►
From YouTube: Design Review Board Meeting September 3, 2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
These
are
improvements
that
are
visible
from
from
a
public
street
and
one
of
the
first
things
we
do
is
we
review
our
minutes
for
the
August
meeting
work
session
and
the
regular
regular
meeting,
and
then
our
secretary
Mary,
Katherine
Martin,
will
will
read
individually
the
applications
and
as
they
read
yours,
if
you
could
just
come
forward
to
this
Center
electron
and
and
state
your
your
name
and
address
and
which
will
be
recorded
for
the
minutes.
So
at
any
rate,
our
board
members
have
had
an
opportunity
to
review
the
minutes.
We
can.
C
A
D
Sir,
first,
an
only
item
of
old
business
is
application:
number
CRH
to
0-0
0
2
applicants,
Caitlin
and
Daniel
Villiers
request
approval
for
updates
to
their
home
at
408,
south
boundary
avenue
south
east
to
include
the
addition
of
a
half
story
and
two
porches
the
replacement
and
addition
of
windows
and
doors,
the
demolition
of
the
carport
and
existing
chimney
and
the
painting
of
the
brick
facade.
This
is
tax
map
parcel
1,
1,
0,
9,
Sierra,
6,
Sierra,
0
7.
So
the
board
originally
heard
this
application.
D
The
applicant
has
worked
with
mr.
chairman
to
make
some
modifications
to
the
element
elevations
to
address
the
concerns
raised
by
the
board,
namely
about
the
first-floor
window.
Placement
in
relation
to
the
dormers
on
the
porch
changes
are
illustrated
in
the
attached,
drawing
provided
in
Exhibit
D
revised
drawing,
and
please
note
for
the
record
that
we
are
adding
exhibit
E
as
well,
which
are
final
drawings.
F
A
A
You
all
have
that
to
hand
out
that
was
it
handed
out
at
the
meeting
exhibit
II.
That
would
be
the
front
front
view
and
as
well
as
this
elevation,
there
I
think
Kate
said
just
to
qualify
that
perhaps
that
Center
window
would
be
more
like
the
two
other
dormers,
even
though
the
the
gable
is
wide
or
the
window
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
be
wider
yeah.
D
G
G
A
A
A
D
A
There
it
is
okay
right,
there's
kind
of
a
colonial
porch
across
the
front:
okay
yeah.
What
anybody
else
like
to
speak
about
this
you're
welcome,
come
forward
and
just
give
your
name
and
it's
in
a
very
prominent
location
and
it's
a
ambitious
redo
but
I
think
it
maybe
would
be
a
good
fit
the
new
design.
H
E
B
I
was
just
going
to
say:
I
still
think
that
there's
too
much
expanse
of
brick
there
in
between
the
front
door
and
the
windows,
or
maybe
between
the
first
and
second
floor
there,
but
I
do
think
the
project
is
a
huge
improvement
and
I'm
glad
to
see
something
like
this
happening.
So
I'm
income
in
favor
of
the
project,
mm-hmm.
A
A
D
A
A
I
J
G
A
J
Name
is
Susan
hook,
140
Greenville,
Street,
so
two
doors
away
from
this
property.
It
really
does
need
to
come
down
yeah,
not
for
just
the
basic
reasons
that
people
break
in
because,
as
this
gentleman
said,
there's
nothing
there
for
them
to
go
in
what
they
are
doing.
We're
dealing
drugs.
There
are
needles
all
over
the
place,
homeless,
they're
living
there.
J
A
J
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
your
statement.
Anybody
else
I
believe
that
the
owner
was
in
the
process
of
demolishing
parts
of
it
or
something,
and
he
was
stopped
by
the
city
while
back
and
then
previous
administration.
So
it's
something
he's
been
trying
to
accomplish
for
some
time.
No
anybody
else
you're
welcome
to
speak.
G
B
A
I
It
was
a
school
at
one
time,
I
think
the
school
has
moved
out
to
the
bypass
next
to
the
new
County
Building
at
least
that's
the
last
I've
heard
of
it.
It
was
there
like
a
remedial
reading
school.
Okay
and
there
were
you,
know
student
scribblings,
all
over
the
building
mm-hmm.
But
it
was
you
know
a
reading
school,
basically,
not
a
reading
room
for
you
know
any
sort,
but
it
gets
left
been
abandoned,
I
think
for
about
three
or
four
years
now,
since
I've
owned
it,
it's
been
abandoned.
If.
K
I
I
D
All
right,
the
item-
B
of
new
businesses,
application
number
CRH
to
0-0,
0
6,
applicant
Dane,
Thomas
of
Ridge
River
chase
Construction
requests
approval
for
an
option
to
install
a
standing,
seam
metal
roof
on
the
new
carport
and
front
number
of
porches
at
338
Dupree
place
Southwest.
The
previous
certificate
was
granted
for
roofing
material
to
match
the
existing
house
and.
G
D
J
K
Got
you
know
some
like
on
the
top
of
one
12
to
8
I
mean
a
2.5
8
by
12.
You
know
some
kind
of
really
small
pitches
that
you
know
you're
not
going
we're,
not
gonna,
be
able
to
put
shingles
on.
So
that's
why
I
was
telling
when
they
kind
of
got
back
together
and
then
try
to
make.
You
know
trying
to
make
it
look
good
and
complimentary
to
the
neighborhood,
but
not
it's
gonna,
be
some
kind
of
material
and
I
figured.
K
A
L
A
C
My
name
is
Bill
good
Farb
I
live
at
6:45
Coker
Springs
Road,
which
is
across
the
street
from
the
backyard
of
the
young
Carmen's,
and
what
was
just
proposed
sounds
perfectly
reasonable
to
me.
It's
so
flat
putting
shingles
on
it
they'll
blow.
If
the
wind
comes
in
the
wrong
direction.
It's
good
news.
Yes,
so
I
think
steel
is
the
good
answer.
Yeah
choices,
so
I
just
wanted
to
speak
in
favor.
C
A
A
G
B
A
D
Item
C
of
new
business
is
application
number
C,
R
H
to
0-0
0
for
applicant
Allison
blood
requests,
approval
for
significant
alterations
to
the
facade
and
roof
of
325
Union
Street
southeast
to
include
window
replacement
and
reconfiguration
and
removal
of
the
brick
entry
at
the
front
of
the
building.
A
new
porch
front
door
and
dormer
will
be
installed.
A
standing,
seam,
metal
roof
and
hardy
board
siding
will
be
installed,
fence
will
be
replaced
with
brick
wall
Tech's
map
parcel
1,
1,
0,
9,
0,
5,
0,
0,
3,
okay,.
F
A
G
G
A
B
F
D
B
D
Item
D
final
item
of
new
business
is
application
number
CRH,
zero,
zero,
zero,
five
applicants,
David
and
Carol
and
Hopkins
request
approval
for
the
demolition
of
the
existing
house
and
construction
of
a
new
home
upon
the
existing
foundation
at
8:05,
south
boundary
Avenue
southeast
new
home
will
be
a
two-story
structure
and
feature
a
partial
wraparound.
Porch
fence
will
be
installed
along
the
front
and
sides
of
the
property.
Construction
of
the
detached
garage
with
breezeway
connection
is
also
requested.
G
A
A
Application
now
I
think
what
we'll
do
is
we'll
talk
about
the
demolition
and,
of
course,
the
requirement
to
do
a
demolition
is,
is
for
us
to
see,
or
at
least
to
hear
from
you
what
the
plans
are
for
the
future
use
of
the
property
and
and
we
we
see
that
your
intention
is
to
build
a
house
essentially
on
the
foundation.
So
the
footprint
is
identical.
A
Now
we
also
need
to
acknowledge
that
it's
non-contributing
it's
in
historic
district,
but
non-contributing
so,
and
that
was
what
you
were
told
correctly
by
the
realtor
we
we
have
had
I
guess
we
can
read
into
the
record.
We've
had
several
comments
in
opposition
to
the
demolition
of
this.
This
particular
cottage
built
in
about
1951.
We
think.
D
G
G
K
D
A
A
Effect
demo,
it
I
mean
I,
suppose
there'd
be
ways
you
could
renovate
by
raising
the
roof
going
out
the
back,
but
by
that
I
think
you're,
just
being
honest
with
us,
that
I
mean
you
could
use
part
of
the
exterior
wall,
I
suppose
and
here
and
there
and
cut
holes
and
go
through
a
lot
of
rigmarole
convincing
us
you're
renovating
it.
That's.
A
M
A
A
M
Great,
we
don't
want
to
interrupt
any
landscaping.
Driveway,
we
will
use
the
existing
foundation
cut
the
slab
for
new
plumbing
because
it
is
a
slab
we
are
proposing
and
a
new
plan
that
will
show
that
we're
gonna
add
like
a
small
addition,
basically
to
match
the
size
of
the
ports
on
the
front
right
hand,
corner
and
then
add
the
wraparound
port
on
the
left
side
of
the
home.
B
M
M
B
M
I
mean
the
other
options
to
leave
the
eight-foot
walls
and
knock.
You
build
a
one
foot
wall
on
top
of
that
and
then
start
my
floor
joists
from
there.
But
at
that
point
it
was
the
roof
lines.
Are
incorrect?
They're
not
gonna
work
out.
For
my
the
second
story,
I
mean
we
have
seven
foot
ceiling
heights
upstairs
in
order
to
get
the
correct
pitch
off
the
back
to
add
bedrooms,
I.
M
Mean
it
yeah
I
mean
it
matches
some
other
homes,
but
you
have
a
ranch
home
right
here.
You
have
another
home,
that's
similar
to
this.
You
have
a
mansion
behind
it.
I
mean
they're
all
different,
but
the
new
one
that
we're
proposing
to
build
I
believe
we
will
make
it
look
closer
as
a
replication
of
what
needs
to
be
downtown
or
what
the
rest
of
the
homes
look
like
downtown.
That's
our
goal.
That's
our
end
goal.
We
want
it
to
fit
like
it
has
always
been
there.
M
A
J
1:40
Greenville
I
was
not
aware.
This
was
even
on
the
agenda,
but
the
two
cottages,
the
one
we're
talking
about
right
now
and
the
cottage
to
the
left
at
least
the
Cato
owns.
They
were
twin
cottages
that
were
Polo
cottages
that
went
with
the
main
estate
behind
that
the
winter
steen
zone.
Right
now
it
was
also
baked
in
days
school
lisa
Cato's
cottage
has
been
beautifully
remodeled.
With
the
exact
same
floor
plan.
They
write
down,
appalled
cottages
built
for
their
polo
players
that
had
little
ringers
that
went
to
the
main
home,
the
Cato's
cottage.
J
The
upstairs
is
two
bedrooms
in
a
bathroom
easily
done
and
a
previous
owner
had
added
on
in
the
back
and
it
looks
perfectly
symmetrical
and
they
did
a
lovely
job
many
years
ago
and
have
continued
update.
It
I
don't
see
tearing
down
a
home
just
because
it
doesn't
suit
the
size
for
your
family
and
it's
a
perfectly
adorable
cottage
and
has
history
and.
G
J
A
J
C
L
G
J
School
and
at
that
point,
I
believe
they
were
split
off
to
pen
rods,
who
are
deceased,
but
I
have
been
in
that
cottage
many
times
when
pen
rods
were
alive
and
not
too
long
ago.
So
I
have
a
problem.
If
we
set
precedents,
mm-hm
tearing
down
properties
just
because
they
don't
suit
our
needs,
they're
out
their
options.
A
N
A
G
N
G
A
A
G
H
D
What
I
counseled
the
applicants
on
as
staff?
The
first
thing
I
do-
is
check
the
historic
resource
survey
to
verify
the
the
official
status
of
historic
significance.
This
was
not
included
on
the
historic
resource
survey.
Therefore,
our
president
is
to
interpret
that
as
non-contributing
properties
on
either
side
across
the
street.
D
Those
are
you
know,
just
specifically
called
out,
but
this
one
was
our
mitad
from
the
survey,
so
I
advised
them,
as
did
their
real
estate
agent,
that
it
was
a
non
contributing
property
and
therefore
the
standards
on
page
21,
specifically
the
first
bullet
point-
would
apply.
Demolition
may
be
determined
appropriate
when
the
structure
does
not
contribute
to
the
historical
or
visual
character
of
the
district
or
site,
and
then
there
are
three
other
times
that
it
lists.
D
Don't
know
if
you
want
me
to
read
those
but
compatible
addition,
that
is
not
an
architectural
or
historically
significant
feature
would
be
removed.
The
report
of
an
engineer,
architect
or
other
professional
with
expertise
in
the
preservation
of
historic
properties,
indicates
that
stabilization
and
rehabilitation
is
not
appropriate
because
of
structural
instability
and
deterioration,
or
the
report
of
an
engineer,
architect
or
other
professional,
with
appropriate
expertise.
Documents
that
the
structure
by
causing
deterioration
could
endanger
a
more
his
significant
historic
property
and
that
there
is
no
appropriate
reasonable
solution
to
ensure
the
preservation
of
both.
Thank
you.
H
M
H
M
We
walked
through
it
and
we
made
a
decision.
I
mean
there.
Was
we
put
a
contract
on
it
immediately
because
it
is
a
house
on
South
boundary
and
we
I
checked
with
her
first
of
what
she
just
said,
because
I
knew
I
mean
I'm.
A
contractor
myself
and
I
know
there's
issues
with
that.
So
that's
the
first
thing
I
told
my
wife.
We
need
to
check
on
that
before
we
even
put
our
offer
on
it.
So
yes,
I
mean
I.
M
H
H
M
A
M
There's
ways
to
preserve
the
exterior
walls
of
the
I.
Don't
like
the
siding,
I,
don't
want
my
kids
around
that
Festus
I.
Think
that
needs
to
go.
I
mean
that's
my
concern.
I
can
abate
that
we
can
leave
the
exterior
walls
as
is,
but
I
still
need
to
change
part.
The
roofline
kids
stay
very
similar
to
what
it
is,
and
that's
what
we're
proposing
the
only
thing
I'm
doing
is
that
in
a
gable,
but
we
could
lift
the
the
front
shed.
Roof
is
very
tall.
It
like
goes
way
up
into
the
roof,
so.
G
M
A
No,
not
really
no
I
think
it
would
I
think
we
really
really
need
both.
You
need
some
more
time
and
we
need
some
more
time,
because
normally
we
just
don't
review
the
new
construction
in
one
in
one
hour
in
the
historic
district.
Furthermore,
we
don't
normally
approve
demolition
of
buildings
that
are
not
in
deteriorated
condition.
We
had
one
here
in
the
overlay
district
and
it
pretty
much
don't
fit
the
standard
for
demolition.
A
This
one
doesn't
and
and
I
think
lastly,
is
that
these
little
cottages
almost
establish
the
character
of
South
boundary,
which
really
wasn't
big
estate
homes
at
all.
They
were,
they
were
nicely
organized.
You
know,
sometimes
on
larger
parcels
like
this.
This
was
a
when
you
rode
by
you
realized.
This
is
actually
part
of
the
horse,
equestrian
property
back
there.
A
They
they
were
as
far
as
I
can
remember
kind
of
established
the
character
going
down
the
south
boundary
on
the
right
hand,
side
there
weren't,
as
many
houses
on
that
side,
is
on
the
Left
there's
a
veterinarian's
office
I
believe
further
down.
All
those
kind
of
work
were
related
to
the
question
use
of
the
property
but
and
and
Marian
Street
went
on
through
and
and
you
could
ride,
I
think
through
Marian
Street
grace
haven't
even
oh,
so
you're
sort
of
touching
on
some
some
nerve.
A
M
A
A
M
A
M
A
M
A
A
A
Necessarily
but
just
scale
drawing
that
shows
the
correct
you
know
window
sizes
and
and
columns
and
and
trim,
but
they
you
can
computer,
but
I've
seen
a
lot
nicer,
drawings
done
by
hand
and
computer.
They
don't
necessarily
give
you
detail
either
so,
but
that
would
be
what
I
think
we
need
I'm.
Speaking
personally
for
any
new
construction
in
the
historic
district.
We
really
need
a
you
know:
a
decent
set
of
drawings.
It
don't
have
to
be
done
by
an
architect
but
by
somebody,
skilled
and
and
drafting.
E
A
It
is
yeah,
I,
think
I,
think
if
the
the
character
of
those
cottages
is
what
we're
trying
to
preserve
but
character
of
them.
So
if
he's
coming
up
with
a
totally
different
look,
even
though
he's
using
the
eight-foot
bearing
walls,
we
may
not,
you
might
approve
it.
I
might
not,
because
it's
changing
the
character,
even
though
he's
using
the
walls.
He
already
thought
about
that.
He
could
do
that,
but
I
guess
the
the
idea
here
is
till
we
want
to
try
to
maintain
some
of
the
original
parents
or
not.
A
O
O
Like
to
say,
my
big
concern
is
that
he
is
trying
to
rush
into
this
whole
thing
far
too
quickly.
You
know,
I
mean
I,
don't
know
what
the
logistics
are
as
far
as
closing
and
being
able
to
elongate
that
or
what
to
sit.
I
have
no
idea,
but
the
two
cottages
are
charming,
lovely,
simple
cottages
and
that's
what
they
are
and
I
think
his
plans.
He
wants
to
there's
no
and
there's
no
way
that
he
can
leave
the
character
of
that
fat
cottage
by
doing
what
he
proposes
to
do.
G
O
G
G
O
A
M
M
A
It's
not
no
I
didn't
know
the
the.
What
we're
looking
at
is
the
front
view
that
that
is
relatively
far
back
from
south
boundary.
That's
what
most
people
see
and-
and
we
don't
really
know-
what's
behind
it,
in
fact,
the
house
next
door
has
quite
a
maybe
doubled
in
size
from
what
it
was.
So
this
is
the
part
that
I
think
is
is
affecting
our.
Our
of
jurisdiction
is
over
the
view
from
the
street
and
we
might
catch
a
glimpse
of.
What's
going
on
the
back
I
think
we
wouldn't
want
a
two-story
right.
M
A
A
A
That'll
be
for
you,
that's
that's!
For
you
to
decide
I!
Guess:
we've
got
to
decide
that.
Do
we
think
that
that
those
cottages
are
important
to
the
to
the
character
of
south
boundary
enough
to
to
want
to
preserve
that
the
two
of
them
and
your
wife
mentioned
she
remembers
them
I.
Do
too
when
we
went,
we
came
to
town
in
1952.
A
M
A
What
you
have
to
side,
but
actually
what
tearing
it
down
and
building
a
whole
new
house
I,
don't
think
we're
going
to
require
you
to
do
something
more
than
tear
down
the
house
and
rebuild
it
all.
We're
probably
going
to
it's
probably
going
to
save
you
money.
We
had
that
the
other
day
when
people
come
in
with
proposals
to
change
out
windows,
and
when
we
question
it,
it
turns
out
they're
paying
three
times
the
cost
of
what
they
should
have.
A
M
A
P
P
A
P
A
G
A
M
A
M
A
M
A
A
If
you,
if
you,
you
could
actually
go
wider
than
28
if
you
wanted
to
go
with
a
slightly
shallower
and
go
as
far
back
as
you
want,
or
do
two
wings
going
for,
you
know
that
most
of
our
rules
have
to
do
it.
If
the
the
the
front,
facade
and
there's
a
hierarchy
of
you
know
as
you
go
further
and
further
back,
you
can
do
more
and
more
change.
So
in
this
case,
but
you've
tried
to
do
the
practical
thing.
Tear
it
down
start
all
over.
A
M
A
We're
not
necessarily
proposing
that
you
go
two
stories:
I,
don't
believe
it's
a
two-story
house,
the
other
one
may
have
some
have
done
something
with
the
dormers
I,
don't
know,
but
this
when
will
vote
on
the
demolition,
we're
right
on
that,
but
I,
don't
necessarily
think
it's
a
closed
door
on
what
you
guys
would
want
to
do.
There's
lots
of
ways
to
renovate
older
homes
when
they're
in
good
condition
when
they're,
not
that
that
poses
other
problems.
But
you
don't
have
that
problem.
M
M
A
A
M
A
You'll
just
have
to
have
our
vote.
Well,
let's
see
if
anybody
else
would
want
to
speak,
but
we've
we've
heard
neighbors
have
gotten
letters,
we've
again
your
contractor.
You
know
yet
you
you,
you
have
to
be
flexible
and
you
have
to
figure
out
ways
to
solve
problems
and
probably
you're
the
right
guy
to
do
that.
But
it's
not
shutting
the
door.
It's
just
saying
that
I'm
not
gonna
speak
for
our
other
board
members
about
that.
The
character
of
the
front
of
it
is
important.
M
M
M
In
all
honesty,
I
mean
we're.
Trying
to
we're
trying
to
create
exact.
Same
I
mean
we're
not
to
use
that
special
singles.
Nobody
sells
this
anymore.
The
wave
jingles
we're
gonna
try
to
maintain
every
piece
of
character.
Okay,
we're
gonna,
save
the
front
door.
It's
gonna,
get
moved
around,
I
mean
there's
my
wife
and
are
the
biggest
about
trying
to
save
stuff
I
mean
that's.
L
My
name
is
Tania
still
318,
Williamsburg,
Street
and
I
happen
to
know
the
pan,
rods
and
I
have
been
in
the
house
and
I've
been
in
the
house.
Next
to
it.
The
pan
rods
house
is
lovely,
it's
kind
of
sad
that
they
want
to
tear
it
down
or
even
change
it,
but
it
is
in
need
of
a
lot
of
repair
and
the
right-hand
side
was
added
on.
A
L
L
You
did
when
you
think
about
everything
that
has
to
be
done
in
it
as
I
I
hate
that
it
would
have
to
be
torn
down,
because
you
know
I
love
it,
but
when
you
think
about
renovating
it,
it's
got
a
lot
to
the
front
of
eight
I
mean
and
those
lots
are
shallow
in
the
back.
So
you
go
back
and
then
least
ten
retailers
Lisa.
They
renovated
that
when
sander
Thomas
added
and
they
are
are,
is
the
secondary.
L
L
G
D
M
A
A
P
We
studied
this
plan
a
thousand
times.
It
was
the
last
thing
I
ever
wanted
to
do
was
take
take
anything
down
on
the
house.
I
wanted.
We
put
an
offer
in
on
the
Fairfield
house
that
was
up
in
foreclosure.
So
as
fast
as
this
all
seems
for
everybody,
we
lost
that
one
within
like
a
day.
Do
you
know
what
I'm
talking
about
the
one?
That's
on
the
corner
of
Fairfield
and
south
boundary
yeah.
A
G
P
We've
had
to
make
a
footprint
of
the
house,
so
then
we
started
going
off
on.
He
sat
down
and
price
tag
price.
It's
the
first
time
with
everything
with
the
regular
ceilings.
Then
he
went
back
and
priced
it
again
with
the
nine-foot
ceilings,
then
he
went
and
priced.
It
again
was
tearing
the
whole
thing
down
and
when
we
looked
at
it
on
paper,
it
didn't
make
any
sense.
P
M
P
When
you
tear
it
down
to
the
studs,
what
do
you
think
I
even
questioned
when
I
was
checking
it
off
on
the
thing
if
I
should
check
demolition
or
what?
Because,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
if
we
tear
it
down
to
the
studs,
and
you
see
that
everything
is
good
on
it,
then
our
plan
was
to
just
leave
it
at
that,
but
I
mean
even
or
even
our
guy.
That
was
clearing
our
Peyman
looked
at
it.
D
Mr.
chairman,
so
there
are
notice
requirements
for
public
hearings,
but
and
I
was
trying
to
I
was
I'm
just
trying
to
look
at
our
zoning
ordinance
on
my
phone
but
I'm
not
having
too
much
look.
Perhaps
if
you
did
a
work
session
before
there
a
follow-up
work
session,
you
so
you're
not
taking
formal
action,
but
they
would
have
a
better
indication
of
where
the
board
stands,
and
that
would
give
them
to
time
to
think
about
how,
before.
A
G
E
A
Wiping
it
out,
yeah
I,
think
we
can
get
over
that
I
think
we
get
over
that
hurdle,
but
but
I
think
the
the
the
resulting
design
I
don't
think
we're
over
that
hurdle
yet
and
I
we
had
already
planned
on.
Even
if
we
approve
the
demolition,
we
need
to
have
another
submittal.
As
far
as
the
the
new
house,
because
we.
E
M
M
A
M
A
B
A
And
I
think
that
that
being
able
to
replicate
the
character
of
the
little
Polo
cottage,
whether
it's
a
renovation,
see
you
can
have
cover
over
that
special
siding
one
way
or
the
other,
but
to
replicate
the
character
of
it
would
be
to
go
if
whether
we
approve
a
demolition
or
whether
we
look
at
it
as
a
renovation,
it
would-
and
it
looks
like
that-
maybe
the
people
next
door
did
dormer,
so
that
should
open
the
door
a
little
bit
the
door.
If
you
need
dormers
personally,
I
think
you
just
need
to
think
about.
A
A
D
D
D
You
can't
interrupt
that
with
a
work
session,
so
we
could
either
the
applicants
could
withdraw
and
come
back
and
submit
what
we
can
and
then
we
could
hold
a
work
session
because
they
live
withdrawing
this
application
from
your
consideration
and
then
they
can
come
back.
So
we
can
have
a
work
session.
Work
session
only
requires
one
or
two
days
notice
and
we
just
have
to
post
it,
and
so
then.
D
D
A
Like
we
can
keep
in
mind
what
what
the
goal
here
would
be,
obviously
you
have
to
have
enough
square
footage
for
your
family,
but
beyond
that,
as
far
as
the
the
historic
where
the
overlay
review
is
to
try
to
maintain
the
character,
that's
that
you
see
from
South
boundary
and
not
anything
to
do
with.
What's
in
the
back
or
what
the
footprint
is
or
things
like
that,
what
do
you
see?
Y'all
y'all
recognize
and
develop
your
long
enough
to
know
about
the
horseshoe
Drive
and
the
you
know.
A
It's
still
gravel
I
think,
isn't
it
maybe
yeah
those
and
in
the
end,
the
Mack,
magnolias
and
all,
but
but
I
think
that
then
you'll
have
everybody
on
board.
If
you
can
maintain
now,
there's
different
ways
to
do
that.
One
way
is
to
use
the
building
just
there
now
and
and
try
to
address
that's
bestest
as
you
can
and
and
then
the
plan
that
that's
and
you
use
the
eight
use
the
porch.
A
As
is
that's
one
way
to
do
it
another
way
and
personally
I
would
start
there,
because
the
more
you
can
leave
and
use
the
less
money
have
to
spend.
You
know
rebuilding
your
walls,
new
walls
in
the
back,
then
the
other
way
as
you
try
to
with
new
construction
kind
of
dictate.
What's
there
that
would
be
a
compromise
and
it
might
satis
might
satisfy
us
enough
to
vote
and
the
neighbors
wouldn't
be
totally
upset
because
you're
you're
trying
to
to
keep
that
that
all
we're
concerned
about
is
the
front.
A
If
I
can
say
that
not
the
footprint
not
the
rear,
and
it
seems
to
me,
like
you,
could
turn
90
degrees
and
go
straight
out.
The
the
back
and
you
know,
do
a
get
your
bedrooms
right
off
the
back
and
living
space.
You
know
you
likely
not
going
to
be
in
the
front
living
room
anyway.
You
people
usually
have
a
big
family
room
in
a
kitchen
and
that's
what
you've
had
I
suspect
in
your
move.
C
A
L
H
B
B
Okay,
is
that,
due
to
a
clerical
oversight,
this
property
is
not
listed
as
contributing
because
the
one
on
the
left
is-
and
this
committee
is
here
to
try
to
make
sense
of
all
of
our
guidelines
and
all
and
to
do
the
right
thing,
whatever
the
right
thing
means
and
personally,
I
can't
in
good
conscience,
vote
to
to
dim
demo
this
house,
knowing
that
a
clerical
error
is
the
only
thing
that
reason
it.
What
and
contributing.
Personally
that's
my
personal
convictions,
maybe
it
no
one
else
shares
that.
M
B
D
A
B
B
M
D
When
we
have
a
property,
that's
on
the
historic
survey
that
intensive
documentation
form
identifies
the
key,
the
significant
architectural
features,
since
we
don't
have
that
what
the
board
say
are
the
significant
architectural
features
that
make
this
house
distinct.
That
should
be
preserved.
Mm-Hmm.
G
M
E
E
A
It
was
a
it
was
a
polo
players
cottage
in
this
winter,
so
we're
trying
to
keep
some
of
that
that
that's
what
we're
hearing
and
then
whatever
you
want
to
do
in
the
back,
but
but
I
think
I.
Would
whether
this
is
a
I'd
start
off
with
the
renovation,
because
you
you
know
you
can
get
that
one
in.
If
you
can
keep
this
character
to
things,
keep
the
front
character
and
it's
a
renovation.
So
it's
not
a
demo.
A
M
D
B
G
M
A
M
A
D
A
B
A
M
M
As
I
said,
we
had
to
go
to
next
month,
but
if
we
either
way
because
I
mean
basically
as
of
now,
if
we
come
back
and
we
do
another
work
session
in
a
week-
we're
coming
back
as
a
renovation
when
they're
coming
back
as
a
full-on
demo,
so
either
I
can
just
let
you
but
I.
Don't
want
you
to
vote
tonight
and
say
no
to
the
demolition
and
then
I
gotta
wait
a
whole
nother
month.
Well,.
D
M
A
We
don't
design
if
it's
twice
as
big
if
it
needs
to
be
2,800
instead
of
1400
I.
Will
we
understand
that?
It's
not
it's
it's
too
small
for
the
neighborhood,
but
the
character
of
it
I
think
it's
just
being
a
little
bit
more
sensitive
to
the
front,
a
little
quaint
cottage
that
it
is
I
I,
don't
see
why
I.
A
M
A
A
First,
step
get
it
size
you
want
second
step
is,
is
what
can
you
do
as
far
as
preserving
the
the
character,
okay
and
then,
and
then
you
might,
we
might
all
come
back
and
say
my
goodness
I'm
having
to
tear
down
half
of
the
insides
of
it.
Let
me
go
ahead
and
there
so
we're
not
there
yet,
because
if
you
can
convince
us,
that's
that
you
can
get
the
character
there,
then
we
almost
have
a
little
bit
more
flexibility
and
you've
got
some
talking
points
about
asbestos
and
low
ceilings
yep,
but.
M
A
M
A
I
think,
if
you
don't
mind
we'll
start
looking
at
a
time
we
could
meet,
and
then,
if
you
don't
mind,
if
you
can
follow
up
on
your
neighbor's
offer
to
maybe
see
if
you
could
walk
through
y'all
want
to
walk
through
it.
The
other
one
see
how
far
it
they
brought
it
you're
a
contractor
you'll,
be
probably.
M
M
M
M
M
D
M
D
E
B
E
Because
I,
don't
really
think
it's
a
demolition,
it's
a
redo,
I
mean
I,
know
I,
redo
houses.
If
I
was
coming
in
here,
I
would
never
say:
I
was
demolishing
it
I'm,
changing
it
great
leave
it
I'm,
not
demolishing
it
I'm
using
the
same
floor
plan
I'm,
adding
a
dormer
I
mean
if
the
dormer
got
modified
just
a
little
bit
and
didn't
look
quite
as
modern
I'm,
not
sure
that
everybody
wouldn't
have
a
property
that
mm-hmm.