►
From YouTube: Planning Commission December 19, 2019
Description
Planning Commission December 19, 2019
A
A
C
You,
mr.
chairman,
the
last
time
we
met,
we
brought
forth
some
review
of
title
23
and
modifications
to
the
proposed
rec
to
the
proposed
changes
that
the
City
Council
had
forwards.
Us
and
I
gave
it
to
the
Commission
with
a
pending
markup.
This
time
we've
gone
ahead
and
done
it
in
an
actual
word
document.
C
So
if
we
get
started
to
build
beginning
here
of
resolution,
Oh
819
of
the
City
Council,
we
have
put
forth
that
the
the
change
under
23
or
401
otherwise
authorized
here,
and
you
can
see
that
in
bold
remains
and
then
under
Section
five,
which
would
be
on
the
second
page,
will
be
b5
that
we
add
the
the
sentence.
Rentals
for
any
duration
must
be
annually
permitted
for
provisions
in
a
CC
29,
which
is
our
our
housing
code.
Going
forward
item
number
10.
There
was
a
there
was
information
or
section
about
home
state.
C
We
recommend
that
that
be
deleted,
conditionally
permitted
uses.
The
council
had
asked
us
to
consider
those
of
tourist
home
and
our
ones,
and
we
recommend
that
they
not
be
included
as
conditionally
permitted
uses
in
our
one
and
instead
they
would
move
and
function
as
principally
permitted
uses
in
our
three,
and
you
see
that
on
the
one
two
three
fourth
page
of
the
Doctrine
continuing
forward,
all
of
the
other
recommended
changes
had
to
do
with
section
five,
the
definitions
and
you
can
see
the
various
changes
there
in
the
in
the
definitions.
C
If
you
look
at
the
very
back
page
of
this
document,
this
is
a
modification
that
we
had
initially
talked
about.
Last
time,
a
title,
2903
l1
winning
rental
permit
is
required.
You
can
disregard
this
last
page
and
instead
look
at
the
more
thorough
recommended
changes
in
the
additional
packet.
It
looks
like
this,
which
basically
takes
this
one
little
modification
of
2900
301
and
instead
more
fully
places
it
throughout
title
29,
so
that
it's
clear.
So
that's
what
we
had
recommended
in
title
23,
the
zoning
code.
C
Those
changes
are
here
in
a
moment,
allow
the
co-director
to
speak
to
this
in
more
detail.
Those
are
these
these
two
additional
documents
you
see
with
you
and
Wow,
the
Planning
Commission,
is
it
necessary,
charged
with
recommending
changes
to
other
portions
of
the
code
other
than
the
zoning
code.
We
think
that
these
changes
to
the
zoning
code
can
only
be
accepted
and
functional
if
these
changes
to
the
other
two
codes
go
along
with
it.
C
So
we
would
ask
that
when
the
Commission
votes,
Commission
would
vote
to
either
recommend
or
modify
or
include
these
changes
as
well
and
then.
Lastly,
the
last
thing
that
I
would
contend
is
that
the
provisions
put
forth
in
title
11,
which
is
the
business
regulations
that
that
were
also
part
of
the
resolution
that
City
Council
took
up
when
they
forwarded
us
to
look
at
the
planning.
I'm.
C
Sorry
at
the
zoning
code
were
a
variety
of
changes
to
the
business
regulations
and
specifically
talking
about
more
detailed
provisions
that
would
support
the
proposed
changes
of
their
zoning
code
and
those
we
don't
think
are
necessary
because
we
think
that
our
housing
code
allows
for
all
of
the
enforcement
necessary
for
short-term
rentals
through
the
rental
permit
process,
which
is
a
tried-and-true
process
that
already
exists.
So
you
know
that
that's
in
a
nutshell.
C
D
Staff
is
to
capture
the
short-term
rental
into
our
existing
rental
program
and
we
think
we
can
do
that
by
modifying
chapter
2903
2
to
incorporate
short-term
rentals
in
the
rental
dwelling
and
housing
permit.
So
if
you
look
all
the
changes
that
you
see
here
or
for
chapter
29,
actually
what
they
do,
is
they
just
ink
in
insert
the
word
short-term
rental
just
to
make
it
clear
for
everybody
that
a
permit
is
required
for
short-term
rentals
and
incorporate
that
into
our
existing
system?
I
did
remove.
D
If
you
look
at
twenty
three
twenty
nine,
oh
three,
oh
one,
rental
permit
required.
We
did
remove
for
a
period
of
more
than
six
months
in
any
calendar
year,
so
anytime,
anyone's
gonna
do
a
short-term
rental
for
any
period
of
time.
They're
gonna
need
a
permit.
So
the
rest,
if
you
go
through
here
just
it
just
includes
short-term
rentals
and
the
rest
of
the
definitions
for
this
chapter,
twenty,
nine
and
three-
and
we
also
included
next
to
the
last
page
they're
a
short-term
rental
definition,
which
is
the
same
as
we
have
in
chapter
23.
D
A
E
Yeah
we
we
currently
have
penalty
systems
already
laid
out
in
229
that
would
still
apply
into
the
short-term
rentals,
as
well
as
just
the
regular
rentals.
There
would
be
a
you
know
the
court
process
to
go
through
the
prosecutor's
office
for
any
penalties
or
violations
that
we
get
corrected
and
follow
the
same
pattern
that
already
exists
in
title
29.
A
D
So
I
also
have
chapter
15,
which
is
taxes.
If
you
can
I'll
just
go
through
that
real
quick
okay.
So
we
did
the
same
thing.
This
is
transient
gas
tax,
which
we
currently
have
for
hotel
and
transient
accommodations.
So
I
did
the
same
thing
in
chapter
15,
which
was
to
include
the
definition
of
a
short-term
rental
and
then
added
that
so
that
it's
clear
that
all
short-term
rentals
will
be
required
to
will
be
responsible
for
a
transient
guest
tax.
A
Must
I'll
go
ahead
and
open
this
up
for
discussion
first
from
the
audience
and
as
if
you've
all
signed
in
who
wish
to
speak
first
of
all
by
the
way,
I
forgot.
Do
you?
If
anybody
who
does
wish
to
speak
if
they
can
raise
their
right
hand,
and
do
you
solemnly
swear
to
tell
the
truth
to
the
Athens
Planning
Commission?
As
you
know
it,
thank
you.
Would
someone
care
to
start
the
train
up
there
and
when
you
come
up,
please
state
your
name
and
your
address.
Thank
you.
A
F
Utah
place
I
live
next
door
to
a
large
facility
that
has
I
won't
mention
anybody's
name,
which
has
been
renting
to
weddings
and
to
hide
a
listing
on
his
website
about
Airbnb
and
is
a
rather
large
party
house.
We
had
to
go
to
complain
about
it
and
the
excess
noise,
etc.
It
caused
major
problems
in
our
in
our
neighborhood
with
the
noise
level,
because
we
seem
to
have
a
wedding
there,
like
every
every
couple
weeks
during
season,
we've
been
through
the
Planning
Commission
session
and
it
creates
a
real
problem.
F
The
house
next
door
to
us
is
also
applied
for
a
short-term
rental
permit
and
neither
person
is
there
much
okay,
we
have
a
constant
flow
of
people
and
noise
and
there's
no
regulation
to
be
honest
with
you
when
we
have
to
call
the
cops
which
is
frequent
in
our
neighborhood
because
of
this
particular
home.
He
doesn't
live
there,
he's
there
once
a
month
and
it
causes
some
real
real
tension
and
stress
amongst
neighbors
I.
F
Think
personally,
and
given
my
experience
with
other
Airbnb
situations,
is
that
you
destroy
the
residential
character
of
a
neighborhood
and
a
community
by
allowing
any
any
I
repeat
any
short-term
rentals
in
a
neighborhood.
There
have
been
cities
across
the
world
where
residential
neighborhoods
have
been
absolutely
overrun
with
tourists,
and
we,
as
I've
mentioned
my
letter.
We
have
enough
hotels
here
to
handle
people
and
there's
there's
no
way
you
can
regulate
this
stuff
because
no
one's
there
and
they
rent
their
place
in
anyway.
F
We
know
that
there's
a
lot
of
cases
of
that
in
the
city
of
ready,
I
think
it's
a
major
mistake
to
do
that.
I
think
we
have
so
few
residential,
so
few
residential
neighborhoods
in
our
city,
ready,
we
were
the
lowest
went
among
the
lowest
in
the
states,
I
think
in
terms
of
owner-occupied
units
I
think
we're
30,
please
a
cracking
it
from
walk
through
at
30
or
35
percent.
F
Here
most
of
them
are
rentals
anyway,
and
I
really
and
I
moved
I've
lived
in
Athens
the
area
for
40
years
of
living,
the
city
now
and
I.
Think
it's
a
grave
mistake.
A
great
mistake
to
open
a
can
of
worms,
in
my
opinion,
I
think
it's
a
big
mistake
and
you
say
that
you
regulate
well
the
bottom
line.
Is
you
really
can't?
We
had
a?
We
had
a
check
a
website
and
we
found
out
that
yeah
they
were
listing.
F
Air
B&B
is
and
they
went
against
our
one
there's
no
way
you
guys
can
check
for
everything.
Given
the
personnel
shortages
we
have
in
this
city,
everybody
tries
the
best
I
can,
but
we
just
don't
have
that
sort
of
thing
for
regulation.
You've
got
enough
rental
violations
in
this
town
to
deal
with
this
stuff
and
I
for
one
am
really
sick
and
tired
of
having
to
go
over
it
weddings
next
door
to
ask
you
quiet
which
is
what's
going
to
happen.
F
I
think
you
know,
given
the
problems
we
already
have
with
the
students
and
I've
worked
it
ru
for
many
years
with
the
students
and
the
drinking
and
the
noise
and
the
lack
of
regulation
and,
of
course,
getting
and
all
this
stuff
you're
going
to
start
bringing
into
residential
neighborhoods
it'll
people
live
there.
We
do.
You
know,
we've
invested
in
the
city.
We
spent
a
long
time
there
just
to
just
to
encourage
more
people
to
get
a
couple
bucks
in
their
pocket.
F
I
think
it's
wrong
and
people
are
going
to
turn
their
houses
into
into
the
tour.
So
tell
us
whether
you're,
not
you
know
it
or
not.
It
means
is
somebody's
going
to
have
to
complain
about
a
neighbor
or
they
call
we.
You
know
we
want
to
get
along
with
everybody.
It's
a
separate
source
of
friction.
It's
not
there.
Let
the
community,
members
and
I
think
for
you
guys
to
pass
this
thing.
Be
a
big
mistake.
This
I've
seen
Airbnb
communities
all
over
the
world
have
been
absolutely
destroying
residential
areas
and
you
can
read
about
them.
F
If
you
want
but
I
know,
Athens
is
at
Venice,
but
you
know:
we've
had
the
entire
city's
Barcelona
being
one
whole
cities
get
destroyed
and
people
don't
live
in
neighborhoods
anymore,
because
these
rentals,
they
turn
into
hotel
districts,
I
think
you're,
really
making
my
opinion
a
major
mistake
by
doing
that
and
and
I
love,
Athens
I
lived
here
a
long
time.
I'm
gonna
be
here.
My
son
lives
here
we
have
family
here,
but
you
know:
did
this
enough
partying
around
here
I
have
a
right
to
live
in
a
house
and
being
a
quiet
street.
F
If
I
want
to
pay
my
taxes,
I
pay
a
lot
of
taxes
to
matter
of
fact.
I
would
support
taxes
here,
I
always
support
services
and
I.
Think
it's
wrong.
I
think
it's
absolutely
wrong
are
to
students.
So
that's
fine!
You
know
let
the
students
be,
but
you
know
we
don't
ask
for
much
more
than
than
some.
You
know
reasonable
respect
for
privacy,
because
I'm
gonna
have
it
on
two
sides
of
me.
F
If
you
say,
if
you
approve
the
one
next
door
to
me,
they're,
never
home
and
the
guy
next
door
to
me
has
a
staff
of
15
people
taking
care
of
his
guard.
You
know:
I'm
talking
about
I,
live
right
next
door
to
that
man.
I
can't
I
can't
think
straight.
My
house
shakes
when
he
turns
to
volume
up.
He
has
fans
out
there
and
loud
parties.
That's
what's
gonna
happen
in
these
places.
I
don't
want
to
start
regulating
that
stuff.
I
mean
you're.
More
than
welcome
to
come.
F
Come
to
my
home
have
a
glass
of
wine
outside
when
the
wedding's
going
on
it's
a
bomb
it
bowling.
You
know,
I,
don't
want
to
have
to
stop
people
from
you
know
enjoying
themselves,
but
a
man.
If
you
open
the
door
you're
asking
for
trouble
and
you
cannot
regulate
it
period,
you
can't
regulate
I,
don't
think
the
city
has
the
ability
I've
been
through
the
been
through
the
mill
here
with
the
with
the
city,
the
city
councilor,
and
she
was
very
nice
and
I
called
I
called
the
code
office
about
it
and
they
were
good.
F
They
took
it
off
the
website,
but
they
still
would
pay
for
a
wedding
on
the
website.
They
said
you
know
they
said
well
talk
to
us.
It's
both.
You
know
period
absolute
period.
We
have
a
nice
neighborhood.
We
have
great
neighbors,
they're,
wonderful
people
in
this
town
and
in
this
community
and
I,
really
think
you're
making
a
big
mistake.
Big
big
mistake
by
opening
up
little
residential
areas.
We
have
left
at
this
sort
of
that
sort
of
crap.
To
be
honest
with
you
thing
really
upsets
Meghan
and
I
can't
do
anything
better.
F
I'll
have
to
call
the
cops
like
yes,
oh
so
much
about
the
cops
have
better
things
to
do
than
worry
about
noise
and
you're.
Asking
them
to
deal
with
this
garbage
I
mean
really
just
where
people
want
to
make
couple
bucks
in
their
pocket.
Okay,
I
think
it's
wrong
and
you
can't
regulate
it.
If
you
open
up
a
can
of
worms,
man,
you
get
a
rubber
stamp.
The
annual
permits,
which
is
what
this
thing
says,
big
mistake.
C
Can
I
ask
you
a
question
sure
sir?
Can
I
ask
you
a
question
for
the
just
so
that
we're
we're
and
I
think
we're
pretty
much
aware
of
the
house
that
you're
talking
about?
Are
you
on
the
west
side
of
the
street
as
well?
Yes,
okay,
many
of
the
streets
for
the
Planning
Commission
or
many
of
the
properties
for
the
Planning
Commission's
knowledge.
Here
on
that
side
of
the
street,
the
back
half
of
the
property
is
outside
of
the
city
limits,
and
you
know
it's
been
a
challenge
in
the
past
with
being
able.
F
F
It
if
it's
a
problem,
then
it's
fine.
You
know
it's
fun
of
me.
I
think
that
to
me
is
an
academic
question.
My
tax
might
go
up
a
little
bit.
It's
fine
I,
don't
wanna
paint
taxes,
I
really
don't
want
paying
taxes.
I
mean
I'm,
a
good
guy
here,
yeah
I,
don't
mind.
If
that's
what
it
is.
That's
fine
with
me.
C
F
The
backs
opera
property.
The
way
the
way
were
zoned
is
that
there's
a
little
strip
when
I
bought
the
lot
I
built
there,
a
couple
years
guide
and
built
there
with
the
idea
of
living
here
and
it's
an
existing
neighborhood.
It's
we
had
to
get
a
zoning
variance,
and
you
know
people
very
nice
about
it.
There's
a
little
strip
of
land
on
the
east.
F
What's
up
on
the
west
side
on
the
west
side,
that's
a
little
tiny
little
strip
of
land,
that's
outside
city
limits,
and
if
you
want
to
rezone,
that's
fine
with
me
I,
don't
care
it
actually
wouldn't
be
zone
to
you
being
annexation.
That's
fine!
Whatever
you
want
to
call
it
fine,
it
doesn't
affect
you
I.
F
Couldn't
I
couldn't
tell
you
why
no
friend
of
mine
lives
on
top
of
Pleasant
Hill
and
they
would
not
pave
the
last
ten
feet
of
the
drop
of
the
street
because
it
was
a
non
jurisdiction
big
to
do
about.
They
finally
got
paid
I,
don't
who
did
it?
They
do
sex,
okay,
that
took
care
of
that
problem.
I
mean
if
you
want
to
NX
it's
fine
me
I
mean
I,
really
have
not
discussed
this
with
other
neighbors
I
mean
I.
Don't
you
know
I
think
the
tax
is
going
to
be
very
negligible.
F
This
is
unapproved
property.
It's
we
back
up
on
the
you
know.
We
were
already
have
high
noise
in
our
area
because
we
back
up
on
the
highway
and
there's
no
sound
protection.
There
and
most
communities
have
sound
protection
across
33.
We
don't
have
that
there,
which
is
okay.
You
know
I
knew
that
going
in,
but
we've
already
got
a
noise
issue
from
that.
So
yeah,
it's
fine.
F
A
G
John
Haase
and
about
45
grams,
arrived
I
just
want
to
sort
of
add
something
to
what
you're.
Just
talking
about
I
think
that
an
accident
might
be
a
good
idea
only
because
I've
heard
that
used
as
an
excuse
for
certain
behavior
in
that
area.
We
can
do
this
because
you
guys
can't
say
anything
about
it.
That's
been
said
in
our
neighborhood.
G
G
We
were
very
happy
that
you
took
the
tourists
homes
out
of
an
r1,
but
it
seems
like
now
what's
happened
is
even
though
you
remove
the
tourists
homes,
you've
sort
of
opened
the
back
door
for
actually
a
tourist
home
to
happen
again
because
of
what
we've
talked
about.
There's
no
real
way
to
tell
when
somebody
starts
a
short-term
rental
in
your
neighborhood,
if
they're
living
there,
if
they're
going
to
ever
be
there
and
then
you've
opened
the
door.
So
what
you've
done,
on
one
hand,
is
shut
down
the
tourist
homes.
G
What
you've
done,
on
the
other
hand,
is
still
say
that
a
short-term
rental
is
okay,
an
r1
and
I
just
want
to
talk
quickly
about
the
Affordable
Housing
Commission.
The
city
is
supposedly
for
establishing
affordable
housing
for
residents.
Many
of
the
little
houses
in
our
neighborhood
would
be
great
starter
homes
for
people
we'd
like
to
see
that
considered
instead
of
people
thinking.
Oh,
let's
just
start
a
little
short-term
rental
there
or
am
I
gonna
have
to
worry
about.
You
know
having
a
you
know,
selling
that
house.
G
H
H
C
H
Just
can't
even
hardly
speak
at
this
point,
but-
and
so
if
that
is
then
the
case,
my
next
concern
is
that
the
violations
that
apply
to
a
long-term
rental
are
the
same
as
written
in
code.
We
don't
exactly
have
it
and
I
don't
want
to
documents
with
me
going
through
the
court
process,
etc,
etc.
I
know
how
long
that
takes
I've
seen
it
happen
right.
H
H
Don't
knows
maybe
somebody
from
the
code
office
or
the
city
planner
can
address
this,
how
long
months
to
get
addressed,
and
then
this
situation
continuously
goes
on,
but
so
you
really
haven't
thought
so,
if
you're
gonna
allow
this,
like
you
proposed,
which
I
think
is
just
just
cutting
us
to
the
quick
those
of
us
who
live
in
the
neighborhoods
in
the
r-1
neighborhoods.
If
you're
gonna
do
this,
you
have
got
to
cover
our
backs.
H
I
Please
please,
please
don't
take
that
away
from
us.
We
know
that
Athens
is
a
sort
of
unique
place,
the
likelihood
of
having
grown
up
tourists
who
are
just
going
to
come
eat
in
our
restaurants
or
spend
money
on
Court
Street.
It's
not
great.
What
we're
going
have
our
student
parties
on
the
ten
big
weekends
a
year
and
if
those
are
allowed
in
residential
neighborhoods
with
people
saying
landlord
saying
we
can
have
rentals
for
a
couple
of
weekends
a
month
that
will
get
us
as
much
as
we
could
get.
I
If
we
were
renting
for
six
months
or
a
year,
the
nature
of
our
neighborhoods
is
going
to
change.
We
came,
as
did
most
people
in
our
one
neighborhoods,
for
a
specific
reason
to
be,
among
other
long
term
residents,
and
as
soon
as
you
allow
any
kind
of
short-term
rentals
and
our
one
zones
those
neighborhoods
are
destroyed.
J
I'll
rob
the
lot
124
more
70
bring
the
city
here
in
Athens,
I
think
what
we
have
right
now
is
an
uncontrolled
situation
or
short-term
rentals,
and
this
is
an
attempt
by
the
city
to
fix
that.
So
what
I'm
hearing
from
folks
is
the
concern
that
this
opens
up
things,
but
it
really
what
it
does
is
it
it
permits
them
and
makes
us
so
the
city
can
actually
enforce
it
right
now.
There
is
no
way
for
the
city
to
enforce
any
restrictions
on
short-term
rentals
in
our
one
zones.
It's
happening
now.
J
J
That
I
think
the
city
is
doing
the
right
thing
for
the
most
part,
I'm
still
a
little
gray
on
a
couple
implications
with
the
changes
here,
but
it
does
seem
like
they're
doing
the
right
thing
and
I
think
that
the
Planning
Commission's
consideration
here
is
that
the
city
needs
tools
to
be
able
to
regulate
short-term
rentals
and
that
this
seems
to
be
the
right
approach.
Thanks
thank.
D
We
actually
currently
have
it's
really
hard
to
find
out
where
these,
where
these
rental
units
are
so
what
we
did
was
we
looked
into
a
corporation
called
post
compliance
where
the
whole
contract,
with
the
with
this
company
to
review,
to
scan
the
web
scan
the
internet
and
they
look
at
over
50
websites.
We
let
specifically
for
short-term
rentals.
They
will
locate
those
properties
pinpoint
the
addresses
for
us
it'll,
also
analyze
the
data
to
find
out.
D
You
know
how
and
if
we're
affecting
the
housing,
affordability
and
availability
and
in
the
area,
it
still
take
me
a
few
weeks
to
get
this
in
in
place
operational,
but
we
do
have.
We
do
have
something
that's
going
to
help
us
find
out.
What's
going
on
in
our
community
and
in
this
this
contract
I
think
it's
done.
It's
gonna
be
really
helpful
for
us.
It's
basically
a
subscription
for
you
yeah
an
annual
subscription,
it's
web-based
so
it
doesn't
actually
affect
anything
in
our
city.
D
H
D
H
D
To
use
yes,
we
hope
I
haven't
seen
any
of
the
information
back
from
the
company.
We
did,
we
did
get
it
started
and
they
said
it'll
be
a
couple
of
weeks
before
we
could
actually
start
to
get
any
data
from
them.
So
we
hope
to
get
this
in
place
at
the
first
of
the
year,
be
a
great
time
for
us
to
do
that.
So.
D
So
the
way
I
the
way
I
read
the
this
is
that
they
can
do
rental
and
then
for
a
week
and
then
stop
for
a
couple
weeks
until
they
get
to
a
point
where
they
bred
for
more
than
six
months
and
at
that
point
they're
in
violation,
and
this
way
we
can
check
with
this
software
we
can
check
and
see
which
ones
are
doing
that
it's
really
hard
to
do
at
Michigan
it
now
that's
what's
happening.
That's
what's
happening
now,
yeah
this
way
we'll
be
able
to
find
out
if
you
on
any
neighbors
but.
H
H
When
I
talked
to
the
code
office
in
Indiana
Pennsylvania,
the
woman
said
to
me:
oh,
we
check
the
online
rental
sites
all
the
time
we
have
to
B&B
establishments
in
our
town
and
we
keep
a
close
eye
on
them.
They
haven't
caused
any
problems
yet
so
that's
a
town
of
13,000
with
the
college
population
and
yet
in
Athens,
somehow,
we've
never
been
able
to
do
that.
I
guess
I
find
it
puzzling,
but
thank
you
I
appreciate
your
okay.
K
K
It
also
can
become
a
backdoor
approach
to
establishing
a
potential
as
a
fewer
occupancy,
perhaps
towards
home,
without
a
definition.
Why
would
you
remind
you
that,
at
the
public
hearing,
the
majority
of
those
people
who
spoke
were
in
opposition
to
having
a
short-term
rental
in
an
r1
now
there's
this
discussion
here
about?
This
is
the
way
the
city
can
control.
This
and
I
would
say.
K
Part
of
the
problem
is
that
it
has
been
going
on
and
it
hasn't
been
controlled
and
when
people
buy
a
house
in
an
r1,
it
becomes
all
the
responsibilities
to
know
what
the
definition
of
an
r1
is
and
what
the
legal
responsibilities
are.
There
I
question
to
that.
Article
number
five
refers
to
the
number
of
renters
that
are
going
to
be
allowed
in
a
short-term
rental,
the
same
as
in
a
long-term.
K
K
So
it
seems
to
me
that,
knowing
that
there
are
short-term
models
operating
in
an
r1,
they
haven't
been
controlled.
We
know
they're
happening
and
to
me,
but
we
know
that's
happening,
then
there's
to
be
a
cease
and
desist
order,
because
otherwise
it
would
appear
that
the
city
is
ignoring
its
own
regulations
for
those
in
an
r1.
I
understand
many
of
these
people.
We
know
they're,
your
friends
they're,
my
friends,
but
the
fact
of
the
matter
remains
is
we
are
in
an
r1
area,
which
is
a
firm
residential
zone.
K
I
also
understand
that
this
legislation
has
been
going
through
the
process
for
quite
a
while
believe
me,
I
know
better
than
anyone
how
long
it
takes
for
some
kind
of
legislation
to
go
through
the
process.
But
when
you
do
this,
that's
your
role
as
an
elected
leader
and
I
think.
Maybe
there
should
have
been
wider
conversation
and
inclusion
into
the
process.
I,
don't
recall
that
any
of
this
was
discussed
in
any
kind
of
neighborhood
forum
when
it
was
going
through.
K
So
I
am
asking
that
you,
members
of
the
Planning
Commission,
really
consider
removing
that
last
sentence
in
item
number,
five,
otherwise,
I
think
you're
setting
yourselves
and
our
city
and
residents
up
for
absolutely
something
that
it's
really
not
going
to
be
able
to
be
enforced
and
then
we're
going
to
have
a
situation.
That's
going
to
take
on
a
whole
character
of
a
different
matter.
Thank.
A
L
Jack's
tall
469
Elmwood
I'd
like
to
remind
you
before
I,
get
started
here
that
public
meeting
14
people
spoke
against.
Three
people
spoke
for.
We
turned
in
a
petition
with
two
hundred
and
fifty
some
signatures
in
opposition
when
I
speak
I'm
speaking
only
about
our
one,
any
words
that
I
speak
will
be
in
our
one.
First
of
all,
thank
you
for
your
consideration
and
dropping
tourists
homes
from
the
City
Council's
proposal
again.
Thank
you.
L
Anything
and
everything
I
say,
does
not
reflect
on
any
of
the
good
citizens
in
this
room
that
spoke
before
me.
These
are
my
feelings
and
my
thoughts
I
have
asked
in
writing
to
City
Council
on
more
than
one
occasion.
The
mayor
on
one
occasion
and
to
date
have
received
no
answers
to
some
very
simple,
common-sense
questions.
L
How
do
you
believe
the
short-term
rentals
will
enhance
the
quality
of
life
in
an
r1
zone
remains
unanswered?
How
do
you
think
these
short-term
rentals
will
adversely
affect
the
quality
of
life
in
an
r1
zone
that
remains
unanswered?
It
seems
to
me
that
the
Near
Eastside
and
the
far
east
side
would
be
the
most
likely
affected.
Could
you
please
share
your
thoughts
on
that
that
remains
unanswered,
I,
take
note
of
the
introduction
of
nonprofit
organization,
501,
C,
3,
and
wonder
why
and
how
this
is
relevant
to
any
existing
or
proposed
future
legislation.
L
I
would
like
to
think
and
ask
you
folks
what
are
the
answers
to
these
common-sense
questions?
Please
give
your
comments
after
I
finish
and
take
my
seat
I.
Believe
we,
the
general
public
in
residence
of
our
one,
are
entitled
to
hear
your
answers
and
reasoning
for
attempting
to
crush
our
dreams
of
living
in
a
complete
r1
district,
as
the
code
currently
provides.
L
Chris
Paul
from
Wednesday
October,
19
2016,
the
headline
is
Athens:
council
adopts
bed-and-breakfast
regulations,
the
Planning
Commission
is
looking
at
r1
and
r2
right
now.
I
would
suggest
to
the
Planning
Commission
that
they
maybe
do
an
ad
hoc
committee
to
all
get
all
the
stakeholders
together
to
discuss
this.
We
will
work
through
this,
so
people
have
their
property
rights
and
people
have
the
conditions
that
they
move
into
their
neighborhoods
with
all
respected
and
protected.
L
L
Seems
that
certainly
someone
or
something
has
happened
behind
the
public's
eyes
that
has
changed
the
opinion
that
we,
the
citizens,
are
no
longer
entitled
to
our
existing
property
rights.
I
am
not
aware
of
any
state
laws
changing,
and
this
is
what
you
want
from
your
home
rule.
I
have
tried
to
the
best
of
my
ability
to
get
elected
officials
to
answer
and
explain
why
we
are
no
longer
entitled
to
the
rights
we
got
when
we
purchased
our
properties
in
our
r1
zone.
L
Yes,
folks,
we
all
did
our
due
diligence
and
chose
to
purchase
homes
and
live
in
a
peaceful,
quiet.
R1,
neighborhood
I
ask
this
Commission
to
please
keep
the
word
of
the
existing
code
and
not
use
the
progressive
views
to
erode
the
general
public's
property
rights.
This
may
be
about
money
to
you
and
why
or
whoever
has
gotten
to
you,
but
the
general
public
is
about
maintaining
our
quality
of
life.
L
Please
try
to
show
some
integrity,
character,
conscience
and
not
fold
to
whatever
political
pressure
you
are
under
by
whoever
or
whatever
that
is,
since
no
one,
the
mayor,
the
counter
or
this
Commission
will
explain
it.
It
leaves
me
wondering
if
30
Utah,
okay,
you
want
30
Utah,
that's
an
address
in
the
city
of
Athens.
A
A
First
of
all,
like
you
know,
we
have
throughout
the
few
months
that
we've
conducted
discussions
about
this
I,
think
we've
kept
things
to
a
pre-civil
manner
and
I,
really
speaking
as
the
chair.
I
do
resent
coming
up
here
and
disparaging
people
who
are
among
the
administration
residents,
whoever
mister
staffer
in
suggesting
that
there's
some
sort
of
ulterior,
motives
and
I
think
that's
that's
a
problem
going
forth
and
I
would
really
expect
that
people
do
respect
the
process
here.
A
L
L
A
M
M
But
when
I
look
at
item
five
here
and
we
can
have
three
adult
renters
in
an
on
regulated
non-resident
home,
it
seems
very
much
like
a
tourist
home
only
with
fewer
people,
that's
better
than
six
people
or
five
people,
but
it's
still
an
unsupervised
situation
where
you
would
have
three
people
or
three
people
and
a
family
in
a
normal
and
district
which
we're
hoping
not
to
have.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
N
First
off
you
know
we
live
in
a
sharing
economy
now,
while
this
is
new
to
us
all
of
it
and
it's
evolving,
it's
gonna
continue
to
evolve
not-too-distant
future.
We're
gonna
be
calling
for
a
pod
to
come
and
take
us
up
to
court
Street
for
a
night
out
and
not
have
to
drive,
because
it's
autonomously
driven
it's
gonna
continue
to
be
challenges.
It's
not
taking
anyone's
rights
away.
It's
about
it's
about.
How
do
we
evolve
under
a
changing
world?
I
think
the
process
I
appreciate
it.
N
I
appreciate
the
chance
you've
had
these
forms
and
you've
had
the
public
meetings
and
I
think
it's
been
a
thoughtful
approach.
I'm
here
I'm
the
people
who
are
opposed
to
this
are
very
well
organized
and
Bravo
I.
Think
everyone
has
opinion
and
I've
tried
to
listen
very
carefully
to
everybody's
concerns.
I,
don't
believe
the
sky
is
falling.
I,
don't
believe
that
there's
going
to
be
no
upside
and
tons
of
downside
I,
don't
believe
we
have
enough
hotel
spaces
notice.
We
don't
have
anyone
from
the
hotel
community
saying:
oh,
don't
do
this.
We're
gonna.
N
Take
some
of
our
business
away:
it's
just
a
fantasy.
You
know,
because
right
now
there
isn't
enough
hotel
space
on
big
weekends
and
in
that
kind
of
stuff,
and
we
do
lose
it'll
buy
off
that
there's
no
economic
opportunity,
I
believe
there
is,
and
we
certainly
need
it
as
a
community
I
respect
land
owner
rights,
but
there's
landowner
rights
involved
with
both
sides
of
this
equation.
N
So
I
appreciate
what
you've
done
you
know,
and
it
seems
that
the
original
proposal
and
the
adjustments
are
making,
but
the
original
pros
'el
was
like
a
reaction
to
people
being
concerned
that
this
was
going
to
be
horrible.
The
owner
has
to
be
there
or
live
there
or
it
has
to
be
right
next
door,
I
mean
it's
pretty
heavily
regulated
to
make
sure
that
it
is
a
process.
N
It
doesn't
deteriorate,
neighborhoods
the
fact
that
we're
going
to
be
Barcelona
and
we're
and
the
theory
side
is
going
to
turn
into
the
restaurant
of
the
hotel
district
I.
Just
don't
think
that's
consistent
with
reality
in
our
small
town.
I
think
this
can
be
done
thoughtfully.
I
think
this
can
be
done
in
a
manner
that
the
the
community
thrives
in
this
and
I
think
it
was
a
well
thought
out
proposal
and
I
appreciate
the
time
you've
done
for
tweaking
it.
N
One
other
thing,
I'm
gonna
say,
is
I
live
on
East,
8th
Street
for
I'm
wearing
an
r1,
but
but
Mason
the
traffic
noise
and
all
that
goes
with
living
on
a
Main.
Street
certainly
doesn't
feel
like
it's
nestled
in
the
middle
of
a
neighborhood.
You
know
so
the
thing
is
we
go
with
give-and-take
and
we'll
continue
to
do
that,
but
I
appreciate
your
time
and
I
see
a
matter
of
time
and
just
trust
that
you'll
do
a
good
job
going
forward.
Thank
you
very
much.
Ok,.
F
Had
we
been
able
to,
we
can't
know
who's
advertising
where
and
when,
because
this
whole
thing
with
with
the
brush
controls
every
we
can't
regulate
that,
and
we
can't
record
the
Internet.
We
can't
do
those
sorts
of
things
that
you're
proposing
but
everywhere
I
know
everywhere.
There's
been
problems
with
short-term
rentals
in
residential
areas.
Even
more
cities
abandoned,
there's,
been
lots
of
problems
and
I.
F
Think
when
you
have,
when
you
have
a
regulation
like
you're
proposing
it
opens
up
the
door
for
more
of
it
and
I
think
it's
I
think
it's
not
a
smart
thing
to
do,
and
it's
just
everywhere.
You
read
about
Airbnb
using
the
research
is
very
strong
on
this
too
I.
Just
that's
my
point,
Salem
and
going
back
to
you
at
the
Rothstein
can
you're
right,
but
the
broad
that's
enough
to
change
everything
you
know
didn't
have
to
change
where
we
live
and
how
we
interact
in
the
community.
F
A
O
Well,
the
first
thing
I
think
is
that
demand
on
any
given
night
for
somebody
to
stay
in
an
Airbnb
in
the
city
of
Athens
Ohio
is
very
minimal.
Most
of
our
hotels
on
any
given
night
or
less
than
half
full,
so
I'm,
not
I
would
not
expect
that
a
lot
of
people
would
all
of
a
sudden
immediately
start
renting
out
their
homes
or
B&B
air
B&B,
or
anything
like
that.
O
Through
the
comprehensive
plan.
We,
the
comprehensive
plan
draft,
is
silent
on
this
issue.
Right
now
we
didn't
have
any.
There
was
no
real
discussions
about
it
through
the
planning
process.
Any
real
consensus
is
to
move
work
on
this
item
or
not.
There
is
some
discussion
about
how
to
change
and
how
to
be
more
dynamic,
with
our
rental
permit,
with
inspections
and
enforcement.
Of
course,
we've
heard
those
things
for
years.
O
Now
that's
never
going
to
change,
but
then
the
other
item
is
like
I
said:
I,
don't
think
I,
don't
think,
there's
that
much
demand
I,
don't
think
a
lot
of
people
want
to
have
people
living
in
their
homes
for
a
short
term
or
for
a
long
term.
Anybody
in
Athens
who's
got
a
single-family
home;
they
can
t
keep
to
renters
right
now.
Very
few
people
do
that
period
and
so
to
just
allow
somebody
to
have
the
opportunity
to
rent
out
their
home
does
not
mean
that
they're
going
to
rent
out
their
home.
O
It
does
give
property
owners
more
flexibility,
though,
we've
heard
from
a
lot
of
people
who
say
this
would
help
them
to
make
their
mortgage
payments.
For
example,
they
can
rent
out
their
house
once
a
week
once
a
month,
something
like
that.
Get
it
a
couple
hundred
a
couple
hundred
dollars
extra
that
can
do
it.
That
can
go
a
long
way
for
somebody
if
they're
on
a
fixed
income
or
if
they're,
on
a
high
mortgage
payment
or
something
like
that,
so
it
can
actually
help
them.
O
In
many
ways
we
do
hear
a
lot
about
conversations
about
75%
of
the
city
is
rental.
That
is
true.
That
being
said,
40%
of
our
city,
4,
is
our
largest
from
our
largest
land.
Use
is
single-family.
Residential
40%
of
our
city
is
single-family
residential,
almost
0%
of
our
cities
are
it's.
It's
very,
very
small
portion.
You
see
anything
yellow
on
that
map
is
r2
actually
less
than
that,
because
there's
a
rezoning,
there's
very
little
r2
in
our
city
of
our
rentals,
about
90%
of
them
or
greater,
are
within
our
r3
zone.
O
So
if
we
look
at
when
we're
my
my
intern
and
I
are
actually
trying
to
break
down
the
numbers
to
get
details
on
how
many
of
our
rentals
are
actually
in
our
one
zones,
but
it's
actually
more
in
line
with
national
averages,
which
is
75%
of
an
r1
zone
is,
is
owner.
Occupied
25%
is
rental,
so
we're
actually
we're
doing.
Okay
on
that
and
so
expanding
allowing
a
little
bit
more
flexibilities,
rental
I
would
not
expect
that
we
would
see
too
much
change
from.
O
Well,
this
separation
of
uses
is
a
historic
purpose
of
zoning
and
that's
and
our
our
zoning
scheme
is
set
up
around
the
separation
of
uses.
It's
typically
referred
to
as
an
Euclidean
zoning,
which
is
based
on
the
the
village
of
Euclid,
the
city
of
Euclid
and
Cleveland
WA,
which
satis
US
Supreme
Court
case
to
defend
the
the
rationale
and
the
legal
basis
for
zoning,
and
in
that
situation
it
was
a
separate
residential
from
manufacturing
so
that
you
didn't
have
they
were.
O
They
were
deemed
incompatible
uses
in
that
a
city
under
the
police
powers
could
zoning
as
an
exercise
of
police
powers.
Historically,
the
separation
of
uses
has
been
the
overriding
goal
of
zoning
over
the
last
two
decades,
though,
there's
been
a
lot
of
planners
architects,
land-use
professionals
and
cities
that
have
acknowledged
that
the
separation
of
uses
has
actually
create
a
lot
of
unintended
consequences,
a
lot
of
problems
in
communities.
It
isolates
it
isolates
us
from
business
uses
it.
O
It
requires
us
to
drive
everywhere
parking
requirements
and
all
those
further
complicate
that
equation,
and
so
a
lot
of
cities
are
moving
back
from,
are
starting
to
shift
less
on
separating
uses
and
more
on
looking
at
how
the
city
is
designed.
So,
rather
than
saying
we
don't
want,
we
don't
want
business
in
our
r1
zones.
If
we,
if
we're
going
to
have
a
business
and
an
r1
zone,
we
want
it
to
look
in
this
manner
or
we
can
have
some
business
in
an
r1,
but
we
don't
want
large-scale
business
in
our
communities.
O
A
One
of
the
things
that
I've
noticed
on
my
street
is
that
more
families
are
starting
to
move
back
with
children.
I
don't
know
if
this
is
because
people
are
trying
to
find
enclaves
where
you
know
they
feel
safe
to
raise
children
whatnot,
but
you
know
and
I
know
that
I'm
selling
my
house,
as
a
matter
of
fact
to
somebody
who's
starting
a
house,
a
family.
So
you
know
my
concern
would
be
what
effect
allowing
more
short-term
housing.
A
O
Seeing
a
generational
change,
I
think
and
that's
it's
that's
typical
about
every
20
to
30
years.
You
know,
20
years
from
now
my
children,
my
child,
will
be
full-grown
and
probably
30
years
from
now
I'll
be
looking
to
sell
my
home
and
then
a
new
family.
Ideally,
then,
a
new
family
comes
in
and
takes
it
over.
O
So
there's
a
that
cyclical
activity
is
happening,
I,
don't
anecdotal,
anecdotally,
at
least
I
know
in
my
neighborhood
there's
a
lot
more
families
with
children
today
than
there
were
10
years
ago
talking
to
neighbors
who,
in
that
neighborhood
for
a
long
time
your
comment
or
your
concern
about
how
that
might
impact
that
I,
don't
I,
do
not
know.
Okay,.
B
Point
of
clarification:
you
know
we
always
talk
about
the
percentage
of
the
housing
stock
in
the
city
of
Athens
that
are
rentals.
We
hear
about
all
the
conversation.
That's
not
had
is,
and
maybe
you
can
answer
is,
what's
the
percentage
of
rental
units
in
our
one
neighborhoods
and,
more
importantly,
or
equally
important
what
constitutes
a
housing
unit,
because
when
I
look
at
things
like
carriage,
Hill
or
I,
look
at
Park,
Towers
or
I,
look
at
river
gate
or
a
look
at
Coates
run.
B
O
B
B
A
Q
A
comment
as
much
as
maybe
a
question
for
the
administration
of
is
there
some
compelling
legal
impediment
or
other
compelling
argument
that
would
prevent
us.
I
mean
I,
certainly
understand
the
need
to
to
have
some
regulation
of
this,
but
is
there
some
compelling
reason
that
that
regulation
could
not
incorporate
limits
based
on
zoning
districts,
so
eliminating
it
from
certain
zone
and
zoning
districts?
Eliminating
short-term
rentals.
P
C
Q
C
B
C
H
P
P
I
think
the
where
property
was
a
residential
property
for
years
and
then
all
of
a
sudden
it's
become
a
party
house,
I
mean
I
I,
don't
I,
don't
have
anything
against
the
owner,
but
I
think
that
if
I
were
the
next-door
neighbor
I,
would
it
be
pretty
peeved
afternoon
and
everything
else
that
happens
and
I
and
I
don't
know
that
we
can
even
deal
with
that
because
it's
a
nonconformity
even
if
we
pass
this
on
either
side
or
unless
a
they
make
a
big
change.
The
other
thing
is
I.
P
Do
think
that
people
have
a
view
of
rentals
that
are
neither
carriage
hill
or
something
else,
but
in
my
neighborhood
on
Franklin
Hall
on
Columbia,
which
is
a
noisy
Road
and
it's
not
one
and
but
it
does
have
rentals
and
the
rentals
are
houses
that
are
rented
and
they're,
not
obviously
different
from
the
others
and
I.
Think
that's
one
that
you
can
tell
because
of
a
car
in
the
front
yard,
but
other
than
that
there's
a
problem
with.
There
is
no
problem
with
rentals.
P
In
fact,
if
I
go
down,
I
used
to
be
the
Third
Ward
room
and
the
people
on
Franklin
and
Grove
never
never
upset
about
having
student
rentals.
Next
autumn
we
heard
testimony
from
a
person
on
State
Street,
who
said
I,
don't
mind
having
the
students
living
next
door
to
me
as
long
as
I
know
who
they
are
when
they
are
when
they're
coming
when
they're
going,
where
they're
parking
their
car
blah
blah
blah.
So
if
they
Park
in
my
driveway
and
tell
them
to
move
and
so
on
and
so
forth,
that's
a
neighborhood
concept.
P
P
The
one
that
Mary
table
has
talked
about
I
mean
that's
a
statement
of
fact:
I,
don't
think
it's
a
segue
into
developing
B
and
B's
all
over
town
I,
don't
see
how
it
could
be
because
we
have
to
permit
all
of
the
rentals
in
order
to
accomplish
some
kind
of
control.
That's
probably
not
the
right
word
regulation.
You
know
you
know,
I,
really
appreciate
what
happened
in
the
intervening
period
between
the
two
events,
but
I
still
would
like
to
see
some
protection
of
the
r1.
That's
where
my
lot,
my
my
line,
is
right.
P
There
item
I,
think
people
see
five
rentals
as
being
a
Segway
and
I'm,
not
sure
it
is
it's.
What
we
really
want
to
do
is
pick
up
those
places
where
people
are
going
on
sabbatical,
maybe
or
other,
are
using
their
house
to
ready
to
give
their
friend
for
a
year
or
swap
I
think
that
probably
needs
to
be
with
the
posts
of
the
houses
of
the
rest.
That
probably
needs
to
be
in
the
code.
We
need
to
beyond
what
it
is
with
the
regulations
as
they
are
so
I'm
in
favor
of.
P
If
we
can
doing
something
about
the
single-family
dwelling
requirement
in
our
one,
either
an
owner-occupant
or
no
I
mean
I'm,
not
talking
about
the
owner,
our
key
that
would
solve
all
the
problems
so,
and
you
know
I
think
you
can
go
back
and
say:
GB
they've
had
so
many
lawsuits
about
it,
but
I
sent
many
of
you
probably
not
successfully.
The
Airbnb
suit
Boston
in
federal
court
challenging
the
ordinance
aimed
to
discourage
from
converting
houses
and
an
apartment.
P
Since
a
de
facto
hotels,
now
I've
been
embossed
the
first
time,
I
stayed
in
a
B&B
and
I
was
staying
in
a
de
facto
hotel
and
he's
more
or
less.
It
was
pretty
scary
because
of
the
lock
situation
and
so
on.
In
addition
to
requiring
the
host
register
of
the
city,
the
origin
is
restricted,
short-term
rentals
to
spaces
where
the
owners
present
require
that
Airbnb
share
its
information.
Those
are
both
things
that
have
just
recently
come
out.
P
We're
doing
this
just
enough
for
two
at
this
time
it
may
have
taken
a
while,
but
it
has
so
I
really
think
that
in
the
r-1
zones
and
in
your
neighborhood
for
example,
which
is
around
the
corner
for
me,
the
neighbors
are
upset
what
the
student
said
live
and
tarp
their
car
for
sale
on
the
street.
But
what
do
they
do?
They
go
to
the
owner
or
lose
in
town
and
they
say
shaped
out
those
guys
up
now,
I'm
not
sure
he
has,
but
I
think
they
think
about
it
and
in
your
neighborhood.
P
Also,
people
are
coming
for
Columbus
on
cash
in
their
pocket
and
buying
houses,
and
that's
scary
as
well.
So
we've
got
to
grab
hold
of
this
thing
and
control.
It
I
mean
I,
don't
know
Nessa,
we
believe
in
control,
but
I
believe
we
need
to
do
something
to
sharpen
it
up
and
I
can
see
no
better
place
to
have
it
than
in
code,
because
I
think
code
is
nothing
on
that's
public
safety
and
that's
what
we're
after
right,
we're
not
trying
to
destroy
capitalism,
we're
not
trying
to
promote
it.
A
I
think
when
we're
talking
about
sharing
economy
and
things
of
that
nature,
what
I'm
hearing
is
that
there's
parts
of
this
town
for
everybody
or
that's
the
theory-
there
should
be
parts
of
this
town
for
but
you're,
not
if
you
don't
really
strengthen
the
r-1
requirements
as
far
as
owner-occupied
short-term
rentals
I,
don't
see
that
that's
giving
that
slice
of
the
pie
to
people
who
want
to
be
away
from
a
lot
of
the
activity
that
might
be
taking
place
around
town.
Do
they
want
to
be
able
to
raise
a
family
there?
A
They
want
to
know
who
the
neighborhood
is,
and
there
should
be
a
piece
of
the
town
for
those
people
as
well.
You
know
I
all
the
people
here
who
really
go
after
the
environment
and
you
have
the
ecosystems
and
whatnot.
You
know
and
I
think
our
one
is
a
fragile
part
of
that
Athens
ecosystem
and
that's
the
thing
then
that
we
need
to
be
preserving
and
you
know
we're
we're.
A
Mixtures
can
be
made.
That's
fine,
but
I
think
that
there
should
be
an
ultimate
notion
of
what
the
r1
is
to
this
town
and
the
protections
that
we
need
to
keep
that
thriving
in
terms
of
family
life
in
terms
of
just
having
some
normalcy
within
the
town.
You
know
you
know
in
a
community
that
has
a
high
bit
of
transition
and
people
moving
in
and
out,
etc.
A
C
C
Currently,
are
you
saying
that
we
should
we
should
go
ahead
and
and
and
basically
continue
to
allow
that,
but
then
reduce
our
duration
of
you
know
what
constitutes
needing
a
rental
permit
down
to
two
everything,
and
then
due
to
any
any
type
of
renting
will
require
a
permit.
Is
that
what
you're
saying
I
would.
P
C
Sure
sure
so
so
to
kind
of
take
it
a
step
further.
Should
there
be
a
definition
of
a
short-term
rental
period
and
I
kind
of
go
back
from
the
from
the
business
I
guess
business
is
perfected
in
the
right
direction,
but
you
know
I
kind
of
see.
You
know
that
that
you
know
I
ran
out
my
spare
room
on
on
VRBO
or
Airbnb.
C
That's
a
that's
a
function
somewhat
like
a
business
so
and
I
would
contend.
That's
transient
and
those
users
should
be
paying
transit,
guests
tax
and
so
I
guess
I
would
say
if
we
were
to
do
that,
we
have
to
have
some
sort
of
definition
of
short-term
rental
so
as
to
be
able
to
collect
the
transient
guests
tax
from
those
people
who
currently
are
allowed
to
do
it
but
aren't
having
it
do
any
kind
of
permit
because
of
that
below
six-month
limitation.
So
I
guess
I
would
just
ask
for
for
input
on
language
from
members.
C
You
can
rent
the
two
people
there,
not
if
you're
a
resident
or
you
can
rent
the
it
says
right
now,
the
keeping
of
not
more
than
two
renters
by
a
resident
owner.
It's
currently
permissible
absolutely
permissible
and
you
don't
have
to
get
a
permit
a
rental
permit
under
our
housing
code,
because
it's
less
than
six
months.
So
it's
currently
legal
to
ran
out
of
spare
room
in
your
house
on
Airbnb
for
two
people
and
it's
currently
in
our
code
now.
A
P
Okay,
Mike
I
still
think
it
was
a
good
face
offer
and
that
line
is
being
maybe
misinterpreted
and
I
think
we
could
almost
say
that
if
we
just
remembered
and
put
it
on
a
separate
line,
rentals
of
any
duration
must
be
annually
permitted
provisions.
I
mean
that
says
nothing
about
our
one.
Two
or
three
all
it
says
is
that.
C
P
A
C
Was
my
best
shot
right
and
I
guess
I
would
ask
the
members
of
the
Commission
if
you
want
me
to
come
back
as
a
member
of
the
Commission
with
a
with
a
modification,
please
send
send
instead
of
just
spoken
recommendation,
some
written
recommendations
and
I
can
source
it
with
the
administration
staff
and
listen.
We
can
come
back
and
bring
it
before
this
body.
Yet
again.
Okay,.
L
You
let
your
let
your
let
your
short-term
rentals
come,
let
them
be
in
all
the
B
zones.
Let
them
be
in
the
our
three
zones.
Let
them
be
in
the
our
two
zones
you're,
giving
those
people
additional
privileges.
Just
don't
give
those
additional
privileges
to
the
people
in
the
r1
zone.
The
r1
zones
won't
be
having
anything
taken
from
them.
They
will
just
be
having
restrictions
so
that
our
one
zones
as
they
are,
can
go
on
and
let
the
regular
folks
have
the
only
thing
they
have
to
retreat
through,
which
is
r1.
Okay,.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
There
are
no
communications
policy
to
end
this
I
guess
then
we're
going
to
discuss
this
earlier
and
I
know
that
we'll
probably
try
to
get
some
things
in
writing
for
mr.
stone.
Remember
stone
to
consider
and
for
me
for
you
for
us
all
to
consider.
Let's
see,
report
from
the
city
planner
mr.
Loeb,
nothing,
nothing.