►
From YouTube: Housing Opportunity Fund Meeting - 9/5/19
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
Hi
I
am
April
I'm
a
case
manager
with
Pittsburgh
Mercy
I
was
coming
to
speak
about
my
experience
with
running
this
grant.
So
right
now
it
has
been
pretty
crazy.
We've
had
a
lot
of
interest
some
days.
I
go
in,
I,
have
60
plus
voicemails
waiting
for
me,
and
I
am
the
only
one
working
on
this,
and
currently
Pittsburgh
Mercy
actually
pulls
from
different
funds.
In
order
to
make
me
full
time
the
10%.
Well,
the
20%
10%
overhead
is
not
enough
for
someone
to
work
full-time
as
a
case
manager
at
Pittsburgh
Mercy.
B
We
would
need
at
least
25
to
30%
to
pay
a
case
manager.
It
would
be
somewhere
around
sixty
four
thousand
to
make
them
full-time.
Currently,
that
is
not.
Ten
percent
is
just
not
covering
that,
so
it
is
a
lot
of
work.
Typically,
a
case
manager
has
between
20
to
25
people
on
their
caseload.
This
is
a
fully
qualified
case
manager
and
right
now,
I
have
30
people
in
my
caseload
with
appointments
waiting.
C
A
D
D
Maybe
my
mistake
in
this
was
coming
in
and
asking
politely
at
meetings
and
saying:
let's
make
sure
that
we
have
an
actual
fair
housing
advocate
at
the
table.
Maybe
that
was
a
mistake
of
kindness
for
weakness.
I
recognize
that
we
all
have
access
to
our
levels
of
levers
of
power.
I
certainly
have
kept
HUD
in
the
Hutus.
The
secretary
aware
of
these
developments,
and
while
the
current
HUD
secretary
may
not
have
a
robust
appetite
for
affh
administration's
change,
but
the
statute
of
limitations
does
not
I.
D
Do
look
forward,
though,
to
working
with
with
miss
Iran
I
think
it
is
so
important
that
the
work
that
you
do
is
reviewed
through
that
affh
lens
and
whether
it's
me
or
you
or
whoever
it
is
I,
don't
think
we
can
sleep
on
that,
and
so,
as
a
result,
I
would
expect
that
the
same
questions
that
I
posed
you
three
months
ago
and
six
months
ago
are
being
asked
at
this
table.
I,
don't
need
to
say
them
again.
D
You
should
know
what
they
are
and
I
would
expect
that
when
you
make
the
deliberation
and
determinations
on
the
money
that
you
spend,
that
you'll
do
so,
with
those
questions
being
asked,
you
have
an
obligation
to
do
so.
The
last
thing
that
that
I'll
say
you
know
and
I
hope
by
the
way.
The
answer
to
that,
of
course,
would
be
yes,
the
last
thing
that
I'll
say
I
have
been
working
in
the
field
of
fair
housing.
D
Almost
since
the
time
I
came
to
Pittsburgh,
it
is
always
an
uphill
fight.
I'll
continue
that
fight.
Some
of
you
will
be
with
me.
Some
of
you
won't,
but
I
will
tell
you
now.
If
you
do
not
look
at
how
your
money
impacts,
segregation
I
will
wait
for
the
administration
to
change
and
then
you'll
see
me
again.
Thank
you
all
very
much.
Thank.
A
A
E
Name
is
Megan
Khan
for
Hammond
I'm.
The
program
director
at
the
Fair
Housing
Partnership
and
I
have
spent
the
last
ten
years
working
in
fair
housing
at
FHP
and
following
J
I
simply
again
want
to
follow
up
on
the
granular
nature
of
what
fair
housing
is
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
in
the
ten
years
that
I've
spent
on
it
and
have
dedicated
myself
to
it
on
the
national
level.
I've
spent
this
last
decade
in
bringing
Pittsburgh
as
a
proud,
Pittsburgh
ER
and
a
Greenfield
resident.
E
Because
of
a
lack
of
inclusive
policies
that
invite
people
of
color
into
our
neighborhoods
and
invite
integration
and
desegregation
and
true
housing
choice
and
unfortunately,
as
a
result
of
those
urban
planning
policies.
We
have
seen
that
not
only
is
are
we
racially
segregated,
heavily
neighborhood
by
neighborhood
by
neighborhood,
but
we
have
never
put
a
variety
that
opportunity
again
and
so
blackness
is
now
correlated
with
poverty
when
that
is
absolutely
not
true,
and
not
real.
It's
because
of
government
policy
that
that
has
happened
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh.
E
But
an
issue
of
racism
and
again
I
would
look
at
the
study
by
Andre
Perry
and
see
that
showed
that
black
houses,
black
neighborhoods,
are
valued
at
11%,
less
simply
for
being
black
neighborhoods,
and
that
is
not
an
issue
of
amenities.
But
an
issue
of
racism
and
I
asked
that
the
HOF
consider
these
factors
to
unsegregated
II
with
its
funding.
Thank
you.
F
D
G
Hello,
I'm
julian
our
you
got
that
exactly
right,
I
work
at
the
housing
court
here
in
this
building.
We
recently
set
it
up
at
the
request
of
Judge
ward
motions,
are
primarily
heard
by
judge
Hertzberg.
My
technical
title
is
data
Clerk,
but
pretty
much.
My
day-to-day
is
running
the
help
desk
down
in
DC
our
so
every
day,
I
see
people
who
could
use
this
program.
G
G
H
We
could
talk
about
what
more
help
is
needed
for
renters
and
homeowners,
where
the
Housing
Opportunity
Fund
is
falling
short,
but
I'm
not
going
to
deal
with
that
there
going
to
be
other
people
I'm
coming
as
a
neighborhood
community
organization,
a
nonprofit
that
is
partnering
with
a
developer.
I
was
going
to
try
to
keep
it
as
neutral
as
possible,
but
I
can't
bottom
line
is
I'm
getting
hosed
and
I'm
being
polite.
Why
do
I
say
that
I
looked
at
the
requirements.
I
H
That
kind
of
partnership,
and
all
a
developer
has
to
do
is
get
a
memorandum
of
understanding
from
a
organization.
My
experience
with
memorandums
of
understanding
is
they're
not
worth
the
paper
they're
printed
on
what
needed
to
be
in
that
is
to
answer
one
simple
question:
what's
in
all
of
this,
for
that
neighborhood
organization,.
H
I've
asked
to
see
the
application
the
application
I
saw
where
it
was,
including
the
nonprofit
partner,
was
blank.
Please
tell
me
that
the
developer
got
this
Housing
Opportunity
Fund,
with
more
than
a
blank
space.
I
have
asked
for
a
chota
application.
My
e
mail
got
forwarded,
I
haven't
heard
from
anyone
suspense
I
want
to
be
a
partner
in
this.
More
neighborhood
organizations
want
to
be
a
partner.
This
is
a
way
that
neighborhoods
community
organizations-
community
resin
they're,
going
to
be
impacted
by
the
decisions
by
the
developments
can
actually
make
a
difference.
H
But
if
what
I'm
seeing
is
the
modus
operandi
for
this?
It's
not
going
to
happen,
there
needs
to
be
some
changes
made
and
I
would
be.
Welcome.
I
would
be
more
than
happy
to
sit
down
with
anyone
here
and
hash
it
out.
There's
always
time,
there's
never
time
to
do
things
right,
but
there's
plenty
of
time
to
do
things
over
I
vote
for
a
do-over.
For
that
aspect.
Thank
you.
J
Good
morning
my
name
is
Celeste
Scott,
a
housing
justice
organizer
for
Pittsburgh,
United
and
I
have
a
lot
to
say,
but
I'm
living
it
for
three
minutes,
so
I'll
keep
it
there.
I
think
the
case
has
been
made
for
me
before
I
even
had
to
stand
up
here,
Thank
You
April
for
coming
down
and
talking
about
your
experience.
I
do
agree
with
you
that
I'm,
not
a
social
worker
nor
do
I
have
a
Social
Work
degree,
but
with
this
housing
stabilization
program,
I
have
a
caseload.
J
Now,
too,
people
are
calling
people
are
walking
into
Pittsburgh
United
that
don't
have
telephones
and
have
to
use
their
neighbor's
phones
to
access
this
program.
So
I
think
you
know
I'm
here
to
say
that
we
see
that
the
monies
are
being
quickly
depleted
from
the
house
of
stabilization
program
and
that
clearly,
the
need
is
greater
than
the
allocation
and
I
also
want
to
say
around
income
targets
that
we.
J
We
certainly
believe
that
30%
area
median
income,
which
is
the
income
targets
in
this
legislation,
matters
that
we
cannot
take
resources
from
those
that
need
it
the
most
and
if
other
resources
are
needed,
is
city,
budget
time.
I
think
that
the
money
should
be
found
and
some
other
priorities
there
and
we
did
cut
some
numbers
around
the
realty
transfer
tax
increase
and
it's
around
3
billion
dollars.
So
maybe
it
could
come
from
that
and
around
the
housing
stabilization
program.
J
As
you
votes
and
look
at
these
guidelines,
we,
you
know,
you
add
we
ask
that
you
look
at
it
with
you
know.
Some
empathy
we've
been
hearing
a
lot
from
folks
around
timeliness,
consistency,
giving
the
service
providers
the
tools
they
have
capacity
because
they
are
trying
to
do
this
work
and
they
don't
have
the
capacity
to
deal
with
the
need
that
is
here
on,
which
is
we
see,
is
very
great.
So
we
asked
for
that.
J
We
also
are
asking
if
we
can
get
some
answers
around
the
timeline
for
the
single
point
of
entry,
as
well
as
the
appeal
process
which
a
resident
did
come
down
and
testify
to
ask
about
so
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
that
this
housing
stabilization
program
is
very,
very,
very
important
that
people
at
30%
area
median
income
that
need
this
money,
as
we
can
see,
are
very
important
and
that
the
spirit
of
this
one
is
around
that.
So
thank
you.
J
K
It's
been
30
I've
been
working
in
this
housing
industry
for
almost
30
years
and
I'm,
so
grateful
that
there's
a
program
for
the
most
vulnerable,
for
there
hasn't
been
a
production
program
that
creates
new
housing,
that's
truly
affordable
in
30
years.
The
housing
that
we
have
the
housing
stock
that
we
currently
have
is
in
horrific
horrific
condition.
K
L
K
K
Around
affordability
that
I
have
not
been
on
top
of,
but
was
I,
asked
to
participate.
No,
you
picked
my
brain
for
the
planning
part.
Are
we
gonna
write
this
legislation?
We're
gonna
do
this
and
it's
alright
for
us
to
lend
our
knowledge,
but
when
it's
time
to
sit
at
a
table,
you
know
we
need
better
people
than
you
and
that's
what
it
felt
like.
M
So
I
want
to
kind
of
piggyback
off
a
couple
of
my
colleagues
here
who
spoke.
So
let's
talk
about
the
monies
being
depleted
quickly
for
the
housing
upper
housing
stabilization
program
and
that
the
30%
ami
matters
and
it's
not
just
for
black
and
brown
people
as
for
just
people
of
low
income
and
there
I
think
that
there
was
one
two
three
four
four
organizations
who
signed
up
for
the
housing
stabilization
program
I
have
been
calling
Macedonia
face:
YWCA
and
Urban
League
and
I've.
Only
gotten
I
think
I've
called
called
them.
M
Six
between
all
three
I've
got
one
phone
call
back
for
one
resident
and
that
particular
resident
didn't
meet
the
guidelines
and
regards
to
having
I
guess
a
job
she
shows
stabilization.
So
they
won't
get
back
into
the
situation
that
they're
and
I
want
to
say
that
I
think
that
the
the
four
organizations-
yes
they
mean
well,
they
they're.
You
know
they're
warm-hearted
with
trying
to
help,
but
I
just
think.
It's
not
enough.
M
Where
they're
in
need
of
these
services
and
they're
not
getting
the
help
that
they
need.
We
have
been
fighting
for
this
for
a
long
time.
This
is
still
a
continuation
of
previous
fights,
so
I
definitely
think
that
the
need
for
the
monies
needs
to
stay
at
a
30%
ami
below,
like
we
said
we're
in
20,000
units
shortage
of
affordable
housing.
M
So
we
need
to
help
those
people
that
are
in
need
of
these
resources
and
try
to
find
a
better
way
to
help
them
get
out
of
these
crises
that
they
have
so
hope.
Hopefully,
you'll.
Take
all
of
that
into
consideration
from
my
previous
colleagues
who
spoke
and
people
that
come
up
behind
me.
Thank
you.
Thank.
N
O
Born
thank
you
for
allowing
us
to
add
our
comments.
I
know,
there
are
changes
afoot
that
are
being
proposed
for
the
Housing
Opportunity
Fund.
Those
of
us
who
advocated
for
it
fought
pretty
hard
to
get
it
passed.
So
what
I
would
suggest
is
before
any
changes
are
implemented
that
you
allow
for
the
advocates
and
those
who
had
a
major
role
in
getting
the
fund
established
to
be
able
to
sit
down
with
the
Advisory
Board
and
with
the
URA
and
even
representatives
of
the
administration,
and
talk
about
how
to
be
very
strategic
in
implementing
any
changes.
O
One
example
is
there
was
the
idea
of
a
bond
issue
floated
back
when
the
fund
was
first
established.
The
idea
behind
a
bond
issue
would
be
to
create
a
fund
that
could
do
major
projects
much
more
readily
than
you
would
if
you
were
just
drawing
on
the
revenues
coming
in
to
the
Housing
Opportunity
fund
itself.
So
it
doesn't
have
to
be
a
large
bond
issue.
But
if
you
peeled
away
two,
maybe
two
and
a
half
million
of
whatever
the
annual
receipts
are
for
the
Housing
Opportunity
Fund.
O
You
could
probably
fund
a
twenty
five
to
thirty
million
dollar
bond
issue.
What
that
would
get
you
is
the
ability
to
do
some
homeownership
projects,
for
example,
that
would
feature
units
that
might
be
affordable
to
people
up
to
a
hundred
and
fifteen
percent
of
median
household
income,
while
at
the
same
time
allowing
for
development
of
affordable
for
sale
units.
So
in
a
sense
it
would
be
mixed.
Income
development
for
homeownership
I
know
that
a
number
of
neighborhoods
right
now
are
looking
very
seriously
at
homeownership.
O
I
know
in
Hazelwood,
I
know
when
the
hill
district
I
know
in
Larmour,
people
want
to
use
homeownership
to
help
build
long-lasting,
stable
communities.
So
again,
those
are
the
kind
of
ideas
that
will
come
out
if
we
have
an
opportunity
to
sit
down
on
on
the
table
together.
I
think
that
50
percent
of
median
household
income-
just
to
give
you
some
reference
point.
If
you
know
people
who
are
making
thirteen
fourteen
fifteen
dollars
an
hour-
and
they
are
a
family
of
three
or
four-
they
are
under
fifty
percent
of
median
household
income.
O
So
our
neighborhoods
right
now
are
filled
with
bus
drivers
with
medical
assistants
with
various
types
of
folks
who
are
working
40
hours
a
week
and
are
pulling
in
twenty
five,
thirty
thirty
five
thousand
dollars
a
year,
so
I
think
from
the
standpoint
of
the
Bloomfield
Garfield
corporation.
That
is
a
community
that
we
think
the
Housing
Opportunity
Fund
should
be
serving
first
and
foremost,
if
we
can
do
some
other
things
with
the
fund.
Fine,
but
let's
sit
down
together
and
talk.
Thank
you
thank.
P
My
name
is
Dave
bring
in
I'm
the
executive
director
at
Lawrenceville
United,
just
gonna
reiterate
some
points
for
my
colleagues
around
specifically
the
income
targets
and
why
the
Housing
Opportunity
Fund
for
us
in
Lawrenceville
is
important
and
and
why
those
income
targets
being
as
low
as
they
are,
we
think,
is
really
good
policy
for
for
us
and
Lawrenceville.
Obviously,
we
you
know:
gentrification
has
really
hit
our
community
hard.
One
statistic:
I'll
just
throw
issues
that
we've
lost
between
2011
and
2016.
P
We
lost
over
half
of
our
Housing
Choice
Voucher
units
in
the
neighbors
120
families
that
were
displaced
from
Lawrenceville.
We
know
that's
that
is
not
the
full
scale
of
it,
but
proportionally
I.
Think
there's
no
other
neighborhood,
that's
lost
as
many,
so
those
are
all
families
earning
below
50%
of
area,
immunity,
income!
That's
why
that
income
targeting
is
really
important,
and
that's
why
the
housing
stabilization
program
among
the
other
programs
are
really
important
to
us
in
Lawrenceville
also
on
the
homeownership
side.
P
So
we
think
a
lot
about
displacement
in
terms
of
rentals,
but
in
Lawrenceville
we
actually
have
a
really
significant
older
adult
population.
Many
of
them
bought
their
homes
for
20,000
35
years
ago,
and
they
are
have
fallen
prey
to
a
lot
of
the
flipping
and
investing
that's
happening
in
the
neighborhood.
So
you
know,
as
folks
transition
into
fixed
incomes
in
retirement
can't
keep
up
the
house
anymore.
P
We've
seen
a
lot
of
these
LLC's
kind
of
swooping
in
actually
targeting
them
for
300
complaints,
waiting
till
they
get
a
property
violation
and
then,
following
up
with
a
lowball
offer
on
their
house,
a
cash
offer
on
their
house
for
way
under
its
value.
So
our
older
adults
are
really
vulnerable
to
even
folks
who
own
their
home.
So
that's
why
the
home
repair
program
is
really
important
to
us.
We
currently
have
a
waiting
list
of
twenty
seniors.
P
All
homeowners
who
need
home
repairs
that
absent
the
Housing
Opportunity
Fund
in
the
home
repair
program
would
not
be
served
by
any
of
the
existing
programs.
So
it's
been
a
really
important
program
for
us
there.
There
are
adjustments.
I
think
we
can
make
it
process
things
to
improve
it,
but
just
even
in
terms
of
Lawrenceville,
we
we
feel
like
those
income
targets
really
important
and
and
the
Housing
Opportunity
Fund
has
been
something
that's
really
important
to
our
community.
Thanks.
P
Q
Hopefully,
you
know
that
everyone
around
the
table
will
consider
that
this
is
an
opportunity,
because
it's
named
housing
opportunity
so
just
make
it
continue
to
be
an
opportunity
for
all
people
that
need
housing,
especially
since
housing
is
a
human
right
and
without
housing,
most
people
won't
be
able
to
maintain
their
children's
future,
their
future
or
the
next
generations
future.
Afterwards,
spanking
Thank.
R
I
We
all
know
we
need
more.
We
should
be
pushing
to
double
this
fund.
This
is
what
Philadelphia
has
already
done,
and
a
lot
of
other
cities.
We
we
all
know
before
when
we
were
when,
when
you
all-
and
everyone
in
the
crowd
was
trying
to
come
together
to
push
this
fund,
we
knew
that
10
million
was
never
going
to
be
enough.
That
was
never
the
original
plan.
It
was
always.
This
is
a
first
step.
This
is
one
tool.
These
are
different
programs.
They
attack
different
issues.
It's
not
enough.
I
We
need
more,
we
need
it
as
soon
as
we
can
get
it
again.
As
Miss
Freneau
said
this
is
budget
season.
We
need
to
be
pushing
for
the
city
to
put
more
into
this
fund
amongst
other
programs
for
renters
for
Vick
Vick
ssin
prevention
programs
habitability
all
of
this
homelessness
issues.
This
is
all
happening
right
now
and
we
should
be
trying
to
tackle
it
and
ten
million
dollars
just
won't
cut
in.
So.
Thank
you
all.
Thank.
A
S
T
T
A
A
Okay,
everybody
Richard
Morris
from
the
Urban
League
is
on
the
phone
as
well
later
in
the
agenda.
We're
gonna
discussion,
an
action
that
is
related
to
the
Urban
League,
but
Richard.
We
just
heard
public
comment
and
we
just
took
roll
call
and
I
do
know
that
your
time
is
sensitive.
So
I
am
wondering
if
you
can
maybe
go
ahead
and
provide
public
comment
right
now
and
then,
if
you
can
stay
on
the
line
and
when
we
get
to
your
item
in
another
30
minutes-
that's
great.
But
if
you
can't
I
understand
that
too.
K
A
S
A
S
A
It
was
presented
to
you
eres
board
and
we
did
list
as
a
contingency
in
you
are
a
board
item
about
the
deed
restrictions,
a
99-year
deed
restriction.
So
if,
for
whatever
reason,
they
cannot
have
the
99-year
deed
restriction,
we
will
bring
it
back
to
this
advisory.
Okay,
thank
and
so
so.
We
can
just
put
that
modification
into
acceptance
of
the
minutes
that
we
will
add
a
sentence
about
Citysearch
coming
back.
I
A
Motion
carries
I'm
super
excited
to
announce
that
we
have
three
new
faces
at
the
advisory
board.
Knowledge
Hudson
is
the
Housing
Authority
representative
Kelly,
where
she
burn
is
to
fair
housing,
representative
and
Megan.
Winters
is
the
western
neighborhood
representative,
guys
wanna,
introduce
yourself
and
like
two
or
three
sentences.
L
Morning,
my
name
is
knowledge:
Bill
Hudson
I'm,
with
the
housing
authority
city
of
Pittsburgh
for
the
last
two
and
a
half
years.
Although
I've
done
a
lot
of
some
work
in
the
community,
around
advocacy
for
housing
and
I
worked
on
the
alarm
of
consensus,
work
with
the
larva
consensus
group
as
a
volunteer
for
the
thirty
million
dollar
project
that
took
place
so
I
have
experience
from
the
community
side
and
experience
from
the
Housing
Authority
side
and
I'm
learning
so
I'm
here
to
listen
and
learn
and
be
available
piece
right.
U
U
Lack
of
a
better
term
in
before
law,
school
and
brief
stint
law
student
with
a
judge
and
Family
Division
I
was
working
for
a
CDC
in
Homewood.
So,
while
I
may
not
have
exactly
some
of
the
Fair
Housing
qualifications
on
paper,
I
do
consider
myself
to
be
an
advocate
of
fair
and
equitable
housing
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
and
I.
Look
forward
to
working
with
anyone
and
everyone,
including
J,
to
make
sure
that
we
can
do
the
best
work
possible
here.
Thank,
You,
Megan.
F
I
actually
have
a
request,
so
we
were
in
a
very
interesting
situation.
Last
week
we
have
three
families
in
crisis
each
needing
a
three-bedroom
unit,
so
we
have
three
three
bedrooms
that
we
are
in
need
of.
We
had
a
landlord
lined
up,
we
had
units
lined
up,
and
unfortunately
there
were
cash
renters
that
materialized
last
minute
and
took
all
three
units.
Students
are
back
in
school,
so
the
markets
incredibly
tight.
F
These
were
all
students
that
were
displaced
because
of
issues
with
their
unit
when
they
got
to
the
city,
so
they
certainly
needed
housing
as
well,
but
we
now
have
three
families
who
are
desperately
in
need
of
housing
as
quickly
as
possible.
So
if
you
have
access
to
a
three-bedroom
unit
in
this
city
and
are
willing
to
work
with
section
8
and
this
and
the
hof
housing
stabilization
program
funds,
these
folks
will
come
with
their
first
month's
rent
and
security,
deposit
and
rental
assistance,
so
I'm
just
putting
the
word
out
there.
F
If
anyone
has
a
three-bedroom
unit
in
the
city
on
these
are
folks
that
would
really
like
to
stay
urban.
The
preferences
are
the
hill
district,
East
Liberty
Oakland
and
the
Southside,
but
there
is
some
flexibility
and
folks
would
like
to
be
in
the
city.
If
you
do
have
a
three-bedroom,
Adrian
wanna,
please
see
me
again:
we
thought
we
had
these
units
locked
down
but
come
Friday.
They
disappeared.
So
we
really
need
your
help.
If
you
know
of
anyone
anything
any
possibility,
I
will
track
it
down
and.
A
And
I
would
also
like
to
add
real
quickly
to
that
for
confidentiality
purposes.
I
can't
12
into
it,
but
these
three
family
suffer
and
crisis
was
actually
part
of
a
Archer
crisis
and
the
Housing
Opportunity
Fund
has
actually
worked
with
seven
other
families
and
helped
them
through
this
crisis,
and
so
I
do
want
to
thank
the
stabilization
providers.
I
think
all
four
of
them
have
worked
with
these
families
and
I
want
to
thank.
You
are
a
staff
at
inna,
Hagan
and
Jamie
Risa
as
well,
for
helping
to
coordinate
that
situation.
A
A
W
W
So
it
was
really
about
what
do
we
do
to
make
sure
that
the
money
that's
not
going
out
or
were
we
the
most
need
can
be
dealt
with
as
well,
so
just
a
conversation
about
what
are
the?
What
are
the
limits?
What
do
they
look
like
if
we
would
have
raised
them,
get
more
people
into
the
system,
and
we
were
to
do
that?
The
more
stabilized!
More
neighborhoods
and
really
just
how
do
we
streamline
the
processes
of
getting
more
money
out
the
door
which
is
really
the
broader
goal
in
that
interest?
W
We
acknowledge
that
you
can't
do
it
without
community,
so
we
did
have
some
conversation
with
advocates
around
discussing
this
conversation.
Saying
hey,
you
know
we're
thinking
these
kind
of
things,
seeing
how
the
money's
going
out
the
door
who
got
some
feedback
from
from
advocates,
still
looking
for
some
more
feedback
and
we're
also
willing
to
continue
to
have
conversations.
W
The
goal
really
is
to
say:
how
do
we
get
the
resources
to
people
that
need
them
in
the
variety
of
different
income
limits,
whether
it
be
thirty
sixty
eighty,
because
again,
as
our
city
changes,
the
broader
context
of
those
who
need
resources
is
broadening
as
well,
and
obviously
this
is
done
layered
on
top
of
other
resources.
So
we
know
that
this
10
million
as
well-meaning
as
it
is
can't
begin
to
touch
the
the
broader
need
of
what
people
have.
W
But
it's
also
about
saying,
if
you
have
this,
according
to
all
the
other
resources
that
are
out
there,
some
of
which
that
are
going
falling
away
and
some
which
that
are
being
there
and
some
reserved
resources
that
you
know,
for
example,
building
more
affordable
housing
and
getting
5ly
tech
bills.
This
year
like
when
you
look
at
all
those
kind
of
things,
what
can
we
try
to
do
to
get
the
most
people
housed
and
meet
the
most
need
and.
A
I
will
say
to
our
homeowner
Assistance
Program.
We
are
finding
like
here
the
income
guidelines
right
here
so
right
now,
our
program,
with
the
exception
of
a
small
water
and
sewer
set-aside
of
250,000.
Everything
else
for
the
program
is
50%
ami
or
below.
So
you
can
see
for
a
family
of
two.
That's
that's
$32,000
and
if
there
is
a
family
of
two
making
like
$15
an
hour,
apiece
they're
just
slightly
over
that.
A
W
And
I
just
say
add
on
that:
yeah
I
think
the
conversation
around
you
know
the
folks
were
really
isolated
is
one
part
of
the
equation.
But
then
we
have
working
poor
folks
and
folks
who
are
just
on
the
cusp
to
your
point
of
being
able
to
think
about
buying
housing
and
being
able
to
stabilize
themselves
and
stabilizing
neighborhoods.
They
may
not
be
able
to
have
access
according
to
the
current
numbers,
I
just.
X
Want
to
add
that
in
a
neighborhood
like
mine
and
like
the
Upper
Hill,
you
have
a
lot
of
homeowners
that
are
between
50
and
80
percent
ami,
who
could
lose
their
homes
because
they
can't
access
this
fund
to
their
home,
their
homes
they
own,
affordable.
So
I
think
that
we
really
need
to
be
cognizant
of
that,
because
we
don't
want
to
create
an
issue
where
we
have
homeowners
that
are
in
relatively
stable
housing.
But
if
the
roof
goes,
you
know
they
can't.
X
A
What
I
would
like
to
say
kind
of
just
about
the
status
is,
you
know,
we've
started
to
talk
about
some
revisions.
You
started
to
talk
to
some
of
the
advocacy
groups
about
it.
It
is
the
role
of
the
advisory
board
to
uphold
the
legislation.
If,
if
any
advisory
board
members
have
comments
about
the
drafting
of
the
legislation
police,
you
know
email
them
so
and
then
send
them
to
me
at
the
URA,
and
you
know
we
will.
We
will
review
your
comments
and
share
your
comments,
but
that's
kind
of
where
we
are
right
now
is.
S
I
think
it's
always
gonna
be
attempting
to
raise
the
income
limits
so
that
we
can
include
more
people.
I
think
this
was
aggressively
targeted
to
those
most
vulnerable.
It
was
actually
think
HR
na
said
really
gave
us
a
lot
of
kudos
for
that,
because
that's
so
challenging,
because
there's
so
much
temptation
to
expand
the
pool
and
I
think
that
there's
something
we
could
look
at
I,
don't
think
we
should
be
moving
any
money
away
for
the
most
vulnerable,
but
with
those
home
repairs
make
them
eligible
up
higher
and
after
loan
resources
are
exhausted.
S
A
And
we
are
looking
at
ways
right
now
to
to
look
at
you
know
all
funding
sources
and
also
even
the
staffing
of
the
ura
and
trying
to
get
programs
to
kind
of
go
together.
I
mean
we
would
love
to
have
you
know
one
homeowner
repair
program,
so
people
out
there
don't
need
to
worry
about
the
different
names
for
different
things
and
so
on
and
and
we're
having
those
discussions
right
now
as
well.
Yeah
I.
A
Getting
it
out
of
folks,
you
can
a
slide.
I
know
we
had
a
slide
last
month.
That
kind
of
showed
some
of
the
statistics
on
that
I.
Do
we
have?
We
don't
have
that's
why
this
month,
but
we
can,
we
can
get
that
and
we
can
also
send
that
to
the
entire
advisory
board
or
the
number
that
have
applied
for
the
program
and
who's
been
turned
down
and
their
reasons
and
and
the
reasons
for
turndowns
are
there
above
income
or
if
they're,
not
current
under
taxes,
or
their
name
is
not
on
the
deed.
Y
A
C
A
I
mean
it's
mostly
above
50%,
because
the
way
the
legislation
reads
right
now
is
25%
can
go
at
80,
but
it's
very
specific
that
that
be
for
home
ownership
and
the
way
the
last
couple
allocation
plans
have
gone.
That's
pretty
much
between
the
CDC
for
sale
program
and
the
down
payment,
closing
cost
that
takes
up
that
full
25%.
R
Just
to
add
on
some
wanted
to
get
that
clarity
first,
I
do
agree
that,
especially
especially
with
the
H
AP
program.
It
makes
sense
to
consider
accepting
folks
at
a
higher
income
level,
but
I
think.
As
we
heard
from
a
comment
earlier,
it
reinforces
the
need
to
be
not
waiting
but
aggressively
looking
now
to
find
more
sources
so
that
we
don't
really
affect
those
that
are
at
this
level
that
we're
currently
serving.
But
we
find
more
sources
to
be
able
to
expand
that
reach.
D
S
A
S
Z
I
would
just
say:
did
this
is
some
new
study
that's
been
done.
That
shows
that
the
need
is
and
at
the
very
low,
extremely
low
income
limits.
I,
don't
think
so,
and
that's
what
we
went
through
for
two
years
with
the
task
force,
that's
where
the
need
is,
is
30
percent
or
below,
where
somebody
might
be
having
a
problem,
but
somebody's
really
got
a
crisis
at
30
percent
or
less
so
before
we
change
a
lot
of
that
stuff.
I
would
certainly
like
to
see
how
we're
doing
on
the
first
two
years
of
allocation.
Z
My
sense
is
that
we're
not
having
trouble
spending
the
money.
We
might
have
some
administrative
things
with
how
how
some
of
the
service
providers
or
how
some
of
the
providers
are
getting
to
know
the
ropes
and
then
those
are
some
things
that
we
should
be
looking
at
is
what
are
the
kind
of
bureaucratic
hurdles
were
putting
in
the
path
of
those
providers
and
and
really
I?
Z
So
to
me,
that's
another
three
million,
that's
that's
found
money
and
we
should
be
at
least
those
of
us
who
want
to
advocate
and
who
have
advocated
for
this
table
to
exist
in
these
funds
to
exist
should
be
pushing
on
our
leaders
and
elected
officials
to
put
more
money
into
the
Housing
Opportunity
Fund,
and
then
the
third
comment
is
I
still
don't
have
a
great
sense,
with
homeowner
Assistance
Programs.
What
all
the
URA
operates.
I
saw
one
presentation
at
the
at
the
large
meeting
we
had
over
in
the
new.
Z
Z
If
we
do
get
to
the
point
that
we're
changing
these
things,
where
we're
going
over
that
fifty
percent,
those
should
be
loan
funds,
they
should
be
paid
back
in
and
recycled,
and
we
should
have
a
say
in
how
those
funds
that
would
be
one
of
my
comments
is
is
if
we
have
to
go
that
way,
I'm
not
sure
we
do
need
to
be
there
and
then
I
guess.
The
last
comment
is
again:
keep
in
mind
what
the
Mullen
alarm,
the
long
Lonergan
study
outlined,
where
the
real
crisis
is
in
Pittsburgh
and
again,
I.
Z
X
X
All
right
so
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
there
was
no
discussion
about
you
know
somehow
diverting
funds
away
from
the
most
vulnerable
to
help
those
who
are
also
vulnerable.
These
are
in
two
different
lines
of
line
items
addressing
two
completely
different
conditions:
people
for
HSP.
We
need
to
be
focusing
on
the
very
the
most
vulnerable.
That's
why
they
need
a
resource
like
this
on
the
affordable,
homeownership
front,
I'm,
asking
that
we
rethink
what
it
means
to
be
a
homeowner
in
an
affordable
unit
in
need
of
critical
repairs
and,
if
you're,
at
52%
AMI.
X
X
A
Y
A
We're
talking
I
think,
there's
good
questions
here.
So
so
HSP
is
a
program
it
is
allocated.
It
is
in
the
2018
and
2019
allocation
plan
and
when
this
Advisory
Board
gets
together
to
talk
about
2020,
he
will
allocate
and
amount
to
HSP.
So
nothing
we're
talking
about
will
affect
that.
There
is
some
discussion
of
to
diamantes
point
that
52%,
am
I
household
not
being
able
to
participate
in
a
HOF
funded
program?
There's
some
discussion
about
that,
especially
on
the
home
owners
side
of
the
equation.
So.
A
X
T
X
Hsp
because
HSP
is
50%,
am
are
below,
and
I'm
not
saying
to
change
that.
I'm
just
saying
that
if
we
don't
think
about
what
we're
doing
on
the
homeownership
side,
we're
gonna
have
this
problem
and
we
don't
have
another
program
that
can
effectively
address
that
and
these
people
are
in
the
very
low,
low-income
bracket.
F
R
F
Something
interesting
that
I'm
hearing
is
a
thread
is
if
we
really
thought
about
a
component
of
hof
being
geared
toward
preservation
and
preservation
in
a
very
broad
conceptual
way.
If,
as
you
said,
if
you
have
a
homeowner
who
has
an
affordable
home
and
it's
just
a
repair
that
would
take
them
out
of
an
affordable
home
and
make
that
home
unaffordable,
then
that
could
be
a
place
where
there
may
be
some
flexible
pot
where
we
would
say
based
on
an
individual
evaluation.
It's
part
of
a
preservation
strategy
in.
A
X
X
Homeowner
that
is
removed
from
that
home
a
speculator
will
then
buy
that
house
and
then
sell
it
for
market
value,
and
so
it
will
not
be
in
a
foreign
unit.
I
mean
that
that's
the
issue,
that's
the
crisis,
then
somebody's
going
to
turn
it
into
student
housing
and
make
a
boatload
of
money.
And
now
you
have
this
family
out
there
that
what
minor
repairs
could
have
potentially
still
remained
in
their
home.
I
think.
A
A
Agree
with
that
I
will
I
will
hold
a
session
for
advisory
board
members
over
the
course
of
the
next
month.
Probably
in
like
two
weeks
where
we
go
through
all
that
I
I
will
state
that
there
are
changes
happening
at
the
ura
and
the
homeowner
programs
are
all
going
to
come
under
center
for
housing
opportunities.
A
A
Okay,
okay,
thank
you
and
so
we're
gonna
have
to
move
on
to
agenda
because
we
have
Angela
from
the
United
Way
here
and
a
couple
other
people
that
that
need
to
speak
about
HSP.
But
if
people
have
any
other
questions
concerns
comments.
Please
please
email
me!
That's
just
you
know
just
a
discussion
that
we've
we've
been
having.
So
thank
you.
Okay,
so
on
to
HSP
the
major
topic
of
the
day.
A
Z
M
Z
A
A
F
So
I'm
gonna
take
a
really
quick,
walk
down
memory
lane
because,
as
we've
been
sitting
here,
I
actually
processing
in
my
head
over
my
career,
thus
far
I
have
launched
19
rental
assistance
programs.
Eight
of
them
were
my
own
conception
and
were
funded
by
sources
that
had
never
been
used
before.
Four
of
them
are
with
governmental
partners,
and
what
I
can
tell
everyone
in
this
room
is
every
single
one
of
them
was
painful,
confusing,
inadequate,
frustrating
mind-numbing
in
the
beginning,
because
it's
incredibly
difficult
to
do
it's
incredibly
difficult
to
put
an
appropriate
infrastructure
in
place.
F
That
is
responsive.
That
removes
barriers
that
is
respectful
of
the
funder
that
meets
all
the
regulatory
requirements.
So
this
is
hard
stuff
and
I.
Don't
know
that
any
of
us,
even
thinking
about
I've,
done
19
in
these
programs
I'm,
not
an
expert
and
I'm,
not
perfect
at
it.
So
I
think
we're
feeling
a
lot
of
those
growing
as
we
are
launching
into
this
prong
of
what
the
HOF
is
doing.
F
There
are
many
different
types
of
rental
assistance
programs
that
are
being
done
and
that
we
could
do
what
we
decided
as
a
group
for
2018
funds
was
that
we
were
going
to
really
focus
on
folks
who
were
in
crisis,
but
not
yet
in
the
homeless
system,
not
yet
evicted.
So
we
were
going
to
try
to
get
folks
prior
to
being
in
those
systems.
F
We
were
going
to
try
to
help
assess
folks
for
the
right
level
of
care
for
them
the
right
level
of
rental
support,
and
so
some
folks
need
just
a
little
bit
of
rental
support,
and
some
folks
need
a
really
wide
deep
array
of
rental
support.
We
were
really
focused
on
a
more
shallow
and
more
short-term
amount
of
support
for
families
who
are
in
crisis,
but
could
relatively
quickly
recover
from
that
crisis.
F
With
that
small
amount
of
support
does
that
support
every
household
that
needs
rental
assistance,
absolutely
not,
but
for
just
2018
and
just
those
service
providers
who
have
already
been
contracted
and
they
are
under
contract.
That's
what
we're
looking
at.
We
are
looking
at
folks,
50
percent
of
AMI
and
under,
and
why?
Because,
in
the
overall
legislation,
we
had
percentages
that
needed
to
go
to
each
group
and
we
all
wanted
to
prioritize
lower
income
households
that
would
have
more
difficulty
getting
the
resources
that
they
needed
to
stabilize
in
their
housing.
F
This
is
only
Pittsburgh
residents
and
I
know
from
being
at
some
of
the
groups.
Some
folks
don't
even
realize
if
they
are
a
Pittsburgh
resident,
it
can
be
really
confusing.
If
you're
on
the
cusp
of
a
neighborhood
is
your
unit
in
the
city
or
is
it
not
so
it's
just
Pittsburgh
neighbors.
We
can
do
again
that
more
shallow
short-term
infusion
of
support
to
help
folks
stabilize
an
household.
So
what
does
that
mean?
F
That
means
that
someone
owes
arrears
or
owes
future
rent
or
utilities,
but
has
the
ability,
the
resources
throughout
their
network
to
be
able
to
move
forward
without
an
ongoing
subsidy.
If
this
is
a
household
that
needs
a
deeper
subsidy
or
more
resources,
it's
our
due
diligence
to
make
sure
they
get
to
a
program
that
can
give
them
that
level
of
support.
So
we
just
wanted
to
take
that
minute
to
kind
of
regroup
and
retool
back
to
that
original
thinking.
Is
that
what
we
have
to
do
every
year?
F
No,
could
we
think
of
15
different,
incredible
rental
solutions
we
could,
but
for
the
2018
funds
we
know
it's
gotten
off
to
a
rocky
start,
but
we
know
that
there's
a
demand,
even
for
this
shorter
term
subsidy
for
the
folks,
50%
and
below
who
are
in
a
crisis,
but
not
yet
through
eviction
or
in
the
homeless
system.
So
what
we're
hearing
is?
We
actually
have
more
people
than
resources
which
we
all
anticipated
would
happen.
F
It
breaks
my
heart
to
see
people
come
for
a
resource
that
they're
not
eligible
for
that's
horrible
when
you're
in
crisis.
That
should
not
be
something
that
you've
ever
experienced.
I
think
one
of
the
things
we
can
do
as
a
advisory
board
going
forward
is
figuring
out
those
mechanisms
to
help
people
connect
with
the
resources
that
really
can
support
them,
and
we
don't
do
a
great
job
of
that
in
our
community.
F
So
one
of
our
partners
who's
here
today,
who's
going
to
talk
to
us
about
doing
a
better
job
about
that
is
Angela
Reynolds
and
she
and
United
Way,
and
our
partners
at
the
Department
of
Human
Services
can
do
exactly
what
we
were
just
talking
about.
How
can
we
know
the
resources
better?
How
can
we
make
the
linkages
and
how
can
we
push
this
fund
up
against
other
funds
so
that
we
have
a
seamless
system
of
services
for
folks
and
they
don't
have
to
know
or
understand
that
were
different
entities?
F
A
AA
Thank
you
so
Angela
Reynolds
I'm
with
the
United
Way
of
southwestern
Pennsylvania.
That
includes
an
initiative
which
is
PA
to
one
one
southwest
it's
a
helpline,
and
so
the
first
thing
to
notice
that
too
one
one
that
we
operate
is
it
operates,
24/7
it's
available
by
phone
text
and
chat,
and
so
what
we're
proposing
to
do
here
is
have
two
on
one
serve
as
somewhat
of
a
centralized
intake.
AA
But
then
what
about
those
households
that
aren't
eligible
so
I
have
been
hearing
that
there
are
some
who
are
calling
our
agency
partners
for
the
housing
stabilization
program
who
don't
live
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
so
too,
when
one
is
able
to
then
recognize
they're
not
eligible
for
HSP,
but
because
of
the
resources
that
we
have
in
our
database.
What
are
some
of
those
other
programs
for
which
they
would
be
eligible
and
if
they're
in
Allegheny
County,
the
United
Way
actually
has
an
emergency
basic
needs
fund
which
could
support
those
households?
AA
The
other
piece
that
I
want
to
mention
is
that
for
the
United
Way's
emergency
basic
needs
fund,
its
income
guidelines
are
higher
and
so
being
able
to
catch
those
households
that
are
at
the
fifty
to
sixty
percent
that
you
were
noting,
and
actually
we
go
over
a
hundred
percent
at
the
United
Way.
So
that's
the
the
first
piece
of
it.
AA
The
more
nitty-gritty
detail
of
it
is
that
you
have
four
agency
partners,
three
of
whom
are
already
part
of
our
secure
database,
and
so
we
would
work
with
the
fourth
partner
to
make
sure
that
they're
into
it.
So
we
take
confidentiality
very
serious.
To
one
line
is
this
confidential
service?
We
don't
share
information
and
unless
we
have
the
permission
of
the
person
who's
calling
so
with
their
permission,
we
would
be
able
to
seamlessly
share
their
information.
AA
The
answers
to
their
questions
with
the
agency
partner,
so
the
agency
partner,
is
focused
on
getting
that
person
to
the
HSP
assistance,
getting
the
the
unit
inspected
going
through
that
process.
So
they
really
are
doing
the
case
management
as
opposed
to
doing
this.
That
pre-screening,
which
many
of
them
are
doing
now,
that's
taking
a
lot
of
time.
So
we
would
like
to
be
able
to
support
the
agencies
and
also
have
this
process
be
more
efficient.
AA
The
last
portion
of
this
is
our
reporting,
so
we
would
be
able
to
report
to
the
URA
into
this
advisory
board,
one
not
only
the
volume
of
contacts
that
we're
seeing,
but
then
also
for
those
who
are
not
eligible.
What
are
the
referrals
that
are
being
made,
even
though,
like
you'll
definitely
have
the
referrals
that
are
being
made
to
the
HSP
program,
but
then
it
gives
you
a
fuller
picture
of
the
resources
that
are
available
for
those
households
that
you
aren't
able
to
serve
so
I
can
take
that's
a
really
quick
overview.
AA
AA
We,
outside
of
there
are
two
different
pieces
here,
so
United
Way
of
southwestern
PA
operates
PA
one
one
Southwest,
so
we
are
the
operator
for
that
system
within
that
system.
Those
are
our
employees
and
we
work
with
agency
partners
for
the
emergency
basic
needs
fund
that
I
mentioned,
and
we
also
have
a
partnership
with
Allegheny
link
so
for
those
households
that
need
to
be
connected
to
the
link,
we
don't
duplicate
the
links
services.
AA
F
Is
there's
a
whole
cadre
of
United
Way
providers?
Many
of
them
do
the
supports
that
folks
need
so
angela
has
that
direct
connect
to
those
providers
they're
already
engaged
with
United
Way
they're
already
2-1-1
partners.
So
again
you
get
access
more
quickly
to
a
group
of
folks.
You
know
Angela
and
her
team
know
those
programs
really
intimately
and
can
make
really
great
warm
handoffs
to
those
programs.
Does.
AA
Do
in
some
cases-
yes
in
some
cases,
no
so,
for
example,
all
they're
a
partner
with
the
link.
We
don't
fund
the
link
through
the
Department
of
Human
Services
and
we
do
fund
our
partners
who
are
with
the
emergency
basic
needs
fund
that
I
mentioned,
and
that
is
eight
I.
Think
what
I
believe
we're
up
to
eight
agency
partners
for
for
that.
Do.
Z
Z
T
F
S
S
S
AA
So
the
way
we're
currently
structured,
if
we
so
we
as
being
two
of
one
so
just
imagine
that
I
have
two
parts
to
me,
one
of
which
is
two
one
one.
So
if
two
on
one
receives
a
contact
from
someone
who
is
about
to
be
evicted
and
is
facing
a
housing
crisis,
we
look
at
the
situation
of
the
household
and
find
the
appropriate
resource
for
them.
So
in
some
cases
the
most
appropriate
would
be
going
to
one
of
our
emergency
basic
needs.
Fund
partners.
I
AA
We
will
provide
that
as
a
referral
another
appropriate
with
the
like
a
knee-length
depending
on
the
qualifications
of
the
household.
It
really
depends
on
the
situation,
so
two
on
one
is
asking
those
questions
to
make
sure
that
we're
getting
people
to
the
to
the
right
place.
The
difference
here
for
what
we're
proposing
for
the
housing
stabilization
program
is
that
we
would
not
be
saying
call
this
number,
rather,
with
their
permission,
we'll
be
putting
that
information
into
our
database.
AA
The
agency
partner
then
comes
into
our
database
to
retrieve
that
information,
so
they
are
already
seeing
basic
characteristics
of
the
person
and
they
are
able
to
contact
them
back,
so
they
could
come
in
the
office
and
we
could
have
handled
the
call
at
one
o'clock
in
the
morning
as
opposed
to
them
having
it
on
their
answering
machine.
So.
R
So
typically
you're
correct,
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
you're
a
connector
to
other
resources,
but
in
this
case
you're
actually
helping
the
process
process
their
application
by
putting
it
in
a
system,
and
is
that
correct
in
this
second?
Is
there
a
follow
up
to
ensure
that
they
were
actually
served?
Do
you
you
know,
follow
them
through
the
process,
or
is
it
once
they're
sent
they're
handed
off
it's
kind
of
out
of
your
hands.
This.
AA
Is
something
that
I
would
like
for
us
to
discuss
with
the
URA?
So
the
way
we
currently
have
it
proposed
for
the
HSP
program
is
that
we
would
put
that
information
in
an
any
agency
partner.
It
would
take
that
record
and
I
believe
you
have
your
own
database
that
they
would
be
entering
that
into
so
these
two
databases
are
not
talking.
We
actually
have
a
program
for
the
United
Way.
AA
That's
called
an
integrator
referral
network
where
we
do
all
of
it,
so
we
actually
see
it
from
front
to
end
so
the
agency
partners
are
putting
in
the
case
notes,
so
we
can
actually
see
that
this
individual
was
assisted.
That's
a
separate
program
that
we
have
which
could
be
modeled
here,
it's
it
would
be
a
different
proposal,
so
you
would
have
to
discuss
that
right.
Right.
A
So
so
in
your
packet
and
I
did
not
email
this
yesterday,
because
it's
kind
of
hot
off
the
presses,
but
the
last
part
of
your
packet
is
a
proposal
from
the
United
Way,
so
so
for
right
now
we're
talking
about
that
first
half
of
the
services
but
Angela
correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong
here
you,
you
will
send
an
e
so
that
that
these
requests
can
be
date
and
stamped
and
logged
in
to
each
provider.
Actually.
AA
Their
day
and
stamped
in
our
database
system,
so
our
database
system
of
record
includes
the
time
that
the
contact
was
received.
It
will
also
include
when
that
information
was
passed
on
to
the
service
provider,
and
then
we
will
also
then
work
with
those
agency
partners
to
see
when
they
actually
picked
picked
up
a.
AA
A
So
so
it
is
and
she
in
her
proposal,
she's
discussing
a
fee
per
call
and
and
I
actually
asked
just
a
typical.
You
are
a
protocol
that
can
be
capped
at
a
flat
fee
right
now
which
which
Angela
agreed
to
of
$9,000.
However,
she
is
going
to
be
tracking
it
by
call,
and
if
it
does
call
volume
is
higher
than
anticipated.
A
You
know
we
will
need
to
rediscover
budget
board
and
you
are
a
board
potentially
with
an
amendment
a
contract,
but
we
wanted
to
be
in
a
position
to
get
United
Way
started
quickly,
because
you
know
we.
We
are
hearing
from
folks
that
people
are
needing
to
call
all
for
providers
and
they're
all
running
their
different
waiting
lists
right
now.
So
it
really
is
critical.
Time-Sensitive
crucial
to
to
get
this
in
place
immediately.
Andand
agenda.
C
F
AA
Want
to
clarify
the
option
1
versus
option
2,
so
in
terms
of
the
discussions
that
I
had
with
with
Jessica
the
option
to
just
basically
requires
that
fourth
partner
being
willing
to
use
our
database
3
of
the
partners
are
already
in.
So
for
us.
It
would
not
take
that
much
for
us
to
launch
the
fourth
partner,
but
they
have
to
agree
to
do
it
and.
AA
A
R
AA
That
the
basic
full
integrated
network
is
actually
a
an
additional
software
package,
so
we
would
have
to
get
license
agreements.
We
would
actually
have
to
look
in
into
that
in
terms
of
the
cost
structure
of
what
it
would
take
for
each
one
of
them
to
get
a
license
into
that
particular
system
right
now.
It's
just
a
matter
of
coming
into
our
database
and
pulling
it
out
as
opposed
to
a
an
add-on
to
our
database
and.
AA
R
To
get
this
moving,
so
let's
do
that,
but
the
reason
I'm
asking
is
because,
if
we're
trying
to
coordinate
it
so
that
you
know
each
agency
is
getting
calls,
we
should
be
coordinating
the
whole
thing.
So
maybe
we
start
with
this,
but
look
at
you
know,
coordinating
the
whole
system
and
I.
If
you
don't
have
that
information
today,
if
you
can
get
that
to
us,
so
we
can
look
at
what
it
would
look
like
to
coordinate
the
whole
system.
I
can.
A
Do
that
I'm
completely
fine
with
that
I
mean
whoever
makes
the
resolute
resolution
here
resolution.
That's
not
the
word
motion.
Thank
you
for
the
contract
with
United
Way
I
mean
they
can
put
that
on
as
an
addendum.
We
just
weren't
ready
for
it
today
and
it
was
just
time
sensitive
that
we
get
this
going.
A
AA
W
A
The
motion
would
be
said
to
enter
into
a
contract
for
an
initial
amount
up
to
nine
thousand
dollars
for
that
for
them
to
provide
coordinated
entry
services
in
accordance
with
their
proposal
with
the
addition
of
the
you
are,
a
staff
will
will
work
with
them
over
the
upcoming
months
to
figure
out
a
Angela.
What's
the
wording
for
a
larger
like
the
second
part
of
the
services,
it's
just.
K
A
Second
Kelly
so
majestic
made
the
motion
Kelly
seconded
all
those
in
favor
hi.
Anybody
opposed
or
abstain.
Okay
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
The
other
motion.
Let's
just
do
the
other
sort
of
motions
that
we
we
have
while
we
have
a
full
advisory
board
sitting
here
is
the
other,
the
other
kind
of
part.
In
addition
to
coordinated
entry,
there
really
seem
to
be
two
steps
needed
to
try
to
make
this
program
more
successful
and
the
other
part
of
that
is
the
service
providers.
A
A
F
Yes,
so
you
might
have
a
fiscal
person.
Unfortunately,
in
the
nonprofit
realm,
like
your
fiscal
person,
would
be
considered
overhead,
not
part
of
the
program
cost.
So
if
you
think
about
the
agency's
cutting
50
checks,
100
checks,
150
checks,
that
component
wouldn't
necessarily
be
covered
by,
what's
considered.
A
Over
admin,
so
what
they're
getting
currently
on
their
contracts
is
for
anything
other
than
actual
money,
going
to
help
that
client
pay
their
rent
or
pay
their
utilities
or
their
security
deposit
is
only
10
percent
of
their
contract
amount.
So
if
someone
has
a
$200,000
contract,
that's
$20,000!
If
someone
has
a
$100,000
contract,
that's
$10,000!
That
is
not
enough,
even
for
a
part-time
person,
answering
telephones
for
the
program,
so
the
proposal
on
the
table
today
is
twofold.
A
One
is
because
the
2019
hof
funds
are
available
at
this
point.
At
the
rate
that
people
are
spending
through
their
contracts,
they
will
have
their
2018
contracts,
probably
expended
in
three
or
four
more
months.
Therefore,
the
proposal
today
is
to
instead
of
issuing
an
RFP
for
2019
funds,
to
amend
their
existing
contracts
with
2019
allocation
due
to
the
learning
curve
of
this
program.
A
It
just
didn't
seem
like
very
like
doing
an
RFP
shir
made
sense,
and
so,
if
we
amend
their
contracts
and
then
raise
the
overhead
amount
to
25%,
that
gets
their
contracts
in
a
position
where
it
could
cover
depending
on
if
they
have
a
$100,000
contract
or
$200,000
contract,
it
could
cover
like
one
and
one
full-time
staff
person,
or
maybe
one
full-time
staff
person
and
a
half
part-time
staff
person
for
some
of
the
programs.
So
you'll
see
here
on
the
screen.
It's
really
basically
doubling
their
contract
amounts
with
2019
money.
This
does
total
610,000.
A
A
2019
allocation
is
800,000,
you'll,
see
neighborhood
Legal
Services
is
not
listed
here,
we're
still
working
with
them
on
the
details
of
their
2018
contract.
So
you
know
if
they
start
using
their
2018
contract,
or
maybe
some
funds
available
for
2019
funding
for
them
as
well.
But
this
is
really
doubling
their
contract,
so
they
can
keep
going
so
three
months
from
now,
they're
not
saying
we're
out
of
money,
that's
the
most
important
thing
and
then
also
by
doubling
their
contracts
or
some
economies
of
scale
that
they
then
have
the
confidence
of.
A
Oh
I
can
hire
somebody
because
I
know:
I'm
gonna
have
money
to
pay
that
person
in
five
months,
and
so
we
do.
The
contracts
like
this
I
think
there's
a
wide,
maybe
showing
what
10%
is
what
we're
actually
proposing
now
is
25%
to
go
to
overhead,
because
it
is
in
the
program
guidelines.
We
need,
what's
called
a
waiver
program
guidelines
to
to
make
that
there
are
any
questions
that
was
a
mouthful
so.
W
A
Yes,
absolutely
in
tangen,
with
United
Way
being
coordinated
entry.
Now
what
we
have
is
United
Way
coordinating
those
phone
calls
into
the
providers
in
an
orderly
fashion
with
United
Way
fielding
out.
You
know
the
people
that
don't
live
in
the
city
and
you
know
other
requirements
such
as
that,
so
so
they
do
that.
Then
it
goes
directly
to
the
provider.
Now
the
provider
has
a
staff
person
who
can
say
yes,
I
can
talk
to
this
person.
You
know
within
24
hours.
That's
that's
really.
What
we're
trying
to
get
to.
S
F
But
I
would
think
at
this
point,
and
this
is
just
my
personal
opinion.
If
you
have
providers
that
are
operating,
I
would
rather
see
more
clients
served
than
bringing
on
another
staff
member.
So
if
you
had
a
robust
staff
in
each
agency
that
was
able
to
do
this,
maybe
you
could
add
on
to
the
number
of
folks
that
we
projected
another
50
or
another
hundred,
and
then
we
would
see
you
know
more
of
the
money
getting
to
the
folks
who
are
in
the
financial
crisis,
the
more
providers
we
add
on.
F
Unfortunately,
you
have
to
repeat
infrastructure
and
I
think
that
that's
always
the
problem
when
you
have
limited
dollars
when
you're
repeating
infrastructure,
there's
just
cost
to
that.
So
if
we
could
enhance
their
capacity,
enhance
the
intake
process
make
that
flow
better.
The
hope
for
me
would
be
that
we
would
actually
see
more
people
on
the
ground
getting
the
rental
assistance.
U
A
Together
to
2018
and
2019
funds,
funds
were
thinking
based
on
based
on
the
rate
that
especially
Pittsburgh
Mercy,
who
was
the
first
provider
they've
been
operating
longer
than
the
other
three,
but
based
on
the
rate
they're
going
if
the
others
operate.
At
that
rate,
we're
gonna
be
out
of
those
both
years
in
about
ten
months.
Z
Z
I
have
no
way
right
now,
I,
don't
think
you
do,
or
anybody
does
to
say
yeah,
that
person
reached
out,
and
so
how
do
we
know
that
that
here's,
who
here
is
everybody
who
called
here's?
What
the
response
is
we're
gonna?
That's
all
the
data
that
we
will
get
on,
what
sort
of
better
you
will
get.
Somebody
will
get
here
on
the
funding
side
of
it.
How
often
like
what?
What's
that
process?
Look
like
I.
A
A
N
X
F
F
So
two
business
days
should
be
the
outside
of
what
a
person
who's
looking
at
any
kind
of
crisis.
Support
should
be
looking
at
I'm,
not
the
kind
of
turnaround
that
you
want.
The
wish
would
be
that
it
could
be
same
day,
but
with
volumes
of
this
size.
That
just
might
not
happen,
but
our
operations
always
worked
on
48
business
hours,
but
we
also
responded
to
people
on
the
weekend
and.
W
F
The
only
caveat
I
have
to
put
to
that
is
say:
for
example,
mercy
did
have
a
full-time
person
that
was
doing
nothing
but
connecting
with
customers,
and
there
were
60
calls
that
day
and
they
needed
to
spend
an
hour
with
each
person
or
30
minutes
with
each
person.
That's
where
we,
when
we
look
at
the
volumes,
that's
where
that
goes
a
little
off-track,
so
the
industry,
gold
standard
is
definitely
the
48
hours
but
I
think
this
influx,
which
is
exactly
what
we've
seen
in
other
rental
assistance
programs.
F
Is
you
get
a
influx
of
thousands
of
people
when
these
programs
launch,
because
the
need
is
there,
but
until
you
can
call
out
those
there's
thousands
of
calls
which
you
kind
of
need
just
a
gigantic
effort
to
weed
out
all
of
those
calls?
Then
you
don't
get
to
the
place
where
service
providers
can
actually
perfectly
provide
service.
That's
why
Crystal
would
be
getting
calls.
That's
why
Celeste
would
be
getting
calls
because
a
person
you
know
to
have
capacity
to
handle
1,500
calls
that
came
in
you
need.
You
need
an
army
to
do
that.
F
U
F
Absolutely
will
happen,
but
what
has
happened
now
is
that
all
of
those
agency
phone
numbers
are
on
the
street
and
hundreds
of
people
have
those
agency
phone
numbers.
So
it's
gonna
take
us
a
minute.
You
know
with
the
link
it
took
about
two
and
a
half
years,
wouldn't
you
say
Chuck
for
us
to
go
from
you
know.
People
have
in
phone
number
and
hand
call
an
agency
directly
to
go
in
through
coordinated
intake,
so
we're
just
gonna
need
to
be
really
keeping
our
finger
on
the
pulse
of
those
volumes.
F
R
That
was
the
point
of
my
question
earlier
to
the
young
lady
from
United
Way,
about
that
coordinating
tree,
to
be
able
to
document
that,
because
it's
one
thing
to
have
a
standard,
they
know
that
we
want
to
hold
them
accountable
too,
but
also
so
we
can
look
at
it
to
say.
Okay,
this
isn't
working.
How
can
we
collectively
think
of
a
better
solution,
even
help
them
out?
R
So
it's
really
two
part
so
yeah
we
want
to
tell
them
hey,
48
hours,
etc,
but
we
really
still
need
to
document
that
and
know
what's
really
happening
and
without
really
having
a
system
to
track
that
I
mean
they
can
tell
us
they
did.
But
you
know
that
may
not
always
happen
so
I
think
it
comes
back
to
why
we
need
to
have
that
system
to
be
coordinated
from
beginning
to
end
yeah
and.
F
Mark
to
your
point,
I'm,
pretty
sure
that
all
of
the
agencies
thus
far
have
a
log
of
the
calls,
and
that
is
certainly
a
conversation.
I
think
had
be
had
with
every
agency,
give
us
an
update
on
your
logs,
who
wasn't
called
back.
Who
do
we
need
to
circle
back
to?
Because
that
would
again
with
the
coordinated
intake.
We
would
want
to
know
that,
because
if
we've
had
people
who
were
already
calling
and
now
they're
calling
two-on-one,
we
would
want
to
have
a
sense
of
of
that.
It'd.
S
Z
To
know
before
we're
giving
them
more
money
that
there
is
something
out
there.
This
is
an
appeal
process,
somebody's
turned
down.
They
think
it
was
unfair,
as
we
heard
and
I
have
no
idea
about
that
person
situation,
but
it
didn't
seem
that
there
was
an
appeals
process.
So
I
just
want
to
be
sure
that
there
is
one
before
at
least
I'll
abstain
from
the
vote.
If
y'all
want
to
proceed
without
knowing
that,
but.
N
So
the
efficient
process
for
HSP
is
displayed
on
the
screen
here,
so
we
are
putting
together
an
appeals
committee
that
is
going
to
be
comprised
of
five
individuals,
so
two
advisory
board
members.
Adrian
is
one
of
them,
since
she
is
the
homeless
representative
for
HOF,
one
you're,
a
staff
person,
one
DHS
staff
person
and
then,
when
you
united
away
staff
person
and
the
United
Way
staff
person
would
be
different
than
the
person
doing
the
intake
so
that
there
isn't
a
repeat
of
someone
reviewing
the
same
case.
A
Fast,
the
reason,
though
it
was
the
reason
those
names
are
listed
is
because,
once
again,
our
legal
departments
very
concerned
about
confidentiality
and
all
of
those
entities
have
some
type
of
agreement
with
the
URA.
Rather
it
be
a
contract
at
the
United
Way
will
be
signing
or
we
have
a
data
sharing
agreement
in
place
with
Department
of
Human
Services.
So
all
those
folks
have
some
type
of
legally
binding
relationship
that
visor
board.
You
know
you're
elected
by
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
so
that
is
why
those
names
are
up
there
right.
N
So
the
process
would
be
fairly
quickly
given
the
emergency
situation
of
the
households
going
through
the
program.
So
we
will
ask
that
if
a
household
has
experienced
a
denial,
they
can
submit
a
letter
of
appeal
to
the
appeals
committee
once
they
have
received
the
denial
letter
from
the
service
provider,
so
they
will
only
be
able
to
receive
a
denial
letter
from
the
service
provider
once
they
have
completed
the
full
intake
process.
N
So
after
they've
come
to
the
service
provider-
and
you
know
there
are
many
cases
for
why
someone
may
be
denied
that
late
later
on
in
the
stage
either
the
landlord
may
choose
not
to
participate
with
the
program
or
other
issues
may
arise,
as
the
service
provider
is
doing
the
full
intake
process
with
the
household.
At
that
point,
you
know
if
the
if
the
household
is
not
eligible,
the
service
provider
will
then
send
out
written
letter
stating
why
they
were
not
eligible
and
then
instructions
on
how
they
may
appeal.
N
F
Have
a
quick
suggestion
in
other
entities:
the
funder
directly
or
the
peels
community
directly
gets
the
letter,
not
through
the
service
provider.
If
a
person
has
to
submit
to
the
service
provider
number
one,
that's
a
delay
and
number
two.
The
service
provider
could
not
forward
that
on
and
I'm
not
suggesting
any
service
provider
would
ever
do
that,
but
I
think
it's
more
best
practice
for
them
to
be
able
to
submit
it
directly
to
whoever
the
appeals
are
actually
going
to
so
that
the
service
provider
isn't
the
conduit
for
them.
X
Quick
question
about
the
need
for
a
letter.
Is
there
a
reason
why
we
need
to
have
an
actual
letter
that
could
be
a
barrier
for
some
folks
that
don't
have
access
to
PCs
can't
print?
Can
we
think
of
another
way
to
for
them
to
file
some
sort
of
grievance
or
appeal
without
it
needing
to
be
a
formal
letter,
yeah
I'm.
U
It's
there's
no
urgency
surrounding
denials,
but
if
we
had
a
form
that
they
could
possibly
check
and
then
maybe
that
form
they've
you
know,
maybe
the
prospective
client
could
just
maybe
write
a
note
or
something
at
the
bottom,
like
hey
I,
want
to
appeal
and
submit
that
that
that
would
eliminate,
maybe
a
week's
time
of
being
able
to
of
us
receiving
the
appeal
from
when
the
denial
verbally
happened.
Well,.
F
Another
best
practice
is
when
someone
comes
into
the
office
to
have
the
conversation
with
you,
you
hand
them
the
appeals
process,
so
it's
something
that
they
have
in
hand
before
they've
ever
even
been
in
taked
in
our
program.
That's
that's
another.
You
know
element,
that's
very
easy
to
do
just
hand
it
to
a
person
when
they
walk
in
the
door
with
their
packet
I
find.
N
So
we
can
include
that
document
the
appeals
process
explaining
how
it
works
and
included
on
the
form
that
we
have
as
like
the
the
income,
verification
form
and
program
eligibility
that
the
service
provider
signs
and
then
the
applicant
signs
at
the
time
of
appointment.
So
that
could
just
be
another
document
that
we
add
on
that.
The
service
providers
explain
to
the
household
during
the
intake,
appointment,
yeah.
S
N
S
A
A
X
If,
if
the
person
at
the
point
of
contact
says
I
want
to
appeal
your
decision,
you
do
not
may
want
to
pull
your
decision.
Can
the
service
provider
then
say
send
an
email
to
this
committee
that
says
this
person
asked
to
you
know
appeal,
and
then
the
committee
make
the
decision
at
that
point
so
that
the
service
provider
we're
paying
them
to
do
this.
The
service
provider
says
this
person
communicated
at
the
time
of
the
denial
that
this
is
what
we're
going
to
do.
That
way.
There's
no
letter
exchange,
you
can
all
be
done.
X
N
X
No,
we
should,
if
the
agent,
if
they
communicate,
that
hey
I,
don't
like
your
decision
I
want
to
appeal.
The
service
provider
then
sends
an
email
with
the
person's
contact
information
saying
this
is
why
we
denied
them,
and
then
it's
turned
over
to
committee-
make
yes
it's
not
yet
there
should
be
nothing
for
the
client
to
fill
out
or
do
it
can
be
communicated
by
the
service
provider.
Z
F
Also,
don't
want
to
put
in
the
hands
of
the
service
provider,
communicating
another
person's
issues,
so
so
we
want
to
have
so
if
I'm
a
service
provider
and
I
chose
not
to
serve.
You
I
have
my
own
conception
of
what's
happening,
and
I
may
not
always
be
clearly
communicating
to
someone
else.
What
your
issues
or
concerns
are
so
I.
Don't
think
that
all
communication
should
come
through
the
service
provider
from
a
client
standpoint,
I
think
that
that
client
statement
their
words,
their
impression
of
what's
happening
their
needs.
X
But
the
service
provider
can
ask
for
a
statement.
Give
me
your
statement
as
to
why
you
don't
think,
like
you
make
your
claim
right
now
to
the
appeals
committee
and
you
know,
and
then
that's
sent
over
it
can
be
in
the
words
of
the
client.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
through
the
lens
of
the
service
provider.
They
can
collect
their
statement
and
send
it
over
as
as.
F
AA
Am
I
allowed
to
respond
to
that?
It
would
not
be
our
position
to
to
actually
take
the
the
appeals
and
I
will
tell
you
the
reasons
for
that
number
one.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
the
individual
who
is
filing
the
appeal
that
is
being
done
in
his
or
her
own
words
and
their
own
statements
number
two.
We
also
don't
want
to
delay
the
process
in
any
way,
so
we
are
not
case
managers
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
keep
the
integrity
of
the
of
the
system
in
the
process
now.
AA
U
We're
just
going
to
need
multiple
vehicles.
Whatever
the
decisions
are
I've
had
you
know
some
people
may
there's
varying
degrees
of
literacy,
so
we
should
not
have
a
writing
requirement.
We
also
should
not
trust
that
they
have
a
comfortable,
confident
relationship
with
a
person
that
just
denied
them
to
be
a
vehicle
through
to
get
that
accurately
through
to
us.
U
X
X
I,
don't
want
to
see
people
fumbling
through
paper
to
try
to
make
their
case
I
just
to
me
that
just
doesn't
seem
right
and
there's
a
better
way
to
do
it,
whether
that's
phone
call,
they
send
an
email,
but
I
think
that
our
service
providers
at
least
need
to
hand
over
the
denial
was
issued.
They
want
2000
sort
of
appeal,
and
if
the
committee
follows
up
via
phone
or
via
email
or
whatever
means
to
get
their
indigenous
voice,
then
maybe
that's
what
we
consider.
B
F
Yeah,
a
phone
and
email
options
seem
like
good
ways
that
a
person
can
directly
connect
with
the
process
and
you
just
have
the
parallel
process
of
the
person
who's
denying
needs
to
present
information.
But
you
also
need
to
hear
from
the
provider
or
from
2-1-1
as
to
why
that
person
was
not
eligible
for
the
service.
So
you
need
both
pieces
so.
R
A
The
makeup
of
it
is
okay,
but
it's
just
the
details
of
ironing
out
how
it's
actually
going
to
flow
so
I'll
commit
to
you
know
working
with
folks
and
vitina
over
the
next.
You
know
couple
weeks
to
get
this
ironed
out.
I,
don't
know
how
to
go
about
getting
an
additional
member
of
the
advisory
board.
Do
we
have
a
volunteer
that
would
like
to
sit
on
this
committee?
In
addition
to
eight
Adrienne
has
already
graciously
volunteered?
Oh.
I
F
A
And
do
it
so
volunteer
great,
thank
you.
So
Kelly
and
Adrian
will
be
the
advisory
board
members
on
the
appeals
committee.
Can
we
go
back
to
someone
making
a
motion
on
the
extension
so
to
motion,
for
the
contracts
would
be
to
amend
existing
contracts
for
the
amounts
listed
on
a
slide
so
who
so
up
to
for
Macedonia
up
to
210
mercy
up
to
400
urban
league
up
to
400
YWCA
up
to
210?
F
Just
a
caveat
to
the
motion
we
had
said
in
the
original
motions
to
approve
people's
contracts,
that
non
performance
of
any
type
would
be
investigated
and
addressed
appropriately,
so
we're
making
a
decision
to
change
these
contracts,
but
the
original
parameters
still
remain
related
to
of
say.
For
example,
Urban
League
decided
to
change
their
protocol
practice
or
reduce
staff
that
that
would
be
an
opportunity
for
us
to
engage
another
partner
or
engage
the
funds
differently.
That.
S
F
S
F
Had
to
say
pretty
sure,
we
had
discussed
that
in
the
first
contract
round
of
non
that
non
performance
was
an
issue,
so
there
would
be
regular
benchmarks
that
would
be
related
to
numbers,
served.
Timeliness
of
reports
and
timeliness
of
payment
requests.
I
know
were
the
three
that
we
had
discussed
previously,
so
that
wouldn't
change
for
this.
That
would
be
a
continuation
of
performance
is
key
with
any
of
the
contracts.
S
A
Jamie,
can
you
explain
your
slide,
but
but
Joanna
to
your
specific
question,
some
of
the
groups
were
a
little
bit
slower,
getting
started
than
others.
Part
of
it
was
a
a
staffing
issue
which,
hopefully
this
amendment
will
address
that
and
then
part
of
it
was
they
just
truly
weren't
prepared
prepared
for
the
influx
that
that
they
received,
but.
F
Y
You
can
see
the
amount
committed
so
far
is
about
160
thousand
dollars.
What
we
should
have
left
after,
like
the
10%
administrative
fee,
is
closer
to
five
hundred
and
thirty
thousand
dollars.
That
also
includes
neighborhood
legal
services.
So,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
with
all
four
of
these
service
providers,
plus
the
legal
services
were
looking
at
about
175
households
remaining
under
the
2018
allocation,
which
we
think
will
carry
us
through
four
ish
months.
Y
Moving
forward,
the
relationship
between
on
the
right-hand
side,
the
30%
of
area
median
income
or
below,
and
this
31
to
50
percent,
which
is
in
the
green,
should
be
two-to-one
right
now,
it's
like
one
and
a
half
to
one.
So
one
thing
that
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
doing
is
getting
enough
of
those
households
at
or
below
30%
of
area
median
income,
and
that
is
something
that
we
have
spelled
out
in
the
contracts
yeah.
Y
Even
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
there
also
was
a
question
at
the
last
meeting
about
the
payment
timeline.
Here's
a
brief
update.
We
still
will
have
a
bigger
picture
once
we
have
invoices
from
all
four
of
the
service
providers,
but
for
the
first
10,
the
typical
timeline
for
getting
a
payment
was
7
days,
one
of
which
happened
the
same
day
for
happened
within
two
days.
Nine.
Within
a
couple
weeks,
there
was
one
outlier
that
was
23
days.
There
is
an
issue
with
the
landlord.
U
Okay
questions
not
about
this
in
particular,
but
as
we're
considering
modifying
the
overhead
/
staffing
costs
to
25
percent,
but
we're
also
discussing
audits
and
things
of
that
nature.
I'm
curious
as
to
what
kind
of
safeguards
we're
going
to
put
in
so
that
you
don't
draw
down
your
25
percent,
and
then
we
realize
that
you're,
ineffective
and
because
there
is
some
type
of
in
terms
of
the
amount
of
people
you're
serving
because
they
have
to
spend
it
and
then
get
it
back.
That's
kind
of
keeping
them
like
honest
if
you
will.
A
The
draw
proportionally
couple
things
one
is:
it
will
be
retroactive
because
we're
amending
contracts,
so
so
the
25%
will
be
under
the
full.
Both
years
contract
amount.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
to
clarify
that
to
folks,
but
but
to
answer
your
question
specifically
when
they
send
in
a
payment
request
with
the
invoices
attached
of
paying
the
landlord
paying
the
utility
bills,
they
can
take
25%.
Y
Z
A
Mean
it
does,
however,
because
we're
amending
two
contracts.
Today
we
are
increasing
the
total
amount
ready
to
be
deployed
to
individuals,
because
those
contracts
will
be
amended
and
I
think
what
birds
in
Adrienne's
mouth,
but
but
one
of
the
things
too.
If
we
don't
do
this,
then
if
the
service
providers
are
not
able
to
continue
and
then
that
number
of
households
goes
down
to
zero
I.
F
Was
not
gonna
sorry,
so
all
this
new
process
stuff
should
enhance
efficiency.
So,
even
though
the
organizations
are
drawing
down
more
in
their
operational
costs,
they
should
be
doing
this
more
effectively
more
efficiently
more
quickly,
so
more
household
should
actually
be
able
to
be
served
to
date
and
I
met
with
the
folks
at
Mercy.
F
If
they
spent
17
days
doing
nothing
but
pulling
down
voicemails,
then
no
one
got
served
so
I
think
that
we're
actually
going
to
see
the
services
ramped
up
because
we'll
be
more
efficient,
more
effective,
it'll
be
a
quicker
timeline,
so
I
think
it's
gonna
balance
out.
There
may
be
a
little
bit
more
in
the
overhead,
but
I
think
that
that
overheads
gonna
allow
them
to
actually
engage
with
more
folks
which,
hopefully
then
on
the
other
side,
gives
us
more
household,
serve
I.
S
Wonder
if
it
will
actually
increase
the
capacity
I
mean
they're
gonna
have
more
funding,
that'll
be
nice
to
pay
the
people
that
already
doing
the
work,
but
is
someone
actually
gonna
be
hiring
more
people?
I
mean
who's.
The
person
we
april's
are
gonna
be
more
april's
or
april.
Just
they
don't
worry
about
how
to
pay
April
or
we're.
F
F
R
I'll
make
a
motion
if
we're
ready
all
right,
make
a
motion
to
recommend
to
approve
the
housing
stabilization
program
administrators
to
amend
their
contracts,
to
continue
to
administer
the
housing
stabilization
program
with
2019
HSP
funds,
as
well
as
the
approval
of
a
waiver
of
program
guidelines
to
allow
for
overhead
operating
costs
to
be
increased
from
10%
to
25%
of
the
contract
amount.
Thank.
R
W
L
A
T
A
A
Community
outreach
so
just
extremely
quickly.
We
did
a
community
outreach,
RFQ
request
for
qualifications,
so
that
differs
from
an
RFP
in
the
respect.
It's
really
just
it's
not
for
a
particular
project
today
or
anything
like
that.
It's
just
it's
a
slate
to
have
on
hand
whenever
any
type
of
community
engagement
or
marketing
activities
are
needed.
We
received.
A
These
are
the
eight
that
we
received
that
were
complete.
We
received
a
ninth
that
just
was
not
at
all
complete
and
not
have
really
any
of
the
requests
and
information
in
it.
So
these
are
the
eight
that
had
complete
applications.
So
our
proposal
today
is
just
for
emotion,
just
adding
these
folks
to
a
slate
that
we
can
use
in
the
future.
N
C
N
Some
of
them
some
are
more
marketing.
Some
are
more
for
community
outreach,
so
we
could
utilize
multiple
organizations
or
partners
for
the
same
event
or
community
outreach,
but
I
think
it's
great
to
have
this
wealth
of,
or
this
variety
of
services
available
to
us
when
we
do
need
them.
So
if
we
do
need
marketing
materials
from
billboards
to
flyers,
to
helping
with
community
outreach
in
general,
these
are
firms
that
are
well
qualified
to
do
that.
To.
A
A
R
A
T
A
Are
working
on
bylaws
as
well
I
think
we
did
a
resolution
when
we
did
it
for
printing
companies
I'm,
not
sure
we
did
it
for
appraisal
services
if
you're
comfortable,
making
the
the
demotion
great.
If
not
we,
it
will
be
going
to
the
you
are
a
board
next
week
they
are
the
official
slate
holder
like
determinant.
A
Over
the
next
three
years,
if
there's
ever
a
time
where
need
assistance
with
something
wherever
that
be
planning
a
series
of
meetings
or
marketing
materials
or
really
anything
like,
if
we
might,
we
might
decide,
we
need
help
creating
bylaws
or
something
you
know
what
whatever
it
is.
These
firms
have
differing
skill
sets
and
we
can
go
to
the
slate
and
look
at
whose
skill
sets
fit.
That
particular
description.
Instead
of
spending
45
days
doing
an
RFP.
R
R
Z
K
A
Z
A
We
can
definitely
discuss
it
more
at
the
next
meeting.
The
flow
chart
is
in
front
of
you.
That's
sort
of
the
you
think
kind
of
the
big
thing
we
wanted
to
get
to
walk
you
through.
It
does
reflect
United
Way
the
front
door
to
the
program,
and
then
you
can
see
the
steps
on
the
flowchart.
If
there's
any
questions
about
that,
you
know
I'm
more
than
willing
to
bring
it
back
up
next
meeting
I
I
am
I,
will
tell
you
I.
A
T
Have
a
general
comment
also
about
the
appeals
process
not
to
take
that
back
out,
but
to
respect
the
opinion
of
the
senior
counsel
they
and
the
confidentiality.
If
they
go
into
an
appeals
process,
are
they
signing
a
waiver
or
anything
like
that,
because
there
will
be
two
advisory
boards
members
on
the
committee
to.