►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Great,
it
worked
well
good
afternoon.
Officially,
everyone
thank
you
for
taking
the
time
this
afternoon
to
work
through
this
strategic
planning
session
for
the
municipal
development
commission,
we'll
we'll
reflect
the
agenda
on
the
screen
in
just
a
moment.
A
Everyone
was
very
agile
today
to
be
able
to
shift
from
the
live
on-site
meeting
to
this
zoo
meeting.
I
think
that
was
the
right
thing
to
do
out
of
abundance
of
caution
with
respect
to
covet
and
the
spike
in
the
numbers
granted.
We
probably
all
believe
that
we've
been
better
for
us
to
get
together
in
person
for
four
or
five
hours,
but
hopefully
this
two-hour
session
will
be
very
good
for
us
and
we'll
have
a
positive
outcome.
A
A
We
have
a
pretty
large
group,
commissioner
city
council
members,
representation
from
the
aching
corp.
I
see
lassie
price
and
gabe
rolls,
as
well
as
buzz,
rich
and
pat
cunning
on
the
line,
the
mayor,
so
thank
you
all
for
joining
us.
That
makes
us
feel
good
that
you
have
interest
in
what
we're
going
to
discuss
today
and
helping
us
with
the
outcome
and
bottom
line,
we're
all
in
this
together
to
try
to
help
the
city
prosper.
A
I
also
want
to
thank
the
mayor
and
city
council
officially
for
taking
the
leadership
to
pull
us
together
to
pull
this
commission
together
with
the
people
that
are
on
this
phone
and
those
that
are
not
here.
It's
the
right
thing
to
do
we're
all
in
this
together
to
try
to
enhance
the
city,
push
economic
development
forward
for
the
city
of
aitkin.
So,
thanks
to
to
everyone
for
that,
the
purpose
today
is
obviously
three
or
three
or
four
fold.
One
is
to
advance
the
commission's
mission.
A
Tim
and
tom
will
show
us
in
just
a
moment
kind
of
our
charter,
a
reminder
as
as
to
why
we
exist
and
what
we're
planning
to
do.
We
want
to
set
our
priorities
for
the
next
24
months
and
beyond
we're
going
to
review
the
aecom
economic
development
report.
It's
fairly
lengthy,
but
tom
has
broken
that
down
and
will
give
us
the
survey
results
and
really
some
of
the
initiatives
that
we
believe
are
important
for
us
to
tackle,
and
then
we
don't
want
to
limit
today
to
just
the
econ
review.
A
There
are
other
thoughts
and
ideas,
actions
that
the
commission
members
may
have
that
we
want
to
tackle
and
add
to,
and
all
this
is
to
try
to
come
together
and
set
the
course
for
the
commission,
but
also
feed
in
to
the
strategic
planning
process
for
the
city
and
the
city
council
is
going
to
have
theirs
in
the
month.
A
So
our
goal
is
to
make
sure
that
our
objectives
are
completed
and
we
can
weave
those
in
and
make
those
recommendations
to
city
council
for
consideration
and
then
last
but
not
least,
and
david
will
touch
on
this
in
the
agenda
as
well.
A
We
want
to
make
sure
that
whatever
we
do
we're
holding
ourselves
accountable,
but
also
there's
some
things
in
the
econ
report
that
are
pretty
broad
that
are
beyond
the
commission's
mission,
we're
probably
going
to
provide
some
advice
and
counsel
to
city
council
for
everyone
to
be
accountable.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
this
report
that
they've
graciously
funded,
doesn't
go
on
the
shelf
and
collect
us
that
the
actions
the
initiatives
within
the
report
are
actually
achieved.
A
So
david
will
cover
that
later
in
the
agenda
with
that
being
said,
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
you.
B
Great
thank
thank
you
all
for
participating.
I
want
to
begin
with
the
just
a
sort
of
overview
of
this.
This
survey
we
we
were
as
cr
as
keith,
has
just
noted.
The
city
was
gracious
enough
to
provide
this
resource
from
the
aecom
consulting
group,
and
what
we
were
trying
to
do
with
this
survey
is
is
not
fine
tune.
What
it
is
we're
interested
in
nearly
so
much
as
to
gain
some
broad
insight
about
where
everybody
is
in
relation
to
the
recommendations
that
are
in
that
report.
B
As
I
was
thinking
about
this
yesterday,
if
you,
if
you
cut
a
tree,
you
can
cut
it
with
an
axe,
you
can
cut
it
with
a
chainsaw.
You
can
cut
the
lumber
that
comes
out
of
it
with
a
band
saw
or
you
could
cut
it
with
a
laser.
Well,
what
we're
doing
today
is
certainly
not
laser
level
work,
excellent
work.
It
is
a
very
rough
sense
of
the
group
about
how
you
respond,
how
you
react
to
what
you
saw
there,
there's
nothing
in
this
summary
coming
out
of
the
report.
B
That's
cast
in
stone
and,
as
we
sort
of
quickly
go
through,
I
I
hope,
you've
taken
the
time
to
look
at
those
those
pages,
but
as
we
go
through
them,
now's
the
time
to
raise
an
eyebrow
and,
maybe
maybe
to
say
I'd
like
to
come
back
and
talk
about
that.
I
I
think
it's
going
to
be
important,
that
we
get
through
all
18
of
those
items
assigned
to
the
municipal
development
corp
commission
before
we
begin
to
go
back
and
forth
about
whether
that's
in
the
right
place.
B
Regrettably,
I
don't
think
we
get
to
action
planning.
As
keith
has
said
today.
B
We
just
didn't
believe
that
a
four
or
five
hour
zoom
session
would
be
productive,
so
we've
tried
to
pull
down
to
what
we
think
we
can
accomplish
and
when
we
move
forward
with
detailed
pending
among
those
highest
priority
items.
To
begin
with,
there
is
in
the
report
a
preliminary
priority
ranking,
and
what
you
need
to
do
you
need
to
know
is
there's
nothing
much
scientific
about
that.
B
I
took
your
priority
rankings
through
the
survey
and
put
a
little
formula
on
it
and
and
try
to
figure
out
how
we
get
some
spread
among
these.
Among
these
projects
also
you'll
note
as
we
go
through
it,
that
there
were
places
for
people
to
say
I'm
interested
in
that,
and
we
had
several
folks
take
advantage
of
that.
B
If,
in
the
course
of
this
conversation,
you
decide
that
there's
something
that
you'd
like
and
we'd
be
happy
to
to
make
that
adjustment
as
you
as
we
go
through
it,
as
you
may
have
noticed,
there's
lots
of
room
for
auditions.
We
weren't
overwhelmed
with
that
all
right.
B
So
if
you
would
go
to
well
page,
one
is
basically
what
I've
just
talked
about.
Page
two
begins
the
recap
of
the
survey
results
and
you
see.
Let
me
just
be
clear
to
you.
I
went
through
the
report
in
the
order
in
which
those
items
were
provided
in
the
report.
B
So
there
was
a
broad
statement
about
housing
and
there
were
several
items
under
that
housing
one
you
can
read
it
there.
Everyone
agreed
that
that
was
would
advance
the
purposes.
There
was
some
question
about
whether
the
timing
was
right.
In
this
instance,
the
number
of
folks
who
didn't
agree
matches
up
with
the
folks
who
had
another
suggestion
about
what
the
timing
ought
to
be
too.
B
Is
it
ready
for
quick
action?
The
majority
of
us
believe
it
is.
One
person
expressed
an
interest
keith.
Thank
you
for
filling
that
in
and
are
there
suggestions
for
projects
and
objectives
which
should
be
added
to
this
list.
Usd
aiken
and
the
bypass
area
for
more
residential
was
a
comment.
B
C
B
B
A
D
Hey
keith
chris,
my
recollection
is
either
tom
or
tim
or
anyway,
someone
said
try
to
well.
I
guess
they
were
talking
about
limiting
the
one
priorities
right.
That's
that's
what
I
was
confused
with.
D
I
got
my
name
on
a
lot
of
that
stuff,
but
to
the
extent
I
can
help
in
any
of
that,
I'd
be
happy
to.
F
B
B
All
right
we're
ready
to
move
to
housing.
Two
page,
three
work
with
amdc
and
this
local
cdc's
to
coordinate.
D
B
B
Poised
for
quick
activity,
most
folks
thought
not
and
that's
the
reason
it's
probably
ranked
as
a
midterm
and
again,
as
you
noted
in
your
conversation
david
chris
and
tim
o'brien,
all
expressed
interest
in
that
there
were
no
suggestions
for
that
additions
to
that
project,
and
this
was
ranked
ultimately
in
my
asses
in
my
unscientific
method
in
the
bottom
tier,
the
bottom.
Third,
if
we
got
to
a
package
for
those
things,
certainly
the
overall
ranking
priority
would
probably
change
and
there
would
be
priorities
within
that
overall
objective.
B
So
now
we're
moving
to
page
four
housing,
three,
looking
working
with
local
community
development
organizations,
almost
everyone
agreed
that
would
advance
the
purposes.
Almost
everyone
agreed
that
the
timing
was
right.
B
A
Tom
douglas
paul,
but
maybe
the
chair
has
the
the
capability
to
add
doug
slaughter's
name
to
this
one.
G
Tom,
this
is
buzz
this,
this
housing
area.
Of
course,
we
weren't
involved
in
the
survey,
but
all
of
these
first
four-
really
that's
something
that
the
agent
corporation
would
definitely
be
interested
in
and
I
would
be
interested
in
it.
B
F
And
I
would
echo
what
buzz
has
said
that
aiken
court
has
a
lot
of
experience
in
the
housing
issues
and
would
be
a
a
great
ally
or
great
champion
of
these.
Some
of
these
issues.
H
I
agree
with
that
where
I've
struggled
was
the
fact
that
there
are
some
mixed
use
in
this
reference
later
in
this
survey.
But
there
are
some
mixed
use
ideas
and
I
think,
as
far
as
housing
there's
certainly
a
role
and
there's
a
high
level
of
expertise
within
the
aiken
corporation.
For
that
but
yeah,
there's
there's
still
at
least
with
respect
to
the
mixed
use.
Portions.
I
think
there's
still
a
place
for
amdc
as
well.
B
I
B
And
and
as
I
say,
we'll
get
to
a
lot
of
that
in
the
action
planning,
but
those
are
good
observations
along
the
way
so
that
it
will
help
us
shape,
trying
to
get
to
the
action
planning
on
on
that
one.
B
We're
going
to
page
five
now
gary
housing
for
issue
rfps
for
the
land,
that
is,
everyone
agreed
that
that
was
a
an
appropriate
activity.
The
timing
was
a
question.
Some
folks
thought
it
was
a
little
longer
term.
B
I
J
To
solve
that
mystery,
this
is
tim
o'brien,
because
this
is
my
job.
I
only
put
my
name
down
for
one,
but
I
basically
expressed
interest
in
each
one
of
the
objectives.
So
that's
why
the
numbers
don't
exactly
match
with
the
people
who
provided
a
name.
J
B
Solves
a
mystery:
there
were
no
additional
projects
and
again
my
rating
on
this
was
a
bottom
third,
and
by
that
we
should
be
clear.
It
doesn't
mean
it's
not
important.
It
means
in
terms
of
when
this
particular
thing
might
get
acted
upon.
It's
at
the
at
the
longer
end
of
this
focus
gary
going
to
page
six,
invest
in
minority
and
women's
business
development
design
and
implement
programming,
to
build
bridges
and
share
resources,
etc.
B
There
was
a
split
on
this
approp
whether
this
was
appropriate
to
the
amdc.
The
timing
seemed
the
majority
believe
that
the
timing
was
right.
It's
not
poised
for
quick
action.
According
to
our
group,
folks
did
express
an
interest
in,
as
tim
may
have
expressed.
He
fills
out
the
three
volunteers
they
expressed
interest
there.
There
were
no
other
suggestions
and.
F
This
in
the
chambers
2021
program
work.
We
have
an
objective
that
is,
is
for
all
practical
purposes
identical
to
this,
and
so
I
I
would
say
that
the
you
can
assign
this
to
the
aiken
chamber,
because
we
plan
to
move
forward
with
this
pretty
quickly
to
get
to
get
to
a
starting
point.
B
Thank
you,
david
all,
right
we're
moving
now,
gary
to
page
seven
clarks,
one
and
and
there's
nothing
magic
about
the
names
I
just
took
something
that
was
some
word
that
was
in
the
recommendation
partner
with
the
local
neighborhood
associations
and
other
community
organizations.
B
Parks
and
green
spaces,
etc.
This
is
one
that
the
commission
was
split
upon.
Everybody
agreed
that
the
timing
was
right.
I
guess
the
question
is
whether
it
is
an
amdc.
B
It's
also
split
about
whether
it's
poised
for
quick
action,
no
one
on
the
commission
expressed
any
interest
in
being
engaged
with
the
activities
here,
and
this
ended
up
being
in
the
bottom
tier.
Any
comments
about
that.
One.
D
Tom,
mr
chris,
I
I
think
it's
a
very
important
one,
but
relative
to
the
list
we've
got,
I
think
it
it.
It
will
be
at
the
bottom
tier
I
mean
I,
you
know
something's
got
to
be
there,
but
I
do
think
it's
you
know
important.
Nonetheless,.
K
And
I
would
kind
of
agree
with
keith
on
that
I
mean
I've
just
seen
a
lot
of
you
know
really
small
parts
around
neighborhood
they're,
pretty
nothing
against
them
they're
good
to
have,
but
I
don't
see
them
a
lot
of
times
being
used
unless
it's
something
you
know
a
significant
something
like
you
know
more
than
an
acre.
You
know
something
significant.
I
don't
see
where
it
really
hits
on
our
radar.
J
Well,
gentlemen,
I
think
this
raises
an
issue.
I've
had
some
feedback
from
the
arts
and
culture
community
already
related
to
the
plan
and
arts
culture,
livability
quality
of
life.
Those
kinds
of
things
are
going
to
be
very
important
to
our
retention
and
attraction
of
residents
can
be
very
important
to
economic
development
in
general,
but
I
think
it
does
show
where
the
municipal
development
commission
is
not
exactly
perhaps
the
the
most
targeted
organization
to
deal
with
these
things.
But
we
need.
B
A
All
right
tom
I'll
bite,
this
is
keith
again
again,
I'm
struggling
why
this
is
really
the
top
of
our
charter.
This
seems
to
be
right
in
the
the
city,
recreational
department's
wheelhouse.
If
there's
something
we
can
do
to
support,
enhance
I'm
all
for
it.
But
beyond
that,
it
seems
like
to
me
this
is
this:
is
their
role
not
ours?.
F
Yeah,
I
think
that
the
the
way
I
read
this
one
is
it's.
It's
very
important.
We've
seen
it
in
some
of
the
work
that
we've
done
in
the
past.
F
This
is
very
important
to
enhancing
the
quality
of
life
of
particularly
attracting
early
career
professionals,
but
it
doesn't
seem
like
it's
the
municipal
commission's
role,
but
we
should
support
anybody,
that's
doing
it
and
we
will,
I
believe,
that's
the
case.
A
B
All
right,
gary
we're
moving
to
page
eight,
invest
one
work
with
the
amdc
local
business
leaders
and
other
city
economic
development
stakeholders
to
increase
awareness
of
available
incentives
for
downtown
development
redevelopment.
Everyone
agreed
that
that
was
in
inside
the
boundaries
of
the
purposes
of
the
amdc.
B
The
timing
appeared
correct
the
most,
even
though
no
one
thought
that
the
timing
was
incorrect.
We
got
some
cancel
on
how
to
move
it
into
the
category.
It's
already
in
short
term.
Is
it
poised
for
quick
action?
Yes,
and
is
the
activity
one
in
which
you
have
a
special
interest
or
attraction?
B
Three
unnamed
folks
said
that
they
were
interested
in
that
we
know
that
tim
probably
is
one
of
those.
H
I
was
interested
in
it.
My
concern
was
that
I
didn't
know
the
most
about
it,
and
so
I
I
had
expected
others
to
maybe
step
up
first,
but
I
am
interested
in
that
and
be
happy
to
be
involved.
I
just
I've
got
some
learning,
probably
in
that
arena
as
well.
B
F
And,
and-
and
you
know,
I
didn't
sign
up
for
this
because
I
didn't
know
to
me-
this
seems
like
when
you're
dealing
with
incentives-
that's
the
city
council
role
and
I
didn't
know
if
they
wanted
a
third
party
recommendation
or
whether
they
just
wanted
to
tackle
this
themselves.
B
Sounds
like
this
was
going
to
get
a
little
more
discussion
about
how
to
be
engaged.
If,
if
the
commission
is
to
be
engaged
this
by
the
way
made
it
into
the
top
third,
as
you,
it
shouldn't
come
as
any
surprise
given
those
ratings
above
all
right,
gary
we're
going
to
page
nine,
invest
two
engage
community
stakeholders
in
creating
a
broader
vision
for
live,
work,
play
18
to
24
hour
downtown
and
use
this
guide
for
future
development
in
the
downtown.
B
B
B
Is
this
activity
in
which
you
have
a
special
interest
and
we
had
three
volunteers
and
two
names
and
if
we
add
tim
to
the
as
the
third
one,
we've
got
that
and
there
were
no
other
suggestions,
and
this
was
a
middle-tier
activity
in
the
hallman
scientific
ranking
system.
A
Tom
this
is
keith,
I'm
I'm
a
little
surprised
at
that,
but
all
the
discussion
the
commission
has
had
over
the
last
several
months
as
it
relates
to
the
hotel,
downtown
aitkin,
the
old
aitkin
county
administration,
hospital
property.
Everything
we've
talked
about.
I'm
surprised
this
one
wasn't
ranked
at
the
top,
and
maybe
I
made
a
leap
here
that
others
didn't,
but
I
kind
of
connected
it
to
downtown
development.
What's
needed,
big
picture
for
us
in
the
short
term.
H
I
took
that
as
invest
three.
What
you're
describing
keith
I
mean
me.
I
had
a
little
bit
of
trouble
pinning
down
what
what
the
actions
that
would
come
out
of
this
invest.
Two
would
be,
and
that's
three
I
think
it
was
invest
three
that
was
a
little
more
specific
direct
towards
the
projects
that
you're
mentioning,
and
so
actually
I
didn't,
I
don't
think
I
put
my
name
down,
but
actually
I
was
interested
in
being
involved
had
a
special
interest
in
the
next
one.
B
L
And
one
thing
too,
I
think
as
a
component
of
this,
as
you
talk
about
a
18
to
24
hour
downtown,
we
are
looking
at
and
hope
in
the
coming
months,
looking
at
our
noise
ordinance,
which
certainly
would
play
into
any
of
this
sort
of
thing,
and
I
believe
before
we,
I
guess
some
of
the
stakeholders
that
need
to
see
it
would
be
this
group
as
well
based
on
your
interest
and
understandable
in
this
downtown
sort
of
18
to
24
hour
vision.
G
K
And
this
is
marty,
I
just
yeah,
I
mean
when
you
look
at
the
size
of
aiken.
I
mean
you
know
just
the
wording
of
that
18.
You
know
a
24
hour,
downtown,
maybe
more
longer
term.
For
us
and
two.
You
know
to
the
point
where
yeah,
sometimes
they
can
gets
a
little
too
quiet
at
10
p.m
and
we'd
like
to
see
more
activities.
But
you
know
what
good
happens
after
1
a.m.
If
you're
not
careful
how
you
plan
this,
I
just
think
it's
something
that
needs
more
study.
B
Okay,
all
right
moving
on
invest
three
is
philip,
is
more
flexible
zoning
in
special
districts
to
encourage
higher
density,
mixed
use,
mixed
income,
development
and
options
for
incentivizing,
affordable
housing,
and
then
some
specifics
of
that
everyone
agreed
that
that
was
a
high
prior
that
that
fit
the
purposes
of
the
amdc
most
agreed
that
the
timing
was
appropriate.
B
Some
suggestion
that
maybe
we
push
it
out
a
little
bit.
Is
it
poised
for
quick
actions?
The
majority
believe
so,
but
we
didn't
get
a
lot
of
takers
on
that.
Besides
david
jameson
and
probably
tim,
I
guess
no
other
suggestion
one,
and
that
was
a
top-tier
ranking
overall,
any
comments.
H
On
that
one,
I
did
not
mark
myself
for
this
one,
but
I
meant
to
this
is
not
the
one
I
was
thinking
of
earlier
when
I
mentioned
it
to,
but
I
do
have
an
interest
in
this
one.
As
far
as
the
flexible
zoning
we've
got
you
down.
B
K
B
B
H
I
think
everybody
on
this
commission
has
a
role
in
all
of
this.
I
mean
this
is
sort
of
fundamental
to
me
to
what
this
commission
is
about.
So
I
didn't
put
down
my
name,
but
I
think
all
of
us
should
be
making
contributions
in
this
arena.
K
B
I
I
think,
as
we
move
forward,
we're
going
to
find
that
these
opportunities
to
roll
things
together
should
make
the
action
planning
more
appropriate,
and
we
started
with
18
recommendations
from
the
aecom
report.
And
what
we're
quickly
seeing
is
that
those
may
boil
down
to
a
smaller
50
number
that
that
are.
G
B
B
Four
people
expressed
an
interest
and
no
one
put
a
name
down.
There
were
no
other
suggestions
for
projects
and
activities,
and
this,
despite
all
of.
A
J
Well,
I
think,
from
the
standpoint
of
a
true
market
study
related
to
the
the
hotel
property
or
the
hospital
property,
we've
been
privy
to
some
privately
funded
portions
of
market
studies.
G
Tom
listen,
this
is
buzz.
I've.
I've
got
a
question
about
this.
As
some
of
you
know,
I've
represented
the
shaw
family
in
the
past.
This
is
private
property,
and
I
know
when
the
commission
first
started.
There
was
a
rather
threatening
letter
that
was
sent
to
them
and
I'm
wondering
if
there's
been
any
collaboration
with
the
family
to
see
what
they
want
to
do,
or
maybe
how
how
we
can
help
them
as
opposed
to
threatening
them
with
what
they're
going
to.
A
Do
well,
as
this
is
keith
I'll
I'll
speak
to
that
we
reached
out
to
the
shawls
about
a
month
ago,
and
the
action
coming
out
of
that
meeting
is
they
are
invited
to
come
present
to
the
commission,
give
us
an
update
on
the
project
they
committed
to
do
that
and
we're
looking
to
have
them
there
at
our
next.
B
This
will
further
inform
the
optimal
plan
for
the
hotel,
aiken
building
and
parcel
most
folks
believe
that
that
fit
the
purpose.
Most
folks
believe
that
the
timing
was
correct.
Correct.
B
Four
people
interested
we
had
tim.
I
think
we
got
all
of
those
names
and
this
again
made
it
to
the
middle
tier.
B
J
F
B
It
seems
that
most
folks
believe
it's
poised
for
quick
action.
Three
people
expressed
an
interest
and
again
we
throw
ten.
We've
got
three
names
there.
There
were
no
other
suggestions
and.
F
I
think
this,
I
think
this
is
an
important
location,
this
crossroads
of
hampton
and
york,
and
it
has
a
lot
of
potential
for
development
and
I
think
we
need
to
just
get
a
lot
more
eyes,
looking
at
it
and
develop
an
action
plan
and
see
if
we
can
attract
a
developer
to
move
forward.
F
G
This
is
my
buzz.
I
would
point
out
that
property
recently
sold
that
it
appears
to
me
that
there
are
renovations
being
done
on
that
building
now
and
the
second
observation
is
the
old
chicken
placed
across
catty
corn
across
the
street
has
a
for
sale
sign
on
it,
which
is
also
a
primary
lot
coming
up
into
your
way
to
the
city.
J
As
part
of
my
response
on
this
survey
item,
I
did
move
it
down
as
far
as
the
timing,
I
think
it's
always
going
to
be
a
key
site
and
a
gateway
to
the
city,
but,
as
buzz
just
pointed
out,
this
property
has
recently
changed
hands.
So
I
think
the
immediacy
of
the
opportunity
has
moved
further
down
the
road.
There
is
an
investment
going
in
there.
J
There's
work
being
done
on
it,
so
I
I
don't
see
us
coming
in
and
reinventing
that
corner,
considering
somebody
is
making
an
effort
to
to
doing
something
with
it
right
now.
So
I
think
we
should
keep
an
eye
on
on
what
happens
there
and
maybe
concentrate
on
some
some
other
areas
that
are
not
moving
forward.
At
this
point.
L
And
along
those
lines,
I
think
just
almost
adjacent
to
it
at
some
point
sooner
rather
than
later,
I
think
the
the
sheriff's
department
will
be
relocating
in
the
next
few
years.
I
know
they
have
a
substantial
amount
of
round
four
cpst
money,
not
sure
of
the
timing,
but
between
that
and
some
adjacent
city-owned
property.
L
Next
to
the
save
a
lot
near
the
save
a
lot
and
adjacent
to
the
where
the
sheriff's
department
is,
you
know
that
whole
entryway
corridor,
I
think,
bears
something
to
keep
an
eye
on
in
a
midterm
perspective.
F
I
believe
you'd
have
to
confirm
tim,
but
this
the
save
a
lot
building
is
in
an
opportunity
zone
also-
and
when
I'm
talking
about
this,
I'm
talking
about
all
four
corners
there
at
hampton
and
and
york
and
taking
a
bigger,
a
little
bit
bigger
view
than
parcel
by
parcel.
B
That
that's
what
I
took
away
from
all
the
comments
was
that
as
you
as
the
commission
thinks
about
this,
you
need
to
the
perspective
on
that
too,
because
somebody
has
mentioned
buzz
mentioned
churches.
So
I
think
that's
worth
noting.
D
L
One
thing
along
those
lines
that
has
checked
that
has
happened.
I
think,
since
I
guess
this
draft
was
well
underway
in
construction
and
being
compiled,
is
for
some
of
this
property.
We
now
have
a
means
to
help
developers
with
our
we've
have
a
commercial
component
to
our
demolition
program.
This
is
the
demolition
2000
program,
so,
under
certain
circumstances,
with
the
residential
property
you
pay
200
and
it's
demoed
for
commercial.
You
pay
2
000
and
it
gets
demoed.
L
That's
something!
Council
just
made
an
amendment
to
our
maintenance
code
here
late
last
year,
so
I
think
that
something,
I
think
needs
to
be-
I
think,
alluded
to
or
mentioned
in
the
report
to
it
can
be
leveraged
with
some
of
these
opportunities.
We're
identifying.
K
This
is
marty
and
I
just
want
to
add
I'm
speaking
to
y'all
from
my
office,
which
is
directly
across
from
generations
park.
So
obviously
I
have
a
lot
of
interest
in
this
highway.
One
corridor
and
pierce
city
does
to
future,
but
I'm
just
saying
yeah.
That
is
a
very
important
intersection
and
we
need
to
do
whatever
we
can
with
it.
But
I
also
think
you
know
if
they
can
really
be
a
big
picture.
You
need
to
also
think
the
i20
backwards
to
that
intersection.
Don't
just
think
about
that
intersection
and
trying
to
grow
it.
K
I
think
you
also
need
to
think
about
the
interstate
and
how
does
it
grow
back
to
that
intersection,
because
I
think
they're
interconnected.
You
can't
just
throw
things
out
there.
They're
not
supported.
I
think
if
you
look
at
what's
happening
in
graniteville,
it
took
that
quite
a
while
to
get
going,
but
when
it
went
it
was
interstate
driven.
So
I
think
the
entire
corridor
needs
to
be
looked
at
big.
B
Down
all
right,
moving
on
to
page
15
gary
explore
four
assess
connecting
generations
park
via
multimodal
it's
a
long
route,
one
for
development.
So
marty,
you
were
prescient,
you
were
paying
attention.
You
knew
this
was
coming
up.
B
Satisfaction
with
the
timing
is
it
poised
for
quick
action?
No,
I
mean
two
out
of
five
two
out
of
seven
believe
it
is,
and
only
two
expressed
interest
in
being
involved,
and
that's
david
and
tim
and.
K
B
This
project
is
in
the
bottom.
Third,
given
the
rankings
that
people
provided
now,
let
me
go
back
and
and
remind
you
my
my
overall
rankings
are
based
on
the
rankings
that
you
all
provided
it
in
in
that
place
on
the
survey.
There's
nothing
magic
about
it.
B
B
A
I
struggled
with
this
one
because
to
me
the
first
part
of
the
statement
didn't
jive
with
the
back
part
of
the
statement.
What
I
mean
by
that
I
was
misreading
this
thinking.
Okay,
are
we
just
looking
at
inactive
under
developed
sites,
or
should
we
also
be
looking
at
some
of
the
recommendations
that
econ
made
with
respect
to
enhancing
our
entrances
to
our
cities
and
this
from
the
southwest
east
north?
You
know
so
on
and
so
forth.
A
F
And
that's
that's
really
why
I
was
undecided.
I
think
the
gateway
enhancements
is
a
city.
F
The
city
would
champion
that,
in
my
opinion,
and
probably
hire
a
landscape
architect
to
design
because
each
one
of
it
might
we
might
create
the
same
theme
from
all
of
the
entrances
to
the
city
and
I'm
talking
about
north
east,
west
and
south,
but
each
entrance
would
probably
have
to
be
created
a
little
bit
differently,
depending
on
the
the
size
of
the
road
and
the
right-of-way
availability.
B
B
I'm
stepping
out
of
my
role.
I
apologize
all
right:
we're
ready
to
move
on
to
explore
six,
which
is
page
17,
gary
identify
10
to
12,
acres
in
or
adjacent
to
citizens,
park
for
development
of
a
hotel
and
restaurant
for
families
and
athletes
attending
tournaments
and
games
at
citizens
park
six
to
one.
This
was
something
that
would
advance
the
purposes
five
to
one.
The
timing
was
right:
it's
currently
ranked
midterm,
somebody
thought
it
should
be
short
term
and
somebody
and
another
person
thought
it
had
a
longer
term
potential.
B
Is
it
poised
for
quick
action
most
folks?
Believe
yes,
is
it
an
activity
in
which
you
have
a
special
interest
or
attraction,
marty
and
keith?
And
I
guess
tim
are
the
three
who
said
yes
to
that,
and
there
were
no
other
suggestions.
This
currently
is
in
the
bottom
third
of
rankings.
D
Obviously
I
may
be
getting.
This
may
really
not
be
relevant
to
the
point.
A
reason
I'm
not
excited
excitable
about
this
and
it
may
be
not
having
access
to
information
is
that
if
we
had
expressions
of
interest
it
seemed
like
that
would
be
more
market
driven
than
us
to
pick
a
site.
D
I
mean
I
understand
that
the
concept,
but
you
would
think
the
marketplace
would
drive
a
hotel
year
there
we
is,
is
what
put
it
there,
the
concept
or
a
lot
of
demand
for
this,
because
you
seem
like
to
me,
we
we're
picking
and
choosing.
J
There's
chris
there's
been
a
good
bit
of
market
interest
over
the
years
in
that
area
of
pinellas
road,
but
there
is
severely
limited
infrastructure
over
there,
so
there
has
been
no
development
along
the
cotton
fields
and
over
there
by
boots,
brothers
and
bridges
and
everything
across
from
citizens
park.
Now
the
infrastructure
the
city
does
have
serves
the
citizens
park
property
proper.
J
At
this
point.
So
that's
part
of
the
thought
on
this,
but
I
think
the
limit
in
development
there
has
been
the
lack
of
available
infrastructure.
K
And
I
just
added-
I
put
my
name
there
just
because
I'm
close
friends
with
you
know
somebody
who
holds
10
or
12
of
those
acres
directly
across
from
the
park.
In
fact,
they
actually
own
some
land
right
here
beside
me,
so
I
mean
and
be
honest
with
you.
Actually
we
actually
have
the
group
one
time,
maybe
10
years
ago,
of
developing
something
ourselves
but
yeah.
There's
an
infrastructure
issue
there
and
it
also
you
kind
of
need
a
hotel
or
or
grocery
store
to
to
make
it
work.
K
But
I
do
think
it's
an
ideal
piece
of
property
and
I
think
it
is
something
to
look
at
about
infrastructure
to
you
know.
If
we
want
to
see
that
developed
and
as
healthy
as
citizens
park
is
as
much
use
as
it
gets.
I
think
there's
a
real
opportunity
there
that
it
wouldn't
take
a
whole
lot
to
get
it
where
someone
would
do
something
with
it.
So
I
think
it's
maybe
could
be
important.
F
And
honestly,
I've
always
wondered
why
it
hadn't
developed
until
I
understood
that
the
infrastructure
wasn't
the
water
and
sewer
infrastructure.
Wasn't
there
because
it
when
you
take
multi-family
housing
there,
that
you
sell
the
amenity
issue
right
across
the
street
from
citizens
park,
but
then
you
look
at
it
the
other
way
with
this
many
groups
that
come
in
from
out
of
town,
if
the
concession
stand
is
backed
up
or
not
functioning.
F
D
E
D
If,
if
we
think
it's
highly
developable
but
need
the
infrastructure,
then
that
maybe.
B
Does
anybody
see
that
that
potentially
the
amdc's
response
to
that
particular
recommendation-
and
maybe
others
is
not
to
do
what's
in
the
recommendation,
nearly
so
much
as
to
give
city
council
some
moral
support
in
thinking
through
where
infrastructure
needs
to
be
where
the
where
those
sorts
of
opportunities
could
arise
as
funds
become
available?
Does
that
make
sense.
F
Yeah
this
the
city's
investing
very
nicely
in
infrastructure,
but
right
now
it's
mostly
the
repair.
You
know
repair
of
things
and
this
I
we
have
city
council
members
on
the
on
the
call,
but
I
think
that
we
could
give
them
that
moral
support
and
and
help
maybe
help
at
least
give
our
recommendations
on
what
some
priorities
should
be
and
why
that
would
be
important.
K
K
Out
here
on
number
one
and
and
the
same
thing
I
mean,
I
just
think
those
are
could
be
two
priority
areas,
I'm
going
to
different
opposite
sides
of
town
now
but
again
across
from
citizens
park
and
out.
Here
are
certain
things
that
need
discussion,
that
to
give
city
council
some
direction.
I
think
I
totally
agree
with.
B
All
right
so
we're
moving
on
to
page
18
gary
explorer,
seven
enhance
west
entrance
of
aiken
with
potential
town
homes,
small
village
type
development
link,
development,
with
multimodal
paths
to
the
lessee
b
price
community
center
and
eustis
park
playground.
Everyone
agreed
that
was
a
appropriate
activity.
The
timing
was
correct
for
most
folks.
B
B
Marty,
david
and
tim
expressed
an
interest.
There
were
no
other
suggestions
for
projects
to
be
added
to
that
particular
list,
and
this
I
would
I
would
want
my.
H
I'd
like
to
add
my
name
there.
Actually,
when
I
looked
at
this,
I
was
surprised
that
my
name
wasn't
on
and
I
somehow
failed
to
click
it.
Thank
you.
F
A
D
You
know
I
I
read
over
and
I
didn't
I'm
a
little
slow,
I'm
not
sure
I
put
two
or
two
together
on
that.
So
I
may
have
been
one.
C
D
For
quick
action
but
I'd
I
take
back
my
vote.
If
I
did.
K
Again,
this
is
marty
I
mean
my
name
is
on
there,
because
I
do
see
the
importance
here,
obviously
with
the
hospital
and
development
and
wanting
to
make
things
grow.
But
I
also
think
that
I
mean
I
don't
think
aiken's
gonna
have
a
problem
with
gentrification
because
of
the
size
and
because
we
do
have
so
much
land
even
around
the
city,
but
you
know
I
do
think
it's
very
important
that,
as
we
do
some
of
this
growth
we're
also
enhancing
some
of
the
lower
income
neighborhoods,
so
that
you
know
we're
bringing
everyone
along.
K
Otherwise,
you
leave
pockets
or
pits
of
things
that
could
be
detrimental
to
what
we're
trying
to
do
and
you're.
Also.
You
know
we
just
need
to
make
sure
it
all
comes
together
as
one
so
you're
looking
at
you
know:
lower
income,
people,
middle
income,
people
and
trying
to
get
the
growth.
So
I
think
you
know
tying
all
that
back
to
leslie
price.
You
know
it
almost
seems
like
you've
got
a
different
heading,
but
I
mean
I
think
you
think
from
the
hospital
all
the
way
through
those
neighborhoods.
K
A
Question
for
buzz
and
pat
should
the
aching
corps
tag
their
name
to
this
one.
G
Redevelopment
of
the
hospital
property-
yes,
absolutely
yes,
and
I
think
our
discussions
have
basically
been
that
if
the
existing
contract
falls
through
that
this
would
be
an
ideal
acquisition
for
the
city
or
the
commission,
or
they
can
call
for
some
combination
to
redevelop
it.
The
county
has
no
interest
in
developing
it.
They
just
want
to
sell
it,
but
but
we
do.
J
And
again,
keith
makes
a
good
point
and
so
does
buzz
that
these
larger
products
projects
like
the
hotel,
potentially
the
hospital,
the
whole
vision
of
having
a
development
commission
and
development
corporation
and
city
council
is.
This-
is
a
team
sport
that
everybody
is
going
to
link
arms
and
take
the
pieces
that
they're
best
equipped
to
take
and
that
we're
going
to
work
on
these
all
as
one.
B
B
Agreed
that
this
is
appropriate,
the
one
question
about
whether
it's
a
one
question
out
of
seven
respondents
about
the
timing
of
this
somebody
thought
it
was
a
longer
term
project.
Is
it
poised
for
quick
action?
We
were
sort
of.
You
were
sort
of
split
on
that
three
to
four
is
this
activity,
one
in
which
you
have
a
special
interest
or
attraction?
We
had
four
folks
and
two
names.
C
Time
I'd
be
interested
in
that
this
is
doug
slaughter.
I
was
in
the
woods
earlier
and
I
couldn't
get
on
so
that
would
be
a
project
that
I
would
be
interested
in.
B
Thank
you
doug.
If
somebody
could
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
I
believe
this
statement
reflects
that.
The
two-page
document
that
the
amdc
gave
city
council
related
to
plutonium
settlement
money
is
that
not
right.
A
It's
connected
there
tom.
I
I
think
we
need
to
add
stewart
mcveinstein
to
this
one,
I'm
sorry
his
role
at
the
site
will
play
a
significant
role
here.
So
let's
add
stewart
to
this.
F
Yeah
this
is
this
shows
up
again,
we'll
have
some
more
discussion.
This
shows
up
in
the
catalytic
project
area
also,
and
my
assumption
is
because
it
was
on
our
list
for
settlement
funding.
It
is
a
high
priority
for
this
commission,
regardless
of
the
settlement
funding.
We
should
move
forward
with
this.
B
And
that's
where
this
came
from
is
from
the
catalytic
thing.
So
we've
gone
through
the
the
report.
Are
there
any
places
we
need
to
go
back
and
gather.
B
F
On
the
rankings,
absolutely
yeah,
absolutely
all
right
on
page
22
starts
the
the
bottom
third
rankings
and
I'm
just
really
surprised
that
housing,
two
three
and
four
fell
in
the
bottom
and
I
believe
if
they
get
packaged
together,
they'll
move
up.
B
There's
no
question,
I
think
you're
right,
but
this
is
this-
was
purely
a
numbers
driven
process
and
based
on
what
the
response
responses
for
for
the
survey
were,
and
and
if
we
go
back
and
change
the
premise
under
which
somebody
gives
it
a
ranking
by
packaging
things
together,
we
may
find
ourselves
with
a
different
set
of
priorities.
B
It's
it's
not
as
if
the
commission
can't
go
down
there
into
that
bottom
third
and
look
at
something
that
they
believe
has
more
importance
than
this
seed
of
the
pants
survey
gave
it.
This
is
just
a
place
to
start
a
conversation
and
and
and
maybe
as
we
move
forward
rather
than
begin
to
specifically
plan
particular
activities.
B
Maybe
the
first
job
is
to
say:
where
do
these
things
sort
of
group
together?
If
they're
not
exactly
the
same
thing,
do
they
fall
in
the
same
category
of
work?
Do
they
do
they
address
similar
sorts
of
issues
and
and
fine,
allow
ourselves
to
group
them
together
and
then
make
plans
for
those
groupings
that
that
would
reflect
action
actionable
items?
D
H
Well,
I'm
just
going
to
throw
my
two
cents
in
here
and
it
might
fall
on
duff
ears
and
that's
fine.
I
think
we
have,
despite
all
of
our
great
ideas
and
aspirations,
we
still
have
limited
resources
and
time
and
potential,
and
I
think
we
have
to
be
very
mindful
of
how
we
spend
that
up
as
opportunities.
H
You
know,
maybe,
as
it
came
up
just
a
moment
ago,
the
hospital
property,
or
maybe
the
hotel,
property
or
or
or
some
sort
of
other
mixed
use
piece
or
the
save
a
lot
property,
but
but
we
it's
going
to
be
awfully
difficult
to
be
all
things
to
all
people
everywhere,
all
the
time,
and
so
I
looked
at
a
lot
of
my
prioritization
as
as
almost
the
same
thing
as
as
setting
a
time
expectation
I'll
tell
you
you
know,
residential
development
has
a
longer
lead
time,
a
longer
absorption
sale
time
it
takes
longer
to
get
in
and
longer
to
get
out
and
commercial
stuff.
H
It
will
utilize
and
absorb
a
lot
more
of
the
resources
that
we
might
put
into
this
than
than
you
might
understand,
and
there
I
think,
there's
some
opportunities
that
we
all
do
hold,
maybe
a
little
more
closely
a
little
more
deer
that
we
can
move
more
quickly
on
and
we
can
complete
more
thoroughly
and
more
quickly
than
this
residential
stuff.
The
residential
development
is
a
bear,
and
so
I
prioritize
this
as
a
bottom.
A
So
tom
this
is
keith.
I
have
a
process
question
and
I
think
it's
posed
to
you
to
begin
with
and
then
based
on
your
reaction.
Maybe
the
other
members
of
the
commission
can
respond,
but
we
have
an
action
to
provide
city
council
with
kind
of
our
goals
and
objectives
initiatives
we
want
to
tackle
for
the
next
24
months,
and
this
report,
the
aecom
reporter
is
very
good.
A
Very
expensive,
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
the
commission
needs
to
raise
our
hand
and
tackle
all
of
the
initiatives
in
the
report,
plus
there's
probably
things
that
we
want
to
tackle.
We
want
to
recommend
that
are
not
in
the
report.
So
from
a
process
standpoint.
How
do
you
plan
to
get
us
to
that?
That
point
where
we
have
those
5
8
10
12
whatever
they
are?
It
says:
here's
what
we're
going
to
do
based
on
this
discussion,
what
how
do
we
rationalize?
B
Well,
in
the
best
of
all
worlds,
we
would
sit
in
a
room
together
and-
and
this
group
has
has
met
together
before
masked
and
distanced
and
that
sort
of
stuff-
and
the
reason
we're
not
doing
that
today
is
a
is
a
rational
decision
based
on
the
risk
that
the
virus
poses
to
everyone
in
our
state
and
in
the
country
right
now
it
it's
going
to
be
very
difficult
to
do
this
at
a
distance,
so
we
could
either
have
another
zoom
session.
B
Where
again,
we
try
to
do
some
work
in
advance
of
where
things
hang
together.
Whatever
there's
been
enough
discussion
about
the
the
top
middle
and
bottom
tier
rankings
and
the
opportunities
that
might
exist
for
grouping
things
together
that
it
seems
to
me
that
we
got
to
turn
our
attention
to.
B
Is
that
really
an
activity
that
the
group
wants
to
undertake
and
then
leave
it
to
me
to
to
try
to
figure
out
some
way
for
us
to
do
some
work
in
advance
and
then
come
together
like
this
again
to
interact
and
to
say
yeah
that
hangs
together
pretty
well,
and
we
can
group
it
that
way.
B
B
B
Whatever
the
time
frame
is
going
to
be,
some
of
those
would
be
jam-packed
priorities
that
have
a
variety
of
impacts
and
needs,
and
some
of
those
might
be
bullet
shot
things
that
you
know
we're
going
to
go
and
do
this
and
be
done
with
this
and
and
move
on
that
would
be
my
take
on
it,
but
I'm
open
to
any
suggestions
anybody
else
has
and-
and
you
you
may
be
going
through
all
of
this
saying
lord.
What
we
really
need
is
a
new
consultant.
B
D
E
F
And
even
and
even
as
we
move
forward,
we
might
work
on
these
goals
that
we
know
I'll
write
this
minute,
but
for
development
success.
We've
got
to
be
nimble,
also
so
that
when
opportunities
show
themselves,
we've
got
to
be
responsive
and
can't
say.
Well.
We
can't
do
that.
It's
not
on
our
list.
We
have
to
be
nimble.
We
have
to
move
forward.
D
J
So,
to
put
it
absolutely
directly
for
everybody
who's
on
the
call,
whether
you're,
a
member
of
the
commission
or
a
consultant
or
not,
does
anybody
at
this
moment
have
something
that
is
outside
of
what's
in
the
econ
plan
that
rises
to
an
important
priority
that
you
haven't
seen.
F
Well
tim,
I
would
respond
that
one
of
the
items
we
put
on
our
settlement
list
was
to
apply
the
whiskey
road
carter
study
and
turn
it
into
action,
and
so
I
think
that
that
see
that
opens
up
so
much
all
at
one
time
if
that
project
is
funded
and
gets
started,
so
it
might
not
be
anything
direct
to
the
development
commission,
but
it's
an
important
it's
a
very
important
step
in
aitkin's
future.
A
And
I
have
another-
it's
probably
on
the
lighter
side,
but
I
think
it's
equally
important
and
that's
marketing
the
city
from
an
economic
development
standpoint.
The
city's
marketing
plan
is
focused
on
tourism
and
recreation.
A
lot
of
things.
That's
in
the
aecom
report,
a
lot
of
the
initiatives
issues
we've
been
talking
about
for
months
in
my
opinion
are
not
covered.
I
think
we
can
make
some
recommendations.
A
Take
the
lead
in
in
helping
the
city
put
together
an
effective
marketing
plan
for
economic
development,
economic
diversification,
quality
of
life,
a
different
spin
than
what
the
marketing
plan
that
exists
today
and,
of
course,
all
that
kind
of
dies
down
even
deeper
into
making
some
adjustments
to
the
website.
Things
like
that.
G
B
B
Well,
I
mean
we've
already
opened
up.
Are
there
other
activities
that
were
not
contained
in
the
aecom
report?
B
I
I
would
hope
that
people
have
looked
through
the
rest
of
the
activities
in
the
in
that
section
of
the
aecom
report
to
say:
gee,
that's
really
something
that
the
commission
should
have
a
role
in
and
that
we've
added
to
our
overall
consideration
when,
before
we
start.
D
D
Did
buzz's
comment
was
on
point:
he
I
think
he
wants
us
to
discuss
about
the
equine
community
and
what
we
thinking
that
may
be
a
a
gap
there.
That's
not
in
this
plan.
I
think
that's
why
he
brought
that
up.
So
I
think
we're
in
that
phase
that
tom's
describing.
C
E
C
You
know
and
other
activities
around
that
I
think
that's
one
way
that
we
can
can
improve
the
tourism
for
a
larger
community
other
than
the
folk
who
own
horses.
I
don't
know
how
we
would
do
that,
but
we
talked
about
that.
I
think
in
our
last
meeting
and-
and
I
think
that's
a
good
idea.
F
I,
but
it
crossed
my
mind
that
the
city
already
has
an
equine
committee
and
and
that
maybe
those
recommendations
should
be
sent
to
the
equine
committee,
and
then
I
thought
broader,
a
little
bit
broader
about
that
in
the
marketing
end
of
equine
tourism
is
that
the
city's
prt
department
has
somebody
out
there
searching
for
sporting
events
and
things.
F
H
I'm
going
to
throw
in
there-
and
maybe
I'm
an
island
of
one
here,
but
I
think
we
ought
to
try
to
sharpen
our
focus.
Do
figure
out
one
or
two
or
three
things.
We
want
to
do
and
try
to
do
them
really
well
and
not
try
to
look
too
too
far
and
too
wide
for
all
the
things
we'd
love
to
do,
but
we
don't
have
the
yet
the
experience
together
or
the
resources
to
necessarily
do.
F
B
Push
back
just
just
a
minute
on
that,
I
I
don't
disagree
that
that
there
needs
to
be
a
fine
point
to
the
level
of
action.
The
question
that
we're
dealing
with
here
is
from
what
list
do
we
draw
those
priorities?
B
H
Absolutely
I
mean,
as
I
said
earlier,
every
one
of
the
things
on
this
list
is
certainly
important
and
it
has
its
place
and
it's
time
I'm
just
thinking.
First
off
we're
just
getting
started,
so
we
need
to
learn
how
we're
going
to
work
and
what
we're
going
to
work
on,
and
we
were
basically
established
by
council
and
virtually
everything
we
do
is
going
to
be
dependent
on
the
puzzle.
So
I
think
council
itself
will
give
direction
and
and
will
play
a
big
role
in
sharpening
that
focus.
H
If
they
want
us
to
focus
on
x
and
not
y,
then
we
need
to
be
focusing
on
x
and
not
y.
That's
number
two
is
to
some
degree,
at
least
when
this
conversation
was
being
had.
While
I
was
on
counseling,
it
may
have
changed
and
I'd
give
great
deference
to
to
the
current
council
members
who
are
here
on
that,
but
in
in
at
least
some
conversations,
the
establishment
of
this
organization
was
sort
of
meant
or
sort
of
envisioned
to
to
do
for
the
city.
H
What
maybe
the
edp
does
for
the
county
to
pursue
economic
development
projects
in
such
a
way
that
the
city
itself
couldn't
do
it,
because,
because
of
all
the
bureaucracy
and
and
things
that
are
associated
with
that,
I
think
those
projects
are
towards
the
city
or
to
meet
the
city's
goals
and
and
to
some
degree,
should
be
directed
and
help
selected
by
the
city.
H
I
mean
there's
a
lot
of
things,
I'd
love
to
do,
but
if
that's
not
what
leslie
and
gail
and
kay
and
ed
and
rick
and
everybody
wants
us
to
be
doing,
you
know,
then
I
need
to
pay
attention
to
them.
So
to
me,
I
think
we
need
to
know
what
we
want
to
do
with
the
contribution
or
the
direction
of
the
city
itself
and
try
to
do
those
things
and
do
them
well.
A
A
So
am
I
saying
that
we're
going
to
have
50
objectives
and
accomplish
those
in
12
to
24
months?
Absolutely
not,
but
within
those
three
priorities
I
hope
we're
going
to
have
objectives
in
each
one
of
these
areas,
because
I
think
that's
what
we
had
discussed
and
what
city
council's
expectations
are.
F
And
and
keith
to
that
point,
what
I'm
hoping
is
going
to
happen
is
that
the
development
commission
has
their
short
list
of
objectives.
The
chamber
has
a
short
list
of
objectives
that
are
different,
but
complementary.
Aikencorp
has
a
list,
that's
different
and
complementary,
and
all
these
things
come
together
to
push
aiken
farmer.
B
I
I
think
everything
we've
done
so
far
puts
us
in
a
position
to
get
to
those
several,
and
I
I
would
just
want
to
be
clear
that
that
when
we
say
two
or
three,
we
recognize
that
two
or
three
might
be
things
that
have
high
level
of
activity
in
the
near
term
with
a
relatively
near-term
payout.
B
B
This
is
hallman's
view.
I
apologize.
It's
hallman's
view
there
needs
to
be
a
comprehensive
look
at
what
needs
doing
a
a
sorting
of
where
the
best
opportunities
are
and
some
action
planning.
That
says,
even
though
I
know
this
won't
come
to
fruition
this
year,
it
might
come
or
we
might
be
able
to
start
that
rolling
next
year.
If
we
did
this
this
year,
and
it
seems
to
me
that
a
group
like
this
is
capable
of
of
holding
those
different
sorts
of
timelines
in
its
process
and
working
toward
those
goals
near
and
longer
term.
H
K
This
is
marty
and
yeah
I
mean
all.
This
has
been
good.
It's
been
good
today,
it's
getting
a
lot
better,
I'm
saying
than
I
thought
it
would,
but
I
obviously
want
to
move
fast.
Obviously
we
want
to
get
our
priorities.
I
think
we're
all
in
agreement,
but
I'm
a
little
bit.
You
know
this
january
city
council
meeting.
Obviously
we
want
to
give
them
some
direction,
but
you
know
maybe
my
brain's
a
little
slower
than
everybody
else's,
but
we
had
the
pressure
acom
to
get
this
to
us.
K
You
know
we
had
to
really
apply
the
heat
like
we.
We
might
not
use
you.
If
you
don't
do
something
quickly.
It
was
kind
of
the
way
I
understood
tim
or
whoever
had
to
put
pressure
on
them.
So
we
got
it
right
before
christmas
and
then
we've
had
the
holidays
and
now
we're
meeting
here
on
the
15th
I'll
rescue
y'all.
But
I've
also
got
you
know:
property
taxes
and
and
and
first
quarter
tax
payments
that
that
have
been
a
priority,
the
last
48
hours
for
me.
K
So
it
you
know,
I'm
just
getting
to
understand
this
program
a
little
bit
just
starting
to
wrap.
My
mind
around
and
I'm
gonna
need
more
time,
so
I
that's
just
marty
big
picture,
saying
wow
I've
had
this.
For
a
month
I've
been
able
to
look
at
it.
Maybe
twice
spent
three
or
four
hours
on
it.
The
best
I
could
given
the
timing
of
it
all.
K
So
why
is
it
so
critical
that
we
paint
ourselves
in
a
corner
between
now
and
the
first
city
council
meeting
I
mean
we
do
need
to
prioritize,
but
we
also
need
some
time
to
figure
out
what
we're
looking
at
wrong
or
what?
What
what
is
more
important
and
also
what
kind
of
what
are
people
in
agreement
with
us
on?
What
do
we
get
a
push
back
from
from
city
council?
And
what
do
we
get
hurrah
for
him.
So
that's
me
what
what
is
our
two
week
goal.
A
Well,
I
don't
want
to
jump
ahead
of
tom,
but
thinking
through
the
discussion
today,
we've
kind
of
bucketed
items
from
the
aecom
report.
I've
heard
two
additional
thoughts
outside
of
the
report.
Can
we
not
take
those
buckets
and
those
two
as
suggestions
and
put
some
overarching
themes,
statements
together?
Doesn't
that
necessarily
say
we're
going
to
accomplish
x
by
x
y
day,
but
don't
we
have
enough
to
put
some
themes
or
some
overarching
goals?
A
Maybe
that's
not
the
right
word
initiatives
on
paper
to
come
back
and
have
one
more
discussion
with
and
say:
okay,
let's
narrow
this
down,
and
it's
enough
that
we
can
at
least
provide
the
city
council
for
their
meeting
on
the
29th
for
them
to
noodle
the
the
objective
or
the
outcome
doesn't
necessarily
say
that
we're
going
to
create
x
amount
of
housing
within
the
next
12
months.
That's
too
specific,
but
I
think
we
could
have
something
that's
broad,
for
example,
in
the
housing
category.
That
says
we
want
to
look
at
x
or.
C
F
Here
all
right
I'll
add
in.
If
we're
talking
about
some
overarching
goals,
I
think
it
would
be
possible
for
tom
to
maybe
tom
and
tim,
to
take
what
they've
heard
today
narrow
it
down
and
give
the
commission
members
a
chance
to
edit
our
comment
and
then
take
take
that
and
and
massage
it
one
more
time
and
possibly
have
something
for
the
city
council
to
at
least
see
what
I
would
call
a
sense
of
the.
M
M
Hey
philip,
this
is
this
is
rick.
We
we're
having
a
planning
session
on
january
29th,
which
the
information
that's
we
were
able
to
put
together
from
this
meeting.
That,
I
think,
would
would
be
helpful
for
us
at
the
beginning
to
maybe
have
a
presentation,
even
if
it's
not
in
a
more
finished
form
like
you're
like
we're
talking
about
doing
so,
I
mean
I.
I
think
it
will
be
helpful,
also
a
lot
of
the
projects
that
we
have
and
we're
talking
about,
the
move
they
can
forward
in
this
meeting.
M
They
require
resources
and-
and
I
think
that's
something
that
that
clearly
we're
going
to
have
to
consider
as
we
enter
into
our
our
budget
process,
which
is,
which
is
what
this
new
horizon
session,
that
we're
having
is,
is
kind
of
to,
as
we
put
our
goals
goals
together
to
help
steward
and
staff
reflect
that
through
the
through
the
budgeting
process.
M
So
I
I
mean
I
guess
I
would
like
to
suggest
that,
as
we
consolidate
some
of
our
thoughts
from
this
meeting,
which
I
think,
as
tom
you've
done,
a
stellar
job,
it's
been
it's
been
about
as
productive,
productive
as
zoom
gathering
as
as
I've
as
I've
been
a
part
of.
So
I
think,
as
we
put
that
together,
I
mean
it
would
help
us
work.
M
I
guess
in
a
parallel
path
to
make
sure
that
we
can.
We
can
work
work
with
the
commission
on
on
getting
some
of
these
projects
that
we,
a
lot
of
we've
talked
about.
Others
are
a
commas
kind
of
pointed
out
and
we're
classificat
putting
the
classification
on
where
they,
where
they
fit
at,
as
we
move
towards
that
through
the
budget
process.
I
think
it'll
be
very
helpful
to
to
kind
of
have
an
outline
of
this
meeting
at
the
beginning
of
it
to
help
us
through
that
process.
I
Can
you
hear
me
I
I
go
along
with
what
mayor
says.
I
think
that
you
all
have
done
a
fantastic
job.
You
know
putting
the
deadline
on
you
in
two
weeks
and
as
has
been
expressed,
you
know
you
didn't
get
the
report
until
in
december,
so
none
of
us
could
control
that
and
it's
a
lot
to
digest
and
sift
down
and
come
up
with,
but
I
think
the
idea
of
giving
us
narrowing
it
down
somewhat
through
the
commission
and
give
us
a
sense
of
what
the
commission
is
going
towards.
I
I
won't
speak
for
city
council,
but
mr
mayor
and
I
think
my
councilwoman
price
is
on
also
that
you
know
we.
We
don't
want
to
push
you
so
fast
that
we
aren't
able
to
do
what
we
need
to
get
done,
but
getting
a
direction.
We
can
always
meet
again.
E
E
I
will
have
to
say
it
in
observing
over
the
last
six
months.
You
have
moved
at
a
quite
a
rapid
pace.
You
may
not
believe
so,
but
you
have
and
certainly
having
this
document
helps
and
I
I
believe
that
city
council
will
have
some
things
to
add
to
it
as
a
body
as
we
meet
as
a
group
the
end
of
the
month.
E
E
I
know
that
you
talked
about
one
two
three
priorities
but
but
I
I
I'm
one
having
if
I
can
use
children
raising
five
children
as
an
example,
you
can
walk,
chew,
gum
and
all
those
things
and
still
take
care
of
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
things.
But
the
important
thing
is
with
this
document
that
you
provided
to
us
in
it
with
me.
E
Is
that
you
don't
give
us
a
document,
as
I
think
tom
said,
in
the
beginning
of
our
key,
and
it
sits
on
a
shelf.
But
it
needs
to
be
constantly
monitored
and
and
watch
in
terms
of
the
pro
the
progress
and
that's
where,
as
a
mayor
has
said,
solidly,
resources
come
in
in
terms
of
ensuring
that
we
are
not
only
informing
you
of
the
of
the
of
the
of
the
process.
E
But
we
have
support
for
you
to
move
this
process
along
a
lot
to
look
forward
to.
I
think,
especially
in
the
next
quarter.
E
Well
in
terms
of
where
we
had,
but
also
as
we
discussed
the
budget
in
terms
of
how
we
can
support
your
efforts.
But
that's
what
I'm
looking
forward
to
the
end
of
the.
A
Month,
tom
and
tim,
are
you
comfortable
with
the
latest
recommendation
with
respect
to
taking
what
we've
discussed
today,
what
we've
bucketed
and
putting
it
in
a
form
where
we
can
have
another
meeting
with
the
commission
and
refine
it
perhaps
ratify
it
and
then
get
that
to
city
council.
J
Very
much
so
I
think
that,
based
on
what
we've
gotten
from
aecom
the
general
public
reaction,
what
I've
heard
from
the
commission
and
what
we've
seen
in
the
survey,
I
think
it's
actually
a
ton
of
information
to
kind
of
guide,
all
of
us
and
the
city
council.
So
so
I
think
we're
pretty
far
along
as
far
as
that.
J
There
are
a
couple
of
things
that,
as
you
noted,
keith
and
a
couple
of
things
that
we
want
to
add
to
what
we've
got,
but
we,
I
think,
we've
got
a
very
good
direction
that
has
gotten
a
very
good
public
reaction
already.
J
So
I
think
that
there
there's
no
controversy
here-
and
I
think
we
even
have
very
clearly
stated
through
our
words
today
in
our
surveys-
the
things
that
we
feel
are
kind
of
direct
responsibilities
of
the
commission
and
other
things
that
we
endorse
as
important
things
that
we'd,
like
others,
to
help
us
take
care
of.
So
I
think
yes,
the
the
long
answer
to
your
short
question
is:
yes,
I
feel
comfortable
with
what
we
have.
L
And
mr
chairman,
if
I
can
add
this
has
been
helpful,
I
think
for
for
staff,
I
mean
we
look
forward
to
kind
of
getting
this
narrowed
down
some.
L
Mr
me,
mr
meadows
shared
with
me
some
three
brief
comments
on,
for
that
were
shared
on
the
youtube
live
stream,
so
I
I
feel,
like
it'd,
be
important
just
to
read
them
into
the
record,
since
someone
did
take
the
time.
All
three
comments
were
from
donna
westby
and
briefly
there
they
are
so
we're
gonna
just
have
those
as
part
of
our
record,
since
those
are,
I
guess
in
our
electronic
meeting
today,
public
comments.
So
thank
you,
mr
meadows,
for
reducing
that
to
writing.
J
And,
and
on
that
last
comment,
gary
meadows
on
the
first
page
of
our
agenda
packet,
the
mission
statement
that
we
put
together
for
this
event,
if
you
wanted
to
just
share
that
in
answer
to
that
public
question,.
B
Mr
chairman,
I'm
I'd
just
like
to
speak.
I
I'm
comfortable
working
with
tim
and
and
trying
to
draw
some
conclusions
from
this.
B
It
would
be
very
important
to
me
to
be
able
to
share
that
back
with
you
and
maybe
whoever
some
smaller
group
of
commissioners
so
that
we
don't
come
back
to
the
entire
commission
with
something
that
doesn't
meet
the
expectations
and
we
waste
the
next
meeting.
So
I
in
in
my
druthers
list,
I'd
rather
tim
and
I
work
to
craft
something
that
we
think
addresses
what
we've
been
charged
with,
but
that
we
have
the
opportunity
to
share
it
with
some
small
group
of
commissioners.
B
You
can
choose,
you
can
get
volunteers,
I
don't
care,
I
don't
think
it
needs
to
be
more
than
three
or
so,
but
I
I
would
rather
have
some
test
from
where
the
rubber
meets
the
road
rather
than
bring
back
a
a
effectively
a
staff-produced
document
to
the
entire
group.
A
It
does
tom
and
I'll
go
ahead
and
speak
to
the
commissioners
if
you've
got
interest
in
being
a
part
of
that
smaller
group,
please
email
or
call
me
later
today
and
if
I
do
not
hear
from
anyone
I'll
appoint
the
elected
official
elected
officers,
I
should
say
to
that
task.
F
Everybody
said
yep,
that's
good
and
then
nothing
happens
and
the
only
way
that
you
can
cause
these
plans
to
really
happen
is
to
have
accountability
and
you've
got
to
have
somebody
wake
up
every
morning
and
say
what
is
moving
forward
with
the
city
of
aitkin's
strategic
plan
as
economic
development
plan.
And
if
you
don't,
it
will
fail.
If
you
don't
a
year
from
now,
you'll,
look
back
and
and
nobody's
kind
of
kicked
into
gear.
F
So
what
I've
suggested
is
that
a
this,
a
project
manager
be
identified
and
this
project
manager
stuart,
I'm
putting
it
off
on
you,
but
it
could
be
a
city
council
recommendation
that
you
either
designate
someone
on
your
staff
to
be
a
project
manager
or
that
you
contract
with
someone
to
be
a
project
manager.
F
F
We
can
see
if
we've
got
a
roadblock,
suppose
suppose
an
organization
is
taking
on
the
royal
champion
and
because
they
have
not
moved
their
project
forward.
It's
impeding
the
progress
of
another
project
so
that
I
think
that
that
that
meeting
with
a
group,
the
group
of
champions
on
a
regular
basis
is
important,
and
then
I
further
suggest
that
we
produce
a
written
report
to
the
city
council
each
january.
F
So
that's
a
plan
that
I
would
like
to
see
go
to
the
to
the
city
council's
planning
meeting
and
make
sure
this
position
is
either
funded,
created
or
understood
and
and
get
some
decision
about
whether
the
city's
willing
to
do
this
or
not.
But
the
city
owns
this
plan
and
that's
why
I'm
pushing
it
back
on
them.
D
Can
I
add
something
to
what
david
said
this
chris
and
leslie
will
remember
this,
because
she
was
on
council
time
to
me
one
of
the
best
one
of
the
best
strategic
plan
process
and
results
was
in
92
or
304.
Whenever
the
city
steve
thompson
was
here,
and
the
city
really
drove
the
accountability,
that's
my
recollection,
lessee
and,
and
what
came
out
of
that
was
the
chamber
building
was
moved.
The
arts
center
for
the
arts
was
done.
The
public
education
partners
came
out
of
it.
A
lot
of
the.
D
E
D
E
D
E
But
we
had
that
during
that
era
we
had
issues
with
our
schools
needed
to
have
capital
to
move
some
things
forward,
and
that
was,
I
said
business.
The
chamber
was
heavily
involved.
It
was.
It
was
at
the
forefront
in
terms
of
helping
to
advance
that
that
whole
plan
that
strategy,
along
with
business.
D
Really
key,
but
you
know
it
all
came
together
with
it
was
somebody
from
the
city
that
would
organize
us
call
the
meetings,
keep
the
list.
Products
push
us
and
everything
else,
and
and
and
that'll
be
the
difference
between
this
being
the
the
stuff
gathering
dust.
As
keith
said,
it
is
at
the
outset,
or
actually
making
some
meaningful
progress.
A
A
Why
don't
we?
We
take
david's
recommendation,
let
everybody
noodle
on
this,
and
then
this
can
be
a
part
of
what
we
formally
recommend
to
city
council
at
the
end
of
the
month.
But
let's
give
it
some
time
for
someone
to
think
about
it,
maybe
massage
it
and
we
can
reconsider
it,
tweak
it
and
if
not,
it
can
go,
as
is
as
a
formal
recommendation
on
the
29th
david.
Does
that
work.
K
A
Well,
thanks
to
tom
everybody,
tom
really
has
been
working
hard
to
prepare
for
today.
A
Up
until
I
guess
it
was
monday,
he
had
everything
lined
up
for
us
to
have
a
five-hour
session
face-to-face
and,
as
we've
said
many
times,
we
knew
that
we
would
be
more
productive
if
we
were
going
to
meet
together,
but
we
just
didn't
think
we
needed
to
do
that
with
respect
to
covet.
So
thanks
tom,
I
appreciate
that
I
know
there's
been
some
long
evenings
and
probably
a
little
different
schedule
than
you're
used
to,
but
no,
I
don't
think
you're
done.
We
want
to
continue
to
seek
your
guidance
and
your
help
and
your
wisdom.
A
So
we
appreciate
that
before
we
close
out.
Is
there
anything
else
that
needs
to
be
said
for
the
good
of
the
commission
or
the
good
of
the
city
by
anyone?
K
A
Okay,
unless
there's
something
else,
we're
going
to
adjourn
for
the
day
thanks,
everybody.