►
From YouTube: Housing Opportunity Fund Meeting - 4/4/19
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Okay
and
we
are
both
she's
with
Pixlr
United's
Lescott
CJ
consulting
we
just
wanted
to.
Let
me
myself
wanted
to
get
clarification
on
when
on
the
I
guess,
so.
The
one-month
contract
that
you
guys
approved
at
the
beginning
of
March
I
know
that
in
the
minutes
is
stated
that
it
was
for
outreach
promotion
and
marketing.
So
just
clarification
on
that
I
don't
get
a
chance
to
see
the
minutes
of
March,
but
I've
noticed
in
there.
C
I'm
Celeste
Scott
housing,
justice
organizer
for
Pittsburgh
United
I,
just
wanted
to
say
talking
about
the
2019
allocation
plan
that
I
hope
there
is
a
look
at
the
consumer
programs,
especially
the
homeownership,
I'm,
sorry,
the
home
owner
assistance
program
and
the
home
stabilization
program.
We
feel
like
those
monies
can
be
spent
quickly
and
if
marking
it
well,
they
will
be
so
I
hope
there
is
a
look
at
that
and
hopefully
increase
of
those
monies
for
2019.
Thank
you.
D
D
A
Channel
Polly
here.
D
E
E
D
E
A
A
The
legislation
states
that
a
report
needs
to
an
annual
report
needs
to
be
complete
by
June
30th
of
each
year,
so
for
2018.
We
all
know
that
we
are
extremely
busy
getting
the
allocation
plan
in
place
and
the
program
set
up
but
did
not
extend
the
funding,
except
for
some
administrative
funds
for
to
HR
in
a
contract
and
a
couple
other
contracts
and
some
staff
salary.
But
those
were
the
only
expenditures
out
of
the
fund
in
2018.
A
So
for
that
reason,
staff
was
recommending
that
we
do
an
RFP
for
these
types
of
services
for
future
years,
but
for
for
the
2018
year,
given
the
fact
it
will
be.
A
small
report
focused
on
the
process
that
we
went
through
in
2018
that
we
use
an
existing
contract
that
the
URA
has
in
place
with
wall-to-wall
studios
and
at
the
last
meeting,
the
board
acts
that
we
go
back
and
get
some
more
clarifications.
A
A
She
will
supply
them
with
most
the
content
for
the
report,
photos
and
the
information,
and
they
will
help
strictly
with
the
layout.
So
we'll
be
a
collaborative
effort
with
you
are
a
staff
and
in
wall
to
wall
to
to
do
to
layout
and
just
a
stylistic
and
then
we
will.
We
are
also
issuing
an
RFP
for
printing,
so
we
will
get
them
printed
separately.
So
this
contract
amount
does
not
include
the
cost
of
printing.
F
F
E
H
A
I
A
I
H
E
A
So
this
was
I
guess
in
December
of
2018,
we
approved
the
Weiser
board,
approved
the
commitment
of
six
hundred
thousand
to
action
housing
for
two
by
MCA
redevelopment,
and
we
have
been
giving
everybody
for
months
and
commitment
letters
so,
each
month,
when
we
bring
these,
we
data,
we
we
write
a
commitment
letter
afterwards
and
give
them
a
four
month,
approximately
120
day
period.
To
close,
they
do
not
close,
you
know
we
can,
we
can
reallocate
the
money
or
they
can
ask
for
an
extension
which
is
what's
happening
today,
so
we're
here
to
review
the
extension.
A
Therefore,
they
are
cueing
themselves
up
to
be
able
to
close
as
soon
as
that
announcement
takes
place.
They
also
have
other
lines
of
credit
that,
once
they
know,
those
funds
are
coming,
they'll
be
able
to
close
while
they
work
with
the
state
on
the
contracting
process.
So
that
is
the
reason
for
the
request.
A
E
A
A
L
M
A
Agree
with
you,
generally
speaking,
I
misunderstood
your
question:
I'm
sorry,
but
generally
speaking,
we
are
last
and
we
filled
that
final
gap.
This
deal
was
a
little
bit
different
because
it
is
so
heavily
dependent
on
grants
that
it's
kind
of
like
you
need
one
to
get
another
to
get
another,
which
is
why
we
made
the
commitment
orally
go
ahead.
Yeah.
K
L
I
wasn't
asking
the
specifics
on
what
you
guys
are
gonna,
because
I've
got
to
abstain
from
this
vote,
but
it's
just
our
policy.
There's
no
policy
that
we've
set
up.
That
says
we
can't
be
first
in
or
we
shouldn't
be
Latin.
We
should
be
last
in
I.
Just
want
to
be
clear
that
we
it's
okay
to
do
to
do
this
as
a
policy.
The.
F
F
Don't
know
if
you
just
the
conversation
just
happened
on
off.
You
had
the
discussion
with
Larry
or
lino.
If
you
can
speak
to
it,
but
if
you
are
pursuing
other
potential
sources
or
if
they
are
pursuing
other
potential
sources
in
place
of
our
cap
and
the
event
our
cap
doesn't
happen,
is
there
confidence,
then
that
those
others
will
be
in
place
by.
F
K
I
A
G
A
H
Done
by
the
end
of
2019,
my
intent
is
not
to
create
more
work
for
your
staff,
but
is
it
possible
to
get
a
list
of
the
projects
and,
what's
encumbered
so
that
as
we're
looking
at
these,
we
can
kind
of
see
like
what's
a
lapsing.
So
we
do
need
to
do
some
sort
of
reclamation
of
funds.
We
don't
allow
it
to
sit
for
too
long
and
that
doesn't
have
to
happen
every
month,
but
maybe
get
orderly
and.
A
I
can
tell
you
I,
think
we've
done
five
commitments
to
date,
I'm
pretty
sure
and
I
will
announce
that
the
first
so
the
first
month
in
December
was
was
this
one
and
was
riverview?
Riverview
will
be
closing
within
two
weeks,
so
we
have
worked
on
closing
costs.
They
will
close
by
their
their
timeline
of
April.
A
30
of
I
need
to
check
in
on
the
status
on
the
observatory
hill
project
that
one
came
to
following
months,
so
that
one
needs
to
close
may
31st,
and
then
the
two
preservation
deals
that
we
brought
to
two
months
ago,
Wood,
Street
and
part
for
you,
and
then
those
will
both
close
within
the
next
few
weeks.
Correct
yeah
I
mean
those
were
those
were
not
as
complicated
in
terms
of
getting
all
the
funders
to
the
table
and
those
are
on
track
to
close.
So
some.
H
A
J
And
spending
down
those
dollars
in
a
timely
fashion,
so
obviously
we're
in
a
learning
curve
right
now,
but
hopefully
as
we're
going
forward.
That's
something
that
we're
really
mindful
of
because
between
the
rolling
and
over
laughing
years
and
delays,
we're
gonna
get
to
a
place
that
it's
just
very
complicated,
yep.
A
A
A
L
One
thing
that
would
help
I
know
that
it's
weird
sort
of
doing
things
for
the
first
time,
but
maybe
having
somebody
if
it's
possible
when
something
like
this
comes
up
from
the
agency.
That's
not
the
member
of
the
Housing
Opportunity
Fund,
Advisory
Board,
a
good
thing,
and
you
know
I'm
not
saying
that
that's
what
we
should
doesn't
matter
for
today,
but
maybe
going
forward
if
something
like
this
is
coming
up.
K
A
We
started
a
couple
months
ago
with
five
annual
allocation
plan
meetings
in
five
regions
of
the
city,
north
south
east
west
central
staff
created
a
pretty
robust
summary
report
from
those
meetings.
Additionally,
there
was
a
survey
that
that
was
taken
at
the
meetings
but
stayed
online
for
at
least
a
month
afterwards,
Jamie.
How
many
people
responded
to
the
survey.
A
275
people
took
the
survey
and
though
that
was
summarized
in
the
report
that
we
sent
out
and
I
have
a
couple
extra
copies.
If
anyone
wants
a
color
copy
of
the
report,
and
so
we
distributed
the
report
to
the
Weiser
board
and
then
held
to
working
group
meetings
at
the
URA
over
the
last
couple
weeks
where
we
discussed
their
report
and
any
other
feedback
advisory
board
members
had
received
from
the
general
public.
A
I
got
one
more
last
night
that
it's
not
included
in
this
data,
but
there
were
11
responses
included
in
the
data
you're
gonna
see
from
the
advisory
board,
and
we
combined
the
data
and
looked
at
the
mean,
and
the
median
even
did
some
example,
samples
that
aren't
on
here
that
took
out
outliers
like
the
highest
and
the
lowest,
and
it
really
didn't
change
the
numbers
that
drastically.
Everyone
seemed
to
be
somewhat
similar,
so
we're
gonna
go
through
this
and
you
have
the
spreadsheet
in
front
of
you.
A
O
A
A
Demonstration
dollars
was
written
in
as
an
additional
program,
and
so
those
are
the
means,
the
averages,
and
so
because
only
a
couple
people
wrote
in
additional
programs.
Those
are
basically
like
showing
what
was
written
yeah
and
you
can
see
when
we
do
averages
and
you'll
see
it
on
the
next
slide.
Medians
it
doesn't
it's
not
necessarily
total
ten
million
when
you
do
it
that
way.
So
when
can
you
go
on
the
median?
The
median
average
are
pretty
similar.
We
focused
mostly
on
the
median.
A
So
that's
where
the
medians
came
out
for
the
program's,
just
to
kind
of
put
it
in
perspective
I.
We
we
have
a
copy
of
the
2018
plan
in
front
of
you
if
you
want
to
kind
of
compare
it
to
to
what
we're
doing
this
year,
but
this
year,
for
example,
the
rental
is
3.875,
and
so
the
median
of
the
11
responses
came
out
to
3.75
house
and
stabilization.
This
year
is
0.75,
so
the
median
is
pretty
similar
to
that
down
payment.
This
year
is
0.75,
so
the
median
goes
down
a
little
bit
there.
A
J
A
M
D
A
F
Terms
of
the
emergency
use
that
was
sort
of
the
ideas
that
there's
gonna
be
circumstances
that
come
up,
that
none
of
us
foresee
be
it
Bethesda
home
would
be
a
Penn
Plaza.
You
know
whatever
the
case
is,
and
if
we
have
all
of
our
money's
committed
sort
of
explicitly
in
these
buckets
without
some
latitude
to
be
responsive.
That
obviously
limits
us
right
and-
and
so
that
was
some
of
the
thought
in
terms
of
it,
I
mean
I
had
more
monies
in
there
for
other
potential
things.
H
A
E
D
J
A
Logistical
II,
you
know
as
we
go
through
this
conversation
today,
I'm
more
than
welcome
to
have
this
conversation
about.
Do
we
need
a
separate
line
item
for
those
emergency
type
of
things,
and
how
do
we
identify
that
line
item
to
City
Council,
you
know,
and
and
so
so
in.
J
H
A
So
we're
fine
with
the
contingency
line
and
explaining
it
to
Council,
or
we
can
potentially
add
to
the
existing
program
guidelines
to
allow
for
emergency
situations
to
go
through
the
existing
program
guidelines
that
might
be
another
way
to
handle
it
either
either
way,
and
then
staff
looked
at
it
and
said:
okay.
Well,
when
we
do
the
medians
were
short
a
little
bit
of
you
know:
I
think
it
was
0.57
million
five
hundred,
seventy
thousand
sure
it's
one
potential
staff
recommendation
for
that
five
hundred
and
seventy
thousand
is
rental
and
the
next
couple
slides.
A
We
wanted
to
talk
real
quickly
just
because
as
staff-
and
this
is
advise
opinion
except
to
say
that
our
phones
are
ringing
a
lot
on
rental
development.
Can
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
so
we
wanted
to?
We
pulled
some
data.
Evan
and
Jamie
spent
the
last
couple
days
pulling
some
data
on
the
current
rental
situation
in
the
city.
Most
of
you
know
that
that
one
reason
this
advisory
board
was
formed
was
because
of
the
needs
assessment
done.
That
said,
we
were
20,000
units,
short
rental
housing,
we're
gonna,
be
working
with
the
city
to
see.
A
N
L
O
Of
the
reasons
that
we're
talking
about
updating
that
study
is
because
the
methodology
that
is
used
in
that
studies
is
completely
different
from
the
HUD,
so
HUD
uses
area
median
income,
which
is
based
on
the
county.
That
study
uses
what
they
call
median
household
income,
which
is
for
the
city
so
and
then
specifically
to
your
question
about
the
previous
slide
verses
of
this
slide,
those
are
cost
burdened
households.
Overall,
this
slide
is
cost
per
hour.
This
site
is
the
gap
between
those
income
bands
which
again
are
not
the.
N
L
I
L
L
O
F
Mark
your
point:
if
we
go
to
back
to
the
last
slide
like
that,
the
45%
of
runners
that
are
cost
burned,
that
includes
you,
know
the
Google
employee
who's,
making
a
hundred
thousand
plus
and
electively
choosing
to
spend
more
than
30%
of
their
income
right
like
it's,
not
just.
If
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
Evon,
it's
not
just
that
gap.
So
it's
exactly
your
point,
but
for
the
public
and
the
viewers
at
home.
H
Community,
because
maybe
they
can
alleviate
some
of
the
burden
around
some
of
the
social
service
stuff,
which
is
in
their
wheelhouse
and
the
more
dollars
that
could
be
developed
to
actually
producing
the
units
that
are
needed
to
address
the
issue
that
the
fund
will
be
better
positioned
to
do
that,
at
least
in
the
early
stages.
So
there's
a
way
for
us
to
start
to
think
about
how
we
make
those
connections.
Maybe
this
is
our
opportunity.
A
I
Another
strategy,
as
it
relates
to
production,
I,
don't
think
I've
seen
anyone
else's
recommendations
is
the
landlord
Assistance
Program
I
sent
in
my
late,
but
I
really
think
that's
the
the
fastest
way
that
we
can
bring
more
units
to
market
that
are
affordable,
so
I
think
we
need
to
be
strategically
including
a
line
item
specifically
for
the
landlord
Assistance
Program.
And
if
we're
talking
about
production,
yes,
there's
a
rental
gap,
but
then
I
think
we
need
to
also
put
money
and
Landlord
systems.
A
E
A
Inspections
are
saying
that
these
units
need
about
five
thousand
to
ten
thousand
dollars
worth
of
work
per
unit
and
with
the
Housing
Opportunity
Fund,
with
the
goal
being
permanent
affordability
on
the
units,
it
doesn't
for
a
five
thousand
to
ten
thousand
dollar
loan
per
unit.
It's
probably
not
a
reasonable
request
to
ask
someone
to
take
even
a
30-year
affordability
term
if
the
loan
itself
is
only
five
or
ten
years.
So
that
is
why
it
is
not
listed
on
here
because
it
seems
like
it
could
be
better
operated
with
another
source
of
funds.
N
A
H
F
But
the
other
thing
I
would
say
that
that
alone
affords
you.
The
ability
to
do
is
on
an
ongoing
basis,
whether
it's
the
five
or
ten
years
at
least
ensure
that
there's
acceptance
most
section
8
tenants
with
section
8
vouchers
right
if
we're
in
effective
lending
against
that
and
whether
it's
the
FMR
that's
sort
of
higher
than
what
they've
been
charging
because
they
haven't
been
able
to
meet
those
standards
or
whatever
the
case
may
be.
That
sort
of
gives
us
a
still
a
contractual
relationship.
It's
ongoing
in
order
to
have.
P
And
I
think
to
that
point,
I
think
the
conversation
about
it,
give
it
to
a
mom-and-pop
and
we're
saying:
how
long
are
you
gonna
make
it
affordable?
So
I'll
give
you
$5,000
to
make
it
affordable
for
five
years
or
T.
That
is
one
thing,
but
I
need
five
thousand
I
say
you
don't
want
it
for
twenty
years.
That's
not
an
appropriate
level.
H
I'm,
sorry,
something
in
the
NSP
the
way
that
the
ura
does
that
with
folks
who
own
their
homes,
it
may
have
a
low-income
bar
or
living
in
an
inn
like
in
a
rental
unit
and
there's
like
an
affordability
period
of
15
years.
Is
there
something
that
we
could
look
at
around
that
that's
sort
of
like
a
private
owner
who's
leasing
to
a
low
to
moderate
income?
Buyer
and
the
the
unit
was
improved
mm-hmm?
A
J
Also
with
anyone
that
there's
an
investment
made
in
making
sure
that
that's
quality
housing
that
it
actually
is
meeting
fair
housing
standards
and
that
these
are
landlords
that
are
following
all
appropriate
guidelines
for
rentals
and
in
their
eviction
processes
appropriate.
Those
are
administrative
issues
that
I
think
can
get
really
complicated.
A
I
I
think
you
know
before,
even
if
it
the
if
it's
determined
that
we
don't
use
these
funds,
we
need
to
kind
of
review
the
you
know
the
recommendations,
because
I
think
the
structure
of
it
matters
for
it
to
be
successful.
We
can't
overburden
landlords,
but
we
can
give
them
just
a
pest
I
think
it's
about
balance,
so
I
think
just
really
making
sure
that
it
works
to
your
point.
You
know,
I
think
the
inspection
process
is.
Is
it's
critical
because
making
sure
that
those
things
are
you
know
rectify?
Yes,.
E
I
E
A
A
You
know
how
we've
been
working
on
a
database
for
the
last
year
of
deed,
restricted
units,
so
any
unit
in
the
city
that
has
something
on
the
recorded
on
the
property
for
affordability.
Those
are
those
levels,
the
small
ones,
and
then
the
larger
ones
per
income
level
show
how
many
people,
according
to
the
census,
right,
Jamie,
yeah,.
E
A
Say,
there's
not
naturally
occurring
affordable
housing
that
also
she
put
statistics
on
the
side
about
section,
8
vouchers
and
so
forth.
But
you
know
that's
also
not
to
say
that
someone
doesn't
have
section
8
voucher
and
is
paying
a
higher
market
rate
someplace
else,
but
but
that's
just
strictly
showing
the
gap
and
indeed
restricted
units
Jamie.
F
O
It's
it's
renter,
households,
runner.
K
A
I
A
Only
declare
so
many
units
HOF
units,
but
if
you
want
to
say
that
the
building
wouldn't
happen
but
4d
HOF
money,
then
then
that
would
be
the
unit
count
there
go
ahead,
and
that
is
that
was
only
just
to
explain.
So
we
had
the
advisory
for
median
staff.
We
wanted
to
do
our
chart
and
then
and
then
we'll
just
let
you
discuss
it.
So
that
was
though
it
was
just
an
explanation
for
our
chart
and
what
we
did
for
our
charges.
A
We
took
your
median
and
then
we
took
that
remaining
point,
five,
seven
and
put
it
into
the
rental
program,
and
we
made
also
an
additional
point,
two
five
into
the
down
payment,
for
we
actually
raised
the
rental
program
by
0.7.
We
did
point
two
five
into
the
down
payment
to
get
it
up
to
what
it
is
this
year,
because
we
have
no
idea
of.
We
have
no
way
of
knowing
how.
E
A
L
Question
on
the
down
payment
assistance
program
that
isn't
what
you
said
at
the
first
working
group
meeting,
it
looked
like
we
weren't
gonna,
get
through
all
the
money
for
2018
and
I
mean
that
was
what
how
I
was
looking
at
this
is
it.
What
did
you
need
to
get
through
the
two
years,
but
you're
telling
me
that
what
did
I
misunderstand
what
you
said.
A
D
I
A
A
P
A
Q
I,
like
the
idea
of
having
and
included
in
the
rental
gap
program,
because
if
it
doesn't,
if
the
emergency
doesn't
arise
or
there,
there
is
another
answer
for
how
we
do
some
of
the
additional
programs
that
we
talked
about
this
program.
I
think
is
going
to
have
this
most
immediate
need.
Maybe
but
I
think
we
should
make
sure
that
we
do
at
the
end
of
the
year.
Have
some
money
left
in
case
an
emergency
doesn't
right.
Q
A
Just
but
Bethesda
Homewood
was
an
example
of
a
project-based
section,
8
deed,
restricted
property.
That
because
of
the
disrepair,
then
all
the
sudden
it
was
gonna
lose
his
project-based
status
and
we
were,
the
city
was
at
risk
of
over
100
households.
You
know
not
having
a
place
to
go
and
then
the
pin
Plaza
example
was
a
straight-out
market.
It
was,
it
was
a
property
that
was
rented
to
a
lot
of
people
with
section
8
vouchers
and
then
the
owner
just
decided
to
do
something
else
with
the
properties.
So
those
types
of
situations.
L
A
Rent,
it
was
decided
that
the
rental
of
me
these
are
20.
A
lot
of
these
are,
you
know,
well
over
a
million
dollar
developments
that
have
all
kinds
of
closing
fees
and
legal
calls
and
so
on
and
so
forth,
and
it
it's
not
coming
out.
It's
not
like
a
homeowner
having
to
come
with
money,
but
it's
a
multi-million
dollar
developments
a
little
bit
difficult.
I
E
L
A
J
A
J
A
I
M
A
How
we're
gonna
account
for
at
the
URA,
like
just
in
our
accounting
system
and
so
on
and
so
forth?
Pretty
soon
we
will
get
into
regular.
Billings
of
you
are
a
staff
time
to
the
HOF
fund
and
we'll
be
able
to
explain
to
you.
You
know
what
those
Billings
are
and
how
and
you
know
how
we're
doing
it,
but
we
got
to
get
the
construction
inspectors
and
everyone
knowing
when
they're
working
on
an
HOF
project
and
billing.
It
correctly
so
that's
been
the
holdup
of
why
I
can't
give
you
that.
A
E
I
I'm
just
a
little
bit
confused
on
how
this
will
work,
even
with
the
two
examples
mentioned
with
the
bethesda
home,
so
those
properties
needed
a
lot
more.
You
know
renovations
than
500k
so
I'm
kind
of
short.
Will
we
be
looking
to
fill
the
gap
with
some
other?
You
are
a
program
if
we,
if
we
only
have
a
portion-
and
it's
not
really
gonna-
get
us
there,
then
what
what?
How
would
these
funds
help
that
situation
and
then,
with
the
other
110
please'?
That's
a
private
development.
Were
you
know
he
made
a
decision?
A
P
Saying
the
D,
but
des
des
it
was
an
example
of
that,
largely
there
weren't
enough
resources
in
a
really
immediate
timeframe
to
turn
that
around
and
it
was
really
complicated
to
figure
out
who
was
able
to
layer
to
do
that
and
ended
up
being
someone
that
access
to
a
lot
of
private
capital
right.
So
if
someone
was
trying
to
come
in
from
a
perspective
of
a
community-based
organization
or
CDC
to
do
that,
then
that
level
of
resources
wasn't
really
there
kind
of
early
in
a
quick
turnaround.
P
Q
Q
E
D
J
J
While
a
person
tries
to
assemble
this
sort
of
complicated
funding
package
to
address
something
like
that,
those
kind
of
circumstances
do
happen,
and
we
certainly
would
want
to
be
able
to
address
them
when
they
do,
because
that
created
just
layers
and
layers
and
layers
of
burden
for
the
household
social
service
involvement,
damage
damage
beyond
what
the
physical
damage
was,
and
if
we
had
opportunities
to
address
something
like
that,
it
would
be
really
transformative.
Mm-Hmm.
E
A
Q
A
E
G
Your
comment
about
the
rental
gap,
because
you
talk
about
the
demand
and
people
are
calling
you
but
I
think
you're,
not
feeling
the
demand,
that's
for
like
renault
stabilization,
because
you're,
not
a
rental
stabilization
provider.
So
I
think
that,
like
you,
might
be
a
little
skewed
but
about
the
demand
because
of
who
you
are-
and
I
and
I
just
wanted
to
draw
attention
to
the
housing
stabilization
line-item
on
the
average
was
quite
higher
than
the
median
1.24.
G
So
maybe
that
could
be
rebalanced
a
little
bit,
keeping
in
mind
that
one
of
the
points
I
made
was
I.
Think
there's
other
service
providers
out
there
I
mean
the
people
there's
no
shortage
of
to
me
and
then
there's
no
shortage
of
need.
So
maybe
there's
additional.
If
the
capacity
is
an
issue,
you
know
we
can
find
some
additional
service
providers
to
help
yeah.
D
F
The
the
point
eight
in
the
point
seven-five
will
be
on
the
street
at
the
same
time
right
so
for
this
year
there
will
be
one
and
a
half
now
whether
if
there's
the
concern
around
capacity
for
those
that
already
requested
to
one
and
a
half,
you
know
we
obviously
have
a
sort
of
runway
to
see
how
that
goes
out.
But
then
it
gives
us
an
ability
to
you
know:
I'd
I,
don't
think
we
know,
there's
a
demand.
F
I,
don't
I,
guess
interested
in
how
much
of
those
eight
how
many
of
those
agencies
are
potentially
hearing
from
the
same
people
within
the
city.
I
mean
Adrienne
spoke
latwon
a
couple
months
ago
to
some
sort
of
the
demand,
as
it
relates
to
the
county
right
and
was
worth
thinking
about
the
city,
how
we
sort
of
balance
those
things
out,
I
think.
J
With
the
with
the
housing
stabilization,
there
are
so
many
mechanisms
in
which
we
could
bolster
those
systems
and
get
economies
of
scale
as
well,
so
I
think
it's
also
with
this
particular
set
of
money.
I'm,
always
thinking
about
what
are
those
matching
opportunities?
What
what
gets
us
further
down
the
road?
So
is
it
further
down
the
road
to
give
20
agencies
small
amounts
of
money,
or
does
it
get
us
further
down
the
road
to
look
at
those
matching
opportunities
where
there's
already
infrastructure
and
we
can
get
much
more
saturation
and
impact
and
also
what
drop?
J
What
dollars?
Are
we
not
drawing
down
from
the
state
or
federally,
because
those
funds
don't
have
the
matching
levels
that
they
need?
Could
this
provide
matching
levels
that
actually
help
us
leverage
in
many
of
those
funds?
It's
an
80%
20%!
That's
a
really!
That's
a
really
great
deal
for
us
if
we
can
put
in
20
percent
of
that
and
then
leverage
80
percent.
On
top
of
that,
that
would
be
really
smart,
so
I
think
rental
assistance
is
a
tricky
one,
but
I
do
think.
J
That's
that's
an
intense
figure
for
us
to
get
our
brain
around
and
think
about
addressing
that
from
a
variety
of
different
angles
where
people
exist
leveraging
on
resources,
so
they
can
stay
there.
The
housing
that
doesn't
exist,
making
that
possible
and
again
thinking
about
our
30%
and
below
folks,
because
there
really
is
not
space
for
them
and
they're
gonna,
get
pushed
out
and
pushed
out
and
pushed
out
and
pushed
out
and
pushed
out
from
everything
that
we
do.
That's
that's
lifting
the
boats
doesn't
seem
to
lift
them
so
getting
to
moving
these
dollars
around.
E
A
G
J
Think
it
certainly
could
look
just
like
that
and
I
think
having
conversations
with
the
Housing
Authority
and
DHS
is
one
of
those
steps.
I
think
having
conversations
with
economic
development,
both
city
and
county,
is
another
one
of
those
steps.
But
how
could
we
really
leverage
these
resources
for
the
maximum
impact?
Flexible
dollars
for
rental
assistance
are
very
hard
to
come
by
and
I'd
love
to
see
us
blow
that
up
to
the
extent
possible,
I
think.
I
That
makes
a
lot
a
lot
of
sense,
but
I'd
like
to
see
more
collaboration.
But
not
just
you
know
the
bigger
entities,
but
also
some
of
the
smaller
agencies
that
are
providing
the
same
services
and
how
can
folks
work
together,
maybe
on
a
state
level
to
attract
more
resources,
not
just
for
the
big
guys,
but
for
the
small
guys,
but.
D
E
J
E
E
J
Little
guys,
it's
a
lot
easier
to
touch
them
with
systems
that
already
exist,
then
trying
to
create
a
whole
new
level
of
system
that
they
then
have
to
try
to
adjust
to.
What
does
the
URA
want
if
I
already
have
a
contract
with
United
Way
or
with
DHS
I
could
just
plug
it
in
there
and
then
I
don't
have
to
create
a
new
infrastructure
for
dollars.
J
I
O
I
Essentially,
meet
the
needs
of
the
people
cuz,
that's
really
the
focus
less
about
who's
getting
the
dollars,
but
that
these
folks
are
being
helped,
but
how
to
work
together
to
attract
more
dollars
and
leverage
few
dollars
to
do
that.
But
once
the
dollars
come
in
when
it
reaches
multiple
organizations
and
not
just
a
few
yeah
yeah.
A
Let
me
just
explain
the
timeline
and
then
it's
up
to
you
how
you
all
want
to
move
forward
with
it.
But
you
know
what
our
thought
was
that
that
we
would
get
to
a
plan
today
that
people
would
temporarily
approve
kind
of
preliminary
plan,
and
then
we
would
post
it
online
for
the
next
month
and
have
we'll
talk
to
you
about
the
housing
event
on
April
30th,
and
you
know
talk
about
it
at
that
of
it
and
then
come
back
two
days
later
with
the
final
vote.
A
A
So
we
could
do
a
final
vote
without
a
preliminary
vote
if
you
want
to,
but
I
do
want
to
get
something
on
our
website
relatively
soon.
So
my
thoughts
and
goals
for
today
was
for
you
to
look
at
how
these
things
compare.
If
people
want
to
make
the
motion
to
go
with
the
median
or
to
go
with
staff
recommendation
or
to
make
any
changes
that
that's,
why
evan
has
that
fourth
column,
we
can
time
to
combine
the
two
or
do
whatever
people
would
like
to
do.
Right
now
would
be
the
preferred
scenario.
Well,.
I
Well,
just
a
few
things
that
come
to
mind
when
looking
at
the
staff
recommendation.
So
we
already
spoke
to
the
landlord
Assistance
Program.
If
there's
another
program
and
dollars
coming
then
I'm,
okay,
with
leaving
that
aside
for
now
but
the
tangle
title,
I,
don't
see
or
estate
planning
necessarily
and
your
recommendations
and
the
other
is
the
one
of
the
biggest
things
I
heard
from
the
community
meetings
was
a
homeowner
Assistance
Program
and
the
need
for
that.
So
that
being
lower
I'm,
not
sure
that
makes
sense.
A
Logic
for
lowering
it
was
a
couple
things.
One
is
thinking
about:
Jamie
slides
there
there's
definitely
a
difference
in
the
number
of
renters
and
a
number
of
homeowners
at
those
levels,
so
we
weren't
we're
not
100
for
sure
the
demand
for
DHAP
program,
so
that
was
a
bit
of
an
unknown
to
us
and-
and
secondly,
this
should
not
be.
You
know
too
much
of
a
hindrance,
but
we
do
need
to
figure
out
form
is
staffing
capacity
and
not
just
you
are
a
staff
but
contractors
and
the
subcontractors
that
the
program.
A
Are
going
to
be
using
and
so
forth,
I
mean
can't
that
construction
field
is
kind
of
crazy
right
now
and
there's
a
shortage.
So
we
wanted
to
see
how
that
worked
out
as
well,
which
was
the
suggestion
for
reducing
it
just
a
little
bit,
not
a
lot,
but
but
it
was
just
our
suggestion
and
I
also,
you
know
understand
if
people
want
to
keep
that
at
a
higher
level,
I
think.
A
So
an
update
on
the
housing
assistance
program,
as
of
today
draft
contracts
have
been
circulated
to
the
program
administrators.
They
are
reviewing
them,
we're
hopeful
to
be
under
contract
with
them
within
a
week.
We
also
have
the
application
to
the
consumer
in
a
semi
final
state,
and
so
as
soon
as
we're
under
contract
within
a
week
with
the
administrators,
we
will
be
releasing
that
application
so
by
the
middle
of
April
the
third
week
of
April,
it
should
be
fully
up
and
running
so.
Q
Q
Relative
need
or
demand
for
the
program
so
much
as
just
having
all
that
money
on
the
street
at
the
same
time,
in
one
program
what
other
programs
get
used
to
funds
so,
while
I
think
that
the
H
AP
program
is
critically
important,
I
just
think
that
we're
gonna
have
a
lot
of
money
on
the
street.
At
the
same
time,
it.
F
F
K
I
I
You
know
just
across
the
city,
so
yeah
I,
don't
know
about
that
and-
and
you
know
yeah
there
were
a
lot
of
homeowners
there,
but
there
are
also
a
lot
of
renters
there
and
I
think
we're
thinking
about
affordable
housing,
we're
thinking
about
homeless
prevention,
but
we
got
to
think
about
existing
homeowners
and
I
think
this
is
the
only
one
that
really
focuses
on
existing
homeowners.
Everything
else
is
for
new
homeowners.
I
J
And
I
asked
a
question.
One
of
the
previous
meetings
related
to
their
minimum
is
related
to
AM
eyes,
but
we
could
do
a
little
bit
more
front-loading
in
different
categories.
I,
actually
like
the
fact
that
the
staff
recommendations
have
a
little
bit
more
in
the
30%
category,
because
again,
I
think
that's.
J
And
I
think
that
those
are
probably
a
lot
of
the
folks
that
did
not
come
out
to
the
public
meetings,
because
they're
they're,
just
incredibly
under-resourced,
so
I
do
think
that
it
is
important
on
every
level
to
make
sure
that
that's
a
group
that
we
have
a
lot
of
focus
on
on
this.
G
A
N
J
L
I
also
think
that
you
know
I
worry
a
little
bit
and
that
word
maybe
it's
something
that
it's
I
know
I
sound
like
I'm
hammering
on
administration.
But
is
there
a
way
to
do
some
of
this
demonstration
and
other
things
out
of
that
since
we're
running
kind
of
two
years
at
a
million
each
we're
probably
not
going
to
spend
at
all,
and
is
there
a
way
that
we
can
set
some
of
this
aside?
So
we
can
do
some
of
that
other
stuff
out
of
there,
and
you
know,
looking
at
yeah.
O
A
L
But
do
we
have
to
go
back
to
City,
Council
I
mean
I,
think
we
do
so.
Should
we
take
a
stab
at
it
and
maybe
make
that
as
part
of
the
allocation
now
and
then,
hopefully,
we
had
a
pretty
close
guess
and
if
we
need
to
adjust
it
because
hey
it
really
cost
a
lot
more
to
do
the
inspections
and
do
we
had
a
lot
more
demand
than
we
thought.
We're
gonna
have
a
lot
more
inspections.
L
A
Tricky
because
of
additional
contracts
as
well
like
the
first
year,
we
had
a
large
HR
na
contract.
We
know
that
the
needs
assessment
will
be
need
needing
to
be
updated.
At
some
point
we
don't
know
the
other
contracts,
so
I'm
just
not
prepared
to
have
that
conversation
today.
Probably
I
think
that
I.
J
H
Actually
insufficient
to
cover
what
the
you
are
asked
to
deliver
to
do
to
do
this
level
of
work
that
you're,
seeing
because
it's
not
just
the
folks
sitting
in
the
corner
over
there.
It's
the
entire
organization,
putting
its
full
thrust
behind
getting
this
program
administered
in
ways
that
probably
don't
even
occur
to
us
exactly.
J
So
I
I,
don't
I,
don't
feel
compelled
in
any
kind
of
way
to
really
adjust
that
administrative
budget
I
think
that
it
is
appropriate.
I
think
that
it
makes
sense
in
a
variety
of
ways,
so
I
I
don't
feel
compelled
to
touch
that
in
any
kind
of
way.
I
do
feel
compelled
to
have
some
level
of
flex
demonstration
additional
program
line
item
in
the
budget,
even
if
that
was
the
point.
H
The
fact
that
we're
in
start-up
we
keep
filling
push
to
gotta,
get
the
allocation
plan
done
by
such
a
such
date,
and
so
we
don't
really
have
time
to
land
the
plane
and
think
strategically.
So
if
we
don't
earmark
dollars
or
when,
though
we
do
have
that
opportunity
in
that
time,
we're
gonna
sort
of
land
lock
ourselves
for
lack
of
a
better
term
into
some
things
and
we're
not
gonna
be
able
to
do
the
strategic
things
that
emerge.
H
I
A
Well,
we
could
do
is
we
could
have
a
six
paragraph
source
with
you
know
we
could
create
small
two-page
guidelines
or
something
that
just
talks
about
any
emergency
and
any
of
these
activities.
So
so,
if
there
is
a
housing,
stabilisation
need
all
the
sudden
or
something
like
that.
It
could
go
there,
probably
without
having
to
be
reallocated
or
go
back
to
council,
yeah,
I.
Think.
P
P
L
L
Then
the
second
part
of
it-
and
maybe
this
is
Adrian
I-
would
destruct
by
the
meeting
we
had
with
the
providers
about
the
need,
that's
out
there
and
what
we're
providing
is
you
know
it's
gonna
be
gone
in
a
couple
of
months
and
even
talking.
If
we
did
this
differently
to
leverage
money
is
what
we're
talking
about
in
that
housing
stabilization
program
enough
funding
to
start
to
really
make
a
much
bigger
impact.
If
we
do
it
differently,
is
any
of.
L
J
That
real
needle
move,
I,
don't
know
that
I
can
I
see.
I
would
say
that
it
can.
What
I
do
know
about
these
funds?
Is
it's
the
level
of
flexibility
for
a
group
of
folks
who
are
barred
from
other
service
systems?
I,
don't
think
we
know,
and
again
maybe
someone's
done
some
research
on
this
I
looked
at
Chuck
in
the
background.
I.
J
Don't
think
that
we
know
what
that
demand
is
for
those
folks
when
I
did
my
allocation
I
actually
put
some
rental
assistance
in
for
the
80%
ami
folks,
because
that
is
a
unique
group
that
may
have
a
crisis
situation
and
get
into
trouble,
because
just
because
you're
at
80%
ami
doesn't
mean
that
you
like
are
burning
money
in
your
driveway.
So.
I
J
I
J
E
G
I
It
is
how
is
the
stabilization
I'm
in
eviction?
It's
that
kind
of
one
in
the
same
yeah
I,
think
the
it
makes
sense
for
the
homeowner
Assistance
Program
and
it's
Angliss
idle
to
be
together
at
first
I
was
thinking.
It
should
be
a
part
of
that
you're
a
admin,
but
since
this
is
connected
to
homeowners,
it
probably
makes
more
sense
to
be
in
a
hat
program.
However,
going
back
to
my
other
point
earlier
about
this
being
one
of
the
hugest
needs
I
think
we
should
look
at
allocating
more
dollars
towards
that,
especially
now.
A
I
I
E
F
P
Title
we
know
it's
a
huge
wealth
issue,
but
if
only
one
group
is
applying
and
they
only
want
a
hundred
thousand.
A
D
G
A
E
E
A
I
Wasn't
here
last
last
time,
but
I
spoke
on
the
phone
about
a
big
situation
that
happens
when
that
happens,
is
a
state
tax
I,
don't
know
if
we
got
a
clear
direction
on
how
that
would
be
handled.
So
in
that
scenario,
when
these
not
in
their
name
and
it
needs
to
be
transferred,
we
can
use
these
dollars
to
facilitate
that
transfer.
Oftentimes,
there's
an
estate
tax
issue
and
these
dollars
be
helped
to
remedy
that
situation.
K
J
I
E
L
E
I
K
So
I
I
really
liked
the
emergency
funds
in
the
rental
cap
program
and
I'm
a
little
concerned
if
we
combine
it
with
the
demonstration
dollars
like
if
we
spend
the
demonstration
dollars
and
then
there's
an
emergency
I,
don't
know
what
we
do
so,
if
there's
some
way
to
have
a
little
bit
more
flexibility
in
the
rental
gap
program.
If
that
happens,.
J
E
P
C
K
E
F
A
F
It
really
is.
This
applies
across
all
of
them,
but
if
we
want
to
talk
about
the
income
bans
at
all
because
to
the
comment
on
the
staff
recommendations
in
terms
of
putting
the
the
lion's
share
of
the
rent
on
capital
money's
in
the
30%
units
versus
the
other
splits
and
obviously
if
we
make
a
change
to
the
way
the
median
values
have
shown,
you
know,
that'll
have
sort
of
a
cascading
effect
and
we'll
need
to
think
about.
You
know
changing
that.
So.
E
E
Q
A
A
F
L
L
So
to
try
to
move
forward
on
it,
we've
got
the
programs
if
we're
looking
at
this,
we're
talking
about
adjusting
the
staff
recommendation
numbers
in
creating
some
demo
emergency
funding,
immediate
the
median
numbers.
Okay.
So
what
we're?
Having
an
additional
line
item
to
the
existing
programs?
It's
demo
slash
emergent
demonstration,
slash
emergency
and.
E
A
G
H
We
haven't
spent
down
all
the
money
from
the
2018
allocation.
How
essential
is
it
that
we
double
down
in
those
areas
where
there's
still
like
there's
still
money-
and
this
is
the
two
thousand-
we're
not
gonna?
Probably
not
gonna
spend
all
the
2019
allocation
either,
so
that
demonstration
bucket
gives
us
the
flexibility,
should
something
expend
out
more
quickly.
The
flexible
program
guidelines
will
allow
us
to
deploy
okay,
we
need
to
only.
D
I
J
E
L
Yeah
and
then
put
the
rest
of
it
into
the
demonstration
of
urgency:
slash
flex,
okay,
you
know.
However,
we
want
to
frame
that,
but
that
that
excess
goes
into
there
as
a
way
to
respond
to
things,
maybe
fill
hole
if
it.
If
we
run
out
of
money
that
quickly,
we
might
want
to
put
more
and
if
we
think
it's
making
that
impact
and.
G
J
D
H
I
H
That
way,
if
there
are
other
priorities,
folks
feel
like
they
have
the
flexibility
to
say
well,
I
do
want
to
see
something
happen
over
there,
because
I
know
for
2019
that
money
is
going
out.
I
think
it's
a
I
think
it
would
be.
It
would
undermine
their
ability
to
make
the
best
decision
and
think
about
new
opportunities.
If
we
don't
do
it
that
way.
Oh
yeah.
I
Q
But
I
think
that
that
is
overlooking
the
fact
that
we
are
already
a
quarter
into
this
year
and
we
have
some
programs,
I,
don't
have
dollars
on
the
street
and
so
doubling
down
on
dollars
that
are
already
on
the
street.
In
programs
where
we
don't
have
any
clue
of
what
the
absorption
is
going
to
be
is
probably
short-sighted,
and
maybe
we
wait
until
we
have
more
data
and
determine
if
we
need
to
reallocate
rather
than
setting
money
aside,
that
we
don't
know
is
going
to
be
used
in
the
next
three
quarters.
I
C
B
Q
E
E
L
2020
allocation-
and
it's
just
you
know,
I
agree
I,
don't
like
rushing
through
this
stuff,
but
we're
sort
of
forced
in
some
ways
to
do.
We
got
to
make
the
best
guesses
as
to
what
we
think
is
gonna
happen,
but
we
cannot.
If
we
see
that
hey,
you
know,
we
really
underestimated
how
many
homeowners
were
going
to
be
using
this
repair
program
that
we
can
also.
A
To
go
so
just
trying
to
get
to
some
phone
numbers
roll
with
your.
So
what
I'm
hearing
is
the
3.75
for
the
rental
gap.
That
was
your
median.
Everyone
seems
like
they're,
comfortable
with
sticking
with
that.
Is
that
an
assumption?
Okay,
so
we're
sticking
with
3.75,
okay
and
then
the
house
and
stabilization
program?
Do
people
want
to
stick
with
your
median
of
0.8?
A
F
F
Looking
at
the
point,
five
seven,
that's
total
right
and
that's
not
sort
of
within
each
of
the
brands.
So
if
we're
saying
they're
gonna
put
point
seven
towards
half
and
point
five
towards
demonstration,
then
in
total
that's
what
it
has
to
be
right
and-
and
we
can
reallocate
within
the
bands
if
we're
short
on
80,
then
tip
up
half
there.
You
know
and
then
turn
the
knobs
down
on
some
other
ones,
but
math.
H
F
A
F
M
N
N
E
F
A
D
A
No
big
event:
April
30th
brand
new
city.
You
are
a
housing
authority,
building
a
4-12
boulevard
of
the
Allies.
Please
please,
please
come
I'm
gonna
be
reaching
out
to
most
of
you
about
it.
I'd
also
like
one
or
two
of
you
to
help
present
this
plan
at
the
the
meeting,
but
there's
going
to
be
over
15,
probably
closer
to
20
other
agencies.
A
Their
Housing
Authority
is
going
to
be
there
to
talk
about
section,
8,
public
housing,
their
homeownership
program,
all
their
programs
and
then
the
United,
Way
and
and
Department
Human
Services,
and
a
lot
of
the
nonprofit's
are
all
gonna
be
there.
So
it's
really
going
to
be
a
resource
for
people,
but
we
are
the
mayor
speaking
and
we
are
going
to.
You
know
talk
about
this
plan
at
this
event.
Yes,.
A
G
L
The
door
knocking
the
community
outreach
around
the
city
to
turn
people
out
to
this.
It
can
benefit
and
make
connections
with,
hopefully,
providers
that
we
funded
and
do
all
sorts
of
good
things,
but
that
I
think
that
there's
other
things
that
we're
getting
include
in
that
5,000,
like
catering
and
other
stuff,
that
that
wasn't,
the
intent
of
my
motion
was
to
limit
I.
Think
it's
going
to
take
all
of
5,000
things.
N
R
G
L
And
so
I'm
just
want
to
be
sure
that
I
wasn't
cutting
off.
You
know
monies
that
if
we
need
to
spend
more
than
five
thousand
to
do
the
whole
event
that
isn't
what
I
was
proposing
was
a
budget
for
the
whole
event.
You
know:
what's
the
real
number
need
to
be,
and
do
we
need
to
vote
on
that,
or
is
that
something
that
you.
E
A
L
G
A
I
I
Well
well,
I
think
I
think
this
is
a
part
of
a
larger
issue
that
was
already
discussed
about
community
outreach
in
general
and
we
shouldn't
just
be
looking
at
it
around
this
event.
There's
outreach
of
this
whole
program,
so
I,
don't
know
if
we
ever
arrived
at
you
know.
Situation
was
subcontracting
with
the
community
group
to
really
provide
outreach
for
everything
from
especially
from
a
grassroots
perspective,
so
I
think
we
should
be
looking
at
it
holistically
and
not
just
this
one
individual
event.
I.
L
Think
that
you
haven't,
you
know,
watched
what
happened
with
last
year's
turn
out
to
different
events.
It's
different
door
knocking
and
getting
folks
to
and
from
this
sort
of
thing
and
I
think
that's
who
we're
trying
to
target
it's,
not
just
you
know
the
same
kind,
the
same
folks
that
show
up
and
a
lot
of
events
like
this.
It's
really
trying
to
get
the
folks
that
we
didn't
touch
very
well
with
the
community
outreach
that
we
did.
We
didn't
have
a
lot
of
renter's
at
those
things.
L
G
L
It's
not
just
the
hours,
it's
also
the
the
technology
and
the
other
stuff
to
go
out
there
and
do
it.
I
would
just
say
if
you
guys
can
cover
the
the
five
thousand
I
thought
was
sufficient
when
I
made
the
motion,
but
if
catering
I
didn't
realize
we
were
thought
about
catering
and
things
like
that.
That
isn't,
where
that
isn't
the
motion
that
I
made.
So
if
you
guys
can
do
the
catering
or
do
through
that
piece
of
it,
I
think
it.
L
G
C
Okay-
and
this
is
for
Pittsburgh
United
with
all
of
our
fees,
a
little
contract
with
CJ
consulting
and
make
sure
that
we
pay
her
what
she's
worth
Oh.
So
we
have
the
stated
contract.
That
rate
is
$50
an
hour
which
is
less
than
usual.
The
estimated
number
of
hours
is
120
for
the
month.
Oh,
we
have
like
three
weeks
left
now.
C
24-Hour
outreach
outreach
to
us
is
canvassing
door,
not
giving
those
sorts
of
things
10
for
promotion.
That's
the
text,
faking
social
media,
those
sorts
of
things
and
five
for
a
bit
planning,
because
we
had
an
agreement
for
us
to
look
at
the
content
and
make
sure
that
it's
tolerable
for
the
demographic
that
we
want
with
the
work
beginning
no
later
than
Monday
April
8th
2018,
if
we
include
it
printing
and
catering
catering
for
the
caterer
that
we
work
with,
would
be
at
least
$2,000
for
200
people
and
delivery
fees.
C
C
I
C
I
Thought
is
that
we,
as
especially
as
we're
looking
at
this
allocation,
we
need
to
be
including
you
know
them
in
a
year.
Lea
outreach
I'm,
not
just
you
know
so,
and
that
can
probably
definitely
be
a
part
of
the
admin.
That'd
really
be
a
yearly
contract
for
outreach
for
all
events,
and
not
just
this
one
event.
G
C
I
That's
not
a
lot
of
money,
so
I'm
opposed
to
reducing
for
for
that
work
to
anything
lower
than
that
I'm
actually
advocating,
therefore,
to
be
hired
or
not,
and
to
be
looked
at
on
a
on
a
yearly
perspective,
but
as
it
relates
to
that
one
event,
it
doesn't
even
make
sense
to
try
to
get
it
lower,
especially
if
we're
trying
to
have
food.
We
were
either
really
need
to
be
talking
about
how
much
more
do
they
need
not
trying
to
cut
it.
Yeah.
L
K
C
L
L
Five
four
five
meetings,
inclusive
of
K,
wasn't
voting.
What
I
heard
was
five
thousand
was
the
number
it
was
going
to
take
to
do
the
outreach.
That's
emotion
that
I
made
it's
gotten
contorted
into
paying
for
the
whole
event
and
I'm,
not
a
party
planner
and-
and
you
know,
don't
know
what
catering
cost
but
I
know
it's
not
free.
If
it's
gonna
get
catered.
I
L
I
was
not
that
wasn't
part
of
what
I.
That
was
not
the
intent
of
the
motion.
The
intent
was
I'm
really
concerned.
We
have
not
heard
from
a
lot
of
low-income
renters
that
most
of
these
funds
are
targeted
towards.
We
heard
a
lot
from
homeowners
and
I
appreciate
that
feedback,
but
we
got
to
turn
those
folks
out
at
some
point
in
time
before
we
get
the
final
allocation
plan
going
to
council.
That's
what
I
voted
it
made
the
motion
for
I.
L
Don't
know
everybody
else
interpreted
that
voted
for
it,
but
it
wasn't
about
catering
the
event
it
was
about
just
doing
the
outreach
and
like
I
really
do
have
to
go.
I'm
meeting
I
have
folks
at
a
group
that
I've
got
it
have
a
site
visit
with
at
11:30,
but
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
up
that
that
motion
that
I
made
was
to
do
the
community
outreach
not
to
pay
for
everything
else
with
the
event
and.
B
C
I
B
N
I
We
vote,
we
I,
don't
think,
there's
anything
else
to
deliberate
about
it's.
Let's
make
it
happen,
so
they
can
get
to
work.
Is
there.
A
The
thing
is:
I
want
to
be
a
good
steward
of
public
money
for
such
an
event,
so
I
wonder
if,
like
maybe
a
budget
for
the
event
not
to
exceed,
if
you
think
that
there
needs
to
be
more
communion,
reach
not
to
exceed
6,000
or
whatever.
That
budget
is
for
the
event.
But
events
like
this
that
have
been
happened
in
the
past
have
had
$3,500
budgets
to.
A
L
I,
don't
think
that
the
uris
ever
door,
not
neighborhoods
and
done
that
kind
of
level
of
grassroots
outreach
and
I.
Don't
know
if
you
guys
have
ever
done
that
and
understand
how
many
hours
that
is
and
how
many
people
that
involves,
and
it's
not
just
whistling
Dixie
I
mean
you
know,
go
door
knock
and
you'll
see
how
long
that
takes
to
talk
to
folks
to
get
them
to
turn
out.