►
From YouTube: Board of Zoning Appeals Meeting 10-09-07
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
evening
this
is
the
meeting
of
the
Athens
Board
of
Zoning
Appeals,
the
city
of
Athens.
Then
the
Athens
City
Board
of
Zoning
Appeals
supports
the
Americans
with
Disability
Act.
Anyone
needing
the
special
accommodation
may
make
such
request
at
this
time.
The
time
is
7
p.m.
and
the
date
is
October
9
2007.
A
At
this
time,
I
will
call
the
meeting
to
order.
The
board
consists
of
five
members
and
two
alternates.
They
alternate
stake
for
part
in
the
discussions
and
become
a
member,
a
voting
member
in
the
absence
of
a
member
or
when
a
member
at
absent
ease
of
the
conflict
of
interest.
President
tonight,
our
members
a
miss
baby
hallo
mr.
Roger
grew
sir
mr.
Hector's
floors
and
is
Michele
dreible.
A
B
A
Also
a
present
as
the
Hatton
City
Prosecutor
mr.
Mike
Miller,
the
board
operates
according
to
the
following
procedure:
1,
the
chair,
will
name
and
describe
the
case
to
the
Zoning
Administrator
will
state
the
basis
of
the
objection
and
any
applicable
facts
or
conditions
pertaining
to
the
case.
Number
3,
the
appellant
or
their
representative
will
give
reason
why
the
appeal
should
be
viewed.
Favorably
number
4.
Anyone
wishing
to
speak
in
favor
of
the
request
will
be
heard.
5.
Anyone
wishing
to
speak
in
general
comments
will
be
heard.
6.
A
Anyone
wishing
to
speak
in
opposition
will
be
heard
if
necessary,
the
appellant
or
their
representatives
will
offer
concluding
summary
or
rebuttal
remarks
it.
Testimony
from
the
floor
shall
be
closed.
The
board
will
deliberate
and
render
a
decision
according
to
the
aten
City
Code,
section,
23
or
7
or
3b.
The
board
has
power
to
grant
variances
from
the
strict
application
of
the
code,
provided
the
variance
will
not
be
contrary
to
the
public
interest.
The
spirit
of
the
code
is
observed,
Public,
Safety
and
Welfare
are
secured
and
substantial
justice
is
done.
A
According
to
the
athens
city
codes,
section
2309,
10
c
variances
from
the
code
shall
not
be
granted
unless
the
Board
finds,
based
on
direct
specific
findings
of
the
fact
that
each
of
the
following
conditions
have
been
supported,
practical
difficulty
in
undue
hardship
because
of
exceptional
or
extraordinary
circumstances
or
conditions
pertaining
to
a
specific
piece
of
property.
A
liberal
enforcement
of
these
regulations
will
result
in
practical
difficulty
or
undue
hardship
that
is
unnecessary
to
the
achievement
of
public
purposes.
A
A
A
The
authorizing
of
such
variance
will
not
be
substantial
detriment
to
the
adjacent
property
and
Walmart
materially
impair
the
purpose
of
the
zoning
code
or
the
public
interest,
not
at
the
general
nature,
the
condition
or
situation
of
the
specific
piece
of
property
or
the
intended
use
of
set
property
for
which
variance
is
sought
one
or
the
other
in
the
combination
is
not
of
such
a
general
or
recurrent
nature
as
to
make
reasonably
practicable
the
formation
of
a
general
regulation
for
such
condition
or
situation.
The
board
also
has
the
power
to
review
decisions
of
the
Zoning
Administrator.
A
Were
an
error?
Is
alleged
I?
Think,
since
we
don't
have
that
section,
I
guess
I'm
going
to
skip
that
part.
It
is.
There
is
only
one
case
tonight
on
the
agenda
and
the
board
is
required
to
take
testimony
under
oath
with
anyone
wishing
to
speak.
Concerning
any
item
on
the
agenda,
please
stand
and
swear
or
affirm
that
any
testimony
you
will
present
to
the
board
will
be
of
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth.
A
Our
only
case
is
case
number
o
7-15
V
for
variance
property.
A
38,
North,
Court,
Street
and
zone
is
B
to
D
Wasserman
Group
LLC
and
the
pair
is
the
appellant.
If
nominees,
requesting
a
variance
from
section
23
11
table
B
office
street
parking
requirements
to
permit
residential
occupancy
of
instruction
with
three
on-site
and
seven
offsite
parking
spaces
worth
10.
Onsite
parking
spaces
are
required.
B
My
name
is
Steve
Pearson,
amazonia
administrator
for
the
city
of
Athens,
Ohio
and
I
have
been
sworn
in.
I
provided
each
of
you
with
a
packet
of
information.
There
were
some
photos
that
were
in
those
that
were
black
and
white
and
I
have
distributed
the
color
pictures
that
accompany
the
application.
For
you
to
look
at
the
packet
contains
the
refusal,
the
original
refusal
you
should
have
a
drawing
that
indicates
where
the
property
is
located.
This
is
a
property.
B
The
board
is
heard
within
the
last
year
has
heard
a
case
regarding
this
property
on
two
other
occasions.
So
this
is
the
third
occasion
for
a
review
of
this
particular
property,
there's
just
a
very
basic
sketch
of
what
the
second
floor.
Residential
use
is
proposed
to
look
like
I've,
been
probably
some
of
these
documents,
you've
seen
with
other
applications
for
the
same
property,
there's
another
drawing
that
shows
the
three
on-site
parking
spaces
that
are
available.
B
B
That's
did
a
real,
quick
aerial
photograph
to
show
you
where
the
parking
for
the
additional
seven
spaces
is
located
at
I'd
like
to
point
out
to
mr.
Wasserman
and
his
application
said
it
was
nineteen
hundred
and
fifty
feet
and
I've
indicated
twenty-two
hundred.
But
it's
right
I
mean
it
is
what
it
is
around
two
thousand
feet:
I
used
just
to
really
quickly
use
GIS
to
make
the
measurement.
Also
in
your
packet
is
the
points
on
which
mr.
Wasserman
is
basing
his
appeal.
So
you
do
have
that
document.
B
That's
required
to
be
submitted,
there's
a
copy
of
a
lease
option
for
the
seven
parking
spots
at
175
Millstreet,
which
is
a
parking
lot
just
for
the
intersection
of
North
McKinley
and
Mill
Street
down
on
the
right
hand,
side
as
you
were
headed
east
toward
the
river,
and
there
was
one
letter
of
support
that
was
received,
and
you
had
that
in
your
packet.
Also.
B
The
parking
requirements
in
the
B
to
D
zone
for
commercial
uses
are
met
by
the
city
parking
garage,
so
there
is
no
commercial
parking
requirement.
Any
on-site
parking
space
is
in
the
current
B
to
D
zone
can
be
counted
toward
a
parking
requirement
for
residential
use.
So
that's
where
you
come
up
with
the
three
I'm
I
believe.
One
of
the
proposal
you've
heard
before
actually
asked
for
stack
parking
because
you
can
in
reality
get
the
more
than
three
cars
in
that
space.
However,
stack
parking
is
not
permitted
to
be
counted
toward
the
parking
requirement.
B
A
B
Correct
one
in
the
in
the
parking
code,
it
says
that
you
can
meet
the
parking
requirement
if
the
spots
are
on
site
or
they
are
in
the
same
ownership,
deed,
restricted
and
within
250
feet.
So
in
this
case,
that's
there's
no
ability
to
do
that.
Mr.
Wasserman
doesn't
own
parking
spaces
that
he
can
deed,
restrict
within
250
feet.
So
the
request
is
just
for
a
variance
to
have
that
parking
off
site
rather
than
on
site
or
in
same
ownership
or
deep
restricted
is.
C
B
I'm
not
sure
what
the
distances
have
been
for
parking,
variances
I
know,
since
the
parking
requirement
was
changed.
The
board's
probably
heard
about
50
cases
regarding
parking
variance
now
give
an
example
I'm
not
sure
how
far
it
is
from
Taco
Bell
or,
what's
that
other
place
up
there,
it
used
to
be
Oh
who
lease?
B
What's
it
called
Jackie
O's
people
that
the
owners
of
those
properties
couldn't
park
on
site,
but
they
came
to
the
board
and
asked
for
a
variance
to
park
on
property
in
their
same
ownership,
or
at
least
one
of
the
partners
ownership
at
electronic
vision.
The
old
electronic
vision,
which
is
a
Snyder
Fuller
office,
down
off
Depot
Street,
so
I'm
not
sure
how
far
that
is,
but
that's
one
example.
There
have
been
some
properties
granted
variance
on
the
west
side
of
town,
in
particular,
for
lease
parking
either
at
the
HDL
center
or
the
fairgrounds.
B
So,
to
tell
you
just
exactly:
what's
the
farthest
anyone's
been
able
to
park
away
from
the
use?
I,
don't
know
that
exact
answer,
but
those
are
a
couple
examples.
There
was
a
place
at
the
corner
of
not
Smith,
not
maple,
ready
that
Smith
maple
area
off
of
West
Washington
that
had
Deidre
Starkey
dan
at
the
HDL
center.
So
that
would
be
another
example.
B
B
B
I
can't
I
can't
remember
the
exact
roll
call
vote
or
what
the
vote
was,
but
it
was
approved
two
or
three
months
later
there
was
another
appeal
same
property.
The
proposal
was
to
have
the
additional
parking
that
was
necessary
at
a
property
in
same
ownership.
However,
it
was
on
North,
Lancaster
Street
above
2nd
Street,
just
about
right
behind
the
station
one
fire
station
and.
E
D
B
A
B
Other
thing,
too,
if
you
look
well,
if
you
looked
over
the
documents
to
related
to
distances,
the
appellant
has
given
a
list
of
distances
from
this
particular
location
to
the
proposed
parking
site,
Morten
lecture
hall,
a
new
Baker
Center,
the
convo
and
the
ping
Center.
So
that
might
you
can
compare
distances
from
this
property
to.
F
F
G
B
H
H
I
I
You
for
for
hearing
my
case
very
much
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
come
before
you
talk
to
you
about
my
building.
I
am
the
owner
of
the
land
and
building
at
38,
North,
Court,
Street,
more
commonly
known
I,
think
is
the
pigskin
building
I
think
the
board
is
probably
tired
of
hearing
appeals
related
to
this
building
this,
as
Steve
mentioned,
it'll,
be
the
third
one
that
you've
heard
in
the
last
year.
One
was
successful.
One
was
not
this
one
perhaps
be
the
tiebreaker.
I
One
of
the
key
differences
is
that
in
each
of
the
past
two
appeals,
the
appellant
was
not
the
owner
of
the
building.
They
were
basically
real
estate
speculators,
hoping
to
take
a
distressed
property
and
and
turn
it
into
the
chicken
that
could
lay
the
golden
egg.
Neither
of
them
went
ahead
and
bought
the
property.
I
On
the
second
floor,
while
bringing
the
entire
building
up
to
current
housing
codes
and
fire
codes,
I'm
requesting
relief
from
the
from
the
board,
in
the
form
of
a
variance
to
allow
me
to
rent
offsite
parking
to
satisfy
the
part
of
the
zoning
code,
that
I
cannot
satisfy
on
the
premises
lot
itself.
I
do
not
seek
to
skirt
or
ignore
or
subvert
the
code
in
any
way
only
to
comply
with
the
spirit
of
its
intention
by
providing
one
space
per
occupant
that
would
live
in
the
building.
I
All
the
spaces
would
be
of
conforming
size,
easily
accessible,
located
in
an
appropriate
zone
for
parking
and
will
be
located
on
the
same
street,
in
fact
as
the
rear
exit
of
the
building.
This
is
a
parking
lot
that
college
students
routinely
use
every
day.
Now
the
lot
houses
over
70
cars,
the
previous
variants
that
was
turned
down,
would
have
had
parking
in
a
zone
for
which
its
unintended
and
it
also
wasn't
actually
a
parking
lot.
I
The
downtown
area
is
zoned
for
mixed-use,
and
the
residential
housing
on
the
second
floor
meets
the
goal
of
the
Comprehensive
Plan
by
also
relieving
pressure
on
the
surrounding
neighborhoods
for
both
housing
and
parking,
and
you
can
see
in
your
in
your
packet
I
believe
that
this
variance
request
has
the
support
of
the
Near
East
Side
neighborhood
Association,
as
evidenced
by
their
support
letter
I,
know,
I'm
sure
that
you've
all
read
the
written
appeal
so
I
suppose
I'm
not
supposed
to
go
through
it
line
by
line.
But
I
do
want
to
hit
a
couple
of
highlights.
I
If
that's
alright
with
you
and
then
hopefully
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have
as
I
mentioned,
I
have
a
building
that
takes
up
almost
its
entire
footprint.
There
is
a
small
parking
lot
in
the
back.
We
parked
five
cars
there
in
a
dumpster,
but
two
of
those
cars
are
always
blocked
in
by
others.
So
I
didn't
count
them
toward
the
parking
that
I'd
be
using
for
this
development.
I
I
counted
only
the
three
spaces
that
are
easily
accessible
from
the
curb,
so
I
think
that
I
have
what
I
think
you
folks
called
a
practical
difficulty,
whereas
I
don't
have
the
space
on
the
lot
to
provide
the
parking
that
the
probe
needs.
You
and
you
alone
have
to
have
the
power
to
remedy
that
this
situation
and
I
and
I
hope
to
demonstrate
that
it's
in
the
public
interest
to
do
so.
I
Ranting
of
this
variance
would
result
in
each
and
every
occupant,
as
I
mentioned,
having
a
dedicated
parking
space
for
their
car
that
conforms
to
the
size,
specifications
of
the
code
and
a
lot
that's
currently
used
every
day.
I
believe
that
I'll
be
improving
the
building
when
you
improve
a
building.
I
In
this
day
and
age
to
house
people,
especially
above
a
commercial
use
that
includes
sprinkler
in
the
building
that
includes
the
necessary
separation
for
fire,
so
that
you
have,
you
know
the
certain
amount
of
hours
that
it's
supposed
to
take
for
flame
to
get
from
one
side
of
the
wall
to
the
other.
There
is
a
restaurant
and
bar
below
it
and
that
space
would
be
brought
up
to
current
building
codes
as
well,
including
splintering
sprinkler
in
that
space.
I
The
end
result
would
be
10
new,
tenants,
uptown
and,
as
I
said,
I
think
that
housing,
tenants
uptown,
is
consistent
with
our
goals
for
uptown
and
specifically
with
the
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan
I.
Think
I've
shown
that
there's
a
hardship
here,
both
mine
and
the
communities.
If
you
look
at
the
photographs
of
the
upstairs
of
the
building,
I
think
you
can
see
that
that
it's
an
unfortunate
waste
of
space
and
I
think
that
there's
no
real
good
public
purpose
served
in
leaving
it
in
that
condition.
I
I
do
believe
that
this
variance
would
be
the
minimum
possible
to
grant
relief.
Recent
history
has
shown
us
that
very
few.
If
anyone
can
rehab
a
building
uptown
without
the
use
of
some
variance
to
to
address
some
problem
that
they
have
with
their
lot,
many
of
them
relate
to
parking
some
to
distance
some
to
ownership.
Some
to
to
both
of
those.
I
Some
of
those
applicants
were
we're
fortunate
enough
to
own
parking
that
they
could
use
off-site
I'm,
not
quite
that
fortunate,
but
I
did
go
out
and
find
a
parking
lot.
That
I
think
is
a
good
lot
and
the
owner
of
that
parking
lot
in
fact
has
intention
to
rehab
it
as
well,
and
it
will
become
a
paved
parking
lot
within
the
next
couple
of
years.
If
he
gets
to
do
what
he's
going
to
do
so,
I
think
it'd
be
a
good
situation.
I
I
So
so
my
building
is
almost
exactly
the
same
distance
from
this
parking
as
it
is,
for
instance,
from
the
new
Baker
University
Center,
and
the
only
reason
I'm
doing
is
to
demonstrate
that
the
distance
is
a
distance,
that
college
students
will
walk
on
a
routine
basis
every
day
in
their
lives
and
and
I
think
that
most
of
them
will
gladly
gladly
pay
that
price
to
live.
Uptown.
I
So
there
isn't
much
else
that
I
can
say.
I
would
like
to
just
draw
your
attention
one
more
time
to
the
photographs
that
I
presented
with
my
appeal,
which
are
laid
out
there
I
think
more
than
anything
that
the
photos
show
what
a
waste
the
upstairs
of
the
building
has
become.
I've
been
a
tenant
of
the
building
for
11
years
before
I
was
given
the
opportunity
to
buy
the
building.
So
I've
witnessed
the
deferred
maintenance
and
you
know
there
are
lot
of
problems
up
there
now.
I
I
H
I
I
That's
an
interesting
question:
I'm,
not
sure
what
I'm
allowed
to
say
in
this
forum.
There
are
spaces
closer,
certainly
but
to
rent
them
would
be
from
renting
from
people
who
would
be
competitors,
shall
we
say
in
the
housing
market,
and
so
it's
not
in
their
interest
to
rent
them
and
they
won't
rent
them
and
believe
me,
I
called
virtually
every
property
owner
in
the
Uptown
area
and
it
it's
a
tough.
I
I
I
wasn't
involved
at
all
because
I
was
merely
a
tenant
in
the
building,
when
the
variance
that
was
passed
about
a
year
ago
came
to
pass.
There
was
going
to
be
a
working
relationship
between
the
owners
of
the
secured
parking
lot
and
the
venn
landlord
Bob,
Wilson
and
I
had
discussions
with
with
the
secured
parking
lot
folks
as
well,
but
no
equitable
deal
could
be
reached,
I
mean
they.
You
know
they
wanted
to
own
the
apartments
outright
and-
and
there
wasn't
really
any
financial
benefit
for
the
building
owner.
There.
F
I
F
I
Already
happened
because
of
and
I
don't
want
to
speak
out
of
school
here,
but
apparently
there
is
a
development
being
considered
by
the
current
owner
on
there.
That
would
still
have
enough
parking
left
over
for
his
development,
as
well
as
the
seven
spaces
that
I
need.
So
that's
how
the
Lots
going
to
get
paved
if
they,
if
they
end
up
building
a
building,
a
lot
will
get
paid.
A
H
A
B
The
code
says
that
ingredient
appearance,
the
board,
can
attach
any
conditions
and
safeguards
necessary
to
guarantee
the
intent
of
the
variance.
So,
for
example,
you
could
say
if
the
parking
was
ever
removed
or
diminished,
relinquished
whatever
at
this
particular
place.
That
would
automatically
avoid
the
variance
and
require
a
rehearing.
B
D
B
Subject
to
our
approval,
wouldn't
it
that's
correct.
That's
not
unsimilar
I!
Think
it's
your
last
meeting
you
had.
There
was
a
variance
granted
long
ago
that
had
quite
a
few
attached
conditions
and
the
code
does
allow
for
those
to
safeguard,
essentially
the
integrity
of
the
variance
and
the
public
interest.
B
A
A
B
You
know
I
have
heard
about
some
plans
to
do
additional
development
at
175
mill,
and
so
as
long
as
it'll
always
be
in
the
record,
but
for
as
long
as
I'm.
Here
you
know
I'll.
If
I
see
175
mill
I'll
know
all
that's
not
only
their
parking
that
they
need
plus
seven
other
spaces,
this
one's
a
little
different.
B
A
F
J
F
G
J
B
F
F
H
F
B
F
F
F
G
F
G
A
F
It's
a
pretty
substandard
pokey
yeah.
It
is
a
parking
lot.
Certainly
it's
in
my
neighborhood
I'm
very
sympathetic
to
the
idea
that
he
was
a
building,
that's
occupied
on
the
first
floor
and
the
space
upstairs
needs
to
be
rehabbed
and
we
have
somebody
who's
willing
to
rehab
it,
and
so,
potentially
that
seems
to
be
an
attractive
situation.
It
would
be
maybe
safer.
F
H
F
F
C
F
The
seven
offsite
parking
spaces
to
be
located
at
175
mill
street,
with
the
condition
that
they
be
clearly
specified
is
intended
for
and
provided
for
and
excluding
all
others
for
mr.
Weissman's
tenants
and
with
the
conditions
that
should
conditions
at
that
parking
lot
change
at
all
that
mr.
Wasserman
would
need,
or
the
owner
of
the
building
at
30
84th
Street
would
need
to
return
to
the
Zoning
Board
to
have
the
case.
We
heard
to
see
if
the
conditions
would
be
still
satisfactorily
met.
A
A
Practical
difficulty
in
undue
hardship
because
of
exceptional
or
extraordinary
circumstances
or
conditions
pertaining
to
a
specific
piece
of
property.
The
literal
enforcement
of
these
regulations
will
resolve
in
practical
difficulty
or
undue
hardship
that
is
unnecessary
to
the
achievement
of
the
public
purposes.
F
Well,
I
think
I
think
every
time
I
read
this
I
really
need
to
think
about
it.
What
it
really
says
is:
does
littoral
enforcement
of
the
code
create
an
undue
hardship
that
is
not
necessary
to
the
achievement
of
public
person
purposes?
It's
not
just.
Is
there
a
hardship,
but
is
that?
Are
we
creating
a
hardship
that
is
unnecessary
through
literal
enforcement
of
the
code?
So
if
we
stick
to
the
terms
of
the
code,
does
that
make
an
unnecessary
hardship
for
mr.
asana
unnecessary
in
terms
of
what
the
code
is
intended?
The.
G
F
G
A
F
J
D
C
We
I
think
it's
reasonable.
It
would
have
been
nice
to
me
to
get
something
closer,
but
I
think
it'd
be
reasonable
because
most
of
the
students
of
uptown
very
very
seldom
take
the
cars
out
and
go
driving
around
the
neighborhood
and
come
back
and
walk
around
I.
Think
some
of
the
students
that
I
know
they
take
their
cars
home
on
a
weekend,
because
I
got
part-time
jobs,
home
yeah,
but
they're
taking
care
of
their
mother
and
father
most
of
the
time
they'll
just
come
park
the
car
and
leave
it
okay.
C
G
A
C
F
If
everybody
else
is
grandfathered,
then
you
think
we'll
gosh.
These
people
should
have
the
same
right
to,
but
the
reason
those
are
grandfathered
and
these
others
are
not
is
because
they
would
probably
grandfathered
when
the
code
came
in
in
68,
because
they
were
already
as
they
were.
In
the
meantime,
buildings
that
used
to
really
house
businesses
have
become
residential,
which
creates
a
different
kind
of
a
problem,
and
it
does
leave
mr.
Wasserman
or
other
people
who,
in
this
circumstance,
sort
of
out
on
a
limb
in
some
ways
without
the
same
privileges.
F
G
A
Okay,
reservation
of
equal
property
rights
they're.
All
its
reputation
of
these
regulations
would
deprive
the
appellant
of
Rights
commonly
enjoyed
by
the
others
in
the
same
zone
and
the
same
vicinity,
and
while
the
granting
of
the
requested
variance
will
not
confer
on
the
appellant
any
special
privilege
that
is
denied
to
other
properties
in
the
same
zone
at
the
same
Senate
again.
This
goes
with
the
second
one
in
terms
of
the
granting.
A
F
It's
not
because
of
us.
We
heard
that
case
three
times
denied
it
twice
and
finally,
were
literally
pressured
by
many
people
into
granting
that
variance,
but
not
until
the
owner
of
the
property
bought
a
parking
lot
within
reasonable
distance
of
that
property.
She
did
in
fact
find
a
parking
lot
on
I
believe
Congress
Street,
it's
a
little
bit
past
the
250
foot
thing,
but
she
did
buy
a
parking
lot
and
it
was
at
that
point
that
we
granted
variance
and
she
chooses
to
keep
it
empty
and
there's
our
apartment.
C
F
C
I
parked
down
the
middle
and
focus
and
I
knew
I
was
gonna
get
ticketed
anyway,
most
of
the
time
I
did
Park
and
it's
basically
put
250
in
a
way
we
are
preventing
him
from
the
other
places
that
are
not
rehab.
Looking
like
crap
that
are
deteriorated
right
before
our
eyes.
Nobody
went
to
touch
it.
I
think
what
is
putting
specula
system
just
over
a
stove
will
cost
you
between
25
and
five
thousand
dollars.
Just
one
over
study.
C
C
H
F
A
A
F
A
Another
man
general
nature,
the
condition
or
situation
of
the
specific
piece
of
property,
or
the
intended
use
of
said
property,
for
which
variance
is
South
is
not
aware,
so,
general
or
recurrent
in
nature
has
to
make
reasonably
practicable.
They
formulate
the
formulation
of
a
general
regulation
for
such
conditions
or
situation.
A
C
C
D
F
B
H
B
Distance
in
a
bigger
wall,
someone
who
might
be
upset-
and
there
are
several
different
ways-
that
the
city
provides
security
in
this
room.
People
are
watching
this
at
home.
They
may
be
watching
it
over
to
police
department.
They
may
be
listening
to.
What's
you
know,
I'm
saying
there
is
because
they're
security
with
every
especially
city
council
or
with
Planning
Commission
I
mean
I,
make
the
next
Planning
Commission
meeting
I
might
recommend
that
they
do
the
same
thing
sit
up
the
podium
rather
than
on
the
floor.
B
F
B
G
H
B
Another
thing
too,
I
believe
the
government
channels.
We've
talked
about
this
for
quite
a
while
working
on
like
an
opening
segment
where
the
members
will
be
introduced
and
that
whole
big
long
intro
will
be
read,
I
believe
there's
an
intern
working
on
that
right
now
and
so
they'll
actually
be
an
introduction.
It
should
be
nice,
so
hopefully
that's
still
in
the
works
and
I
reminded
people
from.
D
J
B
Thing
too,
if
you
notice
tonight,
I
revised
your
introductory
statement,
because
there's
been
some
question
about
announcing
to
the
public
if
they
have
some
kind
of
accessibility
or
handicap
requirement,
where
they
need
special
accommodation
in
this
room,
it's
always
been
on
the
legal
notices.
That's
always
been
on
the
agenda.
It's
always
been
on
the
notices
that
went
out
to
the
appellant
and
the
parties
of
interest,
so
we've
just
I
just
added
it
to
that
introductory
statement.
B
H
B
We
can
to
protect
you
as
possible
tonight.
It
seems
like
tonight
so
calm
and
relaxed
compared
to
the
last
meeting,
but
it
does,
it
does
on
occasion
become
these
things
become
heated
and
controversial,
so
we
get
some
name
plates
made
up,
go
up
there
next
time
at
least
that's
one
better.
You
know
safety
and
security
that
we
can
easily
accomplish,
and
there
are
other
things
that,
amongst
the
administration,
we're
talking
about.