
fleet
right,
and
so
we
heard
just
public
testimony
today.
If
you
were
probably
in
chambers
to
hear
that
people
are
trying
to
build
their
neighborhoods
in
a
way
that
helps
them
not
need
cars
that
we
we
changed.
The
way
we've
been
doing
business
for
the
last
dozens
of
handful
of
decades,
dozens
and
dozens
of
years.
K
In
the
way
we
do
new
construction
or
or
do
our
zoning
and
do
our
building
requirements,
and
that
we
need
to
think
about
it
differently.
If
we're
going
to
help,
people
meet
all
their
daily
needs
without
having
to
get
in
a
single-use
vehicle,
especially
the
single
occupant
vehicle.
So
I
I
think
this
is
an
important
conversation.
I'm
not
entirely
satisfied
with
this
option
that
we
have
in
front
of
us
today.
K
I
do
want
to
note
that
I
am
generally
keen
on
these
kind
of
prefab
shipping
container
industrial,
like
it's
just
really
fascinated
by
this
we've
seen
them
be
like
new
housing
construction
that
was
prefab
that
came
in
on
shipping
container
and
lawrenceville
for
some
of
the
Community
Land
Trust
stuff.
It
came
out
in
flatbed
trucks
and
and
it
kind
of
popped
up
the
pieces
of
a
building
in
the
course
of
a
day,
and
it
was
really
fascinating.
You
see
I've
been
tracking
just
in
my
spare
policy
reading
time.
K
I
kind
of
you
know,
study
hall
time
there
are
prefab
sewage
treatment
units
and
shipping
containers
and
water
treatment
plants
and
shipping
containers
and
there's
a
lot
that
you
can
do
without
having
to
build
from
scratch
and
I'm
really
fascinated
by
that
part,
but
I'm,
not
sure
I'm,
still
not
sure.
It's
worth
the
cost
today.
K
I
understand
that
we're
nervous
about
the
ferry
would
plant
closing
I
understand
that
we
need
the
kind
of
bigger
radius
or
less
time
spent
to
get
the
the
trucks
out,
but
and
I
understand
that
you
negotiated
this
lease
could
have
been.
Even
worse
is
basically
what
your
email
said:
I
think
you've
got
it
too
I'm
sure
you
spent
some
time
to
get
it
done
to
three
hundred
and
eighty
six
thousand
dollars
over
three
years
and
then
I
think
the
numbers
you
gave
us
it
would
have
been
more
like
450
or
425.
K
So
you
know
you
got
fifty
thousand
off
over
three
years,
but
it's
still
eating
a
chunk
to
support
this
fleet
and
I'd
want
to
reiterate.
I
understand
that
in
the
1990s
we
put
this
challenge
in
front
of
the
equipment
leasing
authority,
which
again
we
keep
saying
la
just
like
there's
a
parking
authority
and
a
Development
Authority
and
a
stadium
authority
and
a
Water
Authority
is
also
now
even
in
authority
just
to
buy
trucks.
K
Maybe
maybe
they
should.
Maybe
there
shouldn't
be
I,
don't
know
so,
but
but
all
the
dollars
are
just
coming
straight
out
of
the
city
treasury.
It's
not
like
the
equipment
leasing
authority
has
its
own
revenue
source
or
anything
like
that.
Am
I
right
so
that's
why
you
need
counsel
to
say:
yes,
go,
spend
three
hundred
eighty
six
thousand
dollars
for
this
three
or
least
to
service
right
now.
K
Okay,
so
it's
many
many
more
millions
of
dollars
that
adds
up
right.
So
the
four
that
we're
buying
now
is
like
1.6
billion
at
one
point,
two
million-
and
you
know
hopefully
we'll
get
grants
and
I
want
to
acknowledge
too
I,
do
think
that
part
of
the
reasons
I
have
more
misgivings
may
than
others.
Is
this
the
we
look
like
we're
supporting
the
fracking
industry
in
Pennsylvania?
K
By
doing
this,
there's
an
element
of
that
here
that
you
know
the
state
grants
are
kind
of
there
to
help
prop
up
this
industry,
or
you
know,
increase
local
consumption
of
this
fracking
produced
natural
gas
and
and
that
not
that
I
think
is
probably
why
I
spent
a
little
extra
time
reading
this
little
more
extra
carefully
and
running
the
numbers
myself
or
scribbling
out
the
numbers
myself
so
I
just
want
to
acknowledge
that
I
do
think.
That's
part
of
my
my
misgivings,
so
I'm
not
comfortable
with
this
today.
I
do
think
it's
an
important
conversation.
K
So
again,
I
appreciate
council
members,
all
engaging
on
it
and
I
think
it's
a
conversation
that
should
continue
and
so
I'm
not
supportive.
Today-
and
maybe
we
just
need
to
have
a
little
more
conversation
to
get
to
where
we
feel
like
the
public,
understands
these
choices
that
we're
faced
with
and
to
get
their
feedback
on
that
on
making
these
choices,
because
it's
definitely
giving
it's
giving
me
some
concern.
Thank
you.
Q
You
know
my
my
gut
tells
me,
and
this
doesn't
mean
much
because
I'm
not
in
your
business
and
you
know
better
than
I
do
but
I
hate
to
throw
money
at
technology
when
the
technology
is
changing
and
what
I
mean
by
changing
is
electric.
You
know
I
feel,
like
you
know,
the
the
the
real
answer
here
is
electric.
Do
you
agree
with
that?
Q
You're
pretty
convinced
at
that
Brandon,
because
a
couple
articles,
I
read,
you
know
they.
Of
course
they
all
were
gonna,
be
big
dreamers
and
I
hope
they
get
this
on
the
assembly
line
quickly,
but
in
reality
you're,
probably
right,
I
would
say,
but-
and
this
this
may
be
a
silly
question,
but
since
the
new
gas
station
is
going
to
be
portable,
why
can't
we
just
have
a
portable
gas
station
on
jobs
from
the
East
End
over
this
way
fills
a
Chuck
so
so.
N
It's
mobile,
but
it's
it's
it's
not
that
mobile
in
terms
of
its
on
wheels.
It
is
on
wheels,
but
it's
not.
It's
not
meant
to
move.
It
actually
takes
to
pieces
so
that
one
trailer
holds
all
the
gas.
That's
what
gets
swapped
out
and.
Q
O
J
Okay:
okay,
bill
number
195
resolution
further
amending
resolution
number
797
by
reducing
Smallman
Street
reconstruction
by
four
hundred.
Seventy
three
thousand
three
hundred
seventy
four
dollars
and
30
a
sin
and
increasing
Complete
Streets
by
four
hundred.
Seventy
three
thousand
three
hundred
seventy
four
dollars
and
38
cents
need.
B
R
J
Bill
number
199
resolution
further
amending
resolution
number
863
by
amending
City
Council
city,
B,
G
unspecified
local
option
line
items,
reduce
and
save
a
life
today,
Pittsburgh
by
$8,000,
an
increase
in
Birmingham
Foundation
and
save
a
life
today,
Pittsburgh
by
$8,000
in
authorizing
a
subsequent
agreement
for
operation,
administrative
expenses,
maintenance,
purchase
of
equipment
in
or
rehabilitation
of
neighborhood
facilities.
On
behalf
of
the
residents.
P
J
The
mayor
is
hereby
authorized
to
issue
and
the
city
controller
to
countersign
three
warrants
in
the
total
psalm
of
$19,000
may
it
payable
to
Ehrman
Lucina
in
full
satisfaction
of
all
claims,
including,
but
not
limited,
to
claims
for
any
alleged
loss
compensation
and
in
full
satisfaction
of
all
other
claims.
4700
4750
dollars
to
mr.
Busey
Anna,
the
legal
counsel
Winans
in
Bagan
as
final
settlement
related
to
the
action
filed
with
the
Pittsburgh
Commission
on
Human
Relations.
B
O
J
The
165
resolution
further
amending
resolution
number
948
by
reducing
fancourt
Street
bridge
by
$7,000
and
transferring
those
funds
to
the
Uptown
mobility
network
and
parking
management
plan.
Bill
number
166
resolution
further
amending
resolution
number
772
by
reducing
electronic
daily
activity
sheet
by
$20,000,
an
in-car
camera
system
by
13424,
dot,
71
cent
and
transferring
those
funds
to
the
Uptown
mobility
and
network
and
parking
management
plan.
Bill
number
167
resolution
further
amending
resolution
number
816
by
reducing
signage
on
19,500,
$75
and
29
cent
and
transferring
those
funds
to
the
Uptown
mobility
network
and
parking
management
plan.
J
P
B
Is
so
the
fact
me
bill
181
allows
us
to
in
turn
to
the
contract.
However,
we
realized
we
were
actually
short,
all
the
necessary
funds
for
them
to
perform
the
contract,
so
the
other
bills
are
closing
out
old
projects
that
had
leftover
dollars
moving
them
so
that
they
can
actually
then
perform
the
contract.
R
J
D
B
R
S
B
J
B
J
Know
157
resolution
amending
resolution
830
authorizing
the
mayor
and
director
of
the
department
of
mobile
in
infrastructure.
It's
a
complete
engineering,
design
for
a
multi
module
connection
of
Hazelwood
greenfield
and
four
mile
run
with
Oakland
to
provide
for
a
specific
payee
and
authorizing
increase
to
the
project
cost
to
afford
in
additional
design
services
within
the
scope
of
work
not
to
exceed
a
total
of
1
million.
Four
hundred
sixteen
thousand
five
hundred
forty
dollars
and
forty
three
cent:
an
increase
of
sixty
nine
thousand
eight
hundred
ninety
six
dollars
and
33
cents
for.
J
1:58
resolution
taking
appropriating
and
consuming
by
the
city
for
public
roadway
purposes,
certain
property
in
the
eighteen
Ward
owned
by
Michael,
Glynn
Eldon
and
known
as
320
Arlington
Avenue
authorizing
the
payment
of
just
compensation
and
necessary.
An
incidental
acquisition
cost
related
thereto
motion
to
approve.
B
J
Resolution
taking
appropriating
and
continuing
by
the
city
for
public
roadway
purposes,
certain
property
in
the
18th
ward
by
28:26,
Edwards,
Way
and
Associates
LLC
and
known
as
322
through
324
Arlington
Avenue
authorizing
the
payment
of
just
compensation
and
necessary
and
incidental
acquisition
costs
related
thereto
motion
to
approve.
Second.
B
B
J
Number:
twenty
to
forty
nine:
wasn't
it's
a
minute
of
Pittsburgh
cold
title
nines
on
an
article
1
section:
9,
o
203
zoning
map
by
changing
from
CP
commercial
plan
unit
development
to
UNC
urban
neighborhood,
commercial,
two
parcels
and
a
portion
of
two
possible
parcels
in
Allegheny
County
in
LOC
and
blocked
system;
seventh
Ward
and
changing
from
LNC
a
local
neighborhood
commercial
to
UNC
urban
neighborhood,
commercial,
six
parcels
and
a
portion
of
two
parcels
in
Allegheny
County
block
and
Lots
system.
Seventh
Ward
to.
Q
K
P
To
here,
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
speak
on
this,
so
this
is.
This
is
an
issue,
a
development
that
is
being
proposed,
that
many
of
you
are
familiar
with,
because
there
was
a
public
meeting.
A
public
hearing
excuse
me
held
December
17th
of
last
year
and
at
that
public
hearing
I
asked
to
slow
down
the
process
further
and
allow
for
additional
meetings
to
happen,
but
just
as
a
as
a
refresher.
P
This
is
a
this
is
the
known
as
the
Shakespeare
or
Shady
Hill
Giant
Eagle
site
at
the
corner
of
Shady
and
Penn,
and
it
actually
sits
in
Shadyside,
which
is
in
district
8.
But
it's
right
at
the
intersection
of
shady
side,
Larimer
and
East
Liberty
and
the
Giant
Eagle
and
the
plaza
is
utilized
by
an
even
wider
range
of
communities,
including
Lincoln,
lemming,
ttan
and
Homewood,
and
Larimer
and
East
Liberty
and
others.
P
P
A
significant
amount
of
time
was
spent
actually
in
with
the
law
Department
reviewing
some
of
the
commitments
that
developed
the
development
team
is
willing
to
make
and
I'll
just
go
through
some
of
those
commitments
now,
but
what
was
found
by
the
law
department
was
that
as
much
as
we
desired
to
attach
something
to
this
legislation
to
really
memorialize
it
here.
This
is
not
the
place
for
it.
P
The
place
for
some
sort
of
condition
to
be
attached
is
that
the
Planning
Commission
through
design
review,
which
the
development
team
has
committed
to
to
doing
we
wouldn't
want
to.
We
wouldn't
want
to
jeopardize
the
whole
rezoning
in
this
whole
process
by
a
potential
lawsuit
in
the
future
if,
if
we
just
followed
the
incorrect
process,
so
you
know
among
the
items
that
are
being
committed
to
are
that
15%
of
the
plus
or
minus
230
apartment
units
will
be
affordable.
P
Ten
percent
at
the
50
percent
ami
area
median
income
level
and
five
percent
additional
at
the
eighty
percent
ami
level,
so
15
percent
total.
Yes,
there
are
some
details
to
be
worked
out
around
that,
but
that's
the
commitment.
In
addition,
Housing
Choice
vouchers
will
be
accepted
at
all
units
and
the
housing
affordability
will
be
in
place
for
no
less
than
thirty
five
years.
This
is
pretty
unprecedented
in
the
city
in
part,
because
no
tax,
abatements
or
subsidies
are
being
are
being
taken
by
the
development
team
on
transportation.
P
The
the
housing
developer
has.
It
will
establish
a
fund
of
at
least
$50,000
for
the
purchase
of
transit
passes
for
the
residents
there.
I
know
that
there
are
those
who
want
that
number
to
go
up
well
continue
the
conversation
but
$50,000
for
the
purchase
of
transit
passes
for
for
the
residents
of
the
future
apartments
here.
In
addition,
they're
going
to
be
building
a
new
bus,
stop
relocating
the
bus,
stop
on
Penn
Avenue
and
actually
building
it
as
integral
to
the
development
as
a
sheltered
bus.
Stop
so
improving
the
experience
of
those
who
take
transit.
P
Originally,
the
the
parking
proposal
was
upwards
of
600
parking
spaces
in
the
garage
that's
proposed
now
it's
down
to
420,
so
a
30%
reduction
there
and
they're
partnering
with
domain
to
make
a
substantial
pedestrian
improvement
of
the
intersection
at
Shady
and
Ellsworth.
So
a
better
pedestrian
experience
of
this
really
busy
spot
right
outside
of
the
East
Liberty
transit
station.
We
heard
a
lot
today
about
food
access.
It's
a
huge
priority,
I
think
of
mine
and
a
lot
of
people.
No
doubt
during
construction.
P
There
is
going
to
be
a
disruption
for
about
18
months
for
people
who
are
accustomed
to
driving,
taking
the
bus
walking
to
this
giant
eagle
and
that's
a
big
big
deal,
and
that's
not
just
for
groceries.
It's
also
also
for
for
pharmacy.
Already.
The
commitment
is
a
temporary
pharmacy
across
the
street
and
the
in
the
Shady
in
the
Trader
Joe's
parking
lot,
essentially,
is
what
we're
expecting
for
a
pharmacy
location,
and
then
there
are
additional
details
that
need
to
be
worked
out
between
Giant
Eagle
and
the
communities
who
rely
on
this
Giant
Eagle.
P
Some
ideas
that
been
floated
have
been
shuttle
services
waving
of
a
fee
of
online
ordering
and
delivery
a
you
know:
drop-off
delivery
options
at
certain
meeting
locations,
low-cost
ride,
share
options
and
other
ideas,
and
so
I
am
taking
it
very
seriously
to
continue
to
work
with
Giant
Eagle
to
ensure
that
they
are
not
just
committing
to
things
that
really
won't
work
in
practice,
but
actually
working
with
communities
to
get
the
feedback
to
understand.
What
really
will
work
during
construction
and
then
after
construction
is
done.
P
P
P
So
those
are
some
of
the
items
that
have
been
committed
to
already
like
I
said
the
actual
commitments
will
come
out
and
be
conditions
that
will
be
bound
legally
bound
during
the
Planning
Commission
phase.
This
is
just
sort
of
what
we've
been
discussing
and
you
know
I've
been
promised
and
we're
gonna
hold
developers
to
that.
P
So
I
do
want
to
thank
all
of
the
stakeholders,
the
neighbors,
the
advocates
who
continued
to
push
for
what's
right
for
Pittsburghers
and
really
appreciate
your
efforts
in
advocacy
and
just
I
assure
you
that
we're
going
to
continue
this
process
in
this
conversation,
I
acknowledge
not
everyone
is
getting
what
they
want
right
now.
That's
what
a
process
is.
Sometimes
we
get
part
of
what
we
want,
but
we're
not
done
with
a
process
and
that's
the
main
point.
P
I
want
to
make
we're
still
really
at
the
beginning,
even
though
it's
been
two
years
since
we
started
working
on
this,
but
I
also
want
to
thank
the
development
team.
Echo
Realty
graced
our
and
giant
eagle
for
their
willingness
to
engage
up
until
this
point
and
having
this
ongoing
discussion
about
how
the
development
project
can
best
reflect
the
needs
of
the
community,
so,
like
I,
said,
Planning
Commission,
Zoning,
Board
of
Adjustment
still
to
come,
still
lots
of
Commerce
Street
conversations
to
be
had
and
I
would
appreciate.
P
R
K
Thank
you,
I
was
busy
taking
those
those
are
a
lot
of
different
moving
parts,
so
Thank
You
Councilwoman
for
bringing
us
up
to
date,
but
also
for
I
think
helping
all
of
us
I.
What
we're
trying
to
do
is
really
move
the
bar
about
what
we
expect
from
developments
in
the
neighborhoods
right,
but
I
think
we're.
K
I
wish
that
our
zoning
process
was
more
supportive
of
achieving
these
goals
right
we're
so
we're
still
stuck
at
this
hard
place
and
I've
been
through
it
many
times
in
my
district
as
well,
where
the
zoning
is
unrelated
to
neighborhood
needs,
and
that's
really
to
me
not
the
way
land
use
and
Zoning
is
supposed
to
be.
It
should
be
reflective
of
what
the
actual
neighborhood
desires
and
needs
are
in
a
site
if
neighborhoods
need
grocery
stores.
K
How
do
we
build
that
into
the
zoning
code
and
not
just
have
this
kind
of
like
well
you're
allowed
to
have
this
much
height
and
this
much
width
and
this
much
parking?
And
this
much
of
that?
It's
not
good
enough
for
the
city
that
we're
trying
to
build.
It
was
good
enough
when
no
one
built
anything
I'm,
the
only
person
building
anything
was
actually
the
URA
or
the
city
building
it
itself,
and
so
we're
still
at
this
challenge,
where
we're
trying
to
build
something,
that's
going
to
work
that
it's
going
to
last.
K
That
is
really
not
just
meeting
the
needs
of
the
neighborhood,
but
especially
when
there
are
multiple
sites,
as
there
could
be
on
the
heels
of
one
another.
You
don't
know
when
one
of
those
parcels
that's
under
built
across
the
street
is
suddenly
going
to
sell
and
the
one
next
to
it
and
the
one
next
to
it
that
how
do
we
kind
of
make
sure
that
what
it's
up
in
place
is
not
the
same
cookie
cutter
development
that
we've
put
in
place?
K
That's
a
lot
by
zoning
code
and
if
you
get
20
of
them
next
door
to
each
other,
it's
about
the
neighborhood's
dismantled,
basically
right,
all
of
the
local
neighborhood
serving
businesses
there
have
been
demolished
or
there's
no
as
I
always
say,
and
you've
heard
me
say
many
times.
So
forgive
me
for
saying
it
again.
K
These
are
the
things
that
we
need
right
and
if
we're
going
to
build
a
city
where
you
don't
need
your
single
use,
your
occupant
vehicle
or
whatever
we're
calling
it,
you
need
that
15
minute,
walkable
neighborhood
and
you
you
need
to
build
the
space
where
it
can
be
and
make
sure
that
when
people
buy
a
piece
of
property
and
have
rights
for
development
that
we
have
built
in
what
the
neighborhood
has
rights
to-
and
we
just
aren't
there.
Having
said
that,
I
mean
I'll.
K
K
Legally
required
and
we've
used
them
in
my
district
at
the
zoning
board
as
well,
so
am
I
correct
that
this
was
already
approved
or
it
doesn't
need
to
go
to
zba,
because
it's
not
a
variance
right,
and
so
this
is
just
only
in
the
discussion
at
the
council
table
I'm
reminded
of
councilman
Lavelle's
conditions
that
he
put
on
a
zoning
amendment,
which
was
amending
the
master
plan
at
the
UPMC
one.
So
if.
P
P
So
I
mean
I,
think
comparing
it
to
the
Uptown
Mercy
say
was
a
little
bit
apples
and
oranges,
because
that
had
already
been
a
recommendation
and
conditions
that
had
been
set
by
the
Planning
Commission
for
an
amendment
to
an
institutional
master.
It's
a
slightly
different
process
heard
by
planning
planning
to
us.
This
is
a
rezoning
of
the
parcel,
so
is
to
compete
like
by
law.
We
are
to
consider
a
certain
number
of
criteria
and
conditions
put
upon
that
would
be
outside
of
the
scope
of
what
we're
as
we
as
council.
P
Members
are
meant
to
consider,
and
so
the
fear
is
that
someone
could
come
out
of
nowhere,
sue
us
and
we
don't
have
pro
bono
attorneys
ready
to
represent
us
on
this
and
we'd
have
to
spend
time
and
more
money.
Defending
this.
So
I
agree
with
you
that
our
zoning
does
not.
Our
zoning
process
does
not
match
what
community
needs
are,
and
we
need
to
change
that
I've
gotten.
P
The
the
verbal
commitment
which
I
know
is
not,
and
we've
put
it
in
a
writing
in
an
email
but
I
I
know
is
not
making
everyone
feel
as
comfortable
as
they
could.
But
the
verbal
commitment
from
the
development
team
here
today
that
you
know
they
will
they
what
they
have
put
in
writing
to
members
of
the
community
who
have
engaged
in
stakeholders.
They
will
commit
to
putting
and
writing
as
a
legally
binding
agreement
and
conditions
at
Planning
Commission
and
if
that's
also
CBA,
because
they
as
I
understand
that
they
will
be
going
for
variances.
K
Have
you
said
in
Lawrenceville
and
it's
worked
and
a
developer
is
comported
and
everybody's
happy.
You
know
the
developments
up
and
the
the
neighborhood
feels
confident
that
they
got
what
they
needed.
It
was
also
a
long,
difficult
process,
but
I
appreciate
it
and
I
think
we
have
more
to
share
so
I
mean
we
don't
need
to
take
up
time
in
the
meeting,
but
I
appreciate
it.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
B
Q
D
P
D
P
Q
I
think
it's
fantastic
to
negotiate,
I've
not
seen
it.
Maybe
that's
happened
and
Councilwoman
grosses
district
are
others,
but
I've
not
seen
a
developer.
Put
up.
Transit
funds
before
seems,
like
a
very
you
know,
interesting
thing
to
do
and
I
guess
my
my
follow-up
question
to
that
was:
will
they
be
available
to
the
affordable
housing
people?
Were
they
a
complex
overall.
Q
Q
You
know,
as
you
said
about
eighteen
months
before
and
when
this
thing
gets
started
before
its
end
date,
people
get
in
habits
and
and
I've
seen
it
happen
in
other
neighborhoods,
where
they
get
a
habit
of
going
to
another
grocery
store
and
no
sudden
you
got
this
brand
brand-new
shiny,
grocery
store,
it's
open
and
everybody's
kind
of
in
the
habit
of
going
somewhere
else.
So
I'm
glad
to
hear
that
you
concentrated
you,
you
know
you're
all
thinking
of
that
and
yeah
I'm
happy
to
support.
So
thank.
T
Things
first
of
all,
certainly
I
will
vote
in
the
affirmative
for
this
legislation.
I
want
to
thank
Cosmo
Strassburger
for
her
lead
and
we've
been
supportive
of
this
effort.
I
want
to
say
a
couple
things
that
this
grocery
store,
although
in
Shadyside,
is
also
one
of
the
primary
grocery
stores
for
many
of
the
communities
I
represent.
T
Force,
I
believe
call
for
10%,
affordable
housing,
and
this
goes
beyond
that
and
with
no
government,
subsidy
and
I
think
the
developers
should
be
commended
for
that,
and
so
there's
two
other
things.
I
want
to
say
at
this
moment,
though,
the
reason
this
conversation
has
been
so
important
and
I
always
get
always
geared
up,
always
interest
me
when
I
hear
people
from
other
communities
want
to
compare
themselves
to
the
communities.
I
represent
right,
you
know
they
view
themselves,
even
though
they're
middle-class
neighborhoods
they
oftentimes
want
to
come.
T
You
know
they
want
to
view
themselves
as
similar
to
my
neighborhoods,
which
is
very
interesting
because
they
don't
know
my
neighborhoods
at
all.
In
Homewood
there
is
no
grocery
store.
There
is
no
grocery
store
in
Homewood.
There
is
no
drugstore
in
Homewood.
There
is
one
gas
station
in
Homewood.
That's
at
the
last.
It's
on
the
last
parcel
before
you're,
not
in
Homewood,
nowhere
near
where
the
residents
live
in
Lincoln.
Let
me
ten.
There
is
no
grocery
store.
There
is
no
drug
store.
T
There's
no
gas
station,
except
in
the
fringe
again
of
block,
mostly
in
Larmour.
There
is
no
grocery
store,
there
is
no
drug
store
and,
and
and
I
can
go
down
the
road.
Not
only
is
there
no
drugstore,
there's
no
clothing
store,
there's
no
fruit
market,
there's
no
shoe
store,
there's
no
sit-down
restaurant
and
the
average
income
of
those
neighborhoods
are
half.
I
T
Those
of
the
middle-class
people
who
want
their
resources-
it's
interesting
to
me
when
we
go
down
this
road
that
they
often
want
to
compare
themselves
to
these
neighborhoods
without
actually
looking
at
those
neighborhoods.
The
second
thing,
the
last
thing
I
would
say
at
this
moment-
is
this,
and
this
is
pretty
much
gonna
guide
me
I,
believe
in
the
free
exchange
of
ideas.
T
I,
believe
very
much
in
that
I
believe
everyone
is
encountered
is
entitled
to
share,
and
especially
out
loud
in
public
I,
believe
that
I
believe
that
it's
called
there's
actually
a
speech
term
about
this
I've
taught
over
the
years.
I
actually
really
strongly
believe
in
it.
However,
in
terms
of
my
own
thinking,
although
everyone
is
free
to
say
whatever
they
want
in
terms
of
development
and
I,
think
do
a
lot
of
it.
I
want
to
go
on
record
and
I.
T
Think
I
think
the
advocates
play
a
great
role
in
in
in
their
public
conversation,
but
I
tend
not
to
be
persuaded
by
them.
I
am
persuaded
by
the
residents
of
the
people
who
live
in
the
districts
of
where
the
development
is
occurring.
So
when
I'm
in
Homewood
I'm
gonna
be
persuaded
by
the
residents
who
live
in
Homewood
when
I'm
in
LA
Murr
is
funny,
you
know,
when
I
did,
we
did
choice,
which
is
some
say
one
of
the
greatest
projects
for
apology
in
the
city.
T
T
The
last
thing
is
I.
Do
understand.
I
do
understand,
representing
the
districts
that
represent
that
people
are
in
pain
and
so
because
sometimes
I'm
the
only
person
they
see
and
they
have
to
explode.
They
have
to
express
their
pain
and
so
I.
They
sometimes
express
it
towards
me
because
I'm
there,
you
know
if
you're
mad
I
love
you
Ben,
some
of
you
have
been
married.
T
35
years,
sometimes
I
get
mad
and
that
fuss
half
my
wife
not
because
I'm
mad
at
her
because
she's
the
only
one
in
the
house
right
I
got
a
fuss
at
somebody
and
she's.
There
and
so
she's
close
and
so
I
first
stood
her,
and
so,
if
you
come
to
my
community,
sometimes
you'll
hear
folk
fuss
at
me.
Not
causes
it,
what
they
may
or
ain't
not
like
me,
but
mostly
because
they're
mad
and
hurt-
and
they
have
no
one
else
to
talk
to
and
talk
about,
so
they
yell
at
me
and
I.
Listen
because!
T
Well,
that's
part
of
my
job
too.
So
this
proposal,
the
zone
change
we
are
going
to
I'm,
going
to
agree
to
it.
It's
important
not
only
for
Shadyside,
is
important
for
alarma
it's
important
for
uses
for
Homewood
supporting
for
Lincoln
Limington.
It
is
the
closest
shopping
area
to
them,
but
we're
going
to
spend
the
next
year
eight
months,
something
like
that.
T
I'm
gonna
spend
the
rest
of
the
session
in
great
detail,
laying
out
the
iniquity
neck
WA
T's
of
this
city
in
great
details
and
when
those
people
who
come
out
and
want
to
steal
resources
from
the
communities
that
I
represent
I'm
going
to
in
great
detail,
show
both
their
communities
both
their
where
they,
where
they
live,
where
they
choose
to
live
where
they
with
the
resources
of
those
communities,
are
not
only
because
it's
great
it's
fair
and
just
that's
beyond
that
I
think
councilman
Lavelle's.
Does
it
better
than
me
it's
what's
best
for
the
city.
T
Our
city
will
not
grow.
It
will
not
prosper
as
long
as
it's
doing
this
backward
thinking
of
trying
to
rob
resources
from
at-risk
communities
and
that
need
communities,
it
won't
grow,
it
won't
prosper,
God
won't
bless
it,
and
so
we're
going
to
go
on
this
two-year
discussion
in
great
detail.
Publicly.
No
more
backroom
deals
no
more
link.
We
cannot
not,
let's
pass
it
and
then
we'll
go
back
and
steal
the
money
and
give
it
to
them.
Fluid
communities.
I
will
not
allow
that
to
occur.
Not
on
my
watch
not
on
my
time.
T
Not
here
not
now
we're
going
to
have
in
great
conversations
every
dollar
spent
every
time
we
the
same
time
we
spent
two
hour
hour
talking
about
the
natural
gas.
We're
gonna
spend
twice
that
amount
of
time
talking
about
every
dollar
that's
spent,
and
if
it's
not
going
equitably,
we're
going
to
have
that
conversation.
I
promise
you
that
and
so
I'm
sorry
to
use
this
moment.
For
this
conversation,
that's
not.
This
is
not
the
moment
for
that,
but
I
want
to
lay
out
my
my
my
viewpoint
straight
down
the
line.
This
new
store
will
be
helpful.
T
It'll
be
walk
in
some
ways.
You
know
I
walk
too
it's
walking
distance
from
my
home
walking
distance
for
many
of
our
our
district,
but
certainly
it
is
the
go-to
store
and
so
putting
15%,
affordable
housing.
Great
putting
new
shelter
great
and
the
community
has
a
no
it's
a
meeting
at
Calvary.
It
was,
you
know
great
one.
The
meetings
was
on
Calvary,
it
was
a
great
meeting
them
and
everyone
has
their
opinion.
Sometimes
I.
Think
one
of
my
one
of
my
mentors
in
this
work
with
League
Bankston,
some
said
to
me.
T
We
were
at
Calvary,
so
you
know
sometimes
around
with.
If
if
if,
if
no
one
gets
everything
they
want,
then
you
pretty
much
have
done
the
right
thing
if
everybody
gets
some
of
what
they
want
and
no
one
gets
exact
what
they
want,
sometimes
yeah
pretty
much
though
you've
done
the
right
thing
and
in
this
development
I
think
pretty
much.
You've
done
the
right
thing,
and
so
let's
pass
it
today
and
keep
having
this
conversation.
T
B
You
any
other
discussion,
so
Councilwoman
I
was
simply
add
that,
when
the
shopping
save
in
the
hill
closed,
we
also
began
trying
to
figure
out
what
our
residents
going
to
do
for
access
to
food.
We
did
explore
with
Johnny
go
having
a
local
drop-off
center.
The
problem
with
that
was,
and
I'm
not
and
your
constituency
slightly
different
by
just
one
give
you
my
experience.
The
problem
with
that
was
a
lot
of
those
who
needed
to
utilize.
B
It
were
seniors
and
so
getting
to
and
fro
lack
of
transportation,
not
necessarily
having
a
car
to
haul
bags
in
and
out
and
having
one
or
two
times
where
johnny
was
willing
to
come
was
problematic.
Ultimately,
we
ended
up
with
Johnny
who
are
actually
becoming
willing
to
develop
for
free
to
any
resident
in
the
Hill,
District,
and
so
I
would
haven't.
I
would
advocate
that,
in
your
conversations
with
Johnny
go
that
you
talk
about
that
for
those
citizens,
especially
the
portions
that
live
in
Reverend
burgesses
district.
B
We
also
ended
up
and
I
can
get
the
information
for
you
working
with
a
fresh
food
initiative
that
will
brings
a
truck
to
the
shop
and
safe
Plaza
every
week,
for
others
that
have
also
access
to
fresh
vegetables
and
things
of
that
nature
on-site.
So
they
can
pick
it
up
there
and
I
can
get
you
that
information
as
well.
But
I
do.
B
Thank
you
for
your
leadership
and
all
that
you've
done
to
bring
a
very
complex
development
forward
and,
as
we
have
said,
service,
the
vast
majority
of
those
who
are
in
need
any
further
discussion
with
none
all
those
in
favor
aye.
Any
opposed
Builders
approved
that
success
to
the
urban
recreation
committee
chaired
by
Rev,
emerges
the.
P
J
B
R
R
B
Opposed
bill
is
held
one
week
that
takes
us
to
the
end
of
our
agenda.
We
do
have
some
meeting
announcements
this
afternoon.
There
will
be
sessions
at
1
p.m.
and
1:30
councils
will
hold
a
briefing
on
OMB
legislation,
bills,
120
and
121.
Is
there
any
conversation
for
members
seeing
none
motion
to
excuse
the
absent
member
approved
the
minutes
and
adjourned
the
meeting.