►
From YouTube: Housing Opportunity Fund Meeting - 9/2/21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
morning
and
welcome
to
the
september
meeting
of
the
housing
opportunity
funds
advisory
board,
we
have
transcription
services
available
which
should
be
running
on
the
screen.
We
also
do
have
asl
this
week.
If
you
can,
please
pin
a
joan
sloan
who
is
going
to
be
transcribing
first,
I
believe
you'll
be
able
to
follow
along
as
we
go.
C
D
A
Okay,
I
just
gave
you
a
second.
I
knew
I
saw
you
james
myers,.
F
G
A
H
A
I
Hi
good
morning,
thank
you
kelly
and
thank
you
to
the
hof
advisory
committee
for
your
service.
In
the
wake
of
coven
19's
economic
devastation
and
with
the
eviction
moratorium,
phasing
out
many
city
residents
are
wondering
if
they'll
be
able
to
keep
a
roof
over
their
heads
after
losing
incomes
during
the
pandemic.
I
As
you
well
know,
one
essential
tool
for
preventing
eviction
is
legal
representation
and
remediation
which
preserves
the
rights
of
tenants
and
helps
landlords
and
tenants
come
to
successful
resolutions
to
avoid
displacement
and
prevent
homelessness.
The
advisory
committee,
the
ura
board
and
staff,
will
be
commended
for
its
leadership
in
creating
a
legal
assistance
program
for
tenants
and
homeowners.
I
I
I
want
to
take
this
opportunity
to
remind
folks
that
the
lab
program
is
in
its
infancy,
ramping
up
with
staffing
updating
records
and
just
beginning
to
the
process
of
invoices,
with
the
cdc
and
local
eviction
moratorium
place
which
artificially
depress
the
need
for
immediate
legal
help.
Remediation
nls,
for
example,
has
another
43
open
or
pending
eviction
cases
with
the
expected
deluge
eviction
cases
coming
next
month.
I
The
hof
can
expect
to
see
program
costs
increase,
so
funding
should
remain
at
current
levels
throughout
2022
because
we
have
not
been
yet
crushed
with
the
anticipated
number
of
referrals,
as
the
stats
show
you
can
see,
despite
moratoria,
we're
seeing
eviction
and
mortgage
foreclosure
cases.
So,
please
be
reminded.
The
program
is
still
in
its
early
stages
of
development,
so
it's
almost
certain
that
invoicing
and
other
record
keeping
and
processes.
So
the
proposed
recommendation
in
our
opinion
is
low.
I
It
should
be
kept
at
the
200,
the
500
000
to
six
hundred
thousand
dollar
level.
The
two
hundred
thousand
dollar
proposed
the
allocation
plan
is
extremely
low.
I
Also,
we
wanna
remind
you
that
the
moratorium,
both
the
cdc
and
judge
clark's
local
rule,
have
artificially
maintained
a
lower
level
of
filings
that
prior
to
the
pandemic
and
significantly
lower
than
we
would
expect
to
see
in
the
current
crisis.
I
I
One
final
word:
if
I
might
about
tangled
title
right
now
in
allegheny
county,
the
ura
is
the
only
major
funder
of
tangled
title
work.
There
are
thousands
of
homes
in
our
city
of
an
unclear
ownership
which
keeps
people
from
qualifying
for
help
with
home
repairs,
negotiating
with
taxing
bodies
for
payment
plans
and
leaves
them
vulnerable
to
deed
theft.
Many.
A
Thank
you
and
I
believe
that
that
means
that
the
three
minutes
allotted
for
public
comment
has
expired.
The
next
item
on
our
agenda
would
be
advisory
board
administrative
items
begin
with
committee
updates.
A
We
have
formally
formed
two
committees,
one
of
which
is
the
fair
housing
committee,
which
was
waiting
for
recommendations
from
the
rfp
committee,
which
well
rfp
working
group,
which
we
will
hear
from
now
mark
masterson,
who
is
the
chair
of
that
committee?
If
you
would
like
to
report
out.
E
Sure
I
want
to
thank
the
committee
members
and
wanted
to
let
you
know
that
we
have
one
recommendation
that
the
committee
is
going
to
put
to
the
hof
advisory
board.
That
would
need,
I
think,
to
be
voted
on
today.
That's
my
understanding
kelly.
You
can
steer
me
clear
on
that,
but
it's
it's
related
to
some
of
the
how
the
applications
in
our
rp
process
will
be
scored
for
the
rental
gap
program
and
I'm
not
sure
if
we
have
any
any.
E
If
we
have
the
text
of
that
change,
ready
to
post,
evan
or
shayna
or
pathena.
E
E
E
Basically,
you
would
be
a
point
scoring
that
folks
are
engaging
the
community
and
they
would
get
two
points
if
they
engage
the
community,
the
community
early
and
the
planning
of
the
project
to
understand
community
needs
and
align
the
development
interest
with
their
interests.
E
They'd
get
another
two
points:
if
they
actively
performed
outreach
to
the
to
engage
community
members
and
to
gather
input
again,
another
four
points
if
they
encourage
we'll
move
forward
with
active
participation
from
community
members
and
tenants
and
another
two
points
for
having
ongoing,
have
ongoing
partnered
approaches
and
service
provisions.
That
includes
community
members.
E
E
But
mostly
it
would
be
those
projects
for
renovation
preservation
projects
that
the
what
case
in
point
be
the
project
that
we
have
at
the
in
a
previous
meeting
within
in
brighton
heights,
where
you've
got
an
existing
owner,
that's
going
to
be
doing
major
renovations
or
you've
got
a
smaller
project.
E
The
one
I
point
to
is
the
five
points
sort
of
mixed
use,
with
with
rental
above
in
observatory
hill,
that
there's
a
different
scoring
criteria.
For
that
that
the
points
would
be
a
sign
that
they've
notified-
and
these
are
cons.
E
These
are
in
a
way
dealing
with
occupied
buildings,
maybe
not
the
five
points,
but
but
definitely
the
brighton
heights,
elderly
project
that
they've
notified
tenants
and
immediate
neighbors
and
plans
to
renovate
and
rehab
the
property
and
that
they've
they've
got
contact
information
for
the
project
and
they
they
are
encouraging
comments
on
the
project.
E
With
the
two
points
plan
for
minimal
disruption
to
current
tenants
to
points
created,
an
outline
of
activities
that
could
cause
disruption
to
tenants
and
neighbors
and
and
have
that
distributed,
would
be
an
additional
two
points
and
stage
meetings
for
in-person
and
or
virtual
dialogue
about
the
project.
Two
points
and
finally
in
the
that
renovation
preservation
would
be
created
and
will
distribute
construction,
staging
overview
and
timeline
in
to
tenants
and
neighbors
yep.
Here
we
go.
C
Right
so
just
to
explain
the
slide
up
top
is
what
the
current
criteria
number
eight
is,
which
is
just
picking
up
additional
p4
points.
Wherever
project
can
get
it
and
then
at
the
bottom
is
what
the
working
group
has
suggested
as
a
replacement
metric
that
mark
just
ran
through.
E
So
that's
a
recommendation.
We
have
that
we'd
like
the
board
to
consider
today,
as
so
that
we
can
start
using
it
and
see
how
this
works.
With
the
with
the
upcoming
round,
the
we
had
several
other
discussions
around
different
items.
One
was
to
look
at
a
quarterly.
E
Do
like
a
rolling
quarterly
application
deadline.
There
was
not
consensus
from
the
committee.
I
think
the
consensus
is:
let's
get
make
this
change,
let's
see
how
how
the
application
process
plays
out
and
we
might
make
a
recommendation
for
quarterly
in
the
future,
but
right
now
we're
not
making
that
recommendation.
We
also
have
some.
E
We
discussed
some
things
around
fair
housing
that
we
can
provide
to
the
to
the
fair
housing
committee
that
and
what
we
would
recommend
is
that
there
be
a
category
added
to
the
application
for
up
to
10
points
that
actively
furthers
fair
housing,
and
it's
looking
at
things
like
this
project
located
in
a
high
opportunity
neighborhood.
Does
it
encourage
neighborhood
mobility?
E
Does
it
assist
in
diversification
of
the
existing
neighborhood?
Is
affirmative
marketing
plan
in
place
for
the
project?
Are
there
alternative
alternative
application
processes
in
place?
Diversity,
development,
team
and
partners
project
promotes
and
furthers
a
community
wide
goal
of
engaging
and
cultivating
a
more
diverse
and
inclusive
development
and
construction
teams
operating
in
the
city.
E
E
But
and
then
we
also
had
some
things
that
we
think
will
need
to
be
discussed
as
we
move
forward,
including
looking
at
how
making
sure
that
that
the
overall
large
big
picture
goals
for
the
housing
opportunity
fund
are
are
actually
not
being
implemented.
With
the
type
of
funding
that
we
have
going
out.
We
want
to
take
a
look
at
additional
conversations
on
how
the
the
application
process
captures
sustainability.
E
I
think
we're
getting
to
some
of
that
or
trying
to
get
to
some
of
that,
and
I
think
I'm
missing
something
when
anyone
else
on
the
committee
want
to
jump
in.
E
Yeah,
yes,
I
mean
we
don't
have
we're
not
making
a
recommendation
today,
but
it's
something
that
needs
to
be
considered
that
fit
the.
We
need
some
additional
conversations
around
sustainability
and
greening
ura
staff's
been
looking
at
measures
for
this
element
of
for
funded
projects,
and
I
think
some
of
it
works.
Some
of
it
doesn't
work
and
it
depends
on
maybe
this
type
of
project,
where
maybe
some
of
the
larger
the
projects
are
able
to
to
hit
that.
E
So
I
think
that
there's
going
to
be
additional
dialogue
with
the
ura
staff
about
what's
a
realistic
measure
to
encourage
more
sustainable
and
more
green
infrastructure
and
then
the
last
piece
that
isn't
that
needs
additional
dialogue
is
with
community
input
and
and
registered
community
organizations
and
trying
to
figure
out
how
that
might
work
and
probably
gonna
require
additional
discussion
with
city
planning
and
the
ura
staff
as
to
how
there's,
as
part
of
the
community
input
process.
E
So
I'm
not
sure
how
you
want
to
proceed,
madam
chairwoman,
to
to
introduce.
She
would
like
me
to
make
a
motion
to
adopt
our
recommendation
for
the
rp
process.
A
G
J
E
No,
that's
that's
scoring
that's
the
actual
number.
J
Okay,
well,
I
would
think
that
the
fourth
bullet
would
be
more
impactful
if
you
have
an
ongoing
partnership
approach
with
the
develop
with
community
group
is
like
which
one
of
these
is
more
about.
A
community
group
is
a
co-owner
or
is
the
property
manager
has
a
formal
role
in
the
development?
J
Well,
I
feel
like
the
most
important
thing
is
that
ongoing
ownership
and
role,
because
otherwise
they
might
be
aware,
but
it's
just
happening
to
them-
they
don't
have
a
you
know
a
stake
in
it.
They
don't
have
a
financial
benefit
from
it.
I
guess
it's
not
that
one
is
more
important
than
the
other,
but
that
they're
both
important,
very
important.
J
D
My
comment
may
help
help
with
that.
He
said
I
was
good
like
do.
We
define
engagement
and
do
we
define
who
the
community
is
at
any
point
I
mean
so
notifying
the
community
does
not
get
their
buy-in
necessarily
and
they
you
know
that
is
a
way
of
engaging
them.
They're
still
opposed,
and
it
still
happens,
and
you
still
get
your
two
points.
So
can
we
clarify
like
what
is
engagement?
Who
is
the
community
and
so
in
the
next
one,
you're
notifying
at
least
the
immediate
neighbors?
D
Or
something
like
he
said
like
to
me
to
your
point:
joanne
I've
been
notified.
I
don't
like
what
you're
doing
and
yes,
I've
been
engaged
because
you
told
me
what
was
happening
and
you
get
full
credit
and
all
of
us.
You
know
we
don't
have
a
way
of
responding
and
noting
our
displeasure
or
dissatisfaction.
K
I
guess
jamil
and
joanna
those
are
great
comments,
we're
trying
to
balance.
We
talked
about
communities
where
sometimes
neighbors
are
opposed
to
projects
just
because
they're,
affordable
housing
and
I've
had
this
happen
at
action.
Housing
and
we
didn't
want
that
to
sort
of.
Then
we
have
to
balance
the
desire
for
community
support,
but
occasionally
communities
oppose
projects
for
the
wrong
reason.
So
we
didn't
want
to
require
that
in
case
that
could
stop
a
project
from
happening
in
a
neighborhood
where
affordability
is
really
needed.
A
A
A
I
just
want
to
point
that
out,
because
the
one
where
it's
a
new
development
seems
to
require
a
that's
the
one
where,
like
the
four
points,
is
at
the
neighborhood
and
community
will
be
actively
participating
versus
the
second
one
is
more
so,
if
we're
doing
a
renovation
of
existing
units
that
that
didn't
require
the
same
level
of
community
support
that
I
think
we
have
in
the
top
half
of
the
recommendation.
So
I
just
want
to
point
that
out
since
everybody's
looking
at
this.
For
the
first
time.
L
Would
the
committee
be
interested
in
the
requirement
for
a
letter
of
input
from
the
community,
rather
than
a
letter
of
support
to
allow
for
the
community
to
express
their
response
and
how
they've
been
engaged
and
but
a
letter
of
support
would
have
more
of
a
impact
on
you
know
removing
that
concern
about
having
support,
pull,
holding
back
a
project
for
moving
forward,
just
formal
documentation
of
what
the
input
is
from
the
community?
Would
that
help.
D
A
D
B
Yes,
this
is
diamante,
so
the
ura's
board,
when
they
authorize
funding
requests
they
look.
They
do
a
preponderance
of
the
community's
expressions
of
input,
so
those
expressions
of
inputs
they
can
come
from
residents,
they
can
come
from
cbos
cdcs,
I
mean
there's
a
plethora
of
stakeholders
that
can
be
engaged,
and
so
you
know
the
the
ura's
board
typically
looks
at
the
robust
nature
of
that
engagement
and
the
diversity
of
voices
that
were
permitted
to
late
to
weigh
in.
B
But
the
priority
is
placed
on
those
that
are
directly
impacted
by
the
development,
and
so
the
community's
expression
of
input
document
is
a
is
a
policy
of
the
ura's
board
and
it's
been
very
effective,
and
I
think
you
know
to
the
earlier
point
in
ensuring
that
we're
that
the
board
is
not
only
listening
to
support
supportive
comments,
but
we're
also
listening
to
folks
that
may
have
concerns
and
ensuring
that
those
concerns
are
remedied
and
addressed
before
they
authorize
the
the
the
funding.
A
B
G
We
go
back
to.
There
was
a
part
that
mentioned
like
10
points
for
some
specific
characteristics
like
if
there's
a
high
opportunity,
neighborhood,
etc.
Can
we
can
we
go
back
and
go
over
those
details
again.
E
Sonia
that
isn't
for
what
we're
voting
on
today.
That's
what
we're
we're
trying
to
give
some
framework
for
the
fair
housing
subcommittee
to
take
a
look
at
and-
and
you
know
what
we
don't-
I'm
not
pretending
to
be
expert
in
fair
housing,
but
we,
we
came
up
with
some
some
ideas
that
for
that
committee
to
look
at,
but
that
isn't
something
we're
going
to
vote
on.
That's
not
what
we're
recommending
a
vote
on
today.
N
The
timeline
of
the
community
engagement-
may,
you
know,
actually
come
later
than
than
the
initial
requests
for
funding
support,
but
that
we
include
an
opportunity
to
incl
for
the
developer
to
include
like
a
narrative
of
of
their
community
engagement
process
and
that
that
would
essentially
be
completed
prior
to
actual
funding,
but
just
want
to
make
sure
we're,
also
including
being
being
conscious
that
the
robustness
of
the
community
engagement
may
come
at
different
points
depending
on
where
that
project
is
in
its
life
cycle.
E
So
it
sounds
like
we
have
that
there
can
be
a
motion
if
we
amend
that
second
bullet
point
of
the
new
construction
projects
or
other
than
the
new
projects
and
garner
a
letter
of
input
instead
of
just
garner
input.
The
garner
letters
of
input,
dr
bay,
is
that
am
I
getting
that.
H
A
Great
congratulations,
rfp
working
group.
I
know
a
lot
of
hard
work
went
into
those
recommendations,
I'm
happy
to
see
that
push
through
and
we
will
should
have
a
report
next
month
from
the
fair
housing
committee
around
now
that
they
have
some
we'll
have
some
items
to
work
for
work
through
for
future
items.
A
So
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
agenda
itself
and
the
structure
of
our
meetings
right
now.
This
is
the
structure
that
we
inherited
as
we
as
we
all
know.
Previously,
our
meetings
were
run
by
jessica
from
the
ura,
and
so
this
is
how
so.
A
Another
thing
that
we
had
discussed
in
different
settings
was
having
report
outs
from
different
providers
of
services
to
say
hey.
This
is
how
the
hap
program
is
going
or
what?
What
have
you.
So
those
are
some
things
that
I
wanted
to
see
if
the
board
had
interest
around
incorporating
into
the
agenda.
If
we
like
the
flow
of
things
on
the
agenda,
for
example,
programmatic
expenditures
and
impacts
is
towards
the
end,
which
is
where
we
hear
a
lot
about
how
things
are
going
from
ura
staff.
Sometimes
people
are
on
the
call
for
that.
A
Sometimes
people
aren't
sometimes
it's
rushed
depending
on
how
the
agenda
went
before
it
also
trying
to
keep
in
mind
that
we're
trying
to
center
items
for
quorum
so
that
we
don't
lose
quorum,
but
also,
sometimes
we
sit
around
due
to
some
punctuality
issues,
so
we
don't
want
to
front
load
them
too
much,
because
then
we
may
not
have
quorum.
So
I
don't
know
so
just
thoughts.
Comments
concerns.
A
O
I
like
your
recommendation
of
having
almost
some
folks
setting
some
context,
so
if
it's
even
if
it's
just
a
minute
of
what's
happening
nationally,
so
I
think
what
could
happen
is
if
we
had
just
before
public
comment,
just
just
some
sort
of
conversation
about
what's
going
on
sort
of
either
regionally
or
nationally,
that
sort
of
focuses
our
conversation
or
at
least
gives
a
framework
for
those
who
might
be
joining
for
the
first
time,
then
we
have
some
public
comment
and
then
you
know,
hopefully,
by
that
point
we
have
quorum
and
we're
able
to
then
begin
to
vote
on
the
things
that
we
need
to.
F
E
I'd
agree
with
paul.
I
think
that
that
would
be
good,
that
we
would
get
get
more
information.
You
know
like
the
fair
housing
minute
there.
You
know,
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
be
more
than
a
minute,
but
you
know
I
I
think,
if
that's
a
great
idea
that
and
it
can
rotate,
it
doesn't
have
to
be
everything
in
each
meeting,
but
you
know
getting
presentations
about
maybe
best
practices
or
what
other
folks
are
doing.
H
I
would
just
echo
those
sentiments:
I
think,
that
context
and
environment
in
which
we're
operating
and
making
decisions
is
important
for
all
of
us
to
have
a
deeper
understanding,
there's
endless
expertise
amongst
the
advisory,
but
there
are
definitely
environmental
issues.
Social
issues,
funding
issues
that
having
those
brought
to
the
table
in
a
more
in
a
more
structured
way
just
gives
us
even
more
ability
to
make
good
decisions
for
the
community
and
with
the
community.
I
think
that's
again
another
one
of
the
concerns
that's
been
raised
in
the
public
comment
is
really
active.
N
I
also
would
agree
with
those
comments
I
think
there's
many
things
going
on
statewide
as
well
as
nationally
that
connect
with
the
work
that
we're
doing,
and
we
want
to
be
intentional
that
that
there's
synergy
with
our
recommendations,
there's
a
lot
of
things
happen
happening
as
it
relates
to
equity
and
and
other
types
of
justice
issues.
So
just
thinking
about
what
we're
proposing
and
the
work
we're
doing
and
making
sure
that
there's
synergy
across
the
board.
N
So
I
think
I
think
that
context
will
root
us
in
making
sure
that
there's
connection
as
well
as
alignment.
J
We
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
all
committed
to
coming
as
promptly
as
we
can,
and
you
know
not
creating
something
at
the
beginning
of
the
agenda
that
people
feel
I
can
miss.
You
know
and
just
come
later
than
late,
so
we
just
all
need
to
be
really
committed.
K
I
think
I
agree
with
everyone's
comments
too
in
terms
of
the
section
at
the
end,
where
we
see
the
sort
of
impact
the
state
of
all
the
programs.
I
don't
want
to
create
more
work
for
ura,
but
it
would
be
great
to
see
like
some
of
these
rental
gap.
K
Projects
are
finished
now
or
we
could
hear
a
story
of
someone
who
was
able
to
buy
a
house
through
the
home
ownership
program,
like,
I
think,
actual
stories
of
actual
people
or
projects.
Just
one
for
meeting
would
be
really
meaningful
for
us
and
for
the
public
to
see
that
watch
these
meetings,
because
some
people,
like
the
personal
stories,
are
more
impactful,
sometimes
than
just
seeing
an
app
with
a
lot
of
dots
on
it.
Even
though
we
need
to
see
that
too.
So,
I
think
adding
just
one
story
for
a
meeting
would
be
really
helpful.
F
A
J
A
O
Good
morning,
everybody,
so
I
wanted
to
quickly
just
talk
through
our
the
meeting
that
we
had
a
couple
of
weeks
ago.
So
this
is,
you
know,
we're
finishing
the
fourth
year
of
the
housing
opportunity
fund
allocations,
and
I
think
what
we
you
know.
What
we
had
the
opportunity
to
talk
about
was
the
real
need.
You
know
the
ongoing
effects
of
the
global
health
pandemic.
There's
there's
also,
I
think,
there's
just
a
lot
of
opportunities
to
both
challenge
and
challenges.
O
I
guess
to
stabilize
affordable
housing
for
the
residents
of
pittsburgh.
We
were
you
know
there
was
this
infusion
of
funding
from
the
city
of
pittsburgh
from
the
2021
american
rescue
plan.
So
I
think,
given
those
things,
the
ura
did
an
excellent
job
of
providing
us
some
information
to
help
the
housing
opportunity,
fund
board
and
form
our
decision
and
really
the
recommendations
that
they
had
were
based
on
the
affordable
housing.
The
public
survey
that
went
out
to
some
400
plus
residents,
diverse
residents
in
the
in
the
pittsburgh
area.
O
The
recommendations
were
based
on
you
know
the
market
trends
that
influence
local
housing
needs
the
historic
use
of
the
funds,
and
you
know
what
you
know:
how
additional
funds
can
be
leveraged
to
expand
existing
programs
so
with
that
they
they
essentially,
we
walked
through
the
the
different
buckets
of
of
money,
that
the
down
payment,
closing
costs,
homeowner
assistant
program,
housing,
stabilization
program,
legal
assistance,
program,
small
landlord
fund
rental
gap
program
and
the
for
sale
development
program
and
just
gave
us
a
background
as
to
why
we
could
be
thinking
about
these.
O
How
we
should
be
thinking
about
them
as
we're
going
into
our
plan
for
2022,
and
then
we
were
given
the
opportunity
to
individually
add
to
that
plan
or
make
recommendations
as
well
in
it.
I
believe
we're
going
to
talk
about
that.
O
O
But
I
think
the
one
thing
that
really
stood
out
is-
and
it's
no,
it's
not
a
secret,
but
just
how
clear
of
a
need
there
is,
with
the
the
effects
of
the
pandemic,
with
with
more
people
needing
assistance,
whether
it's
rental
or
whatnot.
Those
numbers
are
we're
seeing
an
uptick
across
the
board
so
and
with
that,
I
think
I'll
open
it
up.
If
anyone
else
wanted
to
add
any
other
thoughts
about
the
special
session.
A
Yeah,
if
no
one
knows
anything
they
would
like
to
add,
we
can
move
forward
with
the
ura
staff's
presentation
on
the
allocation
plan
that
we've
assembled.
P
Thanks
kelly,
so
I'm
gonna
actually
give
a
brief
overview
of
the
survey
findings
before
we
dive
into
the
draft
allocation
plan,
and
I
just
want
to
thank
everyone
in
the
public
who
did
take
the
time
to
attend
our
virtual
community
meetings
and
and
engage
with
hf
advisory
board
members
and
ura
staff
and
actually
take
the
survey.
P
Your
responses
are
critical
in
helping
us
guide
how
we
should
be
spending
the
hof
fund
and
money,
and
so,
as
stated
at
the
end
of
the
survey,
we
would
be
sharing
the
results
with
the
public
at
an
hof
advisory
board
meeting.
So
I
did
want
to
provide
a
summary
of
those
survey
findings
with
with
the
public
and
again
I
just
wanted
to
thank
the
public
for
those
who
participated
in
the
2022
annual
allocation
plan.
P
Your
feedback
is
crucial
and
is
so
important,
and
we
really
appreciate
you
taking
the
time
to
do
this
so
for
this
year
we
started
the
annual
allocation
plan.
In
june,
we
issued
two
rfps
to
engage
community
organizations
to
help
with
community
feedback
and
engagement
and
to
also
help
promote
the
survey
we
received.
Two
responses
from
pittsburgh,
united
and
hilltop
alliance
and
both
of
those
organizations
were
contracted
for
a
six-week
period
to
conduct
community
outreach
and
engagements
hilltop
alliance
hosted
three
virtual
community
meetings
and
pittsburgh
united
hosted
two
virtual
community
meetings.
P
We
also
engaged
in
various
marketing
campaigns
such
as
social
media,
email
campaigns
and
then
marketing
through
other
community
organization
channels,
such
as
next
door
through
the
mayor's
office
and
welcoming
pittsburgh
and
hello
neighbor
just
to
to
make
sure
that
we
reach
all
populations
in
pittsburgh
and
to
have
a
diverse
distribution
of
the
survey
on
the
right.
You'll
see
our
timeline
for
this
annual
allocation
plan
as
we
progress.
P
So
we
are
hoping
to
introduce
the
draft
2022
allocation
plan.
We
will
have
a
period
of
public
feedback.
That's
available
so
we'll
introduce
the
plan
today,
but
we
will
not
vote
on
it.
We
would
like
to
have
public
input
on
it
on
the
plan
that
we're
introducing
today
before
we
make
a
final
approval
in
october,
and
so
once
we
introduce
the
plan
today,
we
will
circulate
it
in
the
public.
P
You
can
move
to
the
next
slide,
please.
Thank
you.
This
provides
an
overview
of
the
demographics
of
the
respondents,
so
we
received
a
total
of
488
responses.
P
So
the
survey
showed
a
greater
than
average
representation
for
homeowners.
In
the
city
I
mean,
and
less
than
average
representation
among
renters
in
the
city.
So
the
yellow
bars
are
what
is
the
average
for
the
city
of
pittsburgh
and
then
the
blue
bars
are
what
our
averages
were
for
the
survey
in
terms
of
age.
The
survey
respondents
tended
to
be
older
than
the
average
age
in
the
city
of
pittsburgh
and
in
regards
to
ethnicity.
P
The
survey
had
a
greater
than
average
representation
for
the
city
amongst
black
and
african
americans
and
those
who
identified
with
as
having
two
or
more
identities
or
who
identified
with
two
or
more
identities
and
less
than
average
representation
among
the
city
for
white
asian
and
other
identities
in
terms
of
income,
the
respondent's
income
trended
higher
than
the
median
salary
in
pittsburgh,
with
less
representation
below
the
20
below
25
000.,
so
yep.
Thank
you.
The
next
slide
shows
how
our
respondents
would
rank
existing
programs
and
potential
programs.
P
Specifically,
we
had
asked
respondents.
How
would
you
rank
these
efforts
in
terms
of
what
is
needed
so
for
the
the
top
chart
we
had
asked?
How
would
you
rank
these
efforts
in
order
of
what
is
needed
in
pittsburgh,
with
one
being
the
most
important,
so
building
more
affordable
house
housing
for
rent
was
the
most
important
program
followed
by
helping
with
home
repairs,
helping
buy
a
home
building
more
affordable
housing
for
sale,
short-term
emergency
financial
assistance
for
renters
and
responding
to
large-scale
emergencies.
P
P
It
also
could
you
know
mean
that
there
is
a
lot
of
the
e-wrap
assistance
that
is
available
currently
could
also
have
factored
into
these
rankings
as
well,
but
in
the
next
chart
we
can
look
at
the
segmented
rankings
where
it
breaks
out
preferences
based
on
certain
groups
like
homeowners
and
renters,
housing
advocates
and
professionals.
P
Both
homeowners
and
renters
ranked
helping
people
buy
their
first
home
as
the
second
most
important
program,
whereas
those
who
identified
as
a
minority
and
those
who
are
65
plus
ranked
building
more
affordable
housing
for
sale
as
a
second
most
important
program
on
the
bottom
chart,
where
respondents
were
asked
to
rank
items
in
order
of
what
is
needed
most
in
pittsburgh.
P
Overall
respondents
largely
supported
current
hrf
programs,
particularly
the
rental
gap
for
cell
development
program
down
payment,
closing
cost
assistance,
program
and
homeowner
assistance
program
and
then
under
eligible
uses,
residents
identified
avoiding
foreclosure,
making,
affordable
housing,
permanent
and
accessibility
for
seniors
and
people
with
disabilities.
As
programs
that
is
most
needed
in
pittsburgh,
so
using
the
survey,
responses
and
feedback
and
public
feedback
along
with
ura
staff
data
and
program
pipeline
data,
we
had
asked
each
individual
board
member
to
complete
a
2022
annual
allocation
plan,
worksheet
and
so
I'll
pass
this
on
to
evan.
E
Sure,
if
you
could
either
one
of
those
last
two
slides,
probably
the
second
last
one,
if
you
could
put
that
up
again,.
P
Yeah,
let
me
refer
back
to
the
memo
that
was
sent
out.
It
did
have
more
specific
details
on
the
rankings,
but
I
believe
it
was
pretty
close
between
those
two
between
one
two
and
three
well.
E
P
P
Was
just
it
was
just
presented
this
way,
because
that's
the
way
that
it
was
the
data
was
easy
to
analyze
in
the
way
that
the
survey
gave
us
the
responses
and
the
way
we
were
able
to
analyze
them
through
the
rankings
we
couldn't
compare
them
to
the
current
existing
programs
and
eligible
uses.
The
way
I
think
you're
proposing
yeah,
I'm
just
wondering
you
know
this
leads
to.
E
Are
we
doing
the
right
programs?
I
guess,
or
you
know,
is
the
public
saying
hey?
No,
no,
we
don't
need.
We
don't
need
the
one
thing
that
you're
doing
or
we
don't
think
we
need
it.
You
know
we
need.
We
need
more
help
in
this
other
area
that
we're
not
currently.
Addressing
that.
That's
that's
the
question
and
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
way
to
fare,
that
out
of
the
responses
that
you
got
or
not.
That's
just
my
general
question
is:
is
there
a
way
to
do
it
and
that
might
be
useful
information.
A
A
P
Yes,
yeah,
I
will
say,
and
the
open-ended
responses
we
did
see,
making
affordable
housing
more
permanent,
come
up
frequently
in
in
something
that
was
written
in,
and
so
I
think
that
that
does
speak
to
a
need
for
that
type
of
program
that
wasn't
necessarily
addressed
in
this
ranking
or
just
seeing.
The
frequency
of
that
comment
brought
up
in
the
open-ended
questions
is
worth
noting
that
that
could
be
a
potential
program
that
the
public
would
like
us
to
fund
more
or
have
more
weight
on.
D
F
P
P
Yes,
absolutely
so,
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide
with
the
segmented
rankings,
this
will
help
you
better
identify
the
priorities
of
different
groups,
so
renters
versus
homeowners,
for
example,
so
renters,
for
example,
ranked
building
more
affordable
housing
for
rent
is
number
one
for
existing
hof
programs,
whereas
homeowners
ranked
helping
people
make
home
repairs
as
number
one
and
that's
consistent
with
you
know.
Homeowners
versus
renters.
A
M
P
And
so
just
to
clarify
the
question:
that
was
the
specific
question
that
was
asked
was:
how
would
you
rank
these
efforts
in
order
of
what
is
needed
in
pittsburgh?
One
being
most
important.
J
Excuse
me,
sony
is
locked
out
of
the
meeting.
If
someone
could
let
her.
M
I
had
to
make
another
note
how
everyone
voted
really
high
on
legal
health.
M
L
That
may
be
reflective
of
what
christine
kirby
was
saying
during
the
public
comments.
That,
from
what
I
heard,
was
that
the
legal
crisis
surrounding
homeownership
and
renters
situations
might
be
coming
at
a
high
rate.
Now
that
the
eviction
moratorium
has
been
lifted,
and
so
maybe
that
that
pressure
isn't
being
felt
by
the
public
today,
but
I
don't
know,
but
it
could
be
coming
right.
A
C
All
right
well,
should
we
move
to
the
next
slide
and
we
can
look
at
the
allocation,
but
we
can
always
come
back
to
this.
There's
more
questions
on
the
survey,
but
so
what's
on
the
screen
right
now.
Sort
of
is
a
combination
of
all
of
the
programs
that
we're
currently
offering
or
that
were
funded
in
the
past
as
well
and
just
to
kind
of
walk
us
through
it.
C
Each
bracket
on
or
each
grouping
on
the
left
side
here
is
for
the
different
ami
levels
that
the
housing
opportunity
fund
serves
and
then
within
each
ami
level.
We've
got
the
staff
recommendation,
which
was
included
in
the
memo
several
weeks
ago
and
that
the
advisory
board
has
seen
and
then
over
the
last
week
or
two
as
advisory
board.
C
Members
have
been
filling
out
their
own
draft
allocation
plans,
we've
taken
the
average
allocation
for
each
program
at
each
ami
level
for
the
advisory
board
and
put
it
into
the
column
that
says
advisory
board,
2022
mean
and
and
then
what
we're
sort
of
resulting
with.
C
Is
this
2022
draft
column
which,
in
a
lot
of
these
scenarios,
is
as
we
went
through
and
just
tried
to
create
what
this
draft
could
look
like,
typically
falling
somewhere
in
between
what
the
advisory
board
average
was
and
what
the
staff
recommendation
was
with
the
understanding
that
we
need
the
total
amount
of
allocation
in
each
bracket
or
each
income
grouping
to
align
with
the
50
25
25,
referring
to
how
much
of
the
allocation
must
serve,
households
at
or
below,
30
percent?
C
Am
I
at
or
below
50
and
at
or
below
80.,
so
that
2022
draft
is
sort
of
what
the
suggested
draft
is
right
now,
based
on
what
the
advisory
board
averages
were
and
again
as
matina
mentioned,
I
don't
believe,
there's
a
vote
needed
on
this,
but
we
can,
you
know,
tweak
this
as
the
discussion
moves
along
here,
but
that's
sort
of
just
the
background
on
what
we're
looking
at
here
and
I
would
open
it
up
to
the
advisory
board
to
comment
or
discuss
if
they're
comfortable
moving
forward
with
the
draft
as
it's
laid
out
here
or,
if
there's
any
different
considerations
that
need
to
be
made.
N
N
I
think
demo
dollars
have
proven
to
be
pretty
invaluable
with
what
we
supported
in
the
past
and
it
does
not
restrict
those
dollars
from
supporting
any
of
the
any
other
columns
that
may
be
running
short.
You
know,
for
example,
legal
assistance
or
or
small
landlord
fund
or
or
something
else,
so
so
my
thought
would
be
having
that
flexibility
for
something
that
does
not
fit
as
neatly
into
one
of
the
other
columns
we
should
still
have.
N
So
that's
just
one
thing
that
I
would
say
I
would
at
least
propose
to
to
adjust.
P
Yes,
so
we
so
the
reason
why
ura
staff
did
not
recommend
allocating
anything
towards
demo
dollars
is
because
we
currently
have
six
hundred
thousand
of
unused
demo
dollars
right
now.
P
So
they
do
go
up
to
80
ami.
I
believe
we
have
400
000
that
can
go
up
to
80
ami
and
then
200
000.
That
is
split
between
50
and
30..
E
I
I
I
guess
you
know
one
of
the
things
that
I
I
was,
I
think,
with
the
the
testimony
we
heard
early
about
legal
assistance
and
I
don't
think
christine's
kirby's
still
on.
E
So
I
guess
that
is.
Is
that
news
to
the
ura
staff
that
they're
believing
that
they
need
more
than
this
allocation,
because
what
they
think
is
coming
as
moratoriums
start
to
end,
and
we
start
to
see
the
things,
change
and
and
more
legal
proceedings
starting
to
to
a
big
tenants
and
to.
P
P
I
think
he
had
considered
what
we
currently
have
funded
and
then
out
of
our
demonstration
dollars.
We
do
have
eight
hundred
thousand
currently,
but
two
hundred
thousand
of
that
has
been
allocated
to
be
used
towards
lap,
so
that
is
currently
funded.
That
lap
program
we
have
now
is
currently
a
one
million
dollar
program,
plus
that
200
000
that
jeremy
recommended
for
next
year.
So
I
think
jeremy
did
take
into
account
and
anticipated
the
the
amount
of
legal
assistance
that
will
be
needed
throughout
2022.
J
Hi,
I
have
a
question
about
how
the
aura
or
creation
of
other
ura
programs
affected
these
recommendations
and
also,
I
was
glad
to
see
that
it
was
noted
that
a
lot
of
the
rental
gap-
funds
in
the
past
specifics
have
funded
expensive,
nine
percent
deals
and
there's
a
goal
to
you
know,
have
more
community-led
projects
which
is
great
to
see.
But
I
was
curious
how
the
aura,
if
that
was
you
know,
because
of
some
of
the
zara
dollars
or
you
know,
what's
the
context
for
some
of
this.
L
Okay,
joanna
you're,
referring
to
the
american
rescue
plan
dollars,
yes,
yeah
we're.
I
think
we
took
into
account
the
fact
that
we
know
there
is
five
million
dollars
slated
for
community
land
trust,
affordable
housing,
development
in
the
amount
of
five
million
dollars
and
our
own
pgh
line
item
initiative.
L
So
those
two
initiatives
received
funding
to
support,
affordable
home
ownership.
That
being
said,
recognizing,
there
is
a
balance
of
hoth
funds
in
the
fsdp
program.
L
Currently
we
know
there
is
a
strong
pipeline
of
projects
coming
forward
from
our
cdc's
partners,
and
we
also
recognize
that
many
of
those
cdc
partners
are
not
land
trusts,
so
they
cannot
tap
it
or
currently
are
not
land
trust,
so
they
can't
tap
into
those
arps.
So
we
took
into
consideration
the
awards
for
the
for
sale,
development
line
item
the
rgp
line
item
in
regards
to
the
american
rescue
plan.
L
There
is
a
preservation
line
item
in
arp
for
about
five
million
dollars
and
that's
really
focused
on
supporting
acquisition
and
preserving
naturally
affordable
housing,
rental
units
that
are
at
risk
of
going
market
rate
and
our
rgp
funds.
That's
not
the
the
focus
and
use
of
those
dollars.
Typically,
so
we
we
still
see
a
huge
demand
and
need
for
our
gp,
because
arp
is
not
supplementing
or
replacing
those
dollars
here
in
hoth.
J
L
We
have
the
hoth
2021
rgp
line
item
in
the
amount
of
4.6
million
dollars
that
we
will
be
rfping
out.
This
fall
based
on
the
recommendations
that
were
discussed
earlier
in
the
meeting,
and
then
these
dollars
the
2022
dollars,
will
become
available
in
spring
of
2022.
So
we
see
we
feel
between
those
two
initiatives
and
sources.
L
J
N
So
a
clarifying
question,
so
I
I
understand,
there's
a
interest
in
utilizing
rgp
this
round.
You
know
to
support
more
non
nine
percent
tax
credit
deals
and
that
there's
money
left
over
from
from
last
year
to
support
essentially
current.
If
we
have
a
record
year
like
we
did
last
year,
we
get
a
lot
of
nine
percent
deals
in
the
city.
N
L
Yeah
between
the
balances
in
the
2020
line
items
and
ura
specific
sources
for
2021,
we
can
cover
the
commitments
to
the
five
nine
percent
tax
credit
deals
that
submitted
applications
to
phfa
in
march
of
2021..
F
N
We're
focusing
on
non
nine
percent
with
with
these
funds
yeah.
Where
does
that
leave
2022
9
deals.
L
Sure
so
the
these
are
great
questions,
derek
and
I'm
always
thinking
about
balancing
the
these
different
timing,
the
timings
of
the
program
and
the
needs.
So
we
have
a
request
in
to
the
mayor's
office
for
the
capital
budget
for
2022,
which
is
envisioned
to
support
those
nine
percents,
but
then
also
when
we,
those
that
round
of
nine
percent
would
likely
apply
for
funds
applied
to
nine
percent
at
phfa
spring
of
2022
will
know
what
that
total
request
is
reflecting
on
the
2022
capital
budget
from
the
mayor's
office.
L
Then
next
year,
at
this
time,
this
committee
can
assess
the
pipeline
and
the
balances
of
the
funds
across
all
of
the
accounts
and
making
make
a
determination
on
what
2023
allocations
look
like.
N
L
We're
just
constantly
planning
a
year
and
ahead
while
trying
to
assess
what
we
have
currently,
and
so
I
think,
between
all
of
those
variables,
we
will
be
okay.
We
have
not
received
more
than
five
nine
percent
tax
credit
deals
in
a
year,
and
so
that's
kind
of
what
I
base
my
projections
off
of.
J
A
I
think
the
200
would
have
to
stay
in
the
30
ami
and
below
column,
but
we
could
re-allot
it
within
this
column
to
something
else
if
we
think
it
needs
more
more
help.
I.
E
Guess
I
would
suggest
putting
it
up
into
legal
from
what
we
heard
from
christine
that
that
worries
me.
A
N
Is
actually
what
I
heard
okay,
so
I
I,
I
obviously
think
we
should
leave
if
we
look
at
the
2022
draft.
I
think
that
makes
the
most
sense.
You
know
there's
still
1.2
for
legal.
I
think
it
was
five
or
six
hundred
thousand
with
demo,
but
again
those
demo
dollars
they're
they're
flexible,
so
they
can
still
be
used
for
legal.
Should
it
be
needed,
but
you
know
I
think
jeremy
did
a
good
job
of
thinking
about.
You
know
that
problem
in
the
front
end,
so
so
yeah.
P
A
I
too,
like
the
flexibility
of
of
demo
dollars
for
for
whatever
it
is
that
we
need,
but
you
know
we
can
have
a
you
know,
happy
to
have
a
conversation
and
you
know
have
it.
You
know
moved
and
shifted
otherwise,
otherwise
elsewhere.
Excuse
me,
other
wear
is
not
a
word.
Apologies.
P
Actually,
jordan,
if
you
could
move
forward
a
couple
of
slides,
there
is
a
slide
that
shows
what's
left
and
committed.
So
a
little
more
here
this
one
so
under
the
not
yet
committed
column,
you'll
see
what
we
have
not
yet
committed
to
date,
so
under
demonstration,
you'll
see
800
000
and
that
800
200
of
that
is
approved
to
be
used
towards
legal
assistance.
P
So
if
you
move
200
from
the
demo
to
legal
assistance,
that's
how
much
we
have
so
we
have
about
a
million
in
legal
assistance
right
now
and
that
this
is
what
we
have
uncommitted
so
far
or
the
remaining
funds
left
for
our
programs.
If
that
helps
with,
if
you
helps
with
deciding
what
program
needs
more
assistance.
J
I
even
want
to
support
some
of
the
preservation
of
affordable
homes
like
kind
of
partnering
with
those
ro
funds,
some
of
those
demonstration
dollars
that
could
be
an
option.
N
Correct
correct
joanna-
and
I
think
what
you
just
mentioned-
I
think
that's
part
of
the
thought
process
with
the
the
rental
gap
for
this
for
this
round.
Is
that
that
those
funds
could
support
you
know
projects
like
life,
preservation,
etc.
Other
naturally
occurring
affordable
housing
projects,
so.
P
So
doran,
if
you
want
to
go
back
to
the
original
slide,
so
we
are
we
switching
anything
or
are
we
sticking
with
this
2022
draft.
F
A
We're
not
formally
voting,
but
we,
I
guess
we
need
to
agree
more
or.
G
A
F
G
O
So,
like
a
non-formal
vote
like
we,
I
would
like
to
recommend
an
ingredients.
No
I'm
just
joking,
so
I
do
I
I.
I
agree
that
we
can
put
this
out
to
the
community
and
I
also
well.
F
N
I
I
agree
with
the
draft
plan
as
well.
M
Right,
I
just
want
to
say
something,
though
I
just
wanted
to
speak
about
the
down
payment
assistant
costs
based
off
of
the
the
way
that
people
voted
on
those
surveys.
M
I
don't
know
it
looks
like
the
average
is
the
same
as
the
staff
recommend
the
same
as
this
draft.
But-
and
you
know
I
know
the
homeowner
assistance
program,
so
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
difference
there,
but
I
was
just
want
to
think
through
that
as
well
like
as
far
as
you
know,
trying
to
get
more
people
in
homes
moving
forward
like
you
know,
so,
I'm
just
I'm
just
putting
out
there
as
a
question
and-
and
I
think
from
last
year,
looks
like
we
had
over
a
million
dollars
still
there.
A
Yeah,
so
we
have
so
if
we
add
let
what
we
currently
have
left
to
what
they're
proposing
we'd
have
about
1.5.
If
my
math,
if
I'm
mapping
properly
in
this
category,
for
to
be
available
for
down
payment
assistance,.
C
And
I
just
on
this
topic
and
how
we
there
were
some
questions
about
how
these
programs
fit
in
with
the
money
coming
in
through
arp.
C
You
may
have
heard
about
the
ura's
own
pgh
program,
which
we'll
be
ramping
up
in
the
next
year
and
a
large
portion
that
is
going
to
be
trying
to
get
low-income
households,
home
ownership,
opportunities
and
sort
of
a
part
of
the
purchase
scenario,
if
you
will
of
how
that
program
is
being
modeled
as
them
accessing
down
payment
money.
C
So
there
already
has
been
a
very
steady
demand
for
this
program,
but
it's
possible
that
it'll
increase
as
home
ownership
opportunities
open
up
for
a
larger
range
of
of
low
individuals
in
the
city.
H
Just
like
to
make
a
comment
tying
together,
some
threads
from
today
so
derek
said
something
really
powerful
about
halfway
through
the
meeting.
He
used
two
words
intention
and
synergy,
and
I
think
a
lot
of
our
conversation
each
time
that
we
talk
about
the
budget
is
missing
some
synergies,
which
sort
of
undermines
our
intention
so
back
to
our
discussion
about
the
agenda
and
how
the
meetings
look.
H
I
think
this
conversation
about
synergistic
funding,
sources
and
leveraging
is
a
really
important
one
and
maybe
something
that
we
want
to
put
on
our
very
short
list
of
topics
to
start
having
a
more
regular
discussion
about,
because
we
continually
hear
about
other
funds
or
other
initiatives
and
that
synergistic
way
of
using
the
funds
to
really
leverage
larger
impacts
with
intention
is
a
powerful
way
for
this
advisory
to
really
start
to
get
closer
to
those
goals
and
outcomes.
E
E
E
It's
helping,
you
know
helping
preserve,
affordable
housing,
helping
keeping
people
helping
them
stay
in
their
homes,
and
you
know,
I
think,
is
hitting
a
lot
of
that's
that's
a
concern
that
that
goes
down
and
when
both
the
staff
and
the
and
the
board
recommendations
were
higher.
I
agree
with
that.
L
F
L
E
A
Possibly
move
some
demo
dollars
here
from
the
80
ami
up
to
here,
since
we
do
have
some
left
over
in
demo
dollars
that
can
be
used
for
80
and
below
from
previous
years.
P
Yeah
one
thing
to
note
with
half-
and
one
thing
to
consider
is
that
the
program
is
currently
closed,
although
we
are
hoping
to
reopen
it
in
the
beginning
of
next
year.
Our
wait
list
is
pretty
significant
and
it's
going
to
take
at
least
a
year
to
get
through
that
wait
list,
and
so,
even
if
we
were
to
open
up
the
program
and
start
allocating
those
funds,
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
start
those
projects
until
at
least
a
year
out
from
now
and
then
we'd
be
running
into
you
know,
2022
2023
allocation.
N
Yeah,
I
would,
I
would
still
you
know,
kind
of
vote
to
keep
it
the
way
it
is
again.
Those
demo
dollars
can
be
used.
The
flexibility.
N
As
we
all
know,
all
these
line
items
are
necessary
and
needing
there's
need
across
the
board.
The
flexibility
allows
us
to
kind
of
wait
and
see
which
one
rises
to
the
top
and
then
support
that
one
at
that
time.
But
but
it's
our
second
largest
line
item,
so
that
already
demonstrates
that
there's
a
high
level
of
commitment
to
it-
and
you
know
I
think
it's
adequately
funded
we're
not
saying
we
can't
support
it
more,
but
you
know
I.
N
I
would
say
that
50
000
should
stay
in
demo
dollars
as
opposed
to
increasing
it
and
just
leaving
that
flexibility
because
again
legally
needed.
But
it's
not
like
we
skimmed
on
it.
It's
it's
it's.
You
know
it's
our
second
largest
lineup,
so.
A
A
Well,
it
seemed
like
folks
were
primarily
overwhelmingly
pretty
comfortable
with
advancing
this
as
a
plan.
Is
that
what
it
seems
to
be
what
I'm
hearing?
I
can't
look
around
and
see
people
nodding,
but
it
seemed
like
that
was
the
consensus
that
we
were
approaching
just
to
advance
this
to
the
community.
A
A
Right
well,
hearing
no
objections.
We
can
move
forward
with
the
programmatic
expenditures
and
impacts
also
from
staff.
Thank
you.
C
Well
I'll
just
say
really
fast
tomorrow,
this
draft
plan
will
be
posted
on
the
I'll
put
on
the
ura's
website,
with
like
a
block
for
comment
and
we'll
share
that
link
with
the
advisory
board.
So
you
can
spread
it
out
through
your
networks
as
well
and
at
the
end
of
the
month,
we'll
collect
the
comments
and
and
be
back
in
october
with
the
final
thing.
P
Great
thanks
seven,
so
this
is
our
down
payment
and
closing
cost
dashboard.
So
currently
there
are
236
homeowners
that
have
either
completed
the
program
or
are
currently
in
the
process
of
completing
the
program.
P
I
think
it's
significant
to
note
that
of
the
236.
We
have
119,
first-time
home
buyers
that
are
between
that
51,
ami
and
80
ami
level.
So
when
we're
looking
at
who's
who
our
first
time
home
buyers
are
they're
actually
falling
between
that
51
and
80
ami
level
here
for
down
payment
and
closing
cost.
P
Homeowner
assistant,
so
this
just
reflects
clients
that
are
either
closed
and
finished
in
the
program
or
currently
going
through
the
program.
It
does
not
reflect
those
who
are
on
the
wait
list,
so
we
have
287
that
are
that
have
completed
the
program
or
are
currently
in
the
program
so
like
the
chart
that
we
saw
earlier
where
there
was
about
750
000
remaining
funds
that
that
showed
the
wait
list
that
took
into
consideration
the
wait
list.
This
does
not.
P
This
just
shows
again
those
in
the
process
and
those
who
are
who
completed
the
program.
So
that's
just
where
the
discrepancy
is
coming
in,
but
so
far
287
currently
in
the
process
or
have
been
helped
already.
P
And
then
this
is
our
development
program
dashboard.
We
have
48
fsdp
units
and
then
461
rental
gap
units
that
have
been
created
through
our
hoff
programs
so
far,
and
these
are
commitments
and
closings.
P
And
this
is
the
slide
that
we
saw
earlier
again.
This
does
take
into
account
if
you
look
at
the
hapless,
the
hap
hap
line
item-
and
this
does
take
into
account
those
on
the
wait
list
so
that
not
committed
get
column
of
7555
plus
that's
essentially
a
zero.
We
are
fully
committed
at
this
point,
we're
still
processing
applications
that
we
received
when
we
opened
up
the
program
in
the
summer.
L
A
Yes,
and
especially
in
a
time
of
transition
as
well,
seeing
you
pick
it
up
and
jeremy's
hand
off
it's,
it's
been
very
impressive
to
see.
We
really
appreciate
you
and
the
rest
of
the
team's
efforts.
This
has
been.
We
know
it's
a
heavy
lift
and
we
appreciate
you.
A
If
there
are
no
other
comments
or
questions,
are
there
any
announcements
for
the
war.
P
Kelly
thanks
everybody.
There
is
one
reminder
I
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide.
Actually
the
hsp
program
did
transition
to
allegheny
link
as
of
september
1st.
So
the
point
of
entry
into
the
program
is
now
allegheny
link.
So
if
you
do
receive
any
client
inquiries
into
the
program,
please
direct
them
to
the
con.
The
contact
information
on
the
screen.