►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting February 15, 2022
Description
Planning Commission Meeting
February 15, 2022
6 PM
Call To Order
Minutes
Old Business:
none
New Business:
A) Application 22- 60002 Rezoning Request, General. Business ( GB) to Residential SingleFamily ( RS- 10), 901 & 925 Park Avenue SE, TMP 121- 10- 08- 001 & 002, by Karl McMillan.
B) Application 22- 60003 Rezoning Request, Residential Single- Family ( RS- 15) to Limited Professional ( LP), 712 Chafee Lane SW, TMP 104- 20- 18- 007, by Diane Padgett.
C) Consideration of 2022- 2027 Capital Improvement Program.
Adjournment
A
A
Courteous
and
respectful
communication
is
required
during
public
hearings.
All
questions
and
statements
from
the
public
shall
be
directed
to
the
chair.
If
you
wish
to
speak,
raise
your
hand-
and
I
will
recognize
you-
please-
approach
the
podium
and
state
your
name
and
address
in
order
to
allow
opportunity
for
everyone
who
wishes
to
address
planning.
Commission
speakers
should
limit
their
comments
to
the
subject
being
discussed.
A
Each
speaker
will
be
given
three
minutes
to
address
an
issue
and
may
only
address
an
issue
once
unless
the
questions
from
the
planet
commission
are
posed
to
the
speaker,
so
I'll
run
a
stopwatch
until
that
stopwatch
is
delivered.
I
guess
by
amazon
or
someone,
but
we
do
have
one
order,
but
I'll
I'll
control
it
up
here.
Obviously
we
don't
have
a
big
crowd,
as
of
yet
so
we'll
be
respectful
of
everyone's
time
and
consideration.
A
A
With
no
old
business,
we
do
have
an
additional
item
to
be
added
to
the
new
business.
We
in
our
previous
january
11th,
regular
meeting.
We
fell
to
in
the
election
of
officers
to
make
note
that
our
planning
director
meyer
moultrie,
who
is
also
the
secretary
for
the
planning
commission.
So
we
do
need
to
make
that
addition,
and
so,
if
I
can
have
someone
make
that
motion.
C
C
A
D
D
D
The
plan
would
be
to
put
a
parking
area
in
the
rear
of
the
building
to
be
accessed
through
the
parking
lot
of
eclipse,
the
current
eclipse
location
coming
off
of
lancaster
street,
so
the
building
is
only
about
1400
square
feet.
There's
three
rooms
that
can
be
made
in
offices
there's
an
open
area
which
would
be
a
reception
area
and
a
kitchen.
So
it's
it's
real
limited
in
terms
of
number
of
people
that
you
could
put
into
it.
D
It
is
just
going
to
be
general
office
space,
they
don't
see
any
investors
or
customers
or
anybody
that
comes
in
so
you're
transferring
existing
employees
from
one
building
to
the
next.
So
no
additional
employees,
no
additional
parking,
no
additional
cars
or
trips
that
it's
not
already
happening
right
now,.
D
The
there
is
going
to
be
some
improvements
made
to
the
property
in
order
to
make
it
into
an
office
so
that
we
will
rehabilitate
the
property
and
cause
most
of
the
activity
in
terms
of
traffic
and
access
to
the
property
from
the
rear.
And
I
don't
see
that
it's
going
to
create
any
more
traffic
trips.
It's
not
going
to
create
any
thing
different
in
terms
of
any
safety
or
traffic
issues
coming
through
either
on
lancaster
street
or
chaffey
lane.
D
B
A
E
E
E
A
E
F
I'll
answer
that
I
know
one,
that
was
one
thing
you
brought
up
that
the
area
actually
per
our
comprehensive
plan.
Has
it
currently
listed
as
public
and
institutional
that
particular
block,
not
where
you
live,
of
course,
but
and-
and
that
was
in
retrospect,
looking
back
at
when
it
was
done
five
years
ago,
it
was
never
that
area
was
never
really
looked
at
to
see
if
it
was
that
it
would
jive
with
what
was
currently
happening.
F
Comprehensive
plans,
just
by
their
nature,
are
not
static,
which
is
why
we
look
at
them
every
five
years.
In
fact
we're
in
the
process
now
of
doing
an
update
or
in
the
process,
so
we'll
be
looking
at
some
of
these
areas
that
don't
quite
fit
what
the
current
zoning
is
happening.
As
far
as
what
the
comprehensive
plan
is
saying,
so
this
was
obviously
lp
for
quite
some
time
since
prior
to
2017,
not
this
particular
parcel.
That
block
has
been
limited.
E
F
I'm
actually
speaking
of
the
limited
professional
block,
not
the
residential
block,
so
what
I'm
getting
at
is
since
2017,
that
particular
blog
that
we're
talking
about
is
was
limited,
professional,
not
public
institutional.
So
as
it
stands
right
now,
that
area
is
out
of
sync,
but
it
will
still
be
public
institutional.
F
E
Some
history,
if
I
may,
in
the
36
years
I've
lived
there,
there
was
one
limited
professional
entity,
and
that
was
the
hitchcock
center
that
was
at
721
richland
avenue.
A
lot
of
the
other
houses
were
all
including
the
one
that
mr
hart's
office
is
in
was
occupied.
It
was
rented,
but
people
were
living
there.
E
Other
other
houses
were
also
owner
occupied.
So
over
these
years
it's
now
down
to
up
to
six
or
seven
limited
professional
entities
and
the
fabric,
the
residential
fabric
of
that
neighborhood
is
becoming
eroded
and
I'm
having
problems
with
litter,
I'm
having
problems
with
traffic,
I'm
having
people
walking
in
my
house
thinking.
It's
an
office.
E
People
come
over
and
smoke
cigarettes
in
my
driveway.
It's
just
become
a
nuisance
and
there's
no
guarantee
that
eclipse
the
company,
the
the
the
horse
entity
right
now
would
stay
there.
They
could
leave
and
then
we
don't
know
what's
going
to
come
in
so
just
out
of
caution.
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
deny
this
erosion
of
the
residential
attributes
of
the
neighborhood.
E
E
G
G
F
H
My
name
is
johnny
turner.
I
live
at
136,
lancaster
city,
trout,
west,
which
is
on
the
corner
of
lancaster
texas.
Just
like
judy,
I
want
to
say
something
like
I
say:
we've
been
down
we're
the
youngest
couple
in
the
neighborhood
when
we
move
down
that
way.
They're,
probably
the
oldest
okay,
we've
been
there
40-something
years,
and
we
have
seen
the
traffic
in
that
neighborhood
parking
in
the
parkway
parking.
H
H
You
say
you
got
parking
in
the
park
back
parking
lot
behind
the
house
to
shore
if
they
park
back
down
people
apart
wherever
they
want
to
park,
and
it's
just
nice
since
it's
been
basically
residential
for
a
couple
years
now,
looking
and
there's
not
not
very
little
traffic
trial
development
is
left
too
very
little
walk
by
traffic
walk
around
traffic
people
checking
out
things
my
house
has
been
broken
into.
My
garage
has
been
broken
into
when
we
first
moved
there.
It's
just
it's
just
so
much
nicer.
H
H
H
H
You
know
just
people's
money
anyway,
but
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
how
much
nicer
our
neighborhood
has
been,
since
we
don't
have
all
the
traffic
and
people
walking
in
this
sort
of
thing
in
the
neighborhood
other
than
just
regular,
neighbors
walking
walking
around
doing
the
dogs
and
that
kind
of
stuff.
But
I
think
it's
it's
been
changed.
We
finally
got
it
back
to
a
residential.
I
didn't
know.
H
I
H
Not
in
our
residential
drive
rivalry
park,
it's
mostly
in
that
corner
now
with
them,
golfers
is
now
where
mr
hardy
is
it's.
I
know
they
do
park,
try
to
park
in
the
house
across
the
street
and
they
put
cones
up
there
to
keep
them
from
parking
in
there.
So
so
they're
parking
the
in
the
parkway
right
there
on
chaffee
and
they'll
park.
H
H
H
A
Any
other
questions
anyone
else
in
attendance
that
would
like
to
speak
in
regards
to
this
application.
I
think
to
address
some
of
the
questions.
As
you
may
be
aware,
the
planning
commission
is
a
recommending
body
so
there,
regardless
of
how
this
goes
this
evening,
you
will
have
some
additional
opportunities
to
to
state
your
case
with
city
council.
It
will
be
the
final
approver
of
this,
so
this
is
a
recommending
body,
not
a
final
approval,
so
do
pay
attention
if,
depending
on
how.
I
A
Any
discussion
all
in
favor
wait
raise
your
right
hand
passes
unanimously
all
right
and
we
will
move
into
application
c.
There's
more
of
a
memorandum
for
the
consideration
of
the
2022
through
2027
capital
improvement
program,
as
you
guys
and
we've
discussed
in
the
work
session.
These
are
department
recommendations
in
order
and
planning.
Commission's
action
is
to
consider
ranking
the
projects
listed
in
the
capital
improvement
program.