►
From YouTube: Board of Zoning Appeals Meeting 09-09-08
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
evening
this
is
a
meeting
he's
got
a
small
excellent.
This
is
a
meeting
of
the
average
Board
of
Zoning
Appeals.
The
time
is,
7:00
p.m.
the
date
is
September
9th
2002
September
9
2008,
and
the
meeting
is
called
to
order
at
this
time
of
night.
The
board
consists
of
five
members
and
two
alternates
at
an
alternate
in
discussion
and
becomes
a
voting
member
in
the
absence
of
a
regular.
A
A
All
right
the
board
operates
according
of
the
following
procedure.
The
chair
will
name
and
describe
the
case.
A
code
enforcement
representative
will
cite
specifics
of
the
refusal,
the
appellant
or
a
representative,
then
will
state
case
for
granting
the
appeal
testimony
next
book.
Taken
from
those
who
support
granting
me
appeal,
then
those
who
wish
to
speak
in
general
comment
and
those
who
support
denial
of
the
appeal
following
all
testimonies
the
board
will
receive
concluding
remarks
from
the
appellant
discussion
from
the
floor
then
will
be
closed.
A
The
public
interest
so
that
the
spirit
of
the
code
shall
be
observed,
public
safety
and
welfare
secured
and
substantial
justice
done.
Athens
City
Code,
section
23
on
eine
1
0
C
requires
that
variances
from
the
code
shall
not
be
granted
unless
the
board
makes
specific
findings
of
fact,
based
directly
on
the
evidence
provided
to
it
that
the
following
six
criteria
are
met,
practical
difficulty
or
undue
hardship
is
the
first
one.
There
must
exist
a
practical
difficulty
or
undue
hardship
caused
by
exceptional
conditions
pertaining
to
the
specific
piece
of
property,
exceptional
circumstances.
A
There
must
exist,
exceptional
circumstances
or
conditions
applying
to
the
property
or
its
intended
use
that
do
not
in
general,
apply
to
properties
in
the
same
zoning
district
and
number
3
preservation
of
equal
property
rights.
It
must
be
determined
that
literal
interpretation
of
the
code
would
deprive
the
appellant
of
rights
commonly
enjoyed
by
others
in
the
same
vicinity.
While
granting
the
variance
would
not
convey
a
special
privilege
number
4,
it
must
be
a
minimum
variance.
A
It
must
be
determined
that
the
very
as
the
minimum
required
to
make
reasonable
use
of
the
property
number
five
an
absence
of
detriment.
It
must
be
determined
the
granting
on
the
variance
will
not
be
of
substantial
detriment
to
adjacent
properties,
enormity
really
impaired
the
purposes
of
the
code
or
the
Public
Interest
and
last.
It
must
be
not
of
a
general
nature
if
the
variants
thought
must
be
not
a
general
or
recurring
nature
such
that
the
situation
would
more
reasonably
be
handled
by
changing
the
law.
A
A
To
hear
and
decide,
applications
for
conditional
use,
substitution
for
non-conforming
use,
temporary
uses
and
appeals
for
its
alleged
by
the
appellant.
There's
an
error
in
the
decision
made
by
the
Zoning
Administrator
regarding
enforcement
and
interpretation
of
the
code,
as
well
as
request
for,
inter
turf
interpretation
of
the
code.
C
A
A
There
are
four
cases
on
the
agenda:
there's
number
0,
8
0
s,
419
South,
Court,
Congress
Street,
which
is
zoned,
are
three
Jack's
topher
is
the
amount
then
there's
0,
8
1
V,
plus
mu
1
Maplewood
Drive,
which
is
zoned
r1
Steve
Howard
is
the
appellant
number
0
822
T
4
West
30
Westfield
place
zoned
r3
Cecilia
Han
the
appellant
and
number
zero.
Eight
two
three
v4
721
Central
Avenue,
which
is
zoned
r1
Heather
McDowell,
is
a
parent.
A
appellant
board
is
required
by
law
to
take
testimony
under
oath.
A
Do
you
swear
that
the
testimony
you
will
give
to
be
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing?
But
the
truth.
Thank
you
know
we
do
have
the
four
cases.
We
still
do
not
have
our
two
newest
members
sworn.
But
what
we're
going
to
do
is
to
proceed.
They
will
be
able
to
listen
comment
and
so
on
until
it
comes
time
for
us
to
make
our
decision
at
that
time.
A
If
they
haven't
yet
been
sworn,
then
we're
going
to
be
operating
on
them
with
a
board
of
four
people
which
should
not
present
a
problem
unless
somebody
here
would
rather
be
heard
by
the
full
board
of
five,
in
which
case
you'd
be
able
to
have
your
case
continued
until
next
month.
A
You
don't
have
to
decide
just
yet
well
really
thinking
that
the
mayor's
gonna
be
here
any
minute
now.
So
that's
the
option,
however,
the
Dixons
okay.
Our
first
case
is
Oh
8
to
0
s
for
standing
for
substitution,
the
19th
South
Congress,
Street
zoning
r3
and
Jack
Stouffer's
get
palette.
Would
you
like
to
cite
any
specifics
of
fizzle
that
you
think
need
to
be
commented
on.
D
Just
for
the
record,
my
name
is
polish
and
mocker
I'm,
the
acting
secretary,
but
in
place
of
the
Zoning
Administrator
he'll
presenting
facts
about
the
cases.
This
case
is
pretty
much
identical
to
the
one
you
heard
two
months
ago.
Two
months
ago,
mr.
Stoffer
one
has
a
property
in
nineteen
soft
on
us
with
three
separate
buildings.
Two
months
ago,
he
asked
first
for
an
interpretation
to
see
if
changing
from
four
apartments
to
two
constitutes
a
change
of
views
which
would
necessitate
becoming
before
the
war
and
was
agreed
that
it
is
the
change
of
views.
D
So
you
gave
him
a
substitution
so
that
you
could
go
ahead
with
the
project.
This
is
for
the
rear
building
or
the
one
closest
to
South
High
Street.
The
rear
building
is
pretty
much
identical
to
the
middle
government.
So
as
far
as
I
know,
the
work
that
mr.
staffer
wants
to
do
will
be
identical
as
well.
D
A
E
Been
sworn
I'm
gonna
tell
you
the
truth,
all
the
truth,
my
name's
Jack
Stouffer
I
live
with
a
62
sunny
side.
I
want
to
take
about
a
minute
minute,
have
two
minutes
to
first
apologize
for
being
here
again,
but
give
you
a
little
background
as
to
how
I
came
to
be
here.
I've
been
sworn
in
I'm,
going
to
tell
you
the
truth.
I
hope
with
the
past
information
and
results
from
being
here
in
June
for
the
same
property,
but
a
different
building
that
this
evening
will
be
a
mere
formality.
E
However,
after
seeking
advice,
I
must
make
a
matter
of
public
record
all
the
facts,
I'm
aware
of
in
case
this
matter
goes
to
the
next
level.
I
need
to
provide
to
you
with
all
the
information
I
have
as
to
how
I
came
before
you
this
evening.
I
now
like
to
present
to
you
documents
that
will
help
the
chain
of
events
all
unfold
and
transpire
at
least
my
parents.
Here,
okay,.
A
E
E
But
what
I
became
aware
of
and
what
I
want
to
make
you
aware
of
so
in
case
this
isn't.
The
end
of
the
line
tonight
is
the
fact
that
I
became
aware
that
River
Park
Towers,
formerly
known
as
Lake
View
Apartments,
had
a
very
very
similar
case
to
mine.
They
submitted
their
application
on
April,
the
17th
and
I
submitted
my
application
on
April,
the
21st.
E
Mine
was
refused
on
May.
The
2nd
theirs
was
approved
on
May.
The
20th
now,
as
best
I
can
ascertain
from
the
information
that
I
could
get
from
the
code
office
in
the
mayor's
office
in
the
sort
of
safety
director's
office,
both
River
Park
Towers
in
nineteen
soph,
Congress
or
r3.
Both
were
interior
work.
Only
both
had
no
change
in
the
footprint
both
had
a
shortage
of
parking
and
both
had
no
increase
in
occupancy,
but
somehow
they
got
approved
and
I
didn't
get
approved
now.
I'm,
not
here
to.
E
Assume
or
imply
anything
I'm
merely
passing
along
the
information,
because
if
I
don't
say
it
here
tonight
and
we
go
to
court,
I'm
not
allowed
to
say
it
in
court,
but
I'm
hoping
this
is
just
the
end
up
here
this
evening,
of
course,
and
in
the
packet
of
information
you
received
and
I
won't
go
through
it
all,
but
there's
several
emails
back
and
forth
between
the
service,
Safety
Director,
the
mayor,
the
code
director
and
Nick
Carr.
In
regards
to
my
project
and
River
Park
Towers
project,
I,
reiterate,
I
was
refused
within
12
days.
E
E
E
I'm
going
to
read
most
of
this
stuff
to
you
just
like
I
did
the
last
time
because
they
get
nervous
when
I
get
mixed
up,
and
it's
important
to
me
for
this
to
pass
and
it's
important
to
me
to
get
all
the
facts
out
to
you
and
it's
important
to
me
that
you
understand
everything
that
I
say
so
at
any
point
in
time.
If
I'm
not
clear,
ask
me
a
question,
because
the
facts
are
on
my
side
and
I
want
to
get
them
all
out,
so
we
can
make
the
proper
decision
here
this
evening.
E
A
A
E
All
my
properties
at
all
the
different
addresses,
including
phase
one,
which
was
the
Congress
Street
building
and
Phase
two,
which
is
the
building
you
approved
in
June,
of
which
I
completely
renovated
between
June
16th
and
August
30th
and
mr.
Fredrick
did
have
a
chance
to
take
a
look
at
that
unit
today.
E
But
anyway,
if
you
look
at
the
there's
a
plat
map
in
here
that
shows
you
the
three
buildings
and
the
one
that's
been,
the
shaded
building
for
one
in
the
rear.
The
one
nearest
High
Street
is
the
one
that
we're
talking
about
here
this
evening.
The
front
house
has
been
completely
done.
The
middle
building
has
been
completely
done
and
now
I
want
to
not
bring
up
the
code.
My
building
is
up
to
code,
but
bring
up
to
today's
standards.
The
building
in
the
rear
and
I
wanted
to
get
my
building
permit
in
place.
E
So
if
there
was
any
work
that
I
could
accomplish
over
winter
break
or
spring
break
to
get
a
jump
on
the
situation,
that's
what
I
want
to
do.
I
had
mr.
bill
Morgan
draw
up
those
plans
that
you're
looking
at
there,
although
they're
just
a
set
of
flat
floor
plans,
you'll
look
on
one
side
and
they're
marked
proposed
improvements,
and
that
would
be
the
building
we're
going
to
do
and
the
other
building
and
the
other
floor
plan
is
the
building
that
was
recently
completed
this
summer.
E
E
The
living
rooms
are
in
the
same
places.
The
kitchen
and
living
room
are
kind
of
combined
and
expanded
to
make
a
nice
big
area
and
to
add
all
the
amenities
that
today's
consumer
requires,
which
is
central
air,
washers
and
dryers,
dishwashers,
garbage
disposers,
etc,
etc.
Updating
all
the
plumbing
and
all
the
elected.
That's
my
intention.
That's
what
I
want
to
do.
That's
the
reason
I'm
here.
E
I've
prepared
all
the
answers
and
explanations
for
the
six
points
that
I
would
need
should
I
be
going
for
a
variance
which,
of
course,
I'm
not
I'm,
going
for
a
less
objectionable
or
not
more
objection
or
non-conforming
use,
but
I
have
all
that
information.
I've
contacted
online
neighbors,
with
the
exception
of
mr.
singly,
who
would
be
to
my
immediate
north
and
I've
left
messages
a
couple
times
in
mr.
singly
or
mrs.
E
singly,
whoever
hasn't
contacted
me,
but
by
their
absence,
I'll
assume
that
they'd
have
no
objections
and
I
have
letters
from
all
the
other
people
that
are
my
neighbors
as
well
as
from
mr.
and
mrs.
Edward
robe,
who
previously
owned
a
property
for
29
years
before
I
did
and
for
mr.
Melvin
Steadman,
who
is
a
former
code
director?
So
if
you
want
to
hear
those
letters,
I'll
start
reading
them.
If
you
don't
want
me
to
read
them,
I
won't
take
up
your
time.
I
don't
want
to
hurt
my
case
by
not
reading
him.
You
tell
me.
E
Okay,
the
first
letter
is
from
Patrick
Rhodes.
If
you
look
at
the
plat
map,
you'll
see
just
to
the
north
on
the
Congress
Street
side,
a
building
that
has
probably
marked
Church
apartments
and
that's
what
mr.
Patrick
Rose
owns
the
letter
reads:
Athens
Zoning
Board
of
Appeals
I've
known
Jack
Stauffer
for
many
years
and
feel
compelled
to
contribute
a
few
words
concerning
his
situation
of
19
South,
Congress
I,
also
own
the
property
directly
next
door
at
15,
South
Congress
over
the
years
jack
has
continuously
worked
to
improve
those
rental
properties.
E
He
is
personally
involved
in
renovations
and
mechanical
updates
and
knows
how
to
get
the
job
done
right.
He
does
quality
work
and
takes
pride
in
the
results,
since
there's
no
change
in
Hawkins
to
be
requested,
I
always
support
Jack's
efforts
to
enhance
the
housing
stock
of
Athens.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
Sincerely
Patrick
Rose.
E
E
Appeals
Jack
approached
me
recently
and
informed
me
of
his
difficult
and
gaining
permission
to
improve
his
property,
which
is
next
door
to
our
Beta
Theta
Pi,
fraternity,
house
jack
has
been
a
good
neighbor
the
past
ten
years
and
less
and
I
that's
less
Cornwell
has
had
as
board
members
have
no
objections
to
his
current
request
update
his
property.
We
do
not
believe
it
would
be
a
detriment
to
our
fraternity,
house
or
neighborhood,
but,
to
the
contrary,
would
help
further
the
improvement
of
the
housing
available
in
and
around
the
near
campus
police.
Consider
mr.
E
Back
across
the
high
street
from
me,
I
have
a
couple
of
neighbors.
The
first
one
is
dimitra's
Pro
Coast
members
of
the
Board
of
Zoning
Appeals.
Thank
you
for
notifying
me
of
mr.
staffers
upcoming
case.
I
would
like
to
let
you
know
that
I
have
no
objections
to
his
upcoming
project
at
19
soft
converse.
If
Jack
is
allowed
to
improve
its
property,
it
will
help
with
this.
It
will
help
with
the
cities,
go
state
and
the
Comprehensive
Plan
to
upgrade
the
housing
stock,
thus
enhancing
all
surrounding
neighborhood
property
values,
respectfully
Demetrius
protests.
E
The
next
one
is
from
Cody
Reynolds.
Mr.
James
Cody
Board
of
Appeals
Cody
Reynolds
has
several
properties
across
the
street
from
Jax
property
as
an
adjoining
property
owner.
We
have
no
objection
for
his
his
desire
to
remodel
his
property.
We
also
have
some
concerns
that
are
more
global
in
nature.
If
property
owners
are
not
able
to
renovate
older
properties
in
an
efficient
and
economical
manner,
there
will
be
consequences.
E
Failure
to
renovate
older
properties
will
result
in
a
gradual
but
real
decline
in
the
overall
quality
of
rental
housing
in
Athens.
Please
note
that
remodeling,
an
older
unit
usually
demands
a
great
deal
of
removal
of
old
plumbing,
wiring
bathrooms
and
kitchens.
This
is
both
expensive
and
complicated
and
older
units.
Some
flexibility
and
moving
walls
around
etc
is
vital.
We
believe
that,
as
long
as
the
total
number
of
tenants
is
preserved
in
a
given
property,
then
such
flexibility
should
be
allowed
and
even
encouraged
in
order
to
ultimately
upgrade
Athens
property.
E
Back
to
the
high
street
side
across
High
Street
from
the
back
of
my
property,
where
my
parking
lot
is
and
next
door
to
mr.
Pro.
Kisses
property
is
property
owned
by
leon
hoshi,
our
dear
zoning
board
members
I
own
21,
South
High
Street,
which
is
located
across
High
Street
from
the
rear
of
mr.
stockers
property
at
19,
South
Congress
as
I
understand
the
situation.
Mr.
E
Stouffer
would
like
to
remodel
an
existing
structure
from
for
one
person
units
into
two
two-person
units,
both
the
total
number
of
allowable
occupants
and
the
total
number
of
parking
spaces
would
remain
the
same
under
the
existing
situation
and
the
proposed
improvement.
Consequently,
this
proposed
change
would
have
no
impact
on
the
population
density,
nor
the
parking
situation
of
the
neighborhood.
Therefore,
this
proposed
change
would
have
no
adverse
impact
on
my
property
at
21
South
hi.
Mr.
Furst
offer
plans
to
invest
a
good
deal
of
money
in
his
proposed
improvement
to
his
property
as
a
business
person.
E
He
believes
that
these
proposed
upgrades
will
provide
the
ever
more
demanding
student
housing
market
with
the
amenities
that
it
desires.
This
in
turn
makes
mr.
staffers
apartments
a
more
desirable
place
to
live
in
order
to
compete
with
mr.
staffers
upgrades.
The
other
landlords
in
the
neighborhood
will
be
prompted
to
improve
their
properties.
The
net
result
will
likely
improve
the
quality
of
life
for
high
streets,
/
Congress
Street
residents.
The
alternative
of
not
allowing
owners
to
improve
their
properties
is
a
recipe
for
economic,
economic
and
physical
decay.
I
have
known
a
conducted
business
with
mr.
E
staffer
for
20
years.
In
his
dealings
with
me,
he
has
always
been
an
honest
man
of
his
word.
If
he
tells
you
he's
going
to
install
90
plus
efficiency,
furnaces,
13,
seer
air
conditioners
and
upgrade
the
wiring
he
will.
In
conclusion,
mr.
staffers
proposed
improvements
are
as
I
see
it.
Definitely
not
a
more
objectionable
non-conforming
use
I
implore
you
to
allow
mr.
staff
to
make
his
proposed
improvements.
Leon
OSHA,
our
PhD
CPA.
E
The
next
letters
from
mr.
Melvin
Steadman
he
lives
at
84,
Sunnyside
Drive
he's
a
former
code
director
in
the
city
of
Athens
and
in
all
honesty
is
my
next-door
neighbor.
I
would
like
to
support
mr.
Stoffer
in
his
request,
upgrade
his
apartment
building
at
19
South
Congress
Street.
Mr.
Stoffer
has
some
of
the
best
maintained
apartments
in
Athens.
Mr.
staffers
not
changed
in
the
use
or
enlarging
the
use.
He
is
only
wanting
to
upgrade
this
apartment
building
for
the
health
and
safety
of
his
tenants.
E
Respectfully
Melvin
Steadman
I
have
one
last
letter.
This
is
from
Edward
and
Sally
rub:
19
Roosevelt
Drive
in
Athens
members
of
the
Board
of
Zoning
Appeals.
We
purchased
the
property
in
about
1970
from
the
previous
owners,
Earl
Bridgewater
and
dr.
Patton
and
I
believe
a
third
under
his
name,
I,
don't
recall.
In
any
event,
I
would
like
to
provide
you
with
some
background
information
on
the
property.
While
we
owned
the
property
from
1970
until
we
sold
it
to
Jack
Stoffer
in
June
of
1998,
we
maintained
the
property
but
did
no
major
renovations
remodeling.
E
There
was
12
one-bedroom
apartments
in
8
parking
places.
We
have
talked
with
Jack
at
times
over
the
years
and
he
has
told
us
of
his
renovations
and
improvements
to
the
front
building
which,
when
we
owned
the
property,
he
had
four
apartments.
We
understand
from
Jack
and
viewed
his
documentation
that
he
had
has
asked
for
an
was
granted
approval
to
renovate
the
front
building
and
has
completed
those
improvements
in
the
front.
Building.
Work
was
done
in
the
summer
of
2004
and
completed
in
the
summer
of
2007
with
new
mechanical
systems.
E
In
regards
to
the
two
back
buildings
they
were
built
in
the
late
40s
or
early
50s
and
Jack,
like
my
wife
and
I,
maintained
the
property,
but
did
not
upgrade
it.
The
property
in
question
is
in
need
of
improvements,
updates
and
redecoration
as
old,
electric
heating
and
plumbing
are
around
50
years
old
and
Jack,
who
I've
known
for
25
to
30
years
as
anxious
to
update
his
property.
While
he
has
had
new
windows
installed
to
increase
in
efficiency,
he
wishes
to
continue
his
improvements
by
adding
new
wiring
plumbing
heating,
cooling,
washers
and
dishwashers.
E
To
combine
on
first
floor,
the
existing
two
one-bedroom
apartments,
which
have
very
small
kitchens
and
bathrooms
and
utility
rooms,
which
will
allow
enough
room
to
enlarge
the
kitchens
and
baths
to
accommodate
high-efficiency
washers,
dryers
and
dishwashers,
and
do
the
same
on
the
second
floor,
there
would
seem
to
be
no
negative
impact
on
adjacent
property
owners
or
the
city
in
general.
To
the
contrary,
this
would
make
the
property
more
efficient
and
safer
for
future
tenants.
Respectfully
mr.
and
mrs.
Edward
Grove.
E
I'm
here
to
defend
my
property
rights
this
evening
without
the
ability
to
upgrade
my
property,
if
the
government
will
be
condemning
me
to
owning
substandard
housing,
I
have
pride
in
my
property.
I
want
to
be
able
to
be
proud
of
my
property
and
not
worry
about
what
may
break
down
or
go
wrong
next
I
realize
the
code
is
a
good
thing.
I
currently
meet
the
code,
but
I
have
50-year
old
buildings.
E
Again,
we
are
not
asking
for
a
change
of
use.
We
are
not
asking
for
a
change
of
occupancy.
We
are
not
asking
to
increase
density,
only
to
be
allowed
to
bring
the
property
up
to
today's
standards
for
the
same
number
of
people.
There
will
be
no
change
in
the
footprint.
The
building
will
look
exactly
the
same
from
the
outside,
except
we
will
tuck
point
the
walls.
We
will
paint
the
outside
and
we
will
install
a
new
roof.
E
Legal
occupancy
of
8,
we,
the
board
and
myself,
decided
that
it
would
be
a
concession
on
my
part
and
more
logical
that
we
reduced
the
number
of
allowable
residence
in
that
middle
building
from
8
to
4
and
that's
what
we
did
and
I
have
absolutely
no
objection
to
making
that
same
concession
to
the
building
that
we're
about
ready
to
undertake
the
same
exact
renovations
should
I
convince
you
people
to.
Let
me
do
so.
The
ceiling.
E
To
me,
this
seems
to
be
the
most
logical,
as
stated
in
23:05
Oh
to
substitution,
substitution
for
non-conforming
use
of
another,
not
more
objectionable,
non-conforming
use
may
be
made
I
realize
this
is
where
the
codebook
and
common
sense
come
together
again.
I'm
here
to
defend
like
property
rights
and
I
want
to
encourage
you
to
give
me
relief
change
seems
to
be
the
key
word
here.
I
asked
the
code
office
to
show
me
the
definition
of
change.
There's
not
one
written
down
so
its
interpretation.
E
So
I
feel,
like
I've,
been
run
through
the
wringer
in
June
and
again
in
September,
costing
myself
several
extra
dollars.
I
understand
you're
thinking.
Well,
that's
the
price
of
doing
business.
Well,
it
is
but
well
it
shouldn't
be.
I
had
to
twelve
bedrooms
of
twelve
one-bedroom
apartments
and
I'm
just
seeking
to
reconfigure
him
to
make
him
updated
and
safe.
E
G
G
F
G
G
G
E
Right
now,
I
have
old,
outdated
apartments.
I
could
let
them
go
and
continue
to
grow
older,
less
safe,
less
desirable.
That's
not
what
I
want
to
do.
What
I
want
to
do
is
make
my
property
safer,
more
attractive,
more
presentable,
more
rentable,
something
I
can
not
worry
about
something
going
wrong
or
somebody
you
know
being
injured
by
backed
up
drains
or
carbon
monoxide
I'm
going
to
get
the
gas
out
of
the
last
building.
F
E
F
A
E
H
E
When
I
renovated
the
front
house
in
the
summer
of
four-and-oh
7
I
put
in
there
was
three
apartments
over.
There
was
four
apartments
I
combined
it
I
made
it
three
apartments.
I
then
went
to
the
city,
water
department,
Beckwith
met
with
Nick
Joseph
and
put
in
three
separate
water
meters
for
the
three
separate
units
in
the
front
house
this
summer,
when
I
renovated
the
middle
building
and
reduced
it
from
four
apartments
to
two
apartments.
E
Well,
let
me
back
up
a
second.
The
water
service
to
the
front
house
comes
off,
Congress
Street
and
that's
where
we
put
in
three
new
meters,
two
separate
for
the
three
new
apartments,
the
two
buildings
in
the
back,
the
one
that's
renovated
and
one
it's
going
to
be
renovated.
Our
runoff
1
meter
the
feeds
from
High
Street.
So
what
I
did
when
I
did?
E
The
middle
building
was
I,
separated
out
all
the
water
lines
and
ran
two
new
water
lines
outside
the
building
X
number
of
feet,
and
that's
where
they
are
right
now,
my
plan,
when
I
do
this
building
next
summer,
with
your
blessing,
is
I'm
going
to
run
two
separate
lines
from
the
building.
I
just
renovated
out
to
High
Street
and
as
well
as
I'm,
going
to
run
two
separate
water
lines
from
the
back
building
out
to
High
Street
and
I've
already
met
with
Nick
Joseph
about
making
the
manifold
to
get
the
four
meter.
E
A
I
G
J
In
each
of
you
one
at
a
time
there
and
I
apologize
for
not
getting
to
this
earlier.
Looking
at
the
dates,
I
realized.
We
were
going
to
do
this
last
month
in
August,
but
since
you
never
met
it,
I
didn't
do
it.
Fortunately,
Joanie
got
in
touch
with
me,
so
I
scrambled
this
okay
I'll
start
with
Joanie.
Repeat
after
me,
Oh
aye,
yes
repeat
after
me,
hi
Joan
Kanaskie
thank.
K
J
J
A
G
J
A
A
We
do
several
extra
wording,
the
whole
thing
yeah.
We
do
want
to
mention
the
that
the
production
to
four,
and
we
also
want
to
mention
the
parking,
and
we
also
want
to
mention
the
gas
regulator
that
is
to
be
removed
so
that
we
can
try
to
find
another
parking
place.
It
will
probable.
It
looked
likely
anyway.
Last
time,
I
looked
that
we'd
be
able
to
have
at
least
nine
spaces
out
there
when
that
regulator
was
moved.
A
Yes,
we
we
did
have
that
might
be
well
to
have
in
the
okay
motion.
Okay,.
C
E
E
A
Alright
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
did
have
the
opportunity
to
go
and
take
a
look
at
the
work
that
was
done
on
the
middle
building
and
all
of
the
things
that
he
told
us
yeah.
This
is
a
beautiful
building,
complete
two
hardwood
floors
right.
It's
absolutely
a
place
that
I'm
I
think
that
well
I
met
the
young
ladies
who
are
living
there.
They
were
really
thrilled
to
be
in
it,
and
it
is
definitely
an
upgrade
to
that
particular.
G
G
C
A
A
L
A
A
Too,
am
in
favor,
so
you
have
a
unanimous
decision
for
going
ahead
and
making
the
other
building
as
wonderful
as
the
middle
one.
Is.
It
really
is
a
fine
job
that
you've
done
and
I
think
that
I
hope
your
tenants
are
as
pleased
as
they
should
be.
A
D
D
H
A
N
My
company
installed
our
construction
and
Steve.
Howard
is
my
client
and
we
have,
since
May,
been
trying
to
build
his
deck
exact
same
lot
cover
just
before
the
picture
makes
the
covered
part
look
bigger
than
it
really
is
it's
probably
a
bad
aspect,
but
we're
just
trying
to
cover
his
back
door
where
he
enters
when
he
brings
his
groceries
in
so
basically
has
an
unbroken
line
from
his
car
into
his
house,
so
he
can
get
into
his
back
door.
N
G
N
N
It
yeah
so
probably
coming
out
about
six
feet
with
the
pitch,
so
it'll
cover
the
full
of
the
stairs
as
they
go
into
the
house.
G
B
G
N
G
M
N
Some
Sketchup
it's
free
from
Google.
It's
a
lot
less
than
AutoCAD.
N
G
A
M
A
G
A
L
A
G
A
G
A
H
A
C
A
A
I
A
I
tune
the
field
it's
appropriate,
so
the
variance
is
granted
okay
moving
right
along
then
we
have.
The
next
case
is
for
a
temporary
use,
permit
its
case,
number
0,
822,
t
430,
westfield
place
and
cecilia
helen
a
hands
and
is
the
appellant
but
I
believe
that
is
being
represented
this
evening.
Would
you
Paul
give
us
the
specifics,
profly
we're
here
this
evening
with
this
case?
A
D
One
of
them
not
accessible,
that
variance
request
was
turned
down
over
the
board
later
did
give
her
a
temporary
use
permit
for
one
year,
for
that
was
in
2006
in
2008
a
couple
of
months
ago,
she
came
back
to
the
board
and
again
asked
for
a
variance
this
time
to
have
two
people
there
with
two
parking
spaces,
one
of
which
was
not
accessible
mule,
as
both
of
them
have
to
be
accessible.
The
board
turned
her
down,
but
did
recommend
that
she
come
back
and
seek
to
get
a
temporary
useful.
D
D
D
According
to
the
rules
as
I
understand-
and
you
can
renew
temporary
use
permits
for
up
to
36
months,
okay,
so
I
would
assume,
if
you
give
it
to
for
one
year,
then
they
have
to
come
back
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
if
the
pool
I
don't
think
the
board
is
allowed
to
give
a
temporary
use
permit
for
36
months
flat
out,
I
think
it's
one
year.
Okay
and.
B
C
B
Briefly,
to
remind
the
court
of
the
board
I'm
a
format
for
the
forum
members
were
present
early
this
summer,
when
the
case
of
mission
heard
by
note
all
the
members
weren't
again
I
represent
the
city
Hanson
at
the
time
that
this
issue
arose.
She
was
a
medical
student
at
the
University
since
that
time
she
has
started
her
residency
in
New
York
in
emergency
medicine.
Her
desire,
ultimately,
is
to
return
the
Athens
area
to
begin
a
practice
and
teach
at
the
Omaha
University
College
of
Medicine.
B
Right
now
she
owns
the
the
property
at
30.
Westfield
place
her
desires
to
return
of
that,
but
she
wants
to
keep
that
property
active
in
the
meantime,
as
the
code
is
written,
there's
no
way
for
her
to
rent
out
that
property
without
a
variance
or
temporary
permit
of
some
nature
minimum
of
two
parking
spots
up
to
the
number
of
residents
who
are
located
there
again.
B
So
the
possibility
of
putting
in
additional
parking
is
not
there.
In
addition,
given
the
nature
of
the
community,
she
doesn't
have
available
to
her
the
opportunity
to
lease
out
offsite
parking
to
satisfy
that
one
additional
parking
spot
that
she's
meeting
again
her
desires
to
have
up
to
two
people
right
now.
She
has
a
desire
to
have
one
person
in
there.
That,
of
course,
could
could
change
on
yearly
basis
to
paint
upon
me
desires
of
that
tenant,
but
her
desires
at
this
point
time.
B
They
have
one
person
in
there,
not
even
I,
don't
believe
covering
the
entirety
of
the
mortgage
payment,
but
just
an
in
order
to
a
sister
and
in
making
that
I
believe
that
having
to
pretend
it
in
there
would
be
a
betterment
for
the
community
as
a
whole.
I
think
that
in
most
people,
I
think
would
agree
that,
having
somebody
there
on
a
regular
basis
taking
care
of
the
property
having
somebody
live,
there
is
much
better
than
having
an
empty
house
with
you
know.
B
In
addition,
at
most
there's
two
people
in
there
from
the
fall
of
oh
six
into
a
summer
of
Southern
when
she
initially
had
her
temporary
use
permit
granted.
Previously,
though,
were
individuals
living
there.
Only
two
people
were
living
there
in
no
time
were
any
concerns
over
additional
traffic
raised
to
her
or
the.
As
far
as
they
know,
the
code
enforcement
office.
No
complaints
were
made
to
miss
Hanson.
The
reason
that
temporary
permit
was
not
extended
beyond
that
period
of
time
was
miss
Hanson
returned
to
the
Athens
area.
B
B
Let's
see
last
time
we
were
in,
we
heard
the
case
back
when
I
was
a
very
into
quest.
There
was
only
one
member
of
the
community
who
spoke
out
at
the
hearing,
I'm,
not
sure
if
the
forums
remember
mr.
Slagle
actually
spoke
out.
He
actually
spoke
out
in
favor
of
the
variance
request.
I
have
not
heard
of
any
other
additional
people
who
have
spoken
out
against
the
variance
or
the
temporary
permit.
A
minor
saying
is
that
it's
neutral
or
in
favor
of
although
I'm
not
actually
spoken
to
any
of
the
community
members.
B
There
are
apparently
number
of
houses
in
that
development
which
are
rented
out.
They
were
a
little
luckier
as
far
as
the
parking
situations
they
didn't
need
to
come
to
the
board
for
a
variance
or
a
temporary
use.
Permit
miss
Hanson
wasn't
so
lucky
and
she
does
require
the
temporary
permit
in
order
to
utilize
property
again
without
a
temporary
use.
Permit
she's
not
able
to
make
any
use
of
the
property
at
all.
Okay,
she's
gonna,
be
in
New
York
for
approximately
four
years
and
without
being
it'll
put
a
renter
in
they're.
B
C
B
A
Does
anybody
have
any
questions,
but
very
much?
Is
there
anyone
here
wishing
to
speak
in
favor
or
in
general
comment
or
in
opposition,
and
in
that
case,
then
the
commentaries
closed
and
we're
ready
to
deliberate.
A
G
A
I
G
H
G
K
D
A
A
She
were
in
our
one,
she
would
have
a
be
five,
she
could
write
yes
and
if
the
rules
of
her.
A
H
C
A
H
A
A
Has
a
contract
that
everyone
who
moves
into
that
development
signs
and
they
understand
that
what
they
can
and
can't
do
they
believe
one
of
the
things
is
that
they
can't
rent
those
parking
places
out.
I,
don't
have
it
I'm
just
trying
to
remember
it
from
last
time,
but
it
seems
to
me
that's
what
I
recall
for
the
last
time.
H
A
C
D
D
A
D
D
C
A
H
L
Okay,
I
make
a
motion
in
case
o
22
T,
30,
West,
Road
place
zone
r3
appellant
is
requesting
a
temporary
use
for
that
we
grant
the
appellant
a
temporary
use
permit
from
section
23
point:
oh
eight
point:
oh
one:
a
to
permit
occupancy
of
a
dwelling
unit
by
two
tenants
with
one
accessible
and
one
non
accessible
parking
space
or
two
accessible
parking
spaces
are
required.
A.
A
J
D
C
A
If
this
permit
is
revocable
on
application
by
any
aggrieved
person,
it
can
be
revoked
also
just
realizes
that
if,
for
some
reason
somebody
comes
in
and
says,
hey
I'm
really
this
they're
there
they're
abusing
this
privilege
it
can't
it
is
not.
It
is
a
revocable
permit
and
that's
section
D
of
that
same.
A
Okay,
all
right
I
think
we
have
fairly
thoroughly
discussed
this
already.
Is
there
anything
additional
that
we
need
to
say,
apart
from
the
fact
that
she's
not
gonna,
be
creating
any
structures
there
she's
not
doing
anything,
excepting
making
it
possible
to
rent
the
place
and
she's
currently
planning
to
only
rent
it
to
him
single
individual
for
the
period
of
one
year?
She
understands
it's
for
one
year
only
and
that
she
needs
to
get
it
renewed
at
the
end
of
this
coming
year
by
this
time
next
year,
anything
else
I'm
ready
to
vote.
M
F
A
H
A
A
C
A
D
Straightforward,
it's
just
that
the
deck
they
want
to
put
on
the
back
of
the
house
would
be
within
25
feet
of
the
back
property.
The
structure-
that's
there
is
separate
from
the
house,
so
it's
considered
an
accessory
structure
and
it's
not
bound
by
the
30-foot
setback.
Accessory
structures
only
have
to
be
5
feet
away
from
the
property,
but.
A
C
N
H
A
H
A
A
O
C
D
D
A
J
J
J
C
A
G
O
Sense
now
now
we're
good
goodness
now,
I
don't
try
to
figure
out
what
I'm
trying
to
say.
We
like
turn
onto
our
home
I'm
willing
to
compromise,
put
that
right
out
there.
We
are
just
trying
to
get
as
much
space
as
we
possibly
can
to
put
on
an
addition
to
fit
our
family
I
brought
pictures.
I
have
a
letter
from
my
immediate
neighbor.
I
have
I
feel
like
I
have
support
from
other
neighbors.
G
O
O
G
H
C
O
G
A
K
O
A
H
H
G
H
G
A
G
O
O
G
H
H
O
My
name
is
Jill
Brown
I
live
at
17,
central,
a
band
on
the
property
Brian
Heather,
that's
my
partner
Brian
and
my
stepdaughters.
Other
girls
have
been
wonderful
neighbors.
The
addition
they
want
to
add
to
their
home
will
not
bother
me
in
any
way.
In
fact,
I
would
love
to
see
it
happen
so
that
they
can
continue
to
be
my
neighbors.
G
I
C
A
J
In
general,
comments
and
I
swear
to
tell
the
truth.
I
actually
looked
at
this
house
26
years
ago
in
terms
of
trying
to
buy
it
and
it's
a
charmer
small
house,
but
it
is
small.
There
was
some
silver
problems
in
the
back
I
think
when
I
first
looked
at
it,
which
is
why
I
think
the
appraised
I
was
working
with
my
father
said:
don't
buy
it
I'm
wallet
but
I,
say
it's
small
one
of
the
unusual
characteristics
of
this
house,
which
was
why
I
was
attracted
at
a
time.
J
It's
it's
very
far
in
the
back
of
the
lot,
which
is
why
you're
dealing
with
this
problem
right
now
and
I
just
want
you
to
make
you
aware
of
that
condition.
That
I
was
looking
at
at
the
time.
I
mean
there's
something
to
be
said
for
having
so
far
back
in
away
from
Central
Avenue,
because
it
is
a
high
trafficked
area.
At
the
same
time,
it
does
represent
a
limitation
on
what
you
can
do
with
the
property
and
I've
just
got
my
personal
hat
on
and
as
I
say
as
a
perspective.
H
A
But
he
did
swear
okay.
Alright,
then
we're
coming
with
the
commentary
from
the
floors
closed
unless
we
need
another
comment.
Otherwise,
it's
closed
and
we're
ready
to
deliberate
and
render
our
decision-
and
this
is
something
that
does
require
a
variance
so
who
would
like
to
craft
a
variance
request.