►
From YouTube: Housing Opportunity Fund Meeting - 10/6/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
Afternoon
and
welcome
to
the
October
meeting
of
the
Housing
Opportunity
funds-
Advisory
Board.
We
certainly
our
second
meeting
in
chamber
so
still
working
out
some
of
our
hybrid
Tech
glitches,
even
those
that
are
self-imposed
we're
going
to
begin
with.
Our
roll
call.
A
I'm
here,
okay
Jerome.
D
B
B
F
F
So
I
took
the
averages
of
everybody
from
The
Advisory
board
that
went
ahead
and
put
their
proposed
budgets
in
and
I
created
this
sheet.
That
has
The
Advisory
board
members
average
budget
for
each
Ami
level.
It
has
the
Ura
staff
recommendations
and
then
I
created
a
compilation
in
the
2023
draft
just
to
start
the
conversation.
So
the
averages
from
the
board
didn't
equate
to
the
exact
amounts
that
were
needed
just
due
to
the
way
averages
work
so
in
that
difference,
I
adjusted
a
little
bit
to
account
for
some
of
the
Ura
recommendations
as
well.
F
So
to
look
at
this
document
here,
we
really
want
to
look
at
the
third
column
for
each
of
these
three
areas
so
that
we
can
start
this
conversation
to
determine
how
we
want
to
fund
these
projects
going
forward
for
next
year
and
I.
Don't
know
if
anybody
has
any
initial
thoughts
looking
at
this
or
wants
to
start
off
the
conversation
anywhere
in
particular,
but
I
will
open
it
up
to
the
board
for
any
comments
and
to
start
this
conversation.
G
Any
specific
places
where
the
Ura
staff
really
felt
I
I
know
that
you
made
very
cautious
and
mindful
recommendations,
but
if
there's
anywhere
that
there's
a
discrepancy
between
you
know
where
the
board
was
landing
at
and
where
the
Ura
staff
was
landing
at.
If
there's
anything
that
really
stands
out
to
you,
that
you
feel
like,
maybe
there
are
pieces
that
the
board
members
didn't
have
you
know
you
know
the
best
information
to
make
decisions
or
any
places
that
you
are
concerned.
G
If
there
wasn't
an
exact
alignment,
I
think
that's
always
helpful
to
find
out.
You
know
from
folks
who
are
operating
the
programs
if
there's
any
place
that
you
feel
really
strongly
that
this
is.
This
is
the
right
number
and
maybe
we're
missing
the
mark
for
some
reason.
F
Yeah,
so
you
know
a
lot
of
the
things
that
the
board
had
input
did
align
with
a
lot
of
our
recommendations.
There
were
some
differences
where
you
know,
for
example,
at
different
Ami
levels.
There
was
some
discrepancy
of
where
we
had
put
that
versus
where
the
board
put
it.
Some
of
them
we
put
at
50
Ami
versus
30
Ami.
F
Just
so
there's
the
opportunity
to
you
know
address
anybody
at
50
am
I
or
under
because
these
Ami
levels
are,
you
know,
30mi
and
Below,
50,
Ami
and
Below
just
to
provide
more
opportunity
there,
but
you
know
overall,
I
think
that
they
did
somewhat
align
and
the
you
know
compiled
draft
numbers.
I
think
where
I
started
off
at
were
a
decent
compromise.
F
You
know,
I,
don't
know
if
anybody
else
like
Evan
or
Derek.
If
you
have
any
additional
comments
that
you
you
know,
think
there
is
some
larger
discrepancies
that
you
want
to
address.
H
No
I
I
don't
believe
there
were
any
discrepancies.
Once
we
got
to
this
point,
I
think,
through
the
working
session
that
we
had
with
the
Advisory
Board,
it
became
clear
to
the
staff,
but
some
of
the
important
items
this
year
might
be
such
as
the
demonstration
program,
I
believe
in
the
2022
plan.
There
was
no
funding
for
it
and
we
made
sure
to
to
add
it
in
this
year.
F
And
one
thing:
I
will
note
as
well:
Mark
I
know
you
had.
You
know
a
particular
demonstration
program
that
you
added
there
so
I
did
add.
You
know
into
the
description
of
the
demonstration
program,
some
of
what
you
were
mentioning
in
the
document
itself.
So
that
is
something
on
the
document
whenever
we
submit
that
that
that's
included
in
that
and
I
just
combined
your
numbers
with
the
rest
of
the
demonstration
dollars.
Thank.
E
You
I
I,
do
have
a
question.
E
You
know
the
staff
recommendation
at
the
with
the
homeowner
assistance
program,
which
is
I
kind
of
look
at
as
it's
preserving,
affordable
housing,
stock,
getting
roofs
and
furnaces,
and
you
know,
repairs
to
houses
so
that
they
can
be
remain
affordable
and
people
aren't
having
to
leave
because
the
house
isn't
functional
anymore,
that
got
cut,
and
yet
that's
the
program
that
we,
it
seems
like
we
fund
it,
it's
open
for
applications
for
a
month
or
two,
and
then
the
rounds
are
shut
down,
because
it's
all
it's
gone
and
I'm,
not
sure
why
we
would
cut
that
as
a
board.
E
I'm.
Not.
You
know
curious
for
folks
that
didn't
want
to
see
it.
Maybe
they
can
enlighten
me
because
I
I
was
thinking
that
that
was
something
that
would
be
hard
to
replace
with
maybe
some
of
the
covet
emergency
funding
that
I
think
is
going
to
come
to
the
Ura
for
different
development
projects
or
development
programs.
It
might
be
hard
to
use
those
funds
or
am
I
missing
it
that
it's
easy
to
use
those
for
individual
homeowners.
H
That's
not
that's
directly
kind
of
earmarked.
At
this
moment
there
was
the
whole
home
repair
bill
that
was
passed
recently,
but
that's
still
sort
of
being
worked
out.
So
just
to
clarify
your
question,
are
you
saying
the
Advisory
Board
kind
of
mean
slash
recommendation
was
cut
by
the
staffer?
It
was
cut
from.
E
It's
it's
a
it's.
Both
I
believe
I
have
to
look
it.
F
Is
I
can
pull
up
the
year
over
year,
just
as
a
point
of
context,
give
me
one
second
to
pull
that
up.
B
Because
there's
based
on
what
our
recommendations
were
this
year,
it
is
equal
to
or
greater,
but
but
I
don't
have
the
previous
years
in
front
of
me,
which
is
the
challenge
of
being
in
person
versus
yeah.
E
H
B
Talking
and
I'm
like
I'm,
not
because
from
this
it's
this,
it's
the
same,
if
not
slightly
higher,.
I
And
this
this
is
Derek
with
the
Ura
to
answer
Mark
your
question
on
the
pipeline.
You
know
we're
we're
sitting
at
yeah.
G
I
Mean
it's
about
120
or
so
folks
that
are
on
the
wait
list
currently
yeah
and
I.
You
know,
I
think
the
the
numbers
that
we're
presenting
today,
at
least
in
my
mind,
wasn't
a
cut
I,
mean
I.
Think
I
need
to
to
look
at
the
numbers
again,
but
you
know
I.
Our
goal,
you
know
with
our
staff
recommendation,
was
to
really
sort
of
keep
it
at
least
steady
level
of
funding.
I
You
know,
at
least
from
my
perspective,
I
think
if
we
were
going
to
throw
more
resources
at
you
know
the
hap
program
it
would
be.
What's
really
neat
is
a
like
a
significant
you
know,
increase
in
that
program,
which
isn't
something
we
can
do
within
the
current
limitations
of
the
10
million
dollars
that
we're
working
with
you
know,
and
there
are
other
things
we
need
to
do.
You
know
with
all
of
these
funds,
so
I
mean
I.
Think
my
position
is
to
keep
it
at
its
current
level.
E
E
A
E
Know
there
there
might
be
other
that's
why
I
was
asking.
Are
there
other
funds
that
will
likely
be
coming?
That
can
help
in
some
of
these
other
areas
that
we
should
be
thinking
about?
It.
J
I
Yes,
you're
right
Lena
that
it
most
likely
will
be
a
significant
amount
of
money
for
home
repairs,
yeah
12,
13
million,
maybe
coming
to
the
county.
So
not
all
of
that
will
be.
You
know
available
in
the
city,
but
yeah
I
mean
that
is
coming.
We
just
don't
know
how
that's
going
to
interact
with
our
current
program.
That's
you
know.
We
start
trying
to
figure
that
out.
J
And
some
of
the
the
r
puns
like
a
lot
of
that,
has
been
delayed
at
the
city
county
and
the
state
level.
I,
don't
know
as
much
about
the
whole
home
repair,
but
I
sensed
that
that
one
was
moving
very
quickly.
J
I
mean
you
never
know
until
the
program
is
created
and
the
money
is
here.
So
who
knows
when
it
will
show
up,
but
it
is,
it
is
resources
for
this
purpose
that
we'll
get
here
eventually.
E
I,
just
don't
I
don't
want.
You
know
I'd
like
to
see
us
not
have
120
on
a
wait
list
and
if
you're
telling,
if
there's
other
monies
that
are
going
to
come,
that
those
people
would
be
eligible
to
get
the
help.
You
know
that's
fine
I,
just
don't
want
to
that.
Wait
list
is
going
to
grow.
If
we
cut
I
think
from
what
the
recommended
staff
level
was.
E
F
H
I
do
I
do
think
it's
one
of
our
big
issues,
which
we've
talked
about
a
lot,
is
the
the
reason
for
the
waiting
list
is
mostly
because
of
contractor
availability.
So
you
know
the
more
money
we
put
into
the
program
just
for
the
program
itself
may
not
necessarily
speed
up
the
waiting
list.
It
might
actually
make
it
grow.
H
This
is
where
sort
of
we're
working
internally
at
the
Ura
on
things
like
minority
contractor
line
of
credit,
some
type
of
program
that
can
help
to
sort
of
build
capacity
so
that
we
can
move
people
through
this
program
at
a
faster
pace.
G
Of
doing
is
talking
about
how
they're
going
to
intersect
in
whole
homes.
This
is
going
to
be
a
rollout
that
many
people
who
are
sitting
around
the
table
are
part
of
that
conversation,
so
making
sure
that
the
programs
can
really
dovetail
with
each
other
so
that
you
know
we're
getting
the
maximum
benefit
per
household.
You
know
the
funds
are
stretched
further.
We
have
those
good
dollars,
for
you
know:
coordination
of
Care,
Resource
enhancement
for
the
people
that
are
using
the
program
so.
G
All
the
different
programs
they
can
layer
together.
So
this
actually
is
one
of
those
unique
moments
in
time
where
the
Hof
really
could
you
know,
Assist
our
partners,
the
Ura
and
the
county,
to
talk
about
how
these
funds
are
going
to
leverage
other
funds
and
how
families
are
going
to
get
more.
K
One
thing
I'd
like
to
say
is
I
think
the
numbers
look.
You
know
pretty
much.
K
Recommendations
were
pretty
close.
One
thing
that
jumps
out
at
me
is
a
for
sale
development
program.
You
know
I
think,
there's
still
a
need
to
build
more.
You
know
affordable
for
sale,
housing
and
I'm,
not
quite
sure
how
we
do
that
with
these
limitations,
but
I
would
like
to
see
that
number
increase,
yeah,
I,
think
about
just
more
production.
K
Anything
that
we
can
do
to
you
know
produce
more
housing,
whether
it's
rental,
whether
it's
for
sale
as
well
as
creating
more
homeowners
and
existing
helping
existing
homeowners.
But
just
all
about
you
know
more
production
and
I
think
the
for
several
seems
to
be
the
one
that
is
really
lower
again.
I
think
it
should
be.
G
I'm
feeling
like
a
chatty
Kathy
today,
so
I
think
Derek
to
your
point,
something
that
Mark's
been
talking
about
consistently
is
how
many
different
ways
can
we
split
up
10
million
dollars
when
every
year
the
programs
get
more
expensive
so
again,
another
thing
for
us
to
have
you
know
in
our,
in
our
view,
is
every
year
this
is
going
to
be
more
difficult.
G
H
G
These
things
is
a
priority
or
they
wouldn't
have
been
in
the
list
to
begin
with,
so
is
2023
of
the
year
that
we
can
really
think
about
leveraging
other
funds
to
match
up
and
align
with
funds
that
the
HF
has
in
a
more
intentional
way.
How
do
we
make
the
pot
bigger
so
that
it's
not
choosing
between
you
know?
Do
we
value
homeownership?
Do
we
value?
You
know
people
stabilizing
in
rental
housing?
Do
we
value
the
creation
of
new
rental
units
each
year
and
and
I
would
assume
other
members
are
feeling
the
same
way.
G
You
know
it's
10
million
dollars
it's
going
to
remain
10
million
dollars.
So
if
we're
talking
about
every
project
being
more
expensive
every
you
know
new
home,
that's
built
being
more
expensive
everyone.
You
know
feeling
that
rental
crunch,
because
the
housing
stock
is
more
expensive,
but
their
salaries
aren't
going
up.
G
H
Also
on
the
topic
of
additional
sources
when
it
comes
to
for
sale,
development,
Derek
I
fully
agree
that
that's
a
very
important
effort
just
overall
for
the
affordable
housing
ecosystem
in
the
city.
But
something
I
would
want
to
call
out
is
that
in
the
arpa
legislation
in
earmark
for
the
Ura
there's
up
to
five
million
dollars
to
support
Community
Land
trusts
in
that,
and
so
that
is
definitely
an
infusion
of
capital.
For
that
type
of
effort
that
we
have
not
seen
recently
so
I
would
defer
to
The
Advisory
board.
H
If
you
do
want
to
change
that,
but
I
want
to
give
you
a
kind
of
on
top
of
our
normal
sources
outside
of
Hof
like
cdbg
and
home
that
the
UI
often
gets
on
an
annual
basis.
There
is
this
other
pot
of
funds
that
we'll
be
looking
at
in
the
near
future,
probably
six
to
12
months.
H
If
it
would
show
up
as
a
carryover,
that's
somewhat
of
a
function
of
our
just
timing
of
when
we
make
commitments
so
as
far
as
like
applications
in
hand
or
in
our
pipeline
I
mean
we
could
likely
consider
ourselves
fully
committed,
it
hasn't
necessarily
all
gone
to
this
board.
Yet
we
want
to
make
sure
that
these
projects
are
really
ready
to
go
when
we're
bringing
them
to
you.
H
But
it
is
very
much
so
in
demand
with
the
activity
of
both
just
cdc's
throughout
the
city
and
also
some
of
the
more
active
land
trusts.
D
I
think
I
just
I
want.
D
Mark
was
talking
about
earlier
with
the
homeowner
assistance
program
we
kind
of
going
back
to
that
about
full
home
repairs
and
what
what
Adriana
mentioned
about
kind
of
this
is
10
million
dollars.
So
how
do
we
spend
it
in
each
year?
It
hasn't
grown
bigger,
but
it's
sort
of
Statewide
homeowner
assistance
program
is
Will
exist
and
there
is
a.
D
There
is
a
part
of
me
that
things
that
would
make
sense
from
this
year
for
us
to
bolster
that
a
little
bit
so
that
we
can
get
more
bang
for
the
buck
and
it
would
ideally
be
a
program
at
the
Housing
Opportunity
fund
to
plug
into
and
it
may
be
seamlessly
for
the
resident
who
would
be
taking
the
opportunity
or
taking
advantage.
D
D
What
was
proposed
by
staff,
if
I'm,
seeing
correctly
but
I.
C
F
And
I
will
note
too
and
level
of
importance
to
individuals
in
the
survey
that
was
conducted.
The
rental
gap
program
and
the
homeowner
assistance
program
are
what
people
indicated
as
the
most
important
programs
to
be
utilized,
and
you
know
to
Derek
Kendall
Morris's
point
from
earlier.
You
know
we
do
have
you
know
almost
all
those
funds
are
committed
for
hap
I
mean
they're
not
technically
committed,
but
they
are.
F
You
know
we
have
all
of
the
funding
is
projected
to
be
used
and
we
only
keep
that
open
for
a
month
every
year
because
of
the
limited
amount
of
funds
we
have,
but
again
to
the
point
that
Adrian
made.
You
know
there
is
a
limited
amount
of
funds
here
and
how
you
want
to
adjust
those
but
yeah
we're
open
to
any
of
those
options.
B
Let's
see
are
there
does
so
Megan
had
made
a
you
know,
a
suggestion
that
we
try
to
find
some
additional
funds
in
our
budget
to
move
towards
the
hapline
item,
and
so
I
guess
I
was
going
to
see
if
any,
without
a
taking
a
formal
like
motion
and
vote.
But
if,
if
that's
the
line
of
conversation
and
adjustment
that
we
want
to
be
on
it's
kind
of
hard
but
sorry
I
feel
like
I'm
looking
every
bit
where,
but
and
nowhere
at
the
same
time,
I
just
screen
and
then
there's
people.
B
But
if
we
generally
agree
that
that's
something
that
we
want
to
do
yes
or
no,
and
then
maybe
take
some
suggestions
as
to
what
we
might
move.
If
we're
going
to
move
some
things
again,
acknowledging
that
the
numbers
have
to
stay
within
the
income
guideline
columns
that
they're
in
so
it's
we
can't,
you
know,
drag
things
across
just
kind
of
up
and
down
within
each
piece.
K
Are
there
layover
funds
from
HSP
or
are
there
other
fines?
You
know
coming
from
another
source
that
could
support
that
lineup.
F
K
No,
are
there
HSP
funds
from
the
previous
year
leftovers,
so
how
much
and
are
there
any
other
sources
you
know
similar
to
like
e-wrap
that
are
available?
You
know
for
for
this
service.
F
Yeah
so
I
think
the
HSP
funds
were
about
and
I
can
look
it
up
here.
Really
quick,
but
I
think
they
were
about
60
percent
I
want
to
say
yep.
K
G
G
Everybody
I
thought
that
DHS
the
contract
limit,
they
were
ramping
up
to
get
to
our
contract
numbers
that
it
hadn't
all
been
expended,
but
they
had
ramped
up
to
get
to
those
contract
numbers
because
the
arpa
funds
had
finalized.
So
they
I
thought
that
what
Andrea
had
shared
was
they
anticipated
a
ramp
up
in
this
end
of
the
contract
period,.
K
Moving
additional
funds
to
hap
I
agree
that
is
super
important
and
I.
Think
that's.
Why
I
prioritize
that
the
number
that
it
is
but
yeah,
it's
just
you
know,
I
struggle
with
where
to
pull
that
from
you
know,
because
I
see
other
finals.
That
really
should
be
more
like
I,
said
the
for
sale
development
program
yeah.
So
unless
there's
another
agency,
you
know
that
may
be
funding,
for
example,
HSP
or
even
the
legal
assistance
program,
I
kind
of
feel,
like
those
numbers
you
know,
should
stay
where
they
are.
K
It
all
really
increase,
not
increase,
so
my
struggle
is:
where
do
we
pull
that
from
looking
at
where
it
is
now
I
know,
there's
other
agencies
that
do
the
legal
assistance
with
other
agencies
that
do
hhsp.
If
there's
other
sources
available,
there
then
I
think
that
makes
sense,
but
all
the
other
components
as
it
relates
to
production
and
creating
and
preserving
affordable
housing.
I,
really
don't
think
we
should,
you
know,
take
funds
from
from
them.
I
Foreign
just
to
make
a
comment,
I
think
on
HSP
and
lap
in
terms
of
you
know
other
funding
sources
and
like
what's
in
the
environment,
currently
within
the
city,
for
the
the
type
of
program
that
and
the
type
of
work
that
the
legal
assistance
program
supports.
I
You
know
this
funding
from
the
Hof
is
is
really
the
only
source
of
funding
that
supports
that
kind
of
work
within
the
city
currently
and
on
the
HSP
side
there
is,
you
know
some
limited
funds
from
the
county
for
that
sort
of
stabilization
work,
but
a
lot
of
that
money
has
gone
away
over
the
last
few
months,
so
yeah
I
think
I
would
just
hesitate
to
Tinker
with
those
things
I
mean
we
could
certainly
Tinker
with
them,
but
I
wouldn't
want
to
take
too
too
much
away,
because
those
are
really
we're
sort
of
the
only
game
in
count
in
town
for
those
things
right
now,.
E
H
H
I
do
think
that
the
program
is
early
on
in
its
kind
of
concept,
and
you
know
if
there
was
if
we
were
going
to
shift
funds
around,
especially
maybe
at
the
80
percent
Mark.
You
could
look
to
that,
possibly
as
a
reduction
to
to
move
into
hap
or
a
different
program.
If
you
were
thinking
about
it,.
F
And
I
will
note
with
the
legal
assistance
program
as
well.
The
board's
recommendations
were
about
a
hundred
thousand
more
than
our
recommendation
at
the
Ura.
So
that
is
something
that
you
know.
I
think
we
would
be
willing
to
take
a
little
bit
off
of
that
as
well
to
move,
but
I
can
let
Derek
or
Evan
speak
more
to
that.
I
I
Just
acknowledging
you
know
the
current
work
that
we're
doing
within
that
program
to
to
ramp
it
up
and
really
sort
of
change
how
it
operates.
You
know,
I
I,
think
you
know
there
may
be
a
scenario
next
year
where
we
come
to
this
board.
We
know
we
may
need
more
funds
as
things
change
there.
You
know,
because
we
are
working
on.
You
know
different
initiatives
with
with
the
mayor's
office
around
legal
assistance,
to
figure
out
the
best
way
to
provide
that
service.
I
So
just
just
all
that
to
say
we
could
take
some
funding
from
it
from
that
program
today,
but
we
may
need
to
utilize
some
demo
dollars
to
support
that
program
in
the
future.
If
it
really
takes
off
the
way,
we
hope
it
does.
B
Well,
it's
funny.
I
was
just
actually
going
to
mention
demo
dollars,
which
we
previously
had
zero
in,
while
we
expended
prior
years
and
now
we're
allocating
325
which,
as
I'm
not
saying,
is
inappropriate.
B
But
if
we
were
to
try
to
find,
since
everything
is
an
identified
priority
that
we've
already.
You
know
why
it's
in
the
legislation
why
it's
in
the
budget,
I,
guess
I,
I,
I'm
split,
because
I
believe
that
half
is
super
is
critically
important.
But
it
also
seems
like
we're
almost
at
capacity
in
terms
of
the
ability
to
actually
get
the
work
done,
and
we
also
know
that
money
is
coming
here,
so
I'm
a
little
bit
reluctant
to
pull
money
from
something
that
is
existing
and
we
know
doing
good
work.
B
So
if
anything,
I
would
recommend,
perhaps
shaving,
maybe
just
25
each
off
of
off
of
each
category,
except
for
the
Ada
am
I
right,
because
that's
only
at
50.
to
go
from
the
demo
dollars
which
are
kind
of
less
defined,
perhaps
to
go
towards
hap.
If
we
were
to
make
if
we
were
to
shift
anything.
B
That
would
be
my
my
first
inclination,
because
that
would
get
us
at
least
back
to
the
to
last
year's
number
plus
10K,
because
I
really
don't
see
we're
500
would
come
from
without
you
know,
sacrificing
another
program.
G
You
know
I,
think
to
Kelly
and
other
board
members
points.
You
know
this
happened
last
year
as
well.
We
had
a
very
vocal
group
that
came
and
told
us
that
the
legal
assistance
was
the
most
important
thing
that
we
were
going
to
do
and
in
the
meeting
we
really
switched
gears
and
moved
in
that
direction.
G
You
know,
I
think
that
hap
is
incredibly
important,
but
I
do
think
it's
challenging
when
you
know
we
come
to
this
meeting
and
and
want
to
shift
priorities
and
move
money
because
I
feel,
like
all
of
these
things
are
important.
Every
one
of
them
has
a
different
constituency.
We
don't
have
something
that
says
this
thing
is
going
to
be
more
impactful
than
this
other
thing,
so
you
know
it
does
become
a
challenge,
always
I.
G
Think
in
this
allocation
meeting
of
what
voices
are
the
loudest
and
how
do
we
start
to
wave
into
is
owning
a
home
more
important
than
renting
a
home
which
is
more
important
than
demo,
because
we
might
have
a
disaster
where
we
may
have
a
shelter
need
you
so
again
with
this
finite
pool
of
money.
This
is
this
is
going
to
get
harder
and
harder
every
year,
but
to
a
point
Derek
made.
G
We
also
might
not
have
the
context
of
you
know
the
legal
services
that
we
provide
directly
might
not
be
available
anywhere
else.
We
have
whole
homes
repair,
which
is
12
million
dollars,
which
is
going
to
have
some
impact
in
the
city.
We
don't
know
exactly
how
that's
going
to
roll
out.
There
were
some
phfa
dollars
that
were
allocated
that
weren't
used.
G
So
it's
incredibly
difficult
to
say:
what's
going
to
be
the
thing
that
comes
into
this
line
item
to
move
it
forward
versus
what
the
Hof
dollars
are
really
going
to
you
create,
promote,
continue
so
I'm
going
to
say
this
again,
I
think
we
need
to
start
this
process
earlier
in
the
year.
We
need
to
start
prioritizing
earlier
in
the
year.
G
Not
necessarily,
you
know,
we
need
to
start
in
January
talking
about
what
our
actual
allocations
are
going
to
be,
but
you
know
really
understanding
what
the
impact
of
each
of
these
are,
where
there's
holes
that
are
being
filled
that
are
really
integral
to
us
supporting
our
communities
in
a
way
that
makes
sense
what
other
dollars
are
at
play
so
that
we
can
be,
you
know
more
prepared
for
what
does
this
allocation
really
mean
and
that
we
can
be
smarter
about
those
leverage
opportunities,
so
I,
I,
love,
hap
I
would
love
us
to
be
able
to
increase
that
budget,
but
I
like
Kelly,
I'm,
reticent
to
say
now
today.
G
B
I
think
to
Adrian's
point.
This
is
something
that
we've
kind
of
played
around
with
in
it.
It's
kind
of
a
cross
between
this
and
it
made
administrative
item
for
later,
but
measuring
our
impact.
We've
talked
about
things
that
are
visual
in
terms
of
like
yard
signs
be
like
you
know,
Hoff
was
here.
We
do
great
work,
you
know
all
of
those
sorts
of
things,
but
also-
and
we've
talked
about
a
little
bit
about
how
to
get
our
end.
Consumers
story
back
to
us
and
how
to
do
that
in
a
way.
That's
not.
B
You
know
exploitive,
because
sometimes
government
and
nonprofit.
We
do
that
in
a
way,
that's
kind
of
gross,
so
doing
it
in
a
way
that
feels
genuine
that
protects
people's
interests,
but
also
I,
think
that
that
would
help
this
this
process
and
deciding
kind
of
like
what
that
impact
is
also
through
soft
through
hard
and
soft
data,
like
what
kind
of
repairs
perhaps
are
getting
fixed
through
this,
and
maybe
a
story
about
what
that.
B
What
that
impact
is
for
that
particular
person,
and
we
can
really
get
if
we
start
that
earlier,
a
more
a
better
idea
of
what
our
progress
of
both
what
our
programs
are
doing,
but
also
I,
think
we
all
see
through
kind
of
not
to
say
that
anybody's.
You
know
ignorant
of
the
problem,
but
we
see
things
through
like
our
sliver
when
I
was
at
Health.
You
know
like
everything
was:
is
this
when
you're,
when
you're?
B
Looking
at
it
from
that
angle,
you
know
to
kind
of
really
make
sure
we're
all
having
the
same
kind
of
conversation.
Maybe
looking
at
some
of
the
same
data
I
think
would
be
helpful
as
part
of
informing
this
process
going
forward.
B
If
we
start
that
earlier
and
maybe
think
about
what
that
might
look
like
and
I
guess
back
to
these
numbers
that
we
have
without
all
of
that
warm
and
hard
data,
if
there's
anybody
that
would
like
to
propose
anything
else
either
that
we
accept,
as
is
I,
also
still
as
I,
even
though
I
say
like,
let's
move
it
from
demo
I
like
demo,
because
it
can
go
anywhere.
You
want
within
each
column
as
the
need
arises.
B
So
so,
but
anyway,
if
there's
any
but
other
comments
or
suggestions.
As.
B
So
that
would
be
for
the
50
Ami
move
that
from
275
to
225
and
put
that
up.
Yes,
okay,
because
that's.
E
Is
that
just
totally
throw
a
wrench
into
the
you
know
from
a
staff
perspective?
Is.
H
Think
ajad
is
updating
it.
The
live
here
so
what's
on
the
screen
can
be
eventually
when
emotions
ready
what
gets
approved.
B
Comments
on
moving
50
from
the
50
50
000.
Excuse
me,
I'm
about
to
say,
50
twice
in
one
sentence:
moving
fifty
thousand
dollars
from
the
small
landlord
fund
to
the
hap
under
the
in
the
50
Ami
and
Below
peace
versus
something
else
to
make
up
for
where
we
were
last
year.
If
that's
something
that
we
want
to
do,
thoughts
comments
from
anyone
not
in
the
room.
N
Caleb,
this
is
Paul
you
all
had,
or
you
had
a
reference
just
a
few
minutes
ago,
the
idea
of
moving
25
000
from
a
couple
of
different
spaces,
and
we
we
left
that
that
conversation
never
had
a
conclusion
to
it.
Are
we
replacing
this
most
recent
recommendation
with
your
recommend
or
a
reading
getting
rid
of
yours
completely,
or
is
that
something
that's
still
worth
considering
to
talk
about,
because
it
was
oh.
B
They're
still
both
on
the
table,
I
mean
I,
guess
they're.
If,
if
the
desire,
which
I
think
it
might
be
not
sure,
because
we
can't
look
around
for
eye
contact
and
Knots,
but
if
the
agreement,
if
the,
if
the
conversation
is
to
restore
last
year's
funding
to
the
hap
line,
then
those
are
two
recommendations
on
the
table
and
we
can
discuss
and
entertain
either
to
get
to
get
to
that
number,
which
would
be
one
was
moving
25
from
demo
dollars
at
both
the
30
Ami
and
the
50.
B
Ami
would
be
one
way
to
do
that
and
then
the
other
would
be
to
move.
Actually
we
could
do
the
third
or
we
could
move
50
from
the
small
landlord
fund
at
50
Ami
or
we
could
do
some
combination
of
the
two
where
we
do
25
from
30
and
25
from
the
50
Ami.
We
can
really
kind
of
split
those
any
way
you
like
anyway,
we'll
not
use
specifically
anyway.
B
That
is
the
pleasure
of
the
of
The
Advisory
board,
but
those
seem
to
be
the
areas
where
we
at
least
the
two
of
us.
B
C
E
K
I
guess
yeah
I
mean
I
I,
don't
know.
Just
personally.
The
small
landlord
fund
is
a
it's
a
very,
very
important
program
because
it
you
know,
rental
Gap
is
a
longer
term
process.
Small
landlord
can
kind
of
meet
needs
now,
as
it
relates
to
you,
know,
creating
and
preserving
affordable
housing.
K
That
line
item
is
already
truth,
truthfully
severely
under
budget.
So
to
take
anything
from
it,
I
mean
you
know,
we're
we're
bumping
up
a
line
item,
that's
2.1
million
dollars
and
taking
it
from
the
laden,
that's
400
000
it
just
you
know
for
another
very
important
program.
We
know
the
housing,
Choice,
voucher,
programs
and
utilized
and
part
of
the
reason
is,
you
know.
K
Sometimes
the
repair
is
going
to
be
cumbersome
for
for
these
small
networks
and
we
we
desperately
need
all
those
units,
so
I'm
apprehensive
to
do
that,
and
the
demonstration,
though,
is
I,
think
you
know
it
was
already
voiced
that
right
now
you
know
there's
an
issue
with
you
know
trying
to
work
it
out
with
the
climate
tractors
and
really
weak
at
the
ends
where
it
is
now.
K
K
You
know,
supportive
of
keeping
that
kind
of
word
is
now
we
we
could
move
demonstration
dollars
if
there's
no
other,
you
know
emergency
or
or
just
you
know,
new
concept
that
we
want
to
support
so
so
so
yeah
I
think
for
for
those
reasons,
I
again
I
support
that
I
know
why
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense,
but
small
landlord
makes
a
lot
of
sense
too,
and
it's
way
way
more
unrefunded
than
where
half
is
kind
of
so
I
I
would
not
move
either
of
them,
because
the
flexibility
of
demo
with
dollars
is
just
as
important
I
would
just
say,
you
know,
leave
it
where
it
is.
K
The
reason
why
I
asked
about
is
there
other
programs
is
support,
but
it
wouldn't
really
because
all
of
the
programs
we
know
are
important,
but
it
wouldn't
impact
them
as
much
so
so
yeah.
So
that's,
that's.
That's
really!
Really.
My
thoughts,
I
I,
think
one
thing
we
we
should
do
no
matter
where
we
land
today
going
forward
is
really
to
find
you
know
who
who
we
are
and
and
what
they,
what
the
you
know
who
are
who
we
are
and
who
we
are
not
and
I
think
that
will
really
help
Define.
O
So
I
have
a
comment
and
kind
of
piggybacking
on
what
time
Derek
just
said,
I
think
that
is
a
a
good
idea
to
kind
of
revisit
our
spending.
You
know
somewhere
along
the
the
yard
or
we've
ever
done,
that
before
and
I
don't
know
if,
if
that's
a,
if
that
would
be
too
much,
you
know
too
much
to
do.
O
So
we
can
see
how
we're
spending
see
where
we're
spending
see
what
we're
not
spending
and
then
allocate
dollars
from
where
you
know,
funds
are
not
being
used
into
the
hat
or
some
other
line
item
where
funds
are
being
used
and
needs
more
funding
in
that
line.
Item
I
definitely
think
that
that's
a
that's
a
good
idea.
If
that's
something
that
we
can
do.
H
So
I
think
we
can
on
an
ongoing
basis.
You
know
continue
to
give
information
on
what
our
expenditures
are.
H
The
pipeline
of
programs
give
updates
on
individual
ones
at
certain
Advisory
board
meetings,
but
I
do
want
to
caution
against
the
expectation
that
we
would
fully
maybe
like
re-budget
in
the
middle
of
a
year,
because
this
does
have
to
get
approved
by
city
council.
I
know:
David
Geiger
is
on
the
line.
So,
if
I'm
getting
any
of
this
wrong,
please
correct
me,
but
it
would
be
a
lot
to
kind
of
just
move
things
around
from
program
to
program
in
a
given
year.
H
That
being
said,
demonstration
dollars
would
I
think
give
us
the
flexibility
to
kind
of
move
them
into
a
different
program.
I
know
at
the
in
March,
around
March
of
2020
I,
believe
we
put
demonstration
money
into
HSP
on
an
emergency
basis,
so
there's
something
we
said
for
the
flexibility
of
demo
dollars
and
I
also
would
passion
against
thinking
that
we'll
re-budget
mid-year
I
think
we'll
end
up
with
just
a
headache
for
everybody.
If
we,
if
we
get
to
that
point,.
B
So
hearing
lots
of
different
ways
of
approaching
this,
which
are
to
move
funds
from
demo
dollars,
move
funds
from
small
landlord
fund
and
then
also
to
leave
everything
where
it
is
and
potentially
shift
demo
dollars
as
needed
going
forward.
Does
somebody
feel
strongly
enough
about
those
options
to
make
emotion.
G
I'm
not
making
a
motion
just
to
be
clear,
but
I
think
to
your
point.
If
we
want
to
move
demo
dollars,
I
think
that
should
be
a
very
you
know
scheduled
precise
conversation,
because
you
know
we're
talking
about.
You
know
any
number
of
families
that
may
get
one
benefit
or
no
benefit.
You
know,
based
on
what
we're
deciding
so
I
think
if
I
I
think
the
demo
dollar
move
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
You
know,
as
long
as
we're
very
intentional
about
there's
a
time
when
we
talk
about
demo
dollars.
G
B
So
I
would
say:
I
I
agree
with
that
train
of
thought,
but
also
we've
kind
of
used
it
as
kind
of
an
emergency
fund
and
like
savings
so
that
we've
been
able
to
respond
to.
B
You
know
that
the
church
down
the
street
that
we
did
the
housing
we
helped
with
the
the
homeless
shelter
that
they
had
there
like
that,
wouldn't
be
a
thing
that
you
would
necessarily
be
able
to
plan,
but
we
could
have
moved
it
and
then,
when
that
need
presented
itself,
which,
if
I
believe
was
in
the
dead
of
winter,
we
wouldn't
have
been
able
to
help
that
so
perhaps
to
set
aside,
maybe
a
certain
percentage
of
demo
dollars
that
we're
gonna,
you
know
reallocate
like
because
it
is
June
1st
and
we
said
we
would
do
it
versus
you
know.
B
Whatever
other
piece
we
would
leave
to
be
flexible
with
I
guess
would
just
be
to
be
flexible
with
our
flexibility,
because
we
don't
want
to
lock
it
in
in
a
way
that
makes
it
unhelpful
or
just
as
difficult
to
move
as
anything
else.
But
excellent
excellent
point
did
anybody
else
have.
B
Okay,
and
actually,
as
as
I'm
sorry.
N
I
needed
to
make
sure
that
my
microphone
is
good,
as
Derek
Tillman
was
was
talking.
The
numbers
in
the
far
right
column,
on
the
on
the
chart
from
small
landlord
fund,
went
from
375
to
400
and
I'm,
actually,
okay
with
where
things
are
at
currently
right
now
with
happened,
you
know,
2.1,
the
rgp
at
3.8,
like
I,
am
maybe
ready
so
to
make
a
motion
that,
based
on
sort
of
that
movement,
that
small
movement
that
happened.
N
That
would
keep
things
where
they're
at
as
we're
goes
in
the
far
right
column
and
then
also
I.
Don't
know
if
this
is
a
separate
motion,
but
I
think
the
idea,
if,
if
there
seems
to
be
a
greater
need
for
funding
in
winter
months,
for
emergencies,
and
things
like
that
that
are
coming
up,
then,
maybe
to
the
point
of
being
intentional,
that
we
look
to
use
a
certain
percentage
of
the
demonstration
program.
Funds
in.
K
B
N
F
And
Kelly
before
you
do
that
I
just
want
to
know
really
quick.
The
movement
that
we
saw
on
the
screen
was
just
me,
moving
it
back
to
what
it
originally
was.
Yes
FYI,
so
it
is
back
to
what
we
had
at
the
start
of
the
meeting.
Yes,.
B
I
checked
the
numbers
when
he
had
said
that,
so
yes,
so
this
is
Emotion
by
pulse
Bradley,
to
accept
our
draft
budget
as
presented
initially
at
the
at
this
meeting
and
to
review
use
of
demo
dollars
again
in
February
as
needed,
did
I
get
that
right.
Paul,
that's
good!
Thank
you.
Okay,.
B
Okay,
any
questions
on
that
motion
all
right,
all
those
in
favor
aye
aye,
all
those
well
any
opposed
and
any
abstentions.
Oh
great,
okay,
great!
We
good
work,
everybody!
We
have
a
draft
budget
and
Derek.
You
had
a
comment
that
you
were
about
to
make
beef
during
your
second.
K
Yes,
I
just
wanted
to
bring
back
to
life
as
well
as
cautiousness
that
demo
dollars
is
not
just
what
was
not
intended
to
just
be
for
large-scale
emergencies.
It
also
could
be
some
to
smaller
scale.
It
was
really
intended
to
be.
You
know
for
things
that
didn't
fit.
You
know,
as
as.
K
Or
as
neatly
into
another
bucket,
and
that
didn't
have
to
be
something
more
skill,
there
were
some
large-scale
things
you
responded
to,
but
but
you
know
something
smaller
scale
may
come
up
something
new
or
Innovative
may
come
up
Etc.
So
just
just
being
aware
of
that
to
not
just
you
know,
have
our
minds
prone
towards
you
know
something
major.
That's
large
scale.
F
B
I
think
we
hadn't,
we
discussed
some
pilot
projects
and
the
ability
to
just
kind
of
have
fun
with
it
do
some
of
the
you
know,
maybe
the
new
and
Innovative
things
that
we
hear
about
being
done
around
the
country.
So
no
thank
you
for
keeping
our
our
minds
open
as
to
the
use
of
demo
dollars
any.
B
E
I
have
a
request
and
I
know
that
it
hasn't
been
brought
up
in
a
couple
of
years,
but
is
there
an
accounting
of
the
administer
how
the
administrative
funds
have
been
spent
since
the
start
of
Hof?
We
budgeted,
we
allocate
it
the
way.
The
legislation
reads:
is
that
it's
up
to
a
million
and
I
think
people
forget
that
it
doesn't.
E
It
isn't
always
a
million,
but
is
there
we
had
talked
about
that
early
that
we
really
haven't
had
an
accounting
here
at
the
Hof
of
how
those
funds
were
spent
so
of
someone
that
you
guys
spend
it
and
keep
track
of
it.
It's
something
is
that
something
we
can
share
with
The
Advisory
board
over
the
in
the
next
month
or
two.
H
Yeah,
it
is
information
that
gets
put
into
the
Hof
audit.
We
can
clarify
any
of
it
if
you
know,
there's
questions
about
what
shows
up
in
the
audit,
but
there
yeah
it
is
accounted
for
its
invoice
for
by
the
ura's
finance
department.
H
I,
just
have
one
other
comments,
just
to
set
expectations
for
The
Advisory,
Board,
that
this
is
now
an
approved
draft
plan.
H
What
the
Ura
is
going
to
do
by
the
end
of
the
day
tomorrow
is
post
this
on
our
Hof
webpage
as
a
draft
plan
with
just
a
section
for
comment
from
the
public
with
and
so
we'll
collect
that
over
the
next
month
and
at
the
November
Advisory
board
meeting
is
when
we
would
seek
a
final
approval
and
at
that
point
the
Ura
board,
which
is
the
governing
board
of
Hof,
would
approve
this
after
they
do.
B
Great,
thank
you
and
now
your
administrative
updates.
F
F
So
the
one
administrative
item
we
had
again
is
that
making
confer
Hammond's
presentation
on
Fair
Housing
is
being
postponed,
so
we
will
be
sending
out
a
doodle
pull
for
timing
for
an
alternative
meeting.
She
suggested
having
a
meeting
sometime
in
November.
That's
not
during
the
regular
Hoff
board
meeting
to
discuss
fair
housing,
so
we
will
be
sending
out
a
poll
to
with
Megan
in
hand
as
well
on
times
that
work
best
for
her
to
get
the
board's
options
four
times
it
might
work
and
that's
all
we
have.
B
So
some
other
administrative
updates.
B
The
first
is
that
there
is,
there
are
budget
discussions
around
Hoff
currently
taking
place
at
the
city.
Mayor
gainey's
budget
includes
an
increase
to
our
to
our
budget
from
our
10
to
12.5
a
million
dollars.
So
it's
we've,
you
know
discussed
quite
quite
a
bit
that
there's,
you
know
much
more
need.
Then
we
have
funds
available
for
that
has
not
been
voted
on
yet
a
little
advocacy
never
hurt
anybody
to
get
that
approved.
If
you
would
like
to
I
would
like
to
do
what
they
do
to
encourage
that
increase.
B
You
are
welcome
to
do
so.
As
we
are
all
you
know,
City
residents.
B
So
so
the
budget
has
been
proposed
by
the
mayor's
office,
and
now
the
next
steps
would
be
that
would
be
voted
on
by
Council,
and
so
those
would
be
as
we
sit
in
their
house
and
telling
people
to
you
know
that
would
be
the
legislative
process
that
Council
will
be
approving
that
budget,
and
so
that
would
be
who
would
need
a
friendly
nudge.
B
B
That
was
that
that
was
so.
That
was
going
to
be.
My
next
part
is
that
we
have,
by
the
time
that
that
budget
would
be
passed.
It
would
be
December,
so
we
could
and
then
redo
all
of
the
things
which
does
not
seem
to
make
a
lot
of
sense.
Even
though
we
don't,
we
wouldn't
be
getting
the
money
until
spring
as
traditionally
put,
and
so
we
don't
have
to
make
a
formal
decision
on
how
to
do
that
today.
B
But
my
recommendation
would
be
for
us
to
consider
and
I
am
not
the
math
whiz
that
they
are
at
the
end
of
the
table,
but
consider
but
holding
these
percentages
so
that
if
we
decided
that
this
we're
going
to
give
4.2
percent
to
this
particular
line
item
under
this
particular
category
that
we
just
grow,
the
dollar
amount
in
alignment
with
the
percentages
that
we
just
voted
on.
B
Unless
we
and
again
we
could
perhaps
shift
some
things
as
needed,
but
I
don't
think
we
necessarily
want
to
revise
across
three
columns.
However,
many
line
items
that
we
want
to
go
through
this
entire
process
again,
even
though
we
do
want
to
advocate
for
additional
funds,
but
that
would
be
my
first
recommendation
would
be
that
we
get
a
budget
back.
That
reviews
that
just
kind
of
grows
those
proportionally
and
then
see
if
that
makes
sense
before
we
start
over
again
from
scratch,
with
new
blank
budget,
worksheets.
K
And
I
think
this
is
what
you're
saying,
but
couldn't
we
just
allocate
the
additional
2.5
wherever
you
know,
we
thought
was
the
greatest
need
and
priority.
You
know
in
alignment
with
you
know
all
the
surveys
and
things
that
have
that
were
done,
but
also
connected
to
you
know
the
conversation
we're
having
so
company
just
really
just
allocate
the
additional
2.5
and
that
touch
the
initial
funds
that
that
we've
utilized.
A
B
B
Adding
to
this
or
to
say,
we
want
to
proportionally
move
this
around
I
mean
proportionally
grow
this
from
10
to
12..
So
those
are
just
the
two
options
that
we
have
again.
We
don't
have
to
decide
right
this
minute,
because
that
won't
approval
process
won't
take
place,
but
just
to
Mark's
question,
we
kind
of
discussed
those
options
as
being
how
we
would
want
to
move
things
around.
B
We
certainly
wouldn't
want
to
go
back
and
open
up
the
entire
12.5,
but
again
I
would
imagine
we
would
have
to
have
a
if
we
move
things
and
don't
grow
proportionally.
I
think
we
might
have
to
David
I
think
is
on
the
line
and
he
may
not
know
off
the
top
of
his
head,
but
go
back
through
the
same.
We
might
have
to
open
the
public
comment
process
again
in
in
a
similar
fashion.
H
B
B
M
Kelly
yeah
I
apologize
I
should
have
prepared
more
for
this
meeting.
I
can't
answer
your
specific
question
on
exactly
which
steps
would
have
to
be
repeated,
but
The
Advisory
Board
would
have
to
go
through
an
amendment
process
would
have
to
advance
to
the
Ura
board
and
then
be
voted
on
again
by
Council
some
of
the
sort
of
the
inputs.
Two
data
management
process
I
have
to
go
back
and
check
the
legislation
so
I
apologize
for
not
having
that
on
hand.
Right
now,
but
I
agree.
It's
a
it's
a
very
preliminary
budget.
M
B
Thank
you
David,
so
again
preliminarily,
but
we
just
want
to
let
everybody
know
and
also
give
us
an
opportunity
to
kind
of
get
our
ducks
in
a
row
both
internally
and
externally
around
that
potential
additional
funds
coming
down.
The
pike
next
item
is
that
there
are
several
new
advisory
members
who
have
been
nominated.
We
have
some
vacancies.
We
have
some
folks
whose
terms
have
come
to
an
end.
B
So
that's
kind
of
exciting
and
something
to
keep
an
eye
out
for
and
also
depending
on
how
long
this
process
is
of
revising.
Hopefully
revising
the
budget
will
speak
it.
You
know,
speaking
into
fruition,
that
there
will
be
more
money.
We
will
need
to
revise
the
budget
that
they
would
that,
potentially
there
will
be
additional
members
who
will
have
their
opportunity
to
align
with
their
priorities
as
as
more
funds
come
online
and
they're,
making
those
choices,
I,
don't
believe.
B
We've
had
any
committee
meetings
in
the
past
month,
I
think
we've
been
all
of
our
meetings
that
have
not
been
around
this
table
have
been
as
it
relates
to
the
allocation
plan
unless
I'm
incorrect.
If
anybody's
been,
we
had
additional
meetings
this
month,
I,
don't
believe
so
stare
at
the
screen.
Okay,
all
right!
So
then
we
will
move
on
to
jad's
programmatic
expenditures
and
updates.
F
Yeah,
so
really
the
only
big
change
from
last
month
is
with
the
small
landlord
fund.
We
did
have
one
closure
on
that
that
which
changed
the
percentage
quite
a
bit
I
mean
we
also
actually
have
another
project,
that's
worth
about
80
000,
that
is
in
the
process
as
well,
and
it
was
approved.
So
that
will
be
an
additional
large
percentage
increase
for
that
program,
since
that
one
has
more
limited
funds
compared
to
some
of
the
other
on
this
list.
But
that's
the
only
major
adjustment
from
last
month
that
I
have
to
report.
E
F
E
F
Like
you
said
with
the
for
sale
development
program,
you
know
really
there's
all
that
money
is
in
the
pipeline,
but
it
is
not
all
technically
committed
same
with
the
homeowner
assistance
program.
That's
almost
100
percent
in
the
pipeline
with
projects,
so
this
only
shows
what
has
been
committed
or
closed
in
respect
to
these
programs.
F
That
one
as
well
I
wasn't
able
to
get
the
information
from
DHS
prior
to
this
meeting.
Unfortunately,
so
I
wasn't
able
to
incorporate
this
past
quarter,
but
I
do
expect
that
that
will
go
up
quite
a
bit
from
what
they
give
me
here
this
month.
B
All
right
so
onto
announcements,
our
next
Advisory
board
meeting
is
November
3rd,
which
is
a
Thursday
at
two
o'clock
here
in
city,
council
chambers
and
also
hybrid
via
zoom
and
I.
Believe,
that's
it
any
other
announcements.