►
From YouTube: Board Of Zoning Appeals September 24, 2019
Description
2:46 Application #19-92006 – Petitioner Robert Hottensen, representing property owner 450 Crossways LLC, is requesting a Special Exception to permit a pleasure stable at 450 Crossways Pl (TPN 121-15-11-009) – continued from May 28, 2019. WITHDRAWN
3:13 Application #20-93002 – Petitioner Larlee Construction, representing property owner Martin & Lynn Smith, is requesting a variance regarding the maximum height of a fence in a residential district for property located at 355 Barnard Avenue (TPN 121-17-11-003).
A
I
now
call
to
order
the
schedule
meeting
of
the
Board
of
Zoning
Appeals
notice
to
the
public
the
time
the
date
the
place
and
the
agenda
was
published
as
a
legal
notice
on
July
1st
in
the
Aiken
standard
notice,
two
contiguous
property
owners,
they
went
mail
and
signs
posted
by
July
3rd
2019
notice
was
sent
by
July
19th
to
the
city
clerk
for
posting,
on
the
Finance
and
Administration
Building
notice
for
and
to
the
Municipal
Building
notice
board
at
least
24
hours.
Before
this
meeting
agenda
sees
were
mail
or
email
to
interested
parties.
A
A
A
A
A
D
C
Property
before
you
this
evening
is
355
Barnard,
Avenue,
South
East,
it's
about
400
feet
west
to
notch,
Road
about
a
third
of
a
mile
east
of
whisky.
Road
property
is
roughly
at
the
intersection
of
the
most
Circle
and
Barnard
Avenue,
previously
consisted
of
two
Lots,
which
were
recently
combined
for
one
large
through
lot,
roughly
two
acres
in
size
now,
so
it's
fairly
large
for
the
neighborhood
other
properties
in
the
neighborhood
generally
range
from
about
a
third
of
an
acre
to
an
acre.
C
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
variance
to
section
four
point:
one
point:
four
C
of
the
zoning
ordinance,
which
is
our
fence
height
regulation,
which
states
that
in
residential
districts,
the
area
between
the
plain
of
the
front,
the
principal
the
front
of
the
principal
building
in
any
Street,
the
fence
can
not
exceed
four
feet
and
then,
beyond
that
to
the
rear
of
the
house,
it
cannot
exceed
six
feet
unless
a
fence
on
an
adjacent
lot
along
that
same
property
line
is
higher.
In
this
case,
there
was
a
variance.
C
This
did
not
make
it
in
your
packet
staff
had
some
time
hunting
it
down,
but
we
were
able
to
find
it
between
the
time
that
your
packet
arrived
and
we
suspected
this
was
a
case,
but
it
was
not
indexed
the
way
I
suspected.
So
it
took
me
a
little
longer
to
find
it,
but
in
2015
that
property
immediately
to
the
west
on
Barnard
was
constructed.
C
At
that
time,
a
variance
was
given
by
the
board
for
an
8-foot
fence,
so
you
will
see
an
8-foot
fence
on
that
property
of
privacy
fence
on
the
Western
property
facing
Barnard.
So
for
our
zoning
ordinance,
the
subject
property
could
match
that
8-foot
fence
along
that
property
line.
We've
not
interpreted
that
to
be
able
to
match
around
the
entire
property.
It's
only
the
same
property
line
that
that
higher
fence
previously
existed.
C
So,
in
other
words,
for
the
remainder
of
the
property,
it
could
have
a
fait
8-foot
fence
along
the
western
property
line
and
then
a
six-foot
fence
per
our
ordinance
on
the
south
and
eastern
property
lines
and
then
four
feet
in
front
of
the
product
in
front
of
the
subject.
Principal
dwelling,
the
reasons
for
the
variance
issued
on
the
339
Barnard
property,
the
property
of
the
West,
a
lot
of
the
same
arguments
that
will
be
made
in
this
case,
particularly
a
slightly
larger
lot
size
or
a
very
significant,
larger,
a
lot
size.
C
F
C
F
G
C
The
size
of
the
Lots
of
the
fence
in
this
case
only
comes
into
play.
I
think
if
there
is
a
it
goes
back
to
what
the
purpose
of
the
fence
is,
is
a
purpose
of
the
fences,
essentially
for
two
things:
safety
and
privacy
for
the
most
part
and
the
fence
regulation
that's
in
place
the
size
of
the
property.
C
So
if
you
do
have
property
at
a
higher
grade,
say
across
the
street
those
sorts
of
things
it
may
provide
a
a
essentially
a
you
know
if
something's
right
behind
the
fence,
it's
hard
to
see
further
out
where
the
pool
is
in
this
particular
case,
which
would
be
more
central
to
the
lot.
Because
you
see
in
the
plot
plan
that
was
provided,
it
may
provide
kind
of
a
guess,
a
Shou
shallower
depth
of
field
to
be
able
to
see
it
for
the
privacy
sake.
C
A
H
H
H
It
looks
awfully
tall,
but
there's
a
great
slight
great
difference
from
that
drive
that
where
the
proposed
driveway
is
and
a
Samson
fence,
so
you're
going
to
see
the
proposed
8
foot
fence
and
there's
a
chance
that
the
other
8
foot
fence
is
going
to
be
higher
than
this
8
foot
fence.
Is
that
the
way
I
interpret
that
I
think.
C
Because
the
adjacent
property,
the
with
the
current
8-foot
fence
I,
think,
is
at
a
higher
grade.
It
would
typically
have
a
higher
fence
height
than
then
on
this
property.
We
did
mention
that
it
looks
like
again
not
taking
into
account
a
topographical
survey
that
Brandi
Lane
is
slightly
above
grade
of
the
subject
property.
C
H
An
estimate
that's
hard,
a
little
difficult
to
tell,
but
the
other,
the
other
question
I
have.
If
you
have
and
I
see,
I
saw
the
Samson
fence,
I
saw
a
chain-link
fence,
I
saw
a
board
fence
and
then
I
see
an
old
what
appeared
being
an
old
hog
wire
fence
for
the
lack
of
a
better
term,
because
it
was
all
growing
up.
H
C
Don't
have
a
requirement
in
the
zoning
ordinance
it
just
has
to
be.
It
just
cannot
cross
over
an
adjacent
property
line,
so
a
lot
of
it
depends
on
whether
and
we
weren't
able
to
verify
that,
whether
that
other
adjacent
fence
was
built
actually
some
distance
into
the
property,
whether
it
was
essentially
on
the
property
line.
Okay,.
C
If
you
look
at
the
plan
here,
not
again,
I
would
defer
to
the
applicant.
It
appears
the
image
here
in
front
of
you.
References
I,
believe
about
a
12
to
16
foot
distance
at
the
drive
at
that
current
driveway
I.
Believe
that's
what
that
is
referencing
it
again.
We
could
have
the
applicant
clarify,
probably
better
than
I.
C
Is
no
landscape
plan
required
I,
don't
know
if
they
plan
on
keeping
the
there
is
a
mount
quite
a
large
amount
of
vegetation
on
the
the
Brandee
side
and
along
some
of
the
perimeter.
I,
don't
know
if
some
of
that
plans
the
plans
are
for
some
of
that
to
main
be
maintained
or
whether
that
will
be
removed
in
lieu
of
the
fens.
I
So,
on
the
Brandee
side,
that's
my
concern
is
the
Brandee
side
because
that's
a
front,
even
though
it's
the
back
of
the
house
and
the
neighbors
next
door
on
both
sides
would
have
an
8-foot
fence
in
their
front
yard,
on
the
side
on
their
sides
and
then
the
brandy
Road
would
be
8
foot
also,
so
brandy
is
not.
They
don't
have
to
do
a
4-foot
fence,
their
nose.
C
So,
while
most
of
the
zoning
ordinance
references,
front,
yards
and
side
yards
with
respect
to
the
fence,
it
references
the
front
of
the
primary
residence.
So
beyond
that
the
yard
standard
does
not
apply.
Essentially,
you
pick
one
side
of
your
lot
to
be
the
front
of
your
lot.
The
other
sides
we
apply,
the
the
fence,
the
six-foot
fence
allowance
to,
but.
C
C
C
E
J
A
C
C
Brandi
Road
appeared
to
be
a
foot
to
two
feet
above
the
average
grade
of
the
property,
as
well
as
the
property
here
immediately
adjacent
to
the
west,
and
then
it
appear
that
two
in
some
portions,
this
property
may
actually
be
above
the
grade.
The
property
kind
of
gets
to
the
reared
of
the
east
looked
like.
It
may
be
slightly
above
grade
of
this
property
in
some
places
as
well,
but
again
we're
talking,
probably
a
matter
of
just
a
few
we're.
C
D
C
I
A
Before
I
call,
an
applicant
representative
of
the
applicant
I
would
further
explain
the
procedures
that
anyone
that
wishes
copies
of
the
days
preceding
we
ask
that
you
sign
on
the
set
up
on
the
son
up
she
just
beyond
the
double
doors,
or
you
may
call
the
Planning
Department
when
addressing
the
board.
Please
state
your
name
and
your
address
now
to
a
lolly
construction
to
every
representative.
K
Hello,
I'm
a
grant
larlie
address,
1096
tool,
Beck
Road
I
can
answer
the
questions
about
the
drop.
Barnard
is
sloping
this
way
to
the
house.
The
lot
is
and
then
on
the
other
side
on
Brandi,
there's,
probably
a
two
foot
drop
and
it
slopes
and
kind
of
all
those
lots
kind
of
all
bowl
to
the
back
property
line,
and
there
really
is
no.
K
We
have
issues
with
water
like
one
of
the
things
we
have
to
do
with
this
property
is
put
in
pits
to
do
the
water,
because
we
take
on
the
road,
water
and
there's
no
storm
water
on
those
roads
as
well.
Now,
when
we
first
start
looking
at
this
property
and
putting
it
together
and
we
saw
the
8-foot
fence
on
the
property
up
on
the
west
and
then
we
looked
at
the
rear
of
the
property
and
we
stood
on
Brandi
Road
and
we
looked
at
where
a
six-foot
fence
would
be,
it
basically
shrunk.
K
It
way
down
where
you
could
just
see
right
in
to
the
property.
Our
plan
is
to
move
that
fence
back
16
20
feet
whatever
and
then
plant
grass
and
some
shrubs
or
trees,
and
then
also
not.
We
don't
want
to
really
even
know
where
the
gate
is.
We
just
want
it
to
look
like
the
fence
and
just
open
in
to
the
property
at
the
rear
on
Brandi
Road.
We
when
we
first
started
this
and
we
wanted
to
do
the
8-foot
fence.
We
went
to
all
four
of
the
adjacent
neighbors
explaining
what
we
wanted
to
do.
A
K
Sir
I
mean
dealt
when
we
purchased
the
old
house.
I,
don't
know
if
you
ever
went
there,
but
it
it's
sloped
the
driveway
sloped
right
down
into
the
garage
and
when
we
got
there,
they
had
sandbags
placed
in
front
of
the
house
because
it
took
on
the
water
from
the
road,
and
it
had
so
much
rot
that
we
we
thought
about
turning
it
into
a
guest
house
for
this
property,
but
it
was
just.
It
was
beyond
repair.
A
When
I
look
at
and
it's
not
marked
as
an
exhibit
when
I
looked
at
these,
what
was
submitted
in
the
staff
package
at
the
elevations
I
get
one.
Ninety
nine
point:
five
four
foot
bar
not
Avenue
and
Bradley
Road
I
get
one.
Ninety
nine
point:
six,
nine!
That's
only
15
hundredths
of
an
inch
difference,
but
it.
K
G
C
C
Also,
it's
tall
enough
to
be
difficult
to
scale
without
being
so
tall
that
it
it
you
starting
to
kind
of
lose
some
of
the
I.
Guess
you
on
a
smaller
lot,
you
would
start
to
feel
more
enclosed
yeah.
You
can't
have
to
recall
that
most
of
our
zone
districts
are.
They
have
a
minimum
lot
size
that
the
largest
district
at
fifteen
thousand
square
feet
well
on
that
size
of
a
lot
the
tall.
C
G
C
Not
that
I
have
heard-
and
we
do
have
a
number
of
higher
fences
that
do
occur
in
the
historic
district,
particularly
which
has
kind
of
a
an
out.
It
allows
higher
tolerance
heights
in
this
org
district
and
there
are
commonly
his
taller
fences
in
that
district.
We've
never
received
any
concern
from
public
safety
regarding
those.
K
A
J
K
The
property
to
the
left
on
brandy
has
a
fence,
so
I'm
not
sure
exactly
how
we're
going
to
tie
in,
but
that
one
over
here
has
an
old
hog
wire
fence.
So
we
would
make
that
probably
a
common
line
for
them
if
they
want
and
so
that
they
could
maintain
their
side.
We
can
maintain
our
side
and
then
over
here
on
the
Samson
property,
which
is
on
Barnard.
There
is
already
an
8-foot
fence
that
goes
down
to
that
property
line
and
there's
a
chain-link
on
the
property
on
Brandee
on
the
west
side,.
K
K
E
E
E
Guess
I'm
trying
to
understand
you're,
obviously
need
for
privacy.
I
mean
you
have
your
pool.
You
know
a
couple
hundred
feet
from
the
road
and
obviously
you
don't
have
any
privacy
issues
to
either
side
or
the
front
them.
You
get
a
thing
completely
surrounded
by
structures
and
building
you're
going
to
have
a
building
from
the
brandy
side.
E
K
E
K
L
K
E
K
E
K
E
K
K
A
H
But
quick
question
there:
yes,
sir
Fran,
oh
this
will
be
a
solid
forward
fence
that
right
vertically,
with
reinforcing
and
so
forth,
but
solid
off,
not
shadowbox
or
anything
like
that.
Solid
all
the
way
around
and
right
and
if
I
understand
the
gate
on
brandy,
would
be
like
a
double
gate.
They
allow
vehicles
in.
K
H
K
K
I
K
K
K
H
Grand
if
it's
20
to
25
feet
back
and
you
pulled
your
fence
line
back
off
of
Brandi-
would
would
that
distance
say
we
using
that
tree.
Ism
is
your
mark?
Would
that
allow
you
enough
distance
to
get
a
vehicle
all
the
way
off
the
road
right
away
if
they
had
to
stop
and
open
the
gate
or
stop
and
close
the
gate
yeah
without
getting
into
the
roadway?
Yes,.
K
H
K
A
F
J
K
M
K
Yeah
on
the
tree,
I
mean
it's:
it's
a
water
oak,
so
it's
not
a
great
specimen
tree
mm-hm,
but
it
is
a
large
tree
so
and
some
of
the
other
trees
that
we
took
down
on
the
property
ended
up
being.
You
know
this
big,
but
they
were
that
hollow
in
the
middle.
You
know
as
a
matter
of
time
before
they
they
filmed
some
of
them
when
we
dropped
and
they
just
exploded.
They
were
so
rotten
in
the
middle
when
we
cleaned
up
the
both
properties.
K
F
K
G
J
D
D
A
M
Hello,
I'm
Julie
aalverson
and
my
husband,
Scott
and
I
live
at
8:06
Brandi
roads.
So
we
are,
they
were
on
the
eastern
side
of
the
property
Brandi
Road
and
we
are
supportive
of
the
8
foot
fence.
We
believe
that
it
will
be
a
nice
privacy
barrier
on
that
side
for
us
and
perhaps
take
care
of
some
of
the
noise
that
might
be
coming
from
the
pool
area
or
the
pump
and
I
think
with
the
setback
off
of
the
8
foot
fence
off
of
brandy
Road
by
twenty.
M
Sixteen
to
twenty
feet
will
certainly
help
us
help
our
sight
line
going
down
Brandi
as
we're
coming
out
of
our
driveway,
and
also
we
have
a
four
foot
fence,
picket
type
fence
that
comes
off
of
our
six
foot
fence
into
the
front
into
the
front
yard,
and
that
will
you
know
continue
to
open
up
that
part
of
the
lot
for
us
as
well.
That.
M
A
B
M
N
Hello,
thank
you
for
listening
to
me.
My
name
is
Linda
Harris
I
live
at
9:38,
whiskey
Road,
which
is
down
the
street
and
to
the
right
from
this
property.
I
pass
that
property,
often
as
a
homeowner
that
lives
on
whiskey,
Road
I
deal
with
a
lot
of
noise.
We
have
a
short
four
foot
fence
that
allows
the
noise
change
all
around
the
back
of
our
property.
N
We
fenced
in
the
back
from
the
house
line
to
the
back,
to
our
neighbor's
yard,
for
privacy
and
also
when
we
moved
into
the
property
we
had
lots
of
people
walk
right
through.
You
could
look
out
your
bedroom
window
and
see
someone.
So
we
noted
we
know
the
need
for
privacy.
However,
we
only
have
six
foot
if
my
husband
and
I
decided
next
week
that
we
just
we
do
not
have
a
pool.
Our
neighbor
does
next
door
and
it's
a
vacant
house
with
a
pool
with
fence
covering
around
that.
N
If
my
husband
and
I
decided
next
week
to
ask
for
a
variance
for
eight
feet
for
all
around
our
our
fenced
in
area
would
y'all
consider
that
the
house
that's
vacant
and
they
have
a
pool.
But
geography
is
that
it's
probably
truly
at
least
two
to
three
feet
higher
than
our
house,
so
they
could
see
into
our
yard
with
no
problem
I'm
questioning
allowing
this
only
because
it,
as
has
been
suggested
that
it
bowls
the
property
bowls
in
the
in
the
back.
N
N
Looking
back
and
seeing
anybody
in
the
pool
and
visually
I
was
missing
on
the
graphic
for
the
fence
line,
if
it
who
area
is
supposed
to
be
enclosed,
no
matter
how
big
the
fence
is,
and
then
it's
supposed
to
be
enclose
away
around
I
think
there
is
a
emitted
behind
the
guest
cottage
or
whatever.
That
is
on
the
west
side
of
the
property.
N
There's
no
fits
that
goes
across
to
protect
any
little
cutie
pies
in
that
pool
and
somebody
you
know
coming
in
the
pool,
so
there's
no
fence
on
the
west
side
of
the
house
that
I
see
it's
all
going
straight
back
and
because
I
do
see
the
enclosure
on
the
right.
The
driveway
side.
I
do
not
see
anything
on
the
left,
maybe
that's
just
a
graphic
era.
The
draftsman
emitting
that
but
I'm
concerned
I'm
concerned.
N
N
Perhaps
giving
a
good
long,
hard
look
at
this
and
thinking
I
mean.
Is
that
adding
value
to
the
properties
on
either
sides
and
further
close
from
the
that
property
to
the
end
of
way
of
whiskey?
There
are
a
lot
of
homes
that
have
not
been
improved.
You
know
still
first
owners
from
past
time
and
they
can't
afford
to
do
a
bigger
offensive
or
whatever
to
keep
the
property
and
concerned
so
I
would
I
appreciate
you
listening
to
me
and
wish
you
would
consider
this
hard
and
long
and
pause
and
look
so
any
questions
any.
L
My
name
is
Chanda
crisp,
Thornton
and
I
live
at
782
Boardman
Road
I
bought
my
house
in
Oh
2
and
had
no
idea.
I
would
still
be
there
and
now
I
intend
to
own
this
house
until
I'm
not
able
to
live
on
my
own
about
it,
probably
a
year
and
a
half
ago
or
so,
and
there's
Boardman
and
then
there's
brandy
and
then
Barnard
I
happened
to
drive.
L
I
hadn't
been
on
those
two
streets
in
quite
some
time
and
about
a
year
and
a
half
ago,
or
so
I
happened
to
drive
down
those
and
was
so
impressed
with
what
has
happened
on
those
two
streets.
Since
the
last
time
I
had
been
down,
it's
really
been
delightful
going
by
and
seeing
the
beautiful
remodeling
jobs
and
the
few
new
houses
that
have
gone
up
so
I
have
taken
great
interest
in
that,
and
this
new
one
that
is
going
up
has
just
been
fascinating
to
watch.
It's
just
been
fun
for
me.
L
I
would
much
prefer
to
lessen
you
know
the
natural
screen
that
I've
got
in
addition
to
my
six-foot
fence
and
be
able
to
have
an
8-foot
fence
in
my
backyard
and
cut
down
on
the
mosquito
problem.
So
that's
why
I'm
here,
I
don't
want
it
to
be
just
because
this
property
is
so
magnificent
that
they're
getting
an
eight-foot
fence
and
it
is,
it
looks
fabulous.
So
how
can
I
come
back
and
get
an
apron?
L
O
O
O
There
are
other
places
that
have
four-foot
high
fences,
and
the
real
point
of
this
is
we're
going
to
turn
into
a
compound.
If
we
all
have
8-foot
fences
and
I,
don't
think
we
really
want
that
in
Aiken,
I,
don't
want
it
Nick
and
I
would
love
to
have
an
8-foot
fence
too,
but
I
don't
really
want
to
have
a
pound.
Yes,
we
had
problems
with
people
walking
through
our
yard
every
day,
because
it
was
a
shortcut.
So
we
had
to
build
a
fence
to
do
that,
but
I
also
have
gates
in
it.
O
The
privacy,
if
this
down-low
and
the
privacy
on
there,
they
could
put
a
privacy
fence
around
the
pool
I
used
to
live
in
Huntsman,
we
had
a
privacy
fence
around
the
pool
that
was
six
foot
high.
Everybody
could
see
everyone
else,
but
no
one
could
see
in
the
pool
I
don't
understand
why
we
can't
do
that
here.
If
they're
worried
about
privacy,
a
six-foot
fence
should
be
fine,
a
six-foot
fence
around
the
pool
should
be
fine,
and
that
would
be
a
heck
of
a
lot
safer.
O
O
K
A
K
N
P
A
A
L
L
H
A
A
I
I
E
Well,
to
read
to
board
member
of
Dukes
his
points.
I
am
struggling
with
the
number
three
in
terms
of
the
application
ordinance.
This
particular
piece
of
property
would
effectively
prohibit
or
unreasonably
restrict
the
utilization
of
the
property.
If
we
limited
them
to
a
smaller
fence,
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
that
would
be
the
result
of
turning
the
it's.
Certainly,
a
nice
want
to
have
in
terms
of
six
the
authorization,
the
variance
will
not
be
a
substantial
detriment
to
adjacent
property
in
the
care
to
the
district.
E
Two
board
member
Dukes
is
point
into
some
of
our
speakers.
Today,
the
character
the
district
will
not
be
harmed.
If
we
grant
a
variance
and
to
the
gentleman's
comment
on
compounds-
that's
maybe
a
slight
exaggeration
but
I
think
that
does
go
to
the
point
that
you
start
getting
and
I
do
appreciate
a
lot
of
the
fantastic
building
and
and
larger
character
properties
that
are
being
developed
along
there.
But
you
know
looking
at
the
one
on
Barnard
and
in
whisky:
that's
for
sale,
that's
quite
a
large,
magnificent
home.
E
It's
got
a
six-foot
fence
around
it,
the
one
on
Boardman
and
cross
some
Dumbarton
Oaks
that
corner
there.
That's
a
six-foot
fence
around
a
very
large,
magnificent
home
and
stately
lot,
the
not
wanting
to
unreasonably
restrict
the
utilization.
The
property
I
am
concerned
with
the
privacy
aspects
of
the
pool
that
the
way
the
pool
have
been
positioned
between
the
the
the
two-story
three-car
garage
and
the
and
the
adjacent
building
to
the
other
side
and
being
well
over
200
feet
from
the
road,
with
a
shed
already
obstructing
view
from
brandy
and
I.
E
Just
just
don't
think
you
need
a
don't
think
you
need
a
massive
privacy
wall.
There
I
think
the
pool
is
very
well
situated
for
privacy
as
it
is,
I
did
not
see.
I
wish
I
was
a
little
more
certain
of
this,
but
I
also
did
not
especially
if
we're
talking
about
pulling
the
the
the
line
back
25
feet.
Well.
That
would
certainly
be
of
help.
E
My
concern
on
the
detriment
of
the
neighborhood,
still
is
you're
still
going
to
have
8-foot
fence
along
people's
front
yard
lines
or
side
yard
lines
anyway,
on
those
people
that
are
that
are
facing
Brandi.
That's
the
unusual
part
to
this
is
you've
got
you
know
the
ordinances
get
turned
around
because
you
got
you
got.
You
know,
forward-facing.
E
Am
sympathetic
that
he
be
able
to
would
be
able
to
match,
you
know,
there's
been
a
previous
variance
granted
for
certainly
the
believe.
That's
the
Sampson
house
is
the
Western
property
right.
I'm
saying
that
right
would
certainly
would
want
his
would
feel
strong
and
he'd
be
able
to
match
for
the
length
of
that
goes,
but
then
that
that's
not
much
passes
garage
area
as
it
is,
and
then
to
see
a
taper
down
to
the
zoning
requirement
as
you
go
further
back
and
around
or
even
to
keep
it
symmetrical.
E
I
F
F
I'm
I'm
a
little
torn
because
I
think
it
seems
that
the
the
property
owner
wants
to
maximize
the
fact
that
they
have
two
Lots.
That's
a
very
generous
parcel
to
come
in
off
the
road
to
25
feet,
which
is
actually
five
feet
more
than
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
right
in
the
twenty
foot
setback.
If
this
were
the
front
of
a
property
because
of
this
tree,
there's
the
possibility
of
them
sort
of
being
penalized,
they
can't
use
that
additional
I,
don't
have
them.
F
With
that
sort
of
board-and-batten
style
fence,
that
is
very,
it
really
stops
the
energy
of
the
property
you
can't
see
through
it
Aitken.
Historically,
you
look
at
a
lot
of
the
aesthetics
that
the
older
properties
that
are
in
the
historic
overlay
that
aren't
in
the
historic
overlay.
There
was
a
lot
of
attention
given
to
these
beautiful
brick.
F
But
if
the
aesthetic
was
addressed,
perhaps
if
it
wasn't
that
sort
of
wooden
compound
II,
looking
fence
if
there
was
something
to
be
presented,
that
was
you
know,
beautiful
and
lent
to
the
Aiken
aesthetic
I'm
wondering.
Is
that
something
that
we
could
suggest
or
put
forward?
That's
a
requirement
of
the
higher
height
that
might
perhaps
make
everybody
happy.
J
I
M
F
J
B
F
I
believe
grant
had
spoken
to
the
fact
that
that
was
going
to
be
remedied,
because
there
was
a
drainage
issue
insofar
as
there
were
pits
or
french
drains
or
something
to
be
implemented
in
order
to
facilitate
water
drainage,
because
I
can't
imagine
I
know
just
from
my
experience
with
putting
in
even
a
fence
on
a
property
that
was
slightly
crowned.
There
was
water
pooling
and
in
the
corners
that
has
to
be
considered
as
well.
I
would
imagine
I
don't
want
to
speculate
but
I'm
thinking
that
would
have
to
be
brought
up
to
grade
that
pool.
E
Well,
with
the
with
the
fence
line
being
proposed
being
brought
back
I'm
assuming
that
you're
bringing
it
back
to
much
more
of
a
level
spot,
so
there
again
the
six-foot
from
a
scalability
standpoint,
you
should
be
getting
much
more,
the
six-foot
effect,
because
it's
not
gonna
anybody
from
brandy,
pole,
vaulting
over
it
from
two
feet,
advantage
someone's
seeking
to
scale
the
fence.
I,
think
you!
You
know
somebody
wants
to
scale
your
fence.
It
doesn't
make
any
difference
whether
it's
six
or
eight
feet,
I
mean
that's,
that's
really
the
bottom
line.
E
So
so,
when
you
go
to
the
privacy
aspect
of
it,
I
think
they
have
sheer
distance
another
building
and
view
or
in
between
the
pool
and
the
thing
and
with
some
trees.
I.
Just
not
saying
a
rule.
Compromise
on
heart
be
a
peeping
tom
from
two
hundred
and
fifty
feet
away.
Probably,
but
you
know
where
there's
a
way:
I
guess,
but
I
just
don't
see
any
again.
This
is
I'm.
Absolutely
an
agreement
aesthetically.
This
would
be
beautiful.
I
mean
that's
it's
hard
to
argue,
they're,
doing
an
outstanding
job
with
everything
that
I
saw
there.
E
It's
gonna
be
a
beautiful
home,
a
beautiful
eight-foot
fence
around
it
would
look
really
nice,
but
again
you
can't
open
it.
You
know,
there's
got
to
be
a
compelling
hardship
to
them
for
not
getting
that
a
foot
fence
and
I
just
I'm,
just
not
seeing
it
again,
I'm
willing
to
let
a
match
up
to
there
is
where
there's
a
bit
of
variance
granted
and
even
to
keep
it
symmetrical
on
the
other
side
and
then
begin
your
taper
down
to
zoning
code.
E
H
Six-Foot
fence
versus
eight
now
granted-
we've
got
two
Lots
here
and,
as
has
been
pointed
out,
was
kind
of
turn
the
the
ordinance
kind
of
on
in
here
a
little
bit,
because
we've
got
two
lots
that
were
originally
I've
got.
One
lock
that
was
originally
two
lots
and
technically
doesn't
one
home
was
facing
branding
the
other
home
was
facing.
Portland
I
mean
Barnard
schism,
so
in
that
sense
the
parents
I
mean
with
the
the
wardens
would
apply
fairly
straightforward.
Four
foot
six
foot
is
that.
H
C
C
E
So
they
are
able
to
without
a
variance
they're
able
to
meet
that
eight
foot
height
on
that
western
leg,
to
correct
that's,
correct,
yeah,
so
I'm
all
for
symmetry
here
I
mean
I,
give
it
to
them
the
same
amount
on
the
other
side.
Just
for
for
a
symmetry
standpoint
and
step
down
to
the
back
I
mean
that's.
You
get
two
large
structures
on
both
those
side
lines
anyway.
E
So
there's
no
to
me:
there's
not
going
to
be
any
no
great
leap
of
variance
that
guests
home
to
the
left,
the
pool
or
guest
house
that
what
that
is,
or
is
that
just
a
pool
house
to
the
east
ease
of
the
pool
is
that
gonna
be
two-story
structure
just
one
but
but
with
a
pitched
roof.
I
mean
okay,
so
means
eight-foot
fence
along
that.
K
E
You
can
see
it
there,
so
an
8-foot
fence
coming
back
on
that
side,
it's
not
to
me,
there's
no
aesthetic
difference
there
in
heaven
that
would
give
them
some
symmetry
to
come
to
the
level.
The
Samson
rear
lot
line
to
begin
their
step
down
to
code.
That
gives
them
the
natural
variance
they
get
by
having
the
Samson
leg
and
gives
them
some
symmetry
and
immediately
around
the
house
and
pull
this
eight-foot
structure
that
they
so
choose,
and
so
on
did.
A
H
E
Be
unfair
modification
I
would
least
allow
him
to
match
the
what
he's
already
granted
the
eight-foot
match
to
the
eastern
side
as
well
before
he
would
begin
to
step
down
the
code.
So
that
would
be
a
small
variance
given
to
him,
and
it
was
at
least
he
would
able
to.
If
you
will
compound
it
symmetrically
past
his
building
all
his
structures
as
garages
pool
house
to
where
he's
given
a
variance
on
the
one
side,
the
eight
foot,
two
that
Samson
back
property
line,
then
he
could
then
he
could
scale
it
down
to
code
from
there.
A
You're
saying
that
you
want
to
modify
the
motion
to
include
the
8
foot
back
to
the
end
of
the
first
properties
before
they
combine
them
so
to
match
the
properties.
The
property
owner
east
would
match
the
property
on
the
west,
correct,
which
is
a
sample
which
is
already
in
a
they
would
by
appearance.
A
previous
appearance.