►
From YouTube: Athens City Planning Commission Meeting 10-01-08
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
If
you
remember
this,
we
amended
the
resolution
of
308
to
be
2d
zone,
also
that
during
public
hearing
some
of
the
discussions
got
to
be
next
to
the
enforcement
of
the
noise
ordinance
and
that
data,
rather
than
outside
operations.
Okay
I
requested
captain
file
to
be
here
to
answer
any
questions
on
how
enforcement
works
or
doesn't
work
in
that
sense,
I.
That
was
that
request
of
Planning
Commission
member
it
niklas.
But
since
he's
not
here,
anybody
else
has
a
question.
B
A
C
B
B
B
B
Chief
may
I
did
put
together
for
and
with
Captain
fire
put
together
proposal,
some
of
the
draft
ordinance,
but
really
we're
at
this
point
discussing
the
one
that
was
put
forward,
the
18th,
or
rather
5-yard
the
r300
age,
and
specifically,
that
basically
was
saying
eating
drinking
a
staff,
entertainment
staff
and
principal
buildings
residing
in
a
B
to
D,
which
is
what
we
amended
of
time
as
identified
by
Aston
city
code
and
business,
conducting
outside
operation
Celsius
outside
operations
at
12
a.m.
on
Friday
and
Saturday,
and
10:00
p.m.
B
A
Has
you
know
they
come
in
and
then
and
the
police
do
find
that
it's
that
they're
operating
after
10
there
was
concern
about
you
know
when
the
operation,
how
the
police
would
be
able
to
enforce
it
if
they
didn't
close
down
at
10:00,
and
that
there
was
this
concern
that
four
hundred
people
would
be
put
on
the
street.
That's
what
several
other
businesses
asked
about.
Is
there
a
concern?
I,
don't.
C
My
guess
is,
is
that
the
people
that
if
we
shut
down
an
outdoor
area
based
on
whatever
ordinance,
was
passed
that
would
probably
go
to
another
location
or
just
go
inside
the
business,
so
I
would
not
be
concerned,
but
we
wouldn't
directly
approach
anybody
in
that
area.
We
would
approach
more
management,
business
management,
restaurant
management,
that
kind
of
thing
and-
and
you
know
you
get
their
cooperation
and
but
but
my
guess
is,
is
if
you
had
some
kind
of
ordinance
like
that,
they
probably
would
be
violated
that
that
often
because
it's
their.
A
A
A
But
I
think
that
something
to
open,
like
the
general
discussion
about
this
ordinance,
is
that
I
think
that
it
was
pretty
plainly
put
forward
by
the
public
hearing.
Is
that
it's
a
very
large
hammer
for
a
very
small
nail
and
that
it
would
affect
a
lot
of
businesses
that
are
being
good
corporate
business?
You
know
citizens
in
the
city
of
Athens
and
I,
think
you
know
Chris
Pyle
who
owns
donkey
I,
think
he
put
it
pretty
succinctly.
A
You
know
that
it
would
hurt
a
lot
of
businesses,
because
one
or
two
businesses
in
town
are
seen
as
causing
problems,
and
so
I
think
in
that.
In
that
terms
that
it's
an
overly
broad
like
what
you
said
earlier,
it's
an
overly
broad
coordinates.
Okay,
there
were
several
things
that
were
brought
up
legalize
and
I.
A
If
you
could
answer
this
either
the
question
of
the
city's
ability
to
overrule
a
state
statute,
meaning
several
of
the
bar
owners
say
they
have
a
license
to
sell
alcohol.
That
means,
including
on
courtyards
in
courtyards
or
in
patios
that
says
that
they
can
sell
alcohol
until
2:00
p.m.
2:00
a.m.
and
that
is
an
issue
that
birds
that.
D
B
A
B
D
D
E
Oh
well,
I'm
we
did
have
this
meeting.
There
was
some
concern
that
I
heard
from
the
police
department
regarding
localizing
enforcement
and
I.
Don't
know
if
you
want
to
speak
to
that
or
not
meaning.
Well,.
C
Option
when,
when
this
kind
of
situation
pops
up-
you
know,
people
say,
let's
develop
the
police
department
and
talk
about
noise,
the
and
and
even
the
ordinance
was
was
amended
to
try
to
to
allow
for
us
to
take
some
enforcement
action,
but
it
it's
just
so
an
area
of
decibel
readings.
It's
just
a
little
too
specific
in
some
areas
and
not
specific
enough
and
others.
C
So
if
we
proposed
this
order
to
try
to
close
these
loopholes
and
then
this
ordinance
will
be
applied
to
every
business,
restaurant
bar
whatever
and
probably
could
even
some
organizations
like
fraternities
or
things
like
that
that
have
outdoor
operations
it
can
be
applied
to
all
of
them,
and
then
we
can
do
that
uniformly
and
fairly
and
equitably.
So
we
don't
run
into
this
ethical
issue
of
just
singling
out
a
particular
zone
or
business
or
organization.
So
that's.
B
Just
to
reiterate
this
is
nothing
nothing.
We're
gonna
work
on
it's
up
to
Council
now
to
look
at
this
ordinance.
Alto
is
it's
a
Debbie
Walker
to
give
to
the
members
of
council
for
the
next
committee
meeting,
and
the
discussion,
of
course,
is
that
any
type
of
enforcement
of
this
nature
his
complaint
based
primarily
well.
C
That
we
actually
put
that
right
in
the
ordinance
that
that
that
that
they're
they're,
basically
two
tests
that
have
to
be
passed
for
there
to
be
a
prima
facie
violation
of
this
section
of
the
North
ordinance
as
it
would
be
amended,
would
be
that
they're
one.
The
the
digital
reading
on
whatever
device
we
used
to
measure
was
never
the
threshold,
including
ambient
noise
and
and
the
noise
was
cumulative
in
nature,
not
a
single
person
but
but
cumulative.
You
know
if
there
are
forty
people
in
an
outdoor
area
or
operation.
C
So
I
think
those
two
things
together
bolster
the
case
that
that
whatever
enforcement
action
has
taken
is
necessary
because
there
are
numerous
businesses
in
town
that
have
outdoor
operations
and
new
ones
coming
on
the
horizon
that
we,
they
just
simply
won't
be
a
problem
or
we
won't
get
complaints
on,
but
they
all
have
the
potential
to
to
be
complained
about
from
one
time
or
another
situation
dependent.
So
you
know
doing
a
trying
to
approach
it
in
this
manner,
makes
it
uniform
and
I
think
we
could.
We
could
solve
some
problems
like
that.
B
A
E
A
A
A
D
A
The
resolution
ro
308
and
we
will
put
forward
to
the
council
that
we
have
declined
it
plus
we
will
put
forward
and
and
with
the
help
of
the
Athens
Police
Department,
put
something
for
it
that
hopefully
will
answer
the
citizens
question
about.
You
know
noise
and
also
the
businesses
concern
about
their
business
operations
and
I
think
that
that
is
a
really
it
that's
the
way
it
should
work.
D
B
A
A
F
Want
to
build
a
office
building
on
Columbus
Road
on
the
property
toward
town
from
the
present
Holzer
building.
It
would
be
a
one-story
building
on
speculation.
I
do
not
have
a
tenant
lined
up
at
the
present
time.
The
building
would
be
very
similar
to
the
three
buildings
I
built
right
across
the
street
in
the
last
10
years.
A
G
G
G
F
B
E
E
A
B
F
D
B
D
A
G
A
H
H
H
So
we
went
into
another
period
of
research
and
discovery,
ultimately
culminating
with
the
plan
which
you
have
in
your
packet,
which
was
six
six
attached
residential
units
in
a
condominium
structure
and
that's
the
rendering
that's.
We
have
a
rendering
of
that
building
in
there.
That's
this
one
right
here,
but
that's
correct.
Okay,
that's
correct
and
you've
got
the
site
plan.
That's
the.
H
B
H
Could
leave
this
afternoon
and
begin
construction
on
that?
According
to
our
information
mm-hmm
we
have
constantly
and
and
and
I
thought
whether
this
is
good
or
a
bad
thing,
but
historically
maybe
it's
old
age
I'm,
not
sure,
but
we
discuss
our
development
agenda
ongoing
with
everything
we've
done,
and
those
of
you
that
had
experience
with
anything.
H
H
Probably
the
most
significant
two
points
of
change
are
that
we
want
to
move
forward
with
keeping
the
existing
commercial
structure,
recycling
that
and
retrofitting
that
into
a
residence
as
opposed
to
removing
that
as
well
as
there's
a
double
garage
sits
on
that
property.
We
would
be.
You
know,
removing
those
two
existing
buildings
which
we
think
we
can
recycle
and
reuse
and
turn
that
commercial
into
into
a
nice
residence
then
take
what
originally
was
going
to
be
six
attached
resonances
in
one
significant
structure
and
a
significant
excavation
and
downsize
to
five
single-family
detached
units
which.
H
Gives
us
the
same
number
of
residential
structures
that
we
had
an
existing
approval
for,
and
these
are
in
our
mind,
the
reason,
our
collective
minds,
the
reason
for
that
request.
We
think
and
again
it's
a
response
to
some
extent
to
what
we
think
makes
sense,
based
on
the
location
on
the
east
side
of
Athens
current
economic
realities.
H
You
know
that
exist
in
the
housing
market
as
far
as
as
needs,
we
think
that's
more
efficient
use
of
this
entire
parcel
of
land,
specifically
using
an
existing
structure
as
opposed
to
removing
it.
We
think
that
this
single-family
housing
concept
really
is
a
little
bit
more
in
step
and
in
feel
with
the
location
of
the
property
on
the
east
side
and
moving
towards
the
north
side
there.
So
the
feel
of
the
final
development
would
be
in
keeping
with
the
neighborhood
that
exists
again.
I've
mentioned
this.
H
H
We
are
not
anticipating
nor
do
to
do
any
type
of
lot
split
there,
because
it
would
be
impossible
based
on
the
ingress
and
egress
issues.
You
can
see
from
that
that
map
you
know,
there's
a
relatively
interesting
ingress,
egress
issue
there
with
a
large
loop
that
you
know
has
been
a
big
part
of
determining
you
know
what
is
a
reality
in
there
and
candidly
that
had
a
great
deal
to
do
with
moving
away
from
the
original
24
unit
property.
We
could
get
it
on
there
it
fit.
H
H
This
is
a
spot
where
you
can
really
do
something
like
that.
You
know
people
can
walk
to
work,
walk
to
town.
We
have
an
opportunity
to
take
advantage
of
that
here,
which
is
rarely
the
case.
So
we
want
to.
We
want
to
do
that
and
we've
limited
again,
we've
designed
and
and
we'll
share
that
with
you
shortly
promoted
a
structure
which
de-emphasizes
vehicles
and
sort
of
emphasizes
living
space.
H
And
then
you
know
we
we
have
an
opportunity
by
making
this
change
to
create
a
more
affordable,
single-family
residential
choice,
I
hate
to
keep
driving
on
the
point
at
a
price
point
during
a
time
of
economic
duress,
but
hey.
If
anybody
watches
Larry
King,
they
know
that's
happening
and
we
think
we
could
reduce
reduce
our
price
point
to
buyers
by
as
much
as
1/3
by
developing
in
this
style,
as
opposed
to
developing
as
the
six
attached
residences.
H
H
H
H
H
And
finally,
you
know
a
comment
right
out
of
the
comprehensive
plan,
and
it
was
a
quote.
One
measure
of
a
desirable
community
is
that
it
offers
its
residents
adequate
choice
and
housing
options,
and
quote
you
know
this
is
the
direction
we
as
a
company
you're
moving
in,
is
you
know,
after
30
years
of
a
number
of
different
development
developments
that
we've
accomplished.
It's
it's
pretty
obvious
to
all
of
us
that
you
know
we're
moving
into
a
new
era
of
what
is
really
important
to
have
as
far
as
choices
go
and
that's
nationally
but
locally.
H
We
want
to
be
on
the
forefront
of
doing
that.
These
will
be
more
modest
in
size,
they
will
be
more
affordable
and
we're
really
pretty
excited
about
it
and
we're
ready
to
get
gone
as
soon
as
we
can
now
we
did
have
a
conversation
with
Paul
and
Paul
directed
us
to
have
this
conversation.
I
will
say
this
I,
don't
know
where
this
will
go.
H
You
know
our
sense
was.
We
were
really
in
an
alteration.
We
were
not
at
square
one
of
let's
come
to
the
Planning
Commission
and
start
day.
One
John's
gonna
address
conversations
that
he's
already
had
on
a
technical
basis
with
sewer
water
fire.
You
know
square
footage,
topography
and
things
of
that
nature.
So
that's
very
important
to
us
as
we
move
through.
This
is
getting
some
sense
where
we're
going,
because
it's
a
project
we'd
like
to
begin,
obviously
as
soon
as
possible,
so
I'm
gonna
turn
it
over
to
John
and
let
him
be
information,
I.
Think.
I
June's
covered
most
of
the
bullet
points
here
we
in
taking
our
original
plan,
that's
approved
that
that
plan
encompasses
about
a
thousand
square
feet
of
a
structure
which
contains
these
six
units.
If
we
leave
the
existing
greenhouse
and
alter
that
into
a
residence
and
add
the
five
houses
we've
got
in
mind,.
I
What
you're
looking
at
there
is
a
rendering
reductive
CREB
that
before
we
go,
but
a
rendering
of
when
you
look
at
the
site
plate,
we
gave
you
initially
those
footprints,
the
five
footprints.
Basically,
that
is
the
general
direction
and
feeling
that
we've
come
up
with
as
far
as
a
residential
unit,
there
will
also
be
a
lower
level
on
all
of
those
which
we
just
haven't
developed
yet,
but
we
certainly
didn't
want
to
come
up
here
and
present
the
plan.
I
That
was
not
pretty
well
solidified
in
our
minds
as
to
how
its
kind
of
fit,
how
it's
gonna
work,
and
this
with
a
little
bit
of
tweaking,
we
might
alter
the
design
a
little
bit
a
B,
a
B,
but
this
is
kind
of
the
feeling
where
we're
looking
for
on
this
location.
So
once
again,
what
we're
doing
here
is
we're
putting
an
overall
footprint,
that's
about
1/2,
of
the
square
footage
of
what
we
have
approved,
which
means
obviously
we're
going
to
increase
the
green
space,
minimize,
the
hard
surface
area,
etc.
I
We
have
met
with
technical
review,
I've
met
on
the
site
more
than
once
with
NIC
card
Nick
Joseph
we've
talked
to
the
fire
chief,
obviously
from
starting
off
with
24
units,
and
then
units
approved.
This
is
still
six
units.
The
capacities
for
water
sewer
storm
are
all
a
parallel
situation
and
there's
really
no
issue
with
I
think
having
to
go
into
that
again.
We
have
we've.
I
Had
the
geotechnical
firm
come
down
from
Columbus
we've
done
tests
borings
when
we
had
the
state
approved
plans,
they
were
incorporated
in
that
all
of
the
boring
capacities
of
this
project
are
certainly
a
lot
less
of
an
impact
than
that
larger
eight
thousand
square
foot
building.
So
once
again,
what
kind
of
knocking
that
down
a
notch
and.
I
You
know,
as
Jim
said,
this
is
pretty
much
of
a
lateral
move.
In
our
mind,
the
current
plan
has
been
reviewed
by
code
enforcement.
It's
been
reviewed
by
technical
review.
We
think
this
is
almost
like
taking
six
draws
and
we're
just
dropping
in
a
different
way,
but
there's
still
the
same
six
residential
units
we're
going
to
end
up
with,
and
we
feel
our
current
approved
building
permit
closely
parallels
our
request
to
change
and
we
would
sure
like
to
be
allowed
to
move
forward
with
this
project.
I
Bruce
did
most
of
the
design
work
here,
all
the
design
work
and,
if
you've
got
any
questions
that
relate
to
any
one
of
the
three
of
us,
we'd
like
to
just
try
to
find
a
way
to
you
know.
I
know
this
is
a
little
bit
of
a
unique
situation
and
it
doesn't
really
pigeonhole
into
exactly
how
procedure
is
typically
followed,
but
the
reality
is.
We
have
done
a
lot
of
work
in
getting
this
far
with
working
with
the
city
and
getting
the
city's
approval
every
step
along
the
way
so
I
know.
I
H
E
E
E
E
D
D
D
H
E
H
We
have
not
done
a
laundry
list
of
variances
because
we're
looking
for
feedback
as
to
how
this
can
be
accomplished,
cooperative
without
being
here
next
tope,
understand
and
and
and
again
I
assume
that
if
it
needs
to
be
named
a
PUD,
then
obviously
there
probably
are
it's
not
a
subdivision.
Okay,
the
building
permit
was
based
on
a
variance
I
mean
it's
a
it's
a
it's
a
little.
H
D
E
E
A
H
H
There
will
be
a
subsidy
if
you
have
an
opportunity
to
make
an
on-site
visit.
You
will
see
that
the
entire
site,
the
entire
site,
is
currently
landscaped
every
design
concept
from
day
one
primarily
was
taking
into
consideration
the
greatest
amount
of
mature
trees
that
existed
a
huge
there's,
huge
fir
and
pine
trees
that
border
Madison
and
one
of
the
reasons
we
determined
we
weren't
penetrating
Madison
to
come
in
it
for
ingress
and
egress.
Was
the
wee
death
take
every
one
of
those
trees
out?
H
H
H
Really
that's
correct
with
the
ability
to
take
the
lowest
level
which
we
at
this
point.
If
determined
is
unfinished
space
which
would
be
a
primary,
it
would
be
plumbed
for
the
addition
of
a
additional
bathroom
if
an
owner
determined
they
wanted
to
spend
additional
money
to
put
a
bathroom
and
a
media
room
or
an
additional
bedroom
or
a
family
room
that
space
exists.
So,
ultimately,
you
could
have
three
bedrooms
to
remember
at
three
and
a
half
bathrooms.
Okay,.
B
H
There
are
additional
adjacent
property
owners
that
have
ingress
in
hint
and
egress
non
that
private
road
by
deed;
okay,
that
exists
that
it
existed
in
for
years
and
years,
the
it's
actually
two
pieces.
Originally
there's
two
there's
two
descriptions
of
property
that
combined
to
make
this
entire
piece.
The
adjacent
properties
have
ingress
and
egress
over.
H
H
G
B
D
H
A
H
H
H
A
H
Okay,
so
let
me
put
that
back
to
the
Planning
Commission.
What
assurances
do
you
need
to
have
that
those
will
be
whenever
occupied
residences?
What
do
you
need
to
have
in
order
for
that
to
be
the
case,
then
that
is
the
goal,
and
that
is
the
intention,
and
that
is
what
we're
doing
this
is.
This
is
indicative
of.
If
there
was
a
block
of
property
for
sale
between
Sunnyside
and
Maplewood
we're
building
homes,
we
would
be
selling
owner-occupied
single
families
all.
A
A
More
and
then
their
kids
aren't
living
in
there,
but
their
kids
friends
are
now
living
in
there
see
when
I
heard.
You
know,
I
mean
so
I
think
that
that
I
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
they're,
not
you,
know
apartments
and
I,
just
I'm,
always
cautious.
When
people
start
some,
you
know
saying
they're
only
gonna
be
owned.
Your
owner
occupied
and
such
so
I
think
the
fact
that
they're
single-family
they're
detached
they're
small
certainly
does
I.
Personally,
you
know
I
would
like
to
see
more
housing
for
professionals
and
graduate
students.
I
mean
I.
H
It's
a
fine
line
between
the
owner
occupant
of
a
single-family
home
in
an
Eastside
neighborhood.
This
is
the
same
story.
I
mean
we
have
no
intention
of
developing
these
as
investment
great
properties
is.
That
was
our
intention.
Quite
candidly,
we
would
have
come
here
when
we
would
have
when
we
had
the
24
unit
approval,
if
we
would
have
argued
to
have
a
24
unit
building
and
tried
to
have
that
approval.
D
H
D
A
H
You
certainly
if
you
were
in
times
of
economic
duress,
and
let's
say
you
were
offered
a
position
in
Akron
and
you
left
sorry
for
doing
that.
You
do.
You
would
want
to
be
able
to
rent
your
home.
If
you
couldn't
sell
it,
we
would
think
that
it
would
only
be
free
for
people
to
have
that
opportunity
and.
H
A
H
B
D
A
I
think
I'm
I
agree
with
Paula
is
trying
to
figure
out
what
the
most
appropriate
way
forward
with
this
I
appreciate
that
it's
in
fell.
I
think
that
the
probe
that
project
does
it,
as
it
looks,
is
encouraging.
I
think
that
you
have
a
lot
of
the
right
ideas
about
in
felling
and
pedestrian
friendly
and
stuff.
So
well,.
B
Again,
I
I
think,
and
this
is
going
to
be
a
condo
set.
So
there's
gonna
be
some
kind
of
condo
agreement
there.
That
would
probably
restrict
any
type
of,
even
if
it
turned
into
a
rental,
be
it
a
student
rental.
Even
there
be
standards
of
the
maintenance
that
we
employ
and
that's
something
to
look
at
when
you
draft
a
condo,
Koon
I,
don't
know
what
you
call
it
growing
into
something.
B
From
my
front
of
you,
I
looked
at
this
as
a
PUD,
although
they,
as
you
say,
the
acreages
is
smaller
than
the
required
2
acres.
There
had
been
cases
where
that
has
been.
The
only
variance,
I
think
required
for
a
PUD
I'd
have
to
go
back
and
look
at
the
the
buildings
on
Coulson
to
review
those
I
think
mr.
Cody's
buildings
off
of
Coulson.
There
was
a
PUD
whose
two
buildings
they
put
together
and
that
was
a
I
think.
B
The
only
variance
given
at
that
time
was
for
the
size
of
the
acreage
that
Anne
asked
before
I
really
was
on
council.
You've
been
paying
attention
to
a
lot
of
that
stuff,
but
I
think
that's
something
that
could
be
built
in
as
this
I
process.
Wise
I
look
at
this
as
my
usual
I,
look
at
as
a
good
design
actually
and
I
look
at
it
as
something
that's
doable
so.
B
E
D
A
Mean
I
think
that
I
have
some
issues
about
what
this
looks
like
I
have
some
questions
about.
This
looks
like,
but
I
think
that,
overall,
with
the
general
concept,
you
know
I
think
that
it's
a
great
have.
You
talked
to
the
neighbors
about
the
change
about
around
here,
the
neighbors
of
the
hill
and
and
such
we.
A
H
A
A
I
thought
they
would
be
welcome.
Oh
yeah,
I
know,
I,
don't
think
that
there's
any
issue
with
the
neighbors
know,
though
I've
had
people
say
what's
going
on
with
the
flower
shop
I've,
you
know,
sir,
so
you
know
maybe
a
letter
to
the
Neighborhood
Association
or
something
saying
hey.
These
are
our
plans,
they've
changed
and
here's
some
pictures
you
know
and
and
then
of
at
one
of
the
neighborhood
than
nina
meetings.
It
can
be
brought
up
and
said
this
is
the
plan.
B
H
Super
happy
to
share
the
information
we're
at
a
point
where,
for
example,
the
floor
plan
and
the
rendering
that
Bruce
handed
to
you
know
that's
company
material
today,
you
know
we're
not
really
prepared
until
we
get
a
real
sense
of
where
we're
going,
I
mean
our
intention
and
our
desire
is
to
build
exactly
what
you
see
there.
That
is
our
intention
if,
in
fact,
it
appears
that.
D
H
A
B
I'd
well
again
at
that
I
think
it
should
go
as
PUD
I.
Think
again,
I
really
would
want
to
review
the
PUD
process
to
a
truth:
I
she's
10.
You
know
this
came
in
front
of
us
last
time
we
were
looking
at.
This
was
something
different,
but
I.
Think
it's
you
know,
I
I
would
say
I'm
very
favorable
to
it,
for
it
and
I,
don't
think
they.
The
variance
for
the
size
is
such
a
problem
that
you
know,
do
stop
anything
right.
D
B
H
A
A
E
D
H
D
A
I
D
E
B
A
A
I
hear
we
will
look
at
exactly
what
we
need
to
do
on
our
end.
We
will
communicate
what
we
need
from
you.
One
of
the
first
steps
is
looking
at
the
site
and
doing
a
preliminary
site
go
over
and
review,
but
I
would
feel
more
comfortable
if
we
had
better
schematics-
and
you
know
not
necessarily
maybe
larger
or
maybe
do
a
site
visit
or.
D
D
A
B
H
A
A
I
E
B
A
D
D
G
Have
the
I
believe
what
is
the
final
draft
of
the
new
zoning
map?
There
are
no
changes
from
the
zonings
that
we
already
have
in
place.
It
is
merely
a
GIS
representation
of
all
of
the
changes
that
have
been
made
up
to
today.
I
guess
there
hasn't
been
a
zoning
changes
in
a
while.
No
guard
gave
us
four
copies
of
it.
G
G
Anybody
who
wants
to
review
it
or
has
any
comments
can
come
to
me
or
email
me
and
I
can
take
care
of
it.
If
we
want
to
do
a
public
meeting,
I
can
host
that
as
well.
When
we
can
set
a
date
for
that,
I
don't
know
who
would
come
to
it,
but
I'm
more
than
happy
to
sit
in
Council,
Chambers
or
in
one
of
our
conference
rooms
for
two
hours
and
wait
for
people
to
show
up.
G
G
G
F
D
G
I
spoke
with
Chuck
about
that
this
morning
and
he
had
thought
we're
going
to
check
the
old
map
and
see
it's
it's.
It's
almost
a
piece
of
cellophane
right
now,
it's
so
threadbare,
but
we
will
look
Chuck
thought.
Maybe
it
would
be
the
service
Safety
Director
and
the
Zoning
Administrator
and
those
two
people
would
have
tested
and
that's
it.
But
we
could,
if,
if
we
want
to
do
a
public
meeting
or
a
public
hearing
about
it
and
set
a
date
for
that,
I
would
recommend.
G
G
A
G
G
B
A
D
B
B
A
I
would
just
make
it
a
meeting
just
an
information
meeting
Paul
can
give
a
little
spiel
about
it,
and
then
we
can
have
all
public
comments
by
the
12th,
because
I
will
give
people
from
that.
Hearing
that
meeting
information
meeting
a
week
to
play
it
in
public
comment
and
then
by
the
12th
floor
know
whether
people
are
happy
with
it
or
not.
Example:
okay,
great
okay,.
G
The
FEMA
will
conduct
a
public
meeting
at
some
point
and
then
there'll
be
a
90-day
period.
From
that
point
for
public
input
on
the
on
the
new
firm
maps,
they
have
not
set
a
date
for
the
public
meeting,
though
Bob
Eichenberg
and
I
have
been
in
conversation
with
them
over
a
future.
A
few
issues
we've
noticed
on
it.
G
G
With
a
new
the
new
flood
floodplain
regulations-
and
that
is
correct-
we
did
the
committee
that
Elaine
is
formed,
met
on
Monday
morning
to
take
the
the
model
regulations.
The
model
code
that
was
given
by
ODNR
Elaine
has
combined
that
with
their
recommendations
for
what
we
keep
from
the
current
code
and
then
added
some
to
it,
and
the
the
task
force
of
the
committee
has
reviewing
that
right
now.
But
it
looks
like
it's
pretty
close
to
being
done.
B
A
A
Nobody
okey
dokey
announcement,
some
other
business.
Our
next
meeting
will
be
October
15th
at
12
o'clock,
so
Wednesday
here,
since
we
changed.