►
From YouTube: Housing Opportunity Fund Meeting - 5/4/23
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Welcome
to
the
Housing
Opportunity
fund
meeting
for
May
4th
2023.
I
am
very
excited
to
be
the
new
chair
of
the
Housing
Opportunity
fund
group.
Thank
you
to
everyone.
This
is
my
first
meeting.
Luckily
I
have
all
of
the
great
Ura
stuff
here
and
Kelly
to
help
me
walk
through
our
meeting.
Today
we
have
a
pretty
full
agenda.
We
are
live
at
this
point
and
being
recorded,
so
our
first
order
of
business
is
actually
going
to
be
our
roll
call.
A
A
I
don't
see
more
again
and
we
are
actually
going
to
have
an
update
related
to
Morgan
in
just
a
few
moments.
Dr
Jamil
Bay.
C
D
A
A
Our
second
order
of
business
for
today
will
be
the
review
and
approval
of
the
minutes.
Our
Ura
team
had
circulated
the
meeting
minutes
from
the
last
minute.
Can
we
have
a
vote
to
accept
those
minutes,
Mark
Masterson
approves.
Do
we
have
a
second
so
moved?
Thank
you,
Esther.
Are
there
any
objections
or
abstentions.
A
C
F
A
So
we
have
a
very
exciting
introduction
to
make
today.
So
Kiana
is
joining
us.
She
is
a
new
member
of
the
Ura
staff,
acting
as
the
chief
housing
officer.
We're
incredibly
excited
to
have
her
on
board.
Kelly
and
I
had
the
opportunity
to
meet
with
her
last
week,
and
we
cannot
wait
for
the
ongoing
collaboration
and
the
things
we're
going
to
do
together.
Kiana.
Would
you
like
to
make
a
few
remarks
about
yourself
in
way
of
introduction.
G
Could
I
just
I
think
sushila
namani
Stanger
our
executive
director
director
actually
might
have
a
few
words
and
then
maybe
Kiana?
Oh.
D
G
H
I
appreciate
that
my
name
is
sushil
and
Imani
Stanger
executive
director
at
the
Ura,
as
you
all
know,
affordable
housing
is,
is
an
essential
and
robust
unit
at
the
Ura
and
Kiana
wasler,
and
her
role
as
Chief
housing
officer
will
compliment
Evan,
Miller's
excellent
work
as
director
of
housing.
You
know
we're
anticipating
new
initiatives,
substantial
additional
funding
and
complex
projects
in
the
pipeline
and
Kiana
will
play
a
really
important
role
in
fulfilling
the
work
and
advancing
these
critical
Community
needs.
H
F
Thank
you
sushila
and
Adrian.
As
stated
I'm
Kiana
wassler
I'm
happy
to
join
you
all
here
today
and
happy
to
rejoin
the
urban
Redevelopment
Authority
and
the
chief
housing
officer
capacity.
I
am
a
former
Ura
employee
with
over
a
decade
of
experience
in
several
different
capacities
within
the
organization,
as
well
as
some
private
sector,
affordable
housing
development
experience.
F
Access
to
safe
and
affordable
housing
continues
to
be
a
critical
need
throughout
the
neighborhoods
and
the
development
of
affordable
housing
is
a
key
opportunity
to
advance
to
Equitable
development
practices
in
many
ways
via
Construction
Services
and
other
opportunities
in
the
city.
I'm
excited
to
work
alongside
ura's,
amazing
housing,
department
staff,
as
well
as
the
Hof
advisory
boarding
committees
and
the
advancement
of
this
important
work
and
I
look
forward
to
hopefully
meeting
you
all
in
person
someday,
but
seeing
you
here
monthly
on
these
meetings.
Thank
you.
F
C
I
And
then
it
wasn't
on
here
because
it
was
something
that
was
forgotten
until
the
very
beginning
of
this
meeting,
but
Morgan
Overton
left
for
a
role
at
the
city,
so
she's
no
longer
going
to
be
on
the
Housing
Opportunity
fund,
Advisory
Board,
so
thank
you
Morgan
for
everything.
I
know
she's,
not
here
today,
but
yeah.
Thank
you
so
much
for
everything
she's
done.
A
One
of
the
things
that
we
hope
that
we
will
continue
to
be
able
to
support
is
robust
public
comment
and,
as
this
group
we
have
made
that
commitment
and
remade
that
commitment
several
times
just
to
let
everyone
know
Kelly
and
I
are
collaborating
and
thinking
through
how
to
connect
with
the
mayor's
office
to
make
sure
we
have
the
best
opportunities
for
virtual
and
in-person
meetings
and
to
make
sure
that
information
is
going
out
to
the
community.
A
So
we
we
are
sorry
that
we
don't
have
any
public
comments
today,
but
we
will
continue
with
our
commitment
to
engaging
public
comments
and
hopefully,
next
month
we
will
see
some
folks
joining
us
for
that
part
of
our
agenda,
so
I
believe
our
next
topic,
Astra
is
going
to
give
us
some
information
on
our
homeowner
assistance
program.
J
Thank
you,
Adrian
I
think
actually,
I'm
gonna
take
this
one
hi
everybody
good
afternoon:
I'm
Derek,
Kendall,
Morris
manager
of
consumer
lending
within
the
housing
department
here
at
the
Ura,
and
we're
coming
to
you
today,
asking
for
authorization
to
revise
the
guidelines
for
the
homeowner
assistance
program,
specifically
to
eliminate
the
hap
plus
sub
program
within
the
homeowner
assistance
program,
so
that
we
can
more
effectively
and
more
efficiently
serve
all
of
the
clients
who
have
applied
for
assistance
through
through
hap.
J
Currently,
the
program
does
exist
in
sort
of
two
buckets
one
bucket
which
serves
homeowners
that
are
at
fifty
percent
of
Ami
or
below,
and
then
the
Hat
plus
bucket,
which
serves
homeowners
that
are
between
50
and
80
percent
of
Ami.
The
way
those
two
buckets
are
set
up.
The
Hat
plus
program
had
a
more
complex
financing
structure
where
each
homeowner
was
receiving
one
grant
for
five
thousand
dollars
and
then
two
loans,
one
which
was
a
deferred
loan
and
then
one
which
wasn't
amortizing
loan
that
they
were
required
to
pay
back
monthly
to
the
Ura.
J
That
is
a
second
deferred
mortgage,
so
that
would
be
thirty
five
thousand
dollars
in
total
assistance
that
each
homeowner
could
receive.
So
that's
those
are
the
changes
that
we
would
like
to
propose
and
we're
hopeful
that
you
would
all
support
that
today.
Some
any
questions.
K
K
Thanks
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
I'm
understanding
this
change
and
what
I
think
I
heard
was
that
the
new
program
would
be
a
five
thousand
dollar
Grant
kind
of
upfront
in
hand
and
then
the
30
000
deferred
mortgage
means
that
you've
got
like
another,
thirty
thousand
dollars
to
pay
for
your
house,
but
you
don't
actually
make
payments
on
it
because
it's
deferred,
and
so
then
what
you're
left
with
as
the
new
homeowner
is
just
writing
kind
of,
like
your
one
check
to
your
One
Bank
mortgage
under.
J
K
Is
thank
you
okay,
so
this
is
all
of
the
like.
They
may
have
an
existing
mortgage,
but
now
like
there's
a
link
in
the
roof
or
the
heating
went
out
and
or
you
know,
sewer
work,
which
is
often
in
the
ballpark
of
thirty
thousand
dollars.
Yes,
so
the
homeowner
applies
gets
the
five
thousand
dollars
cash.
J
So
the
homeowner
never
actually
receives
any
of
this
funding
directly.
Okay,
the
Ura
facilitates
the
home
repairs
on
the
homeowner's
behalf
and
the
funding
goes
to
the
contractor
or
the
organization
that
that
conducts
the
repairs
and.
J
Well,
with
the
way
the
program
currently
exists
for
those
50
to
80
Ami
homeowners.
J
You
know
the
funding
doesn't
actually
go
directly
to
the
homeowner,
but
they
are
taking
out
in
in
their
case,
they're,
taking
out
two
loans
with
the
Ura
that
get
attached
to
their
home.
One
is
the
Deferred
loan
that
they
don't
have
to
make
payments
on
as
long
as
they
continue
living
in
the
home
and
then
the
other
is
a
traditional
amortizing
loan
that
they
have
to
make
a
monthly
payment
on.
I
So
just
having
gone
through
some
of
these
statistics
today
for
the
Hat
plus
program,
which
is
the
50
to
80,
Ami
I,
believe
we
had
about
95
individuals
go
through
that
portion
of
it,
whereas
the
hap
regular
part
I,
believe,
has
upwards
300
upper
300s
and
the
amount
of
individuals
that
have
gone
through.
K
Great
amazing,
so
there's
a
lot
more
people
at
50,
Ami
or
below
50
Ami
or
below
then
at
that
50
to
80,
which
is
you
know,
to
be
very
narrow,
range
yeah,
interesting,
but
that's
nearly
400
and
then
so.
If
we're
making
this
easier,
our
goal
is
bigger
than
that
I
guess.
So,
what's
the
goal
for
the?
If
we
vote
Yes
today
of
how
many
people
we
would
serve,
oh
see.
J
Well,
currently,
on
the
hat
plus
side
of
the
program,
we
have
an
additional
looks
like
there's
yeah
there's
about
30
people
in
the
pipeline,
and
then
we
will
be
reopening
the
program
later
this
year
and
be
accepting
more
applications,
and
so
our
hope
would
be
as
we
reopen
the
program
if
the
terms
are
simplified
and
they're
the
same
across
the
board
for
all
homeowners,
then
more
of
those
homeowners
that
apply
this
year
would
successfully
be
able
to
go
through
the
program.
J
Well,
we
hope
to,
and
we
anticipate
that
we'll
receive
probably
around
200
applications
this
year,
because
that's
generally
what
we
do
see,
but
Chad
I
don't
have
it
on
the
top
of
my
head.
If
you
know
what
was
the
allocation
for
hap
for
this
year,.
I
So
I
always
keep
it
on
hand
I'm
going
to
do
a
flyby
through
the
slides.
Really
quick,
so
give
me
one
second
here:
okay
yeah,
so
for
hap
we
had
this
year,
we'll
be
getting
two
million
one
hundred
and
ten
thousand,
and
then
people
can
get
up
to
thirty.
Five
hundred
so
I
believe
that
comes
out
to
like
between
70,
like
70,
to
80
households
or
like
65
to
75
somewhere
in
there
yep
that's
correct.
C
And
these
goals
are
broken
up.
Sorry
just
to
well:
we've
got
it
short
up.
What
are
the
goals
by
income,
because
we
we
do
that?
You
know
we've
got
the
legislation
requires.
You
know,
percentages
by
income
and
just
sort
of
what's
the
impact
there
and
and
we've
run
out
this
money
gets
committed
in
months.
This
isn't
something
that's
open
year
round.
Is
that
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
to
have
the
window
open
for
a
shorter
period
of
time
or
to
what
end?
C
K
J
So
the
whole
home
repair
is
going
to
be
is
not
open
yet
we'll
be
opening.
My
understanding
is
later
this
month
and
yeah.
J
We
are
certainly
looking
at
that,
although
you
know
that's
going
to
serve
the
entire
County
and
the
funding
they
have
for
whole
home
repairs
is
probably
going
to
serve
about
200
households
across
the
county,
so
I
think
it's
not
going
to
have
a
real
substantial
impact
on
our
program
and
what
we're
doing
in
terms
of
City
residents
Mark
to
answer
your
question
I,
you
know
I,
don't
think
we're
looking
to
have
the
applications
open
for
a
shorter
period
of
time.
J
I
think
you
know
these
changes
are
more
targeted
to
making
sure
that
the
people
who
are
accepted
into
the
program
actually
do
get
to
make
it
the
whole
way
through
and
actually
do
receive.
You
know
the
assistance
that
they
need.
You
know
because,
frankly,
I
think
that
the
big
issue
that
we're
seeing
is
yes,
you
know
these
homeowners
are
50
to
80
Ami.
They
have
slightly
higher
income
than
the
lower
income.
Homeowners
do,
but
you
know,
attacking
another
monthly.
J
Payment
on
to
their
budget
is
something
that
a
lot
of
them
can't
bear,
and
so,
when
we
get
to
the
point
of
actually
creating
a
scope
of
work
for
that
homeowner
trying
to
work
with
them
with
a
contractor,
you
know
some
of
them
have
been
dropping
out
and
choosing
to
not
receive
the
assistance
at
all
because
they
can't
afford
that
monthly
payment.
So
I,
don't
think
these
changes
would
really
reduce
the
amount
of
applications
that
will
that
we
will
accept
or
the
amount
of
time
that
the
applications
will
be
open.
A
K
Great,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
got
the
numbers
kind
of
written
down
the
right
way.
So
we
already
in
the
original
program,
which
is
like
from
2018
till
now,
I
think
I
saw
on
the
chart.
We've
done
nearly
400
stabilized,
like
400
homeowners,
100
at
the
50
to
80,
Ami
and
300
at
below
50,
Ami
and
then,
and
so
those
repairs
have
been
made
and
they're
in
the
program
and
then
we're.
K
If
we
do
this
change
we're
anticipating
another
200
applications,
but
is
that
in
the
just
the
next
12
months
or
as
Mr
Masterson
was
saying
like?
Is
that
just
in
like
in
what
time
frame
right?
Are
you
expecting
200
applications
again
I'm
just
trying
to
I
just
couldn't
recollect
the
scale
and
the
targeting
of
the
program.
J
So
it
typically,
we
open
the
program
every
spring
or
summer,
depending
on
when
we
receive
the
2023,
in
this
case
the
2023
allocation
from
the
city.
J
We
reopened
the
program
and
we
take
applications
until
we
reach
the
number
of
applications
that
we
have
funding
to
support.
So
for
this
year
you
know
Jazz
correct
that
probably
will
be
around
70
to
80
applications
and
then,
at
that
time,
we'll
shut
it
down.
So
looking
at
prior
years
as
an
example,
you
know
that
usually
means
that
you
know
our
application
round
is
about
a
month,
because
we
do
receive
typically
about
200
applications.
J
Just
in
that
first
month
that
wow
the
program
is
open
and
then
once
the
program
is
closed
again,
then
we
do
maintain
a
list
of
everybody
who
reaches
out
to
the
Ura.
Who
would
like
to
apply
for
this
program,
and
then
we
will
let
them
know
next
year
when
it's
open
again
that
they
can't
apply.
So
we
do
currently
I
know
have
a
list
of
about
300
people
who
have
said
that
they
want
to
apply
for
this
program,
so
we
will
be
notifying
them
when
we
open
that
this
is
available.
J
K
J
So
I
would
say
that's
in
general,
fairly
common.
A
lot
of
these
homeowners
are
in
situations
where,
if
they
don't
receive
assistance
to
make
these
repairs
they're
not
really
sure
how
they're
going
to
do
that.
K
J
K
Right
and
so
it's
just
again,
I'm
just
trying
to
get
a
sense
of
kind
of
like
where
is
the
intensity
and
like
what
is
the
scale
of
our
response?
So
that's
I'll
stop
there.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Absolutely.
E
I
move
that
we
I'm
sorry,
it's
Kelly,
where
that
we
authorize
the
Ura
to
eliminate
the
Hat
plus
subprogram
and
serve
all
homeowners
under
80
Ami,
with
the
same
financing
terms.
A
G
Thank
you
good
afternoon.
Everyone
Evan
Miller
here
with
the
housing
department
at
the
Ura
and
wanted
to
discuss
today
some
amendments
that
we're
looking
to
make
to
the
for
sale
development
program,
largely
in
an
effort
to
make
it
more
responsive
to
what
the
current
development
climate
is
like
here
in
Pittsburgh,
especially
for
for
sale
development.
G
What
we're
hearing
from
our
partners
in
the
community
about
where
they
could
see
improvements
and
allowing
for
the
production
of
this
program
to
ramp
up
over
the
coming
year
or
years
to
come.
So
some
of
those
changes
that
are
and
well
I'll
take
a
little
picture
of.
What's
going
on
in
the
Ura
I
think
this
is
important
background
as
well.
G
There
is
currently
an
arpa
funded
for
sale
development
program
targeted
towards
land
trusts
that
was
budgeted
by
city
council
that
the
Ura
will
be
launching
in
the
coming
months
here,
and
so
that
required
the
creation
of
a
program.
That's
very
similar
to
this
for
sale
development
program.
G
G
Development
program
so
that
all
entities
that
are
working
in
the
for
sale,
development,
space
in
Pittsburgh
have
the
similar
the
similar
ability
to
to
do
their
work
and
carry
it
out
well,
and
so
some
of
the
changes
that
are
being
requested
this
month-
and
this
will
go
to
the
Ura
board
for
final
approval-
is
adding
clear
guidance
on
conservatorship,
knowing
that
that's
a
tool,
that's
being
used
by
parties
throughout
the
city
to
to
try
to
get
affordable
home
ownership
opportunities
online,
also
explicit
language
that
allows
for
limited
Equity
cooperatives
to
participate
in
the
for
sale
development
program.
G
Another
exciting
development
is
the
ability
to
use
a
rent
to
own
model
when
there's
issues
up
front
with
fully
fundraising
for
a
project.
Maybe
the
building
the
structure
can
be
habitable,
but
the
sales
price
allowable
will
not
fully
fund
the
deal
for
the
nonprofit
developer,
so
they
might
have
to
generate
some
income
through
renting
or
it
allows
a
household
that's
interested
in
home
ownership,
but
maybe
not
there
yet
at
this
exact
moment
being
able
to
to
get
that.
First,
mortgage
amount
that's
needed
to
make
the
deal
pencil
out.
G
They
could
rent
to
own
for
a
period
of
time
and
then
upon
the
sale
of
the
unit.
The
the
fsdp
financing
would
convert
to
a
grant
that
supports
long-term
affordability,
also
adding
a
more
clear
definition
about
the
eligible
costs
and
the
time
frame
for
it.
G
There's
just
not
been
clear
definitions
in
our
existing
guidelines,
so
any
acquisition
or
work-
that's
been
done
within
the
12
months,
leading
up
to
the
application
would
be
eligible,
but
trying
to
make
sure
that
long-term
assets
that
have
been
held
for
years
and
possibly
improved
years
ago,
aren't
coming
to
this
program
kind
of
at
the
very
end
of
the
line
we'd
like
to
use
the
ura's
staff,
we
have
a
whole
quality
controls
and
inspections
team
that
can
help
to
verify
the
construction.
G
That's
being
done
that
it's,
the
scope
is
correct
that
we're
going
to
be
handing
over
a
unit
to
a
home
buyer,
that's
really
move-in
ready
and
inhabitable,
and
so
we
want
to
have
the
ability
to
have
some
oversight
over
that
process
and
then,
lastly,
and
I
would
say,
most
importantly-
is
increasing
the
available
per
unit
subsidy.
Currently,
it's
at
seventy
thousand
dollars
for
every
unit,
that's
rehabbed
and
we're
looking
to
increase
that
to
100
000
dollars
per
unit
rehab
and
then
for
new
construction.
G
It
was
capped
at
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
per
unit
and
the
proposal
is
to
increase
that
amount
that
maximum
allowable
amount
to
a
hundred
thirty
thousand
dollars
per
new
construction
unit.
So
we
think
this
will
be
really
beneficial
to
to
those
that
are
looking.
They
continue
to
do
this
work
here
in
Pittsburgh
and,
as
many
of
you
know,
the
ability
to
do
these
for
sale.
G
Construction
projects
has
really
been
been
diminished
by
Rising
costs
in
construction
and
just
overall
difficulties
and
in
acquiring
properties
and
gaining
site
control,
so
we're
hoping
to
make
that
a
bit
more
streamlined
so
that
we
can
continue
to
to
strive
towards
these
end
goals
of
creating
more
affordable
for
sale,
Home
Ownership,
so
I'll
stop
it
there,
but
I
think
the
action
on
the
table
today
is
authorization
to
make
the
following
amendments
to
the
for
sale
development
program.
I
do
see.
Council
person
gross,
you've,
got
your
hand
raiser,
chair
woman.
A
Just
a
quick
Point
Evan
talked
about
all
of
these.
You
know
very
important
reasons
for
us
to
be
talking
about
this
today
and
one
of
which,
being
you
know,
coming
into
alignment
across
different
programs
that
are
administered
by
the
same
body.
You
know
it
gives
more
transparency
on
the
programs.
It
allows
us
for
better
Outreach
so
that
folks
have
a
deeper
understanding
of
programs.
It
also
really
allows
for
us
to
be
thinking
about
strategies
more
globally
across
the
community
that
may
have
more
impact
or
really
enhance
our
ability
to
manage
the
programs.
A
So
thank
you
to
Ura
staff
for
bringing
this
to
the
table.
We
have
a
lot
of
hands
up,
I'm,
going
to
start
actually
with
Dr
Jamil
Bay.
B
Thank
you
where,
where
would
the
funds
come
from
for
the
additional
the
increase
in
the
requested
increase
in
the
per
unit
subsidy?
Is
that
are
we
trading
up
being
able
to
do
fewer
units
or
is?
Are
there
new
funds
available.
G
G
The
argument
that
could
be
made
is
that
if
there's
some
deals
that
just
sit
there,
because
there's
still
this
additional
Gap
that
they
can't
fill
or
having
trouble
filling,
and
so
this
will
likely
move
the
the
pace
along
of
projects
actually
getting
completed
at
a
greater
rate
than
if
it
remained
at
this
normal
or
the
existing
per
unit
amount.
But
then
also
important
to
mention
is
that
there
are
some
other
sources
at
the
Ura
that
can
be
put
towards
for
sale
development
through
this
program.
G
So
we
have
cdbg
money
as
well
as
home
investment,
Partnerships
money
and
from
time
to
time,
paygo
money
from
the
city
as
well
and
so
oftentimes.
We
we,
when
we
receive
the
application
for
a
project,
we'll
vet
its
eligibility
for
all
of
the
different
sources
being
that
we
have
on
hand
and
kind
of
figure
out
what
works
best
for
it.
So,
although
there's
a
finite
amount
in
every
annual
allocation
plan
from
the
Housing
Opportunity
fund,
we
we
do
have
other
sources
as
well.
G
K
Thank
you.
First
of
all,
I
am
so
grateful
that
you
have
added
the
limited
Equity
housing
co-ops
to
participate.
Council
passed
resolution
last
year.
Looking
for
a
report
on
limited
Equity,
housing
co-ops
and
the
array
was
the
first
agency
to
respond.
We
don't
have
responses
from
some
of
the
Departments
yet
and
I.
Remember
kind
of
explaining
myself
at
the
time
saying
you
know
what
council
wants
doesn't
want
to
see.
K
Is
that
there's
only
like
their
funding
pots
for
individuals
and
then
housing
clubs
don't
qualify
and
then
there's
funding
pots
for
like
multi-unit
development
and
housing
clubs
don't
qualify.
So
this
is
a
Brazil
development
program,
and
so
thank
you
for
adding
limited
Equity
housing
clubs
is
an
allowable
form
to
apply.
K
It
says
here
on
your
slide
that
our
vote
today
would
a
man
to
allow
clear
guidance
on
conservatorship.
Did
you
email
us
the
guidance
on
the
conservatorships.
G
So
so
the
proposed
language
is
properties
with
conservatorship
rulings
in
favor
of
the
applying
entity
for
the
for
sale.
Development
program
are
eligible,
except
when
the
conservative
filings
are
against
the
city
or
the
Ura,
so
we'd
rather
work
with
Community
Partners
that
are
having
issues
with
you
know
publicly,
on
property
through
means
other
than
conservatorship,
but
for
privately
owned
properties.
G
We're
we
just
want
to
ensure
that
the
the
conservatorship
filing
has
played
out
and
that
we're
not
going
to
invest
public
funds
into
improving
a
private
owner's
property
that
they
might
you
know,
be
able
to
get
back.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
it.
K
Right
absolutely
right,
you
know
you
don't
want
to
be
like
taking
Grandma's
house
or
big.
You
know
for-profit
development
or
something
right
and
like
now,
I
can't
figure
out
how
to
take
my
raised
hand
down
your.
K
K
No
I
see
it,
it
was
somebody
else's
hand,
sorry
so,
and
then
so
we're
allowing
it,
but
we're
you're,
not
anticipating
that
this
is
going
to
be
like
the
whole
pot
of
money,
is
all
going
to
conservatorship
for
sale,
development.
G
No,
not
anticipating
I,
think
it's
just
been
our
experience
in
the
last
several
years
that
at
times
we've
been
approached
by
Community
groups
that
are
that
have
filed
conservatorship
or
in
the
process
of
filing
conservatorship
looking
for
funding
and
because
the
guidelines
were
largely
silent
on
it.
G
It
was
a
bit
of
a
gray
area,
but
it
is
what
we've
heard
is
from
Community
Partners.
Is
that
it's
a
tool
that
can
be
very
helpful
in
you
know
turning
around
some
of
the
distressed
properties
in
neighborhoods,
so
we
would
like
to
create
that
ability
for
for
it
to
be
a
component
of
the
program,
but
I
would
not
go
so
far
as
to
say
that
it's
the
main
focus
of
it.
K
G
G
Not
entirely
there,
there
is
the
ability
for
a
quote,
unquote:
for-profit
developer,
to
work
with
the
program,
but
only
if
they
have
a
proven
partnership
for
that
project,
with
a
neighborhood
community
group
and
in
some
type
of
memorialized
agreement
that
states
what
the
role
of
that
community-based
non-profit
is
is
in
the
project.
G
So
there
are
not
for-profit
developers
that
are
coming
to
this
program
in
this
board
for
funding
through
this
program,
but
at
times
there
might
be
a
mixed
income
development,
where
some
component
of
affordability
is
desired
by
the
community
and
the
developer
would
partner
with
a
neighborhood
community
group
to
help
apply
here
at
the
Housing
Opportunity
fund
for
for
funding
through
this
program.
Sure.
K
I
can
think
of
projects
that
I've
seen
like
that.
But
when
you
talked
about
conservatorship,
you
said
only
that
Community
groups
may
have
filed
for
conservatorship
is
the
guidance
on
conservatorship
that
funding
will
only
be
considered
if
it
is
the
community
group
partner
and
not
the
for-profit
partner
who's
filed
for
conservatorship.
G
It's
not
currently
specified
in
the
guidelines,
but
that
if,
if
that's
something
that
the
board
would
find
important,
I
think
we
could
make
that
distinction
that
only
you
know,
non-profits
that
are
applying
for
conservatorship
are
eligible
for
funding
through
this
program.
I,
don't
think
that
would
be
an
issue
at
all.
K
I
have
seen
Community
groups
kind
of
intervening
to
stop
for-profit
firms
filing
conservatorship
in
neighborhoods,
and
so
it
does
seem
like
we're.
Trusting
conservatorship
when
it's
kind
of
in
you
know
aligned
with
Community
priorities
and
and
with
the
community
group,
so
it
and
again
I
think
it
required
just
kind
of
inferring
what
I
heard
from
your
own
words
that
was
kind
of
the
scenario
that
was
being
imagined
here.
A
K
Just
wrap
up
then,
by
saying
that,
in
voting
for
these
amendments,
I'd
like
to
actually
see
amendments,
maybe
it's
because
I'm
used
to
being
you
know,
I've
got
a
council
table,
but
seeing
bullet
points
you
just
obviously
I'm
going
to
have
way
too
many
questions
to
in
the
meeting.
If
I
can't
actually
see
the
legislative
language
or
the
the
program
language.
K
C
I
I
I
just
would
like
to
ask
a
question
about:
why
are
you
defining
the
period
of
eligible
cost
is
no
earlier
than
12
months.
You
know
having
done
projects
and
you
know
with
Community
developers.
I
have
yet
to
see
one
that
had
a
pre-development
period
of
shorter
than
12
months.
C
So
aren't
you
going
to
be
ex
making
a
higher
hurdle
there
for
folks,
you
know
to
do
a
conservatorship
and
to
get
that
if
you
know
just
on
the
example
we're
talking
about
is
gonna
in
most
cases
take
more
than
12
months
for
the
community
group
to
do
that.
If
you're
trying
to
buy
a
property
from
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
it's
going
to
take
them
18
months,
just
to
clear
the
title
and
you
might
be
spending
money
on
the
architect
and
you
know:
you'll
have
site
control,
then
waiting
for
that
process.
G
Okay,
we
have
seen
some
scenarios
where
a
property
has
just
been
owned
by
a
community
group
for
a
number
of
years
and
then
they're
renting
it
and
then
at
some
point
they're
they
decide
if
they
want
to
sell
it
instead
and
so
they'll
try
to
apply
to
this
program
with
you
know
the
construction
costs
that
took
place
four
or
five
years
ago.
G
It's
just
it's
it's
difficult
from
an
oversight
standpoint
to
guarantee
that
the
construction
work
that
was
done
was
all
necessary,
I'm
open
to
suggestions
on
sort
of
maybe
building
out
this
eligible
cost
timeline.
If
you
think
you.
C
Know,
we've
we've
seen
we've
financed
projects
where
hey
they
had
to
do
roof,
repair
and
Sewer
repair
and
that
half
that
occurred
well
in
advance.
You
know
of
Acts
to
get
the
to
save
the
building
from
deteriorating,
and
rarely
does
this
stuff
happen
in
a
12-month
time
frame
and
it's
not
for
folks,
you
know
just
trying
to
get.
You
know,
get
drawings
of
all
the
things
that
you
need
to
do.
It's
taking
you.
You
know
three
to
six
months,
just
to
get
pli
to
approve
construction
drawings.
C
G
There's
not
an
avalanche
of
it,
but
the
Edward
counter
that
the
the
scenario
that
you're
discussing
there
where
people
are
taking,
you
know
needing
three
to
six
months
to
get
a
building
permit,
conceivably
as
their
building
out
the
deal
before
they've
even
acquired
the
property,
they
would
be
engaging
with
the
Housing
Opportunity
fund
for
fun,
providing
an
application
and
seeking
funding
before
any
of
that
starts.
G
I
think
we're
just
trying
to
take
away
projects
sort
of
retroactively
or
that
are
coming
in
long
after
construction's
been
completed,
and
this
this
program
is
really
meant
to
provide
funding
for
typically
construction
Grant
financing
for
these
projects.
G
C
Okay,
well,
yeah
I'm,
not
sure
that
you
know
this
is
maybe
we
need
more
information
before
we
take
about
I
I
certainly
do
about
some
of
the
definitions
and
and
what
is
in
and
what
isn't
in
with
the
12
and
why?
12
months
and
again,
we
talked
is
this
something
that
you
talk
to
folks
that
have
successfully
completed
the
program
to
ask
them?
If
that's
a
reasonable
period
of
time.
G
Yes,
I'd
say
when
we've
had
applications
for
for
program
or
for
units
where
it
is
largely
after
the
fact
that
they're
seeking
funding,
we
make
it
very
clear
that
that's
not
not
so
much
the
intention
of
this
program,
that's
really
for
ongoing
efforts
to
rehab
or
construct
units
and
I.
Think
they've
been
receptive
to
that
understanding
that
you
know
the
the
Ura
has
as
stewards
of
this
Public
Funding
needs
to
ensure
that
the
for
sale
units
that
are
going
to
you
know
low
and
moderate
income.
G
Families
are,
you
know,
quality
units
that
have
some
level
of
oversight
during
the
construction,
we're
not
paying
for
shoddy
work
or
that
we
can
ensure
our
mwb
Eagles
are
met.
You
know
various
components
of
of
that
come
along
with
Public
Funding.
That
really
happened
during
the
oversight
period
of
through
oversight
during
the
construction
period.
C
A
It
feels
to
me
and
I
may
not
have
the
full
temperature
of
all
of
our
members
that
what
is
being
requested
is
more
significant
language
and
deeper
understanding
of
some
of
these
parameters,
including
conservatorship,
and
who
is
taking
that
conservatorship
and
these
limits
that
have
been
set
related
to
costs
that
come
in
prior
to
before
longer
than
12
months
prior
to
the
application,
and
also
some
questions
about
the
subsidy
increases.
So
it
sounds
to
me
like
we're,
not
ready
to
take
a
vote.
But
what
is
the?
What
is
the
thinking
of
our
members.
A
So
the
group
would
like
to
table
this.
The
specific
questions
that
are
coming
back
to
the
Ura
is:
who
are
we
talking
about
related
to
conservatorship?
A
K
K
K
L
So
councilwoman
gross,
if
I,
if
I
hear
you
correctly
just
based
on
the
term
of
either
table
or
whole,
creates
a
different
process.
So
you're
saying
if
we
table
it,
then
my
Gmail
will
then
have
to
make
another
motion
to
put
that
back
onto
the
agenda
with
me.
Being
the
person
to
second.
That
motion
is
that
correct.
K
Doesn't
have
to
be
the
exact
same
people
but
I
if
I'm
just
looking
up
now,
I'm
pretty
sure
that
only
the
people
who
voted
either
up
or
down
I'm
tabling
it
are
eligible
to
vote
to
untable
it,
but
I'm
I'm,
doubting
myself,
but
generally
it
councilman.
We
just
want
to
like
put
something
off
to
the
next
meeting.
We
just
say
motion
to
hold.
B
B
You
know
if
we're
going
to
be
formal
more
formal
than
we
have
been,
then
we
should
all
be
on
the
same
page
with
the
Rules
of
Order
and
the
rules.
You
know
the
rules
that
we're
adopting,
and
so
you
know
these
are
not
Robert's
Rules
Council
rules
are
different.
Parliamentary
rules
are
different,
so
we
need
to
be
clear
on
that
and
we
could
probably
all
use
a
refresher.
A
And
I
don't
believe
in
our
actual
by
laws:
I'm,
not
remembering
a
tabling
parameter
versus
a
hold
parameter.
A
D
I
think
that's
the
most
appropriate
course
of
action.
Considering
we're
not
clear
on
what
which
direction
we
want
to
go
so
I
would
I
think
we
should
just
go
move
forward
with
that
and
I'm
happy
to
make
the
motion
if,
if
Jamil
or
Mr,
Bay
would
like
to.
D
A
Thank
you,
everyone
more
to
come.
Thank
you
to
the
Ura
staff.
Hopefully
you
have
Clarity
on
the
issues
that
have
been
brought
forward
and
we
can
pick
this
conversation
up
next
month.
So
we
have
to
vote.
A
A
I,
don't
see
Megan
with
us
at
this
point
there
you
are
Megan.
M
Hi
Adrienne
I
apologize
for
my
Hagrid
appearance.
Everyone
I
jumped
off
an
Amtrak
in
front
of
a
camera
and
I'm
doing
my
best
to
make
it
to
the
weekend.
So
apologies.
But
let
me
just
jump
in
on
discussing
the
fair
housing
Summit
that
the
Fair
Housing
Partnership,
the
Pittsburgh
Commission
on
human
relations,
a
housing,
employees,
View
Pittsburgh
and
the
urban
Redevelopment
Authority
hosted
last
week,
and
how
some
of
this
topics
pertaining
in
that
event
certainly
are
applicable
to
this
body.
M
As
you've
heard
me,
speak
on
on
certain
topics
as
questions
that
have
been
arose
or
risen
in
the
past,
a
couple
of
topics
are
exactly
the
kind
of
conversation
that
we've
been
discussing
over
the
past
few
years
has
been.
M
You
know
establishing
what
the
criteria
is,
what
the
goals
are
of
certain
age,
West
programming,
so
that
the
programming
with
the
limited
fund
that
we
have
is
not
simply
a
matter
of
equality,
but
also
a
matter
of
equity,
a
matter
of
understanding
of
the
most
vulnerable
and
how
these
limited
funds
are
being
distributed
in
a
way
that
recognizes
that,
but
to
dive
into
the
fair
housing
Summit
of
quickly
just
to
touch
base
is
that
you
know
there
was
a
nice
space
where
the
breakout
group
from
the
housing
Alliance,
you
know,
was
brainstorming
housing
models
that
were
limited
only
by
the
imagination
and
the
space
of
you
know-
and
this
is
a
conversation
we're
seeing
play
out
here
with
different
conversations
about
limited
Equity,
Cooperative,
Community,
Land
trusts,
different
housing
models
and
I
asked
that,
as
you
consider,
all
these
variety
of
housing
models
is
that
any
model,
any
any
Roofing
of
of
power
and
development
and
funding
is
vulnerable
to
concept
of
discrimination,
whether
intentional
or
not
without
explicit
guard
rails,
that
those
bodies
or
entities
are
engaged
in
a
fair
housing,
training,
understanding
that
their
health
and
applications
and
how
various
models
exist.
M
Of
housing,
decision
makers
and
we'll
go
through
a
couple
of
examples
of
how
that
plays
out,
especially
what
we
see
already
with
homeownership
associations
and
different
cooperatives
throughout
the
city,
where,
when
you
convene
a
group
of
like-minded
individuals
even
with
good
intentions,
a
lack
of
knowledge
about
the
fair
housing
requirements
and
can
lead
to
concerns
that
are
simply
best
addressed
proactively
and
also
to
share
with
this
body.
M
M
As
you
can
imagine,
it
is
tremendously
popular
mediation
as
a
means
of
addressing
issues
immediately,
while
legal
resources
are
certainly
limited,
and
the
lawyers
of
the
day
program
is
particularly
popular
and
provides
an
opportunity
for
tenants
who
have
not
otherwise
engaged
with
the
solar
system
to
have
that
opportunity
when
they
arrive
at
the
magistrate
and
these
programs
that
we're
seeing
and
there
should
be
a
Pittsburgh,
especially
as
the
erupt
funding
and
sunsetting
that
is
being
provided
by
by
the
hos,
was
greatly
popular.
In
the
discussion
on.
M
You
know
what
the
legalities
are
regarding
landlord
Senate
requirements
within
the
city
and
so
Annette
that
went
off
on
a
couple,
different
topics
that
we
might
have
touched
on
in
the
past
and,
just
to
reiterate,
you
know
we're
having
a
lot
of
deep
discussion
quickly
and
so
remember
that
each
of
these
topics
have
nuanced
legalities
when
we're
talking
about
private
landlords
and
housing
providers
who
are
receiving
Federal
funding
and
that's
what's
in
the
industries,
the
housing
protection
related
to
domestic
violence
and
language
barriers
for
accessing
housing
that
we
see
with
our
immigrant
and
Refugee
population.
M
M
So
we
were
thrilled
to
have
Sandra
Park
a
lawyer
at
the
ACLU
women's
rights
project,
and
she
gave
us
some
remarks
about
how
Municipal
nuisance
or
crime
degree
ordinances
are
weaponized
against
Survivors
by
penalizing
survivors
for
calling
the
police
or
other
emergency
services.
So
one
of
the
huge
ACLU
patients
that
occurred
occurred
in
Norristown
Pennsylvania
in
the
East
and
now
what
we're
seeing
and
so
Pennsylvania
has
had
worked
hard
on
addressing
that
nuisance
or
crime-free
ordinances
that
require
municipality
to
require
a
landlord
to
evict.
M
M
Information
to
these
entities,
for
example
in
the
last
year
FHP
had
faces,
such
as
a
Survivor
and
a
co-op
where
she
used
was
no
longer
with
her
abuser
had
obtained
the
legal
protections
you
could
get,
but
the
abuser
continued
to
come
to
her
apartment
building,
her
Condo
building
beat
on
the
door
cause
and
seeing
required
the
voice
to
be
called,
and
she
did
all
that
she
could
be
taking
him
away,
but
the
co-op
made
to
evict
her.
M
And
so,
if
the
consideration
for
how
our
housing
models
are
addressing
the
fair
housing
protections
and
how
that
operated,
and
so
but
Sandra
also
talked
about
how
the
reauthorization
of
our
last
fall
at
Congress
included
municipality
certifying
that
their
compliance
with
bala,
including
these
nuisance
and
crime-free
ordinances
and
now
outside
the
Department
of
Housing
and
Urban.
Development,
has
a
format
of
four
filing
follow-up
complaints
directly
in
an
administrative
format.
So
you
don't
have
to
access
and
it's
earn
it
and
what
we
see
with
federally
subsidized
housing
is
common.
M
Vola
violations
include
conditioning
emergency
transfers
based
on
a
credit
score
or
passing
a
housekeeping
inspection
or
refusing
to
buy
here
separate
a
lease
and
bring
the
Survivor
and
the
abuser,
and
so
the
different
components
of
how
the
way
that
this
body
continues.
The
power
of
the
earth
to
you
know,
ask
some
questions
and
be
aware
and
put
it
into
the
Forefront
of
the
housing
providers
receiving
Federal
funding
simply
how
these
Pro
these
rules,
policies
within
their
housing
is
operating.
You
know
after
development.
Of
course,
you
know
these.
M
These
have
Federal
requirements
that
I'm
sure
the
policies
in
place,
but
looking
at
the
pragmatic
implication
of
how
they're
addressed
underground
for
us
as
a
city
after
after
they're
built
and
additionally
in
a
panel
about
language
barriers
in
housing.
So
we
know
in
Pittsburgh
when
you
have
an
immensely
diverse
immigrant
and
Refugee
population,
and
so
we
have
a
tremendous
amount
of
languages
represented
in
our
immigrant
Refugee
population.
M
We
don't
have
two
or
three
languages
that
are
the
clear
majority
of
the
languages
represented
in
our
our
populations,
with
limited
English,
purposely
and
so
at
the
federal
level.
Housing
discrimination
based
on
language,
for
example,
a
landlord
refusing
to
take
a
tenant
or
interact
with
the
tenant
in
any
language
other
than
English,
can
be
addressed
by
the
federal
protected
class
of
national
organ.
M
If
City
will
have
it
translated
into
several
languages,
and
so
now
that
leases
availability
in
a
multitude
of
languages
will
assist
private
City
landlords,
with
being
proactive
about
language
compliance
and
being
able
to
engage
and
interact
with
immigrant
and
refugees,
with
a
lease
available
in
the
languages
that
both
parties.
Additionally,
the
model
leads
includes
Applause
for
survivors
of
domestic
violence
that
FHP
crafted
with
the
private
area
landlord
a
couple
years
ago
that
allowed
for
a
survivor
of
domestic
violence
to
be
released
from
their
lease
for
their
safety
within
a
private
housing
context.
M
So
if
a
Survivor
has
gotten
the
PSA,
the
stockings
and
singing,
or
they
no
longer
feel
safe
to
remain
in
a
unit
where
the
abuser
has
had
access
to
previously
they're,
often
faced
with
the
thousands
of
dollars
charge
of
having
to
be
released
in
their
lease
early
or
intending
immense
physical
harm
for
for
staying
in
that
unit
and
there's
a
leads
that
we
are
Applause
that
we're
working
to
have
every
landlords
understand
how
they
can
Implement
protections
that
protect
both
parties,
but
make
sure
that
we
are
not
forming
a
business
model
that
is
based
on
from
his
criminal
court
terms
and
in
the
federally
fund.
M
This
housing
things
is
looking
at
how
we're
making
sure
that
the
language
assistance
plans
that
are
required
better
with
is
we've
seen
such
a
difficulty
with
the
laps
locally
because
of
how
many
languages
are
represented
in
our
population,
and
so
what
I
hope
that
you
can
take
away
from
the
conversations
we've
been
having
and
from
you
know,
the
summit
that
we
had
recently
is.
This
is
never
the
end.
We've
had
some
tremendous
progress
and
we
also
have
a
tremendous
way
to
go.
So
how
do
we
talk
with
the
developers
and
other
bodies?
M
Other
housing
decision
makers
that
approach
this
body
about
how
they
are
addressing
the
survivors
of
domestic
violence
and
how
they're
addressing
language
access
and
making
sure
that
we
are
finding
ways
to
capture
data
and
to
create
entry
points
for
some
of
the
most
vulnerable
throughout
the
low-income
households
within
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
also
will
have
access
to
the
programs
that
the
housing
opportunities
fund
is
creating
and
maintaining
so
I
hope
to
see
more
of
the
Hof's
activities
in
April
of
2024,
based
on
the
work
that
that
we're
going
to
get
done
this
year.
M
A
A
Well,
I
will
personally
say:
I
think
that
it's
exciting
I
am
very
disappointed
that
I
did
not
make
the
summit
I.
Think
some
of
the
points
that
you
raised
are
really
wonderful
for
our
discussion
when
we're
looking
at
applications
and
and
we
have
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
developers.
So
thank
you,
Megan
for
always
putting
those
you
know
important
items
on
the
agenda.
A
One
item
that
Megan
actually
brought
to
my
attention
is
that
we
have
a
unique
opportunity
as
a
community.
At
this
point,
HUD
is
seeking
public
comment
on
potential
changes
to
Section
504
for
folks
who
are
unfamiliar
with
Section
504.
A
It
prohibits
discrimination
on
the
basis
of
disability
in
programs
and
activities
that
are
receiving
federal
assistance
from
HUD.
This
is
a
wonderful
opportunity.
Hud
has
not
opened
up
the
dialogue
on
Section
504
in
quite
a
while.
I
would
personally
like
to
see
us
take
some
time
in
our
next
meeting
to
discuss
some
of
the
interesting
questions
that
have
been
raised.
Related
to
you
know
the
prior
504
standards
and
things
that
we
can
do
to
take
us
into.
You
know
the
next
phase
of
more
Equitable
and
diverse
housing.
A
So
if
I
would
like
to
hear,
you
know
remembers
having
an
interest
in
some
discussion
about
504.
It
gives
us
the
unique
opportunity
to
you
know:
connect
with
HUD
in
a
different
way,
so
not
just
focusing
on
our
local
work
here
in
Pittsburgh,
but
focusing
on
National
work.
That
could
have
some
great
impact
for
folks
that
were
serving
through
the
Hof.
D
And
I
just
have
a
a
comment:
if
that's
all
right,
Adrian,
worse
and
and
correct
me,
if
I'm
wrong,
has
the
has
this
body
ever
or
has
it
been
common
practice
to
provide
public
comment,
as
as
the
body
itself
I
think
that's
a
really
powerful
statement.
If
we
were,
you
know,
if
we
really
want
to
create
or
amplify
voices,
that's
something
that
we
could
possibly
do.
D
I,
don't
know
if
that's
outside
of
our
of
how
we
interact,
but
I
definitely
would
like
to
see
that
since
we
do
have
committees
and
they
have
the
bandwidth
to
kind
of
work
on
the
wording
and
kind
of
present
to
back
to
everyone.
A
Thank
you
so
much,
that's
ex!
That
was
exactly
my
thinking.
We
have
not
to
date.
I.
Don't
think
that
there's
anything
in
our
legislation
that
would
preclude
us
from
being
able
to
weigh
in
on
many
topics
locally,
regionally
and
nationally
that
do
impact
the
work
that
we're
trying
to
achieve
here.
M
Thank
you
for
raising
Section
504,
the
Rehabilitation
Act
Adrian
to
anyone
who,
if
you
haven't
yet
watched,
the
Netflix
documentary
called
Chris
Camp.
The
documentary
is
actually
about
the
passage
and
the
disability,
Civil
Rights
Movement
for
Section
504
and
the
law
has
not
been
opened
up
for
discussion
since
1988.
This
will
last
update
to
what
disability
compliance
with
Federal
funding
looks
like,
and
so
the
rulemaking
has
a
number
of
questions.
M
They
are
asking
for
a
responses
that
I,
certainly
they
certainly
think,
is
a
worthwhile
discussion
for
further
student
here,
and
additionally,
I
forgot
to
add,
is
that
I'll
provide
the
model
we've
current
iteration
to
the
Ura
staffers
to
distribute,
and
if
anyone
has
any
feedback
or
a
thought.
You
know
analysis
time
to
in
the
space
that
you
look
at
with
housing.
Institute
offer
thoughts
and
feedback
as
we
finalize
the
model
in
order
to
get
a
further
translated
for
for
you
27
years.
A
A
Well,
hearing
none
I
will
definitely
connect
with
the
Ura
staff
and
you
know
see
how
we
could
craft
some
conversation
related
to
that
in
our
next
meeting,
and
thank
you
Megan
for
offering
to
send
out
that
sample
lease
I
think
that's
really
exciting
and
can
be
incredibly
valuable
to
all
of
us.
A
So
for
our
location,
update
as
I
mentioned,
Kelly
and
I
are
going
to
continue
to
work
toward
a
resolution
to
have
a
good
public
engaged
meeting
location,
whether
that
be
a
more
inclusive
virtual
option
or
a
more
inclusive
in-person
option.
We
will
be,
you
know,
continuing
to
pursue
that
together
to
make
sure
that
we
have
the
best
opportunities
to
not
only
have
transparency
with
our
community,
but
also
to
engage
our
community
foreign.
A
Ees
I'm
trying
to
watch
hands
and
make
sure
I'm
not
missing
anybody
for
our
subcommittees.
We
are
kicking
off
this
month.
This
is
the
first
official
month
in
the
new
committee
configuration
that
came
out
of
the
retreat.
We
are
hoping
that
we
will
have
any
of
our
membership
that
has
not
stepped
forward
and
chosen
a
committee
do
that
right
away
so
that
we
can
have
those
committees
convene,
we
can
have
all
voices
represented
and
we
can
have
some
really
wonderful
discussions
that
will
work
in
parallel
with
our
Hof
full
group
discussions.
A
So
if
you
or
one
of
the
folks
that
has
not
taken
this
great
opportunity
to
connect
back
to
the
Ura
and
share
the
committee
that
you
would
like
to
participate
in,
please
do
that.
You
can
even
do
that
now
as
we're.
You
know,
having
our
conversation
and
just
let
them
know
which
group
you'd
like
to
participate
in.
There's.
I
Yeah,
so
one
note
about
the
community
or
the
committee
kick
off
as
well.
You
know
for
anybody
that
didn't
fill
it
out.
That
poll
that
I
sent
out
about
which
committees
you'd
like
to
be
part
of
I
can
resend
that
again
either
after
this
meeting
today
or
tomorrow.
I
For
those
of
you
that
didn't,
but
I
will
also
send
what
I
have
so
far
to
everybody
as
well
indicating
who's
in
what
committee,
so
that
the
individuals
that
are
leading
these
committees
can
work
with
those
individuals
and
at
least
get
started
this
month,
yes
and
in
terms
of
our
community
feedback
survey
for
our
annual
allocation
plan
of
2024
that
launched
on
May
1st,
so
we're
very
excited
about
that
did
an
email
campaign
to
all
the
individuals
that
we
have
worked
with
in
housing.
I
You
know
people
that
have
called
us
or
people
that
have
come
to
our
community
events.
So
that's
really
how
we
kicked
it
off
was
by
launching
to
people
that
have
specifically
expressed
interest
in
Housing
Programs,
but
we
sent
it
to
all
of
you
as
well.
I
There
was
a
social
media
toolkit
which
I
know
some
people
had
some
questions
on
that
was
attached
to
what
I
had
sent
out
in
that
you
know
there
are
some
different
images
if
you
wanted
to
post
it
on
social
media,
and
then
you
know
different
wordings,
if
you
I
mean
you
can
come
up
with
your
own
as
well.
These
are
just
suggestions.
We
also
did
post
it
on
our
social
media
as
well
at
the
Ura.
I
So
if
you
want
to
repost
what
we
have
posted
already,
you
can
feel
free
to
do
so,
but
this
will
be
open
until
July
31st,
so
there
it's
going
to
be
open
for
a
while,
and
in
addition
to
this
we
are
doing
some
community
events
and
I
have
some
of
them
listed
out
here
that
we
have
scheduled
so
far.
I
Now,
oh,
we
only
have.
Let
me
get
my
screen
to
move
here.
There
we
go.
We
only
have
six
that
have
been
scheduled
so
far
and
some
of
them
certain
aspects
of
them
are
TBD,
but
we
do
have
about
I
believe
eight
others,
that
of
different
Community
Partners
that
wanted
to
work
with
us
all.
The
events
that
we're
trying
to
do
are
being
incorporated
into
something
that's
already
ongoing
from
last
year's
Community
feedback
survey.
You
know
the
ones
that
we
did.
I
Standalone
sessions
didn't
tend
to
be
as
successful
as
events
where
you
know
the
community
was
already
meeting
and
incorporating
ourselves
into
those.
So
all
these
meetings
that
we
have
scheduled
so
far
are
you
know
incorporating
ourselves
into
these
already
occurring
meetings
of
some
kind
and
we're
trying
to
hit
each
Council
District
within
this
as
well,
so
that
you
know
we're
trying
to
get
all
through
the
community
yeah,
so
I
will
say
if
anybody
wants
to
go
to
any
of
these
meetings.
I
I
will
continue
to
update
all
of
you
with
new
meetings
that
are
being
scheduled
until
the
end
of
this
period.
If
any
of
you
want
to
attend
any
of
these,
you
know,
let
me
know
I'll
make
sure
that
we
have
the
information
sent
over
to
you,
but
I
will
send
out
an
email
with
this
information
after
this
meeting
as
well,
along
with
the
other
things
that
we
discussed.
A
A
So
don't
forget
that
option
and
also
don't
forget
if
you're
not
following
the
Ura.
This
is
a
good
time
to
do
so
on
social
media.
Because
then
we'll
have
you
know
our
finger
on
the
pulse
of
what's
going
out
from
them
and
we
can
reinforce
that
and
we
can
also
use
those
materials
for
our
own
conversations.
So
if
you're
not
plugged
into
the
Ura
yet
today
is
a
good
day
to
do
so.
I
Yes,
thank
you
Adrian
and
I
will
say
too.
You
know
we've
actually
had
a
decent
amount
of
responses.
Already
from
this
you
know.
Last
year
we
probably
only
had
about
upper
I,
think
it
was
like
280
responses
in
total,
and
that
was
over
a
couple
months
span,
but
already
we
have
about
over
40
responses.
I
So
it's
exciting
to
see
that
we're
getting
a
lot
of
responses.
This
early
on
I'm,
very
hopeful
that
we'll
be
able
to
you
know,
have
a
high
turnout
of
responses
this
year.
So
please,
you
know,
distribute
with
among
your
community
groups
and
community
members
that
you
know
of.
We
want
to
make
sure
this
gets
out
to
as
many
people
as
possible,
and
all
of
you
are
a
great
resource
to
reach
out
to
the
community
as
well.
So
we
want
to
utilize
that.
I
And
then
it
is
me
again
so
our
regular
program,
expenditure
updates
again
most
of
the
updates-
have
just
been
minor
additions
to
the
amounts
that
have
been
dispersed.
I
One
thing
I
will
note
is
that
the
homeowner
assistance
program
is
continuing
to
have
a
lot
more
money
going
out
the
door
I
said
that
last
month
and
I'm
saying
it
again,
I
think
our
efforts
in
trying
to
increase
our
contractor
pull
and
things
of
that
nature
have
really
been
effective
and
there's
a
lot
more
money
going
out
the
door
and
projects
being
completed
so
excited
about
that.
I
But
otherwise
you
know
it's
just
been
all
incremental
increases
across
programs
as
usual
I'm
going
to
go
through
each
of
the
programs
with
the
some
graphical
information.
If
you
have
any
questions,
feel
free
to
stop
me
as
I'm
moving
along
for
the
down
payment,
closing
costs
and
assistance
program,
we
have
percent
funds
by
Council
district
and
Ami
level.
I
You
know,
I
do
parse
these
out
between
half
half
plus
and
both
of
them
combined
and
also
you
know
one
utilizing
all
of
our
different
funding
sources
and
one
just
utilizing
our
Hof
funding
sources
of
money.
That's
gone
out
the
doors
in
the
pipeline.
I
We
did
a
nice
break
out
of
our
demonstration
dollars
and
actually
thinking
about
that
I
know
that
was
a
discussion
that
I
know
people
had
talked
about
at
one
point
is:
maybe
changing
the
name
of
that
to
something
else
to
think
about
for
future
agendas,
but
yeah
we
broke
out
these
dollars
by
what
projects
they
had
went
to.
One
was,
you
know,
a
homeless
shelter,
some
of
it
went
into
the
Bedford
campus,
a
project,
HSP
lap
pilot
and
homeowner
assistance.
A
Absolutely
so
are
there
any
questions
or
comments
related
to
you
know
our
quick
review
of
expenditures
or
the
public
meetings
open
survey
in
our
data
collection
for
next
well,
this
year's
our
next
allocation
plan.
A
Hearing
none
we
are
on
for
next
month,
June
1st,
the
first
Thursday
in
the
month
at
2
pm.
We
are
going
to
do
another
virtual
meeting
and
Kelly
and
I
will
be
working
in
the
interim
to
try
to
solidify
what
our
strategy
will
be
going
forward
per
our
discussion
in
the
last
meeting
on
how
we
would
be
convening
and
ensuring
that
we
have
that.
F
A
Thank
you,
Mark
and
thank
you.
Everyone
we'll
expect
to
be
engaging
with
the
Ura
on
the
for
sale
development
program
next
month
having
a
conversation
on
Section
504,
in
addition
to
our
regular
business,
and
hopefully
we
will
have
some
applications
to
take
a
look
at.
So
thank
you.
Everyone-
and
we
will
see
you
next
month
and
please
make
sure
you
sign
up
for
your
committee.