►
From YouTube: Housing Opportunity Fund Meeting - 8/4/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
morning
and
welcome
to
the
august
meeting
of
the
ura's
housing
opportunity
fund
advisory
board,
there
is
a
is
there
asl
interpretation
available
today?
That's
where
I'm
looking
there.
B
A
C
F
C
A
Adrian
wanaha,
here
I
am
present
and
megan
winter-
is
here
all
right.
We
do
not
have
any
public
comment
registered
for
today,
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
move
on
to
the
approval
of
minutes.
Okay,
I'll
order
has
everybody
had
the
opportunity
to
review
our
minutes
for
our
july
meeting.
G
This
is
adrian,
I
move.
We
accept
the
minutes
from
the
july
7th
board
meeting.
A
Do
we
have
any
abstentions
or
objections?
Okay,
all
those
in
favor.
H
Yeah
hi
I'll
take
this
say
my
it's.
My
colleague,
victoria
jackson
really
did
the
lion's
share
of
the
work
here,
but
she's
got
a
family
matter
to
attend
to
today,
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
introduce
the
project
for
the
advisory
board.
My
name
is
evan
miller
with
ura,
and
the
request
here
today
is
for
a
four
seal
house
for
sale
development
program
for
a
housing
project
on
east
liberty,
boulevard
in
the
larmor
neighborhood
kind
of
along
the
east
liberty
border.
H
So
east
liberty,
development
incorporated
the
ldi
they're
requesting
a
loan,
the
amount
of
200
thousand
dollars
to
finance
the
pre-development
activities
related
to
the
construction
of
six
affordable
units
that
are
going
to
be
part
of
a
larger
18
unit
for
sale.
Development
along
east
liberty
boulevard.
H
The
proposed
loan
that
they're
that
we're
considering
here
today
would
be
sourced
with
hof2021
for
sale,
development
program
funds
and
the
loan
would
have
a
12-month
term
at
zero
percent
interest
and
carry
a
10-year
affordability
period,
and
that
10-year
affordability
period
is
due.
The
fact
that
this
is
a
loan
not
a
grant,
so
that
12-month
term
would
really
come
into
play
either.
H
The
pre-development
loan
itself
will
be
used
to
pay
for
architectural
and
engineering
design
services,
as
well
as
consultants
for
the
project
and
the
six
units
that
will
be
affordable,
every
sold
the
buyers
at
or
below
80
of
the
area
meeting
income.
I
do
want
to
note
that
the
loan
request
exceeds
the
100
000
maximum
for
pre-development
loan,
where
the
project
is
scattered
site,
so
we're
requesting
waiver
guidelines.
I
do
think
it's
worth
pointing
out
that
the
per
unit
maximum
for
a.
H
Pre-Development
loan
is,
I
believe,
30
000
per
unit,
and
in
this
case
I
really
think
we're
going
over
that
that
one
hundred
thousand
dollar
threshold,
just
because
there's
more
units
in
this
project
than
we
typically
see
in
an
affordable
deal,
and
so
the
the
per
unit
subsidy
that
we're
looking
at
here
is
not
really
out
of
the
ordinary.
It
just
so
happens
that
there's
a
handful
of
units
versus
just
one
or
two
overall
project
details.
This
project
is
part
of
the
larmor
for
sale.
H
Housing
strategy-
that's
outlined
in
the
alarm
revision
to
action
plan,
which
is
managed
by
keel
partners
and
keel
partners,
is
a
collaboration
between
kingsley
association,
east
liberty,
housing
incorporated
eldi
and
alarmer
consensus
group,
and
the
strategy
includes
the
construction
of
up
to
50
for
sale
homes,
30
of
which
will
be
affordable
units.
So,
in
discussions
with
the
keel
partners,
they've
made
it
clear
that
the
residents
of
weimer
want
to
see
more
for
sale
activity
happening
in
the
neighborhood.
H
There's
been
a
lot
of
investment
in
rental
and
multi-family,
but
they
would
like
to
see
a
push
towards
affordable
both
affordable
and
market
rate
housing.
That
is
going
to
encourage
home
ownership
in
the
neighborhood.
Eldi
is
currently
undergoing
the
disposition
process
with
the
ura.
These
lots
are
owned
by
the
ura
and
they've
got
a
hold
for
market
letter
from
february
2022
to
help
kind
of
move.
This
development
process
along
and
they
plan
to
begin
construction
on
the
planet,
18
units
in
april
of
2023
and
complete
the
construction
in.
F
H
2024
and
then
sell
the
units
accordingly,
in
addition
to
the
equity
that
eldi's
bringing
to
the
table,
they've
also
secured
a
line
of
credit
from
dollar
bank,
as
well
as
a
grant
from
the
heinz
endowments
and
once
again
we're
requesting
approval
wave
of
fsdp
guidelines
and
the
authorization
of
the
pre-development
loan
in
an.
I
H
Not
to
exceed
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
with
the
ldi,
I
will
note
that
only
gangster
of
keel
partners
is
here
today
to
answer
any
questions
you
might.
F
A
I
just
want
to
note
for
the
minutes
that
derek
and
paul
are
are
here
any
questions
from
anyone.
J
No,
I
just
I
want
to
say
this
is
very
close
to
where
I
live
and
there's
a
huge
need
for
affordable
for
sale,
housing
in
east
liberty,
a
house
on
my
the
houses
on
my
street,
I
think,
have
increased
like
four
times
in
sales
price
over
the
last
few
years.
It's
kind
of
really
shocking
to
watch.
So
I'm
glad
that
eldi
is
focusing
on
this
and
there
there's
definitely
a
need
for
more
for
sale,
affordable,
housing
in
this
area.
F
H
I
believe,
overall,
it's
around
seven
hundred
fifty
thousand
dollars,
so
that
is
one
of
the
reasons
we
also
are
willing
to
go
over.
The
program
guidelines
here
is
that
eldi
and
keel
partners
have
done
a
significant
amount
of
fundraising.
You
know
to
ensure
that
hof
is
not
the
only
group.
You
know
taking
pre-development
risk
here.
K
Yeah,
I
I
I
I
was
waiting
to
see
if
there
were
any
questions.
I
just
wanted
to
pick
up
on
a
couple
of
comments
that
were
already
made.
Elena's
comment,
obviously
about
affordability
is,
is
something
that
has
bugged
us
all
for
quite
some
time,
and
it's
already
been
noted,
you
know,
particularly
in
I,
I
would
say,
over
the
last
10
to
15
years
in
particular
as.
K
That
and
the
investments
that
were
made
in
in
both
refining
and
trying
to
execute
the
longer
vision,
the
alarm
revision
plan,
particularly
in
the
housing
area.
You
know,
we've
seen
a
total
of
about
you
know
roughly
about
370
rental
units
that
have
been
constructed
over
the
last
10
years.
K
They're,
supportive
housing,
there's
low
cost
rental
and
there's
obviously
a
market
rate.
So
there's
a
mix
there
on
the
rental
side
in
terms
of
home
ownership,
there's
only
been
a
total
of
as
best
we
can
figure.
There's
only
been
a
total
of
six
six
affordable
home
ownership
units
that
have
come
online
during
that
same
period.
I
think
two
came
through
the
phdc
pipeline.
I
K
K
The
efforts
to
develop
a
comprehensive
housing
strategy
for
larmer
we're
really
grounded
on
a
couple
of
grounded
and
a
couple
of
sort
of
understandings
and
concerns
at
the
time
when
we
started
on
this
work,
I
think
the
overall
homeownership
rate
in
the
city
of
pittsburgh
was
somewhere
around
50.
K
Percent
when
we
look
at
the
targeted
area
that
was
the
subject
of
the
alarm
revision
plan,
we
were
sitting
somewhere
around
30
and
so
from
a
benchmarking
standpoint.
You
know
we
set
out.
We
set
forth
a
goal
to
say
that
you
know
our
goal
is
eventually
to
be
able
to
try
to
match
the
city's
overall
home
ownership
rate,
and
I
think
that
actually
makes
sense
if
you
start
thinking
about
even
other
neighborhoods
across
the
city
like
what
do
you
bench
market
against,
and
how
do
you
begin
to
sort
of
strategize
and
plan
to
get
there?
K
So,
from
our
perspective,
you
know
we
started
thinking
about
okay.
Our
goal
eventually
is
to
match
the
city's
overall
homeownership
rate,
but
and
at
the
same
time,
understanding
that
a
healthy
housing
market
you
know
is
made
up
of
like
five
segments.
K
The
five
segments
that
I
referenced
a
minute
ago,
we've
had
a
lot
of
really
robust
activity
in
the
rental
market
in
the
rental
segments,
very,
very
little
activity
in
the
home
ownership
rate
on
the
homeownership
side,
and
I
think
everybody
would
agree
and
understand
that,
in
order
to
build
adorable
stable
community,
you
really
do
have
to
have
the
healthiest
the
healthy
presence
of
all
five
segments
of
that
housing
market.
K
So
this
is
in
many
ways
sort
of
the
the
missing
tooth
of
of
the
overall
housing
strategy,
at
least
the
pursuit
of
the
overall
housing
strategy,
as
it
relates
to
both
the
affordable
and
the
market
rate
for
sale.
The
other
thing
that
I
think
we
have
the
advantage
that
we
have
now
that
we
didn't
know
we
didn't
know
these
things,
even
I
would
say
seven
years
ago,
six
or
seven
years
ago.
K
The
housing
side
on
the
housing
question
you
know:
we've
we've
begun
to
figure
out
at
least
a
formula
that
allows
us
to
combine
both
market
rate
and
affordable
units
in
a
package
that
actually
it
you
know
enables
us
to
deliver
both
and
by
using,
let's
say,
the
profits
that
are
that
are
generated
through
for
sale
through
market
rate
for
sale.
We
can
actually
use
that
to
offset
and
bring
down
the
cost
of
affordable
units
to
make
them
more
reachable.
You
know
more
attainable
for
lower
income,
home
buyer
families.
K
That
aspect,
and
then
the
last
thing
I
guess
I
just
want
to
mention-
is
that
we
specifically
the
partners
to
kill
partners,
and
everybody
occupies
a
different
lane
than
this
in
this
partnership
in
this
coalition.
K
But
we
specifically
wanted
to
tackle
and
address
the
question
something
that
has
perplexed
and
challenged
folks
across
the
city
for
quite
some
time,
and
that
is,
we
wanted
to
actually
do
this
project,
keeping
in
mind
a
a
target
audience
and
there's
no
exclusivity
here,
but
certainly
a
target
audience
that
we
specifically
want
to
try
to
attract
young
african-american
homebuyers
to
this
neighborhood
through
this
project
and
do
this
effort,
and
so
we've
invested
in
and
in
fact
I
would
also
point
out
in
relationship
in
relationship
to
this
request.
K
The
partners
collectively
have
already
expended
and
or
committed
well
in
excess
of,
probably
about
250
000
already
on
delivering
this
project,
and
that
in
that
investment
is
in
both
the
sort
of
soft
recognizable
pre-development
cost
that
everybody
is
kind
of
familiar
with.
But
it
also
is
invested
in
things
like
strengthening
the
understandings
of
the
community
partners,
as
it
relates
to
the
needs
that
families
may
have
who
live,
who
may
live
in
the
neighborhood
or
see
who
are
interested
in
living
in
the
neighborhood.
So
from
the
very
beginning,
you
know
much
of
our.
L
Question
when
you
talk
about
all
the
rental
housing,
I'm
assuming
you're
talking
about
the
choice,
neighborhoods
work,
that's
been
going
on
and
I'm
curious
how
this
fits
in
with
your
choice,
neighborhoods
plan
was
it
always
a
piece
of
it
as
an
additional
piece?
I
understand
it's
part
of
the
larimer
vision
plan,
but
I
was
just
curious
how
it
fits
in
with
choice
and
if
there's
any.
K
L
Any
resources
from
choice
that
were
that
will
be
going
into
this
project
was
the
last
part.
That's
a
good
question.
K
K
N
K
Point
out
that
the
overall
numbers
that
I
cited,
those
are
not
just
choice
numbers,
although
the
bulk
of
it
is
choice,
at
least
in
terms
of
the
rental
units.
The
bulk
of
it
is
choice,
but
they
are
not
exclusively
choice.
There
have
been
a
couple
of
li-tech
deals
that
have
been
done
as
well,
that
delivered
at
least
40
units,
as
as
part
of
that
total.
K
K
21
million
of
it
went
directly
into
the
housing
program.
Four
and
a
half
million
went
into
providing
supportive
services
for
the
impacted
families
and
folks
in
the
neighborhood,
and
then
there
was
another
four
and
a
half
million
that
went
into
the
what
were
called
neighborhood
improvements.
K
We
actually
were
able
to
carve
out
at
the
time
my
record
that
the
best
of
my
recollection,
we
carved
down
about
800
000
out
of
the
neighborhood
improvements
pot
that
we
had
hoped
to
direct
into
a
a
for
sale
product
and,
in
fact,
members
of
the
consensus
group
actually
at
that
time
were
working
with
phdc
and
there
were
a
couple
of
you
know,
ill-fated
attempts
to
actually
put
something
out
on
the
street
to
collect.
K
I
K
Figure
out,
ultimately
how
to
actually
deliver
that
when
the
numbers
actually
came
in
couldn't
figure
out
how
to
do
it,
and
so
the
dollars
that
were
allocated
in
the
choice
grant
ultimately
were
were
reallocated
toward
to
support
other
objectives,
because
there
were
specific
requirements
around
the
expenditure
to
grant
that
you
know
that
it
had
to
be
expended
by
a
particular
period
of
time,
so
those
dollars
got
reallocated,
but
this
has
always
been
on
the
radar.
This
has
always
been
a
consideration
from
the
very
beginning
that
we
needed
to
have.
K
K
We
talked
about
the
50
units
because
we
recognize
and
realize,
if
we're
not
able
to
start
to
talk
about
these
projects,
talk
about
projects
like
this
with
some
kind
of
real
scale
that
ultimately
they
end
up
not
really
impacting
we're,
bringing
the
kind
of
impact
that
we
expect
to
see
in
the
way
of
change.
We
can't
get
there
by
doing
onesies
and
twozies.
K
A
I
believe
these
are
two
if
they're,
if
there
are
no
other
questions,
and
we
would
like
to
move
forward,
these
would
be
two
separate
motions
that
would
need
to
be
voted
on
if
anybody
would
like
to
make
them.
N
Well,
this
this
is
derek.
I
I
want
to
recruit
myself.
I
actually
need
to
recuse
myself
from
the
vote,
but
I
do
want
to
make
a
comment
that
I
agree
with
malik's
comments
about.
You
know
really
what
constitutes
a
a
healthy
community
having
a
variety
of
housing
that
that
really
is
available
for
for
for
different
demographics
economically.
F
A
Thank
you
for
that.
Okay,
so
we've
got
our
two
recusals
and
if
there's
a
motion
on
the
table,
this
is
some
suggested
wording
but
you're,
obviously
not
beholden.
To
that.
O
But
I'll
make
a
motion
to
authorize
entering
into
a
four-cell
development
program.
Pre-Development
loan
agreement
with
these
eldi
incorporated
in
the
amount
of
two
hundred
thousand
dollars.
A
A
A
A
Exciting
and
just
for
the
record,
I
think
we're
going
to
be
reviewing
those
project
guidelines
we're
having
our
we're
in
the
process
of
getting
our
force
cell,
our
developers
meeting
schedule
for
the
next
couple
of
weeks,
where
we're
going
to
review
costs
and
some
other
items
so
that
we
can,
you
know,
meet
the
meet
the
need.
That's
out
there.
A
We
all
know
that
costs
have
risen
significantly,
since
we
began
as
a
as
an
advisory
board,
and
so
we're
going
to
be,
I
believe,
assessing
those
things
later
this
month
in
advance
of
the
2023
allocation
plan
process.
H
All
right,
yeah
kelly-
I
was-
I
was
going
to
plug
that
later,
but
since
you
brought
it
up,
just
I've
gotten
a
handful
of
responses,
but
if
everyone
who
has
not
yet
responded,
could
please
to
that
google
form.
I
can
send
it
back
out
later
today,
but
just
be
sure
to
get
your
info
and.
H
A
F
A
Thank
you
for
all
of
your
work
in
this
community
and
its
various
forms
over
over
many
years.
We
appreciate
you
yeah.
Thank
you
up.
Next,
we
have
derek.
Oh,
the
squares
are
shifting.
Sorry,
we
have
derek
from
the
ura,
with
some
proposed
changes
to
the
hsp.
I
Thank
you
kelly.
Good
morning,
everyone
I'm
derek
kendall
morris
manager
of
consumer
lending
with
the
ura.
I
wanted
to
bring
an
item
up
for
discussion
with
you
all
this
morning.
As
you're
all
aware,
the
housing
stabilization
program
is
currently
funded
through
the
housing
opportunity
fund,
but
is
being
administered
by
the
department
of
human
services
and
so
dhs
reached
out
to
us,
because
they
are
planning
to
put
a
large
rfp
together
in
the
coming
months,
to
try
to
better
coordinate
and
more
strategically
utilize.
I
So
as
a
part
of
that
large
rfp
that
they're
planning
to
issue
you
know
they
really
do
want
to
streamline
the
application
process
that
clients
would
have
to
go
through
and
improve
customer
experience
and
the
way
that
they'd
like
to
do,
that
is
to
move
towards
a
model
where
dhs
would
have
one
organization
that
is
serving
as
the
service
provider
for
all
of
the
eviction
prevention
programming
in
moving
forward,
which
would
be
a
different
model
from
the
way
you
know.
I
The
housing
stabilization
program
has
worked
previously,
where
we've
had
multiple
service
providers
that
you
know
a
particular
client
could
be
referred
to.
So
that
is
their
goal.
That's
what
they
are
moving
towards
with
this
rfp,
but
they
did
want
to
give
the
ura
and
the
housing
opportunity
fund
the
opportunity
to
provide
some
feedback
on
that
idea
before
the
rfp
goes
out.
So
I
wanted
to
bring
it
in
front
of
you
all
this
morning
to
see
if
you
have
any
thoughts
or
feedback
about
about
that
change,
because
that
would
change.
I
In
some
ways
I
mean
the
services
would
still
be
provided.
People
would
still
be
receiving
the
help
that
they
need
just
how
they
do
that
in
the
organizations
that
they're
partnering
with
to
do.
That
would
be
different,
so
open
up
the
floor
to
any
comments
or
questions
about
that.
Unfortunately,
ghs
was
not
able
to
have
a
representative
present
at
the
meeting
this
morning,
but
I'm
happy
to
try
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
have
and
take
questions
back
to
ghs.
If
I
can't
answer
something.
G
I'll
start
derek
just
thinking
through
there's
there's
been
many
times
where
you
know
dhs.
The
county
ura
have
had
a
lead
organization,
that's
really
leading
the
charge,
we'll
say
so.
Would
dhs
have
an
openness?
You
know
they're
asking
for
input
now.
Would
they
have
an
openness
on
members
of
this
group
and
constituents
that
have
been
active
in
the
public
comment?
You
know
walking
through
what
that
rfp
looks
like
what
the
qualifications
are
for
those
providers.
G
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
does
happen
in
the
community
is
that
maybe
we
are
not
as
aware
of
what
the
individual
experience
is
with
different
organizations.
Capacity
and
looking
at
organizational
infrastructure
is
very
different
than
maybe
the
on
the
ground
experience
that
folks
are
having
with
services
or
a
particular
organization.
G
I
G
I
Yeah
yeah,
I
really
appreciate
those
comments.
Adrian
and
I
I
agree-
and
one
thing
I
forgot
to
mention-
is
dhs-
has
requested
and
offered
that
you
know
representative
from
the
ura
and
a
representative
from
this
board
participate
in
the
review
of
the
responses
to
this
rfp
so
that
we
have
some
input
into.
Ultimately,
you
know
who
ends
up
being
the
the
service
provider,
so
I
I
think
we
absolutely
will
take
them
up
on
that
offer
because
I
think
yeah
we
do
want
to
get
this
right.
N
A
No,
I'm
just
gonna
say
that
I
guess
additionally,
I
just
have
some
concerns
about
the
duration
of
whatever
contract
we're
entering
into.
I
would
say
that,
as
we've
had
multiple
service
providers,
while
in
some
ways
it
has
had
its
disadvantages,
it
has
also
let
us
know,
what's
not
working
and
allowed
us
to
pivot.
There
are
a
number
of
programs
where
we've
been
like,
oh
well,
we
had
we
sent.
A
You
know
we
sent
five
doves
in
that
direction
and
three
came
back
so
what's
wrong
with
those
other
two,
and
so
I
do
have
some
concerns
about
putting
all
of
our
eggs
for
such
a
critical
program
into
one
service
provider
basket
and
to
be
able
to
have
the
ability
to
to
pivot,
to
tweak
and
make
changes
versus.
A
If
there
are
corrections
that
need
to
be
made
in
a
program
such
as
this,
and
so
that
would
just
be
my
concern
as
we're
drawing
as
we're
drawing
things
up,
that
we
are
not
because
dhs
is
our.
Is
our
provider
right
that
we're
not
turning
the
ship
over
to
them
in
a
way
that
kind
of
eliminates
our
ability
to
control
the
process
or
make
shifts
or
edits
that's
necessary?
A
So
I
don't
necessarily
have
a
direct
ask
there
other
than
what
adrian
is
mentioning
in
terms
of
getting
community
feedback
and
involvement
as
we
go
as
we
build
it,
but
perhaps
maybe
how
to
get
some
of
that
as
we
continue
down
the
process
as
to
what
to
do
with
complaints
and
how
to
figure
out
if
things
aren't
working,
I
just
don't
want
things
to
get
stuck
out
in
no
man's
land.
A
N
Yeah,
I
actually
have
some
concerns
with
going
in
this
direction
and
don't
really
agree,
I
think,
from
the
beginning.
You
know
it's
been
important
to
have
these
kind
of
opportunities
available
to
multiple
organizations
and,
frankly,
some
smaller
organizations.
N
When
we
talk
about
consolidating-
and
you
know
putting
it
all
to
one
organization-
that's
usually
weeds
out
the
smaller
guys
and
and
only
you're,
only
talking
about
one
or
two
bigger
ones
that
ultimately
have
the
capacity
to
handle
the
whole
program.
So
you
know
I
I'm
just
really.
You
know
thinking
about
some
of
the
small
organizations
that
have
delivered
for
us
that
have
done
a
good
job.
N
I
do
think
that
there
were
some
inefficiencies
in
the
system,
I'm
all
for
thinking
about
ways
to
improve
it,
but
you
know
consolidating
to
to
one
provider.
I
I
personally
would
not
recommend
that
we
go
in
that
direction.
A
I
thought
about
it
too
actually
had
a
concern
from
it
from
that
non-profit
equity
perspective,
which
I'm
not
sure
it's
not
necessary,
which
is,
I
didn't,
say
it
because
I'm
like
I'm,
not
sure
if
that's
necessarily
what
we
are
focused
on
as
the
as
a
half,
not
that
we
shouldn't
be,
but
I
do
but
just
to
echo
that
concern
that
it
does
eliminate.
A
You
know
we
have
had
some
some
like
smaller
non-profits
some
community
organizations
and
some
folks
are
most
familiar
and
comfortable
getting
services
through
some
of
those
smaller
organizations,
and
they
would
certainly
not
be
able
to
participate
to
participate
in
a
in
this
type
of
rfp.
I
would
imagine
there
has
been
definitely
some
benefits
to
piecemealing
the
contract
overall.
A
Is
this
a
voting
item?
Do
we
need
to
could
we
would
it
be
possible
to
have
someone
from
dhs
perhaps
discuss
this
with
us
at
a
later
date,
or
is
this
something
that
needs
to
be
absolutely
moved
on
at
this
point,
because
I
don't
think
I
don't,
I
think
you
guys
are
in
a
you,
know
an
agreement
and
understand
our
concerns,
but
also,
ultimately,
this
would
be
a
process
that
they
would
be
moving
forward.
So
I'm
a
little
bit
uncomfortable
with
their
absence
today.
I
Yeah-
and
I
I
do
apologize
that
they're
not
here
today
so
I'll-
have
to
follow
up
and
see.
You
know
exactly
what
their
timeline
is.
You
know
my
understanding
is.
They
are
moving
forward
with
this
rfp.
It's
just
a
question
of
whether
you
know
the
housing
stabilization
program
is
a
part
of
it
or
not.
I
You
know,
obviously
their
their
preference
would
be
that
it
is
so
that
all
eviction
prevention,
you
know,
programming,
you
know
sort
of
handled
the
same
way,
but
you
know
I
think,
regardless
of
whether
you
know
we
are
comfortable
and-
and
you
know
you
or
all,
as
the
hof
board
is
comfortable
with
this,
I
think
this
rfp
is
going
to
still
roll
out.
It's
just
a
question
of
whether
the
housing
stabilization
program
becomes
a
part
of
that
or
if
it
gets
separated
out
as
this
separate
entity
that
dhs
is
still
managing.
N
Do
we
have
a
sense
of
magnitude
of
dollars
that
you
know
rental
gap
program
contributes
to
this
bucket
versus
funding
from
other
sources.
I
Again,
I
don't
know
the
the
specific
numbers
I
do
know
you
know.
Hsp
is
a
program
and
the
funding
that
we
provide
through
that
program
is
one
of
the
smaller
buckets
for
eviction
prevention
that
dhs
administers.
N
Do
you
know
if
they're
open
to
even
a
modification
that
if
there
was
a
almost
a
master
provider,
but
that
that
the
provider
could
even
subcontract
with
some
smaller
agencies,
do
you
you
know?
Are
they
open
to
that
kind
of
discussion,
because
maybe
there's
another
way
to
get
at
that
at
the
same
result,
you
know
that
that
word
that
we're
raising.
I
Yes,
when,
when,
when
we
spoke
with
ghs,
they
did
indicate
you
know
that
they
were
open
to
you
know.
Whatever
singular
provider
is
identified
through
this
rfp,
you
know
they
were
certainly
open
to
that.
That
provider.
You
know
having
partnerships
and
subcontracts
with
other
organizations.
L
Eric
I'm
interested
in
the
most
important
thing
is
whether
people
can
access
their
resources.
I
know
that
when
we
got
the
state
funds
action,
housing
was
really
the
lead
right.
They
were
kind
of
the
single
entity
to
execute
that
program.
I'm
wondering
how
efficient
that
was.
If
people
were
able
to,
you
know
get
all
the
support
they
needed,
because
in
some
ways
it
creates
clarity
for
people.
L
If
everybody
knows,
there's
one
place
to
go
for
help,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
people
can
get
to
the
you
know
get
their
application
in
whether
it's
email
or
online
or
in
person,
and
that
yeah,
I
think
the
most
important
thing
is
just
directing
people
to
the
right
place
and
making
sure
that
they
can
apply
conveniently.
A
I
think
we
might
be
derek,
can
ask
if
we
can
create
like,
even
maybe
I
don't
know
that
they're
that
there's
actually
the
bandwidth
for
it,
but
perhaps
a
small,
a
small
subsection
of
ourselves
to
work
with
them
on
this
rfp,
because
some
of
those
might
be
things
that
we
can
incorporate
into
the
rfp
is
a
willingness
and
ability
to
work
with
smaller
non-profits
willingness
inability
to
assess
at
different
intervals.
Things
like
that.
I
think
we
might.
A
If
we
put
our
heads
together
as
a
group,
come
up
with
some
some
pretty
some
pretty
good
stuff.
That
would
maybe
alleviate
some
of
our
concerns.
We
certainly
do
want
from
a
consumer
end.
A
You
know
for
it
to
be
as
easy
to
utilize
as
possible,
which
I
think,
being
under
the
dhs
single
point
umbrella.
Might,
you
know,
might
be
that,
but
with
perhaps
some
some
concerns
and
some
tweaks.
So
if
we
can
perhaps
send
a
couple
of
emissaries
to
those
conversations
that
would
be
that'll
help
us
get
there
from
here.
I
If
you
know,
perhaps
we
could,
we
could
set
up
a
meeting
with
you
know
anyone
from
the
board
that's
interested
to
see
if
we
can
get
some
tweaks,
you
know
into
the
rfp
language
before
it
gets
rolled
out
and
see
if
we
can't,
we
can't
make
it
something
that
you
know
is
more
representative
of
you
know
our
concerns
and
what
we
feel
is
is
correct,
so
I
will
take
that
back
to
them
and
see
if
we
see,
if
that's
possible
and
see
if
we
can
set
that
up.
Okay,.
J
Eric,
I
think,
as
a
part
of
this-
and
this
is
not
my
area
of
action
housing.
So
I
was
not,
you
know
hugely
involved,
but
I
know
that
we
really
we
did
administer.
We
ended
up
administering
the
e-wrap
program,
which
was
a
huge
amount
of
money
that
came
to
allegheny
county
very
quickly
and
we
were
kind
of
the
central
facilitator
of
it,
but
we
did
partner
with
a
lot
of
neighborhood-based
non-profits
a
huge
number
of
them.
J
I
can't
remember
how
many,
but
they
helped
us
with
the
outreach
and
we
opened
a
physical
center
downtown
and
just
like
the
amount
of
overhead
we
had
and
staff
we
had
to
hire
and
new
systems
we
had
to
put
in
place
it
really.
J
There
are
benefits
to
having
one
central
coordinating
entity
that
they
can
also
work
with
local
nonprofits
to
help
reach
people
on
the
ground
in
an
individual
neighborhood.
So
I
think,
as
part
of
that
meeting,
it
would
be
helpful
for
maybe
natalie
from
action
or
someone
to
walk
through
the
e-wrap
experience,
because
I
think
it
would
be
really
relevant
and
might
address
some
of
these
concerns.
G
I
would
reiterate
that
I
think
natalie
would
be
a
great
you
know
if
she
has
not
already
been
invited
to
the
table
a
great
person
to
help
really
have
a
deeper
understanding
of
you
know
the
many
ways
that
this
can
look
on
the
ground,
because
natalie
also,
you
know,
ran
programming
in
another
non-profit
in
this
same
realm,
with
intake
with
dollars
that
you
know.
M
I
Yeah,
that's
a
great
suggestion.
Thank
you
lena
yeah.
I
definitely
will
will
advocate
for
that
because
I
yeah.
I
know
that
natalie
in
action
did
a
ton
of
work
to
pull
erab
off
rather
successfully
so
yeah.
I
thank
you
all
for
your
comments.
This
has
been
really
really
helpful.
I
will
take
this
back
and
follow
up.
A
Great
now
we
have
some
administrative
items
from
ura
staff.
B
B
We
are
setting
up
some
of
the
events
for
community
meetings.
B
Some
for
all
have
been
set
up
thanks
to
megan,
mark
and
joanna
are
also
helping
out
and
setting
some
things
up,
so
I
will
send
out
the
list
of
ones
that
we
have
to
everybody
and
if
any
hof
board
members
are
willing
to
attend
those
events,
you
can
just
let
me
know
and
then,
as
I
get
the
rest
of
them
scheduled,
we
can
I'll
send
those
out
to
you
guys
as
they
come
through,
but
we
did
want
to
discuss
the
strategy
to
disseminate
the
event
information
as
well.
B
You
know,
is
it
something
where
you
know
you
would
like
us
to
let
city
council
people
know
you
know
that
it's
happening
in
their
district
or
things
like
that,
or
is
that
something
that
you
know
the
hof
board
you'd
want
to?
Let
your
respective
networks
know
that's
one
question
I
put
up
to
you
guys
there.
F
M
B
Perfect
and
then
the
other
item
that
we
had
to
bring
up
here
was
something
that
evan
already
mentioned,
at
least.
Actually.
I
don't
think
that
was
in
relation
to
this.
That
was
in
relation
to
something
else,
but
we
will
be
sending
out
potential
times
for
hof
advisory
board
annual
allocation
plan
working
groups
to
meet
in
september.
B
B
So
we
are
doing
paper
copies
as
well.
Some
of
the
different
ways
that
we
went
about
providing
the
survey
is,
we
did
some
direct
mail
to
targeted
neighborhoods
and
we
did
provide
the
actual
survey
with
that,
but
then
also
provide
the
ability
to
do
it
online
if
they
want
to
do
that,
providing
the
link
and
having
a
qr
code
associated
with
it
also
sent
out
via
email
with
the
qr
code,
and
then
we
are
going
to
do
some
text
message,
campaigns
as
well
and
also
at
the
in-person
events.
I
Thank
you,
chad,
just
a
quick
update
for
the
board
that
the
housing
homeowner
assistance
program
has
closed.
You
know
we
did
have
our
application
window.
You
know
through
the
month
of
july
on
that,
so
that
application
window
is
now
closed.
We
got
a
ton
of
applications
as
we
do
every
year,
we're
able
to
approve
about
81
of
the
135
applications
that
we
received
so
that
that
was
what
we're
able
to
do
for
this
year.
So
the
program
will
open
again
next
year
when
we
receive
next
year's
allocation.
I
So
that's
the
update
there
and
then
just
a
quick
update
on
the
legal
assistance
program
that
I
know
we
had
the
legal
assistance
providers.
You
know
presented
to
to
you
all
last
month
and
you
know
just
confirming
you
know
those
contracts
are
going
to
be
extended
at
next
week's
ura
board
meeting,
as
was
discussed
at
last
month's
hof
meeting.
D
Yeah,
I
guess
I
do
have
one
question
about
the
closing
of
it.
How
are
we
doing
with
contractor
capacity?
Is
that
still?
Is
that
one
of
the
other
reasons
that
this
closes,
that
they're
not
enough,
there's
not
enough
staff
or
whatever
that
sort
of
the
people
into
the
equation,
not
to
be
able
to
get
the
work
done.
Do
we
have
a
bigger
stable
of
contractors,
or
is
it
clearly
just
the
funding.
I
So
mark
you're
correct
that
it's
both
you
know
it
is.
It
is
a
funding
consideration,
but
it
is
also
a
contractor
capacity
consideration.
We
do
have
a
larger,
stable
of
contractors.
You
know
this
year
than
we've
ever
had,
but
we
still
need
more.
D
I
D
If
we
were
able
to
allocate
more
funding
towards
this,
you
know
that's
where
I'm
kind
of
lost
like,
if,
if
you
put
the
whole
10
million
dollars
into,
we
probably
wouldn't
get
it
all
out,
but
is
there
some
incremental
amount
that
this
program
needs
to
be
increased
by?
Because
we
do
have
the
capacity
and
we
could
get
the
funds
out
and
help
more
more
people.
I
So
it
from
a
pure
funding
perspective,
you
know
if
we
were
to
allocate
more
funding
to
the
homeowner
assistance
program.
You
know
we
could
accept
more
applications.
We
could
approve
more
homeowners,
but
that
wouldn't
increase
our
ability
to
finish
projects
any
any
faster.
You
know
because
that
that
really
is
just
an
availability
of
contractor
issue.
I
So
you
know,
if
we
increase
the
budget
for
the
program,
we
absolutely
could
add
more
people.
You
know
to
our
list
and
work
with
those
homeowners,
but
you
know
currently
homeowners
wait
about
a
year
before
they
receive
services.
Typically-
and
you
know
the
larger
that
list
becomes
the
longer
that
weight
would
be
so
it's
it's.
I
It's
a
both
and
situation
where
you
know
more
funding
would
be
needed,
but
we
also
need
to
expand
contractors
and
nonprofits
that
that
are
engaging
with
us
through
the
program
and
we're
actively
trying
to
do
that,
but
that
that
really
is
what
slows
down
the
actual
production
of
of
work
within
the
program.
D
And
is
that
also
a
function
of
what
we're
able
to
pay
contractors
with
the
program.
D
And
is
there
gonna
be
an
appreciative
recommendation
about
what
we
look
at
as
the
program
limits
on
this,
because
we
haven't
really
touched
them
too
much
for
a
while,
if
ever
you
know,
is
that
something
that's
going
to
get
presented
as
part
of
the
allocation
planning
piece.
I
I'll
say
you
know
possibly,
you
know
we
did
increase
the
total
amount
per
homeowner
last
year
through
the
program.
I
And
you
know,
but
you
know,
prices
continue
to
go
up
and
you
know
the
situation
continues
to
be
very
fluid
and
so
yeah
I
mean
that's,
certainly
something
that
I
think
your
uri
staff
will
evaluate
in
terms
of
you
know
how
many
things
if
we
had
to
turn
down
in
the
last
year.
What
are
current
market
prices?
And
you
know
if
we
feel
like
we
need
to
increase
that
you
know
we
certainly
will
recommend
it
yeah.
We
need
to
try
and
stay
with
market
price
and
you
know
stay
competitive.
C
I
would
also
say
that,
because
the
jobs
tend
to
be
pretty
small,
given
the
amount
of
money
that
we
have
available,
that
we're
dealing
with
smaller
contractors,
who
are
sometimes
challenged
to
wait
a
month
before
they
get
paid
right,
and
so
they
they
shy
away
from
these
jobs
because
they
don't
have
any
kind
of
upfront
payment.
With
this
program.
I
N
Other
questions
is
there
flexibility
in
payment?
You
know
two,
two
contractors,
you
know
maybe
seven
to
14
days
for
work,
completed.
I
So
we
do,
we
do
pay
out.
You
know
within
seven
to
14
days
of
work
being
completed.
It's
more
of
an
issue
of
you
know.
As
sonia
mentions
these
smaller
contractors.
I
You
know
some
of
them
a
lot
of
them.
You
know,
don't
have
the
capacity
to
upfront,
the
costs
of
materials
and
things
you
know
and
wait
those
seven
to
fourteen
days,
you
know,
after
the
project
is
completed,
to
to
get
their
payment,
which
you
know
providing
an
upfront
payment
is
just
completely
sort
of
outside
of
the
model
for
the
program.
N
And
is
there
an
ability
within
the
ura
to
have
a
maybe
a
a
global
line
of
credit
that
would
be
available
for
smaller
contractors
to
purchase
upfront
materials
things
that
they
give
you
a
purchase
order
and
you're
able
to
fund
those
those
items
to
help
facilitate
work
for
smaller
contractors,
but
also
expediency
of
you
know,
project
execution.
I
L
I
have
a
question:
how
does
the
state
funding
the
new
state
funding
for
home
repairs
fit
in
to
this?
Will
it
some
of
that
funding
come
to
match
hof
funds
like
how
are
we
going
to
make
sure
that
money
can
get
out
the
door?
I
think
some
of
these
modifications
that
are
being
requested.
I
Okay,
okay,
I
mean
we're
certainly
aware
of
the
whole
home
repairs
bill
that
passed.
I
don't
at
least
to
my
knowledge,
don't
know
you
know
exactly
how
those
funds
are
gonna
be
dispersed,
and
you
know
how
we
would
be
able
to
apply
for
them,
but
that's
certainly
something
that
that
we
will
look
at
once
once
that
information
is
available.
N
I
just
I
just
would
mention
this
again
because
it's
worth
mentioning
you
know,
we
hear
so
much
about
the
need
to
increase
mwb
participation,
and
we
want
to
see
this
on
every
job
and
it's
it's
really
the
minority
and
smaller
contractors
that
are
struggling
with
this.
This.
This
is
really
the
issue.
N
I
think
we
have
an
opportunity
to.
Basically,
you
know
meet
both
demands,
essentially
bridge
both
gaps
by
just
being
a
little
bit
more
creative.
I
understand
the
the
concern
about
oversight
and
things
of
that
nature,
but
we'll
never
move
the
needle.
N
If,
if
we're,
if
we're
not
willing
to
take
some
level
of
risk
there,
and
then
I
think
we
have
to
so,
you
know,
I
just
want
to
push
that
again,
because
it's
it's
so
so
important
on
so
many
levels
in
in
this
city
and
what
what
we're?
What
we're,
what
we're
trying
to
do
as
as
a
whole.
H
We
can
get
some
type
of
see
what
the
options
are
given
the
other
resources
at
the
ura
that
could,
potentially
you
know,
serve
as
you
know,
online
accredit,
or
something
like
that
to
help
move
this
program
along
and
open
up.
You
know,
opportunities
for
a
large
pool
of
contractors.
A
Excellent
there's
no
other.
It's
great
discussion,
I'm
looking
forward
to
all
the
creative
things
we
come
up
with
to
try
to
bridge
some
of
these
gaps
and
move
forward
as
equitably
as
possible.
A
There
aren't
any
other
questions
comments
on
any
of
these
items.
We
do
have
our
advisory
board,
updating,
updates.
Let's
see,
committee
staffing
updates,
knowledge
is
leaving
us
and
he
is
you
know.
We've
really
and
I
can
speak
personally.
It's
been
great
well
working
with
you
really.
A
You
know,
as
you
heard
first
on
the
first
on
the
motion
johnny
on
the
spot,
with
whatever
it
is
that
we
need
is
currently
sharing
both
of
our
subcommittees,
and
so
he
will
be
greatly
greatly
missed,
moving
on
to
working
on
digital
infrastructure,
as
opposed
to
physical
housing
infrastructure
in
his
new
role,
and
that
is
going
to
require
for
us
to
come
up
with
two
new
committee
chairs
both
for
the
fair
housing
team
and
for
the
community
outreach
team
as
well.
A
So
if
they're,
I
don't
know
if
there's
anybody
who's
interested
in
taking
on
either
of
those
roles.
But
while
we
still
have
knowledge
before
you
think
you're
transitioning.
O
A
We
have
one
day
to
pick
his
brain
before
you
have
to
like,
buy
him
a
coffee
to
do
so,
while
he
is
still
on
the
clock,
if
anybody
is
interested
in
either
of
those
roles,
you
don't
have
to
speak
now
or
forever
hold
your
piece,
but
just
to
let
you
know
that
they
are
available
both
on
both
fronts
and
would
like
to.
I
think
both
have
picked
up
a
fair
amount
of
steam
and
we'd
like
to
see
them
continue
to
roll
forward.
A
Okay,
you
volunteer
as
tribute
paul
on
which
committee.
A
Okay,
marketing
and
outreach
perfect
excellent
anyone
for
fair
housing.
It
was
originally
me
knowledge
stepped
in
to
help
me
because
I
was
a
little
bit
overwhelmed.
I
feel
a
little
bit
more
stable.
I
could
take
it
back,
but
I
would
also
be
more
than
happy
to
hand
it
over
to
anybody
who
is
currently
working
on
that
committee.
If
they
are
so
inclined.
A
You
don't
have
to.
Let
me
know
right
this
second,
but
I
just
wanted
to
for
us
to
take
a
minute
to
appreciate
knowledge
right
now
and
then
also
to
you
know,
do
a
little
bit
of
succession
planning
so
that
this
doesn't
fall
by
the
wayside
when
we
turn
around
in
september
and
he's
not
here
and
wonder
what
exactly
happened
so
paul.
As
you
know,
our
team
of
ura
staff
is
great,
I'm
here
as
well
to
help
you
transition
into
that
role.
A
Knowledge
is
here,
for
it
turns
into
a
pumpkin
tomorrow
at
five
o'clock,
so
you
have
him
for
for
a
second
to
to
pick
his
brain
as
well,
and
those
are
our
committee.
Staffing
updates
knowledge.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
say
anything
before
you
leave,
don't
put
you
on
the
spot,
but
we
can
also
transition
to
committee
reports
where
you
also
would
have
to
say
something
anyway.
A
So
you
can
pick
we
can
pick,
which
would
what
you
wouldn't
do.
O
Well,
I
will
say
that
it's
been
really
a
great
opportunity
serving
the
residents
of
pittsburgh
with
all
of
you,
I'm
happy
that
I've
been
able
to
learn
from
so
many
of
you
around
development
and
really
how
these
processes
go
and
representing
housing
authority.
This
is
a
really
important
thing
to
like
find
creative
ways
to
increase
affordable
development
and
throughout
the
city
of
pittsburgh.
So
I'm
honored
that
I
was
chosen
and
that
I
was
able
to
learn
and
experience
have
these
experiences
with
you
all.
O
So
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
and
you
know,
although
I
will
be
transitioning
to
the
department
of
commerce
in
a
couple
of
weeks,
but
I
could
be
available
next
week.
O
If
you
all
don't
want
to
grab
a
coffee
or
anything
I'm
taking
a
week
or
so
off,
so
we
can
catch
up
or
we
can
talk
about
anything
off
related
or
have
you
so
you
know
I
want
you
to
feel
so
pressured
that
I
won't
be
able
to
speak
on
behalf
of
my
experiences
or
share
things
that
may
be
beneficial
for
for
sure
that
this
this
work
continues
on.
So
I
want
to
say
thank
you.
N
I
just
want
to
say
you
know
I
want
to
echo
kelly's
comments,
knowledge.
It
has
definitely
been
a
pleasure
serving
with
you
appreciate
you
just
in
general,
your
your
leadership,
just
thoughtfulness
around
certain
issues-
and
you
know
just
just
want
to
you
know-
say
that
publicly
and
then
the
question
or
are
you
relocating
or
will
you
be?
Will
your
new
role
be
local.
O
So
I
will
be
well
first
of
all,
thank
you
very
much.
I
appreciate
your
kind
words.
It
means
a
lot
for
both
you
and
kelly,
so
I
will
be
housed
in
dc,
but
I'll
be
remote,
plus
travel.
So
the
agency
ntia
under
the
department
of
commerce,
we're
still
figuring
out
remote
learning,
so
I'll
still
be
able
to
live
here
in
pittsburgh,
but
I'll
be
traveling
throughout
the
country
to
ensure
that
every
resident,
while
the
united
states
has
access
to
the
internet
and
brought
the
infrastructure.
E
Thank
you
for
being
a
leader
knowledge.
We
appreciate
you
and
if
you
want
to
help
us
with
any
special
tips
around
the
internet,
that
you're
going
to
learn,
you
know
just
that's
fine,
too
also
how
we're
going
to
do
coffee
with
you
if
you're
not
even
going
to
be
in
you
know,
you
know
what
I'm
just
I'm
going
to
get
my
coffee
in
before
tomorrow.
O
That's
perfect:
we
can
get
coffee
tomorrow
and
I
would
definitely
be
willing
to
help
on
the
broadband
infrastructure
stuff,
so
there's
40,
46
billion
dollars
and
me
and
my
team
will
be
responsible
for
2.75
billion
dollars
deployed
through
states.
But
you
know
I
can
connect
any.
You
know
you
all
to
the
person
in
pennsylvania
in
the
governor's
office
who's
already
starting
this
work.
G
A
So
I'm
gonna
move
it
along
we'll
have
to
grab
our
coffees
and
drinks
offline
committee
reports.
The
fair
housing
committee
did
not
meet
this
month,
although
we
have
been
emailing
pretty
extensively,
I'm
not
sure
if
there
are
any
reports
that
anyone
from
the
fair
housing
committee
would
like
to
share
out.
At
this
point.
A
Marketing
and
community
outreach,
then
I
know
dad
gave
some
of
somewhat
of
an
overview
as
we
talk
about
the
allocation
plan,
if
there's
anything
that
he
missed
that
we
want
to
discuss.
A
Okay,
I
guess
that's
all
that
we
have
internal
as
administrative
items.
We
do
have
kind
of
a
joint
administrative
item
between
the
advisory
board
and
the
ura
staff
regarding
our
next,
our
meeting
schedule,
which
is
shifting
for
the
month
of
september,
we
were
moving
to
hybrid
back
in
city
council
chambers
for
the
month
of
september,
which
is
this
year
has
been
really
flying
by.
I
almost
stuttered
when
I
said
this
was
the
august
meeting
of
the
half,
but
it
is,
and
so
now
we're
moving
towards
september.
A
That
meeting
will
be
on
the
first
at
2
p.m,
in
council
chambers,
and
that
will
be,
as
you
know,
they're
all
set
up.
In
order
to
do
the
you
know,
we
can
participate
on
screen,
obviously
we'd
like
for
as
many
of
us
to
attend
in
person
as
feel
comfortable
engaging
in
person
at
this
stage
of
pandemic,
and
hopefully
we'll
have
some
more
robust
public
comment,
especially
as
we
move
into
allocation
plan
season.
I
believe
we've
exhausted
our
agenda.
B
Yeah,
I'm
just
gonna,
add
one
thing
to
what
you
said
there
as
well
kelly,
so
I
did
meet
with
david
at
the
city
and
we
went
into
council
chambers
to
see
what
the
hybrid
setup
would
look
like,
and
I
just
want
everybody
to
know
it
is
pretty
easy.
B
They
have
it
set
up
really
great
in
city
council
chambers.
I
don't
really
see
any
barriers
for
us
at
this
point.
In
doing
that.
Just
to
note,
if
you
know
there
is
public
comment
that
is
going
to
attend
in
person,
they
don't
need
to
register
anything
like
we've
been
doing,
but
if
they
do
want
to
do
public
comment
online,
they
would
still
need
to
register
the
same
way
they
had
before,
so
that
the
city
can
ensure
that
they're
you
know
put
into
the
zoom
chat
but
yeah.
A
I
think
being
able
to
walk
in
really
does
eliminate
quite
a
few
barriers
in
terms
of
participation,
and
so
I'm
excited
to
see.
If,
if
we're,
you
know
us
getting
back
to
the
swing
of
things
in
person,
so
we'll
see
fingers
crossed
so
we've
got
some
programmatic
expenditure
updates.
B
Yes,
so
you
know
leading
into
the
allocation
season,
I
did
go
ahead
and
add
in
our
2022
allocations
and
what
has
been
committed
or
closed
so
far.
One
thing
I
will
note
on
here:
you
know
there
was
discussion
about
the
homeowner
assistance
program.
You
know
this
is
what
was
committed
and
closed,
but
it
doesn't
include
any
of
the
placeholders
for
all
the
other
approved
projects
we
have
where
you
know
the
actual
amount
hasn't
been
decided.
B
B
I
can
do
that,
but
the
numbers
won't
necessarily
be
accurate
for
the
placeholders,
because
they,
you
know,
we
don't
know
the
amounts
at
this
point,
and
one
other
thing
to
note
here
is
that
the
small
landlord
fund
that
did
just
start
here,
I
believe
back
in
june
with
the
new
funding
source.
So
we
do
have
one
project
that
went
that
we
have
commitment
for
that.
So
far,
so
that
one's
just
getting
started.
B
B
And
if
anybody
has
any
questions
as
I'm
going
through
these
just
please
let
me
know
for
rental
gap
program
and
for
sale
development.
We
have
the
number
of
units
by
ami
and
then
also
just
the
percentage
of
projects
that
were
going
toward
ami
in
general.
B
O
B
And
then
I
think
the
announcement
that
I
was
going
to
bring
up.
You
know
that
was
what
we
had
already
discussed
here.
So
I
don't
think
we
have
any
other
announcements
from
our
end.
A
All
right,
so
there
are
no
other
announcements
other
than
please
respond
to
evan's
doodle
for
the
development.
Well,
it's
not
doodle.
It's
a
google
poll
for
a
scheduling
for
our
developers
meeting.
Please
do
so!
That's
going
to
be
very
important
as
we
move
forward
to
the
allocation
plan
so
that
we
can
know
exactly
what
it
is
that
we're
doing,
and
if
we
need
to
shift
those
numbers
around
please
respond
to
that
and
other
than
that,
I
don't
think
we
have
any
pressing
business.
A
A
So
please
reach
out
to
jed
around
scheduling
so
that
we
can
attend
as
many
of
those
as
possible
and
any
other
action
items
for
folks,
chad
or
evan,
no
all
right
and
with
that
I
will
see
not
at
the
same
that
time
same
bat
channel
in
person
in
city,
council
chambers
at
2
p.m.
On
the
1st
of
september,
thanks.
A
H
D
A
Do
we
have
a
motion
to
return
all
right?
We
have
away
from
mark
and.