►
From YouTube: Pittsburgh City Council Standing Committees - 11/1/21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
good
afternoon
and
welcome
to
the
standing
committee
meeting
for
monday
november,
1st
2021.
council
will
continue
to
meet
in
a
hybrid
format
until
further
notice.
We
encourage
all
speakers
to
continue
registering
and
speaking
virtually
as
there
will
be
limited
number
of
seats
available
in
our
council
chambers.
Our
first
order
of
business
is
public
comment.
I
would
like
to
run
all
speakers
that
the
rules
of
council
state
that
comments
are
limited
to
matters
of
concern.
Official
action
or
deliberation
which
are
or
maybe
before,
city,
council
and
profanity
will
not
be
permitted.
A
B
Dr
ronald
lynn,
miller,
bell
silver
and
hill,
oxford
and
educated
and
the
gis
candidate
for
pittsburgh.
Mayor
2021,
I
have
a
larry
here
from
the
pittsburgh
post
gazette
it's
a
letter
of
inquiry
about
me
now.
The
american
philosophical
association
is
something
which
I
joined
in
the
early
2000s.
You
know
for
clarity
of
speech.
B
Concern
of
city
council
is
the
permissibility
and
impermissibility
of
citizen
speech.
Council
on
speech
and
public
comment
quote:
we
do
not
permit
profanity
hill
smith
lavelle,
one.
No
definition
of
profanity
is
provided
by
council
on
for
public
comment,
pc
to
no
list
of
words
or
expressions
that
are
not
permitted
in
pc
is
provided
by
council,
so
kale
smith,
burgess
lavelle,
can
arbitrarily
identify
any
word
as
impermissible.
B
Three
no
rule
exists
regarding
profane
speech
of
counsel,
for
no
ordinance
on
permissible
or
impermissible
speech
that
has
been
passed
by
this
council
exists.
B
Five,
the
city
office
of
solicitor
can
find
no
legal
foundation
for
the
council
ban
on
profane
speech,
6
no
ground
for
enforcement,
no
specifications
for
procedures
for
dealing
with
it,
seven
no
ground
for
not
permitting
profanities
in
non-american
languages,
and
there
is
ground
for
permitting
profanity.
B
Since
the
council
has
already
done
that
with
the
f
word
in
public
comment,
which
some
consider
to
be
a
piece
of
profanity,
therefore,
the
pittsburgh
council,
in
my
view,
is
using
the
anti-profanity
claim
to
illegally
control
citizen
speech
what
I
call
speechism
speechism
plus
racism,
ethnocentrism
sexism
august
through
november
2021
via
public
comment.
In
the
public
record,
I
have
identified
patterns
of
racism,
ethnocentrism
sexism
and
speechism
in
the
public
actions
of
the
council
and
the
mayor,
all
of
whom
are
members
of
the
democratic
party
pittsburgh
mayor
and
councilor
ldp
pittsburgh.
B
Mayoral
consular
actions
show
racism,
ethnocentrism,
sexism
and
speechism
the
therefore
the
pittsburgh
dp
signifies
re
sxsp
isms.
Therefore
any
pittsburgh
dp
candidate
for
council,
the
mayor
signifies
all
of
the
above,
regardless
of
race,
ethnicity,
sex,
gender
or
speech,
and
therefore
the
2021
pittsburgh
dp
candidate
for
mayor,
mr
guinea
represents
racism,
centrism,
sexism
and
speechism.
C
C
I
hope
it
shows
in
the
camera
fight
me
in
for
mayor.
C
Don't
worry
about
the
ballot,
the
important
thing
is
to
get
someone
in
the
office
who
can
really
think
a
little
bit
and
do
something
that's
different,
because
we
know
that
the
violence
is
going
to
continue
to
rise.
If
we
don't
do
something
to
satisfy
not
only
the
african-american
community
but
the
rest
of
the
community.
C
C
C
C
E
E
E
E
Significant
community
concern
has
been
expressed
to
the
board
of
education
and
city
council
these
months
since
the
announcement
of
the
sales
agreement
for
bonaire
school.
Perhaps
there
is
a
neighborhood
busting
plan
afoot,
blockbusting
is
illegal.
Is
there
any
lobbying
or
unregistered
lobbying
taking
place?
Are
any
special
friends
of
bill
peduto
involved
in
this
non-compliance
sale?
E
My
sincere
consistent
request
is
that
city
council
create
a
resolution
to
block
zoning
change
and
support
a
green
space
to
replace
bonaire
school
building.
Do
your
part
for
the
environment,
reduce
urban
heat,
reduce
watershed
to
route
51
increase
green
space
to
benefit
all
ages
and
stages,
protect
the
children
at
the
playground
across
the
street.
E
F
F
F
The
only
way
forward
to
addressing
lead
poisoning
across
our
communities
is
prevention,
and
we'll
speak
a
little
bit
about
that
today.
As
you
may
know,
this
is
an
environmental
justice
issue
and
a
racial
justice
issue.
The
pennsylvania
department
of
health
had
indicated
in
a
recent
report
of
december
2020
that
children
who
reside
in
black
and
brown
communities
in
allegheny
county
had
six
times
the
rate
of
lead
poisoning
as
children
in
predominantly
white
communities.
F
We
know
that
there
is
no
safe
level
of
lead
and
it
causes
lasting
harm
to
children's
bodies,
their
brains,
their
behaviors,
we've
seen
lower
iq
impacts
to
speech,
hearing
and
language
development
muscle
and
bone
growth.
The
list
goes
on
and
this
list
is
not
only
applicable
to
children,
but
to
adults
as
well.
The
pittsburgh
lead
safe
law
is
designed.
F
We
know,
based
on
data
that
is
collected
by
the
allegheny
county
health
department,
that
over
400
children
in
the
pittsburgh
metro
area
in
allegheny
county
essentially
are
lead
poisoned
every
year
and
that
number
has
held
true
and
it's
held
steady.
So
now
is
the
time
to
take
action.
Our
team
has
learned
from
cities
across
the
country.
We've
worked
with
the
city
council
now,
with
all
of
you
for
nearly
two
years
on
an
orange
and
we've
learned
that
we
have
primary
prevention
strategies
that
can
be
put
into
place
and
that
are
effective.
F
F
As
you
may
know,
just
last
week
the
cdc
had
lowered
their
lead
reference
level,
meaning
that
when
a
child
is
identified
as
lead
poisoning
it's
at
five
micrograms
per
deciliter
and
higher,
which
is
the
level
that
they
find
in
the
blood
when
the
blood
is
taken
from
the
child.
The
via
venous
draw
that
number
last
year
was
lowered
to
3.5.
F
So
we
know
now
that
we're
going
to
see
a
greater
number
of
children
impacted
by
and
identify
with
lead
poisoning
across
the
city.
This
is
an
urgent,
urgent
issue
that
we
have
to
address
now.
So
last
week's
award
you
may
have
heard
during
the
lead
summit
was
established
in
honor
of
dr
herbert
needleman.
G
H
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
ashley
hamilton,
I'm
a
longtime
north
side
resident
of
pittsburgh.
Thank
you
for
the
time
to
speak.
Today,
the
city
of
pittsburgh
recently
announced
in
a
press
release
the
award
of
the
street
lighting
upgrade
project
to
the
efficiency
network,
also
known
as
ten
and
a
subsidiary
of
ducane
light.
H
H
H
I
Hi
good
afternoon,
my
name
is
kevin
quisenberry,
I'm
the
litigation
director
with
the
community
justice
project,
which
is
a
non-profit
law
firm
in
the
pennsylvania
legal
aid
network.
I
work
here
in
our
downtown
pittsburgh
office
and
my
comments
today
are
made
on
behalf
of
myself
and
my
organization
and
to
get
the
let
out
pittsburgh
campaign.
I
I
I
Second,
under
current
language
in
the
bill,
the
lead
inspection
protocols
of
the
ordinance
are
quote
not
to
exceed
applicable
law,
and
this
is
a
major
problem
under
this
provision,
because
there
is
no
other
applicable
law
that
already
requires
inspection
for
lead
hazards.
The
lead,
inspection
provision
of
the
pittsburgh
led
safety
law
may
be
effectively
nullified.
I
I
A
A
Is
there
anyone
else
seeing
none
we'll
move
on
to
our
standing
committee
agenda?
Would
it
clerk
please
take
the
role.
J
A
G
G
N
Whatever
the
will,
the
body
is,
I
can
explain,
we
had
a,
we
have
a
committee
meeting
and
we
I
do
agree
with
the
whole.
My
thought
was
to
amend
and
then
hold
for
at
least
we're
all
working
on
the
same
basic
idea,
which
is
the
same
thing.
We
did
on
the
stop.
The
violence
fund
exactly
the
same
thing
requiring
an
annual
theme
of
council,
and
then
we
can
hold
for
as
long
as
you
want.
O
Thank
you.
I
didn't
think
there
was
discussion
on
emotion
to
hold.
Firstly
when
ordered
so,
mr
terry,
are
you
what
are
you
doing
with
that?.
N
O
A
M
K
N
A
So
if
we
can,
let's
move
on
to
the
next
bill,
we
will
come
back
and
revisit
this,
we'll
ask
legal
to
weigh
in
yep
based
upon
reading
our
rules
of
council
is
debatable
whether
or
not
we
can
or
cannot
have
rules
account.
So
it
doesn't
say
that
we
cannot
have
discussion
on
a
motion
to
hold.
A
A
So
our
new
paper
is
bill.
2091.
J
A
A
Any
discussion
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye
aye,
any
opposed
transfers
are
approved,
need
a
motion
to
approve
the
p-cards,
no
move.
Second,
any
discussion
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye
cards
are
approved.
That
takes
us
to
public
works
committee
chaired
by
councilman
coghill.
One
deferred
paper
bill
1744
bill.
L
P
Thank
you
councilman.
We
need
to
continue
to
hold
this.
Unfortunately,
we
are
in
negotiations
with
phipps
conservatory
and
we
need
a
little
bit
more
time.
So
I
I
request
a
two
week
hold
please
ocean.
A
K
A
M
Thank
you
I'd
like
to
have,
I
believe,.
I
A
You
would
come
to
the
podium
and
provide
your
name
and
title
for
the
record
request.
M
All
right,
so
I
guess
who
I'll
ask
the
question.
Whoever
would
like
to
answer
that'd
be
great,
so
we
have
this
so
previously.
If
you
could
just
familiarize
this,
there
was
a
a
previous
effort
to
undertake
this
lightning
replacement,
and-
and
can
you
just
explain
that
that
brief
history
of
what
like
what
like?
Why
are
we
at
this
place
now
where
there
was
something
that
was
happening
in
2018
and
now
we're
at
this
place
with
a
new
contract.
R
Sure
I'll
go
ahead
and
give
that
a
shout-out
answer.
So
in
2018
there
was
an
rfp
that
was
released
for
smart
streetlight,
led
conversion.
That
project
was
not
awarded.
It
did
go
through
some.
You
know
selection
committee,
but
the
the
contract
was
not
awarded
and
I
do
not
believe
that
there
is
any
authorization
for
it.
R
Last
spring
we
undertook
a
completely
new
process,
starting
from
the
very
beginning,
I
was
not
personally
involved
in
the
2018
version
of
the
rfp,
but
I
can
speak
to
what
we
did
in
2021.
R
So
what
we
did
is
we
formed
a
collaborative
committee
across
several
departments,
a
working
group,
if
you
will,
that
was
staffed
by
myself
and
one
other
from
domey,
which
is
the
department
that's
going
to
be
holding
the
contract.
R
We
also
included
representatives
from
omb
office
of
sustainability
and
resiliency,
because
there's
an
energy
and
a
greenhouse
gas
emissions
component
of
the
project,
as
well
as
representatives
from
imp
who
could
sort
of
act
as
advisors
in
those
sort
of
more
technical
areas
that
working
group
got
together.
We
reviewed
rfps
for
led
conversions
done
in
other
cities.
R
We
did
a
survey
and
you
know
some
cold
calls
to
other
cities
who
have
done
this
type
of
progress
or
project.
Recently
we
went
through
the
steps
of
writing
the
rfp
and
sending
it
through
our
leadership
committee,
which
was
a
higher
level
body
of
all
of
those
representative
departments.
R
Before
we
even
got
to
the
point
of
releasing
the
rfp,
so
we
took
a
lot
of
care
into
making
sure
that
it
is
a
you
know,
the
type
of
project
that
the
city
needs.
We
received
seven
responses,
qualified
responses,
we
did
a
rfp
scorecard,
I'm
evaluating
those
got
a
short
list
to
five.
Did
five
interviews
further
shortlist
to
two
finalists:
did
follow-up
interview
or
follow-up
written
questions
and
called
references
from
other
cities
and
then
made
a
recommendation
to
the
leadership
committee
to
offer
to
10.
M
And
were
there,
can
you
clarify
the
difference
between
what
we're
seeing
at
council
here
for
16
million
in
language
like
not
to
exceed
contract
like
in
the
contract
not
to
exceed,
and
then
also
can
you
clarify
the
cost
proposals
of
each
of
the
two
finalists.
R
Sure
so
the
cost
proposals
were
submitted
to
the
city,
using
a
template
that
we
actually
put
together
and
asked
respondents
to
fill
out,
giving
us
the
their
estimate
for
units,
and
then
you
know,
work
needed
needing
to
be
done
for
the
planning
and
design.
So
we
took
care
to
make
sure
we
were
doing
an
apples
to
apple
comparison
of
all
of
the
cost
proposals
we
received.
R
The
rfp
was
has
sort
of
two
facets
to
it.
The
first
is
a
conversion
of
the
35
000
high
pressure,
sodium
lights
to
led
and
then
there's
other
components
of
the
rfp,
where
we
asked
for
respondents
to
submit
to
us
proposals
to
sort
of
expand
on
the
work
that
could
be
under
this
contract.
R
We
called
those
ad
alternates
and
that
that
gave
the
people
who
were
responding
to
the
request.
The
opportunity
to
propose
things
like
a
more
robust
community
engagement,
a
network
lighting
management
system,
update
to
city
code,
the
lighting
code,
so
things
that
we
weren't
necessarily
requiring
for
them
to
respond
to
as
a
part
of
the
rfp,
but
things
that
they
thought
you
know
being
technical
experts
in
the
you
know.
R
In
the
realm
of
municipal
lighting
might
bring
value
to
the
project,
and
so
all
of
the
proposals
came
back
within
a
range
of
providing
sort
of
a
baseline
for
just
the
straight
led
retrofit
and
then
additional
budget
for
those
ad
alternates
add-on
tasks
that
we
might
choose
to
authorize
once
we
actually
get
into
the
contract.
M
Just
to
further
clarify
to
pinpoint
my
question
so
there's
been
some
public
comment
made
about.
You
know
we're
here
we're
seeing
16
million
here
in
front
of
us
for
the
agreement
with
10,
and
there
was
public
comment
about
that.
This
was
like
4
million
dollars
higher
than
another
finalist.
Can
you
clarify
what's
going
on
here.
R
Sure
so
the
cost
proposal
that
10
submitted
to
us
actually
had
a
baseline
proposal
of
nine
million
dollars
for
the
straight
led
conversion
and
then
additional
for
a
network
lighting
management
system
update
to
lighting
code,
more
robust
community
engagement
strategy.
R
The
dow
kia
proposal
had
a
baseline
of
12
million
for
the
led
conversion,
but
they
were
able
to
add
some
additional
tasks
within
their
proposal.
That
would
have.
R
So
I
I
think,
if
I
could
explain
this
another
way,
I'm
sorry.
I
can
also
jump
into.
Q
It
yeah,
if
you
want
to
so
just
to
say
it
another
way.
We
received
multiple
proposals,
each
of
which
had
a
range
because
of
the
base
services
that
we're
contracting
for
and
different
elements
with
regards
to
public
engagement,
etc.
So
the
16
million
dollar
figure
isn't
that
10
gave
us
a
proposal
and
said
16.16
million
dollars
to
do
everything.
That's
scoped
out.
We
identified
16
million
as
the
appropriate
amount
to
come
to
council,
with
based
on
our
government
estimate
for
the
base
services
and
the
additional
public
outreach
component.
So.
M
16
million
was
just
domi
that
wasn't
a
request
that
10
that
wasn't
their
correct.
Q
R
M
R
The
contract
is
for
the
conversion
of
the
35
000
led
street
lights
to
high
pressure
sodium,
as
well
as
some
of
the
initial
study.
That
needs
to
be
done
in
order
to
spend
the
arp
funds
for
new
street
lights,
where
there
are
currently
none
and.
R
R
J
M
Well,
thank
you
for
answering
my
questions.
Whenever
you
know
there
was
some
outreach
to
me
about
the
four
million
discrepancy
or
the
difference
I
should
say
I
want
to
take
that
seriously
and
ask
those
questions.
So
thank
you.
Q
May
I
just
respond
also
to
a
question
we
received
via
email
just
to
address
it
here
as
well.
There
was
a
question
about
the
cost
savings
that
we
anticipate
having
as
part
of
doing
the
street
light
conversion
and
the
timing
of
when
we
would
expect
to
see
those
cost
savings
come
into
place.
Do
you
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
that
or
I
can
continue
so.
Q
Savings
not
only
in
the
cost
of
energy
consumption,
because
leds
use
less
energy
than
high
pressure
sodium,
but
also
in
the
maintenance.
So
high
pressure,
sodium
lights
have
a
useful
life
of.
I
believe,
two
to
three
years.
Leds
have
a
10-year
lifespan,
and
so
we
anticipate
those
monthly
checks
that
we
currently
pay
in
a
contractor
to
go
out
to
look
at
every
single
light
every
single
month
and
we
pay
for
that
touch.
Q
O
O
O
Sorry,
director
lucas,
I
couldn't
figure
out
that
was
you
on
the
screen,
my
apologies,
so
I
am
I
we
had
a
conversation
last
week
where
I
had
a
variety
of
questions.
O
I
think
I'd
like
to
first
confirm
my
what
I'm
understanding
is
in
front
of
us
today,
the
sixteen
thousand,
the
sixteen
million
dollar
authorization
today,
while
it
only
has
a
two
sentences
in
the
text
file,
you
sent
a
memo
for
us.
I
think
on
friday
that
says
that
this
bill
is
just
for
replacing
existing
lights.
R
I
do
want
to
clarify
that
as
a
part
of
this
authorization,
we
will
be
doing
the
initial
study
that
needs
to
be
done
to
locate
new
lights,
but
not
actually
installing
those
new
lights.
So
the
our
funds
will
be
authorized
separately
for
x
number
of
lights
to
be
determined
through
the
study
that
we're
authorizing
through
this.
O
Right
and
you
were
describing
that
you
had
these
like
a
form
that
all
of
the
people
who
submitted
proposals
filled
out
so
in
that
part
of
the
form
it
said
specifically
like
do
a
study
to
locate
new
locations.
I
I
expect
that's
what
it
said.
Yes,
we
don't
have
this
form.
That
was
part
of
the
rfp.
It
wasn't
part
of
the
rfp.
R
I
am
happy
to
share
them
now
if
they
were
not
previously
shared.
Okay,.
O
R
R
That's
to
collect
any
additional
data
that
may
not
have
been
part
of
the
cyclomedia
data
collection
to
do
the
study
and
then
actually
doing
the
the
study
for
how
we
would
go
about.
You
know
converting
35,
000
lights
right
and
where
it
might
be
required.
Great.
O
Great
so
for
200
000
we
could
get
started
right
away
with
that
study.
Absolutely
this
bill
has
another
16
million
another
15
million
800
000
that
it's
appropriating
to
change
the
current
lights.
R
Yes,
the
bulk
of
that
is
in
labor
and
material
to
convert
lights.
I
also
want
to
add
that
part
of
the
operational
piece
of
this
project
is
in
restoring
or
replacing
poles
that
may
need
to
be
upgraded
or
replaced
in
order
to
support
the
street
light.
There's
also
a
certain
amount
of
wiring
and
electrical
work
that
needs
to
go
into
this
project
so
but.
O
Only
for
the
current
footprint,
yes
for
the
current
footprint
of
where
lights
are
okay,
so
we
are
going
to
get
to
the
point
where
we
help
the
neighborhoods
with
who
have
inadequate
lighting,
but
that's
not
here,
except
for
the
200
000
part,
which
is
to
do
the
study
and
then
it
additionally
again
according
to
the
memo
which
the
public
doesn't
have.
O
It
says
that
this
company,
the
efficiency
network
that
is
called
an
acronym
10,
will
be
tasked
with
negotiating
a
new
utility
electric
terms
with
ducane
light,
because,
as
we
were
told
last
week
in
our
conversation
that
duquesne
lights,
our
current
contract
is
fixed
per
unit.
O
O
So
what
I'm
told
is
that
you
know
we
are:
we
have
a
current
contract
for
utility
per
for
electric
purchasing
and
that
there's
no
way
to
bring
down
that
payment,
no
matter,
even
if
we
turned
all
the
electric
street
lights
off
today.
O
R
Your
understanding
is
correct.
The
city
is
locked
into
a
per
unit
rate
for
with
our
energy
supplier,
based
on
the
number
of
street
lights.
We
currently
have,
as
a
part
of
converting
to
a
more
energy
efficient
street
light,
in
order
to
actually
recognize
those
energy
savings
where
we
would
need
to
negotiate
that
rate
with
our
energy
supplier,
so
that
that
piece
of
that's
a
important
piece
of
the
contract
for
us
to
actually
recognize
the
energy
savings,
and
it's
something
that
is
doable.
It's
just
a
another
piece.
R
Another
task
that
needs
to
be
complete
in
order
to
you
know
fulfill
the
project
objectives.
O
And
the,
and
when
did
we
enter
this
current
contract
with
duquesne
light.
S
This
is
assistant
director,
jennifer
olszinger,
omb,
councilwoman
gross.
To
answer
your
question
regarding
that
we
are
actually
speaking
with
them.
Now
we
have
a
meeting
with
brent
irvin
ben
smith
from
law
nrg,
which
is
the
current
supplier
to
duquesne
light
to
talk
about
that
amendment
in
negotiations
and
ten
will
be
involved
in
those
discussions
and
help
help
the
city
negotiate.
S
Those
better
terms
with
that
amendment
that
will
be
coming.
Probably
in
the
next
couple
of
months.
The
council
you've.
O
Help
me
with
that
part,
then,
okay,
so
we'll
all
agree.
Well,
there's
no
cost
savings.
Unless
we're
in
a
good
this
contract,
we
have
to
renegotiate
this
contract
so
that
there's
then
some
kind
of
metering
that
actually
says
how
much
energy
we're
using
and
that
that
energy
has
some
kind
of
relationship
to
how
we
get
billed,
but
when
they,
when
we
all
sit
at
the
table.
This
resolution.
O
O
Okay,
I
think
the
memo
that
we
were
sent
says
that
10
would
be
negotiating
I'll,
have
to
double
check
that,
but-
and
so
I'm
kind
of
figuring
out
who
this
this
organization
is
this-
the
efficiency
network
is
actually
a
subsidiary
of
duquesne,
light
holdings,
and
so,
if
they're
on
our
side
of
the
table
right,
if
we
invite,
if
we
invite-
but
we
allow
this
contract
to
go
forward
and
and
10-
is
either
sitting
next
to
us
on
our
side
of
the
city
table
or
is
there?
O
O
So
the
contract-
I'm
sorry-
I
found
the
language
the
contract
awardee
so
10
will
renegotiate.
The
monthly
unit
rate
is
what
is
the
what
the
department
of
mobility
and
infrastructure
memo
was
sent
to
council
this
week.
R
Those
are
that
was
my
language,
so
I'll
take
responsibility
for
it.
They
will
be
working
with
the
city
and
representing
our
interest
when
we
have
those
discussions
with
our
energy
supplier,
direct
energy,
which
is
a
different
entity
than
duquesne
light,
which
is
a
you
know,
a
utility
that
is
regulated
by
this
puc
further.
I
I
want
to
you
know,
address
the
question
of
the
relationship
between
dukane
light,
the
utility
and
10,
which
is
a
separate
entity.
R
They
are
sister
companies
or
affiliates
under
duquesne
light
holdings
which
also
owns
dqe.
I
believe
and
does
does
work
you
know
in
the
region,
so
they
are
separate.
There
are
puc
in
place
to
ensure
that
there's
a
separation
between
the
work
that
10
would
be
doing
from
what
duquesne
light
needs
to
do
and
the
standards
they
need
to
uphold
and
compliance
for
being
a
regulated
utility.
O
Right
so
that
that's
that's
the
conversation
about
rates
now,
let's
talk
about
the
actual,
led
lights
and
and
this
company's
record
with
them.
O
So
this
bill
again
is
not
doing
anything
more
than
spending
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
do
a
plan
for
where
lights
are
needed,
but
is
this
bill
does
authorize
the
spending
of
15
million
800
000
to
replace
current
lights
only,
and
we
have
you
know
not
had
much
time.
We
saw
this
bill
come
over
last
week.
Council
has
not
had
a
briefing
we've
just
done
a
little
bit
of
looking
into
it
ourselves
as
an
office,
and
my
office
looked
up
kind
of
where
10
has
done
other
projects.
O
You
said
that
in
researching
and
reviewing
all
of
the
proposals,
you
also
had
a
task
force
that
looked
into
you
know
how
well
these
have
turned
out.
So,
for
example,
I
believe
that
10
is
just
finishing
a
replacement
of
the
street
lights
in
cleveland,
and
I'm
looking
at
the
cleveland19.com
news
outlet
that
says
cleveland
street
lights
malfunction
causing
strobe
effects.
They
have
a
video
listed
that
I
won't
show
you
on
camera,
but
it
could
the
lights
on
superior
avenue
between
18th
and
26th.
O
All
in
unison
started
strobing,
an
entire
city
block,
maybe
two
maybe
more
than
city
blocks,
and
there
are
reports
also
of
the
streetlights
actually
completely
going
dark,
and
these
are
the
the
ten.
This
is
the
efficiency
networks
project
in
cleveland
this
year.
Can
you
speak
to
why
you
know
what
concerns
you
have
or
and
what
you
thought
when
you
saw
this.
R
R
R
Also,
one
of
the
things
that
sort
of
made
them
stand
apart
from
some
of
the
other
responses,
is
that
they
have
done
conversions
in
the
state
of
pennsylvania,
bethlehem,
scranton
in
harrisburg,
which
we
thought
you
know
was
a
sort
of
unique
thing
out
of
the
other
responses
we
received
to
have
that
more
local
experience
and
and
as
well
as
you
know,
the
size
of
the
the
cities
and
number
of
street
lights
being
comparable
as
well.
R
We
will
not
know
that
until
we
go
through
the
test,
one
in
the
rfp,
which
is
10
working
with
the
city,
to
look
at
a
selection
of
options
and
then
selecting
one
or
two
models
to
to
use.
10
is
brand
agnostic,
which
means
they're,
not
you
know,
affiliated
with
any
one
mana
manufacturer
they'll
bring
us.
You
know
several
options
to
the
table
for
us
to
consider.
O
Thank
you,
and
so
so
we
are.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
hear
you
say
this
clearly,
so
you
are
not
going
to
include
camera
technology
in
this
project.
R
That
was
not
a
requirement
of
the
the
rfp
that
was
not
expressed
as
interest
by
the
city
in
any
of
the
conversations
that
we
had.
I
cannot.
O
O
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
thought
it
was
important
to
get
that
stated.
I
think
forthrightly,
and
so
so
there
are
no
cameras,
but
even
in
other
cities
that
didn't
have
cameras.
I
what
we're
reading
is
that
and
I
apologize
we
again
I
feel
like
this
is
being
a
little
rushed
on
the
public
side
and
so
we're
trying
to
figure
out
this
technology
in
the
current
in
the
current
real
world
examples.
So
the
last
time
it
came
to
the
table
in
2018,
we
didn't
have
much
discussion
about
the
technology
per
se.
O
So
I
think
you
know
that's
what
we
were
looking
for
when
I
was
kind
of
clicking
around
last
week,
and
so
I
think
in
detroit
it
wasn't
a
10
project,
but
it
was
also
the
actual
lights
failed,
and
so
there
was
the
and
it
was
I
think,
they're
suing
the
manufacturer
and
having
to
do
replacements
did
you
did
you
have
concerns
about
particular
brands
of
these
led
lights.
R
Not
concerns
with
a
particular
brand.
I
will
say
that
the
warranty
is
incredibly
important
to
us
because
we
are
going
to
own
and
maintain
these
street
lights.
Once
they're
turned
over
to
the
city
as
a
part
of
the
contract,
we
will
manufacturers
warranty
for
any
equipment.
That's
a
minimum
of
10
years.
Some
offer
12
as
well
as
three
years
of
warranty
for
the
labor
and
work
performed
by
the
contractor.
R
Q
We
agree
and
as
part
of
our
market
research,
we
do
have
some
preliminary
data
on
that
and
we'll
absolutely
be
focused
on
that,
especially
as
the
department
that
will
be
responsible
for
ongoing
maintenance.
We
will
we
obviously
care
a
lot
about
making
sure
that
we're
selecting
a
product
that
has
proven
its
ability.
O
Right,
it
seems
like
in
detroit
they
went
dark
prematurely,
dimming
burning
out
and
having
to
be
replaced,
20
000
of
the
lights.
How
many
are
in
our
projected
replacement,
26
000.
O
000
and
in
detroit
20
000
of
them
had
to
be
replaced,
and
so
we'll
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
on
the
hook
for
replacing
nearly
100.
You
know-
or
you
know,
70
of
our
lights
after
putting
them
in
and
it
was
just
a
few
years
it's
what
I'm
seeing
in
media
from
the
detroit
news
this
year.
So
there
seem
to
be
reliability,
problems
right.
So
there's
a
promise
that
oh,
these
are
going
to
last
10
years
and
it's
great,
and
so
you
won't
have
the
maintenance
costs.
O
You
can
save
all
this
money,
but
if
they
fail,
then
you
have
an
even
worse
replacement
schedule
than
with
the
current
lights
who's.
I
can
never
remember
the
full
technical
name
of
the
hsp.
O
All
right,
so,
let's
move
on
so
I
believe
I
think
my
point
here
is
this
is
still
just
unreliable
technology
and
and
so
that's
concerning
and
then.
Secondly,
do
you
want
to
respond.
R
Yeah,
I
I
think
I
just
want
to
say
that
as
there's
going
to
be
issues
with
any
large-scale
infrastructure
upgrade,
I
don't
think
that
leds
are
less
reliable
than
high
pressure,
sodium
lights
and
this
maintenance
of
our
existing
system
is.
You
know
it's
taxing
on
us
because
of
the
age
of
the
infrastructure
as
well
as
the
technology.
So
we
you
know
we
will
put
forward
thought
into.
You
know
making
sure
that
we
select
the
most
dependable,
reliable,
sustainable
and
practical
system
for
us
to
maintain.
O
Is
that
you've
done?
That's
it
okay,
yeah!
So
I
am
concerned
about
some
of
the
maker
manufacturers.
I'm
definitely
concerned
that
the
ones
that
you
know
were
not
probably
the
same
manufacturers
in
cleveland
as
in
detroit,
but
both
sets
failed
and
so
we'll
want
to
know
that
for
sure
and
cost
millions
of
dollars
to
fix
you
know,
and
so
we
want
to
make
sure
to
avoid
those
problems.
I
want
to
move
on
then
some
from
reliability
and-
and
you
know,
manufacturer
defects
to
just
the
do.
O
Do
people
actually
want
led
lights,
and
I
know
that
you
put
out
a
survey
on
engage.
I'm
sorry,
I
don't
see
the
results
from
that.
I
feel
like
we
haven't
had
enough
discussion
about
this.
O
I
know
mayor
peduto
has
been
intending
and
wanting
to
do
this
and
and
putting
this
as
part
of
his
platform
for
many
years
now,
but
again
that
it
has
actually
rolled
out
some
places,
and
so,
instead
of
just
being
a
concept,
we
have
some
real
world
experience,
and
so,
with
the
led
lights
being
brighter
being
whiter,
you
get
negative
feedback
and
in
fact,
great
concerns
from
people
who
are
getting
older.
Like
myself,
we
start
to
have
night
vision,
issues
right,
and
so
you
have
glare.
O
I
think
councilman
burgess
has
spoken
before
about
how
he
doesn't
drive
at
night
for
these
issues.
So
it's
it's.
You
know
that
every
light
creates
a
kind
of
a
ring
of
glare
around
it
as
you're
driving,
and
so
these
lights
are
worse
than
the
current
lights
in
that
respect.
O
Similarly,
because
of
their
brightness,
which
is
supposed
to
be
a
virtue,
is
touted
by
the
industry
as
a
virtue,
even
if
you're
not
driving
a
car,
if
you're
walking-
and
they
have
these
very
discreet,
pools
of
light
where
they
shine
and
where
they
don't
right
and
that's
kind
of
a
feature
of
the
technology
that
people
get
night
blindness
because
you're
walking
into
bright
light.
You
know
how
it
is
when
you're
you're
in
a
dark
room
and
if
you
shine
a
bright
light
and
then
turn
it
off.
O
You
can't
see
and
so
and
that's
deeply
concerning
and
a
a
negative
feature,
let
alone
we
have
installed.
Some
4
000
led
lights
now
over
the
years
with
our
current
contractor
and
many
of
them
were
removed
because
people
just
hated
them
right.
So,
like
the
city
put
in
an
led
light
on
south
millville
avenue
and
then
in
broomfield,
where
I
represent
between
pen
and
friendship
and
people
hated
it,
and
I
think
it
started
to
stroke,
didn't
it
and
you
had
to
replace
it
and
you
put
back
the
old
technology.
O
R
I
can
find
out
for
you
what
municipalities
have
used
that
I
am
not
aware
of
one
offer
albuquerque.
Thank
you.
Albuquerque
new
mexico
was
one
of
the
case
studies
that
did
do
the
dark
skies
compliant
3,
500,
kelvin,
cct,.
R
O
Well,
I
will
definitely
look
into
that.
I
appreciate
the
one
example
there
and
I
think
I've
asked
most
of
my
questions
for
today,
but
I
it
really
brings
me
to
the
point
that
council
has
not
had
enough
information
about
this
project.
I
don't
think
the
public
has
had
enough
information
about
this.
This
project,
I
heard
quite
a
bit
of
media
blitz
in
the
past
week,
you're
on
the
confluence
this
morning
and
there's
been
articles
out
about
it.
So
I
don't
I
actually.
O
I
should
give
you
the
opportunity
to
talk
about
one
of
the
very
positive
features
that
it
looks
like
you've
built
in
that
it
hasn't
been
mentioned
yet,
which
is
that
there's
going
to
be
some
local
jobs
training,
but
I
didn't
hear
a
full,
a
full
discussion.
So,
if
you'd
like
to
to
talk
about
that
that'd.
R
Sure
one
of
the
the
strengths
of
the
ten
proposal,
this
election
committee,
you
know
was
happy
about-
was
the
workf
force,
development
side
and
so
10
presented.
I
think
a
very
enthusiastic
and
meaningful
participation
for
meeting
and
exceeding
disadvantaged
business
goals,
as
well
as
doing
building
into
the
project
on
this
workforce.
R
Development
piece
well
they'll
be
partnering
with
a
phillip
roundoff
institute
to
build
up
training
for
things
like
traffic
control,
some
of
the
surveying
and
inventory
there's
a
lot
of
jobs
that
are
going
to
come
a
lot
of
technical
skills
that
are
missing
in
you
know
the
existing
labor
pool
that
they're
going
to
work
with
this
institute
to
to
to
build
up
those
skills
so
that
local
residents
can
share
in
some
of
the
job
creation
and
work.
That's
going
to
be
happening
that.
R
O
Not
so
much
the
ongoing
labor,
but
the
kind
of
training
right
you
said
10
would
be
handling
and
partnering
with
this
institute
to
to
do
the
recruiting
and
training
for
local,
like
city
residents,.
Q
O
O
But
you
will
you
be
requiring
a
substantial
amount
of
residential
like
training
of
city
residents,
and
you
know
like
a
number
of
candidates,
size
of
classes.
Anything
like
that.
Q
That
was
not
a
technical
requirement
as
part
of
the
rfp,
which
is
why
we
were
impressed
and
appreciated
the
fact
that
10
included
it
as
part
of
their
proposal.
So
I
don't
know
that
we
can
actually
put
in
requirements
per
se,
but
we
absolutely
will
have
a
focus
on
that
in
our
negotiations.
J
O
I
know
that
you
offered
a
briefing
to
members
and
we
haven't
had
that
yet,
which
is
why
I
was
hoping.
I
talked
to
a
few
members
before
the
meeting
that
we
would
not
take
this
provisional
vote
before
a
briefing
it
seems
backwards,
and
so
I
had
hoped
that
we
would
hold
this
bill.
I
don't
know
that
unload
members
have
that
desire
today,
but
I've
taken
up
a
great
deal
of
time,
and
I
appreciate
you
answering
all
my
questions.
D
Good
afternoon
welcome
my
question
really
is
going
to
focus
or
my
questions
are
going
to
focus
on
the
rollout.
Can
you
are
you
able
to
speak
today
to
prioritization
of
neighborhoods,
which
would
see
the
upgrades
first
and
have
you
given
thought
to
that.
R
We
have
given
thought
into
the
types
of
criteria
that
we
would
consider
in
putting
together
a
phasing
plan,
so
critical
infrastructure
needs
areas
where,
based
on
the
existing
condition,
survey,
that
the
contractor
will
be
doing
where
they
find
you
know
critical,
unsafe
conditions.
Those
need
to
be
addressed
immediately.
R
There
will
be
a
geographic
element
to
this
to
make
sure
that
we're
putting
you
know,
crews
in
places
that
they
can
you
know,
do
the
conversion
in
an
efficient
manner.
The
sort
of
interesting
thing
here
is
that
the
the
time
element
is
not
in
the
actual
conversion
of
the
lights.
It's
really
in
the
planning
and
the
study
that
happens
in
advance
and
so
10
believes
that
they
can
convert
all
35
000
lights
within.
R
Q
G
D
Just
how
we'll
go
about
prioritizing
what
neighborhoods
might
see
upgrades
first,
they
is
not
helpful
to
me:
is
they
the
contractor?
Is
they
a
process
within
domi?
Who
actually
can
you
help
me
better
understand
who
will
actually
lead
the
process
by
which
will
determine
which
neighborhoods
would
see
upgrades
first.
G
Q
D
All
right
that's
a
much
better
answer.
I
can
so
a
cooperation
between
the
the
contractor,
offering
suggestion
if
you
will
or
recommendation
but
ultimate
authority
line
within
the
department
of
mobility
and
infrastructure.
Yes,.
P
Thank
you
acting
director
and
angie,
thank
you
for
being
here
today
being
there
today.
I
wanted
to
see
if
you
can
speak
to
the
energy
and
climate
goals
that
this
helps
to
accomplish
for
the
city.
R
Sure
so,
just
in
the
basis
of
technology,
leds
are
50
to
70
percent
more
efficient
than
the
high
pressure
sodium
lights.
I
would
say
the
high
pressure
sodium
lights
are
not
efficient
at
all
they're
inefficient.
R
They
have
a
very
high
burn
rate,
so
they
they
go
through
those
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
So,
by
converting
to
a
more
efficient
type
of
fixture,
we
will
be
reducing
our
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
Our
contribution
to
those
from
city
streetlights.
P
And
how
much
should
we
spend
per
year
currently
with
the
street
lights,
that
we
that
we
do
have?
I
know
a
portion
of
them
are
an
old
version
of
led,
but
it's
a
small
percentage.
So
generally,
what
are
we
spending
per
year
on
everything,
the
contract,
maintenance.
P
L
Thank
you
welcome
ang,
kim,
thank
you
for
being
here.
It's
just
two
quick
questions.
I
was
out
buying
my
christmas
lights.
Early
leds
are
like
four
times
as
expensive,
at
least
as
the
in
the
original.
I
understand
you
know.
Ten
year
life
span
versus
a
two
or
four
year
lifespan,
so
we're
going
to
have
savings
there
as
far
as
the
labor
goes,
so
I'm
thinking
down
the
road
10
years
from
now
when
we
have
to
replace
35
000.
What
is
the
cost
of
a
sodium
bulb
today
versus
a
led?
Do
we
know.
Q
R
The
leds
are
more
up
front
than
initial
cost.
I
think
part
of
the
issue
that
we
run
up
against
with
the
high
pressure
sodium
lights
is
right.
Now
you
can't
really
get
them
off
the
market
and
so
to
maintain
those
lights
where
we
don't
have
like
a
full
stock
or
inventory
inventory.
Excuse
me
of
those
pieces
and
parts.
We
have
to
constantly
kind
of
look
for
those
because
they're
just
not
as
widely
available,
because
the
industry
is
moving
to
led.
L
L
R
I
don't
have
stats,
but
you
know
anecdotally.
I
know
that
you
know
representatives
of
council
have
brought
to
our
group
concerns
with
existing
led
lights,
which
is
why
I'm
pleased
that
we're
able
to
convert
those
four
thousand
existing
leds
to
under
this
contract
because
they
do
have
issues.
Okay,.
L
And
my
main
concern,
I
I
feel
like
this
is
ultimately
a
good
thing,
I'll
be
in
favor
of
it,
but
10
the
operating
company
have
they
agreed
to
use
all
of
local
labor
unions
to
do
these
jobs.
Q
They
did
identify
a
labor
union
as
part
of
their
hiring
strategy.
They
have
exceeded
my
understanding
and
had
their
proposal
accepted
by
the
eorc.
Don't
want
to
mess
up
the
acronym,
and
so
we
do
think
that
they
have
a
very
competitive
package
that
they've
put
together
for
local
staffing.
L
And
I've
talked
to
some
of
the
labor
unions,
and
I
they
relayed
that
to
me
as
well.
I
just
wanted
to
hear
it
from
you,
you
too,
so
so
yeah
big
requirement
for
me
is
that
we're
using
our
local
labor
and
keeping
that
money
in
the
pittsburgh
area.
So
thanks,
thanks
for
being
here.
O
It
I
do
appreciate
that
the
goal
is
to
lower
energy
costs,
but
again
that
is
contingent
on
the
leds.
Firstly,
not
failing
and
then
secondly,.
O
Having
there
would
be
technically
energy
savings,
but
the
cost
savings
concomitant
with
the
energy
savings
would
have
to
be
negotiated
in
this
situation,
where
we
hypothetically
have
an
arm's
length
organization
of
two
cane
light
on
one
side
of
the
table
negotiating
with
a
arm's
length,
you
know
company
or
subsidiary
of
duking
light
sitting
on
the
opposite
side
of
the
table,
which
gives
me
pause,
I'm
still
not
very
confident
in
in
that
arrangement
being
the
best
way
to
negotiate
a
rates
that
we're
paying
that
reflects
the
hypothetical
lower
energy
use.
O
So
it
still
seems
like
there's
a
lot
of
ifs
there.
So
I
don't
feel
super
confident
in
that.
We
know
that
the
promise
of
led
lights,
the
industry
goal
the
industry
promise-
is
that
they
are
more
energy
efficient,
feel
free
to
respond.
R
I
I
wanted
to
just
add
one
additional
piece
to
the
comment
about
the
relationship
of
ten
to
duquesne
light
holdings.
We
did
not.
You
know
include
that
relationship
in
our
evaluation
of
the
responses.
This
election
committee
arrived
at
10
because
we
feel
they,
though
they
are
the
most
qualified
firm.
However,
before
we
made
the
you
know
official
award,
we
did
speak
with
our
city
law
department
to
ensure
that
there
may
not
be
you
know
any
potential
conflict
or
something
there.
Q
I
also
want
to
add-
and
hopefully
I
don't
regret,
adding
it
but
of
the
responsive
and
responsible
proposals
that
we
reviewed.
I
would
say
the
majority
that
we
interviewed
had
a
relationship
with
a
local
company,
so
whether
it
was
with
an
energy
provider
company
or
whether
it
was
with
our
maintenance
operations
company,
which
needs
to
also
be
rebid
in
the
next
year,
and
so
in
terms
of
the
industry
and
people
who
are
responsible
and
responsive
to
the
rfp.
Q
O
That's
why
we
ask
these
questions
at
the
table,
so
we
can
all
have
eyes
on
the
same
situations,
and
so
that's
that
sunlight
that
is
guaranteed
in
sunshine
laws
and
his
instructor
of
government
is
why
we
ask
these
questions
so
that
the
citizens
can
can
know
what
is
what
is
happening
right.
More
more
sunshine
on
the
situation
will
hopefully
also
provide
a
guarantee
of
of
propriety,
so
yeah.
O
But
so
thank
you
for
clarifying
that
just
in
between
rounds,
I
was
looking
to
see
if
albuquerque
had
actually
implemented
their
streetlight
replacements,
and
it's
not
clear
to
me
that
they
have.
It
looks
like
it
was
contracted
this
year,
but
it's
not
clear.
The
project
has
started.
We
were
saying
that
there
can
be
a
big
gap
in
between
when
a
city
moves
forward
with
the
project
and
the
streetlights
actually
get
in
because
of
the
planning
and
and
design
and
research
that
has
to
happen
first.
O
So
the
latest
I
see
was
that
a
contract
was
awarded
in
february
of
2021,
so
there's
probably
no
fee.
I'm
unaware
that
there's
any
feedback
from
people
in
albuquerque
of
lights
that
are
at
the
lower
kelvin
and
at
a
warmer
color.
So
if
there's
any
other
examples
of
cities
that
have
actually
done
what
you're
proposing
we
do
here,
that
would
be
helpful
and
if
you
can
get
that
to
me,
you
don't
have
to
have
it
on
the
spot.
O
Now
I
think
my
questions
are
finished,
mr
chair,
but
I
I
do
have
misgivings
of
moving
this.
You
know
contracting
award
forward
today,
especially
before
we
have
a
fuller
briefing
and
I
apologize
for
taking
so
much
time.
These
all
would
have
been
questions.
I
would
have
asked
in
a
briefing
that
we
probably
should
have
had
before
standing
committee.
A
Thank
you
any
further
discussion,
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye,
the
post
unopposed
motion
overseas
affirmative
recommendation
that
exhausts
our
public
works
committee.
So
we
will
now
go
back
to
our
first
bill,
which
was
bill
57
or
council's
edification
clarification
per
our
updated
rules
of
council
in
2016.
A
The
only
motions
that
are
not
debatable
are
recess,
adjourn,
table
or
motion
to
call
to
question.
Any
other
motion
is
debatable,
including
a
motion
to
hold
so
with
that.
With
that
being
said,
it
was
motioned
it
to
hold
for
two
weeks
by
councilman
coghill.
It
was
seconded
by
councilwoman
gross
and
reverend
burgess
wanted
ask
for
discussion
and
then
councilman
krauss
and
then.
D
N
My
background
in
parliamentary
procedures
goes
back
to
my
high
school
and
college
days
when
I
was
a
debate
coach
and
a
participant
in
the
national
forensic
league
and
the
nathan
catholic
league
and
the
nationals
which
is
now
the
national
speech
and
debate
association,
there's
an
event
called
congressional
debate
and
that's
how
and
I
taught
it
coached
it,
but
they
occur
on
individual
days.
They
are
not
a
sequence.
There
are
days.
So
in
those
events,
the
motion
to
hold
is
treated
equally
to
the
motion,
the
table.
N
It
is
not
exactly
the
same
as
congressional
rules
or
roberts
throughout
the
worst,
so
I
apologize
for
all
those
years
of
not
allowing
emotion
to
hold
be
debatable
because
that's
my
background
in
forensics
kind
of
back
in
my
mind,
reminded
me
not
to
do
that,
and
so
I
apologize
for
that.
Secondly,
my
preference
is
to
discuss
this
and
amend
and
then
hold.
N
I
have
no
problem
with
the
hold
it's
just
I
figured
we
might
as
well
have
the
discussion
on
what
we're
trying,
because
the
what's
presently
on
the
table
is
wrong,
but
the
the
the
numbers
are
wrong:
the
format's
wrong,
so
I'm
correcting
it,
and
then
we
can
have
a
conversation.
We
can
hold
it
for
four
weeks,
five
weeks.
It
doesn't
matter
to
me,
that's
it
so
to
my
my
thing
is
to
to
approve
and
then
discuss
and
then
hold
thank.
D
Thank
you
very
much,
so
my
issue
is,
is
is
larger
than
just
this
bill
alone.
It's
it's
the!
I
don't
know
the
road
we're
going
down
here
in
terms
of
communicating
with
one
another.
I
certainly
was
in
the
dark
as
to
what
was
being
discussed
in
the
committee
that
was
formed
to,
I
guess,
inform
members
as
to
what
actions
are
being
taken,
so
we
can
voice
our
opinion
or
a
vote.
D
D
Why
should
not
be
amended
and
the
councilman,
and
I
are
pretty
much
flying
by
the
seat
of
our
pants,
not
understanding
how
and
why
the
things
that
are
being
proposed
or
even
taking
place
and
that's
not
how
we
operate
as
a
council-
we've
never
operated
that
way,
we're
we
are
much
more
open
and
transparent
and
communicating
and
discussion
these
things
with
one
another.
So
what
I
didn't
appreciate
about
today
was
how
councilman,
wilson
and
I
kind
of
fell
through
the
cracks
and
really
had
no
idea
why
there
are
these
opposing
opinions,
which
ultimately.
D
B
J
M
M
I
don't
I'm
I'm
totally
in
the
dark
about
this
like
he.
It
doesn't
even
understand
the
whatever
was
happening
with
the
hold
and
whatnot,
but
I
represent,
like
someone
told
me
recently,
I
should
start
saying
them
an
expensive
date,
because
we
got
a
lot
of
things.
We
got
to
fix
up
on
the
north
side.
So
if
we're
just
gonna
leave,
you
know
kick
this
down
the
road
another
two
weeks
and
then
we're
waiting
around.
For
you
know,
that's
gonna
take
another
two
weeks
for
the
plan
or
you
know
on
how
we're
gonna
spend
the
money.
A
M
O
Thank
you
just
to
process
and
timing,
a
minute
for
mr
wilson
and
for
mr
krause
councilman
smith.
President
smith
has
required
us,
as
a
committee
of
councilman
burgess,
councilman,
coghill
and
myself
to
get
this
done
this
year.
In
fact,
we're
supposed
to
finish
up
before
the
end
of
this
month.
We
are
very
close
and
we
will.
My
understanding
was
that
this
would
not
be
on
the
agenda
today.
O
It
did
not
have
to
be
on
the
agenda
today
that
we
would
then
be
briefing
you
on
our
suggestions,
because
that's
what
we
were
tasked
with
right
was
to
bring
back
suggestions
to
council
members,
and
I
do
have
concerns
about
this
language
that
I
barely
saw.
I
think
I
might
have
had
an
email
over
the
weekend
or
late
last
week,
but
not
that
it
was
not
meant
for
today's
agenda.
O
I
didn't
read
it
as
closely
because
if
we
were
going
to
be
meeting
again
to
talk
more
about
this
proposed
language,
I'm
not
comfortable
with
this
language
and
to
councilman
wilson's
point.
Yes,
there
is
a
change
that
the
voters
voted
on
for
homo
charter.
It
does
not
match
this
language
in.
In
my
mind,
when
I'm
looking
at
it
here
now,
so
I
I
think
we
should
not
amend
with
this
language
that
it
actually
changes
the
the
intent
of
the
homeworld
charter
amendment.
So
it
wasn't
meant
to
be
on
the
agenda
today.
O
Therefore,
we
should
hold
it,
we
should
not
amend.
So
that's
that's
why
I
wanted
to
quickly
intercede.
Councilman
burgess
was
talking
on
the
motion
he
had
always
for
years
told
us.
There
was
no
discussion
on
emotional
hold,
which
he
now
clarified
is
not
our
rules
of
counsel.
So
I
do
appreciate
that
clarification
for
the
future,
but
I
suggest
that
we
just
move
forward
with
the
hold.
So
we
can.
We
can
fix
this.
O
We
can
talk
member
to
members
as
councilman
krause
requested
and
as
as
the
way
I
understood
president
smith
tasked
us
with
we're
we're
very
close
to
be
able
to
do
that.
A
A
L
Okay,
so
to
your
point,
councilman
kraus.
I
felt
that
way
also
with
the
task
force
with
the
arpa
funds.
You
know
I
felt
like
I
was
kind
of
in
the
dark
and
that's
what
task
force
do.
I
guess
they
go
and
they
bind
their
heads,
but
I
was
uncomfortable
in
this
amendment
today
because
I
didn't
have
a
chance.
We
didn't
have
a
chance
to
really
brief
the
both
of
you
and
whoever
else
feels
like
they're
in
the
dark.
I
thank
councilman,
burgess
and
councilwoman
gross.
L
I
feel,
like
we've,
had
really
productive
meetings
around
this,
but
until
you're
comfortable
with
it,
you
know
as
the
the
direction
it's
going.
That's
why
I
motioned
to
hold
for
two
weeks
in
doing
so
and
councilman
wilson.
You
know
I
couldn't
agree
with
you
more.
You
have
parks
that
want
to
be
fixed
up.
We
want
to
get
this
thing
rolling.
We
are
on
it.
I
just
feel
like
we
need
another
two
weeks
clarify
as
the
direction
we're
going,
so
everybody
can
be
well
informed.
L
I
wasn't
prepared
to
inform
you
as
to
the
exact
direction
we're
going
with
this
today.
I
think,
within
two
weeks
we
will
certainly
be
meeting
once
or
twice
before
that
time
and
from
there.
I
hope
you
know
everybody's
on
board
and
comfortable
that
we're
moving
in
the
right
direction.
So
so
that's
why
I
motioned
the
whole
for
two
weeks
and
I
still
stand
behind
that.
A
Thank
you
so
we'll
we'll
now
move
on
to
second
round
on
the
motion.
The
whole
councilman
wilson,
followed
by
councilman
krauss.
M
So
I
represented
the
district.
I
can't
wait
if
this
was
already
held
two
weeks.
I
think
we
need
to
work
around
the
clock
to
get
this
done
and
to
the
table
for
passage
as
soon
as
possible.
M
M
A
D
N
N
N
This
language
is
not
my
language,
it's
the
language
from
the
parks.
This
is
from
the
referendum.
Yes,
it's
from
the
referendum
itself.
That
says
basically
that
this
allows
other
people
to
put
money
in
it.
That's
all
it
does.
It
doesn't
doesn't
change
the
use
of
it
it
just
it
just
clarifies
that
this
fund
can
accept
money
other
than
the
money
you
put
in.
That's
the
only
purpose
for
it,
that's
what
I
take
out
of
it,
but
I
don't
know-
and
so
and
so-
and
so
I
did
give
this
was
written
by
our
budget
office.
N
I
did
give
it
to
the
committee
and
said
when
it
came
back
up.
This
would
be
the
template
we
would
work
on
and
so
no
one
we
didn't.
There
was
never
a
debate
of
something
different
when
this
was
put
on
the
table
today.
I
did
not
put
it
on.
It
came
from
the
clerk's
office
with
the
amendment
from
the
budget
office.
I
said,
okay,
we'll
just
make
this
the
working
document
and
hold.
N
It
was
never
my
intention
to
pass
it
or
to
rush
it,
but
you
need
a
starting
place
and
this
is
a
good
starting
place
to
have
the
conversation,
but
I'm
willing
to
do
it
in
whatever
way.
It's
just
that,
I
I
I
was
not.
I
am
there
are
times.
I
am
the
reason
that
things
are
moved
in
this
case.
I
am
an
innocent
party.
I
simply,
I
simply
I'm
simply
here,
and
so
my
thought
is.
D
Yeah
yeah
right
just
that
did
we
seek
legal
counsel
when
we
wrote
this
and
which
we
did
not.
It
was
written
by
bill
urbanic
or
mike
strelik,
one
of
the
two
or
a
combination
of
both,
but
it
didn't
pass
legal
muster
and
and
given
the
the
fact
that
we're
we
are
billing
in
a
very,
very
tumultuous
sort
of
contract
agreement.
D
Referendum
was
highly
charged
lots
of
different
opinion
on
both
sides
of
it.
But,
as
the
councilman
said
it
did
win,
you
know
50
plus
one
it
did
when
we're
going
to
implement
the
parking
tax,
or
I
mean
I'm
forgiving
me
the
parks
tax.
Mr
chair,
would
you
would
you
be
able
to
clarify
this
monies
that
are
being
collected
now,
because
tax
bills
have
gone
out?
I
paid
my
my
parks:
do
we
have
a
place
to
house
the
monies
as
we
speak?
D
D
D
So
I
would,
I
would
scold
and
charge
the
committee
with
assisting
us
with
creating
the
trust
fund
by
which
we
can
deposit
the
monies.
I'm
not
going
to
vote
to
support
a
an
amendment
today,
because
they
don't
fully
understand
the
birth
of
the
of
the
amendment
and
why
it
needs
to
exist
and
I
would
be
willing
to
hold,
but
I
don't
think
we
need
two
weeks
to
figure
this
out.
A
L
You
know
it
seems
to
be
the
will
of
the
body
if
council,
one
woman
gross
and
council
and
burgess
are
willing
to
get
together.
I
guess
in
the
next
week
and
come
up
with
the
language
that
we
need
to
make
you
comfortable
I'm
willing
to
hold
for
just
one
week.
If
it's
okay
with
the
rest
of
the
body,
I
would
have
to
withdraw
my
yes.
G
J
A
D
Motion
to
approve
with
brief
discussion,
please
thank
you.
Thank
you,
members
I
I
was
hoping
director
manuel
manuel
would
be
here.
I'm
not
sure
that
she
is.
D
If
she
isn't
that's
okay,
I
would
ask
members
if
we
could
proceed,
but
I
would
like
to
ask
the
questions
if
this
has
a
direct
impact
on
as
to
when
we
will
be
putting
or
at
least
hoping
to
schedule,
a
new
police
officer
class
and
when
that
might
occur,
but
I
can,
I
can
certainly
have
those
conversations
with
the
director
I'd
be
happy
to
bring
it
back
to
members
if
they
wish
to
to
have
further
information,
but
for
today
I
would
ask
members
to
please
pass.
A
Thank
you
any
further
discussion,
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye,
those
of
both
receive
infirmities
and
recommendation
that
takes
us
to
land
use
and
economic
development
committee
chaired
by
councilman
wilson.
First
new
papers,
bill
2093
bill.
K
2093
resolution
amending
resolution
number
377
entitled
arthur
watson,
the
mayor
and
director
of
permits,
licenses
and
inspections
to
apply
for
grant
funding
from
the
allegheny
county
department
of
community
and
economic
development's
act.
152
blight
removal
program
to
add
language,
to
allow
the
city
to
decrease
the
amount
of
the
grant
and
allow
the
city
to
accept
the
grant
and
to
spend
the
funds.
B
M
Motion
hold
94,
95,
96
separately
on
separate
dates
and
times
for
each
of
them.
A
public
cable
cast
public
hearing.
A
Lincoln,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye,
aye
aye,
you
oppose
all
bills
will
be
held.
That
takes
us
to
urban
recreation
committee
chaired
by
councilman
burgess.
One
new
paper
bill,
2020
21-21.
K
Bill
2121
resolution
authorized
and
pursuant
to
chapter
173
of
the
city
code
entitled
commission
on
naming
public
properties,
powers
and
duties,
subsection,
f
city
council
hereby
names
the
park
created
by
the
I-579
cap
urban
connector
project,
which
spans
over
a
portion
of
I-579
crosstown
boulevard
and
is
bounded
by
washington,
place
center
avenue
chapman
place
bigelow
boulevard
and
includes
land
to
the
north
of
bigelow
boulevard
as
frankie's
pace
park.
The
area
in
question
occupies
a
lot
block
numbers
2b
107
to
be
257,
2b,
406
and
2b
402.
A
K
2092
resolution
creating
the
one-stop
pga
permitting
technology
trust
fund,
in
which
a
technology
fee
collected
from
applicable,
one-stop
pga
permits
shall
be
deposited.
The
monies
deposited
in
said
trust
fund
shall
be
used
by
participation,
participating
departments
to
cover
expenses
associated
with
the
one-stop
pgh,
permitting
platform
for
ongoing
maintenance
and
enhancements
to
improve
customer
and
user
experience.
P
Thank
you.
I
see
that
we
have
director
kinter
here
to
answer
questions,
so
I
just
wanted
to
have
a
maybe
not
a
robust,
but
at
least
a
transparent
conversation
here
and
acting
director
norman
as
well
so
a
transparent
conversation
here
about
an
additional
trust
fund
that
we're
setting
up.
If
someone
can
just
explain
the
purpose
of
the
trust
fund.
Thank
you.
T
U
Sure,
thank
you,
director
councilwoman.
If
it's
okay
with
you,
I
can
provide
a
little
bit
more
context
or
you
guys
can
okay,
so
council
members
will
see
before
them
soon
a
fee
schedule
adopting
the
annual
fees
for
2022
and
participating,
one-stop
pgh
departments,
including
pli,
are
seeking
to
include
a
fee
to
support
the
one-stop
pgh
permitting
licensing
and
code
enforcement
system.
U
The
bill
before
council
today
proposes
a
trust
fund
for
council's
consideration
to
direct
those
funds
and
guarantee
the
future
funding
of
the
one
stop
pgh
system.
As
you
know,
we've
invested
a
lot
of
money
for
this
technology
system
and
software
as
a
service
requires
ongoing
maintenance
and
support,
and
this
is
a
potential
path
to
ensure
that
there
are
minimal
revenues
that
can
pay
for
those
annual
fees
in
annual
support
of
the
system.
U
Since
we
have
launched
starting
with
module
one
in
november
2019
for
licensing
and
our
most
recent
module
was
code
enforcement
in
may
2020,
with
permitting
and
city
planning
in
between
there
as
well.
We
have
had
a
really
great
user,
a
huge
user
base.
You
know
thousands
of
customers
that
are
using
one
stop
pgh
and
a
lot
of
requests
for
enhancements
and
improvements
of
the
system,
and
we
want
to
ensure
that
our
customers
see
changes
that
are
beneficial
to
them,
as
well
as
our
staff
to
improve
that
system
over
time.
P
Thank
you
both.
So,
if
you
can
remind
us,
I
think
director
kinter
your
best
suited
for
this
by
2022
when
this
the
schedule
goes
into
effect
and
we'll
be
collecting
funds
and
depositing
into
this
trust
fund.
What
services
will
one
stop
pgh
cover
at
that
time,
those
for
the
publix
and
the
council's
editing
sure.
U
Yeah
we
have
rolled
out
a
few
different
modules.
We
now
have
all
the
development
agencies,
development
agencies
in
the
city
of
pittsburgh
in
the
same
sandbox.
So
we
all
work
through
one
stop
pgh.
It
is
the
place
where
we
intake
permits
licenses,
domi
applications,
zoning
and
development
review
applications,
and
it
is
also
the
place
where
we
manage
our
code
enforcement
workflows
for
complaints
that
come
into
3-1-1.
U
P
Okay,
thank
you.
I
will
open
it
up
to
council
colleagues
for
questions.
Those
are
the
extent
of
my
questions.
I
appreciate
you
both
being
here
today
and
helping
to
understand
that
a
little
bit
better.
L
Just
have
one
one,
quick
question:
you
know
the
way
the
system
once
stopped
pittsburgh
set
up.
It's
great.
I
think
it
you
know,
saves
people
trips
downtown
to
you,
know
congestion
parking,
you
name
it,
but
do
we
still
have
director
kinter
a
system
where
somebody
can
come
in
and
apply
for
their
permit
at
a
desk.
U
So
we
don't
have
that
yet,
but
we're
getting
there.
So
our
next
move
is
to
412
boulevard
of
the
allies
slated
for
this
spring
2022
and
when
we
reopen,
we
will
have
moved
away
from
the
old
system
where
you
would
have
to
go
to
maybe
domi's
counter
and
then
zoning's
counter
and
then
pli's
counter
and
stand
in
three
different
lines
for
your
development
process.
We
will
have
one
counter:
the
one
stop
pgh
counter
where
we
can
consolidate
that
intake
and
customers
can
have
a
more
streamlined
process.
L
I'm
so
glad
to
hear
you
say
that
director
kinter,
because
in
voting
for
you
know
the
sale
of
the
property
at
412.
You
know
that
was
a
requirement.
It
was
before
you
as
director
kennedy.
I
believe,
and
I
said
we
still
want
a
desk
where
people
can
come
in.
There
are
still
a
lot
of
people
out
there
believe
it
or
not,
who
aren't
using
modern
technology
and
would
like
to
actually
see
and
talk
to
a
person
with
their
plan
or
their
plans
and
get
their
approval
or
disapproval
at
the
desk.
L
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that's
always
available
and
that
it's
going
to
be
up
and
running.
So,
as
I
understand
right
now,
we
have
no
place
where
you
can
go
and
apply
in
person,
but
once
we
get
412
underway,
then
we
will
have
a
desk
just
as
they
always
did.
They
could
come
downtown
if
they
wish.
Is
that
right
right?
A
K
K
2076
resolution
authorizing
the
ura
to
acquire
all
the
city's
right
title
and
interest
and
into
the
following
publicly
owned
properties
in
the
fifth
ward
designated
in
the
deed
registry
office
of
allegheny,
county
blocked,
10
k
lot
to
94,
95
95,
a
95
b,
96
and
99,
located
on
the
west
side
of
elmore
street
between
wiley
and
webster,
avenues
on
the
east
side
of
worcester
street
between
wiley
and
webster
council
district.
Six.
A
K
Bill
2077
resolution
approving
execution
of
a
contract
for
disposition
by
sale
of
land
between
the
ura
and
fifth
and
then
with
east
development,
llc
or
a
related
entity
for
the
seller
block
11
e
lots,
19
20
22
24,
25,
26,
27,
28,
29,
30,
31,
56,
57,
58,
59,
60,
68,
61,
62,
63,
64,
65,
65,
8,
66,
67,
68,
69,
70,
71,
72,
73
and
85
being
formerly
designated
as
blocks.
11
e
lots,
81,
82
and
85
in
the
third
ward,
six
council
district.
O
Thank
you,
councilman
level.
I
just
wanted
to
give
you
an
opportunity
to
comment,
since
you
had
three
consecutive
bills
here
with
a
great
deal
of
transfers
and
some
of
them
look
like
some
really
exciting
projects
like
the
crawford
grill
project
and
this
one
here
on
fifth
and
did
dinwiddie.
I
think
I
did
get
briefed
on
it,
but
I'm
less
familiar
and
it's
a
great
number
of
parcels-
and
I
just
thought
you
might
want
to
just
share
with
us
any
good
news.
A
Sure
the
first
one
regarding
the
crawford,
grill,
franco
harris
and
a
number
of
other
individuals
are
looking
to,
hopefully
in
the
near
future,
begin
reviving
and
bringing
back
to
life
the
crawford
grill.
These
are
the
parcels
around
it
so
that
if
and
when
they
can
actually
move
forward,
we'll
have
the
additional
parcels
around
it
to
support
that
development,
either
by
potentially
adding
an
addition
onto
the
building
potentially
using
it
as
parking.
A
If
you
know
where,
at
the
bottom
of
fifth
indemnity
there
used
to
be
a
public
works
facility
on
the
right-hand
side,
if
you
were
looking
up,
then
woody
and
the
development
would
be
on
both
sides
of
the
street,
so
there'd
be
a
building
a
and
a
building
b,
and
so
this
is
transferring
the
property
so
that
development
can
move
forward.
G
K
M
Yes,
this
is
in
the
brighton
heights
area,
going
down
towards
woods
run
and
the
community
has
been
working
on
a
plan
with
allegheny
land.
Trust
to
you
know,
turn
us
into
a
park
in
a
green
space,
and
it's
something
that
they've
been.
This
is
a
site
of
an
old
hospital,
the
old
saint
john's
hospital,
and
so
this
is,
you
know:
community
supported
and
they're
very
eager
to
move
this
along
and
and
see
this.
This
development
take
place.
A
O
A
D
A
K
2083
resolution
authorized
in
the
ura
to
acquire
all
the
city's
right
title
and
interest
if
any
and
into
the
following
publicly
owned
properties
in
the
25th
and
the
26th
ward
of
the
city
designated
in
the
deep
registry
office
of
allegheny,
county
north
side
of
bright
ridge
street
between
brighton
road
and
north
charles
street
511,
chester,
avenue
and
south
side
of
chester
avenue.
West
of
holyoke
street
council
district.
Six.
O
Thank
you.
I
I've
been
talking
to
some
members
about
this
and
additionally,
members
and
staff
at
the
ura,
and
even
it's
been
a
little
while,
but
many
weeks
ago
now
with
members
of
the
administration
at
pnc
because
of
preservationist
concerns
around
the
skinny
building,
which
is
the
city's.
O
I'm
sorry
for
the
background
noise,
the
the
second
skinniest
building
in
in
the
world,
we're
told
it's
got
its
own
wikipedia
page
and
you
can
go
to
see
it.
O
I
am
hoping
that
we
can
find
an
agreement
where
we
don't
sell
the
entirety
of
the
property
to
pnc,
but
that
they've
agreed
in
theory
to
partner
with
the
preservation
organization,
and
I
would
love
to
see
it-
have
a
council
table
stronger
enforcement
on
preservation
and
this
disposition
does
not
include
those
guarantees
for
the
public,
and
I'm
told
that
councilman
lavelle
has
something
to
add
so
I'll
defer.
A
Sure
why
would
I
would
add
that
the
guarantees
for
the
public
are
on
the
ura
side,
so
on
the
uras
on
in
our
resolution,
when
we
were
moving
this
forward,
we
put
in
place
a
99-year
covenant
with
pnc,
where
they
are
actually
not
allowed
to
demolish
it,
and
even
if
they
ever
sold
the
building,
they
would
not
be
allowed
to
demolish
it.
They
have
to
maintain
the
facades.
They
cannot
re
redo,
the
building
they
have
to
maintain
them
as
currently
is
they
have
to
bring
them
up
to
up
to
date,
there
was
austin.
A
I
was
trying
to
pull
it
up,
also
as
a
condition
precedent
to
closing
pnc
had
to
has
to
enter
into
an
agreement
with
a
third
party
preservation
partner,
to
provide
guidance
and
assistance
on
preservation
activities
for
that
for
the
building
itself.
So
there
and
there's
more.
I
couldn't
find
it
all
in
time,
but
there
are
a
number
of
covenants
that
I
can
certainly
get
and
provide
to
council
on
the
uras
and
on
what
pnc
can
and
cannot
do
with
this
building,
but
the
intent
is
to
actually
preserve
it
as
the
world-class
skinny
building.
O
A
I'm
okay,
we
can.
We
can
certainly
amend
the
bill
on
tuesday
to
provide
the
language
that
I
just
read
to
be
a
part
of
our
resolution
as
well.
O
That,
I
think,
would
provide
comfort
to
a
lot
of
of
interested
parties,
and
so
I'd
be
happy
to
just.
We
can
talk
about
that
this
week.
A
D
Thank
you.
Thank
you
all
I
have
no.
I
also
have
to
say
thank
you
for
doing
that.
I
appreciate
that
I
was
gonna.
Ask
if
you
would
please
share
the
the
covenant
with
the
council,
but
making
part
of
the
resolution,
which
I
agree
with
councilwoman
gross
on,
is
the
perfect
avenue
to
pursue.
So
thank
you
and
why
are
we
having
a
meeting
next
monday.
D
A
A
K
Each
contingent
upon
the
mayor
and
director
of
finance
first
entering
into
a
corporation
agreement
with
the
ura
setting
forth
the
rights
and
obligations
of
the
city
and
the
ura
related
to
this
initial
conveyance
and
further
setting
for
the
rights
and
obligations
of
the
city
and
the
ura
relating
to
the
subsequent
disposition
of
this
property
to
third
parties.
Council
district,
one.
O
M
This
is
community
driven.
This
is
troy
hill
citizens,
they're
gonna
work
with
us
on
a
rfp.
This
actually
relates
to
the
other
bill.
The
previous
week.
A
O
I'll
first
say:
motion
to
approve
our
intent
is
to
hold
that
motion
to
approve
a
discussion.
Second,
so
I'll
just
say,
I
was
surprised
that
this
was
under
intergovernmental
affairs
and
not
land
use.
I'm
just
not
sure
why
why
it's
there,
but
maybe
because
there
are
sections
about
other.
O
I
don't
know
if
we
kept
the
sections
that
were
about
other
governments
or
other
water
companies
or
something.
But
I
know
we've
had
a
lot
of
discussion
about
this,
and
I
know
that
as
co-sponsors,
we
are
still
working
out
with
so
many
versions
of
input
from
city
law
department
from
the
activists
and
get
the
let
out
group
our
own
pli
department
and
so
I'm
supportive
of
holding.
While
we
continue
to
work
on
the
language
I
wanted
to
see,
if
any
of
the
other
co-sponsors
wanted
to
speak
to
it.
P
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
Thank
you
councilman
gross,
and
I
am
in
favor
of
holding
the
bill
for
one
week
as
well.
We,
as
you
heard
at
public
comment
today,
we
do
have
some
additional
details
to
work
out
in
the
bill
that
are
really
really
important
and
we're
not
quite
there
yet.
P
So
I
support
holding
it
for
one
week,
but
I
do
want
to
thank
everyone
who
has
been
involved
up
to
this
point,
including
the
get
the
let
out
coalition
and
councilwoman
gross
and
councilman
wilson
and
councilman
o'connor,
and
the
law
department
and
director
kinter
from
pli
and
the
mayor's
office.
So
thank
you
to
everyone,
who's
put
in
a
lot
of
time
over
the
last
two
years
and
will
continue
to
discuss
and
hammer
out
the
details.
A
It
will
be
held
one
week
on
that
exhaust
our
agenda.
We
do
have
some
meeting
announcements
on
wednesday
november
3rd
at
1
pm
council
will
hold
a
cable
cast
public
hearing
on
bill.
1885
as
it
relates
to
the
renaming
of
roberto
clemente
drive
to
roberto
and
vera
clemente
drive.
Speaker
registration
will
close
at
11
30
a.m.
Wednesday
morning
to
register,
fill
out
the
sign
up
form
on
the
council
meeting
webpage.
You
may
also
call
the
city
clerk's
office
at
412-255-2138.
A
Also,
on
thursday
november
4th
at
10
a.m,
council
will
hold
a
cable
cast
public
hearing
on
bill
1867,
as
it
relates
to
the
residential
parking
permit
program.
Speaker
registration
will
close
at
9am
thursday
morning
to
register,
fill
out
the
sign
up
form
on
council
meeting
webpage.
You
may
also
call
the
city
clerk's
office
at
412-255-2138.
A
Next
week,
council
will
hold
our
regular
meeting
on
monday
november,
8th
at
10
a.m
and
our
standing
committee
meeting
on
tuesday
november
9th
at
10
a.m,
and
then,
lastly,
but
certainly
not
least,
we
all
want
to
collectively
say
congratulations
to
ms
kim
clark
baskin,
our
assistant
clerk,
who
received
the
mayor's
employee
of
the
month
award
last
friday.
We
want
to
thank
her
for
her
service.
I
don't
need
to
counsel
but
to
all
the
residents
of
the
city.
So
congratulations
and
thank
you.