►
From YouTube: Pittsburgh City Council Standing Committees - 7/13/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
Thank
you.
Our
next
order
of
business
is
public
comment.
I'd
like
to
remind
all
speakers
of
the
rules
of
council
state
that
comments
are
limited
to
matters
of
concern.
Official
action
or
deliberation
which
are,
or
maybe
before,
city,
council
and
profanity
will
not
be
permitted
after
you
recall,
please
restate
your
name
and
neighborhood
for
the
record.
Our
first
speaker
is
naomi
mullen.
C
Good
morning,
shady
trees,
not
shady
eels
regarding
the
threat
to
fire
and
fine
city
workers.
I
suggest
the
following
solutions:
set
up
an
anonymous
online
reporting
of
vaccine
fitness,
respect
the
privacy
of
employees,
the
way
dukane
light.
Does
they
manage
to
keep
the
electricity
on
for
us
set
up
an
anonymous
reporting
method?
Do
not
fire
well
trained
individuals?
C
C
Now,
regarding
bonaire,
my
husband,
michael
j
mullen,
who
was
one
of
the
leaders
in
the
community,
died
in
january,
and
this
was
read
at
his
funeral,
but,
and
it
was
authored
by
battalion
chief
douglas
kraskovic
retired
deputy
chief
mike
mullen
touched
the
lives
of
many
people.
His
uncompromising
dedication
to
his
sworn
duty
to
provide
for
the
safety
of
the
citizens
of
pittsburgh
was
truly
exceptional
and
one
that
should
be
emulated
by
every
firefighter.
C
He
loved,
sharing
his
knowledge
of
firefighting
in
all
its
many
aspects
to
make
our
firefighters,
safer,
smarter
and
more
efficient
on
fire
grounds
mike
knew
most
of
the
firefighters
on
the
entire
bureau
of
fire
by
their
first
name
and
was
always
approachable
regardless
of
prank.
If
you
had
a
question,
he
would
tell
what
he
was
to
answer
it.
He
worked
tirelessly,
but
also
energetically
his
entire
career
and
pursued
more
knowledge.
His
legacy
will
serve
our
citizens
and
firefighters
for
many
years
to
come.
C
C
We,
the
people
of
bonaire,
have
maintained
our
properties
and
participated
in
many
functions
here.
Our
community
made
it
extremely
clear
at
our
home
meeting
in
may
of
2021
that
we
have
voted
a
detrimental
property
join
our
supporters,
mayor,
daney,
councilman,
coghill
and
state
representative
venom
for
the
creation
of
a
green
space.
C
C
D
D
The
pandemic
has
changed
many
facets
of
our
life
and
not
more
significant
than
where
and
how
we
work.
Virtual
meetings
and
hybrid
work.
Experiences
are
likely
here
to
stay
and
with
such
radical
changes
comes
the
need
to
rethink
downtown
a
place
historically
dedicated
to
commercial
offices.
At
the
center
of
our
region.
An
economic
engine
for
southwestern
pennsylvania
downtown
has
remained
overly
reliant
on
commercial
office
for
far
too
long.
D
The
new
fund,
created
in
part
with
these
funds
will
support
residential
conversions
to
sort
office
buildings
to
residential
and
downtown.
This
fund
will
begin
to
counter
declining
office,
occupancy
and
utilization
rates
that
threaten
downtown
vitality
and
will
prevent
further
erosion
of
an
important
component
of
the
region's
property
tax
base,
an
effort
to
support
the
high
cost
of
building
conversions
increase,
the
supply
of
affordable
workforce
housing
and
support
the
overall
health
and
vitality
of
downtown
pittsburgh.
D
E
Council
members,
my
name
is
bill
schlachter.
I
am
a
long
time
resident
of
mount
washington.
I've
spoken
to
you
all
quite
a
number
of
times
regarding
this
topic,
which
is
the
airbnb
ordinance,
I'm
going
to
reiterate
the
need
for
a
amendment
regarding
a
primary
resonance
for
any
anybody
that
has
an
airbnb
and
also
to
reconsider
the
use
of
a
multi-unit
for
the
airbnb.
E
I
think
a
weak
look
back
at
what
happened
on
the
north
side,
which
was
an
unbelievable
tragedy,
and
you
ask
yourself
if
there
was
a
primary
residence
there.
If
there
was
somebody
living
there
or
it
was
somebody
else's
sort
of
extra
unit
in
the
back.
Would
that
tragedy
have
happened
and
when
we
ask
ourselves,
we
look
around
the
country.
E
E
That
is
not
good
for
the
city
and
it
is
slowly
starting
to
happen
up
here
on
our
washington.
This
is
one
of
these
issues.
Where
is
a
fraud
sort
of
slowly
boiling
in
the
pot
and
as
leaders?
I
ask
you
to
be
proactive
on
this
issue
because
it
may
not
seem
like
a
big
issue
today,
but
I
guarantee
you
by
the
time
many
of
you
are
up
for
re-election.
This
will
become
an
even
greater
issue.
E
This
is
a
slow
fuse
that
is
going
to
burn
and
is
going
to
get
worse
and
that's
why
many
cities
across
our
country
have
put
the
primary
amendment
in
there,
and
that
is
an
extraordinarily
important
amendment
to
this,
and
I
hope
I
hope
that
you
do
the
right
thing
as
leaders
and
address
this
issue.
Thank
you.
A
F
F
High
capacity
guns,
four,
a
new
name
for
each
division,
will
serve
the
purpose
of
distinguishing
the
total
difference
and
usage
in
each
division.
Five,
if
an
attempt
is
made
to
break
through
the
described
division,
it
shall
be
punishable
by
as
much
as
death
and
can
only
be
changed
from
from
that
type
of
decision
by
the
united
states
supreme
court.
I
hope
that
this
promotes
a
better
understanding
of
this
horrific
problem
and
that
it
seems
to
solve
the
objections
that
up
one
would
expect
from
the
national
rifle
association.
F
F
G
My
name
is
yvonne,
f
brown.
I
live
at
715
mercer
street,
as
kaylee
irving's
tires
yesterday,
when
the
mayor
was
with
outside
with
the
young,
with
the
men
for
the
base
baseball,
I
mean
for
the
children,
little
league,
okay.
I
went
and
asked
the
mayor.
I
said
we
don't
have
a
bus
coming
from
kd
or
ervis
down
through
the
bottom
of
the
hill.
We
have
to
go
all
the
way
through
town.
G
We
that
means
that
we
are
subjected
to
a
lot
of
people,
I'm
talking
about
all
the
way
through
town,
to
go
back
out
to
the
bottom
of
the
hill.
I
hadn't
been
coming
because
I
do
have
health
problems,
but
the
young
man,
because
I
was
pressing
the
mirror
in
the
mirror.
He
thought
man.
I
can't
I
can't
do
you
can
speak.
You
get
a
mouth
okay.
G
So
then,
after
we
came
in,
there
was
a
young
man
that
had
been
out
there
with
him,
and
so
let
me
tell
you
how
people
look,
he
came
and
he
said,
miss
brown.
That's
your
mirror!
You
are
to
respect
him.
I
said
what
are
you
talking
about?
You
pointed
at
him.
Listen!
Let
me
tell
you
something:
I
went
to
college,
I
I
took
public
speaking
and
with
public
speaking.
We
were
taught
that
you're
supposed
to
be
talking
to
everybody,
not
just
one
person
or
looking
at
one
person
and
I'm
animated.
G
G
every
week
this
was
may
of
1999,
because
I
was
looking
at
the
papers
and
I
would
go
over
to
the
school
board.
We
just
fussed
about
phasm
and
the
little
boy
that
this
guard
was
taken
in
the
room
upstairs
in
the
closet.
They
found
them
with
the
little
boy
with
his
pants
off.
When
I
asked
for
I
went
to
the
school
board
for
him
to
have
an
open
hearing,
because
we
wanted
to
know
about
our
children.
G
Well,
the
school
board
wouldn't
do
it.
I
went
to
him
and
I
said
if
we
start
start
up,
if
we
have
a
meeting,
will
you
come?
He
said?
Yes,
ms
brown,
I
would
okay,
so
we
had
we're
supposed
to
have
the
meeting
and
mr
o'connor.
Well,
I
still
can't
forget
that
he
took
him.
He
was
going
to
have
the
meeting
and
then
he
stopped
it.
He
said
no
or
not,
because
it's
going
to
be
how
he
said
something
about
a
hung,
jury,
some
kind
of
stuff.
G
Anyway
he
stopped
the
meeting
and
I
found
out
he
wasn't
allowed
to
do
that,
but
he
did
so.
We
never
had
the
meeting
with
I
mean
with
phasing
now
last
night
I
went
over
to
county
council
and
I
went
there
so
that
I
could
explain
to
them
that
we
don't
have
a
bus
up
coming
from
the
top
of
the
hill,
because
I
brought
in
petitions.
G
I
talked
to
mr
watts,
dwight
watson,
I
mean
he's.
I
might
be
pronouncing
his
name
wrong,
but
anyway
dwight
you
know,
he's
a
big,
huge
man.
Okay.
So
when
joe
defazio
john
defazio
was
running
for
president
again
now
I
found
out
he
died,
but
I
found
out
that
he
died,
but
I
wanted
to
say
to
the
family
that
he
did
treat
me
fear.
I
had
other
things
to
say,
but
that's
okay.
My
time
is
up
have
a
nice
day.
A
Thank
you.
Is
there
any
anyone
else
wishing
to
speak
before
council?
Please
come
forward
anyone
else
wishing
to
speak,
seeing
none
that
moves
us
to
our
standing
committee's
agenda.
Our
first
committee
of
the
day
is
finance
and
law,
which
is
chaired
by
myself.
Our
first
supplemental
paper
is
bill.
586.
H
Bill
586
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
to
receive
grant
funding
and
technical
assistance
from
cities
for
financial
empowerment
funding
for
the
2022
cohort
of
the
financial
empowerment
cities
intended
to
create
an
office
of
financial
empowerment
in
the
amount
of
one
hundred
and
seventy
thousand
dollars
and
authorizing
expenditures.
For
this
stated
purpose.
I
K
K
I
I'm
just
my
director,
I
just
don't
I
don't
you
can't
see
it
director.
Can
you
please
help
me
understand?
I
I
don't
see
a
cost
associated
with
this
unless
it's
in
paperwork
that
I
haven't
reviewed
for
that
I
apologize,
but
I
I'd
like
to
know
the
cost
associated
with
this
and
a
better
understanding
as
to
why
we
would
be
moving
employees
into
100
ross
or
not
over
to
the
new
to
the
new
building.
I
Okay.
So
if
you
just
give
me
one
second,
I'm
gonna.
N
Get
you
more
of
the
costing
information
to
you
the
background
on
this?
Is
we
discovered
in
the
end
of
april
the
property
building
property
manager?
You
know
informed
us
that
the
heating
system
for
100
ross
is
in
dire
condition
or
I'm
sorry
for
200
roth
is
in
dire
condition
such
that
you
know
when
we
reviewed
it
with.
We
went
through
a
series
of,
and
still
going
through,
a
series
of
reviews
with
their
technical
people.
N
Our
technical
people
and
the
other
property
owners
make
a
determination
about
what
what
kind
of
repairs
we
can
affect,
but
it
was
my
our
professional
determination
of
public
works
that
it's
very
likely
that
the
heat
is
going
to
be
a
struggle
to
get
the
heating
system
up
and
running
for
staff
that
use
200
routes.
N
So
we
made
a
kind
of
an
emergency
decision
to
relocate
the
existing
city
staff
that
are
reporting
their
lock
or
telework,
but
some
still
report-
and
now
we
put
those
folks
in
a
variety
of
city,
existing
city
facilities
where
we
can,
but
there
is
kind
of
somewhere
outstanding
folks
that
we
could
not
find
available
space
for,
and
so
we
are
moving
through
that
process
right
now
and
we
work
with
the
housing
authority-
is
the
the
tenant
of
100
ross,
who
kind
of
brought
this
opportunity
to
us
and
it
works
for
a
lot
of
different
levels.
N
It's
both
time
effective
and
cost
effective,
we're
still
working
through
the
final
lease
price
there.
But
this
is
a
situation
that
gives
us
you
know
safe
space
for
our
employees
to
meet.
While
we
resolve
the
200
ross
issue.
I
And
I
I
support
safe
spaces
for
employees
to
work.
I
think
that
that
is
indicative
of
the
responsibility
of
counseling
the
administration.
I
worry
a
little
bit
after
not
necessarily
being
prepared
to
proceed
with
the
public
safety
facility.
I
see
a
second
time
now,
where
we're
perhaps
not
quite
prepared
to
proceed
with
moving
everybody
into
the
new
facility
and
that
we're
we're
continuing
to
allocate
dollars
to
sort
of
mothball.
I
If
you
will
some
of
the
the
activities
that
need
to
take
place
while
we
ready
the
facilities
that
are
already
you
know
under
construction
are
underway.
Just
so
I'd
be
lying
to
say,
I'm
not
concerned
about
that.
I
would
really
like
to
know
what
the
cost
associated
with
this.
Forgive
me.
It
is
a
one
year,
one
year
that
we're
looking
at
I'm
doing
this.
Yes,
so
all
of
these
folks
excuse
me
all
these
folks.
N
Are
you
know
scheduled
to
move
to
the
4-1-2?
The
permits
are
currently
under
review,
with
pli
for
the
renovation
of
the
full
people
of
those
city
spaces.
So
very
shortly,
you
know,
within
the
within
the
month,
we'll
be
out
to
construction
bit
to
renovate
that
space.
So
we
really
feel
like
the
year
is
more
than
adequate
for
what
we
need
in
terms
of
the
cost.
I
As
well,
okay,
you
know
georgia,
the
greatest
respect
for
you
and
the
work
that
you
do.
I
I'm
certainly
not
looking
to
be
an
obstructionist.
I.
I
The
monies
and
and
where
they
go
and
how
we
should
be
managing
them
there
are
perhaps
maybe
doing
a
little.
I
don't
know
exactly
how
I
want
to
say
this,
but
being
cognizant
of
just
how
precarious
the
times
can
be
financially.
I
We,
you
know
right
now
we're
doing
okay,
we
have
the
money
coming
in
we've
kind
of
stabilized
everything,
but
we
would
be
doing
a
great
disservice
to
the
public
at
large
to
not
continually
trump
it
that
that
stability
is
for
a
very
short
for
a
shorter
period
of
time
than
we
would
like
to
see
and
that
it
behooves
us
to
to
really
really
watch
the
pennies
that
are
going
to
turn
into
dollars,
because
we
don't
know
what
2024
holds
for
us
when
the
upper
money
is
gone
and
we
don't
know
what
the
tax
base
ultimately
is
going
to
be
and
what
kinds
of
revenues
are
going
to
be
coming
in
and
that
the
kinds
of
difficult
decisions
this
council
may
be
forced
to
make
in
2024.
I
A
Opposed
one
abstention
council.
A
Recommendation
I
apologize
that
will
move
us
on
to
bill
594.
L
Councilman
wilson,
thank
you,
mr
chair,
so
you'll
see
this
is
a
resolution
for
an
agreement
with
a
northside
christian
health
center.
The
the
the
funds
were
in
a
previous
bill,
so
the
fiscal
part
of
this
was
at
a
previous
bill
and
to
to
you
know
to
buy
by
all
laws
that
require
to
use
these
funds.
We
have
to
enter
into
an
agreement,
so
this
is
just
to
finalize
this
project,
so
any
questions
about
that
or
like
to
take
a
vote
on
it
today.
Thank
you.
L
Thank
you
and
thanks
for
you
know,
members
to
to
relate
this
yesterday.
A
P
P
So
we
can
have
a
better
watch
on
what's
going
out
the
door
who
we're
funding,
what
they're
actually
what
we're
actually
funding,
what
they're
actually
doing
in
the
community,
if
anything,
whether
they're
registered
with
the
department
of
state
whether
they
completed
their
990s
their
federal
documents,
whether
they
have
the
501c3
status,
not
anything
with
this,
because
I'm
sure
councilman
wilson
probably
did
his
more
than
his
due
diligence,
because
I
know
he
does,
but
in
in
general
terms.
P
I
just
want
to
say
you
know,
as
we
have
moved
forward,
and
we
have
a
lot
of
money
going
out
and
a
lot
of
people
who
applied
for
grant
funding
for
the
stop
the
violence
fund
for
our
cdbg
funding.
For
all
the
different
things
we
have
different
criteria
for
for
different
for
akbo
and
for
different
ones.
P
I
just
think
we
need
to
streamline
that
a
little
bit
and
have
a
set
a
set
standard
for
applications
and
and
for
distributions
of
those
dollars,
and
we
also
need
to
know
that
the
controller
is
doing
audits
of
appropriate
to
make
sure
programs
are
actually
helping
actually
happening
that
we're
funding,
because
a
lot
of
times
we
see
people
getting
funding
we're
like
well,
we
never
saw
that
program
in
our
district,
never,
and
so
I
I'm
gonna.
I
keep
talking
about
how
I'm
gonna
be
more
watchful
of
this,
and
I'm
definitely
going
to
be.
A
P
K
K
That
said
when
it
comes
to
federally
qualified
health
centers
like
this
one
as
we
as
we
determine
the
best
way
to
track
and
hold
accountable
the
organizations
to
whom
we
distribute
funds.
I
would
like
to
also
figure
out
a
way
to
not
create
duplicate
or
duplicate
the
processes
or
the
paperwork
for
organizations
that
have
to
do
mountains
of
paperwork
to
meet
federal
requirements
like
federally
qualified
health.
K
Centers
like
this
one,
the
squirrel
hall
health
center,
others
so
wanted
to
just
add
that
to
the
the
chorus
of
this
is
call
for
additional
oversight,
but
also
some
flexibility
when
it
comes
to.
You
know:
additional
paperwork
for
some
that
already
have
a
lot
of
requirements
to
meet.
L
I
think
I
think
the
council
person
straussburger
has
summed
it
up.
Well,
I
am
yeah
I've.
You
know
to
your
point.
I
I
agree
in
this
case.
You
know,
like
we've,
talked
about
the
fqhc
status
that
they
have
and
their
ability
to
provide
affordable
healthcare
to
to
to
the
community
into
pittsburgh.
You
know
I'm
looking
forward
to
this
project,
so
thanks.
H
L
Yes,
first
off,
I
want
to
thank
all
members
for
getting
this
to
the
table
today
and
I
know
with
recess
coming
up.
We
were,
you
know
relating
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
bills
here,
so
I
appreciate
everyone
being
timely
with
this
bill.
I
think
it's
important
and
I
should
say
that
this
is
a
friendly
resolution
that
we
worked
on
with
the
controller's
office
to
send
over
an
official
resolution
to
direct.
L
You
know,
like
I
said
it's
a
friendly
resolution,
but
you
know
the
language
is
to
direct
the
the
controller
to
do
this
on
it
essentially
12
years
ago,
council,
this
council
passed
an
ordinance
that
requires
private
development
projects
that
are
subsidized
by
public
monies
to
to
pay
wages
that
reflect
the
local
wage
scale,
so
this
prevailing
wage
act
that
went
into
effect
12
years
ago.
L
You
know,
I
believe
that
we
have
some
some
work
to
do
still
on
this,
to
ensure
that
people,
when
the
people
that
are
hired
especially
service
workers,
are
hired
to
work
at
these
at
these
places
that
that
they're
paid
a
fair
living
wage,
and
so
we
we
need
to
make
sure
that's
happening.
Simply
speaking
so,
you
know
a
couple
three
items
here
of
what
we'd
like
to
see
covered
is
to
compel
employers
to
provide
annual
payroll
data.
L
L
M
H
605
resolution
further
amending
resolution,
number
93
entitled
providing
for
an
agreement
or
existing
or
existing
agreements
and
or
contracts
or
use
of
existing
contracts
and
for
the
purchase
of
materials,
supplies,
equipment
and
or
services
for
various
projects
in
connection
with
the
city
council
neighborhood
needs
program
in
council
district
3
and
providing
for
the
payment
of
cost
thereof
by
transferring
two
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
to
the
hilltop
alliance.
Total
cost
of
all
district
three
neighborhood
needs
project
is
not
to
exceed
fifty
one
thousand
nine
hundred
forty
three
dollars
and
seventy
seven
cent.
H
I
Yeah
thanks
mr
chair.
This
is
just
a
reimbursement
of
funds
that
hilltop
alliance
suspended
for
a
project
in
the
third
council
district
and
we
are
paying
it
back
to
our
neighborhood
needs.
A
H
I
Yeah,
thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
would
like
to
start
by
thanking
the
reapportionment
committee
for
the
hard
work
that
they've
done,
and
you
know
anyone
who
has
gone
through
this
process
understands
just
how
very
complex
and
how
very
complicated
redistricting
can
be.
Redistricting
is
obviously
ordered
by
the
census.
We
do
this
every
10
years.
I
This
is
the
second
time
since
I've
been
a
member
of
council
that
we
have
gone
through
the
redistricting
process,
but
I
especially
want
to
recognize,
and
my
chief
of
staff
bob
charlene
for
all
of
the
work
that
he
did.
He
truly
worked
endless
hours
on
this
to
make
this
reapportionment
map
be
the
very
best
that
it
could
be
we're
given
very
strict
limitations
and
guidelines
and
procedures
that
we
must
follow,
and
it
can
be
a
very
you
know,
tedious
process
to
work
through.
I
You
know
the
details,
the
devils
and
the
details,
and
it
can
get
quite
complicated,
so
I
I
I
would
be
promised
to
thank
bob
for
all
of
his
hard
work
and
his
diligence
in
in
the
part
that
he
played
bringing
this
map
to
us
today
and
then.
Secondly,
I
would
really
like
to
thank
my
colleagues
on
council.
You
know
these
they're
not
easy
choices,
they're
not
easy
decisions
to
make.
I
The
one
thing
that
I
am
just
so
very
happy
with
and
so
very
happy
to
share
with
constituency
is
that
you
all
know
I
represent
the
neighborhood
of
the
belts
uber
community
and
from
the
day
I
I
got
in
office.
There
has
been
a
steadfast
request
by
constituency
in
belle
super
to
see
that
mckinley
park
actually
become
connected
in
with
the
belt
super
neighborhood
mckinley
park
is
essential
to
the
to
the
history
and
the
integrity
of
this.
I
You
know
hundred
and
seven
plus
year
neighborhood,
and
we
have
worked
diligently
with
the
business
response
conservancy
to
do
major
renovations
to
the
park,
which
has
done
a
lot
to
to
raise
property
values
in
the
neighborhood
of
belz
uber
and
to
to
sort
of
consummate
the
the
the
importance
that
this
park
brings
to
that
neighborhood
and
to
the
hilltop
in
its
entirety.
I
And
today
the
map
is
being
presented
thanks
to
very
hard
work
by
my
colleagues
that
I'm,
I
couldn't
be
any
more
appreciative
of
the
when
this
is
voted
through
today.
The
the
mckinley
park
will
now
exist
within
the
third
council
district
and
be
married
with
the
neighborhood
about
super,
as
it
should
have
been
all
along
and
so
for
that
you
have
my
deepest
and
most
sincere
thanks
and
gratitude
for
the
hard
work
and
your
willingness
to
bring
this
this
request
of
mine
into
fruition.
I
So
with
that,
I'm
I'm
very
happy
to
to
vote
the
reapportionment
map
that's
presented
to
us
today
and
to
once
again
thank
bob,
the
members
of
the
reapportionment
committee
and,
of
course,
most
importantly,
my
colleagues
in
presenting
this
map
and
bringing
this
forward
into
the
best
interests
of
the
constituents
that
we
serve.
So
thank
you
very
much
appreciate
it.
Mr
chair.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
I
have
councilman
coghill.
Q
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
too
want
to
echo
the
thoughts
of
councilman
krause
in
thanking
the
real
apportionment
committee.
I
know
I
followed
it
closely.
I
think
most
of
us
have
followed.
You
know
closely
as
to
the
hard
work
that
they
put
into
it.
God
bless
james.
I
think
he
had.
You
know
total
about
30
maps.
He
reconstructed
and
you
know.
Ultimately
I
will
say
I
believe
we
got
it
right.
Q
Not
every
member
may
be
happy
with
the
outcome,
but
there
were
some
very
important
things
there
that
we
had
to
be
creative
with
that
we
had
to
talk
through
up
until
late.
Yesterday
we
were
discussing
this
and
coming
to
a
consensus
which
I'm
so
happy
that
that
we
we
came
to,
I
agree
with
you.
Councilman
krauss
mckinley
park
belongs
in
district
three.
I
think
90
percent
plus
of
the
people
who
utilize
that
park
are
from
district
three,
and
that
was
right
again.
We
had
to
be
creative.
Q
I
want
to
thank
the
county
and
david
boye
coming
over
and
you
know
helping
us,
you
know,
decide
what
we
could
and
what
we
could
not
do,
and
you
know
they
were
very
patient
with
us
and
got
us
the
answers
that
we
needed.
So
I'm
very
happy
with
the
outcome.
You
know
it
took
a
lot
of
hard
work.
I
want
to
thank
my
colleagues
again
to
you
know
for
for
working
on
this
with
me
and
especially
every
apportionment
committee.
Q
P
I
want
to
thank
everyone.
Jonathan
alexander
was
the
person
who
represented
district
two
on
that
committee
and
he's
not
political
he's
not
been
involved
in
politics,
he's
actually
a
resident
from
sheridan
he's
in
a
cpa,
and
he
works
for
allegheny
county
controller's
office,
then
chelsea
wagner
and
now
councilmember,
well
controller
o'connor,
but
he's
done
a
great
job
in
our
area,
doing
making
sure
that
he
was
trying
to
balance
the
needs
of
every
district
and
making
sure
he
looked
out
for
district
two
and
followed
all
the
guidelines.
P
P
If
I
keep
going
further
north,
I
might
my
son
may
actually
be
back
in
my
district
anyway,
but
I
do
want
to
thank
our
the
law
department.
I
want
to
thank
our
solicitor.
I
want
to
thank
our
clerk's
office,
our
our
sergeant-at-arms,
everyone,
who's,
helped.
You
know
bring
this
together.
All
of
you,
the
people
that
you've
appointed
and
especially
you
know
our
colleagues
but
one
person.
I
really
think
really
drove
me
insane
through
the
whole
process,
but
really
kept
us
all
on
track.
P
He
made
sure
that
every
district
had
had
some
concessions
and
every
district
had
some
benefits,
and
so
I
want
to
thank
everyone
for
for
working
through
this,
and
I'm
I'm
happy
we're
putting
this
behind
us,
hopefully
so
and
eager
to
represent
the
additional
areas
that
that
we'll
have
included
in
our
area
in
district
2..
R
Thank
you.
I
want
to
I'd
just
like
to
acknowledge
also
all
the
people
that
have
been.
R
And
thank
you
councilman
claude,
for
mentioning
the
district,
seven
appointee,
james
murray,
who
did,
I
think,
very
very,
I
think
at
least
20
maps
to
try
to
find
these
compromises.
R
But
I
just
want
to
kind
of
refresh
the
conversation
that,
as
a
reminder,
we
are
required
to
every
10
years
to
bring
the
districts
into
alignment
by
population
so
that
no
district
has
way
more
population
than
another.
So
that
said,
district
7
had
to
lose
territory
because
it
had
too
many
people
in
it
and
it
wasn't
they
needed
to
to
put
people
in
other
districts.
R
So
I
want
to
acknowledge
the
citizens
of
polish
hill,
who
turned
out
to.
I
think
every
of
the
public
hearings
of
the
reapportionment
committee
turned
out
to
the
public
hearing
here
at
city
council
and
their
request
was
to
keep
polish
hill
in
district
7
with
its
neighbors
bloomfield
and
lawrenceville,
especially
because
of
the
tight
neighborhood
relationships,
and
this
amendment
keeps
every
single
inch
of
polish
hill
in
district
7.,
but
you'll
see
when.
R
R
But
the
neighborhood
line
of
polish
hill
is
the
dividing
line,
and
what
I
learned
that
I
didn't
know
before
is
that
our
city
neighborhood
lines
follow
those
census,
tracts
and
blocks,
and
so
in
the
desire
to
keep
polish
hill
intact.
It
was
actually
fairly
easy
to
it.
Was
it's
not
actually
easy?
It
did
take
some
time,
but
it
it
follows
the
neighborhood
line.
Precisely
so
I'm
happy
with
the
compromise.
R
I
want
to
acknowledge
the
one
person
who
hasn't
been
acknowledged
yet
is,
madam
president,
for
wrangling
all
of
the
members
in
all
of
their
various.
Very
you
know
about
fighting
for
each
of
our
residents
right
and
we
all
we've
all
put
in
a
lot
of
hours,
so
I
I
really
appreciate
it.
Madam
president,.
L
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
chair.
So
first
I
want
to
echo
a
lot
of
what's
been
said
is
is
thanking
the
committee,
the
reapportionment
committee,
that
was
chosen
by
council
when
they
worked
really
around
the
clock,
to
figure
something
out
with
the
challenges
of
staying
within
the
deviation
from
population
to
you
know
being
mindful
of
of
each
community
and
what
and
what
they
you
know
seek
to
to
to
see
in
a
map.
L
So
it's
very
challenging.
I
think,
but
I
really
appreciate
council
president
teresa
cal
smith
in
this
moment,
because
you
know
without
her
leadership,
you
know
we
might
not
have
been
able
to
get
to
this
in
a
timely
manner
and
then
all
council
members,
for
you,
know
all
their
work
on
this
in
the
past
few
weeks
to
come
to
this
moment.
You
know
that
said
district
one
will
be
crossing
a
river.
So
that's
it's
a
big!
That's
a
big
moment.
L
P
L
Okay,
well
we're
crossing
rivers
here
in
the
city
of
pittsburgh,
and
that's
that's
that's
that's
a
big
moment
for
us,
but
you
know
I
put
I
put
that
lightly,
but
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
the
challenge
ahead.
Looking
to
the
final
vote
on
tuesday,
so
I
want
to
put
a
little
little
humor
in
there
about.
L
You
know
district
one
going
across
the
river,
but
it
is
it
it's
it's
something
to
it's
great
to
see.
L
Obviously
this
happens
every
10
years
and
you
know,
but
I
I
you
know,
I
have
to
say
that
district
one
had
to
grow
because
of
the
loss
of
population,
sure
the
the
state
pen
penitentiary
closed
and,
and
that
was
a
loss
of
population,
but
here
in
the
city
of
pittsburgh,
like
we're
under
a
crisis
in
a
lot
of
ways,
you
know
650
000
people
used
to
live
here
in
what,
in
the
80s,
late,
70s,
right,
50s
and
50s
and
60s
so
but
300
000
is
what
we're.
You
know
teetering
around
that.
L
You
know
that
that
population
number
so
you
know
continually.
You
know,
especially
what
we're
trying
to
do
with
the
land
bank
to
have.
You
know
to
put
in
place
recycling
tools
for
for
land
and
of
vacant
abandoned
property
and
to
do
it
you
know
in
the
right
way.
I
mean,
I
think
we
all.
You
know
that
conversation
can't
go
away.
I
mean
we're
seeing
that
happen
in
the
map
here.
L
We're
seeing
some
places
grown
population
do
very
well
and
then
we're
seeing
others
that
are,
you
know
continually
neighbors
are
seeing
the
house
abandoned
and
vacant
next
to
them,
and
they
may
not
feel
as
though
this
is
the
best
street
for
them,
and
then
they
move
away
from
the
city
of
pittsburgh,
and
we
we
don't
want
that
to
happen.
I
think
you
know
a
lot
of
us
on
council.
We
have
a
lot
of
you
know.
L
K
If
there's
ever
a
time
when
we
have
to
all
recognize
that
uneven
growth
in
the
city
and
population
loss
in
some
parts
of
the
city
and
population
growth
in
other
parts
of
the
city
affects
us
all,
this
is
it
right,
we're
all
feeling
it
in
the
redrawing
of
this
map
and
with
some
council
districts
having
to
grow
in
new
ways
geographically,
that
were
are
going
to
be
a
change
for
them,
and
other
districts,
like
the
one
I
represent,
having
to
to
shrink
in
in
geographic
in
the
land
that
it
actually
encompasses
so,
but
I'll
also
echo
what
everyone
else
has
said
and
call
out
my
appointee
to
the
pre-apportionment
committee,
emily
yonah,
my
my
chief
of
staff,
who
just
did
an
amazing
work.
K
I
also
really
appreciate
the
entire
the
work
of
everybody
council,
president
kale
smith,
our
finance,
chair,
councilman,
lavelle
and
and
the
work
that
everyone
did.
I
recognized
that
there
has
been
a
tremendous
amount
of
compromise
and
wrangling
of
people
and
listening
to
concerns,
and
I
I
think
this
is
in
a
lot
of
ways:
a
great
map.
It's
a
great
new
set
of
districts-
and
I
know
a
lot
of
people
are
getting.
You
know,
have
gotten
what
they
needed
and
wanted.
K
I
also
have
to
recognize
that
there
have
been-
maybe
not
as
vocally
publicly
but
a
lot
of
people
in
the
district
that
I
represent,
who
are
are
unhappy
with
this
map
and
there
weren't
a
whole
lot
of
options
to
change
it
in
the
way
that
we
wanted
to,
because
of
the
constraints
that
we're
under
and
because
of
the
criteria
that
we
have
to
fit.
K
So
I
am
going
to
be
voting
no
today,
that's
not
an
indictment
or
critique
of
the
committee
and
it's
not
an
indictment
or
it's
not
a
critique
of
the
map
as
a
whole,
but
I
do
really
have
to
listen
to
my
constituents
and
vote
that
way,
so
that
I
just
wanted
to
explain
a
little
bit.
Why
I'll
be
voting
now.
A
Thank
you
councilman
cargill.
Sorry,
second,.
Q
Round
second
round,
okay,
you
know
I
failed
to
mention
blake
flapjack
blake
was
on
this
from
the
beginning.
He
kept
me
in
tune,
we
talked
about
it
on
a
daily
basis,
and
I
know
he
worked
in
conjunction
with
you
know
your
other,
the
other
appointees.
Q
I
also
failed
to
mention
yes,
madam
president,
you
know,
I
don't
know
how
you
do
it,
I
really
don't.
You
know
she
has
nine
different
personalities
coming
at
her.
We
each
have
our
own
city.
We
each
have
our
own
set
of
problems
that
we
bring
and
I
know
I'm
a
lot
to
deal
with
and
you
know
I
appreciate
your
patience
and
I
appreciate
you
working
through
this
and
getting
us
to
what
I
think
is
an
acceptable.
Q
You
know
outcome
and
I
did
want
to
point
two
other
things
out.
We
as
city
council,
we
did
this.
We
tried
to
follow
what
the
people
were
telling
us.
It
wasn't
necessarily
I
wanted
to
keep
on
air.
It
wasn't
necessarily
deb
gross
wanted
to
keep
polish
hill.
The
people
were
speaking
to
us,
so
I
want
the
city
of
pittsburgh
to
know
and
and
these
two
neighborhoods
bonaire
and
pole
show,
I
believe
they
really
mirrored
each
other.
Q
I
believe
paul
show
wanted
to
stay
in
connection
with
bloomfield
and
lawrenceville
and
that's
kind
of
their
identity.
Likewise,
with
bonaire
bonaire,
I
think
wanted
to
stay
with
beach
view
and
brookline,
and
you
know
what
they've
been
there
for
40
years.
So
so
I'm
really
happy
that
we,
you
know,
came
to
a
consensus
on
that
again.
I
just
wanted
to
thank
everybody
again.
I
think
we
we
got
it
right
as
right
as
right
as
we
can
get
it.
So
thanks.
I
A
A
Yes,
councilman
cross
thanks,
mr
chair
one
other
outcome:.
I
Of
the
redistricting
bat
is
that
the
third
council
district
continues
to
represent
model
over
city
sinclair
and
so
suzanne.
If
you're
watching
or
someone
is
watching
for
suzanne.
I
just
want
to
say
you
stuck
with
me
again
for
at
least.
S
I
The
next
10
years
and
it's
a
it's
an
honor
and
a
a
pleasure,
a
true,
true
pleasure-
to
to
be
able
to
continue
to
to
represent
the
melbourne
river
city,
sinclair
neighborhood,
and
I'm
excited
that
we
won't
be
moving
on
after
all,
but
we'll
be
staying
with
you.
So
thanks.
Mr
chair
appreciate
it.
P
P
Smith,
from
I
mean,
but
giovanni
from
imp,
he
did
I
mean
they.
They
did
an
amazing
job.
They
were
there
for
every
meeting
and
same
with
our
imp
department
televising
our
meetings,
but
I
also
want
to
thank
dan
friesen,
our
city
solicitor
too,
but
definitely
thank
all
the
all
the
people
on
the
committee.
I
we
sat
in
our
my
office
last
night
and
I
looked
at
all
the
chief
different
chiefs
of
staff
and
I
thought
they're
all
going
to
be
on
council
when
there
were
going
to
be
a
much
better
council
when
they
are
because.
P
A
Thank
you
last
councilman,
wilson,
second
round.
L
I
just
want
to
speak
to.
I
know
you
know
from
my
end
what
I
was
familiar
with
as
paying
attention
to
the
map.
Obviously
the
neighborhoods
that
I'm
familiar
with
and
also
heard
some
others.
You
know
talk
about
keeping
neighborhoods
together.
I
just
want
to
make
a
comment
about.
It
really
is
a
real
effort
to
keep
neighborhoods
intact.
You
know
with,
and
that
was
a
big
concern
for
neighborhoods.
L
You
know
I
know
I
mean
there
were
several
meetings
that
I
went
to
I'm
sorry.
There
was,
you
know
a
few
meetings
where
neighborhoods
say
just
you
know,
keep
us
intact.
Whatever
you're
doing
we
like
to
have
you
know
our
neighborhood
group
people
come
on.
You
know
whether
the
evenings
six
seven
o'clock
at
night.
You
know
they
can
discuss
all
those
issues
with
one
member.
So
I
really
do
appreciate
the
efforts
to
to
keep
that
intact.
Thanks.
A
A
And
then
I
also
just
want
to
thank
all
those
who
even
worked
tirelessly
yesterday,
including
council
members,
giovanni
sean,
who
worked
into
the
evening
to
help
us
get
this
map
done.
So,
thank
you
all
for
your
due
diligence.
K
A
One
in
opposition
affirmative
recommendation.
Thank
you
very
much
that
will
move
us
to
our
new
papers.
Madam
president,
will
you
please
read
bill
555,
I'm,
madam
clerk?
I'm
sorry
555.
P
J
Okay,
you're
gonna
skip
522,
correct
right.
A
H
H
ordinance
amendment
title
6
conduct
article
1,
regulated
rights
and
actions
by
creating
a
new
chapter;
620
protection
of
abortion
providers
from
out-of-state
investigation
or
persecution
for
providing
legal
abortion
care
bill
number
523,
ordinance,
amended
title
vi,
conduct
article
1,
regulated
rights
and
actions
by
creating
a
new
chapter;
603
enforcement
limitations
regarding
bans
of
certain
reproductive
health
services,
bill
number,
524,
ordinance,
amendment,
title
vi,
conduct
article
1,
regulated
rights
and
actions
by
creating
a
new
chapter.
607
regulations
of
deceptive
advertising
by
limiting
services,
pregnancy,
centers.
L
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I'd
like
to
talk
about
all
all
the
bills,
but
first
I'd
like
to
go
through
the
amendments
before
discussing
the
bills.
So
I
have
three
amendments
one
for
each
bill.
L
I
I
can
I'd
like
to
just
quickly
explain
roughly
on
each
of
them,
but
I'm
gonna
amend,
motion
to
amend,
522,
523
and
524.
K
L
So,
each
of
the
bills
you'll
see
there
are
definitions
in
places
where
there
haven't
been.
For
instance,
we
define
abortion
in
522
in
523,
also
whenever
we
are
looking
at
bill
522,
the
very
first
one
of
protection
of
reproductive
health
care
services
from
the
shield,
the
shield
bill,
which
protects
from
out-of-state
investigation,
for
instance,
west
virginia
ohio.
L
We
also
made
some
clarifications
in
coordination
with
law,
so
in
section
620.02,
where
it
states
no
assistance
from
the
city
of
pittsburgh
officials,
we
originally
had.
You
know
a
paragraph
that
was
describing
that
and
we
broke
it
down
into
a
more
comprehensive
way.
So
there's
a
better
understanding
so
that
some
of
the
so
that
is
some
additions,
but
also
technical
523
is
also
some
some
technical
ones.
L
This
is
the
the
one
where
it
it
deprioritizes
the
enforcement,
and
this
is
the
if
then
one
so,
if
the
state
would
ban
abortion
that
this,
this
would
instruct
our
our
local
local
city
officials
and
also
our
our
city
of
pittsburgh
police
to
de-prioritize
this
so
similar
to
de-prioritizing
marijuana
in
the
cases
where
people
will
be
carrying
a
low
amount
of
marijuana.
So
this
this
is
technical
nature
as
well.
L
I
do
want
to
talk
about
the
clear
the
clarifying
in
certain
reproductive
health
care
services,
including
abortion,
ever
becomes
illegal
in
nationwide
or
in
the
or
in
the
commonwealth
of
pennsylvania
that
we
clearly
defined
what
what
would
be
de-prioritized,
whereas
before
it
just
said
any
abortion-related
crime.
Now
it
clearly
defines
related
to
or
providing
receiving
these
reproductive
health
care
services,
including
abortion
to
the
full
furthest,
extent
possible
and
then
finally,
on
the
third
bill.
L
524
this
bill
speaks
to
the
to
the
regulation
of
deceptive
advertising
by
limited
services.
Pregnancy,
centers,
so
you'll
see
that
the
recital
section
is
strengthened.
L
For
instance,
in
similar
bills
we
did
the
same
with
paid
sick
leave
and
also
in
the
time
of
cover-paid
sick
leave,
to
strengthen
our
argument
that
this
is
a
health
and
wellness
concern
and
in
our
charter
it
directs
us
to
ensure
the
health
and
wellness
of
of
our
of
our
citizens,
and
so
you
know
any
sort
of
commercial
deceptive
advertising.
L
That's
that's
going
on
that.
We
would
we
wouldn't
we
wouldn't
allow
any
sort
of
deceptive
advertising.
So
there
is
the
the
strength
in
in
the
recital
side
in
terms
of
the,
whereas
section
other
than
that
there
is
also
an
added
definition
of
abortion.
L
Yes,
I'm
going
to
make
further
comment
here
once
we
once
he's
our
amendment
amended,
but
all
three
bills,
especially
I'm
sorry,
all
three
bills,
we're
giving
the
same
attention
to
to
the
law
department-
and
you
know
we.
J
L
Had
a
very
robust
conversation
directly
with,
I
want
to
thank
jesse
exiles
and
also
the
solicitor
in
terms
of
assisting
assisting
my
office
and
me,
and
and
and
getting
this
done
so.
P
I
just
want
to
say
I
wonder
if
they
got
approval
from
the
law
department,
because
yesterday
on,
if
you
heard
the
public
comment
from
a
church
in
mount
washington
where
they
talked
about
how
they
would
definitely
sue
because
they
they
didn't
feel
like
they
were
doing
deceptive
advertising,
I
mean
heck.
Some
of
our
politicians
could
be
sued
for
that,
but.
M
P
That
I
just
think
that
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
putting
ourselves
in
a
situation.
I'm
gonna
vote
in
favor
in
the
end.
But
I
want
to
make
sure
that
that
they're,
okay.
L
L
Of
you
know,
a
vote
in
the
you
know
in
the
positive
would
be
to
do
everything
we
can
to
protect
reproductive
health
care
in
the
city
of
pittsburgh.
P
L
People
you
know
that
will
come
here
or
are
currently
pittsburghers.
P
I'm
not
trying
to
put
you
in
this
in
this
situation.
I
just
want
to
want
to
know
because
I
don't
you
know
I
didn't
vote
for
the
gun
laws
because
they
were
not.
You
know
we
didn't
have
that
jurisdiction.
So
there's
other
things
I
haven't
voted
for.
I
haven't.
I
tried
not.
I
try
to
be
consistent,
so
I
just
want
to
know
that
it's
okay
from
the
law
department,
so
I'll
abstain
today
and
then
I'll
get
something
in
writing.
Okay,
okay,.
A
L
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
chair,
so
you
know
in
light
of
light
of
dobbs,
you
know
in
the
in
the
post-ops
world.
L
You
know
this
is
it's
quite
quite
shocking
to
see
that
decision
in
terms
of
allowing
states
to
make
this
determination-
and
you
know
we
were
we
were
you
know-
we've
been
discussing
this
and
working
on
this-
these
package
of
bills
since
there
was
that
the
the
leak
of
that
decision,
so
I'm
thankful
for
the
the
assistance-
and
these
are
two
individuals
that
we've
been
working
with
and
you
know
I'm
gonna
have
them
come
to
the
table
soon.
L
I'm
thankful
for
the
assistance
of
greer
donnelly
and
sue
fricci
in
framing
these
bills.
So
it's
been
quite
a
a
pace
here
in
the
past
couple
weeks
or
you
know
when,
since
the
leak
came
so
about
you
know,
obviously
more
than
a
couple
weeks,
but
but
recently
you
know,
since
that
decision
came
down
on
that
friday,
it's
been
quite
a
pace,
so
I
appreciate
everyone
involved.
I
want
to
thank
my
office.
L
I
want
to
thank
all
individuals
that
worked
in
this
law
department.
I
want
to
especially
thank
the
co-sponsors
council
person.
Strasberger
and
o'connor,
the
the
city
law
department,
was
also
tremendously
instrumental
in
helping
tighten
up
these
bills
and
and
I'm
thankful
for
their
hard
work.
So
with
that
said,
can
I
have
I'd
like
to
ask
sue
fricci
to
to
come
to
the
table
and
also,
I
believe
we
have
donnelly
on
online.
L
T
L
Well,
I
I
appreciate
you
you
come
on
today
and
if,
if,
if
I'm
not
sure
who
who's
best
or
it
would
be
great
to
hear
from
both
of
you
on
the
really
the
you
know
to
explain
the
the
context
of
what's
happening
here
in
terms
of
nationally
and
regionally
on
what
what
reproductive
health
care
looks
like
now,
after
after
the
dobbs
decision.
U
Sure
I
can
speak
more
knowledgeably
about
local
conditions
and
greer.
I
think
you
have
such
expertise
nationally.
Would
you
like
to
set
the
stage
for
the
national
situation.
T
That's
that
would
be
perfect,
so
we're
obviously
here
today,
because
the
supreme
court
just
overturned
nearly
50
years
of
president
and
held
that
the
constitution,
the
federal
constitution,
no
longer
protects
the
right
to
abortion.
T
This
opens
up
the
door
for
roughly
half
the
country
to
eventually
ban
abortion
in
the
coming
months
and
as
devastating
of
the
decision
as
that
is.
I
am
often
in
the
unfortunate
position
of
telling
people
that
the
worst
is
yet
to
come.
We
know
this
because
the
anti-abortion
movement
is
telling
it
to
us
directly.
T
Pittsburgh
is
located
in
an
important
location,
given
that
we
are
surrounded
by
some
states
that
are
going
to
ban
abortion
in
like
west
virginia
and
ohio,
meaning
that
we're
likely
to
see
a
lot
of
out-of-state
residents
in
our
city,
and
it
would
be
wonderful
for
pittsburgh
to
be
a
place
that
welcomes
these
people,
who
need
this
vital
care
from
out
of
state.
Our
providers
are
willing
and
able
to
offer
this
care
and
want
to
provide
this
resource,
but
they
should
not
have
to
risk
their
freedom
and
their
livelihood
to
provide
this
lawful
care.
T
The
shield
bill
today
would
help
to
protect
our
providers.
It
can't
eliminate
all
risk,
but
combined
with
the
governor's
recent
executive
order
and
can
mitigate
a
lot
of
the
risk,
and
in
this
moment
we
should
do
whatever
we
can
to
prevent,
protect
our
providers
and
show
that
we
have
their
backs,
given
that
they
are
providing
fully
lawful
care
in
our
state.
T
There
are
two
other
bills
today
that
are
also
very
important.
The
first
is
a
trigger
bill
which
would
deprioritize
the
enforcement
of
crimes
related
to
abortion
provision
if
abortion
were
to
become
illegal
here.
The
second
is
a
bill
that
makes
it
illegal
for
limited
services,
pregnancy
centers,
to
engage
in
deceptive
advertising.
T
You
know
these
these
crisis,
pregnancy,
centers,
are
fake
abortion.
Clinics
whose
whole
purpose
is
try
to
is
to
try
to
convince
people
not
to
have
abortion.
Often
through
deceptive
means.
T
These
clinics
outnumber
real
abortion
clinics
and
people
should
not
be
able
to
lie
to
others
to
try
to
stop
them
from
engaging
in
in
lawful
health
care.
So
I
just
want
to
thank
you
so
much
to
council
person,
wilson,
strasbourg
and
o'connor
for
introducing
this
vital
legislation
and
I'll
turn
it
over
to
sue
who
has
some
more
additional
local
insights.
Thank
you.
U
Yes,
thank
you
so
as
part
of
my
job
at
the
women's
law
project,
I
represent
the
freestanding
abortion
facilities
in
pennsylvania
and
have
done
that
since
1992,
and
I
can
tell
you
there
has
never
been
a
time
like
this
ever
the
level
of
of
fear
and
intimidation
that
is
coming
not
from
our
state
officials,
but
from
people
in
other
states
in
other
legislatures
from
texas
for
crying
out
loud.
U
You
know
the
shield
law
is
the
heart
of
this
package
of
bills.
It
is
so
important.
U
Set
of
abortion
laws
and
a
regulatory
framework
that
is
vigorously
vigorously
enforced
by
the
department
of
health
and
the
department
of
state
at
the
state
level,
abortion
complications
are
vanishingly
rare.
This
is
a
safe
procedure
in
our
city
and
the
fact
that
I
have
doctors
calling
me
saying
am
I
going
to
go
to
jail
for
practicing
legal
medicine
under
the
laws
of
our
state.
U
That
cannot
happen
in
this
city,
so
the
city
of
pittsburgh
has
been
so
extremely
helpful
in
supporting
reproductive
health
care
providers
and
I'm
looking
back
at
the
buffer
zone,
ordinance
that
was
passed
back
in
2005
and
that
the
city
defended
through
a
lot
of
litigation
and
defended
successfully
at
every
single
turn,
and
my
only
comment
on
the
other
laws
would
be.
The
other
bills
would
be
bill.
523.
U
It's
very
important
that
in
de-prioritizing
enforcement
of
abortion-related
laws
we
must
not
have
a
de-prioritization
of
enforcement
of
the
buffer
zone
and
other
statutes
that
protect
providers
and
patients
from
extremist
violence.
That
is
a
problem.
It's
a
continuing
problem.
The
buffer
zone
has
been
very
effective
in
managing
confrontations
on
the
sidewalk
in
front
of
our
two
freestanding
facilities
and
needs
to
continue
to
be
enforced.
L
Well,
thank
you
greer
and
thank
you
sue
I'd
like
to
defer
to
the
council
person
strasburger
right
now.
K
Well,
first,
I
really
want
to
thank
councilman
wilson
and
his
staff,
particularly
mohamed
bernie,
for
for
for
his
leadership
and
really
taking
the
initiative
to
create
a
safe
haven,
safe
haven
in
pittsburgh,
as
we've
done
so
many
times
on
other
issues,
and
I
can't
think
of
a
time
more
urgent
than
now,
not
only
considering
the
dobbs
decision,
but
also
acknowledging
that,
in
the
11th
hour
of
the
state
budget
process,
our
state
legislators
passed
by
narrow
margins,
a
constitutional
amendment
that
would
effectively
ban
abortion
if,
if
several
different
steps
that
would
have
to
occur,
to
get
it
on
a
ballot
initiative
but
and
get
it
passed
through
through
the
through
a
ballot
initiative
process.
K
I
want
to
thank
sue,
fritchey
and
greg
donnelly
for
being
here
today
and
for
all
the
assistance
that
the
two
of
you
have
provided
to
councilman
wilson
and
all
of
us
as
sponsors
on
this
bill
and
speaking
here
today,
and
you
know.
Obviously,
this
the
urgency
of
the
situation
requires
that
cities
like
pittsburgh,
who
have
the
opportunity
to
serve
as
a
refuge
for
reproductive
care,
take
every
action
and
their
power
to
do
so.
K
K
K
In
addition
to
those
who
have
have
really
provided
assistance
in
these
bills,
I
do
want
to
give
a
shout
out
to
all
of
the
organizations
that
have
worked
for
decades
in
this
fight
and
in
this
effort
to
protect
equality,
gender
equality.
In
this
way,
it's
it's
planned
parenthood.
It's
a
women's
law
project,
it's
also
new
voices
for
reproductive
justice.
It's
the
national
council
of
jewish
women,
it's
feminist
majority,
it's
a
national
organization
for
women,
so
many
other
organizations,
but
as
legislators
we
can
move
bills
that
protect
rights
and
that
that's
that's.
K
P
I
just
want
to
say
I
appreciate
councilwoman
strasberg's
opinion,
but
I
really
like
to
have
something
from
the
actual
law
department
on
at
least
just
bill
524,
the
other
ones,
I'm
ready
to
vote
for
the
that
one.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
good.
Thank
you.
R
Yeah,
I
want
to
thank
the
sponsors
of
the
bills
and
I
want
to
thank
also
all
of
the
partner
organizations,
as
councilwoman
strasberger
pointed
out,
who
have
been
fighting
for
our
rights
collectively
for
so
many
so
many
decades,
and
I
think
maybe
just
one
other
point
that
hasn't
been
said
enough
is
that
this
is
fighting
for
medical
rights
and
our
right
to
privacy
in
our
medical
choices,
and
this
may.
R
This
threat
to
abortion
rights
is
really
a
threat
to
all
of
our
rights,
because
you
know
what
rights
will
they
go
after
next,
and
so
it's
not
only
about
abortion
care
right,
and
so
it's
it's.
It's.
I
think
to
everyone's
credit
here
that
to
do
the
hard
work
to
draw
this
line
in
the
sand,
and
I
just
wanted
to
acknowledge
that.
Thank
you.
Q
You,
mr
chair,
first
and
foremost,
you
know
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
councilwoman,
wilson
and
councilwoman
strasberg.
I
really
respect
your
willingness
to
take
on
this
very
sensitive
subject.
Q
I
think
we
were
all
you
know
disappointed,
I
think,
in
the
supreme
court's
judgment,
but-
and
I
stand
with
you
in
solidarity
with
with
your
legislation.
I
also
do
have
concerns,
as
council
president
has
as
to
524,
and
it
can't
help
to
have
been
moved
by
pastor,
gilbert
and
his
wife.
Yesterday.
I
have
a
couple
questions
on
that
and
I
don't
want
to.
I
don't
want
to
bring
the
attorneys
to
the
table
or
the
law
department,
but
just
tell
me
if
I'm
correct
in
assuming
are
we
on
good
legal
ground?
Q
Q
So
you
know,
as
far
as
our
legal
standing
goes
as
far
as
us
being
sued
by
organizations
that
surely
will
probably
try
that
in
making
it
the
prioritization
for
our
law
enforcement
to
not,
you
know,
hold
people
personally
responsible
and
is
that
how
we
are
making.
Is
that
what
makes
us
in
good
legal
standing
ground
and
are
we
on
good
legal
standing
ground?
I
guess.
Q
Q
No,
that's.
That's
right.
That's
right!
I!
I
guess
you
know,
I
don't
know,
that's
why
I'm
asking
I
didn't
know
it,
for
you
sure
sure
please
do
girl.
T
I
would
just
like
to
say
that
you
know
two
things.
First
of
all,
this
is
a
classic
trigger
bill.
The
anti-abortion
movement
has
used
these
in
a
variety
of
contexts.
It
won't
come
into
effect
unless
the
state
or
federal
government
advance
abortion.
So
that's
the
first
thing
to
note
in
the
short
term,
I
don't
think
there's
much
threat
of
being
sued
and
the
second
part
is,
I
agree
completely
with
sue
right,
that
the
the
reason
why
you
know
there
are
big
concerns
about
this
law
in
terms
of
preemption.
T
The
reason
why
this
law
should
not
cause
preemption
concerns
is
because
it
does
not
conflict
with
state
law
to
the
extent
of
federal
law,
to
the
extent
that
it
says
hey
in
pittsburgh.
This
is
totally
legal.
If
the
state
or
federal
government
says
it's
not,
it
says
hey.
If
this
is
illegal,
our
we
are
going
to
de-prioritize,
it
put
it
to
the
bottom
of
the
list,
and
so
you
know
it's
worth
noting
that
another
city
in
pennsylvania
has
passed
a
law
like
this.
T
So
it's
not
we're
not
the
first
to
go
out
on
a
limb
to
do
that.
Rather,
city
pass
that
law
too,
so
I
think
within
the
trigger
law,
I'm
not
concerned
about
it
having
a
huge
legal
risk
that
doesn't
mean
we
won't
get
sued
right.
This
is
abortion.
T
Q
Thank
you
for
clearing
that
up
great
and
that's
the
line
I
was
thinking
on.
So
I
appreciate
that
you
know
I
proudly
support
your
522-523.
Q
I
do
want
to
abstain
on
524
until
we
get
a
little
more
information
as
to
what
is
false
information.
I
guess
is
really
my
question.
Unless
you
want
to
take
that
up
now,.
U
I
would
just
say
that
the
bill
contains
a
a
feature
that
should
protect
you
and
should
protect
the
city
and
should
protect
everybody
from
incorrect
enforcement,
and
that
is,
it
has
to
be
a
knowing
knowingly
deceptive
something
that
a
person,
either
knows
or
certainly
should
know,
is
deceptive.
So
mistakes
would
not
fall
under
that
law.
Q
T
I
would
just
like
you
know
to
add
too,
as
as
council
person,
strauss
berger
said,
I
apologize.
I
didn't
hear
the
public
comments
that
were
made
yesterday,
so
I
feel,
like
I'm,
responding
a
little
bit
blind,
but
to
the
extent
that
their
comment
is
that
they're
not
providing
deceptive
services,
then
this
their
conduct
shouldn't
fall
within
the
scope
of
the
law
at
all.
This
will
only
be
you
know
this.
The
crisis,
pregnancy
center
law
will
only
come
into
effect.
T
If
someone
is
deceiving
someone
and
the
types
of
things
that
you
know,
crisis
pregnancy,
centers
are
known
to
do
is
to,
for
instance,
lie
about
how
far
along
a
person's
pregnancy
is
so
that
they
time
out
or
be
able
to
access
lawful
services
in
the
state,
or
you
know
to
say
that
they
offer
abortion
when
they
don't.
You
know
it
is
common
for
for
legislators
to
regulate
doctors
in
a
variety
of
contexts,
and
so
you
know
it's.
I
don't
I
unders.
You
know.
T
The
supreme
court
a
few
years
ago
had
a
very
famous
case
where
considered
a
california
law
that
concerned
crisis
pregnancy,
centers,
and
it
invalidated
that
law.
This
city
ordinance
was
passed
after
that
case
came
out
trying
to
make
sure
it
did
not
violate
any
of
the
problems
that
the
supreme
court
found
with
requiring,
for
instance,
crisis
privacy
centers
to
to
you
know,
do
what
they
consider
to
be
with
moral
speech
right.
This
is
just
saying
you
can't
lie
to
people.
That's
it.
L
I
mean
you
know
just
like
a
reference
before
and
the
I
know
you're
going
to
ask
me,
but
I
feel
you
know
compelled
to
just
explain
this
a
little
more
further
we're
stating
our
reasons
of
why
we
think
this
is
important
in
the
recitals
and
one
in
particular
stands
out
to
me
and
it's,
whereas
if
a
pregnant
person
does
not
receive
timely
and
accurate
information,
subsequent
decisions
could
lead
to
further
complications
and
unnecessary
medical
procedures
which
could
be
costly
for
both
patients
and
providers.
L
So,
within
our
charter
with
the
health
and
wellness
you
know
we're
directed
to
to
take
that
into
account
for
all
of
our
citizens.
You
know
that's
why
I
gave
the
example
of
paid
sick
time
and
how
that
you
know
stood
to
the
test
at
the
supreme
court
in
pennsylvania
and
likely.
So
you
know
I
feel
in
this
case.
We
also
have
the
duty
to
you
know,
look
at
this
situation.
L
L
It's
also
an
important
moment
that
we're
talking
about
this,
because
it's
not
something
that
is
typically
discussed,
and
maybe
these
centers
are
around
and
and
individuals
may
not
recognize
them,
but
now
we
will
and
we'll-
and
you
know,
hopefully,
individuals
will
be
able
to
to
recognize
that
that
there
are
centers
out
there,
that
that
may
be.
L
The
the
bill
that
is,
the
the
shield
law
bill
that
that
protects
our
health
care
providers.
You
know
in
particular
you
know,
staff
and
and
doctors
and
and
anyone
legal
anyone
related
to
any
sort
of
procedure
or
guidance
or
or
health
care.
Just
any
health
care
in
general
to
an
individual
that
is
seeking
health
care
in
cases
of
in
cases
like
like
this
bill
would
speak
to
that
they're
protected.
So
this
this
bill,
which
is
you
know,
preliminary
vote
now
and
and
final.
L
You
know
if
it
passes
today,
final
vote
this
coming
tuesday
and
if
passed
this
bill
will
be
first
of
its
kind.
So
the
city
of
pittsburgh
will
be
the
first
city
in
the
country
to
to
pass
a
bill
like
this.
The
shield
law
bill-
and
you
know
I
you
know
it's
easy
to
say
you
know
first
bill
in
the
country,
but
I
think
what's
important
here
is
that
I
think
what
we've
seen
today
is
what
greer
and
and
and
sue
and
what
council
person
strasbourg
was
talking
about
and
and
councilman
gross.
L
L
You
know
pittsburgh
can
be
a
leader
and
it
has
been
leading
the
way,
and
so
you
know
we
look
to
work
with
the
county,
the
state,
so
you
know
I
think
this
bill
is
extremely
important
in
particular,
because
we
have
states
around
us,
you
know
that
are
making
it
very
difficult.
They're
banning
you
know
outright
banning
the
reproductive
freedom
of
individuals
in
their
in
in
their
own
state.
L
So
you
know
it's
just
important
that
we
protect
our
health
care,
people
that
are
seeking
health
care
and
the
people
that
I'm
sorry
it's
important,
that
we
protect
individuals
that
are
providing
health
care
so,
but
in
light
I
appreciate
your
comments
about
the
governor
sue,
because
I
was
glad
to
see
governor
wolf's
executive
order
yesterday
on
reproductive
health
care.
L
I'm
especially
proud
that
that
our
shielding
bill
on
on
on
on
you
know
to
protect
the
health
care
providers
from
out-of-state
investigation
is
going
forward,
and
you
know
I'm
glad
that
we,
we
have
everyone
here
to
discuss
this
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
any
further
conversation
things
that
happen
between
now
and
and
final
vote
for
many
of
the
members
and
also
I
am
looking
forward
to
any
governor.
You
know
the
next
governor
of
pennsylvania
to
continue
on
with
wolf's
direction
here.
L
So
with
that
said,
I
have
no
further
comment,
but
I
appreciate
everyone
coming
today.
I
appreciate
sue
and
greer
co-sponsors
and
all
of
council.
Thank
you.
P
I
just
want
to
thank
councilman
wilson.
I
didn't
have
a
chance
to
say
that,
and
I
didn't
disagree
with
the
first
two
bills.
I
disagree
with
the
third.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
think
it's
a
matter
of
just
talking
with
some
people
about
law.
It's
a
matter
of
put
just
a
making
an
amendment
to
add
a
description,
so
we'll
talk
with
our
law
department
about
some
of
that.
Make
sure
that
we're
good
thank.
A
U
I
think
you
would
look
to
other
statutes
that
do
define
deceptive.
It
is
defined
fairly
sure
in
state
law.
It
may
be
defined
elsewhere.
No.
M
U
It
is
defined
elsewhere
in
the
law,
and
you
also
look
at
its
common
usage,
so
lying
deliberately
misrepresenting
the
truth.
That
kind
of
common
common
sense,
common
usage
would
be
read
into
this
language.
T
M
T
Agree
with
that
I
mean.
Certainly
the
bill
could
be
clarified
at
a
definition,
but
I
don't
necessarily
think
it
needs
one
right.
That
would
be
a
decision
for
the
courts
to
make,
and
you
know
I
teach
that
statutory
interpretation
to
a
bunch
of
law
students-
and
you
know
the
first
thing
we
would
do-
is
look
to
other
parts
of
the
the
city
and
state
code
to
see
where
it's
defined
and
see
if
it
makes
sense
in
this
context
and
if
not
the
courts
could
also
look
at.
U
The
consumer
protection
laws,
I
think,
define
deceptive
practices
and
but,
as
greer
says,
if
it
would
bring
comfort
to
have
an
actual
statutory
definition,
I
don't
see
any
problem
with
that.
A
Okay,
I'd
be
interested
in
that
I'm
I'm
not
gonna
hold
this
up
for
that
purpose.
Just
for
my
edification,
I
need
to
better
understand
what
that
actually
looks
like
my
other
question
is
what
is
the
enforcement
or
the
penalty
for
this.
A
L
Round
counseling
wilson
I'll
just
you
know,
say
that
you
know
I'm
happy
to
to
amend
the
bill
before
tuesday
in
terms
of
clearly
defining
deceptive
advertising.
Okay,.
P
Abstention
on
bill
zero,
five,
two
four.
V
P
J
A
H
Phil,
I'm
sorry
bill
555
resolution
amending
resolution
579
of
2021,
which
authorized
an
agreement
with
the
pwsa
for
the
completion
of
projects
approved
in
the
city
of
pittsburgh's
american
rescue
plan
by
updating
the
approved
projects
to
align
with
the
revised
plan
bill.
556
resolution
amending
resolution
453,
which
appropriated
federal
american
rescue
plan
funding
by
updating
the
approved
projects
as
outlined
in
exhibit
a
bill.
A
Q
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
don't
know
if
there's
anybody
to
speak
to
this,
I'm
just
curious
as
to
these
funds,
we
can.
A
Just
to
save
time
right
bill
555,
I
believe,
moves
about
500
000
from
lead
line,
replacement
to
wastewater,
lateral,
repair
replacement
bill.
556
actually
allows
for
money
to
be
moved
out
of
the
arp
trust
fund
into
our
capital
counts
into
the
authorities,
they're
going
to
actually
utilize
the
money
bill.
557
is
moving
money
around
within
the
ura
so
that
it
can
be
better
actually
spent.
A
It
also
moves
two
million
dollars
out
of
the
ura,
which
was
money
set
aside
for
artists
and
the
city
can
better
manage
that
money
than
the
actual
ura
can
558
is
pretty
straightforward
and
then
certainly
probably
could
also
talk
better
about
the
bridge
asset
management
trust
fund.
But
that's
that's
the
the
global
of
what
I
can
know.
He
can
go
better
into
detail.
Q
Sure
sure-
and
I
guess
my
me,
you
some
you-
you
kind
of
gave
me
the
answer
to
most
of
my
questions
there.
I
think,
but
the
trust
fund,
that
money
was
in
the
trust
fund,
but
was
it
earmarked
for
anything
in
particular.
W
I
think
I
can
explain
globally.
W
So
the
key
bill
here,
as
the
chairman
mentioned,
is
bill
556,
which
is
the
bill
amending
the
american
rescue
plan
allocation
plan.
W
Are
all
follow
along
items
that
adjust
various
agreements
or
other
prior
resolutions
to
implement
those
changes
to
the
overall
spending
plan?
So
the
changes
here
I
would
describe
as
primarily,
administrative
or
technical
in
nature,
with
four
exceptions
in
in
most
cases,
the
changes
are
to
take
funding
items
that
had
been
one
large
bucket
of
funds
and
breaking
it
into
a
longer
list
of
line
items
that
are
more
clearly
itemized.
So,
for
example,
within
some
of
the
ura
allocations,
we're
taking
what
had
been
a
21
million
dollar
pot
of
money
for
own
pgh
and
differentiating
between.
Q
W
Between
sub-accounts,
so
some
of
that
will
go
to
the
pittsburgh
housing
development
corporation,
which
is
a
ura
subsidiary.
Some
of
it
will
be
utilized
for
education
and
counseling
for
first-time
home
buyers,
and
some
of
it
will
support
other
activities.
So
most
of
this
is
consistent
with
the
originally
adopted
plan,
but
for
accounting
purposes
is
being
more
specifically
described.
W
The
four
significant
changes
are:
the
establishment
of
the
bridge
asset
management
program
and
the
associated
trust
fund.
Those
are
funds
that
had
been
previously
appropriated
under
the
original
american
rescue
plan
resolution
to
be
transferred
to
one
pgh
mayor,
peter's,
nonprofit
initiative.
It
was
determined
and-
and
this
is
not
an
indication
on
the
prior
administration
or
council's
decision
last
july,
when
this
was
adopted,
but
it
was
determined
on
the
basis
of
treasury,
u.s
treasury
department
guidance
that
was
not
available
until
december
of
last
year
that
that
was
not
an
eligible
use
of
funds.
W
So
we
needed
to
find
a
way
to
reprogram
those
funds
and
identified
paying
for
a
comprehensive
bridge
asset
management
program
as
a
wise
expenditure
of
those
funds.
In
light
of
the
collapse
of
the
fern
hollow
bridge
and
other
other
needed
improvements
to
our
bridge
maintenance,
so
that
is
one
of
the
four
significant
changes.
The
second
is
the
creation
of
a
downtown
housing
conversion
program.
W
W
However,
concerns
were
raised,
I
think
rightly,
about
the
ability
to
drive
out
the
total
amount
of
funding
that
had
been
budgeted
there
in
the
relatively
limited
window
of
time
for
to
which
we
have
to
spend
arpa
funds,
but
we're
still
fully
committed
to
that
program,
and
I'm
hopeful
that
we'll
be
able
to
identify
additional
if
it
is
successful
to
identify
additional
dollars
to
support
it
into
the
future.
But
it
was.
W
W
Frankly,
a
a
an
important
need
in
the
downtown
real
estate
market,
with
the
shift
in
the
ways
that
individuals,
you
know
and
companies
are
managing
their
workforce
in
light
of
covid,
with
with
more
individuals
working
from
home,
at
least
a
part
portion
of
the
week.
The
vacancy
rates
particular
particularly
in
class
b
and
c
office
space
in
the
central
business
district
are
very
low.
That
has
enough
a
potential
to
negatively
impact
our
tax
base.
It
certainly
also
has
an
oppor
potential
to
you
know
impact
the
sort
of
neighborhood
fabric
of
downtown.
W
So
this
is
also
an
opportunity,
however,
to
facilitate
the
conversion
of
downtown
office
buildings
that
are
under-occupied
into
housing
and,
in
particular,
affordable
housing.
The
city's
resources
here
would
be
matched
by
investments
from
the
state
and
the
county.
The
portion
of
the
program
that
we
will
be
funding
is
targeted
at
achieving
affordability
in
those
projects.
W
A
state
grant
of
three
million
dollars
has
been
made
to
the
ura,
the
ura's
identified,
900
thousand
dollars
in
other
funds,
and
so
the
city
here
would
be
transferring
within
monies
that
were
already
slated
for
the
ura
2.1
million
for
a
total
of
three
million
on
our
part,
and
the
county
is
also
putting
in
three
million
dollars
as
well.
W
The
third
significant
change
is
moving
again
within
funds
already
designated
for
the
ura
funding
for
the
gladstone
school,
affordable
housing
project
to
the
acquisition
of
hayes
woods
park,
the
for
various
reasons.
It
was
determined
that
arpa
funds
were
not
the
best
use
of
funds
to
support
gladstone
gladstone
is
a
low
income.
Housing
tax
credit
deal.
Deals
of
that
structure
typically
require
their
public
support
to
come
in
the
form
of
a
loan
rather
than
a
grant.
W
In
order
to
make
the
back-end
deal
mechanics
work,
we're
not
permitted
to
use
arpa
funds
for
loans;
they
can
only
be
utilized
for
grants.
If
we're,
they
can
only
be
us
for
grants
if
they're
being
transferred
out
to
an
outside
entity.
We
can
of
course
use
them.
We
can
spend
them
to
purchase
things,
so
other
funds
were
identified
for
gladstone.
W
Very
briefly,
the
between
actual
acquisition
and
holding
costs
over
the
time
in
which
the
ura
has
been
in
possession
of
the
hayeswood
site
for
the
city
that
the
total
cost
to
them
has
been
six
million
dollars.
Four
million
of
that
has
been
raised
in
you
know
private
charitable
support
to
offset
the
cost,
leaving
a
two
million
dollar
remainder.
Those
funds
were
fronted
out
of
the
pittsburgh
development
fund,
which
is
a
fund
that
council
created,
I
believe
in
the
90s
to
support
loans
to
community
business,
district
projects
and
housing
projects.
W
So
by
acquiring
haze
woods
for
that
formula,
I'm
sorry
that
two
million
dollar
remainder
will
be
able
to
reimburse
effectively
that
fund
to
allow
other
projects
to
advance
and
take
possession
of
haze
woods.
I
do
just
want
to
thank
the
ura
for
the
years
in
which
they've
held
the
site
and
have
done
important
cleanup
for
us.
You
know
subdividing
the
site
in
order
to
transfer
those
portions
of
it
that
are
not
within
city
limits,
but
in
baldwin
borough
to
baldwin,
applying
conservation
easements
to
the
mineral
rights
beneath
the
site.
W
A
lot
of
work
went
into
preparing
the
site
to
become
a
park
for
us
and
we're
now
close
to
being
ready
to
take
possession
and
the
final
change
is
a
small
one.
But
I
just
want
to
note
it
for
clarity,
because
it
involves
a
transfer
across
council
districts
and
we'll
be
moving
629
476
dollars
from
the
thaddeus
stevens
project
to
the
zone,
4
public
safety
project.
I
do
want
to
just
make
sure
that
everyone's
aware
it's
an
even
swap
the
some.
W
Some
services
had
been
procured
in
support
of
the
thaddeus
stevens
project
before
we
had
full
guidance
on
what
types
of
contracts
needed
to
be
used
in
order
to
access,
arpa
funds,
and
so
the
the
compliant
contracts
weren't
utilized
for
that
early
work.
If
we
were
to
attempt
to
move
forward
with
arpa
funds
for
that
project,
it
would
mean
basically
letting
the
those
designs
go.
We
wouldn't
be
able
to
purchase
them
from
the
designer
so
again
making
it
even
swap
here,
because
the
zone
4
project
has
not
begun
to
advance.
W
P
W
Road
with
her
yes,
so
there's
there's
no
substantive
change
again
in
terms
of
the
projects
that
we'll
be
completing.
Q
Yeah-
and
you
know
I
should
say
director-
I
feel
you're
being
very
responsible,
especially
around
the
affordable
housing
programs
that
you
have
going
on.
You
know
one
there
and
dear
to
my
heart.
I
hope
we
can
be
as
creative
up
in
carrick.
You
know
when
it
comes
to
fruition,
councilwoman
gross,
and
I
made
a
visit
out
there
and
you
know
it's
just
ripe
for
that.
Q
W
R
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
thank
you,
director,
pollock,
for
once
again
that
very
precise
and
detailed
level
discussion.
I
really
do
appreciate
your
skills
in
communicating
so
clearly
and
also
this
once
again.
R
I
think
this
is
a
second
or
third
week,
where
we've
seen
really
intense,
due
diligence
on
matching
funds
to
uses
and
cleaning
up
accounts,
and
so
it
gives
me
you
know
assurance
that
I
feel,
like
you
know,
we're
we're
making
you're
putting
really
good
papers
in
front
of
us
that
are
going
to
keep
us,
especially
in
compliance
with
the
arpa
funds,
because
this
has
been
it's
a
really
important
trust
fund
that
we
were.
You
know
so
fortunate
to
get
at
cities
across
the
country
from
the
federal
government.
R
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we
do
everything
perfectly
well,
so
that
we
don't
have
to
pay
any
of
the
money
back,
because
that's
what
happens
if
we
don't
do
our
compliances
as
well,
and
so
we're
really,
I
feel
very
confident
in
your
work
and
I'm
grateful,
but
I
also
just
want
to
ask
some
follow-up
questions
about
the
75
million
dollar
pot.
That
is
goes
to
the
ura,
and
so
that's
amendment
or
that's
a
that's
bill.
R
557
and,
as
you
say,
it
refines
it
just
kind
of
clarifies
and
refines
some
of
the
uses,
but
also
that
money
hasn't
left
the
city
trust
fund,
yet
correct,
and
this
bill
will
move
that
money.
W
This
bill
557
amends
the
existing
resolution
that
authorizes
agreements
consistent
with
what
is
itemized,
so
this
bill
changes
the
itemization
okay.
I
note
we've
been
working
through
individual
agreements
with
the
urban
redevelopment
authority
on
each
authorized
project,
so
each
one
will
have
its
own
agreement.
I
will
have
to
check
I
I
cannot
off
the
top
of
my
head.
Remember
if
any
of
those
the
pen
circle,
two-way
conversion,
I
believe
contract
has
moved.
Agreement
has
moved.
W
Off
the
top
of
my
head,
I
believe:
that's
the
only
one.
That's
been
fully
authorized
at
this
point,
but
many
others
are
approaching
the
point
at
which
we
can
authorize
them
to
begin
moving
them.
But
it's
not
moving
all
in
one
slug.
It's
moving
program
by
program
as
the
ura
completes
and
authorizes
policies
and
procedures
through
their
board
and
that
then
complete
the
agreement
and
then
that
agreement
can
be
executed
and
the
funds
are
moved
piecemeal.
R
Oh,
I
I
thank
you
for
that
answer.
So
there's
a
dynamic
tension
here
between
us
wanting
to
be
sure
that
things
are
done
correctly
and
so
iteratively
like
that,
with
lots
of
eyes
on
it.
But
then
again
the
clock
is
ticking
right,
and
so
there
we
have
both
things
that
we
want
to
make
sure
happens.
We
want
to
make
sure
everything
every
t
is
crossed
and
every
I
is
dotted,
but
on
the
other
hand,
it's
already
july
of
2022.
R
So
since
this
is
a
relatively
large
pot,
I
would
like
to
hear
from
you
the
plan
to
meet
the
other
arpa
requirement,
which
is
to
have
the
funds
I
think
encumbered
by
2024.
But
maybe
you
could
clarify
that
for
me,
since
I'm
a
little
rusty
now,
it's
like
there's
a
encumbering
by
2023
and
spent
by
2024,
but
for
certain
kinds
of
funds,
but
not
others.
So
maybe
you
could.
W
Help
us
with
that
funds
need
to
be
encumbered
before
the
end
of
2024.
If,
if
the
invoices
haven't
like
left
the
account
into
the
first
quarter
of
2025,
that's
permissible,
but
we
need
the
funds
need
to
effectively
be
ready
to
go
out
the
door
in
2024.
the
exception
to
that
is
infrastructure
projects
which
have
until
2026
that
would
affect,
I
believe,
the
pwsa
led
line
pot
and
no
others
in
our
current
allocation
plan.
That
having
been
said,
I
believe
they
intend
to
fully
expend
those
funds
well
before
2024.
W
So
I
don't
believe
we'll
be
relying
on
that
additional
time
for
infrastructure
projects
in
any
of
the
work
that
we
intend
to
spend
the
funds
on
there
actually
are
some
folks
from
the
ura
on
the
on
participating
via
zoom,
who
might
be
able
to
speak
better
than
I
can
to
some
of
your
timeline
questions.
I
will
just
note
generally
before
we
get
to
that
that
they're.
You
know.
W
I
would
expect,
as
part
of
the
budget
process
later
this
year,
to
be
coming
back
to
council
again
to
talk
about
arpa
once
again,
because
when
we
have
new
revenue
projections
for
2023,
that
recalculation
will,
in
turn,
cause
us
to
recalculate
the
operating
portion
of
this
based
on
lost
revenue.
We
have
to
annually.
M
W
Our
loss,
revenue
calculations
and
that
will
have
bearing
on
the
city
operating
section
of
exhibit
a
and
in
turn
that
may
result
in
us
either
needing
to
move
funds
out
of
operating
into
other
uses
or
move
funds
from
other
uses
into
operating,
depending
on
how
that
calculation
turns
out.
So
I
would
think
of
these
actions
as
a
primarily
a
cleanup
action
with
further
dialogue
to
occur
in
coming
years.
R
Sure,
no
that's
excellent
answer.
Thank
you.
So
I
do
my
follow-up
question
is
about.
I
would
like
to
hear
from
the
ura
about
the
kind
of
plan
for
meeting
the
deadlines,
but
then
I
also
don't.
Let
me
forget
that
I
want
to
ask
about
the
applicability
of
these
funds
to
the
limited
equity
housing,
co-op
resolution
that
councilman
smith
and
I
passed
a
few
months
ago
that
has
an
upcoming
deadline.
So
while
we
had
looked
at
existing
funds
and
programs,
these
are
kind
of
new
funds
and
programs.
R
So
if,
if
you
could
speak
to
that
as
well
hello,
mr
geiger,
you
can
introduce
yourself
for
the
audience
and
director
flitzerman
as
well.
I
was
trying
to
read
the
name
because
I
was
spacing
out
on
the
name.
So
thank
you
for
helping
me
director.
R
Y
Problem
councilwoman
david
geiger
senior
advisor
for
the
urban
redevelopment
authority.
I
think
the
the
simplest
way
to
answer
your
question
is
that
the
ura
is
compelled
to
provide
quarterly
reporting
on
our
spending
market
dollars.
So,
with
the
deadline
in
mind
of
2024,
you
know
the
city
will
be
receiving
quarterly
reports
about
how
these
funds
are
being
drawn
down
and
spent
each
quarter
as
they
get
spent,
and
that
will
provide
members
of
the
mayor's
office
as
well
as
council.
M
W
Include
in
the
subrecipient
agreements
here,
language
that
allows
us
to
take
funds
back
if
they're
not
moving
in
on
a
timeline
that
would
permit
us
to
meet
the
deadline
if
we
need
to
reappropriate
them.
R
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
that
because,
as
I've
mentioned
before,
my
office
is
still
tracking
our
kind
of
14
or
15
benchmark
cities
and
how
they're
doing
their
allocations
and
some
of
the
ways
that
we're
spending
in
pittsburgh,
even
if
the
kind
of
category
of
spending
is
the
same,
we
use
authorities
sometimes
where
other
cities
don't
right
and
they're
just
kind
of
spinning
it
out
of
their
own
treasury
and
so
I've.
R
This
has
been
a
kind
of
conversation
that
I
revisit
every
now
and
then
on
council
about
kind
of
what
is
our
jurisdiction
and
our
abilities
in
as
a
city
that
maybe
we
don't
utilize
anymore,
that
we
used
to
and
still
could
but
but
haven't.
R
I
am
really
enthusiastic
about
some
of
these
line
items,
especially
the
five
million
dollars
for
community
land,
trust
which
I
think
is
just
so
compatible
with
some
of
our
other
housing,
affordable
housing
strategies,
the
limited
equity
housing
co-ops
is
one
but
other
kinds
of
home
ownership
which
can
bring
down
the
cost
of
home
ownership,
but
keep
permanent
affordability
in
neighborhoods
when
they
have
increasing
price
pressure,
especially
and
also
could
be
applied
to
rental
projects
as
well,
so
there
I
I'm
just
really
excited
about
that.
One.
R
I'm
excited
also
to
see
the
nearly
nine
million
dollars
for
housing
preservation.
It
is
it's
something
that
we've
talked
about
for
a
long
time.
I
remember
councilwoman
smith
and
I,
and
maybe
at
the
time
councilwoman
rudiak
talking
about
keeping
affordable
housing
stock
available
because
in
districts
we've
lost
it
in
my
district
over
these
eight
years
right,
and
so
we
should
get
out
in
front
of
the
other
neighborhoods
before
they
lose
it,
and
I
was.
R
I
am
sad
that
we
pushed
for
the
authorization
and
the
ability
to
do
housing
preservation
like
affordable
preservation
in
the
housing
opportunity
funds,
and
in
that
the
original
language.
R
Many
years
ago
now,
but
we
didn't
spend
that
money
and
so
that
money
could
have
preserved
more
housing
for
at
affordable
levels
in
my
district
right
and
you
know
if
we
can
find
any
to
preserve.
That
would
be
great,
but
we've
lost
a
lot
of
it,
and
but
I
think
it's
really
important
around
the
city
and
I'm
also
really
enthusiastic
about
the
office
space
conversion
and
I
feel
like
that's
an
opportunity
that
could
be
even
a
bigger
pot.
If
we
in
the
future
aren't
spending
down
other
parts
of
arpa.
R
R
I
know
I
have
a
lot
of
people
who
are
working
on
that
and
I'm
really
enthusiastic
about
ensuring
a
right
for
tenants
to
purchase
a
building
whenever
it
is
sold
or
whenever
it's
being
pursued
by
an
aggressive
speculator
of
developers,
as
we
have
in
my
district
right
people
buying
buildings
displacing
tenants
from
multi-units
and
and
they
call
it
reno
renovation,
sometimes
right
either
from
homes
or
for
multi-units.
R
But
if
we're
providing
the
funding
here,
then
we
can
put
those
kinds
of
conditions
in
a
deal,
and
so
I'd
be
interested
to
talk
more
about
that.
But-
and
I
think
that's
that
looks
like
a
low
dollar
amount
to
me
when
you're
talking
about
bigger
buildings,
especially.
W
Yeah
that's.
W
This
is
basically
a
pilot
opportunity
to
do
proof
of
concept
to
the
commonwealth,
to
hopefully
have
a
further
conversation
about
a
larger
program
for
office
space
conversion
in
a
postcovid
world,
not
just
here
in
pittsburgh,
but
actually
in
all
of
the
urban
centers
in
the
state.
Those
those
conversations
have
been
ongoing
with
particularly
senator
costa,
as
well
as
the
department
of
community
and
economic
development.
W
He
was
instrumental
in
securing
this
initial
three
million
dollar
wave
of
support
from
the
state
to
be
matched
by
the
city
and
county
with
an
eye
towards
using
that,
as
a
basis
to
argue
for
increased
investment
in
conversions
down
the
line,
and
I
think
that
that
is
absolutely
something
that,
as
that,
as
this
experiment,
hopefully
bears
fruit.
We
can
have
further
conversation
about
in
the
future,
but
we're
just
not
sure
of
the
scale
or
necessary
match
requirements
for
some
prospective
future
programs.
So
this
will.
R
That's
wonderful,
thank
you.
So
I
didn't
hear
an
answer.
I,
unless
I
missed
it
about
whether
there
is
any
assurance
that
these
funds
would
not
exclude
common
ownership
like
a
limited
equity,
housing,
cooperative
and
I'll
just
clarify
again
for
listeners.
R
There
there
are
some
times
where
a
program
is
either
for
an
owner
of
multi-units
like
a
single
entity
or
for
a
resident
homeowner,
that's
assumed
to
be
just
one
person
and
then
something
like
cooperative
ownership
falls
in
a
gap,
so
I
spoke
with
since
I've
been
having
a
lot
of
conversation
since
we
introduced
the
resolution-
and
I
spoke
to
a
person
who
had
created
a
new
one
in
the
last
several
years
in
the
city
of
pittsburgh,
by
combining
three
houses
that
she'd
gotten,
I
think
from
treasurer
sale,
so
a
great
project,
kind
of
side-by-side
houses
and
then
the
minute
that
she
moved
them
with
a
very
sophisticated
attorney
from
madison
wisconsin,
which
is
like
the
mecca
of
cooperatives.
R
They
lost
their
what's.
It
called
when
you
get
your
exemption,
homestead
homeowners.
What's
that
homestead
exemption?
Am
I
saying
it
right
because
it
was
no
longer,
even
though
they
lived
there
and
they
owned
the
properties
they
owned
them
in
common,
and
so
they
weren't
individual,
separate
owners
of
a
single
parcel,
and
so
we
just
want
to.
I
want
to
make
sure
also
in
our
funding
streams
that
we're
not
saying
oh
this.
R
Z
Today
it
comes
from
gross
yeah,
so
I
don't
think
that
it's
very
closer
with
the
ura,
the
executive
director
of
the
ura.
You
know
that
concept
of
co-op
hasn't
really,
as
far
as
I
know,
really
entered
the
the.
Z
Z
That
we
would
like
to
potentially
explore.
I
mean
I
can't
think
off
top
of
my
head,
how
we
would
do
that.
Maybe
a
first
rate
of
refusal
to
attending
cooperative
might
be
part
of
the
thinking
there,
but
I
think
it's
a
good
idea
to
to
insert
that
into
the
conversation
as
a
way
to
try
to
figure
out
how
to
transition
some
of
these
properties
in
the.
X
Yes
thanks:
my
name
is
evan
miller,
I'm
the
acting
director
of
housing
lending
at
the
ura
just
to
address
the
council
person's
question
kind
of
building
off
of
what
director.
X
The
mechanisms
that
we'll
be
spending
these
funds
with
the
programs
still
need
to
go
through
the
your
board
approval
process.
We
need
to
get
guidelines
finalized
and
your
interest
and
concern
about
cooperatives
is
noted,
and
it's
something
that
ura
has
been
approached
about
over
the
last
few
months
from
other
people
throughout
the
city.
So
I
I
do
believe
that
between
whether
it's
the
preservation
line
item
or
perhaps.
R
Some
of
the
work
we're
doing
around
for
sale
housing
that
we'll
be
able
to
build
out
the
flexibility
to
to
use
some
of
this
funding
to
support
cause.
R
W
Well,
I
think,
I
think
what
you
heard
evan
say
is
that
they
will
work
to
incorporate
the
ability
to
support
co-ops
into
the
rules
and
regulations
that
are
have
as
yet
not
been
adopted
by
the
board.
W
So
if
I
could
read
between
the
lines,
I
think
perhaps
what
he's
saying
is
he
can't
commit
to
that
until
the
board
does,
but
but
that
the
staff
will
work
to
address
these
concerns
and
ensure
that
it
is
taken
into
account
the
draft
policies
and
procedures
or
rules
and
regulations
presented
to
the
board
ahead
of
when
we
would
execute
an
agreement
and
I'd
be
happy
to
stay
in
touch
with
you
about
that,
as
that
process
continues.
Thank.
R
You
I
would
appreciate
that
we
can
lobby
our
councilman
who's
on
the
board
councilman
level.
I
hope
that
you
will
support
cooperative
ownership
and
and
to
be
not
excluded
from
any
of
the
rules
and
regulations
around
the
expenditure
of
these
75
million
dollars
worth
of
funds,
and
then
also
I
thought
I
also
heard
that
others
have
inquired
at
the
ura
about
cooperatives.
J
R
Can
do
that?
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
think
that
exhausts
my
questions,
mr
chair,
so
and
again
thank
you,
director,
pollock
for
and
everyone
at
the
ura
appreciate
it.
Q
I
Yeah,
mr
chair,
thank
you
very
much
good
morning,
thanks
for
being
here,
mr
chair,
are
we
solely
considering
557
or
are
we
also
considering
558?
I
had
to
step
away.
I
In
reference
to
558-
and
I
guess
5
7
2
and
redistribution
of
american
restaurant
nine
dollars,
two
million
dollars
of
money
came
in
to
rehab
public
safety
facilities
and
one
of
those
was
to
be
the
south
side
substation
here
at
18th,
and
very
there
was
a
million
dollars
that
was
allocated
for
that
and-
and
I
began
to
get
a
number
of
questions
about.
Maybe
stagnation
is
too
strong
a
word,
but
perhaps
maybe
a
hiccup
that
we
might
have
hit
in
the
the
restoration
and
the
reopening
of
the
zone.
Three
substation.
I
Are
you
able
to
speak
to
that
here?
If
not
prepared,
I
mean
we
can
certainly
go
into
a
deeper
dive
if
it
is
easier
to
do
for
you
to
do
that
another
time,
but
it
came
up
a
number
of
times
in
yesterday's
planning
forum
meeting
and
and
I've
received
any
number
of
calls
from
constituents
that
are
are
concerned
that
the
project
is
kind
of
no
harm.
Are
you
able
to
to
speak
to
that
today?.
W
I
am
councilman
you're
correct
that
two
million
dollars
are
included
in
the
allocation
plan
for
community
public
safety
facilities.
You'll
see
that
under
the
city
operating
portion
of
the
allocation
plan
based
on
the
size
of
the
projects
and
the
fact
that
the
work
is
being
done,
in-house
renovations
renovation
work
has
occurred
at
the
former
zone
3
facility
on
18th
street
to
repair
the
roof
and
make
other
necessary
structural
repairs
to
that
would
allow
the
the
facility
to
be
utilized
again
in
the
future.
W
The
the
current
status
of
that
work
is
is
not
structural,
but
for
program
programming
work
within
the
department
of
public
safety
to
determine
how
best
to
utilize
the
site
as
part
of
overall
public
safety
operations
in
zone
three.
There
are
some
some
unresolvable
structural
components
to
the
building
that
precludes
some.
You
know
some
types
of
activities
like
detention
there,
but,
but
generally
speaking,
the
the
work
to
repair
damage
to
the
facility
either
has
been
done
or
is,
is
ongoing.
So
the
current
discussion
is
about
the
best
appropriate.
I
I
You
so
you
can
imagine,
in
light
of
you
know,
there's
there's
been
no,
probably
no
higher
public
safety
conversation
taking
place
to
divide
other
than
the
what
has
been
taking
place
in
the
session,
not
just
this
summer,
but
for
decades
now,
and
it
does
not
give
constituency
comfort
to
hear
that
we
don't
have
a
a
very
stronger
timeline
as
to
whether
we
might
expect
that
to
to
be
operational.
I
And
you
know
I'm
not
one
to
to
argue
that
brick
and
mortar
drive
public
safety
by
any
means.
I
believe
it's
equipment
and
training
and
and
manpower
power
cameras,
those
kinds
of
things
that
really
drive
public
safety,
but
the
idea
of
having
a
steady
police
presence,
I'm
in
the
south
side
area.
I
I
think
at
this
point
in
time,
is,
is
as
important
as
it
has
ever
been,
and
so
I
I
strongly
want
to
advocate
for
for
the
continuation
of
the
project
and
and
perhaps
you'd
be
willing,
or
maybe
it
is
chief
frank.
I'm
not
sure
if
you
can
help
me
to
understand
who
might
be
able
to
give
provide
me
with
the
best
accounting
of
where
we
are
and
where
we
expect
to
be,
and
what
kind
of
the
timeline
that
might
be.
I
I
do
understand
that
there
are
all
kinds
of
complications
and-
and
I've
been
aware
of
this
for
the
entirety
of
my
time
in
the
office,
there
are
always
complications
once
we
take
somebody
into
custody
and
I
understand
why
there
are
reservations
for
us
to
take
people
into
custody.
I
You
know
the
complications
that
that
provides
to
the
city
in
terms
of
litigation
and
liability,
and
so
I'm
not
incensed
to
that.
I
do
understand
and
appreciate
that,
but
my
highest
hope
for
the
reuse
of
that
has
been
that
it
can
be
used
to
process
some
of
the
defense
in
a
very
timely
manner
and
that
it
can
also
almost
be
used
as
a
night
court.
I
If
you
will
that
we
can
again
process
our
events
and
equipment
in
time
and
manner,
the
the
the
idea
is
really
to
show
consequence
for
behavior
and
to
do
this
as
quickly
as
we
can
in
yesterday's
planning
forum
meeting.
The
idea
of
a
curfew
came
up
any
number
of
times
and
it
was
discussed
the
complexities
of
curfew.
I
You
know
what
that
means,
how
to
process
where
they
go,
how
to
detain
the
liability
entertaining
all
those
kinds
of
things
you
know
they
do
they
come
into
interplay
and-
and
so
you
know
I
offer
up
that.
I
understand
the
complexities
of
that
as
as
well,
but
there
we.
I
We
have
to
come
to
an
understanding
or
an
agreement
within
ourselves
as
to
how
we
are
going
to
how
we
are
going
to
handle
summary
offense
and
what's
the
best
way
to
to
process
that
in
a
timely
and
effective
manner
as
to
be
able
to
show
consequence
for
behavior.
W
Agreed
councilman
and
I
think
the
the
exact
considerations
that
you
just
articulated
are
precisely
the
ones
that
we're
taking
into
account
presently
and
determining
how
you
know
a
physical
facility
interrelates
with
the
needs
to
to
address
those
issues,
and
you
know
to
make
sure
that
that
that
use
is
appropriate
and
maximizes
effectiveness
for
the
bureau
of
police.
I'll
just
note,
because
you
mentioned
consistent
presence
facility,
even
even
now,
with
the
facility
not
presently
occupied.
W
You
know
police
presence
on
carson
street.
I
it
has
been
significant
not
just
from
the
bureau
of
police,
but
also
from
our
county
and
state
partners,
to
whom
we're
very
grateful
for
their
assistance
when
necessary,
and
we
believe
that
as
the
process
of
determining
how
best
to
use
a
facility
to
supplement
that
is
ongoing,
that
we
remain
adequately
tactically
positioned
to
ensure
public
safety.
I
I
know
I
I
understand
fully
the
the
difficulties
of
staffing
police
and
the
numbers
that
are
necessary
to
deal
with
the
kinds
of
crowds
that
are
being
intentionally
brought
in
to
the
south
side
of
any
number
of
businesses,
and
so
I'm
not
I'm
not
devoid
of
understanding
of
how
complex
and
difficult
that
can
be.
So
I'm
going
to
take
the
opportunity
to
once
again
to
argue
one
of
the
things
about
the
yesterday's
meeting
at
the
planning
forum.
I
That
brought
me
great
concern
was
a
continued
focus
on
policing
once
things
become
problematic
and
if
there's
anything
that
I've
learned
in
the
15
soon
be
16
years.
That
I've
been
here
on
council
and
the
professionals
that
I've
been
privy
to
work
with
is
that
we
plan
for
success
when
we
police
failure
and
the
idea
is
not
about
bringing
police
officers
in
to
quite
situations
that
have
already
been
allowed
to
take
root.
I
It's
about
not
allowing
those
situations
to
occur
to
begin
with,
and
that
is
clearly
a
partnership
between
those
businesses
that
choose
to
invite
a
disruptive
customer
to
the
street
and
city
officials,
elected
officials,
all
of
us
and
public
safety
officials.
As
well
to
ensure
that
those
kinds
of
things
don't
happen
to
begin
with,
and
then
we
will
begin
to
see
the
reduction
of
a
need
for
for
police,
because
we
will
have
already
planned
for
success
and
will
not
be
struggling
to
understand
how
we
can
please
failure.
W
Once
again,
I
agree
with
your
your
point,
councilman,
that
a
proactive
approach
is,
of
course
preferred,
and
it's
our
intention
to
to
continue
to
be
as
proactive
as
possible
and
to
update
our
strategies
accordingly,
to
ensure
safety
on
carson
street
and
throughout
the
city.
I
And
I
should
take
this
opportunity
to
acknowledge
the
administration,
to
acknowledge
you
and
to
acknowledge
americany
for
the
swift
action
that
was
taken
when
we
realized
the
kinds
of
businesses
that
were
intentionally
the
kinds
of
customers.
I
should
say
that
were
being
intentionally
invited,
contracted
and
promoted
within
skybar
and
the
repercussions
that
that
that
had-
and
I
know
the
our
conversation
you
died.
I
The
conversation
I
was
able
to
have
with
the
mayor
and
the
swift
interaction,
intervention
of
mayor
gandhi
and
the
district
attorney's
office
helped
to
bring
that
to
a
successful
conclusion,
and
I
spoke
with
the
mayor
yesterday
purposefully
to
thank
him
personally
for
his
for
his
intervention.
I
I
have
not
had
the
opportunity
to
do
that
with
you,
but
what
was
able
to
take
place
with
the
shuttering
of
foxtail
and
skyward
for
the
foreseeable
future
is
directly
related
to
the
communications
that
we
were
able
to
have
and
the
communications
you
were
able
to
have
with
with
mayor
gainey
the
district
attorney's
office,
the
owner
out
of
december
of
that
establishment,
and
and
to
to
bring
that
to
a
at
least
for
this
moment
in
time.
I
A
successful
conclusion
that
brought
consequence
for
behavior,
and
so
I
personally
would
like
to
publicly
recognize
you.
I
have
been
able
to
do
that
with
mayor
candy,
but
I
want
to
thank
you
as
well
for
for
your
swift
action
and
intervention
and
your
always
your
willingness
to
to
interact
with
me
at
a
moment
so
notice
when
these
kinds
of
things
come
up.
So
I
thank
you
very
much
director
for
your
help
in
that.
I
That's
all
I
have.
No,
I'm
sorry.
I
do
have
one
more
question
in
relationship
to
substations
and
the
possible
positive
effect
that
they
have.
I
don't
expect
you
to
be
able
to
provide
this
information
now,
but
at
a
later
time
perhaps
can
we
show
definitively
that
there
has
been
a
reduction
in
misgrip,
behaviors
and
and
their
impact
with
the
the
launching
of
the
substation
down
by
market
square.
Now
that
that's
probably
been
up,
maybe
three
years
or
so
now
is
there?
I
Is
there
a
way
to
sort
of
track
successes
that
we
might
have
had
we
it's
been
quite
some
time
since
we've
heard
of
disruptive
behavior
or
damaging
behavior
taking
place
downtown
and
I'd
just
be
curious
to
know
if
we
can
find
a
connection
between
that
substation
and
a
reduction
in
investment.
W
Behavior,
it's
a
complicated
question
to
answer
only
because
so
much
of
that
period
also
overlapped
with
covid.
So
I
don't
know
that
we
have
the
necessary
data
to
draw
clear
and
definitive
conclusions.
However,
we
are,
you
know,
continuing
to
work
on
a
consistent
improvement
in
the
utilization
of
facilities
downtown
and-
and
so
we
remain
committed
to
that
work.
But
I
I
I
can't
give
you
unfortunately,
a
clear
data
picture
of
that.
Given
the
ways
in
which
occupancy
downtown
has
fluctuated
in
light
of
covet.
P
We
can't
forget
that
we
have
existing
neighborhoods
with
housing
that
need
help.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
put
that
out
there
and
then
I
would
like
to
also
say
that
with
adding
75
million
dollars
in
addition
to
what
we've
already
done
with
the
ura,
I
know
that
we
have
one
board
member
from
city
council
on
there,
but
I
think
giving
this
kind
of
money.
We
should
probably
reconsider
and
having
at
least
a
second
one-
and
I
just
want
to
put
that
out
there.
W
P
K
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
Thank
you,
director,
pollock,
for
all
your
due
diligence
and
for
answering
our
questions
so
thoroughly.
Today.
I
want
to
focus
first
on
just
to
make
sure
I'm
understanding
correctly.
The
way
that
you
and
I
had
talked
about
it
when
you
briefed
me
on
this
prior
to
today,
was
the
energy
efficiency
program
being
reduced
to
then
be
able
to
to
help
with
a
number
of
things,
including
the
downtown
office-based
conversion,
which
I'm
in
full
support
of
that
project.
K
W
Pardon
me
the
downtown
conversion
program.
Other
funds
there
are
supporting
the
preservation
line
item
which
is
related
to
the
the
preservation
line
item
is
a
way
to
support
preservation
of
existing
homes,
including
repairs
that
are
associated
with
the
uses
outlined
for
the
utility
brand.
That's
so
sure,
some
of
that
transfer
is
meant
to
just
more
accurately
capture
for
the
purposes
of
our
federal
compliance.
The
ways
in
which
the
funding
was
intended
to
be
utilized
initially
and
by
moving
it
into
different
accounting
line
items.
K
J
M
K
Programs
through
grants
or
through
it,
so
maybe
for
the
ura
representatives
we
have
here
today
you
can
answer-
is
the
4
million.
That's
left
in
that
in
that
bucket
still
going
to
be
dedicated
solely
to
what
I
understand
to
be
kind
of.
Y
S
Thank
you,
hello.
Everyone.
My
name
is
kendall
morris
manager
of
consumer
lending
at
the
urban
redevelopment
authority.
Answer
your
question
council
person.
Yes,
the
remaining
four
million
dollars
will
be
for
energy
efficiency
grants
for
homeowners.
K
Great,
thank
you.
That's
what
I
was
wondering
so
we'll
still
have
4
million.
For
that
I
would
love
to
grow
that
in
future
years
again,
I
know
there
are
so
many
priorities,
but
given
the
climate
action
plan
that
we
have
given
the
climate
crisis,
we
have
energy
efficiency
over
old
building
stock
and
home
stock
is
just
such
an
easy
way
that
pays
dividends
in
the
future
and
and
helps
for
so
many
different
reasons
so
wanted
to
boost
that.
K
But
you
know
we
have
nine
different
council
members
and
lots
of
different
ura
members
and
lots
of
different
priorities,
so
I
understand
the
needs
for
every
different
priority.
The
second
thing
was
the
bridge
asset
management
program,
trust
fund.
I
understand
that
today's
action
is
just
to
establish
that
and
not
to
transfer
funds.
Do
you
have
or
have
I
missed,
and
somehow
I
missed
in
the
conversation
here
that
the
amount
the
dollar
amount
that's
expected
to
be
transferred
in.
W
So
brief
clarification,
the
556
is
where
the
line
item
for
the
that
fund
is
created
and
it's
2.5
million
dollars.
W
Item
item
560
would
create
the
trust
fund
between
those
two
actions.
Those
funds
can
be
transferred
from
the
arpa
trust
fund
to
the
bridge
asset
maintenance
fund.
There
is
a
later
paper
awarding
a
contract
based
on
a
competitive
proposal
to
wsp
group,
which
is
an
international
engineering
firm
to
conduct
the
first
phase
of
that
assessment
for
not
to
exceed
amount
of
1.5
million
dollars.
That
would
leave
an
additional
million
dollars
in
the
trust
fund
for
future
distribution.
As
that,
first
phase
of
work
uncovers
additional
scope
of
work.
That
would
be.
K
Necessary
at
a
future
date
sure
thank
you
for
the
clarification.
This
is
where
you
know
you
don't
want
to
cut
off
your
nose
to
spite
your
face.
I
understand
the
need
for
a
full
professionalized
assessment
and
you
know
almost
ordered
list
of
priorities
of
our
bridges,
given
the
state
of
disrepair
that
some
of
them
are
in.
That
said,
I
also
acknowledge
that
we
probably
know
with
our
own
expertise
and
the
assessments
that
have
done
been
done
previously,
the
top
ten
that
need
to
be
done
immediately
and
part
of
me
wishes.
K
We
could
just
put
the
two
million
into
the
most
pressing.
You
know
bridges
and
you
know
and
contracts,
and
just
continue
to
get
those
done
now.
So
I'm
a
little
bit
torn
on
this
one,
but
you're
welcome
to
speak
to
it.
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
express
the
fact
that
I'm
ambivalent
about
this
particular
line
item
and
this
transfer
because
of
the
severe
need
that
we
have
for
so
many
bridges
right
now
and
and
what
we
do
know
currently
about
our
bridges.
So.
W
You
know
to
the
states
soon,
so
this
is
a
preparatory
action
to
maximize
our
ability
to
utilize
additional
outside
funding
as
quickly
and
effectively
as
possible
as
those
dollars
arrive.
So
it's
it's
really.
I
would
think
of
it
less
as
an
assessment
of
current
conditions.
That's
really
just
the
subpart
of
it.
It's
really
building
the
systems
necessary
to
manage
what
will
be
potentially
an
unprecedentedly
large
amount
of
infrastructure
funding
into
the
future.
A
Very
much
councilman
wilson.
L
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
Let's
get
it
get
my
bearings
here,
okay,
so
director
the
bill
where
it
is
the
70
well
was
75.
Now
it's
roughly
73
in
this
bill.
L
57.,
you
know
in
the
future,
I
think
you
know
just
like
when
these
funds
were
initially
thought
of
when
they
we
broke
it
down.
We
met
with
leadership
on
that,
so
I
think
I'd
appreciate
just
a
a
briefing
in
the
future
on
situations
like
this,
because
you
know,
for
instance,
4
million
dollars
housing
development
of
affordable
units
for
through
phdc
yeah.
What
does
that
mean.
W
Yeah,
so
that
that's
an
example
like
what
I
mentioned
earlier,
nothing
is
actually
changing
in
the
programmatic
design.
The
line
items
are
simply.
We
took
what
was
one
21
million
dollar
line
item
that
was
labeled
own
pgh
that
had
always
been
intended
to
include
a
combination
of
development
of
new
for
sale,
units,
education
and
counseling
for
first-time
homebuyers
and
other
force
for
sale,
home
ownership
supports
and
split
it
into
three
different
line
items
for
accounting
purposes.
W
So
if
you
look
at
housing
for
sale,
homeownership
at
a
total
of
15
million
625
000
and
then
two
new
line
items
below
that
four
million
dollars
for
phdc
and
1.3
million
for
education
and
counseling,
those
three
items
had
previously
been
rolled
up
in
one
21
million
dollar
line
item.
The
total
funding
for
that
work
has
not
changed.
It's
simply
been
distributed
across
three.
L
W
AB
W
W
J
L
W
The
purpose
of
breaking
it
down
more
granularly
than
it
was
in
the
original
plan
is
to
make
it
easier
or
to
maybe
more
transparent,
in
particular.
In
the
way
we
report
these
various
expenditures
to
the
us
treasury
department,
as
we're
obligated
to
under
their
regulations
that
were
promulgated
in
december
again
when
the
origin.
I
think
the
original
plan
was
intentionally
ambiguous
on
some
of
these
points,
simply
because
we
did
not
know
at
that
time
how
we
would
have
to
document
it
for
compliance
purposes.
W
L
L
Allocated
to
the
one
pgh
and
put
them
in
here
where,
where
do
I
see
that
I
only
see
a
trust
fund.
W
That's
being
created
so
again,
the
movement
of
the
funds
from
one
pgh
to
instead
of
bridge
asset
management
program
is
inside
bill
556
and
it's
again
in
the
same
spreadsheet.
You
know
once
those
funds
have
been
moved
in
the
allocation
plan,
we
still
need
a
separate
resolution.
W
AB
W
Million
if
council
affirmatively
adopts
a
later
paper,
will
be
the
not
to
exceed
amount
for
a
contract
with
wsp
group,
an
international
engineering
firm
to
conduct
the
assessment.
There
would
be
at
least
a
million
dollars
remaining
in
the
trust
fund
for
further
allocation
down
the
line.
As
that
work
progresses
again,
I
say
it's,
that's
the
not
to
exceed
amount.
We
have
not
yet
because
you
don't
have
council
authorization
executed
a
contract,
so
we're.
L
What
are
we
gonna?
What
are
we
gonna
find
out
that
we,
I
think,
council
person
strassberg
was
one
of
this
or
alluded
to
what
we
already
know.
Someone
just
wanted
to
dive
a
little
deeper
on
that.
So
what
like?
What
are
we
gonna
find
out
with
that.
W
X
W
L
W
But
we
would
to
utilize
arpa
funds,
for
that
would
then
clock
out
when
when
those
positions
are
funded-
and
we
also
need
this
assessment
really
to
know
exactly
what
types
of
engineering
skills
we
need
and
the
appropriate
ratios
of
those
right.
So
I
think
this
this
engagement
will
equip
us
with
the
tools
to
make
those
decisions
ahead
of
the
2023
budget.
The
preliminary
report
on
this
work
will
be
due
in
october,
so
it'll
be
done
in
time
for
us
to
have
more
informed
discussions.
L
Did
this
go
through
with
this
firm
and
rfp
process.
AB
A
Q
So
for
the
sake
of
time,
I'm
just
going
to
make
comments
and
if
the
ura
can
you
know,
maybe
get
back
to
me
at
a
later
date,
I
don't
want
to
you
know,
get
into
the
weeds
here.
First
and
foremost,
I
want
to
say
to
madam
president's
comments
about
demolition.
Absolutely,
we
absolutely
need
more
money
and
demolition.
I
have
buildings
falling
down
that
are
unsafe,
like
rotten
teeth,
you
know
there
are,
there
is
no
saving
them
on
certain
ones;
they
need
to
be
removed.
I've
got
one.
Q
I've
been
waiting
for
two
years
on
and
I
just
can't
believe
we
got
all
this
money
we're
throwing
around
and
I'm
like.
Let's
get
these
buildings
out
of
here
please,
so
I
got
four
or
five
I'll
discuss
with
you
later.
The
other
thing
was,
you
know,
I'm
very
interested
in
the
co-op
that
council,
madam
president
and
councilwoman
gross
had
spoke
to
specifically
for
one
site,
and
I
dragged
one
injury
actually
enthusiastically
came
to
this
site.
Q
Councilwoman
gross-
and
you
know
you
know-
and
I
don't
have
a
lot
of
affordable
housing
and
I
don't
have
the
need.
I
feel
at
this
point
for
a
lot
of
affordable
housing
in
my
district,
but
this
specific
site
begs
for
it.
I
think
it's
ideal.
I
I
look
forward
to
learning
more
about
the
co-op
and
talks
with
the
both
of
these.
You
know,
madam
president,
councilman
gross
on
that.
So
I
look
to
pursue
that.
I
think
it's
a
great
idea
and
it
could
be
a
pilot
program.
Q
You
know
and
let's
see
how
it
works.
We
have
40
units
there
and
I
don't
see
any
better
place
than
we
could
start
by
trying.
Q
Q
So
you
know
we're
not
giving
up
this
property
and
we
could
make
sure
that
it's
you
know
everything's
in
line
and
we
don't
have
to
bicker
with
developers
and
just
my
thought
I
mean
if
we're
serious,
about
affordable
housing,
I
feel
like
we
should
take
matters
in
our
own
hands,
buy,
sell
and
rent
their
places
by
ourselves.
Maybe.
Q
Don't
want
any
remarks
on
it,
please
I
I'm
ready
to
move
on
myself,
so
I
just
would
like
the
ura
or
anybody
with
the
ura
to
follow
up
with
me
on
some
of
those
questions.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
well,
you
said
you
didn't
want
to
comment,
but
you'd
have
all
types
of
insurance
and
liability
issues.
That
would
be
the
city
that
the
city
would
be
faced.
If
we
took
that
approach
and
what
I'll
also
say
simply
say
is
in
terms
of
demo,
I've
advocated
for
years
now
that
it's
not
necessarily
demo.
A
Yes,
I
understand
the
concerns,
but
what
we
really
need
are
more
flexible
dollars
for
stabilization
efforts
to
fix
dormers
to
fix
those
sort
of
things,
so
they
don't
get
to
the
demo,
because
once
you
tear
it
down
one,
we
have
a
poor
practice
of
demo.
Then
you
have
the
expense
of
digging
it
back
out
of
the
ground
once
you
want
to
do
the
home,
it's
cheaper
to
go
in
and
renovate.
A
Q
The
sake
of
time,
we
won't
debate
it
now,
but
if
I
can
just
respond
to
that
quickly,
one
of
the
structures,
I'm
speaking
of
are
not
not
no.
Q
Not
going
to
renovate
them
nobody's
going
to
run
away,
you
need
to
be
removed.
Okay,
these
are
unsafe
and
deplorable
condition.
As
a
contractor,
I
know
I
could
see
from
the
outside
nobody's
saving
this
place
and
would
cost
extraordinary
amount
of
money
just
to
renovate
the
place
going
back
to
liability
issues
with
the
ura
and
you
know
being
whatever
they
are.
You
know
we
could
overcome
that.
We
own
properties
all
over
the
city
of
pittsburgh.
Q
As
as
we
speak,
I
know
to
be
a
landlord
if
there's
additional
responsibilities
and
managing
properties,
I
get
it.
But
again,
I
just
feel
like
we're
throwing
money
away
when
we're
putting
money,
ura
money
in
the
major
projects
for
developers,
stabilizing
them-
and
you
know
they're
coming
in
and
putting
10
affordability
there.
We
could
do
it.
A
hundred
percent
thanks.
R
Yes,
my
first
comment
is
just
in
response
to
the
upcoming
bill
that,
hopefully
we'll
eventually
get
to
about
hiring
the
the
consulting
firm
for
the
engineering
assessment
on
bridges.
Well,
I'm
also
very
eager
for
us
to
hire
more
engineering
capacity
in-house
and
I'm
absolutely
supportive
of
adding
capacity
that
we
did
used
to
have
in
the
city
and
that
we
lost
under
austerity
and
act
47.
As
director
pollock
mentioned,
we
have
a
lot
of
bridges
and
I
can't
actually
name
how
many
embarrassingly,
how
many
bridges
do.
We
have.
R
So
400,
you
know
if
we,
even
if
we
did
hire
our
own
engineers
in-house
right
now,
it
would
just
take
too
long
basically
to
it
would
take
years
probably
to
do
assessments
on
the
bridges.
So
let's
do
both
right.
Let's,
let's
do
this
this
contract,
let's
get
good,
you
know
engineering
analyses
of
our
own
instead
of
relying
on
someone
else
to
get
around
to
it
and
then
get
started.
So.
Thank
you.
That's
all!
I
want
to
say
that
and
I'm
also
thank
you.
I
want
to
talk
more
about
housing.
H
A
B
P
I
just
want
to
thank
the
really
quickly
the
person
who's
purchasing.
This
she's
waited
years
to
get
this
one
acacia
kennedy,
so
thank
you.
P
H
562
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
director
of
the
department
of
finance
to
enter
into
an
agreement
with
the
pittsburgh
community
reinvestment
group
for
the
purpose
of
providing
an
annual
analysis
of
community
reinvestment
of
possible
city
depositories
and
other
associated
work
associated
with
the
rfps
for
the
city
deposit
depository
analysis.
Total
cost
not
to
exceed
75
000
over
three
years.
K
AC
Hi
jennifer
gould,
I'm
the
acting
director
of
the
department
of
finance,
so
we
actually
use
an
outside
company
to
do
evaluations
of
all
the
community
reinvestment
information.
That's
required
that
the
prospective
depository
submit
to
us
as
part
of
the
rfp
process.
C
AC
You
know
some
members
of
council
or
their
representatives
the
controller's
office
and
such
and
gives
us
guidance
on
how
to
award
how
to
award
monies
to
depositories
or
take
monies
away
depend
of
current
depositories
based
on
their
performance
with
community
reinvestment.
P
Director,
thank
you.
I
I
do
know
what
that
what
this
does.
I
I
know
what
this
is,
but
I
I
have
a
concern
that
pcrg
is
the
the
recipient.
I
think
that
we've
have
there
how
many
applicants,
how
many
people
replied.
AC
We
did
actually
post
it
through
the
regular
rfp
process
online,
using
opengov
with
omb.
We
have
done
that
same
procedure.
You
know
the
past
three
or
four
times
that
we've
done
this.
I
believe
they
might
be
really
the
only
qualifying
people
in
the
city
to
actually
do
this.
I
think
in
the
few
times
that
we've
actually
you
know,
issued
that
rfp
we've
maybe
only
had
one
or
two
other
respondents.
AC
So
it's
you
know
pretty
specialized
and
there
really
aren't
there
aren't
a
lot
of
qualifying
candidates.
P
Yeah,
I
I
don't
know
that
you
can,
how
you
consider
them
qualified
I'd
like
to
have
a
little
further
conversation
about
the
organization.
I
can
just
tell
you
my
experience
with
them
and
the
west
end
has
been
very
different
than
what's
been
here
in
the
city,
giving
a
75
000
grant
to
an
organization.
I
know
when
they
were
in
my
district.
They
were.
They
were
supposed
to
be
part
of
stopping
the
mortgage
foreclosure
crisis
in
our
area
and
did
not
they
were
to
hire
somebody
from
our
community
did
not.
P
They
told
me
that
the
female
that
I
had
intended
to
apply
for
the
job
that
she
was
not
qualified.
She
was
a
black
female
in
law.
School
almost
done
with
her
degree,
but
they
hired
somebody
from
friendship
instead
to
come.
Do
the
job
and
needed
her
help
to
go
to
get
into
the
homes,
because
people
weren't
opening
the
doors,
so
they
asked
her
to
volunteer.
P
So
I
can
tell
you.
I
have
a
lot
of
not
positive
history
with
pcrg,
particularly
in
my
community
communities
of
keller,
and
so
I
will
just
say
it
has
not
been
good
in
the
past.
I
don't
know
what
they've
done
in
the
future
or
what
they've
done
over
the
years
to
change
that
I
know
we
were
going
to
have
some
conversations.
We
were
going
to
have
some
meetings.
P
They
also
never
happened,
so
I
can't
say
that
I
have
full
confidence
in
them,
making
any
types
of
decision
with
with
this,
or
so
I
think
that
I'm
going
to
make
a
motion
to
hold
and
we
can
discuss
it
over
the
weekend.
What
city
council
wants
to
do?
Second,
thank
you.
A
A
K
Chair,
yes,
I'd
like
to
register
I
votes
for
all
remaining
bills.
I
have
a
meeting.
P
H
564.
resolution
authorizing
an
interdepartmental
transfer
in
the
amount
of
40
thousand
dollars
from
the
bureaus
of
administration
and
animal
care
and
control
in
the
department
of
public
safety
to
the
bureau
of
police.
This
transfer
is
necessary
to
assist
the
bureau
of
police
with
unanticipated
funding
needs
for
their
imaging
project
that
need
to
be
completed
by
the
end
of
2022.
L
O
Charlotte
showers,
part
of
business
administrator
for
public
safety,
and
this
bill
is
actually
a
compendium
bill
to
560
569,
which
is
the.
O
O
However,
because
there
have
been
so
many
projects
that
we
need
to
get
started
with
before
the
end
of
the
year,
we
need
to
just
find
some
additional
funding.
This
this
project
doesn't
actually
do
anything
for
animal
control.
It
actually
is
a
transfer
of
funds
within
the
public
safety
bureaus.
There
was
an
overage
in
another
project.
M
O
Our
other
colleagues
who
can
discuss
this
can.
L
O
AA
A
L
A
H
565
resolution
amending
289,
which
authorized
the
mayor
and
the
city
solicitor
to
enter
into
a
professional
services
agreement
with
block
and
associates
llc
for
services
related
to
an
employment
related
matter
by
increasing
the
total
spend
by
ten
thousand
two
hundred
dollars
for
a
new
not
to
exceed
amount
of
twenty
thousand
dollars.
Bill
number
five:
sixty
six
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
the
city
solicitor
to
enter
into
a
professional
services
agreement
with
fisher
phillips
six
ppg
place
for
legal
services
in
connection
with
collective
bargaining
in
an
amount
not
to
exceed
fifty
thousand
dollars.
A
P
S
A
Any
discussion
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye
all
right.
Any
opposed
transfers
are
approved,
need
a
motion
to
approve
the
p
cards.
I
moved
second
and
we
inside
of
p
carbs.
We
need
a
motion
to
waive
our
rules
so
that
a
shoot
so
state
permitting
fee
for
pli
can
be
approved.
A
H
Fuel
602
resolution
amending
resolution
176
entitled
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
director
of
the
department
of
public
safety
to
execute
relevant
grant
agreements
to
receive
grant
to
receive
funding
from
allegheny
county
health
department
to
develop
a
public
health,
inform
diversion
program
and
further
providing
for
expenditures.
Under
the
terms
of
said
agreement
to
correct
the
amount
authorized
by
the
grant
agreement
or
agreements
and
the
authorized
for
expenditures
motion
to
approve.
P
A
H
583
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
director
of
the
department
of
public
works
on
behalf
of
the
city,
to
enter
into
an
agreement
with
the
board
of
public
education
of
the
school
district
of
pittsburgh,
for
the
board
of
public
education
of
the
school
district
of
pittsburgh,
to
grant
to
the
city
its
successors
and
assigns
the
privilege
and
license
to
construct,
maintain
and
use
at
their
own
cities
at
the
city's
own
cost
and
expense.
A
ball
playing
field
to
be
located
on
the
grounds
of
pittsburgh.
A
H
584
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
director
of
the
department
of
public
works
on
behalf
of
the
city,
to
enter
into
an
agreement
with
the
southside
community
council,
the
city
to
grant
to
the
side
community
council
its
successors
and
assigns
the
privileged
license
to
improve
and
maintain
esther
palace
located
at
1200
east
carson
street.
In
the
17th
ward.
I
Yeah,
mr
chair,
thank
you
just
sincere
kudos
out
to
the
south
side
community
council
for
all
the
efforts
and
the
work
that
they
have
done
within
esther
plaza.
It's
for
those
of
you
that
might
not
be
the
words
of
12th
and
east
carson.
It
is
an
amazing
public
space
and
the
south
side.
I
Community
council
and
france,
messer
plaza,
have
really
really
taken
that
the
role
that
responsibility
on
themselves
to
do
great
improvements,
not
just
physically,
but
to
raise
the
kinds
of
dollars
that
are
necessary
to
make
the
kinds
of
improvements
that
they
want
to
see,
and
it's
all
been
under.
The
leadership
of
sustained
community
council
and
the
friends
of
esther
plaza
so
just
want
to
give
a
shout
out
for
all
you're
doing
here.
Now,
I'm
over
the
top
happy
to
to
vote
this
through,
and
thank
you
members
for
the
same.
P
V
H
537
resolution
amendment
resolution
number
224,
which
authorized
the
mayor
and
director
of
the
department
of
public
works
to
enter
into
an
agreement
between
the
city
and
sasha
resin
for
the
creation
and
installation
of
public
art
at
arsenal
park
by
authorizing
the
agreement
to
be
made
with
mango
tava
inc.
On
behalf
of
the
artists.
P
H
Bill
538
resolution
amended
resolution
515,
which
are
which
authorized
the
mayor
and
director
of
the
office
of
management
and
budget
on
behalf
of
the
city,
to
execute
an
amended
professional
services
agreement
with
rig
specific
company
for
the
manufacturing
and
distribution
for
recycling
containers
and
provision
of
containers,
it'll
cost
not
to
exceed
two
million.
Six
hundred.
Fifty
four
thousand
eight
hundred
dollars
motion.
Q
To
prove
brief
discussion,
second,
is
somebody
on
the
phone
they
can't
or
somebody
online
here
I
I
just
want
to
know
is
this,
of
course,
for
the
recycling
bins
director
hornstein,
I
see
you
part
of
the
city.
My
part
of
the
city
did
not
get
them
yet,
but
this
is
the
total
cost
for
all
of
them
across
the
city.
Is
that
correct,
okay
and
distribution?
Wise?
Q
V
M
H
Bill
540
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
the
department
of
mobility
and
infrastructure
to
apply
for
a
grant
from
the
pennsylvania
department
of
economic
development's,
greenways
trails
and
recreation
program
to
provide
funding
for
the
green
boulevard
project.
The
grant
proposal
includes
an
ask
of
250
thousand
dollars
with
a
local
match:
374
thousand
three
hundred
twenty
four
dollars
and
forty
three
cent
for
a
total
cost
of
six
hundred
twenty
four
thousand
three
hundred
twenty
four
dollars
and
forty
three
cent.
H
541
resolution
providing
for
an
agreement
with
the
sai
consultant
engineers
inc
for
costs
associated
with
the
cbd
signals,
phase,
4
project
providing
for
the
payment
of
costs
not
to
exceed
five
hundred
twenty
four
thousand
seven
hundred
thirty
nine
dollars
and
thirty
three
cents
motion
to
approve.
Second,
second,.
H
M
V
P
Second
brief
discussion:
I
just
want
to
thank
the
administration
for
continuing
this
worthwhile
project
and
thank
you
councilman
for
cheering
this
up.
H
Bill
544,
a
resolution
providing
for
a
supplemental
agreement
for
professional
engineering
design
services
with
trans
associates
engineering
consultant
inc
for
the
pn
avenue,
phase
2
reconstruction
project
at
a
cost
not
to
exceed
one
million;
five
hundred
sixty
four
thousand
three
hundred
sixty
six
dollars
and
forty
five
cent,
an
increase
of
eight
hundred
thirty
one
thousand
seven
hundred
and
thirty
nine
dollars
and
eighty
four
cent
from
the
previously
executed
agreement
motion
to
approve.
Second.
H
545
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
director
of
the
department
of
mobility
and
infrastructure,
on
behalf
of
the
city,
to
enter
into
a
professional
services
agreement
with
wsp
global
inc
and
or
its
subsidiaries,
wsp
usa,
for
a
period
of
two
years
for
management
services,
in
conjunction
with
a
comprehensive
bridge
asset
management
program
at
an
amount
not
to
exceed
one
million.
Five
hundred
thousand
dollars.
P
V
P
A
H
554
resolution
providing
that
the
city
enter
into
a
professional
services
agreement
and
or
contract
with
upmc
mercy
in
connection
with
the
administration
and
evaluation
of
medical
examinations
and
related
tests
and
procedures
for
the
civil
service
commission's
medical
examination
program
for
current
and
prospective
employees
for
employment
and
promotion
and
providing
for
the
payment
of
costs
not
to
exceed
one
million.
Two
hundred
thousand
dollars.
Q
A
A
L
A
motion
to
hold
both
bills:
270
and
465
until
august
24th,
which
which
is
our
next
standing
committee,.
Q
P
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
get
this
passed
and
I
want
to
thank
councilman
wilson,
councilman
gross
for
working
together
on
this
I
know
councilwoman
gross
is
taking
the
portion
for
the
zoning
and
and
councilman
wilson
is
taking
this
portion,
but
I
do
want
to
make
sure
that
we
add
in
here-
and
I
think
councilman
gross
articulated-
that
in
the
meeting
that
I
want
to
add
in
that
we
have
that
you
have
to
at
least
own
one
of
the
properties
to
to
have
to
have
rentals
and
that
there
there
was
one
other
piece.
P
What
was
it
yeah?
You
have
to
live
in
one
of
the
properties,
and
then
there
was.
I
think
there
was
one
other
piece,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I
say
publicly
that
I
she
and
I
spoke,
and
so
I'd
like
to
work
with
you
on
those
amendments,
councilman,
okay,
I
just.
A
All
bills
will
be
held
until
august
24th.
I'll
simply
add
me
and
councilman
wilson
had
a
similar
conversation,
where
I
understood
that
he
didn't
necessarily
want
to
add
those
amendments
into
these
bills.
I'm
I
I'm.
A
P
L
P
A
J
AD
Is
seeking
accreditation
as
a
building
department
and
code
enforcement
agency
through
the
international
accreditation
services
program?
Accreditation
is
a
pathway
to
recognize
our
competence
as
a
building
code.
AD
L
AD
L
A
Councilman
wilson,
laura
jagowski,
has
joined
us,
so
we
can
go
back
to
page
11
under
public
safety
and
take
bill
602,
which
is
still
open.
L
All
right
thanks,
hello,
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
have
a
quick
briefing
on
what
this
I
see.
It's
amending
it.
So
is
it
adding
additional
funds
or.
AE
A
clerical
error
the
way
that
this
this
is.
AE
What
will
be
three
years
of
contracting
and
the
way
that
we've
approached
this
is
to
amend
the
contract
and
the
statement,
work
and
budget
with
each
succession
here,
so
the
number
that
we
are
authorized
to
contract
should
be
growing
with
each
new
year's
amount
right.
AE
So
this
you
know
this
next
year
would
be
added
on
to
the
previous
authorized
round,
so
the
amount
that
we
had
in
the
legislation
that
you
all
originally
reviewed
was
was
putting
solely
what
we
would
be
getting
this
year
and
not
what
we
would
be
getting
in
total
over
the
three
years.
So
it's
not
actually
changing
anything.
It's
just
making
it
a
cumulative
amount.
A
About
that
any
further
discussion,
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
any
opposed
affirmative
recommendation
that
takes
us
back
now
to
innovation,
performance,
asset
management
committee
chaired
by
councilwoman
strasberger.
We
have
one
supplemental
paper
bill,
590.,
yo,.
J
L
P
P
M
H
Bill
569
resolution
amending
resolution
593
a
resolution
amending
an
agreement
with
edok
technologies
for
licenses
services
and
maintenance
and
support
services
to
provide
imaging
and
document
management
services
to
include
police
documents
at
an
additional
cost
not
to
exceed
four
hundred.
Ninety
seven
thousand
three
hundred
and
fifty
dollars.
P
Second,
just
brief
discussion.
I
just
wanna
thank
councilman.
Strasberger
she's
been
doing
a
great
job.
Cheering
this
committee
and
director
norman's
been
doing
a
really
good
job
too,
so
I
just
want
to
thank
them
both.
Thank
you.
L
M
AA
Yes,
I'm
wendell
moore,
I'm
assistant,
director
of
business
technology
with
education
at
the
department
of
innovation
and
performance,
and
these
funds
are
for
imaging
for
the
police
documents
which
are
currently
housed
in
sharepoint
and
was
developed
as
a
custom
application
by
b3.
It
was
requested
that
we
retire
all
of
the
b3
custom
applications
by
the
end
of
this
year.
We're
to
do
that.
AA
L
Happy
to
hear
I
just
want
to
understand,
because
I
know
at
some
point:
there's
gonna
be
a
change
in
in
how
reporting
is
done
to
speed
up
reports
that
that
police
do
to
save
time.
So
all
right
thanks,
I
see
that's
not
this
thanks.
H
Bill
502
resolution
requesting
the
approval
of
an
inter-municipal
transfer
of
a
restaurant
liquor
license
from
china
palace
restaurant
to
the
applicant
szechuan
spice
inc
for
the
premises
located
at
5700
center
avenue
known
as
szechuan
spice
restaurant
pursuant
to
amended
pennsylvania
liquor
code.
Four,
four,
six
one.
H
P
A
H
Bill
547
resolution
approving
execution
of
a
contract
for
disposition
by
solid
land
between
the
ura
and
cedarwood
homes,
holding
llc
for
a
related
entity
for
the
sale
of
block
70a
lots,
3
and
10,
and
block
70e
lots.
185,
241
and
375
in
the
28th
ward
of
the
city
board
heads
forting
road
between
orchard
circle
and
von
bonhurst
street
council
district
number.
H
Council
district
number
nine
bill
number
553
resolution
authorizing
a
corporation
agreement
with
the
ura
for
the
performance
of
certain
work
in
connection
with
the
penn
circle:
two-way
conversion
and
providing
for
the
payment
of
costs
not
to
exceed
one
million
dollars.
Council
district
number,
nine.
P
H
P
You
I
just
want
to
talk
about
the
properties
in
ferrywood.
I
want
to
thank
the
ura
for
all
the
work
that
they're
doing
in
our
district
in
fairywood,
but
this
particular
project
is
for
the
housing.
So
a
lot
of
people
know
that
there's
going
to
be
a
resident,
the
industrial
side
to
fairwood
and
there's
going
to
be
additional
warehouse
space
built
there,
but
there's
a
division
and
then
on
the
other
side,
will
be
the
residential
side.
What
they
and
people
are
saying
that
they'd
like
to
see
affordable
housing.
P
Well,
what's
happening
on
in
ferrywood
is
there's
one
housing
effort
where
people
are
refurbishing
existing
homes
and
another
housing
effort
where
we
have
rental
house
places
built.
But
the
third
is
the
this.
This
part
the
project
which
is
affordable,
senior
patio
homes
in
fairywood
and
there's
not
there's
actually
not
a
lot
of
patio
homes
in
the
city
of
pittsburgh.
So
this
is
something
that
the
residents
specifically
ask
for.
So
when
you
hear
about
the
industrial,
don't
don't
think
that
we
forgot
about
the
resident,
the
residential
we
have
not.
M
A
Any
of
your
proposed
firms
and
recommendation
on
all
remaining
bills
with
that
our
meeting
announcements
shortly
after
this
meeting
council
will
hold
an
executive
session
relative
to
updates
on
the
rules
of
counsel
from
council's
attorney
regarding
legal
matters.
Also
this
afternoon
at
2
30
council
will
hold
an
executive
session
relative
to
bills
518
and
519..
A
Next
week,
council
will
hold
our
regular
meetings
on
tuesday
july
19th.
Speaker
registration
closes
at
9
a.m.
Tuesday
morning
to
register,
please
fill
out
the
sign
up
form
on
the
council
meeting
webpage.
You
may
also
call
the
clerk's
office
at
412-255-2138.
Council
recess
will
begin
next
wednesday
july
20th
and
end
thursday
august
18th.
The
first
council
meeting
after
recess
will
be
friday
august
19th
at
10
a.m.