►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Virtual Work Session April 14, 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
A
This
is
this:
is
the
city
of
Aitkin
Planning
Commission,
meeting
work
session,
convening
in
Tuesday
April
14th
2020
at
5
o'clock
p.m.
A
A
We
don't
have
any
old
business.
The
new
business
is
the
zoning
ordinance
text,
amendment
request
from
Kathy
James
and
roberts10
cabbage
regarding
the
hours
of
the
solid
waste
collection
in
the
vicinity
of
residential
properties.
We
we
heard
from
these
two
folks
last
meeting
in
which
they
brought
up
the
an
idea
of
possibly
looking
at
the
zoning
and
a
change
in
the
zoning
ordinance
regarding
this
collection
of
garbage
and
refuse.
A
If
you
all
will
remember
it
it's
over
there
off
of
alpha
colleton
and
near
Marlborough
Street
and
there's
a
there's,
a
rebar
facility
which
is
fairly
close
to
them,
which
was
picking
up
garbage
early
in
the
morning
on
Friday
years.
I
think
it
was
Friday
morning
and
they
were
asking
if
there
was
some
way
that
we
can
look
at
making
some
changes
and
and
Ron.
You
have
printed
out
this
ordinance
that
you
sent
us
this
three
point.
One
point,
eighteen
regarding
non-residential
refuse
collection
is
that
the
zoning
ordinance
all
that
deals
with
noise
so.
B
B
That
they
didn't
find
could
be
cited
under
the
noise
ordinance
and
we
don't
necessarily
have
a
petition
method
for
the
general
code
of
the
city,
though
we
do
the
zoning
ordinance,
so
the
applicants
or
the
petitioners
from
this
case
have
applied
for
something
to
be
put
in
the
zoning
ordinance.
So
we
can
enforce
it
through
the
zoning
ordinance
well.
B
That's
a
yeah,
sorry,
mr.
Onur,
we
we
looked
at
some
different
options
and
different
areas
that
did
regulate
this
through
Moulton
well.
First,
first
thing:
I
wasn't
able
to
really
find
many
cases
where
this
is
dealt
with
through
the
zoning
ordinance.
It's
usually
in
the
noise
ordinance
sometimes
uses
zoning
as
a
reference
point,
but
in
the
noise
ordinance,
if
you
were
in
a
place
so
then
I
tried
to
figure
out
if
you
weren't
a
place
in
the
zoning
ordinance.
B
If
we
were
to
do
so
and
try
to
it's
alphabetical,
so
we
put
it
alphabetically
and
we
kind
of
drew
text
from
some
of
the
best
options,
we've
kind
of
found
out
there.
When
we
did
research,
we
really
didn't
find
any
in
South
Carolina
and
dealt
with
this,
so
we
started
looking
costs
across
the
country,
some
of
the
larger
cities
for
deal
with
this,
and
this
is
kind
of
what
we
came
up
with.
B
We
did
get
a
couple
of
emails
in
on
this
late
in
the
day
today,
or
during
the
day.
Today,
one
is
from
the
applicants.
First,
they
say
thanks
for
considering
this
being
awakened.
Every
Friday
at
4:00
a.m.
is
unreasonable
and
as
considerable
health
consequences
outlined
in
their
letter
that
they
gave
to
you
are
giving.
B
A
B
Not
been
able
to
that's
been
one
of
the
issues
is
that
they,
the
actual
owner
of
the
facility,
has
had
very
little
success
with
arranging
different
pickup
times,
as
they
say
from
their
their
provider.
The
provider
just
kind
of
comes
with
makeup,
I
mean
they
know
the
days.
They
know
it's
early,
but
it's
just
where
they
are
on
the
route
and
when
their
route
begins.
Yeah.
A
Well,
I,
don't
I'm
a
little
leery
of
passing
I.
Think
the
six
o'clock
would
would
help
them
so
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
we
can
make
a
deal
ater
than
in
my
opinion,
I,
don't
think
we
can
go
any
later
than
six
o'clock
I'm,
not
sure
the
guy
can
comply
with
the
six
o'clock
rule.
What
happens
if
he
says
he?
If
he
comes
back
to
you
and
says
I
can't
do
this
I'm
gonna
be
out
of.
Are
you
gonna
run
him
out
of
business,
so
we.
A
E
F
F
Yeah
I
just
asked
what
the
unintended
consequences
are,
how
many
different
sites
that
are
like
this
are
being
impacted,
and
so
this
gets
you
know,
recommended
to
the
council.
City
Council
approves
it.
How
many
other
areas
will
be
impacted
by
by
this
rule
and
decision?
It
seems
fair,
9
p.m.
to
6
a.m.
but
what
are
the
other
unintended
consequences?
I
agree.
A
I
think
that's
a
good
question.
I,
don't
think
you
I,
don't
think
we
need
to
do
something.
That's
gonna
force,
somebody
out
of
business
I
mean
I,
don't
I
mean
he's
good.
If
he's
you
know,
he's
not
gonna.
Take
to
that.
I
think
that
line
down.
You
know
he's
gonna
move
on
that,
and
this
is
a
is
he
gonna
be
grandfathered
in
you
know
this
is
a
new
ordinance.
Oh
I,.
G
Agree
with
you
can
y'all
hear
me
yeah.
Yes,
we
can
I,
have
a
problem
with
making
some
wide
sweeping
change
like
this.
Just
for
one
party
I
agree
with
you
guys
your
there's,
no
telling
how
many
people,
how
many
businesses
are
gonna,
get
affected
by
this.
Just
to
please
one
one
family
I
mean
I
feel
sorry
for
them,
but
nobody
likes
to
get
woke
up
at
4
o'clock
in
the
morning,
but
maybe
we
need
to
do
a
little
bit
more
research.
G
B
We
have
and
we
were
able
to
run
that,
and
we
can.
We
can
kind
of
do
that
for
you
running
different
distances,
but
it's
a
500
feet.
There
are
1287
parcels
that
are
within
500
feet
of
either
a
property
zoned
residential
single-family
or
residential
multi-family
in
the
city,
and
so
that's
not
strictly
addresses.
That's
not
businesses,
but
that's
powerful,
that
are
zoned.
G
B
That's
one
thing
that
we
can
do
is
I
guess
we
could
run
some
examples
of
that.
What
different
buffers
500
feet
is
on
the
higher
end
of
the
buffers
that
I
saw.
300
feet
is
used
as
well
in
a
lot
of
codes
and,
and
that
doesn't
sound
like
a
lot
reducing
it
by
that,
but
it
it
tends
to
kind
of
be
more.
It's
not
necessarily
linear
as
to
how
many
properties
that
affects
when
you
reduce
it
by
a
buffer
range
like
that.
So
maybe
that'd
be
helpful.
F
Yeah
and
forgive
me
right,
I,
don't
know
if
you
can
do
this,
but
how
many
different
carriers
or
companies
are
servicing
these
sites.
If
it's
the
same
company
for
servicing
the
majority
of
them
it'll
be
interesting
to
see
how
that
will
impact
their
business
so
I
don't
know
how
many
different
companies
are
out
there
doing
this
I
can't
imagine,
there's
a
lot
it'll
be
interested
in
to
see
how
this
will
impact
their
business.
With
this
change
as
well
I
mean,
certainly,
the
idea
will
be
not
to
have
them
collect
garbage
at
4:00
a.m.
F
B
E
A
Yeah
I
guess
I
would
like
to
see
a
little
more
research
on
it.
We
we
could
be
opening
up
a
real
hornet's
nest
here.
If
we
passed
something
or
even
recommend
something
we're
not
gonna
pass
it
I
mean
the
City
Council's
gonna
have
to
deal
with
it,
but
if
we
recommend
something,
that's
going
to
impact
1,200
to
2,000
pieces
of
property,
I
mean
that's
a
that's
a
lot
of
pieces
of
property,
a
lot
of
people
so
I'd
like
to
see
a
little
more
dad
a
little
more
granular.
A
B
Can
do
that
I
have
some
maps
already
they
weren't
going
to
show
up
very
well
I
just
got
them
today
and
we're
able
to
kind
of
analyze
them
today
and
I.
Don't
think
they
were
gonna
show
up
very
well
on
this
sort
of
no
anyway
we'll
get
you
paper
copies
of
that
to
kind
of
take
a
look
over
in
the
meantime.
If
we
still
exist
in
this
next
month,
yeah.
A
D
A
B
Would
give
you
a
better
idea
of
how
many
people
are
impacted
by
this
kind
of
thing?
If
you
can
get
it
because
I
think
I
think
something
if
it
were
to
show
up
on
a
meeting
where
I'd
take
action?
Where
you
could
take
action,
it
would
draw
some
interest
both
on
the
business
side
and
and
from
residents.
So
we
could
get
it
yeah
kind
of
opinion.
There
also.
E
One
other
quick
thing.
Mr.
bland
you
mentioned
what
is
it
1287
businesses?
Those
are
parcels,
integrate
multiple
businesses
on
those
parcels,
that's
correct,
okay,
a
way
that
you
could
find-
and
this
might
be
too
much
but
there's
there
way
that
you
can
find
the
number
of
businesses
that
would
be
affected
by
this.
Not
just
the
business
parcels,
I
think.
B
We
can
come
close.
We
have
address
points
which
there
can
be
multiplied
pallab.
Usually
we
would
have
a
bad
business
without
an
address
point,
so
I
think
we
can
kind
of
get
more
granular
on
that,
as
chairman
hunter
said,
and
then
I
just
I
will
bring
up
that.
We
also
had
a
second
comment
come
in
on
this
from
another
neighbor
in
the
area,
expressing
their
support
and
just
saying
that
they
that
the
neighbors
has
assessed
the
disruption
accurately
well.
B
D
C
B
A
B
Do
we
have
two
different
things?
Our
applicants
are
available
to
talk
to
you
at
least
some
of
them
are
to
talk
to
you
through
this
format.
Right
now,
I'm,
for
instance,
I
have
Jason
long,
who
represents
the
Aiken
mall
application
and
I
have
McDonald
law
representing
the
Centennial
corporate
Center
application
they're,
both
in
a
waiting
room
on
here
and
can
be
available
to
speak
to
you.
B
Otherwise,
what
we
have
set
up
is
a
email
address
that
I
am
monitoring,
as
we
are
doing
this.
That
email
address
is
PC
comment
at
city
of
Aitkin,
SC,
gov,
again,
I'll
say
it
again:
P
C
comment,
as
in
Planning
Commission
comment
at
city
of
aiken,
SC,
gov
and
again,
while
each
of
these
come
up,
I
have
that
on
my
computer
screen
here.
Those
should
come
up
real
time.
If
people
do
have
comments
so
they'll,
be
speaking
through
me.
I'll
read
those
to
you.
Okay,.
A
A
A
A
Okay,
how
about
B,
how
about
3b?
That's
the
annexation
request
by
Teddy
and
Margaret
Gant.
Anybody
got
any
comments
on
that:
one:
okay,
how
about
C
application
and
accession
request
on
Mineta
Street
by
Heather,
Heather
villa
gran,
all
right
and
D.
That's
a
reasoning
request
from
office
to
plan
commercial!
That's
the
one
on
South
Centennial,
behind
South,
Lincoln,
High
School
there
by
McDonald,
I
guess
McDonald
law
is
representing.
The
owners
of
those
parcels.
Is
that
right,
Ron.
B
B
Here
it
was
online
here
and
you
did
but
available
if
he
needs
to,
but
I'll
try
to
do
my
best,
so
the
Centennial
corridor,
if
you
remember
it,
will
counter
house
connector
is
a
future
road
that
would
alleviate
pressure
off
of
whiskey
Road
by
connecting
east
gate
drive
to
powder
house
right
right,
Centennial
connector,
then
would
kind
of
bisect
that
and
come
drop
down
through
this
developments.
Detention
pond,
essentially,
is
how
this
would
happen
straight
south
and
ultimately
connect
with
the
powder
house
connector.
B
It
alleviate
a
fair
amount
of
traffic,
so
as
part
of
this,
we
and
engineering
and
our
transportation
engineers
are
working
to
find
a
way
to
reallocate
the
detention
for
this
property
as
part
of
a
larger
detention
facility
that
will
be
required
as
part
of
those
road
improvements
so
other
than
that.
The
purpose
of
this
is
essentially,
to
just
add
a
70
I,
say
just
but
add
a
7,200
square
foot
building.
They
expect
it
to
be
a
two
tenant
building,
potentially
with
restaurant
drive-through.
B
That
would
be
essentially
at
the
southeast
corner
of
Centennial
and
Corporate.
Park
Lake
is
right
off
their
existing
entrance
right
now,
the
main
entrance
into
that
office
right
right.
It
doesn't
really
change
much
as
long
as
far
as
their
site
plan
is
far
we
would
have.
We
would
look
to
make
sure
that
they're
not
losing
open
space.
We
would
make
sure
that
they're
not
increasing
impervious
surfaces
that
would
start
to
get
into
some
storm
water
issues
and
calculations,
and
things
like
that.
But
at
this
point
we
don't
believe
that's
the
case.
B
B
G
B
So
it
comes
down
to
when
they
actually
submitted
their
building
plans.
Again,
this
is
a
concept
plan.
When
they
submit
their
building
plans
and
a
site
plan,
we
would
evaluate
whether
they
are
increasing
or
decreasing
any
impervious
surface,
which
is
what
drives
a
stormwater.
We
would
as
long
as
they're,
not
increasing
impervious
surface.
We
would
be
able
to
check
that
with
a
site
plan,
we
believe
and
they
believe
that
they
can
accommodate
that
on
site
by
essentially
rearranging
green
space,
and
things
like
that.
B
Some
of
the
parking
lot
Islands,
but
essentially
it's
placing
now
you
would
just
focus
area-
would
challenge
that
much
right
service
area.
We
don't
expect
to
change
that
much
I
think
some
of
their
primary
concern
is
the
same
as
the
cities,
and
that
is
that
we
ultimately
get
the
property
that
we
need
as
a
city
to
be
able
to
facilitate
this
teneal
extension,
because
that
will
be
important
as
part
of
the
whiskey
road
congestion
relief.
G
B
A
B
A
B
Talk
to
a
that
cunning
who
was
acting
as
an
agent
of
his
and
you
know,
I
think
while
they
would,
they
would
probably
like
the
assurance
of
having
a
condition
that
they
would
have
to
to
dedicate
this.
At
some
point
me
to
the
city,
understood
the
City
Attorney's
recommendation
to
do
that.
The
development
agreement
instead
of
a
condition
of
approval
on
this
application,
I.
B
G
B
We
don't
anticipate
it
they're,
not
changing
their
access
points,
the
one
thing,
depending
on
what
those
users
are
of
that
building.
They
may
require
a
traffic
study
at
some
point
just
to
make
sure
that
there's
sufficient
turn
lanes
and
things
like
that.
But
I
guess
the
entrance
there
to
the
office
park
is
fairly
robust
as
it
is.
It
can
handle
a
lot
of
traffic,
so
we
don't
anticipate
significant
changes
there,
but
that
may
be
reviewed
in
the
future
when,
when
we
know
what
those
tenants
they're
building
for
with
the
kind
of
traffic
they'll
generate.
Oh.
A
B
C
B
A
B
Right
the
application
that
you
looked
at
last
month,
they
did
not
change
any
aspect
of
the
plan
that
you
saw.
Essentially,
they
went
back
and
ran
some
numbers
looked
at
right
now,
the
mall
parcels
about
eleven
percent
open
space
as
currently
developed.
They
anticipate
their
development
to
end
up
somewhere
in
between
fifteen
and
twenty
percent
open
space
fairly
conservatively,
but
they
were
concerned
that
they
might
not
be
able
to
satisfy
the
twenty
five
percent
open
space
requirement.
B
The
we
did
get
a
email
regarding
this
one
from
an
adjacent
property
owner.
This
is
to
request
the
city.
Bacon.
Commission
adhere
to
the
regulations
of
the
twenty
five
percent
of
the
property
being
developed,
be
recreational
outdoor
or
green
space.
I
do
not
feel
it
should
be
less
than
to
accommodate
a
company
building
for
profit.
This
property
is
going
to
have
shops,
restaurants
and
housing
and
feel
that
this
area
should
be
should
have
as
much
green
space
as
we
normally
require,
as
required.
I,
don't.
E
B
B
So
that
includes
the
the
walking
trail
and
that
amenity-
or
it
includes
their
interior,
plaza
spaces.
I'm
kind
of
connect
areas
within
there
are
open
space.
It's
not
green
space,
it's
open
spaces!
Look!
The
requirement
is
so
it
can
be
hard
scaped
areas
that
are
large
enough
and
dimension,
which
is
over
six
feet
in
dimension.
B
B
B
G
E
E
G
G
B
C
G
A
A
C
A
Putting
this
developer
in
a
position
where
there's
an
existing
massive
piece
of
building
and
mall
out
there
and
I
be
honest,
I'm
sensitive
to
the
green
space
idea,
but
I
honestly
believe
that
when
these
guys
finish,
it's
gonna
look
a
whole
lot
better
than
it
does
now,
even
though
it
may
not
have
quite
as
much
screen
space
as
we
would
like
to
have.
It's
still
gonna
look
a
whole
lot,
better
I
think.
F
And
I
agree
that
it
definitely
like
a
whole
lot
better
than
what
it
currently
looks
right
now
and
it
sounds
like
you
have
a
another
group
were
to
develop
a
place.
That's
completely
no
structures
built
complete
grass
or
land
that
they
couldn't
go
back
and
use
this
particular
situation
to
request
something
less
than
25
percent.
Yes,
the
situation
is
different
in
the
sense
that
it
already
exists
as
a
big
piece
of
concrete
at
building.
Right
now,
just
wanna
make
sure
that
we
set
ourselves
up
for
future
requests.
Yeah.
B
I
think
the
waiver,
the
waiver,
is
there
for
the
reasons
that
it
allows
you
the
flexibility
of
one
context
and
to
preferable
or
good
development
patterns.
So
if,
if,
if
I
think
it's
designed
so
that
you
can
allow
some
flexibility
in
that,
if
this,
if
the
constraints
are
such
that
would
cause
a
good
development
to
have.
B
A
G
B
B
B
It
should
remain
there.
Detention
for
that
facility
they'll
still
need
to
do
storm
water
retention,
management
and
they'll
need
to
use
the
plan
is
my
understanding
is
to
continue
to
use
that
as
the
stormwater
management
facility
for
the
good
thing
is
I
guess
they
are
reducing,
ideally,
some
impervious
service
on
the
site
with
the
new
development.