►
From YouTube: Pittsburgh City Council Standing Committees - 5/31/23
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
D
A
Thank
you.
Our
next
order,
business
is
public
comment.
I
would
like
to
remind
all
speakers
of
the
rules
of
council
state
that
comments
are
limited
to
matters
of
concern.
Official
action
or
deliberation
which
are
or
maybe
before,
city,
council
and
profanity
is
not
permitted.
Please
restate
your
name
after
you
are
called
provide
your
neighborhood
for
the
record
you'll
be
given
three
minutes
to
speak.
Our
first
registered
speaker
is
Dr
Ronald,
Lynn
Miller.
E
Daughter,
ronaldin
Miller
belsoover
and
the
hill
Global
intelligence,
Society
Kennedy
for
president
2024.
E
lgbtqia,
plus
anyone
want
to
tell
the
public
what
the
symbols
mean.
Miss
Warwick.
Would
you
like
to
contribute
to
that
off
your
phone?
We
are
all
bisexual
in
my
view.
Why?
Because
we
are
created,
one
part,
male
one
part
female
and
it's
fused,
that's
the
biological
genetic
foundation
and
then
gender,
as
most
of
you
seem
to
be
in
agreement,
our
choices
about
what
to
wear,
how
to
speak
and
so
on
and
so
on,
and
so
on.
E
I
think
that
needs
to
be
clarified.
No
one
did
that
this
morning
and
I
think
that
is
a
mistake
on
this
Police
Issue.
So
what
we
have
a
new
bureau
chief.
Do
people
really
talk
to
the
police
officers
who
go
into
the
neighborhoods?
We
have
90
plus
neighborhoods.
Do
you
talk
to
them?
What
do
they
want?
I'll
tell
you
what
they
want.
I'll
tell
you
what
they
tell
me
that
they
want.
E
They
want
somebody
who
has
control
of
the
information
which
is
in
the
neighborhoods,
isn't
that
right,
Mr
Cross
in
South,
Side,
neighborhoods,
Mr
Cross,
is
reading
something
while
I'm
talking.
This
shows
absolute
contempt
for
public
comment
and
for
a
person
who's
doing
public
comment,
regardless
of
whether
it's
Ron
Miller
or
not.
Isn't
that
right,
Mr,
Cross,
Mr
Cross
refuses
to
answer
more
trouble
on
this
point.
E
The
police
deal
with
not
compliance.
They
deal
with
deviance.
How
would
you
like
it
if
every
day
you
had
to
get
up
in
the
morning
had
to
go
out
and
and
deal
with
people,
our
people,
the
city,
people
and
throughout
the
United
States
of
America,
who
are
doing
something
is
not
right.
It's
something
that
is
wrong.
E
That's
what
our
police
officers
have
to
deal
with.
They're,
not
convinced
they're,
just
appointing
a
new
bureau
chief
because
of
gender
is
going
to
make
any
difference
whatsoever.
If
that
person
is
not
familiar
with
the
information
in
our
neighborhoods,
they
want
somebody
our
officers
do
who
go
into
these
neighborhoods.
What
they
want
is
somebody
who
is
operating
at
a
very
high
level
of
intelligence
and
they're,
not
convinced
that
the
the
head
of
the
Department
of
Public,
Safety
and
the
Bureau
of
police
are
that
miss
strasberger.
The
BSL
is
in
in
District
8.
E
and
so
is
the
super
computer
center,
and
so
is
cyber
command
in
our
defense
network.
Why
don't
you
say
anything
about
that?
Those
make
Pittsburgh
and
particularly
it
makes
Oakland
a
Target
internationally,
and
it
also
makes
Pittsburgh
a
Target
and
Oakland
in
particular
an
international
Target.
You
need
to
speak
about
this
or
you
need
to
resign.
C
Here,
thank
you.
Ronald
Miller,
that
was
very
good.
I
honor,
my
husband,
who
was
a
true
City
of
Pittsburgh
Public
servant
from
the
1970s
to
2021.
Sadie
trees,
not
shady
deals
and
Bonaire.
This
is
for
you
Michael
the
Pennsylvania
Constitution
titled.
The
Declaration
of
Rights
is
the
entire
article
and
it's
concerned
with
establishing
the
principle
that
the
people
are
the
the
sovereigns,
not
the
state,
which
would
include
municipalities
and
school
boards.
They
shall
not
harm
the
people
or
will
be
held
accountable.
C
The
city
controller
is
the
fiscal
Watchdog
for
the
citizens
of
Pittsburgh
is
the
job
of
the
controller
to
protect
city
tax
dollars
from
waste
Fraud
and
Abuse.
Michael
Lamb
should
have
attended
our
meeting
to
explain
why
the
waste
Fraud
and
Abuse
continues
waste.
A
thousands
of
dollars
per
month
is
occurring
with
on
our
school.
Bob
was
perpetrated
with
the
claim
of
community
support
for
the
sale
of
the
building
to
a
developer.
Abuse
is
occurring
due
to
the
threat
of
flock
busting
and
intentional
Affliction
of
distress.
C
Why
won't
he
advocate
for
we,
the
people
who
have
been
harmed
by
this
detrimental
building?
Who
does
he
serve?
It
is
no
wonder
that
issues
with
the
school
district
persist,
checks
and
balances,
don't
exist
when
the
same
person
is
the
controller
for
the
city
and
Pittsburgh
Public
Schools.
Is
that
a
conflict
of
interest
the
memorial
Green
Space
is
the
solution
for
the
peace,
safety
and
happiness
of
Bon
Air
baby
trees,
not
shady
deals
and
Bonaire.
Thank
you.
F
Greetings
everyone
my
title:
this
is
for
my
chalk:
mom
I'm,
a
grand
Council
Chief
member
of
the
airpod
Confederacy
of
aborigine
American
people
and
I'm.
Also
the
grand
bigger
chief
of
my
nation,
we
and
so
I'm
here
today
to
remind
and
Enlighten
those
who
are
unaware
of
what
the
definition
and
the
meaning
of
colonization
is
and
I'll
read
this
from
etymology
colonization
and
Acts,
or
process
of
colonizing
state
of
being
a
colony
1758.
F
Now
of
action
from
colonize
in
U.S
history,
the
movement
for
assisted
immigration
within
east
of
free
blacks
to
Africa
for
the
formation
of
colonies
there,
the
American,
Colonization
Society
organized
in
December
1816..
Hence
colonizationists
is
one
who
favors
colonization
of
emancipated
slaves
or
Slavs
and
free
blacks
to
some
other
place
in
1831.
F
Here
are
our
people,
the
Aborigines
of
America,
the
indigenous
people
of
America
and
the
only
indigenous
people
of
America
to
be
indigenous
to
a
land.
You
must
originate
from
that
land.
You
can't
come
from
another
life
to
be
indigenous
to
this
land,
and
that
is
anywhere
and
it's
disrespectful.
It's
disingenuous
for
anyone
to
claim
a
title
that
does
not
belong
to
their
ancestry.
F
So
with
that
I
want
to
move
forward
and
say
we
have
an
opportunity
right
now
to
right
the
wrongs
of
all
of
our
ancestors,
who
played
a
role
in
colonizing
reclassifying
renaming
mislabel
you,
the
Aborigines
of
America,
for
in
1924,
Walter,
Ashby
plecker,
a
stunt,
eugenics
applied
a
terminology
to
our
people.
That
term
became
colored
and
we
were
reclassified
from
Indian
and
no
longer
allowed
to
claim
our
identity,
because
there
was
Acts
that
were
created
to
to
kill
us
basically
for
doing
so.
F
The
Indian
scouting,
the
Indian
Removal
Act,
the
Homestead
Act
and
there's
many
other
acts
as
well.
We
all
have
an
opportunity,
and
we,
as
the
indigenous
and
the
aborigine
of
this
land,
have
been
held
back
for
too
long
and
continue
to
be
held
back
and
when
we
celebrate
everyone's
accomplishments
on
our
land,
and
we
do
it
so
celebrate
those
accomplishments
too,
as
well
as
long
as
they're
benefiting
the
whole.
F
We
see
ourselves
being
isolated
and
pushed
back
and
pushed
aside,
and
these
are
punishments
that
will
be
held.
People
will
be
held
accountable
if
they
choose
to
continue
to
ignore
what
we
are
saying
we
are
here.
We
have
always
been
here,
and
there
are
laws
that
protect
us.
There's
the
Delaware
treaty.
A
G
My
name
is
Yvonne
F
Brown
I
did
a
715
Mercer
Street
apartment
105.
I
mean
316..
I
want
to
start
off
first
to
Mr
Krause,
since
he
left
the
room.
He
might
maybe
he'll.
Listen
in
the
back.
I
wanted
to
say
to
Mr.
Krause
I
am
not
attacking
you.
I'm
attacking
the
actions
that
you
do
against
me
and
I
can
show
that
the
bias
that
you
have
been
the
biased
have
been
biased
against
me.
Please.
Let
me
understand,
please
let
me
explain.
G
I
asked
for
open
hearing
about
Shop
and
Save
I
brought
in
about
35
signatures.
Okay,
so
we
come
to
a
meeting
on
Tuesday
Mr
Krause.
Does
the
meeting
I
leave
after
the
medium
I'm
talking
to
Dan
Gilman
out
there
we're
talking
and
we
he's
looking
up
and
I,
see
crosses
in
that
room
in
5
10.
and
he
takes
and
opens
the
door
and
says
oh
Miss,
Brown
I
forgot
to
tell
you
your
hearing
is
Monday
something
something
I
said:
Mr
Krause,
that's
not
right!
No
I
said
you're
incorrect.
You
shouldn't
do
me
like
this.
G
Do
have
the
hearing
he
says
we
have
two
speakers
only
and
I'm
saying,
but
who
is
this
mysterious
sponsor?
He
would
not.
Even
let
me
be
a
sponsor.
I
didn't
get
five
minutes.
I
got
three
minutes,
but
I
took
and
walked
that
neighborhood
all
through
the
neighborhood
35
signatures
and
I
said
Mr
Krause
do
not
treat
me
right,
I,
even
for
speaking
the
one
time
I
was
talking.
Oh,
he
cut
me
off
so
when
he
hits
the.
H
G
I
have
to
stop
talking.
I
sat
down.
There
was
a
group
from
South
side
at
that
time.
The
one
his
ladies
from
the
South
Side
stood
up
at
Bruce,
so-and-so
and
he's
she's
in
in
the
hallway
talking
and
he's
smiling.
Then
he
finally
said
no,
you
have
to
sit
down.
Do
you
understand
I'm,
saying
I'm
coming
here
every
day
you
just
may
not
see
it,
but
I'm
treated
like
a
second-class
citizen
I
have
been
coming
for
years,
only
be
because
you
don't
know
what
you
don't
know
and
you've
all
showed
some
kind
of
disdain.
G
For
me,
you
don't
you
do
not
speak
up
when
he's
wrong.
We
have
no
one
to
tell
them
like
okay,
look
at
Mr,
Burgess
well,
he's
doing
his
emails,
I
guess
he'll
stay
home
and
holler,
and
we
can't
hear
him.
He'll
spend
10
to
15
minutes
talking
and
you
won't
come
in
here,
but
when
you're
here
you're
sitting
and
it
should
be
against
the
law
that
they
can
bring
their
phones
to
the
table,
shake
it
at
me
see
that's
the
good
Reverend.
G
A
H
B
A
H
A
Second
need
a
motion
to
waive
the
rules
to
approve
the
P
cards.
There's
our
annual
Zoom
membership
is
6520.
It
was
split
for
the
purposes
of
approving
it.
Director
Norman
is
going
to
work
with
procurement
to
have
it
approve,
as
our
normal
invoice
next
year.
A
A
Just
curious
both
is
I
believe
so
this
was
initially
purchased
under
our
emergency
declaration
so
that
we
can
continue
our
meetings
when
everything
had
to
shut
down.
So
we
could
have
public
opinion
since
then
many
other
departments
have
been
added
to
it
and
so
I
believe
it's
both
Council
and
the
city
at
Large
happy
to
support.
Thank
you.
Councilman
gross.
K
L
O
P
P
One
is
for
the
annual
fee,
which
is
just
over
six
thousand
dollars
and
has
been
slightly
expanded
over
time
since
2020
when
we
purchased
it
under
the
emergency
Proclamation
for
the
for
the
pandemic,
and
then
we
also
pay
a
forty
dollar
a
month
fee
for
ongoing
Services
I
can
look
into
the
history.
I.
Wasn't
the
director
back
at
in
2020
at
the
time,
so
I
can
look
in
the
history
of
how
that
developed
in
terms
of
your
offices
being
charged
separately
on
separate
licenses.
P
So
I
think
the
the
issue
here
is
that
since
2020,
when
we
originally
purchased
that
under
the
emergency
procedures,
we
had
not
been
advised
that
we
needed
to
go
back
and
do
a
competitive
process
to
be
on
a
contract.
And
so
it's
been
paid
on
the
P
card
for
all
of
this
time.
And
so
what
I'm
asking
is,
if
I
can
pay
the
annual
fees
on
the
P
card
and
then
I
can
go
back
and
I
can
conduct
a.
M
K
I
K
I
J
Here
so
I
really
appreciate
the
councilwoman's
diligence
and
bringing
this
up
because
I
hadn't
gotten
quite
that
far
down
that
path.
Yet,
but
each
Council
Office.
We
support
a
number
of
community
organizations
that
hold
monthly
meetings
and
we
do
that
through
a
zoom
account
in
our
office
and
through
Public
Safety,
the
planning
form
and
a
number
of
other
ones,
Knoxville
Community
Council,
and
that's
how
we
do
it
and
I
just
began
to
accept
it.
I
guess
that
we
put
it
on
a
credit
card.
J
We
have
a
private
Zoom
account
for
our
office
and
we
reimburse,
through
our
Professional
Services
account,
but
I
do
think
it
would
be
in
our
best
interest
to
go
back
revisit
the
contract.
Now
that
we
are
out
of
the
emergency
Declaration
of
the
pandemic
and
do
that
in
a
little
more
Equitable
way.
I'd.
H
R
H
P
J
L
Thank
you,
I
just
want
to
thank
councilwoman
gross
for
making
sure
she
pointed
that
out
great
job,
but
I
also
want
to
thank
imp.
Don't
hear
me,
thank
you
very
often,
but
I
am
going
to
thank
you,
for
you
did
get
us
through
the
pandemic
through
the
zoom
and
doing
all
the
things
that
it
was
really
something
we
none
of
us
were
ready
for
or
prepared
for
and
I
just
want
to
thank
imp
for
their
professionalism.
During
that
time,
appreciate.
A
Thank
you,
I
would
just
add,
as
we're
being
looked
at
having
councils
added
to
the
city,
Zoom
contract,
it
would
probably
have
to
each
office
would
have
to
be.
You
looked
at
as
its
own
Department
it
wouldn't,
so
it
wouldn't
make
sense
for
all
of
council
to
have
one
Zoom
account,
because
then
we'd
be
stepping
on
each
other's
toes
all
day,
long
versus
each
Council,
Office
being
looked
at
as
an
additional
Department,
that's
being
added
to
the
account,
as
all
the
other
departments
have
been
added.
I
At
it,
so
with
this
account
this
this
renewal
here,
how
do
you
use
it?
This.
H
P
Reason
that
we
had
to
get
Zoom
is
because,
at
least
at
the
time,
teams
did
not
allow
for
people
outside
the
organization
to
call
in
in
a
secure
way
that
we
could
control
and
zoom
did
so.
We
actually
had
to
move
to
zoom
professional
accounts,
not
just
basic
Zoom
accounts,
in
order
to
be
able
to
provide
the
kind
of
security
that
we
needed
in
those
early
days
of
the
pandemic.
P
A
B
B
J
Thanks
Madam,
president
I:
don't
need
discussion,
I
just
want
to
offer
it.
If
you
wanted
to
speak
to
it.
H
I
T
Thanks
so
what
happened
here?
One
of
our
Environmental
Services
drivers
was
pulled
over
on
a
weight,
restricted,
Road
leading
to
the
landfill
and
they
came
in
significantly
overweight
for
the
road,
and
so
this
is
a
violation
in
in
that
regard.
So.
I
They
go
a
different
route.
Now,
yes,
okay
and
then
it
was
a
State
Trooper,
correct.
I
All
right:
okay,
that's
one
good
day,
I
Clarity
on
that.
Yes,
there's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
streets
where
trucks
are
driving
with
oversized
loads
on
the
city
streets
and
just
just
want
to
know
a
little
bit
more
about
this.
T
A
O
S
O
T
It
was
one
of
our
refuse.
Packers
does.
L
L
Just
curious
because
I
just
read
an
article
somewhere
and
I
can't
remember
where
I'm
trying
to
find
it,
where
electric
vehicles
weigh
so
much
that
they're
concerned
that
our
infrastructure
infrastructure,
if
we
go
to
all
electric
vehicles,
cannot
handle
the
weight
of
those
those
Vehicles
I'm
curious.
If
there's
anybody's
looking
into
that
and
checking
into
it.
That's
all.
Thank
you.
I
just
want
to
see,
if
that's
what
it
was.
U
Yeah,
you
know
she
just
asked
the
question.
Madam
president
asked
I
was
curious
as
to
what
type
of
truck
so
so
the
truck
wasn't
over
capacitated
it.
It
was
the.
T
U
This
it's
a
diesel,
I
said
diesel,
correct
yeah,
and
is
there
a
weight
limit
on
those
for
us
ever.
T
I
mean
for
the
well,
the
state
regulates
the
weight
limit
that
can
be
had
on
on
roads,
which
is
why
some
are
posted.
Certainly,
we
have
some
bridges
that
are
posted
with
weight
restrictions
as
well,
but
the
vehicle
is
rated
by
the
state
also
to
carry
a
certain
maximum
load.
U
T
U
Okay
and
while
I
have
you
here,
I,
never
I've
promised
my
district.
The
fourth
division
will.
U
K
Thank
you.
Those
were
interesting
questions.
I
was
happy
to
hear
the
answers,
but
I
also
want
to
note
that
I
think
we
should
amend
the
title,
because
it's
just
grammatically
incorrect
because
it
says
that
the
driver
is
overweight.
R
K
I'm,
just
gonna
do
a
simple
verbal,
Amendment
Madam
clerk,
so
that
it
says,
instead
of
driver
for
being
overweight,
It
should
read
motion
to
amend
it
should
read
driver
for
driving
and
overweight
load
on
a
controlled,
Road
and
I.
Think
that
is
more
accurate.
A
I
Call
girl-
maybe
if
you
get
a
truck,
that's
overweight
on
your
groundbreaking
it'll
break
the
ground
for.
I
Gotcha
the
these
might
be
a
couple
of
dummy
questions,
but
it's
just
interesting
to
me
because
well,
first,
like
do
you
know
how
they
make
a
road
like
how
they
you
know
sanction
a
road.
That's
has
a
certain
weight
limit,
I.
I
I
It
just
seems
like
that
driver
is
on
many
roads
that
yeah
are
already
taken,
a
taking
a
beating
so
I'm,
like
so
they're,
just
just
interesting
scenario,
that
you
know
we
literally
pave
like
a
like
an
old
paper.
Street
or
there's,
like
you
know,
I,
don't
know
just
you
should
see
some
of
the
streets
and
yeah
you've
seen
them
yeah
anyway.
B
1551
resolution
providing
for
an
agreement
or
agreements
with
the
efficiency
networking
for
costs
associated
with
project
management
for
the
planning,
designing
and
services
during
construction
to
convert
the
city's
network
of
high
performance,
sodium
lights,
HPS
to
energy,
efficient,
LED
luminaries
within
three
years,
providing
for
the
payment
of
the
cost
they're
of
not
to
exceed
2
million.
Two
hundred
forty
thousand
two
hundred
and
sixty
nine
dollars.
J
J
No
I'm
excited
about
this
actually
coming
to
fruition,
so
we're
gonna,
I,
hope,
you're,
all
kinds
of
good,
positive
things
that
makes.
J
J
Thank
you
for
being
here
so
I
guess
you
got
good
news
for
us,
so
we're
excited
to
hear
about
moving
ahead
with
the
you
know,
the
installation
of
our
new
LED
luminaries.
So
will
you
do
your
presentation
for
us.
Q
Sure
so
we
are
here
today
and
for
a
refresher.
We
came
to
the
table
in
2021,
with
the
request
for
Council
to
authorize
the
department
to
enter
into
a
contract
for
16
million
dollars
to
do
the
planning,
design
and
construction
of
the
LED
conversion
project
for
our
street
lights
after
the
department
moved
to
award
that
contract.
Q
We
received
a
protest
and
it
was
determined
at
that
time
in
coordination
with
the
administration
and
the
legal
department
and
procurement
that
the
better
route
was
to
split
the
contract
into
two
distinct
Parts,
one
for
that
design,
planning
and
construction
management
and
the
other
into
construction.
They
were
specifically
concerned
about
using
an
RFP
for
construction
services.
So
what
we
did?
Q
The
team
took
back
the
RFP
divided
it
into
two
separate
projects:
two
separate
contracts
rather
for
the
same
project
and
we're
here
in
front
of
you
today,
because
we
issued
that
RFP
for
the
design,
planning
and
construction
management
element,
and
we
have
selected
event,
and
we
would
like
to
move
to
awarding
that
contract.
That
amount
is
2.24
million
dollars.
What
that
will
do
is
that
will
not
only
perform
a
photometric
study
of
the
whole
city
to
determine
where
we
have
parts
of
the
community
that
are
under
lit
so
identifying
the
need
for
new
lights.
Q
It'll
also
identify
parts
of
our
community
that
are
overlit
and
to
say
that
we
need
to
reduce
the
number
of
Lights
here.
We
need
to
make
an
adjustment
so
that
we've
got
a
lighting
standard,
city-wide
to
improve
light
equity,
and
that
builds
on
the
work
of
the
Department
of
city
planning
a
couple
years
ago.
Q
The
project
will
also
evaluate
our
800
plus
trolley
polls
that
we
own
and
determine
if
they
need
to
be
replaced,
repaired
or
removed,
because
those
are
holding
up
a
number
of
our
street
lights
and
a
lot
of
them
are
in
a
condition
that
could
be
considered
unsafe
and
so
we're
evaluating
that
as
part
of
this
project
as
well.
So
the
plan
includes
public
engagement.
There
will
be
a
website.
Q
There
will
be
meetings
to
inform
and
educate
about
the
benefits
of
moving
to
LED
street
lights
and
we're
referring
this
to
a
modernization
project,
because
it's
not
just
about
converting
existing
lights.
To
LED
it's
about
right
sizing
or
lighting
asset
for
the
city,
and
we
anticipate
that
there
will
be
cost
savings
for
the
city
in
that
conversion.
Not
only
do
LEDs
consume
less
energy,
we
believe
that
there
will
be
lower
maintenance
costs
associated
with
upgrading
our
lights,
many
of
which
currently
are
past
the
age
of
useful
life
in
our
city.
J
So
that's
if
I
may,
that's
exactly
where
I'd
like
to
sort
of.
Let
focus
is
this
sort
of
reimagining
if
you
will
in
an
equitably
Distributing
light
throughout
the
city,
so
this
is
not
just
about
changing
light
bulbs
on
existing
post,
correct,
correct,
they're
right.
This
is
bigger
than
that.
This
is
some
may
be
added.
Some
new
polls-
I,
don't
that's
the
right
terminology,
maybe
added
some
may
be
re
removed,
but
there
is
a
a
concerted
and
concentrated
effort
to
understand
our
lighting,
our
public
Lighting
in
a
holistic
and
comprehensive
approach.
Right.
H
J
And
so
I
love
that
idea,
because
from
that
day
I
walked
in
the
door.
We've
talked
about
or
some
of
our
underserved
neighbors,
this
Mission
or
Hilltop
that
have
been
incredibly
patient
about
about
having
lighting
appropriately
distributed
throughout
this
neighborhood.
So
for
me
this
is
incredibly
good
news
and
something
I'm
very,
very
excited
about
hearing
and
I.
J
Probably
will
stop
my
questions
there
because
I
know
members
are
going
to
want
to
I
know.
Members
are
going
to
have
questions
so
I'd
rather
open
the
opportunity
for
them.
I'm,
certainly
by
all
means
supportive
of
this
today
and
I,
want
to
thank
and
congratulate
you
for
a
long
process
and
your
due
diligence,
your
professionalism
and
and
ultimately,
bringing
this
to
fruition.
There's
a
whole
whole
bunch
of
happy
people
that
I
represent,
because
this
is
coming
to
be
so
I.
J
K
Thank
you,
Mr,
chair,
I,
want
to
say
thank
you
to
Domi
for
kind
of
going
over
and
briefing
me
on
this
bill,
because
I
had
lots
and
lots
of
questions
the
last
two
times
it
came
up
actually,
so
we
just
we
discussed
LEDs
and
the
efficiency
Network
I,
think
in
2021,
but
also
in
2018.
K
and
so
I,
actually
re-watched.
Our
2021
discussion
and
I
want
to
to
acknowledge
right
up
front
that
I'm
I'm
so
much
more
comfortable
with
the
build
this
time.
K
Two
years
later,
because
most
of
the
P3
and
privatization
elements
have
been
taken
out,
and
so,
as
I
talked
with
about
Domi,
it
was
quite
a
few
years
ago
now,
maybe
seven
years
ago,
maybe
less
because
I
think
councilman
strasburger
hosted
a
post
agenda
on
privatization,
where
we
kind
of
used
the
mnemonic,
dbfom
design,
build
Finance
operate,
maintain
and
the
lower
you
get
towards
Finance
operating.
K
Maintaining
you
basically
privatized
your
asset,
you
know
privatized
it
in
operations,
even
if
you
haven't
sold
the
ownership
outright,
and
so
even
this
one
is
just
a
design
contract
and
it
doesn't
include
all
of
the
other
elements
and
really
the
first
time
it
came
to
the
table
now
five
years
ago.
K
It
was
really
like,
like
the
violia
contract
for
pwsa,
that
was
being
tossed
around
right,
where
we
would
be
selling
leasing
right
this
street
lip
was
the
concept,
then
that
we're
not
doing
now,
which
I'm
happy
we're
not
doing.
We
are
not
leasing
out
the
street
lights
because
other
cities
have
run
into
it.
We've
seen
the
problems
with
leasing
out
parking
Assets
in
Chicago.
K
We
see
the
problems,
leasing
out
water
assets
that
have
destroyed
Water
Systems
around
the
country
and
even
in
other
countries,
and
so
this
is
not
that
and
so
I'm
really
grateful.
I
also
had
a
bunch
of
questions.
Now
there
it's
been
two
years
since
my
staff
did
the
research
on
LED,
specifically
right
so
I'm
I'm,
happy
that
we
have
been
a
little
slow
to
adopt
because
I
think
some
of
the
early
adopter
cities
ran
into
problems
ran
into
cost.
K
Problems
ran
into
functionality,
problems
entire
sections
of
the
city
going
dark
because
of
the
failure
of
the
technology
lawsuits
against
the
manufacturers
of
the
LED
lights.
I
think
the
two
years
ago
you
all
were
talking
about
Albuquerque
being
happy,
but
it
was
just
starting
they've
now
just
settled
a
lawsuit
for
three
million
dollars
all
right.
They
did
begin
implementation
two
years
ago
in
Albuquerque,
but
it
again
went
badly,
but
some
of
those
things
are
being
worked
out.
K
So
I
think
what
we
were
seeing
in
2018
for
sure
I
think
were
over
Promises
by
the
by
the
tech
companies
and
that
didn't
pan
out
and
really
even
got
the
opposite
outcomes
for
cities
that
were
promised
not
to
cost
savings
but
cost
overruns.
And
so
this
is
just
a
study
I'm
happy
to
support
it.
I'm
happy
that
we're
being
more
methodical,
I'm
happy
that
we're
not
doing
privatization
and
that
I'm
happy
that
we're
learning
lessons
from
other
cities.
We
talked
about
Calvin's.
Two
years
ago
we
talked
about
color
intensity.
K
Now
again,
this
is
sometime
later
that
the
Amber
colors
are
better
than
the
blue
colors,
for
example,
because
of
everything
from
habitats
to
people
and
the
impacts,
the
night
sky,
kind
of
concerns
and
all
those
kinds
of
things
so
I'm
comfortable
that
what
we're
doing
here
today
is
just
authorizing
a
study
and
that
we
will
have
the
chance
to
discuss
it
more
and
with
the
public
so
that
we're
getting
to
the
equity
issues
that
I
know
members
are
rightfully
concerned
about,
but
we're
also
protecting
again
against
protecting
our
assets
and
saving
ourselves,
some
of
the
hassle
that
other
cities
have
experienced.
K
I
So
when
we
voted
on
this
two
years
ago,
it
was
combined
by
we
vote
on
this
two
years
ago,
it
was
combined
is
the
the
kind
of
maybe
I
misheard
you
councilman,
but
was
there
leasing
in
the
one
two
years
ago?
I
don't.
Q
I
All
right
so
and
then
this
is
what
we
met
my
understanding.
This
was
for
planning
design
just
like
it
says
we
planning
the
services,
so
this
this
part
is
going
to
actually
design
it
and
then
we'll
go
out
with
the
design
and
then
hire
the
the.
I
Q
I
All
right
great
and
then
with
the
dark
sky
ordinance.
This
is
they're
going
to
design
it
to
come
into
compliance
with
that.
Q
I
I
didn't
ask
this
question
when
I
was
in
in
the
in
our
in
our
briefing,
but
it
came
to
me
just
recently:
will
there
be
any
design
that
is
integrated
into
the
street
light
or
I,
don't
know
even
below
the
street
light
if
they
have
to
remove
like
a
pool
to
set
it
up
for
any
future
connections
or
any
all-gun
connections
to
in
terms
of
vehicles
or
bicycles
or
anything?
That's.
Q
A
great
question
I
think
what
you're
referring
to
is
that
now
we
have
certain
elements
in
our
right-of-way
that
are
charged
by
street
lights.
We've
got
some
spin
charging
stations
and
maybe
even
Pogo,
that
are
plugged
into
the
street
lights,
essentially
to
power
them
Denny,
I'm,
not
sure.
Actually,
so.
V
S
V
I
V
I
I
H
D
I
D
We
would
anticipating
transferring
over
the
capabilities
of
the
existing
things
which
are
currently
tied
into
the
infrastructure,
and
then
we
have
talked
about
wanting
to
make
sure
that
there
is
an
opportunity
that
if
we
see
Bike
Share
other
sort
of
micro,
Mobility
expanding
in
the
city
that
there's
an
opportunity
to
knock
preclude
the
location
of
that
type
of
equipment
based
on
the
street
light
infrastructure.
D
Right
now,
some
of
our
decision
making
and
locations
for
where
we
can
put
a
Mobility
Hub
is
constrained
by
the
availability
of
the
street
light
to
be
tapped
into
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
precluding
the
best
location
for
micro,
Mobility
or
automate
smart
loading
zone
enforcement.
Other
things
that
the
city
is
attaching
or
drawing
from
our
street
lights
by
you
know
switching
over
to
a
new
offering.
O
Yeah,
so
just
to
clarify
something,
because
you
thank
you
for
the
briefing
yesterday
and
I
actually
said
during
the
briefing
that
I
don't
actually
get
a
lot
of
constituent
calls
about
lights
and
then
I
got
that
like
right
after
we
hung
up,
I
got
one
which
I
think
I
think
comes
up
and
I've
seen
elsewhere,
and
this
is
about
a
just
in
particular
right,
a
light
on
a
paper
Street.
That's
just
kind
of
it
feels
like
just
like
a
big
light
in
someone's
backyard.
Q
So
if
that
light
is
deemed
to
be
over
lighting
an
area,
then
it
will
be
considered
for
removal
if
it's
a
scenario
where
the
technology,
you
know
if
by
chance
that
light
is
a
new
light
and
it's
one
of
the
new
LEDs
that
would
not
actually
come
about
through
this
contract
because
it
doesn't
meet
dark
skies
and
it
doesn't
meet
our
Kelvin
goals.
H
O
So
I
mean:
will
there
be
an
opportunity
for
individuals,
because
right
I
mean
that,
as
we've
heard,
there
are
people
who
who
want
light
on
their
street
who
feel
unsafe
or
whatever
you
know,
and
then
there
will
be
people
who
want
to
get
rid
of
that.
One
street
light
that's
sort
of
what
will
be
the
process
for
giving
that
very
specialized
feedback
on
individual
lights.
D
D
Of
it
involves
setting
the
table
for
the
explanation
of
how
a
lighting
study
is
done
and
how
the
city
makes
a
selection
about
the
type
of
fixtures
that
we
put
in
we'll
be
looking
for.
You
know
to
select
a
figure
or
excuse
me,
a
fixture.
That's
going
to
allow
us
to
be
able
to
put
shielding
or
directional
sort
of
direct
the
light
away
from
the
house
and
onto
the
street.
D
The
newest
Light
nuisance
lighting
may
be.
The
result
of
you
know
the
wrong
light
and
the
the
wrong
location,
and
so
by
starting
with
a
design
approach,
getting
the
right
light
in
the
right
location,
there's
other
mitigating
things
that
we
can
do
to
address
those
really
hyper-specific
issues
which
are
probably
coming
about
by
wrong
light
wrong
place.
Q
O
Okay,
yeah
I
mean
because
that
just
I
mean
just
like
with
everything
else.
You
know.
Obviously,
we
need
to
have
a
comprehensive
approach
to
study
just
like
with
traffic
calming
or
anything
else,
but
that
individual
feedback
from
people
who
are
sort
of
living
and
walking
the
streets
every
day
about
you
know
this
one.
You
know
this
place.
This
is
what's
happening
with
this
light.
O
I
think
is
important
to
and
and
and
and
and
important
to
hear
and
also
have
a
a
standardized
way
to
give
that
feedback,
which
I
don't
know
if
I
think
now,
folks,
probably
just
call
3-1-1,
but
if
there's
actually
a
program
going,
you
know
being
and
whether
that's
through
the
council
office.
However,
we
should
definitely
figure
out
a
way
to
make
sure
that
people,
because
once
they
hear
about
this
right
like
once
this
becomes,
you
know,
oh
we're
reviewing
the
lighting
that
everybody's
gonna
be
like.
O
O
D
Perhaps,
to
just
address
your
question
more
directly,
the
project
team
does
include
a
public
engagement
subconsultant
that
will
be
putting
together
a
public
engagement
plan
and
I
think
sort
of
mining
our
existing
311s
the
last
time
around
when
we
did
and
we
released
an
RFP
for
the
street
lights.
We
actually
did
a
survey
on
engage
just
to
sort
of
take
the
temperature
of
the
types
of
Common
Street,
light
issues
that
residents
are
having
and
so
I
think
we'll
build
a
public
engagement
plan
that
will
hopefully
speak
towards
I.
D
O
Great
and
then
will
you
when
it
comes
to?
Well,
maybe
you
don't
know
this
yet,
but
when
it
comes
to
implementation,
is
it
going
to
be
like
a
street
by
Street
or
a
neighborhood
by
neighborhood
type
or
I
mean
just
just
to
sort
of
know,
I
mean.
Obviously
it's
not
going
to
be
like
the
whole
city
is
all
at
once
done
so.
D
D
Based
on
you
know
what
geographic
area
we're
going
to
work
work
with,
as
Denny
said,
we're
anticipating
a
two-year
time
frame
to
get
throughout
the
entire
city,
and
so
we
do
want
to
build
in
some
Equity
analysis
around
where
in
the
city
we
may
want
to
start
based
on
maybe
addressing
some
of
those
Equity
issues
and
or
starting
the
conversion
in
areas
where
we
know
we
have
an
equity
issue,
but
some
of
that
will
come
from
the
design
and
planning
process.
Okay
sounds
good.
U
Hey
thanks
for
being
here,
I
first
I
want
to
say:
I
can
barely
get
here
today,
because
I
had
so
much
road
work
going
on
throughout
my
district.
So
I
want
to
compliment
you
on
having
the
contractors
out
there
and
specifically
for
a
cobblestone
street
that
we've
been
getting
a
lot
of
complaints
for
in
a
concrete
road.
So
so
that's
really
nice
I
know
the
first
one
to
complain.
Maybe,
but
I
also
want
to
compliment
you
when
I
see
good
things
going
on.
U
You
had
mentioned
the
telephone
poles
director.
You
know
we
own
the
polls,
how
many
problems
trolley
pools
so
on
Broadway
Avenue
in
Beachview,
the
big
Steel
Pulse
we
own
those.
V
We
we
own
800
of
them,
PRT
still
own
some
and
Duquesne
Light
own
some
well.
H
V
That's
a
big
piece
interesting.
It
comes.
H
U
U
R
R
U
U
The
the
the
contract
for
the
lighting,
the
new
lighting,
first
of
all,
we're
replacing
all
of
the
lights.
Is
this
all
the
44
000
lights,
or
is
this
a
fraction
of
them?
How
many
six
consistent.
Q
J
U
So,
and
the
other
thing
was
this:
when
those
lights
when
they
we
talked
about
this
at
the
table,
I
think
councilwoman
gross
brought
it
up
one
day
it's
like
when
they
start
these
LEDs
and
it's
like
a
strobe.
It's
like
torture
is
that
when
they
burn
out,
are
they
malfunctioning?
What
what
is
it
do
they
burn
out
so.
V
U
Okay,
so
so
the
the
contract,
once
we
do
put,
we
have
to
put
that
out
to
bid
RFP
right.
J
U
Because
I
know
I
got
some
Flack
and
I
know
many
of
us
did
when
we
took
a
little
bit
of
that
diverted
a
little
bit
of
the
study
funding
and
it
was
our
local
unions
that
were
calling
and
saying,
oh
wait.
This
is
a
big
contract,
so
I
didn't
know.
If
we
are
so,
we
didn't
pick
a
contractor
when
the
time
comes,
we'll
probably
know
then
or
see
who
applies,
but
we
use
Union
contractors
here
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
I.
Q
Believe
we
have,
everybody
knows
I,
don't
know
that
that's
the
best
question
for
OMB,
but
we
can
take
a
look
and
see
if
that
you
know
it's
lowest,
responsible,
better
and
responsive
bidder.
So
if
that
is
one
of
the
requirements
that
the
city
has
set
forth,
that
needs
to
be
met
like
you
know,
mwdbe
requirements,
and
we
can
take
a
look
at
that
and
they
would
have
to
meet
that
requirement.
U
M
No
I'm
just
going
to
speak
in
no
I
just
wanted
to
thank
you
for
taking
the
time
to
brief
a
to
brief
our
office
on
on
this
project
and
answer
our
questions
and
I
have
no
further
questions.
All
the
ones
that
I
wanted
to
reiterate,
haven't
already
been
reiterated
or
asked
today.
I
just
wanted
to
voice
my
support
for
this,
this
conversion
and
addition,
and
in
some
cases,
removal
of
lights,
will
no
doubt
save
energy,
save
taxpayer
dollars
and
save
carbon
emissions,
and
so
for
all
those
Reasons
I'm
supportive.
Thank
you.
A
J
A
The
next
committee
is
economic
development
Chair
by
councilman
Wilson.
We
have
a
recommitted
paper,
Bill
1536.
K
X
I'll
have
brief
discussion
and
I'll
ask
for
a
hold
I
think
having
been
on
Council
these
many
years.
It's
challenging.
H
X
Sometimes
parochial
and
sometimes
Territorial
and
all
those
sort
of
things,
and
so
I'm,
just
I'm,
really
saying
this
for
both
Barb
and
some
of
the
new
accounts
of
people,
I
kind
of
have
a
rule,
and
that
is
and
and
I'm
sad,
because
this
violates
one
of
my
rules
is
I,
do
not
believe
that
a
bill
should
ever
originate
to
to
reallocate
or
touch
the
money.
X
That's
under
my
control,
without
my
direct
participation
I
did
not
have
direct
participation,
nor
did
I
asked
for
this,
nor
that
I
approve
this
and
it
should
have
never
been
on
the
table.
I
understand
that
the
reason
for
this
is
because
there's
some
some
fear
of
some
of
that
money
being
reallocated
now
and
I
I'm.
Aware
of
that
and
I
am
sensitive
to
that.
But
my
principle
is
beyond
that
to
me:
you
know
it's,
it
is.
X
It
is
council's
prerogative
and
for
me
this
is
overstepping
the
division
between
the
separation
between
the
administration
and
the
mayor's
office,
and
so
I
am
willing
to
have
a
conversation
about
how
I
may
and
even
and
I,
don't
even
allocate
my
own
money
right.
All
these
years
on,
Council
I've
always
had
third
P
third
persons
to
allocate
it.
So
it's
not
like
I
want
to
to
have
this.
X
You
know
back
the
day,
kids
through
the
last
two
years,
kids
from
the
district
have
done
it
so
I,
don't
I,
don't
really
want
to
necessarily
hand
pick
who
gets
it,
but
I
would
like
to
be
part
of
the
process
in
some
way
and
I'm
saying
this
for
all
of
you,
because
I
think
that's
true
for
all
of
us,
so
I
think
the
fair
thing
is
to
hold
it
for
six
weeks.
That'll
give.
X
Whoever
wants
to
you
know,
reallocate
the
money
I
think
it's
I
think
it
has
till
September
I'm
willing
to
listen-
and
you
know
be
brought
in
as
part
of
the
process
and
hear
the
rationale
for
The
Cooperative
Ministry,
which
I've
done,
which
I
know
well
and
have
been
apart.
For
many
many
years
and
so
I'm
going
to
now
motion
to
hold
for
six
weeks.
A
K
Completely
100
concur
I
had
the
exact
same
discussion
a
few
weeks
ago,
or
maybe
a
month
ago
and
I
I
talked
to
president
Smith
about
it.
I
talked
to
the
administration
about
it.
I
talked
to
our
budget
office
about
it.
These
bills
should
not
be
coming
forward
with
unless
they're
sponsored
by
the
council
member.
K
So
you
have
my
full
support.
Also
I've
been,
this
is
our
maybe
third
or
fourth
week
in
a
row,
councilman
Krause
being
Persnickety.
There
is
no
dollar
amount
in
the
title
of
the
bill.
There
should
be
a
dollar
amount
in
the
title
of
the
bill
so
that
the
public
can
see
if
they
want
to
read
it.
You
know
if
it's
more
than
you.
K
Bucks,
maybe
the
council,
you
know
the
public
doesn't
want
to
pull
up
the
text
file
and
read
it,
but
if
it's
200
000,
maybe
the
council,
you
know
members
of
the
public
want
to
pull
up
the
text
file
and
know
what
that's
about
so
anyway.
That's
I
just
wanted
to
put
them
through
on
my
two
cents,
because
we've
been
having
this
same
discussion
repeatedly
appreciate
it.
K
L
B
L
To
be
put
in
the
title,
so
just
so
members
know
when
the
numbers
come
over,
the
legislation
comes
over
if
the
number's,
not
in
there
solicitor,
friedson
Clerk's
Office
chairperson,
we
all
look
at
they
all
everyone
looks
at
the
legislation.
If
it's
not
the
way
it's
supposed
to
be,
we
send
it
back
so
and
asked
to
to
do
it
the
right
way,
so
we'll
make
sure
that
we're
going
to
continue
doing
that.
We
did
that
this
past
week.
L
We'll
continue
to
do
this,
but
since
this
was
already
through
the
process,
it
was
one
that
went
through,
but
I
just
want
to
also
say:
I
agree
with
councilman
brothers
that
everyone
needs
to
I.
Think
it's
communication,
I,
think
that
you
know
we
all
just
want
to
know.
What's
going
on
in
our
districts
we're
responsible
and
accountable
to
the
public
we
meet
with
the
public
every
day
in
our
neighborhoods.
We
know
what
they're
saying.
L
We
know
that
the
administration
talks
to
some
people
too,
but
they
talk
to
us
a
smaller
group
of
people
in
each
of
our
districts
than
we
do,
but
they
talk
to
a
lot
of
people
across
the
city,
but
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
think
and
everything
goes
smoother
when
we
all
communicate
and
work
together,
and
so
with
that
said,
I
hope
that
they'll
be
mindful
of
before
sending
this
kind
of
legislation
over
without
numbers
and
without
talking
to
council
members,
but
for
the
most
part,
I
think
they
are
trying
to
do
more.
L
O
Well,
two
separate
points,
one
just
we
with
regards
to
the
amount
of
money
in
the
bills.
That's
helpful
and
also
just
I
mean
really
as
much
detail
as
possible.
There
was
another
one.
Last
week,
that's
referred
to
various
projects,
I
mean
things
like
that,
or
it's
like
that.
You
know
we're
all
in
a
hurry.
We
like
to
know
what's
in
it
and
anything
like
that,
just
sort
of
raises
the
question
various.
What's
that
mean
numerous?
O
Well,
how
many
you
know
any
any
kind
of
wording
like
that,
that's
not
specific
I
think
is
valid
for
sending
back,
and
you
know
it's
a
little
longer
on
the
page,
but
it's
worthwhile
and
then
also-
and
maybe
this
is
a
question
for
our
Council
budget
director,
but
just
as
far
as
these
as
these
funds
go,
these
cdbg
funding.
O
You
know
when
there's
when,
when
there's
money
that
hasn't
been
used,
that's
running
out
and
it
would
be
great
to
sort
of
know-
you
know
have
a
list
because
we
don't
want
to
leave
money
on
the
table.
We
we
don't
want
it
to
run
out.
So
if
there's
an
organization
in
my
district
that
you
know
hasn't
taken
advantage
of
something
that
that
was
allocated
I,
don't
know
when
back
then
just
sort
of
a
periodic
update.
You
know
like
hey
look.
O
This
is
still
what's
sitting
in
the
Pod
and
that
way
we're
able
to
call
and
say
hey
either
you
know.
Are
you
going
to
use
this
because
if
you're
not
you
know,
we
can
move
it
over
here
this
and
that
that
would
that
would
be
a
helpful
thing,
at
least
for
me:
I,
don't
speak
forever,
but
it'll
be
helpful
for
me
to
have.
A
Thank
you
second
round
I.
L
Just
want
to
say
Lori
in
our
office
does
a
really
good
job
of
tracking
those
doors.
If
you
want
her
to
work
with
your
office,
she'll
be
happy
to
do
that,
so
she
can
work
with
show
them
how
she
does
it,
but
I
just
want
to
say
I,
don't
I!
Don't
think
that
this
is
this
moving
money
and
doing
things
and
not
sending
over
is
isolated
to
one
Administration.
L
It
all
works
better
when
we
communicate
and
then
we
earn
up
to
that
trust
if
they
say
tell
us
something
that
they
want
us
to
keep
confidence
that
we
keep
that
confidence.
That
kind
of
stuff
builds,
builds
the
relationship
and
I
think
that
helps
a
little
bit.
So
it's
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
say
that
that's
very
clearly
that
it's
not
it's
just
the
nature
of
this.
This
job
I
think.
A
B
1562
ordinance
accepting
a
new
street
name:
Ruther
Glen
Place
in
the
15th
ward
of
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
as
per
recommendation
by
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
addressing
committee,
the
following
street
name
was
approved
by
CPAC
in
April
2023.
The
name
listed
in
this
ordinance
shall
be
made
official
in
accordance
with
the
Pittsburgh
code,
title
for
public
places
and
property
chapter
420,
uniform,
Street
naming
and
addressing
motion.
T
H
B
R
L
N
Well,
I
was
going
to
also
say
that
this
money
was
going
to
be
used.
It's
one
of
those
funds,
that's
kind
of
up
against
the
deadline,
so
to
speak,
so
we're
going
to
put
it
toward
Administration
for
funds
that
we
could
get
out
for
advertising
for
public
ads
and
things
like
that.
But
you
want
to
see
if
it
could
be
moved
to
Domi.
H
H
M
L
I
Yeah
I
remember:
I
was
in
previous
discussions
with
City
Planning
about
our
ASL
interpreters
and
making
sure
that
they're
funded
is
that
this
wasn't
that
pot
of
money?
Was
it
not
to
my
knowledge?
Okay,.
H
I
I
Okay,
yeah,
they
need
to
come
up
with
it
Could
you,
since
you
know
you
open
the
bill
and
there's
some
different
pots
of
money
that
we
move.
Could
you
explain
what's
going
on.
H
N
What's
going
on
is
we're
looking
to
move
these
from
was
originally
given
to
the
Ura
and
the
Ura
couldn't
spend
the
funds,
so
they
gave
us
the
money
back
through
all
this
period.
Back
and
I've
actually
got
a
timeline
here
as
I'm
looking
down
on
my
computer,
so
around
February
of
2023.
That's
when
the
Ura
told
us
they
couldn't
spend
the
funds.
What.
N
It
at
that
time
they
just
could
not
use
those
funds,
also
with
a
lot
of
other
coveted
funds
on
the
street
back,
then
it
was
more
easier
to
use
some
of
those
other,
because
I
think
there
was
so
much
Federal
funding
on
the
street
back
then.
So
those
are
a
little
bit
easier
funds
to
use,
as
opposed
to
the
funds
that
Dr
a
had
received
here,
but
they
could
not
use
them.
I
You
all,
are
you
here
for
this
bill?
Do
you
know
about
this
bill.
N
Y
Yeah
dude
we
gotta
get
your
senior
advisor
Ura
I
believe
what
Kelly's
referring
to
is
that
there
were
other
funds
made
available.
These
were
initially
for
the
HSP
program,
which
is
you
know,
a
rent
assistance
program
that
we
provide,
but
I
believe
with
the
availability
and
the
program,
flexibility
of
the
e-wrap
funding
that
eventually
came
through
in
like
much
more
substantial
amounts.
We
spent
the
e-wrap
funding
and
have
since
sent
this
funding
back.
S
I
N
N
Moving
a
million,
so
716
085
is
going
to
go
through
the
Jewish
Family
and
community
service
food
pantry.
Fifty
seven
thousand
eight
hundred
ninety
nine
dollars
and
twenty
cents
will
go
to
Just
mediation,
Pittsburgh
and
286
500
we'll
go
to
the
Greater
Pittsburgh
Community
Food
Bank!
That's
the!
When
you
add
those
three:
that's
your
million
dollars
right
there
and
what's
also
happening
is
with
these
funds.
N
With
the
with
the
Jewish
Family,
a
food
pantry
they're
going
to
buy
additional
food
with
just
mediation,
Pittsburgh,
that's
to
help
with
some
of
their
tenant
landlord,
Assistance
programs
and
with
the
Greater
Pittsburgh
Food
Bank.
They
are
going
to
end
up
doing
a
Erp
system
and
also
scanners
to
help
with
things
within
the
food
bank
to
help
get
the
food
out
in
the
easier
purchase,
an
easier
manner.
N
I
I
N
Was
about
to
say,
the
previous
administration
had
made
funding
to
see
funding
decisions
with
those
monies
why
we
picked
those
three
organizations
specifically,
is
they
were
able
to
spend
some
of
their
previous
allocations
officially
efficiently
in
a
Time?
Initially,
what
happened
when
we
started
this?
There
was
actually
80
cdbgcv
spending
deadline.
It's.
H
N
June,
2nd,
we
were
about
65
at
that
time
about
in
April
that
80
deadline
was
moved,
but
we
had
already
started
discussions
with
these
other
organizations,
so
no
matter
what
we
just
still
wanted
to
get
them
the
funding,
because
we
started
the
conversation
with
them.
They
had
spent
money
previously
and
we
just
wanted
to
uphold
that.
E
I
So
that
that
was
two
million,
but
we
only
took
I,
don't
know,
there's
well,
it
doesn't
matter,
there's
remaining
963
000..
What's
the
what's
the
plan
with
those
dollars.
I
H
O
Y
Yeah
e-wrap
was
a
program
that
was
funded
at
greater
amounts
and
with
more
flexibility
and
could
provide
actually
more
assistance
to
our
residents
than
these
funds
could
do
so.
We
switched
to
mainly
relying
on
e-wrap
in
order
to
provide
that
assistance.
Y
K
I'm
supportive
of
these
uses
again
being
Persnickety
this,
especially
a
2
million
I.
Just
give
an
example
that
if
it
was
two
hundred
thousand
dollars,
it
should
be
in
the
title,
because
maybe
you'd
want
to
read
the
text
file.
K
This
is
two
million
dollars
in,
like
you
know
a
few
minutes
later
and
then
also
you
know,
I'm
supportive
of
the
uses,
but
I
do
think
that
Council
should
be
having
these
discussions,
and
so
you
know,
I'll
I'm,
happy
to
vote
for
this
today,
but
I'm
going
to
ask
that
our
budget
office,
let
us
know
of
any
other
unexpended
funds
that
have
been
coming
in
from
the
pandemic
funds
right
I
had
thought
they
were
all
gone,
and
so
I
really
would
like
an
update
not
just
on
the
earpa
but
on
the
pots
of
funds
previously,
because
there
is
need
out
there,
and
we
should
be
having
discussion
about
how
to
get
this
money
to
where
the
needs
are
so
Pete
prayer.
K
L
A
B
Bill
1552
resolution
providing
for
reimbursement
agreement
or
agreements
with
the
Pittsburgh
Water
and
Sewer
Authority
for
costs
associated
with
the
critical
sidewalk
gaps
project,
where
pwsa
would
be
responsible
for
paying
100
of
actual
expenses
involved
in
certain
work,
described
parent
and
itemized
in
exhibit
B
and
an
amount
not
to
exceed
6
339.69
and
further
amending
resolution.
Number
723
of
2022,
effective
December,
27
2022,
entitled
resolution
adopting
and
approving
the
2023
capital
budget.
The
2023
community
development
program
in
a
2023
through
2028
Capital
Improvement
program
by
increasing
ramp
in
public
sidewalk
by
6
339.69.
K
A
lot
of
information
on
this
program,
and
so
members
would
like
for
their
information
I,
can
get
it
to
you
by
email.
If
you're
comfortable
voting
for
today.
A
H
A
B
H
B
1557
resolution
authorizing
the
Ura
of
Pittsburgh
or
an
urban
Redevelopment
Authority
affiliate
to
acquire
all
the
city's
right
title
and
interest
if
any
in
into
the
following
publicly
owned
properties
in
the
Fifth
Ward
of
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
designated
in
the
deed
registry
office
of
Allegheny
county
is
blocked.
26P
lot,
164
Council,
District,
6.
H
B
Bill
1558
resolution
approving
execution
of
a
contract
for
disposition
by
a
cell
of
land
between
the?
U
r,
a
of
Pittsburgh
and
read
Roberts
housing,
limited
partnership
or
related
entity
for
the
sale
of
block
11a
Lots
35
36,
37,
38,
40,
41,
42,
43,
44,
46,
47
and
48
and
block
11e
Lots
300.
A
300b
301.
B
A
Sure
this
is
to
so
as
you're
aware,
we
are
going
after
a
choice:
neighborhood
application
to
rebuild
all
of
Bedford
dwellings,
public
variable
public
housing
in
the
Hill
district.
This
is
to
allow
us
to
actually
begin
phase,
one
of
that
Redevelopment
irregardless
of
whether
or
not
we
receive
the
federal
money
from
the
federal
government
from
HUD
we're
going
to
do
the
very
first
phase
of
development
on
this
site.
L
In
this
agenda
repeatedly,
your
District's
very
fortunate
to
have
it,
but
I
hope
that
now
coming
forward,
not
that
they
have
so
many
projects
going
in
the
hill
that
they'll
start
looking
at
the
rest
of
the
city,
where
there's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
blight
and
a
lot
of
need
also
so
just
want
to
say
that
part.
Thank
you.
H
A
Any
opposed
affirmative
recommendation,
our
meeting
announcements
tomorrow,
Thursday
June
1st
at
10
A.M
Council,
will
hold
pre-agenda
interviews
for
the
disruptive
property
appeals
board,
the
Housing
Authority
board
of
directors
and
the
commission
on
human
relations.
Next
week,
Council
will
hold
our
regular
and
sunny
Community
meetings
on
Tuesday
June
6
and
Wednesday
June
7th
at
10,
A.M
respectively.
Speaker
registration
will
close
at
9
A.M
the
day
of
the
meeting
so
register
to
speak.
Please
fill
out
the
sign
up
form
on
the
council
meeting
web
page
or
call
the
clerk's
office
at.
L
Just
going
to
again
congratulate
you,
because
I
think
you
and
Reverend
Burgess
have
done
a
tremendous
job
in
rebuilding
your
communities
and
I
and
I
think
that
I
hope
that
we
learn
a
little
bit
from
you
so
that
we
can
do
some
of
the
see
some
of
this
project
started
in
our
areas
that
we
want
to
see
happen
and
yours
is
happening
on
its
own
Deb.
So
I'm,
sorry.
A
K
Thank
you:
I
need
two
motion
for
a
public
hearing,
a
cable
cast
public
hearing
for
the
mobility
enhancement,
district
and
we'll
work
on
setting
the
date
with
the
community
members,
so
that
we
can
keep
keep
the
next
process
dip
in
the
process.
Moving
motion
to
hold
a
cable
cast
public
hearing
for
the
mobility
enhancement.
Second,
yeah.
J
J
A
Aye
any
opposed
work
with
the
clerk
to
get
that
schedule
anything
else.
If
not
motion
to
approve
the
minutes
and
adjourn
the
meeting.
Sir.