►
From YouTube: Pittsburgh City Council Standing Committees - 7/26/23
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
morning
and
welcome
to
the
standing
committee
meeting
for
Wednesday
July
26
2023,
due
to
catastrophic
system
failure,
there
will
be
no
audio
in
council
chambers
today,
so
all
of
us
will
have
to
slightly
project
our
voices.
Our
first
point
of
business
is
roll
call
with
a
clerk.
Please
take
the
role.
B
A
A
Next
order,
business
is
of
a
common
election
speakers
of
the
rules
of
Council
of
state
that
Commons
are
limited
to
matters
of
concerned.
Official
action
or
deliberation
which
are
or
maybe
before,
city,
council
and
profanity
will
not
be
permitted
after
you
recall,
please
restate
your
name
provides
your
neighborhood
for
the
record.
You
will
give
you
three
minutes
to
speak.
Our
first
registered
speaker,
Dr
Ronald,
Lynn,
Miller,.
D
412-969-7997
is
my
U.S
primary
tell
text
by
appointment
only
I'm
the
founder
of
the
sex
gender
equality,
a
nationwide
Nexus
2022
I,
announced
this
in
2022,
so
this
is
not
new.
In
that
sense,
we
are
interested
in
male
female
inclusionist
approaches
to
the
solution
to
sex,
gender
and
justice
and
review
this,
as
unlike
the
review
as
sexist
gender,
Equity
Commission
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
and
others
that
are
across
the
United
States,
that
is
overwhelmingly
male
exclusionist
and
that
is
supported
by
equitous
intersectionalists
gross
strasberger
and
kale.
Smith
find
this
Council.
D
D
Recently,
the
yellow
gold
political
Empowerment
Group,
especially
East
Asian
U.S
Americans,
got
some
money
right.
Yellow
is
like
Blackness
is
a
subcultural
information
intelligence
template.
The
negative
is,
of
course
blackface
and
yellow
face.
D
Oh
my
mistake:
the
Pittsburgh
city
council
agendas
have
never
supported
a
yellow
or
Asian
political
empowerment.
The
group
funding
not
now
not
ever
not.
As
far
as
we
can
tell
from
the
records.
This
is
anti-asian.
D
However,
Pittsburgh
city
council
has
repeatedly
funded
the
black
political
Empowerment,
Group
Mr
Gainey
used
that
to
become
the
mayor
of
the
city
of
Pittsburgh.
D
How
is
that
not
racist?
How
are
the
people
on
this
on
this
Council
look
around,
who
read
their
papers?
Who
are
doing
it
right
now,
like
Miss
gross,
that's
War.
We
have
to
do.
How
are
you
supposed
to
pay
attention
to
that
Mr
Wilson
yesterday,
you
spoke
very
eloquently
about
the
union
and
I
support
what
you're
trying
to
do
with
that
I
support
workers,
whether
they're,
Union
or
not.
Union.
We
have
a
problem
with
racism
on
this
Council
and
in
the
office
of
Mayor.
A
Our
next
register,
speaker
is
Naomi.
Mullen
I
do
not
see
Miss
Mullen.
Our
next
registered
speaker
is
Catherine
Jones
for
Caitlin
Jones,
here
Caitlin
Jones
with
us.
If
not
our
next
speaker
is
Lonnie
gibner
Mr
given
please
come
forward,
provide
your
name,
provide
your
neighborhood
for
the
record,
you'll
be
given
three.
E
Okay,
my
name
is
Lonnie
gibner
and
my
neighborhood
is
Mount
Washington
and
basically
I'm
here
today,
just
observed
because
I've
never
been
I've
seen
you
guys
on
looking
on
television,
but
I've
never
been
down
hard
to
see
here
at
the
discussions
or
anything
like
that,
but
so
I'm
here
today
to
observe
and
see
how
everything
is
ran,
how
things
are
done.
Basically,
they'll
sit
back
and
acknowledge
some
things
today,
that's
expected
in
here
for
today.
Thank
you.
Okay,
welcome
to
council.
F
Good
morning,
it's
a
perfect
timing:
councilman
I'm,
the
founder
and
executive
director
of
lettuce
turn
of
the
bead
sustainability
Collective
we
are
based
in
Carrick
before
I
became.
Let
us
started
to
beat
Jamie
I
was
Corporate,
America,
Jamie
and
I
learned
a
lot
about
how
to
run
a
business
and
how
to
not
run
a
business.
Most
important
lesson,
I
learned
was
the
investment
in
people
yields
the
highest
return.
F
I've
talked
previous
about
the
economic
impact
for
businesses.
Today,
I
want
to
talk
about
talk
about
the
economic
and
social
impact
of
the
tri-party
agreement
passing
and
how
what
it
would
be
for
I
mean
for
our
residents.
The
tri-party
agreement
would
allow
residents
the
opportunity
to
invest
in
land.
Land
of
any
kind
is
a
recession-proof
investment
from
a
financial
perspective.
Obviously
that's
good,
but
giving
residents
the
opportunity
to
build
equity
and
own
something
when
maybe
they
haven't
owned.
Anything
ever
in
their
life
gives
them
a
better
sense
of
security.
F
They
start
to
like
who
they
they
are
more
and
it's
a
ripple
effect.
It
could
lead
to
that
Resident
wanting
to
make
positive
changes
in
their
lives
and
in
their
communities.
They
then
inspired
some
to
do
the
same.
So
please
think
of
your
vote
for
voting,
yes
for
the
tri-party
agreement
as
not
just
a
vote,
but
really
an
investment
into
the
people
in
your
communities.
F
My
four-year-old
said
something
to
me
the
other
day
that
really
made
me
proud
to
be
his
parent
and
he
said
Mommy
I
really
like
that
I
like
who
I
am,
and
that
just
was
like
so
profound
to
hear
from
his
little
voice,
but
also
like,
maybe
like
good
job.
You
know
so
I
know
you
all
with
that
same
feeling.
I
know
you're
all
doing
a
good
job
and
I
think
the
residents
need
to
really
feel
that
as
well
so
have
a
wonderful
day.
Thank
you.
A
H
My
name
is
rubonne
m
Browns
I
live
at
715,
Mercer
Street,
that's
in
Katy
Rivers
tires
up
at
the
top
of
Bedford
that
senior
citizen
there's
190
apartments
in
that
building.
I
came
down
to
speak
the
day
for
you,
Council
people.
Please
help
us
bus
drive
bus
riders
when
I
left
City
Council
on
Tuesday
last
week.
I
walked
down
to
where
Burger
King
used
to
be
that's.
Where
I
catch
my
bus
out
of
town
well,
there's
there
the
street
is
blocked
off
so
I've
taken
over
to
the
next
street.
H
H
I
chased
them
up
the
street
to
try
to
catch
the
next
corner
and
there's
he
kept
going
now
when
I
asked
the
bus
driver
I'm
saying
he
said
well,
miss
I'm
not
from
that
bus
garage,
but
I
said:
if
you
are
a
bus
driver
and
a
stock
is
missing
or
he
is
blocked.
You
can't
get
through.
Don't
you
seem
like
the
next
stop,
you
would
stop.
He
said
well,
miss
I,
don't
know
I,
don't
know,
I
don't
know
so
then
I
said
you
know
good
service
and
very
knowledgeable
bus
drivers.
H
Okay,
so
the
next
day
I
come
Center,
I
can't
catch
the
bus,
so
I've
taken
I
walk
up
now,
the
third
day
when
I
come
back
to
town
I
was
saying
to
a
bus
driver.
Please
explain
to
me
why
we
can't
find
out
where
the
bus
is
going
he's
saying
when
they
come
in.
They
don't
know
but
I'm
saying
when
a
bus
comes
and
you're
going
to
change
that
that
traffic
stop
or
the
stop.
This
should
be
that
first
bus
driver
should
have
a
piece
of
paper
right
there
saying
where
the
new
stuff
is.
H
When
I
was
telling
my
grandchildren,
which
is
played
down
even
my
grandfather,
he
said,
Grand
mommy
seemed
like
they
would
put
a
sign
on
the
bus.
Stop
that
has
moved
no,
they
don't
they
don't
at
all,
and
I
am
really
upset
with
this
bus
company,
because
when
this
white
woman
that
you
have
now
when
she
came
years
ago,
there
was
two
white
bus
drivers
that
came
down
and
they
were
very
upset
up
in
the
hill.
They
said
you're
going
to
be
cutting
they're,
going
to
cut
your
services
and
wish
they
did.
H
We
used
to
have
a
Hill
Loop,
which
we
don't
and
then,
with
this
part
about
you,
fixing
up
71
in
Oakland.
You
already
had
two
buses
in
Oakland
that
would
come,
one
would
go
to
town.
One
would
just
go
through
Oakland.
Remember
that,
but
yet
still
you're
getting
ready
to
take
a
make
the
buses
and
go
through
Oakland.
We
still
can't
get
a
bus
at
the
top
of
the
hill
Bedford
to
go
down
the
bottom
of
the
hill,
where
the
hospital
is
that's.
All
we
want
to
do
is
get
to
the
hospital
I.
H
G
I
am
Bernadette
from
Beachview.
Yesterday
I
spoke
about
the
ill-planned
ill
announced
Community
input.
Meeting
I
was
told
by
one
of
the
city
planners
at
my
table
that
anything
that
a
previous
mayor
agrees
to
or
that
you're
in
the
planning
of
creating
basically
gets
thrown
out
with
the
baby
in
the
bathwater.
If
that
theory
is
true,
then
shouldn't
we
be
living
in
the
Victorian
times.
G
I
have
a
letter
here,
and
this
is
concerning
the
use
of
an
archery
range.
There
could
be
both.
Last
night
we
had
a
plethora
of
a
brand
new
Girl
Scout
Troop
for
beach
view
have
a
wonderful
time.
All
the
all
the
leaders
in
this
girl
scout
scout
troop
are
going
to
be
certified
archery
teachers
so
to
speak.
G
Dear,
Miss,
Grote,
she's
part
of
the
Pittsburgh
archery,
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
and
the
department
of
Public's
works
are
pleased
to
support
Pittsburgh
archery
in
creating
a
practice
orchary
range.
By
the
way
there
are
scholarships
to
universities
for
archery
and
the
USA
team,
there's
not
for
pickleball.
G
According
to
the
Greenways
for
Pittsburgh
policy
guide,
Greenways
may
contain
active
use
sites
offering
Recreation
entertainment
game
skill
Etc.
An
excellent
use
includes
archery
sports
are
an
opportunity
to
connect
with
the
community
and
teach
us
teamwork.
Pittsburgh
archery
is
authorized
to
create
the
archery
range.
We
have
full
100
support
of
University
of
Pittsburgh
archery
team
to
maintain
to
clear
out
all
the
shrubbery
to
keep
this
up
and
running
every
single
year.
This
lessens
the
cost
to
the
city.
Again:
scholarships
college
teams
there's
also
the
letter
here
from
Bill
perduto
promising
his
support.
G
This
should
not
get
thrown
out
with
the
baby
in
the
bathwater
or
a
community
input
meeting
that
is
manipulated
by
not
notifying
the
residents.
There
should
be
Flyers
put
out
in
the
mail.
This
should
come
from
the
mayor's
office
months
in
advance.
Not
everybody
is
on
Facebook
or
Twitter
or
Instagram.
G
There
was
not
a
clear-cut
notice,
an
accidental
flyer
being
found
on
our
honor
about
July
5th.
Before
this
community
input
meeting
is
not
notice
and
as
I
read
and
as
I
read
yesterday,
they
didn't
put
up
anything
okay,
you're,
not
supposed
to
put
up
things
on
telephone
poles,
Tim's
Market
wasn't
notified
any
of
the
stores
around
that
area.
G
A
Any
further
speakers
any
further
speakers
we
should
see
if
not
that
takes
us
to
our
standing
committee's
agenda,
which
our
first
grade
today
is
financing
law
chaired
by
myself.
Our
first
supplemental
papers,
Bill
1805.,
built.
C
Bill
1806
resolution
authorized
in
demand
and
the
directors
of
the
Department
of
Public
Works
and
the
Department
of
Finance
to
enter
into
a
lease
agreement
with
the
Pittsburgh
parking
authority
for
the
off
street
parking
facility
located
at
the
northeast
corner
of
Forbes
and
Murray
avenues
for
a
period
of
29
years
and
an
annual
rental
fee
of
one
dollar
per
year.
At
no
cost
to
the
city
motion.
J
B
A
C
Bill
1454
resolution
amending
resolution
109
of
2023,
which
authorized
the
cooperation
agreement
or
agreements
with
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
equipment,
leasing,
Authority
for
the
purchase
and
leasing
of
vehicles,
equipment
and
accessories
equipment,
support
infrastructure
and
Professional
Services
for
use
by
city
of
Pittsburgh
Department.
By
increasing
the
total
spend
by
nine
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
new
not
to
exceed
amount
of
10
million
365
991
dollars.
K
Mr
chair,
like
make
a
motion
to
amend
by
substitution.
We.
J
We
have
that
Amendment.
We.
K
No
I
just
thank
the
administration
for
coming
up
with
the
funds
that
are
so
sorely
needed
for
for
our
vehicle.
Our
Fleet
Swiss
armpit
money,
900
000,
there's
also
a
transfer
some
other
inner
Department
mental
funds
from
the
equipment,
leasing,
Authority
board,
so
we're
looking
at
close
to
two
million
dollars
which
will
help
and
go
a
long
way.
So
so
that's
what
the
money's
about!
If
anybody
has
any
questions.
A
Understood
one
abstention
and
it
was
just
it
was
just
email
to
your
customer
affirmative
recommendation
that
takes
us
to
our
new
papers,
beginning
with
Bill
1751.
L
I
know:
there's
someone
here
to
speak
to
this
I
know.
There's
this
there's
also
the
second
bill
in
1752
that
relates
to.
M
N
N
M
N
So
we
have
the
ability
to
initiate
investigations
under
each
one
of
the
laws.
Each
of
the
laws
has
its
own
administrative
remedies
baked
in
for
us
to
conduct
investigations
and
seek
resolution
of
complaints.
So
we
have
the
proactive
when
we
find
out
that
something
is
going
on
that
needs
attention,
whether
it's
related
to
unfair
labor
practices,
discrimination
or
public
nuisance.
We
can
proactively
address
those
issues,
but
as
part
of
each
one
of
the
statutes,
there's
also
a
process
in
place
for
the
general
public
to
come
to
us
to
seek
a
resolution.
Thank.
M
L
Thank
you
and
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Zeke
for
coming
to
the
table.
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
a
couple
things
that
I've
been
working
on
and
to
see
where
we're
at
with
that,
so
this
office,
how
much
of
it
you
know
how
much
of
the
the
audit
that
we
we
did
with
the
controller
about
prevailing
wage.
You
know,
was
there
a
not?
Was
there
a
lot
found
in
the?
Can
people
hear
me
what's
going
on
with
these
mics
again
they're
just
recording.
L
It
was
like
this
is
live.
You
can't
go
to
like
the
cable
channel
and
find
it
okay,
all
right.
So
for
the
audience,
I'll
speak
a
little
louder.
I
just
didn't
know:
I
guess:
I
couldn't
hear
the
micro,
the
speakers,
so
the
audit
that
was
done
by
the
controller
to
to
look
at
the
prevailing
wage
act,
and
you
know
how
that
how
that's
going?
Can
you
speak
to
that
like
like
what
will
the?
How
was
he?
How
was
that
impacted?
When
you
read
that
and
then
how
was?
How
would
that
be?
L
You
know
factored
into
this
office.
Sure.
N
N
So
what
we're
doing
right
now
is
we're
working
with
our
Community
Partners
and
Council
to
amend
the
legislation
to
give
the
mayor's
office
a
full
enforcement
Powers,
while
the
city
controller
keeps
a
few
functions
that
they
desired
and
we're
working
together
to
make
sure
that
we
can
finally
enforce
this
law,
because
it's
a
long
time
coming.
N
N
So
the
mayor
himself,
under
the
home,
Rule,
Charter
and
under
the
city
code,
is
tasked
with
enforcing
all
of
the
laws
of
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
city
council.
You
know
you
look
at
some
of
these
laws
paid
sickly,
for
example,
and
others.
These
were
huge
achievements
when
city
council
passed
them
and
what
we
want
to
do
right
now
in
the
executive
branch,
is
give
these
laws
their
due
attention
and
actually
be
able
to
enforce
them
to
the
benefit
of
residents
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh.
What.
L
N
Sure,
right
now,
the
fiscal
impact
of
the
office
of
equal
protection
is
currently
zero,
because
we
have
all
of
the
positions
currently
budgeted
for
it's
myself,
Ada
coordinator
and
compliance
coordinator-
and
you
know
we're
a
small
team,
but
we're
looking
forward
to
doing
some
really
important
work
and
you
know
I
think
the
hope
is
that
this
office
will
eventually
grow,
but
we
are
not
there
yet
and
we're
very
much
looking
forward
to
getting
started
on
this
work.
We
certainly
appreciate
your
consideration
for
these
bills
in.
L
The
wake
of
the
office
decision,
this
Council
acted
quickly
and
passed
abortion
protections
for
health
care
workers
and
people.
You
know
that
are
within
Pittsburgh
with
this
office,
you
know:
do
that
work
car!
Well,
you
know
in
the
initial
steps
of
creating
obstacle
that
well,
some
of
those
protections
be
within
you
know,
being
enforced
within
that
office
or
in
the
future.
The.
N
Mayor's
office
right
now
is
working
on
with
the
Department
of
innovation
performance,
to
create
an
intake
form
and
also
establish
a
landing
page
that
will
allow
the
general
public
to
contact
us
with
those
kinds
of
complaints
and
we're
certainly
open
to
having
discussions
about
how
either
the
mayor's
office
or
the
office
of
equal
protection
can
go
about
enforcing
that
law.
N
We
hope
to
communicate
with
them
frequently,
especially
around
disruptive
properties,
because
what
happens
under
disruptive
properties
after
we
send
out
a
notice
of
violation
if
we
still
don't
get
compliance
and
people
are
not
willing
to.
You
know,
submit
an
abatement
plan
or
improve
the
conditions
at
their
properties.
The
law
specifically
gives
us
recourse
to
work
with
the
District
Attorney's
office
to
bring
criminal
charges.
O
Yeah
thanks
so
I
actually
wanted
on
the
the
issue
of
the
disruptive
property.
So
I,
don't
necessarily
think
it's
worth
going
through
here.
O
You
can,
but
but
so
again,
just
declare
because
we've
talked
about
this.
So
essentially
you
will
be
making
sure
that
the
disruptive
properties
move
through
the
D.A
in
the
courts
more
quickly
than
they
have
been
right
past.
All
that's
sort
of
the
general
idea
right.
That's.
N
That's
generally
right,
but
the
part
of
what
we're
excited
about
with
disruptive
properties
is
that
actually
we
don't
need
to
rely
on
the
courts
and
we
don't
need
to
rely
on
the
D.A
to
do
our
own
enforcement
of
this
law.
We
have
a
five-member,
disruptive
property
appeals
board
that
provides
a
due
process,
protection
for
anybody
who
wants
to
appeal
a
notice
of
violation
that
we
send
out
there's
a
whole
administrative
enforcement
mechanism,
that's
already
baked
into
the
statute
that
allows
us
to
do
all
of
this
work
on
our
own.
Okay,.
O
Yeah,
so
that's
what
and
again
you
don't.
This
is
not
something
that
we
need
to
hear
right
now,
but
if
I
do
want
to
make
sure
that
the
process
is
very
clear,
you
know
it's
like
whatever
it
is.
Like
maybe
they're.
You
know
if
it's
a
disruption
not
of
the
property
itself,
but
of
the
people
living
at
the
property
that
they're
whatever
there
has
to
be.
There
has
whether
there
has
to
be
a
call
to
9-1-1,
or
you
know,
whatever
the
requirements
are
to
get
that
ball
rolling
and
then
the
step
steps.
O
With
difficult,
neighbors
and
and
difficult
properties
for.
N
Us
to
begin
disruptive
properties
enforcement.
There
needs
to
be
a
citation
or
an
arrest,
but
beyond
that
we
are
looking
forward
to
marshaling
our
resources
at
3-1-1,
working
with
city
council,
working
with
the
Pittsburgh
Bureau
of
police
and
also
the
department
of
permits,
licenses
and
inspections
to
really
get
these
complaints
moving
through
the
system.
Yeah.
O
A
lot
of
time,
literally
just
following
up
on
3-1-1
requests
for
properties
and
that's
not
really
the
best
use
of
our
time,
so
it
will
be
nice
to
have
an
office
that
we
can
count
on
to
be
doing
that
follow-up
and
letting
the
neighbors
know
kind
of
where
it's
at
over
the
you
know.
Over
the
months
we.
H
P
K
I
just
wanted
to
say
what
was
it,
maybe
eight
or
nine
months
ago,
you
came
to
me
talking
about
disruptive
properties
and
I,
know,
there's
a
lot
of
responsibilities
in
this
path,
this
past,
but
but
I'm
particularly
enthused,
because
of
your
enthusiasm
quite
frankly,
that
you
feel
like
you're,
going
to
be
able
to
address
disruptive
properties
when
we
were
in
District
two
together
at
the
council
Madam
president's
meeting.
You
spoke
to
your
initial
focuses
on
Commercial
disruptive
properties,
correct.
E
K
N
So
we
decided
to
start
on
enforcement
related
to
commercial
properties,
because
we
noticed
that
the
most
serious
problems
that
were
occurring
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh.
When
you
talk
about
violence-
and
you
talk
about
drugs,
they
were
disproportionately
located
at
certain
hot
spots
right
and
the
vast
majority
of
those
hot
spots
were
commercial
properties.
N
So
there's
a
practical
consideration
driving
this,
but
there's
also
a
legal
consideration
driving
this,
which
is
that
we
think
that
the
law
as
written
relies
a
little
bit
too
heavily
on
the
eviction
process
when
it
comes
to
resolving
disruptive
property
issues
at
residential
homes,
for
us
to
feel
comfortable.
Moving
forward
with
that
now,
I
understand
that
that
there
this
is
a
conversation
with
Council
for
a
different
date
for
a
future
date.
N
But
we
would
love
to
work
with
you
guys
on
potentially
amending
that
language,
so
that
we
could
at
some
point,
do
the
commercial
properties
get
good
at
that
understand
how
the
process
works.
We're
creating
all
of
this
from
scratch
right
at
another,
Point
figure
out
how
to
address
vacant
homes
and
eventually
figure
out
how
to
address
problems
at
residential
homes.
But
this
is
going
to
be
something
that
requires
a
longer
term
working
relationship
with
Council.
To
get
this
done
and
we
look
forward
to
making
that
happen
is.
K
N
Yeah,
so
you
know,
we've
worked
with
both
the
police
and
pli
to
try
to
figure
out
what
are
the
most
problematic
properties
in
the
city
and
so
we're
currently
developing
a
strategy
that
allows
us
to
hone
in
on
some
of
the
properties
and
some
of
the
actors
that
we
feel
have
been
not
meeting
their
obligations
under
the
law.
Right.
K
P
K
N
N
I
I,
don't
like
to
use
the
word
non-serious,
because
this
stuff
is
all
serious
right,
but
the
statute
specifically
refers
to
Serious
offenses
as
a
category,
so
I'm
going
to
talk
about
remedial,
offenses
and
serious
offenses
remedial
offenses
are
things
like
we
overgrown
weeds
or
something
that
doesn't
have
to
do
with
violence
or
drugs
or
serious
crime.
That's
the
difference
between
those
two
things.
When
we
send
out
a
remedial
offense,
it
requires
three
of
those
to
tag
a
property
as
disruptive
when
we
send
out
a
serious
offense
violation.
N
It
only
requires
one
of
those
to
tag.
A
property
is
disruptive
after
the
property
is
tagged
as
disruptive
there's
all
kinds
of
things
that
can
happen
after
that.
But
the
first
thing
that
happens
is
that
property
owner
becomes
liable
for
every
to
pay
for
every
call
for
service
that
comes
to
that
location.
And
then,
after
that,
that's
when
we
can
get
involved
with
the
DA's
office
and
there's
other
things
that
we
can
do
in
courts
of
law
to
begin
to
escalate
enforcement
actions.
K
Q
Income
for
meeting
with
me
a
one-on-one
and
explaining
the
full
of
the
office
of
equal
protection
and
I'm
very
supportive
as
well
for
those
who,
for
the
general
public,
might
be
aware
of
the
commission
on
human
relations.
I
thought
it
might
be
helpful
if
you
could
explain
what
you
explained
to
me.
The
interaction
between
this
office
and
perhaps
a
relationship
and
overlap,
overlap
or
lack
thereof
between
this
new
office
and
the
commission
on
human
relations,
which
you
know
at
first
flush,
seemed
to
have
similar
similar
missions.
N
Sure,
thank
you
for
your
question.
We
look
forward
to
working
with
the
commission
on
human
relations
because
we
think
that
our
missions
are
complementary
and
each
one
of
them
fills
a
distinct
and
important
need
in
city
government,
so
the
office
of
equal
protection.
When
we
do
civil
rights
work,
we're
mainly
focused
on
disability
rights,
work
and
protections
for
people
with
previous
criminal
convictions.
N
We
want
to
make
sure
that
when
we
do
compliance
work,
that
our
own
house
is
in
order
and
that
our
business
partners
are
also
doing
the
right
thing
right,
so
we
do
the
work
up
front.
This
is
compliance
work.
The
commission
on
human
relations
does
enforcement
work,
so
they
come
in
after
the
problem
has
happened.
If
you
are
a
protected
class,
the
protected
classes
include
race
and
sexual
orientation,
disability
or
otherwise,
there's
about
seven
or
eight
of
them.
N
So
actually,
when
you
have
the
office
of
equal
protection,
doing
civil
rights
work
on
the
front
end
to
make
sure
that
problems
don't
happen,
and
then
the
commission
on
human
relations,
making
sure
that
they're
addressing
problems
after
they
happen
and
they
have
broader
jurisdiction
than
we
do
they.
You
know
you
can
be
anywhere
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
and
file,
a
complaint
that
will
then
be
investigated,
whereas
we,
our
mission,
is
much
more
specific
and
limited
to
the
obligations
that
the
city
has
under
law.
Q
Thank
you.
That's
a
perfect
explanation
and
I
hope
it
clarifies
any
questions
that
anyone
might
have
about
that
and
again
really
supportive
of
this
new
office
and
look
forward
to
seeing
it
continue
to
grow
as.
R
R
N
Sure,
and
just
to
clarify
Madam
council
president,
are
you
talking
specifically
about
disruptive
properties?
Okay,
so
the
in
standing
up
disruptive
properties?
We
want
to
make
sure
that,
whether
it's
a
member
of
the
public,
a
member
of
our
Department's,
a
member
of
City
Council,
we
want
these
cases.
We
want
to
be
accessible
to
the
general
public
and
it
has
always
fallen
under
the
Department
of
Public
Safety,
as
you
said,
to
send
out
the
notices
violation.
R
N
No,
so
the
the
way
the
law
is
written,
the
director
of
the
Department
of
Public
Safety
is
required
to
sign
the
final
notice
of
violation
and
it
comes
from
him,
and
so
you
know
we
we
want
to
make
sure
we're
following
the
law
as
you,
you
all
wrote
it
that
they
come
directly
from
the
director
and
in
the
event,
somebody
wants
to
appeal
a
notice
of
violation.
It
goes
to
our
five-member
board,
which
you
recently
confirmed
all
five
of
our
members.
So
we're
excited
to
have
the
board
up
and
running.
R
Further
discussion
because
I
do
think
that
there
was
things
we
need
to
have
Clarity
on,
but
I
do
want
to
say
that
you're,
one
of
the
easiest
persons
to
work
with
and
really
I
appreciate
that
you
were
ready
to
talk
with
us
and
look
through
this
all
with
us,
how
publicly,
privately
and
through
emails
and
other
things.
So
thank
you
for
your
for
your
work
on
this
I
actually
feel
good.
That's
in
your
hands,
but
I
also
trust
the
public
safety
director.
If
you
know
this
deal
so
with
that
said,
Thank
you.
A
A
C
A
L
Thank
you
Mr
chair,
so
the
first
step
was
back
at
the
the
end
of
2022,
when
this
Council
reorganized
the
harbor
funding,
and
in
that
there
was
a
million
dollars
that
was
allocated
to
the
purpose
of
we're,
leaving
Pittsburgh,
there's
other
medical
debt
and
I
want
to
thank
the
I
want
to
thank
the
administration.
L
I
want
to
thank
OMB
and
I
also
want
to
thank
the
procurement
office
and,
and
all
members
that
have
been
very
supportive
of
this
and
also
my
staff
to
to
go
through
the
process
to
actually
you
know,
put
out
the
I'm,
sorry
and
also,
and
also
the
Law
Department,
to
put
out
the
the
RFQ
to
see
who
would
do
the
work
who's
qualified
to
do
the
work
and
I'm
elated
today
to
to
see
that
we
have
before
us
with
17
Bill
1753,
that
this
is
a
bill
that
was
spread
into
the
record
would
authorize
the
mayor
to
go
under
contract
with
medical
debt.
L
I'm
sorry
rip
medical
debt
for
leaving
Pittsburgh
as
other
medical
debt,
and
that
would
be
there
are
classifications
and
criteria
of
who
will
qualify.
But
the
best
part
about
this
is
that
no
one
actually
has
to
go
on
and
and
apply
for
it
that
we
would,
under
this
contract
this
non-profit
would
go
into
the
medical
debt
space
and
could
buy
you
know,
for
they
could
buy
over
over
a
half
million
dollars.
L
So
that's
a
it's
a
it's
a
it's
a
lot
that
I
think
that
can
happen
for
the
City
of
Pittsburgh
and
its
residents,
especially
in
the
time
of
covid-19,
and
that's
why
I
thought
this
was
especially
appropriate
for
arpa
funding,
because
that
funding
was
you
know
directly
related
to
you
know.
The
purpose
of
it
was
to
was
to
bring
back
communities
and
people
who
experience
medical
debt.
L
You
know,
or
have
that
is
the
number
one
cause
of
is
the
one
number
one
cause
of
of
bankruptcy
so
with
that
I'm
excited
to
to
take
this
vote
today,
because
this
is
yet
another
step
towards
getting
to
that
goal.
L
Director
I'm
sorry
Deputy,
Mayor
Pollock
is
here.
K
So
explain
to
me
and
I'll:
give
you
a
I'll,
give
you
a
scenario
for
me
that
I
feel
that
how
this
works
and
then
you
could
comment
so
rip
comes
into
the
City
of
Pittsburgh
and
they
kind
of
go-to
all
the
hospitals,
I
guess
who
are
or
debt
agencies
at
this
point
or
is
it?
Is
it
refunding
hospitals
or
debt
agencies.
S
K
K
S
K
S
So,
by
way
of
getting
there,
I
just
wanted
to
take
one
step
back,
which
is
to
note
that,
as
this
after
this
fun
was
included,
funding
was
included
in
the
budget
late
last
year
we
conducted
an
RFQ
to
identify
which
types
of
firms
or
providers
could
provide
this
service
and
were
able
to
conclude
that
no
one
really
does
this
other
than
rip
medical
debt.
S
So
you'll
recall
that
there
was
some
discussion
around
that
when
this
was
originally
approved
and
we've
been
able
to
verify
that
they're
unique
week
in
this
space
only
company-
yes,
that's
correct
what
they
what
they
do
so
so
we
will
establish
through
our
contract
with
them,
which
this
agreement
authorizes,
the
criteria
under
which
they
will
purchase
debt
using
our
funds,
and
then
they
will
go
to
the
health
systems
that
are
holding
the
debt
and
identify
accounts
that
meet
that
criteria.
S
So
individuals
under
the
income
threshold
who
are
City
residents
and
they
will
make
an
offer
to
that
Health
provider
to
purchase
that
debt
on
discounted
terms
as
you've
already
described.
So
so
we
don't
participate
in
the
selection
process
of
the
individuals.
We
set
broad
criteria
of
City
residents
under
I.
Think
it's
three
times
the
federal
poverty
line,
I
believe
yeah
65
am
I
those
things.
Those
two
numbers
basically
add
up
to
the
same,
and
they
will
buy
as
many
of
those
accounts
out
as
they
can
get.
They
can.
K
S
Rip
medical
debt
and
the
debt
holders
will
negotiate
through
the
secondary
medical
debt
Market
to
identify
who
which
individual
residence
debt
is
cleared
based
on
who
meets
the
criteria
and
what
accounts
the
service
providers
are
willing
to
sell.
But
the
the
city
government
is
setting
parameters
around
which
broad
groups
of
our
citizens
are
eligible
for
this
support.
And
then
it's
really
it's
it's
up
to
the
provider
to
decide
what
they're
going
to
sell.
K
S
Believe
Chicago
has
done
it.
There
may
be
cities
Beyond
Chicago,
that's
the
that's
the
one
example
that
I
know
and
they've
done
it
with
arba
funds.
S
I
think
I
think
there
is
a
movement
among
cities
to
utilize
some
small
portion
of
their
arpa
funding
for
this
purpose,
given,
as
councilman
Wilson
said
earlier,
the
direct
Nexus
between
the
growth
of
medical
debt
during
the
pandemic
and
the
purposes
of
Arbor
relief.
But
you
would
not
be
incorrect
to
say
that
over
the
longer
span
of
time
they
receive
more
of
their
funding
from
philanthropic
or
charitable
sources
than
governments.
S
In
Pittsburgh,
not
in
Pittsburgh
to
my
knowledge
but
okay
I
suppose
we
wouldn't
know
for
sure,
because
if
we
weren't
the,
if
we
weren't
providing
the
funding
it
might
be,
they
might
have.
They
might
have
done
that
within
our
Market
under
an
arrangement
with
a
foundation
where
the
the
work
is
confidential.
S
My
to
my
knowledge,
no,
but
they
they
have
in
the
course
of
our
RFQ
and
then
subsequent
discussions
in
anticipation
of
being
able
to
conduct
this
agreement.
If
Council
approves,
they
have
analyzed
the
local
Municipal
debt
market
and
the
criteria.
Broad
criteria
we've
established
and
are
confident
in
their
ability
to
to
spend
this
money
within
this
Market.
Under
the
criteria
we've
established,
and
so
they
don't
see
any
any
any
risk
of
them
not
being
able
to
purchase.
S
S
S
Well,
we
won't
know
that
until
we're
already
we
yeah,
we
won't
know
that
until
we're
already
in
the
work
because,
for
example,
there
could
be
a
family
of
two
otherwise
identical
families
of
four
one
has
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
of
medical
debt,
and
one
has
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
of
medical
debt
right.
So
so
the
money
goes
it
can.
It
could
cover
more
or
fewer
People,
based
on
their
debt
profile,
which
is
hard
to
predict
at
the
outset.
Right.
S
We
will
have
access
to
that
information
for
for
privacy,
Reasons
I'm,
not
sure
that
we
would
want
to
publish
some
of
that,
but
we
will
for
accountability
purposes.
You
know
again,
this
gets
to
privacy,
confidentiality
HIPAA
right
there.
There
are
some
types
of
information
we
will
get
but
cannot
disclose
in
a
report,
but
we're
happy
to
provide
reporting
at
a
I
guess
disaggregated
level
or
not
including
people's
names,
and
addresses
to
protect
their
confidentiality.
That
explains
the
impact
of
the
work.
S
Me
personally,
I
don't
want
to
see
the
names
of
the
individuals
themselves
for
again
for
for
privacy
purposes.
Folks,
there
will
be
folks
in
the
Law
Department
who
have
access
to
that
data
for
verification
purposes,
but
I
don't
I.
K
Don't
want
to
at
least
have
a
number
saying:
we
helped
out
300
people,
oh
City
residents
and
all
Crews
all
of
them
accrued
this-
that
throughout
the
pandemic,
that's
a
qualification
for
it.
S
S
O
L
You
know
what
the
what
the
criteria
should
be
and
how
they
match
up
with
Oracle
guidelines,
and
that's
why
it
was
you
know
I,
guess,
I
believe
it
was
four
times
probably
right
now
is
three
times
so
that
65
I
can't
remember
what
the
percent
was,
but
the
initial
number
was
18
000.,
so
that
would
it
would
be
reduced
now,
since
it
would
be
less
than
since
this
is
the
Ami
was
reduced
65.
So.
S
L
You
allow
me
they
would
they
wouldn't
stop
relieving
the
debt
until
we
would
get
to
as
close
to
zero
as
possible,
and
that's
how
we
initially
calculate
calculated
the
money
as
well
in
terms
of
the
approximate
debt?
That's
out
there,
because
I
know
this
question
came
up
because
they
did.
They
are
familiar
with
this,
this
space
in
Pittsburgh
and
they
have
relieved
medical
debt
here
through
church
donations
to
them
in
the
past.
L
Oh
okay,
but
specifically
the
amount
a
million
dollars
was
the
calculation
I
believe
the
calculation
was
965
000
for
18
000
individuals
to
relieve
all
their
medical
debt
Okay.
So
you
know
kept
it
there.
Even
though
the
percent
was
reduced
and
the
percent
am
I
was
reduced
so
anyway,
and.
O
U
S
No,
no,
the
individual
payments
would
not
come
back
to
the
table,
but
the
the
answer
to
your
question.
Councilwoman
is
yes
they'll.
They
will
not
there'll,
be
a
continuous
series
of
transactions
in
which
they're
making
purchases
and
retiring
debt
and
we
will
certainly
have
access
to
that
information
on
an
incremental
basis,
as
that
occurs
at
a
minimum.
We
are
requiring.
S
U
O
E
S
Is
in
fact
part
of
the
agreement
so
so
so
we're
we're
someone
voluntarily
wants
to
to
have
their
participation
publicly
known.
They'll
have
that
opportunity
and
I
should
also
know
that
in
the
course
of
the
communications
from
rip
to
the
folks,
who's
dead
is
being
relieved.
They'll
be
made
aware
not
just
that
their
debt
is
being
relieved,
but
it's
being
relieved
by
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
okay,.
O
S
C
1755
resolution
president
2012
effective
January,
1
2013,
entitled
resolution
adopting
and
approving
the
2013
capital
budget
and
the
2017
program
in
the
2013
through
2018
Capital
Improvement
program
by
reducing
Recreation
and
senior
centers
about
10
544.74
thing
and
increase
in
park.
Reconstruction
about
10,
544.74.
C
C
C
Just
fifty
thousand
dollars
bill
number
1760
resolution
program,
menu
resolution
number
647
in
2020,
effective
December,
23,
2020,
entitled
resolution
adopting
and
approved
in
the
2021
capital
budget
and
the
2021
Community
developmental
operating
program
in
the
2021
through
2026
Capital,
Improvement
programs,
City
facilities,
faculty,
two
thousand
nine
hundred
thirty
seven
dollars
and
nine
cents.
Reducing
recreation
in
senior
centers
by
one
million
six
hundred
twelve
thousand
six
hundred
twenty
six
dollars
and
thirty.
I
So
this
is
all
for
I
want
to
thank
former
mayor
peduto
from
the
chief
of
staff,
Dan
Gilman,
the
current
mayor,
current
chief
of
staff
and
budget
director
1B
I'm,
an
old
man,
so
I've
gotten
a
chance
to
see
what
God's
able
to
do
right
during
our
time
on
Council
we've
been
able
to
participate
in
our
district
to
build
thousands
of
units
of
affordable
housing,
including
Garfield,
lawmer,
Homewood
and
development.
In
each
of
my
almost
every
community.
I
In
my
district,
where
there
were
none
when
I
first
took
office,
and
now
in
the
time
when
we've
had
no
Parks
built
in
the
city.
In
my
district,
we
will
have
built
two.
We
build
a
brand
new
million
dollar
Park
in
Larimer
and
now
we're
building
a
brand
new
field
and
pool
in
Homewood.
This
one
particularly
is
special
to
me,
because
I
learned
to
play
baseball
in
the
park,
Boyce
Georgia
Park
watched
Willie
play
baseball
with
his
son
at
that
same
park,
same
park,
I
learned
to
swim
at
and
the
same
park.
I
I
look
at
every
day
when
I
leave
my
church
and
so
a
block
from
where
I
was
born
and
raised.
I
won't
talk
long,
but
I
do
think
this
people
now
that
I
am
contemplating
retiring
Republic.
Like
people
ask
me
a
lot
about
Legacy
and
I
I
find
in
the
music
right,
because
I
I
don't
think
this
work
is
about
Legacy.
My
legacy
is
my
children.
I
The
success
of
my
children
is
what
I'm,
proud
of
and
my
wife
and
my
family,
but
I
do
enjoy
walking
and
seeing
the
young
children
I
saw
a
young
girl
come
on
some
of
the
housing
we
built
and
so
I
parted.
She
on
she
had
on
the
Cinderella
outfit
and
all
little
girls
had
on
their
Little,
Ferry
and
queen
outfits,
and
they
were
running
down
the
place
that
was
abandoned
and
dangerous.
These
little
girls
were
having
a
birthday
party
running
down
the
street
laughing
and
giggling.
I
So
that's
the
Legacy
I
get
I
get
joy
from
is
seeing
the
transformed
lives
of
the
people
that
I've
been
apart,
not
the
only
person
but
part
of
a
team
to
do
and
I
guess.
The
other
thing
is
I'm
not
dead.
Yet
I,
don't
know
why
people
think
I'm
gonna
stop
doing
this
work.
I
I
ran
a
two
million
dollar
non-profit
organization
that
I
started
in
Hollywood
before
I
was
a
council
member
I
passed
the
church
for
30
years
40
years
now,
so
916
was
that
24
pastor
church
at
home
with
24
years
before
I,
was
here
taught
at
the
college,
whatever
that
number
is
20
years
before
coming
on
Council
I'm
not
going
to
go
anywhere,
I'm,
I,
I
believe
and
I
have
not
said
this
publicly.
I
Some
people
say
I
know
how
to
do
things,
and
so
why
people
think
I'm
going
to
stop
helping
black
people
rebuilding
black
communities
just
because
I
this
was
just
an
instrument.
This
ain't,
the
work.
The
work
is
in
the
community
I'm,
going
to
continue
to
build
like
the
lives
of
black
people,
lives
of
black
families,
rebuilt
black
communities,
I'm,
uniquely
qualified,
and
able
to
do
it,
and
so
I'm
not
going
to
stop
whether
I'm
member
of
council
until
I'm
in
the
grave
anyway.
This
is
Park
is
I'm.
I
This
is
this
perk
is
the
one
that
is
special
to
me.
I
will
see
it
every
day.
It's
a
block
from
my
mama's
house
and
Crosses
through
Canada
corner
across
the
street,
from
the
library
category
to
my
church.
This
one's
special
and
I'm
I'm
happy
to
see
it
being
built
and
can't
wait,
can't
wait
to
I,
don't
know
if
I
can
hit
a
baseball
but
I'm
going
to
try
when
they
open
that
field.
I
I'm,
gonna,
I'm,
gonna
catch
a
football
or
hit
a
baseball
or
take
my
sons
or
we're
going
to
do
something
in
that
part
right
when
they
open.
So
thank
you
for
this
moment
of
sort
of
reflection,
but
yeah
we're
looking
forward
to
this
and
thank
you
for
everyone's
support.
R
You
have
a
legacy
before
you
go
out
on
Council
as
well
as
that,
and
you
have
done
a
lot
and
you
do
do
a
lot,
but
it
also
want
to
say
we
also
I
also
have
gotten
some
parts
done
in
those
wonderful
ribbon
cutting
with
the
spray
part
with
director
Pollock,
and
it
was
so
nice.
In
short,
your
city,
but
I
also
have
projects
that
need
done
too
and
I'm
waiting
for
some
of
those
I'm
actually
trying
going
to
call
for
a
post
agenda
on
the
delayed
projects
after
this
meeting.
R
L
M
Thank
you,
Mr,
chair,
I
I
know
that
a
lot
of
I've
talked
to
a
handful
of
members.
I,
don't
think
I've
talked
to
all
members
about
this,
and
I
am
going
to
invite
Deputy,
Pollock
I
think
the
play
the
best
person
in
the
room
up
to
the
table
if
you're
still
here.
M
Thank
you
appreciate
it,
because
this
is
a
big
building,
there's
a
big
asset,
and
it
has
you
know
this
is
a
project
of
a
complexity
and
so
I
do
think
that,
even
though
we
have
a
very
long
agenda
today
that
it
it
deserves
some
time
and
attention
in
public
kind
of
information,
and
so
first
I'll
I'll
have
Deputy
Pollock
speak
to
it.
So
if
you
can
introduce
yourself
again
just
briefly.
S
Jake
Paul
Deputy
Mayor,
director
of
OMB
I'm,
sorry,
200,
Ross
Street,
also
known
as
the
John
P
Robin
Civic
building
is
building
right
around
the
corner
from
here
that
had
long
been,
and
still
at
this
point
partially
is
the
home
of
the
the
Urban
Development
Authority,
the
housing
authority
of
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
and
numerous
City
departments,
including
pli
planning
fire
and
that's
everyone
from
the
city
who's
in
the
building
and
when,
when
it
essentially
shut
down
the
building's,
been
in
a
pretty
significant
state
of
disrepair
for
a
long
time,
I
worked
there
about
a
decade
ago,
a
little
bit
less
than
that.
S
Even
at
that
point
it
was
in
need
of
a
lot
of
work.
It
had
been
underinvested
in
over
many
years
for
understandable
reasons,
given
the
city's
financial
position
during
that
period
of
time
during
the
padudo
administration,
the
determination
was
made
to
purchase
what
is
now
412
Boulevard
of
the
Allies
former
art
institute
campus
to
relocate
those
agencies
and
City
departments
to
a
new
home.
Work
is
underway
right
now
on
both
the
Ura
and
I
believe
that
I'm
sorry
on
the
cities
and
I
believe
the
housing
authorities.
S
S
The
three
agencies
no
longer
have
a
a
current
need
or
use
for
200
Ross
Street
and
the
ownership
structure
of
it
at
the
time
it
was
originally
purchased
is
somewhat
unconventional,
or
at
least
unconventional
anymore.
It's
called
tenants
in
common,
which
is
a
complicated
way,
to
say
the
least,
to
jointly
own
a
building.
We
do
not
own
412
Boulevard
of
the
Allies
in
the
same
way,
because
it
presented
challenges
over
the
course
of
the
years,
including
in
maintaining
the
building.
S
The
long
shot
of
that
is
that,
in
order
to
sell
200
Ross
Street,
we
need
to
consolidate
its
ownership,
so
the
the
basically
the
the
two
two
of
the
three
owners
would
need
to
convey
their
stake
in
the
building
to
the
Third.
S
In
order
for
there
to
be
one
agency
to
bring
it
to
Market,
and
it's
our
hope
it's
our
it's.
Our
recommendation,
that
that
be
the
Ura
specifically
because
of
their
ability
to
use
urban
Redevelopment
law
disposition
powers
to
have
some
control
over
the
ultimate
end
use
of
the
building,
which
would
strongly
preference,
affordable
housing
under
this
proposal
would
seek
applications
from
from
folks
who
want
to
redevelop
the
building
with
again
a
strong
preference
for
affordable
housing
in
the
hopes
that
it
can
be
rehabilitated
and
reconditioned
to
serve
as
a
residential
structure.
S
If,
if
there's
Market
appetite
for
that,
I
can
say
it's
probably
a
good
building
for
that
kind
of
conversion.
Given
its
age,
it
has
small
what
folks
in
the
design
Community
would
call
floor
plates,
meaning
that
it's
easier
to
break
into
multiple
units
than
a
1980s
open
floor
plan
office
tower.
So
we
think
this
is
the
most
prudent
responsible
way
to
dispose
of
what
is
presently
a
public
asset
that
we
don't
need
for
government
functions
anymore,
but
will
support
an
urgent
need
in
the
community
and
in
downtown.
M
Thank
you
for
that
explanation,
so
the
building
is
jointly
owned
by
the
city,
the
Ura
and
the
Housing
Authority
correct
I
named
that
correctly
right,
and
so
this
resolution
transfers
the
city
portion
of
the
ownership,
which
is
exactly
one-third
correct
to
the
array
for
one
dollar.
S
S
That's
what's
if
you
read,
even
in
the
title
contingent
upon
the
mayor
and
the
Director
of
Finance,
entering
a
cooperation
agreement
or
agreement
or
agreement.
S
Forth
the
rights
and
obligations
of
the
city
relating
to
these
initial
conveyances
and
setting
forth
and
further
setting
forth
rights
and
obligations
of
the
city
in
the
area
relating
to
subsequent
disposition.
So
so
when,
when
it
refers
to
subsequent
disposition
in
the
agreement
that
provides
for
the
way
in
which
I
I
I
take
your
point
that
it's
stated
somewhat
broadly
here.
S
M
Seems
to
be
the
theme
for
2023
director
that
well,
we
might
support
the
goals
of
the
resolution
that
were
presented,
that
we
don't
have
really
anything
binding
to
be
sure
that
what
we're
being
promised
and
what
we
support
is
actually
happening,
but
so
I'm
not
going
to
go
into
detail
today,
because
we
have
a
very
long
agenda
and
I've
I've
talked
to
enough
members
who
are
supportive
of
the
intent.
M
It
also
only
looks
to
me,
like
the,
whereas
Club
says
that
it
will
be
for
affordable
housing,
which
again
is
not
really
any
guarantee
that
you
will
execute
a
cooperation
agreement.
That
said
so
so,
just
that's
the
point
of
clarification.
M
I
also
will
move
on
to
say
that
I
have
I
think
it
may
be
an
ideological
position
that
we
should
not
be
giving
away
City
assets,
especially
a
significant
downtown
building,
and
that
we
could
keep
some
control
for
its
future.
I've
said
it
in
the
past
when
I
represented
the
Strip
District,
and
there
was
just
a
kind
of
like
hey,
we
can
get
money
for
these
six
different
facilities
that
the
city
owns
and
uses
in
the
Strip
District.
M
M
But
it's
in
the
assumption
that
the
vision
can
only
be
accomplished
by
the
private
Market
having
absolute
control
and
ownership
and
and
I
hear
this
a
lot
from
from
residents
and
I.
Think
the
next
generation
of
leaders
who
are
interested
in
public
policy
that
our
Reliance
on
the
private
Market
to
do
affordable
housing
has
been
insufficient
right.
M
Eventually,
those
deed
restrictions
ends
and
those
properties
revert
to
luxury,
Market
or
other
office
use,
and
we've
lost
a
significant
holding
of
affordability
and
again
I'm
not
going
to
belabor
the
point
today
and
I
think
that
most
members
are
supportive
of
the
sale,
but
I
would
encourage
us
to
at
least
consider
like
some
of
the
significant
property
holders
in
the
private
Market
in
the
city.
They
never
sell
the
land
under
those
buildings.
There
are
several
30
million
dollar
apartment
buildings
in
the
Strip
District
30
million
dollars.
M
They
spent
bill
building
the
building
and
they
don't
own
the
land
under
it.
They're
on,
like
they're
short
30-year
leases
to
the
bunch
of
the
company
right
and
so
I
think
we
can
take
a
lesson
here,
and
so,
while
we
don't
need
to
trust
the
private
markets
too,
I
think
it's
a
valid
tool.
The
city
has
used
when
it
sold
off
the
rights
to
the
produce
terminal.
That's
still
on
the
ground
lease,
unfortunately,
with
the
back
door.
Buyout
we
own
the
land
under
the
zoo.
M
The
zoo
routinely
raises
30
40
million
dollars
to
create
new
exhibits
and
has
a
significant
investment.
But
it's
on
a
fairly
short
ground
lease
to
the
city.
It's
City
prop
it's
the
people's
property.
I
said
I
wasn't
going
to
believe
with
the
point,
so
I
have
I.
Think
I've
made
the
point
and
I'll
I'll
concave.
Thank
you.
K
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman
two
councilwoman
gross's
coin.
I
would
love
to
see
us
as
a
city.
I
know
the
Ura
does
doesn't
want
to
purchase
a
property
and
manage
it,
but
when
we
have
a
40-year,
affordable
housing
requisite
when
we
post
out
on
something
so
we're
really
not
protecting
the
future.
I
mean
we're
yes,
40
years
we
will
all
be
gone,
I,
don't
know
about
gone
gone,
but
I'll
be
interested,
but
I'm
saying
you
know
so
so
we're
doing
great
work.
We're
requiring
these
properties
we're
putting
the
standard
of
40-year,
affordable
housing
on
it.
K
To
me,
it
just
seems
like
we
should
take
matters
in
our
own
hands,
meaning
even
with
200
rust
street.
So
we
can
protect
our
future.
You
don't
have
to
comment
on
it.
There
was
just
a
comment
I
wanted
to
make,
so
the
other
thing
was
200.
Broad
Street
was
depressing
25
years
ago.
I
would
have
to
go
in
that
building
for
a
permit,
so
I'm
so
glad
we
got
out
there
and
I
know
it
was
kind
of
a
split
decision
between
Council
and
More
in
favor,
because
it
passed
to
buy
was
it
you
said
412?
B
K
412.,
okay,
so
I
had
the
opportunity
to
tour,
at
least
through
the
Housing
Authority
as
being
their
three
fours
with
councilwoman
strasberger
and
I
went
over
and
took
a
little
tour.
K
Three
floors
right:
we
went
in
your
area,
we
just
were
at
the
Housing
Authority,
okay,
but
they're
up
and
running
it's
very
nice.
They
have
ample
space,
it's
not
depressing!
So,
yes,
you
know.
As
far
as
the
412
goes,
I
mean
that's
an
asset
and
that's
the
type
of
thing,
I
like
to
say
reverting
back
to
affordable
housing.
Where
we
are
landlords,
we
do
purchase
property.
We
manage
properties,
yeah.
S
Yeah
can
I
quickly
respond,
so
use
a
really
important
word,
which
is
asset,
but
what
I
would
say,
generally
speaking,
is
I,
don't
go
to
the
wider
conversation.
Don't
believe
that
the
sale
of
publicly
owned
properties
is
the
right
choice
in
all
circumstances
or
even
in
most
circumstances.
200
Broad
Street
at
this
point
is
a
liability
to
the
public.
For
the
reasons
you've
mentioned
it
has.
S
Second
I
I,
don't
disagree
with
you
or
others
in
the
slightest
that
that,
in
thinking
that
a
wider
array
of
tools
for
developing
and
maintaining
affordable
housing
and
maintaining
those
affordability
protections
for
as
long
as
possible
are
needed
and
in
fact
we're
investing
in
an
array
of
them
land
trusts
being
one
that
has
a
more
permanent
affordability
component
and
other
tools
that
are
similar.
S
The
40-year
number
really
comes
from
the
deed
restriction
required
in
a
low-income
housing,
tax
credit
or
lie
Tech
deal
structure
and
that's
a
parameter
set
not
by
us,
but
by
the
federal
government
right
and-
and
so
we
are
capable
of
making
these
Investments
through
the
tools
provided
to
us
by
others
outside
of
our
control
and
trying
to
maximize
the
way
in
which
that
produces
benefit,
while
adhering
to
their
their
rules.
Sure.
K
S
S
K
S
We're
certainly
going
to
give
it
away
right,
but
but
the
the
the
it
depends
on
what
there's
there's
a
spectrum
of
possibility
in
the
response
right,
that
a
response
could
have
a
significant
payment
to
the
owners
and
relatively
little
and
socially
beneficial
inclusion
in
the
in
the
building,
and
then
there
could
be
a
very
aggressive,
deeply
affordable
proposal.
That's
heavily
reliant
on
other
sources
of
funds.
That
would
probably
you
know
like
also
applying
for
state
and
federal
aid.
And
of
course
that's
going
to
mean
they
can't
afford
a
high
purchase
price.
K
I
I
would
just
suggest
if
we
get
any
lump
sum,
whether
it
be
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
or
two
million
dollars
from
our
third
partner
ownership
of
200
Ross,
that
that
should
be
applied
to
the
bond
in
order
to
recreate
the
increase
decrease.
Our
interest,
I
would
hope.
Is
that
something
that
you
would
do
as
a
practice
or
something.
E
K
S
I
could
offer
a
slightly
different
version
that
I
think
arrives
in
the
same
place.
One
of
the
things
I
would
think
we
could
consider
doing
is
retiring
whatever
our
highest
interest
rate
debt
is
at
that
time,
which
may
or
may
not
be
the
debt
on
four
one.
Four
one
two
right
we
might,
we
might
have
higher
interest
rate
debt
that
would
come
ahead
of
412
debt
retirement,
but
offsetting
offsetting
interest
costs.
They
understand
your
point.
Yeah.
P
I
A
lot
of
people
are
talking
about,
affordable
housing,
not
specific
to
this,
but
and
they're
saying
it
in
ways
that
I
think
are
counterproductive.
Again,
not
this
affordable,
housing,
there's
a
wide
variety
of
affordable
housing
needs
right.
It's
it's!
It's!
The
majority
of
affordable
housing
needs
are
single
mothers
with
children,
but
that's
not
the
only
affordable
housing
need.
We
have.
We
have
Workforce
Development
where
people
who
are
working,
but
you
know
some
of
this
people
were
in
the
in
the
chambers.
I
Yesterday
there
were
two
BJ
members
right,
some
of
them
who
are
cleaners
or
security
guards.
They
are
working
every
day,
but
their
income
is
so
low.
They
can't
afford
clean,
decent,
affordable
housing
as
we
move
the
city
toward
affordable
housing.
I
think
there's
two
principles:
I
want
at
least
suggest,
maybe
more
but
couple
principles,
and
this
is
really
for
the
the
general
audience
and
as
we
continue
I'll
re
restate
them.
I
I
You
put
affordable
housing
in
communities
at
risk
communities.
You
are
subjecting
them
to
probably
disintegration
in
30
years,
because
those
low
with
good
intentions,
we
build
projects
as
we're
redoing
them
in
the
hill.
Now
you
know,
as
I
grew
up
going
to
them
in
you
know
my
Summers.
They
were
good
ideas
right,
good
ideas,
Barrack
style
housing
people
got
nice
housing.
Then
they
turn
because
if
you
build
all
affordable
housing
in
concentrated
communities,
you
are
also
subjecting
those
families
to
later.
You
know:
poverty,
hopelessness,
crime,
it's
that's!
I
What's
going
to
happen
every
single
time,
so
you
have
to
do
it
in
Balance.
You
have
to
build
affordable
housing
with
market
rate.
Housing.
I
know
it's
not
popular
by
some
people,
because
they
just
don't
understand
and
you
know,
God
bless
them.
You
know
still
foolish,
but
God
bless
them.
You
know
you
have
to
build
it
in.
You
have
to
build
it
in
partnership
with
strong
communities
right,
affordable
housing
has
to
be
built
and
it
should
not
be
affordable.
It
should
be
mixed
income.
I
The
goal
is
always
now
whether
you
mix
it
by
by
project
or
you
mix
it
by
Community.
The
goal
is
mixed:
that's
I
grew
up
in
Homewood
1957
we
moved
here.
Homewood
was
a
mixed
income,
diverse
Community
right.
We
had
workers,
we
had
people
who
weren't
working.
We
had
people
who
were
working,
it
was
economically
mixed
and
it
was
strong
only
when
it
became
all
poor.
Did
it
disintegrate
you
can't
for
communities.
I
Lastly,
you
have
to
think
of
the
amenities
around
wherever
you're
pointing
affordable
housing,
because
if
you
buy
good,
you
know
we
have
a
crisis,
but
if
you
put
verbal
housing
in
some
desolate,
isolated,
Place,
With,
No
amenities,
you're,
also
not
helping
those
families
and
so
Ross
Street
would
probably
be
a
great
place
for
a
Workforce
Development
housing
right
for
those
people
who
are
working
every
day.
It's
probably
not
a
good
place
for
families.
I
It's
where
it's
at
around
the
corner,
from
the
jail
run
across
from
the
homeless,
shelter
I
wouldn't
want
to
put
families
in
that
building.
It's
a
bad
idea.
There's
no
stores,
there's
no
grocery
stores
near
it.
There's
it's
not
close
to
amenities.
There's
no
park
near
it
not
really,
and
so
you
know
I
so
when
we
say
we're
going
to
put
affordable
housing
there.
That
may
be
a
good
idea
if
it's
the
right
type
of
affordable
housing.
They
say
that
and
I
know.
I
You
know
all
this
stuff,
I'm
really
saying
this
for
the
public
and
for
when
I'm
gone.
We
have
to
start
thinking
about
this
comprehensively
and
strategically,
not
just
say
we're
going
to
be
affordable
housing,
because
if
you
don't
do
it
correctly,
you
really
are
not
in
20
in
the
Next
Generation
20
30
years
those
families
will
be
in
the
After,
the
Glitter
rears
off.
You
know
those
new
houses,
because
it's
going
to
go
through
some
some
some
trauma
20
30
years.
I
Those
families
were
the
descendants
of
those
families
will
be
in
the
same
place
or
worse
than
before.
You
build
the
house,
and
so
it's
not
a
building.
Affordable
housing,
not
a
Magic
Bullet.
It
has
to
be
done
with
a
certain
amount
of
skill
and
planning
and
sophistication
in
order
not
to
build
the
houses.
That's
not
our
goal.
I
didn't
build
housing
to
build
houses,
I,
don't
build
parks
and
build
Parks
I.
I
Don't
care
about
that
I
care
about
the
lives
of
the
families
who
are
going
to
live
in
those
properties
in
the
lives
of
the
children,
we're
going
to
use
the
parks
we
have
to
do
it
smarter.
We
have
to
do
it
in
a
in
a
coordinated
way
or
also
he
doesn't
get
done,
I'm
talking
about
them
all
right,
that's
it,
but
I
I'll
support
this
certainly
support
this.
This.
S
A
C
M
Motion
to
perfect
discussion.
Second,
thank
you.
Members.
We
talked
I
think
a
little
bit
about
this
last
week,
so
we
took
the
position
out
of
the
food
Justice
fund
plan
that
was
funded
for
five
years.
This
is
just
a
partial
funding
for
the
remainder
of
2023
and
we
look
forward
to
moving
more
money
to
fully
fund
the
position
moving
forward.
So
we
can
get
that
money
out
the
door
add
a
little
more
capacity
at
parks
and
rec,
because
we're
I
am
personally
enthusiastic
about
the
workshop.
R
She
needs
an
entire
team
to
be
honest
with
you,
so,
but
we
we
have
the
administration,
109
positions,
so
I
wanted
to
make
sure
we
weren't
adding
to
the
budget,
because
I
don't
want
to
end
up
back
in
after
27
I'm
trying
to
be
a
little
bit
more
responsible
with
our
daughters
and
we'll
continue
to
use
money
in
ways
that
aren't
really
helping
our
departments.
You
know
carry
out
the
jobs,
we're
expecting
them
to
do.
I'm
sure.
If
you
ask
imp,
they
could
probably
use
millions
and
millions
of
more
dollars
having
these
issues
with
Michael.
R
R
We
could
do
other
than
diverting
money
from
our
departments
and
from
things
we're
doing,
but
for
this
particular
thing,
I
think
that
it's
it's
going
be
helpful
not
only
for
director
Vargas
to
have
someone
to
get
the
forms
up
and
running
and
to
get
the
programs
up
and
running
and
some
of
the
things
we
really
care
about
a
good
way
to
also
engage
kids
and
young
people
in
this
whole
process.
So
it
would
just
be
another
different
type
of
activity
for
city
folks
and
one.
A
I
P
I
1711.
you're
doing
those
are
the
Articles
they're,
not
on
your
agenda,
but
in
order
to
in
order
for
us
to
dispose
of
them
before
recess,
we
have
to
bring
them
up
today
so
that
we
can
finally
bring
them
back
before
recess.
I
think
there's
an
email
that
went
out
to
you
explain
this
process,
and
so
it's
working
with
the
administration.
It's
about,
has
a
lot
to
do
with
the
notice
and
the
Post-Gazette
not
being
happy
to
having
to.
I
A
I
Motion
to
reconsider
motion
away
the
rules
of
council.
I
A
President,
so
we
did
receive
America,
so
we
did
receive
an
affirmative
action
so
that
will
now
move
us
on
to
our
invoices
motion
to
approve
the
invoices.
A
O
A
A
A
K
K
L
W
Thank
you
for
having
me
thank
you
for
having
us
I'm,
Camila
I'm,
the
assistant
director
for
the
office
of
community
health
and
safety.
W
Most
of
it,
80
is
going
to
be
used
to
do
harm
reduction
trainings
for
our
ppv
shown
to
policemen.
Also
people
who
are
part
of
the
downtown
trust,
particularly
the
ambassadors,
that
the
city
also
works
with
and
security
private
security,
but
are
constantly
engaging
with
the
police
and
calling
9-1-1
and
we're
also
going
to
include
Outreach
workers
who
are
working
with
unhealth
populations,
people
with
substance
use
and
people
who
are
experiencing
extreme
poverty.
W
And
then
the
other
part
of
the
funding
is
going
to
go
particularly
to
religious
leaders,
community
members
and
they're
going
to
be
trained
in
first
aid.
Mental
health,
CPR
trauma
and
Trauma.
T
M
W
For
the
fund
so
yeah,
the
funding
was
provided
to
us,
while
previous
leadership
in
the
office
to
develop
a
Neighborhood
Academy
for
First
Responders,
but
it
never
really
came
to
fruition.
So
we
decided
to
Pivot
and
because
exactly
what
you've
been
saying,
we've
been
getting
a
lot
of
questions
from
business
owners
who
are
going
to
be
their
important
stakeholders
on
how
to
really
de-escalate
and
and
talk
about
these
issues,
especially
with
overdose.
W
And
so
we
pivoted,
because
we
had
done
a
focus
group
with
police
and
we
were
very
strategic
in
picking
police
from
every
Zone
and
police,
who
were
a
little
bit
more
skeptical
of
this
type
of
training.
And
after
the
training
happened,
they
were
very
supportive
and
this
is
going
to
serve
as
a
foundational
training
for
all
these
important
stakeholders
to
understand
how
to
address
particular
issues
that
we're
seeing
of
Overdose
continuing
overdose
and
some
of
also
mental
and
behavioral
health
challenges
that
we're
seeing
so
we're
hoping.
W
M
It
feels
like
we're
getting
like
parts
of
a
support
network
in
place
and
I'm
grateful
that
we're
moving
forward
with
the
training
for
our
own
Public
Safety
employees
and
I-
think
I
heard
downtown
ambassadors
and
Outreach
workers.
The
last
summer.
We
really
heard
from
the
front
line
people
who
are
not
city,
employees
or
who
are
not
in
an
official
role
as
an
Outreach
broker,
which
are
those
Frontline
workers
that
are
retail
workers,
that
are,
you
know,
Cafe
workers
even
grocery
store
workers.
M
That
was
seeing
quite
a
bit
of
concern
about
the
impact
of
you
know
grocery
stores
kind
of
becoming
a
place
where
people
are
looking
for
best
rooms.
M
Looking
you
know,
kind
of
coming
inside
away
from
the
Heat
or
inside
away
from
the
cold
in
the
winter,
and
so
I
passed
a
resolution
asking
the
administration
to
work.
Also
on
trainings
for
the
Frontline
workers,
we've
been
patient.
We
were
hoping
to
have
one
this
summer.
We
understand,
there's
been
some
Personnel
turnover
and
I,
but
I
don't
want
it
to
get
lost
because
I
feel,
like
you,
really
have
put
a
lot
of
this
capacity
in
place
so
that
we
can
have
those
screenings.
So
can
I
hear
a
little
bit
about
that.
T
The
in
public
safety,
the
nighttime
economy
group,
okay,
has
been
requested
by
several
of
the
the
city,
employees
and
hotels,
and
you
know,
staff
just
as
you're
describing
but.
M
M
T
Of
the
things
that
we're
planning
to
to
start
to
do
is
to
start
with
a
de-escalation
course
that
would
be
very
just
sort
of
basic
information
about
how
do
you,
if
possible,
talk
with
somebody
who's
starting
to
become
upset
and
escalated,
and
so
to
use
some
of
those
skills,
such
as
use
of
self
with
voice
body?
You
know
posture
trying
to
help
people
to
learn
those
skills
so
that
they
can
kind
of
calm
someone
down
early
on.
T
M
Which
is
great
and
I'm
glad
our
police
officers
are
getting
that
training,
but
we
I'll
just
how
about.
If
I
share
with
you,
the
resolution
that
we
passed,
the
council
voted
on
and
passed
that
we
haven't
seen
any
action
on
who
speaks
to
also
being
able
to
connect
people
with
referral
networks?
Sometimes
they're,
not
behavioral.
It's
not
that
they're.
M
You
know
causing
a
problem
to
other
people,
but
they
still
need
help
right,
and
so
it
isn't
only
de-escalation
training
that
is
going
to
help
fill
the
gap
or
help
the
Frontline
worker
do
their
jobs
and
attend
to
to.
You
know
the
rest
of
the
public.
So
why
don't?
We
start
there
and
we'll
Circle
back
around
with
Public,
Safety
and
I
think
the
mayor's
office
and
kind
of
seeing
where
what
is
the
status
of
how
we
can
launch
a
program
that
reaches
outside
of
our
own
employees
to
employees
our
private
businesses,
so.
X
I
appreciate
it
respectfully
what
she's
addressing
it
is
not
for
police.
It's
for
business
owners
things
into
so
this.
These
are
two
different
things
that
she's
addressing
right
here.
This
also
is
going
to
have
so
I
work,
downtown
I'm,
the
co-response
sergeant
in
downtown
I've
been
watching
the
businesses
that
are
the
highest
amount
of
calling
that
seem
to
have
the
most
needs,
and
we
have
all
intentions
on
inviting
employees
from
there
as
well.
X
M
W
Are
just
owners
or
owners
and
they
send
their
designates
just
to
start
because
we're
the
trainings
have
a
limit
of
30
to
35
people
just
because
there's
two
people
doing
the
training,
so
we
expanded
how
many
sessions
we're
going
to
have
and
then,
with
the
support
of
Stockton
Farm,
we
look
to
increase
that
and
for
business
workers.
Our
diversion
program
we're
going
to
do
some
training
with
them.
W
This
particular
training
is
look
to
start
like
the
foundational
training,
and
then
we
can
get
more
specific
to
help
out
the
people
who
are
working
in
retail,
specifically
right.
M
X
R
I
just
want
to
ask:
are
you
seeing
an
improvement
in
downtown?
Yes,
so
we
hear
a
lot
of
horrific
things
and
there
are
terrific
things,
especially
if
you
know
the
incident
we
just
heard,
and
you
know
our
thoughts
are
with
the
family
and
everyone
who's
affected
by
them,
but
I'm
just
kidding
I'm
just
curious
as
to
what
you're
seeing
any
changes
any
improvements.
If
so,
where?
What
do
you
saying.
R
X
Right
so
a
lot
of
things
had
to
be
set
up
in
place
to
actually
really
Drive
change
like
it's.
You
know
every
entity
has
kind
of
tried
their
own
thing
and
there's
never
been
a
real,
concerted
effort
within
the
space.
You
know
between
Public
Safety,
between
mental
Behavioral,
Health
and
all
of
the
other
systems,
business
owners
where
everybody
works
together.
So
a
lot
of
time
was
spent
kind
of
setting
up
that
space.
M
X
A
X
We
spent
a
lot
of
time
kind
of
setting
up
the
the
relationships
relationship
building
amongst
the
different
entities,
and
some
of
them
maybe
didn't
always
work
well
together.
So
it
was
a
lot
of
that
laying
the
groundwork
so
now
that
we're
into
zone
two
we
meet
every
day
with
different
entities.
We
talk
about.
You
know
people
downtown
how
to
help.
So
it's
very
new
and
in
its
infancy
on
that.
It's.
W
Going
well
but
yeah
I
would
say
one
of
the
major
successes
for
the
first
time
there
is
a
crisis
intervention
team,
that's
County
and
City,
so
the
city
and
the
county
never
collaborated.
So,
as
you
all
know,
DHS
owns
all
these
services
that
we
need
to
provide
to
the
most
complex
cases
and
we
were
basically
operating
like
completely
independent
individuals.
So,
for
the
first
time
there
is
a
crisis
intervention
team
that
we've
worked
with
the
ppb
and
Zone
2,
particularly
downtown
to
create
a
list
of
the
most
complex
and
intense
cases.
W
So
the
people
they're
constantly
engaging
the
people,
they're
arresting
the
people
that
they
cycle
in
the
criminal
legal
system,
and
so
what
this
has
created
is
all
these
Outreach
workers
that
are
City,
County
and
non-profits
and
Ng
videos
are
working
together
to
provide
more
services.
So,
for
example,
like
two
weeks
ago,
we
were
able
to
reunite
a
person
that
had
been
living
in
the
streets
for
10
years
with
their
family
and
provide
support
and
who
was
one
of
the
highest
utilizers
of
resources
downtown.
W
So
we're
doing
that,
but
because
these
cases
are
so
complex,
it
takes
a
lot
of
relationship,
building
and
trust,
and
now
that
we're
going
to
have
hopefully
a
policy
that
strategizes
on
how
to
work
with
on
house
populations
and
collaboration
with
roots
and
bridges,
to
Mountain
we're
able
to
provide
a
more
service
referral
and
because
we're
at
the
table
with
DHS,
particularly
Jen
batterman
and
Aaron
Dalton.
We
also
can
put
pressure
saying
well.
These
are
all
the
services
that
we
need.
W
R
T
T
R
So
I
talked
to
the
director
today
and
he's
always
really
helpful,
but
I
talked
to
him
today
about
that
they're,
still,
not
an
agreement
sign
and
there's
five
million
sitting
on
the
table
and
with
Ahn.
So
you
know:
I
had
a
conversation
with
him.
I
felt
a
little
bit
more
comfortable,
but
maybe
they're
going
to
be
moving
towards
that.
But
I
think
that
if
it's
not
something's
not
done
with
it,
but
it
won't
be
a
next
year's
budget.
I
mean
I'm.
R
R
My
understanding
and
I
talked
to
the
director
about
it
today
and
I
don't
want
to
talk
to
the
table,
but
it's
my
understanding
that
there's
also
some
concerns
as
to
where
you
get
referrals
for
people
and
that
council
is
known
on
that
list,
and
so
it's
a
conversation.
I
have
the
director
on
that
list.
We
which
are
OT
so
you
know
it's
either
we
work
together
or
we're
going
to
work.
T
R
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
either
going
to
work
together
or
not
yeah.
We
can't
work
inside
this
is
that
our
region
needs
us
all
to
do
this,
but
I
do
thank
you
for
your
work.
I
think
it's
a
really
challenging
challenging
world
out
there
right
now,
and
these
are
some
really
challenging
issues,
especially
in
what
you're
seeing
in
downtown
but
I'm,
also
seeing
them
spread
within
our
communities.
And
you
know
it's
like
we're
in
Birch
talk
about
helping
one
place
and
not
helping
all
everything
around
it.
R
It's
like
an
island
if
you're
helping
the
island
sooner
or
later,
everyone
is
going
to
affect
it
and
that's
the
same
thing
as
housing.
It's
the
same
thing
with
mental
health.
It's
the
same
thing
about
themselves.
We
have
to
work
with
our
with
our
partners
on
the
county
level
too,
because
it
might
just
move
forward
in
the
most
boroughs,
so
it
happens
in
the
key
blocks,
happens
and
aspirin
happens
here,
a
lot
of
times.
R
People
focus
on
sharing
and
forget
that
there's
excellent
in
between
and
that
they
have
a
lot
of
need
as
well,
so
I
think.
It's
remembering
all
those
neighborhoods
and
during
the
camp
in
downtown,
but
also
spreading
that
across
because
I
don't
see
a
lot
of
responses.
T
If
I
could
just
say
that
we
have
three
programs
Under,
the
Umbrella
co-response
is
just
one
of
the
programs
where
the
social
workers
are
working.
We
also
have
a
program
called
pins.
Where
we
are,
we
are
in
all
the
zip
codes.
We
received
the
referrals
from
First
Responders
and
from
we've
gotten
some
from
Council
and
those
those
aren't
immediate
response.
But
those
are
social
workers
going
out
and
following
up
with
a
with
the
liaison
and
Sergeant
Bristow
could
speak
more
to.
W
We
have
received
referrals
from
Council.
Just
the
person
in
needs
are
so
inundated
by
our
ppb
because,
of
course,
of
Manpower
and
EMS
and
fire,
but
I.
We
are
actually
working
to
develop
a
process
where
the
social
worker
that's
going
to
be
working
with.
You
all,
can
get
support
and
referrals
through
our
office.
R
R
Obviously
in
distressed
meetings,
I
asked
if
they
needed
something
they
needed
something
to
eat,
help
with
that
help
get
something
to
drink,
but
I
thought
they
didn't
need
9-1-1,
but
they
needed
something
and
they
needed
something
to
me
because
after
hours,
I
didn't
know
who
to
call
until
I
knew
we
did
okay,
but
there
should
be
a
number
that
we
could
call
this
non-emergency,
not
the
police.
I
know
we
have
the
non-police
emergency
numbers,
but
something
that's
not
the
least
like,
but
like
hey.
This
person
is
in
District.
R
They
need
something
to
eat,
they
need
medicine
for
something
wrong
or
something
you
can't.
We
just
want
somebody
so
is
there
I
mean
like
not
211,
because.
R
R
T
R
X
Yeah,
this
is
actually
something
we're
modeling,
where
we
were
building
this
up
to
try
to
help
that
we
had
talked
about
resolve
being
county-wide
is
too
big
right.
It's
too
hard.
It
takes
too
long
for
everyone
to
get
there,
so
we're
trying
a
pilot
right
now
of
resolve
being
embedded
in
your
neighborhood,
so
right
now
in
downtown.
Yes,
it's
there
in
2ac
right
now,
that's
where
they
deploy
from
there.
So
our
officers
have
been
seeing
a
response
within
10
to
15
minutes
when
they
call
results.
R
Problem
in
the
city-
and
it
is
so
used
to
tackle
and
I,
see
just
four
people
sitting
here
and
I
know:
there's
a
team
of
people,
but
it's
really
I
think
it's
so
much
more
than
what
we
can
handle
as
a
city.
I
think
we
absolutely
and
I'm
glad
to
hear
more
about
the
county
publicly.
Absolutely
need
that,
but
I
want
people
to
know
that
you
know
we
are
working
on
things
and
that
I
really
do
think
a
number
that
would
help
council
members
or
anybody
in
the
community.
T
R
Charlotte
Street
Greenview
Avenue
a
lot
of
course,
and
when
I
go
up
there,
there
are
a
lot
of
people
in
distress.
Somebody
they're
just
choosing
to
hang
out
and
choosing
to
do
whatever
they're
doing
and
their
families
ask
for
that.
All
the
time
so
I
can
go
on
for
the
subject.
I
know
that
I'm
getting
off
of
the
initial
bill
and
all
the
things
that
people
are
so
I
apologize
because
it's
just
when
you
come
to
the
table.
R
A
A
A
C
R
C
R
B
L
H
C
L
L
J
J
L
So
this
is
a
big
project
going
online.
Just
wanted
to
have
you,
you
know
talk
about
in
a
short
brief
description.
V
What's
going
on
here,
so
this
is
a
Liberty
Avenue.
This
is
from
downtown
like
from
Grant
Street,
all
the
way
to
28th
Street
bridge
and
what
it
is
is
going
to
be
a
kind
of
like
a
road
diet.
It's
going
to
put
four
lanes
into
two
lanes
and
the
reason
why
we're
here
today
is
to
get
right
away
to
secure
right
away.
So
we
add
new
traffic
polls
and
also
bus
stops
and
add
sidewalks
to
the
project.
So
it's
more
pedestrian
friendly
for
everybody.
Great,
because.
V
V
L
Okay,
and
can
you
just
go
through
the
type
of
Outreach
that
was
done
to
make
this
happen.
V
L
L
R
Y
R
K
Y
So
this
is
the
one
in
Garfield
and
friendship,
so
yeah.
U
Y
M
And
so
everyone
underground
isn't
very
far,
I
mean
at
one
point.
This
was
supposed
to
go
all
the
way
into
I
mean
like
years
ago,
right
15,
20
years
ago.
It
was
supposed
to
go
all
the
way
in
the
middle
of
East
Liberty,
and
then
it
was
like.
Oh
we're
only
going
to
go
to
Negley
and
Penn,
and
now
so
is
there
a
phase
three
or
is
phase
two
just
stopping
at
Grand.
Y
I
mean
we,
we
have
phase
three,
we
don't
have
funding
for
it.
Yet.
M
Got
it
got
it
got
it
okay,
yeah
so
I
mean
eventually
it
has
to
be
done.
Yeah,
it's
just
that
now,
there's
multiple
phases
and
not
just
like
one
huge
phase,
one
and
not
one
huge
phase,
two
so
that
that
totally
makes
sense.
Okay
and
I
know
that
we
there
have
been
many
many
many
public
meetings
and
so
I'll
just
make
sure
to
relay.
If
there's
any
concerns
that
I
get
from
the
neighborhood
appreciate
it.
Thank
you
thank.
C
Bill
1743
ordinance
emitting
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
Public
ordinances,
title
IV,
public
places
and
property
article
one
public,
right-of-way,
chapter
473
kg
protection
by
inclusion
of
the
new
section,
41708
sidewalk
and
curve
repair
program
to
authorize
the
directors
of
the
Department
of
mobility
and
infrastructure
and
the
Department
of
Public
Work
to
develop
and
Implement
a
program
to
provide
options
and
incentives
for
property
owner
Staff.
Law
prepare
and
maintenance
in
lieu
of
prosecution.
J
I
I
don't
think
we
would
do
this
Justice
to
have
a
conversation,
but
perhaps
after
we've
returned
from
Recess
I
would
be
happy
to
schedule
a
prepaid
for
council
members
so
that
they
could
firsthand
witness
the
amount
of
services.
J
J
Y
Sure
so
you
know,
as
you
know,
maintaining
sidewalks
and
curves
are
the
responsibility
of
the
Jason
Property
Owners
by
Statute.
Obviously
there
are
many
folks
who
that's
a
challenge
for
them,
either
due
to
financial
reasons
or
just
just
getting
a
contractor.
That
takes
time
it
takes
effort.
Y
Y
This
is
a
a
pilot
program
where
the
city
using
our
staff,
would
go
out
and
be
a.
We
would
approach
property
owners
in
targeted
locations
say.
Would
you
like
to
participate
in
this
program?
If
they
agree,
we
the
city,
would
go
and
replace
our
sidewalk
at
our
costs
and
then
there
would
be
a
reimbursement
for
our
actual
costs.
For
that
we
are
proposing
to
have
a
sliding
scale
reimbursement
for
owner
occupied
properties
where
at
lower
income
levels,
you
would
not
have
to
pay
the
full
cost
of
the
sidewalk
at
higher
income
levels.
Y
You
would
pay
the
full
cost
that
it's
costing
the
city
to
do
the
work,
and
you
know
this
is
a
a
pilot
program.
So
we
have
two
areas
that
we're
targeting
to
see
how
it
works
to
see
how
this
works,
with
with
you
know,
getting
the
public
to
buy
into
a
program
like
this.
How
many
areas
I
believe
we
have
two
areas.
Y
So
there
is
one
area
that
I
believe
is
in
Spring
Hill
that
we
were
investigating
further
and
there
were
some
complications
with
some
retaining
walls
along
the
sidewalk
and
I.
Think
we're
going
to
pull
it
out
of
this
as
a
pilot
and
perhaps
just
try
to
do
it
ourselves
because
of
some
of
the
complications
with
the
retaining
wall.
We
thought
it'd
be
too
complex.
Y
Y
Pulled
it
out
of
the
program,
I
believe
it's
up
by
the
school
up
there:
okay.
A
M
Thank
you,
I
think
I
love
the
concept
of
this
program,
so
I'm
really
excited
to
see
it
and
but
I'm.
Also
supportive
of
members
who
you
know
who's,
have
the
pilot
in
there
districts
wanting
to
hold
to
make
sure
you've
got
the
right
targeting
or
whatever
it
is,
and
so
I'm
supportive
of
both
things,
but
the
I.
If,
if
I
think
most
of
us
have
had
constituents
faced
with
a
a
citation
from
the
city
forcing
them
to
replace
their
entire
sidewalk
and
some
of
those
constituents
cannot
afford
it
and
but
it's
random.
M
Currently
it's
just
random.
If
someone
calls
in
a
3-1-1
on
you,
you
get
the
citation
and
if
someone
doesn't
call
in
a
3-1-1
on
you,
you
don't
even
if
the
person
the
first
person
sidewalk,
is
barely
out
of
compliance
and
it's
something
like
an
inch
lick
right
and
I
understand
that
we
want
to
be
ADA
Compliant.
But
we
know
that
there
are.
You
know
sidewalks
out
there
that
have
six
12-inch
Buckles
in
them
right
and
there
is.
There
is
a
matter
I
think
of
the
city.
M
M
A
lot
of
you
know
we're
going
to
learn
something
from
this
pilot
projects,
we're
going
to
learn
to
see
what
we
can
do
and
what
we
can't
do
on
whatever
limits,
and
how
do
we
do
this
fairly
and
I'm
sure
there's
lots
and
lots
of
new
ones
here
that
I'm
definitely
eager
to
participate
in
the
discussion,
so
I'm
fully
supportive
of
members
wanting
to
hold
it
to
figure
out
more
about
the
project.
Absolutely.
Thank
you.
R
If
we're
not
going
to
take
care,
we're
not
taking
care
of
the
our
infrastructure,
we're
not
taking
your
mental
health
issues
in
the
potassium
that
we've
really
love
to
be
able
to,
and
there's
a
lot
of
issues
across
this
making
it
difficult
challenging
to
live
in
the
city
sidewalks.
If
you're,
disabled
or
one
of
the
hugest
things
in
our
city,
we
I've
seen
sidewalks,
where
there's
any
handicap
ramp
and
Ada
accessible
ramp,
leading
to
a
crumbling.
R
It's
like
the
waste
of
money
and
time
has
been
unbelievable.
So
I
would
really
like
to
make
a
motion
to
hold
for
one
week
until
we
can
get
this
right
and
have
a
conversation
about
what
we
need
to
do
better.
But
I
am
glad
you're.
Thinking
of
this
way,
I'm
glad
that
you're
starting
to
talk
about
it
and
ways
that
we
can
do
things.
But
we
also
just
moved
a
lot
of
money,
we're
talking
about
moving
on
back
to
Harper
funds
to
the
Ura.
A
A
O
Yeah
so
I
do
want
to
say,
I,
agree
with
council
president
well
and
and
I
applaud
the
effort
here.
I
don't
want
to.
You
know
that
I'm
glad
that
you're
looking
at
sidewalks
and
trying
to
figure
out
a
way
to
make
it
easier
for
residents.
That
said,.
O
A
O
This
sort
of
economy
of
scale,
so
I
really
do
think
that
we
need
to
as
as
much
as
I
applaud
this
effort,
we
need
to
be
looking
at
a
more
comprehensive
solution
to
fixing
our
sidewalks
city-wide,
which
I
I
personally
feel
lies
in
having
a
sidewalk
fun.
So
we
are
responsible
for
all
of
our
sidewalks
and
that
to
to
kick
off
how
we
might
fund
that
fund,
I
would
say
just
blanket.
You
know,
citing
every
single
car,
that's
parked
on
sidewalks
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh.
O
I
know
you
know,
but
you
know
that's
the
reality
and
of
course
there
are
streets
that
are
very
narrow.
Where
and
and
you
know
that
would
be
something
for
Domi
to
address
like
how
we
deal
with
the
streets
where
they're,
where
you
really
do-
have
no
choice
but
to
park
on
the
sidewalk.
O
With
you
know,
with
the
respect
they
deserve
they're,
expensive,
and
you
know
we
shouldn't
be
parking
on
them
blocking
them.
A
K
Okay,
thank
you.
You
know
I
completely
agree
with
you.
Councilman
Warwick,
yeah
I've
heard
you
talk
about
this
in
the
past.
I
I
wish
that
we
would
take
on
our
side
books
across
the
city
and
I
know
it's
a
major
price
tag
on
that,
but
and
I
know,
there's
complications
like,
as
you
said,
skinny
little
streets
they
Park
on.
You
know
both
sides
and
the
real
issue.
Is
emergency
vehicles
being
able
to
get
down
that
street?
K
Well,
they're,
not
parking
on
the
sidewalk,
so
it's
kind
of
too
tight
and
a
lot
of
streets
in
my
own
District
I.
Imagine
across
the
city.
So
let
me
ask
you
this:
if,
if
somebody
takes
a
spill
or
trips
on
a
sidewalk
and
accumulates
multiple
damages,
who
is
responsible
in
court,
is
it
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
or
is
it
the
homeowner
I
know
we're
responsible
for
maintaining
and
taking
care
of
our
sidewalk?
But
when
it
comes
to
legal
action,
who's
responsible.
Y
I
mean
at
this
time
I
believe
that
each
each
sidewalk
is
the
responsibility
of
the
adjacent
property
owner,
whether
that
be
a
person,
whether
it
be
the
city
that
person's
responsible
for
building
maintaining
replacing
the
sidewalk.
So
if
there
was
a
liability
concern
that
would
also
fall
back
to
that
person.
K
It's
I
know:
there's
there
has
to
be
multiple
cases
of
this,
so
it
always
comes
back
to
the
homeowner
who
doesn't
own
the
sitting
book.
K
Y
K
K
K
So,
okay,
that's
really
it!
Thank
you
here
you
go.
K
A
But
to
sort
of
councilman
gross
is
comment
around
how
we
arbitrary
and
force
all
of
this,
but
based
upon
3-1-1
calls
a
pet
peeve
of
mine
is
also
how
we
sort
of
arbitrarily
enforce
whether
or
not
we're
going
to
find
someone
for
parking
on
sidewalks
I've
seen
in
parts
of
my
district,
where
people
Park
on
sidewalks,
sometimes
three-in-one
complaints
will
come
in
because
you're
forcing
people
into
the
street.
However,
over
after
years
of
parking
on
sidewalks,
they
collapsed
the
sidewalk
they
get.
A
The
calls
come
in
complaining,
so
we
come
to
remove
the
cars
off
of
the
sidewalk,
and
then
we
find
the
homeowner
and
say
repair
these
sidewalks.
Otherwise
you
got
to
go
to
court.
So
again
it
is
sort
of
an
arbitrary
system
based
upon
the
reporting
of
it.
I
do
have
one
question,
I
think
I
know
the
answer
sewers
that
are
a
part
of
the
sidewalks
that
still
falls
on
the
property
owner
in
front
of
that
sewer,
correct,
we'll
up
to
the
lateral
okay.
A
P
A
J
Members
respectfully,
if
we
could
please
pass
the
bill
today
and
put
discussion
and
a
briefing
for
members
off
until
we
come
back
from
races.
Members
are
intent
on
having
discussion
today,
then
I
would
like
to
offer
this
stuff.
I
am
still
going
to
ask
for
us
to
pass
the
Bill
and
the
Bill
calls
us
specifically
for
Public
Works
to
develop
a
program
and
I
do
believe.
The
council
needs
to
have
input
on
the
development
of
that
program.
J
Of
course,
the
walls
would
look
bad.
She
should
have
to
paint
them,
but
if
she
painted
the
wall,
she
had
to
take
the
curtains
towel
and
wash
them,
and
if
she
did
should
have
to
wash
the
window
and
the
law
of
the
story
is
we
do
the
next
right
thing,
that's
in
front
of
us
and
that
perfect
is
the
enemy
of
the
hood
and
putting
anything
off
until
we
have
a
complete
holistic
strategy
by
which
we
address
every
sidewalk
in
the
city
does
no
one
any
good
at
all.
J
This
is
a
good
piece
of
legislation
where
it
Mobility
infrastructure
are
gonna,
try
to
put
together
a
better
way
to
assist
people
with
repair
sidewalk,
as
opposed
to
Prosecuting
someone
for
non-proparity.
That's
a
that's
a
good
discussion.
This
is
the
first
step
out
that
discussion.
So
ask
members
again
if
we
could
just
Place
past
this
move
on
the
agenda.
There
are
21
remaining
bills
for
consideration
on
today's
agenda,
and
then
we
will
have
a
I
promise.
J
A
wholesome
discussion
as
it
relates
to
this
bill
when
we
return
from
Recess
holding
this
one
week
puts
this
off
until
September.
We
don't
have
another
opportunity
to
consider
before
those
are
my
remarks.
Thank
you.
A
A
Bothered
by
the
by
the
disrespect
from
the
chairman
of
the
community.
L
A
K
R
You
reconsidering
so
withdraw
my
motion
to
hold
it,
but
I'm
going
to
say
this.
Councilman
Crossman
is
your
District.
We
make
sure
we
give
you
that
that
respect
and
authority
to
just
determine
what
you
want
in
your
District
when
it's
in
our
district,
like
this
one,
isn't
mine,
which
I'm
not
really
thrilled
that
they're,
including
a
lot
of
places
and
a
lot
of
parcels
that
are
landlords
who
own
the
properties,
not
homeowners,
that
live
there
that
are
struggling
in
my
district.
N
R
There
are
plenty
of
them,
I'm
I'm,
asking
for
a
real
conversation
about
how
we
can
actually
truly
help
people
in
my
district
and
not
ignore
places
like
Aspen,
because
there's
not
a
large
population
of
votes
there,
but
that
are
a
great
tremendous
amount
of
need
here.
So
sometimes
it's
all
that
respect
goes
two
ways:
I'll
withdraw
my
version.
A
Y
Yes,
so
we
have
two
two
locations
in
our
pilot:
one
is
North
radic
Avenue
from
Kelly
Street
to
Felicia
way.
The
other
one
is
Zephyr
Avenue
from
Sherwood
to
Mint.
What.
Y
So
our
goal
is
to
do
a
complete
sidewalk.
You
know
from
end
to
end
so
that
we're
getting
that
that
good
walking
path
over
that
entire
stretch,
certainly
beside
what
was
in
perfect
shape.
We
would
not
replace
it
for
no
reason,
but,
yes,
we
would
approach
all
the
potentially
all
the
properties
along
that
stretch.
Y
O
O
Y
Y
Also
from
our
own
crew
standpoint.
We
do
need
some
continuity
for
efficiency
of
of
placing
the
concrete.
We
can't
do
this
and
that
and
this
one
over
here
and
that
one
over
there.
Y
O
A
A
Any
will
any
other
votes
be
needed
to
for
this
project.
Will
this
come
back
before
Council
any
other
party
any
other
time.
A
Okay,
I'm
asking
for
clarity
because
I
understand
councilman
process
wish
to
move
this
forward,
but
if
the
two
affected
members
or
have
concerns
and
want
to
spend
time
working
with
you
all
to
get
this
right,
I
think
that's
also
respect
that's
necessary.
So
that's
why
I
was
looking
for
my
own
Clarity
councilman.
Y
I
mean
just
under
under
current
under
current
regulations.
If
their
sidewalks
are
out
of
compliance,
they
could
be
sided.
O
P
Y
L
What's
the
percent
for
that
the
city
would
pay
for
for
the
lowest
income
bracket,
so.
Y
What
we
have
proposed
is
for
a
household
that
is
at
50
of
the
Ami
area,
mean
income
median
income.
If
there
are
50
or
lower,
we
would
they
would
pay
25
of
the
cost
of
the
work
and
that
could
be
paid
if
desired
over
a
period
of
five
years.
L
L
A
R
Just
want
to
say
quickly,
so,
if
you're
able
to
improve
those
property
owners
and
more
speak
to
you,
imagine
because
a
lot
of
them
were
2002
citations
already,
and
so
my
concern
is
that
your
chemical
program,
it
and
yet
you're,
saying
you're
going
to
do
the
entire
section.
So
the
entire
block,
correct.
R
R
Leave
them
like
we
do
now
and
we
don't
collect,
we
don't
collect
them
now,
but
we're
going
to
distilled
with
it
just
happens
if
we're
going
to
do
for
actually
need
help.
That's
what
I'm
trying
to
say
there
are
people
that
are
passion
is
helping
actually
want
to
see
some
things
done
with
our
side.
I
actually
love
the
idea
of
putting
sideways
I
love,
the
idea
of
fixing
Cycles
across
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
because
it's
our
responsibility,
but
so
with
that
said,
I'll
have
the
conversation
continue
to
have
a
conversation
with
your
life.
A
K
C
1745
resolution
granting
and
to
Stella
Property
Group
LLC,
gives
successors
and
assigned
the
privilege
and
license
to
construct,
maintain
the
use
of
their
own
costs
and
expense
at
Dollar
park
at
6314,
Broad
Street
and
the
11th
floor.
Council
District
of
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
at
no
cost
for
the
city
discussion.
A
I
J
Further
discussion
councilman:
what
was
the
amendment.
K
V
It's
a
part
in
exists
in
parking
lot
that
they're
going
to
make
it
into
a
dog
park,
so
they're
in.
V
M
I
K
K
I
Y
R
Y
P
I
K
I
No,
no,
no
nothing
around
there
that
built
borders
that
borders
the
borders,
the
tracks
it
borders,
the
train
tracks,
so
the
back
of
it
borders
the
train
tracks,
the
other
side
of
it.
Borders,
Broad
Street
across
the
street,
from
Broad
Street
are
the
new
houses
we
build
as
part
of
the
choice,
so
it
by
itself
it's
to
the
right
hand,
side.
There
would
be
a
restaurant
to
the
left
hand,
side,
it
would
be
the
post
office
and
it's
sort
of
isolated,
like
you,
there's
no
there's
no
neighbor
behind.
K
It
yeah
well
that
makes
more
sense,
I
guess,
I
didn't
know
we
permitted
people
to
install
dog
parks,
I
guess
that
was
the
main
thing,
but
you
know
your
District
better
than
anybody
rev
and
if
you're,
okay,
with
it
I'm,
okay
with
it
yeah,
we
don't
think
it's
going
to
affect
the
residents
or
have
any
complaints
I'm,
just
surprised
that
we
allow
people
will
put
dog
parks
in.
That's
it.
K
B
K
K
Yeah
I
just
wonder
if
it
sets
the
Precedence.
You
know
if
somebody
wants
to
go
put
their
dog
park
in
there
side
yard
I
mean
yeah.
This
kind
of
opens
it
up.
Doesn't
it
yeah?
Okay,
you
know
just
but
but
I
am
pursuing
a
dog
park
in
the
beach
view,
neighborhood
I'm
hoping
to
do
it
in
one
of
our
Greenways
addition
to
the
greenway.
A
M
H
M
There's
a
request
for
vacating:
are
you
vacating
a
portion
of
city
street
I've
got
the
text
file
of
it
now
and
I.
Just
is
it
for
profit
document?
Is
it
a
park
like
City
like
open
public
park
dog
park.
M
M
The
parcel
has
this
big
kind
of
using
it,
which
sometimes
happens.
It's
basically
like
paper
Street
in
a
way
from
your
diagrams.
Here
in
your
in
your
bill
that
you're
bringing
to
council,
it
looks
like
you
turn
down
the
street
vacation
request,
but
then
have
reconsidered
it
because
of
some
change
in
the
encroachment,
but
it
just
says
that
the
Reconstruction
will
be
developed
into
an
outdoor
off-leash
safe
dog
park.
M
So
maybe,
if
we're
all
comfortable
with
the
partial
vacation
of
the
unused
Terminus
of
Broad
Street
that
ends
at
this
property
line,
then
we
should
be
asking
another
day:
it's
not
today
from
Planning
and
Zoning
kind
of
like
what's
the
deal
with.
Is
this
a
private
dog
park?
Is
it
not
a
private
dog
park
and.
M
R
K
O
Y
A
A
C
1748
resolution
authorizes
the
mayor
and
the
director
of
the
Department
of
Public
Works
to
enter
into
an
agreement
or
agreements
with
the
Pennsylvania
Department
of
Aging
for
the
purpose
of
receiving
and
spending
Grand
funds
in
the
amount
of
fifty
thousand
dollars
to
support,
building
repairs
and
upgrades,
as
well
as
arts
and
Recreation
in
Clinton.
At
the
Mount
Washington
healthy,
active
living.
A
I
M
P
A
Second,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye,
any
opposed
affirmative
recommendation
with
that.
I
want
to
exercise
My
Prerogative
as
a
chair
to
go
a
little
out
of
order
and
I
would
like
to
go
to
councilman
gross's
chair
committee
next,
which
is
the
intergovernmental
intergovernmental
education,
Affairs
committee
and
I'm
doing
so.
Just
because
we
have
two
members
online
I'm,
not
sure
how
much
longer
one
will
be
able
to
be
with
us.
I
know
we
have
another
member
who's
going
to
have
to
step
away
from
the
table
as
soon
and
I
know.
A
R
Administration
in
the
Ura,
the
Ura
Housing
Authority,
there
are
so
many
people
to
thank
for
this
project
that
this
is
the
affordable
housing
project
for
fury.
It's
getting
such
success
to
talk
about
doing
another
one,
but
several
units
of
patio
films
for
seniors
that
will
be
approval
for
the
next
40
Years.
Thank
you.
B
C
Bill
2022-0376
Revolution
amending
resolution
number
661
of
2017
entitled
resolution,
amended
resolution,
number
432,
2017,
title
resolution
authorizing
and
cooperation
agreement
or
agreement
with
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
the
urban
new
development
authority
of
Pittsburgh
and
the
Pittsburgh
Land
Bank
provide
for
future
shared
administrative
services
in
the
transfer
of
property
among
agencies
for
governmental,
Redevelopment
and
portfolio
management
purposes.
All
districts
by
providers,
the
city
council,
review
of
the
policies
and
procedures
of
the
Pittsburgh
Landing
pursue
it
to
174
a13b
of
the
Pittsburgh
code
of
ordinances
for
authorizing
Amendment
to
the
cooperation
agreement.
M
J
I
may
first
to
kind
of
explain
those
amendments
and
then
I
would
like
to
comment.
Thank
you.
M
Thank
you,
Mr
Krause,
thank
you,
Mr
chair,
so
members
have
in
front
of
them
some
conditions
to
the
original
resolution
and,
as
a
reminder,
the
original
resolution
came
over
more
than
a
year
ago
and
is
of
the
form
that
is,
we
see
frequently,
which
is
asking
Council
to
authorize
the
administration
to
do
kind
of
like
whatever
agreement
they
want,
and
we
very
often
grant
that
authorization,
especially
in
bills
that
don't
have
as
much
public
import
as
as
this
one
and
we've
had
a
great
deal
of
basically
investigation
and
briefings
and
just
public
discussions.
M
We
recently
had
in
June
a
post
agenda
on
the
kind
of
goals
for
this
triparty
agreement
and
last
week,
a
public
hearing
where
we
heard
from
the
public
this
set
of
conditions
which
just
is
additive
at
the
end
of
the
resolution.
The
kind
of
core
res
part
of
the
resolution
does
not
change
at
all,
except
to
add
a
few
helpful,
whereas
clauses,
but
it
does
add
conditions
that
we
I
think
a
majority
of
members
feel
help.
M
The
tri-party
agreement
reflects
what
it
has
been
kind
of
you
know
advertised
to
accomplish,
but
that
also
what
the
public
and
council
members
have
said.
They
hope
for
the
land
bank
and
the
tripod
agreement
to
accomplish,
and
so
it
talks
about
goals
for
the
land
bank,
to
use
the
properties
that
the
city
currently
owns
for
affordable
housing.
M
It
also
does
some
very
simple
things
that
council
members
ask
for
like
required
that
there
be
some
notification
to
the
public
when
properties
are
requested
by
the
land
bank
and
then
also
just
very
similarly
to
what
we
saw
in
the
housing
conditions.
The
housing
Bond
conditions
ask
for
some
reporting
to
the
public
and
just
give
some
questions
and
answers
and
some
framework
for
that
reporting,
and
so
it
isn't
anything
radically
different
I
just
want
to
I
just
want
to
reiterate.
M
It
is
very
consistent
intentionally
consistent
with
the
land
bank's
own
policies
and
procedures,
which
I
think
all
members
are
very
supportive
of.
It
just
gives
a
little
more
guarantee
because
those
policies
of
procedures
are
subject
to
change
outside
of
council's
control
and
also
can
be,
you
know,
can
our
guidelines
for
the
land
bank
board
but
aren't
binding,
and
so
this
says
for
the
properties
that
we're
transferring
into
the
land
bank
that
are
currently
have
the
city
of
Pittsburgh's
name
on
the
deed
that
there's
some
guidance
for
the
use
of
those
properties.
J
Service
examination
of
the
land
bank
and
how
we
can
a
little
bit
ahead.
You
know
with
some
good
if
you
will
suggestions
and
boundaries
around
them.
A
couple
things
and
I
spoke
with
councilman
Brothers
this
morning
and
cell
problem
members
and
I
only
want
to
share
by
concern
and
some
caution
around
some
of
the
things
that
the
Amendments
have
proposed.
A
councilwoman
gross
did
change
the
80
requirement
for
affordable
housing
on
property
that
is
built
dispensed
by
the
land
bank
to
a
suggestion.
J
J
Would
like
to
have
a
a
more
mixed
use
cut
into
the
neighbors
and
we
fight
that
fight
every
day.
We
all
agree
on
this
Council
that
mixed
really
the
best
the
best
kind
of
neighborhood
right,
regardless
of
income
or
social
economic
status
or
any
other
Myriad
of
of
a
place
that
might
come
into
play.
We
agree
that
diversity
and
inclusion
and
a
broad
spectrum
of
people
living
collectively,
operating
cooperatively
together,
is
the
right
way
to
go
so
I
appreciate
the
council
movements.
Wisdom
in
removing
that
restriction.
J
I'm
Number
Two,
my
I
have
some
reservation
as
I
always
do
around
a
certain
procedure
require
range
Council
of
approval
before
they
can
can
come
to
fruition,
and
you
know
the
members
that
I
spoke
with
this
morning
are
all
aware
of
some
of
the
things
taking
place
in
Philadelphia
I'm,
not
suggesting
for
a
minute
that
they
are
happening
here
or
even
after
any
kind
of
consideration
here.
J
Mr
chair
is
the
sunset
clause
and
my
reservation
around
the
sunset
Clause
is
this
in
that?
Would
it
then
provide
a
level
of
instability
to
or
the
appearance
of,
instability
to
the
council's
commitment
here
and
with
the
incentive
license
to
the
urh
or
perhaps
maybe.
J
Take
two
years
to
consider
whether
or
not
counts
is
really
behind
this
100
percent,
and
will
we
end
up
in
some
level
of
oburgatory
for
two
years?
Wow,
you
know,
has
the
worst
thing
is
process
ndra
tries
to
understand
how
to
move
ahead
with
with
the
participants
and
the
acceptance
and
dispensation
of
so
those
are.
Those
are
only
my
concerns
again.
I
said
they're,
not
skills
that
I'm
going
to
die
on
I
think
this
is
also
we're
in
a
good
place.
J
I
wouldn't
be
supportive
of
members
and,
at
the
same
time
continue
the
conversation
around
some
of
these
minor
tweaks.
If
you
will
up
until
the
final
vote
on
Tuesday,
if
I
appreciate,
everybody's
work
and
commitment
to
it,
councilwoman
Mark
is
is
once
again
performing
her
her
due
diligence
and
it's
greatly
appreciated.
So
thank
you
all
very
much
Mr
chair.
Thank
you.
K
Thank
you,
Mr
chair,
you
know
I
first,
want
to
start
by
saying:
I,
don't
believe
this
Council
wants
to
get
bureaucracy
in
the
way
of
filtering
properties
and
getting
them.
You
know
back
on
the
tax
rules.
Secondly,
I
want
to
say:
I
have
complete
faith
in
our
manager,
Sally
stableman,
she
was
very
proficient
with
me.
I
asked
her
for
some
things
and
she
got
right
back
to
me.
So
I
think
we're
all
excited
to
see
what
you
can
do
with
this.
K
The
sunset
is
just
simply
a
check
and
balance
for
us
and
we're
expecting
big
things
to
move
through
the
system
by
then
and
and
we're
going
to
sign
off
on
that.
The
kitty
split
I
would
hope
in
two
years,
but
I
do
really
appreciate
councilwoman,
gross's
diligence
in
making
sure
there's
oversight
still
from
this
city
council.
Having
come
off
alone
that
we
took
out
that
we
have
no
oversight
on
I
was
really
cautious
about
not
having
oversight.
K
These
properties
at
one
time
were
a
hindrance,
I
think
they're,
an
asset,
okay,
I
always
looked
at
them
as
an
asset
and
and
how
to
get
them
back
on
the
tax
rules.
I
think
we're
moving
in
the
right
direction
and
I
think
what
you
proposed
through
many
conversations
yesterday
and
I
want
the
public
to
know
that
each
of
our
individual
districts
are
so
different.
You
know,
Seventh
District
is
completely
different
from
the
fourth,
it's
a
completely
different
from
the
ninth,
so
we
all
have
different
needs
and
different.
K
You
know
things
that
we
want
baked
in
that,
but
I
do
believe
you
were
able
to
achieve
these
amendments
without
all
the
while
making
sure
that
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
interfere
only
if
absolutely
necessary
and
I
think
we
hit
a
comfort
level
with
most
council
members
there.
So
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
your
work
in
it.
I'm
glad
I
feel
much
more
comfortable
in
doing
so.
I,
don't
think
we're
going
to
hinder
Sally
stableman's
work
at
all
in
this.
K
I
So
I
will
sort
of
echo
councilman
cross.
The
one
thing
that
I
cannot
support
is
the
sunset
I.
Don't
think
it's
an
approach?
It's
this
is
not
the
appropriate
place
for
this.
So
the
agreement,
the
the
agreement,
should
be
an
agreement.
That's
continuous.
We
can
ask
for
report
back,
but
they,
the
cooperation
agreement,
does
not
control
land
distribution
of
all.
It
just
says
the
three
entities
agree
to
participate
together.
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
so
I'm,
not
in
favor
of
the
of
the
result
of
that
I
think
that
should
be
just
removed.
I
I
can.
Although
I'm
caught
I
I
am
I
still
I
agree
with
with
cosmicross,
although
I
will
not
I
will
fight.
It
I
think
that
trying
to
trigger
a
second
round
of
counter
approval
of
land
is
still
burdensome
right,
that
the
clause
which
would
be
B2,
B2,
A
and
B
I
I
personally,
would
take
that
out
too.
I
think
that
that
when
we
put
land
in
the
land
bank,
we
have
we.
I
Unless
it's
a
community-based
organization,
wants
to
land
we're
not
going
to
know
what
the
final
distribute
disposition
of
the
land
is
going
to
be
and
like.
When
we
did
llama,
for
instance,
warmer
was
pre-land
bank
right,
we
did
choice
for
normal,
we
did
pre-landing.
So
we
amassed
all
this
property
for
the
choice,
neighborhoods
and
the
reason
we
were
able
to
do
it.
We
had
all
this
land.
Well,
some
of
it
became
affordable
housing.
Some
became
parking
lot,
some
became
some
became
still
holding
I
think
it
was.
I
It's
really
not
letting
them
it's
actually
a
veto.
I,
don't
think
you
should
give
Council
people
a
veto
to
the
disposal
of
land
once
they
put
it
in
the
land
bank,
which
is
which
is
what
you're
really
doing
I
I.
Think
both
those
those
are
my
two
objections.
I,
don't
think
either
one
of
those.
Now
the
one
I
will
I'm
not
in
favor
at
all
the
other
one.
You
know
I'm
willing
to
live
with
I,
just
don't
think
it's
appropriate,
but
I
want
to
live
with
it.
That
makes
sense.
I
You
know,
I'll
live
with
it.
If
that's
the
majority
of
the
body,
I
think
the
sunset
we
should
just
take
out.
If
you
want
to
update
fine,
but
I,
think
you
don't
want
to
you
don't
want
to
you,
don't
want
to
rework
a
real,
a
reauthorization
of
the
of
the
agreement
when
they're
when
we're
when
we're
creating
these
long.
You
know,
in
order
to
do
this,
we
have
to
have
school
board
representation,
there's
a
whole
big
bureaucracy,
thing
that
has
to
occur.
That's
too
too
complex
for
a
two-year
agreement.
I
O
Mean
I
would
say,
I
mean
I
think
both
sound
reasonable,
but
certainly
if,
if
Council
has
no
V
I
mean
this
is
a
pilot
right.
We
have
a
land
bank
that
has
done
that
has
not
moved
anything
except
overnight
here.
So
I
look
at
this
as
brand
new
right.
We
have
new
leadership,
we
have
new
money
and
you
know
we'll
see
how
it
goes
right.
There
there's
there's
a
plan
in
place.
O
These
are
things
that
we
are
trying
and
in
two
years
time,
I,
hope
and
and
I
think
that
this,
the
the
that,
the
that
the
that
the
reauthorization
will
motivate
those
at
the
land
bank
to
deliver
on
the
things
promised,
because
in
two
years
time,
they'll
come
back
and
I'm
excited
to
see
right,
I'm
excited
to
see
how
many
properties
were
moved
were
moved.
Where
were
they
moved
to?
Did
it
go
to
Rhett?
How
many
went
to
Residence
how
many
went
to
cdc's?
O
How
many
went
to
you
know
whatever
whatever
and
the
before
and
after
right,
I
want
to
see
I
want
to
see
what
the
property
looked
like
before
and
what's
it
what
it
looks
like
now
and
if
there
are
slowdowns
or
if
there
are
other
agreements
which
need
to
be.
You
know
factored
in
in
those
two
years
that
that's
all
something
to
be
considered
but
having
the
sunset
is
the
thing
that
will
I
think
ensure.
O
This
is
working
and
hopefully
it
is
and-
and
that
seems
to
be
everyone
seems
to
think
it's
going
to
work
and
it's
going
to
be
a
success
and
then,
if
it
is,
and
if
it
isn't
that's
not
to
say
we're
going
to
end
it
right,
that's
not
going
to
say
it's
over
like
we
shut
it
down,
but
it
will
be
an
opportunity
I.
Think
for
us,
then,
to
okay.
What's
not
working!
Why
aren't
we
moving?
What
kind
of
tweaks
can
we
make
at
that.
B
O
A
I
This
is
not
bad.
This
is
a
cooperation
agreement
that
already
exists.
We
are
simply
amending
the
cooperation
agreement.
All
the
things
you
want
to
do,
that's
fine.
It
should
be
in
the
land
bank
legislation
not
in
this.
This
is
not
the
place
for
it.
This
is
a
this
is
simply
allowing
the
bodies,
the
taxing
bodies,
in
order
to
order
to
come.
This
is
not
the
pla
right,
because
what
will
happen
is
when
you
Sunset
it
it'll
just
go
back
to
the
original
agreement.
You
won't
be
ending
of
the
agreement.
I
You'll
be
ending
the
amendment
to
the
agreement,
so
all
the
things
if
this
won't
trigger
any
of
those
things,
if
you
want
to
trigger
it
the
place
to
put
it,
is
in
the
language
in
the
land
bank
legislation
itself,
you
can
write,
we
can.
We
can
do
that,
I'm
willing
to
do
it
with
you
all
the
things
you
want.
We
can
do
it
this
shouldn't
be
here,
and
we
can
do
it
it
we,
it
should
be.
Does
that
make
sense?
This
is
they're
two
different
things.
None
of
this
this
this
amendment.
I
This
is,
in
my
opinion.
This
is
not
the
place
to
put
that
at.
If
you
want
to,
because
we
we
have
we,
in
fact,
there
is
already
a
land
bank,
Sunset
I,
don't
know
what
it
is.
We
put
that
in
there's
a
there's,
a
there's
already:
a
land
bank
there's
a
land
bank
Sunset
already
in
the
land
bank
legislation
there's
already
a
sunset
agreement:
I,
don't
remember:
I
can't
remember
what
it
is,
but
it's.
I
No
there's
a
land
bank
Sunset,
we
did
I,
remember
putting
it
in.
We
put
a
we
put
a
sunset
I,
don't
remember
the
one.
So
my
point
is
I.
Don't
disagree
with
all
the
things
you
said,
I'm
simply
suggesting
that
if
you
want
to
do
that,
this
still
isn't
the
place
for
it.
Let's
put
it
in
the
right
place
where
you
get
all
the
stuff
that
you
want
back,
you
won't
get
any
of
those
things
by
putting
the
sunset
in
here.
C
O
M
required
Council
vote
on
every
Property
Disposition
and
that
that's
what
sun
set
it
after
12
months,
but
it
was
moot
because
no
properties
were
disposed
so
that
I
recall
being
there.
So
I
feel
I
hear
what
the
council
members
saying
and
we
don't
want
to
conflate
the
taxing
body
agreement
with
this
tri-party
agreement.
So
I'm,
just
assuming
you
just
you.
I
M
And
it
is
true
that
polemic
needs
to
next
get
an
agreement
with
the
three
taxing
bodies,
which
is
the
school
board,
the
county
in
the
city
right,
and
that
is
not
in
place.
So
really
you
can't
title
player
even
after
even
after
we
have
this
third
amendment,
the
Second
Amendment,
which
would
be
the
third
version
of
this
Cooperative
agreement.
But
it
still
brings
it
back
to
council
for
discussion,
which
I
think
is
councilman
Warwick's
kind
of
Will
and
and
discussion
and
I'm
happy
to
support
it
and
that's
the
reason.
M
So
it
does
still
as
we'd
like
to
do
kind
of
bring
things
back
for
public
input.
There's
lots
of
things
on
lots
of
our
agendas
that
we
just
kind
of
vote
on,
but
they're
there
in
the
record
and
so
Pub.
The
public
can
see
them
and
have
input
if
they
so
choose
lots
of
time.
There's
no
public
input
on
lots
of
the
bills
that
are
on
our
agendas,
but
they're
still
there
and
they're
in
the
record.
M
R
Thank
you,
I,
just
the
sunset,
for
it
I
think,
was
the
way
that
Council,
Warren,
Warwick
and
I
got
some
level
of
comfort,
because
this
is
something
you
know.
You're
asking
us
to
do
a
lot
to
trust
a
lot
of
people
and
today
I
trust,
you
and
I
trust.
The
mayor.
I,
don't
know
who's
going
to
be
here.
R
For
working
with
everyone
on
it
and
I,
thank
everyone
for
working
together.
I,
don't
know
that
we're
at
some
agreement
totally
with
everyone
I
think
we're
trying
to
get
to
a
place
where
we
want
a
successful
land
bank,
but
we
also
want
don't
want
that
at
the
expense
of
our
most
vulnerable
residents
and
oftentimes
when
we're
seeing
the
development
occur
in
the
city
very
good.
At
saying
it's
going
to
be,
you
know,
inclusive.
It's
really
include
members
of
the
community
that
everyone
has
to
say.
R
We've
been
saying
this
kind
of
things,
but
oftentimes
cdc's
don't
represent
the
neighborhoods
they
serve
and
there's
a
lot
of
issues
there
and
I
think
that
sometimes
some
of
those
people
come
to
the
table
with
plans
that
they
like
to
see
in
my
district
you're
asking
me
to
trust
after
something
just
happened
in
my
district,
but
we're
getting
right
to
know,
request
for
and
that's
six
Boggs
Avenue,
and
you
know
there
was
a
person
who
offered
money
for
six
months.
Avenue,
you
know
the
story
and
it
was
sold
instead
back
to
the
people.
R
I
originally
took
it
off
of
was
the
CDC,
because
the
community
said
they
had
concerns
about
how
the
property
was
being
disposed
of,
that
they
thought
that
the
CBC
was
purchasing
it.
To
sell
to
a
developer
is
what
they
had
surgery
that
was
on
their
board.
They
did
a
lot
of
concerns,
so
they
pulled
it
considered
to
be
a
public
process.
It
sat
for
a
while
trying
to
figure
out
what
the
right
process
would
be,
so
there'll
be
a
public
process.
R
That
process
finally
ended
up
going
to
the
Ura,
who
was
supposed
to
have
a
public
process
and
then
in
turn,
said
that
they
want
to
give
it
to
the
land
bank.
The
land
bank,
then
in
turn,
sold
it
to
somebody
back
to
the
back
to
the
CDC
who
I
took
it
off,
and
then
they
decide
that
they're
going
to
make
it
into
a
food
pantry,
which
sounds
great,
but
there
was
Food
Pantry
in
a
service
place,
just
a
few
doors
down.
R
Just
two
goes
down
and
the
most
need
the
area
most
need
is
like
towards
the
hollow
in
Mount.
Washington
is
more
in
off
of
Southern
Avenue.
You
know
this
and
instead
of
putting
it
closer
to
them,
we
moved
it
someplace,
that's
already
doing
a
lot
of
work
and
the
property
was
off
of
200
000
to
purchase
that
property,
and
he
was
going
to
build.
He
was
going
to
do
business
down
below
of
affordable
housing.
Above
so
we
turned
down
affordable
housing,
which
we
say
we
need.
R
From
people
so
I
mean
I,
I
think
there's
a
need
for
both
in
the
area
and
even
the
person
who
made
the
initial
we're
offer
on
the
building
he
actually
donated
to
Improvement
I
think
nobody
wants
to
go
against
the
food
pantry.
But
it's
the
lack
of
conversations
that
occurred.
We
had
one
conversation
and
it
was
we're
going
to
give
it
to
CDC,
because
eventually,
okay
and
the
other
person
didn't
have
a
history
of
getting
things
done
quickly
and
that
person.
R
So
they
actually
do
have
some
successes,
and
so
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
think
if
that
is
the
things
that
make
me
hesitant
to
trust.
What's
going
on
and
I
do
want
to
say,
councilman
Wilson
was
really
great.
He
made
sure
that
he
called
to
say
that
you
know
asked
if
I
knew
about
it
and
at
that
point
the
conversations
had
already
happened
and
it
was
I
think
it
was
a
Friday
night.
R
You
know
give
it
to
him
on
Monday
or
something
within
an
automated
decision,
but
anyway,
so
a
movement
has
been
so
for
me.
Having
some
kind
of
sunset
is
important.
I'm,
okay,
voting
for
these
today.
As
long
as
we
have
a
conversation
on
you
know,
if
there's
some
other
better
place.
To
put
it,
we
do
that,
let's
just
work
together
and
figure
it
out.
Let's
do
whatever
we
do.
R
Let's
move
this
forward,
so
we
can
get
some
of
these
things
done
and
I
think
you
know
kind
of
just
gonna
ever
see
some
of
this
stuff
about
he's.
I
just
think
he's
going
to
do.
Do
a
good
job
so
I
think,
let's
practice
in
here,
so
that
those
issue
and
I
and
as
I
mentioned
I'd
like
my
colleagues
that
are
on
their
mouth
I,
just
don't
know,
what's
going
to
happen
in
the
future.
So
I
want
to
put
some
protection
Center.
Q
Thank
you,
Mr,
chair,
I,
I,
wholeheartedly
agree
with
what
councilman
Crouch
already
stated
so.
Q
To
deliver
the
point,
just
Echo
everything
he
said,
and
what
brother
Burgess
already
said
and
I'll
just
make
the
general
point
that
I
strongly
strongly
believe
that
this.
Q
X
B
Q
And
that,
as
we've
seen
from
examples
all
across
the
country
that
when
Cap
City
councils
become
overly
involved,
it
actually
does
the
opposite
of
what
we're
intending
to
do,
which
is
to
be
representative
of
our
public.
It
accomplishes
oftentimes
the
opposite
of
that
and
is,
in
fact,
less
effective
and
so
I
feel
strongly
about.
Q
We
should
do
everything
we
can
to
pass
this
today
and
move
out
of
the
way
and
actually
let
the
big
Landing
do
its
job
with
the
councilman
second
I'll
say:
I
really
also
feel
strongly
that
this
should
not
be
a
two-year
pilot
that
we
should
assume
that
this
is
a
long-term
program
flooded
after
such
and
as
we
see
the
need
for
amendments
in
the
future
or
tinkering
with
it
or
changes
that
need
to
be
made.
As
we
see
it
actually
be
implemented,
which
we
haven't
actually
seen
yet
then
the
name
changes.
Q
K
Okay,
yeah
I
was
part
of
the
interrogatory
too
I
believe
first
round
still.
Okay,
so
I
just
want
to
reiterate
and
talking
to
woman
grows
and
others
as
to
these
Provisions
that
we're
putting
in
these
these
goals-
and
you
know
also
commitments
that
nobody
on
this
Council
wants
to
get
in
the
way
of
the
process.
Everybody
I'm
I'm
excited
I'm
excited
that
Sally's
excited
I,
can't
wait
to
see
this
thing
move
forward
two
years
from
now.
K
It's
just
a
look
at
it
and
it
gives
us
the
option
to
come
back
and
say:
well,
you
know
what
we
need
to
change
things
or,
and
we
can
do
that
anyway,
I
I,
imagine
but
I,
don't
feel
there's
any
harm
or
foul
in
looking
at
this
in
two
years
and
just
evaluating
it's
a
simple
evaluation,
and
certainly
if
things
are
going
smooth,
you
know,
it'll
be
overwhelming.
Support
for
you.
I
do
want
to
comment
on
Reverend
burgess's
Point
as
to
this
legislation
should
be
in
a
different
package
than
what
we're
turning
in
today.
K
I
feel
strongly
in
order
to
pass
this
I
kind
of
needed
that
little
bit
of
assurance
that
we
will
be
able
to
look
at
it
and
adjust
and
do
things
in
the
future
not
getting
in
the
way
in
any
way,
shape
or
form
and
then
and
and
to
me,
it
gave
me
the
Comfort
level
to
in
order
to
vote
for
the
tribe
party
agreement
today,
councilman,
Lavelle
and
I
had
a
conversation
yesterday,
Mr
Lavell
and
I
had
a
conversation
yesterday,
maybe
we're
very
I'm,
very
protective,
any
property,
that's
moving
in
my
district.
K
You
know
we
jump
all
over
it
I'm
like
who's
moving.
What
and
why
so.
You
know,
but,
as
Madam
president
said,
my
next
Council
representative
here
might
not
be
so
aggressive
in
checks
and
balances
in
that
nature.
So
so
you
know
I
want
to
make
sure
it's
not
only
for
me,
but
for
future
Council
people
that
sit
in
this
seat,
that
they
have
the
option
without
just
getting
steamrolled
in
the
thing.
So
so
again,
I
fully
support
it.
I,
don't
see
any
harm
or
foul.
K
I
Probably
together,
we
control
70
percent
of
the
vacant
land
when
I
did
when
we
did
the
work
and
then
Teresa,
V3
and
then
proves
between,
but
we
did
the
land
bank
from
the
very
beginning.
The
reason
we
put
council
members
on
the
board,
which
was
a
fight,
was
to
get
counsel
its
due
diligence.
These
other
poison
pills
which
was
come
on.
This
is
silly.
These
are
poison
peels
Sunset
and
it's
a
poison
peel,
giving
Council
veto
power
or
poison
pills.
They
control
the
land.
They
cannot
give
it
its
Authority
and
its
autonomy
to
function
now.
I
If
the
communities
the
power
dispose
of
their
own
land,
these
are
poison
pills
by
Council
to
keep
their
artificial
control,
and
it's
not
they're,
not
right.
I
didn't
agree
to
these
things.
Neither
one
of
these
two
Provisions
that
I
agree
to,
and
so
I
did
not
agree
to
a
sunset.
I
did
not
agree
to
give
council
members
veto
on
the
back
end
of
selling
properties.
These
are
these
are
simply
all
these
are
are
are
ways
where.
A
Thank
you,
I
do
have
members
that
went
up
for
second
round
before
dorm
side,
just
like
to
add
last
few
cents
in
part,
because
I
had
someone
and
a
little
bit
of
an
end
in
how
we
got
to
these
amendments.
So
I,
just
like
sort
of
speak
to
what
I
saw.
First,
how
we
got
here
and
then
maybe
philosophical
touch
on
a
few
things
so
specific
to
the
the
the
cause
that
it
was
sentencing
and
calcium
grows.
Councilman
particular
news.
They
had
the
conversation
with
them.
That
was
very
concerning
to
me.
A
If
you
simply
let
something
expire
us
having
to
go
through
the
entire
legislative
process,
all
over
again,
May,
absolutely
no
sense,
especially
to
do
the
year
from
now
and
so
I
suggested
that
it
be
extended
that
if
you
change
to
a
reauthorization,
but
if,
if
this
body
is
concerned
about
that,
has
a
larger
hole,
I'm
willing
to
have
that
conversation
specific
to
B2,
which
is
around
B2,
A
and
B.
In
terms
of
what
council
members
have
the
right
to
do.
What
I
initially
saw
this?
A
That
was
extremely
problematic
for
me,
because
I
use
the
example
of
the
Upper
Hill
district,
whereby
I
will
absolutely
land
into
the
land
bank
to
ultimately
get
to
Ura,
more
specifically
phdc
pictures,
and
so
because
the
resolutions
that
authorize
us
to
put
land
into
the
land
bank
can
say
what
the
purpose
of
it
is
I
asked.
And
if
the
concern
was,
you
are
a
simply
ganking
land
out,
which
is
what
was
presented
to
me.
A
That
was
the
concern
that
when
we
put
land
in,
we
said
yes
I'm
putting
this
in
the
ultimately
for
the
Ura
to
be
able
to
utilize
it.
Then
the
conversation
was
what,
if
to
your
point,
Reverend
Burgess,
you
were
trying
to
work
on
a
larger
development.
You
put
a
bunch
of
land
in
just
to
begin
clearing
title
and
then
we
discovered
on
the
back
end
that
it
was
best
when
we
best
suited
for
you
already.
Then
my
suggestion
was
the
Ura
reach
out
to
that
council
member
to
get
approved.
A
X
A
N
A
G
A
Used
in
that
I
wasn't
thinking
of
it
in
that
manner
at
the
time,
because
again,
in
my
mind,
based
on
how
I
operate,
the
Ura
wouldn't
be
doing
any
of
that.
Without
my
approval
on
the
front
end,
to
begin
with
right,
so
I
would
absolutely
be
checking
off
because
I'm
gonna
be
working
with
them,
but
it
is
potentially
a
veto
about
members.
So
I
acknowledge
that
point
then.
Lastly,
this
is
sort
of
a
more
philosophical
one,
councilman
gross
in
Chicago.
We've
had
this
conversation,
but
I
just
want
to
speak
to
it.
A
It
is
around
number
three,
as
a
goal
to
80.
I
will
always
be
hesitant
of
prescribing
any
specific
number
to
something
such
as
that
and
for
a
number
of
reasons.
One.
When
you
become
too
prescriptive,
you
limit
the
ura's
ability
you
limit
the
land
bank's
ability
to
be
flexible
right
to
have
dollars.
That
can
say:
oh,
we
can
do
here's
money,
we
had
to
go
after
a
Federal,
Grant
or
a
federal
match
that
we
can
utilize
these
dollars.
A
The
other
challenge
for
me
is
when
we're
talking
about
affordable
housing
conversation
because
of
the
historical
racism,
segregation
and
policies
that
existed
in
our
city.
You
really
only
talk
about
doing
this
in
a
few
places
throughout
our
city,
unfortunately,
and
if
what
you
tell
me
is
I
can
only
do
80
of
all
the
land
has
to
be
used
for
affordable
housing
purposes,
you're.
A
Essentially,
if
I
use
the
Hill
district
as
an
example,
which
is
already
an
affordable,
Community,
you're,
essentially
telling
me
I,
can
only
ever
make
it
that
right,
it's
a
cat
at
what
it
can
actually
be
when
the
reality
is
using
the
Hill
district
as
an
example
we're
getting
ready
to
bring
a
thousand
new
units
of
affordable
housing.
Well,
two-thirds
of
Richmond
Airport
housing,
so
six
seven
hundred
units
of
affordable
housing
on
site
online
into
a
community.
A
That
is
already
that
it's
already
that
I
spent
11
million
dollars
building
a
grocery
store
that
couldn't
sustained
itself,
because
I
didn't
have
disposable
income
to
support
it
right
and
so
I
absolutely
have
the
intent
of
using
the
land
bank
to
put
property
to
move
vacant
Parcels
that
are
taxing
liquid
into
the
land
bank
for
the
purpose
of
actually
doing
market
rate
for
sale.
Housing,
because
I
need
that
to
balance
out
everything
else.
That
has
happened
within
that
Community
to
support
the
business
districts
that
we're
trying
to
build
to.
A
A
It's
also
just
worth
noting
that,
because
I
hadn't
seen
these
until
recently
that
even
under
the
80
goal,
which
again
I'm
prepared
I
could
go
for
this
I
just
want
to
explain
myself
when
you
say
for
affordable
rental
housing.
Household
incomes
must
not
exceed
50,
because
the
Ami
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
is
approximately
71
000.
At
this
point,
you're
literally
someone
at
35
000
per
under
from
being
able
to
participate.
Is
it
just
a
goal?
I
acknowledge
that
and.
A
I
know
it's
not
binding
I'm.
Just
my
point
is
at
some
point:
we
collectively
have
to
have
a
different
conversation
about
the
housing
needs
within
our
city.
Right,
yes,
I
understand
that
there's
the
most
vulnerable
of
the
most
vulnerable,
but
if
you
look
at
what's
also
happening,
we're
losing
middle
class
families
right
and
so,
if
we're
capping,
but.
A
There's
a
reason
why
Penn,
Hills
and
other
areas
are
where
black
homeowners
are
going
to
purchase
homes
right
they
are
above
the
thresholds.
These
are
their
goals.
They
are
above
the
thresholds
that
that
some
ways
were
sort
of
arbitrarily
set
in
here.
So
at
some
point
we
collectively
had
to
have
a
a
greater
conversation
over
what
we're
doing.
B
O
O
It's
really
too
bad
I
wish
that
we
could
speak
as
freely
among
each
other.
All
the
time
in
front
of
all
of
you,
because
I
think
that
a
lot
of
the
time
what
happens
is
we
are
having
these
conversations
due
to
the
rules
of
council,
which
you
know
have
to
be
there,
but
so
in
pockets,
and
so
the
full
conversations
we're
having
are
not
necessarily
being
heard
in
the
way
that
is
helpful
to
to
the
public
I
do
want
to
say
that
I
also
want
to
say
to
to
councilman
burgess's
point.
O
And
by
by
primarily
white
organizations
telling
them
that
they
knew
better
about
what
that
land
should
be
used
for
by
white
organizations
that
did
not
even
inquire
about
using
the
they
wanted
it
for
a
grocery
store
did
not
even
not
not
that
they
did
the
research
and
came
back
and
said
hey.
We
really
studied
this
and
we're
sure
we're
telling
you
this
Lane
can't
use
because
of
nope.
O
That
happened,
and
that
is
one
of
the
main
reasons
that
I
ran
so
to
have
this
land
bank,
which
sort
of
I
mean
again
that
maybe
this
is
just
a
feeling.
Maybe
this
is
like
all
Vibes
right,
but
the
reason
that
it
is
is
because
there
has
been
no
clear
discussion
right.
All
I've,
been
all
I
have
heard,
is
how
fast
it's
going
to
be,
and
and
and
and
that's
it
with
no
nothing
concrete.
O
So
I
am
concerned
about
a
land
bank
where
large
swaths
of
property
in
a
community
in
a
primarily
African-American
Community,
whether
that
be
in
my
district
or
another
District,
is
handed
over
to
primarily
white
organizations
to
think
that
they
know
best
and
that
the
community
members
have
no
say
and
then,
if
they
come
to
me
as
their
Council
representative
and
say
Barb,
what
is
going
on.
Why
are
why
don't
we
get
some
of
these
properties,
because
this
is
what
I've
heard?
O
When
do
we
get
a
chance
at
these
properties?
How
come
the
cdcs
are
quote,
unquote,
buying
up
the
neighborhood
right
and
there's
such
distrust
and
I
think
the
reason
that
the
distrust
is
there
is
because
there's
no
chance
for
these
community
members
and
I'm
not
seeing
that
chance
of
land
banking.
That
is
that
that's
my
entire
hesitation
here
and
that's.
Why,
and
you
know
whether
it's
to
and
I
would
I
would
be
open
to
a
Frank
conversation
with
leadership
at
the
Landing.
How
long
will
it
take
to
get
up
and
running?
O
B
O
Then,
with
that
with
those
numbers
and
that
timeline
in
mind,
I'm
happy
to
look
again
at
you
know,
maybe
two
years
isn't
enough:
maybe
it
takes
18
months
to
clear
a
title,
so
maybe
two
years
really
actually
isn't
enough
for
the
land
bank
to
make
some
serious
progress
and
to
show
like
hey,
look
before
and
after
pictures,
we're
really
turning
these
properties
over
we're
really
making
the
change
that
we
want
to
see.
Maybe
it's
three
years,
maybe
it's!
O
Maybe
it's
two
years
with
you
know
these
should
be
your
expectations
into
like
what
what
should
I
expect
from
the
land
bank
in
two
years.
Well,
tell
me
now
what
you
think
I
should
expect
in
two
years
and
then
in
two
years
we
come
to
the
table.
If,
if
that's,
where
we're
at
free
right,
we're
not
like
out
to.
O
O
This
is
not
my
area
of
expertise
at
all,
but
that's
why,
at
a
certain
period
of
time,
I
want
this
to
come
back
to
the
table
so
that
we
have
a
chance
to
say:
okay,
Landing
how's
it
going
show
us
where
you
are
tell
us
where
you
want
to
be
and
show
us
where
you
are
right
and
then
we
can
move
on
from
there
make
adjustments
as
needed.
Excel
like
a
process
where
we're
working
together
anyway,
I'll
leave
it
at
that.
I
think
I've
said
my
piece.
I
Yeah
right,
I,
I
I
will
first
of
all
we
all
be
certainly
I,
do
not
doubt
councilman's
gross
is
sincerity.
She's
been
working
on
the
land
bank
like
I,
have
from
her
first
time
on
Council
and
so
I
am
willing
to
sort
of
compromise.
I
I'll
vote
for
the
rest
of
it.
I
just
can't
vote
for
the
for
the
for
the
for
the
the
authorization
two
years
that
just
doesn't
think
that
I
don't
think
that
makes
sense.
But
if
I
I'll
make
a
motion
to
strike
that
and
then
I'll
I'll
stop
talking,
I'll
go
for
the
rest
of
it.
So
I'm
a
motion
to
strike
section
four.
J
I,
even
though
I
don't
support
the
sunset
I,
don't
think
that's
in
the
best
interest
of
this
legislation
out
of
respect
for
the
numbers
that
have
worked
so
diligently
these
past
days,
perhaps
just
as
a
suggestion
we
could
hold
this
jumble
look
at
it
alone.
We
cannot
hold
off
on
any
further
Amendment
today
so
that
we
can
continue
conversation
throughout
the
week
and
then
make
collectively
any
other
amendments
members
might
deem
necessary
when
we
bring
it
to
climate
votes.
I
J
And
I'm
willing
to
work
with
you
in
numbers
as
well.
Have
my
you
know
my
concern,
as
the
conversation
goes
around
further,
is
the
idea
of
having
any
kind
of
a
even
even
a
chest
did
come
out
of
a
property
that
must
be
redeveloped
in
accordance
with
affordable
housing?
J
Yesterday
Pittsburgh
magazine
published
under
a
cover
story,
7
Up,
And,
Coming,
neighborhoods
and
one
of
the
seven
was
the
hilltop
Collective
and
and
what
was
so
exciting
to
read
about
that
was
that
after
all,
these
years
of
work,
not
just
you
know
in
the
work
that
we
joined
task,
but
the
work
that
the
community
does
Hilltop
neighborhoods
are
really
really
coming
into
their
own
and
really
deserve
the
option
and
the
eternity
to
to
receive
diversify
balance.
J
The
collective
and
Cooperative
development
that
we,
as
this
councils
always
agree,
is
the
best
kinds
of
development
development,
but
I'm
not
willing
to
to
you,
know
I'm
willing
to
speak
with
Council
for
me
most
other
members
about
how
we
may
tweet
that
I'm.
Just
offering
my
suggestion
of
my
suggestion,
perhaps
collectively
we
come
to
some
agreement
on
amendments,
we
might
fight
to
see.
I
I
A
R
I'm
president,
thank
you
I
just
want
to
say,
I
want
to
thank
my
councilwoman
councilman
Warwick
for
being
so
thoughtful
working
through
these
these
amendments
in
for
a
year
and
put
on
this
principle
of
all
your
leadership.
A
L
I've
been
remaining
silent
because
I'm
just
gonna
speak
through
my
actions,
make
a
motion
to
make
a
voice
amendment
to
remove
section
four
which
states
this
cooperation
agreement
will
require
reauthorization
two
years
from
the
effective
date
of
this
resolution.
A
L
And
I'll
make
another
voice
Amendment
to
amend
the
bill
for
Section
Five
B,
one
two.
L
Shall
always
say:
I'll
make
comment
to
that.
It's
been
a
year
and
this
whole
thing
has
been
quite
a
charade,
so
I
thought
it
was
best
to
get
this
done
so
that
members
could
make
make
their.
You
know
make
this
make
this
happen
today
and
it
looks
like
well.
It
looks
like
we'll
go
forward
either
way,
but
I
do
think.
It's
a
quite
appalling.
L
What's
been
taking
place,
I
appreciate
the
the
council
president
for
making
sure
that
this
is
getting
done
before
recess,
but
the
only
thing
that
is
being
lost
here
are
pittsburghers
and
to
put
more
restrictions
and
more
redundancy
to
the
land
bank.
L
We'll
just
hinder
the
development
that
can
happen
and
to
really
strengthen
our
neighborhoods.
So
I
think
that
I
think
the
council
should
stay
out
of
the
way
I
wish
that
this
is
all
these
criteria
that
we've
been
talking
about
would
not
be
in
place
and
I
look
forward
to
the
great
work
that
the
land
bank
can
accomplish,
regardless
of
of
what's
happened
here,.
A
Thank
you
any
further
discussion
on
the
bill
as
amended,
if
not
I'll,
simply
say
I'm
more
than
willing
to
work
with
you,
councilman
Krause
or
just
all
members,
obviously,
over
the
next
few
days
to
come
up
with
whatever
most
appropriate
language
will
bring
forward.
All
those
in
favor,
say
aye,
give
me
opposed
any
abstentions.
Affirmative
recommendation,
why
don't
we
finish
up
your
committee
councilwoman
gross
about
to
bring
Bill
641.
A
L
For
coming
so,
this
meeting
is
taking
way
too
time.
I
just
want
to
recognize
the
properties
that
were
that
are
in
discussion.
Here
are
the
ones
that
will
be
for
the
alcazam
project
and
if
you
could
just
explain
exactly
what's
happened
here
in
terms
of
the
properties
that
are
being
sold
to
outstand
for
the
purpose
of
a
three
acre
site
that
will
be
staged
so
that
the
main
driller
will
be
that
will
drill
down
to
like
130
150
feet
below
surface.
L
That
alcasan
says
is
completely
okay,
no
problem
is
to
you
know,
fix
the
amount
of
Wastewater
that
goes
into
our
Rivers,
so
you
know,
and
that
would
project
would
take
what
15
years,
and
so
is
this
just
sold?
Would
we
get
them
back?
You
know
what
what
guarantees
we
have
with
this,
that
this
is
the
best
approach.
Z
Alcasan
approached
us
asking
for
these
11
Parcels
that
are
on
the
North
Shore,
just
east
of
the
veterans.
Bridge
there
are
11
of
approximately
60
or
so
that
are
there
many
owned
by
buncher
these
11
owned
by
the
Ura,
but
under
option
to
buncher
actually
from
a
long
time
ago,
maybe
20
2005
I
believe,
and
they
said
that
they
needed
these
Parcels
to
accomplish
their
two
billion
dollar
clean
water
plan
that
they
need
to
do
to
be
in
compliance
with
Federal
the
Clean
Water
Act,
the
federal
law,
the
Clean
Water
Act.
Z
They
do
plan
to
use
this
land
to
put
their
Diggers
on
I'm,
not
an
expert
on
all
of
this.
But
what
I
understand
is
they
will
stage
their
diggers
there
and
then
go
a
couple
hundred
feet
underground
and
dig
out
the
tunnels
that
they
need
to
divert
storm
water
away
from
the
rivers,
and
this
construction
project
will
take
a
long
time.
I
think
I've
seen
online
that
it
would
be
somewhere
in
like
20
30,
something
before
it
is
finished,
2034
2038
before
they're
done,
and
during
that
time
that's
what
the
land
will
be
used
for.
Z
I
believe
that,
ultimately,
when
it's
finished,
what
I
understand
is
there
will
be
only
like
some
small
maintenance
type
structures
located
there,
but
the
land
is
being
sold
to
alcasan
and
they
will
own
it.
It's
not
going
to
return
to
the
Ura
when
it's
done.
They
did
give
us.
They
agreed
that
they
will,
if
they
want
to
sell
the
land
in
the
future,
when
their
project
is
done,
which
I
don't
know
if
they
would
want
to,
but
if
they
did,
they
would
bring
to
us
the
potential
purchaser
for
our
comment.
L
Z
L
Okay,
have
you
engaged
opposite
in
terms
of
I
know?
This
may
not
be
your
responsibility,
but
to
see
what
type
of
public
process
they've
been
they've
been.
You
know
taking
place
here
without
what's
taking
place
here.
Z
L
I'm,
quite
surprised,
just
you
know
just
how
much
how
little
attention
it's
gone.
This
will
be
just
like
this.
Isn't
you
know
tearing
up
part
of
the
neighborhood?
It's
you
know
it's
capitalizing
on
a
neighborhood
who
has
our
that's
already
been
torn
apart.
You
know
behind
the
highway
and
everything
that's
there.
So
it's
just
an
interesting
scenario
that
you
know
I
mean.
Would
they
have
picked
some
other
other
location?
L
If
all
those
neighborhoods
still
existed,
if
pen
Pond
didn't
ruin
it,
you
know
to
begin
well
at
the
time,
but
you
know
so
I,
don't
know
in
my
you
know,
although
I'm,
obviously
supportive
of
taking
Wastewater
out
of
the
rivers
I
just
feel
that
there
should
be.
There
should
be
highlighted
more
in
this
one
of
their
misses
attention,
since
this
will
be
15
years.
Yet
another
area,
you
know
on
the
North
Shore
area,
what
they
call
North
Shore.
This
is
a
downright
Chestnut
Street.
You
know
this
continuing
to
be
some
empty
parking
lot.
P
L
L
C
R
I
do
know
a
little
bit
that
they
have
done
problems.
I
do
do
some
they
have,
or
conducting
me,
actually
have
some
meetings
on
a
regular
basis
about
those
projects
from
a
consent
to
crazy.
So
it's
not
like
something
that
they
just
really.
You
know
what
you're
going
to
do
is
something
they
have
to,
and
also
I
I.
Think
it's
great
that
you
work
with
pwsa
and
office.
It
could
be
also
be
helpful.
You
know
to
say
help
to
work
with
us
on
development.
I
think
it's
ironic.
R
L
That's
that's
not
in
my
that's
in
councilman
lavelle's
area,
that's
over
by
the
West
End
Bridge.
At
the
end,
the
West
End
Bridge,
somehow
I
found
out
about
it.
This.
This
is
right
across
the
16th
Street
Bridge
yeah.
B
L
R
But
anyway,
for
us-
and
you
know,
PWC
has
been
an
obstacle
for
several
projects
in
our
district
development,
Banksville
and
Potomac
they're
waiting
for
development,
there's
a
water
line
that
they
don't
want
to
replace
it.
You
can
see
it
has
some
issues,
they're
saying
they
don't
some
of
these
places.
R
There's
a
project
on
Noblestown
Road
we've
been
waiting
for
development
on
Noblestown
Road,
there's
a
water
line.
They
don't
want
to
move
it's
in
the
middle
of
the
property
and
there's
there
are
others
in
our
district
I
can't
think
of
all
of
them
off
and
it's
for
several
times
so
as
much
as
I
would
love
working
with
the
utilities
or
with
all
the
authorities.
I
also
want
them
to
work
in
return
with
us,
and
but
that's
it.
I
do
know
this
project
in
particular
it's
something
that
they
have
to
do
so.
Thank
you.
A
M
You
were
working
here,
so
my
chief
was
working
for
me,
so
it
was
after
February
of
2020..
So
maybe
a
year
ago
and
council
members
might
recall
that
kind
of
near
the
end
of
Corey
O'connor's
tenure,
maybe
the
year
before
it
was
during
covet
that
he
wanted
us
to
authorize
and
amend
a
cooperation
agreement.
I
think
between
us
now,
since
so
that
elksen
could
proceed
with
these
dig
sites
and
I
said
as
it
was.
Intergovernmental,
Affairs
and
I
think
maybe
found
something
called
they'll
tease
me
about
holding
it.
M
And
so
it's
true
and
it's
sad
right
that
elksen
has
eminent
domain
power
like
we
can
we're
gonna
lose
if
we
try
to
stand
in
their
way
on
any
of
these
staging
sites
and
it's
a
two
or
I
think.
Maybe
it's
closer
to
three
billion
dollar
project
and
see
you
know
we
were
in
court
about
it
with
the
consent
decree
for
some
20
years
and
we
basically
lost
and
outstand
gets
to
double
the
size
of
sewage
treatment
plant
and
then
gets
to
build
these
15
foot.
Diameter
tunnels.
M
150
feet
under
our
Rivers
in
the
Bedrock
there
being
the
tunnel
Boring
Machine
the
engineer
that
we
had
on
site
at
the
Allegheny
River
sites
visits
that
I
actually
posted
was
straight
from
London
who
was
working
on
the
London
big
dig
right.
We
had
four
outstand
Engineers
out
there,
so
thank
you
to
elkasan
for
doing
this
site,
because
it's
it's
the
staging
area
for
each
of
these
deep
shafts
that
will
basically
capture
what
all
now
falls
out
or
out
falls
into
the
river
from
each
of
these
big
sewage.
M
Interceptors
won't
fall
into
the
river
anymore.
It'll
fall
into
a
150
foot
tunnel
that
goes
straight
down,
and
so
there
is
a
quarter
acre
staging
area
while
they're
doing
the
Dig
and
the
tunnel
boring
machine
is
making
its
way
down
150
feet
deep,
but
then
it'll
be
done,
but
the
leaf
behind
is
this
tunnel
opening
for
each
one
of
these
drop
shafts.
M
That's
about
30
feet
wide,
so
picture
in
your
mind,
like
a
30
foot
manual
cover
and
then
the
upper
opportunity
that
we
should
be
cognizant
of
as
city
council
and
as
council
members
is
that
they
have
a
three
billion
dollar
budget
basically,
and
they
have
to
leave
behind
something.
It
doesn't
have
to
just
be
a
big
30-foot
metal
plate.
It
can
be
a
public
park
and
all
of
the
sites
in
district
7
are
well
within
long-standing.
M
Now,
15,
20
years
of
community
planning
for
Riverfront
linear
Park
along
the
Allegheny
River
Front
Edge,
most
of
them
are
where
the
again,
some
of
them
federally
funded.
Two
million
dollar
Community
plans
that
there
should
be
perpendicular
access
to
connect,
City
neighborhoods
to
the
riverfront
parks
that
they're
not
cut
off.
M
You'll
probably
win
through
two
years
of
lengthy
discussion
about
rezoning
group
of
front
zoning
so
that
we
wouldn't
have
Perfection
block
wrong
buildings,
cutting
citizens
off
from
the
parks
and
so
there's
not
it's
not
I
won't
go
as
hard
to
say
it's
a
silver
lining,
but
there
is
a
tiny
bit
of
opportunity
in
this
pretty
large
miserable
project
where
I
really
feel
that
the
city
is
getting
the
brunt
of
the
misery
and
solving
an
entire
County
sewage
facility,
and
that
we're
having
these
construction
projects
to
deal
with
municipalities,
they're
15
miles
away,
dealing
with
their
sewage
overflowing
into
our
Rivers,
there's
at
least
that
one
little
bit
of
opportunity
that
we
shouldn't
let
go
by
so
I'm
happy
to
continue
talking
about
that
I,
don't
know
if
there's
going
to
be
anything
else
in
my
committee.
M
Certainly
this
specific
resolution
is
only
about
the
site's
at
Tustin
Street,
as
councilman
Wilson
said.
So
you
know,
if
he's
supportive,
I'm
supportive,
but
we
do
have
to
I
think
we
should
maybe
collectively,
as
a
council
body
instead
of
individual
council
members
talk
about
what
are
those
leave
behinds
of
these
very
very
many
dig
sites
along
all
three
of
our
Rivers,
so
happy
to
talk
more
about
that.
Thank
you,
Mr
chair,
thank.
K
M
Then
we
could
also
see
kind
of
where
exactly
they
would
be
doing
that
drop
shaft
so
that
we
could
think
ahead
10
years,
maybe
when
that
dig
was
done?
Well,
okay,
so
what
is
the
public?
Is
there?
Any
public
benefit
opportunity
that
again
doesn't
make
up
for
the
misery
that
we're
all
experiencing,
let
alone
the
impact
of
the
wallets
of
83
municipalities
residents
in
Allegheny
County,
which
can
barely
afford
this
project.
Clearly,
I
have
strong
opinions
about
the
project
and
I
should
stop
talking
so.
K
Should
I
take
it
offline
with
you,
yeah
I,
know,
I
know
one
other
little
thing.
So
in
that
agreement
they
offer
to
give
us
some
amenity
a
park
or
so
is
that
right.
A
A
B
C
1734
resolution
provided
for
reimbursement
agreement
or
agreements
with
the
Pittsburgh
Water
and
Sewer
Authority
lacrosse
associated
with
the
Sylvan
Avenue.
Multimodal
smart
project
for
pwsa
you'll
be
responsible
for
paying
100
of
the
actual
expenses
involved
in
certain
workers,
described
hearing
and
itemized
and
exhibited
fee
at
an
amount
of
Taxi
117
899.
A
J
A
And
councilman
cross
was
asking
that
this
happened
to
do
with
changing
checking
the
Box.
J
C
C
18086
of
2021,
effective,
December,
27
2021,
as
amended
entitled
resolution
adopted
and
approval
of
a
2022
capital
budget
in
the
2022
Community
Development
block
grant
programs
and
the
2022
through
2027
Capital
Improvement
program
that
included
employees
Foundation
as
a
grant
recipient
along
with
people
of
origin.
Rightfully
love
and
wanted
four
more
and
authorizing
a
subsequent
agreement
for
a
total
cost
of
forty
thousand
dollars.
C
January
1
2019,
as
amended,
entitled
resolution
adopting
and
approved
in
the
2019
capital
budget
and
the
2019
Community
Development
block
grant
program
and
the
2019
through
2024
Capital
Improvement
program,
so
as
to
adjust
emergency
Solutions
Grant
Harris
acts
funding
by
decreasing
emergency
Solutions,
granted
by
48
824.06,
increasing
the
Salvation
Army
by
750
and
increasing
Allegheny
singer
Research
Institute,
doing
businesses;
aha
Research
Institute
at
56,
644.60
and
authorizes
subsequent
agreement
or
agreements
to
provide
emergency,
shelter,
Services
Street,
Outreach,
Services,
rental
assistance
and
housing,
relocation
and
stabilization
services
and
or
data
collection
activities.
Motion.
A
A
That
takes
a
sort
of
deferred
paper,
councilman
I
know
you're
amending
270..
You
want
to
read
that
one
separately
just
want
to
read
them
together.
Okay,
can
we
rebuild
270
and
465
together.
C
Bill
2022-0270
Orton
September,
Pittsburgh
code
of
ordinances,
title
seven
business,
license
rental
of
residential
housing
that
creating
a
new
chapter,
783,
short-term
rental
permit
program
and
building
the
2022-0465
or
in
commending
the
Pittsburgh
code.
Title
5
traffic
article
7
parking
chapter,
549
residential
parking
permit
program.
549.08
visit
us
for
me
non-resident
permits
so
as
to
relate
the
issues
of
residential
parking
permits
or
short-term
rentals
to
the
issues
and
licenses
by
the
department
of
licenses
and
inspections
authorizing
the
operation
of
short-term
rentals
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
motion.
L
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Mr
chair,
I
have
actually
before
members
actually
even
last
night
in
the
evening
center
with
the
of
the
amendment
that
will
be
presented
today
and
the
intention
is
to
is
to
amend
and
hold
so
that
there
will
be
a
briefing
set
up
once
we
return
from
Recess
this.
This
is
a
product
that
came
out
of
you
know
there
were
some
complications
that
have
Arisen
with
you
know
the
current
rental
Reg
istration
program
and
I'm.
L
Sorry
I
should
say
that
the
permit
program-
and
this
is
in
response
to
that
the
But.
It
includes
also
the
short-term
rental
permit
program,
but
actually
takes
out
that
language.
So
it's
actually
just
any
rental,
whether
it's
you
know
24
hours
to
two
years.
It
would
all
be
this
bill
would
cover
all
of
that
and
this
this
is
a
you
know.
I
couldn't
deal
without
the
Law
Department
I
mean
they
were
essential
in
and
bring
us
forward
the
administration
Kyle
Chief
Kyle
chinalopoly,
Chief,
generalopoly,
deputy
mayor
paulak.
L
You
think
the
permits
license
and
inspection,
which
you
know
director
of
Kenner,
had
moved
on.
So
looking
forward
to
working
with
director,
green
and
council
president
for
for
everything
that
we've
you
know
been
talking
through,
is
that
what
you're
laughing
about
is.
L
Yeah
so
I
want
to
thank
for
your
support
in
terms
of
literally
almost
every
week
talking
about
what
we're
going
to
do
here
so
making
sure
that
we
we
come
with
a
product
that
can
withstand
the
test
of
time,
but
obviously
want
to
make
sure
that
all
members
have
you
know,
input
and
briefed
on.
What's
Happening
Here
so
plan
to
set
up
those
briefings
with
with
law,
plon
and
the
administration.
You
know
my
office
will
set
that
up.
R
R
I
want
to
thank
you
for
the
work
that
we've
done,
and
the
administration
group,
but
I
also
want
to
thank
councilman
brothers
because
she
was
working
on
the
zoning
piece
of
some
of
this,
and
so
I
think
it
was
a
collective
effort
and
when
we
do
those
kinds
of
things,
that's
when
we
get
the
best
products.
So
thank
you
all
for
your
foreign.
B
L
A
L
C
A
A
C
A
L
For
the
public,
since
obviously's
meeting
is
going
on
it's
three
o'clock,
they
want
us
to
go,
but
I
did
bring
to
the
intention
that
we
did
not
discuss
the
arpa.
All
the
money,
that's
being
moved
in
terms
of
the
Opera
I.
Really
don't
want
to.
L
A
A
Going
to
happen
is
preliminary
approving
the
department
budget,
long
item
s
on
Tuesday
we'll
have
our
regular
meetings.
We
will
disclose
of
all
papers,
except
for
the
Opera
line
Island.
We
will
then
recess
Tuesday's
meeting.
We
will
then
hold
our
public
hearing
for
the
Department
bills.
We
will
then
gavel
back
in
our
regular
meeting
at
which
time,
having
heard
from
the
public,
we
would
then
have
full
discussion
and
before
taking
final
folk,
if
members
felt
comfortable
having
that
discussion
at
this
table,
we
can
certainly
do
this.
As
opposal
said
in
those
seats.
M
M
2023-1704-56789
10
and
11
that
are
those
are
for
transfers
they're
in
legislar,
fully
loaded.
So
members
of
the
public,
since
we
didn't
actually
have
a
lengthy
verbal
discussion
today,
we
can
go
to
the
city
clerk
register,
legislative
records
and
look
at
those
bills
in
advance
of
next
week's
public
hearing.
So
yeah,
thank
you
all.
Have
the
public
hearing.
Thank
you.
A
This
afternoon,
shortly
after
finishing
this
meeting,
we
will
hold
a
cable
cast
public
hearing,
as
it
relates
to
the
Verizon
franchise
agreement.
Speakers
restoration
will
be
closed
at
some
point.
Okay,.
A
Next
week
else
we'll
hold
our
regular
council
meeting
at
10
A.M
on
Tuesday
August,
1st,
prospectively
and
school
registration
closes
at
9am
Tuesday
morning
also
on
August
1st
beginning
at
1
30
p.m.
Public
hearing
as
it
relates
to
Arco
funding
bills,
2023
1704,
1705,
1706,
1707
and
1708
speaker
registration
will
close
at
12
p.m.
On
August
1st
emergency.