►
From YouTube: Pittsburgh City Council Standing Committees - 6/21/23
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
C
A
A
Thank
you.
Our
next
order
of
business
is
public
comment.
I
would
like
to
remind
all
speakers
of
the
rules
of
councils
state
that
comments
are
limited
to
matters
of
concern.
Official
action
or
deliberation
which
are,
or
maybe
before,
city,
council
and
profanity
is
not
permitted.
After
you
recall,
please
restate
your
name
and
provide
your
neighborhood
for
the
record.
You'll
be
given
three
minutes
to
speak.
Our
first
registered
speaker
is
Naomi
Mullen.
D
D
Yeah
baby
trees,
not
shady
fields
and
long
hair.
The
Pennsylvania
state
constitution
says
the
government
was
created
for
the
peace,
safety
and
happiness
of
We,
the
People
decisions
and
actions
that
harm
the
people
are
not
acceptable.
They
are
elected
and
appointed
officials
that
have
proven
themselves
to
be
enemies
of
spawning.
That
is
not
advisable.
D
E
Go
to
Ronald
and
Miller
Bill
silver,
Global
intelligence,
Society
candidate
for
president
2024.
global
intelligenceociety.org,
when
I
was
at
Oxford
at
St,
Anthony's,
and
also
the
international
Department
of
international
history.
At
the
University
of
London,
my
specialization
was
the
Nichi
etome,
which
is
the
English
Japanese
Alliance
of
1905.,
very
important
Alliance.
That
I
think
should
be
renewed,
with
the
bay
being
replaced,
replacing
the
English
part
of
that
for
us
now.
A
concern
of
this
council
is
is
that
it's
also
internationally?
It's
also
the
vote.
E
E
It
has
to
do
with
with
a
governance,
embedded
individuals
and
institutions
like
the
Allegheny
County
election
division,
backed
up
by
non-elected
vote
systems,
I
think
they're
bugs
the
sub-rationally
claim
that
your
vote
is
secure
it.
It
is
secure
up
to
a
point,
I
mean
99,
but
there's
one
percent
that
they
usually
identify
are
less
than
one
percent
to
identify
it
that
must
be
or
that
may
be
lost
or
misapplied.
So
there's
a
percentage
of
that.
That
is
a
very
low
percent.
E
They
claim
that
it
may
be
a
problem,
but
citizens
do
you
want
your
vote
to
be
one
of
those
one,
that's
lost
or
misapplied
the
Allegheny
County
election
division
does
not
permit
citizens
to
go
and
check
for
whom
they
voted.
So
you
can
vote
in
the
morning
or
vote
in
the
afternoon,
but
you
can't
check
in
the
evening.
E
You
know
to
see
whether
that's
okay
on
the
other
side
of
voterism
on
dialectical
voterism
has
to
do
with
with
with
an
approach
which
says
your
vote
has
been
stolen
and
you
know
one
percent
or
up
to
ten
percent.
They
claim
that
is
lost
or
is
misapplied.
Your
vote
for
a
goes
to
B
now,
but
do
you
think
that
those
people
who
institutions
across
the
United
States
do
you?
Do
you
think
that
they
say
we
need
a
paper
ballot
overwhelmingly?
E
No
or
the
the
voters
need
an
encrypted
receipt
to
overwhelmingly?
No,
but
my
Approach,
the
what
I
call
the
trial
electrical
evidential
approach
since
2012
insists
on
a
paper
ballot
and
also
vote
by
voter
verification,
for
whom
not
just
that
you
voted,
but
for
whom
you
voted.
E
I
think
this
is
the
core
issue
of
our
democracy
and
I
I'm,
insisting
and
hopefully
take
back
the
vote.
Citizens
take
control
of
your
own
vote.
F
I'm
not
going
to
read
further
into
that,
but
I
suggested
everyone
on
Council
and
the
Ura
and
land
bank
read
this
Delaware
treaty
because
we
are
enforcing
this
treaty
on
this
land
and
the
problem
is
that
there
is
not
an
equal,
an
affair
and
a
just
way
of
working
together
that
has
been
implemented
on
your
part
on
our
part.
Yes,
we've
extended
our
hand,
and
we
continue
to
do
so
and
without
redress.
I
must
add
at
this
moment,
so
there's
not
going
to
be
a
continuation
of
non-redress
and
I
want
to
remind
everyone.
F
G
Greetings:
I
am
an
Aboriginal
American
matriarch
and
my
title
is
the
agology
located
in
the
Delaware
territory,
as
you
all
will
call
Pittsburgh
PA.
My
statement
today
are
to
invoke
my
people's
constitutional
indigenous
rights.
We
are
the
original
beings,
the
original
stewards
of
our
ancestral
lands,
the
Americas,
including
the
islands,
the
envoy
only
from
our
Great
Law
of
Peace.
G
My
people
are
recognized
in
multiple
maxims
of
laws
and
documents
such
as
the
Constitution
Article,
1,
Section,
2,
Clause,
3
and
excluding
Indians,
not
tags,
the
Delaware
treaty,
the
Northwest
Ordinance,
the
adrift,
the
undripped
house,
Congress
resolution,
331
100
Congress
second
session,
and
the
list
continues.
The
city
is
under
the
jurisdiction
of
the
state.
The
state
is
under
the
jurisdiction
of
the
government.
Are
you
going
to
honor
your
oath
to
the
constant
institution?
Are
you
going
to
continue
to
commit
18
U.S
code,
2381
treason,
18
U.S
code,
1091,
genocide?
G
Are
you
going
to
continue
to
force,
enforce
the
simulation
Eugenics
colonization
making,
causing
my
people
to
be
prisoners
of
War
and
against
the
Aboriginal?
Americans
uphold
your
oath
to
the
Constitution
uphold
your
agent?
Is
the
folk
ancestors
oath
uphold
your
slogs
ancestors
hope
to
the
Constitution?
We
are
not
to
be
confused
with
title
25
Native
Americans,
who
are
the
immigrants
The
Foreigner,
the
citizens
naturalized
under
the
jurisdiction
of
the
United
States,
which
is
a
corporate
Corporation
and
a
corporation,
is
a
business.
You
are
on
Stolen
land
and
you
have
stolen
our
resources.
G
Are
you
going
to
continue
to
walk
in
the
footsteps
of
your
many
nefarious
ancestors,
such
as
Walter
Ashby,
flecker,
a
physician,
the
First
Virginia
state,
Register
of
Vital
Statistics
from
1912
to
1946
a
promoter
of
eugenics,
a
discredited
movement
nefariously
pressuring
state
agencies
to
reclassify
my
people
as
color
the
policies
Legacy
was
effectively
to
erase
Indians
as
an
identity
and
has
made
it
difficult
for
Indians
so-called
to
gain
state
federal
recognition.
My
people
are
aboriginy
Americans
and
who
have
been
reclassified
as
so-called
Indian,
so-called
color,
so-called
negro,
so-called
black
and
so-called
African-American.
G
We
cannot
be
from
two
places
at
once.
We
cannot
be
immigrants
and
we
cannot
be
foreigners,
and
my
people
are
not
citizens
not
going
through
the
10
steps
of
naturalization.
We
are
not
from
Africa,
which
it
is
an
actual
City,
and
that
content
is
actually
called
Barbarian
word
for
ancestors.
The
agencies
and
ideas.
A
H
H
when
we
had
the
trucks,
the
people
that
cooked
in
the
trucks
the
different
trucks
came
here.
These
were
employers,
employees
and
business
owners,
and-
and
it
was
this,
what
I
say:
I
agree:
City
Council
Members
should
shop
at
the
shop
and
save
on
Center
Avenue
in
the
Hill
district
concerns
substandard
meat,
rotten
fruit
and
vegetables,
rotten
cucumbers.
This
was
on
Facebook.
Somebody
showed
what
they
had
sold
to
someone
okay
Bakery
day
old.
They
were
hot,
they
were
priced
higher
than
their
fresh
food,
many
say
Shop
and
Save
prices
are
higher
than
other
stores.
H
H
That
would
swear
I
mean
you
actually
use
the
f
word
and
would
swear
at
people
and
when
I
found
out
that
they
said
that
he
had
fire,
he
got
fired,
but
he
had
been
stealing
from
his
brother-in-law.
That's
why
he
hired
him.
H
The
reason
why
I
have
here
I
agree:
City,
Council
Members
should
shop
at
Shop
and
Save.
There
was
one
of
the
owners
that
had
the
truck
she
caught
me
out
in
the
in
the
hallway
and
she
said
Miss
Brown.
You
are
right.
She
said:
I
brought
a
green
pepper,
one
time,
I
took
it
home
and
when
she
took
it
out
of
the
package
it
was
rotten
on
the
inside
she
said:
I
took
her
back
to
the
store.
She
said.
You
tell
city
council
to
come
and
Shop
up.
H
There
I
told
you
to
do,
but
you
never
did.
Then
another
thing
you
have
to
realize:
you
put
a
store,
Shop
and
Save
on
Center
Avenue.
You
change
the
buses
that
they
don't
even
come
past
Shop
and
Save
It
All.
You
have
to
get
a
chicken
to
go
home.
Does
that
make
sense?
No
it
didn't
not
for
the
older
people.
They
caught
hell
and
they're
still
catching
it.
We
have
nowhere
to.
We
don't
have
food
up
here.
H
To
get
we
don't
have
food
I
want
you
to
understand,
I
keep
coming
because
I
want
you
to
understand.
You
may
not
want
me
here:
I
have
a
paper
I
have
from
Janet
Reno
when
she
came
here
to
Pittsburgh
I
went
to
the
college.
I
had
a
big
sign
about
Johnny
Gammage.
She
was
talking,
then
she
stopped
and
she
says,
I
see
your
sign.
I
have
another
meeting,
but
if
you
write
me,
I
will
answer,
you
I
wrote
it,
and
this
is
what
I'm
saying
when
she
died.
I
said:
Janet
Reno
rest
in
peace.
H
A
I
C
K
Hi
good
afternoon,
Council
Patrick
Cornell,
Chief
Financial
Officer,
so
earlier
in
the
year
we
passed
well,
you
all
passed
a
resolution
that
would
allow
the
controller's
office
to
shift
to
in
a
technical
correction
fashion
the
account
strings
from
the
office
of
equity
into
the
office
of
the
mayor,
I
neglected
to
add
one
to
the
list,
and
this
is
a
correction
to
add
that
contract
to
the
list.
A
B
Bill
1643
resolution
amending
resolution
number
321
of
2022,
which
authorized
the
mayor
and
the
director
of
the
Department
of
Public
Safety
to
enter
into
an
amended
agreement
or
agreements
with
the
Pittsburgh
Public
Safety
Supply
Inc
for
the
provision
of
uniforms,
Duty
equipment
and
related
tailoring
and
embroidering
services
for
the
Department
of
Public
Safety
by
extending
the
term
for
six
additional
months.
Cost
for
these
Commodities
will
vary
based
on
departmental
need.
L
C
I
Thank
you
Mr
chair,
so
the
title
reads:
it
strikes
out
10
million
nine
hundred
ten
thousand
five
hundred
seventy
nine
dollars
and
replaces
it
with
56
million
188,
000
or
so
dollars,
and
then
in
the
text
file.
I
C
B
Bill
16
28
resolution
amending
resolution,
745,
effective
2019
authorizing
the
mayor
and
the
director
of
the
Department
of
Public
Safety
to
enter
on
behalf
of
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
into
an
amended
professional
service
agreement
or
agreements
with
excellent
Enterprise
Inc
for
body-worn
cameras
and
tasers
to
the
Bureau
of
police
and
an
additional
cost
of
45
million
277
527.45
over
10
years.
This
new
contract
amends
the
existing
agreement
and
includes
new
Provisions
for
body,
worn
cameras,
tasers
and
other
related
Support
Services.
J
L
Okay,
I
only
have
one
question
and
then
we'll
open
up
to
the
members
is
to
this
is
to
replace
all
devices
over
tasers
devices.
N
Evidence.Com,
so
all
of
our
technology,
as
it
relates
to
evidence,
storage
as
it
relates
to
the
taser
as
it
relates
to
axon
and
our
video
equipment
from
our
body,
worn
camera
to
our
in-vehicle
camera
system
and.
N
Time
we
have
with
the
body
worn
camera,
we
have.
We
have
Incorporated
that
into
our
Operations
Branch
and
in
our
investigation
to
Ranch,
and
it
has
become
the
system
that
we
used,
but
we
were
using
a
competing
system
in
our
vehicles,
which
was
L3,
and
so
that
system
doesn't
communicate
with
with
axon,
and
so
it
doesn't
serve
its
purpose
and
as
we
change
and
transition
to
all
axon
products.
This
was
the
the
recommendation.
N
All
new
tasers
taser10,
so
it's
their
current
technology.
It's
not
only
the
technology.
It's
our
evidence,
storage,
our
our
online
portal
for
communicating
with
our
with
our
citizens
after
before
and
after
911
calls.
So
it
gives
us
a
multitude
of
platforms
that
we
otherwise
wouldn't
have
had
in
the
past.
So.
L
N
N
Need
to
be
replaced
correct
and
we
continue
to
purchase
them
as
as
a
course
of
action,
normally
so
like
whether
it's
going
to
be
L3
or
ant
or
axon.
We
would
have
continued
that
course
of
conduct
this
person
to
make
purchases
for
in-car
video
systems
for
our
Bodywork
cameras
for
our
tasers
as
they
as
the
technology
is
Advanced
as
well.
N
J
Thank
you.
Welcome
thanks
for
being
here,
appreciate
it.
So
one
thing
this
Council
has
always
been
has
been
accommodating
to
law
enforcement,
to
have
everything
that
they
need
to
to
do
the
very
difficult
jobs
that
we
ask
you
to
do
so
I
hope,
I.
Remember
this
correctly
I
believe
we
brought
our
first
version
of
a
body,
worn
camera
when
I
first
came
into
office,
I
think
about
16
years
or
so
ago.
I
think
am
I
no
2000.
N
J
N
N
J
P
P
Please
go
ahead.
I
I
can
kind
of
give
you
it's
not
just
about
the
cameras.
There's
a
number
of
different
products
that
axon
has.
We
will
provide
to
us
within
this
package.
So
there's
the
in-car
cameras,
which
the
L3
system
is
a
server-based
system,
which
means
that
each
station
has
to
have
a
server
where
the
cars
have
to
download
the
video
footage.
P
There
are
some
problems
with
that
from
technology
standpoint,
so
we're
going
to
go
to
an
axon-based
Fleet
camera,
which
will
then
load
up
automatically
into
evidence.com,
which
is
our
digital
storage
platform.
We
have
unlimited
digital
storage
with
this
platform.
So
not
only
do
we
have
unlimited
news,
digital
storage
with
axon
recorded
devices.
P
You
know
there's
a
lot
of
different.
You
know
video
camera
footage
that
we
use
for
evidence.
We
can
then
bring
that
into
our
evidence.com
and
keep
it
all
in
one
place.
So
what
that
allows
us
to
do
is
if
you're
a
homeowner,
you
have
a
ring
camera
you
capture,
something
a
crime
on
your
ring
camera
you
can
provide
us
a.
We
can
provide
you
a
link
in
which
your
point
you
can.
You
know
send
that
information
over
to
axon
and
load
up
indoor
events.com.
Additionally,
there's
some
other
modules.
P
A
platform
called
my
90
and
that's
operational
now
and
that's
a
post,
911
survey.
So
right
now,
if
you
call
9-1-1,
there
is
based
upon
17
different
categories
of
call.
Most
of
them
are
report.
Calls
you
say
your
car
is
broken
into.
An
officer
shows
up.
We
take
a
report
about
eight
hours.
Later
you
get
a
text
link
with
you
know,
a
survey
link.
You
get
a
text
message
with
link
which
point
you
can
choose
to
complete
a
survey,
and
we
ask
you
know
a
series
of
numbers
of
questions
of
you
know.
P
O
P
85
percent
of
respondents
to
those
the
surveys
rate
to
Pittsburgh
Europe
police,
either
very
professionally
or
professionally.
Additionally,
that
we
have
some
virtual
reality.
Headsets
will
be
so
allow
us
to
do
some
scenario:
Based
training
with
this
axon
package,
and
so
so,
de-escalation
very
important.
It
takes
you
know
place
in
the
virtual
world,
so
we're
not
having
to
you
know,
locate
a
building,
locate.
It's
it's!
You
know
doing
that
scenario.
Based
training
outside
of
the
virtual
realm
is
very,
you
know,
Staffing
intensive.
P
You
know
and
costs
a
lot,
and
you
know
we
can
do
this
now
in
a
virtual
aspect,
the
so
there's
a
number
of
different.
You
know
accountability
aspects,
you
know
with
the
body
on
camera
as
well.
N
So
for
for
what
I
look
at
any
technology
or
in
any
addition
to
to
what
we
would
normally
carry
I?
Think
about
three
things:
safety,
transparency
and
accountability,
and
this
gives
us
all
three
just
for
the
perspective
of
the
expectation
of
video
footage.
When
we
have
use
of
force
where
we
have
daily
enforce
encounters.
N
We
have
critical
incidents
that
there
is
an
expectation
from
society
and
our
communities
from
you
all
from
from
the
judicial
system,
that
there
is
footage
that
speaks
to
our
officers,
actions
and
in
this
this
provides
us
with
that
in
in
various
in
various
platforms,
not
only
from
the
body
but
from
the
vehicle.
There
was
also
a
safety
aspect
from
single
sidearms,
so
when
our
officers
pull
their
weapon,
that
the
body
camera
activates
that
we're
not
having
officers
in
a
life
or
death
situation
having
to
concentrate
on
tapping.
C
N
Award
get
their
firearm
out
and
then
engage
in
a
deadly
threat
so
from
a
safety
perspective.
The
system
this
system
for
us
then
eliminates
that
extra
step
of
thought
process.
More
importantly,
where
we
would
oftentimes
lose
footage
because
we
won't
challenge
them
to
compromise
their
safety,
to
ensure
that
we
have
video
footage,
but
there
will
be
an
expectation
that
that
footage
exists
following
one
of
these
events.
J
We
crafted
the
city's
first
camera
privacy
policy,
which
has
not
really
been
updated
since
that
point
in
time
now,
when
director
hisrich
was
public
safety
director,
there
was
a
desire
within
the
Department
of
Public
Safety
to
revisit
our
camera
privacy
policy
and
and
update
according
to
the
new
developments
in
technology.
So
one
of
the
questions
I
have
is
all
the
data
that
has
been
stored
from
camera
car
cameras
at
this
point
in
time
with
a
different
company.
Just
gets
shifted
over
to
this
new
technology
to
The
Amity
Axon.
J
J
N
J
N
J
It
has
evidentiary
value
yes,
so
so
part
of
the
purpose
of
the
camera
privacy
policy
was
to
understand
the
chain
of
command,
if
you
will
of
of
at
least
as
I,
remember
specifically
cameras
within
the
public
rights
of
way
and
and
how
that
data
is
collected
stored
in
the
fact
that
it
could
be
evidentiary
in
nature
and
I
want
to
say
it's
applicable
to
cameras,
camera
usage
throughout
the
city,
but
I
can't
definitively
say
that
so
yeah.
So
that's
I,
guess
my
question.
I,
don't
know
how
to
ask
what
I
want
to
ask
you.
J
J
Okay,
gotcha,
so
the
then
within
this
new
realm
of
Technology,
that's
going
to
be
more
holistic.
If
you
will
in
nature
Under
This,
One,
Umbrella
there'll
be
new
policies
crafted
as
to
the
way
this
data
is
collected,
secured
stored
or
is
that
part
of
the
package,
or
is
it
going
to
be
based
on
existing
policy?
I.
N
Don't
feel,
there's
a
need
to
change
the
existing
policy
I
believe
because
it's
been
in
existence
for
such
time
now,
seven
or
so
years
we
haven't
had
any
any
issues
or
any
direct
complaints
from
Community
from
the
public,
as
it
relates
to
the
way
in
which
we
store
it.
The
DA's
office
controls
the
dissemination
of
it
for
for
public
consumption,
I.
J
N
And
so,
in
that
regard,
we
will
follow
our
Purge
guidelines
for
again
video
footage
that
doesn't
have
any
evidentiary
value.
Moving
forward.
I
think
that
six-month
period
gives
us
the
gives
us
an
opportunity
to
ensure
that
we
don't
have
it's
part
of
its
relative
to
Citizen
complaints
and
giving
us
the
time
that
we
don't
Purge
video
that
three
months
from
now
four
months
from
now
becomes
complaint
and
we
have
to.
We
won't
have
that
footage
to
either
exonerator
and
hold
the
officer
accountable
for
some
some
type
of
action.
J
It's
a
massive
amount
of
data
that
we're
talking
about
that's
being
collected,
stored
and
sorted
I.
Guess
that's
how
you
say
it
and
all
of
those
Provisions
for
the
collection,
the
storage,
the
the
cataloging.
If
you
will
it's
all
part
of
this
contract,
all
of
that
takes
place
within
this
system.
Yes,.
N
From
from
Storage
to
transcription
it's
so
into
feedback
loops,
so
yeah,
it
plays
a
complete,
a
paint,
a
complete
picture
of
what
accountability
and
transparency
would
look
like
to
ensure
that
it
to
your
to
your
concerns
or
to
community
concerns
or
toward
organizational
needs
and
how
we
collect
that
data
in
a
meaningful
and
useful
way.
J
N
Axon
has
been
very
again
very
technology
forward
in
their
evolution
from
going
from
taser
and
look
at
the
evolution
of
taser
and
what
it
is
when
it
started
to
what
it
has
become.
So
taser
is
part
of
axon
and
that's
what
it
was
called
when
when
the
company
started
so
this
Evolution
into
evidence
space,
this
Evolution
into
Bodywork
cameras
is
evolution
into
in-car
cameras.
N
That
was
a
platform
they
didn't
even
exist
to
to
service
three
or
four
years
ago,
and
this
contract
and
in
in
its
length
of
time,
gives
us
an
opportunity
to
evolve
a
technology
throughout
the
next
10
years
without
evolving.
The
cost
of
technology
looks
like
10
years
from
now,
when
we're
trying
to
to
accomplish
or
obtain
the
same
equipment
so.
J
N
N
J
N
So
forecasting
that
we're
not
ever
going
to
be
in
an
environment
that
we
don't
require
or
demand
this
level
of
accountability.
This
level
of
account,
for
instance,
is
within
our
communities
that
we
are
securing
a
stable
cost
today,
so
10
years
from
now
that
it
isn't
cost
prohibitive
for
us
as
an
organization.
So.
J
You
may
not
be
able
to
answer
this
question,
but
if
you
can
I'll
ask
it
the
time
to
launch
this
for
lack
of
a
better
word
once
contracts
are
in
place.
We
all
agree.
This
is
past,
sign
so
forth
and
so
on.
When
do
we
seem
to
think
this
new
hardware,
software
will
hit
the
streets
give
or
take
and.
P
J
Will
receive
that
so
this
is
well
I,
don't
want
to
say
what
I'm
trying
to
say,
but
it'll
come
in
layers,
yes
or
for
a
period
of
time,
good,
I'm,
I'm!
Well,
thank
you
for
one
more
question:
I
guess,
I,
don't
understand
the
the
data
collection
of
the
taser
and
how
that
communication
actually
happens.
How
is
it
because
the
body-borne
camera
is
automatically
activated
when
it
is
if
a
taser
is
removed
from
the
belt,
it
activates
the
camera,
much
like
if
a
gun
is.
N
J
Okay,
this
was
really
good.
This
was
very
helpful.
I
appreciate
you
taking
the
time
to
explain
it,
I'm
always
happy
to
support
and
make
certain
that
you
have
what
you
need
to
do,
the
difficult
jobs
we
ask
you
to
do.
Thank.
Q
I
Thank
you
so,
as
I
was
saying
earlier,
this
is
a
change
from
10
million
or
almost
11
million
to
56
million
and
in
the
text
file
for
members
of
the
public.
That
would
have
to
open
up
and
register
and
look
at
the
full
text.
I
25
26
27,
28
29,
the
contract
amount
is
4
million
or
so
close
to
4.1,
and
then
it
jumps
in
20
the
year
2030
through
year,
2034
to
4.9
million
in
each
year,
and
so
I've
heard
you
say
a
little
bit
about
anticipating
Rising
costs.
I
But
could
you
speak
to
why
the
10-year
agreement,
our
first
contract,
was
a
five-year
and
this
one
is
a
new
contract,
it's
being
written
as
an
amendment,
an
extension
of
a
contract,
but
it's
clearly
a
new
contract
locking
in
10
years
with
the
company
and
adding
in
some
new
Services,
adding
in
the
in-car
cameras,
I
think
adding
in
tasers,
which
were
separately
contracted,
I,
I,
believe
and
again
virtual
reality.
Headsets,
who
did
the
contract
yeah.
I
P
It
Exxon
my
90
is
also
part
of
that
as
well.
So
I
think
you
have
you
mentioned
it.
The
fleet.
You
have
the
body,
worn
cameras,
you
have
all
the
evidence,
storage.
You
have
all
of
the
accountability
aspects
with
that
activations
of
the
cameras,
the
virtual
headsets,
so
I
think
yeah
I
think
you
kind
of
covered
some
of
that
I
can't
answer
the
questions
about
like
I
think
there
was
a
cost
savings
from
the
five
years
to
ten
years.
C
P
Again
like
so,
we
didn't
have
Fleet
in
that
initial
contract,
that
mission
contract
basically
had
a
body-worn
camera
and
the
evidence
storage.
So
if
you're
going
and
looking
at,
you
know
why
the
doubling
we
have
a
fleet
of-
and
there
are
in
all
the
marked
cars,
so
you're,
probably
I,
don't
know
what
the
how
many
more
cars
we
have,
but
it's
over
100.
So
you
have
over
100
cars
that
have
now
in-car
cameras.
P
You
have
the
virtual
headsets,
which
I
think
will
be
getting
38
of
those
and
with
all
the
software
packages
associated
with
such
you
also
have
the
axon
my
90
product,
which
is
yours,
three
portions
of
that
there
is
the
post
911
survey
which
I
spoke
about.
P
They
accumulate
all
of
that
data,
put
it
on
a
dashboard
for
us
to
view,
there's
also
an
internal
survey
aspect
which
we
can
you
know,
survey
internally,
our
employees
and
there's
a
community
survey
page
which
we
can
post
a
link
onto
some
of
our
web
pages
to
you
know,
get
feedback
from
the
community.
Additionally,
there
is
a
a
text
message
portion
of
of
that.
P
So
if
somebody
calls
9-1-1,
we
can
set
up,
you
know
that
individual
to
receive
a
text
message-
and
you
know
the
example
I
would
give-
is
if
you
know
somebody
calls
in
for
an
accident.
We
can
then
send
a
text
message
that
says:
if
there's
no
injuries
and
the
cars
drive,
you
can
pull
over
to
the
side
of
the
road.
You
know
this
is
the
information
you
need
to
exchange
so
there's
there's
other
functions
that
were
not
part
of
the
original
contract.
They're
now
part
of
this
contract.
P
I
P
Also
have
unlimited
digital
storage
and
unlimited
transcription,
which
we
didn't
have
before
and,
as
councilman
said.
That's
you
know
a
lot
of
data
to
store
and
so
having
the
unlimited.
The
ability
to
store
unlimited
amount
of
video
data
is
a
is
a
big
bonus.
I
Well,
lots
of
more
but
I
have
sometimes
called
before
in
Tech
contracts,
bells
and
whistles,
and
then
I've
also
said.
Well,
you
know
I
want
to
see
if
the
department
actually
uses
the
things,
because
very
often
I've
had
to
vote
on
Lots.
You
know:
we've
voted
on
multi-million
dollar
technology
packages
previously
and
then
I
had
to
cancel
them
and
kind
of
scrap
the
whole
set
of
software
and
then
contract
a
whole
new
I.
I
Don't
think
that's
going
to
happen
in
this
place,
but
I
do
wonder
if
and-
and
we
can't
see
it
here,
nor
can
we
hear
it
in
your
testimony
that
the
separate
contracts
for
the
things
that
we've
currently
had
like
tasers,
like
vehicle
cameras
like
the
online
storage,
that
the
bundling
of
these
Services
into
one
contract,
there's
cost
savings
I
can
probably
follow
up
with
I.
Don't
know
if
I'm
working
with
imp
on
the
Contracting
or
do
you
go,
do
your
own?
I
C
A
I
Q
I
For
a
minute,
okay,
thank
you
so
yeah,
if
I
think,
if
we
as
the
public
can
articulate
because
again
we're
locking
up,
in
this
case,
Not
Just
2
million
2.2
2.5
billion
a
year,
but
we're
literally
committing
4
million
a
year
for
the
next
five
years
and
then
nearly
five
millimeter
for
the
next
five
years.
After
that,
and
that's
a
lot
of
money.
Yes,
we've
been,
we
have
other
decisions
like
that
in
front
of
us,
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
bundling
is
also
cheaper
than
if
we
did
it
separately.
I.
R
Can
speak
to
that
Jake,
Paul,
Deputy,
Mayor
and
director
of
The
Office
of
Management
and
budget.
So
as
Commander
Ragland
mentioned,
director
Schmidt
requested
both
five
and
ten
year,
pricing
from
axon
in
preparation
for
advancing.
O
R
Contract
and
axon
offered
significant
discounts
for
a
10-year
commitment,
which
average
out
to
be
the
average
savings
per
year,
is
877
thousand
dollars.
But
the
total
savings
over
the
life
of
a
10-year
contract
is
10
million
dollars.
89
367.45.
So
by
signing
on
to
a
longer
term
commitment
we're
able
to
reduce
the
total
cost
of
these
Services
over
that
10
years
by
10
million
dollars.
The
the
value
I
did
ask
actually
asked
the
director
several
of
the
same
questions.
R
You've
been
asking
councilperson
about
the
long-term
kind
of
state
of
technology
in
this
sector
and
axon
and
I
think
he
felt
comfortable,
as
did
the
folks
in
the
bureau,
and
they
can
certainly
speak
to
this
more
firsthand
than
I.
R
Can
that
axon
is
one
of
if
not
the
leading
vendor
for
these
services
in
the
sector
and
that
that's
unlikely
to
change
given
the
way
in
which
the
market
is
that
market
is
structured
and
that
having
all
of
our
Services
of
this
type
in
one
in
the
hands
of
one
vendor
and
a
lot
that
allowing
for
the
various
pieces
of
equipment
to
communicate
with
each
other
and
for
the
data
storage
to
be
integrated
will
allow
for
the
most
seamless
capturing
of
the
necessary
evidentiary
data.
R
So,
for
example,
if
the
in-car
cameras
are
and
the
body
worn
cameras
and
the
taser
and
Firearm
sensors
are
all
communicating
with
each
other,
they
can
enable
each
other
activate
each
other
as
an
officer
moves
from
pursuit
to
out
of
their
car.
So
then,
the
sort
of
the
car
camera
will
tell
the
body
worn
camera
to
activate,
certainly
and
then,
if
they
draw
their
weapon,
it
activates
and
then
the
storage
all
happens
in
one
place.
R
So
it
it
streamlines
the
way
in
which
we're
able
to,
as
the
chief
and
Commander
were
saying,
maintain
clear
accountability,
information
across
a
single
platform.
So,
there's
both
a
financial
savings
from
a
10-year
commitment
and
confidence,
I
think
in
the
The
Bureau
in
the
Department
of
Public
Safety
and,
ultimately
an
OMB
that
a
10-year
commitment
to
axon
is
a
from
a
business
decision.
Point
of
view
for
the
city,
a
smart
investment,
particularly
if
we're
able
to
get
that
pricing.
I
I'm
somewhat
comforted,
that
is
company
that
has
proven
that
it
is
functional
before
that
we've
been
using
it
I,
just
can't
help,
but
like
say
an
old
person
thing
not
to
be
a
Luddite,
but
like
the
more
dependent
we
are
on
all
these
combined
Services.
You
know
they
can
you
know
in
10
years
yeah
they
can
easily
triple
the
price
and
we're
completely
dependent.
We
have
literally
seen
that
happen,
while
I've
been
at
Council,
suddenly
we're
dependent
on
these
functions
and
it's
just
one
vendor
who's
able
to
provide
them
for
us.
I
So
let
me
switched
I've
said
that
it's
a
it's
a
problem
that
we've
faced
before
we're
going
to
face
again:
I,
don't
have
the
solution
here,
so
it's
not
really
appropriate,
but
I
do
think
it's
a
discussion.
We
should
have
I'll.
Also
say
again.
What
I've
said
before
is
that
you
know
that
the
use
of
technology
in
cameras
is,
is
twofold,
and
certainly
with
the
body
cameras.
I
Our
citizens
want
that
chain
of
evidence
so
that
they
have
backup
to
what
they
have
experienced,
but
with
the
powerful
cameras
that
we
are
now
adding
all
over
the
place,
including
now
we
have
both
in-car
and
body,
worn
cameras.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
no
monitoring
happening
right
and
that's
a
big
difference
and
I
asked
this
last
when
we
were
talking
about
the
eye
of
Sauron
on
the
top
of
the
UPMC
building.
I
That
is
a
powerful
camera
that
can
see
into
people's
houses
that
I,
frankly,
didn't
know
existed
until
this
year,
and
so
I
sit
down
and
I'll
say
again
that
we
just
need
to
continue
to
have
these
conversations
as
the
power
of
this
technology
moves
that
it's
not
it's
incumbent
upon
this
table
to
make
sure
that
people's
rights
are
being
protected
because
or
to
pay
for
these
things
or
to
not
to
buy
them
or
not
buy
them.
I
Is
that
the
standard,
would
you
be
able
to
activate
the
body
camera
even
before
yeah,
so
you
so
like
what?
What
is
our
kind
of
standard
of
having
body
cameras
on
so.
N
Citizen
Congress
call
for
service
traffic,
stops
engagement
so
that
that
citizen
encounters,
whether
it's
initiated
by
officers
or
initiate
by
calls
for
service
traffic,
stop
etc.
Those
will
be
the
opportunities
or
the
moments
those
cameras
activate,
and
so
that
is
accurately
capturing.
Our
officers
encounters
with
the
public,
with
our
members
of
the
community
to
ensure
that
level
of
accountability
that
we
all
demand
and
and
that
level
of
transparency
that
we
all
demand,
gives
us
all.
Also
the
opportunity,
then
to
remediate
behavior
remediate
training.
D
S
R
Caught
by
surprise,
and
so
didn't
have
a
reason
to
have
it
on
already
or
they
made
an
error
and
didn't
activate
it
when
they
should
have.
But
then
a
situation
escalates
to
the
point
that
they're
drawing
a
weapon.
It
guarantees
that
it
activates
itself
at
that
stage,
rather
than
the
incident
where
the
weapon
is
drawn,
potentially
used
not
being
captured
due
to
user
error
or
surprise.
I
I
We
wouldn't
even
be
able
to
buy
the
servers
and
the
Personnel
to
monitor
the
server
so
we're
completely
dependent
on
the
cloud
like
most
of
us
are
for
everything
else,
including
like
your
list
of
phone
numbers
in
your
phone,
and
so
the
vehicle
camera
stuff
is
going
from
server
to
Cloud
base
to
be
folded
into
the
cloud-based
subscription
I'll
just
emphasize
that
subscription
we're
basically
paying
56
million
dollars
for
a
digital
subscription
and
some
of
the
some
of
the
hard
equipment
that
goes
with
it.
S
Thank
you
Mr
chair,
so
this
is
a
large
contract
and,
specifically
in
terms
of
this
contract,
you're
talking
about
immediately
the
the
the
car
cameras
have
to
be
replaced.
Is
that
correct,
yeah.
N
So
L3
system
cost
us
about
a
half
a
billion
dollars
a
year,
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
a
year.
If
we
were
going
to
equip
40
vehicles
with
the
the
with
the
service
agreement,
the
camera's
about
seven
thousand
dollars
a
piece,
it
doesn't
account
a
maintenance
plan.
So
if
something
were
to
be
damaged
plus
it
doesn't
also
account
the
servers
that
we
are
required
to
have
in
our
stations
geographically
located
throughout
the
city,
so
that
information
is
uploaded
and
captured
when
when
it
occurs,.
C
S
Axon,
what
brand
is
that
L3,
so
the
l3s
had
to
be
replaced,
and
then
when
would
we
replace
the
the
body
cameras
and
the
tasers.
P
That
happens
on
a
you
know,
basis
when
I
think
it's
like
every
like
36
months
or
when
a
new
body-worn
camera
iteration
comes
out.
R
N
R
S
Between
but
immediately
we're
gonna
replace
all
the
units
in
the
cars
correct
on
the
vehicles.
Okay,
because
the
way
it
reads
here,
it's
like
the
you
know,
obviously
I
don't
have
the
full
text
up,
but
the
you
know
right
away.
It
says
for
body,
worn
cameras
and
tasers,
but
it
seems
like
it's
actually
for
the
replacement
of
the.
R
Initially
I
think
I
can
help
answer
that
councilman,
the
the
switch
from
L3
to
axon
for
the
in-car
cameras
was
authorized
separately
earlier
in
the
year.
So
that's
why
they've
mentioned
that
that
conversion
is
already
started
to
occur.
This
contract
would
combine
a
renewal
of
our
taser
and
body
worn
camera
package
with
okay.
R
P
So,
as
I
said
earlier,
my
90
is
a
survey
tool.
It
does
post
911
surveys
for
individuals
who
call
9-1-1
using
the
phone
number
that
calls
911.
P
We
also
have
the
ability,
through
email,
addresses,
to
do
a
totally
Anonymous
surveys
of
our
employees
debate
debating
debating
on
what
kind
of
questions
we
want
to
ask.
We
have
not
utilized
that
as
of
yet,
and
we
also
have
the
ability
to
do
community
type
surveys,
so
we
can
send
post
that
link
on
one
of
our
web
pages,
depending
on
what
we
want
to
find
out
about.
The
you
know
from
the
General
Public.
S
In
terms
of
management
staff-
and
you
know,
or
the
direction
of
you
know
from
your
direction,
you
know:
are
there
any
features
here
that
are
you're
already
looking
at
to
look
internally
at
some
of
the
footage
or
audio.
N
Some
of
it
is
some
of
it
is
restricted
by
by
our
bargaining
agreement,
so
there
there
are
trigger
points
that
we're
allowed
to
look
at
video.
We
went
out
to
looking
for
training
improvements,
we're
allowed
to
look
up
for
Behavioral
issues
when
it's
identified
when
an
officer
has
been
placed
on
monitoring.
So
it
gives
us
a
lot
of
accountability
pieces
that
we
would
otherwise
not
have,
especially
when
we're
talking
about
engagement
with
the
community.
N
We're
talking
about
internal
complaints
and
I
think
to
it
is
rather
the
the
continued
decrease
in
citizen
complaints
is,
is
a
part
of
of
this
Bodywork
camera
system
that
it
it
regulates,
Behavior
as
well,
and
and
also
then
accounts
for
our
officers,
actions
when,
when
there's
complaints,
Lodge
against
them,
that
that
are
false.
So
it
gives
us
that
sense
of
security
that
our
officers
are
acting
appropriately
all
the
time,
especially
when
they're
engaged
with
the
community.
So
in
that
accountability,
piece
I
think
it's
really
important.
P
And
if
I
may,
you
know
Chief
has
been
very
clear
about
you
know.
One
of
his
pillars
has
been
officer
wellness
and
giving
officers
purpose.
So
as
we
move
forward,
not
just
identifying
when
maybe
an
officer
does
something
wrong,
but
we
utilize
the
technology
that
we
have
to
be
identified.
You
know
when
an
officer
does
something
well,
and
so
that's
part
of
the
reason
why
you
know
we've
kind
of
instituted,
my
90,
which
is
allows
people
to
kind
of
comment
on.
P
You
know
how
they
were
treated
and
how
the
officer
responded
to
their
call.
You
couple
that
with
you
know
some
other
tools
and
you
can
you
know,
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
officers
do
well
that
never
fall
into
a
stat
column,
but
you
know
how
you're
treated
is
very
important,
and
so,
as
we
move
forward,
this
gives
us
the
ability
to
kind
of
recognize,
good
work
and
incentivize.
Your.
P
Treatment
of
you
know
our
citizens,
so.
S
You
talked
a
lot
about
on
the
like
the
customer
side,
I'm,
not
sure
what
the
residence
customer
like.
However,
I
can't
remember
what
exact
term
you
use,
but
it
looks
like
you're
talking
about
customer
satisfaction,
but
also
the
question
I
was
asking
was
directed
at
the
management
and
it
definitely
sounds
like
you're
gonna
you're,
using
tools
that
are
available
to
analyze
your
own
staff,
regardless
of
what
that
you
know
what
the
surveys
are
saying
from
the
the
residence
side.
Well,.
P
I
think
that
could
be
a
a
comprehensive
approach.
You
know
I
think
we
have
to
sit
down
and
kind
of
look
at
what
kind
of
tools
we
currently
have
and
you
know
kind
of
develop
a
you
know,
a
a
professional
Matrix
so
to
speak
of
you
know
how
an
officer
performs
so
I
think
that
there's
obviously
the
opportunity
is
there.
S
Look
at
do
you
see
that
as
a
direction
you
take
just
on
your
own,
or
would
that
be
something
that
you'd
want
to
get
clearance
from
the
administration
or
Council.
N
On
I,
don't
think
we
need
to
be
prompted
to
be
accountable.
So
when
we're
talking
about
arrests,
we're
talking
about
use
of
force,
we're
talking
about
training,
those
are
the
initiatives
that
I
should
lead.
I,
don't
think
I
need
to
be
pushed
into
one
of
these
scenarios.
It's
absolutely
the
the
way
in
which
I
see
this
Police
Department
moving
forward
in
the
way
in
which
I
see
we
serve
our
officers
in
our
community,
so
it
doesn't
need
direction
from
anyone
else.
N
I
think
when
we're
proactive
in
this
space
that
we
actually
accomplish
more
than
being
forced,
Upon
Us
in
some
some
other
way
or
some
other
medium
to
to
get
to
us
so
I.
Think
of
even
from
the
training
perspective
that,
like
the
virtual
reality,
we
talk
about
active
bystander
Behavior.
We
talk
about
scenario,
Based
training.
Well,
we
don't
have
a
location
that
we
can
do
that
with
any
frequency.
P
Depends
so
if
it's
a
crime,
it's
stored,
you
know
until
such
time
that
the
a
says
that
we
can
get
rid
of
it.
If
it's,
you
know,
evidentiary
value,
that's
you
know
up
to
the
D.A.
If
it's
you
know
just
a
regular
citizen
counter,
it's
usually
120
days,
but.
S
P
Cameras
are
10
days
10
days
unless
we
make
a
request
to
preserve
that.
S
Does
the
does
the
does
the
body
camera
does
the
audio?
Is
it
always
recording.
P
So
it's
buffering,
you
know
it's
in
standby
mode.
It's
buffering
every
30
seconds.
It's
buffering
video
only.
R
Again,
it
records
video
only
for
30
second
bursts
that
aren't
retained
with
no
audio,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
when
you
activate
the
camera,
it
preserves
the
10
seconds
before
you
push
the
button
to
capture
whatever
may
have
caused
you
to
activate
the
camera,
but
without
audio
and
then
the
audio
only
picks
up
after
the
Button
had
been
pushed.
T
Yeah,
so
you
know
when
I
first
saw
this
come
across
the
table,
it
definitely
raised
my
eyebrows.
It's
just
an
awful
lot
of
money.
I
think
I
can
safely
presume
that
this
bill
is
going
to
pass.
T
You
know
here
we
we
regularly
sort
of
haggle
over
over
costs,
much
smaller
than
this
much
smaller
than
this.
That
will
actually
improve
life
for
our
residents
and
make
life
better
in
the
city,
and
this
is,
you
know,
just
to
be
clear
again.
This
is
just
so
that
if
we
need
to
taser
a
resident,
we've
got
it
on
camera.
You
know,
we've
got
it
recorded,
I
mean
just
I.
Think.
Last
week
we
were
haggling
over
thirty
five
thousand
dollars
to
give
city
employees
passes
for
the
Pogo
bikes.
T
You
know
about
whether
we
need
so
and
and
so
I
you
know,
and
just
I
just
can't
help
that
you
know
we're
here
in
budget
season.
You
know
I've
got
traffic
calming
projects
and
playground,
repairs
and
there's
neighborhoods
without
rec
centers,
and
you
know,
I've
got
parents
lining
up
at
6
a.m,
to
get
a
spot
in
our
in
our
city
park
summer
camps,
because
we
know
the
staff
and
the
the
resources
to
expand
those
camps.
T
I've
got
neighborhood
groups
that
need
funding
to
offer
nighttime
activities
which
we've
talked
about
that
they
need
at
this
body.
You
know
so
that
our
kids
in
the
summer
and
on
weekends,
when
school
is
out
have
safe
places
to
go.
T
T
You
know
neighbors
have
to
report
other
neighbors,
because
their
sidewalks
are
inadequate
because
we
don't
pay
for
sidewalks
right.
People
are
responsible
for
their
own
sidewalks
and
you
know
all
of
these
gaps
and
needs,
but
we
have
no
choice
but
to
vote
Yes
on
on
this
bill,
and
that
is
frustrating
to
me.
This
is
not
on
for
you,
but
that
is
just
frustrating
to
me.
T
So
I
do
just
have
a
few
questions
since
we're
talking
about
body
cams
and
tasers,
I
guess
the
first
one.
Well
one
thing
too:
I
do
want
to
just
quickly
so
like
the
this
technology,
if
I
understand
does,
does
this
also
apply
to
firearms
like
if
a
firearm
is
drawn?
Does
the
camera
turn
on
and
all
of
that
so.
N
That's
what
we're
talking
with
signal
sidearms
so
single
sidearm
is,
is
bent
for
the
firearm
too,
when
it
is
drawn
from
The
holster,
then
it
activates
the
camera.
What
we're
finding
is
that
that
was
a
gap
in
in
obtaining
footage,
because
the
officers
are
focused
on
the
threat,
that's
in
front
of
them,
which
obviously
is
a
daily
Force
encounter
and
they're.
C
N
So
concerned
or
aware
about
the
camera
on
their
chest
so
and
then
I
would
understand
that
concern
as
well,
so
but
I
also
understand
that
we
cannot
failed
to
capture
that
most
significant
event
that
daily
encounter
and
in
a
meaningful
way,
and
then
we're
relying
on
the
officers
to
do
it
and
and
if
we
miss
that
the
expectations
that
come
from
Community
expectations
come
from
this
panel.
This
board
this
this
body,
our
expectations,
organizationally
the
and
the
need
to
have
that
footage
for
prosecution
in
every.
N
So
it
touches
every
facet
of
what
we
do
professionally
and,
more
importantly,
the
expectations
that
come
from
it.
And
in
that
that
we
weren't
getting
that
footage.
Fleet
the
same
way
it
was
it.
We
were
still
relying
on
officers
to
individually
activate
the
cameras
by
pushing
a
button
in
the
middle
of
their
chest.
Right
now,
we're
creating
an
environment
that
that
can't
that
they
can't
defeat
it.
It
won't
be
defeated
by
by
inaction
and
or
other
behaviors
that
right.
T
N
It's
when
they
draw
their
tasers
when
they
draw
their
firearm
from
the
vehicles
when
they
remove
the
rifle
or
the
less
lethal,
less
lethal
munition.
So
there
are
multi
multi.
It's
multifaceted,
activation
from
different
different
points
and
some
are
in
the
vehicle,
and
it's
created
that
redundance
created
intentionally
to
ensure
that
it's
activated
by
other
means
beyond
the
officer
and
his
or
her
pushing
the
button
in
above
their
chest.
T
R
Versus
tasers
I
think
the
chief
has
more
up-to-date
information
than.
T
N
So
we're
talking
about
intermediate
Force
versus
deadly
force,
that's
right
and
those
encounters
can
evolve
within
the
same
instance
right
so
non-compliance,
aggressive
non-compliance,
assaultive
non-compliance,
but
it
doesn't
meet
daily
force.
It
doesn't
meet
the
the
the
demand
of
daily
force.
It
doesn't
meet
the
requirement
of
deadly
force,
so
that's
oftentimes.
N
No,
it's
an
intermediate
control
tactic,
so
it
it
is
so
that
we
are
minimizing
the
amount
of
force
that
either
was
usually
could
have
been
deployed
by
batons
and
or
deployed
by
officers.
Multiple
officers
that
multiple
officer
engagement
with
with
a
citizen-
that's
resisting
in
this,
this
intermediate
use
of
force
minimizes.
All
of
that
liability
that
comes
with
that
physical
encounter
and
keeps
our
officer
safe,
keeps
the
citizen
or
the
person
that's
being
arrested.
N
A
safer
control
tactic
for
for
certain
for
not
only
the
person
that
we're
taking
into
custody
but
for
our
officers.
It's
minimizing
officer,
injury,
minimize,
the
potential
for
officer
injury
because
it
it
then
obviously
will
create
an
environment
where
the
officer
doesn't
have
to
engage.
Russell
could
be
on
the
ground
ground
fight
with
with
someone
that.
B
N
N
Aren't
many
instances
where
the
taser
the
weapon
system,
that
I
that
I
know
to
speak
of
Will
has
caused
death
or
been
proven
to
cause
death.
Obviously,
when
they're,
when
there
is
a
failure
in
this
weapon
system,
it's
relative
to
oftentimes
the
prongs
not
connecting
it
requires
both
promises
to
be
touching.
At
the
same
time,
oftentimes
that
doesn't
occur
based
on
clothing
based
on
placement,
so.
Q
R
That
that,
to
the
extent
that
a
taser
has
caused
a
deadly
incident,.
Q
R
Been
when
it's
been
used
out
of
accordance
with
departmental
policy
which,
to
the
the
point
of
today's
discussion,
was
captured
on
body,
worn
camera
and
resulted
in
termination
for.
T
So
I
guess
I
want
to
is
there
can
do
do
we
know
how
so
my
my
staff
found
I'm
to
be
honest,
I'm,
not
sure
where
they
found
it,
but
that
that
from
2015
to
2020
that
15
of
the
time
that
tasers
were
were
deployed
on
subjects
resisting
arrests?
Does
that
do
we
have
a
place
where
we
can
I
mean?
Does
this
system
allow
us
so
I
mean
I
would
love
to
know
how
many
times
tasers
were
I
mean
when
we
talk
about?
How
often
do
we
use
right?
This
is
very
expensive
stuff.
T
How
often
do
we
use
tasers
and
you
know,
are
there
I'd,
like
a
comparison
of
you,
know
times
where
we've
had
someone
resisting?
We
don't
use
a
Taser.
We
do
use
a
Taser
like
which
is
more
effective
Etc.
Do
we
have
any
way
to
report
on
that.
N
B
N
So
yes,
there
will
be,
there
will
be.
We
do
capture
it
today,
so
it's
not
something
we
have
to
start
capturing.
Are
we
capture
it
in
our
use
of
force
reports,
and
so
it
is
mandated
that
we
report
on
what
type
of
force
we
use?
Okay
and
and
the
effectiveness
of
it,
for
that
reason,
is
that
we
we
stand
behind
this
Tool
as
as
an
ability
to
influence
behaviors
ability
to
to
take
into
custody
individuals
that
that
are
resisting
and
in
a
manner
that
is
least
harmful
to
both
the
officer
and
the
individual.
N
That's
going
to
be
taken
into
custody
and
in
this
I
stand
behind
this
tool
as
a
deployment
Factor,
because
otherwise
we
would
be
using
batons
old
things
like
the
Blackjack
and
or
Hands-On,
and
in
those
instances
we
know
that
officer,
injuries
increase
the
use
of
force
has
to
be
done
by
more
people,
which
then
increases
the
opportunity
and
risk
for
injury
to
the
person.
That's
resisting
as
well.
Okay,.
T
Okay,
that
makes
sense
okay.
So
then,
my
next
sort
of
set
of
questions
relates
to
axon
Enterprises,
so
I
we
did
a
little
bit
of
looking
into
so.
First
of
all,
there
was
a
public
Source
article
back
in
2017,
so
we
that
saying
that
we
first
moved
forward
at
that
at
that
year,
with
body
cameras,
buying
body
cameras
and
at
that
time
the
contract
that
we
negotiated
with
axon.
It
was
for
1.5
million
and
again
this
is
just
an
art.
T
You
know
I'm
just
taking
this
article
at
its
word,
but
that
at
the
time
we
got
550
body
cameras
for
the
same
price
that
the
New
Jersey
State
Police
got
a
thousand
body
cameras.
The
Los
Angeles
Police
Department
got
860
cameras
in
the
Denver
Police
Department
got
800
cameras,
so
there
was.
There
were
definitely
concerns
at
the
time
about
the
contract
negotiations
with
axon
so
and
so
I
get
so
we
don't
know
who
I
mean?
Who
who
did
those
negotiations?
T
I
went
on
axon's
website
and
tried
to
sort
of
look
at
their
pricing
and
just
to
to
be
clear
that
well
the
only
prices
that
they
have.
So
you
can
a
person
individual
can
buy
one
of
these
tasers
for
a
thousand
dollars,
which
means
we
could
you
know
an
individual
could
buy
900
tasers
for
nine
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
do
that
every
year
for
ten
years,
for
nine
million
dollars
and
the
same
with
now
they
didn't
have
prices
on
their
body
cams.
T
You
know
for
10
years,
you'd
be
looking
about
ninety
thousand
dollars
now
I
understand,
there's
all
this
software
that
goes
along
with
that
right
and
axon
is
sort
of,
like
the
apple
of
body,
cams
and
tasers,
to
the
point
that
actually
the
yeah,
a
Federal
Trade
Commission
filed
a
complaint
against
them
when
they
bought
their
competitor
for
creating
a
monopoly
in
the
body,
cam
taser
business.
T
N
C
R
Well,
I
was
not
personally
involved,
I
reviewed
some
of
the
materials
that
resulted
from
that,
which
is
where
I
was
able
to
quote
the
discount.
In
my
earlier
comments,
I
I
I
think
it
is
helpful
to
think
about
this
engagement.
R
I
mean
we're,
we're
more
really,
leasing
the
equipment
per
se
than
purchasing
it,
and
so
so
the
cost
is
not
necessarily
it
I
would
think
of
it
more
as
the
the
cost
of
having
and
utilizing
the
equipment
having
it
replaced,
having
it
serviced
when
that's
necessary,
for
example,
when
the
tasers
are
used,
replacement
cartridges
are
provided
as
a
part
of
the
contract
and
we're
not
purchasing
those.
The
associated
equipment
is
included
in
that
cost
too.
So
it's
a
different
pricing
model
than
the
sales
to
the
general
public,
where
you
purchase.
D
R
Of
at
your
own
risk
and
then
add
to
that
right,
yeah
there's
the
digital
subscriptions,
of
course,
and
then
to
the
the
various
pricings
for
for
different
cities.
As
as
I
mentioned,
by
pursuing
a
longer
contract
term,
we
were
able
to
receive
a
discount.
The
the
I,
don't
know
all
of
the
Departments
you
mentioned,
but
I
re.
Could
you
could
you
name
them
again.
R
R
So
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
about
New,
Jersey
or
Denver,
but
the
Los
Angeles
Police
Department
is
perhaps
10
times
as
large
as
ours
right
and
so.
I'm
saying
that
that
higher
purchase
larger
users
get
better
pricing
is
my
point.
Yeah.
T
Okay,
so,
but
then
again,
though,
this
does
because
I
think
councilwoman
Grocers.
So
it's
like.
Yes,
we
are
saving
10
000
on
a
package
that
we
did
not
formally
have
right,
but
we
are
paying
double
for
additional
Services
right
and
now
I
understand.
Some
of
that
is
cameras
in
the
cars
and
things
like
that.
But
it
would
be
nice
to
know
the
specifics
right
like
how
much
more,
how
much
are
we
paying
for
this
text
service?
Where
the
you
know
the
person
gets
a
text
message
to
give
a
customer.
T
You
know
like
a
five-star
review
to
the
officer.
I,
don't
I
I
mean
that
may
be
a
valuable
tool,
but
if
it
costs
you
know
or
or
are
these
packages,
do
we
just
have
no
choice
and
that's
just
axon
just
coming
to
the
pit,
the
city
and
saying:
look,
you
know:
either
you
buy
this
giant
package,
that's
double
what
you've
been
paying
and
we'll
call
it
a
deal
and
by
the
way,
just
so
everyone
knows
their
their
motto
is
quote
everything
your
Public
Safety
agency
needs
without
breaking
the
bank.
N
N
Right
to
the
deputy
mayor's
point,
they
did
by
somewhere
they're,
comparing
US
versus
to
La
it's
when
you're
buying
it.
It's
such
a
magnitude
that
you're
just
your
pricing,
is
different
like
just
like.
If
the
Allegheny
County
Police
would
go
to
make
the
same
purchase,
that
price
would
be
different
because
they're
not
purchasing
nearly.
U
M
T
R
So
the
my
90
service,
which
is
the
text
program
that
Commander
Ragland
mentioned,
is
included
for
free
in
this
package,
for
example,
so
so
so
in
making
in
in
agreeing
to
a
10-year
commitment,
something
that
would
have
cost
money
on
its
own
is
included
without
cost.
In
this
proposal,
which
is
in
the
materials
that
you're
you
were
provided,
as
is
unlimited.
Third-Party
storage,
for
example,
is
listed
at
no
cost.
R
Some
of
the
services
that
we're
articulating
here
today
are
are
not
we're
not
being
charged
for
by
agreeing
to
other
aspects
of
the
package.
T
Right,
but
the
question
is
what
is
I
mean
and
like
if
it's
the
cameras
and
by
the
way,
the
cameras
that
don't
and
again
like
I,
said
axon
is
sort
of
known
as
the
apple
of
tasers
and
cameras.
So
specifically,
they
and
there
have
been
lawsuits
with
other
camera
companies
because
axon
cameras
don't
work
with
their.
You
know,
like
their
stuff,
doesn't
work
with
other
people's
stuff,
so
it's
sort
of
at
any
rate,
that's
just
something
to
know
again.
This
is
not
on
you
guys.
T
This
is
just
something
for
the
public
to
know
about
this
company
that
we're
Contracting
with
and
and
which,
quite
frankly,
we
don't
have
a
choice
but
to
contract
with,
because
they're
the
only
show
in
town,
more
or
less
right.
T
They
have
70
percent
of
the
market
or
something
but
again
I'm
asking
what
what
so
that
so
we're
paying
an
additional
2
million
per
year
and
I
understand
that
we're
buying
cameras
for
the
cars
and
and
and
and
what
are
the
other
things
that
we're
getting
for
that
2
million
per
year,
which
yes
is
a
deal
compared
to
if
we
had
done
a
five-year
contract.
But
what
is
it
that
we're
getting
for
the
extra
2
million
a
year?
R
R
What
we
are
getting
in
addition
to
the
continuous
replacement
of
those
pieces
of
equipment
are
additional
software
services
that
allow
us
to
integrate
the
footage,
as
well
as
the
censoring
of
other
equipment
such
as
well
is
the
installation
of
the
in-car
cameras
in
their
incorporation
into
the
system,
which
I
should
note
came
at
a
like.
Continuing
to
contract
with
L3
has
a
cost
that
we're
we're
is
being
offset
by
migrating
right.
So
we
would
no
longer
be
continuing
to
pay
the
seven
thousand
dollars
a
unit
for
all.
Three
cameras
continue
to
pay.
C
R
Sensors
at
each
Police
Zone
that
downloaded
the
data
from
those
cameras
into
that
separate
system
right.
So
there
are
offset
costs
to
not
continuing
forward
with
L3
that
are
achieved
by
by
moving
to
axon
and
then
the
the
censoring
of
tasers
at
draw
sidearms
and
the
other
equipment
in
the
vehicle,
like
the
long
guns
that
the
police
keep
in
the
vehicle
until
they
need
to
use.
O
C
T
Again,
so
just
because
you
know
we
we
do
have
a
new
police
chief,
and
so
they
think
I
said
at
the
swearing
end.
You
know
I
do
feel
like
we.
T
That
is
an
abnormal
way
to
be
at
work
right,
and
that
is
the
cost
of
the
status
quo
of
policing
in
this
country
for
so
many
years,
right
that
this
is
what
it's
got.
This
is
the
kind
of
money
that
it's
costing
us.
In
addition
to
you
know
millions
of
dollars
in
settlement
fees.
Etc
right
is,
is
constant
surveillance
and
scrutiny
over
officers
who,
for
the
most
part,
are
good
at
their
job
right
and
doing
what
they're
supposed
to
be
doing
right.
T
So
that's
you
know,
and
this
isn't
about
keeping
people
safe
right.
This
isn't
even
about
keeping
people
safe.
This
is
just
about
scrutinizing
every
move
that
our
officers
make
to
keep
to
protect
the
public
right
in
in
the
rare
instances
or
I
should
say
not
more
and
more
infrequent
instances
where
there
was
actual
misconduct,
but
really
also
to
protect
officer
right,
because
you
know
you
have
to
have
the
cameras
on
because
of
this
state
that
we
are
in
right,
and
that
is
that
is
what
the
status
quo
of
policing
in
this
country
is
costing
us.
T
I
I
hope
that
I
I
want
the
public
to
understand
that
it's
costing
us
as
taxpayers
and
I
want
the
the
force
to
understand
that
it's
costing
them
just
I
mean
I,
don't
know,
I
would
I
mean
peace
of
mind.
I
wouldn't
want
a
camera
on
me
constantly
at
work.
That
is
so
stressful.
I
can't
imagine
you
know
yet
here
we
are
and-
and
you
know,
we're
paying
I
mean
we're
it's
like
we're
paying
as
much
per
year
as
we're
just
putting
into
affordable
housing
more
into
affordable.
T
How
we
just
had
a
whole
talk
about
affordable
housing
and,
like
sleeping
it's
too
much,
you
know
whatever
a
year
and
we're
putting
that
just
into
tasers
and
body
cams.
T
It's
it's
it's
nuts
right,
but
it's
sort
of
that's
where
we
are
so
it's
just
I
I
really
want
the
public
to
to
hear
that
and
I
want
the
force
to
hear
that
and
then
hopefully,
as
you
move
forward
with
what
you
know,
I
I
think
you
have
a
fantastic
plan
and
vision
for
for
kind
of
moving
toward
a
Community
Police
relations
that
are
based
on
trust
and
confidence
and
Guardian.
You
know
a
sense
of
Safety
and
Security
and
guardianship,
and
you
know,
and
then
hopefully
maybe
someday
down
the
road.
T
A
Thank
you.
I've
got
president
Smith.
M
Thank
you,
I'm
gonna
I'm,
just
going
to
be
really
cautious
because
I
never
like
approving
a
contract
that
comes
before
us
to
continue
a
contract
I
like
for
us
to
be
able
to
look
at
the
parameters
of
the
contract
and
some
of
the
things
that
are
in
the
contract.
M
So
I
just
have
a
couple
questions,
but
first
I
want
to
say,
acknowledge
Commander
Ragland
for
the
work
that
he's
done
with
the
program
that
we've
approved
today
for
operation
Better
Block.
So
thank
you
for
your
work.
There
was
it
with
Perry.
Is
that
right?
You
started
pairing,
so
I
want
to
acknowledge
that,
and
so
I
know
that
I
know
the
work
you
do
and
but
I
but
I
do
have
some
concerns
and
some
questions
about
this
contract
overall
and
I
really
think
that
I'd
rather
get
some
of
these
things
in
writing.
M
R
So
so,
as
a
few
others
have
mentioned,
the
axon
is
a
leading
and
and
fairly
standard,
they're
they're.
R
In
essence,
for
better
for
worse
to
points
council
person,
Warwick
mentioned
the
industry
standard
in
in
this
in
this
type
of
Technology
they're,
really
the
only
provider
of
the
kind
of
comprehensive
set
of
technologies
that
are
being
procured
here,
and
in
light
of
that,
and
in
light
of
the
fact
that
we
are
already
using
and
sort
of
configured
if
you
will
to
use
their
body,
worn
cameras
which
is
the
most
comp,
the
most
numerous
part
of
the
technology.
R
Oh
and
the
tasers,
which
are
also
you
know,
every
officer
has
one
that
to
continue
our
business
relationship
with
them
and
to
add,
in
some
of
these
additional
Services
into
an
integrated
system.
Is
you
get
from
a
business
perspective,
our
determination
that
both
the
the
bureaus,
the
Departments
and
ultimately
ombs
the
the
best
operational
and
Financial
Choice
for
for
this
service,
and
that's
why
we
determined
to
proceed
with
the
continuation
and
expansion
of
a
contract
rather
than
a
new
RFP,
given
the
clear
state
of
the
industry?
If
you
will
so.
R
N
And
I
think
maybe
they'll
get
caught
up
in
the
bells
and
whistles
because
they
don't
truly
have
a
cost,
but
we're
going
to
talk
about
three
fundamental
things
and
that
is
the
fleet.
So
that's
in
car,
the
body
worn
and
the
taser
and
those
three
things
I
think
are
absolutely
essential
for
for
that.
For
our
officer
safety,
for
our
organizational
accountability
and
and
when
these
encounters
a
car
to
ensure
that
we're
protecting
our
community
in
a
responsible
way.
So.
M
I
just
want
to
say
real
quickly,
I,
very
supportive
of
our
police.
I
think
everybody
knows
that,
but
I'm
always
cautious
when
it
comes
to
contracts
that
are
being
continued
instead
of
coming
before
us
we're
going
to
negotiated
and
then
with
a
quick
search
and
the
first
few
things
I
see
are
FBI
investigating
state,
senator
and
axon
FBI
approaches,
state
senator
and
criminal
investigation
regarding
excellent
FBI
investigating
state
center
and
axon
I
mean
it
just
goes
on
and
on
and
it's
just
so.
M
It
makes
me
anxious
that
then
we
bring
a
contract
before
us
that
we're
just
Arena
here
we're
just
extending.
So
it
makes
me
a
little
bit
anxious
a
little
bit
nervous.
So
I
would
like
to
know,
and
the
other
thing
I'd
like
to
know
is:
do
we
need
any
additional
capacity
technology
wise
to
to
sustain
all
this
stuff?
These
extra
things.
N
So
they're
they're
very
self-sufficient
as
an
organization
as
an
entity
and
in
that
I
think
again
to
to
the
deputy
mayor's
point
they
are.
They
are
very
technology
forward
in
this
space
they
they
have
because
of
the
Lion's
Share
of
of
the
market.
They
have
evolved
and
advanced,
IT
and
and
I
believe
they
satisfy
our
needs.
Every
time
we
have
not
had
issues
with
the
product.
We
have
not
had
issues
with
the
technology
and
and
so
it's
fairly
easy
to
stand
behind
the
company.
M
N
Know,
yeah
I,
don't
I,
don't
yeah
I,
don't
I,
don't
follow
it
in
that
regard,
because
my
concern
is
more
specific
to
the
product
and
how
it
serves
officers
in
our
community.
So
what
is
publicized
in
some
other
venue?
Relationship-Wise
just
never
became
a
area
that
I
focused
on
just
because
I
again,
I'll
focus
on
the
product
and
the
product
has
has
served
officers
in
our
community
well
for
the
six
or
so
years
that
we've
been
in
in
that
had
been
in
service
for
the
organization
in
our
partnership
with
with
AXA.
R
To
your
question
about
technology,
I
believe
this
migration
would
actually
reduce
our
need
for
in-house
Technology
support
services.
For
them
we
would
reduce
other
costs
for
technology
by
not
having
to
Main
and
maintain
internal
servers
and
internal
like
our
own
equipment,
to
download
footage
from
the
in-car
cameras
into
internal
servers.
It
would
be
it
would
improve
our
efficiency
and
lessen
that
burden
on
imp
by
moving
migrating
to
a
cloud-based
system
that
we
would
have
here.
V
Chair
I
well,
thank
you
for
answering
the
questions
that
we've
that
you've
received.
So
far.
It's
been
helpful.
It's
the
question.
The
line
of
questioning
has
been
helpful.
Your
answers
have
been
helpful.
This
is
a
tremendous
amount
of
money
and
it's,
like
others,
have
voiced
it's.
It's
really
difficult
for
me
to
wrap
my
head
around
spending
this
amount
of
money,
even
if
it
is
over
10
years.
V
In
addition,
I
might
not
have
the
same
precise
concern
that
council
president
kale
Smith
voice,
but
my
concern
is
more
about
10-year
contracts.
A
lot
can
change
over
10
years,
I
fully
unders.
Let
me
just
stay
I
understand
the
utility
of
this
of
it
all
of
all
the
technology
fitting
together
of
the
many
uses
of
it.
Both
internal
external
throughout
the
judicial
like
I,
get
I,
get
the
I,
get
that
point
that
you've
made
I
wish.
We
didn't
need
it
but
I.
You
know,
I
understand
it.
V
That
said,
I
do
take
issue
with
this
company,
which
sounds
like
it's
one
of
the
the
primary
companies
out
there
that
can
offer
these
services
saying
we'll
give
you
a
discount
if
you
sign
this
long-term
contract,
which
of
course
is
their
right
as
a
business.
That's
how
businesses
operate
I
do
understand
that
I
want
those
who
negotiate
contracts
to
hear
loud
and
clear
from
Council
that
we
want
the
same
savings
with
a
shorter
contract
and
we
want
a
five-year
contract
and
the
same.
V
It's
10
10
million
dollar
savings
and
feel
free
to
use
counsel
as
your
as
a
negotiated
negotiating
chip
in
the
future.
If
you
need
to
to
get
that,
but
there's
so
much
that
can
that
can
change
in
10
years
we
don't
even
I
mean
this
company
could
go
under
it
could
be
acquired
or
just
the
way
that
policing
works
could
could
change.
I,
don't
expect
that
to
happen,
but
there's
as
an
as
examples,
I
I
feel
more
comfortable
with
a
contract
being
even
just
extended
after
five
years,
rather
than
a
full
10
years.
V
So
rationally
understand,
of
course,
that
bundling
it
you
know
putting
everything
together,
allowing
the
technology
to
talk
to
one
another,
integrating
it.
It
makes
sense
financially.
But
please
know
that
in
the
future
a
a
shorter
contract
is
is
preferable
strongly
preferable
to
council,
or
at
least
to
me
and
I,
would
also
hope
that
as
Chief
you
work
to
implement
the
plan
that
you've.
V
That
Focus
puts
a
premium
on
yes
officer,
Wellness,
but
also
Health
and
Human
Services,
as
part
of
as
part
of
the
way
that
we,
as
you
know,
Public,
Safety
and
I
I
mean
we
broadly
is
like
the
county
as
a
partner
too,
that
that
can
result
in
cost
savings
that
might
not
have
to
do
directly
with
this
contract.
V
I
get
that
they're
not
totally
connected
But
realize
other
cost
savings
over
time
that
make
something
that
is
at
least
for
now,
so
critical
and
so
sort
of
something
that
we
can't
do
without
a
little
bit
more
palatable,
because
we
realize
savings
elsewhere.
V
I
guess
I,
don't
have
a
question
if
there
is
something
that
I've
said
that
you
that
anyone
would
like
to
sort
of
respond
to
I'm
I'm
fine
with
that,
but
just
wanted
to
voice
again.
My
my
concern
over
a
longer
contract
and
this
sheer
amount
of
money
that
we're
spending,
regardless
of
how
important
it
is
for
transparency,
officer,
wellness
and
internal
and
external
assessment.
A
Thank
you
before
moving
on
to
the
second
round,
councilman
strasberger
started
to
ask
the
question
that
I
was
going
to
ask,
was
simply
that.
Are
there
any
provisions
in
the
contract
that
allow
us
to
potentially
change
and
or
exit,
because
so
much
can
change
in
10
years
the
technology
can
change.
You
may
need
something
slightly
different
for
the
police
force
like.
Are
there
any
provisions
that
say
hey
in
year?
Six
we
may
need
to
revisit
a
or.
P
Answer
your
question:
the
answer
is
yes
now
what
those
are
I'd
have
to
go
through
that
contract
again,
but
there
are
Provisions
that
if
you
know
they
are
not
meeting
our
needs-
or
there
is
some
definitive
change
and
technology
that
they
cannot
Supply,
that
we
can
exit
that
contract.
J
What
I
thought
I
might
bring
up
a
second
time
around
has
has
been
has
been
addressed.
I
will
ask
this
one
question:
just
for
my
edification
I
am
going
to
vote
in
support
of
this
today,
but
for
my
edification,
the
the
chain
of
activation.
Can
you
walk
me
through
that
again?
When
is
it
uniform
policy
that,
when
an
officer
is
in
the
car
that
camera
is
going
on
in
these
10
seconds
on
audio
clips
of
of
data
that
is
in
stored?
Is
that.
N
N
N
J
One
or
two
lawsuits
that
we
cannot
win
in
a
court
of
law,
because
we
do
not
have
the
evidence
to
support
the
action
of
that
officer
could
be
a
hundred-fold.
What
we
would
be
putting
into
a
contract
like
this,
and
this
Council
has
experienced
that
over
the
years
that
that
I've
been
here
a
number
of
times.
Where
we've
you
know
in
the
finest
Church
shaking
his
head,
where
we
were
faced
with
enormous
sums
of
money
that
were
staggering
amounts
that
could
have
crippled
or
bankrupted
this
city
that
thank
God.
J
There
was
provision
in
place
where
we
were
able
to
navigate
those
to
you
know
successful
outcome
to
the
benefit
of
of
the
the
public
we
serve
so
so
I
was
just
trying
to
have
a
little
better
understanding
of
the
integration
of
it
all
and
how
it
all
works,
collectively
and
cooperatively
in
the
holistic
fashion
and
I'm.
Just
trying
to
understand
that
better
I'm
sure
we're
going
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
this.
A
little
bit
further
I'm
sure
I'm
going
to
be
calling
you
tonight
may.
R
I
add
it:
yes,
please
point
to
your
point
about
litigation.
There's
another
dimension
to
the
value
of
the
recordings
Beyond
protecting
the
officer
protecting
the
public
and
protecting
the
city
in
the
case
of
litigation,
which
we
you
just
mentioned
and
is
an
excellent
point,
and
it
is
that
prosecutors,
judges
and
juries,
as
as
as.
R
Becomes
more
prevalent
have
become
more
insistent
on
that
as
part
of
the
evidentiary
record,
in
order
to
secure
convictions
or
in
some
cases
exonerations,
you
know
we
we
find
that
increasingly
prosecutors
want
to
have
video
evidence
of
a
situation
in
order
for
that
to
supply
necessary
evidence
to
advance
to
charges,
and
we,
you
know,
we've
also
found
instances
where
video
evidence
has
exonerated
officers
who've
been
alleged
with
misconduct
in
where
that
may
not
have
been
case.
If
that
wasn't
part
of
the
evidentiary
records.
R
So
so,
in
addition
to
sort
of
providing
Surety
in
the
case
specifically
of
criminal
prosecutions,
we've
been
able
to
advance
cases
and
secure
favorable
outcomes
in
the
judicial
system
through
the
use
of
video
footage,
because,
as
we
for
again
I
don't
mean
to
comment
on
it,
but
just
as
it
has
become
more
prevalent,
it
has
become
more
expected
and
thus
our
ability
to
capably
execute
on
charges
brought
against
individuals
that
we've
taken
into
custody.
It's
essential
that
we
have
as
much
video
evidence
as
possible.
Yeah.
J
And
I'm
not
saying
I
agree
with
this
state
of
the
world
that
we
are
in
is
the
Commander's
mouth
it's,
but
it's
the
reality
of
the
situation
that
we
are
in
the
drives
are
our
need
to
to
invest
this
way.
One
more
question:
please
about
the
the
totality
of
the
system.
How
is
the
storage
ultimately
achieved?
Is
the
storage.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
someone
has
the
job
of
uploading
everything
or
it
is
part
of
the
system
as
that
act,
that's
the
cameras
activated
in
these
intermittent
no
audio.
J
Just
video
Snippets
that
are
deleted
as
time
goes
on,
they're
automatically
uploaded
into
the
cloud
in
real
time.
Just
and
if
you
don't
know,
that's
that's
good.
P
So
the
car
is
yes,
the
car
has,
you
know
internet
card
uploads
automatically
the
body
One
camera.
We
get
stocked
in
a
docking
station
at
the
each
of
the
stations
Duty
locations,
so
it
goes
into
the
dock
automatically
uploads
and
evidence.com
I'm.
J
Automatically
so
it's
only
the
little
drama
there,
a
little
so
the
body
warm
camera,
though,
is
manually,
activated
uploaded
the
and
the
car
is
done
automatically,
which
means
if
it
are,
if
a
firearm
is
just
not
discharged
but
unholstered
or
tasers
unholstered.
That's
part
of
the
body
camera
that
that
will
be
docked
at
the
end
of
the
day.
Part.
N
Of
both,
so
the
car's
camera
system
will
activate
all
the
vehicles
that
are
in
range
of
the
activation
of
the
of
the
signal
will
activate.
So
that's
what
was
happening
is
you
would
have
points
of
view
like
right,
single
points
of
view,
but
this
system
now
gives
us
multiple
points
of
view.
So
the
car's
system,
by
the
way
in
it's
which
this
is
designed,
will
activate
on
any
other
Activation.
J
And
in
a
more
comprehensive
and
holistic,
yes,
approach,
which
is
another
reason
to
argue
for
this
system.
I
really
appreciate
your
time
here
today
and
and
helping
Council
to
understand
the
the
enormity
of
it
and
the
need
for
it
and
I
appreciate
your
petition
and
I
will
be
voting
in
favor.
Thank.
U
As
high
decrease
in
leadership
in
some
ways,
during
my
time
on
Council
I
I
think
the
two
things
I
have
been
the
most
active
in
has
been
affordable,
housing
and
policing.
U
U
I
have
done
everything
I
can
in
legislation
to
assist
them,
and
so
I
want
to
make
a
philosophical
argument
not
really
directed
toward
this
moment,
but
I
heard
Barb
say
something
so
I
want
to
sort
of
put
my
my
my
view
down
in
the
16
years.
I've
been
here,
I
have
never
saw
us
vote
down
anything.
The
police
has
asked
us
for
not
one
single
thing,
whether.
U
Whether
it
was
rifles
whether
it
was
training,
whether
it
was
technology,
whether
it
was
cameras
and
cars-
and
you
know-
we've
ordered
to
give
them
things-
they
didn't
ask
for
you
know
when
we
first
did
shot
spotter.
There
was
some
resistance.
We
first
did
cameras
and
cars.
There
was
resistance,
so
we
voted
all
that
and
I'm
in
favor
of
that
I
I
think
you
need
it
I'm
in
favor
of
it
I
support
the
chief
support,
the
the
bureau
and
the
officers,
but
there
is
this
Viewpoint
I
hear
from
time
to
time.
U
That
I
think
is
dangerous
in
our
city,
and
it
goes
somewhat
like
this
crime
is
up.
We
have
to
give
more
money
to
the
police.
Crime
is
down
to
keep
it
down.
We
have
to
give
more
money
to
police.
There
is
a
mindset.
There
will
always
always
no
matter
what's
going
on
in
the
city.
Their
conclusion
will
always
be
to
give
more
money
to
the
police.
U
What
I?
What
bothers
me
is
not
the
investment
in
public
safety.
What
bothers
me
at
times
is
the
scrutiny
we
give
to
giving
money
to
community-based
organizations
and
giving
money
to
Social
Services
and
giving
money
to
preventative
programs,
and
we
ask
and
we
do
we-
we
will
spend
hours.
You
know
with
that
scrutiny
which
is
investing,
especially
in
Black
communities.
U
If
you
start
putting
money
in
Black
communities,
you'll
see
a
fervor
of
conversation
and
scrutiny
and
due
diligence
when
that
same
level
of
due
diligence
does
not
exist
in
public
safety,
not
that
you
don't
do
it,
but
we
don't
have
that
level
of
accountability
over
you
and
so
I'm
simply
suggesting
and
will
say
all
the
time
have
said
this.
Since
I've
been
on
Council.
We
need
to
have
the
best
trained
police.
We
have
to
have
enough
officers
to
keep
us
safe
and
they
have
to
be
some
of
the
highest
paid
professionals.
U
U
At
the
same
time,
separate
from
you,
we
have
to
also
invest
in
programming
in
Partnerships
in
community-based
organizations
and
partnering
to
build
the
underlying
cause
of
crime,
which
is
lack
of
jobs,
affordable
housing,
education,
I'm,
talking
a
little
bit
education
later,
and
so
that's
all
I
I'm
in
favor
of
this,
certainly
in
favor
of
you
I,
just
it
bothered
me
sometimes
when
I,
when
I,
listen
and
we'll
you
know
we
will
have
some
talk
but
we're
going
to
vote
it
through,
whatever
you
bring
to
us
we're
going
to
vote
for,
make
no
mistake.
U
If
you,
if
you
put
on
the
table,
you
wanted
a
50
million
dollars
to
to,
you
know,
buy
tanks
we
would
we
would
have
we
would.
We
would
vote
that
through
too
well.
We
did
this,
we
we
we
did
it
don't
say
we
didn't
know,
we
wouldn't
do
it.
We
did
do
it.
There
was.
There
was
a
time
we
did.
We
did
buy
large
armored
vehicles,
we.
J
U
We
did
I
know
we
did
right,
so
I
saw
them,
I've
watched
it
ride
through
Homewood
I
was
standing
there
on
the
corner
and
watched
it
drive
down
the
community
and,
and
that
and
that's
when
I
put
my
first
bill
saying
that
we
couldn't
buy
this
stuff
anymore,
because
I
saw
it
so
I
know
we'll.
Do
it
no
problem,
though,
with
whatever
you
need?
If
you
told
me
you
need
this,
go
make
us
safe
I'm
with
you,
whatever
I'm,
simply
as
a
old
man
on
Council,
the
conscious
of
counselor.
U
Stop
the
violence
funds
when
we
start
talking
about
the
smaller
amounts
of
money
on
the
barn
that
we
treat
them
equally
with
the
same
level
of
accountability,
and
if
we're
willing
to
give
the
police
the
benefit
of
the
doubt
in
spending,
then
we
should
also
give
the
investment
in
community-based
organizations
investment
in
the
community
the
same
benefit
of
tout,
believing
that,
both
together
the
partnership
together,
the
police
in
the
Community
Partnership,
together
both
being
strong
and
safe
and
both
being
healthy,
is
actually
the
best
way
to
keep
us
safe.
That's
what
I
think.
M
Thank
you,
I
just
want
to
say
two
reverence
comments.
We've
been
on
this
conversation
for
about
two
hours,
so
I
think
we're
giving
it
some
scrutiny,
but
I
also
say
that
I
don't
disagree,
that
we
should
be
partnering
with
the
community
groups.
I
think
that
we
have
to
hold
them
accountable
and
the
difference
between
giving
to
the
police
and
giving
to
community
groups
is
we
hold
them
accountable?
They
work
for
the
City
of
Pittsburgh,
they
can
be
fired.
M
The
community
people
cannot
necessarily
be
so
I
think
there's
a
lot
and
we
don't
actually
hold
them
to
the
same
standards.
We
do
our
police
officers,
so
I
will
say
that
a
lot
with
that
said
I
wonder
what
the
number
of
officers
this
contract
was
based
on.
M
M
N
We
have
we,
we
anticipate
there
will
potentially
higher
40
70
officers
this
year
so
depending
on
departures,
you'll.
N
N
N
It
won't
be
at
9.50,
so
the
budget
is
900,
that's
where
we
will
aim.
N
R
R
M
N
M
I
want
to
give
you
the
total,
the
tool
to
do
the
job
that
we
ask
you
to
do
every
single
day
and
I
do
think
that
we
all
make
all
these
demands
and
all
these
things
that
we
say
that
we
want
you
to
do
that.
We
want
to
see
violence
reduced.
We
want
to
see
people
homicides
down.
We
want
to
see
our
officers
protected.
We
want
to
see
everybody
having
good
health,
but
then
we
also
try
to
manage
and
micromanage
everything.
I
asked
I,
remember:
Chief
McClay
one
time.
M
I
said:
what
would
you
do
to
keep
policing
separate
so
from
politics,
so
that
politics
isn't
interfering
constantly
on
what
the
job
is,
that
we
expect
you
to
do
to
keep
the
public
safe
and
he
said
he
would
make
the
chief
and
public
safety
director
independent
of
appointment
from
it
would
be
like
a
like
a
sheriff's
office
voted
in
so
I'm
thinking
that
maybe
he's
not
so
wrong
about
that.
So.
A
I
I
L
You
Council
Chicago,
okay,
thank
you.
Mr,
chair
I
want
to
simplify
this
for
me,
okay,
so
to
date
per
year.
What
do
we
pay
for
have
to
have
all
the
equipment
that
we
analyze
and
I
understand
it's
a
different
package,
different
components,
but
what
what
does
it
cost
us?
Two
million
dollars?
Is
that
accurate.
O
I'm,
sorry
I'm
not
sure
the
exacting
figure
of
all
the
packages
together,
something
we
can
certainly
look
into
and.
L
R
This
extension
of
that
contract
would
keep
that
in
place,
so
it
wouldn't
necessarily
mean
that
tomorrow,
the
body
worn
cameras
are
the
tasers
will
be
replaced.
It
would
mean
that
the
next
time
they
would
regularly
be
up
for
replacement.
That
would
occur
right
or.
L
So
what
would
happen
if
we
were
not
to
approve
this?
What
would
what
would
change?
What
would
be
different
if
we
were
to
go
with
the
ax
other
than
the
ability
that
the
officer
doesn't
have
to
put
the
camera
on
himself
or
herself
right?
We
know
that,
but
so
what
would?
What
would
be
the
big
difference,
because,
like
my
colleagues,
this
price
tag
is
enormous.
It
really
is
it's
a
it's
a
big
price
tag
for
techno,
and
this
is
about
technology.
This
is
not
about
tasers.
L
This
is
not
about
you,
know,
body
cameras
or
police
cameras.
This
is
or
this
is
really
about
technology.
Isn't
it
I
mean
the
hardware
is
the
hardware
we
have
it
now.
L
R
The
10-year
price
for
the
Vehicles,
the
vehicle
component,
is
4.789
million
okay
in
this
in
this
package,
and
for
that's
for
165
Vehicles,
we
have
slightly
fewer
than
that
and
for
our
950
officers.
Again
we
have
fewer
than
that
today.
The
price
for
the
body
worn
package
is
39
million,
556
000,
which
together
constitute
the
vast
majority
of
the
overall
cost.
All
of
the
other
components
cost
the
most
expensive
is
352
000
over
that
10-year
period.
So
the
the
vast
majority
of
the
cost
is
incorporated
into
the
consistent
replacement
of
the
hardware.
R
The
44
million,
roughly
44
million
of
this
cost,
is
goes
to
the
hardware
I,
the
the
pricing
they
would
give
us
if
we
were
asking
for
different
options,
might
be
different.
I
can't
speculate
on
what
what
different
in
discounts
or
pricing
they
would
provide,
but
of
the
total
cost
here,
roughly
44
million,
which
is
the
vast
majority
of
it,
is
for
the
hardware.
L
This
this
would
be
a
lot
better
if
axon
had
the
self-reporting
system.
Is
that
something
that
they
carry?
Do
they
do
that
meaning
like?
As
we
talked
you
know,
previous
meetings,
whereas
it'd
be
great
to
have
a
self-reporting
somebody
steals
somebody's,
a
lawn
mower
instead
of
having
two
police
officers
respond
and
taking
three
hours
of
their
time
for
insurance
purposes,
that's
all
they're
going
to
get
out
of
it
anyway.
The
self-reporting
system
is
axon.
Do
that
or
is?
Do
we
even
know.
N
N
N
Is
the
company
we're
moving
to
that
migration
to
now,
and
so
yes,
they
could
do
it,
but
even
in
the
to
the
online
reporting,
we
have
a
an
opportunity
with
a
different
company
that
serves
our
purposes
wellness
and
have
that
cost
so
there
to
to
to
Council
on
the
stress
record,
Point
like
looking
for
other
Savings
in
other
places,
so
that
this
is
more
palatable
and
I
just
suggest
they
it
one
instant
We,
Are
One
incident
in
a
way
where
there's
an
expectation
for
this
technology,
it
doesn't
exist.
L
I'll
say
this:
it's
just
a
heavy
price
tag
for
technology.
It
really
is
and
I
understand
that
I
understand
the
need
for
it
in
today's
world.
It's
good
to
have
everything
on
videotape,
especially
if
we're
dealing
with
a
police
matter
now
just
correct
me
when
an
officer
engages
when
they're
on
their
way
to
a
scene,
the
in
the
the
car
cameras
goes
on.
R
N
Yes
in
car
cameras-
yes
right
today,
one
system
is
separate
in
this
thing,
so
L3
upper
when
it's
light
system,
the
lighting
system
goes
on
it
activates
just
the
the
in-car
camera
system.
It
does
not
activate
the
body
worm
part
the
body
worn
camera
okay,
but
in
this
new
system,
once
it
is
all
operationalized,
one
will
activate
the
other
okay.
L
So
you
pull
up
to
a
scene.
Your
lights
are
on
your
body,
cameras
on
yes,
okay,
it
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
unsheath
your
weapon.
No,
it
does
not
okay
gotcha,
and
if
you
pull
up
this
in,
you,
don't
have
your
lights
on.
If
you're,
you
know
just
kind
of
observing
something
that
you're
required
by
policy
to
activate
the
body.
N
N
N
That's
why
all
these
other
safeguards
were
put
in
place.
So
if
that
would
happen
that
we
would
still
capture
the
incident
from
the
vehicle
and
then
we
obviously
hold,
we
have
accountability
measures
in
place
for
them
time
that
it's
either
forgotten
to
be
turned
on
and
or
is
intentionally
turned
off
right.
L
L
Get
it
I,
get
it
yeah.
So,
okay,
yeah,
it's
a
it's
a
again.
It's
a
hefty
price
tag.
I
have
the
same
concerns
but
you're
all
confident
that
we
need
this.
You
feel.
A
Sorry,
councilman
Warwick.
T
Yeah
so
I
just
just
wanted
to
Circle
back
to
this
public
Source
article
from
2017
to
clarify
this
was
not
like
an
economy
of
scale
situation.
The
article
accounts
for
it
says
that
these
are
deals.
These
are
1.5
million
dollar
deal
with
Los
Angeles
police
for
300,
more
cameras
in
Pittsburgh
and
in
fact,
one
of
the
deals
in
Austin
Texas.
The
original
deal
was
500
cameras
for
1.5
million,
a
competitor
sued,
claiming
the
bidding
process
was
rigged,
which
led
to
a
court
injunction,
and
the
deal
was
revised
to
provide
724
cameras
for
925
000.
T
so
and,
and
the
headline
I
didn't
mention
before,
but
I
might
as
well,
because
now
the
conversation
has
gone,
you
know
the
headline
I
mean
the
real
story
of
this
article
is
that
the
the
commander
at
the
time
who
negotiated
this
contract
had
worked
for
axon
for
five
years
and
had
got
all
kinds
of
trips
and
like
whatever
blah
blah
blah?
You
know
what
I
mean,
and
so
there
was
scrutiny
on
the
contract
right.
This
was
about
the
contract,
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
clear.
T
T
These
guys
are
a
business.
I
mean
it
makes
me
wonder
if
they
might
I
mean,
do
you
think
they're
just
going
to
walk
away
from
maybe
30
million
dollars
for
the
time
for
or
or
whatever,
for
a
five
year
instead
of
a
ten
year,
they're
just
going
to
walk
away
from
that,
because
Pittsburgh
city
council
said
yeah,
we
don't
want
to
do
a
tenure,
we
want
the
same
deal,
but
in
a
five-year
I
mean
that's
just
doing
business.
T
You
know
I
I'm,
curious
I
mean
if,
if
I
were
to
motion
to
hold
is,
would
that
be
some
I
mean?
What
would
it
be
for
you,
I
mean
I
I,
don't
know
who
does
this
negotiating?
How
much
time
did
it
take
to
negotiate
this
contract?
Is?
Would
that
be
adding
six
months,
or
would
that
be?
You
know
like
what
kind
of
pain
would
that
cause
the
department
to
sort
of
go
back
to
this
company
and
be
like
look
city
council's?
You
know
either
held
it
because
they
don't.
You
know
what
I
mean.
R
I,
don't
know
how
to
answer
that
that
question
director
Schmidt,
who
is
unfortunately
out
of
the
office
this
week,
would
probably
be
the
best
position
to
answer
it.
Unless
you
have
any
insights,
Charles
or
chief
or
any.
T
C
N
T
N
R
Here,
that's
expressly
prohibited
by
code,
just
in
in
I.
Understand
that
you
didn't
mean
direct
participation
in
the
negotiation,
but
just
for
the
sake
of
the
record.
Okay,
that's
expressly
prohibited
by
code
for
Council
to
engage
directly
in
a
contractual
negotiation.
No.
T
R
Yeah
I
I
can
only
say
that,
based
on
my
evaluation,
again,
I
didn't
participate
directly
in
the
negotiations.
Based
on
my
evaluation
of
the
materials
that
emerged
from
them.
I
am
comfortable
with
and
confident
in
The
Proposal
that
we
have
and
the
opportunity
for
savings
that
were
achieved
and
were
I
not.
We
would
not
have
brought
this
forward
to
a
vote
today,
but
but
the
determination
on
whether
to
hold
is
certainly
that
that's
that's
councils
to
determine.
M
L
T
N
C
L
R
Know
well,
go
ahead
just
to
prepare
us,
the
the
the
savings
I
understand.
What
you're
saying
it's:
it's
not
like
the
sticker
price
on
a
car
versus
what
they
let
you
leave
the
lot
with.
It
was
what
they
quoted
us
for
five
versus
what
they
quoted
us
for
ten.
So,
for
example,
we
could
have
signed
a
five-year
contract
that
if
we
had
signed
it
for
five
years
and
then
renewed
it
over
a
10-year
period,
buying
it
in
five
year
increments
would
have
cost
10
million
dollars.
R
T
So
just
to
this
is
really
where
and
I
mean.
Maybe
this
is
bringing
it
back
to
sort
of
just
green
lighting
public,
so
just
to
compare
and
I.
T
Forgive
me,
but
I
can't
remember
her
name
and
I,
don't
even
remember
the
bill,
but
there
was
a
very
large
imp
contract
that
was
negotiating
we
and
we
brought
the
person
who
negotiated
it
to
the
table
and
and
and
she
I
mean
she
negotiated
with
this
provider
like
negotiated,
like
no,
that
we're
not
accepting
that
give
me
a
better
offer
like
this
was
the
kind
of
negotiation
that
went
on
over
this
particular
I.T
contract
and
and
she
did
a
really
good
job,
and
you
know
at
any
rate
so
I'm
curious
if
that,
if
I'd
like
to
kind
of
know,
if
that's
how
this
negotiation
went
or
if
it
was
just
like
yeah,
we
can
offer
you
this
for
five
years
or
this
for
ten
years
and
we're
like
well.
T
R
Not
having
been
there
I
can't
provide
the
same
level
of
specificity.
You
got
in
that
case,
but
but
I
do
know
that,
as
Charles
mentioned,
director
Schmidt
and
others
were
working
on
this
for
several
months.
So
so
it
wasn't
a
short
process
and
and
I
believe
I'm,
confident
in
involved
extensive
due
diligence
and
and
discussion.
R
What
exactly
the
param!
You
know
what
the
extent
of
the
movement
was
is
I.
Think,
as
you
point
out
somewhat
dependent
on
the
market
share
that
the
provider
has
and
so
I
I
can't
say
whether
we
had
as
many
opportunities
as
we're
in
that
imp
contract
to
shape
cost.
But
I
do
know
that
it
was.
It
was
not
I'm
I'm,
confident
that
that
sufficient
sort
of
diligence
around
the
deal
we
were
getting
was
deployed.
Director
Schmidt
could
speak
more
completely
to
what
that
included
and
and
he's
only
not
here.
L
A
L
M
A
And
he's
requesting
a
three-week
hold
motion
told
through.
J
B
Ordinance
accepting
a
new
street
name,
Woodring
court
and
the
23rd
ward
of
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
as
per
recommendation
by
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
addressing
committee,
the
following
street
name
was
approved
by
CPAC
in
June
2022.
The
name
listed
in
this
ordinance
shall
be
made
official
in
accordance
with
the
Pittsburgh
code
title
four
public
places
and
property
chapter
420,
uniform,
Street
naming
and
addressing
Russian.
M
U
A
C
U
What
I'm
doing
is
I
I
am
re-submitting
a
bill
that
I
held
for
six
weeks
because
of
I
read
my
email
wrong,
and
this
was
at
the
end
of
my
email,
I
approved
it
by
email
but
didn't
see.
It
I
saw
some
earlier
part,
and
so
when
this
came
up,
I
didn't
realize
it
was
part
of
a
package
I
had
already
approved
but
found
it
was
some
other
secondary
thing
and
I
was
mistaken.
U
In
my
conversation,
my
budget
director
does
a
great
job,
and
so
I
want
to
rectify
the
mistake
that
I
made
not
their
mistake
but
mine.
So
there's
no
reason
to
hold
this
up
and
I
already
previously
approved
it.
So
I
want
to
re
recommit
this
and
not
recommit.
What
is
it?
I
want
to
bring
back
to
the
table,
reconsider.
That's
the
word,
reconsider
the
bill,
which
is
2023
1536
that
deals
with
the
my
own
cdbg
money.
So.
U
C
U
A
T
Motion
to
approve
a
brief
discussion,
so
the
director
is
here,
but
I
I
mean
I
can
just
give
a
brief.
So
Google
assured
workloads
is
part
of
a
cloud
that
we
use
for
public
safety
data
to
comply
with
security
requirements
and
the
astronomer
services
are
part
of
Google
workloads
and
they
allow
us
to
make
data
available
to
other
parties,
so
that
and
and
also
to
analyze
the
data
they're,
both
under
the
same
agreement.
T
J
Q
M
M
A
We'll
make
one
I
do
have
a
budget,
because
we've
been
discussing
the
bond
and
how
much
money
that
is,
we
spent
two
hours
discussing
Public
Safety
in
the
amount
of
investment.
However,
if
we
actually
add
up
over
the
time
the
amount
of
money
we've
spent
on
imp
and
other
technology
related,
it
exceeds
those
dollar
amounts.
J
V
Yeah
I
mean
I,
don't
disagree
and,
having
formerly
chaired
the
Imp
committee
I,
also
understand
and
want
to
just
remind
everyone
that
imp
does
not
unlike
Public
Safety.
Unlike
many
other
departments,
it
serves
every
Department
in
the
city,
so
it
is
providing
the
technology
not
just
for
themselves,
but
for
Council,
but
and
for
City
Planning
and
for
pli
and
for
Public
Safety,
which
is
a
huge
portion
of
the
Imp
budget,
is
Public
Safety.
So
just
as
I
wanted
to
add
that
back
into
the
record
as
well.
C
B
31.
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
the
directors
of
the
Department
of
Public
Works
and
the
department
of
innovation
and
performance
to
enter
into
an
agreement
with
indoor
view
to
improve
the
management
of
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
facility
spaces
for
the
total
cost
not
to
exceed
twelve
thousand
six
hundred
dollars.
T
A
A
Next
week,
Council
will
hold
our
regular
and
standing
committee
meeting
on
Tuesday
June
27th
and
Wednesday
June
28th
at
10,
A.M
respectively.
Speaker
registration
will
close
at
9
A.M
today
at
a
meeting
to
register
to
speak
at
these
meetings.
Please
fill
out
the
sign
up
form
on
the
council
meeting
webpage
or
call
the
clerk's
office
at
255-2138,
anything
from
Members
councilman
Burgess.
U
Real
quick
I'll
say
this
quick
is
hours
late,
but
there
is
a
report.
That's
in
the
news
that
the
math
scores
for
our
nation's
13
year
old
says
the
largest
drop
since
they
began
assessing
since
1973.
In
addition,
their
reading
scores
have
declined
by
Four
Points.
We,
our
children,
are
in
crisis,
educationally
I've
been
saying
this
for
many
years
now
and
it's
getting
worse
and
we
have
yet
to
do
to
come
together
on
a
comprehensive
approach
in
order
to
help
our
children
learn
and
that's
something
I
think
I
want
something.
A
U
M
I'm,
just
going
to
say,
I
used
to
work
for
the
school
district
and
I
I
support
our
schools,
our
teachers
very
much,
but
I
think
that
they
also
need
to
feel
supported,
and
so
do
the
parents
and
helping
the
kids
get
to
where
you
need
them
to
get
you're
not
going
to
do
this
alone.
You're
not
going
to
do
this
through
politics,
it's
going
to
be
by
involving
the
parents
of
the
people.
M
A
lot
of
our
kids
live
in
foster
care,
so
it's
going
to
be
by
involving
the
people
they
live
with,
and
so
with
that
said,
I
think
that
it's
going
to
be.
If
you're
going
to
talk
about
comprehensive
plan,
it's
got
to
be
everyone
working
together
for
the
kids,
I
mean
honest
to
goodness,
you
go
on
the
streets
and
in
our
communities
and
kids
are
out
little
kids.
You
know
all
by
themselves
with
nobody
around
and
sometimes
I
go
out.