►
From YouTube: Pittsburgh City Council Standing Committees - 12/1/21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
morning
and
welcome
to
the
standing
committee
meeting
for
monday
december,
1st
2021
council
will
continue
to
meet
in
a
hybrid
format
until
further
notice.
We
encourage
speakers
to
continue,
registering
and
speaking
virtually
as
there
will
be
a
limited
number
of
seats
available
in
council
chambers.
Our
first
order
of
business
is
public
comment
now,
but
like
to
remind
all
speakers
that
the
rules
of
council
state
that
comments
are
limited
to
matters
of
concern.
Official
action
or
deliberation
which
are
or
maybe
before,
city,
council
and
profanity
will
not
be
permitted.
A
B
B
I
view
the
office
of
the
city
clerk
clerk
of
council
as
the
most
important
city
office
no
office,
including
mayor
and
president
of
council,
requires
greater
intract
counselor
inter
legislative
dash,
executive
branch
and
inter
government,
citizen,
recording
and
transmitting
of
information
using
optimal
intelligence.
A
concern
of
council
is
to
specify,
by
ordinance
by
law,
responsibilities
and
so
qualifications
necessary
to
meet
those
responsibilities
of
key
pittsburgh.
B
Government
offices,
pittsburgh
code,
title
1,
administrative
section
on
article
5,
chapter
153
law
regarding
the
clerk,
a
attend
all
meetings,
keep
accurate
minutes
b,
have
custody
of
all
papers
which
may
be
presented
to
council
c,
transmit
papers
from
council
to
a
committee
of
council
d
file.
All
papers
on
which
final
action
may
have
been
taken
by
council
e
record
and
file
in
his
or
her
office.
All
ordinances
and
resolutions
and
publish
all
that
require
publication.
B
F,
keep
an
index
of
all
actions
of
counsel
g
act
as
clerk
to
all
committees
of
council.
H,
keep
accurate
minutes
of
all
actions
of
the
committees.
Okay,
keep
an
accurate
keep.
B
Sorry,
l
maintain
an
office
to
keep
the
books
and
papers
in
his
or
her
custody
jay,
which
is
one
of
the
most
important
of
all
indexed
and
have
bound
annually
sufficient
copies
of
the
municipal
record
to
supply
each
member
of
council,
the
mayor
and
each
director
of
a
department
with
one
copy
and
have
additional
copies
for
sale.
B
L
furnish
all
transcripts
orders
and
certificates
called
for
by
any
person
m
deposit
monthly,
with
a
city
treasurer
all
revenue
from
the
sale
of
documents
and
develop
a
calendar
with
the
two
commissions
qualifying
for
this
office
legally.
Requiring
the
meeting
of
the
responsibilities
requires
an
exceptional
person
and
we
have
one,
but
there
was
no
public
hearing
in
19
in
2017,
which
is
lawless,
not
she,
but
mr
krauss.
C
C
C
After
repeated
speeches
to
the
board
and
city
council,
they
have
not
dropped
the
sale
of
bonaire
school.
It
is
the
crime
to
use
a
falsehood
to
vote,
create
a
resolution,
sign
a
sales
agreement,
transfer
property
or
create
a
legal
contract
under
a
misrepresentation,
officials
have
a
duty
to
investigate
and
act
against
crime.
Now
you're
notified.
C
There
have
now
been
three
community
meetings
with
gregory
coyle.
It
is
seven
months
of
no
community
support
from
bonaire.
We
even
gave
him
a
petition
with
250
signatures
on
it.
We
want
the
building
torn
down
and
green
space
to
take
its
place.
Gregory
is
operating
in
bad
space
and
the
school
district
officials
are
harming
we,
the
people
of
bonaire.
C
C
Significant
community
concern
has
been
expressed
to
the
board
of
education
and
the
city
council.
All
these
months,
perhaps
there's
a
neighborhood
busting
a
plan
plan
afoot,
blockbusting
is
illegal.
Is
there
any
lobbying
or
unregistered
lobbying
taking
place
a
senior
neighbor
whose
extended
family
that's
lived
here
for
over
a
hundred
years,
told
me
something
very
wise.
C
C
My
sincere
consistent
request
is
that
city
council
create
a
resolution
to
block
signing
change
and
support
a
green
space
to
replace
bonnier
school
building.
Do
your
part
for
the
environment,
reduce
the
watershed
to
route
51
increase
green
space
to
benefit
all
ages
and
stages,
protect
the
children
at
the
playground
across
the
street?
C
Let's
make
it
wheelchair
accessible
to
allow
those
who
have
difficult
access
to
nature,
the
ability
to
enjoy
it,
tear
down
detrimental
problem
buildings,
not
safe,
stable
neighborhoods.
You
want
to
reduce
watershed
to
route
51,
and
this
is
your
opportunity
to
help
that
need
investigate
fraudulent
acts
by
pps
administration
board
and
contractors.
C
A
D
Okay,
thank
you
greetings
and
good
day.
My
title
is
the
grand
inca,
the
iroquois
confederacy
of
aboriginal
american
people,
and
I'm
here
to
speak
about
the
indigenous
people
here
right
here
in
pittsburgh.
The
utmost
good
faith
shall
always
be
observed
towards
indians
due
to
a
lot
of
ill-conceived
policies,
broken
treaties
and
depredations
the
homestead
act.
The
indian
removal
act
of
1830,
the
general
allotment
act
of
1887.
D
out
turned
into
new
statues
policy
codes
that
only
serve
corporate
and
municipal
interests.
The
indigenous
people
of
the
land
never
ceded
any
land,
it
was
clearly
stolen
and
must
be
returned
and
anyone
moving
in
the
direction
opposite
to
redress
is
guilty
of
genocide
upon
the
aboriginal
american
people.
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
A
E
E
E
And
when
you
get
a
chance,
if
you
have
a
chance
to
read
it,
I
hope
you
look
at
it
in
the
terms
that
I've
stated
it
to
you.
Are
we
going
to
get
in
the
car
and
drive
to
the
future,
or
are
we
going
to
go
stay
the
same.
E
A
F
A
G
Bill
2213
resolution
authorizing
the
issuance
of
a
warrant
in
favor
of
crystal
abbott
and
her
attorney
in
the
amount
of
34
996
dollars
in
full
and
final
settlement
of
litigation
filed
in
the
court
of
common
pleas
of
allegheny
county
bill.
Number
2214
resolution
authorizing
the
issue.
One
of
a
warrant
in
favor
of
michael
lucas,
in
the
amount
of
25
2500
in
full
and
final
settlement
of
litigation
filed
in
the
county
court
of
common
pleas
bill.
G
for
full
and
final
settlement
of
litigation
filed
in
the
county
court
of
in
the
court
of
common
pleas
of
allegheny
county
bill
number
2216
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
the
city
solicitor
on
behalf
of
the
city,
to
enter
into
a
professional
services
agreement
with
kohin
law
group
to
address
a
matter
of
pending
telecommunications
litigation
at
an
amount
not
to
exceed
61
050
dollars.
Bill
number
2217
resolution
authorizing
the
issue.
G
Another
warrant
in
favor
of
alan
daniels,
simon
and
simone
pc,
in
the
amount
of
65
000,
relating
to
the
full
and
final
settlement
of
a
case
file
in
the
allegheny
county
court
of
common
pleas.
Bill
number
2218
resolution
authorizing
the
issuance
of
a
warrant
in
favor
of
summer
abbott
and
field
de
la
santee
and
associates
in
an
amount.
Fifteen
thousand
dollars
in
full
and
final
settlement
of
litigation
filed
in
the
court
of
common
pleas
of
allegheny
county.
I
A
G
Bill
2219
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
director
of
the
department
of
public
safety
to
enter
on
behalf
of
the
city
into
an
agreement
with
a
step
up
veterinarian
veterinary
in
inc
for
professional
licensed
veterinary
services
to
the
city's
department
of
public
safety,
bureau
of
animal
care
and
control
at
an
overall
cost
not
to
exceed
one
hundred.
Eighty
thousand
three
hundred
twenty
seven
dollars
and
seventy
one
cents.
J
F
J
A
G
K
G
Bill
2221
resolution
amending
resolution
number
47
authorizing
the
mayor
in
direct
for
public
safety
to
enter
on
behalf
of
the
city
into
an
admitted
professional
services,
agreement
with
in-time
solutions
for
ems
and
policing,
scheduling
and
timekeeping
services.
That'll
cost
not
to
exceed
902
525
dollars.
G
2244
resolution
providing
for
a
second
supplemental
agreement
with
michael
baker
for
contract
administration
and
construction
inspection
service
class
associated
with
small
grants,
project
agreement
and
providing
for
the
payment
of
costs
relating
to
allegheny
circle
phase
two
not
to
exceed
one
hundred.
Ninety
thousand
six
hundred
sixty
three
dollars
and
five
cent.
A
fifty
thousand
five
hundred
seventy
dollars
increase
from
the
previous
agreement
ocean
to
approve.
L
Thank
you.
I
see
that
this
is
now
a
second.
What
I
would
call
a
budget
amendment-
and
I
would
just
like
to
find
out
the
reason
for
this
amendment
and
I
guess
we're
calling
it
a
supplemental
supplementary
agreement,
what
is
leading
to
the
the
additional
cost
of
this
project,
if
that's
indeed
the
case
or
has
the
scope
of
the
project
changed.
F
L
Sure
I'm
just
I'm
seeing
that
this
is
now
the
second
supplement
supplementary
agreement
with
michael
baker
for
this
project,
and
I'm
curious
I
mean
to
me
this
is
a
budget
amendment
to
the
original
budget
of
the
allotted
budget
for
the
project.
I'm
just
curious.
What's
leading
to
this,
is
it
unintended
costs
or
unexpected
costs
that
we're
running
into
for
some
reason?
Are
they
seeking
the
additional
funding?
Are
we
you
know
what
is
what
is
causing
this
I'll
have.
A
A
J
N
First
of
all,
I'll
add
my
name
as
a
co-sponsor.
Second
of
all,
we
were
working
with
the
law
department
to
make
two
slight
changes.
Amendment
makes
two
slight
changes,
one.
It
codifies
the
process
where
the
directors
of
each
of
the
departments
assigned
parking
spaces
and
then
the
second,
the
second
change
at
the
very
last
page,
the
law
department
said
that
we
could
not
direct
the
sergeant
of
arms.
N
We
could
not
directly
give
him
the
authority
to
patrol
the
lot,
but
that
the
as
a
police
officer
he
has
to
be
assigned
by
the
police
to
do
that,
and
that
was
a
you
know.
Both
these
are
mostly
technical
changes
that
the
law
department
suggested,
and
so
we
have
written
them
so
motion
to
amend.
I
N
O
J
On
yeah,
I'm
sorry,
I
just
want
to
respond
to
that
that
this
came
about
when
there
were
some
changes
which,
if
you
recall
the
administration
and
put
somebody
in
charge
of
changing
the
spaces
and
to
address
the
parking
during
code
when
a
lot
of
us
weren't
here.
J
Well,
the
problems
continued
after
we
returned
and
a
lot
of
people,
including
the
controller's
office,
there's
a
lot
of
confusion
over
whose
parking
spots
for
whom
and
who
they
belong
to
and
whether
or
not
people
could
park
theirs
freely
and
it
started
getting
pretty
nasty
where
people
started.
Leaving
notes
on
other
people's
cars
started
singing
confronting
one
another,
so
it
started
escalating.
J
So
we
said,
I
said,
worked
with
madame
clerk
and
she
suggested
we
could
draft
something
where
we
control
the
lot
where
our
people
park
at
the
diamond
lot
and
fourth
avenue.
So
that
way,
not
only
can
our
people
have
their
spots,
but
the
people
that
have
been
parking
there
for
years
will
be
able
to
have
their
spots,
including
the
controller's
office,
and
will
work
as
as
people
leave
or
move
on
we'll
work
on
how
we,
with
the
process
on
how
those
spots
are
filled.
J
And
this
way
we
also
want
to
make
sure
our
sergeant-at-arms
can
enforce
the
parking
there.
Because
there's
been
a
lot
of
issues,
different,
no
one's
being
forced
out,
so
I
mean
whoever's
spreading.
Those
rumors
is
spreading
rumors,
it's
no
one's
being
forced
out.
If
anything,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
they
have
a
place
to
come
to
to
stay
and
to
know
that
that's
their
spot
and
so
that
they're
not
forced
out
by
somebody
else
who
just
thinks
that
they
have
the
right
to
park
there
they're
paying
for
these
spots
to
be
clear.
J
We're
not
taking
anyone
in
the
controller's
office,
but
if
they
have
a
legitimate
spot,
if
they,
if
they
don't,
have
a
legitimate
spot,
we'll
address
that
with
the
controller
we
want
to
work
with
the
controller
and
everyone
else.
This
is
not
about
the
controller.
This
is
about
the
city
as
a
whole,
and
this
is
about
a
lot
and
our
employees
that
are
all
struggling
and
trying
to
get
to
work
into
and
to
have
this
space
that
they've
waited
for
or
have
held
or
have
and
have
held
for
years.
J
So
it's
not
about
taking
anybody
out.
It's
about
making
sure
people
get
to
stay
yeah
as
long
as
we're
not
displacing
anything
except
for
I
will
say
on
fourth
avenue.
I
did
ask
the
clerk
to
look
at
those
spaces
on
fourth
avenue,
because
I
think
the
mayor's
office
currently
has
an
abundance
of
spots
and
we
have
a
lot
of
need
on
this
side
of
the
hall.
J
Not
taking
any
spaces
if
they're
paying,
if
they're
in
good
standing
they're
paying
their
their
parking
and
they
have
a
legitimate
spot,
we're
not
taking
them
and
if
they
don't
have
a
legitimate
spot
and
the
controller
wants
them
to
have
a
spot.
He
needs
to
work
with
the
clerk's
office
to
figure
that
out.
That's
it.
O
O
Right
yeah,
including
us,
but
I
don't.
O
But
but
but
at
the
same
time
you
know,
I
understand
their
their
plate,
it's
kind
of
a
perk
for
their
auditors,
so
you
know
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
we
weren't
displacing.
J
A
J
J
A
In
favor,
say,
aye
your
post,
it
will
be
held
one
week,
new
papers,
bill,
2206.
field.
A
G
2207
resolution
granting
unto
erica
nestle
han,
kill
it
their
successors
and
assigns
the
privilege
and
license
to
construct,
maintain
and
use
at
the
wrong
continent,
expense
to
reconstruct
three
existing
sets
of
steps
and
to
install
four
tree
pits
and
an
awning
at
4632
center
avenue.
In
the
fourth
ward,
eight
council
district.
F
I
L
G
2210
resolution
granting
unto
gustavo
and
emily
cordona
their
successors
and
assigns
the
privilege
and
license
to
construct,
maintain
and
use
at
their
own
cost
and
expense.
An
existing
retaining
wall
presently
constructed
in
the
right
of
way
at
130
burst
street
in
the
16th
ward,
third
council
district.
G
A
K
Motion
to
approve
discussion
hi.
Thank
you.
I
have
an
amendment
by
substitution
from
councilman
o'connor
I'd
like
to
take
a
motion.
Second,.
A
A
K
I
have
I'm
happy
to
go
through
the
the
amendments
before
I
make
the
motion
to
amend
this.
This
rpp,
which
we've
held
a
post
agenda
and
also
a
public
hearing
on
so
I'd
like
to
go
through
some
of
these
amendments.
We
have
director
daschle
on
as
well.
We
do,
and
also
director
lucas.
K
So
I'm
gonna
just
make
out
some
brief
comments
about
the
amendments
here
and
then
I
will
ask
the
director
to
fill
in
any
blanks
that
I've
left
out.
So
basically,
what
we've
done
here
is
we're
gonna.
K
These
amendments
show
that
that
they
are
that
the
domi
will
be
responsible
for
the
curbside.
They
will
be
the
entity
that
will
do
the
study,
not
the
parking
authority,
so
that
amendment
does
require
us
to
to
fulfill
or
create
a
position
at
domi
for
a
so
that
would
require
a
you
know.
To
make
this
complete.
K
We
would
need
to
follow
up
and
do
a
budget
amendment
to
include
that,
but
the
way
I
have
the
way
I've
the
way
I've
worked
this
out
is
that
on
the
parking
authority
side
they
would
have
taken
that
from
what
they
already
negotiate
with
finance
on
tickets.
So
the
program
doesn't
pay
for
itself
so
either
way
wherever
we
put,
you
know
the
person
who's
going
to
do
the
curbside
study
or
the
parking
study
we're
either
going
to
fill
a
position
at
the
parking
authority
or
in
the
field
position
here.
K
K
Director
did
I
leave
any
any
very
important
points
out.
P
No,
that
can
that
that
kind
of
encompasses
the
the
changes
there
were
some
limit.
You
know
landlord
permits,
which
are
now
I
think
property
owner
manager
permits
non-resident
permits.
There
were
some
additional
restrictions
that
were
put
on
that,
based
on
some
questions
and
comments
from
from
council
members.
After
after
we
had
the
the
post
agenda
and
the
public
hearing.
K
I
should
just
I
want
to
open
up
the
members
for
questions
I
just
want
to
make
it
known
that
I
mean
I'd
like
to
make
this
amendment
and
then
put
this
over
to
next
tuesday
and
then,
if
there's
further,
you
know
slight
changes.
We
can
make
that
then,
but
I'm
also
willing
to
just
hear
the
conversation,
how
it
goes
so
I'll
turn
it
over.
The
members.
H
I
H
Well,
first,
I
want
to
congratulate
councilman
wilson
on
tackling
an
unbelievably
difficult
topic.
When
councilman
dowd
came
to
this
table-
and
I
made
an
attempt
to
to
do
what
councilman
wilson
has
achieved
and
and
without
pulling
any
punches,
basically
threw
our
hands
up
in
the
air
in
frustration
that
it
was
just
such
a
complicated
topic
to
try
to
resolve
that
we
kind
of
threw
in
the
towel.
H
So
first
and
foremost,
thank
you.
If,
if
time
permits,
could
I
could
I
just
go
through
a
couple
of
the
things
on
the
on
here
that
I'm,
I'm
still
not
quite
comfortable
with
the
the
new
language
for
a
short-term
rental?
Is
that
intended
to
be
more.
H
Abiding
for
airbnb
and
that
kind
of
short
term
rental,
is
that
what
your
sort
of
end
game
is
with
that.
P
P
So
that
it
would,
you
know,
assuming
that
that
residents
that
were
in
a
monthly
or
longer
lease
would
be
residents
under
the
program
who
would
be
able
to
obtain
permits?
This
was
you
know
we
did
go
through
and
try
to
try
to
get
try
to
define
what
these
short-term
rentals
were.
You
know
that
which
were-
and
that
was
a
pretty
commonly
accepted
definition.
H
But
then
how
is
the
permit
ultimately
terminated
once
they
have
vacated
that
their
short-term
lease?
What's
the
system
in
place,
councilman,
if
you
I
mean,
what's
the
system
in
place,
to
terminate
that
so
that
it
doesn't
become
a
black
market
that
they
can.
K
Pass
it
off
to
something
else
to
use.
I
can.
I
can
follow
up
on
that
question,
please,
okay,
so,
basically
just
for
clarification.
This
all
came
out
of
you
know.
Most
of
these
amendments
are
just
complaint
based
and
so
really
you
know,
there's
no
system
in
place.
F
K
This
short-term.
F
K
Parking
authority
trying
to
get
some
on
the
phone
trying
to
get
that
variance
so
we're
trying
to
set
up
a
system
that
is
user
friendly,
which
has
to
be
done
on
the
parking
authority
side.
You
know
the
goal
is
to
make
it
just
as
user
user
friendly
as
meter
park.
You
know
so,
if
you're
someone
who
is
entering
into
you
know
the
the
business
of
airbnb,
then
it
would
operate.
K
You
know
once
you
qualify,
which
you
would
have
to
provide
documentation
of
the
ownership
of
the
short-term
rental
documentation
that
the
you
know
it's
it's
actually
being
offered
as
rental
property
and
then
also
proof.
The
short-term
rental
doesn't
have
off-street
parking
so,
and
I
just
want
to
just
answer
your
question
is
that
it
would
operate
similar
to
a
visitor
pass,
but
you
know
could
be
like
a
plug-and-play
type
scenario
where
the
per
the
residential,
the
person
who
owns
the
property,
go
and
change
that
license
plate.
K
H
K
Try
to
make
it
the
goal
there
is
to
you
know.
Sometimes
people
just
come
in
for
a
steeler
game
and
they
might
be
here
for
a
night
or
two.
So
you
know
the
five
dollar
fee
gets
that
and
then
person
could
continue
to
run
it.
That
would
start
the
new.
F
K
K
H
Residents
are
watching
our
conversation
and
texting
this.
This
is
an
incredibly
important
topic
to
both
southside
flats
and
to
oakland.
So
the
the
next
question
that
excuse
me
that
I
have
is
really
about
the
addition
of
other
permits.
The
contractor
permits
the
child
care,
the
caregiver
perm,
I'm
in
good
keeping
with
all
of
that
stuff.
I
think
that.
H
H
The
percentage
of
rental
property
has
clearly
exceeded
50,
and
that
was
a
number
of
years
ago.
I,
I
would
probably
speculate
it's
probably
closer
to
60
or
even
higher,
that
is
rental
property,
a
very
common
scenario
in
both
south
side
flats
and
all
throughout
oakland.
You
have
a
landlord
that
has
a
property
that
rents
for
six
thousand
dollars
a
month.
It
puts
four
sheeplets
four
students
in
there
and
1500
bucks,
a
piece
and
he's
getting
six
thousand
dollars
a
month
for
that
unit
and
we're
talking
about
charging
him
25
for
a
permit.
H
P
That's
correct
the
the
25
per
permit
per
area
for
a
land
worker
nor
or
I'm
sorry,
I
forget
what
it
was.
The
property
owner
or
manager
non-resident
permit
is
correct.
H
H
P
Was
discussion
for
the
permits
given
to
residents
the
the
property
owner
manager
non-resident
permit
is
intended
for
property
owners
or
managers.
You
know
who
don't
live
in
a
property
to
be
able
to
do
work.
You
know
on
on
those
properties
that
they
are
renting
to
residents,
and
so
you
know
there
is
a
lot.
P
You
know
all
of
the
non-resident
permits
you
know
are
intended
for
people
that
would
you
know
people
that
would
be
parking
in
an
rpp
area
beyond
the
grace
period
for
certain
types
of
activities
and
that
using
a
visitor's
pass
wouldn't
be.
You
know,
kind
of
an
acceptable
use
of
you
know
something
outside
of
what
the
typical
use
of
a
visitor
pass
would
be.
That's
where
these
non-resident
permits
were
created
from.
H
So
then,
director
to
play
devil's
advocate
here,
being
that
this
council
struggled
for
the
last
14
years
to
create
a
rental
registry
that
has
been
largely
opposed,
not
singularly
opposed
by
the
realtors
association,
because
they
don't
want
to
go
into
the
units
to
do
the
work
to
bring
them
up
to
code.
Why
are
we
providing
passes
for
them
to
park
when
they
clearly
are
that
are
intended
to
assist
them
with
working
under
properties?
When
we
have
clear
evidence
that
there's
not
a
desire
to
work
on
those
properties.
P
I
mean
I,
I
don't
really
have
an
answer
for
you
on
that
one
councilman,
but
this
would
give
them
the
opportunity
to
be
able
to
park
in
a
district
and
work
on
those
properties.
H
Mean
to
put
you
on
the
spot,
you
know
I
I
really
did
so.
Will
you
indulge
me
just
to
go
through
some
of
this
announcement?
Just
in
turn
it
it's
the
one.
I
I'm,
I'm
really
good
with
the
bill.
I
truly
am
the
the
one
sticking
point
for
me
really
is
about
the
rental
property
owner's
ability,
and
I
understand
within
reason
to
to
assign
the
ability
to
enter
an
rpp
area
to
to
do
regular
maintenance.
P
Yeah
they're
councilman
there
was
there
was
a
limitation
that
was
placed
on
that
that
was
based
on
discussion
discussions
with
you
know,
I
I
think
that
was
something
that
we
had
heard
from
residents
in
the
public
process
that
they
wanted
limitations
on
that.
So
we
did
create
that
limitation.
That
four
number
is
lower
than
you
know.
P
I'd
say
what
we
heard
from
some
of
the
property
management
or
pro
property
owner
companies
that
you
know
that
that
that
own
rentals
and
a
number
of
in
a
number
of
rpp
districts,
so
we
were
trying
to
create
that
balance
by
creating
that
as
the
limitation.
H
And
that
is
the
maximum
number
of
four
vehicles.
H
H
To
a
hold
yeah
good,
I
want
to
show
you
please,
please
yeah,
okay,
all
right!
So
then
rental
property,
I'm
on
section
four
here:
rental,
property,
owner
or
manager,
non-resident
a
person
who
offers
real
estate
for
rent
in
an
rpp
area
who
does
not
qualify.
H
But
in
that
section
I
don't
see
a
limitation
of
vehicles,
a
limit
of
vehicles
in
there
and
then,
following
that
rental,
property,
owner
and
manager
may
only
receive
one
non-resident
permit
to
be
assigned
to
a
motor
vehicle
registered
in
their
own
name,
non-residential
permit
for
each
motor
vehicle
registered
to
a
community
company
they
own,
whose
primary
business
interest
is
rental
property
for
each
rental
parking
permit
area,
wherein
they
own
rental
property
up
to
four
vehicles.
So
let's
pretend
on
this
on
just
because
I
know
this
a
little
more
succinctly.
H
H
I
should
know
how
many
rpp
areas
there
are
in
south
and
central
oakland,
but
you
could
see
the
magnitude
of
the
number
of
vehicles
if,
if
real
estate,
one
real
estate
agent
owned
25
permits-
and
we
had
five
real
estate
agents,
we
could
have
125
permits
out
there
just
for
for
landlords.
P
So
if,
for
example,
you
know
the
south
side
example,
if
someone
owned
property
in
all
four
permanent
parking
districts
number
one,
they
would
have
to
be
rental.
You
know
rental
properties
that
they
would
have.
That
did
not
have
off-street
parking,
because
that
is.
That
is
a
limitation
here
that
you
know
they
do
have
to
prove
that
they,
you
know
when
they're
trying
for
that
non-resident
permit,
that
they
don't
have
off-street
parking
that
they
could
park
their.
You
know
these.
You
know
construction
vehicles
or
leasing
vehicles.
P
You
know
which
is
which
is
really
what
this
is.
You
know,
which
is
what
this
is
around
and
then
yes,
they
would
be
required
to
get
a
permit
for
each
parking
district,
but
they
would
all
be
assigned
to
the
same
license
plate
so
that
you
know,
although
that
one
car
may
have
four,
you
know
ford
permits
in
the
example
that
you
gave
in
the
south
side.
Obviously
they
wouldn't
be
able
to
park
in
more
than
one
district
at
a
time.
H
P
P
F
H
K
H
K
Now
I'll
just
say
that
it
makes
total
sense
to
me
to
provide
at
least
some
support
to
the
land
to
the
the
property
owner,
especially
in
the
time
of
like
passing
rental
registry,
that
that
they
would
have
an
opportunity
to
go
to
all
units
be
on
site.
For
some
reason
you
know
at
a
you
know,
tied
to
one
license
plate
at
least.
H
We
councilman
we've
passed
rental
registry.
How
many
times
since
we've
sat
at
this
table.
Implementation
is
key.
You
know
that
god
willing
this
is
the
home
run
this
time
and
it
actually
is
implemented,
but
in
terms
of
the
short-term
rental
permit,
you
know
I
mean
I
I'm
not
going
to
push
back
on
that.
One
airbnb
is
not
what
it
has
been
pre
pre-pandemic
by
any
means,
but
there
is
there's
still
an
ample
amount
of
of
short-term
rental
property
throughout
the
council
district.
For
the
most
part,
I
think
residents
are
okay.
H
We
do
get
pushback
on
on
airbnb
if
it
becomes
a
rental
property
for
event.
Space,
that's
a
whole
different
dynamic,
but
as
someone
that's
renting
it
as
an
event,
space
for
a
friday
and
saturday
night
is
not
interested
in
applying
for
permits
for
people
to
park
off
street.
You
know,
so
that's
really
going
to
be
more
of
a
probably
pli
and
police
enforcement
issue.
So,
but
if
you
would
councilman,
you
know
if
you,
if
your
wish
is
to
hold,
I
know
you
want
to
move
this.
I
would
not.
K
I
don't
want
to.
I
don't
want
to
rush
at
all.
I
mean
I'm
doing
this
in
a
way
that
we
can
talk
about
this
publicly
because
some
of
these
amendments,
you
know
weren't,
provided
to
the
public
at
the
hearing,
and
so
I
think
it's
important
that
we're
continually
talking
about
this.
I
K
At
the
table-
but
I
just
want
to
you-
know,
keep
it
going
I'll
hold
it.
I
just
want
to
keep
it
keep
the
questions
going
so
that
members
can
get.
You
know
any
clarification.
I
need.
A
M
Thank
you,
and
I
want
to
thank
councilman
wilson,
also
for
working
with
me
on
the
part
about
the
medical
permits.
M
I
shared
a
story
at
the
public
hearing
about
a
constituent
who
has
a
child
who
needs
24-hour
care,
and
so
there
are
a
variety
of
assistants
that
have
to
be
attending
the
child
at
any
given
time
and
they
may
be
coming
from
all
over
the
county,
and
so
we've
been
through
this
before
on
in
one
of
the
kind
of
variances
and
the
requirement
that
a
doctor
that
was
in
the
original
draft
that
a
doctor
be
able
to
provide
the
license
plates
numbers
of
the
caregivers
was
an
undue
burden.
No
doctor
knows
who's.
M
What
nurse
is
coming
from
brentwood
or
baldwin,
or
something
that
day
or
that
month
and
to
get
a
letter
out
of
your
doctor
about
anything,
is
enough
of
a
challenge
to
get
a
letter
wait
and
we
we
did
this
right.
We
got
a
letter
from
the
child's
doctor
about
the
child's
medical
condition
that
that
was
unacceptable
to
the
parking
authority.
We
had
to
somehow
give
the
doctor
these
license
plate
numbers
that
the
doctor
was
willing
to
send
a
letter
back
it
took
months.
M
It's
an
it
was
an
undue
burden,
a
level
of
requirement
so
striking
out
that
the
doctors
don't
know
the
people's
license
plate
numbers,
who
are
the
caregivers
that
are
coming
to
a
home
and
those
two
things
just
don't
go
together.
So
I
appreciate
the
willingness
to
strike
that
out,
but
I
also
want
to
speak
to
some
of
councilman
krause's
points.
I
in
district
7
also
have
a
very
high
number
of
short-term
rentals.
M
It's
dated
information
now,
but
at
one
point
we
had
a
map
of
short-term
rentals
and
I
think
district
eight
has
a
lot.
District.
Seven
has
a
lot
and
I'm
sure,
coming
crosses
also,
and
it
may
have
changed
over
time,
but
I'm
I'm
willing
to
give
this
one
a
try
for
the
short-term
rentals,
because,
right
now
we
can't
actually
study
what's
effective
and
what's
ineffective
because
it's
just
by
variances
and
it's
not
kind
of
coordinated,
and
so
we
can't
systematically
see
what's
working,
what
isn't
working
and
I
feel
like.
M
Over
50
percent
of
the
population
in
bloomfield
are
renters
and
since
they're
renters
in
the
single-family
homes
generally,
there
are
very
few
multi-units,
it's
possible
that
there's
a
landlord,
a
different
hypothetically,
a
different
landlord
for
every
single
structure,
and
so
that
would
be
a
great
number
of
these
additional
permits
that
would
be
issued
for
a
year
at
a
time,
even
if
it
was
only
one
per
landlord
that
it
it
would
add.
It
would
double
hypothetically
the
number
of
permits
issued
in
the
in
the
district,
so
it
doesn't
really
work
either.
M
It's
worded,
it's
it's
a
real
estate
kind
of
business
right,
so
a
person
who
offers
real
estate
for
rent
is
can
be
like
again
one
could
they
could
have
one
house
in
an
rpp
area,
but
what
is
simultaneously
also
happening
is
that
increasingly
we
just
voted
on
210
pearl
street
private
sewer,
it's
it's
there's
no
person's
name.
M
I
just
read
through
the
whole
file
it's
under
an
llc,
so
let's
say
I
am
landlord
deb
gross,
which
I'm
not
but-
and
I
have
four
bloomfield
dwellings
but
they're
each
under
a
separate
llc,
because
it
says
that
you
know
it's
like
kind
of
where
they're
doing
business
it
looks
to
me
like
you
could
get
four
different
classes.
M
So
that's
weird
too,
and
I
need
some
time
to
tease
that
out
and
really
think
through
that
and
maybe
there's
something
we
can
do
better
there.
So
yeah.
I
would
support.
Thank
you
again.
Councilman
wilson,
I'm
supportive
of
the
way
to
do
the
medical
permits.
M
I
think
again
it's
going
to
be
better
that
we
not
force
people
through
a
variance
process
that
there's
a
clear
path
and
then,
since
we've
created
the
path-
and
we
can
see
it
rolled
out
systematically,
we
will
know
whether
it's
working
for
people
or
doesn't
or
how
it
needs
to
be
improved
same
thing
with
the
airbnb,
I'm
feeling
like,
similarly
that
the
landlord
part
is
maybe
too
loosey-goosey
and
in
reality
could
be
problematic.
So,
thank
you.
That's
all.
I
have.
P
I
just
might
note
councilman,
you
know,
I
think
that
idea
that
you
know
maybe
some
of
the
activity
that
was
in
the
the
you
know,
rental
property
owner
manager
non-resident
permit.
You
know
if,
if
the
main
activity
on
that
is
similar
to
the
contractor
permit,
I
think
that
might
be
something
that
we
could
that
we
could
look
into.
L
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
and
I
just
also
want
to
thank
councilman.
L
I
too
was
one
of
those
who
attempted
to
take
on
this
behemoth
of
rpp
and
it's
a
sort
of
citywide
problem,
or
it's
a
citywide
issue
and
challenge
and
and
threw
up
my
hands
and
said
you
know
someone
else
can
do
this,
so
I
really
appreciate
you
taking
this
on.
I
I
kind
of
wish
councilman
krauss
was
were
still
in
the
room.
I
think
he
exited
just
for
a
moment,
but
I
did
have
some
questions
or
just
scenarios
to
talk
through
about
the
rental
property
owner
section
as
well.
L
I
mean
in
the
section
of
one
of
the
neighborhoods
that
I
represent
is
shadyside
and
I
also
represent
part
of
oakland,
so
I'm
very
sympathetic
to
oakland
and
the
challenges
that
it
has.
But
but
you
know,
for
instance,
in
shadyside
we
have
very,
very,
very
large
rpp
areas
and
just
to
give
one
property
owner
as
an
example,
70
different,
smaller
rental
property
units
over
500
apartments,
all
in
one
neighborhood.
L
So
they
are
constantly
shuttling
back
and
forth
to
different
units
showing
apartments
showing
units
repairing
them
this,
and
that,
and
in
that
case,
they're
very
responsible,
they
are
keeping
up
their
properties
and
I
do
think
that
the
four
vehicles
is
fair
for
them.
I
do
think
it's
necessary.
L
L
L
Cutting
some
in
half
shrinking
some
changing,
you
know
changing
just
you
know,
making
more
districts
and
kind
of
related
to
that.
What
is
going
to
be
our
process
to
go
through
and
recertify
all
of
these
districts,
many
of
which
are,
you
know,
need
to
be
recertified,
or
is
that
moot
at
this
point?
Because
of
this
bill.
P
So
to
the
first
question
you
know
as
to
how
these
districts
can
be
addressed
or
looked
at.
The
answer
is
yes,
you
know,
and
and
and
the
opportunity
is
there
to
look
at
them
through
a
number
of
different
ways,
and
so
you
know
previously
the
only
time
that
we
really
took
a
look
at
a
district
is
if
someone
submitted
petitions
in
some
form
or
fashion
or
if
we
were
going
through
the
mandatory
recertification
of
the
district.
P
The
mandatory
recertification
of
the
district
has
been
removed
from
from
the
code,
and
you
know,
but
you
know
what's
what's
happened,
is
that
we've
we've
increased
the
ways
that
people
can,
you
know,
can
initiate
changes
to
the
districts.
So
if
your
example
of
you
know
area
u
and
shadyside
looking
to
to
be
split
into
multiple
districts,
you
know
that
could
be.
P
I
you
know,
triggered
by
the
parking
permit
officer
that
could
be
triggered
by
a
neighborhood
plan
that
could
be
triggered
by
the
council
members
themselves
to
be
able
to
look
at
that.
As
you
know,
those
as
issues
you
know,
so
the
intention
is
that
they're.
You
know
that
a
program
that
was
really
only
petition
driven
in
the
past
you
know
will
be
able
to.
You
know
that
we'll
be
able
to
look
at
you
know
kind
of
you
know
the
curb
in
our
residential
neighborhoods.
P
L
P
Yeah
that's
correct,
and
that
was,
and
that
is
that
is
in
the
in
the
the
last
section
of
of
the
amendment
or
not
of
the
amendment.
I'm
sorry
of
the
of
the
you
know
of
the
entire
code.
L
The
building
yeah,
I'm
going
to
repeat
what
I
said
for
councilman
krause's
benefit.
Really,
you
know
I.
I
fully
understand
the
the
challenges
of
oakland.
I
represent
part
of
oakland
too,
but
there's
a
there's,
a
different
case
in
every
neighborhood
right
and
shady
side.
As
an
example,
I
gave
one
property
owner
that
has
500
different
units,
70
different
small
apartment
buildings,
all
in
shadyside
all
in
one
neighborhood,
and
I
think
they
deserve
to
have
four
cars.
Four
vehicles
that
have
permits.
L
So
they
can,
you
know,
attend
to
the
many
many
different
showings
of
apartments
that
happen
every
single
day
and
being
able
to
go
from
one
area
to
you
know
we
have
two
main
rpp
areas
in
shadyside:
go
from
one
area
back
to
another
back
to
another.
If
they
need
to
and
not
have
to,
you
know
worry
about
getting
tickets
over
and
over
again
they
should
have.
They
should
have
the
ability
to
have
those
four,
and
so
I
guess
to
that
point,
every
district
is
different.
Every
neighborhood
is
different.
Every
challenge
is
different.
L
Is
there
some
sort
of
way
to
build
in
discretionary
flexibility
so
that,
if
you
are
literally
just
like
councilwoman
gross
gave
the
off
the
example
of
one
property
owner
with
four
small
properties?
You
know-
and
you
replicate
that
over
and
over
and
over
again
you're
essentially
duplicating
the
number
of
permits.
L
You're
gonna
get
in
one
in
bloomfield,
that's
a
very
different
scenario
where
maybe
they
don't
shouldn't
get,
they
all
shouldn't
all
get
up
to
four
versus
a
company
that
has
you
know
that
really
is
operating
like
a
business
and
has
just
like
the
example
I
gave
in
shady
side.
Is
there
some
way
we
can
legislate
flexibility
or
discretion
into
this,
and
I
realize
that's
putting
a
lot
of
pressure
then
on
the
person
administering
this,
but
perhaps
we
can
think
about
adding
some
language
and
to
make
it
more
flexible.
P
Yeah
I
mean
I
think
we
can
have
conversations
with
the
parking
authority
about
that.
I
think
one
of
the
struggles
here
is
that
on
we
don't
have
that
flexibility
on
kind
of
the
administration
of
the
permits
so
getting
to
some
consistency,
city-wide
on
on
how
you
know
on
what
permits
can
be
granted
and
how
many
permits,
because
of
you
know,
you
know
there
might
be
less
flexibility
there.
You
know,
but
they're
you
know.
Obviously
the
intention
is
to
have
flexibility
around.
P
You
know
the
hours
of
operation
in
a
permit
district
or
grace
periods
or
under
under
the
bill.
Now
the
new
proposed
hybrid
areas,
which
would
be
a
point
of
flexibility
as
well,
so
there
are
some
places
where
I
think
you
know,
given
our
capabilities
that
we're
we're
trying
we're
trying
to
increase
flexibility,
I
think,
with
the
number
of
permits
we
might
allow
per
district
for
specific
means
that
might
be
more
difficult.
A
M
M
I
think
this
is
what's
important
is
also
that-
and
I
don't
see
it
really
detailed
out
that
the
landlord
should
absolutely
provide
you
know
the
number
of
units
and
addresses
that
they
are
servicing,
supposedly
that
they
own,
I'm
not
sure
if
that's
spelled
out
there
and
and
prove
their
ownership,
maybe
that
that
is
embedded
in
there
someplace
and
then
also
you
know,
I'm
kind
of
curious
in
in
shady's
side
does
that
landlord
that
has
500
units
have
them
clearly
labeled
as
their
units
or
are
they
using
the
llc?
M
I
think
that
they're
still,
probably
because
of
the
shift-
that's
we're
really
seeing
this
acceleration
of
these
shell
companies
that
that's
something
else
we
might
need
to
tease
out
right,
that
there
really
be
not
just
for
the
bureaucracy's
benefit,
one
of
the
things
that
we
don't
need
to
talk
about
in
detail,
but
that
we
consistently
hear
about
guest
permits
or
other
permits
is
that
having
gone
digital,
the
the
residents
can't
identify
the
visiting
vehicles
and
it
seems
to
me
if
we're
providing
these
temporary
or
extra
permits
that
are
outside
of
the
residence.
M
They
should
be
also
clearly
labeled.
Somehow.
So,
if
it's,
you
know
a
large
I'm
a
large
real
estate
owner,
I
should
have
my
vehicle
clearly
labeled,
not
just
as
like
random
landlord,
but
with
my
like
my
company.
If,
right,
if
we're
issuing
this
permit
to
that
specific
company,
I
feel
like
it
should
be
labeled
for
the
benefit
of
of
the
public.
So.
M
M
That
is,
you,
know,
experienced
and
that
may
be
unnecessary
or
could
be
avoidable,
so
yeah,
I
think,
there's
a
lot
a
lot
to
tease
out
and
refine
in
the
landlord
stuff,
but
again
I'm
open
to
to
what
the
body
is
will
is
today.
Thank
you.
K
So
my
wishes
to
amend
and
then
and
then
hold
for
a
week,
so
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna,
offer
up
this.
This
amendment.
H
A
K
K
K
You
know
agreement
with.
You
know
some
unsaid,
some
undocumented
agreement
somewhere
that
we
need
to
document.
The
director
of
domi
would
be
in
charge
of
granting
that
special
exception
for
any
certain
time.
That
would
be
that
parking
would
be
allowed
and
that
would
be
demarcated
by
signage.
So
motion,
two
motion
to
amend.
H
F
H
J
J
K
So
15
item
15
was
added
for
bicycle
lane.
Currently
it
didn't
didn't
exist
in
the
in
our
code.
It
you
know,
state
law
does
give
the
ability
to
ticket
in
a
moving
lane,
but
we're
clearly
defining
that
bicycle
lane.
A
A
Bill
is
recommended
that
takes
us
to
our
new
papers,
bill
2224.
bill.
G
2224
resolution
further
amending
resolution
number
647
entitled
resolution
adopting
and
approving
the
2021
capital
budget,
the
2021
cdbg
program
and
the
2021
through
2026
capital
improvement
program,
so
as
to
identify
specific
public
service
grant
projects
for
the
mayor's
office
and
authorize
a
subsequent
agreement
for
operation,
administrative
expenses,
maintenance,
purchase
of
equipment
and
or
rehabilitation
of
neighborhood
facilities.
On
behalf
of
the
residents
of
the
city.
G
Bill
2230,
ordinance,
amending
and
supplementing
the
city
coded
title
vi,
conduct
article
1,
regulated
rights
and
actions
by
adding
a
new
chapter,
610
entitled
prohibition
on
use
of
certain
bags
and
checkout
bag
charge
to
permit
the
use
of
only
certain
bags
by
retail
establishment
at
the
point
of
sale
or
for
a
delivery
and
establishing
a
charge
payable
by
the
customer
to
the
establishment
for
the
provisions
of
other
types
of
bags.
All
under
certain
terms
and
conditions
motion.
K
I'll
defer
to
the
council
person.
A
G
L
H
A
A
H
M
Councilman
smith,
I
I
didn't
get
a
chance
to
touch
base
with
you
about
this
project.
Are
you
supportive
of
this
one
today.
J
No
I'd
just
like
to
hold
it
for
two
weeks.
Please.
A
A
Second,
any
discussion
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
opposed
bill
is
recommended
that
exhausts
our
agenda.
We
do
have
meeting
announcements.
Budget
meetings
will
continue
this
afternoon
at
1
30
with
the
department
of
finance
and
the
department
of
law,
including
the
ethics
board,
which
will
be
chaired
by
myself.
On
thursday
december
2nd
budget
meetings
will
be
held
with
the
department
of
public
works
at
10
am
chaired
by
councilman
coghill
at
1
30,
with
the
park
tax
trust
fund,
chaired
by
myself
and
followed
by
parks
and
recreation
chaired
by
councilman
burgess.
A
A
Budget
meetings
will
continue
next
monday
december
6
at
10
a.m,
with
the
office
of
community
health
and
safety,
the
office
of
community
services
and
violence
prevention,
both
chaired
by
councilman
o'connor,
and
with
the
stop
the
violence
trust
fund
cheer
by
myself.
With
that
anything
from
members,
if
not
need
a
motion
to
excuse
the
absent
member
approve.
The
minister
adjourn
the
meeting
removed.