►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
In
addition
to
the
the
board
of
directors
going
to
be
asked
to
stick
around
afterwards,
we
will
have
an
executive
session
immediately
following
today's
public
meeting.
A
It's
the
only
thing
from
the
chair
moving
right
along
it's
the.
B
A
B
There
are
four
scorecards
to
reflect
the
four
types
of
dispositions:
the
land
bank
oversees.
This
is
vacant,
land,
side
yards
mixed
use,
commercial
property
and
residential
property.
Pcrg
will
be
using
the
scorecard
to
gather
feedback
from
their
member
organizations
in
various
community
groups
to
gather
best
practices
and
overall
recommendations
for
plb
ura
staff.
As
a
brief
reminder,
their
12th
annual
summit,
redefining
equity
equality
and
justice
will
be
going
on
next
week.
A
B
B
D
B
The
next
staff
update
are
updates
to
the
tri-party
cooperation
agreement,
so
the
tri-party
cooperation
agreement
articulates
a
process
for
transferring
properties
between
the
land
bank,
ura
and
the
city
of
pittsburgh.
The
land
bank
is
currently
working
with
the
city
on
terms
for
property
transfers
between
the
city
to
the
land
bank.
The
city
has
reviewed
the
agreement
and
responded
to
the
amendments
to
the
original
tri-party
agreement.
B
The
final
voting
item
is
authorization
of
a
proposed
revision
in
the
land
bank
policies
and
procedures.
As
a
general
summary
of
this
revision,
the
land
bank
is
entertaining
an
amendment
to
allow
for
a
non-competitive
disposition
process
for
individuals
and
community
groups
in
the
city
of
pittsburgh.
B
Among
the
proposed
edits
are
guidelines
that
allow
for
a
non-competitive
disposition
under
the
following
proposed
end
uses
side,
yards
green
space,
affordable
mixed
income
or
workforce
housing
development
assemblages,
where
the
applicant
owns
a
significant
portion
of
the
site
properties
in
the
pittsburgh
property
reserve,
community-based
facilities
and
an
approved
disposition
by
two-thirds
vote
of
the
entire
board
of
directors
on
hand
to
answer.
Any
questions
from
the
board
is
matt
sanders,
associate,
counsel
and
nathan,
clark,
chief
ura
legal
officer
for
questions.
D
I
have
a
question
about
the
last
item:
the
board
approval,
whether
that's
needed.
If
we
had
all
of
the
other
items,
I
think
are
the
ones
we
actually.
So
this
is
page
13..
If
we
had
items
one
through
six,
that
seems
to
cover
most
situations
where
we
would
really
want
to.
D
You
know
that
has
been
our
priorities.
You
know
prioritizing
the
property
reserve.
We've
talked
about
green
space
and
side
yards
and
affordable
housing.
So
I
guess
I
am
wondering
why
number
seven
would
be
needed
and
why
and
suggesting,
maybe
that
we
considered
not,
including
that.
E
E
This
is,
this
is
matt
sanders
associate
counsel
at
the
ura.
E
I
think
when
that
would
apply
would
be
if
somebody
approached
the
land
bank
and
there
was
a
property
that
was,
I
currently
owned
by
the
city
that
had
that
didn't,
have
clear
title
and
they
would
ask
the
land
bank
to
clear
title
specifically
for
a
specific
property
that
they
would
be
interested
in,
and
then
the
two-thirds
approval
by
the
board
would
be
the
process
would
be,
as
the
land
bank
staff
would
take
it
to
the
board.
Saying
hey
this.
This
proposed
end
user
has
asked
us
to
acquire
this
property.
E
Are
you
okay
with
us
as
the
plb
staff,
specifically
working
with
the
applicant,
who
asked
us
to
acquire
it.
D
All
right,
but
what,
if
that
ended
up
being
in
conflict
with
one
of
the
other
six
like
what,
if
that
was
a
property
that
could
be
used
for
affordable
housing
or
could
be
used?
You
know
that
you
know
somebody
wanted
to
put
it
in
the
property
reserve
or
something
like
that
and
hadn't
had
a
chance
to
do
that.
Yet
I
guess
I'm
trying
to
understand
where
this
could
be
something
that
would
be
negative
to
our
goals
and
priorities
and
negative
to
community
groups.
E
Yeah,
so
I
hear
you,
which
I
think
that's
why
we,
with
the
way
in
situations
like
that,
we
would
ask
for
a
board
vote.
You
know
the
other
ones
would
be
almost
almost
by
right.
You
know
properties
that
were
interested
that
certain
community
groups
would
be
interested
in.
But
if
we're
going
to
dispose
an
individual
that
doesn't
have
a
community
interest
in
mind,
we
would
ask
that
the
board
review
it
before.
F
Let
me
ask
this
question
so
say:
it's
a
property
vacant
property
next
to
a
house,
not
a
side
yard
and
the
owner
wants
to
buy
that
house
or
whatever
he
wants
to
do
that
piece
of
property.
Then
he
would
have
the
ability
he
or
she
would
have
that
ability
to
come
before
the
board
and
say
look
this
property's
in
between
two
houses.
I
would
like
to
own
this
house
and
it
won't
be
in
a
community
development,
and
I
would
have
the
opportunity
just
because.
B
F
Understand
that,
but
I
think
you
need
to
have
that
there
just
to
protect
that
one
thing
that
might
happen
and
all
it
is
is
covering
all
the
other
things,
one,
that's
what
I
believe.
I
think
it
all
works
together.
It's
not
stopping
or
you
know,
making
the
development
or
what
a
neighbor
wants
to
do
part
of
it.
I
honestly
believe,
if
you
have
that
in
it
protects
all
of
us,
so
we
have
the
ability
to
vote
on.
It's
we're,
not
it's
not
stopping
anybody.
D
D
Right,
given
that
that
every
disposition
comes
to
the
board
for
a
vote
and
gets
a
for
a
vote
of
approval,
this
is
only
those
that
don't
have
to
compete.
So,
in
my
view,
I
actually
respectfully
disagree
and
they
think
that
adding
number
seven
allows
somebody
to
end
around
one
through
six
in
a
way
that
would
could
be
damaging
two
one
through
six.
So.
A
In
the
scenario
that
director
mazda
described,
there's
none
of
those
things
apply
one
through
six,
don't
apply,
that's
the
way.
I
read
it
right,
and
so,
if
I
wanted
the
property,
that's
in
my
neighborhood
that
I've
always
liked.
That's
now
been
abandoned.
That
no
community
group
is
looking
to
put
it
into
a
reserve.
A
D
A
Right
those
still
exist,
but
in
his
example
no
there's
no
pressure
for
any
of
those
for
that
particular
property.
So
do
we
allow
it
to
continue
to
dilapidate
because
it's
been
vacant
so
long
or
is
there
an
opportunity
here
as
a
potential
buyer
and
someone
who's
going
to
invest
in
that
property?
Can
they
access
it.
D
I
just
I
don't
know
why
we're
giving
somebody
this
who
just
comes
forward
and
says
I
want
this
property
to
have
that
opportunity
without
competition
in
that
like
why.
That
would
be
something
that
we
would
specifically
want
to.
Have
the
you
know
the
example
given
if
it's
somebody
who
it's
next
to
their
property,
that
counts
as
the
development,
assemblage
or
side
yard.
D
So
I
feel
like
the
one
through
six
criteria
are
very
good.
I
don't
know
why.
Seven
seven,
I
think,
allows
some.
You
know,
maybe
somebody
without
the
community's
interests
in
mind
to
swoop
in
and
just
get
a
property.
You
know
without
you
know
that
might
be
counter
to
what
we
want
to
have
happen.
B
Yeah,
so
I'm
happy
to
answer
these
questions
as
part
of
the
land
bank
staff
who
does
work
on
staff
matters
and
gets
to
present
these
to
the
board
of
directors.
The
the
land
bank's
public
process
is
set
in
a
way
that
we
dispose
of
property
to
the
highest
and
best
use.
However,
our
public
process
is
very
time
consuming
and
it
involves
informing
the
community
in
an
adequate
way.
C
As
we
both
have
the
same
last
name,
I
got
a
little
confused
there,
but
I
think
she
was
talking
about
you,
but
the
I
guess
I
could
see
one
scenario
that
I
know
my
office
has
been
contacted
about
and
it's
like
a
family
member
trying
to
get
back
their
family
home.
C
So
it
does
make
sense
to
allow
some
wiggle
room
for
a
direct
sale
to
happen
without
competition.
You
know
I
mean
it
does
require
a
vote
by
the
the
board.
If
something's
improper,
it
would
be
public.
F
Excuse
me,
but
I
agree
because
and
no
disrespect
to
you
miss
wilson.
I
could
see
llc's
trying
to
swoop
in
taking
a
single
piece
of
property,
regardless
of
what's
on
this
piece
of
paper.
I
think
we
need
to
have
that
other
piece
that
other
layer
just
to
protect
the
land
bank
and
the
people
in
these
communities,
because
it
happens
every
day
in
sheridan
and
in
district
2.,
so
somebody
can
come
in
and
buy
that
house
right.
Next
to
me,
it
was
vacant.
F
Ten
thousand
dollars
have
the
ability
to
wait
two
years
and
do
whatever
to
wash
the
title,
and
then
now
you
have
that
home
in
between
you.
So
I
think
if
somebody
comes
forward,
has
a
responsibility,
the
wherewithal
the
monetary
ability
to
take
that
home
and
re-purpose
it
for
their
family
or
if
they
want
to
keep
it.
I
think
we
need
to
have
that
layer
here
to
protect
ourselves,
protect
our
mission
and
everything
that
we're
trying
to
stand
for
here
and
that's
my
opinion.
That's
what
I
believe
and
I
I
think
we
need
the
extra
layer.
C
Of
is,
I
would
just
hope,
you
know,
I
guess
the
just
like
historic
designation.
You
know
if
we're
gonna
go
for
with
his
organization,
designation
where
the
owner
doesn't,
you
know
they're,
not
in
support
of
it.
We
need
majority,
we
need
super
majority
of
council
and
which
you
know
hopefully
protects.
You
know
the
the
well.
Hopefully
it
provides
more
accountability
to
what's
actually
being
put
in
front
of
people
to
decide.
C
C
Is
the
the
score
card
does?
Are
there
any
points
in
the
scorecard
that
we
want
to
see?
You
know
be
in
place
here
like,
for
instance,
one
of
the
items
in
the
scorecard
is
back
taxes.
Do
we
want
to
like
is?
Do
we
want
there
to
be?
We
want
number
seven
to
reference
parts
of
the
scorecard
that
must,
you
know,
must
be
in
place.
B
Yeah
happy
to
answer
that
question,
and
to
that
I
will
say
the
scorecard
reflects
the
content
in
the
policies
and
procedures
that
pertain
to
each
of
the
land.
Banks,
disposition
types
and
it
is
a
tool.
It
is
not
the
sole
deciding
factor
in
any
disposition,
but
it's
a
way
for
staff
to
evaluate
an
end
user
in
regard
to
our
policies
and
procedures
and
have
less
of
a
subjective
opinion
of
an
end
user,
but
have
more
of
an
objective
to
the
policies
and
procedures.
B
How
this
end
use
fits
into
the
community's
vision,
how
prepared
and
how
much
planning
the
financial
ability
of
our
end
users,
and
so
the
scorecard,
could
easily
and
will
easily
be
a
factor
into
applications
that
we
receive,
but
it
is
never
the
sole
deciding
factor
or
the
only
thing
that
land
bank
staff
rely
on.
It
is
simply
a
tool.
G
C
The
motion
is
to
approve
the
revised
section
of
5.04.
B
D
I've
I
have
some
questions.
If
I
may,
I
feel
like
we're
still
not
seeing.
Is
this
just
one
month
of
in
the
income
statement,
it's
just
one
month
of
expenses.
D
D
D
The
staffing
costs,
so
we
have
the
pulse
fellowship,
which
is
a
cost
and
then
legal
which
would
be
the
grb
law
contract.
But
other
you
know
we're
paying
the
ura
for
stuffing.
And
I
don't
see
it
on
the
financials,
which
I
think
is
a
problem
for
the
board
not
being
able
to
see
a
full
financial
picture
on
a
regular
basis
through
the
the
financial
statements
that
are
provided
to
the
board.
G
D
Yeah
is,
I
think,
it's
also
helpful
if
we
could
maybe
on
a,
if
not
monthly,
on
a
quarterly
basis
get
that
up
to
date
and
get
the
so
that
the
board
has
an
accurate
picture
of
the
financials.
D
So
would
it
be
possible
to
have
the
billing
occur
and
then
for
us
to
see
it
on
the
financials?
Yes,.
D
A
D
Of
money
plus
legal,
we
know
we're
gonna
have
as
well,
so
we
we
it's
just
not
a
complete
financial
picture.
C
D
Ideally,
best
practice
would
be
monthly.
You
know
that
those
should
be
booked
into
your
financial
statements
on
a
monthly
basis,
if
that's
for
some
reason,
not
feasible
at
least
quarterly.
I
would
say
other.
B
A
D
F
And
I
I
agree
with
director
wilson
what
what
happens
if
you're
going
to
all
of
a
sudden,
add
in
numbers
after
you
already
went
past
that
you
know
month
quarter
whatever,
then,
when
you
go
in
to
get
your
audit
okay,
what
happened
here-
and
you
know
just
me,
being
part
of
a
union
and
being
audited
and
things
like
that.
You
can't
that
can't
happen,
because
that's
how
trustees
and
people
get
in
trouble.
So
I
honestly
think
no
fault
to
anybody.
F
I'm
not
saying
there's
an
issue,
but
I
think
just
to
protect
all
of
us
and
the
ura
as
well
the
city.
You
know
the
land
bank
we
have.
We
should
have
that
in
there.
If
what,
if
it's
ten
dollars
an
hour,
if
it's
a
hundred
dollars
an
hour
whatever
the
number
is
we
should,
even
though
they
didn't
pay,
we
still
should
have
that.
I
mean
to.
F
D
It
should
be
booked
whether
it's
paid
or
not,
which
you're
exactly
right,
but
it
needs
to
be
booked
into
the
financials.
Then
we
would
begin
to
see
you
know
an
accounts,
receivable
report.
If
that
money
is
in
fact
outstanding
or
it's
payable.
On
our
I
mean
it's
really
a
payable
on
our
side
that
you
know
if,
for
whatever
reason
we
haven't
actually
paid
it
yet
then
it's
a
outstanding
payable,
but
at
least
the
payables
have
been
booked.
A
G
There
there
isn't
an
old
agreement
that
you
guys
have
of
how
much
you
would
pay
for
a
manager,
and
at
that
time
it
was
damn
on
tape,
part
of
her
salary
and
stuff.
So
there's
an
old
agreement.
Yes,.
G
D
D
B
D
D
A
H
Thank
you,
I'm
going
to
give
you
an
update
on
a
few
pieces
of
like
legislation.
First
of
all,
as
I've
been
reporting
on
senate
bill
811,
that's
the
the
legislation
that
provides
lag,
any
county
land
banks
with
a
expedited
sheriff's
sale
process,
as
well
as
lowering
the
redemption
period
that
was
unanimously
passed
in
the
in
the
senate,
urban
affairs
and
housing
committee
on
march
30th,
and
it's
still
sitting
in
the
senate
appropriations.
H
Hopefully,
when
we
get
back,
that'll
get
moved
a
bill
in
the
house
by
representative
austin
davis,
1750,
that's
the
same
bill
house
version
of
my
senate
bill
811
and
that's
currently
in
the
house
urban
of
affairs
committee
there's
been
some
talks
that
this
bill
may
be
considered
running
during
the
next
committee
meeting
on
tuesday
may
24th,
so
we'll
get
to
see.
If
that
happens,
two
other
bills
that
were
I
was
asked
to
to
give
an
update
on
is
hospital
2209..
H
This
is
the
bill
that
allows
liam
bank
board
of
the
clan
bank
board
of
directors
to
establish
a
virtual
quorum
via
internet
platform,
skype
zoom
teams,
whatever
in
order
to
conduct
business
meetings.
We
had
this
discussion.
I
think
last
time
I
asked
the
question:
the
bill
was
amended
in
committee,
allowing
the
banks
to
enter
into
partnerships
with
other
entities
also
to
convert
vacant,
blighted
tax,
delinquent
properties
into
facilities
that
has
individuals
experiencing
homelessness.
H
The
legislation
exempts
land
banks
from
state
and
local
realty
transfer
taxes,
so
they
added
two
amendments
to
it,
whether
that's
good
or
bad,
we'll
see
it
did
go
through
the
house
appropriations
committee,
30
37-0
and
went
to
the
full
for
the
house
april
26th
and
passed
185
to
18
now
sits
in
the
senate.
Urban
affairs
committee
also
house
bill
2210.
H
This
was
heard
in
in
the
house
on
april
12th
in
the
committee
went
past,
25.00
went
into
into
the
house
appropriations
april,
26
passed
37-0
and
it
passed
the
full
floor
house,
floor
april,
26
174-29
and
again
it's
in
the
senate
as
as
is
2209
in
the
senate
urban
affairs
committee.
We
got
back
on
on
the
23rd.
I
guess
it
is
and
then
we're
there
the
whole
month
of
june.
Almost
so.
H
I
I
will
do
my
best
to
I'm
on
the
urban
senate
urban
affairs
committee
I'll,
do
my
best
to
reach
out
to
the
chairs
and
ask
him
to
to
run
the
bills
before
we
break
at
the
end
of
june
and
that's
my
report.
Thank
you
happy
asking
questions.
Anybody
has.