►
From YouTube: Pittsburgh City Council Public Hearing - 4/21/21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
afternoon
and
welcome
to
pittsburgh
city
council's
public
hearing
for
wednesday
april
21st,
2021
relative
to
bill
2021
1085.
and
for
the
for
everyone
watching
I'm
I'm
bobby
wilson,
I'm
the
chair
of
the
economic
development
committee
and
I
am
currently
on
the
on
the
line.
Right
now
we
have
councilwoman
straussberger
and
there
may
be
other
members
that
join
as
we
continue
clark.
Will
you
please
read
the
title
of
the
bill.
A
Thank
you
and
I'll
mention
other
members
as
I
join
and
our
first
sort
of
business
will
be
a
presentation
and
the
presentation
is
will
be
presented
by
andrea,
lavin,
cosis
and
from
the
city
cities,
plan
department
and
then
we'll
have
following
that.
We'll
have
the
testimony
of
all
the
registered
speakers
so
andrea,
I'm
not
sure.
Do
you
have
the
ability
to
to
share
a
screen
if
you
have
a
presentation.
A
C
C
Year
so
we
spoke
with
planning
commission
about
the
proposed
expansion
of
existing
riv,
curb
cut
standards
to
single
family
attached
uses
citywide
and
at
their
meeting
on
february,
23rd
of
this
year
they
recommended
that
city
council
approve
the
proposed
amendment
and
that
we
continue
researching
additional
motions
per
their
charge.
Last
year.
C
C
C
C
A
A
I
believe
I
believe
it
will
go
to
the
speakers
that
are
that
have
attended
this
hearing.
I
have
well
first
off.
Thank
you
very
much
for
that
presentation.
We're
also
joined
by
director
dash
of
the
pittsburgh
city
planning
department.
A
A
D
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
dave,
bringing
I'm
the
executive
director
of
lawrenceville
united
located
at
118
52nd
street,
I'm
here
to
speak
in
support
of
the
zoning
code
text.
Amendments
of
council
bill,
2021
1085.
D
D
When
the
administration
proposed
dropping
minimum
parking
requirements
for
single-family
attached
homes,
a
group
of
community
organizations
in
row,
house
neighborhoods
came
together
to
express
our
support
and
ask
that
the
city
take
additional
steps
to
meet
the
goals
of
the
legislation.
Specifically,
we
called
for
minimally
replicating
the
curb
cut
design
standards
in
the
river
zone
into
r1a
zones.
We're
grateful
for
the
mayor's
administration
and
city
planning
for
taking
this
feedback
and
implementing
our
request
quickly.
D
As
city
planning's
presentation
demonstrated
so
well,
front-facing
off-street
parking
integral
garages
and
their
corresponding
driveway
curb
cuts.
Do
significant
and
long
lasting
damage
to
the
essential
character
of
row.
House
neighborhoods.
They
remove
public
on-street
parking
increase
vehicle
trips
threaten
safety
and
accessibility.
Drive
up
housing
costs
permanently,
eliminate
the
ability
to
plant
street
trees
and
demote
neighborly
interaction.
D
This
legislation
goes
a
step
further
than
eliminating
the
parking
minimum,
and
this
is
a
stride
in
the
right
direction
to
limiting
the
propagation
of
driveway
curb
cuts
on
otherwise
walkable
blocks,
as
we
certainly
have
seen
instances
where
developers
to
save
money
or
out
of
simply
poor
design,
choices
have
attempted
to
create
off
street
parking
in
the
front
when
rear
access
existed.
D
However,
we
must
acknowledge
the
limits
of
even
this
new
legislation.
For
one
thing,
it
only
applies
to
single-family
attached
dwellings
and
not
to
r1a
zones,
which
leaves
a
lot
of
residential
projects
exempt
in
neighborhoods
like
lawrenceville,
while
most
of
our
r1a
neighborhoods
have
lots
of
single
unit
detached
dwellings
interspersed
with
our
row
homes
and
while
we
share
the
same,
they
share
the
same
blocks,
the
same
public
off
street
parking
and
the
same
sidewalks
detached
homes.
D
D
So
we
ask
that
city
council
pass
this
ordinance
and
our
coalition
of
neighborhood
groups,
spike
pedestrian
groups
and
disability
advocacy
organizations,
would
love
to
work
directly
with
the
city
to
identify
additional
measures
to
give
to
communities
the
tools
to
reduce
driveway
curb
cuts
when
they
harm
mobility
in
our
communities.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
for
the
record,
we're
joined
by
councilwoman
gross,
and
our
next
speaker
is
sam
spearing.
E
F
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
emily
persico
and
I'm
a
community
development
manager
with
lawrenceville
corporation
speaking
in
support
of
this
legislation.
Lc
is
located
at
143rd
street
and
is
a
nonprofit
with
the
mission
to
serve
as
a
catalyst
and
conduit
for
responsible
growth
and
reinvestment
in
lawrenceville.
F
We
sincerely
appreciate
your
work
and
the
peduto
administration's
leadership
to
address
the
growing
harm
caused
by
curb
cuts
in
dense
urban
communities
like
ours.
Yet,
while
this
legislation
is
certainly
a
significant
step
in
the
right
direction,
we
echo
concerns
expressed
here
today
and
urged
city
council
to
go
one
step
further,
to
expand,
curb
cut
design
standards
to
all
uses
along
primary
streets
and
r1a
neighborhoods.
F
These
requirements
also
give
developers
the
ability
to
drive
up
housing
prices
for
market
rate
projects,
exacerbating
the
challenges
of
gentrification
and
displacement
faced
by
lawrenceville,
and
so
many
other
r1a
neighborhoods,
integral
garages
on
primary
streets
and
r1a
neighborhoods,
impose
too
great
of
public
costs
to
be
permitted
to
continue
unchecked.
That
is
why
we
are
today.
F
We
are
here
today
to
call
upon
city
council
to
take
a
more
holistic
approach
to
driveway,
curb
cuts
and
consider
additional
measures
to
limit
their
propagation,
especially
in
dense
walkable,
transit-rich
neighborhoods,
like
lawrenceville
single-family,
detached
homes
and
other
uses
that
are
often
situated
within
row
house
blocks
and
r1a.
Neighborhoods
should
not
be
exempted
from
necessary
parking
standards
that
preserve
urban
density,
quality
of
life
and
affordability.
F
Thus,
we
urge
you
to
extend
this
legislation
to
either
prohibit
or
require
a
special
exemption
or
variance
for
curb
cuts
for
all
uses
along
primary
streets
and
r1a
neighborhoods
and
to
implement
the
ribs
curb
cut
design
standards.
We
truly
appreciate
your
time
and
we
hope
you
will
consider
our
request
as
you
review
this
legislation.
Thank
you.
A
All
right,
we'll
just
move
on
to
the
next
speaker
and
we'll
we'll
move
that
position
down
to
the
end
I'll
I'll
call
on
ikana
hamakina
again.
At
the
end,
our
next
speaker
is
allison
keating.
G
All
right,
hi
yeah-
this
is
allison,
sorry
for
the
noise
I'm
outside.
I
don't
know.
If
that's,
I
don't
have
to
hear
that
so.
Okay,
thank
you!
So
my
name's
allison
keating.
G
I
live
in
manchester,
I'm
speaking
on
behalf
of
speaking
on
behalf
of
pittsburghers
to
public
transit,
which
is
a
local
organization
that
represents
riders
and
transit
workers
in
the
region
and
beyond,
and
our
interest
is
that
off-street
parking
raises
housing
prices,
making
neighborhoods
unaffordable
for
many
incomes
and
it
also
decreases
ridership,
making
the
transit
system
less
sustainable.
G
My
neighborhood
manchester
is
partially
an
r1a
neighborhood.
It
is
also
r2
and
rm,
and
I
guess
I
just
want
to
briefly
talk
about
like
what
zoning
code
says
and
does
it's.
It's
basically
like,
like
the
city's
vision
for
what
they
want
to
see
in
communities
and
when
what
I
guess.
What
I
want
to
say
is
that
I
think
it.
I
think
it's
pretty
easy
to
expand
this
this
this
suggestion
to
most
residential
and
commercial
area
districts,
because
it's
just
a
nudge.
G
It's
not
it's
not
a
demand.
It's
just!
It's
just
a
nudge
and
it's
the
city,
saying
hey!
You
know
we
want
walkable
streets
if
you're
going
to
build
something
new.
We
want
something
walkable,
we
want
something
that
is,
you
know
friendly
to
everybody,
and
you
know
it.
It
fits
in
with
you
know,
old
pittsburgh,
and
I
also
I
also
want
to
talk
about
the
the
gap
between
developers
and
buyers.
G
Sometimes
developers
might
not
like
they
think
they
understand
the
market,
but
people
are
really
happy
living
in
the
neighborhoods
as
they
exist
and
you
know
so
so
they
they
end
up,
maybe
building
things
that
they
think
people
want,
but
they
don't
understand.
You
know
so,
there's
just
a
gap
between
developers
and
buyers
and
I
think
the
city
can
step
in
and
help
developers
understand
the
markets
a
bit
better
and
and
and
they
do
that
through
the
zoning
code,
so
yeah,
so
that's
you
know,
please
do
this
and
then
do
more.
Thank
you.
H
A
I
Sorry
I
clicked
on
mute
like
three
times.
Can
you
hear
me
now.
I
Perfect
great
hi,
my
name
is
eric
bohr
and
I
reside
at
4904
hatfield
street
in
lawrenceville.
I'm
the
advocacy
director
of
bike
pittsburgh
we're
a
3,
500
member,
non-profit,
bicycle
and
pedestrian
advocacy
organization,
we're
headquartered
in
lawrenceville,
and
I
myself
have
lived
in
the
neighborhood
for
11
years.
I
I
In
a
city
where
about
a
quarter
of
households
have
no
access
to
a
vehicle,
we
need
to
ensure
users
of
all
modes,
especially
those
who
rely
on
transit,
walking
and
bicycling.
Don't
get
pushed
aside
for
private
vehicle
storage.
I
While
in
support
of
the
change
and
applaud
this
reform,
we
feel
that,
ultimately,
our
work
is
not
done
and
we
would
like
to
see
an
expansion
of
this
change
to
improve
pedestrian
safety,
enhance
walkability
and
promote
non-motor
vehicle
mobility
across
all
residential
zones
and
types
within
the
city.
I'd
like
to
thank
city
staff
council
on
the
peduto
administration
for
pursuing
this
change
and
look
forward
to
continuing
this
work
in
a
bolder,
more
comprehensive
manner.
Moving
forward
thanks
and
have
a
good
afternoon.
A
H
I
unmuted
now.
Yes,
thank
you.
My
name
is
john
axtell.
I
live
on
south
pacific
avenue
and
friendship.
H
I
I
want
to
thank
council
for
having
passed
the
previous
amendment,
which
permitted
the
elimination
of
the
r1a
parking
requirement.
I
think
this
is
a
next
necessary
next
step
and,
like
other
speakers,
I
want
to
say
that
I
think
there's
every
reason
for
all
residential
zoning
districts
to
provide
for
the
requirement
that
parking
only
be
accessed
from
alleys.
If
alleys
are
available
at
a
property.
The
the
benefits
of
having
our
primary
streets
unbroken
by
driveways
and
curb
cuts
are
are
great.
H
A
All
right,
thank
you,
and
I
want
to
just
go
back
to
someone
that
was
not
on
the
line
that
registered
to
speak.
Madam
clerk
is,
there
is
ikana
hamakina.
A
Okay,
thank
you
so
having
exhausted
move
ahead
a
little
bit.
So
thanks.
Thank
you
for
everyone
for
your
your
testimony
and
I
want
to
move
to
to
to
members
and
we'll
I'll
go
in
the
order
that
they
they
came
into
the
zoom
call
here
so
councilman
strasberger.
If
you
have
comment.
J
Thank
you.
My
only
question
out
of
curiosity
is
well.
First
of
all,
thank
you,
mr
chair.
Thank
you
for
sharing
this
meeting
and
for
all
the
speakers
who
came
out
today
and
especially
the
work
of
getting
staff
as
well.
All
right.
J
My
only
question
out
of
curiosity
is
where
we
still
have
the
kind
of
gap
or
discrepancy
between
what
we
are
proposing
today
or
what
is
being
proposed
before
us
and
discussed
today,
and
the
call
for
for
for
greater
inclusion
for
single
for
those
that
are
not
single
family
homes
into
this
proposed
amendment.
So
I've
been
a
little
out
of
the
loop.
J
I
apologize
that
I'm
making
you
kind
of
go
back
and
and
describe
the
reason
behind
why
we're
doing
it
this
way,
rather
than
the
way
that
all
the
speakers
ask
for,
but
any
kind
of
information
you
have
for
me
would
be
appreciated.
K
I
can
respond
to
that,
so
you
know
I.
I
think
that
when
you
know
most
of
our
parking
regulations
are
are
done
by
use,
and
so
the
the
standard
right
now
is
for
single-family
attached
dwellings
that
they
had
a
parking
requirement.
We
we,
the
first
step,
was
that
we,
you
know
the
council
had
passed,
was
that
we
eliminated
that
parking
requirement
for
that
use.
K
Other
outside
of
you
know
the
riv
and
I'll.
Have
zoning
administrator
layman
correct
me.
If
there's
any,
you
know,
you
know
that
there
might
be.
You
know
in
some
of
the
specially
planned
districts
most
of
our
most
our
plan.
K
Most
of
our
pregnant
requirements
are
by
use
and
not
by
district,
and
so
we
felt
that,
as
we
were
looking
through
the
the
issue
here,
which
the
issue
it
you
know
was
a
lot
around
around
these
house
neighborhoods
and
the
garage
condition
that
we
see
in
the
front-
and
you
know
those
you
know,
those
those
conflicts
that
they
create
with
sidewalks
and
with
on-street
parking
and
and
other
items
that
we
would
be
addressing
that
you
know
by
the
use
and
and
understanding
that
that
is
a
a
common
condition
of
you
know
of
that
of
that
particular
use
and
and
therefore
what
we
needed
to
address,
as
opposed
to
only
addressing
that
in
the
r1a
areas,
which,
on
one
of
the
earlier
slides
that
andrea
presented,
you
know
there
are
a
lot
of
areas
where
we
see
row
house.
K
You
know
where
we
see
row
house
neighborhoods
that
are,
you
know
that
are
zoned
other
than
just
r1a,
so
they
may
be
zoned
rm,
primarily
in
the
hill
district.
There
are
places
that
you
know
in
the
manchester
neighborhood
and
others
that
are
zoned
are
two
so
they're.
You
know
we
see
this
condition
in
a
lot
more
than
just
the
r1a
districts
and
so
wanted
to
apply
it
to
the
use
and
not
to
the
district.
J
I
think
I
have
more
to
learn
and
more
to
explore
here,
but
I
appreciate
that
initial
answer
and
look
forward
to
further
conversations
around
this
with
a
number
of
parties,
but
that's
all
I
have
for
now,
thanks
thanks
to
everyone.
L
I
was
listening
and
remembering
that
it's
difficult
for
most
people
to
understand
the
kind
of
the
complexity
of
our
land
use
to
where
there's
zones
on
a
zoning
map
which
says
like
which
parcel
of
a
hundred
and
forty
thousand
parcels
in
the
city
or
so
are
in
one
of
these
categories
that
we've
been
talking
about
r1a
or
our.
L
But
then
I
think
of
these
tables
and
kind
of
vertical
in
my
mind's
eye,
for
no
good
reason
are
like
you
know,
you
can
use,
do
these
different
things
like
have
a
pharmacy
or
not
have
a
pharmacy
or
you
know,
have
you
know
a
single
family
or
have
a
different
kind
of
business?
L
A
use
table
right.
Am
I
saying
all
this
right
and
then
you
know
different
zoning
categories,
kind
of
point
to
the
different.
The
use
tables,
so
that's
why
you
can
have
a
kind
of
it's
not
really
like
a
business
occupancy,
but
this
building
form
of
a
single
family
detached
or
a
townhouse
attached
in
more
than
one
of
the
zoning
categories.
L
Okay,
good,
so
I
think
that's
vaguely
how
I
understand
it,
and
so
then,
when
we
make
amendments,
we
have
to
decide
whether
we're
going
to
do
it
on
the
map
or,
if
we're
going
to
do
it
in
the
table,
which
could
apply
to
more
than
one
category
of
the
map,
but
it
doesn't
mean-
or
maybe
we
should
do
both
in
order
to
satisfy
this
need
so,
okay,
having
under
like
just
tried
to
recap
for
my
own
sanity
kind
of
what
you
know
is
the
reason
why
we
that
was
given
for
having
an
amendment
to
the
use
table
and
not
to
the
map.
L
I
really
heard
loudly
and
clearly
what
our
speakers
spoke
to
our
public
commenters
said
today,
because
that
is.
That
is
what
I
hear
from
my
district
right.
These
driveways
may
have
made
my
street
dangerous
or
it
wasn't
dangerous
before
we
didn't
have
these
driveways
here.
This
neighborhood
is
super
highly
densely.
L
You
know
some
small
lot
lines.
Some
of
the
lot
lines
in
lawrenceville
are
15
feet
right.
It's
like
every
15
feet
is
a
new
house,
and
so
it's
there's
a
lot
of
people
in
a
small
amount
of
space,
and
especially
it's
almost
like
the
sidewalks
are
what
we
think
of
as
primary
streets.
There's
like
people,
traffic
on
those
sidewalks,
there's
a
lot
of
people
in
a
narrow
city
sidewalk
and
they
get
heavy
heavy
use
and
they
get
all
kinds
of
users.
So
we
have
people
in
wheelchairs.
L
We
have
people
with
visions,
problems,
we
have
little
kids
on
tricycles
and
we
have
the
seniors
and
having
their
suddenly
be.
L
The
driveways
crammed
in
has
really
got
us
word
just
frankly
about
your
safety
on
the
sidewalk,
because
suddenly
now
that's
a
that's
car
space
instead
of
a
non-car
space-
and
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate
and
emphasize
that-
and
so
you
know
it
isn't
just
an
aesthetic
that
people
are
concerned
about,
and
yet
there
is
also
that
right
so
on
the
tree-lined,
walkable
streets,
right
or
sidewalk
area
that
you
once
had
that
you've,
we've
kind
of
taken
that
away
from
people
and
from
the
neighborhood
as
a
whole,
because
it's
not
just
the
residents
on
that
street
again.
L
People
are
not
using
their
cars
when
I
lived
in
bloomfield
pre-pandemic
pre-painting,
a
council
person
for
sure
this
is
some.
You
know
ten
years
ago
I
sometimes
didn't
even
move
my
own
car
for
three
weeks
at
a
time,
and
so
you're
really
you're
going
places
on
foot
and
you're
going
past
other
people's
blocks,
where
you
don't
even
live
to
try
to
get
to
to
meet
your
needs
or
to
go
about
your
day,
and
so
it
really
does
change
your.
L
I
think
it
removes
some
of
your
safety
and
diminishes
your
mobility
if
you're
not
in
a
car,
and
I
think
that
is
the
opposite
of
what
we're
trying
to
do
and
what
we
espouse
as
a
as
a
body
here
at
city
council
and
certainly
goes
against.
I
think
our
our
notion
of
what
our
complete
streets
and
and
it
privatizes
that
space
in
a
way
you
know,
and
then
we
run
into
problems
about
like
well,
someone's
car
is
sticking
out
and
you
know
into
the
sidewalk
and
pedestrian
space.
L
L
The
rear
of
our
street
is
also
a
public
street,
and
so
I'm
very
mindful
that
my
car
does
fit
if
I've
got
it
in
the
space
that
it's
in
my
property
and
not
in
the
city
sidewalk,
but
we've
seen
that
be
a
problem
in
in
neighborhoods
that
have
these
kinds
of
we
call
them
curb
cuts,
but
they
are
driveways
person.
You
know
private
driveways
that
are
kind
of
taking
away
that
sidewalk
space
and
that
curb
length
in
an
area
where
I
have
so
much
residential
parking
permit
activity.
L
Every
time
these
driveway
permits
are
granted.
We
have
lost
curb
lakes
that
we've
already
sold
residential
parking
permits
to,
and
so
they
really
are
competing
interests
here.
So
there's
that
there's
just
many
many
reasons
for
me
in
the
areas
of
r1a
that
I
represent
that
speak
to
a
higher
bar,
if
not
an
outright
exclusion,
and
we
have
many
people
who
think
they
should
be
excluded
entirely,
and
I
do
want
to
emphasize
that
I
have
written
down
here
and
it's
something
that
I've
heard
many
times.
L
L
So,
for
all
those
reasons,
I
just
wanted
to
affirm
what
we
heard
in
public
comment
and,
of
course,
thank
the
commenters
for
coming
out
and
being
so
clear
in
their
comments
and
suggestions
and
as
always,
thank
you
to
the
to
the
planning
and
zoning
departments
who
are
helping
us
adjust
to
these
changing
realities
and
these
changing
market
pressures,
especially
in
our
city
neighborhood.
So
thank
you,
mr
chair.
That
was
longer
than
I
expected,
but
this
is
a
really
big
topic
for
for
the
residents
of
my
district.
I
appreciate
it.
A
Thank
you
councilwoman,
and
I
just
have
a
few
comments.
You
know
I
want
to
thank
the
the
whole
department
of
city
planning
and
everyone
that
that
works
within
zoning
within
the
the
public
parts
of
of
you
know
what
all
took
place
prior
to
this.
I
was
curious.
You
know
what
is
the:
what
is
the
process
to
implement
this
in
other
zones,
so
we're
doing
the
use
in
one
zone
and
then
with
all
the
zones?
What
would
just
so
we
can
just
so
the
public
can
understand
what
that
process
is.
K
Sure
so
you
know
I
mean,
since
since
a
lot
of
our
parking
requirements
are
are
by
use.
You
know,
I
think
that
you
know,
I
think
we
we
hear
what
some
of
the
people
testifying
have
stated.
I
think
that
that
might
come
with
greater
parking
reform
to
the
zoning
code
and
I
think
that
as
domi
completes
the
20,
their
2070
vision
and
we
complete
the
work
of
forging
pgh
conference
and
planning
effort,
which
has
a
mobility
working
group,
it's
a
part
of
that.
You
know.
K
I
think
that
we
would
see
a
lot
of
recommendations
that
would
come
around
that
relative
to
parking
citywide,
and
I
think
that
that
might
enable
the
planning
department
to
then
have
the
direction
to
be
able
to
create.
You
know
larger
larger
amendments
to
city
council
relative
to
to
parking
and
parking
reform.
So
you
know,
I
think
that
concluding
including
those
two,
those
two
plans
will
be
able
to
help
us
think
through
what
comes
next
relative
to
changing
parking
regulations
in
the
city.
All
right
thanks.
A
I'm
looking
forward
to
that
a
couple
comments
that
I
had
were
you
know:
I
represent
a
district
that
has
a
lot
of
people
who
that
have
moved
in
you
know.
A
lot
of
people
have
been
there
for
a
long
time,
but
there
was
a
you
know:
large
amount
of
people
throughout
the
past.
A
Oh
could
be
since
the
80s
30
years
that
have
moved
in
and
meticulously
fixed
up
their
house,
and
you
know
they
like
the
way
they're.
A
You
know
they
want
to
keep
the
the
neighborhood
intact
the
way
it
was
100
years
ago,
and
so
I
see
this
as
a
as
a
way
to
continue
that
and
to
and
to
not,
you
know,
destroy
the
the
fabric
of
of
what
that
neighborhood,
you
know,
looks
like.
I
think
I
think
they
like
that.
You
know
for
many
reasons,
because
of
you
know,
without
the
curb
cuts,
without
the
you
know,
you
know
people
were
people
are
already
buying
those
houses
already
they're
interested
in
in
the
the
way
it
functions.
A
Currently
you
know
so
the
you
know
so
anything
moving
forward.
I,
like
I
like
to
see
this
type
of
improvement
and
also
you
know
regards
to
to
bicyclists.
A
You
know
we're
working
on
with
the
move
forward
campaign
and
they've
presented
to
the
their
plan
throughout
my
neighborhood.
I'm
sorry,
my
my
district,
you
know
there
are.
There
have
been
challenges
with
sighting,
so
every
curb
cut
increases.
The
I
mean
decreases
the
amount
of
parking
which
you
know
everyone's
concerned
about
their
parking
being
taken
away,
but
also
you
know
just
it's
just
one
more
risk
for
the
cyclist
with
these
curb
cuts,
and
so
that's
that's
another
big.
A
You
know
just
being
involved
within
the
planning
in
the
in
the
public
discussion
of
bike
lanes,
being
you
know,
added
to
the
different
streets
or
our
neighborhood
streets.
It
creates
this
large
buffer
and
I'm
you
know
I'm.
I
know
that
no
one
from
domi
is
on
the
line,
but
I'm
off
to
ask
them.
You
know
it
creates
like
this
font
like
a
like
10
feet.
A
You
know
of
of
you
know
more
thermoplastic
that
has
to
go
down,
and
so
you
know
it's
obvious
that
it
creates
this
risk
to
even
you
know,
other
users
on
the
street,
so
yeah,
I'm
definitely
looking
forward
to
this.
You
know
come
before
standing
committee,
so
we
can
discuss
this
further
and
hopefully
pass
and
looking
forward
to
other.
You
know
other.
You
know
additional
implementations
in
the
future
to
other
zones.
So
thank
you.
I
don't.
I
don't
have
any
other
further
comment.
I
appreciate
you
know
everyone.
A
I
appreciate
andrea
corey,
director
dash
and
let's
see-
and
thank
you-
you
know
to
councilwoman,
strasberger
and
and
and
gross
to
to
come
to
this
very
important
public
hearing
does.
Does
anyone
else
have
any
further
comment.
A
All
right
so
so
having
exhausted
the
business
of
the
public
hearing,
this
meeting
is.