►
From YouTube: Athens Board of Zoning Appeals - May 10, 2022
Description
Athens Board of Zoning Appeals - May 10, 2022
A
A
The
board
consists
of
five
members
and
two
alternates,
the
alternates
taking
full
part
in
the
discussion
and
becoming
a
voting
member
in
the
absence
of
a
member
or
when
a
member
of
states
for
conflict
of
interest
present
tonight,
our
members,
joe
kraus,
kelly,
sauber
and
kay
towsley,
and
alternate
aaron
thomas,
who
will
be
a
voting
member
tonight
I
am
lisa
carson.
The
chair
also
present
is
zoning
administrator,
mr
david
riggs.
A
The
athens
board
of
zoning
appeals
operates
according
to
the
following
procedure.
The
chair
will
name
and
describe
the
case.
The
zoning
administrator
or
secretary
will
state
the
basis
of
the
objection
and
any
applicable
facts
or
conditions
pertaining
to
the
case.
The
appellant
or
their
representative
will
give
reason
why
the
appeal
should
be
viewed
favorably.
A
A
According
to
athens
city
code,
section
23.07,
0.03
b,
the
board
has
power
to
grant
variances
from
the
strict
application
of
the
code,
provided
the
variance
will
not
be
contrary
to
the
public
interest.
The
spirit
of
the
code
is
observed,
public
safety
and
welfare
are
secured
and
substantial
justice
is
done.
A
A
literal
enforcement
of
these
regulations
will
result
in
practical
difficulty
or
undue
hardship
that
is
unnecessary
to
the
achievement
of
public
purposes.
Preservation
of
equal
property
rights.
Literal
interpretation
of
these
regulations
would
deprive
the
opponent
of
rights
commonly
enjoyed
by
others
in
the
same
zone
and
the
same
vicinity.
A
Any
person,
resident
or
officer
department
or
appointed
body
of
the
city
of
athens,
agreed
by
a
decision
of
the
board,
may
petition
the
athens
county
court
of
common
pleas
concerning
the
illegality
of
the
decision.
Such
petition
must
be
filed
within
30
days
after
the
mailing
of
the
decision
of
the
board
to
the
applicant.
A
Thank
you
one
case
on
tonight's
agenda.
The
property
at
271
east
state
street.
The
board
is
required
to
take
testimony
under
oath.
Would
anyone
wishing
to
speak
concerning
any
item
on
the
agenda?
Please
stand:
do
you
swear
or
affirm
that
any
testimony
you
will
present
to
the
board
will
be
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth.
Thank
you
all
right.
A
So
this
in
this
case,
271
east
state
street
appellant,
is
requesting
a
variance
from
athens
city
code
230310
to
use
the
second
principal
dwelling
for
rental,
short-term
rental
purposes,
where
only
one
principal
dwelling
is
permitted.
So,
as
I
understand
it,
there's
a
variance
request
for
the
sec
for
the
extra
dwelling
and
also
for
short-term
rental
permission.
B
Yeah
so
the
appellant
submitted
a
short-term
rental
permit
application
to
our
office
and
we
denied
it
because
they
actually
have
two
primary
structures
on
this
property,
and
the
second
principal
dwelling
will
need
a
variance
if,
if,
if
you
approve
that
variance,
then
we've
got
these
are
new
code
changes
for
us,
so
we're
trying
to
we're
trying
to
muddle
through
it
as
well.
But
if
you,
if
you
approve
two
principal
structures
or
two
primary
structures
on
that
lot,
are
they
both
still
resident
owners
or
is
one
of
them
a
non-resident
owner?
B
B
So
first
thing
you
have
to
do
is
decide
whether
you're
going
to
approve
the
variance,
and
if
you
do
then,
if
we
could
tackle
the
second
question
which
is,
do
they
need
a
conditional
use
for
this,
or
are
these
if
they're
living
in
one
house
and
renting
out
the
other?
Are
they?
Is
it
still
an
owner-occupied
structure.
C
B
B
Yeah
at
the
first,
it
passed
the
first
of
the
year
okay,
but
we
haven't
seen
a
lot
of
these
requests
come
in.
I
did
send
a
letter
out
to
eight
different,
short-term
rental
people
that
are
advertising
for
short-term
rentals
to
remind
them
that
they
do
need
to
have
a
permit
so
we'll
we'll
slowly
get
some
of
these
will
come
in,
and
this
is
this
is
kind
of
the
first
one
we've
seen
that
has
to
actually
has
to
come
to
the
board
of
zoning
appeals.
B
30
days
or
less
is
a
short-term
rental.
I
think
that's
the
way
our
code
defines
it.
So,
if
you're,
if
you're
renting
for
a
period
of
less
than
30
days,
that's
considered
a
short-term
rental.
Okay,.
D
So
it's
airbnbs
and
the
such
and
that's
what
you
folks
might
be
interested.
Okay,
yeah
all
right.
A
I'm
really
confused
by
this
so
you're
splitting
this
variance
request
into
two
parts.
Basically
I
mean:
how
is
it
a
second
principle
dwelling
they
already,
I
mean
they've
had
those
dwellings
there.
So
this
is
because
it's
a
change
of
owner.
A
E
B
Is
the
it's
the
wording
that
people
use
they're?
We
we
try
to
call
them
short-term
rentals
to
not
confuse
all
of
that
right.
B
A
So
this
might
not
be
relevant
at
all,
but
what
if
they
had
wanted
to
do
long-term,
regular
rental.
D
B
Yeah,
the
new
code,
yeah
we've
got
a
new,
a
new
code
that
started
the
first
of
the
year.
Short-Term
rentals
are
permitted
in
every.
I
think.
Almost
every
zone
not
open
space,
of
course,
but
they
they
did
restrict
those
for
our
for
residential
zones,
so
r1
and
r2
zones.
They
want
them
to
be
owner
occupied
where
you
could
be
in
a
b2
or
b3
and
be
non
owner-occupied.
Short-Term,
rentals
gotcha.
The
restrictions
they
have
here
is
that
for
and
I'll
read
it
for
you
conditionally
permitted
uses.
B
This
is
acc
230401c.
B
The
new
code
says
short-term
rentals,
non-resident
owners,
short-term
rentals,
keeping
not
more
than
three
adult
renters,
plus
related
children
by
a
non-resident
owner
for
periods
of
less
than
30
days
on
r1
lots
that
abut
an
r2
r3
any
b
zone,
or
that
the
principal
home
fronts
on
east
state
street
carpenter,
street,
lancaster
street
or
columbus
road.
So
these
are
the
conditional
conditionally
approved
short-term
rental
uses
in
an
r1
zone,
and
this
falls
in
that
case.
B
D
So
the
code
does
say
state
that
that
specific
location
which
they
happen
to
be
in
is
acceptable
upon
conditional
use
with
it
has
to.
E
A
Okay,
yeah,
but.
A
Right,
yeah,
you're
right.
I
wasn't
here
for
that
one,
but
yeah
we
did
do
the
one
on
that
corner
so
yeah.
I
guess
I'm
only
really
confused,
because
you
told
me
that
we
have
to
divide
this
in
two,
but
it
isn't
really
divided
into.
Is
it
it.
B
Depends
on,
if
you
consider
both
structures
to
be
owner,
occupied
or.
B
Resident
are
both
structures
resident
owners
because
they're
gonna
be
renting
one
and
living
in
the
other
one
yeah.
It's.
C
D
A
D
F
F
E
G
My
name
is
emily
hunkler
and
I
live
at
271
east
state
street.
Okay,
please
tell
us
whatever
you
want
to
tell
us
yeah,
so
it
is
a
little
confusing
because.
A
A
G
Do
have
a
couple
of
things
that
I
don't
think
were
necessarily
included
and
what
you
may
have.
But
if
I
may
bring
those.
A
D
G
G
Unfortunately,
as
discussed
previously,
none
of
the
previous
owners
went
through
the
steps
of
being
fully
compliant
once
those
codes
came
in
and
requesting
the
correct
permits,
then,
but
it
has
been
lived
in
for
many
many
years
when
we,
as
recently
as
last
year
when
we
bought
the
house,
there
was
a
tenant
living
in
there,
but.
G
The
house
primary
residence-
yes,
the
rental
part
that
house
had
a
rental
permit,
which
we
let
expire
in
february.
I
believe
it
was
okay,
because
we
knew
we
wanted
to
change
it
once
we
knew
the
short-term
rentals
were
coming
through
and
we
knew
we
wanted
to
change
it.
To
that
exceptional
circumstances.
G
G
Preservation
of
equal
property
rights,
so
we
have
neighbors
touching
our
property,
who
have
at
least
two
primary
structures
on
their
property
with
rental
permits,
and
I
included
those
records
in
the
original
appeal:
that's
57
elmwood,
which
is
57
57
and
a
half
57a
57b,
all
on
one
property
and
then
there's
61
and
61,
and
a
half
elmwood
place
and
both
of
those
have
those
accessory
structures.
Touching
our
our
property
line,
the.
G
G
And
it's
two
also,
it
looks
like
yeah.
I
did
reach
out
to
those
owners
to
get
this,
but
it's
a
whole
conglomerate.
It
seems
like,
and
it
was
hard
to
get
in
touch
with
someone
other
than
their
secretaries.
So
I
have
to
try
that
there's
also
the
case
of
three
sunnyside,
which
I
believe
was
included
in
there,
which
was
as
recent
as
2020
and
that's
where
the
appellant
was
granted
an
appeal
for
two
primary
structures
on
one
property
there
which
that
was
granted.
G
It's
also
the
case,
given
our
location
on
east
state
street,
we're
surrounded
by
mixed-use
properties,
tons
of
businesses,
multiple
dwelling
units,
those
sorts
of
things
which
I
think
is
probably
part
of
the
reason
why
they
include
that
in
part
of
the
short-term
rental
code.
I
guess
minimum
variance.
This
variance
request
is
very
minor.
I'm
simply
attempting
to
correct
what
previous
owners
failed
to
do
and
that
is
to
obtain
the
necessary
permits
that
the
building
needs
in
order
to
be
in
compliance
absence
of
detriment.
G
So
no
other
property
is
going
to
be
impacted
whatsoever.
With
this
appeal
effectively
nothing's
changing
the
building
and
its
use
were
established.
Many
years
ago,
without
any
detrimental
impact
on
the
neighborhood
for
general
public
and
I've
included
the
letters
of
support
there
as
well
and
not
of
a
general
nature.
So
this
request
applies
to
a
pre-code
structure
with
an
intended
use
that
was
established
prior
to
the
existing
code.
C
I
do
have
a
question:
do
you
prefer
the
short-term
rental
idea
versus
a
long-term
rental?
We.
G
Do
because
we're
fit.
We
have
two
young
girls.
I
just
came
from
soccer
practice
soccer
game,
so
we're
living
in
that
main
house,
so
really
we're
just
looking
to
like
for
ou
weekends,
rent
it
out
to
parents,
two
people
we're
not
trying
to
have
someone
live
there
full
time
we
use
the
backyard
so
yeah,
just
occasional
kind
of
things.
A
Any
other
questions
I
do
nope,
so
I
think
you
could
go
ahead
and
sit
down.
I
think
I'm
going
to
read
out
the
letter
or
the
emails
in
support.
Ordinarily,
we
would
call
on
people
to
speak
in
support
in
general
comment
or
in
opposition,
but
there's
no
one
here,
but
you
so.
I
will
read
out
the
letters
or
sorry
emails.
A
There
are
four
of
those,
the
first
to
whom
this
may
concern.
We,
the
owners
of
273
east
state
street,
do
not
have
any
problem
with
the
owners
of
271
renting
out
their
guest
cottage
and
that's
pandy
and
david
riser.
A
The
second
one
is
hi
emily
isa
and
I
are
supporting
you
to
get
a
permit
to
rent
your
guest
house
on
your
property.
Good
luck
with
your
permission,
that's
bilal
berkmez
and
then
his
partner
also
wrote
separately.
So
that's
the
third
letter
that
is
from
isis
sapmas
saying
that
the
two
of
them
support
the
variance
request
and
the
fourth
is
from
suzanne
boyd,
a
neighbor.
She
says
to
whom
it
may
concern.
A
A
So
why
don't
we
go
ahead
then,
and
are
you
all
ready
to
discuss
and
vote.
B
F
A
Right
yeah,
that
makes
sense,
okay,
permission
to
use
all
right,
so
we
have
to
determine
we're
gonna.
Someone
will
make
a
motion
and
someone
will
second
it,
and
then
we
will
discuss
the
question
of
whether
they
are
resident
owners
of
both
structures
right
or
how
we
want
to
interpret
that
and
then,
whether
or
not
we
want
to
grant
conditional
approval
according
to
the
current
code,
for
them
to
do
a
short-term
rental
in
that
part
of
state
street
east
state
street
emotion,.
A
Thank
you
guys
shall
we
start
by
sort
of
dealing
with
this
resident
owner
issue?
I
think
it's.
C
D
A
A
D
G
D
G
A
A
I
found
her
arguments
very
good
yeah.
Do
you
have
comments
on
the
question
of
practical
difficulty?
They've
already
had
this
in
the
past.
E
A
E
It's
not
her
fault
that
the
previous
owner
led
the
rental
permit
lapse
or
never.
A
A
A
A
They're
just
trying
to
return
to
what
right
was
there?
Yes,
absence
of
detriment?
Well,
we
only
have
letters
of
support
and
not
of
a
general
nature.
C
A
Okay,
all
those
wishing
to
grant
the
variance.
Please
raise
your
right
hand,
all
right.
Okay,
got
the
variance,
and
now
what
do
we
have
to
do?
We
have
to.
B
Be
right
so
now
that
you
have
that
variance
for
the
property
they'd
also
like
to
use
it
as
a
short-term
rental.
That
is
a
conditional
use
that
has
to
be
approved
because
of
the
location
because
of
the
location,
because
it's
in
an
r1
zone
it
becomes
conditional
use
in
this
area.
So
not
any
not
everywhere
in
an
r1
zone
is
a
conditional
use,
but,
but
here
it
specifically
is
and-
and
the
board
needs
to
to
vote
on,
the
board
of
zoning
appeals
needs
to
vote
on
that
affirmative.
To
allow
a
short-term
rental.
Do
you.
D
Have
to
do
it
this
way,
but
so
allowing
short-term
rentals
in
athens,
but,
of
course,
in
what
zones
now
what
what
where
they
don't
need
to
go
through
the
variance
aspect.
B
Yeah,
if
you're,
if
that's
owner-occupied,
and
that's
really
the
that's
really
what
we're
really
the
question
we're
asking
here:
is
this
owner
occupied
or
not
because
now
you
have
two
structures
owned
by
one
person
on
one
lot:
they're
going
to
rent
out
one
of
those
structures
as
a
as
a
rental
or
short-term
rental.
The
question
really
is:
is
that
owner-occupied
or
not
owner-occupied.
B
Then
it's
not
a
conditional
use
if
you,
if
that's
the,
if
that's
the
decision,
that
the
board
wants
to
make
that
that
if
you
have
two
structures
they're,
both
owner
occupied,
if
you
live
in
one
of
them,
they're
both
owner
occupied
and
that
might
be
more.
The
tone
that
was
the
purpose
of
people
wanting
to
be
on
the
site.
B
F
F
E
B
B
D
So
to
carry
on
with
with
his
take
on
that,
if
the
house
were
to
sell
and
the
property
were
to
sell-
and
it
was
never
owner
occupied-
would
that
affect
the
next
owner's
ability
to
rent
the
main
house
and
rent
the
back
house.
E
B
This
all
this
applies
to
short-term
rentals
that
are
either
that
are
owner.
Occup
that
are
owner-occupied
would
be
permitted
here.
If
you
consider
both
of
these
houses,
if
they
you
live
in
one
and
rent,
the
other
one
out,
if
you
consider
both
of
them
to
be
owner
occupied,
you
don't
need
a
special
or
a
conditional
use.
You
don't
need
to
vote
on
a
conditional
use.
If
you
consider
those
to
be
two
different
structures,
then
you'll
have
to
approve
a
conditional
use.
B
If
nobody's
living
there,
then
a
short-term
rental
would
not
be
permitted.
I
see
in
either
one
of
these
houses
if
the
owner's
not
living
there,
but
because
yeah.
B
A
F
A
E
E
A
C
G
Yeah,
the
conditional
use
is
for
a
non-owner-occupied,
short-term
rental.
C
G
D
D
A
A
So
if
we
vote
that
as
a
conditional
use,
then
we
do
an
end
run
around
the
owner
occupy
we
yeah.
So
I
suggest
that
we
do
that.
Then
I
I
got
all
excited
about
going
home.
A
A
F
A
We
should
proceed
with
that
and
you
too
all
right.
So,
let's
who
wants
to
wait
now
what
we
do
do
we
have
to
make
a
motion.
C
D
G
A
E
A
F
A
F
D
A
A
Okay,
so
the
minutes
from
the
12th,
the
12th,
so
we've
looked
at
those
everyone's
got
a
chance
to
look
at
them.
Did
someone.
F
A
B
A
A
A
Well,
there
always
it
would
be
good
to
have
a
waiting,
so
so
a
motion
to
approve
the
minutes
as
amended
because
they
were
met
before
you
saw
them.
So
why
do
I
say.
E
A
A
D
B
E
So,
with
kelly
having
a
thing
at
the
last
one
yeah
is
there
ever
a
conflict
of
interest.
Somebody
voting
on
the
minutes
that
affected
their
personal
requests.
B
D
E
Know
being
the
son
of
a
real
estate
attorney,
I've
said
this
millions
of
times
the
biggest
thing
he
always
taught
me
was
liability.
You
just
gotta
limit.
My
dad
always
told
me.
I
was
a
little
equation.
You
limit
what
you
say
in
a
public
capacity,
because
it
could
be
used
against
you
right
and
so
that's
all.
I
was
thinking
with
that's
valid
kelly's
thing,
not
kelly,
but
then
somebody
coming
back
towards
us
yeah,
giving
preferential
treatment,
yeah
type
of
thing
right.
That's
interesting!.
B
Yeah,
I
I
I
to
me
it
doesn't
sound
like
that,
would
be
no
because
we
approved
it.
It's
the
men.