►
From YouTube: Pittsburgh City Council Standing Committees - 6/15/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
morning
and
welcome
to
the
standing
committees
meeting
for
wednesday
june
15
2022,
all
council
meetings
will
be
live
streamed
on
the
city's
website.
Our
first
order
of
business
is
roll
call
where
the
clerk
please
take
the
roll.
A
Thank
you.
Our
next
order
of
business
is
public
comment.
I'd
like
to
remind
all
speakers
of
the
rules
of
council
state
that
comments
are
limited
to
matters
of
concern.
Official
action
or
deliberation
which
are
or
may
be
before,
city,
council
and
profanity
will
not
be
permitted.
Our
first
registered
speaker
is
naomi
mullen.
C
Good
morning,
can
you
hear
me.
C
Okay,
good
morning,
my
name
is
paul
o'hanlon.
I
live
on
south
braddock
avenue
in
wilkinsburg
and
I'd
like
to
start
off
by
asking
if
a
date
has
been
set
yet
for
a
meeting
between
the
city
councils
of
pittsburgh
and
wilkinsburg
to
discuss
the
annexation
question.
If
not,
please
schedule
it
soon.
It's
critical
that
the
two
councils
understand
the
strengths
and
needs
of
the
other
and
see
if
annexation
really
offers
solutions
to
the
needs
of
either
municipality.
C
I
happen
to
think
that
the
question
of
annexation
is
that
of
wilkinsburg
is
a
distraction
and
doesn't
actually
offer
solutions
to
the
problems
of
either
wilkinsburg
or
pittsburgh.
Let
me
give
you
one
example.
C
Many
of
you
know
me
as
a
result
of
my
disability
advocacy,
but
fewer
people
know
that
I
worked
for
over
20
years
for
neighborhood
legal
services
as
a
housing
lawyer
and
along
the
way
I
became
pittsburgh's
resident
expert
regarding
the
section
8
home
ownership
program.
Most
people
are
familiar
with
the
section.
8
housing
choice,
voucher
program
as
a
rental
supplement
program.
C
I
call
it
the
buy
your
landlord
a
house
program.
The
rental
voucher
program
does
build
equity
for
the
landlords,
but
not
the
participants.
The
section
8
home
ownership
program
changes
all
of
that.
What
drew
my
attention
to
the
section
8
home
ownership
program
was
the
sustainability
built
into
the
program.
The
section
8
subsidy
can
be
used
not
only
to
help
pay
the
mortgage,
but
the
taxes,
insurance
utilities
and
even
a
maintenance
and
replacement
reserve
fund.
The
one
limiting
factor
of
the
program
is
price
in
round
numbers.
C
C
We
reached
the
limit
size
for
our
space
over
50
families
attended
our
first
workshop
and
we
have
waiting
lists
for
at
least
two
more
workshops
which
we'll
be
holding
this
summer.
The
response
was
off
the
scale
among
our
more
than
300
responses
were
around
50,
who
were
people
with
vouchers
with
the
city
housing
authority.
C
A
D
My
reason
for
doing
so
is
not
to
bore
you
but
to
try
to
impress
upon
you
just
how
detrimental
this
zoning
will
be
to
oakland
and
the
important
role
you
have
been
given
when
this
ordinance
was
first
sent
to
the
planning.
Commission,
councilman
krauss
said
that
the
planning
commission
were
the
experts
about
planning
and
zoning
and
would
be
deferred
to
that.
D
Many
residents
have
put
a
lot
of
time
and
money
into
understanding
this
legislation,
though
it
may
not
be
in
your
district.
You
get
to
vote
on
it.
Were
you
there
on
monday
to
hear
the
comments
from
oakland
residents,
even
when
prompted
to
do
so?
Not
one
person
came
forward
with
a
positive
comment
on
it.
That
is
a
comment
in
and
of
itself.
D
D
The
3d
model,
showing
the
effect
of
this
rezoning
was
in
council
chambers.
Recently,
since
we've
been
saying
all
along
that
the
issue
was
scale,
some
of
us
felt
that
a
3d
model
would
show
it
best.
I
encourage
you
to
watch
the
video
of
it
on
oakcliff.org,
learn
as
much
as
you
can
before
it
comes
to
a
vote.
Thank.
E
F
Olynyk,
yes,
thank
you
marcoliniak
31
years
in
south
oakland,
12
years
before
that
in
other
open
locations,
I'm
here
to
talk
about
zoning
ordinance,
2021
1906,
nicknamed
oakland
crossings
and
the
ucmu
district.
I
test
cited
the
planning
commission
yesterday
about
the
overall
oakland
plan.
It
was
disturbing
to
see
the
confusion,
especially
related
the
oakland
crossings
related
portion,
not
having
access
to
the
hearing
video.
Yet
I'm
relying
on
my
notes
from
recollections.
F
I
understand
that
there
is
a
process
to
provide
commissioner's
recommendations
to
counsel
and
it
may
be
unorthodox,
but
everything
about
this
has
been
unorthodox.
So
far,
so
I
encourage
you
to
watch
the
video
for
yourselves
when
it
is
posted
the
comments
and
questions
echo
many
of
those
from
residents
concerning
heights
and
masking
adjacent
to
residential
properties.
F
They
also
are
something
repetition
of
their
own
prior
comments
about
the
effect
of
overly
high
buildings
towering
over
and
boxing
in
cold
art
avenue.
I
took
some
of
their
comments
as
the
commissioners
being
under
the
impression
that
the
oakland
plan
could
have
some
effect
on
oakland
crossings.
What's
coming
before
you
hear
shortly,
one
quote
from
memory
refrain
to
hawken
street
north
of
louisiana
street
is
quote.
F
I
can't
envision
a
building
400
feet
wide
and
120
feet
high,
so
close
to
single
family
houses,
end
quote
and
allowing
this
now
will
essentially
skew
any
consideration
of
coulthard
later.
I
was
also
a
little
concerned
about
something
they.
I
thought
deputy
director
dash
said
like
there
was
some
other
plan
that
I'm
not
I'm
not
aware
of
to
possibly
re-zone
coltar
in
the
near
future,
given
the
number
of
long-term
and
life-long
lifelong
current
residents
who
have
no
plans
of
leaving,
and
at
least
one
community
land
trust
house
there.
F
Now
that
should
give
significant
weight
to
the
concerns
of
we're
building
on
hawker
street
and
mckee
place.
I
know
you
saw
the
physical
thr.
Some
of
you
saw
the
3d
bit
model
in
person,
but
I
would
strongly
encourage
you
to
watch
the
video
on
oaklist.org.
It's
oak
o-a-k-c-l-I-f-f-e,
dot,
o-r-g,
with
better
close-up
perspectives
of
key
areas.
Another
great
concern
of
mine
is
possible
loss
of
inclusionary
zoning.
I
see
due
to
the
current
legal
challenge,
walnut
capital's
attorney.
F
Mr
kamen
assured
us
at
monday's
meeting
that
they
are
committed
to
providing
actual,
affordable
housing
on
the
sites
they
own
or
control.
But,
as
I
read
it,
public
benefits
agreement
does
not
survive
the
sale
of
any
of
those
properties
and
does
not
apply
to
any
other
implementation
of
the
ucmu
district.
Affordable
housing
was
one
of
the
highest
priorities
noted
in
the
oakland
plant.
The
boatman
crossings
is
going
to
continue
to
be
the
tail
wagging
your
dog
and
zoning
legislation.
G
G
I
came
to
talk
to
you
about
council
bill
2021
1906,
the
so-called
oakland
crossings
bill,
because
I
understood
from
councilman
house
that
it
would
be
up
for
discussion
today.
However,
I
don't
see
it
on
the
posted
agenda,
so
please
forgive
me
if
I'm
jumping
the
gun.
My
purpose
in
testifying
today
was
to
let
you
know
in
case
any
of
you
missed.
G
Without
understanding
that
context,
councilman
krauss
can
confirm
that
oakland
residents
are
not
in
support
of
bill
1906.
He
heard
that
clearly
at
the
meeting
he
hosted
on
monday
evening.
I
would
also
like
to
clarify
for
everyone
in
case
there
has
been
any
misunderstanding
that
oakland
planning
and
development
corporation
does
not
support
bill
1906.
G
Our
testimony
thanking
the
mayor
and
his
staff
for
their
intervention
on
this
bill
must
not
be
confused
for
support
for
the
bill
itself
and
assertions
that
opdc
drafted
or
helped
to
draft
the
revisions
to
this
bill
are
categorically
untrue.
Council
bill,
2021
1906
is
complicated,
politically
fraught
and
would
set
a
terrible
precedence
for
planning
in
the
city.
Should
this
bill
be
brought
before
you
today
or
any
day
for
your
consideration.
I
urge
you
to
consider
long
and
hard
before
taking
any
action
on
it.
A
H
H
You
recently
had
a
public
hearing
on
this
issue,
although,
unfortunately
you
did
it
at
one
o'clock
in
the
afternoon
when
pretty
much
most
of
the
community
is
working.
So
you
heard
from
a
lot
of
airbnb
business
owners.
H
This
is
a
really
important
issue,
because
if
you
look
in
many
of
the
cities
across
the
country
like
denver
like
philadelphia
like
l.a
like
san
francisco,
they
put
this
in
there
because
it
corporations
are
buying
up
property
in
the
neighborhoods,
not
just
rentals,
but
also
houses
and
they're,
taking
them
off
the
market.
There's
a
reason
why
primary
residence
is
extraordinarily
important.
So
when
you
have
a
corporation
who
owns
30
40
units
in
the
city
of
pittsburgh,
they're
taking
that
away
from
the
average
individual
who
could
go,
buy
a
home.
H
H
When
you
have
a
place
that
is
30
units,
40
units,
20
units,
all
being
short-term
rental.
That
is
a
hotel,
you
cannot
say
otherwise
there
is
no
difference
and
then,
if
you
look
at
a
hotel,
they
at
least
have
a
front
desk
person.
So
when
you
have
a
multi-unit
filled
with
30
short-term
rentals,
it
is
a
hotel.
H
You
really
need
to
consider
that,
because
there
are
neighbors
of
where
I
live
up
in
mount
washington.
In
fact,
many
places
up
there
are
being
converted
to
airbnbs.
They
are
not
happy
with
this.
Teresa
knows
this,
but
she's
being
very
quiet
on
this
issue
and
leadership
is
about
being
proactive.
I've
had
the
great
fortune
in
my
life
to
work
for
senator
harry
reid.
I've
worked
at
leadership
pittsburgh.
Some
of
you
have
even
spoken
to
the
class
about
being
what
a
good
leader
is.
I've
worked
for
mr
bill.
H
Strickland
traveling
the
world
helping
him
create
centers
for
the
community,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day
it
is
about
serving
the
people
of
your
community,
not
the
businesses
who
are
taking
ownership
of
your
community.
I
would
like
to
reiterate
my
points,
an
amendment
around
primary
residence
for
airbnb
and
also
to
the
reconsideration
of
multi-units
around
airbnb.
That
is
a
slippery
slope
into
a
hotel
world
that
not
that
our
communities
just
do
not
want.
I
I
The
sign
is
that
in
our
prisons,
when
I
went
to
an
oversight
meeting
I
had
never
been
before
went
to
the
oversight
meeting
about
the
prison.
It
was
stated
that
our
prisoners
are
being
served
feces
and
one
man
said
he
turned
his
macaroni
and
cheese
over
and
it's
a
half
dead
mouse.
Now,
as
mr
burgess
says,
what
I'm
saying
is
not
true,
I'm
asking
you
who
have
people
that
are
in
the
jail.
I
Your
family
members
are
friends
for
them
to
write
you
a
letter
or
what
they're
eating
write
the
letter,
also
to
teresa
tell
smith
the
president
of
council.
This
is
this
414
grand
street
room,
510
pittsburgh,
one
five,
two,
five,
nine
and
there's
also
my
address.
So
if
you
send
it
to
her,
please
send
me
one
too,
so
I
can
have
document
documented
proof.
I
You
seem
to
be
trying
to
take
our
rights
away
to
be
able
to
come
down
and
speak
when
we
have
a
problem
now,
I'm
being
proactive,
because
we
need
to
make
sure
that
our
family
members
and
friends
that
are
in
prison
are
not
being
mistreated
and
there's
another
thing.
I
would
like
to
say
they're
saying
that
they
have
a
calendar
on
what
they're
supposed
to
eat,
but
they
have
where
the
calendar
may
say
something
else
and
they're
eating
bologna
sandwiches
three
times
a
day.
I
Now
to
me
it
seems
like
that
would
be
fraud
against
the
company
if
you're
saying
you're
you're,
giving
us
hamburgers
or
whatever
and
you're,
giving
baloney
sandwiches.
I
come
before
you
because
I
believe
that
this
was
said.
I
heard
brandy
fisher
who's,
an
activist
and
also
the
council
member
best,
that's
over
at
county
council
because
she's
having
a
problem
getting
into
the
jail
she
wants
to
do
spot
checks,
not
letting
them
know
but
come
and
see
just
exactly
what
our
families
are
getting
getting
into
now.
I
Please
please
help
me,
because
you
can
support
me
that
I'm
telling
the
truth
you
send
and
say
what
you're
eating
in
the
prisons
so
that
we
can
so
counsel
miss
to
the
president
and
the
rest
of
the
council.
That
don't
believe
I
don't
come
down
here
to
lie.
I
heard
this
at
the
meeting.
I
knew
nothing
about
the
mice
or
the
feces
until
they
started
at
the
meeting
in
front
of
your
warden
harper
and
harper.
Has
you
know
we've
been
talking
about
him
a
bit.
Thank
you.
Have
a
nice
day.
J
I've
been
up
here
before,
and
I
told
about
certain
conditions
and
as
far
as
people
this
homeless,
in
the
street,
that
has
mental.
You
know
illness
and
young
people
that
are
really
like
kids,
they're
in
the
street
and
they're
running
around
half
of
the
night
and
there's
a
lot
of
people
out
here
homeless,
because
they
don't
have
their
identification,
I'm
one
of
them
and
I
have
a
job
pending
and
I'm
trying
to
deal
with
vital
statistics.
J
And
they
told
me
now
that
they
gave
me
my
mother's
last
name
from
a
previous
marriage
that
I
have
to
have
a
court
order
to
get
a
change
back
over
okay
to
my
right
name,
and
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
think
pittsburgh
should
address
the
homeless
situation
more
seriously,
because
there's
a
lot
of
people
out
there
with
substance
abuse
problems
and
they
need
more
outreach
programs.
J
And
I
just
I
just
say
you
know
I
I
feel
that
pittsburgh
needs
to.
You
know
really
address
the
homeless
situation
better
and
giving
people,
tents
and
sleeping
bags.
K
K
K
K
K
K
A
N
M
O
A
N
N
P
Certainly
good
morning,
my
name
is
heidi
norman,
I'm,
the
director
of
innovation
and
performance
at
the
city
of
pittsburgh.
I'm
really
happy
to
present
to
council
this
legislation
this
morning.
It
is
the
establishment
of
a
partnership
between
the
city
of
pittsburgh
and
computer
reach,
an
organization
that
has
been
for
a
long
time
in
pittsburgh,
helping
folks
to
receive
devices,
computer
devices
and
others,
and
to
learn
how
to
use
them
safely
on
the
internet.
P
This
is
toward
our
efforts
to
close
the
digital
divide
here
in
pittsburgh,
and
we
are
so
pleased
that
our
initial
donation
will
be
in
excess
of
92
000
in
value
of
devices.
This
will
include
desktop
computers,
laptop
computers,
monitors
mice,
keyboards
and
the
like,
and
I
would
like
our
the
executive
director
of
computer
reach,
dave
sevick
to
say
a
few
words
in
appreciation
for
this
new
partnership.
Thank
you.
Q
Thank
you
city
council,
for
inviting
me
my
name
is
dave
sevik,
I'm
the
executive
director
of
computer
reach
we're
located
at
one
drv
drive
in
wilkinsburg
pa
behind
the
rite
aid
pharmacy
along
the
railroad
tracks.
We
recycle
and
distribute
about
3
000
computers.
A
year
we've
been
around
for
22
years.
Q
R
Q
N
You,
oh,
I
had
one
more
question.
Okay,
thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
I
understand.
Maybe
you
can
correct
me
if
I'm
mistaken,
but
that
this
is
the
exact
type
of
setup
that
you
would
prefer
as
pro
as
computer
reach,
the
large
contracts
where
you
might
be
getting
a
bulk.
N
S
N
Q
S
Q
O
Wilson-
and
this
is,
I
just
had.
O
Is
this
recycling
or
reuse?
I
know
probably
someone
both.
T
Q
S
O
Q
According
to
what
director
norman
said,
it
looks
like
324,
desktops,
74
laptops,
427
monitors,
okay,
43
keyboards,
I'm
sorry,
243.,
170,
mice,.
O
O
A
U
Thank
you.
I
apologize
for
not
being
there
today.
I
am
curious.
I
I
think
I
caught
what
is
the
gist
of
this
project.
The
property
is
valued
at
92
000,
but
really
we're
just
we're.
Not
there's
no
cash
being
exchanged,
we're
just
giving
you
a
lot
of
our
electronics
that
we
would,
or
we
were
disposing
of.
Am
I
right.
U
Thank
you,
so
I'm
really
excited
about
this
and
I'm
curious
about
your
total
organizations.
U
Q
U
I
I
believe
that
we're
all
a
little
more
conscious
these
days
about
e-waste
recycling
as
well
and
what
I've
been
listening
to
on
the
news,
is
that
we
in
the
united
states
are
having
like
with
everything
else,
supply
chain
issues
right,
especially
around
semiconductors
and
microchips,
and
the
rare
earth
minerals
that
are
really
terrible
for
the
world
to
be
mining
new.
But
we
still
are
because
we're
all
dependent
on
our
electronic
devices.
U
So
do
you
know
that
you
can
tell
us
a
little
more
about
the
recycling
supply
chains?
There.
Q
Q
You
can
fix
a
computer
that
doesn't
take
a
lot
of
effort
and
put
it
back
into
the
community
as
far
as
the
rare
earth
metals
the
logic
boards
all
of
the
toxic
chemicals
in
there,
they
all
go
back
to
the
recycler
and
they
take
care
of
that.
Our
goal
is
service
to
the
community,
digital
literacy
and
such
so
we're
not
a
for-profit
recycler.
We.
U
U
Q
I
can
ask
yes
we're
very
happy
with
our
recycler.
We've
been
through
many
we're
using
infinite
electronic
recycling
in
wintersville
ohio.
They
have
a
facility,
that's
as
big
as
a
home
depot.
It's
a
hundred
thousand
square
feet.
They
have
great
record-keeping
they're
an
r2
registered
recycler,
they're
reputable.
They
know
they
take
care
of
multiple
hospitals
in
the
area,
so
they
usually
stop
by
and
get
two
or
three
pallets
worth
of
our
leftover
computers
that
are
responsibly
recycled.
U
R
Round,
hey
david
yeah,
I'm
just
trying
to
get
an
idea,
so
I-
and
I
heard
you,
you
know-
inform
us
as
to
the
the
number
of
computers
a
number
of
laptops
and
I'm
just
curious
as
to
if
we
were
to
purchase
those
new
versus
you
rebuilding
or
refurbishing
them.
So
just
I'll
just
throw
out
an
example.
If
we
get
100
laptops
for
92
000,
how
many
would
you
be
putting
in
the
street
refurbished?
Is
it
200
or
is
it?
Is
it
twice.
Q
The
volume
well,
it
depends
on
the
quality
of
the
donation.
You
know,
sometimes
you,
when
you
get
a
new
corporation,
that
donates
like
the
city,
you
get
a
large
volume.
I
think
we're
going
to
have
a
couple
of
rooms
full
of
computers.
We
don't
know
the
quality
of
those
computers
if
they
were
well
maintained
by
the
city.
So
normally
it's
about
one-third
of
what
we
get
we'll
be
able
to
go
back
out
in
the
community.
S
Q
R
Q
R
To
help
pay
the
rent,
so
it's
obviously
much
cheaper
than
buying
new
and
the
92
000
is
the
value
of
the
equipment
you
are
receiving
and
refurbishing
that.
A
T
M
Motion
to
approve
with
brief
discussion.
Second,
I
believe
we
have
online
with
us
jacqueline
weinberg,
I
think
from,
and
I'm
not
sure,
if
there's
anyone
else
from
that
in
from
that
organization.
Yes,.
M
All
right
I'll
say
a
few
words
and
then
I'll
I'll
come
back
to
you.
Pittsburgh
is
wrestling
with
multiple
public
health
crisis,
institutional
racism
and
its
intergenerational
consequences,
the
global
kovac
19
pandemic
and
its
effects
and
the
local
epidemic
of
violence
and
crime.
M
Historically,
pittsburgh
has
over
relied
on
the
three
p's
policing
prosecution
in
prisons
in
an
attempt
to
reduce
violence
and
strengthen
community
safety.
This
strategy
has
not
only
failed
to
yield.
Long-Term
results
has
come
at
an
extremely
high
social
cost
to
many
of
our
most
vulnerable
communities.
M
We
have,
together,
as
a
city,
decided
to
initiate
a
comprehensive,
coordinated
strategy
that
recognizes
policing,
prosecution
and
prisons
alone
cannot
stem
the
time
of
violence
on
their
own.
As
a
city,
we
have
made
a
fundamental
commitment
to
peace
and
strive
to
eliminate
all
incidents
of
violence
and
crime.
Violence
is
not
an
unsolvable
problem.
M
Violence
is
not
an
unsolvable
problem,
but
rather
a
public
health
crisis
that
is
treatable
and
preventable
through
an
intentional,
coordinated
and
sustained
efforts.
I
would
like
to
just
from
the
very
beginning
I
want
to
thank
mayor,
ed
gainey
and
for
his
leadership,
I'd
like
to
thank
the
opportunity
to
work
with
lisa,
frank
and
the
administration
and
to
be
a
co-author
on
the
plan
for
peace.
M
M
It
is
a
public
health
approach
to
violence
reduction
into
peace.
It
uses
data
and
evidence
and
it
balances
for
sort
of
things
in
a
comprehensive,
coordinated
way.
It
has
community
partnerships,
it
has
people
in
the
community,
such
as
the
outreach
workers
actually
doing
outreach
workers
to
outreach
to
these
most
vulnerable
populations.
M
And
then,
of
course,
there
is
the
last
pillar,
which
is
the
healthy
environment,
which
really
means
community
development,
making
sure
that
these
communities
at
risk
have
not
only
violence
reduction
but
have
prosperity,
have
affordable
housing,
have
all
the
amenities
of
a
good
school
and
and
resources
and
stores
and
places
to
play,
work
and
worship.
M
Now
that
brings
us
to
today's
bill,
which
fits
in
the
area
of
partnerships,
and
this
is
another
partnership
that
we're
bringing
to
the
city
to
deal
with
one
of
the
most
at
risk
populations
for
future
violence,
interaction
and
that's
those
who
are
firmly
incarcerated.
As
you
know,
that
population
has
a
very
difficult
time
when
they
come
home.
They
come
back
to
the
communities
in
which
they
are
from.
M
They
have
a
difficult
time
of
getting
employment
because
of
despite
the
ban,
the
box
that
we
did
many
years
ago,
we
found
out
that
what
employers
do
is
they
just
stop
hiring
black
and
brown
people
right
and
so
as
a
way
to
try
to
get
around
the
background
check
stuff.
So
with
this
program,
which
has
been
very
successful
in
philadelphia
and
grateful
that
they're
going
to
replicate
it
at
scale
here
in
pittsburgh,
what
it
does
is,
it
employs
formerly
incarcerated
people.
It
pays
them
daily.
M
It
provides
them
not
just
with
the
job,
but
it
provides
them
with
the
soft
skills
needed
to
be
successful
in
terms
of
interview,
skills
and
interpersonal
activities
and
job
search
and
all
the
things
that
are
necessary
to
make
them
productive
citizens.
And
so
this
part
is
a
program,
a
part
of
several
programs
that
are
needed
in
order
to
be
a
city
for
all.
We
must
all
we
must
be
all
in
for
the
city,
all
of
us
all
of
us
have
the
role
to
play.
V
Thank
you,
councilman
burgess,
and
thank
you
council
members
for
having
us
here
today.
I'm
jacqueline
weinberger,
I'm
the
regional
director
for
the
mid-atlantic
region
for
the
center
for
employment
opportunities.
V
Our
program
is
a
four-stage,
evidence-based
model
that
solely
works
with
individuals
coming
home
from
incarceration,
and
so
once
individuals
get
referred
to
our
program,
we
bring
them
in
for
an
orientation
that
is
paid
and
then
right
after
we
immediately
hire
them
and
begin
to
work.
They
begin
to
work
on
transitional
work,
crews,
I'm
currently
in
our
pittsburgh
location.
We
work
with
archonic
as
well
as
the
ura
and
hopefully
soon
with
you
all
doing,
work
in
and
around
the
city
of
pittsburgh.
V
Once
they
come
into
our
our
program.
We
provide
them,
like
councilman
burgess,
said
with
soft
skills,
but
a
very
intentional
job,
coaching
and
job
development
to
not
just
get
folks
connected
to
work,
but
connect
them
to
meaningful
work,
career
pathways,
jobs
that
are
going
to
give
them
a
living
wage
and
we
work
with
them
until
we
find
a
good
employer
match
for
them,
and
then
we
place
them
into
full-time
employment.
V
Once
we
do
that,
we
continue
to
work
with
individuals
for
365
days
past
that
date
of
first
employment
and
while
we're
doing
a
lot
in
our
retention
services
over
that
year.
Our
main
goal
is
to
keep
individuals
connected
to
work,
because
we
know
that
if
individuals
stay
connected
to
work,
the
less
likely
they
are
to
recidivate.
V
So
we
hope
to
be
one
part
of
a
player
in
being
able
to
help
with
reducing
violence
in
the
city
and
I'll
answer.
Any
questions
you
may
have.
A
Thank
you,
councilman
burgess,
good
president
smith,.
W
They
hire
them,
yes,
and
so
I
just
wonder
why
is
there
any
effort
to
also
make
sure
dpw
is
part
of
that,
because
we
actually
have
people
in
dpw
that
have
criminal
histories?
Some
have,
as
you
know,
director
10-year
federal
prison
records,
and
I
actually
helped
the
one
person
get
a
job
and
they
said
he
is
the
best
employee
they've
ever
had
in
dpw.
W
So
I
don't
know
why
we
are
not
doing
that
on
our
own
and
I
actually
one
of
the
conversations
I
had
was.
We
also
eliminate
people
if
they
have
if
they
fail
a
drug
test,
even
though
they
might
have
a
medical
marijuana
card,
they
may
not
have
used
it.
I
don't
I
don't
know
so,
but
no,
I
just
want
to
know
what
we're
doing
other
than
this
other
than
hiring
somebody.
What
are
we
doing
as
a
city?
Do
you
want
to
come
forward?
One
of
you,
yeah.
M
S
X
Good
morning,
everyone
jake
paulette
director
of
the
office
of
enemy
budget,
thanks
councilman
for
this
question.
I
think
that
this,
among
other
partnerships,
create
very
beneficial
training
opportunities
that
can
then
themselves
become
pathways
into
city
employment,
and
so
I
believe
that
the
goal
that
you're
outlining
and
the
goal
of
this
program
are
very
compatible.
X
X
I
I
I
certainly
believe
that-
and
I
wasn't
aware
of
that,
but
but
I'm
not
surprised
to
learn
that
you
know
we're.
You
know
this,
I
believe,
could
be
one
of
several
opportunities
for
folks
to
particularly
those
who
are
re-entering
citizens
who
need
these
kinds
of
opportunities
to
be
plugged
into
training,
opportunities
and
skill
development
opportunities
to
then
develop
the
skills
necessary
that
could
make
them
strong
and
competitive
applicants
for
eventually
for
city
positions
and
and
we're
eager
to
establish
numerous
partnerships
of
this
kind
in
order
to
build
that
pipeline
into
employment.
X
So
I
think
that
programs
that
can
assist
residents
again
initially
being
employed
by
an
outside
partner,
but
who
can
collaborate
with
us
on
conducting
this
work
is
a
great
way
to
give
those
folks
the
necessary
skills
and
learning
and
connection
to
our
teams
and
understanding
of
the
ways
in
which
we
do
this
work.
That
then,
will
make
them
excellent
applicants
for
city
jobs
after
that
sort
of
training
program.
So
the
the
two
the
two
are
are
deeply
connected
and
they're.
T
W
Internal,
we
don't
need
to
have
a
special
group
or
special
anybody
come
in
and
tell
us
how
to
do
it.
Let's
just
do
it
and
I
feel
the
same
way
about
when
I
I
think
I
talk
to
you
about
people
that
don't
have
a
driver's
license,
who
can't
get
employed
with
dpw,
but
they
can
do
all
the
work.
They
just
can't
drive
a
vehicle.
Well,
why
do
four
people
need
to
drive
the
somebody
go
jump
in
the
front
seat?
W
I
mean
why
can't
the
two
in
the
front
have
to
have
a
license
two
and
a
back,
not
because
we've
seen
people
in
your
district
who
called
us
who
said
that
they
couldn't
get
employed
because
of
that
we've
seen
people
who
couldn't
get
employed
because
they
failed
the
medical
marijuana
test.
But
yet
we're
saying
that
you
know
we
don't
want.
We
want
to
decriminalize
marijuana,
so
I
just
feel
like
we.
We
contradict
ourselves
and
if
we
really
want
to
give
people
a
chance,
let's
just
do
it.
That's
all.
X
I'm
gonna
say
you
haven't
mentioned
that
to
me
in
the
past,
and
I
think
again
it's
a
great
point
and
we
have
the
administration
I
mean,
has
tasked
assistant
director
newman
with
with
leading
our
efforts
around
modernizing
our
policies
and
building
some
of
these
collaborations
for
exactly
this
purpose
it.
I
think
it
is
a
both
and
question
right.
X
It
is
both
a
question
of
modernizing
our
policies
and
approaches
and
fixing
some
of
the
inconsistencies
that
you've
rightly
identified,
as
well
as
using
partnerships
with
initiatives
like
this,
like
landforce
and,
like
others,
to
build
the
skill
base
and
then
to
bring
those
two
things
together
through
hiring
out
of
these
programs
into
our
workforce.
So
so
we're
we're
100
on
the
same
page
as
what
you've
just
laid
out
moving
both
of
those
efforts
in
tandem
to
arrive
at
the
same
result.
Okay,.
R
You
know
on
its
face.
I
think
it
sounds
like
a
good
program.
I
really
do.
I've
had
I've
hired
many
people
incarcerated,
coming
out
of
prison
and
the
challenges
that
they
have,
whether
it's
not
a
driver's
license.
They
don't
typically
have
the
financial
means
to
you
know,
go
searching
for
a
job.
They
really
need
to
go
to
work
right
away.
You
know,
and
some
have
worked
out
to
be
great
for
me.
R
Some
have
not
a
lot
of
them
were
like
after
a
month
in
the
roofing
business,
they
wanted
to
go
back
to
prison.
R
So
you
know
so
so
it
sounds
like
a
really
good
program.
Anything
we
can
help
anything
we
can
do
to
help
people
get
back
on
their
feet
after
being
in
prison.
Is
is
a
good
thing
most
of
the
time.
That's
what
they
need
is
an
opportunity,
so
I
was
glad
to
provide
that
for
many
people
in
the
past.
I
guess
my
question
is
this:
where
do
do
we
provide
them
with
a
phone
number
when
they
come
out
of
prison
or
do
we
search
after
them
or
are
they
to
contact
us?
M
V
So
individuals
can
contact
us
directly.
We
can
you
know
our
goal
is
to
really
develop
community
partnerships.
V
From
incarceration
are
whether
that's
community
organizations,
parole
and
probation
officers,
other
community-based
organizations
who
are.
T
V
With
us-
and
we
are
happy
to
give
our
information
out
as
well
as
we,
we
do
recruitment
too,
and
so
if
there
are
opportunities
or
job
fairs
or
places
that
you
all
think
that
we
should
go
to
recruit.
We
are
happy
to
do
that.
We
do
also
have
flyers
and
an
outreach
plan,
and
so
our
goal
is
to
serve
as
many
people
as
we
possibly
can.
R
Yeah,
that's
great
amy
and
that's.
R
Jacqueline,
so
that's
reverend,
no
jaclyn,
that's
great,
and
you
you
mentioned
the
flyer.
You
know
just
the
many
challenges
I
mean
they
might
not
have
access
to
the
computer
to
get
online
to
find
out
where
you're
at
and
who
you
are,
but
just
a
simple
flyer
as
you're
coming
out.
The
gate
would
be
great.
I
feel
like
just
to
have
put
it
in
their
hand,
and
I
don't
know
if
you
do
that.
I
heard
you
mention
flyer
but
yeah.
V
Yes,
we
are,
we
do
have
flyers
and
we
are
working
on
figuring
out
how
we
can
get
them
into
the
discharge
facilities
and
things
like
that
to
be
able
to
get
folks
even
before
they
walk
out
the
door
with
the
information.
R
Great,
that's
all
for
me,
mr
chair,
thanks.
M
I
just
want
to
say
one
thing,
and
certainly
we
are
grateful
for
the
partnership
with
jake
pollock,
but
I
do
want
to
say
to
our
viewing
public
and
to
anyone
who
listening
we
can
solve
this
problem.
We
can
reduce
violence
and
make
our
city
a
city
of
peace.
We
can,
and
we
will
do
that.
We
will
reduce
our
violence.
M
We
will
make
our
city
safer
and
stronger,
and
I
want
to
make
it
very
clear
that
the
city
is
working
in
concert
to
do
just
that
and
it's
something
we
will
succeed
in
doing
it
will
take
all
of
us
and
a
little
bit
of
prayer,
but
where
we
will,
we
are
able
to
make
this
city
a
greater
city
for
all
of
its
residents.
All
of
us
will
succeed.
M
A
You
thank
you.
If
no
other
speakers
I'll
simply
say
this.
This
partnership
makes
all
the
sense
in
the
world
not
only
as
a
violence,
prevention
effort,
but
the
other
reality
is.
We,
as
a
city
cannot
maintain
our
land
to
the
to
the
level
that
we
should
be
able
to.
And
unfortunately,
if
our
current
financial
projections
stay
in
place,
we
won't
be
in
a
position
to
hire
more
individuals
to
come
on
board
to
maintain
our
land
so
partnering
with
them,
where
they
can
take
individuals.
A
W
A
Any
opposed
invoices
are
approved.
We
now
need
a
motion
to
approve
the
interdepartmental
transfers
so
moved
back,
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye,
any
opposed
transfers
are
approved,
need
a
motion
to
approve
the
p
cards,
moved.
N
V
A
M
N
L
Bill
455
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
director
of
the
department
of
public
safety,
on
behalf
of
the
city,
to
enter
into
a
professional's
a
professional
services
agreement
with
zambali
firework
manufacturing
company
for
the
display
of
a
fireworks
show,
in
conjunction
with
the
city
of
pittsburgh's
independence,
day
festival
at
an
amount
not
to
exceed
67
375
dollars.
Emotional.
S
A
R
Yeah,
I
just
had
a
question
as
to
is
this
several
artworks
or
is
it
one
big
piece,
and
is
anybody
online
to
speak
to
that.
A
T
This
is
a
dpw
piece
of
legislation,
but
I'm
sarah,
I'm
the
public,
art
and
civic
design
manager
within
the
department
of
city
planning,
yeah.
R
Gotcha,
okay,
does
that
include
the
material
or
just
whatever
material
it
might
be?
Is.
S
T
R
W
I
just
want
to
thank
sarah
director,
pollock
commander
ripple
for
an
incident
that
happened
with
our
public
art
in
mount
washington.
S
W
Worked
really
late
on
into
a
saturday
evening.
I
guess
you're
familiar
with
the
issue
really
late
into
saturday
night,
and
so
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
all
the
work
that
you
all
did
in
resolving
the
best
we
can
you
could
that
issue.
Thank
you.
A
O
Yeah
I'd
like
to
hand
it
over
to.
W
A
Y
Name
is
jesse
excellence,
central
city
solicitor.
We
were
just
that's
parliamentary
right
now,
but
as
of
because
this
amendment
was
like
put
in
before
or
after
the
agenda
was
set,
it
would
be
recommended
to
have
this
put
in
the
next
agenda
to
discuss
because
under
the
sunshine
act
law
like
this,
the
amendments
that
are,
if
council
is
going
to
do
official
action
on
this,
it
would
need
to
be
put
to
the
public
for
them
to
see
before
official
action
could
be
taken.
So
there
could
be
discussion,
but
no.
A
If
just
I'll
reiterate
as
councilman
cross
may
be
coming
on
that,
given
that
the
amendment
was
not
provided
to
council
before
the
agenda
was
set,
we
can
discuss
it.
I
think
we
can.
I
believe
we
can
even
vote
it,
but
we
would
need
to
hold
it
so
the
public
can
then
provide
comment
on
it.
A
A
W
W
M
Not
seeing
mr
krause
I'll
make
a
motion
to
amend,
there's
a
written
amendment
on
the
table
and
I'll
do
this
on
behalf
of
councilman
cross.
U
M
It
was
me
what
I
did
was
on
behalf
of
mr
krauss.
I
made
a
motion
to
amend
and
then
following
that
amendment
and
whatever
at
some
point
I'll,
make
a
motion
to
hold,
but
I
made
a
motion
to
amend,
of
which
it
was
passed.
So
it
is
the
bill
at
this
point
is
amended.
U
Yeah
it
just
a
few
moments
ago,
in
fact,
and
so
I
would
like
to
for
us
to
read
the
amendments.
M
U
A
Okay,
that's
fine,
so
we
affirmed
the
recommendation
on
the
on
the
a
motion
to
amend
the
bill
so
on
the
very
first
page,
the
building
length
of
street
facing
facades
is
limited
to
a
maximum
of
400
is
what
it
said
previously.
Now
it
is
425
feet.
So
the
amendment
is
25
feet
on
the
second
page
under
public
benefits
agreement.
A
A
On
page
two
under
section
d,
the
commitment
to
sustainability,
a
sentence
was
added,
so
walnut
agrees
that
all
wanted
projects
developed
within
the
ucmu
district
will
be
developed,
and
the
amendment
says
so
that
they
will
be
able
to
obtain
at
least
one
performance
point.
Pursuant
to
the
standard
set
forth
in
the
zoning
codes,
high
performance
buildings,
new
construction
should
walnut
project
fail
and
it
adds
to
meet
this
standard.
A
That's
the
amendment
for
that
section,
then,
on
continued
on
page
three
under
j
there's
j
has
been
added.
Excuse
me,
and
the
amendment
reads:
commitment
regarding
3380
boulevard
of
the
allies,
any
redevelopment
of
the
property
located
at
3380
boulevard
of
the
eyelash
pittsburgh
pa
15213,
blocking
lot
number
28p
305,
shall
reuse
and
preserve
the
facade
of
the
former
islands,
building
located
on
the
property
on
page
four,
which
I
believe
is
our
last
amendment
under
section
six,
which
is
the
entire
agreement
it
states.
The
amendment
is.
U
Yeah,
sorry,
I
I
had
a
really
bad
connection
with
the
laptop
I
was
trying
to
work
on
at
home,
and
so
I
actually
am
in
the
process
of
trying
to
switch
but
I'll
keep
talking
here
and
if
you
get
feedback,
I
apologize
my
I'm
just
having
technical
difficulties
here
so
here
I
am,
I've
got
something
happen.
I'm
going
to
switch
computers
really
quick.
U
Awesome.
Okay:
I
apologize
for
that.
This
is
a
better
connection,
so
I
I
think
we
have
several
levels
of
things
happening
here.
I'm
glad
that
the
solicitor's
office
communicated
that
we
have
to
hold
for
public
hearing.
I
I
I
want
to
say
several
things:
councilwoman.
S
U
So
that's
one
issue
I'll
just
keep
I'll
just
continue
with
my
issues.
I
am
alarmed
that
we
got
these
really
during
the
current
session.
It
really
was
just
minutes
ago
that
we
received
the
email
of
these
amendments.
U
I
do
believe
that
four
zoning
changes
that
have
already
been
through
planning
commission
if
there
are
substantive
amendments
at
the
council
table
that
the
of
the
zoning
in
its
entirety
must
go
back
to
planning
commission.
So
there's
definitely
some.
I
have
I
looked
there
and
I
can
tell.
Can
you
all
hear
me
clearly,
I
still
have
a
choppy
connection.
U
U
The
definition
of
what
is
substantive
changes,
I
think,
needs
to
be
communicated
to
council
and
to
the
public.
I
I
would
assume
that
our
solicitor,
not
council
solicitor,
but
the
mayor
solicitor's
office,
would
need
to
make
a
an
opinion
about
whether
you
know
what
is
substantive
change.
That
requires
a
return
to
planning
commission
and
whether
this
meets
that
definition
and
then.
Secondly,
the
solicitor.
U
The
mayor
solicitor's
office,
has
already
told
council
that
the
public
needs
time
to
review
and
make
comment
typically,
when
a
council
introduces
a
new
paper
on
a
tuesday
that
paper
waits
eight
days
before
it's
even
provisionally
discussed
right,
and
so
I
believe
that
we're
probably
looking
at
a
two-week
window
right,
there's
usually
a
full
two
weeks
before
it
is
voted.
Finally,
and
so
I
would
suggest
that
this
should
probably
wait
at
least
several
weeks
before
it's
even
voted
provisionally,
but
there's
a.
U
T
A
U
Councilman
krauss
was
not
the
sponsor
of
this
amendment
when
it
was
put
on
the
table.
He
was
this
he's
the
sponsor
of
the
amendment
today
he
was
not
the
sponsor
at
all
of
the
amendment
to
the
public
realm
district
in
oakland,
and
he
has
a
multiple
public
testimony.
You
know
pub
it's
in
record,
it's
in
legislature.
It's
in
our
record.
U
U
I
do
not
want
any
mayor
moving
forward
from
here
to
sponsor
amendments
to
any
one
of
our
districts
right.
The
planning
department
has
the
authority
and
the
jurisdiction
to
amend
our
zoning
maps,
and
that
is
the
way
it's
written
for
good
reason,
because
they
do
all
of
the
public
process
and
have
again
it's
a
it's
an
established
path
that
we
have
all
been
living
with
in
our
ordinance.
U
This
has
been
a
an
attempt
to
circumvent
the
normal
public
process,
both
in
the
way
it
was
introduced
which
should
not
have
been
introduced.
We
should
never
have
forwarded
it
to
planning
commission.
I
believe
I
voted
no
on
the
referral
to
planning
commission
as
well
and
then,
as
we've
heard
in
multiple
times
in
public
testimony,
we
we
shouldn't,
allow
this
or
this
specific
bill
1906
to
be
traveling
down
this
process.
That
is,
in
parallel
and
in
competition
to
the
work
that
our
own
planning
department
has
been
doing.
U
God
knows
I
could
be
using
them
in
my
own
district.
I
would
much
rather
have
had
the
planning
process,
the
planning
department,
moving
forward,
a
bloomfield
master
planning
process
that
we
could
have
easily
started
two
to
three
years
ago,
but
they
have
been
doing
a
master
planning
process
in
oakland,
and
it
looks
to
me
that,
like
some
property
owners
didn't
like
the
way
it
was
going,
I'd
use
the
mayor's
office
to
circumvent
it,
and
I
I
am
deeply
concerned.
U
I
do
not
want
to
see
this
happening
now
and
I
definitely
do
not
want
to
see
it.
Have
it
moving
forward
that
we
are
giving
a
large
land
holder,
some
special
roundabout,
some
special
getting
around
the
ordinances
and
our
own
public
processes
and
some
kind
of
like
red
carpet
path
to
zoning?
And
so
I
have
a
lot
of
objections
here
and
but
I'll
I'll
I'll.
Let
others
speak.
E
Mr
chair,
I
apologize
for
joining
late.
I
was
on
a
a
really
important
call.
Can
I
speak
or
is
there
a
different
order.
E
Okay,
thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
apologize
to
everyone
for
for
missing
the
beginning
of
this
conversation.
I
got
pulled
away
on
an
important
phone
call,
but-
and-
and
here
now
so
forgive
me
if
I
repeat
anything
along
the
way.
E
The
the
the
bill
having
been
originally
introduced
by
the
peduto
administration
came
before
before
the
council
at
the
end
of
last
year
and
the
one
of
the
first
things
that
that
I
had
ever
learned
as
a
member
of
council
was
the
importance
of
of
open,
honest
discussion,
that
anyone
has
the
right
to
put
the
bill
on
the
table
to
to
have
public
discourse
on
it
and
that
the
it
is
not
the
rules,
the
role
the
council
to
stop
discourse
that
we
may
look
at
that
bill,
and
we
may
think
it's
the
dumbest
thing
we
have
ever
seen,
and
we
have
absolutely
no
intention
of
passing
it.
E
We
may
find
the
bill
has
some
merit,
it
needs
discussion
and
we
may
amend
and
make
some
kinds
of
considerations
and
ultimately
pass
it.
We
may
think
it's
just
utterly
brilliant,
and
why
didn't
we
think
of
this
before?
And
we
need
to
move
this
ahead
but
to
to
squelch?
The
conversation,
I
think,
is
in
the
direct
disinterest
of
elected
bonds,
and
so
the
bill
did
come
in.
E
E
My
concern
was,
I
believe
the
bill
was
overly
generous,
that
it
provided
much
too
much
relief
and
that
much
of
it
could
be
in
conflict
of
the
oakland
plan,
which
was
openly
being
discussed
at
the
time,
and
so
we
worked
to
reduce
the
the
bill
and
everything
that
we
did
in
terms
of
the
amendment
that
I
put
forward
was
to
was
to
either
reduce
or
to
deny
my
concern
was
that
if
it
did
go
to
planning
commission
came
back
with
an
approval
of
positive
approval,
we
would
not
have
the
opportunity
to
do
the
reductions
afterwards,
and
so
that
was
the
motivation
behind
why
we
worked.
E
E
It's
it's
as
though
any
bill
comes
over
from
the
administration,
councilman
o'connor
chooses
to
amend
and
then
we
ultimately
pass.
It
doesn't
make
the
council
of
congress
legislation.
It
still
has
its
origin
where
it
has
its
origin,
so
we
did
send
it
over
to
planning
commission
that
was
very
hotly
debated.
I
know.
E
Director
pollock
is
here
to
open
up
the
discussion,
but
I'll
just
make
one
more
comment
before
I
ask
director
to
come
up
to
the
table
to
speak,
but
the
idea
that
came
out
of
planning
commission
after
the
debate
was
that
and
it
was
there-
was
conversations
between
the
mayor's
team,
the
planning
department
stakeholders
in
oakland
as
to
how
to
sort
of
put
the
best
plan
forward.
E
If
you
will
and
planning
commission
agreed
that
if
these
changes
were
made,
they
could
send
it
to
council
for
a
positive
record
with
a
positive
recommendation,
which
is
what
is
before
us
today.
We
offered
that
amendment
inclusive
of
the
changes
that
planning
commission
wish
to
see,
and
that
is
the
buildings
before
us
today
and
the
process
by
which
it
got
here.
But
unless
I'm
corrected
by
someone
in
law
that
does
not
make
anybody
the
sponsor
other
than
the
administration.
E
We
did
have
changes
in
administration
and
it
is
now
mayor,
gainey
and
that
has
to
bring
you
know
this
before
before
council
and
be
part
of
our
discussions.
But
I
hope
that's
helpful
in
how
the
process
happened
for
us
to
get
here.
There
will
be
a
minor
amendment
offered
up
today
and
chief
or
I'm
sorry,
director
is
here
to
speak
about
that
as
well.
E
It
does
add
additional
footage
to
the
the
grocer
of
building
so
as
to
permit
the
loading
and
unloading
of
trucks
that
will
support
the
grocer
to
be
able
to
do
everything
inside
and
to
keep.
You
know:
waste
waste
management
cardboard
and
everything
like
that
within
a
confined
area
and
not
out
in
open
space
to
be
disrupted
in
any
way.
So
with
that,
could
I
please
ask
director
pollock
to
come
up.
I
know
he
is.
E
X
E
Apologize
for
my
voice,
I
think
I'm
about
to
lose
it
from
the
the
last
couple
days
here
but
director
I
I'd
sort
of
like
to
not
sort
of.
I
would
like
to
open
the
floor
to
you.
I
know
you're
here
to
to
speak
in
the
positive
affirmation
of
what
is
the
force
and
I'd
like
to
give
you
an
opportunity
to
do
that.
X
Thank
you
councilman
and
just
again
for
the
record
jake
paula
director
office
of
management
and
budget
councilman
krauss.
You
frankly
have
covered
the
majority
of
the
salient
points.
The
legislation,
as
you
noted,
was
introduced
last
year,
but
was
in
the
hands
of
the
planning
commission
during
the
expiration
of
the
previous
council
term
and
so
survived.
X
What
would
you
know
that
that
process,
because
of
where
it
was
and
so
was
returned
to
the
active
agenda?
This
year,
mayor
gainey
upon
taking
office
charged
myself
and
chief
economic
development
officer,
kyle
chintallopoly,
with
working
closely
with
the
affected
oakland
stakeholders,
as
well
as
the
proposed
developer,
in
discussing
modifications
to
what
was
then
proposed
as
opre
to
bring
it
into
closer
alignment
with
the
thinking
underlining
the
still
in
draft
form
and
not
yet
formally
adopted,
but
nonetheless
well-developed
oakland
plan,
as
well
as
to
you
know,
adhering
to
community
desires.
X
In
that
regard,
we
of
course
held
a
number
of
consultations
with
the
public.
We
held
our
own
community
meeting
on
this
topic
and
then
met
with
the
two
relevant
rcos
opr,
I'm
sorry,
opdc
and
obid
to
gather
additional
feedback
on
suggested
changes.
We
then
work
closely
with
the
proposed
redeveloper
and
their
legal
counsel
on,
and
the
planning
department
and
others
and
the
city's
law
department,
of
course,
on
revisions
to
what
was
before
council
at
that
time
or
before
the
planning
commission.
X
At
that
time,
beggar
pardon
and
arrived
at
a
a
agreed
to
set
of
modifications
to
that
legislation
that
were
presented
to
the
planning
commission.
X
Those
modifications
were
affirmatively
recommended
our
planning
commission
and
it
was
with
the
the
affirmative
recommendation
of
those
changes
that
what
had
been
opre
transitioned
to
ucmu
sorry
opre
is
oakland
public
realm
subdistrict
e
and
ucmu
is
urban
center.
Mixed
use.
X
The
reason
for
that
change
again,
both
in
the
name
and
in
the
structure,
was
to
align
with
recommendations
that
continue
to
be
incorporated
into
the
draft
oakland
plan
and
I'm
happy
to
report
that
a
number
of
modifications
were
made,
including
reducing
the
scope
of
the
overall
rezoning,
the
exclusion
of
the
the
parklet
from
the
the
scope
of
this
rezoning
and
some
some
other
adjustments
to
enhance
residential
compatibility,
notably
the
inclusion
of
affordable
housing
requirements
and
other
similar
enhancements
in
the
so.
The
administration.
X
Based
on
the
that
dialogue
is
supportive
of
this
legislation
as
adjusted
based
on
on
the
planning
commission
process,
and
we
are
also
supportive
of
your
proposed
amendments
today.
X
The
other
components
in
the
amendment
on
the
table
today
that
the
chair
read
are
adjustments
to
the
public
benefit
agreement
that
had
been
agreed
to
as
part
of
that
negotiated
process,
notably
the
inclusion
and
the
agreement
of
the
historic
preservation
of
the
isley
site,
that's
relevant
because
it
in
an
earlier
version
of
the
legislation,
more
more
specific
protections
were
articulated
for
that
site,
but,
but
I
think
correctly
deemed
to
be
too
site-specific
for
base
zoning.
X
I
will
note
that
there
are
historic
preservation,
bonus
points
included
in
the
zoning
language,
so
there
are
multiple
paths
toward
ensuring
that
that
preservation
can
occur,
but
we
felt
it
prudent
in
kind
of
a
built
and
suspended
sense
right
to
be
doubly
certain
to
explicitly
include
that
protection
in
the
public
benefit
agreement
to
ensure
the
public
and
and
everyone
that
the
facade
preservation
that
had
been
proposed
for
that
location
will
be
required.
So
you
know
beyond
that.
I
think
you've
accurately
councilman
described
the
the
history
here.
X
You
know
this
was.
This
is
certainly
a
a
very
unique
set
of
circumstances
in
that
this
legislation
was
initiated
by
a
prior
administration,
and
we
are,
you
know,
grateful
for
the
cooperation
of
council
planning
staff,
others,
community
stakeholders
and
the
developer
for
try
reaching
a
resolution
here.
I
I
don't
pretend
that
there
is
100
agreement,
but
it
is
reflective
of
a
broad
consensus
and
compromise
around
the
best
path
forward.
X
It
would
not
be
the
gainey
administration's
intention
to
initiate
another
similar
process
in
the
future,
but
but
we
are
fully
supportive
of
this
result
and
thank
council
for
their
time
and
I'm
happy
to
remain
to
answer
questions,
but
that's
the
the
bulk
of
the
the
issue.
So
thank
you
so.
E
Director
pollock,
if
you'll
stay
with
me
for
just
a
minute
while
I
signed
bar
here,
madam
clerk,
can
you
tell
me:
please
was
just
the
the
small
verbage
of
the
amendment
distributed
to
members,
or
was
the
community
benefits
agreement
distributed
to
members
as
well.
L
E
Yeah
and
I
do
apologize-
that
hiccup
is
on
my
plate,
I'm
sure
many
of
you
know
the
the
the
crazy
time
I've
been
experiencing
here,
trying
to
just
sort
of
handle
some
activity
that's
taken
place
in
in
the
south
side
here,
and
you
know
I
spoke
with
councilman
gross
this
morning.
I
appreciate
her
her
conversation
with
me
that
yeah
I
apologize
for
the
lateness
of
that.
E
I
did
speak
in
public
arenas
on
several
occasions
that
I
would
ask
for
this
to
be
on
today's
standing
committee
agenda,
but
failed
to
communicate
that
to
the
clerk
and-
and
that's
why
my
bad-
and
I
apologize
for
that,
but
in
terms
of
the
the
isley
building,
if
we
could
go
a
little
bit
deeper
into
that
conversation,
director
there's
always
been
a
desire
from
the
beginning
of
the
discussions
to
preserve
the
building.
E
Because
of
the
significance
of
the
building-
and
I
know
it-
you
know
to
allah
allah,
any
conversation
around
conspiracy
or
you
know
intentional.
You
know
a
purpose
or
misuse
of
that
that
we,
I
know
it
existed
originally
in
the
zoning
document.
E
I
believe
it
was
the
desire
of
the
zoning
administrator
to
see
it
not
live
there,
that
it
really
should
be
part
of
the
community
benefits
agreement,
but
then
it
didn't
quite
make
it
into
the
community
benefits
agreement,
but
it
is
in
there
now
and
if
you
could
speak
to,
if
you
could
speak
to
forgive
me,
the
how
that
came
to
be
and
to
assure
any
any
reservations
that
anyone
might
have
that
the
building
is
not
going
to
be
protected,
and
one
other
thing
I
would
add
to
that
is
the
verbiage
of
facade
really
applies
to
the
front
of
a
building.
E
By
definition,
there
has
been
some
discussion
largely
created
by
me
that
perhaps
that
might
read
a
little
bit
differently
to
make
certain
that
the
building
on
all
four
sides
is
protected
in
its
entirety,
that
the
the
tiles
are
removed,
cataloged
restored
and
replaced
in
exactly
the
same
way
that
the
building
needs
to
snow.
So
without
going
too
deep
into
the
weeds.
If
you
could
for
the
benefit
of
the
public,
you
want
to
speak
a
little
bit
about
the
honestly
building
and
how
that
came
to
be,
and
then
it
will
now
be
protected.
X
Yes,
happy
to
councilman,
and
your
recounting
is
is
correct.
Generally,
it's
there's
a
sequencing
issue
frankly,
that
that
led
to
the
necessity
of
the
amendment
in
order
to
ensure
that
the
original
intent
around
preservation
there
is
preserved.
Just
just
to
note,
I
believe,
quickly.
X
In
the
original
language,
there
were
two
provisions
intended
to
preserve
the
historic
features
of
the
eisley
building.
One
is
the
inclusion
of
historic
preservation
bonus
points
in
the
bonus
point
structure,
which
are
as
at
least
as
we
understand
them
necessary
for
the
proposed
redeveloper
to
achieve
in
order
to
meet
the
height
the
the
height
that
they're
aiming
for
in
their
proposed
design.
So
so
there
is
even
within
the
the
zoning
text,
historic
preservation,
language
that
is
necessary
for
the
project
as
envisioned
to
be
completed.
X
There
had
also
been
some
language
that
was
specific
to
the
preservation
there
that,
as
you
correctly
know,
was
determined
not
to
be
appropriate
for
base
zoning,
and
so
that
that
language
has
since
been
simply
migrated
from
the
the
zoning
legislation
into
the
public
benefit
agreement,
so
that
it
is
functionally
the
same
right.
The
protection
is
still
there.
The
commitment
is
still
there
from
the
proposed
redeveloper,
but
it
is
captured
for
legal
purposes
in
a
different
document.
That's
more
appropriate
to
that
kind
of
building
specific
site-specific,
one-off
commitment.
X
So
there
are,
there
are
two
mechanisms
for
protection
here:
the
bonus
point
structure
which
which
calls
for
historic
preservation
and
then
a
supplemental,
specific
site-specific
commitment
to
the
the
preservation
of
the
facade
of
the
structure,
and
I
believe
you
are
correct
in
this
sense.
When
I
say
facade,
I
mean
the
entire
exterior
facade
of
the
building,
not
simply
the
frontage
facade.
E
And
director,
could
you
go
a
little
bit
deeper
for
us
on
the
amendment
that
would
permit
a
an
additional
25
feet
to
be
added
to
the
to
the
grocery
development
there?
Does
it
have
impact
beyond
that
building?
Does
it
extend
down
how
could
street
and
would
it
have
unintended
impact
or
consequence
that
we
might
not
have
thought
through.
X
It's
the
minimum
building
length
established
for
that
sub
area
of
the
proposed
zone.
I
believe
it
would
only
apply
in
that.
It
would
only
apply
to
that
that
sub-district
zone,
the
boundary
of
which
I
believe
is
bisected
at
louisa
street.
So
I
don't
believe
that
that
minimum
length
would
impact
any
of
the
other
sub-districts
in
this
zone
or
any
other
zones.
E
But
just
just
that
we
could
have
further
assurance
that
that
is
indeed
the
case.
I
apologize
I'm
going
to
dissident
and
sure.
Don't
have
the
map
in
front
of
me
and
don't
want
to
make
a
miscarriage,
but
if
we
could
find
a
way
to
make
certain
that
that
was
indeed
the
case
and
that
there
was
not
a
unintended
consequence
by
offering
that
amendment.
I
would
like
that
reassurance.
Please.
X
Yeah,
absolutely
I
I
can.
I
can
check
that
right
now
and
I
believe
answer
that
before
we
leave
the
table
just,
but
I'm
happy
to
continue
the
discussion.
While
I
do
that
thanks
director.
E
M
Certainly
will
support
councilman,
krauss
and
the
administration
in
approving
this
amendment
to
the
zoning
code.
I
will
support
it
now
and
and
in
its
final
vote,
when
that
happens,
I
am
I
am.
I
am
grateful
for
the
passion
of
my
friend
and
colleague,
councilwoman
gross.
M
I
agree
with
her
wholeheartedly
and
that
the
powers
of
counsel
over
land
use
is
absolutely
absolute,
and
so
we
are
certainly
today
doing
that
thing
in
a
way
that
she
proposed
for
last
week,
but
we
I
want
to
make
it
clear,
because
I
think
there
were
some
statements
unintentionally
spoken
that
were
in
error,
and
so
I
just
want
to
talk
about
process
so
that
we
all,
including
the
public,
can
understand
the
process,
and
you
know
it
is
normally
council's
sort
of
working
philosophy
that
we
defer
to
the
members
whose
district
is
in
and
we
typically
support
developments
in
those
districts,
although
as
now,
sometimes
we
do
not
right.
M
We
have
the
right
that
if
there
is
something
in
another
council
district
that
we
vehemently
opposed
to
like
for
me
and
historic,
designation
that
we,
you
know,
we
vote
our
conscience,
a
couple
of
things
in
terms
of
the
misspoken.
I
just
want
to
remind
council
and
the
public
of
council's
process-
and
that's
really
very
easy.
M
First
thing
is:
nothing
can
come
to
council
at
any
time
in
any
way,
without
it's
one
of
its
members
being
the
sponsor
and
so
no
matter
where
it
originates
from
no
matter
who
writes
it
any
person,
any
citizen
has
the
same
right
to
come
to
council
and
say
here's
some
legislation.
In
fact,
my
work
with
32bj
is
an
example
oftentimes.
They
have
come
to
me
with
legislation
and
we
have
amended
it
same
thing
with
health
care.
I've
worked
with
an
sau
health
care.
M
I've
worked
with
those
entities
with
legislation
they
proposed
and
we
have
amended
it
and
introduced
it,
and
once
I
introduce
it,
doesn't
matter
where
it
comes
from
once
it
hits
this
table,
it
must
be
introduced
by
a
council
person.
Only
a
council
person
can
introduce
legislation
to
this
table,
and
so
any
legislation
that
hits
this
table
must
be
introduced
by
council
person.
Therefore
it
will
have
a
council
person
initially
as
a
sponsor.
M
Second
of
all,
in
terms
of
the
planning
commission
work,
there
are
only
two
entities,
then
that
can
initiate
an
amendment
specifically.
The
zoning
code.
Remember
we
said
before
council
is
the
final
arbiter
of
land
use.
As
we
talked
about
last
week.
Therefore,
an
amendment
to
city
code
can
only
to
the
zoning
code
can
only
be
introduced
by
either
the
planning,
commission
or
council
now,
if
it
has
no
sponsor.
So
when
the
planning
commission
gives
us
an
amendment,
it
will
have
a
sponsor
of
entity.
M
That
entity
will
then
come
to
council
from
the
planning
commission
and
get
introduced.
However,
if
another
entity-
that's
not,
the
planning
commission
introduces
it
gives
it
to
council,
and
then
council
introduces
it.
Then
the
sponsor
becomes
city
council.
So
I'm
actuality
just
I
just
want
to
be
clear
process.
Wise
city
council
is
the
sponsor
of
the
original
zoning
amendment
because
it
had
no
initial
sponsor
and
we
did
introduce
it
when
there
is
no
no
individual
from
the
planning
commission,
whose
name
is
on
it
and
any
member
introduces
it.
Then
council
itself
becomes
its
sponsor.
M
So
to
answer
I
just
want
to
be
clear
in
the
process,
because
I
think
you
know
I'm
sure
passion.
You
know.
People
are
very
passionate
and,
and
sometimes
misspeak,
but
we
are,
we
are
the
we
are
officially
when
it
was
introduced
without
a
sponsor,
certainly
originated
from
the
administration.
M
So
I
want
to
make
it
clear,
regardless
of
our
feelings,
about
the
past
administration,
they
did
what
was
in
their
power
and
right
to
do.
Council
has
done
explicitly,
which,
in
its
power
and
right
to
do,
as
you
yourself
said
last
week,
is
not
the
planning
commission,
it's
not
a
historic
review.
Commission,
it
is
council
who
is
the
arbiter
of
land
use
in
the
city
of
pittsburgh
and
that
that
that
power
is
absolute.
M
And
so
I
say
all
that
to
say:
I
just
want
to
make
it
clear,
so
they're
all
clear
that
nothing
nefarious
has
occurred,
that
there
is
a
sponsor
to
both
the
original
legislation,
which
is
city
council
and
that
councilman
level
number
councilman
krauss
is
the
sponsor
of
this
amendment.
M
We
will
hold
it,
we
will
pass
it
on
wednesday
and
then
we
will
finally
pass
it
on
tuesday,
which
I
believe
gives
it
probably
maybe
one
less
day
that
it
would
normally
have,
but
still
a
long
time
in
terms
of
having
the
public
to
weigh
in
and
they
may
agree
or
disagree.
M
I
think
I
have
been
involved
with
certainly
not
private
development,
but
I
think
I've
been
involved
with
as
much
public
development
as
any
other
member
of
council
and
when
you
do
development
of
this
scale,
you're
always
going
to
have
this
conversation
right
and
community
benefits
and
misagreements
and
disagreements-
and
you
know,
but
we
are
moving
our
city
forward,
having
this
development
in
oakland,
which
the
first
phase
of
it
has
been
in
the
paper
giving
that
neighborhood
a
grocery
store
put
in
affordable
housing
where
the
people
who
work
at
pitt,
the
security
guards,
the
housekeepers
will
be
able
to
live
there
and
walk
to
work
can
be
transformational
to
those
families.
M
Because,
although
we
talk
about
affordable
housing,
one
of
the
most
severe
limits
of
affordable
housing
is
quality
housing
to
working
people.
People
in
unions,
people
who
are
you
know,
janitors
and
and
people
who
are
security
guards
and
all
those
hard-working
people
who
are
working
40
hours
every
day,
but
do
not
make
a
lot
of
money
and
the
affordable
housing
in
this
project
will
be
in
a
place,
probably
where
those
residents
will
be
able
to
walk
to
work
and
walk
back
into
high
quality
amenities
in
the
grocery
store
and
all
the
benefits
of
oakland.
M
So
I
both
I
both
support
the
amendment,
but
I
also
support
the
project
because
you
know
it
will
move
our
city
forward
in
a
way
that
shows
that
new
development
can
be
for
all
and
be
a
bright
shining
star
for
all
so,
and
I
want
to
thank
walnut
capital
and
their
leadership
in
this
and
their
willingness
to
compromise
for
all
parties.
I
do
understand
that
there
will
be
you
know,
disagreements,
but
I
look
forward
to
it
passing
and
us
moving
forward.
Thank
you
very
much
for
this
moment.
N
N
That
said,
given
that
this
was
and
also
councilman
krauss,
I
give
you
all
the
credit
in
the
world
for
doing
what
you've
been
doing
these
last
few
days
and
and
really
you
know
rubber,
hitting
the
road
when
it
comes
to
the
work
that
you're
doing
throughout
your
district.
N
So
so
no
fault
to
you,
I,
but
I
would
feel
much
more
comfortable
process
wise
if,
if
we're
going
to
be
holding
the
bill
anyway
for
a
week,
if
we
also
held
off
on
voting
on
the
amendment,
I
know
that
the
legal
advice
that
we
received
from
our
parliamentarian
was
that
we
could
indeed
vote
on
the
amendment.
I
personally
would
feel
more
comfortable
holding
that
as
well
for
a
week
and
then
voting
on
the
amendment
and
the
bill
after
a
week
of
percolation
throughout
the
community.
But
that's
just
my
opinion.
N
I
thought
that
councilwoman
gross
stopped
it
before
we
actually
voted.
Yes,.
E
A
E
Very
much
mr
chair
is
there,
and
maybe
this
is
our
parliamentarian.
Is
there
a
way
to
roll
back
the
action
of
the
amendment
I
and-
and
I
want
to
thank
director
pollock
for
being
here
with
his
insight.
I
I
I
personally
want
a
an
elevated
comfort
that
the
25
foot
extension
applies
solely
to
that
building.
X
S
X
Okay,
so
so
so
councilman,
I
I
I
actually
misspoke
in
my
earlier
comment
as
I
was
had
in
my
mind.
X
The
prior
map
of
the
subzones
ucmu
is
a
single
district,
including
hellcat
street,
the
what
most
people
would
think
of
as
that
block
of
how
those
two
blocks
excuse
me
of
hellca
street,
the
quality
insight
and
the
the
eisley
site,
so
the
minim
or
maximum
building
length
would
apply
to
the
entire
zone.
I
can't.
E
Not
support
that
director
and
and
not
that
anybody
intentionally
misled
anyone.
E
I
don't
mean
to
apply
that
in
any
way,
but
my
my
understanding
of
the
amendment
was
to
make
it
applicable
to
the
grocer
because
of
the
need
for
the
the
need
to
be
able
to
house
the
you
know
more
destructive
aspects
of
housing
and
grocery
in
a
dense
earth
like
that,
and
so
I'm
going
to
need,
I'm
going
to
need
that
to
be
applicable
only
to
that
building,
and
I
apologize
for
any
additional
confusion
here
as
to
how
to
make
that
happen.
Should
we
refer
to
our
our
clerk?
E
Procedurally,
how
we
might
or
or
is,
is
this
better,
mr
chair:
do
we
leave
it,
as
is
we
will
hold
a
week
and
then
re-amend
the
next
wednesday
discussion?
We.
A
We
can
do
so.
We
have
taken
no
official
action
on
the
bill,
yet
we've
only
voted
to
amend
it.
If
members
are
comfortable,
we
could
have
a
motion
to
withdraw
that
amendment.
We
could
vote
on
that
and
withdraw
the
amendment.
You
could
potentially
work
on
whatever
changes
you
need
and
then
we
amend
the
following
week.
E
That
would
be
my
preference,
mr
chair,
if,
if
we
could
make
that
action
happen,
please.
M
U
S
Y
A
Y
So
if
he's
amending
it
further,
those
amendments
still
need
to
get
to
right
get
to
the
public.
So
if
you're.
B
E
A
U
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
would
like
to
address
the
comments
earlier.
I
I
am
not
confused
about
process
and
I
would
like
to
clarify
how
confusing
some
members
are
talking
about
the
zoning
process
by
conflating
words
like
who
is
a
bill's
sponsor
who
introduced
a
bill
and
who
is
the
arbiter
of
land
use,
so
don't
conflate
those
three
words
right,
as
some
members
have
been
jumbling
them
up
for
the
public,
to
make
it
even
more
confusing.
U
M
U
Please
stop
speaking,
and
I
will
so.
There
is
no
right
and
we
have
always
in
our
legistar
system.
U
U
We
can
put
them
on
the
table
or
we
cannot.
Mr
krause
has
many
times
not
only
in
this
case,
attested
that
he
likes
to
see
bills
discussed
when
they
come
over
from
the
mayor,
and
he
thinks
that
he
believes
that
that
is
our
duty.
I
do
not,
but
he
does
believe
it
is
our
duty
and
but
that
is
not
the
same
as
a
council
person
sponsoring
legislation
right
in
this,
in
this
case,
from
1906.
U
No
member
of
this
council
put
that
bill
on
the
table
as
the
sponsor
the
mayor
is
the
sponsor.
That
is
not
please,
I
have
a
floor.
This
is
not
interrogatory,
so
our
municipal
code
right.
This
is
not
a
resolution
just
for
discussion.
This
is
not
a
minor
text.
Change
to
some
administrative
policy.
In
our
ordinance,
this
is
a
zoning
map
change,
and
that
is
addressed
specifically
on
its
own,
about
how
it
can
be
get
to
the
table
and
the
planning
commission
can
put
it
can
send
it
to
council.
U
U
U
S
U
U
All
right,
the
planning,
commission
or
the
city
council,
it
should
initiate
a
zoning
map
and
or
text
amendment
with
or
without
an
application
from
the
property
owner
right,
and
that
did
not
happen
in
this
case.
The
other
way
a
property
owner
itself
can
also
say
hey.
I
would
like
to
change
the
zoning
of
my
property
and
they
have
the
absolute
right.
U
U
I
think
a
really
important
goal
for
council
is
to
help
foster
the
creation
of
more
housing
and
housing
that
is
affordable
to
our
workers,
certainly
our
workers
at
universities
and
our
workers
at
the
hospitals,
who
we
know
are
some
of
the
lowest
paid
in
our
region
and
can't
afford
to
live
in
the
city,
and
we
have
all
marched
and
demonstrated.
Certainly,
I've
done
a
lot
of
marching
and
demonstrating
about
how
I
think
their
pay
should
be
higher
and
so
that
they
can
more
affordably
live
in
the
city.
U
However,
you
know
this.
I
believe
that
this
zoning
map
amendment
purports
to
upzone
and
increased
density,
but
I
don't
believe
that
it
does.
The
density
of
this
area
is
already
parts
of
it
are
between
five
and
ten
thousand
people
per
square
mile
and
parts
of
it
are
10,
000
people
or
more
per
square
mile.
U
That
is
incredibly
dense.
It's
definitely
dense
compared
to
our
region,
which
has
an
average
of
5
000
people
per
square
mile.
I
think
the
city
of
pittsburgh
has
a
as
an
average
of
5
000
people
per
square
mile
and
again,
I'm
I'm
not
gonna
circle,
this
probably
perfectly,
but
you
know.
For
example,
we
talked
a
lot
about
how
kit
here
today
and
that's
partly
dark
blue,
which
is
at
least
medium
blue.
I
don't
know,
I
think,
I'm
looking
at
the
colors
correctly
at
10,
000
people
or
more
per
square
mile.
This
is
20
20.
U
census
data,
and
you
know
part
of
it-
maybe
I
think
also
dips
down
into
the
slightly
lighter
car,
which
is
five
to
ten
thousand
people
per
square
mile.
U
What
I've
seen
happen
in
our
new
construction
right,
even
if
you're,
adding
height
you're,
adding
a
concomitant
number
of
car
spaces
to
apartments
right,
and
so
when
you
have,
because
I
represented
myself-
and
I've
really
looked
at
this
about
like
well,
where,
where
do
we
add
density
in
district?
Seven
again
having
you
know,
sought
to
create
housing
but
also
create
affordable
housing?
U
Because
I
represent
neighborhoods
of
opportunity,
which
is
where
cities
in
the
united
states
are
supposed
to
be
encouraging
affordability
and
some
of
the
densest
parts
of
my
district
are
some
of
the
just
little
two-story
timber
houses
that
are
crowded
into
like
ninth
ward
bloomfield
in
the
same
levels
of
density.
If
you
tore
them
down,
you
really
almost
can't
build
that
high
and
the
reason
is
they
were
built
without
any
parking
all
right.
U
They
were
built
before
we
had
parking
requirements,
and
so
you
have-
and
you
have
a
lot
of
people
crowded
into
very
tiny
footprints
right.
Some
of
the
some
of
the
parts
of
my
district
have
parcels
that
are
only
12
feet.
Wide
12
feet
is
very
narrow,
and
so
you
get
a
lot
of
people
crammed
into
a
very
small
amount
of
space.
U
What
I've
also
seen
here-
and
I
don't
believe
it
was
changed
in
the
amendments
today-
was
that
there's
a
great
deal
of
the
proposal
in
front
of
us
that
changes
areas
that
were
are
currently
residential
and
allows
them
to
be
public
assembly
allows
them
to
be
kind
of.
Like
I
don't
know,
maybe
classroom
use
or
other
kinds
of
uses
where
you
won't
have
housing.
U
I
you
know
somebody
correct
me.
I
don't
know
if
director
of
pollock,
if
you
can
speak
to
that,
but
I
I
contend
that
this
proposal
is
highly
likely
to
decrease
the
housing
in
the
footprint,
even
though
the
spin
is
different.
So
let
me
ask
dr
pollock
if
I've
said
any
of
that
incorrectly.
X
Speaking
specifically
to
the
the
last
topic
you
raised,
councilwoman,
the
in
the
changes
between
the
originally
proposed
1906
opre
to
the
revised
ucmu.
X
A
large
number
of
what
had
been
proposed
as
permitted
uses
in
the
original
version
were
eliminated,
including
specifically,
university
campus
and
many
of
the
other
assembly
uses
that
you
just
cited
as
examples.
X
Those
that
remain
are
those
typically
associated
with
first
floor
retail
in
a
multi-story
structure,
so
retail
uses
that
one
would
imagine
being
part
of
the
first
or
second
story
of
a
mixed-use
development
continue
to
be
permitted,
but
the
types
of
public
assembly
or
university
campus
uses
that
that
I
know
many
members
of
the
public
were
rightly
concerned
about
during
the
initial
consideration
here
were
eliminated.
As
part
of
the
compromised
reached
between
the
administration
and
the
proposed
redeveloper.
X
I
believe
that
there
are
some
limited
uses
associated
with
like
training.
You
know
that
that
are,
for
the
purposes
of
the
code
classified
as
a
classroom
that
are
that
are
permitted
on
the,
but
but
they
are
edge
cases
and
not
not
the
same
thing
as
the
sort
of
what
what
a
campus
would
would
look
like.
X
They're,
not
the
institutional
master
plan
style
uses
like
university
campus
that
had
been
included
in
the
original
draft,
so
they
have
been
significantly
curtailed
and
are
consistent
generally
with
the
types
of
uses
that
are
permitted
elsewhere
in
the
city
for
mixed-use
development.
There
are
no
unique
lee
permitted
uses
here
beyond
what
one
would
expect
for
a
combined.
You
know
primarily
residential
building
with
a
first
floor
retail
component.
X
Of
course
the
grocery
store
use
is
is
also
permitted,
and
it
is,
I
believe,
envisioned
by
the
proposed
redeveloper,
that
the
portion
of
the
site
at
the
intersection
of
the
boulevard
of
the
allies
and
hellcat,
where
they
propose
to
have
a
grocery
store,
would
have
a
greater
mix
of
uses
than
the
the
residential
buildings
elsewhere.
But,
but
I
know
I
would
not,
I
would
not
categorize
the
uses
that
are
proposed
under
the
revised
plan
that
was
affirmatively
recommended
by
planning
commission
as
being
out
of
the
ordinary,
as
it
relates
to
mixed-use
development.
X
U
So
maybe
that
gives
me
some
small
comfort,
but
I'm
still,
I
would
love
to
see
between
now
and
when
councils
you
know
whatever
voting.
Finally,
on
you
know
either
the
oakland
plan,
which
I'm
also
just
noticing
this
morning
was
actually
voted
on
yesterday
by
planning
commission
but
is
a
different
plan
that
will
also
be
coming
to
us
and
is
not
this
plan.
I
would
like
to
see
projections
on
density
if
all
of
the
parcels
that
are
were
faced
within
rezoning
for
the
public
realm
here
are
then
the
ownership
swaps
happen.
U
I
understand
that
walnut
capital
has
sales
agreements
on
almost
the
entirety
of
this
footprint.
I'm
not
sure
I
don't.
I
don't
have
the
facts
in
front
of
me.
I
would
like
those
facts
and
then,
if
they
are,
then
you
know
demolished
and
built
kind
of
how
that
density
changes
again.
I
I've
been
thinking
about
this
for
my
own
district,
so
this
is
not
something
that
is
just
a
new
thought
for
me,
but
when
I
look
at
the
historic
recar
pre-zoning
code,
housing
that
exists
in
my
district,
I
am
struck
by
the
density
right.
U
Some
of
the
densest
housing
that
you
see
nationwide
to
be
at
ten
thousand
people
or
more
per
square
mile,
is
very
high
density.
It's
the
kind
of
density
that
we're
trying
to
achieve
in
our
urban
core,
where
we
have
fixed
transit
or
high
frequency
traffic
transit,
which
I
know
we
have
partners
that
are
advocating
for
like
pittsburgh
for
public
transit.
U
We
want
to
have
more
robust
support
for
public
transit
in
the
city,
that
these
are
the
kind
of
neighborhoods
that
are
located
near
things
like
grocery
stores
and
churches
and
schools
and
have
walkability,
etc.
U
And
so
we
don't
want
to
go
backwards,
and
so,
while
it's
technically
upsetting
because
you
can
build
taller
or
you
can
build
wider,
like
the
amendment
today,
I
I
still
question
that
doesn't
on
its
face
guarantee
a
higher
density,
and
so
I
would
love
to
see
and
maybe
follow
up
with
the
planning
department
to
actually
see
what
kinds
of
projections
we
see.
U
Does
this
a
map
amendment
for
this
oakland
public
realm,
take
us
backwards
or
take
us
forward
some
density,
I'm
really
I'm
a
skeptic,
so
you'll
have
to
just
forgive
me
for
that,
but
based
on
based
on
numbers
that
I'm
looking
at,
I
want
to
see
the
numbers
and
okay.
So
we
talked
about
director
paul.
I
didn't
ask
you
about
this
question
that
I
have
the
discomfort
with
the
path.
U
That
is
the
legal
path.
If
you,
if
you
want
to
respond,
please
feel
free,
but
before
you
do,
thank
you
to
members
for
being
willing
to
not
rush
a
vote
today
and
for
allowing
the
public
to
take
time.
I
heard
saying
forget
the
background.
If
you
can
hear
the
dogs,
I
heard
us
our
solicitors,
that's
the
mayor
solicitor
saying
that
we
would
have
to.
U
Put
any
future
amendment
amendments
on
the
agenda
for
the
public
to
see
them,
we've
only
been
putting
them
out
24
hours
in
advance.
I
I
don't
think
that
passes
legal
muster
for
zoning
math
amendment
right
and
I
I
didn't
hear
anyone
speak
to
whether
the
substantive
changes
should
go
back
to
planning.
Commission
I
and
again
I've
had
to
struggle
with
this
myself
right.
We
did
not
make
amendments
to
the
inclusionary
zoning
map
amendments
that
we
wanted
to.
U
We
we
just
we,
you
know,
sacrificed
changes
that
we
wanted,
because
they
would
have
been
substantive
changes
that
would
have
sent
us
back
to
planning
commission
so
that
I'm
not
making
this
stuff
up.
This
is
the
reality
that
we
deal
with
it,
and
so,
if
and
and
so
I
want
us
to
stay
in
reality
here
and
not
just
suspend
reality
and
do
something
differently,
so
director
paul,
you
can
feel
free
to
respond
to
that.
X
Councilman
two
responses
to
two
items
that
you
raised.
One
is
that
the
guidance
that
the
administration
has
received
from
legal
counsel
is
is
consistent
with
the
discussion
at
the
table
earlier
that,
whether
that,
when,
when
an
administration,
a
mayoral
administration
sends
legislation
to
council
for
introduction
that
is
in
effect
a
request,
but
that
upon
receiving
accepting
and
and
ultimately
entering
the
paper,
it
becomes
a
council-initiated
action.
X
I
cannot
speak
to
the
question
of
whether
that
is
initiated
by
the
individual
member
handling
the
paper
over
or
council
as
a
body,
but
but
it
is
that
is
consistent
with
what
we've
been
advised
by
law
and,
as
a
result,
this
legislation
would
meet
the
criteria
in
code
for
how
it
is
introduced.
I
would
also
add
that,
because
of
that,
it
would
be
outside
of
the
mayor's
office
discretion
as
to
whether
to
withdraw
it
because
it
would
not
have
been
initiated
by
us
or
by
the
mayor
or
his
office.
X
I
should
say
to
your
latter
question:
we've
further
been
advised
by
the
law
department.
As
of
yesterday
that,
in
light
of
the
amendment
on
the
table,
it
would
be
advisable
for
the
consideration
of
this
legislation
to
follow
the
rules
that
would
relate
to
a
negative
recommendation,
meaning
that
a
seven
to
two
vote
would
be
required
as
opposed
to
the
typical
six
to
three,
but
that
it
would
not
that
the
the
nature
of
the
amendment
itself
would
not
trigger
re-referral
to
planning
commission.
U
I
said
that
was
a
completely
different
new
topic,
so
that
was
an
interesting
one.
I
I
would
interpret
the
planning
commission's
recommendations
to
council
as
being
not
satisfied.
Yes,
there
was
a
positive
recommendation,
but
with
conditions.
X
X
That's
that
is,
that
is
the
point
that
I
was
just
making
that
by
modifying
one
of
the
provisions
that
was
included
in
those
conditions,
it
would
be
necessary
to
for
the
vote
to
be
counted
as
if
it
were
a
negative
recommendation
again,
which
would
require
a
seven
to
two,
but
it
would
not
require
re-referral.
Is
there
guidance
to
us?
I
just
spoke
to
the
assistant
solicitor
about
this
after
you
raised
that
point
to
confirm
my
understanding
and
he
advised
that
that's
correct.
U
I
think
he
lost
me
when
the
bill
in
our
recommendation
right
the
recommendation
from
planning
commission
doesn't
change,
but
there's
no
amending
that.
That's
what
stands
in
record
if
the
planning
commission
only
recommended
it
with
conditions,
so
I
don't
interpret
that
as
a
positive
recommendation
if
the
conditions
are
not
met,
and
I
thought
that
planning
commission's
recommendations
were
about
reducing
height
it's
hard
to
keep
everything
up
on.
You
know
I
could
say
I
have
a
big
desktop
with
a
lot
of
things
in
front
of
me,
but
I
don't
have
that
one
up
as
well.
X
The
relevant
distinction
here
is
not
about
height,
it
is
about
building
length.
The
planning
commission
recommendation
was
for
400
feet
the
amendment,
the
only
substance,
the
actual,
only
sub
zoning
substantive
section
of
the
amendment
before
council
today
is
changing
400
feet
to
425
feet
all
of
the
other
material
and
the
amendment
is
actually
a
documentation
of
changes
to
the
public
benefit
agreement,
but
they
don't
affect
the
zoning
text.
So
just
for
the
sake
of
clarity
here,
the
change
here
is
in
building
length,
not
height.
U
X
Right-
and
that
is,
that
is
the
reason
for
their
guidance
that
the,
if,
frankly,
it
falls
into
an
area
that
I
would
say,
is
perhaps
not
fully
contemplated
by
the
the
code
as
written,
and
so
their
guidance
and
abundance
of
caution
would
be
to
rely
on
the
vote
thresholds
for
a
negative
recommendation.
In
order
to
ensure
that
it
is
satisfied.
Given
that
there
is
a
modification
that
steps
outside
of
the
conditional
recommendations
of
the
commission,
but
they
they
believe
that
that
is
sufficient
and
that
re-referral
to
the
commission
is
not
called
for.
U
U
I
I
think,
I'm
gonna.
I
know
I
won't
belabor
this
much
longer
today,
mr
chair,
but
I
think
there
is
a
lot
of
things
to
be
discussed
about
how
there
is
no
council
sponsored
to
this
bill,
and
I
noticed
that
the
our
solicitor's
office
and
our
director
and
some
of
our
members
are
using
the
word
about
council
initiated
action
right
now.
U
If
I
put
a
new
paper
on
the
table
on
tuesday,
there's
no
stopping
me
right,
but
that
does
that
mean
that
all
of
council
has
initiated
it
because
other
members
can't
stop
me
from
putting
a
new
paper
on
the
table,
and
so
I
think
that's
a
really
curious
assertion
that
the
moment
a
member
puts
a
agrees
to
hand
in
and
not
pocket
veto
mayor's
proposed
agenda
item,
as
some
members
would
have
us
do,
because
the
mayor
deserves
to
be
heard,
then
we've
suddenly
also
been
claimed
that
it's
council
initiated
action.
U
So
it's
you
know
it.
It
feels
like
we're
everyone's
trying
to
have
their
cake
and
eat
it
too,
and
that
what
we
really
do,
what
we're
doing
is
creating
a
lot
of
gray
area
and
I'm
not
sure,
I'm
comfortable
with
it.
U
So
I
think
that's
a
that's
a
discussion
we
should
maybe
have
at
length
for
for
another
day,
it's
not
irrelevant
here
and
it's
the
cause
of
my
discomfort,
but
I
won't
again,
we've
been
going
on
and
I've
brought
that
point
out
multiple
times
and
I
think
I've
gotten
my
message
through
so
I'll
pause
there.
Mr
chair,
thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
councilman
cross.
E
Thanks,
mr
chair,
just
for
a
customer
of
gross's
comfort
level,
the
recommendations
that
were
made
by
planning
commission
in
order
to
receive
for
in
order
to
receive
their
positive
recommendation
were
already
amended
in
the
bill
previously
by
this
council,
and
that
is
the
bill
that
we
have
on
the
table
right
now,
so
we
met
the
requirement
there
and
then,
in
terms
of
the
community
benefits
agreement.
E
If
I
may
just
ask
one
more
question
of
director
pollock
director
pollock,
the
the
community
benefits
agreement
is
that
attached
to
the
legislation,
is
it
become
a
piece
of
what
it
is
we?
I
know
we
don't
vote
on
community
benefits
agreements.
I
understand
that,
but
is
it?
Does
the
agreement
get
attached
to
the
the
legislation?
E
So
there's
no
misunderstanding
as
to
what
the
the
agreements
are.
Yeah.
X
That's
correct,
councilman.
The
the
agreement
is
attached,
essentially
as
a
reference
document
to
the
legislation,
so
the
council
is
aware
of
its
contents,
and
that
is
why
the
amendment
paper
that
was
provided
to
members
today
lists
the
changes
to
the
agreement.
You're
correct.
The
council
is
not
voting
on
those
changes
themselves,
as
they
are
not
part
of
the
the
legal
action,
but
it
is
attached
for
reference,
and
so
the
changes
to
it
have
similarly
been
attached
for
reference.
E
To
appreciate
it,
mr
chair,
may
I
then
call
for
a
one-week
hold
on
the
bill.
W
M
Burgess,
just
as
a
point
of
personal
preference,
let
me
apologize
for
councilwoman
gross
for
interrupting
her,
although
not
excuse
before
this
meeting
today,
I
received
some
very,
very
tragic
news,
and
so
I'm
quite
not
quite
myself
today.
I
think
my
patience
is
not
where
it
should
be,
and
so
to
my
friend
and
colleague,
let
me
apologize
publicly
for
something
that
I
did
publicly.
N
O
Thank
you.
I
have
an
amendment
that
I'd
like
to
make
I'd
like
to
take
the
vote
on
that.
I
can
explain
so
motion
to
amend.
O
Yes,
this
amendment
effectively.
O
The
what
I've
been
saying
to
the
to
the
media,
what
I
wanted
to
do
of
what,
for
instance,
I
think,
would
have
assisted
law
enforcement
in
the
case
of
the
airbnb
shooting
on
how
to
connect
public
safety
better
to
a
short-term
rental
property
that
would
that
would
have
a
party
that
would
not
be
in
in
you
know,
in
agreement
with
the
with
the
lease
it,
it
makes
transparency
it
provides
transparency
to
the
to
the
pro
to
who
owns
the
property,
a
responsible
local
agent.
O
O
So
there
are
a
host
of
these
amendments
to
the
bill
that
I
believe
will
strengthen
it.
Basically,
the
way
I
see
it
is
that
there
are
two
things
going
on
here:
one
we
don't
know
where
the
where
the
short-term
rentals
are
two
which
is
based
on
one.
You
know
we
have
to
take
account
for
understand.
What's
out
there
and
then
number
two
there.
There
is
discussion
amongst
the
sponsors
of
the
bill
and
also
the
administration
and
other
members
here
have
suggested
as
well
about
a
zoning
requirement.
O
So
this
bill
was
not
number
two.
It
is
number
one
it
is
to
literally
take
in
to
create
the
system
where
we
would
identify
and
require
them
to
register
and
and
receive
a
license.
O
So
I
want
to
I
want
to
thank
the
the
the
sponsors
and
and
then
also
the
council
and
also
the
administration.
O
I
do
want
to
note
that
I
will
be
asking
for
a
hold
for
a
week
after
talks
with
the
administration
on
some
on
some
amendments
that
they'd
like
to
you
know,
put
forth,
and
so
I'm
happy
happy
to
work
with
them
so
that
we
can.
You
know
at
the
end
they
have
the
strongest
bill
to
to
put
regulation
around
short-term
rentals
in
the
city
of
pittsburgh.
W
I
just
want
to
thank
councilman
wilson
and
muhammad
in
his
office
and
our
solicitor
dan
friedson
for
all
working
together
and
putting
together,
we
receive
so
many
requests
or
suggestions
for
amendments.
So
many
so
much
information
from
the
public,
and
it
was
he
offered
early
on
to
take
the
amendments
for
this
portion
and
councilman
gross
offered
to
do
the
section
for
the
zoning
so
between
the
two
of
them
they're
doing
a
great
job.
W
S
W
E
E
Good
morning,
good
morning,
yeah
you've
probably
heard
I've
had
a
little
on
my
plate
and
and
by
the
way,
councilman
strasberger.
Thank
you
for
your
time
remarks.
They
were
taken
to
heart
and
I
really
appreciate
them
my
question
about
this.
I
really
am
glad
you're
going
to
hold
this
for
a
week
because
I'm
reading
this
as
we're
having
the
discussion
and
don't
want
to
make
an
ill-informed
decision.
O
This
bill
creates
a
new
chapter
and
it
is
not
it's
under
business
licensing,
not
included.
So
to
answer
you
clearly,
no,
it
is
not
attached
to
rental
registry
and
it
does
make
reference
to
parts
of
the
short-term
rental
in
terms
of,
for
instance,.
O
O
You
know
to
separate
this
completely,
but
the
whole
for
one
week
is,
you
know
just
to
air
out
those
concerns
and
also
to
to
you
know,
coordinate
with
the
administration
and
what
their
you
know.
What
they've
been
working
on,
because
they
weren't
working
specifically
I'm
sorry
directly
with
the
solicitor
on
on
the
solicitor's
recommendations,
so
that
we
don't
get
into
some
sort
of
legal
battle
over
this.
E
Yeah,
which
is
exactly
what
we
want
to
avoid
the
you
know,
the
imp,
risking
the
implementation
of
the
rental
registry.
Any
further
by
any
means
is,
is
a
route
road.
I
don't
want
to
go
down,
and
I
so
I
appreciate
that.
I
have
one
more
question
as
well.
This
does
not
determine
the
length
or,
or
the
the
the
legend
say,
I'll
just
say
it
that
way.
This
does
not
define
length
of
state
is.
E
Okay,
so
councilman,
I
I
will
call
you.
I
really
appreciate
you
willing
to
to
take
a
little
bit
of
time
with
this
and
happy
to
give
you
a
phone
call
or
take
it
offline,
so
that
other
members
will
have
their
their
time
to
to
speak,
but
appreciate
your
efforts
on
this
and-
and
I
I'd
like
to
help
any
way
I
can.
Thank
you
thanks.
U
I'm
sorry
there
was
noise.
Was
that
my
name?
Yes,
thank
you
also
councilman
wilson.
Thank
you
for
this
draft,
but
it
would,
I
think,
be
helpful
for
all
of
us
sponsors
especially
to
be
you
know,
have
a
briefing
on
it.
Certainly,
I've
been
having
meetings
also
with
operators.
U
My
my
staff
has
been
doing
research
and
again,
I'm
just
opening
it
also,
since
we
have
various
amendments
come
in
just
this
morning,
obviously,
on
the
previous
bill
that
we
spent
some
time
on,
and
so
I'm
still
trying
to
process-
and
I
see
some
things
that
I
thought
belonged
in
this
section
that
that
I
would
like
to
see
here
that
aren't
here
and
so
I'm
sure
we'll
have
fun.
Like
I'm
sorry,
there's
still
background,
I
don't
know
what
that
was
friendly
amendments
for
next
week.
I
appreciate
it.
O
N
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
Thank
you,
councilman
wilson,
for
all
your
work
and
your
staff's
work
on
this.
I'm
glad
to
see
some
of
the
language
that
was
used
in
rental
registration
used
here,
even
if
they're,
not
actually,
you
know
one
in
the
same.
It's
a
smart
approach,
a
responsible
local
agent.
N
Making
sure
that
there's
a
published
list
so
that
the
public
can
find
without
having
to
search
the
actual
short-term
rental
sites,
which
ones
are
indeed
short-term
rentals
the
the
definition
of
disorderly
short-term
rental
caught
my
attention
and
it's
a
little
bit
different
from
what's
in
the
language
here,
I
guess
my
question
as
a
sort
of
tangent
from
that
is:
is
there
anything
in
this
bill
or
in
city
code?
That
would
prevent
this
from
any
short-term
rental,
from
being
subject
to
the
disruptive
properties
task
force.
N
O
So
we
don't,
you
know,
we're
not
referencing
that
that
that
piece
of
ordinance
that
ordinance,
but
but
this
similar
in
some
ways-
you
know
I
mean
basically
you
know
there
is
this.
O
N
N
I
understand
that
there
is:
it's
explicitly
stated:
what
is
what
the
penalties
and
enforcement
will
look
like.
I
guess
my
question
is
following
that
threat
a
little
bit
do
we
do.
We
know
just
from
the
conversations
that
you've
had
you
know
what
more
we
will
be
able
to
do
once
this
is
law
to
be
able
to
take
action
with
a
particular
company
that
is
then
refusing
to.
N
I
don't
know,
refusing
to
take
a
particular
particularly
problematic
unit
offline
off
their
site,
even
in
violation
when
it's,
in
violation
of
this
code,
like
what
is
our
recourse,
then,
with
that
company.
O
So
it's
it
will
go
through
the
typical
pli
process,
so,
for
instance,
if
you're
you
know
just
the
way
the
typical
funding
process
would
happen.
If
you're
violating
I
mean,
there's
a
there's,
a
extensive
list
of
situations
where
pli
doesn't
have
an
automatic
fee,
I'm
sorry
fine
and
that
they're
taken
to
the
the
magistrate
or
higher
court.
You
know,
depending
on
how
that
process
goes,
but
but
the,
but
I
will
say
that
the
in
discussion
with
the
administration
there
are
talks
of
putting
a
a
fine
in
place.
So
it's
open
for
discussion.
N
Great
well
similar
to
councilwoman
gross.
I
too
would
be
interested
in
a
briefing,
and
particularly
I
mean
what
I've
read
today
makes
sense.
I
understand
it.
What
I'm
interested
in
is
understanding
you
know
of
all
of
the
different,
the
kind
of
panoply
of
options
we
had
to
include
here
and
that
were
not
included
sort
of
a
disc.
You
know
an
understanding
of
of
why
we've
all.
N
I
think
all
council
members
have
received
suggestions,
comments,
ideas
for
amendments
to
include
in
the
bill,
and
I
am
interested
in
hearing
and
would
be
happy
to
then
repeat
publicly
next
week,
what
we
discuss
privately
for
the
public's
benefit
kind
of
answers
to
those
questions,
but
would
be
interested
in
hearing
kind
of
how
we
came
to
this
and
and
and
why
there
isn't
the
inclusion
of
some
things
that
we've
heard
suggested
by
various
individuals
and
entities.
So
look
forward
to
that
conversation.
O
If
I
could
just
make
a
brief
comment
to
that
absolutely
well,
I
was
you
know,
happy
to
include
the
hoa
rules
that
you
know.
I
think
I
know
I
represented
a
few
different
areas
ahead
of
hoas,
and
you
know,
and
some
of
your
concerns
with
that.
So
I'm
happy
to
include
those
measures
in
here
and
then,
as
you
know,
moving
forward
over
this
next
week,
you
know
look
forward
to
addressing
those
concerns
or
questions
that
are
still.
O
O
For
instance,
when
you
get
into
occupancy
this
this
bill,
you
know
for
single
single-family
homes
of
the
you
know.
No
one
is
living
in
a
single-family
home
is
required
to
have
an
certificate
of
occupancy,
so
but
obviously
it
grows
from
there
and
that's
where
I
believe
it.
It
leads
into.
You
know
if
we're
going
to
talk
about
different
types
of
units
that
will
be
included
in
a
zoning
piece.
T
W
L
Bill
291
resolution
approving
a
conditional
use
application
under
the
pittsburgh
code.
Title
9
zone
in
article
4
chapter
910
to
myers,
uncover
scott
on
behalf
of
306th
avenue;
property
llc
for
the
transfer
of
development
rights
involving
33
dwelling
units
from
130
through
165th
avenue
zone,
gta,
golden
triangle,
sub
district
8
and
5
dwelling
units
from
417
wood
street
zone,
gta
golden
triangle,
sub
district,
8
to
306th
avenue,
zone,
gta,
golden
triangle,
sub
district,
a
first
ward,
council
district,
six.
E
Discussion
second,
mr
chair.
E
Well,
you
know
this.
This
sounds
like
a
very
interesting
undertaking
and
I
know
we've
been
here
long
today
and
I
won't
I
won't
belabor
it,
but
whoever
may
have
come
here
to
speak
to
this
day.
I'd
love
a
phone
call
into
the
office
to
talk
a
little
bit
further
about
it.
Thank
you.
N
A
Any
opposed
affirmative
recommendation.
We
do
that
exhausts
our
agenda.
For
today
we
do
have
meeting
announcements
on
monday
june
20th.
Our
offices
will
be
closed
in
observance
of
juneteenth
next
week,
council
will
hold
our
regular
standing
committee
meetings
on
tuesday
june
21st
and
wednesday
june
22nd
at
10
a.m.
Speaker
registration
closes
at
9
a.m,
tuesday
and
wednesday
morning.
Also,
tomorrow,
thursday
june
16th
at
7
6
pm
at
the
southside
hal
senior
center
at
12th
and
bingham
streets
council
will
hold
an
in-person.
A
Only
public
hearing
on
the
city's
proposed
annexation
of
wilkinsburg
registration
closes
at
3
p.m.
June,
16th
to
register
to
speak.
At
these
meetings
and
hearings.
Please
fill
out
the
sign
up
form
on
the
council
meeting
webpage.
You
may
also
call
the
city
clerk's
office
at
412-255-2138
or
email
city
clerk's
office
at
pittsburgh,
pa.gov
anything
from
members.
Madam
president,
thank.
W
You
I'd
like
to
call
for
a
post
agenda,
maybe
a
public
hearing
but
post
I'll
call
for
both
the
post
agenda
and
public
hearing
televised.
I
was
gonna
call
for
rcos
in
the
city
of
pittsburgh,
but
I
think
I'm
gonna
call
for
city
planning,
so
we
can
discuss
rcos
in
the
art
commission.