►
From YouTube: Housing Opportunity Fund Meeting - 6/4/20
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
morning,
everybody
welcome
to
the
June
meeting
of
the
Housing
Opportunity
Fund
advisory
board
via
the
city
of
Pitt's
idiot
experts,
YouTube
channel.
So
today
we're
going
to
get
started
in
our
normal
fashion,
with
some
public
comments.
I
must
stress
that
you
know
we
are
doing
this
remotely
and
we
could
be
doing
this
remotely
for
a
while.
So
the
way
public
comment
works,
we
are,
we
are
using
the
city
of
pictured
staff
to
air
these
meetings.
We
are
following
city
of
Pittsburgh
City,
Council
protocol.
We
ask
that
everybody
pre-register
for
public
comments.
B
A
You
to
email
us
at
HOF,
a
URL
or
to
register.
We
will
then
send
you
the
zoom
and
zoom
callin
information
for
pre-registration
from
public
members
that
do
not
want
to
speak
for
public
comments.
They
can
watch
this
on
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
YouTube
channel.
It
airs
live
so
this
morning
we
had
a
few
public
registered
public
speakers.
We
also
received
some
some
folks
wanting
to
get
into
the
meeting
that
had
not
registered
for
today's
purposes.
We
are.
A
We
are
letting
everybody
into
the
meeting
to
give
public
comment,
but
in
the
future
we
will
not
be
able
to
do
this.
We
are
going
to
have
to
stick
to
the
list
of
public
commenters.
It
is
so
much
easier
for
the
city
staff
to
be
able
to
administer
it
when
we
have
a
list
of
emails
and
phone
numbers
so
for
future
meetings.
If
you
would
like
to
give
public
comment,
you
have
to
register
in
advance
that
meeting
so
the
first
person
for
public
comment
this
morning
is
plus
my
public
comment.
Lists
Alysia
sim.
C
C
D
C
D
C
A
D
Thank
You
Jessica
I
hadn't,
planned
on
giving
public
comments.
I
just
wanted
to
watch
since
you've.
Given
me
the
opportunity
now,
I
would
just
ask
you
know:
Rena,
listen,
I,
know
that
that
HOF,
the
HOF
advisory
board
and
the
you
are
a
you-
are
a
staff
are
working
hard
to
try
to
streamline
streamline
on
the
rental
assistance
program,
the
housing
stabilization
program.
You
know
so
I
want
to
applaud
you
for
that
focus
for
paying
attention
to
that.
D
I
would
encourage
you
to
take
a
look
at
how
legal
services
is
funded
through
that
program
and
not
conflate
rental
assistance
with
legal
services.
You
know
not
count
and
and
to
be
to
be
clear,
so
I'm
a
staff
attorney
with
regional
housing,
legal
services.
We
do
not
provide
a
victim
defense,
so
we
are
not.
D
You
know
going
to
respond
to
a
legal,
an
eviction,
defense
RFP.
At
any
time
we
don't
have
a
dog
in
this
fight.
This
is
just
a
matter
of
you
know
ensuring
that
the
program
works
as
intended,
but
I
would
encourage
you
to
fund
legal
services
and
rental
assistance
separately
and
not
penalize
residents
who
are
receiving
legal
services
by
deducting
the
cost
of
that.
D
Those
services
from
the
assistance
and
I
would
also
encourage
you
to
look
at
foundations
fund,
similar
programs,
but
just
fight
instead
of
funding
per
person,
served,
provide
a
grant
for
a
total
number
of
people
served.
I
mean
it
just
seems
that
the
way
that
is
being
proposed
is
really
burdensome
for
the
URA
and
it's
impossible
to
to
implement
my
neighborhood
legal
services,
and
so
I
would
encourage
you
to
take
a
look
and
thanks
for
giving
me
the
opportunity
to
speak
on
this.
A
E
Can
you
hear
me
good
morning?
Yes,
okay,
good
morning,
everyone
I
just
want
to
say
I
heard
a
little
bit
with
Bob
said
and
I
realized
that
neighborhood
legal
services,
we
received
a
funding,
but
we
I
hope
you
would
consider
some
kind
of
funding
strength
for
pre
counseling,
so
that
people
that
are
facing
eviction
can
get
legal
have
help
before
the
fact
you
know,
because
neighborhood
legal
services
they
do
what
they
do,
but
they
kind
of
do
it
after
the
fact.
E
So
if
there
could
be
some
kind
of
a
pre,
counseling
or
pre
legal
services
before
and
there
may
be
after,
if
a
tenant
wants
to
appeal
or
something,
maybe
legal
services
could
pick
it
up
from
there
like
a
two
part
thing
so
and
I
think
I,
just
especially
it's
very
important
because
of
the
copic,
it
was
always
important,
but
most
tenants,
don't
I,
guess
the
the
resources
to
acquire
a
lawyer
to
defend
them.
It
says
almost
like
if
you
went
to
court
and
got
one
of
those
pro
bono,
lawyers.
E
A
F
A
G
Happy
Thursday
so
crystal
Jeannine,
City
of
British
CLT
I,
just
want
to
thank
the
HLF.
Fine.
We've
sold
three
permanent,
affordable
homes
this
month
to
first-time
homebuyers
all
below
80%
ami,
and
we
have
three
more
being
completed
this
summer.
We
are
in
position
to
begin
construction
on
as
many
twenty
four
homes
and
three
two
communities
over
the
next
12
months.
As
we've
seen
in
this
crisis,
CLT
homes
provide
a
backstop
that
most
homeowners
don't
have.
G
Our
stewardship
is
key
to
the
long-term
successful
in
homeownership
and
that's
what
we
want
right
now
believe
that
coming
out
of
Kovac
tenon,
don't
co-op.
Housing
can
and
should
be
a
strategic
priority
to
stabilize
communities,
individuals
of
small
landlords.
So
this
is
something
that
we
were
definitely
working
on
and
working
toward.
We
think
this
is
another
housing
option
that
could
be
provided
could
be
provided
to.
G
C
G
A
A
But
I
did
hear
a
theme
coming
across
with
public
comment
regarding
the
legal
assistance
needed
for
evictions
and
I
will
say
that
we
have
been
in
a
lot
of
meetings
and
a
lot
of
discussion
on
this
topic
recently
and
I
do
want
to
have
either
a
committee
meeting
of
the
day,
Joe
Weiser
board
or
potentially
discuss
this
in
more
detail
at
the
next
advisory
board.
Meeting:
okay,
Jessica.
H
This
is
Dee
Ponte
I
have
one
thing
to
note
about
public
comment:
the
procedures
I'm
wondering
whether
or
not
we
can
offer
a
phone
number
for
folks
that
are
like
caught
in
the
digital
divide.
Right
now.
It
may
want
to
get
public
comment
and
can't
email
HOSA.
You
are
a
orgas
there,
a
phone
number
that
can
be
used
so
folks
can
get
their
names
on
the
list
and
be
able
to
get
public
comment.
A
I
A
A
Hey
nut
okay,
I'm
going
to
introduce
a
Jeremy
to
to
discuss
this
in
more
detail,
but
this
is
an
item
for
the
house
and
stabilization
program.
We
are
moving
forward
today
needing
to
to
get
your
recommendation
on
approvals
to
bring
on
more
program
administrators
into
the
program.
As
you
know,
this
program
is,
you
know,
very
busy
with
kovat
related
work,
shortages
and
losses
of
income
and
jeremy
is
going
to
go
through
this.
A
Additionally,
as
was
noted
in
public
comment,
the
you
Ras
and
fundraising
additional
resources
to
to
make
the
program
really
about
close
to
a
four
million
dollar
program
moving
forward.
But
today
we
are
here
to
talk
about
the
million
dollars,
a
million
fifteen
thousand
that
will
be
coming
out
at
a
Housing
Opportunity
Fund
go
ahead,
Jeremy,
hey.
A
K
A
C
L
A
N
So
we,
the
you,
are
a
staff
met
with
advisory
board
members,
Mark
Masterson
and
Adrian
wanna
on
Monday
June,
1st,
to
review
staff
recommendations
for
the
awards
where
we
went
through
every
proposal
and
explained
the
staff
recommendations
based
off
of
a
forum
scoring
mechanism
that
looked
at
each
organization's.
Readiness
to
perceive
organizational
experience,
financial
capacity
and
approach
to
supportive
services.
N
So
in
front
of
you
is
the
proposals
that
we
are
putting
forward
for
consideration
today.
So
the
Urban
League
of
Greater
Pittsburgh
will
get
a
hundred
thousand
YWCA.
Also
a
current
provider
will
get
a
hundred
thousand
Chartier
Center
and
goodwill
and
Jewish
Family
and
Community
Services
are
all
new
providers
and
then
at
the
bottom
there
you
will
see
150,000
reserved
for
community
ambassadors.
N
N
One
of
those
projects
that
were
working
with
the
county
on
is
this
community
Ambassador
Program.
So
these
will
be
designated
for
smaller
community-based
organization,
who
were
maybe
not
funded
in
this
round,
and
the
purpose
of
the
community
ambassador
program
is
to
really
assist
with
outreach
of
the
program,
make
sure
the
community
members
know
the
assistance
and
what
the
eligibility
is
to
help
people
collect,
obtain
their
documentation
for
the
program
and
help
fill
out
the
applications.
N
Advisory
board
members
will
see
in
their
packets
that
there
is
additional
non
hof
funding
being
proposed
to
other
organizations
as
well.
That
will
include
CDBG
as
well
as
foundation
funding.
So
this
in
front
of
you
is,
we
are
question
approval
for
for
the
hof
funds,
but
in
total
we
will
have
11
providers
serving
the
housing
stabilization
program.
N
A
few
other
notes.
We
do
hope
to
move
pretty
fast
and
expect
to
have
most
of
the
new
providers
begin
services
as
soon
as
July
1st.
So
you
are
a
staff,
will
work
very
quickly
to
make
sure
that
happens
in
an
effort
to
get
ahead
of
July
10th
moratorium
lifts
to
address
the
surge
that
we
are
expecting
and
with
this
little
over
1
million
dollars
of
hof
funding,
we
this
funding
will
serve
a
minimum
of
253
households
to
maybe
about
422
households
just
based
on
the
assistance.
Someone
might
need.
N
O
You
Jeremy
and
thank
you
to
everybody
else
for
giving
me
a
few
minutes.
First
of
all,
I
want
to
thank
you
for
considering
our
proposal
and
just
briefly
I
want
to
add
that
we
feel
very
confident
that
we
can
manage
this
funding
and
the
program
effectively
and
get
the
funds
to
the
people
that
need
them
as
effectively
as
possible.
Basically,
for
three
reasons:
we
have
a
history
of
successfully
mental
assistance
programs,
including
rental
assistance.
We
have
a
well
trained
staff
that
includes
a
diverse
staff
hired
from
the
communities
we
serve
in
house.
O
We
have
bilingual
bicultural
staff,
who
speak
Arabic,
Nepali,
Spanish,
Swahili
and
Uzbek,
and
we
also
have
37
contracted
interpreters
that
are
available
to
us,
as
well
as
a
telephone
interpretation
service.
We
have
job
counselors
and
licensed
clinical
social
workers
involved
in
both
of
the
emergency
assistance
programs.
We
have
so
we
have
the
infrastructure
to
to
be
able
to
begin
this
Rite
of
July
first
and
then.
Lastly,
we
have
a
well-established
reputation
for
working
collaboratively
in
community
efforts.
O
M
Yes,
the
morning
my
name
is
Odell
Whittington,
an
executive
director
of
Pittsburgh
Services
Inc.
We
are
the
designated
Community
Action
Agency
for
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
we've
been
to
the
agency
since
1983
our
mandate
and
work
with
individuals
with
25%
of
the
poverty
level.
We
are
part
of
the
national
network,
the
auxin
agencies
over
a
thousand.
There
are
44
in
the
state
of
Pennsylvania
alone,
and
our
primary
mandate
is
to
new
folks
at
near
the
poverty
to
some
form
of
self-sufficiency.
We
have
done
everything
from
providing
rental
assistance
to
workforce
development.
M
M
Pandemic
sandy
actually
across
the
country,
was
awarded
a
billion
dollars
in
stimulus
funds.
You
see
a
sigh
on
top
of
our
regular
funding.
We
see
funding
to
provide
impact
based
on
the
Abner
Kovac
19,
so
this
activity
of
rental
assistance
is
already
on
our
radar
screen
to
provide.
We
will
be
adding
additional
funds.
M
I
was
listening
to
the
conversation
about
the
cream
legal
support.
I,
wasn't
aware
of
that
specific
issue.
The
flexibility
of
our
CF
Dali's
allows
me
to
actually
consider
maybe
putting
some
funds
toward
that,
so,
if
at
all
possible
coasting
listening,
whoever
is
having
these
meetings.
I
know
it's
about
kind
of
how
to
make
the
how
to
make
this
process
work,
but
I
can,
in
my
budget
or
stimulus,
hope
to
put
some
resources
in
place
to
assist
with
that
prenatal,
counseling
and
support.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
before
we
open
it
up
to
advisory
board
members
to
talk.
I
just
want
to
point
something
out
because
I
realized,
as
Odell
was
talking.
You
know
this
slide
lists
the
organizations
that
are
receiving
hof
funding,
but
the
packets
that
were
given
to
advisory
board.
Members
also
include
the
organizations
that
are
receiving
CDBG
and
other
funding,
Pittsburgh,
Foundation
and
other
sources
of
funding
and
the
PCs
eye
allocation
is
coming
out
of
CDBG
and
for
those
those
people
that
are
watching
this.
A
On
the
YouTube
station
I'm
going
to
read
the
list
of
the
other
providers
that
are
receiving
different
funding
sources,
those
funding
sources
will
be
presented
along
with
the
Tuda.
You
are
a
board
meeting
next
week,
so
so
they're
not
final
until
that
happens,
but
I
do
want
the
general
public
to
know
all
the
organizations
that
are
participating
in
the
program
so
that
they,
you
know,
will
know
who's
doing
it
so
other
than
this
list
you
see
on
the
screen.
Macedonia
face
is
also
receiving
a
non
HOF
award.
A
The
Urban
League
is
receiving
additional
funding,
and
so
it's
the
YWCA
takes
burg.
Mercy
is
receiving
non
hof
funding
action.
Housing
is
as
well
receiving
non
HL
of
funding
and
Chartier
centered,
the
veterans
Leadership
Program
NeighborWorks,
and
then
the
pickford
Community
Services
Inc,
who
Odelle
represents,
are
receiving
non
HLS
funding
and,
additionally
of
that
list
that
I've
read.
A
million
of
the
CDBG
funding
coming
from
the
city
is
specific
to
mortgage
payment,
payment
of
mortgage
and
preventing
foreclosure
and
the
groups
that
will
be
working
with.
That
is
action,
housing,
NeighborWorks
and
the
Urban
League.
N
Additionally,
just
something
that's
still
in
the
works
is
the
addiction
prevention
program
that
will
be
part
of
8
housing
stabilization
program.
It
is
very
much
still
in
the
works
with
our
County
Partners
and
the
core
system,
so
we
are
looking
at
how
we
can
use
some
of
the
on
HOF
funding
to
respond
to
the
evictions
coming,
but
we,
we
are
still
working
to
coordinate
that
with
core
partners,
whether
with
a
magistrate
level
or
the
Pittsburgh
housing
court.
A
Yes,
thank
you
and
also
the
community
Ambassador
Program,
which
Jeremy
did
mention,
while
he
was
talking
I
just
want
to
re-emphasize.
You
know
this
is
something
that
we
intend
to
make
Awards,
hopefully
as
early
as
next
month.
So
there
were.
There
are
actually
four
smaller
organizations
that
apply
to
this
program
that
that
really
did
not
have
experience
operating
a
program
like
this,
but
they
do
have
great
community
contacts
and
community
context,
and
we
are
working
with
Department
of
Human
Services
in.
A
County
Department
of
Economic
Development
to
to
jointly
create
this
community
ambassador
program
that
Jeremy
discussed.
So
you
will
be
seeing
more
about
that
in
the
upcoming
months
and
I
would
also
like
to
say
that
that
part
of
the
the
reason
for
this
is
because
the
feedback
we
are
receiving
from
the
housing
advocates
and
from
the
general
public
that
they
want
the
program
to
be
much
more
user
friendly
and
that
people
need
help
with
the
applications.
That
is
part
of
the
reason
you
know
why
this
program
is
being
created.
Thank
you.
A
J
J
Because
a
lot
of
that's
been
being
done
by
volunteers
and
it's
been,
you
know
it's
not
maybe
the
best
way
to
it
wasn't
the
best
way
to
do
it,
but
we
didn't
know-
and
you
know
we
were
sort
of
you
know-
learning
as
we
were
going
so
I
think
it
was
a
really
great
meeting
and
it
was
great
to
hear
Jeremy
talk
about
some
of
the
bigger
picture
issues
like
we're
talking
to
the
county.
You
know
in
in
life
in
general,
there's
a
lot
of
silos
in
stuff
around
homelessness
and
homelessness
prevention.
J
It
is
nothing
but
silos.
So
you
know:
we've
got
silos
even
within
the
URA
between
different
programs
and
sources
of
funds
that
are
coming
in,
like
CDBG
we've
got
silos
among
units
of
local
government.
You
know
most
prominently
between
the
city
and
the
county
locally,
but
there's
others
with
with
other
units
of
local
government
in
a
coordination
amongst
different
departments
within
local
government.
We,
you
know
I,
don't
think
we've
really
touched
on,
like
with
the
police
and
how
things
are
done
with
it.
J
If
you
dread,
community
policing
aspect
to
police
officers,
know
that
hey,
there's
these
resources
and
there's
these
organizations
that
might
be
able
to
help.
But
then
you
know,
there's
also
funding
silos.
You've
got
local
state
federal
foundation
and
private
donors
and
everybody
has
a
little
different
piece,
and
then
you
have
people
that
have
families
and
people
that
are
in
crisis.
That
are
the
least
able
to
navigate
amongst
the
silos,
and
it
was
what
I
was
really
happy
to
hear.
J
Jeremy
say
was
that
it's
really
taking
a
look
at
it,
so
that
the
person
in
need
of
the
help
is
the
one
that's
getting
the
help
that
they're
not
told
and
bounced
from
silo
to
silo.
This
I
know
that
hey
they're
applying
and
then
the
administrators
are
figuring
out.
Here's
the
pot,
here's
the
criteria,
here's
the
pot
of
money,
we're
gonna,
go
access
to
pay
for
this,
and
it
isn't.
You
know
we
got
a
long
way
to
go
on
this
road,
but
it
was
really
great
to
have
that
kind
of
conversation.
J
J
So
I'm
just
really
excited
that
we've
taken
a
turn
to
start
looking
at
this
way
there
might
there's
gonna,
be
a
debate
about
hey.
Is
$150,000
enough
for
those
organism
knows,
are
all
debates
we
can
have
and
solve
as
long
as
we're
thinking
about
the
problem
in
the
right
way,
so
I
just
was
really
excited.
I
wanted
to
you
know
just
thank
the
staff,
for
you
know,
starting
to
think
this
way.
I
was
really
enjoyed.
P
So
comment
and
then
a
question
I
agree:
I
think
there
was
a
lot
of
feedback
last
month
about
something
with
the
program
and
how
we
could
improve
it.
So
I'm
encouraged
to
see
the
Keating
ambassadors
program.
It
shows
you
know
that
we
hurt
the
community.
We
heard
that
the
communication-
and
this
seems
to
be
in
direct
response
to
that.
So
that's
great.
My
question
is
that
the
amounts
how
how
these
amounts
were
determined.
Is
it
these
the
amounts
that
these
organizations
are
platform
or
you
know
if
you
can
just
think
back
on
how
the.
N
So
when
we
have
5.2
million
requests
and
we
have
1
million
to
allocate-
we
looked
first
at
tier
1,
which
are
the
existing
providers
and
with
those
providers
we
looked
at
how
much
they
have
spent
on
their
existing
contracts
to
determine
how
much
to
give
them
in
new
contracts,
and
so
with
tier
1,
and
also
with
tier
2,
which
are
all
the
new
providers
were
who
requested
funding.
We
look
deeply
into
their
proposals
and
tried
to
match
what
their
stated
capacity
would
be
to
available
funding.
There
would
be
as
well
and
also
you
know
this.
N
This
slide
that
you
see
right
now
is
one
third
of
the
funding
right.
So
we
have
two
million
cpg
that
you
see
on
your
packets,
and
so
we
tried
to
match.
You
know
some
organizations
that
have
hof,
CDBG
and
potentially
foundation
money
as
well,
but
you
know
we
essentially
tried
to
match
the
base
on
their
scoring.
H
I
have
a
very
quick
note,
so
at
the
last
HOF
meeting,
I
recall
a
lot
of
folks
speaking
out
about
our
maybe
in
the
you
are
a
sport
meeting
a
lot
of
folks
speaking
speaking
out
about
the
non-english
speaking
community's
ability
to
access
these
programs.
We
know
that
they
are
under
a
tremendous
amount
of
strain
with,
as
it
relates
to
housing.
So
can
you
talk
about
how
the
new
slate
of
program
administrators
will
help
us
to
establish
non-english
speaking
partners
that
can
work
with
that
part
of
our
population?.
A
We
have
been
working
really
hard
to
resolve
that
we
realized
that
there
was
a
federal
forum
being
used
by
the
Urban
League
that
that
does
not
need
to
be
used
at
at
its
full
extent.
So
we
have
the
application
down
to
three
pages,
would
lift
just
a
small
amount
of
supplemental
information.
We've
been
working
with
Casa
San
Jose
will
work
with
Jewish
family
community
services
and
the
other
groups
to
help
them
understand
exactly
what
what
needs
to
be
done.
But
but
trust
me,
the
forum
is
much
much
much
smaller
than
what
was
being
used
right.
H
And
the
only
other
note
that
I
have
is
that
I
stressed
that
I
think
that
we
need
to
continue
to
look
at
process
improvement
as
we
expand
the
list.
We
really
need
to
have
a
stand
way
for
everybody
to
engage
this.
This
program
should
not
be
burdensome
to
the
public
and,
to
you
know,
minority
and
diverse
communities
that
are
really
going
through
a
hard
time,
so
anything
that
we
can
redo
to
reduce
red
tape,
understanding
that
there
are
compliance
requirements.
H
I
really
want
us
to
think
about
that,
and
do
that
I
don't
want
to
see
people
spinning
their
wheels
in
cut
up
in
processes,
but
they're
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
keep
their
kids
and
a
fat
and
a
roof
over
their
head.
So
thank
you
guys
for
all
the
work
that
you've
done
for
the
committee.
This
is
excellent.
I
A
couple
things
the
first
one
is
excited
to
see.
You
know
where
things
are
going.
I
think
that
this
advisory
board
is
a
really
critical,
plays
a
really
critical
role
in
connecting
the
URA
with
the
community,
and
it's
this
great
opportunity
right
to
get
a
lot
of
feedback
and
work
together
to
meet
community
needs.
I
My
question
is
so
it's
great
that
you
provided
information
about
non
hof
dollars.
You
know
that
are
part
of
these
programs.
In
what
ways
can
we
continue
to
monitor
funds
like
that
relate
to
that
HOF
and
are
connected?
Maybe
you
know
we
helped
design
the
programs
or
came
up
with
the
concepts
like
with
small
landlord
fund.
To
what
extent
you
know,
will
the
euro
be
using
this
group
to
help
continue
to
monitoring
those
funds
as
they
relate
to
they
Joe.
A
Yeah,
that's
a
good
question.
I
mean
this
is
new.
To
all
of
us,
I
mean
HOF
is
a
funding
source
which
comes
in
front
of
Advisory
Board,
we're
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
how
to
operate
programs
that
have
multi
funding
sources.
You
know
we.
We
obviously
appreciate
feedback
from
everybody
all
the
time
all
I
can
say
is.
We
can
continue
to
have
discussions.
You
know
in
the
future
about
about
these
programs
and
that's
the
only
answer.
I
really
have
right.
Now
we.
I
Can
work
together
to
figure
out
what
that
looks
like,
because
it's
probably
even
better
for
you
to
track
everything
together
in
one
sense
program
and
then
my
other
thing
was
just
questioning
about
Geographic.
These
providers
like,
for
example,
with
the
north
side
I'm.
Just
not
sure
you
know
what
is
the
go-to
provider
that
are
working
in
the
north
side,
communities
and
there
may
be
others.
A
N
N
E
P
Have
a
follow-up
question
to
question
so
you
know,
as
you
know,
we
have
been
advocating
for
more
dollars
and
it's
great
to
see
that
happening,
but
you
know
kind
of
to
her
point
about
these
additional
dollars
being
still
under
the
Housing
Opportunity
Fund
boards.
Her
to
you
who
has
to
approve
that
is
this
City
Council,
like
what
governing
bodies
at
the
URL
or
anything,
is
a
City
Council
who
specifically
will
have
to
approve
that.
A
P
P
Addition
sort
of
CDBG
funds,
the
small
and
what
fun
these
additional
dollars
that
you
know
this
fort
will
still
have
some.
You
know,
oversight
and
input
into
the
administration
into
the
structure,
etc,
and
you
know
somebody
some
of
these
ideas
actually
came
from
this
board,
so
you
know
we
we
want
to
be
involved
in
the
decision-making
process
on.
You
know
how
how
the
funds
are
administered,
etc.
So
I
understand
it.
P
A
H
With
Derek
is
saying,
I
think
that
clarification
here
is
that
the
you
Ras
that
City
Council
vote
to
approve
CDBG
funding
dollars
and
allocates
that
to
the
ura.
The
you
are
eggs
board,
conducts
a
series
of
votes
about
how
that
information
is
about
how
those
dollars
are
allocated
and
that's
inclusive
of
the
hof
in
the
CDBG
dollars
or
any
other
philanthropic
dollars
that
are
awarded
to
the
ura.
So
there
is
a
dual
level
of
oversight
year,
one
that
the
City
Council
rung
and
then
at
the
you
are
age.
The
board
I
think
I.
H
Think
that
was
the
question
of
what
is
the
other
sort
of
authorizing
body
over
the
over
the
documents.
Now
I
think.
The
question
here
is
from
an
advising
on
how
those
dollars
are
earmark
and
I.
Think
you're
more
so
talking
about
policy
and
you're
trying
to
understand
who's,
setting
policy
around
how
those
those
dollars
are
engineered.
You
know
what
I've
been
a
staunch
advocate
of
it,
and
this
and
I'm
going
to
raise
the
point
again
about
the
conflicts
of
interest
that
we
encounter
here,
because
I
think
when
advisory
board
members
have
to
step
away.
H
We
lose
a
voice
and
we
can't
hear
folks
weigh
in
on
some
very
critical
things
that
they
are,
that
they
have
these
subject
matter.
Expertise
around
so
I
think
that
we're
always
looking
to
this
table
to
help
shape
policy
and
programs
and
really
understand
how
to
drive
and
deepen
impact.
But
from
a
structural
standpoint
from
a
regulatory
standpoint,
the
cassini
Council
in
the
you
are
aids
governing
board:
have
the
final
authority
over
the
authorization
of
funds?
I
think
that
was
the
question
but
I'm
not
100%
sure.
P
N
And
I
do
want
to
note
that
when
we
met
with
the
advisory
board
members,
the
two
of
them
on
Monday,
we
did
go
over
all
of
the
CDBG
and
foundation
money
awards
to
give
them
a
larger
picture
of
what
other
resources
will
be
allocated
in
addition
to
the
HOA
funding.
But
we
can
further
explore
how
we
can
keep
engaging
I.
Q
Three
phones,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
was
waiting
to
jump
in
here.
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
think
that
you
do
have
a
voice.
I,
think
that
that's
one
of
the
reasons
I'm
on
this
board
I
think
that
if
there's
some
things
that
you'd
like
to
discuss,
we
can
arrange
some
meetings
with
some
of
the
members.
Q
I
did
say
before
that:
I
think
that
the
land
bank
and
this
board
should
sit
down
together
and
try
to
work
a
little
bit
more
cooperatively,
because
there's
a
lot
of
times
where
we
have
some
questions
on
how
we
can
make
sure
that
we're
benefiting
the
residents,
especially
in
terms
of
development
and
affordable
housing,
so
I
think
that
there
would
be
a
good
opportunity
for
us
to
work
together
and
Senator.
Fontana
was
going
to
make
some
arrangements
for
us
to
meet
with
some
of
the
folks
on
the
state
level
as
well.
Q
A
I
Q
I
didn't
want
to
say
that
I
do
I.
Everybody
knows
I,
have
a
lot
of
concerns.
I
hear
all
these
organizations
to
give
me
a
ton
of
money,
and
you
know
I
I
want
the
money
to
go
as
as
directly
to
the
residents
as
possible
and
we
are
going
to
be
doing
an
audit
in
the
city,
all
the
nonprofit's
that
we
work
with
in
the
real
benefit
to
the
residents.
So
we're
doing
that.
Q
C
A
Okay,
so
it's
a
little
unclear
to
us
based
on
the
legislation.
If
we
actually
need
a
recommendation
for
contracts
or
not,
but
just
just
I
guess
to
be
on
the
safe
side.
We
can
move
forward
and
someone
can
make
a
recommendation
to
approve
the
contract
of
contracts
listed
on
the
screen.
So
I
guess
it
would
be
Urban
League
of
Greater
Pittsburgh
100,000
YWCA,
a
hundred
thousand
Chartier
Center
165
thousand
goodwill
of
southwestern
PA,
two
hundred
thousand
and
a
Jewish
family
and
community
services.
300
thousand
out
of
the
HOF
funding.
Can
someone
make
a
motion.
A
Thank
you.
No,
the
only
thing
I
would
I
would
modify
to
that
motion
is
we're
actually
approving
one
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
less
than
that's
today,
because
we
will
be
back
next
month
with
the
community
ambassadors
program,
so
someone
can
do
the
math
real,
fast
I.
Guess
it's
eight
hundred
and
sixty
five
thousand
that
we
are
approving
today.
A
C
B
J
A
The
outstanding
Awards
today
we're
here,
because
COBIT
happens
in
the
middle
of
March,
and
you
know
what
that
did
from
a
development
side
was
a
lot
of
things.
Construction
got
shut
down,
thermoses
licenses
and
inspections
got
to
shut
down
the
federal
government
HUD
for
a
couple
of
these
projects
on
the
list
need
grant
awards,
specifically
from
HUD.
They
shut
down
for
a
little
while,
as
they
were,
preparing
not
shut
down,
but
as
they
were
preparing
to
roll
out
stimulus.
A
You
know,
there's
a
lot
of
the
staffs
focus
has
changed
and
some
of
the
other
funding
that
people
are
going
after
and
also
even
the
ability
to
get
architects
on
side,
environmental
engineers
on
sites
things
like
that.
So
so
there
were
a
lot
of
reasons
why
these
projects
have
suffered
additional
delays
that
are
all
related
to
covin.
Therefore,
what
we
are
doing
today
is
we're
showing
you
the
projects
on
this
screen
that
had
expiration
dates,
sent
Kovan
I
do
need
to
point
out.
A
Five
points
had
an
expiration
date
actually
a
long
time
ago,
but
after
at
the
meeting
in
March,
they
were
given
until
the
end
of
March.
They
are
still
delayed
due
to
some
of
the
kovat
reasons,
so
they
are
on
here
showing
a
March
expiration
date.
Stanton
Avenue
had
a
March
expiration
date,
Lori
Liberty
was
in
April,
and
then
there
were
more
recent
ones
made
Granada
Square
Apartments
in
July
has
a
July
expiration
date
and
the
two
we
entertained
a
couple
months
as
months
ago
have
August
delay.
A
Even
those
are
probably
going
to
be
delayed
due
to
the
fact
that
those
three
are
loans
of
housing,
tax,
credit
developments
with
the
state
of
Pennsylvania,
since
many
Housing
Finance
Agency,
and
there
are
delays
across
the
entire
state
on
the
the
local
housing
tax
credit
program
due
to
market
fatality,
the
pricing
of
credits
and
and
the
other
construction
issues.
So
we
anticipate
the
lays
on
those
projects
as
well.
So
what
we
are
recommending
today
is
just
four
months:
let's
give
everyone
in
an
additional
form
one.
A
It's
called
decoded
extension
and
it's
four
months
from
their
expiration
date,
so
you
can
see
the
new
exploration
base.
We
believe
that
these
are
all
very
reasonable
that
you
know,
as
of
now
they're,
it's
the
development
of
being
moved
forward
by
the
developers.
There
should
be
no
reason
why
they
cannot
get
these
dates.
Are
there
any
questions
or
comment.
B
To
say,
I
just
want
to
thank
the
URA
for
being
proactive
on
this.
It's
true
everything
their
delays
and
constructive
agencies
in
permitting,
and
while
we
all
want
these
projects
to
get
built
as
quickly
as
possible,
and
the
is
only
increasing
it's
really
great-
that
you
guys
are
being
proactive
and
realistic
with
the
development
community.
So
I
want
to
thank
thank.
A
A
A
Okay,
Jerome,
so
Sonia,
Jerome,
dairy
Galena
and
also
Derek's
voice
also
reminded
me
that
there
are
two
projects
on
here
that
that
had
received
commitments,
but
there's
are
absolutely
to
the
end
of
the
year
because
of
a
4%
tax
rate
around,
and
that
is
systems
and
woody
Street
and
the
Northside
property.
Those
expire
on
December
anyhow.
So
so
those
are
not
shown
on
this
list
and
they
will
keep
their
their
expiration
date
of
December.
N
Jeremy
so,
as
you
know,
we
originally
had
roof
athan
scheduled
for
April
come
of.
It
happened
as
soon
as
contractors
were
able
to
begin
work
in
May
we
immediately
rescheduled
for
June.
So
we
are
happy
to
report
that
twenty-three
roofing
projects
are
officially
underway
and
they
will
be
completed
in
the
month
of
June.
N
N
N
The
total
cost
for
all
of
these
projects
for
Ruth
thon
is
about
691
thousand
dollars.
One
hundred
and
twenty
five
thousand
of
that
is
being
sponsored
by
Wells,
Fargo
and
I
want
to
applaud
my
team
for
the
work
on
this.
We
have
closed
about
we've
done
about
twenty
closings
in
a
matter
of
two
weeks,
which
is
a
lot,
and
you
know,
even
throughout
all
of
this,
trying
to
practice
social,
distancing
and
being
safe.
We
were
able
to
have
over
half
of
the
households
complete
all
of
their
closing
documents
remote
without
seeing
anybody.
K
J
Just
our
we
haven't
seen
any
media
releases
or
reads
or
something
planned
said
again:
taxpayers
know
that
they're
getting
benefit
for
their
dollar
that
this
is
happening
because
of
you
know,
HMF
funding,
which
help
leverage
private
monies
try
to
keep
driving
that
message
about
why
they
Wendy
transferred
tax
increase
was
a
good
thing.
Yes,
yes,.
A
Absolutely
we
are
we're
working
with
the
mayor's
office
and
we
will
let
you
know
as
soon
as
something
is
confirmed.
You
know,
with
with
social
distancing
requirements
still
in
place,
with
being
slightly
more
relaxed,
we're
a
little
unsure
at
this
point.
If
we're
going
to
do
some
major
zoom
event
where
we
could
showcase
a
lot
of
the
houses
at
the
same
time
or
if
we're
gonna
try
to
do
one
actually
at
a
house
like
we
did
with
the
down
payment
closing
cost
program,
but
we
will
definitely
let
the
Vice
be
board.
Members
know.
N
J
Q
Q
Yeah,
what
it
was
okay,
so
I
just
wanted
to
have
me,
because
they
are
going
above
and
beyond
to
make
sure
that
they're
reaching
all
across
the
district
and
all
across
the
city
and
including
going
to
late
night
meetings
in
people's
homes
on
the
bike,
and
so
I
just
want
to.
Thank
you
for
especially
you
made
a
lot
of
people
and
shared
and
happy
for
for
going
down
there
Soren.
Thank
you
for
that.
I
B
I
N
A
The
chair
nomination
process
I've
received
a
couple
of
inquiries
about
this
I
had
emailed
the
committee
to
set
up
I,
guess
a
nominating
committee.
We
had
tried
to
do
this
about
a
year
ago
and
then
got
delayed
with
the
changes
and
seats.
So
only
a
couple
people
responded,
so
I
just
want
to
open
it
up
again.
Here
please
shout
out.
If
you
want
on
the
Nominating
Committee,
the
process
is
going
to
be.
A
P
J
A
B
L
Don't
have
a
timeline
for
replacement,
but
I,
don't
believe,
there's
the
intention
to
remove
anyone
that
is
currently
on
the
board.
I
think
the
plan
is
to
read
AMA
Nate,
everyone
that
is
serving
on
an
expiring
term.
I
know
the
mayor's
office
normally
likes
to
do
these
in
batches,
so
I
I,
don't
know
if
Co
bid
and
sort
of
as
put
the
brakes
on
that.
But
certainly
nobody
in
the
mayor's
office
has
expressed
to
me
a
desire
to
shift
you
know
and
take
anybody
off.
K
A
C
R
So
this
map
looks
a
little
different
than
our
previous
ones.
As
you
see,
we've
included
housing
stabilization
program.
Participants
on
the
map.
One
thing
to
note
is
that
this
map
represents
clients
who
entered
and
completed
the
program.
Creek
Ovid.
It
represents
the
number
of
invoices
that
we've
received
and
have
reimbursed
service
providers.
R
For
so
you'll
likely
see
a
huge
jump
in
the
number
of
orange
dots
in
the
future
once
we
do
get
the
invoices
for
coded
clients,
but
this
map
gives
a
good
representation
of
the
geographic
distribution
of
the
program
so
far,
and
we're
really
happy
to
see
that
it
is
pretty
diverse
and
then
you'll
see
the
other
programs
as
well.
It's
broken
down
into
committed
and
closed
under
one
color,
as
opposed
to
committed
and
close
being
under
separate
colors
for
each
program.
R
R
We
can
define
those
terms
that
we
have
the
same
understanding
moving
forward
so
closed
or
completed,
projects
means
that
almost
sorry
documents
have
been
signed
and
construction
is
near.
Completion
and
progress,
core
is
completed
versus
committed
and
in
progress,
which
means
client
is
eligible
and
husband.
R
So,
under
the
committed
and
in
progress
projects,
the
funding
amounts
you
see
is
if
each
program
participant
were
to
be
receiving
the
full
program
amount
so,
for
example,
HSP
each
client,
if
they
were
to
max
out
at
the
three
thousand
dollar,
grant
award,
that's
how
much
his
euler
funds
would
be
committed.
So
far
from
the
invoices
that
we've
collected
we're
actually
seeing
an
average
amount
of
assistance
needed
to
stabilize
a
household
is
closer
to
eighteen
hundred
dollars.
R
N
Can
speak
to
that
so,
yes,
Joanne.
We
lost
about
two
months
of
work
as
expected,
but
as
soon
as
the
workers
were
got
the
green
light
to
begin
in
May
projects
resumed
quite
quickly,
so
we
do
have
about
a
hundred
and
twenty
projects
in
the
queue
or
in
process
right
now
in
construction.
So
almost
all
of
those
have
restarted,
but
we
still
yeah.
We
still
have
quite
a
lot
to
close,
but
there
is
quite
a
bit
in
progress
right
now.
A
Yeah
and
I
would
just
like
to
say
you
know
big,
thank
you
to
the
staff
and
also
to
the
community
advocates
and
and
everyone
who's
bringing
people
into
the
program,
because
you
know
this
program
started
roughly
may
each
of
last
year,
and
there
are,
you
know
more
than
100
that
are
either
complete
or
under
construction
right
now,
so
Bert.
So
so
we're
pretty
happy.
You
know
with
those
numbers
and
we're
getting
more
and
more
in
and
prepared
to
do
more
than
100
next
year.
I
C
P
A
C
N
Been
monitoring
these
lately
and
the
the
most
lag
time
is
getting
all
the
work.
Ups,
the
permits
getting
bids
approved
and
all
of
that
once
we
actually
get
an
approved
bid.
I've
seen
staff
take
one,
maybe
two
weeks
to
prepare
closing
documents
and
then
it's
another
week
or
two
to
schedule
all
of
those
signings
and
everything
so.
P
N
A
Mean
I,
I
will
say
more
contractors,
yes,
we'll
help.
You
know
we
are
committed,
I.
Think,
roughly
two-thirds
of
the
way
through
to
2019
money.
For
this
program
we
do
have
the
2020
allocation,
but
if
we
added
everyone
on
the
waiting
list
that
that
would
fully
eat
up
to
2020
allocation.
R
R
Is
the
one
that
you
typically
see
every
month
and
this
is
an
aggregate
form
of
all
the
data
previously
presented.
So
what
you
see
here
is
a
combination
of
the
committed
and
closed
projects
and
then
this
slide
and
you'll
see
that
we
have
about
half
of
the
hof
funds
that
have
been
allocated
over
the
three
years
we've
expended
or
committed
about
half
of
that
now.
N
Sure
so
we
wanted
to
give
an
update
on
HSP
program
in
general,
not
covert
specific,
so
we
are
seeing
about
80
percent
of
households
are
at
30%,
am
I
level
or
below,
and
as
we
reported
on
the
HS
picot
vid
update
a
few
weeks
ago,
we
are
seeing
a
75%
in
rising
of
households
identifying
their
need
due
to
coded
eighty
percent.
Over
households
are
minority
head
of
household
and
about
56
percent
are
female
head
of
households
in
terms
of
program
access?
We
know
this
is
important,
so
we
wanted
to
report
what
we're
what's
happening.
N
R
So
this
is
just
a
brief
update
on
the
issue
of
annual
report
and
we
did
issue
a
small
RFP
to
the
consultants
that
were
on
the
pre-approved
slate
of
community
outreach
and
marketing
firms.
We
received
two
proposals:
any
holdings
was
selected
based
on
their
deliverables
and
contract
cost,
and
we
are
working
with
them
to
get
that
done
to
meet
the
hof
legislation
deadline
of
the
end
of
June.
A
A
Okay,
the
announcements
just
you
know
for
the
time
being,
I
think
this
is
going
to
be
to
format
sort
of
meetings
for
a
little
while,
so
our
next
meeting
will
be
in
July
at
9:00
a.m.
via
the
city's
YouTube
channel.
I
also
wanted
to
make
a
quick
and
that
just
sort
of
update
from
last
month
last
month,
advisory
board
or
actually
a
couple
weeks
ago,
the
advisory
board
encouraged
us
to
meet
with
an
from
the
create
lab
at
Carnegie
Mellon.
A
A
Present
I
I
need
to
talk
to
him
about
it
that
the
meeting
we're
having
next
Tuesday
just
for
you,
RA
and
CMU,
create
lab.
You
know
to
get
to
know
each
other,
but
but
yes,
I.
If
they
are
comfortable
presenting,
don't
know
if
it'll
be
July
or
August
I
think
it
will
depend
on
the
size
of
the
agenda,
but
we
would
love
to
have
them
percent.
A
Additionally,
the
fair,
healthy
partnership
had
been
slated
two
percent
right
around
the
time
covetous,
so
so
we're
in
discussions
with
them
and
the
URA
is
also
undergoing
fair
housing
training
next
week
as
well.
You
know
just
because
we
have
a
lot
of
new
staff
and
then
just
to
get
updated
on
that.
So
we
also
plan
to
have
them.
Do
a
presentation
to
the
board
at
some
point
soon,
great.
I
And
then
the
third
thing
I
put
in
the
chat
was
like
I'm
without
side.
You
know
community
groups,
where
we
gonna
start
scheduling.
Some
of
those
regularly
I
know
that
people
come
to
this
meeting
was
not
really
an
opportunity
to
dialogue.
Gonna
may
actually
create
smoother
meetings.
You
know
if
we
had
something
in
between
yeah.
A
Call
me:
let's,
let's
talk
about
what
you're
thinking
and
we
can
maybe
put
it
on
the
agenda
for
next
month
to
talk
about
it.
They
might
report
as
well.
I
haven't
been
able
to
monitor
the
chat.
Super
well.
Well,
I've
been
doing
this,
so
if
anyone
saw
anything
else
in
the
chat
that
needs
address,
please
shout
it
out.
I'm.
K
Jessica
this
is
Adrian,
it's
not
in
the
chat,
because
it's
just
coming
into
my
head
now.
Is
there
a
full
process
in
place
for
us
to
take
a
look
at
delays
that
have
been
related
to
Kovac
capacity,
changes
that
are
related
to
Cove
it
across
all
of
these
funds
and
contracts,
because
I
would
think
that
you
know
many
of
the
contracts
do
have
timelines
that
will
need
to
be
adjusted.
K
You
know
we're
now
juggling
2018
2019
2020
funds,
you
know,
do
we
need
to
go
back
through
that
lens
and
and
rethink
contract
timelines
I'm
changing
capacity
that
may
exist
for
organizations
coming
out
of
you
know
kovat
protocols
and
look
at
how
those
three
years
of
funds
have
been
impacted
and
make
shifts
you
know.
Is
there
any
plan
for
just
sort
of
that?
More
global
review,
yeah.
A
That's
a
great
question:
yeah,
like
I
I,
think
we
need
to
constantly
probably
be
doing
that
and
and
would
love
to
baby.
You
know
set
up
a
team
of
advisory
board
members
where
we
meet.
You
know
once
a
month
to
to
talk
about
it,
I
think
it's
a
constantly
changing
topic
due
to
the
economy
and
how
the
economy
recovers
from
kovat.
You
know
something
like
the
down
payment
program.
It's
the
first
couple
weeks
that
we
all
work
remotely.
A
There
were
lots
of
clothing,
but
but
then
it
has
slowed
down
the
last
you
know
couple
weeks,
so
we
are
keeping
our
eye
like
onto
homeownership
market
DHAP.
You
know
stop
completely,
but
now
it's
speeding
back
up
with
permitting
you
know,
and
every
program
is
different.
The
rental
program
we
talked
to
a
lot
of
developers
to
four
months
seem
realistic,
but
if
the
economy
goes,
you
know
back
down
at
some
point,
then
that
might
need
to
be
revisited
as
well.
So
I
think
it's
just
an
ongoing
conversation.
K
A
J
A
Yeah,
when
we
all
have
a
chance
to
breathe,
probably
in
the
fall
like
probably
August,
September
ish,
but
let
me
double-check
the
legislation
and
and
I
will
say
you
know,
based
on
that
comment-
and
we
can
talk
about
this
in
a
future
meeting,
but
the
legal
assistance
associated
with
evictions
is,
you
know,
we've
we've
heard
lots
and
lots
and
lots
of
questions
about
that
recently.
It's
in
part
part
of
HSP,
but
it
does
not
fit
into
HSP
program
parameters
very
well.
A
So
when
we
do
move
forward
with
the
allocation
planning
at
2021,
I
just
want
to
buy
a
board
to
start
thinking
about
that
that
it's
if
legal
eviction
assistance
is
something
that
they
would
want
to
fund.
It
is
an
eligible
use
in
the
legislation
we
you
may
want
to
get
your
brain
kind
of
spinning
about.
Is
there
a
separate
program
or
a
different
way
to
fund
it?
Yeah.
J
I
guess
you
know:
I
wanted
to
touch
on
that
too,
because
there
are
a
lot
of
public
comments
at
the
start
of
the
meeting
and
I
guess
it's
again
related
to.
But
what
I
was
really
glad
to
hear
when
we
had
the
subcommittee
meeting
on
the
HSP
probe
and
looking
at
taking
the
view
that,
what's
good
for
the
family
or
the
person,
that's
in
Meade,
that's
that's
in
probably
the
one
of
the
worst
moments
of
their
life
and
then
is
trying
to
navigate
a
system
and
try
to
navigate
a
legal
system.
J
So
whether
it's
eviction
prevention
trying
to
straighten
out
that
taxi
tangled
title
or
you
know
other
things
that
are
related
to
that
to
preserving
low
moderate
income
housing
unit
and
keeping
a
low,
moderate
income
family
house
you
know,
is
it
possible
for
us
to
do
a
contract
that
lets
neighborhood
legal?
They
figure
out
what
the
proper
assistance
is
and
what
we're
concerned
about
is
how
much
we
spending
per
client.
J
How
many
clients
are
we
getting
and
then
let
them
figure
out
how
they're
gonna
slice
and
dice
that
and
we're
just
agreeing
to
an
amount
and
the
outcome
is
gonna,
be
you
know
fifty
families
or
whatever?
That
number
is
that's.
What
we're
concerned
about
is
the
outcome
and
how
they
get
there.
Let
them
decide
how
to
make.
Let
them
be
the
chef
and
figure
out
how
to
make
it
so
that
these
families
get
to
help,
but
they
need
that.
C
L
J
I
A
Yeah,
the
you
know
in
the
required
program,
guideline
changes
but
I.
We
100%
hear
you
and
that's
what
we
want
to
have
the
conversation
about.
What
is
the
best
way?
Is
it
to
amend
the
program
guidelines
to
be
able
to
do
something
like
Mark
just
said?
Is
it
to
create?
You
know
our
own
to
create
a
separate
program
for
legal
eviction.
You
know,
assistance
we've
been
talking
to
a
lot
of
folks
about
that.
A
We've
been
talking
to
the
county
about
that
and
DHS
and
6-part
foundation,
so
I
I
just
feel
like
you
know,
we
want
to
do
and
we
want
to
do
it
right
and
then
we
need
to
sit
and
just
kind
of
think
about
it.
So
you
may
see
email
come
out
from
me
soon
to
to
see
if
there
are
people
that
would
like
to
serve
on
a
committee.
That
means
you
know
every
so
often
once
a
month,
at
least,
if
not
more
frequently,
to
figure
this
out.
J
As
we're
looking
forward
and
talking
about
program
changes,
something
else
that
we
need
to
think
about
is
what
what
is
this
going
to
be
like?
Even
you
know,
with
the
cure,
a
vaccine,
you
know
if
we
get
back
to
that.
What
is
it
going
to
look
like
and
a
great
fear
what
happened
in
a
lot
of
our
neighborhoods?
We
saw
a
lot
of
foreclosures.
J
We
saw
the
rise
of
a
lot
of
single
family
rental
units
that
were
not
necessarily
affordable
to
anybody
and
it
led
to
a
lot
of
changes
that
I,
don't
think,
looks
exactly
happy
within
a
lot
of
neighborhoods
and
kind
of
displacement
of
a
lot
of
folks
from
those
neighborhoods
and
as
we're
thinking
about
that
as
a
city
we
should
not.
We
should
do
things
that
prevent
that
from
happening
so
making
sure
people
stay
in
their
homes
if
they
get
the
help
that
they
need.
J
You
know
this
thing
that
we're
talking
about
with
the
legal
assistance
it's
going
to
be
critical,
but
we
also
might
need
to
come
up
with
some
new
programs
and
not
respond
to
years
after
it
all
happens,
because
it's
it
is
gonna,
be
it'll,
make
the
inequity
that
we've
got
in
the
city
now
a
lot
worse.
If
that
happens
so
I
just
want
to
plant
that
seed
I'm.