►
From YouTube: Pittsburgh City Council Standing Committees - 11/23/20
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
afternoon
and
welcome
to
the
setting
committee
meeting
for
monday
november
23rd
2020
council
will
continue
to
meet
virtually
until
further
notice.
All
meetings
will
be
live
streamed
on
the
city's
youtube
channel.
Our
first
order
of
business
is
public
comments.
I
would
like
to
remind
all
speakers
that
the
rules
of
council
state
that
comments
are
limited
to
matters
of
concern.
Official
action
or
deliberation
which
may
or
may
be
before
city,
council
and
profanity
will
not
be
permitted.
B
C
It
floods,
our
hearts
with
new
hope
for
humanity.
There
is
also
a
more
discouraging
breathtaking
example
of
self-centeredness
and
dispassionate
government.
We've
seen
a
leadership
without
a
conscience
or
a
care
for
the
human
side
of
modern
life.
We
see
well
organized
groups,
shout
out
their
fear
of
socialism,
but
all
took
the
bailout.
Checks
that
came
to
keep
our
country
propped
up.
C
Our
capitalism
can
be
cruel
in
a
crunch.
When
a
going
got
rough,
we
chose
to
expose
the
whole
country
to
the
virus
so
that
we
could
keep
making
money
and
immigrants
people
of
color,
laborers
and
small
business
owners
who
live
from
paycheck
to
paycheck.
They
have
no
money
stored
up
to
help
them
endure
the
enemy
that
we
cannot
see
at
the
government
level.
Mercy
and
compassion
have
gone
by
the
wayside.
C
A
A
Whom
I
also
do
not
see,
therefore,
having
exhausted
our
list
of
registered
speakers,
we'll
move
on
to
our
standing
committee
agenda
and
will
the
clerk
please
take
the
role.
A
A
Thank
you.
Our
first
committee
of
the
day
is
finance
and
law,
which
is
chair
by
myself.
We
have
a
number
of
new
papers.
First
bill
is
bill.
899.
E
E
A
B
B
B
No,
no,
mr
chair,
I'm
sorry!
It
is.
B
G
A
Well,
I
saw
her
go
come
off
of
mute,
so
miss
davis,
if
you're
with
us,
if
you
could
give
us
a
a
brief
walk
through
of
the
bill.
H
Yes,
oh
hello,
thank
you.
Yes,
so
this
proposed
legislation
does
not
affect
anything
that's
already
existing.
It
only
adds
a
few
new
provisions.
It
adds
a
definition
for
independent
expenditures
as
well
as
three
new
sections,
19805
subsection.
Three
four
and
five
three
covers
political
committees.
H
Four
covers
individuals
and
five
enables
the
board
to
conduct
audits
of
campaign
finance
reports
and
in
terms
of
the
the
goals
here,
you
know
we're
just
really
seeking
to
make
sure
that
we
can
obtain
transparency
and
disclosures
from
all
money,
that's
being
spent
in
our
our
local
elections
for
candidate
campaigns,
as
well
as
ballot
initiatives,
and
that's
here
with
these
provisions,
we're
seeking
to
capture
independent
expenditures
and
some
people
call
those
non-coordinated
campaigns.
H
So
it's
not
to
impose
any
extra
burden
on
donations
to
candidates,
but
an
independent
campaign.
So
if
an
individual
or
a
dark
money
or
other
political
committee
group
came
into
our
town
and
wanted
to
spend
money,
we'd
be
able
to
capture
that
spending.
I
Okay,
hi
leanne
good,
seeing
you
again,
it
was
a
nice
nice
conversation.
We
had
the
other
day
and
I
I
will
say
this
leanne.
You
know
I've
long
been
critical
of
your
department
and
we
kind
of
went
over.
You
know
those
things
the
other
day
passed
before
you
come
along.
I
I
welcome
the
change
with
you.
I
I
felt
one
important
thing
that
we
went
over
was
that
you
will
now
require
an
initiative
say
I'm
going
to
use
the
parks
tax,
for
example,
okay,
the
political
campaign
that
was
you
know,
driven
by
politicians,
really
they
will
now
have
to
report.
Just
like
a
candidate,
does
right
expenditures.
Everything.
H
That's
correct
under
subsection
three
political
committees,
which
is
defined
to
be
basically
a
group
of
people,
or
it
could
be
some
outside
entity
as
well.
They
would
have
to
report
the
same
form
that
candidate
committees
fill
out
currently.
H
So,
if
there's
a
group
organization,
a
political
committee
that
has
banded
together
to
have
a
political
campaign
in
support
of
a
ballot
initiative,
we
would
be
requiring
disclosures
for
that
campaign.
Finance
activity,
the
same
as
we
do
for
our
candidates.
One
of
the
nice
things
about
our
current
campaign.
H
Finance
law
is
that
we
require
these
disclosures
a
few
months
before
it's
required
at
the
county
level,
which
allows
for
the
residents
of
the
city
of
pittsburgh
to
know
what
interests
could
be
behind
a
particular
candidate
or
issue
well
before
they
make
up
their
mind
as
to
how
to
vote
on
that
particular
issue,
whereas
the
county,
it's
only
required
about
a
week
before
the
election.
F
I
That
that
is
a
welcome
change.
I
you
know,
I
would
say
again
using
the
parks
tax
as
an
example,
I
felt
that
all
should
have
been
reported.
You
know
it
was
a
political
campaign.
You
know
so
political
professionals
were
hired.
So
so
I
I
think,
that's
great.
So
I'm
glad
that
that's
the
case
now.
The
other
thing
was,
of
course,
the
reporting.
I
know
you
require
three
separate
reports
which
you
know
during
an
election
is
like,
oh,
but
but.
I
You
were
and
the
biggest
problem
for
me,
you
were
not
coordinated
with
the
city,
you
were
not
cool
and
the
city
was
when
I
say
the
city,
I
mean
controller
lam's
office
and
he
was
not
coordinating
with
the
county
and
you
all
had
different
dates.
So
we're
really
looking
at
like
eight
different
reports
through
a
cycle.
H
That's
correct
for,
like
I
said:
the
county
only
requires
it
about
a
week
before
the
election,
but
for
that
particular
so
there'd
be
the
filing
in
may
and
november
for
the
primary
and
general
election
for
those
particular
reports
that
are
due
with
the
county.
You
can
just
do
a
xerox
copy
of
it.
It's
going
to
be
the
same
reporting
period
and
all
that's
going
to
be
up
on
our
our
website
coming
soon
to
make
it
really
clear
for
everyone
to
yeah
and
and
I'm
definitely
open
to
feedback.
H
If
there's
other
things
that
we
can
do,
I've
heard
some
suggestions
that
it
might
be
easier
if
we
expanded
our
reporting
period
for
the
the
initial
filing
to
begin
the
day
after
the
general
election.
Others
like
it
better
that
we
have
it
start
at
january
first,
so
please,
the
more
feedback
I
can
get
the
more
I
can
help
align
and
make
it
as
efficient
and
okay
for
everybody.
I
Yeah
jury
first,
for
me,
put
me
in
that
column:
okay,
okay,
so,
and
the
other
thing
was,
you
know,
we
talked
about
you
know
kind
of
trying
to
track
or
trying
to
make
sure
people
are
transparent
as
to
where
this
you
know,
sometimes
what
I
think
we
refer
to
as
like
dark
money
coming
into
election
elections,
you
know
so,
which
is
very
disturbing.
I
don't
have
that
problem.
I
could
tell
you,
but
you
know
so
so
so
that
all
sounds
great.
I
You
know
and
I'm
all
for
transparency
as
long
as
it
doesn't
provide
more
work
for
the
candidate,
because
I
do
believe
you,
you
know
with
with
five
or
six
or
eight
different
reports
and
the
layers
of
things
that's
a
candidate
has
to
do.
It
really
restricts
an
average
person
who
doesn't
have
people
that
we
pay
and
we
know
to
take
care
of
all
these
things.
I
myself
could
I'd
never
make
the
primary
you
know
so
so
just
be
careful
as
to
going
forward.
I
I
want
to
make
sure
this
doesn't
require
more
work
on
the
candidate's
end.
The
three
reports
I
got
it,
the
second
one
is
perfect
and
january
1st
state
all
good
with
me.
So,
okay,
that's
it
for
me,
I'm
sorry!
I
don't
want
to
take
up
too
much
time
thanks.
Oh.
H
Sure
no
problem
yeah,
just
to
reiterate
this
would
not
impose
any
additional
burdens
on
candidates
or
other
committees
or
to
people
donating
to
a
candidate
or
their
committee,
whether
an
individual
or
a
political
committee.
Those
will
both
be
excluded
from
these
forms.
It's
just
someone
who's
doing
their
own
individual
independent
campaign.
H
Another
thing
I'm
hoping
to
do
is
to
create,
like
a
web
form,
so
folks
can
kind
of
just
very
easily
fill
out
these
campaign.
Finance
forms
online
and
upload
a
spreadsheet
of
their
expenditures
or
contributions
to
make
it
easier
for
everybody.
Still
that's
still
in
the
works
right
now,
but.
I
I
had
an
opponent
running
against
me.
I
think
it
was
four
years
ago
or
three
years
ago
now
so
so
just
want
to
let
you
know
you
know
he
was
hit
with
fine
after
fine
after
fine
you
know,
for
when
he's
late,
I
guess
for
filing
date.
You
know
he
went
out
and
here
they
get
an
attorney,
and
you
know
just
the
chaos
that
ensues
when
we
throw
that
fine
on
people
and
no
other,
no
less
than
you
know
the
former
competition
darlene
harrison
who
took
took
took
issue
with
that
as
well.
G
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
thanks,
sam
for
being
here.
Similarly,
I
think
it's
interesting
for
both
situations
right.
We
don't
want
to
have
these
hoops
to
jump
through
and
time
resources
or
dollar
resources
that
really
discourage
or
defeat
candidates
alone.
Right,
so
also,
you
have
situations-
and
I
don't
know,
if
they're
relevant
to
our
reporting
requirements
or
not
where
people
challenge
a
candidate's
eligibility
based
on
some
of
these
things.
G
So
we
don't
want
to
be
guilty
of
at
the
cost
of
transparency
right
right
for
the
in
pursuing
transparency,
transparency,
but
really
putting
these
barriers
up
the
people
who
just
don't,
have
the
resources
to
comply
with
the
requirements
we're
putting
in
place,
and
I
just
wanted
to
emphasize
that
and
try
to
say
that
in
my
own
words,
to
make
the
public
understand
the
the
reason
we
want
to
grapple
with
this,
because
I
don't
want
the
public
to
just
think
that
we're
against
transparency
we're
not
against
transparency,
but
it
has
played
out
badly
when
you
are
putting
up
a
ridiculous
amount
of
requirements
that
that
your
general
person
can't
run
for
office
because
they
can't
comply
with
all
of
the
burden.
G
That
is
put
up,
so
that's
that's
why
we
want
to
be
slow
and
deliberative,
and
I
appreciate
your
being
your
office
that
we've
tasked
with
our
city
council
legislation
with
complying
with
this
transparency,
ordinance
trying
to
figure
out
a
way
where
we
can
have
the
transparency,
but
not
the
barriers
and
then
also
on
the
flip
side.
G
H
I
have
an
answer
for
you
on
that
yeah
dark
money
groups
are
so
so-called
dark
money
because
you
don't
know
who
the
the
donors
are.
There's
no
disclosure
or
transparency
about
that,
and
this
is
a
national
trend.
H
That's
happening
across
the
country,
and
I
I
don't
know
if
I'd
really
look
at
the
parks
conservancy
as
an
example
of
that,
because
what
we've
seen
nationally
happen
is
there's
these
different
campaigns
where
usually
it's
like
a
direct
mailer
or
a
tv
ad,
and
it's
paid
for
and
it's
by
by
groups
that
you
don't
know
who's
behind
them.
G
H
Sure
so,
there's
a
movie
on
amazon,
prime.
If
anyone
is
a
subscriber,
you
could
watch
it
for
free
called
dark
money
and
it
kind
of
goes
through
this.
H
However,
for
the
501c4
it's
supposed
to
be
considered
a
social
welfare
group,
another
example
of
a
501
c4
is
the
nra
planned
parenthood.
Different
groups
like
that
that
people
feel
strongly
one
way
or
another
about
them
and
in
montana,
and
that
movie
it
documents.
H
There
was
a
mailer
that
came
out,
and
it
said
this
political
candidate
is
basically
aligned
with
child
molesters.
H
So
there's
there's
several
instances
like
that.
There's
also
an
instance
very
recently
in
ohio,
where
the
the
representative
householder
was
affiliated.
It
was
receiving
dark
money
groups.
F
H
There
was,
it
was
linked
to
a
lot
of
corruption
to
deceptive
practices
in
terms
of
a
ballot
initiative
where
they
had
passed,
legislation
to
force
the
public
to
pay
for
this
bailout,
a
public
bailout
of
this
nuclear
power
plant,
and
so
he's
been
criminally
charged
with
several
corruption,
counts
related
to
this
dark
money
organization.
H
So
when
we
have
been
able
to
pierce
the
veil
as
a
society
into
some
of
these
things,
we're
seeing
some
bad
things
that
are
happening,
the
more
transparency
that
we
can
have
into
our
democratic
process,
the
better
there
was
a
study
from
a
comparable
ethics
organization
out
of
california,
where
they
were
able
to
tie
public
engagement
with
racial
and
income
equity
and
improved
equity.
H
When
you
have
improved
participation
of
the
public,
so
whatever
information
we
can
have,
whatever
transparency
we
can
have
as
to
the
interest
behind
a
particular
political
campaign.
No
longer
it's
not
only
good
just
for
the
the
candidates
involved,
so
you
can
like
know
who's
attacking
you,
but
also
for
the
citizens
right.
You
know
we
need
to
know
like
what
interests
are
supporting
or
dissuading
us
from
a
particular
candidate
or
issue.
F
G
Which
is
new,
it's
new
in
the
amendment
here,
section
5
campaign
finance
reports
will
be
regularly
audited
according
to
regulations
promulgated
by
the
ethics
hearing
board.
So
okay.
So
in
the
examples
you
just
explained
to
me
where
there
was
a
dark
money
funding
of
a
ballot
initiative
in
ohio,
I
think
you
said:
if
they
had
this
ordinance,
you
would
see
the
donors
to
the
pack
that
the
501c6
or
the
501c4
had
formed.
H
Unfortunately,
no
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
do
that.
However,
we'd
be
able
to
know
that
the
spending
is
existing
and
occurring
to
be
able
to
track
it,
so
that
if
there
is
some
change
in
the
future
that
we
can
kind
of
focus
our
efforts
there
right
now
under
citizens,
united,
these
groups
can
spend
as
much
as
they
want
and
the
irs
regulations.
H
Obviously,
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
impact
that
right
now,
but
hopefully,
with
a
you
know,
that's
something
that
changed
under
the
trump
administration.
Perhaps
it
could
be
reversed
under
a
biden
administration
where
we
could
get
that
transparency
again.
G
But
a
year
ago,
when
we
had
the
ballot
initiative
for
the
tax
referendum
to
amend
the
homeworld
charter
to
put
in
the
dedicated
funding
for
parks,
there
was
a
pack,
and
so
would
they
would
that
they
all
did
they
comply
with
the
legislation
as
it
stood
before
this
amendment.
So
they
did
file
reports.
G
So
they
didn't
file
okay,
but
if
we
pass
this,
then
they
would
have
to
we
could
we
could
prevent-
or
we
would
be
requiring
a
group
that
is
spending
money
on
messaging
around
any
kind
of
election
language,
whether
it's
a
candidate
or
ballot
correct,
would
be
filing
the
same
reports
that
we
all
have
filed
exactly.
G
So
I
would,
I
remember,
asking
the
parks
conservancy
about
their
pack.
They
did
have
a
pack
because,
probably
as
a
501
c,
4
they're
actually
prohibit
or
c3
they're
prohibited
under
federal,
501
c
3
regulations
from
electioneering
it
doesn't
say
in
the
federal
code
supporting
candidates.
G
So
let's
say
it
was
this
year
or
the
next.
That
would
say
it
was
next
year
and
they
had
formed
the
pack.
They
would
have
to
file
reports,
but
they're
they're
they
funded
their
pack
with,
like.
I
think
they
told
me
someone
correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong,
they
wrote
like
a
700
000
check
from
their
nonprofit
to
this
pack.
G
H
In
that
example,
I
think
that
you
would
be
correct
that
we
would
be
able
to
see
earlier
in
time
how
much
money
was
being
spent
there.
I
recall
there
was
also
a
tv
advertisement,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
that
was
paid
for
by
them
or
if
it
was
paid
for
by
a
different
group
but
yeah
a
political
committee
to
find
as
any
group
of
people
that's
also
within
the
legislation,
is.
G
H
Yeah,
I
think
so
I
think
I
I
envision
that.
Maybe
you
know
we
could
get
citizens
to.
You
know
the
different
constituents
to
go
to
our
website
and
upload
here's
a
picture
of
the
mailer
I
got.
Where
is
it
from
and
we
can
do
a
little
bit
of
due
diligence
to
try
to
help
people
understand
that.
There's
an
example
of
a
particular
mailer.
H
I
don't
know
if
everybody's
gotten
it
here,
but
the
director
of
the
office
of
open
records
for
pennsylvania
got
it
and
it
says
your
voting
record
is:
is
public
record
and
and
within
the
mailer
it
actually
names
a
couple
of
residents
on
on
their
street,
and
so
it
says
we're
going
to
tell
john
doe
selection
and
it's
you
know
it's
kind
of
threatening
it's
kind
of
harassing.
I.
G
H
How
cool
would
it
be
if
you
could
just
go
to
our
city
website?
You
know
you
know
upload
your
picture
of
that.
One
ask
us
about
it,
and
then
we
could
just
do
a
real,
quick
search
of
the
organization
that
paid
for
it
and
the
particular
one
from
this.
The
director
of
the
office
of
open
records
here
in
pennsylvania,
was
actually
paid
for
by
a
partisan
group
and
all
their
spending
went
to
this
partisan
group.
So
the
expectation
is
that
you
can
create
a
targeted
political
outcome
with
this
kind
of
messaging.
H
G
This
is
really
fascinating,
so
this
has
been.
I
think
something
that
I'm
glad
you
you've
responded
with
this
amendment,
because
it
was.
It
was
really
the
substance
of
a
lot
of
emails.
I
got
at
my
office,
we
talked
about
them.
It
seems
like
a
decade
ago
now
because
it
was
before
lockdown,
but
we
just
had
public
hears
and
post
agendas
about
the
parks
conservancy
at
the
beginning
of
2020,
and
I
had
a
lot
of
substance
from
constituents
saying
like
like
what
is
google
gonna
buy
a
ballot?
G
You
know
anyone
can
amend
our
homeworld
charter
if
they've
got
a
million
dollars
in
their
pocket
like
who's
gonna.
Do
it
next
where's.
The
end
like
this
is
creating
we're
gonna.
Have
these
cycles
right?
Can
we
are?
We
gonna
have
like
15
homeworld
amendments
all
purchased
by
deep
pockets
on
our
ballots
right
every
year.
So
what
is
this
like?
There?
There
was
real
citizen
concern
about
like
a
slippery
slope.
Oh.
H
Definitely
I
I
would
agree
with
that.
I
feel
like
we
need
to
make
sure
I
mean,
I
think
the
first
step
is
just
being
able
to
track
where
the
money's
coming
from
and
knowing
you
know
what
what
interests
are
supporting
some
of
these
measures
for
sure-
and
I
mean
there's
been
studies
in
new
york
and
california,
where
they
have
a
different
campaign
finance
system
where
they
can
have
a
publicly
funded
campaigns
and
they
found
like,
for
example,
in
in
new
york
city.
H
H
And
then
this
would
be
a
fascinating
for
a
statewide
race
they're
not
showing
up
because
it's,
but
but
so
they're
able
to
show
the
studies
that
having
some
of
those
components
I
mean
pennsylvania,
probably
won't
have
a
public
campaign
finance
system
anytime
soon.
But
it's
one
of
the
solutions
to
to
this.
This
concern.
G
Thank
you
for
bringing
that
up,
so
I
don't
know
how
other
members
feel.
I
still
feel
like.
I
didn't
read
this
very
carefully
myself
and
I'm
wondering
if
we
want
to
hold
it
for
it
a
little
bit
or
if
other
members
have
already
been
briefed
on
it
and
everything
I
think
it
looks
like
councilman.
Krauss
is
ready.
J
G
But
I'm
not
sure
what
the
other
discussion
is,
but
I
do
thank
you
for
bringing
it
forward.
I
haven't
seen
I
mean
we're
kind
of
at
the
holidays
and
the
end
of
the
year,
so
I
haven't
had
a
lot
of
feedback
from
the
public
or
seen
a
lot
of
public
discussion,
but
I'll
stop
my
my
questions
there
and
see
if
any
other
members
have
questions.
Thank
you
liam.
G
K
Thank
you
and
thank
you
leanne
for
for
the
briefing
earlier
this
week,
or
I
guess
last
week,
because
today's
monday
and
I
just
wanted
to
bring
up
the
a
couple
of
observations.
One
and
one
question
one
is
that
in
states
that
have
really
robust
statewide
referendum
referenda
processes.
K
There
are,
I
think,
that's
where
you
see
the
bulk
of
you
know:
dark
money
coming
from
other
states
and
campaigns
around
these
ballot
initiatives
that
are
not
just
the
city
level,
but
they're
statewide,
and
I
look
at
california
in
every
election,
there's
like
30
ballot
initiatives
that
people
have
to
sift
through
and
figure
out
and
they
need.
K
You
know,
help
figuring
out
what
the
language
actually
means
and
oftentimes
it's
funded
by
an
initiative
from
out
of
state
or
a
national
organization
similar
to
the
koch
brothers,
but
maybe
different
from
them,
and
you
know
they're
really
just
trying
to
influence
influence,
voters
and
almost
tricking
them
into
thinking
that
the
ballot
initiative
language
is,
is
one
thing
when
it
really
means
another
thing.
So
I
I
don't
see
that
happening
here
in
pittsburgh.
I
haven't
seen
it
yet,
but
I
you
know,
anything's
possible.
K
I
suppose,
if
someone
sees
an
opening
or
an
organization
season,
opening
for
making
piecemeal
change
at
the
local
municipal
level,
but
just
so
that's
just
one
observation
and
something
that
I'm
glad
that
you
know
we're
tackling
here
a
second
I
used
to
work
for
an
organization
that
had
a
501c3
and
a
501c4
and
the
501c4,
and
I
guess
the
pack
that
we
then
spun
off
allowed
us
to
run
these
independent
expenditure
campaigns
also
called
non-coordinated
campaigns,
and
with
that
we
had
to
be
very,
very
strict
about
not
ever
talking
to
the
candidate
or
anyone
affiliated
with
a
candidate's
campaign
like
we
were
very
strict
because
under
federal
law,
that's
what
was
required.
K
We
couldn't
communicate
with
them.
After
a
certain
point,
we
couldn't
even
say
hello
to
them
so
on
the
local
level.
Is
there
a
way?
Is
there
a
mechanism
aside
from
someone
reporting
it
to
be
able
to
enforce
this
aspect
of
it,
and
is
that
going
to
be
like
aligned
with
the
timelines
around
the
federal
cut-off
dates
for
communication,
with
coordinated
campaigns.
H
So
when
I
think
about
the
communications
or
the
sort
of
wall
between
an
independent
expenditure
group,
political
committee
and
the
candidates
campaign,
where
you
know,
in
order
for
it
to
be
an
independent
expenditure,
can't
be
coordinated
right.
H
When
I
think
about
that,
I
only
think
about
that
in
terms
of
the
contribution
limitations
and
spending
limitations
that
are
put
on
the
candidates,
because
otherwise
it
would
be
considered
a
contribution
if
it
was
coordinated
right
and
so,
if
a
political
committee
wants
to
give,
I
think
we
tie
our
our
our
contribution
limitations
within
chapter
198
to
the
fec,
and
I
think
it's
like
five
thousand
dollars
right
now
is
the
limit.
H
A
political
committee
can
donate
to
a
candidate,
so
they
could
give
the
five
thousand
dollars
to
a
candidate
and
then
go
do
their
own
independent
campaign
where
they
could
spend
an
unlimited
amount
of
money
after
citizens.
United.
H
So
when
I
think
about
like
the
rules
of
communications
and
things
like
that,
I
think
that's
the
only
thing
that
is
applicable
to
in
our
particular
city
code
and
as
for
reporting.
Again,
you
know
what
we've
seen
on
a
national.
A
national
trend
is
for
these
direct,
mailers
or
or
advertisements
to
be
pretty
like
harassing,
threatening
misleading,
and
so
I
think
that
they
would
draw
attention
to
themselves
and
again
we're
like
we're,
hoping
that
that
would
be.
You
know
brought
to
our
attention.
H
It's
a
small
office
that
we
have
here
for
the
ethics
office
and,
right
now,
we
currently
have
a
vacancy
if
anyone's
looking
for
a
job,
we're
hiring
an
investigator
who
would
who
could
like
help
with
this
these
great
projects,
but
you
know,
there's
we're
not
gonna
be
going
door-to-door
like
sifting
through
people's
mail.
Let's
see
see
what
what
they're
getting.
I
think
that
you
know
by
the
very
nature
of
what's
happening
nationwide.
It
would
be
brought
to
our
attention.
A
Councilman
second
round
councilman
coghill.
I
Hey,
thank
you
I'll,
be
quick.
Two
things
leanne,
I
think
councilman
gross
brings
up.
The
bigger
question
is:
where
is
it
gonna?
Stop?
I
You
know
when
you
put
it
wherever
the
money
comes
from
to
put
an
initiative
on
the
ballot
and
beyond
that,
once
that
question
is
on
the
ballot
oftentimes,
it's
blurry,
there's
not
a
concerted
effort
to
put
out
the
message
as
to
what
it
exactly
means
to
the
people
since
the
one
with
the
cprb
just
recently
90
of
the
people,
I
did
my
own
little
quiz,
you
know,
90
of
the
people,
had
no
clue
as
to
what
that
really,
you
know
consisted
of
whether
you
agree
with
it
or
not.
I
They
just
had
no
clue,
but
the
language
to
me
said
oh
well.
This
is
like
give
here's
what
it
was.
The
police
have
the
opportunity
when
people
read
that
it's
you
know
it's
a
play
on
words.
So
it's
who
puts
that
message
on
that
ballot
and
how
that
is
constructed.
So
anyway,
that's
the
bigger
picture,
and
that
really
is
going
to
be
a
concern
moving
forward.
I
believe
you
know,
especially
when
there's
success
and
they
see
success
and
you
know
breeds
you
know
others
to
come.
I
The
other
thing
liam
is,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
you're
very
careful
not
to
be
used
as
a
political
football
in
your
own
right,
okay,
for
instance,
if
somebody
called
you
and
said,
hey
check
out,
coghill's
campaign,
finance
report
and
somebody
that
gave
my
report
some
money
that
somehow
was
a
child
molester
say,
for
instance,
like
you
brought
up
before
you
know,
I
don't
know
how
you
will
do
that.
You
know
politics
kind
of
plays
in
everything
and
it
gets
in
everywhere.
For
you
to
say.
I
I
A
A
Thank
you,
councilman
any
discussion.
Any
further
members
second
round
council
and
well
councilman
smith,
hasn't
gone.
Then
we'll
go
to
councilman
gross.
G
Thank
you,
sirter,
I'm
just
looking
that
even
in
cleveland,
I
just
googled
a
little
bit
after
my
confusion
right
so
yeah
leanne,
I
thought
gave
us
some
examples
in
ohio
of
dark
money
already
being
active
in
local
government
and
so
even
in
cleveland.
There
was
dark
money
in
a
school
board
tax
initiative,
so
cleveland
schools,
ballot
initiatives
have
had
dark
money
and
it
was
part
of
the
impetus
for
the
statewide
dark
money,
reform
right
and
so
that's
pretty
close
to
home.
G
You
know
it's
just
two
hours
away
right.
Is
it
two
and
a
half
that
we
have
had
a
significant
money
dumped
into
a
local
issue
from
outside?
G
So
I
think
that
it's
prudent
for
us
to
not
assume
that
we're
somehow
immune
or
you
know
we
don't
have
any
other
kind
of
protective
shield
right
if
dark
money
can
enter
into
like
cleveland's
school
district
issues,
dark
money
could
easily
show
up
in
in
pittsburgh
local
issues.
So
I'm
glad
that
we're
having
this
conversation
and
again
it's
gonna,
we'll
just
see
how
it
works
again.
We
don't
want
to
raise
the
bar
too
high
for
candidates,
but
then
we're
maybe
the
bar.
Isn't
high
enough
for
the
ballot
campaigns?
G
G
Again,
I'm
not
a
federal
law
expert,
but
I
you
know
that
seems
like
they
did
that
but
yeah.
So
maybe
a
discussion
for
another
day.
Why
would
we
allow.
G
There
was
a
million
dollars
on
one
side
of
a
ballot
and
zero
expenditures
on
the
opposite
side
of
the
ballot
discussion.
So
I
think
there's
a
lot
here
to
chew
on
that
it
just
raised
for
me
and
and
looking
at
this
first
step.
So
I'm
definitely
supportive
of
this
first
step,
and
I
understand
if
council
members
want
to
to
to
vote
this
through
today,
but
it
is
bringing
up
a
lot
of
other
related
issues.
I
think
that's
all
mr
chair.
I
just
wanted
to
add
that
and
thank
you.
A
Thank
you
very
much
anything
any
other
members.
If
not
real
quick,
you
mentioned,
the
limits
for
pacs
are
5
000
and
the
individual
limits
are.
H
This
isn't
being
changed
again
like
we're
just
proposing.
The
board
is
just
proposing
three
new
substantive
sections
in
the
definition
for
independent
expenditure,
but
I
think
it's
198.01
on
contribution
spending
and
within
that
that
part
of
the
bill
that
was
from
like
2015,
I
think
when
it
was
first
introduced.
H
I
think,
there's
language
in
there.
That
ties
the
contribution
to
the
federal
elections
commission
for
what
their
limits
are,
and
I
think
the
last
time
I
saw
it
said
that
if
you're
a
pac,
you
can
give
five
thousand
dollars
to
a
candidate.
H
D
A
H
A
E
Bill
902
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
director
of
the
office
of
management
and
budget
on
behalf
of
the
city
are
hereby
authorized
to
enter
into
a
grant
agreement
with
allegheny
county
for
the
receipt
of
coronavirus
relief
funds
in
the
amount
of
fifty
thousand
dollars
for
the
bureau
of
emergency
medical
services
and
fire.
These
grant
funds
shall
be
used
to
reimburse
eligible
city
expenditures
related
to
the
covet
19
response,
as
set
by
county
and
federal
guidelines.
M
A
K
A
Any
discussion
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye
abstain;
oh
any
opposed
any
abstentions.
Councilwoman
smith
and
coghill
abstained.
Okay,
invoices
are
approved
that
takes
us
to
our
inter-departmental
transfers,
which
we
need.
A
motion
to
approve.
A
B
A
L
L
A
Any
opposed
bill
is
recommended
that
takes
us
to
a
public
works
committee
which
is
chaired
by
mr
coghill.
One
supplemental
paper
bill
925.
G
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
it.
I
have
the
full
text
of
the
legislation
open,
I'm
wondering
if
someone
can
explain
to
me
what
is
happening
here
when
it
says
dollar
amount
is
being
increased.
Are
we
putting
more
city
dollars.
N
Yeah,
I
can
explain
councilwoman,
sorry,
I'm
not
on
video.
So
what
happened?
We
have
a
like
20-year
lease
agreement
and
the
first
tee
of
pittsburgh
received
grant
funding
for
the
project
through
not
only
alka-san
but
a
couple
other
grants,
and
this
has
to
come
through
us
to
pay
for
a
portion
of
work
in
the
city
right
away
when
it
comes
to
the
sidewalks
as
well
as
repaving.
The
parking
garage
or
parking
lot.
N
Yeah
we
we
have
to
amend
the
lease
agreement.
The
lease
agreement
that
was
signed
only
called
for
this
organization
to
receive,
I
believe,
about
like
42
000
this
year,
but
this
money
could
not
be
could
not
be
collected
by
them.
So
we
are
the
pass
through,
which
is
why
the
lease
agreement
goes
up
to
300
000
for
this
year
and
then
it
would
take
the
usual
expense
of
40
for
the
remaining
years
of
the
agreement.
G
Just
adding
city
operating
dollars
in
it,
I'm
glad
to
hear
that.
I
appreciate
you
clarifying
that.
I
think
that's
an
important
distinction,
given
that
this
group
has
a
lease
on
public
property
for
the
operating
of
it
and
there's.
You
know,
of
course,
the
it's
been
rebuilt
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff.
I
didn't
want
to
see
that
it
was
a
substantial
change
of
the
terms
of
the
lease
we're
really
just
adding
our
using
our
capacity
to
receive
and
put
those
funds
into
the
project.
N
M
A
Any
opposed
bill
is
recommended
that
takes
us
to
land
use
economic
development
committee,
which
is
chaired
by
mr
wilson.
We
have
a
recommitted
bill
bill,
776.
O
First
in
the
hall
one
week,
second,
that
motion's
out
of
order,
I'm
sorry
but
point
of
order
that
motion's
out
of
order.
A
O
A
A
K
L
G
O
When
he
doesn't
have
the
floor,
this
councilman
president
smith
has
the
floor.
Is.
B
Still
know,
I've
lost
the
email
now
somehow
I've
lost
it.
F
B
Motion
to
hold
insistence
on
that
spirit
take
action.
I
disagree
with
that
motion
in
that
I
thought
that's
what
the
the
the
temporary
injunction
was
determined.
J
So
there
were
two
two
options
on
on
a
motion:
there
was
two
essentially
and
the
text
of
the
motions
are
in
that
email,
but
there
was
a
motion
to
let
me
pull
up
the
text,
but
there
was
a
motion
to
hold
pending
until
council
will
be
able
to
act
essentially
pursuant
to
the
to
the
lawsuit.
O
Mr
attorney,
I
believe,
as
I
told
the
clerk
earlier,
that
the
only
one
of
the
proper
motions
is
a
motion
to
hold
pending.
Further
order
of
the
court.
Is
that
right.
J
O
So
I
guess,
but
we
have
to
make
a
motion
today.
My
question
is,
I
think,
the
two
proper
motions
which,
as
I
read
your
your
thing,
one-
is
to
hold
for
executive
session
to
have
this
conversation
or
the
whole
pending
for
the
order
of
the
court
either.
One
of
those
will
do
it.
No
other
motion
is
appropriate.
That's
my
that
my
my
sense
of
it.
J
Yeah
the
advice
given
would
be
to
essentially
if
council
would
be
comfortable
with
with
the
first
of
the
options
which
is
holding
essentially
holding
pending
the
ability
to
act
pursuant
to
this
lawsuit.
If
they
were
comfortable
with
that
on
off
the
bat,
you
could
do
that.
But
if
you
do
have
further
questions
which
it
sounds
like
members
of
council
do,
then
the
course
of
action
be
to
hold
for
an
executive
session.
That
would
be
correct.
B
Yeah,
madam
chair,
yes,
councilman
krauts,
thank
you
very
much,
so
I
would
suggest
I
would
offer
to
councilman
wilson
to
withdraw
the
motion
to
hold
one
week.
I
would
withdraw
the
second.
The
councilman
would
then
make
a
motion
to
hold
for
executive
sex
session,
and
I
would
second
that
motion
motion.
B
Emotion
for
one
week
and
I
withdraw
my
second
and
second,
the
motion
to
okay
councilman.
I'm
sorry.
L
L
L
Of
order
councilman
councilwoman
gross
councilman
level,
are
you
back
on.
A
A
E
Bill
898
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
director
of
the
department
of
parks
and
recreation
to
execute
relevant
agreements
to
receive
grant
funding
from
the
digital
harbor
foundation
by
way
of
the
national
science
foundation
to
participate
in
a
multi-city
effort
to
improve
technology
and
technology
related
educational
programming.
This
grant
will
support
the
city's
rec
to
tech
initiative
and
will
focus
on
building
curriculum
and
tech
improvements
at
two
city
recreation
centers
over
three
years.
This
resolution
further
provides
for
an
agreement
and
expenditures
not
to
exceed
five
thousand
one
hundred
and
eighty
two
dollars.
O
A
B
O
So
I
am
glad
the
council
finally
is
acting
responsibly
at
least
most
of
the
members,
and
so
I
I
am
looking
forward
to
having
ongoing
conversations
on
all
bills,
because
that
is
my
role
and
responsibility
as
a
member
of
council
and
so
for
this
particular
piece
of
legislation.
I
urge
council's
approval.
A
B
K
It's
my
understanding
that
we
have
some
leftover
funds
that
will
be
applied
in
in
a
particular
budget
that
will
be
applied
for
hiring
a
poor
othello.
But
I
see
that
we
have
heidi
norman
here
to
answer
any
additional
questions.
A
K
Yes,
so
this
bill
is
necessary
to
support
our
gis
system
that
has
not
traditionally
been
built
for
city-wide
use,
so
just
as
an
example,
311
needs
new
servers,
but
the
migration
of
all
this
information
to
the
cloud
will
be
less
costly
and
easier
to
manage
with
the
you
know,
with
the
software
so
migrating
this
to
the
cloud.
So
we
do
have.
I
don't
know
heidi.
If
this
is
you-
or
this
is
someone
else
from
imp
here
to
answer
questions
up
there.
P
Q
G
Thank
you,
mr
chair
I'll,
never
skip
an
opportunity
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
gis
systems,
so
I
really
appreciate
you
being
here,
mr
miss
abdul
sami.
Thank
you.
So
I've
noticed
that
we
don't
actually
use
all
the
geographic
information
that
we
can
for
analyses
if
you
want
to
just
take
a
minute
to
help
us
and
help.
The
public
understand,
for
example,
is
this
across
the
new
digital
platforms
that
we
have
for
online
permitting?
Is
it
you
know
how?
How
are
we
kind
of?
G
I
assume
this
will
empower
us
to
synthesize
information
that
are
existing
on
different
platforms
right,
because
we
know
that
we
know
the
pinpoint
locations,
whether
it's
a
311
call
or
it's
a
pli
initiative
or
it's
this
kind
of
stuff.
So
I'm
very
excited
because
you
know
we.
I
do
this
in
pencil
in
my
office
for
sinkholes
and
potholes
and
landslides.
So
thank
you
I'll
give
you
the
floor.
Q
Sure
so
the
current
system,
right
now
as
it's
staining
today,
was
built
actually
for
the
gis
division
in
city
planning.
Since
we
moved
to
inp,
the
gis
system
had
been
broadly
used
by
all
city
employees,
and
actually
we
are
reaching
out
to
the
public
as
well
as
community
engagement
applications.
Q
So
we
found
that
hosting
the
system
or
rebuilding
the
entire
system.
In-House
on
prem
servers
are
going
to
be
very
costly,
so
we
decided
to
move
them
to
the
cloud
we
split
pretty
much
the
product
or
the
project
into
two
sections.
First
of
all,
we
had
to
purchase
all
of
the
licenses
that
are
needed
by
city
employees
to
perform
their
work
and
second
is
rebuilding
the
entire
system
because
it
pretty
much
end
its
end
of
life.
So
this
is
the
second
portion
of
the
project
we
need
to
do
integration.
Q
We
discovered
that
there
is
no
integration
with
other
systems.
Everything
is
done
manually
at
the
time
being
so
this
is
the
next
step
is
to
do
the
integration
with
pgh
one
stop
with
impact
for
finance,
with
with
qsend
for
the
311
system
and
cartograph
for
the
asset
management.
G
So
asset
management
would
also
help
coordinate
with
the
various
authorities
like
alka-san
and
pwsa,
that
have
also
conduct
business
and
have
assets
basically
in
our
footprint,
correct,
yes,
yeah
so,
and
it
and
really
once
you've
got
it
on
a
platform
where
people
can
upload
their
data.
It's
it's
there's,
no
other
expenditures
for
outside,
there's
no
barriers
to
merging
your
data,
basically
right.
G
So
while
I'm
usually
critical
and
wanna,
you
know
question
big
technology
contracts
to
make
sure
that
we
have
bells
and
whistles
there's
no
extraneous
bells
or
whistles
here
like
this
is
we
should
have
done
this
ten
years
ago,
and
we
certainly
should
have
done
it
five
years
ago
and
we
so
I
am
really
excited
to
see
this
capacity
added,
because
it's
just
going
to
remove
a
bunch
of
obstacles
that
we've
kind
of
had
for
no
good
reason
between
different
departments
trying
to
apply
their
regulatory
authority
to
the
same
piece
of
ground,
basically
or
the
same
crisis.
G
A
B
M
E
B
N
I
just
have
one
question
on
this
bill
about
the
non-disclosure
agreement.
So
is
it
you
typical
that
we
would
do
an
nda
as
like?
A
private
sort
of
company
wants
this
information
from
us,
and
maybe
that's
just
a
question
for
the
department
to
get
back
to
us
with,
but
I
I
didn't
know
that
we
did
that
kind
of
agreement
sort
of
like
we're
kind
of
the
middleman
for
this
private
company,
and
I
wasn't
sure
what
we'd
get
back
at
the
end
of
this.
N
So
if
somebody
could
just
get
me
that
info
like
are
they
going
to
share
their
findings?
Are
we
working
on
a
project
with
them
after
the
fact
or
I
just
don't
want
them
to
use?
All
of
you
know
our
city
streets
and
everything
and
we
don't
have
a
bottom
line
at
the
end
of
it.
So
it's
kind
of
my
only
question.
P
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr
o'connor.
This
is
heidi
norman,
so
the
the
mobility
impact
partners
is
partnering
together
with
a
number
of
different
cities
and
the
participation
that
we
and
inp
and
the
department
of
mobility
and
infrastructure
will
have
is
in
discussion,
work
groups
talking
about
the
issues
that
we
are
experiencing
as
cities
in
the
mobility
and
energy
space.
P
I
think
that
is
to
protect
the
integrity
of
their
financial
commitments
to
those
to
those
companies.
We
will
not,
however,
be
sharing
any
data,
whether
it
is
directly
from
our
gis
system
or
anything
else.
This
is.
These
are
merely
discussion,
work
groups
where
we
are
learning
a
little
bit
more
about
what
other
cities
are
experiencing
and
from
mip.
My
understanding
is.
We
will
gain
insights
into
cutting-edge
technologies
that
are
trying
to
address
these
sorts
of
issues
that
we're
discussing.
N
But
basically
it's
a
working
group
with
other
cities.
It's
a
general
discussion,
we're
not
going
to
share
any
of
our
data
with
them
and
they're
not
going
to
share
any
with
us,
and
it's
just
a
general
roundtable
discussion
with
this
private
entity,
who's
going
to
hear
from
all
of
these
other
cities
and
then
develop
a
plan
that
we
might
be
able
to
get
their
technology.
P
I
think
everything
was
correct
up
to
the
very
last.
My
understanding
is
that
they
are
listening
to
what
cities
are
experiencing
in
terms
of
issues
and
that
will
help
to
inform
them
as
an
investment
organization
into
which
companies
they
choose
to
invest
in.
N
I
clearly
understood
understand.
Clearly
I
understand
it
it
just.
It
just
seems
a
little
interesting
that
we're
kind
of
and
again
other
cities
are
doing
it.
So
I
don't
have
an
issue
and
maybe
I'll
just
abstain
and
take
this
offline.
It
just
seems
weird
that
you
know
we're
talking
to
a
company
so
that
they
can
promote
their
business
in
a
way
that
just
seems
a
little
different
than
what
we
would
usually
do
and
that's
why
that
that
bill
just
struck
me
a
little
differently.
N
A
Thank
you,
councilman
o'connor.
Is
there
any
other
members
with
questions
councilwoman
gross.
G
P
So
my
understanding
from
this
is
that
we
and
the
department
of
mobility
and
infrastructure
feel
that
gaining
insight
into
into
companies
that
are
investing
in
technology
to
help
solve
issues
that
cities
are
experiencing
is
something
that
we
would
really
like
to
know.
What's
coming
down.
The
road
mobility
impact
partners
is
interested
because
their
primary
business
is
to
invest
in
companies
which
are
going
to
produce
technology
that
is
needed.
G
I
don't
understand
that
that
these
private
conversations
that
we're
never
to
disclose
if
we
vote
yes,
today,
we
are
agreeing
to
allow
the
bear
to
enter
into
a
non-disclosure
agreement,
so
nobody
will
ever
know
what's
said
and
why
why
maybe
maybe
director
rex
I'll
give
you
a
chance
to
help
us
understand?
Third,
so.
R
Mobility
impact
partners
is
similar
to
energy
impact
partners.
If
anyone
has
familiar
with
that
organization,
they
are
a
collection
of
investors,
so
council
person
gross,
if
you
did-
want
to
invest
in
what
they.
R
But
they
they
really
are
there
as
more
of
a
vetting
entity
for
investors
and
so
that
what
we
would
be
the
non-disclosure
is,
with
regard
to
information
that
we
would
receive
about
potential
companies
that
are
out
there
in
in
the
world.
So
there
are
a
number
of
other
cities
that
are
that
are
participating
in
this,
as
we
said
where
we
can
get
together
and
work
in
groups
learn
about
what
is
coming
down.
R
These
companies,
perhaps
could
have
been
introduced
early
on
we,
as
representatives
of
the
public
interest
of
what
cities
we
think
we've
got
a
strong
value
statement,
a
strong
understanding
of
what's
good
for
urban
environments,
what's
not
good
for
urban
environments
that
we
would
be
able
to
provide
that
feedback
back,
that
this
would
be
detrimental
to
a
public
environment
that
this
might
exacerbate.
Inequities
that
this
actually
might
have
these
unintended
consequences
that
you
might
you
know
not
not
consider.
R
R
Table
perhaps,
but
generally
those
kinds
of
companies
are
not
going
to
be.
You
know
coming
out
onto
the
to
the
public
table
to
highly
you
know,
competitive
environment,
so
we
have
the
opportunity
both
to
learn.
R
So
what
we
get
back
as
a
city
is
to
to
learn
what
might
we
might
be
subject
to
that
might
be
popping
up
unbeknownst
to
us
and
maybe
have
a
tiny
bit
of
a
heads
up
on
our
own,
but
also
we
have
the
opportunity
to
steer
toward
the
public
good
via
you
know,
information
that
we
might
provide
to
a
body
of
investment
advisors,
what
might
be
more
productive
from
a
social
equity
from
an
urban
environment
kind
of
standpoint,
so
we
were
in
invited
to
be
one
of
I
think
it's
four
cities
that
they've
invited
to
kind
of
be
part
of
this
technical
body
of
advisors.
R
The
other
cities
I
I
will
get
that
to
you,
because
I'm
afraid
that
I
will
speak
incorrectly
at
this
time.
Boston
is
one
and
we'll
have
to
get
the
others.
R
G
I
I
just
I'm
not
seeing
the
upside
that
compensates
for
my
discomfort
with
this.
It's
you,
director,
rick.
You
mentioned
energy
impact
partners
that
we
might
be.
Do
we
work
with
them?
Do
we
did
this
body,
give
them
a
non-disclosure
agreement?
Are
we
doing
something
in
the
end.
R
No
doctor
like
this,
I
don't
believe
so.
The
energy
impact
partners,
though,
were
ones
that
were
really
leading
in
the
renewable
energy
space
and
figuring
out
kind
of
how
what
were
the
investments
that
could
be
made.
That
would
really
promote
renewable
and
energy
efficiency
innovations.
R
G
F
G
It's
an
llp
yeah,
limited
liability
partnership
as
a
opposed
to
limited
liability
corporation,
and
I
don't
know
if
they
consider
themselves
a
private
equity
company
or
not,
and
so.
F
G
Understand
that
this
is
like
a
you
know,
it
sounds
like
a
private
equity
firm
that
is
investing
in
mobility
rather
than
energy.
That's
really
not
the
issue
here.
The
issue
moment.
I
guess
it's
maybe
part
of
it
they're,
definitely
a
for-profit
group
of
people
who
will
benefit
from
their
investments,
and
so
I
just
don't
understand.
G
I
I
don't,
even
though
I
understand
your
reference
to
like
well,
it
would
have
been
nice
if
we'd
known,
uber
and
lyft
existed
as
a
technology
ahead
of
time
before
they
got
to
pittsburgh.
I
just
and
I
and
I
actually
probably
follow
that
the
you
know
intelligent
transportation
sector
more
than
other
members,
full
disclosure.
My
husband
chair,
is
a
center
on
intelligent
transportation
at
cmu.
I
don't.
G
So
significantly
that
we're
all
okay,
with
just
kind
of
giving
a
private
equity
company
information
with
the
non-disclosure
agreement-
it
just
all
seems
very
weird
to
me.
So
that's
I
guess
that's
all!
I
can
articulate
right
now,
mr
chair,
but
directors
if
you
want
to
respond
to
that
before
I
give
up
the
floor,
feel
free
because
I'm
still
just
kind
of
I
feel
like
I'm
missing
something
here.
G
B
A
B
A
You
will
do
that
does
give
us
an
affirmative
recommendation,
so
the
bill
is
recommended
bill.
A
E
Bill
908
resolution
amending
resolution,
840
of
2015
entitled
a
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
director
of
parks
to
enter
into
an
agreement
with
apply
for
technology
llc
in
order
to
license
film
and
event
planning
software
and
to
purchase
maintenance
and
solution.
Support
services
cost
not
to
exceed
31
405
dollars
in
order
to
clarify
the
start
date
of
the
contract
as
the
implementation
date
of
the
services
rather
than
the
commencement
date
of
the
contract,
and
reflect
changes
to
funding
sources.
B
K
This
is
going
to
fall
under
our
public
safety
department
and
this
is
going
to
cover
extending
the
to
the
contract
for
one
year
if
I
just
wanted
to
bring
it
up
because
it
seems
like
there
have
been
a
couple
of
questions
from
the
members
in
this
committee
just
in
case
there
were
additional
questions
for
this
bill.
I
don't
have
any
questions,
but
I
have
remembered.
G
Full
of
questions
today,
this
is
definitely
not
b3.
K
This
is
for
scheduling
under
the
special
events
office
for
to
assist
with
sorry,
I'm
toggling
back
and
forth
between
a
couple
of
different
things.
K
To
assist
with,
I
believe
film
is,
I
think,
it's
very
specific
to
film
locations.
I
am.
A
G
No
central
private
discussion,
okay,
so
I'm
gonna
ask
for
a
vote
on
this
one
today,
even
though
we're
actually
not
specifically
clear
from
the
planning
department,
if
it's
at
the
right
stage
of
its
approvals
but
and
instead
it's
not
it's
kind
of
a
medium-sized
development,
but
we're
gonna
allow
it
to
move
through
today.
But
I
just
want
members
to
indulge
me
if
we
get
better
information
from
the
planner
who's
on
vacation
this
week,
that's
different
next
week,
so
we'll
just
keep
our
eye
on
it,
but
I'll
support
it.
Today.
A
Oppose
is
recommended
last
bill
bill
794.
G
Thank
you.
This
one
has
been
basically
tabled
by
the
developer
it's
on
hold
so
rather
than
letting
it
kind
of
limp
along
motion
to
table
and
then,
whenever
the
planning,
the
project,
if
the
project
starts
up
again,
then
we'll
bring
it
back
so
motion
to
table.
F
A
Thank
you
very
much
that
does
exhaust
our
agenda.
For
today
we
do
have
a
few
meeting
announcements.
A
Budget
hearings
will
continue
tuesday
november
24th,
with
the
pittsburgh
housing
authority,
pittsburgh
parking
authority,
sports
and
exhibition
authorities,
slash
stadium
authority
at
10
a.m,
which
will
be
chaired
by
councilwoman
gross,
and
then
we
will
have
the
pittsburgh
water
and
sewer
authority
in
the
allegheny
senatorial
authority
at
1
30
p.m,
which
will
also
be
chaired
by
councilman
gross.
All
budget
hearings
will
be
held
virtually
in
stream
live
via
the
city
channel
on
via
the
pittsburgh
city.
Channel
on
youtube.
A
Council
will
also
hold
a
briefing
on
wednesday
november
25th
with
two
sessions
at
2
p.m
and
2
30
p.m.
With
imp
inp
relative
to
the
briefing
on
recent
pittsburgh
net
rfp,
if
you
would
like
to
register
to
speak
at
the
regular
and
standing
committees
meetings,
please
call
the
city
clerk's
office
at
by
9
tuesday,
for
the
regular
meeting
and
by
9
00
a.m,
wednesday
for
the
standing
committees
meeting,
you
may
also
email
your
comments
to
city
clerk's
office
at
pittsburghpa.gov.