►
From YouTube: Housing Opportunity Fund Meeting - 3/3/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
D
E
A
F
A
Okay,
thank
you
just
for
the
just
for
marches
minutes
want
to
make
sure
we
get
that
right.
Okay,
all
those
in
favor.
A
And
okay
minutes
stand
approved,
we'll
next
move
on
to
public
comment.
J
And
if
thomas
is
not
here,
then
megan
conference.
A
Megan,
you
can,
you
can
begin.
J
Thank
you
kelly
good
morning,
everyone,
my
name,
is
megan
confront
hammond.
I
am
the
executive
director
of
the
fair
housing
partnership
of
greater
pittsburgh
to
do
a
couple
of
fair
housing
updates
for
the
city,
so
that
you
know
april
is
fair
housing
month.
J
Be
sending
out
information,
particularly
on
an
event
regarding
the
fair
housing
protections
for
survivors
of
domestic
violence,
and
we
have
city-specific
protections
as
well
as
efforts
that
are
happening
on
a
state
level
to
make
explicit
protections
possible,
and
so
that
will
be
along
with
other
events.
J
Also,
I
want
to
raise
that
it
is
you
know
going
into
march,
and
you
know
I
would
like
to
be
involved
directly
and
regularly
with
the
fair
housing
committee
I
have
reached
out,
but
I
haven't
received.
You
know,
engagement
back
and
I
have
dedicated
the
time
specifically
to
do
a
deep
dive
into
the
application
of
fair
housing
into
the
hos
programs.
As
we
talked
about
in
the
past,
is
that
you
know
we
need
the
time
and
effort
in
order
to
apply
equity.
J
You
know
across
the
program,
output
and
the
assessment,
and
so
I
am
ready
and
available
with
time
dedicated
to
this
specific
task,
and
so
I
asked
to
engage
with
and
speak
with
regularly
the
fair
housing
committee
on
the
actual
work
of
applying
this
information
in
a
way
that
is
equitable
for
the
affordable
housing
of
our
city.
I'll
also
share
is
that,
as
we
are
seeing,
the
evictions
increase,
as
the
e-wrap
program
is
ending
and
rent
relief
is
going
back
to
its
pre-covet
state.
J
Is
that
we
are
continuing
to
get
cases
in
the
city
regarding
fair
housing
in
which
families
with
children
are
denied
housing
in
the
private
market
because
they
have
children.
There
are
two
active
complaints
at
the
complaint
level
with
investigation
in
the
city
right
now,
and
so,
while
the
private
market
is
not
specifically
to
the
hof
programs
is
to
be
aware
of,
you
know
we're
seeing
families
looking
for
housing
having
not
simply
evictions
but
non-renewals,
and
then
the
acts
of
discrimination
that
are
precluding
access
to
the
next
house.
J
And
then
let
me
also
close
with
making
a
formal
statement
that
you
know
we
saw
formally
that
e-wrap
is
is
announced
its
ending,
and
so
I
implore
the
hof
to
consider
how
the
hsp
can
learn
from
eram
and
potentially
consider
the
hsp
taking
over
the
city
applications
in
the
e-wrap
program
and
how
that
hsp
is
what
we
have
now
with
e-wrap
closing
regarding
rent
relief
and
how
to
benefit
the
residents
of
pittsburgh
with
the
program.
H
A
You
megan
is
our
other
public
commenter
prepared
to
speak
at
this
time.
L
A
So
we
have
it
so.
Thank
you
adrian.
I
I
made
a
note
to
myself
to
put
make
sure
I
address
that
in
our
administrative
items,
but
this
is
an
excellent
time.
There
is
a
doodle
megan.
Just
for
information
is,
we
have
not,
unfortunately,
have
not
convened.
We
have
not
excluded
you,
I'm
not
sure
which
is,
but
we
have
not
been
excluding
you,
but
we
have
not
actually
been
able
to
land
on
a
date.
A
There
is
currently
a
doodle
out
to
half
members,
which
was
fairly
expensive,
trying
to
find
a
date
for
the
month
of
march,
and
when
we
narrowed
that
down
to
two
or
three
dates,
I
was
going
to
reach
out
to
you
just
to
check
your
availability
and
select
a
date.
A
So
unfortunately
you
have,
you
haven't
actually
missed
anything
or
fortunately,
in
that
we
are
not
excluding
you
depending
on
how
you
look
at
it,
but
we
are
working
forward
to
get
you
know
cooking
with
gas,
as
my
great
aunt
says,
starting
in
starting
in
the
month
of
march.
So
thank
you
adrian
for
for
bringing
that
kelly.
A
So
I
believe
our
other
public
commenter
is
not
present.
So
we'll
move
forward
with
a
presentation
by
matt
media
of
neighborhood
athletes
working
on
housing
preservation.
M
Thanks
kelly
good
morning,
everyone
thanks
for
your
time
and
for
having
me
today.
I
don't
have
any
slides
to
present
so
either
sorry
or
you're.
Welcome,
depending
on
your
opinion
of
powerpoint,
but
wanna
just
spend
a
few
minutes
talking
about
the
preservation,
working
group
and
then
happy
to
take
any
questions
or
or
really
any
comments
around
our
work
and
where
you
all
think
we
can
be.
We
can
be
going
so.
M
The
preservation
working
group
is
a
group
of
individuals
who
are
in
organizations
that
primarily
work
on
affordable
housing,
sort
of
at
the
city-wide
or
even
regional
level.
M
M
That
group
has
since
grown
to
include,
say
20
to
25
sort
of
regular
participants
in
in
the
group,
and
the
goal,
quite
simply,
is
to
make
our
ecosystem
for
preservation
better.
It's
really
just
sort
of
as
simple
as
as
that.
I
think
the
the
value
proposition
of
preservation
is
pretty
obvious,
but
let
me
just
just
say
that
one
while
we're
not
talking
about
creating
new
units
of
affordable
housing,
we
were
talking
about
preserving
existing
housing
ergo.
M
We
are
keeping
strain
off
of
the
existing
affordable
housing
system
by
making
sure
that
quality
and
affordable
current
units
that
are
currently
of
quality
and
are
affordable
are
kept.
M
The
other
thing
to
keep
in
mind
that
I
think
is
also
pretty
obvious-
is
that
preserving
a
unit
of
housing
is
cheaper
than
constructing
a
new
unit
of
housing
right,
so
we
are
seeing
you
know,
250,
000
and
up
per
unit,
and
that's
only
getting
worse,
based
on
sort
of
supply,
chain
and
construction
market
activity
for
new
construction
versus
preservation.
M
We
see
units
that
are
livable
might
need
a
little
bit
of
work,
but
are
livable
and
can
be
purchased
for
anywhere
from
50
to
100
000
per
unit,
so
from
a
financing
perspective
and
a
cash
flow
perspective,
you're
actually
talking
about
projects
that
are
oftentimes
more
viable
or
just
maybe
easier
to
pull
together
your
capital
stack.
M
So
I
I
think
again
that
that
kind
of
sort
of
the
conceit
of
the
the
group
is
relatively
obvious
right.
What
are
we
working
on
specifically
so
I'd
say
we
work
in
two
areas.
The
first
is
what
I'll
call
the
acute
or
emergency
affordable
housing
crisis.
This
is
where
a
litec
project
with
some
other
you
know
regulated
housing
stock
apologies
goes
on
the
market
or
is
otherwise
sort
of
lost.
M
Think
of
you
know
the
penn
plaza
crisis
or
what
happened
in
homewood
and
a
couple
other
in
wilkinsburg,
the
home
of
bethesda
housing
a
few
years
ago.
How
can
we
identify
those
properties
before
they
come
a
problem
not
after
in
some
cases,
it's
too
late?
How
can
we
make
sure
that
tenants
are
protected,
that
responsible
buyers
and
developers
can
sort
of
be
introduced
to
the
system
so
again,
working
on
that
sort
of
at
a
holistic
kind
of
ecosystem
level?
M
A
couple
specific
things
in
that
space
that
we're
working
on
one
is
from
the
very
early
stages
of
thinking
about
some
recommendations
around
right
of
first
refusal,
which,
if
you're
not
familiar,
would
give
a
a
either
public
buyer
or
community
based
buyer
the
opportunity
to
purchase
a
regulated
piece
of
affordable
housing
before
it
could
sort
of
go
on
the
market.
M
This
is
something
that
is
used
in
a
couple
other
cities
around
the
country,
but
is,
I
think,
we're
learning
that
it's
not
always
playing
out
as
intended,
and
so
we're
trying
to
figure
out
sort
of
what
makes
those
that
kind
of
a
system
work
and
where
might
it
not
work?
So
in
the
early
stages
of
that,
and
that
would
be
a
sort
of
a
local
intervention.
M
M
One
of
the
things
that
we
are
calling
for
is
in
the
actually
in
the
litec
application
is
a
disclosure
of.
If
you
are
a
developer,
who
has
essentially,
you
know,
flipped
a
property
or
otherwise
let
the
affordability
restrictions
on
a
property
expire
that
you
would
have
to
disclose
that.
I
think
we
would
go
as
far
to
say
that
you
should
probably
be
that
you
should
be
prohibited
from
getting
new
tax
credits
in
the
the
future.
But
the
way
that
sort
of
playing
out
is
that
it
would
be
a
point
deduction.
M
So
that's
something
that
we're
we're
advocating
for,
and
I
think
phfas
is
receptive
to
that.
The
other
thing
is
obviously
funding
dedicated
funding
for
for
preservation
that
would
come
from
the
state.
The
state
does
not
want
to
see
low
income
housing
tax
credit,
particularly
those
units
lost
to
market.
M
They
view
that
as
sort
of
a
a
net
negative
on
the
year
right
when
they're
thinking
about
how
they've
allocated
low
income,
housing,
tax
credits,
but
there's
always
going
to
be
some
financing
gap
on
those
on
those
transactions,
so
we're
also
calling
for
some
dedicated
funding
there.
M
M
So
again,
we
are
working
to
identify
those
properties
and
then
identify
credible
buyers
for
them.
Unfortunately,
in
the
situation
here
is
that
we
are
competing
with
the
open
market
and
we
are
often
competing
with
cash
buyers,
who
you
know,
don't
particularly
care
about
whether
or
not
the
the
transaction
will
pencil
out
for
affordable
rents
because
they
are
looking
to
increase
the
rent
with
minimal
changes,
minimal
capital
improvements
to
the
property.
You
can
actually
actively
see
how
this
plays
out
when
properties
hit
the
market.
M
M
That
means
that
really,
the
thing
that
we
need
is
a
sort
of
community
of
folks
who
care
about
preservation
is
faster
capital
and
easier
capital
access.
So,
in
that
space
we're
really
working
hard
on.
How
can.
B
M
Almost
a
line
of
credit
type
facility
that
a
developer
could
access
so
that
they
can
make
a
competitive
offer
when
a
property
hits
the
market.
The
other
thing
I
would
say
about
that
work
is
that,
unfortunately,
it
is
primarily
occurring
outside
of
the
city
of
pittsburgh,
so
within
allegheny
county,
but
outside
of
the
city
limits.
I
am.
M
Lost
many
of
those
naturally
occurring
properties
that
could
be
purchased,
for
you
know
relatively
cheap.
I
think
in
most
neighborhoods
in
the
city
that
ship
has
already
sailed
on,
unfortunately,
but
there
I,
I
don't
think
that
there
are
no
opportunities
left.
I
just
think
that
it's
an
important
point
that
we
really
need
to
act
in
this
space
now,
the
last
thing
I'll
say,
is
sort
of
the
biggest
challenge
that
we
face
as
a
grouping
that
we
see
in
the
ecosystem
is
actually
not
not
the
capital.
M
It's
not
the
legislation,
it's
not
the
data,
which
is
something
we're
also
always
looking
at.
It
is
capacity,
it
is
having
buyers
and
developers
who
are
focused
on
preservation
who
know
how
to
purchase
a
property.
Keep
tenants
in
it
make
improvements
while
sort
of
managing
that
that
transition,
without
losing
both
the
affordability
and
losing
the
the
quality
of
life
for
the
tenants
who
already
live
there
and.
H
M
Just
short
on
both
non-profit
and
for-profit
buyers
that
have
experience
in
that
space
and
have
the
ability
to
attract
financing
for
that
space.
So
I
think
that's
the
the
biggest
the
biggest
challenge
and
something
is,
as
you
all
are
in
your
communities
or
in
your
various
workspaces
that
I
would
ask
and
really
encourage
you
to
be
thinking
out,
be
thinking
about
and
keeping
an
eye
open
for
those
sort
of
credible,
credible
buyers.
G
M
Yes,
I
do,
I
do
we
have
a
one
pager
for
the
group
and
I'll
I'm
gonna
share
that
with
becca,
and
you
can
search
blade
or
somebody
else.
Thank
you.
Thanks
daniel.
E
So
matt
this
is
derek,
is,
is
the
strategy
to,
I
guess,
put
together
a
fund
to
start
to
acquire?
E
M
So
it's
it's
definitely
both
derek.
It's
a
good
question.
I
we
probably
spend
more
time
and
sort
of
more
energy
on
the
funding
side.
I
think
just
naturally
because
we
all
know
that
there's
a
need
there.
We
also
think
that
you
know
american
rescue
plan
funding
at
the
county,
although,
unfortunately
it
appears
the
county
might
have
spent
all
their
their
funding
already
and
at
the
city
which
did
allocate
money
specifically
for
preservation
can
be
used
for
this,
so
in
both
of
those
cases.
M
So
in
the
case
of
the
city,
we're
happy
to
see
that
we'd
love
to
see
that
I
think
it
was
five
million
dollars
increased,
but
five
million
is
a
great
start,
we'd
love
to
see
sort
of
a
matching
program
at
the
county
and
we're
talking
to
them.
I
do
think
that
the
state
will
be
it
will
take
longer
but
have
more
impact,
or
I
guess
I
should
say
it
will
just
be
a
larger
fund
there.
M
Hopefully
again,
they
have
a
lot
of
american
rescue
plan
dollars
that
they
could
potentially
devote
to
this.
I
think,
even
without
that,
phfa
recognizes
the
need
for
this,
and
so
is
is
sort
of
thinking
creatively
about
how
they
can
so
so
right
now
in
a
low
income,
housing
tax,
credit
application.
You
know,
preservation
is
a
focus
area,
so
it's
not
us
that
they
don't
care
about
it,
but
you're
still
competing
against
all
the
new
construction
projects,
supportive
housing,
senior
housing,
all
that
stuff.
So
having
something.
M
That's
really
much
more
focused
on
preservation
coming
out
of
the
state,
I
think,
is
sort
of
mid-range
an
attainable
goal
for
us.
E
M
I
you
know
it's
it's
conjecture
on
my
part,
but
I
do
think
that
there
will
be
some
dedicated
funding,
probably
made
available
sometime
this
year,
we're
also
talking
sort
of
to
private
folks
right.
You
know
the
foundation
community
is
interested
in
this
and
so
we're
working
them.
As
I
said,
this
grew
out
of
some
upmc
efforts,
so
we're
you
know
hopeful
that
they
might
invest.
So
you
know
I'm
I'm
hopeful
that
we
could
see
something
sort
of
formalized
and
unveiled
this
year.
A
All
right,
if
there
are
no
other
questions,
we
do
have
a
couple
of
presentations
and
voting
items
by
your
a
staff
on
developments.
P
Each
home
will
be
a
three
bedroom
and
one
and
a
half
bathroom
modular
built
unit
sold
to
buyers
between
50
and
80.
Ami.
These
units
have
a
sales
price
between
120,
000
and
135
thousand
dollars.
The
proposed
grant
will
be
sourced
with
hof4
cell
development
program
funds
from
2019
and
2020
per
fsdp
guidelines.
Each
unit
will
have
a
99-year
affordability
restriction.
P
This
grant
request
does
exceed
the
100
paying
a
maximum
for
new
construction,
as
outlined
in
the
guidelines.
As
such,
we
are
requesting
a
waiver
of
the
guidelines
with
the
understanding
that,
if
american
rescue
plan
act,
funds
become
available
between
the
time
of
commitment
and
closing
those
funds
may
wholly
or
partially
replace
the
fsdp
funds.
P
A
little
bit
about
the
project
in
2020,
the
community
builders
and
city
of
bridges
were
selected
in
response
to
the
ura's
request
for
proposal
to
complete
a
redevelopment
project,
reflective
of
the
greater
hazelwood
neighborhood
plan
for
the
publicly
owned
sites
along
the
second
avenue
corridor
in
hazelwood
city
of
bridges
will
construct
12
permanently
affordable
for
sale
units
on
these
sites.
The
four
units
discussed
today
represent
the
first
phase
of
that
residential
development.
P
In
addition
to
being
permanently
affordable
units.
These
homes
will
also
deliver
on
environmental
health,
as
well
as
energy
efficiency
as
part
of
the
living
building
challenge,
affordable
housing
pilot
projects
from
the
international
living
future
institute
to
this
inn,
city
of
bridges
has
engaged
eco-craft
homes
as
the
builder
and
has
a
commitment
from
solar,
united
neighbors
for
the
cost
of
solar
installations.
P
So
once
again,
we
are
requesting
approval
for
a
waiver
of
the
fsdp
guidelines
and
a
grant
in
the
amount
of
six
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
dollars
for
city
of
bridges,
community
land
trusts
to
finance
development
activities
for
four
for
sale
units
on
chatsworth
avenue.
I
do
want
to
note
that
ednesser
and
julie
collins
of
city
of
bridges
are
also
here
today
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have
about
the
project.
With
that,
I
will
open
the
floor
to
questions.
L
I
think,
just
though
one
question
I
would
raise
is
related
to
the
enhanced
funding
limit.
We
have
had
this
conversation
in
the
past
about
you
know,
going
over
the
funding
limit
that
was
established
and
you
know
there's
obviously
additional
funding,
that's
being
looked
at
and
potential
in
this
project,
but
it's
again
one
of
those
things
that
I
think
we
just
need
to
take
seriously
about
when
and
why
we're
making
variations
in
those
limits.
Q
Hi,
I'm
ed
with
city
of
bridges.
I'd
be
happy
to
speak
to
that
adrian
about
just
the
total
cost
of
the
project,
and
so,
first,
first
and
foremost,
the
cost
of
the
project
we're
seeing
is
just
influenced
by
the
reality
of
construction
costs.
Right
now
you
know
we're
still
dealing
with
supply
chain
issues
and
we
expect
to
be
dealing
with
those
for
the
next
18
to
24
months,
but
also
too.
I
think
that
you
know
these
are
as
victoria
mentioned.
Q
These
are
gonna,
be
the
most
energy
efficient,
affordable
homes
anywhere
in
the
state
of
pennsylvania.
If
we're
able
to
accomplish
the
living
building
goals,
so
they're
gonna
be
fully
electric
homes.
No
natural
gas
connections,
solar
panels
on
the
roof
that
will
in
combination
with
appliance
upgrades
and
wall
assembly
and
insulation,
upgrades
deliver
about
a
70
to
80
percent
energy
use
reduction
from
a
typical
baseline
house
in
the
region.
So
no
gas
bill
only
an
electric
bill
and
solar
offsets
about
70
of
that
electric
bill.
Q
So
these
are
going
to
be
really
affordable
homes
not
just
to
buy,
but
also
to
live
in
for
folks,
which
you
think
is
really
important
and
then
also
too
fully
recognizing
that
this
is
a
significant
request
on
the
dollar
amount,
but
in
the
land
trust
model
we're
guaranteeing
that
that
dollar
amount
is
going
to
be
stretched
out
for
generations.
Q
You
know
the
national.
The
national
average
is
that
clt
homeowners
stay
in
their
home
for
seven
to
eight
years,
which
is
a
little
bit
longer
actually
than
how
long
market
rate
homeowners
stay
in
their
homes,
and
so,
if
that
national
average
holds
every
one
of
these
homes
that
we
build,
we'll
serve
12
to
15
homeowners.
Q
So
really
we're
talking
about
creating
access,
an
opportunity
for
as
many
as
48
to
60,
low-income
homeowners
to
be
able
to
own
their
home
through
this
project.
So
while
it
is
a
big
upfront
investment,
when
you
look
at
it
over
time
and
the
number
of
households
that
we
can
serve,
this
could
really
be.
You
know
as
many
as
60
affordable
homes
for
families
over
the
next
99
years.
L
Thank
you
ed.
I
think
you
just
actually
put
together
a
framework,
so
if
we
are
making
decisions
that
are
outside
our
typical
parameters-
and
I
think
you
hit
on
three
key
ones-
one
that
isn't
going
to
go
away
anytime
soon,
which
is
you
know,
adjusting
our
thinking
related
to
escalating
costs
of
product
as
one
of
those
pieces
a
second
one
being
things
like?
Are
we
taking
into
account
enhanced
features
related
to
energy
and
energy
costs?
L
Are
the
projects
do
the
projects,
have
a
greening
component,
a
sustainability
component
that
that
we're
focused
on
as
hof
and
that
real
length
of
affordability?
So
again
it's
not
in
I'm
not
indicating
in
any
kind
of
way.
I
don't
think
that
we
can't
adjust,
but
I
think
ed,
you
literally
set
up
a
really
good
framework
for
us
when
we're
having
those
conversations,
you
know
what
are
those
high
points
that
we
really
want
to
be
focused
on
in
our
decision
making
related
to
we
want
to
adjust.
L
D
Well,
like
I
said
just
you
know,
look
at
this
is,
I
think
our
guidelines
need
to
be
revisited
right
now.
Like
the
you
know,
we
need
to
look
at
this.
I
know
that
the
funding
hasn't
increased
at
all,
but
I
just
don't
think
that
the
guidelines
are
going
to
hold
up
with
what
you
know
what
the
cost
of
actually
doing
this
stuff
is
it's
not
getting
less
expensive,
it's
very
difficult
to
find
contractors
there.
D
There
are
some
temporary
pricing
increases
on
different
building
materials,
but
you
know
I
think
labor
cost
is
going
to
be
going
up
and
you
know
it
should.
I.
I
think
that
that
there's
a
good
thing
for
the
economy,
but
we
need
to
be
maybe
re
looking
at.
N
E
L
I
mean
so
I
I
would
second
that
motion,
but
to
mark's
point
and
to
my
comments.
I
do
think
we
need
to
revisit
so
that
we
do
have
a
framework
and
a
justification
as
to
why
we're
making
decisions
that
are
are
outside
the
norm
of
our
protocol
and
also,
you
know,
sharpening
the
focus
of
our
protocol
to
make
sure
it's
responsive
to
the
projects
that
come
in
front
of
us.
N
I
do
want
to
add
one
thing
when
we
do
that,
I
think
it's
important
that
we
understand
that
we're
one
piece
of
a
larger
puzzle,
so
we
shouldn't
just
look
at
like
paw
funding
in
a
vacuum.
We
have
to
look
at
all
of
the
different
funding
sources,
because
sometimes
we
might
need
to
put
more
hot
funds
into
a
project
because
other
funding
sources
don't
work
and
when
we
look
at
our
funding
alone,
I
think
we
might
miss
elements
of
this
that
are
really
important.
A
I
think
it's
going
to
be
more
of
a
formula
than
a
hash
mark
guidelines
test
where
you
know
you
know
a
little
algebraic
with
all
of
the
different
variables
that
come
up.
So
what
what
it
is
that
we're
going
to
need
to
put
in.
A
So
I
think
that,
as
we
revisit
our
guidelines,
it's
going
to
resemble
the
type
of
math
problem
that
I
was
not
a
fan
of
growing
up
more
than
more
than
kind
of
like
if
this
than
that,
but
I
definitely
agree
with
all
points
made
that
I
think
we're
gonna
have
to
move
in
that
direction.
Did
we
have
a
second
on
mark's
motion,
or
did
we
okay,
pause
and
discuss
okay?
So
we
do
have
a
motion
on
the
table.
I
seconded
the
motion.
A
A
separate
conversation
around
the
guidelines
generally
and
then
a
motion
on
the
floor
to
approve
this
expenditure.
I
believe
mark
that
was
seconded
by
adrian.
We
have
lena
sonja
and
derek
recusing
themselves
from
this
vote
before
we
vote.
A
Thank
you.
Can
we
get
that
recommendation
slide
up
please
if
we
have
one.
A
So
mark,
if
you
would,
if,
if
this
is
the
motion
that
you
would
like
to
make,
if
you
could.
E
D
I'll
figure
this
out
one
of
these
days,
okay,
I
I
make
a
motion
that
the
that
we
enter
into
an
agreement
grant
agreement
with
city
of
brits,
community
land,
trust
in
the
amount
of
620
000,
and
that
I
also
to
recommend
approval
to
authorize
a
waiver
of
for
sale
development
program
guidelines
to
exceed
the
per
unit
grant
amount
of
100
000..
Q
Thank
you
all
very
much.
We
appreciate
the
the
investment
in
our
work.
L
A
Session
versus
having
it
as
an
administrative
item,
so
our
administrative
item
section
normally
is
brief,
but
it
may
we
may
get
in
the
weeds
with
this
a
little
bit.
Thoughts
from
the
group.
E
C
A
So
perhaps
we
can
had
frame
it
next
month
in
a
discussion
under
administrative
items
and
kind
of
get
some
bullets
to
be
dived
into
perhaps
by
another
working
group
in
between
in
the
intervening
month,
if
necessary,.
C
Okay,
then
it
would
be
and
I'm
being
selfish
and
personal.
It
would
be
helpful
for
me
if
we
even
put
that
potential
date
on
the
calendar
for
the
following
month.
You
know
let's
work
on
that
date
already.
I
have
trouble,
get
clearing
anything
in
the
30
day.
My
months
are
really
crazy,
but
that's
just
one
very
soon.
A
A
All
right,
I
think
we
can
do
that
all
right,
any
thoughts
on
how
how
to
get
this
done
before
we
move
on
to
prestigious
health.
D
D
You
know,
we've
approved
a
couple
of
these
deals
now,
if
they're
willing
to
talk
with
us
about
what
they're,
seeing
with
costs
and-
and
you
know,
different
funding
sources
so
that
everybody
on
the
committee
has
a
good
familiarity
with
how
these
deals
get
put
together,
I
would
say
similar
for
the
rental
gap
program.
D
You
know
to
have
a
couple
of
folks
come
in
and
be
ready
to
talk
about
some
of
the.
What
what
the
challenges
are.
Where
do
they
get
the
money?
How
do
they
put
the
deals
together.
A
Would
it
be
possible,
or
would
anybody
be
interested
in
having
that
be
the
how
we've
added
this
community
presentation
from
developers
and
folks
working
in
the
field
at
the
beginning
of
the
agenda
to
have
perhaps
if
we
could
line
somebody
up
for
april
and
somebody
else
from
may
so
that
that
can
be
part
of
the
entire
conversation
that
we're
having?
So
it's
on
point
to
what
we're
working
on.
A
A
Also
not
to
to
put
anybody
on
the
spot,
but
we
do
have
folks
on
our
lovely
on
our
lovely
advisory
board
who
who
operate
in
those
spaces
and
and
view
things
as
we
do,
because
you
are
us.
So
if
you
are
interested
in
giving
the
being
one
of
those
presenters
feel
free
to
reach
out
to
I'm
volunteering
shayna,
I
believe
that
would
be,
but
she
would
be
which
she
would
be
coordinating.
Shayna
is
correct.
A
Is
that
you
yeah
absolutely
perfect
to
see
about
getting
on
the
agenda
in
either
place
to
help
inform
our
discussion?
I.
N
N
Q
Just
to
quickly
chime
in
city,
bridges
would
be
happy
to
to
help
on
any
of
the
for
sale.
Stuff.
We've
got
a
number
of
deals
lined
up.
You
know
this
one
and
a
few
others
you'll
be
seeing
in
the
near
future,
so
happy
to
happy
to
share
any
information
that
we
have.
That
could
be
helpful.
A
Okay,
great,
we
will
pull
those
together
for
the
next
two
months
and
work
on.
You
know
if
you're,
if
you're
interested
in
being
in
that
additional
working
group
again
reach
out,
so
we
can
make
sure
that
we
can
get
that
scheduled
as
well.
T
Thanks
kelly
hi
everyone,
my
name
is
brett
morgan
and
today
I'm
presenting
a
rental
gap
program
loan
for
the
prestigious
hills
redevelopment
in
east
hills.
The
development
was
built
originally
in
1969
and
was
part
of
a
larger
at
the
time.
404
unit
phase
development,
east
hills,
limited
partnership,
which
is
an
affiliated
entity
of
telesis
corporation,
acquired
the
property
back
in
2004
and
completed
a
9,
low-income
housing
tax
credit
rehab
of
some
of
those
units.
T
So
for
the
purposes
of
this
this
project
being
presented
today,
this
will
be
a
four
percent
live
tech
rehab,
including
117
units
across
29,
separate
buildings.
Those
117
units
are
made
up
of
87
3
bedrooms
and
34
bedroom
units,
and
they
will
all
remain
affordable
as
24
at
or
below.
T
30
percent
ami
and
93
units
are
at
or
below
50
and,
if
approved,
a
declaration
would
be
recorded
by
the
ura
at
closing
to
ensure
that
these
units
do
remain
affordable
for
a
period
of
40
years
and,
additionally,
all
117
units
are
supported
by
a
hud
housing
assistance
program,
section
8
contract.
T
T
T
The
borrower
has
an
active
partnership
between
telesis
nac,
the
east
hills,
social
services
center
and
several
other
key
community
stakeholders
that
includes
the
beverly
jewel
wall,
lovelace
children's
program
bank's
children's
learning
center,
the
urban
league
youth
places
and
the
greater
pittsburgh
area.
Mad
dads,
which
provide
and
tailor
services
to
residents
of
the
site
and
ongoing
community
engagement
is
also
occurring
through
conversations
with
the
east
hills.
T
Consensus
group,
as
well
as
efforts
in
the
neighborhood
by
rising
tide,
to
assist
distressed
homeowners
at
this
site,
in
particular
neighborhood
partners
llc,
with
the
help
of
those
community
stakeholders,
have
provided
a
wide
array
of
programs
dedicated
to
promoting
computer
access,
advancing
literacy,
providing
employment
opportunities,
and
there
are
other
programs
as
well
educational
programs
and
child
care
programs
that
have
been
made
available
to
younger
residents
at
the
site.
T
At
any
rate
regarding
the
rgp
loan
repayment
would
occur
annually
as
a
percentage
of
net
project
cash
flow,
though
the
outstanding
balance
would
be
due
upon
maturity
of
the
loan
after
the
40-year
loan
term
plus
the
construction
period.
And
lastly,
the
proposed
rgp
loan
would
be
sourced
with
half
2021
30
set-aside
funds,
as
this
was
a
respondent
to
the
housing
opportunity
fund's
currently
open
rental
gap
program
request
for
proposals.
T
So
at
this
time,
I'd
like
to
introduce
max
blickman
a
representative
from
telus's
corporation
who
we've
been
working
with,
as
we
have
reviewed
this
application
and
advanced
it
to
you
all
today.
We
can
now
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
sorry
have,
but
we
do
at
this
time
request
approval
of
the
1.25
million
dollar
rgp
one.
Thank
you.
T
R
A
No,
that's!
No!
It's!
Okay!
It's
it
also
didn't
probably
didn't
pivot,
because
he
didn't
that's
fine,
it's
one
of
those,
it's
one
of
those
zoom
things
where,
if
he,
if
he
were,
if
we
were
all
physically
together,
we
would
know
he
was
here
and
start
asking
questions.
Anybody
have
any
questions
for
max
about
this
development.
R
Yes,
they
are
secured,
it's
mostly
tax
credit
equity,
there's
going
to
be
a
permanent
loan
and
some
phfa
funding
great.
D
And
maybe
I
missed
it,
but
neighborhood
associates
corporation
the
applicant.
What
how
are
they
in
the
project?
Who
are
they.
R
They
are
a
non-profit
that
provides
services
resident
services
to
all
towson's
communities
nationwide
and
they
are
51,
I
believe,
owner
of
the
management
agent
neighborhood
partners
llc.
So
they
have
a
very
direct
kind
of
responsibility
for
management
of
property
and
resident
services
provisions.
R
Nonprofit,
the
board
itself,
I
think,
is-
has
a
governance
committee
that
names
additional.
M
D
A
Yes,
okay,.
A
All
those,
and
is
that
do
we
need
to
word
it
more
specifically,
or
is
that
or
can
we
put
in
them?
Do
we
need
the
recommendation
to
be
the
full
paragraph.
A
Okay,
that's
what
I
thought
you
can
get
that
one!
Thank
you
if
we
can
get
that
on
the
floor.
Thank
you.
If
anybody
would
like
to
rephrase
their
motion.
C
S
A
A
Okay
and
now
we
have
the
stanton
highlands
apartment
presentation.
I
Thank
you
kelly
good
morning.
Everyone.
Thank
you
for
having
me
here.
My
name
is
nicholas
person.
I
am
a
lending
analyst
in
the
residential
learning
department
of
the
ura
and
today
I'll
be
presenting
on
phase
two
of
the
stan
highland
apartments
rehabilitation
project
in
the
east
liberty,
neighborhood
of
pittsburgh.
I
The
main
action
being
presented
to
the
board
today
is
the
authorization
to
enter
into
a
rental
gap.
Loan
agreement
with
the
borrower,
hi
stanton
highland
departments,
incorporated
in
the
amount
of
690
thousand
dollars
next
slide
so
prior
to
2020.
These
downtown
apartments
was
owned
by
the
pittsburgh
theological
seminary
and
was
originally
purposed
as
market
grade
graduate
stu
graduate
housing
for
students.
I
Next
slide
now,
as
you
will
see
in
the
bottom
right
image
of
the
slide
there,
the
stand
apartments
is
composed
of
three
individual
buildings,
two
of
which
highlighted
in
gray,
are
known
as
the
anderson
and
macmillan
buildings,
which,
during
phase
one
exclusively
received
core
and
shell
renovations
in
2020.
I
for
phase
two
of
this
project.
Action
housing
is
focusing
solely
on
renovations
to
what
is
known
as
the
hawthorne
building.
The
original
23
units
of
this
building
are
to
all
receive
renovations
and
are
to
all
be
transformed
into
affordable
housing
being
marketed
towards
tenants
with
incomes
at
or
below
50
ami.
In
order
to
secure
long-term
affordability.
Action
housing
has
also
gone
into
a
gap
financing
loan
agreement
with
the
allison
ross
management
and
development
corporation,
under
the
condition
that
all
23
units
be
eligible
for
hcp
project-based
vouchers.
I
It's
also
worth
mentioning
that,
in
addition
to
the
gap,
financing
one
from
allies
ross,
the
other
main
additional
sources
of
funding
for
this
project
include
a
loan
from
the
tri-state
capital
bank.
A
loan
from
the
pittsburgh
theological
seminary
themselves,
as
well
as
a
250
000
grant
from
the
pennsylvania
housing
finance
agency's
fair
fund.
I
Now,
with
all
that
said,
in
order
to
cover
the
entire
4.85
million
dollar
cost
of
this
project,
action,
housing
is
asking
for
additional
soft
financing
from
the
ura,
more
specifically
in
the
form
of
a
690
000
rgp
loan,
which
they
are
eligible
for
eligible
for
based
on
the
number
of
affordable
units
within
this
building.
The
repayment
for
this
loan
will
be
cash
flow
and
in
order
to
also
secure
long-term
affordability
for
a
40-year
period,
there
will
be
a
record
of
a
deed
restriction.
I
In
addition
to
this,
as
well
as
you
will
see,
highlighted
in
red,
there
will
be
the
construction
or
extension
of
an
entirely
new
community
room
with
a
shared
and
communal
kitchen
for
the
tenants.
Lastly,
as
well
as
in
order
to
maintain
ada
compliance,
gbbn
architects
is
also
incorporating
an
ada
compliant
ramp
for
concerned.
Tenants
next
slide
and
then,
lastly,
on
to
internal
renovations,
as
mentioned
earlier,
all
23
units
are
received
renovations
in
some
form.
I
This
this
includes,
but
is
not
limited
to
things
like
new
bathroom,
tiling
and
fixtures
new
kitchen
appliances,
as
well
as
new
flooring
and
lighting.
That
said,
as
well
for
the
10
specific
ada
compliant
units,
additional
fixtures
will
also
be
added
to
them
as
well,
which
is
highlighted
here
in
the
left-hand
image
showing
handlebars
being
incorporated
on
top
of
the
toilets,
as
well
as
these
showers.
I
Other
things
to
mention
as
well
include
a
new
boiler,
new
air
separator,
as
well
as
new
storage
tanks
for
the
whole
building
nicely,
and
that
is
everything.
Thank
you
very
much
for
letting
me
present.
I
will
be
opening
the
floor
to
questions
and
comments
and
also
introducing
linda
metropolis
from
action
housing
to
also
help
answer
any
of
these
questions.
L
S
I
can
speak
to
that.
There
is
no
community
space
in
this
whole
complex
of
50
40
54
units,
and,
given
that
we
have
a
particular
focus
on
serving
people
with
disabilities,
who
often
can
be
very
isolated,
we
felt
it
was
really
important
to
have
a
community
room
where
people
from
the
building
could
gather,
and
we
thought
it
was
a
really
important
aspect
of
the
programming
of
this
building.
S
You
know
I
would
like
to
just
mention
one
thing
and
it
references
earlier
conversation
about
naturally
occurring
affordable
housing.
S
We
love
this
project.
It
has
not
been
an
easy
project.
It
was
built
70
years
ago,
so
there
were
definitely
a
lot
of
upgrades
that
we
needed
to
bring
to
the
project
one
of
the
challenges,
and
I'm
particularly
glad
that
there
will
be
sort
of
a
restrictive
covenants
on
this
project
is
that
the
property
was
immediately
reassessed
by
the
county
for
tax
purposes,
and
we
have
a
tax
bill
of
55
000
for
the
54
units
in
this
complex.
S
It's
not
a
very
sustainable
amount
of
money.
Unless
you
have
restrictive
covenants
that
you've
agreed
to
that
phfa,
or
in
this
case
the
ura
will
require
us
to
adhere
to
the
county,
doesn't
care
about
affordable
housing
that
you're
committing
to
it?
Unless
there
is
a
regulation
that
is
forcing
you
to
commit
to
it.
So
in
engagement
around
this
whole
issue
of
naturally
occurring
affordable
housing,
I
think
there
might
need
to
be
some
activity
to
look
at
how
real
estate
taxes
can
be
addressed
in
that
process.
S
So
I
just
want
to
add
that
it
it's
a
challenge
for
operations
when
you're
serving
very
low
income
people
and
have
moderate
rents.
D
A
All
right,
so
we
have
the
same
recusals.
We
have
I've
been
notified
by
derek
that
he's
not
able
to
unmute
himself.
He
had
a
comment
or
question
that
he
would
like
to
make.
That
may
be
pertinent
before
we
before
we
vote
on
this.
I
just
want
to.
A
A
D
A
Let
me
one
second,
I've
got
okay,
apparently
it
is,
it
is
meaningful,
but
not
going
to,
but
it's
not
does
not
change
the
nature
of
our
vote.
So
we
do
have
a
motion
on
the
floor.
Apologies
for
the
delay
that
has
been
properly
made
and
seconded.
A
We
have
our
three
recusals,
so
we
can
put
that
on
record
before
we
get
to
the
abstentions.
That
would
be
sonia,
lena
and
derek.
Who
cannot
speak
but
we'll
hopefully
be
able
to
get
his
comment
at
some
later
date.
All
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
to
approve
all
that
all
those
in
favor.
N
A
D
D
A
I
am
reviewing
the
agenda
and
I
believe
that
is
the
end
of
our
voting
items,
although
of
course
we
hope
that
everybody
who
is
able
to
stay
is
does
so
because
we
do
have
some
important
updates,
but
they
are
not
voting
items.
D
F
All
right
so,
let's
say
hi
everyone.
My
name
is
bailey
knapp,
I'm
the
new
program
coordinator
for
the
housing
assistance
program
and
also
the
small
landlord
fund
which
we'll
be
talking
about
today.
I
wanted
to
give
you
guys
one
a
quick
overview
of
the
program
and
also
talk
about
some
of
the
ura
board,
approved
amendments
to
the
guidelines
so
pretty
much.
F
The
point
of
this
program
is
to
provide
financing
to
landlords,
to
make
some
of
those
interior
exterior
renovations
to
their
rental
units
and
the
goal
there
is
to
preserve
the
preserve
and
grow
affordable
housing
within
the
city
of
pittsburgh
and
also
address
some
of
the
safety
health
concerns
that
some
of
these
properties
have
so
to
address
some
of
these
boxes.
Here
we've
been
growing
numbers
of
inquiries.
I
probably
get
like
one
a
week
now
for
people
who
are
interested
in
the
program
and
currently
our
application
is
closed.
F
We've
had
11
applications
during
the
application
cycle
and
eight
of
them
approved.
Currently,
all
of
them
are
in
the
mid
to
later
parts
of
the
project,
so
all
of
them
are
closed
on
documents
and
some
just
need,
like
final
invoicing
and
construction
next
slide,
please.
F
So
these
are
some
of
the
eligibility
guidelines
here.
Requirements
the
big
one,
and
what
kind
of
makes
this
program
like
what
the
program
is,
is
that
we
do
require
these
landlords
who
are
going
through
getting
these
loans
with
us
that
they
agree
to
rent
out
the
completed
units
to
housing,
choice,
voucher
holders
and
comply
with
those
contract
requirements.
If
they
decide
not
to
do
that,
they
still
have
to
rent
out
to
individuals
who
are
at
or
below
80
average
medium
income.
F
One
exception
to
that
rule
is
if
the
landlord
has
a
property
that
are
in
the
housing
authority's
alternative
payment
standards.
They
have
to
agree
to
renting
out
to
the
housing
choice
holders
and
those
alternative
payment
standards.
What
it
is
it's
zip
codes
that
are
in
areas
that
have
lesser
concentration
of
poverty,
so
that
could
be
like
squirrel
hill
strip
district.
Shady
side
places
like
that
other
requirements
borrow,
has
to
have
20
equity
in
the
project.
F
No
outstanding
city
taxes
must
have
homeowner
insurance
policies
and
then
other
things
so
next
slide.
Please-
and
these
are
some
of
the
amendments
that
we've
made
to
the
guidelines
recently,
it's
gone
up
from.
It
is
now
at
twenty
thousand
dollars
per
unit
and
it's
up
to
a
hundred
thousand
project
maximum,
which
is
forty
thousand
from
what
it
originally
was.
F
G
F
So
we've
had
11
applications;
eight
of
them
were
approved,
at
least
the
ones
that
I've
been
working
on
since
I've
been
working
on.
I
think
three
or
four
pro
like
landlords.
Two
of
them
have
had
three
to
four
units,
and
one
of
them
has
had
one.
So
in
total,
we're
probably
looking
at
between,
like
10
to
20
units.
F
A
I'm
happy
to
see
this
moving
forward.
I
know
this
is
how
to
fill
a
gap
that
we
have
in
our
affordable
housing,
landscape.
K
Thank
you
kelly.
Good
morning,
everyone
I'm
derek
kendall
morris,
the
manager
of
consumer
lending
at
the
ura.
I
just
wanted
to
provide
an
update
on
the
homeowner
assistance
fund
to
the
board.
This
was
brought
before
you
all
in
this
in
november
of
last
year,
and
you
know,
a
fifty
thousand
dollar
allocation
out
of
the
demo
fund
was
approved
at
that
time
to
support
action,
housing's
efforts
to
launch
a
pilot
for
this
program
to
assist
homeowners,
who
are
experiencing
difficulty,
paying
mortgage
payments
and
other
financial
issues.
K
You
know
related
to
you
know
the
pandemic,
and
you
know
recent
financial
struggles
so
providing
an
update
that
that
program
is
now
up
and
running
as
of
february
1st,
but
there
were
some
changes
that
occurred.
You
know
in
the
lead-up
to
program
launch
that
we
wanted
to
make
sure
everyone
was
aware
of
when
this
was
prevent
presented
to
you
all.
Last
year
there
were
only
certain
neighborhoods
that
the
action
housing
was
targeting
and
they
have
added
a
few
neighborhoods
to
their
outreach
targets,
and
that
would
be
you
know.
K
K
K
The
action
that
this
board
approved
was
contingent
on
funding
that
they
had
also
applied
for
through
phfa
and
phfa
did
fund
action,
housing's
proposal,
but
only
the
outreach
strategy
that
they
had
set
forth.
So
it
was
slightly
different
than
what
they
had
proposed
last
year,
but
phfa
did
end
up
supporting
this
effort,
and
but
that
does
not
change.
K
You
know
how
action
housing
plans
to
utilize
the
housing
opportunity
fund
dollars
that
were
approved
last
year,
the
like
I
said
it
is
up
and
running
as
of
the
1st
of
february,
and
then
there
are
certain
community
organizations
that
they're
partnering
with
the
kingsley
association,
the
wellness,
collective,
the
hill
district
consensus
group
and
the
housing
stable
is
that
stabilization
center
downtown
that
action
housing
is
is
running.
These
are
all
centers
where
people
can
physically
go
and
apply
if,
if
they're
interested
in
receiving
assistance
through
this
program,
I
do
want
to
introduce.
O
Yeah
hi
everybody
yeah
thanks
for
taking
the
time
for
us
today,
derek
I
don't
see
any
mistakes,
great
job.
Thank
you.
I
I'm
gonna.
Have
you
speak
on
behalf
of
this
program
moving
forward
at
all
times,
but
the
the
we
have
it.
The
the
real
editions
are
gonna,
be
the
hill
district
consensus
group
that
were
brought
in
so
they'll
be
really
focusing
out
reaching
the
hill
district
in
uptown.
O
I
just
want
to
let
the
group
know
that
we
have
also
put
together
almost
800
000
worth
of
grant
money
from
rk
melon
upmc
and
the
pittsburgh
foundation
to
keep
those
drop-in
centers
running,
so
those
rents
will
get
paid
and
you
know
we'll
be
able
to
apply
supplies
and
staff,
and
everything
like
that.
So
also,
I
think,
the
last
time
we
spoke,
the
funding
request
from
aced
was
still
pending.
O
We
are
wrapping
up
a
federal
contract
with
acd
through
their
housing
trust
fund,
for
the
amount
of
I
believe
it's
two
hundred
thousand
dollars,
so
those
are
the
additions,
but
I
open
the
floor
at
any
questions.
Anybody
has.
O
We
ran
a
lot
of
data
with
cmu's
create
lab,
and
what
we
were
trying
to
do
was
focus
it
on
on
blackboard
homeowners,
who
had
delinquent
property
taxes
who
traditionally
are
missed
when,
like
we
did
this
program
during
the
recession,
help-
and
there
was
just
this
huge
gap
of
applications
like
no
one
in
these
neighborhoods-
were
applying.
O
It's
also
the
group
that
we
had
for
e-wrap,
who
were
already
established.
So
we
we
didn't,
have
to
recreate
the
wheel
here.
We
had
the
infrastructure
so
based
on
the
community
partners
that
we
had
that
we
trusted,
like
obb,
like
civically,
and
the
data
that
we
pulled
from
cmu's
create
lab.
These
were
the
targeted
neighborhoods
that
was
originally
the
play
with
phfa
was
to
do
it
a
bit
small.
It
has
certainly
grown
and
the
the
funds
that
we
have
if
anything
from
the
ura,
that's
citywide
counties,
county-wide
funds.
E
K
A
All
right
up
next
is
our
advisor
board
administrative
items.
You
previously
discussed
the
fair
housing
committee,
which
has
a
doodle
if
you're
on
that
committee
or
interested
in
joining
that
committee,
it's
been
it's
been
a
little
while
please
fill
out
that
doodle
I
can
resend
it
so
that
it's
top
of
your
box.
I
know
how
these
things
get
buried
so
that
we
can
get
that
scheduled
as
soon
as
possible
and
get
megan
come
for
him
and
looped
in
on
that
as
well.
A
The
rfp
review
committee,
I
believe,
has
all
the
recommendations
in
that
they're
going
to
have
in
addition
to
this,
maybe
some
of
the
same
folks
who
are
going
to
be
moving
forward
with
what
we
were
previously
discussing
in
terms
of
changing
our
guidelines,
so
that
might
more
from
one
task
force
into
another.
A
L
The
rfp
review
committee
has
not
met
but
mark,
and
I
are
meeting
this
month
to
get
an
agenda
pulled
together
to
reconvene.
G
A
That,
okay,
so
we
will
stay
tuned
up
next,
I
believe
shane
are
you
going
to
discuss
the
nominations
committee,
or
is
that
me.
H
Yeah,
we
just
wanted
to
acknowledge
that
the
chair
and
vice
chair
positions
for
this
advisory
board
are
year
long
terms
with
the
two-year
term
max,
and
it
might
be.
We
recommend
that
this
advisory
board
discuss
how
they
want
to
advance
conversations
around
those
positions.
H
It
might
be
a
good
time
for
the
nomination
committee
to
reconvene
and
discuss
what
the
approach
is.
If
there
are
people
interested
in
stepping
in
or
if
people
want
to
step
down
it's
about
time
to
have
that
conversation.
H
Maybe
I
would
recommend
the
to
acknowledge
who
was
on
the
nomination
committee
from
last
year
and
if
they
would
like
to
reconvene
or
if
new
members
would
like
to
join
to
activate
that
conversation
in
the
next
month.
L
H
H
Addition
to
you
know
if
we've
been
made
aware
that
someone
would
like
to
step
down.
So
we
are
waiting
on
the
administration
to
wrap
their
head
around
that
concept
and
make
some
decisions,
so
it
might
be
a
good
idea
to
wait
until
those
decisions
are
made.
That's
a
great
you
know,
that's
a
point
to
consider
as
well,
so
we're
expecting
david
geiger
if
you're
still
on,
I'm
not
sure
if
you
have
an
update,
but
ideally
in
the
next
couple
of
months,
we
would
hear
from
the
new
administration.
H
Yeah
we're
just
talking
about
the
advisory
committee
membership
and
the
interaction
between
the
new
administration
and,
if
there's
any
status,
updates
on
their
appointments
to
those
positions
that
have
expired
or
will
be
expiring.
U
No,
I
haven't
heard
anything
from
the
administration
on
it
one
way
or
the
other.
They
have
been
provided
the
information
about
sort
of
membership
of
this
advisory
committee
and
what
sort
of
the
the
terms
are
for
each
member
but
have
not
heard
or
seen
any
communication
about
their
reappointments
or
new
appointments.
H
It
was
brought
up
during
the
concept
that
the
chair
and
vice
chair
positions,
it's
time
for
us
to
talk
about
you
know,
are
we
making
changes?
Is
the
committee
making
changes
to
those
positions
or
not,
and
so
adrian
had
asked
if
there
was
a
status
update
on
the
actual
advisory
committee
positions?
A
I
believe
there
are
five
positions
between
what's
vacant
and
folks
who
are
rolling
off
if
memory
serves
me
correct,
so
we're
talking
about.
L
A
U
Yeah
I
defer
to
the
chair
and
the
advisory
board
as
a
whole,
but
there's
nothing
that
says
you
need
to
wait
for
new
appointments
or
reappointments
and
given
that
membership
is
rolling
over
time
across
administrations,
I
don't.
I
don't
know
if
it's
advisable
to
hold
off
on
that
decision
as
opposed
to
just
making
as
bored
but,
of
course
defer
to
the
chair
and
and
the
wisdom
of
this
board.
So.
C
I
spoke
to
jake
pollock
about
this
a
couple
of
weeks
ago
and
he
didn't
say
with
certainty,
but
it
they
were.
It
sounded
like
they
wanted
to
sort
of
base
this
kinds
of
these
kinds
of
appointments
on
what
comes
out
of
the
recommendations
that
are
due
middle
of
next
month.
C
So
I
don't
know
if
they
may
have
something
by
then,
but
it
sounded
like
they
were
ready
to
sort
of
make
their
announcements
all
at
one
time
in
alignment
with
the
recommendations
that
are
coming
from
the
transition
committees,
but
I'm
not
speaking
with
any
authority
to
say
that.
That's
just
what
I
gathered
from
a
conversation
that
I
had
with
them
about
this.
A
Do
we
want
to
form
a
nomination?
I
mean
forming
a
nominations.
Committee
is
not
a
vote.
So
do
we
want
to
form
a
nominations
committee
at
this
juncture,
or
do
we
want
to
hold
off
and
to
even
take
that
initial
step,
because
we
do
need
to
I'm
happy
to
continue
to
serve
I'm
happy
to
step
down
and
have
somebody
else
take
on
the
chairperson
ship.
A
But
the
term
is
a
one
year
term
that
does
expire
if
it's
not
renewed
with
again
that
two-year
maximum
term
limit
and
I'm
not
going
to
speak
for
derek
and,
unfortunately,
derek
cannot
speak
for
himself
either.
I
believe
still
as
to
whether
or
not
he's
willing
to
continue
to
serve,
but
we
may
want
to
still
consider
a
nominations
committee
to
vet
our
options.
A
It's
not
a
standing
committee.
It
was
created
for
last
year
to
get
to
these
nominations,
so
we
might
want
to
consider
whether
or
not
it
is
a
standing
committee
so
that
we're
not
recreating
the
wheel
every
year,
since
it
is
just
a
one-year
position
again
subject
to
renewal,
but
but
only
two
years
at
that,
so
I
know
knowledge
is
not
on.
I
don't
know
if
diamante
has
thoughts
on
whether
or
not
she'd
be
willing
to.
It
was
the
two
of
them
I
believe,
had
co-chaired.
A
We
can
hold
this
item
for
next
for
our
next
meeting,
if
no
one's
comfortable,
making
a
motion
or
recommendation
as
to
how
we
should
proceed
on
this,
but
I
do
believe
that
we
are,
but
if
we,
if
we
make,
if
we
don't
create
a
nominations
committee
until
next
month,
then
we're
into
may
and
so
we're
kind
of
just
drifting
out
of
our
terms
as
elected
at
that
point
is
just
as
a
point
of
note,
so
we.
G
G
A
So
I
think
we
might
have
to
first
say
that
we
want
a
nominations
committee
and
then
ask
them
if
they
want
to
stay
in
that
position,
because
I
don't
think
it's
a
given
laws
that
they
that
it
exists
to
do
this
function.
And
we
say
we.
We
say
that
we're
going
to
have
officers
and
that
we're
going
to
vote
on
them.
But
I
don't
think
that
our
bylaws
operationalize,
how.
H
A
That
just
kind
of
make
it
so
versus
how
how
to
make
it.
So
I
see
so
perhaps
be
a
two-step
process
where
we
could
vote
today
to
create
a
nominations
committee
and
then
discuss
by
email
or
some
or
some
other
fashion,
how
to
to
do
that
or
make
it
contingent.
There's
a
lot
of
different
options
for
how
to
proceed.
If
we
want,
if
we
choose
to.
G
L
I
was
just
going
to
say
the
same
thing.
You
know
with
five
folks
needing
to
be
filling
in
our
group
and
our
dialogues
and
making
sure
that
we
have
those
representatives
on
the
board.
I
think
it's
important
that
we
do
in
a
committee.
I
think
it
would
be
helpful,
probably
I
think
we're
losing
folks
in
the
meeting
as
we're
going
a
little
bit
longer.
So
I'm
not
sure
that
everyone
who
who
has
participated
in
that
process
is
here
to
make
that
commentary,
but
I
do
think
we
should
be
creating
a
nominating
committee.
G
A
Any
opposed
any
abstentions,
and
so
the
motion
carries-
and
we
will,
I
believe,
reach
out
via
email
to
go
through
some
of
the
logistics
and
forming
on
that
nominating
committee
and
will
be
able
to
announce
should
be
able
to
announce.
Who
is
who
is
going
to
be
on
that
committee
for
april's
meeting,
and
you
know
perhaps
discuss
a
little
bit
about
what
the
logistics
look
like
for
an
upcoming
election.
Well.
G
A
What
areas
they
feel
yes?
Which,
which
one's
vacant
and
perfect.
A
Okay,
that
concludes
our
administrative
items.
For
the
day
now
we
have
our
program,
expenditures
and
impacts
by
uri.
B
I
can,
you
know
briefly,
run
us
through
these
with
patina's
departure.
This
slide
specifically
shows
our
overall
expenditures
and
dollar
amounts
by
all
of
our
programs,
so
the
blue
represents
the
amount
that's
been
committed
or
closed,
and
the
green
is
not
yet
committed
per
program.
B
B
green
is
at
60
to
80
category,
and
then
purple
is
specific
to
just
down
payment.
That's
people
between
80
and
115
of
the
area,
median
income.
Sorry
specifically.
H
B
If
you
want
to
go
to
the
next
slide
and
then
these
are
some
dashboards
with
maps
that
they
haven't
been
in
the
meetings
for
the
last
couple
of
months,
but
I
did
just
want
to
show
them
again
and
this
one
specifically
for
down
payment
and
gives
a
few
metrics
on
on,
where
we're
at
with
that,
but
as
of
january
1st.
So
these
will
be
updated
for
next
month
as
well.
Just
with
the
staff
change,
we've
had
to
kind
of
rework
our
data
processing.
B
And
then
this
is
a
similar
concept
just
for
the
homeowner
assistance
program
and
where
it's
being
deployed
throughout
the
city.
B
And
lastly,
these
are
our
development
programs
to
the
rental
gap
and
the
for
sale
development
program
and
again,
these
numbers
will
be
updated
with
the
commitments
that
were
made
this
month.
When
we
look
at
these
again
next
month,.
H
I
think
seven
just
two
announcements:
I
a
calendar,
invite
was
sent
out
to
the
advisory
committee
extending
these
meetings
throughout
2022.
If
you
did
not
receive
it.
Please
email
me
and
let
me
know
and
we'll
make
sure
that
you
have
this
on
your
calendar
and
with
that.
Our
next
advisory
meeting
is
april,
7th
at
9
00
a.m,
and
we
look
forward
to
another
robust
conversation
with.
G
A
All
right,
if
there
are
no
further
announcements,
as
shane
just
said,
our
next
advisory
board
meeting
is
april.
7Th
at
9.
00
a.m,
stay
tuned
for
doodles
on
our
pending
committee
meetings,
and
that
concludes
the
march
meeting
of
the
housing
opportunity
fund
advisory
board.
Thank
you.
Everybody
thanks.