►
Description
Speakers include: Philip Johnson, PhD., M. Beatrice Dias, PhD, Chris Bartley, & Melissa Bilec, PhD.
A
A
Thank
you
all
for
coming
to
the
first
I
MP
speaker
series.
The
idea
is
that
we
will
be
hosting
a
variety
of
speakers
each
month
on
various
topics
related
to
innovation
in
performance,
and
we
welcome
both
internal
city
staff,
but
also
external
visitor.
So
this
is
all
just
going
to
be
part
of
our
our
new
public
engagement
as
part
of
just
information,
awareness
and
raising,
so
without
further
ado,
I'm
going
to
introduce,
grant
who
will
then
introduce
our
first
set
of
speakers
all
about
air
quality.
B
Great
thanks
director
Liam
greatly
appreciate
it.
My
name
is
green
herb
and
I
serve
as
sustainability
manager
for
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
and
would
like
to
welcome
you
all
here
today,
as
director
said
for
the
initial
kickoff
of
the
innovation
speaker
series
and
we're
really
proud
to
offer
this
up
as
a
service,
not
just
to
see
the
employees,
but
also
our
friends
in
the
community,
to
learn
about
some
of
the
work
that
we're
doing
here
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
with
our
partners
from
around
the
city.
B
This
is
really
a
collaborative
effort
that
we're
bringing
together
today,
nonprofit
partners,
university
partners,
foundations
to
understand
how
the
intersection
between
philanthropy
government
and
the
civic
sector
can
really
lead
innovation
here
across
the
city
of
Pittsburgh.
The
topic
today
is
about
air
quality.
It's
one
of
the
biggest
challenges
that
we
face
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
in
terms
of
our
overall
sustainability
in
terms
of
both
indoor
and
outdoor
air
quality.
B
Today,
we've
brought
together
a
group
of
speakers
who
are
really
at
the
forefront
of
addressing
air
quality
issues
here
in
Pittsburgh,
both
in
terms
of
their
technical
capacity
there
their
role
as
advocates,
and
also
the
investments
that
they're
making
in
our
communities
to
help
make
Pittsburgh
a
more
sustainable
and
innovative
City.
So
without
further
ado,
I'd
like
to
introduce
this
latest
speakers
that
we
brought
for
brought
for
our
audience
here
today.
B
The
speakers
will
all
have
about
ten
minute
presentations
to
enlighten
you
about
some
of
the
work
that
they're
providing
here
as
partners
with
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
and
then
we'll
also
follow
up.
At
the
end,
with
a
series
of
question
of
the
answers
to
allow
you
the
audience
to
get
engaged
as
well
as
answering
some
of
the
questions
that
you
might
have
burning
on
the
tip
of
your
tongue
and
also
some
of
the
issues
that
might
catch
through
some
of
their
presentations.
B
Each
of
the
presenters
that
we're
working
with
today
are
working
hand
in
hand
with
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
on
different
collaborative
projects,
whether
it's
in
the
policy
arena
in
terms
of
developing
public
policy,
to
advance
us
to
the
next
level
or
from
the
technical
standpoint.
So
you're
going
to
get
to
learn
some
of
the
behind-the-scenes
work
that
we're
doing
here,
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
in
terms
of
monitoring
into
our
air
quality,
and
let
some
of
the
lessons
that
we
can
learn
in
terms
of
making
some
strategic
decisions
going
forward.
B
So
with
that
I'd
like
to
introduce
I'll,
introduce
our
group
of
speakers
and
we're
going
to
start
off
today
with
Phil
Johnson
Phil
is
the
director
of
the
environment
program
for
the
Heinz
endowments,
probably
one
of
the
leading.
If
not
the
leading
air
quality
advocate
here
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
he
oversees
the
breathe
project,
which
is
an
initiative
of
the
Heinz
endowments
which
is
really
putting
air
quality
on
the
map.
B
In
terms
of
the
importance
of
the
issue,
as
well
as
some
of
the
aspects
in
which
we
can
change
our
behavior
to
improve
the
air
quality
here
in
Pittsburgh.
Following
Phil
will
be
be
died
as
from
the
create
lab,
as
well
as
Chris
Bartley,
her
co-conspirator
from
the
create
lab
we're
working
with
Carnegie
Mellon's,
create
lab
through
the
deployment
of
the
spec
meter,
which
they're
going
to
talk
to
you
a
little
bit
about
with
regards
to
monitoring
small
particulate
matter
and
a
cool
nifty
little
tool
that
we're
working
on.
B
That's
really
starting
to
engage
and
I
have
to
be
honest,
one
of
the
catalyst
for
this
event,
because
it's
quite
the
conversation
starter
once
you're
providing
a
little
bit
more
information
and
people
are
able
to
visualize
some
of
the
challenges
we
have
higher
quality.
That's
going
to
be
followed
up,
Chris
and
B.
We
followed
up
by
Melissa,
bolic
Melissa
comes
to
us
from
the
University
of
Pittsburgh,
where
we're
working
with
the
University
of
Pittsburgh
and
the
green
building
Alliance,
who
part
of
their
2030
district
program.
B
We
were
one
of
their
initial
guinea
pigs,
along
with
Allegheny
County
in
terms
of
measuring
indoor
air
quality,
so
we're
doing
some
testing
and
our
facilities
looking
forward
to
some
of
the
lessons
that
will
be
able
to
learn
from
their
research
and
then
apply
it
to
some
of
our
changes
here
that
we're
looking
to
make
in
terms
of
systems.
So
with
that
I'd
like
to
introduce
Phil
to
get
his
kick
started
here
and
then
each
speaker
fall
of
Phil
and
we'll
have
question
and
answers
an
end.
So
thanks
much
Phil.
C
C
So
in
the
next
10
minutes,
I'm
going
to
fly
through
a
bunch
of
slides,
talk
a
little
quickly
happy
to
to
handle
any
questions
or
discussion
points
in
the
aftermath,
if
there's
time
so
we're
looking
here
at
the
brief,
can
we
have
four
of
these
spread
across
panoramic
views
of
pittsburgh?
This
is
a
day
a
big
day
july.
C
Fourth
of
last
year,
fine
particulate
matter
was
quite
low
at
six
and
then
you
can
see
the
contrast
when
particles
of
just
a
few
days
before
that
we're
at
35,
you
can
see
how
the
city
is
very
much
dirtier,
even
even
even
at
a
level
that
that
is
within
the
24
hour.
The
24
hour
average
on
that
day
was
less
than
35
and
35
is
the
the
daily
standard
for
fine
particulate
matter.
Here's
a
view.
C
Looking
to
the
north,
you
can
see
a
day
where
particles
are
fairly
low
for
April,
sixteenth
and
here's
a
day
where
April
6
10
days
previous
particles
were
a
24.
You
lose
the
horizon.
It's
basically
gone
if
that
were
a
mountain
range.
I
think
pittsburghers
would
take
this
issue
more
seriously
in
terms
of
visibility,
at
least
because
they
wouldn't
see
their
mountains,
so
grant
gave
me
instructions
what
to
talk
about,
and
I
liked
his
sentence
so
much.
I
just
cut
and
paste
it
right
into
the
title.
C
What
is
the
status
of
air
quality
and
what
I
really
liked
is
when
he
asked
me
what
happens
outside
influences?
What
goes
on
inside
can
I
talk
about
that,
and
so
I
see
at
least
two
things
in
their
first
is
what
happens
outside
my
body
affects.
What's
inside
my
body,
that's
the
health
impacts
and
then,
of
course,
what
happens
outdoors
effects
what's
going
on
inside
where
humans
were
humans,
dwell
so
I'll
make
the
case
and
and
show
the
data
to
support
these
support.
C
These
arguments
and
we'll
see
where
it
goes
so,
just
a
very
quick
primer
on
on
how
such
microscopic,
tiny,
airborne
things
called.
Fine
particulate
matter
can
have
such
a
pronounced
health
impact
on
humans
across
large
populations.
So
this
is
a
picture
of
a
tree
in
Central,
Park
I
turned
it
upside
down
because
it
essentially
looks
exactly
like
a
human
long.
You
have
you
have
the
trachea
or
the
trunk.
You
have
the
bronchial
or
the
branching,
the
the
IBO
lie,
which
which,
if
they
were
really
filled
out
in
a
lung.
C
You
wouldn't
even
see
any
leaf
definition,
but
the
leaf
the
leaf
activity
would
be
the
the
tips
of
this
of
this
organism,
and
this
is
where
the
exchange
occurs.
The
atmospheric
exchange,
the
thing
is,
is
that
that
the
air
that
goes
into
our
lungs
is
chemically
active
and
it
exerts
through
different
biological
mechanics,
pronounced
health,
health,
health
outcomes
and
humans.
C
So
if
there's
a
take
home
from
that
last
slide,
its
particles
of
tiny
they're
about
a
30th,
the
width
of
a
human
hair
because
we
inhale
airborne
particles
were
basically
looking
at
huge,
huge
absorption
by
the
body.
If
you
stretched
out
the
lung,
it
would
be
in
an
adult,
it
would
be
about.
The
tissue
would
be
about
the
surface
area
of
a
badminton
court
so
that
skin
would
be
about
maybe
2
meters,
squared
the
long
run
average
could
be
about
78
meters
squared
which
is
a
badminton
court
toxic.
C
These
particles
have
absorbed
toxic
chemicals
and
other
materials
on
them,
including
biologicals,
and
we
know
that
air
particle
exposures
in
in
certain
time,
durations
and
surprisingly,
not
long
ones
but
but
also
chronic
durations,
can
kill
people
at
least
forty
to
fifty
percent
of
the
population
in
the
United.
States
is
susceptible
to
health
outcomes,
from
air
quality
from
air
pollution,
especially
Pregnant's
children,
persons
with
long
or
heart
disease,
diabetics
and
the
elderly.
C
Anyone
experiencing
elevated
exposures
there
is
actually
is
no
safe
level
of
exposure
per
se,
because
it's
a
non
threshold,
pollutant,
there's,
there's
no
level
at
which
we've
been
able
to
measure
statistically.
That
has
not
been
associated
with
adverse
health
outcomes.
According
to
the
recent
global
burden
of
disease
study
in
the
United
States,
fine
particles
are
responsible
for
twelve
percent
of
ice
cream,
mccart
disease
death
/.
C
Your
ten
percent
stroke
deaf
six
percent,
lung
cancer,
death
and
five
percent
of
COPD
death,
so
this
is
a
pretty
serious
contaminant,
even
at
today's
levels,
when
we
look
at
fine
particles
into
ozone,
we're
looking
at
estimates
of
over
a
hundred
thousand
premature
mortalities
per
year,
nearly
200,000
fatal,
acute
myocardial
infarction.
So
that's
a
heart
pathway.
Ten,
thousands
of
thousands
of
hospitalizations
and
emergency
room
visits,
hundreds
of
thousands
of
case
cases
of
acute
bronchitis.
This
is
an
epa
estimate.
We
know
that
historically,
higher
levels
of
air
pollution
killed
people.
C
This
is
the
famous
event
in
London
1952,
where
you
have
deaths
here
and
you
have
a
peak
in
smoke
right
below
it.
So
how
is
it
that
we
could
have
over
100,000
Americans
today
perishing
from
from
air
pollution?
Well,
when
you
look
at
this
concentration
response
curve,
you
have
micrograms
of
particles
from
high
to
low,
and
then
you
have
a
relative
risk
scale,
which
is
basically
looking
at
the
risk
of
an
adverse
health
outcome
on
the
vertical
axis
and
it's
above
1.
C
C
Well,
how
can
that
be?
It's
a
small
individual
risk,
but
the
problem
is
it's
a
high
prevalence
of
population
exposure,
so
you
have
a
magnitude
of
risk
which
is
high.
That's
because
everyone
breathes
population
in
our
country
is
synoptic
and
ubiquitous,
it's
almost
everywhere
and
it
moves
in
large
patterns,
and
so
hence
you
have
these
magnified
impacts,
which
our
population
scale.
That's.
Why
we
get
these
big
public
health
burdens,
buildings
breathe
as
well.
Humans
are
indoor
them
indoors,
the
majority
of
their
day.
C
We
know
that
to
be
true,
so
so,
how
is
it
that
all
these
ambient
air
measurements
are
correlated
statistically
with
adverse
outcomes
in
humans?
Well,
it's
because
the
building
envelope
does
not
only
provide
an
effective,
does
not
always
provide
an
effective
barrier
from
outdoor
pollutants.
Buildings
breathe,
just
as
we
do
their
breathing
in
pollutants
from
the
outside
and
also
in
some
buildings
they're
generating
pollutants
the
inside.
C
And
so,
when
you
look
at
our
personal
exposure,
that's
where
you
can
get
a
better
sense
of
the
epidemiology
as
to
how
the
ambient
portion
of
air
pollution
affects
humans,
and
so
hence
these
outdoor
studies
of
ambient
air
are
highly
relevant
to
assessment
of
indoor
environmental
health
risks.
There
are
many
studies
that
have
looked
at
this.
This
one
from
Seattle
found
that
seventy-nine
percent
of
the
indoor
particulate
matter
in
houses
in
Seattle
came
from
outdoor
generated
particles,
so
the
majority
of
the
pollution
came
from
the
outside
in
their
houses.
The
range
was
forty-two.
C
C
We've
been
looking
at
this
issue
in
a
transdisciplinary
way.
Over
the
past
year
with
our
raucous
initiative,
reducing
outdoor
contaminants
and
indoor
spaces
and
I
see
a
lot
of
familiar
faces
in
this
room
who
have
gone
to
our
three
forms.
We
have
white
papers
and
we're
doing
demonstration
projects.
The
website
is
raucous
org
and
just
to
kind
of
wrap
up.
This
portion
of
the
slideshow
and
then
I'll
move
on
consider
what
happened
in
Utah
in
the
1980s.
So
here's
a
plot
kind
of
like
a
little
simple
bar
graph
on
the
Left
axis.
C
C
For
each
of
these
three
winters,
then
the
particles
go
down.
Why?
Because
a
steel
mill
closed
that
stopped,
working
particles
went
down
and
the
bronchitis
went
down
and
the
pneumonia
went
down
and
then
the
steel
mill
turn
back
on
again
and
everything
went
up
so
we're
the
children
outside
the
whole
time.
Of
course,
not
they're
in
schools
and
houses,
just
like
our
children
are
I,
don't
think
they
were
in
a
leed-certified
office.
C
Building
at
that
time,
which
may
have
had
cleaner
air
because
their
homes
and
their
schools
certainly
were
probably
where
they
are
spending
most
of
their
time,
and
this
ambient
air
pollution
resulted
in
these
outcomes,
but
it's
not
just
indoor
air
pollution
or
that
migration.
It's
also
outdoor,
so
big
cohort
studies,
one
in
Southern
California,
looked
at
over
3,500
children.
C
Time
spent
outside
they
use
team
sports,
as
a
measure
was
higher
incidence
of
asthma
in
communities
with
high
ozone
compared
to
communities
of
low
ozone
for
children
and
two
or
three
team
sports
I
flew
into
LA
not
too
long
ago,
and
I
took
this
picture
from
the
airplane,
and
here
are
the
mountains.
That
I
should
have
seen
from
a
postcard
that
I
got
at
the
airport
and
you
can
see
the
inversion
up
here.
C
Is
the
blue
sky
as
I
wonder
what
what
oh
and
just
so
you
know
for
grounding
Los
Angeles,
says
much
worse
ozone
than
we
have
where
and
where
non-attainment
Frozone
too,
but
they're
not
much
worse
than
we
are
for
fine
particles,
so
we're
really
in
their
rank,
and
this
was
a.
This-
was
a
high
particle
day
when
I
flew
in.
There
was
no
ozone,
so
I
mapped
it
using
an
EPA
tool
and
I
found
that
there
actually
at
just
at
the
turning
point
of
yellow
they
are
at
52,
and
just
just
so.
C
You
know
we
had
240
days
in
2013
and
Pittsburgh
that
were
yellow
or
worse,
that's
sixty
five
percent
of
that
year,
and
so
you
know
we
would
like
to
say
we're
not
hell
anymore
and
we
used
to
be
held
with
the
lid
off
in
hieronymus.
Bosch.
I
love
his
version
of
hell,
because
I
think
this
person
might
be
trying
to
breathe.
C
I,
don't
know
if
that's
what
he
was
thinking,
but
that's
what
I
think
about
when
I
look
at
look
at
that
painting
and
so
ardent
Pope,
who
did
the
steel
mill
studies
with
the
Utah
plot
that
I
just
showed
you?
He
spoke
in
Pittsburgh
not
long
ago
recently
he
said
pittsburgh
has
come
a
long
way,
but
boy
has
it
got
a
ways
to
go.
What
did
he
mean
by
that?
C
Well,
what
he
meant
was
is,
first
of
all,
we
know,
statistically
in
positive
associations,
we
have
over
thirty
two
different
journal
papers,
showing
that
we
have
positive
positive
and
statistical
significance
for
excess
mortality,
disease
and
adverse
reproductive
outcomes
associated
with
fine
particulate
matter
and
ozone
in
our
contemporary
air.
These
studies
were
counted
up
since
1970
and
there's
actually
more
that
have
been
published
since
this
data
dump
was
done
in
2012-13.
C
C
Pope
was
referring
to
how
you
look
at
our
we're
in
the
worst
thirteen
percent
of
the
United
States
for
fine
particulate
matter
looking
across
our
monitors
and
compared
to
this
part
of
the
United
States,
one
of
the
most
densely
populated
portions
of
the
united
states
in
the
country,
New
York
City,
New,
Jersey
parts
of
New
Jersey,
Long
Island
there
at
forty-one
percent.
That
means
they're
they're
much
cleaner
than
we
are
they're
still
not
good,
but
they're.
C
Much
better
Boston
is
at
seventy-four
percent,
so
there
in
the
upper
twenty-five
twenty-six
percent,
cleanest
countries,
cleanest
cities
in
the
country,
Philadelphia
is
a
little
better
than
us
there.
Twenty
nine
percent
Cleveland
is
a
little
better
than
us.
Bakersfield
California
is
the
worst
one
percent.
So
so
we've
got
something
going
there.
C
C
10
County
area
this
year
is
very
high
cancer
risk.
This
is
lower
cancer
risk
from
airborne
toxic.
This
is
the
rest
of
the
country.
These
are
our
10
counties
in
southwestern
Pennsylvania.
This
is
a
bimodal
curve
and
you
don't
want
to
be
in
this
part
of
the
bimodal
curve.
That's
where
we
are
a
myth.
Most
of
our
pollution
comes
from
Ohio,
actually,
most
of
its
indigenous
34
to
fifty-four
percent
of
Allegheny.
County's
pollution
comes
from
Allegheny
County.
C
If
you
look
out
and
include
all
the
Pennsylvania
sources
that
blow
in
over
Allegheny
County,
you
jump
up
to
a
max
of
sixty-six
percent,
so
we
can
do
something
about
that.
Another
myth
is,
we
have
only
one
dirty
monitor
in
the
valley
south
of
Pittsburgh.
That's
our
only
problem.
Well,
actually,
most
of
our
particle
monitors
are
the
dirtiest
in
the
country.
In
fact,
3
of
11
are
in
the
worst
deciles
seven
of
the
ten
of
our
PM
25
monitors
or
north
quarter
and
10
of
11
or
in
the
worst.
Third,
it's
really
no
clean
place.
C
You
can
find
in
Pittsburgh
relative
to
the
rest
of
the
country,
air
toxics,
looking
at
the
2005
data
set,
which
is
going
to
be
updated
soon,
hopefully
we're
in
the
worst
two
percent
of
counties
for
air
toxics
in
the
country.
Now
a
lot
of
our
urban
counties
have
poor
air
pollution.
Have
a
high
levels
of
air
toxics
we're
not
too
unique
there,
but
for
our
size
were
pretty
unique
and
also,
if
you
just
look
at
industrial
point,
sources
we're
in
the
worst
two
tenths
of
one
percent
air
toxics
in
our
area.
C
According
to
EPA
data
estimates
and
that's
a
risk
function,
another
myth
is
well,
you
know
we
have
have.
We
have
valleys
and
river
valleys
and
inversions
which
trapped
the
pollution.
That's
that's
why
we
have
a
pollution
problem.
Well,
I
mean
yeah,
that's
that's
half
true
and
then
the
other.
The
other
half
of
that
truth
is
that
valleys
and
inversions
with
no
pollution.
C
They
don't
have
pollution
because
there's
no
pollution
there
to
get
trapped
in
an
inversion.
So
you
look
at
this
CMU
three-year
data
set.
This
was
their
domain
of
study.
They
did
saturated
sampling
for
three
three
and
a
half
years.
Looking
at
black
carbon,
which
is
a
particularly
insidious
component,
insidious
component
of
5pm
25-
and
these
are
all
the
black
carbon
hots
and
you
can
see
they're
heavily
river
valleys
are
heavily
burdened
with
air
pollution,
and
that's
that's
because
we
have
a
lot
of
sources
in
our
river
valleys
and
the
river
valleys
are
prone
to
inversions.
C
So
this
kind
of
slide
is
quite
sobering
because
it
tells
us
that
some
of
them
are
precious
environmental
assets
and
developmental
and
economic
and
recreational
assets
are
among
the
most
contaminated
river
areas.
In
the
country-
and
we
have
to
live
with
that-
we
know
that
if
we're
the
minute,
we
start
reducing
these
contaminants
and
start
improving
our
source
emissions
profiles
that
we
get
immediate
public
health
benefits.
In
fact,
of
all
the
government
programs,
studies
have
shown
that
EPA's
clean
air
programs
have
the
largest
payback
of
any
investment.
C
The
government
has
done
thirty
to
one
central
tendency
ratio
paybacks
so
for
every
dollar
spent
we
get
thirty
dollars
saved
by
reducing
and
avoiding
heart
attacks,
respiratory
problems
and
lost
workdays
in
law
school
days.
So
it's
you
know.
These
solutions
are
all
around
us.
This
is
pretty
simple
stuff.
In
some
ways
we
just
reduce
the
sources.
The
problem
starts
to
go
away.
European
Commission
did
an
analysis.
If
they
spend
3.4
billion
for
pollution
abatement,
they
get
12
times
higher
savings.
C
At
least
forty
billion
a
year
through
decreased
disease
and
health
care
costs
and
increased
working
productivity.
Those
are
current
numbers.
So,
finally,
you
know
CMU's
black
carbon
study
and
they've
mapped
out
other
pollutants
as
well.
They
concluded
the
river
valleys
are
among
the
most
polluted
areas
in
pittsburgh,
in
allegheny,
county
and
so
sure
you
know
this
is
no
longer
what
we're
about,
but
what
we
have
to
focus
on
I
think
is
that
same
kind
of
pride
and
passion
and
commitment.
We
have
to
our
icons
like
our
sports
and
our
art
and
culture.
C
D
Hi
everyone,
my
name,
is
bean.
This
is
chris
we're
from
the
create
lab
at
carnegie,
mellon
university
and
we're
going
to
talk
about
exploring
our
air
quality.
I.
Think
Phil
price
give
us
all
a
bleak
overview
of
what
the
air
cold
is
like
in
Pittsburgh,
and
you
know
it's
overwhelming
and
I
often
times
you
can
feel
disempowered
to
fix
anything.
How
can
we
fix
the
problem?
D
How
can
we
breathe
easier
and
we
develop
spec,
which
I'm
going
to
talk
about
we're,
going
to
talk
about
and
show
you
a
little
demo
to
kind
of
address
that
disempowerment
or
feeling
of
disappointment?
Hopefully
so
I
want
to
give
you
a
blue
background
by
the
create
lab,
create
stands
for
Community,
robotics
education
and
technology
empowerment,
and
it's
a
really
long
acronym,
but
we
do
try
to
hit
all
of
those
terms.
We
really
care
about.
Creating
a
technology.
D
That's
mean,
has
meaningful
impact
and
sustainable
impact
in
the
community,
and
we
do
it
through
educational
efforts
and
also
through
citizen
science,
empowerment
and
scientists,
empowerment
and
one
of
those
projects
is
the
spec
air
quality
monitor.
This
is
a
low-cost
device.
It's
we
just
spun
off
a
company
to
sell
them
commercially
so
that
we
could
provide
more
access
to
it
and
we've
been
developing
it
spec
for
about
four
years
now
and
it
started
out
from
an
offer
from
another
project.
D
But
the
idea
was
to
give
people
an
access
to
an
instrument
that
can
give
them
information
about
their
quality
indoors
outside
you
have
a
lot
of
federal
monitors
that
you
can
look
up
online
through
an
org
of,
but
there
are
large.
There
are
a
lot
of
things
that
happen
inside
line,
as
phil
mentioned,
a
lot
of
the
outdoor
air
pollutants
get
inside
your
home
too,
and
we
spend
a
majority
of
time
inside
our
home.
D
So
how
can
we
understand
what's
going
on
inside
our
homes
in
terms
of
these
invisible
particles,
and
so
the
spec
gives
you
a
sense
of
what
what
those
are
and
you'll
see
in
the
screen
here.
It's
still
running
gives
you
a
nice
indication.
You
know
this
is
the
number
of
particles.
This
is
the
particle
concentration
and
it's
in
kind
of
the
good
range
level
and
the
idea
is
not
to
scare
people
off.
D
But
to
give
you
information
so
can
make
informed
decisions
about
what
to
do
to
improve
the
air
quality
in
your
home
or
your
office
or
wherever
you
put
it
the
spec
inside
the
spec.
There
is
an
optical
sensor,
it's
a
very
cheap,
low-cost
sensor
and
what
it
does
on
the
side.
There
is
a
fan,
that's
constantly
running
and
below.
There's
an
air
intake.
D
So
it's
the
fan
is
creating
a
constant
vacuum
inside
the
spec
and
it's
pulling
air
through
the
sensor
and
as
the
air
particles
travel
through
the
sensor,
depending
on
how
the
light
is
refracted
from
the
optical
sensor,
it
detects
the
particles
and
does
account,
and
it's
both
sensitive
to
the
PM
2.5,
the
fine
particulate
range.
So
that's
the
what
we
focused
on
and
those
particles
are
most
important
because
they
have
significant
health
impacts.
D
So,
by
giving
you
access
to
this
information,
where
the
goal
is
to
empower
folks
who
then
take
this
information
and
do
something
about
it
to
improve
the
air
quality
and
we
focus
on
indoors
to
start
with,
is
because
indoors,
you
can
do
a
lot
actually
to
improve
your
equality
and
breathe
easier,
whereas
outdoors,
it
takes
a
lot
more
effort
and
more
longer
term
impact
efforts
to
make
impact
in
the
outdoor
air
quality.
So
we
focused
and
indoors
to
start
with
I'm
not
going
to
go
over
the
slide.
D
Since
we'll
give
you
a
nice
background,
information
about
PM
2.5,
but
there
are
variety
of
sources
that
influence
the
PM
2.5
levels
indoors
and
they
won
30
of
the
size
of
a
hair
and
homing
human
hair.
So
they're
really
tiny,
you
can't
see
them
with
the
naked
eye
and
they
can
lodge
deep
in
your
lungs.
So
what
can
you
do
once
you
see
your
respective
al
you?
So
we
have
kind
of
four
steps
that
you
can
take.
D
First
is
to
establish
a
baseline,
put
set
up
the
spec
or
whatever
instrument
you're
using
and
look
at
it
for
a
week.
What?
How
does
their
our
home
or
office
behave?
What
are
the
numbers
kind
of
in
stop
reacting
to
the
numbers,
just
pay
attention
to
what's
happening,
how
the
things
that
you're
doing
around
it
affecting
the
number?
D
You
notice
that
when
we
were,
if
you
were
looking
at
the
screen
when
we
walked
in
the
spec
numbers,
rose
up
because
a
lot
of
people
walking
on
the
carpet
and
thus
was
kicking
up,
but
it's
now
settle
down
to
a
good
level.
So
you
know
pay
attention
to
how
it's
changing,
move
it
from
room
to
room
to
investigate
was
your
kitchen
worst
in
your
bedroom?
Is
the
bedroom
really
bad?
Is
your
child's
room,
bad
and
identify
those
hotspots
and
when
they
occur,
and
the
context
is
really
important?
D
So
if
you
see
really
high
spikes
during
the
night
time,
when
everybody
is
sleeping
and
there
shouldn't
be
any
activity
influence
in
the
spec
numbers,
then
you
might
think
or
maybe
there's
something
more
pervasive.
For
example
in
my
house,
actually
we
saw
a
really
high
spike
for
a
while,
and
we
couldn't
really
figure
it
out.
D
We
tried
investigating
and
to
no
avail,
couldn't
find
the
source
and
they
were
spiking
when
we
were
out
of
the
house
during
the
day
and
then
the
water
heater
guy
came
to
check
on
the
heater
just
in
maintenance
and
because
we
had
seen
the
spike
my
husband
asked
him.
Oh
can
you
check
the
gas?
You
know
because
we
saw
this
bike
and
sure
enough.
D
We
had
a
small
gas
leak
and
we
would
have
known
to
ask
him
that
if
we
hadn't
seen
the
spike
on
the
spec,
so
it
was
nice
if
it
was
minimal,
wasn't
a
major
issue
and
it
was
really
easy
to
fix
them.
So
some
combustion
from
the
that
gas
leak
was
impacting
the
spec
reading.
So
it's
things
like
that
that
make
you
wonder.
What's
going
on
my
home
and
you
wouldn't
know
it
if
you
didn't
have
something
to
give
you
that
information.
E
D
Then
we
really
have
to
become
investigative
and
experiment
with
things
have
another
story
from
my
house?
Is
the
hood
the
range
hood
of
over
my
stove,
so
I
looked
at
the
research
says
you
run
that
fan
before
you
start
cooking
and
you
know
that's
supposed
to
be
good.
I
tried
it.
It
was
terrible.
It
make
their
quality
worse
when
I
just
even
turned
the
fan
on
so
then
I
did
more
investigation.
I
realized,
okay,
1,
I'm
clean
those
filters
in
five
years
since
we
bought
the
house,
so
it's
gross.
D
So
obviously
it's
getting
worse
when
I
turn
the
thing
on
and
to
the
air
was
just
venting
to
the
ceiling
and
going
up
to
my
child's
bedroom.
So
it
wasn't
really
taking
the
air
bad
out.
It
was
just
sending
it
upstairs,
so
we
recreated
a
air
tunnel
where
we
sent
open
the
basement
door,
open
the
kitchen
window
and
the
upstairs
window
kind
of
just
to
tunnel
the
air
out,
and
that
was
a
better
airflow
than
the
fan
so
I
just
don't
use
it
anymore.
D
So
it's
kind
of
discoveries
like
that
they
can
only
do
by
trial
and
error
and
trying
to
figure
things
out
and
I.
Like
the
term,
you
become
an
air
quality
detective
in
your
home
or
in
your
office,
and
really
try
to
figure
that
out
and
some
easy
things
to
try
to
start
with
this
opening
and
closing
new
windows
using
an
air
purifier
to
improve
their
quality
in
a
specific
room.
If
you
have
that,
if
you're
in
office
building,
you
know
identify
the
hot
spots,
are
there
is
the
bottom
floor
doing
worse
than
the
top
floors?
D
So
then
do
we
triage
that
problem?
Do
we
send
people
who
are
have
respiratory
issues
or
heart
issues?
Do
we
send
them
to
the
upper
floor
so
they're
protected
from
the
bad
air,
at
least
in
the
short
term?
And
then
how
do
we
fix
it?
Just
the
problem
long-term?
What
is
the
issue?
There
was
a
nice
story
from
the
store
Rock
School
in
Pittsburgh,
where
this
teacher
he
he
and
his
students
having
a
lot
of
symptoms.
D
They
were
coughing
and
they
were
wondering
what
was
going
on
because
it
wasn't
something
that
had
they
had
seen
before.
So
they
did
some
investigation
that
she
borrowed
some
some
specs
and
the
specs
were
off
the
charts,
but
they
did
notice
a
pattern.
They
saw
it
spiked
to
actually
the
highest
level
at
that
time
for
that
prototype
of
spec,
and
then
it
was
kind
of
a
sawtooth
graph
with
spiked
stayed
high
for
a
while
went
down
so
I
etcetera.
D
So
then
realized
it
was
some
type
of
pattern
and
every
time
it
spiked
they
had
the
symptoms.
So
they
investigated
they
looked
for
around
the
school,
they
could
access
to
the
roof
of
the
building
and
they
found
a
diesel
generator
there.
That
was
powering
a
cell
phone
tower
and
every
time
the
generator
kicked
on
all
the
emissions
from
that
generator
were
in
were
directly
near
the
air
intake
for
that
classroom.
So
that's
why
they
were
having
the
symptoms,
so
they
found
the
source.
D
They
were
able
to
show
the
data
to
the
school
and
get
rid
of
the
generator.
So
they
were
able
to
literally
pretty
easy
after
that.
So
you
can
do
a
lot
of
things
and
hopefully
your
home
for
the
most
part,
my
arms,
it's
fine
and
kind
of
gives
me
peace
of
mind
knowing
that
it's
fine
and
that
the
forced
air
system
works,
fine
and
if
I
have
to
change
the
filter.
It
might
alert
me
because
the
the
numbers
bike
when
I'm
not
doing
anything.
D
D
One
thing
we
always
get
this:
can
I
download
my
data
of
the
spec
and
how
can
I
analyze
it
and
we
try
to
make
that
easier
and
really
we
really
want
the
data
to
belong
to
you,
the
user
of
the
of
the
spec,
as
opposed
to
kind
of
using
the
data
I
doing
analytics
I'm
telling
you
do
XYZ
to
make
your
hair
better,
but
it
really
want
to
have
pets
in
the
pella
power
in
the
hands
of
the
consumer
or
the
user
of
the
spec.
So
let
Chris
talk
over
that
great.
E
So
this
is
the
mandatory
cloud
diagram
for
from
the
software
guy,
so
this
parts
part
probably
give
a
little
bit
boring,
but
so
be
showed
screenshots
of
specs
intercom,
so
just
a
really
brief
overview
of
how
it
works.
So
the
website
is
really.
It
sits.
On
top
of
a
data
repository
that
we
created
it's
open
source,
it's
free
to
use
and
so
its
environmental.
Since
your
data
repository,
we
call
it
Esther
because
that's
a
mouthful,
so
that's
basically
the
architecture
there
and
so
a
spec
when
it's
connected
to
your
Wi-Fi
it'll
be
uploading
its
data.
E
Whatever
interval,
you
have
it
sampling.
So
typically
every
minute
it'll
be
uploading,
Nestor
and
then
it's
all
visible
through
your
account
on
specs
intercom.
But
the
idea
is,
you
know
it's
not
just
your
spec,
it's
everybody
spec,
and
anybody
who
has
decided
to
make
their
spec
information
public
it'll
be
visible
to
everyone
else
on
spec
since
intercom,
but
it's
not
the
specs.
It's
create
lab
we're
also
mirroring
all
of
ACH
DS,
their
quality
data
in
tester,
and
also
the
2,000
plus
air,
now
federal
sensors
all
over
the
country.
E
E
They're
ready,
go
tool,
breathe
cam
is
already
using
it
for
displaying
the
plots
of
values,
for
the
idea
is
that
since
it's
open,
anybody
can
create
anybody
technically
minded
can
create
their
own
mashup,
so
they
might
want
to
mix
water
quality
data
with
with
air
quality
data
and
maybe
throw
in
some
wind
data
as
well
or
whatever.
So
that's,
that's.
The
really
geeky
part
so
I
think
probably
most
interesting
is
to
show
you
the
site
itself.
E
D
D
E
D
C
D
E
D
D
E
Be
mentioned,
the
discovery
and
investigation
I
have
another
stories
as
a
personal
story
too.
So
I
have
two
specs
running
in
our
laundry
room
in
the
basement
and
I
haven't
going
since
Thanksgiving
or
so
so.
I
have
lots
and
lots
of
data
and
most
of
its
kind
of
boring,
because
we're
usually
not
downstairs
doing
much.
You
can
see
these
spikes.
This
is
when
we're
actually
doing
laundry
and
clean
out
the
the
dryer
vent
and
it
gets
dusty
in
there.
E
But
back
in
February
we
had
new
windows
installed
in
the
house
and
I'll
see
them
out
yeah.
So
that's
this
bike
right
here,
part
of
the
well.
You
can
see
that
it's
tall,
that's
I,
don't
really
need
to
zoom
in
on
so
the
window
guys
they
they've
been
there
both
the
day
before,
and
so
this
is
februari
10th
and
11th.
So
this
is
on
the
eleventh.
One
of
the
windows
is
a
glass
block
window.
They
had
to
chip
out
all
the
mortar
and
my
wife,
I.
E
Wasn't
there
my
wife
said
it
was
dust
everywhere
and
sure
enough.
This
was
upstairs
and
so
the
specs
down
in
the
basement,
because
we
had
central
heat
running
it
took
the
all
the
dust
out
of
there
and
circulated
all
throughout
the
entire
house,
and
it
was
a
disaster
yeah.
She
said
she
was,
you
know
mopping
and
dusting
the
entire
day.
So
you
know
lesson
learned,
maybe
seal
off
the
room
or
you
know,
don't
run
your
central
air.
D
E
G
So
I'll
Melissa
Billick
I'm
from
the
university
of
pittsburgh
into
mascaro
center
and
I'm
also
presenting
on
behalf
of
dr.
Collins
who's
that
post
off
that
works
with
me
and
my
dear
friend
and
colleague,
dr.
rorish,
sure,
are
how
many
people
have
heard
of
the
2030
district.
So
so
a
good
number
of
you
have-
and
we
have
two
districts
now
downtown
and
Oakland
and
I
pulled
some
of
these
really
great
slides
from
architecture.
2030
and
I
feel
like
this
is
a
super
inspirational
to
me.
G
So
maybe
it
will
be
for
you
as
well,
and
so
this
is
as
of
2010
the
total
us.
A
building
stock
is
approximately
275
million
square
feet
and
Dorn
normal
economic
times.
We
tear
down
approximately
1.75
billion
square
feet
of
buildings
each
year.
We
also
renovate
approximately
five
billion
square
feet,
and
every
year
we
build
new,
approximately
five
million
square
feet,
and
so
by
the
year
2030.
We
really
have
kind
of
this
whole
new
building
stock.
G
Almost
seventy-five
percent-
and
this
really
represents
an
opportunity
for
us
to
think
about
the
spaces
that
we're
building
now
and
also
the
air
quality
within
those
spaces
and
the
airport
and
the
ambient
air
quality
that
the
materials
used
to
create
those
spaces
are
also
creating.
So
what
is
a
2030
district?
So
the
first
time
I
heard
this
I
I
seriously
thought
of
the
Hunger
Games.
I
don't
know
if
anyone
else
thought
of
that,
but
this
is
not
about
the
Hunger
Games.
G
It's
actually
a
much
more
kind
of
I
think
in
many
ways
a
healthy
way
to
think
about
energy
conservation
at
the
district
level,
and
one
of
the
reasons
why
I
was
so
kind
of
enamored
with
the
idea
of
the
2030
district
is
it
is
voluntary,
you
know,
so
the
idea
is
the
people
are
committing
to
do
this
and
they're
signing
a
commitment.
But
you
know
it
is
a
voluntary
basis
which
I
think
is
a
really
unique.
G
Think
about
unique
thing
about
the
this
region
that
we
are
volunteering
voluntarily
doing
this,
and
so
there
are
different
targets,
so
there's
targets
for
both
new
buildings
and
major
renovations
and
then
there's
targets
for
existing
buildings,
and
so
you
can
see
by
the
year
twenty
thirty.
The
overall
goal
is
to
really
reach
carbon
neutrality,
which
is
an
ambitious
target
and
part
of
what
makes
the
Pittsburgh
2030
district
unique.
G
Is
the
idea
that
we
want
to
think
about
not
only
the
energy
reduction
at
the
district
level,
but
also
what
we
can
do
in
terms
of
the
indoor
air
quality
of
the
buildings
in
the
in
the
2030
district.
So,
for
example,
we
don't
want
to
say
you
know
we're
going
to
make
these
really
tight
buildings
and
then
decrease
the
indoor
air
quality
in
this
basis.
G
So
we
have
to
keep
that
in
mind
as
we
work
towards
these
aggressive
goals
and
the
2030
district
has
been
really
successful
and
that's
been
a
major
effort
by
the
green
building
alliance,
with
Mike
Schiller
and
with
Aurora,
and
this
shows
in
green
the
number
of
sign
buildings.
So
the
people
that
have
committed
to
the
2030
district-
this
also
shows
Oakland,
and
so
this
is
one
of
the
new
districts
that
came
online
as
well,
and
so
the
numbers
are
pretty
staggering
right,
415
properties
and
sixty-eight
percent
of
the
Pittsburgh
2030
district
they've
committed
to
this.
G
So
this
is
60,
almost
65
million
square
feet
of
property.
So
the
it's.
It's
a
really
great
kind
of
initial
commitment,
and
so
this
is
done
again
not
through
this
command
and
control
thing,
but
it's
done
through
partnership
and
collaboration,
and
it's
done
with
property
partners,
community
partners,
research
partners
and
the
green
building
alliance
and
their
stakeholders,
and
so
one
of
the
first
things
that
the
GBA
did
was
to
create
a
baseline
and
the
baseline
really
would
then
allow
us
to
see
if
we
were
reaching
targets.
G
So
this
is
the
2013
progress
report
and
I'm
sure
that
the
new
progress
report
is
coming
out
very
shortly.
I
managed
and
it
shows
us
you
know
initially-
that
we
are
on
target,
so
it'll
be
interesting
to
see
next
year.
You
know
there
are
we
at
the
same
level
or
are
we
growing
or
re
decreasing?
So
I'll
be
looking
forward
to
that
as
well.
So
what
does
this
mean
for
you?
So
the
district
sounds
really
great,
but
what
does
this
mean
for
you?
So
we
spent
so
as
they
mentioned.
G
We
spend
ninety
percent
of
our
time
inside
of
our
buildings
and
really
what
I'm
interested
is
thinking
about.
You
know,
are
we
considering
the
entire
environmental
lifecycle
of
our
decisions
and
are
we
creating
these
unintended
consequences
and
overall
I'm,
really
interested
personally
in
my
research
in
the
research
at
the
mascara
Center
is
to
think
about
the
environmental
performance
of
buildings
while
connecting
the
occupants
to
this
environment
and
a
more
thoughtful
manner,
and
so
I've
spent
a
lot
of
time.
Thinking
about
you
know
what
is
the
20
we're
talking
about?
G
What
is
the
2030
district
that
when
we
think
about
the
overall
energy
reductions
that
we
may
be
making
it
the
district
level,
then
we
have
to
think
about
you
know?
What,
then,
are
we
doing
also
for
the
reductions
in
the
ambient
air
quality?
And
then
how
does
that
impact
our
indoor
air
quality?
So
we're
really
centered
on
answering
the
question,
I'm
using
the
system's
level
approach.
How
does
the
2030
district
impact
our
indoor
air
quality,
and
so
this
is
difficult
to
do
this?
Isn't?
This
is
a
really
not
an
easy
thing
to
undertake?
G
I
mean
this
is
just
another
reminder
that
our
our
air
quality
is
poor,
and
so
then
we
start
to
say
how
do
we
even
begin
to
tackle
this
study
and
we
have
so
many
different
variables.
We
have
building
types,
we
have
hpc
systems,
we
have
seasonal
impacts,
we
have
multi-year
study.
We
have
these.
All
these
different
uses
the
change
over
time,
and
essentially
we
come
down
to
this
idea.
Like
is
this
a
wicked
problem.
Is
this
something
that
we
can
even
solve?
G
And
you
know
the
reality
is:
is
we
have
to
measure
what
matters
right?
If
we
don't
do
these
measurements
and
we
don't
take
an
opportunity
while
the
2030
district
is
beginning,
we
were
as
a
missed
opportunity
and
if
you
look
at
some
of
the
solutions
for
these
wicked
problems,
the
2030
district
really
comes
into
play.
One
of
the
solutions
is
coming
up
with
collaborative
solutions
and
that's
really
what
the
district
represents.
So
we
have
four
different
pilot
buildings
participating.
One
of
the
buildings
was
this
building.
G
The
testing
protocol
that
we're
mainly
following
is
one
that
was
established
by
the
Environmental
Protection
Agency
and
their
base
study,
and
so
that's
kind
of
like
the
backbone
of
what
of
what
we're
doing
and
again.
This
is
what
we
are
testing
for,
and
this
is
just
an
example
of
one
of
the
pilot
building.
So
what
we're
doing
is
we're
doing
the
testing
and
then,
after
the
afterwards
we're
meeting
with
the
representatives
of
the
buildings
and
we
are
working
with
them
to
identify
the
locations
of
and
what
the
test
results
mean.
G
So,
for
example,
what
we
have
here
is
the
different
locations
that
we
tested
in
the
buildings
and
then
I
also
included
some
pictures
just
kind
of
ground
you
and
you
know
what
is
that
location,
so
one
of
the
locations
happens
to
be.
You
know
the
plotter
room,
which
we
know
has
some
issues.
So
then
we
will
meet
with
the
different
on
building
owners
and
the
people
that
we're
working
with
and
go
over
the
different
results.
So
I'm
just
going
to
show
you,
the
particulate
matter
results
the
PM,
2.5
and
PM
10,
and
so
just
so.
G
This
again
is
kind
of
the
map
of
what
we,
what
we
were
doing
and
where
we
were
doing
the
testing
at
the
orange
is
what
we
we
we
test.
The
results
of
the
testing
and
PM
10
is
the
guideline.
That
term
is
used
pretty
loosely,
but
it's
really
just
to
kind
of
show
you
where
you
stand
right
now
and
then
also
PM
2.5
is
in
green
and
then
the
2.5
guideline
is
there
as
well.
G
So
these
readings
suggest
that
in
the
one
location
51,
we
should
definitely
need
to
do
different
testings
and
the
present
filtration
in
the
HVDC
system
is
likely
and
effective
because
supply
air
and
the
return
air
samples
at
the
air
handling
units
were
nearly
identical.
Okay,
so
that
basically
tells
you
that
the
filtration
systems
are
not
are
not
working,
and
then
you
know
we're
trying
to
discern
is
this
from
indoor
from
indoor
pollutants
or
from
outdoor
pollutants?
G
So
in
this
particular
case
there
were
lower
nighttime
levels
that
may
indicate
mainly
indoor
occupant,
related
sources
and
lower
outdoor
p.m.
at
night,
and
so
this
is
another
kind
of
set
of
data
that
we
were
able
to
kind
of
show
and
again
we're
looking
for
feedback
on
what
would
be
helpful
for
the
for
the
users
of
the
building.
So
one
thing
was
good:
we
went
into
a
data
center
and
it
was
low
p.m.
so
that's
it.
G
That's
a
good
finding
and
typically
there's
a
you
know
constant
recirculation
with
good
filtration,
but
we
did
see
like
higher
pm10
in
certain
locations
as
well,
and
so
we're
working
with
with
the
team
there
to
talk
about
how
to
potentially
address
those
and
then
the
next
step
is
really
to
meet
finally
with
them
and
to
come
up
with
some
recommendations
and
what
we're
finding
when
we're
doing
this
is.
This
is
a
it
raises
level
of
awareness,
and
it
also
provides
people
that
really
want
to
make
change
additional
data.
G
So
they
can
make
that
change
a
lot
of
times.
People
really
want
to
do
that,
but
just
don't
have
the
information
in
order
to
do
that,
and
so
one
of
the
things
that
you
know
we
came
up
with
in
these,
you
know
may
seem
you
know
kind
of
obvious,
but
the
cleaning
was
a
really
big
issue,
equivocal
that
the
areas
needed
to
be
cleaned
and
that
will
hopefully
help
the
folks
to
make
that
happen
and
improve
the
air
quality
in
the
different
location.
G
Okay,
so
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
saw
this
picture
recently,
but
it
was
a
little
diversion,
but
I
thought
it
was
a
really
cool
picture.
It
was
when
there
was
a
big
rainstorm
and
it
takes
us
outside
of
erin
into
water,
but
you
know
I
gave
the
results
for
one
building.
You
know
so
now,
when
you
think
about
that
I
think
there's
over
400
right.
How?
What
does
this
mean
like
now?
G
You
know
what
is
happening
with
a
filtration
system
on
average
in
these
buildings,
and
so
you
can
see
the
bars
in
the
yellow
and
the
bars
and
the
orange
and
some
locations
which
you
know
make
sense
for
some
of
the
smaller
ones.
They're,
essentially
the
same
so
again,
the
filtration
systems
aren't
working,
but
the
good
news
is
is
down.
Here
is
when
we
looked
at
the
buildings
with
the
higher
level
of
filtration,
so
some
of
them
had
up
to
amer
14.
G
G
How
are
we
going
to
think
about
this,
and
how
are
we
move
the
indoor
air
quality,
baseline
and
metrics
that
we're
doing
for
the
2030
district,
and
so
my
aim
kind
of
at
this
point-
and
it's
evolving-
is
really
to
kind
of
create
this
collaborative
and
quantitative
model
that
helps
the
20
30
buildings
and
occupants,
and
does
it
in
a
collaborative
way
that
that's
meaningful
and
builds
awareness
for
the
for
the
folks
and
the
buildings.
So
here's
all
over
contact
information
and
thank
you.
B
Of
the
scale
of
the
challenge,
we
have
some
of
the
innovation
that
has
occurred
currently
here
within
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
with
our
partners
from
Carnegie
Mellon,
the
green
building
lines,
the
Heinz
endowments
and
the
University
of
Pittsburgh.
So
we
thank
you
for
your
efforts
in
your
assistance.
Do
we
have
any
questions
from
the
audience?
Maybe
take
a
few
questions
here,
issues
that
piqued
your
interest.
B
D
Spec
is
200,
Allah's,
plus
shipping
and
tax,
and
you
can
purchase
online
spec
sensor,
calm
and
online.
Also,
I
would
encourage
you
to
type
in
your
zip
code
and
you
can
check
out
what
your
a
quad
is
in
your
area
too.
So
that
way,
you'll
know,
for
example,
whether
they
should
open
the
window
or
keep
it
closed.
So
great
others.
B
G
D
F
B
I'll
be
awesome,
yeah
I
mean
just
from
a
city,
standpoint
yeah.
We
would
be
happy
to
share
that
information
and
one
of
the
opportunities
that
we've
had
internally
we've
deployed
I'm,
going
to
look
to
Afton
we've
deployed
here
in
the
sixth
floor.
The
fifth
floor
fits
so
far
just
on
five
and
six.
So
we
have
two
monitors
right
now
and
really
it's
been
a
an
exercise
from
an
employee
engagement
opportunity
to
just
to
see
you
know.
B
Oh,
we
have
a
ten
today
and
it's
a
15
tomorrow
and
what
happened,
and
so
so
it
started,
creates
a
visibility.
Our
goal
is
to
help
to
expand
the
number
of
specs
that
we
have
in
terms
of
the
different
office
spaces.
So
we
can
get
more
readings
and
have
you
know,
kind
of
a
richer
data
set,
and
we
would
be
happy
to
share
that
information
as
it
becomes
available.
You.
D
B
B
B
D
F
D
F
H
B
We've
been
able
to
bring
to
us
today,
I'd
also
like
to
thank
all
of
you,
our
audience,
fellow
city,
employees
or
nonprofit
partners,
our
university
partners
and
all
of
our
neighbors
here,
and
also
like
to
give
special
thanks
to
our
administrative
team
that
helped
pull
this
together,
as
well
as
the
Pittsburgh
cable
channel
and
their
fine
work
from
producing
this
event
for
us
here
today.
So
thank
you
all
again,
and
this
was
our
first
inaugural
innovation
and
performance
lecture
series.
So
thanks
again
and
see
you
next
time,
thanks.