►
From YouTube: Athens City Council Meeting 12-12-05
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
evening
welcome
to
Athens
City
Council
tonight
is
Monday
December
12
2005
this
evening,
City
Council
will
meet
in
two
committee
meetings
and
then
go
into
a
special
session.
The
first
committee
is
planning
and
development
than
transportation.
The
chair
of
the
Planning
and
Development
Committee
has
member
Jim
sands
Jim.
Mr.
B
We've
discussed
this
revocable
language
and
the
language
I
think
this
draft
is
from
November
and
there
are
two
sections.
The
first
section
authorizes
the
mayor
to
execute
and
deliver
a
revocable
life's
agreement
licenses,
License
Agreement,
which
will
allow
national
church
residences
to
construct
and
operate
on
this
right-of-way
and
other
property
lease
from
Ohio
University.
B
Agree
that
the
city
of
Athens
is
maintaining
the
rights
to
install
repair,
replace
utility
lines
within
the
license
area
and
may
not
be
responsible
for
damages.
As
the
result
of
this
and
finally
section
3
is
the
part
that
this
revocable
license
that
contains
language
that
ties
it
to
the
lease
between
the
University
and
national
church
residences
to
operate
a
retirement
community
on
this
site.
B
The
language
says
this
revocable
license
shall
be
personal
in
nature,
to
Ohio,
University
and
its
successors
and
assigns
and
will
be
in
effect,
with
the
licensee
having
quiet
enjoyment
of
the
property.
As
long
as
the
license
property
is
leased
to
national
church
residences
or
an
affiliate
controlled
by
national
church
residences,
its
mortgagees
successors
and
the
signs,
and
there
is
no
change
of
use
of
the
property
from
a
Planned
Unit
development
for
senior
citizens,
age,
55
or
more
or
a
continuing
care
retirement.
Community.
B
The
Planning
Commission
sent
to
us
a
recommendation
with
regards
to
the
Morris
Avenue
right-of-way,
which
runs
from
the
end
of
developed
Morris
Avenue
to
the
river.
Through
this
piece
of
property,
the
Planning
Commission
recommended
that
we
give
this
right-of-way
to
Ojai
University,
so
that
National
Church
residences
could
could
use
it
for
their
development
or
secondarily,
if
we
didn't
like
that
idea,
they
recommended
that
we
give
them
a
result
of
a
license.
B
After
discussing
this,
for
quite
a
while
counsel
felt
that
we
would
add
a
restriction
to
the
revocable
license,
which
is
just
what
we
said,
that
the
effect
of
the
license
would
be
restricted
to
the
developer
national
church
residences
or
anybody
who
may
come
after
them.
That
continues
to
run
this
site
as
a
retirement
community
or
a
continuing
care
retirement
community,
whichever
they
choose
to
do.
But
if
it
should
change
usage
in
40
years
or
15
years
or
whenever
and
Ohio
University
or
somebody
else
wanted
to
come
along
and
change
it
to
a
dormitory
or.
B
A
motel
or
anything
the
City
Council
at
that
time
would
have
a
tough,
wouldn't
have
a
chance
to
review
those
plans
and
come
to
some
agreement
with
regards
to
the
parking,
because
our
our
development
ordinance
for
this
site
includes
a
very
large
variance
for
parking
300
and
some
spaces
are
required.
According
to
our
code,
the
developers
are
proposing
251
I
believe
so
it's
almost
a
50%
parking
variance
and
we're
very
concerned
about
that
being
used
for
some
other
more
heavily
trafficked
use
than
a
Retirement
Center.
So.
B
Some
members
of
council
have
spent
some
time
talking
to
the
developers
about
the
idea
that,
in
the
past,
the
city
has
traded
rights
of
way
for
some
other
piece
of
property
or
consideration,
and
although
we
are
not
actually
giving
this
right-of-way
away,
we
are
giving
away
the
use
of
it
for
quite
a
long
time.
And
so
what
might
we
expect
from
this
and
I
think
the
conversation
was
regarding
the
proposed
cottages
on
the
on
the
east
side
of
the
of
the
large
ditch.
B
B
At
the
eastern
end,
maybe
I'm
not
sure
what
the
directions
are
of
this
piece
of
property
amounting
to
about
a
third
of
an
acre
which
would
be
contiguous
with
the
large
piece
of
land
that
the
city
has
behind
the
library
that
could
be
utilized
to
develop
some
recreational
area
open
space
area
whatever,
and
they
have
indeed
agreed
via
a
letter
that
we
all
have
copies
of
that.
They
would
provide
this
land
and
up
to
$35,000
to
develop
such
such
a
recreation
area.
D
B
Have
this
one
in
one
more
so
in
most
likely
a
special
session
to
deal
with
other
issues,
which
might
would
probably
include
this
a.m.
we
might
as
well
discussed
it.
A
complicating
factor
is
the
complaint
that
was
lodged
with
the
Ethics
Commission
regarding
some
conflicts
of
interest
that
have
that
might
come
into
this.
For
several
members
of
council
and.
B
B
B
E
It
could
be
very,
very
close
to
that
bicycle
path,
an
access
road
and
nobody
can
promise
anything
right
now.
So
I
was
thinking.
This
may
be
a
bit
premature.
I
thought
we
were
hanging
on
to
this
as
a
way
to
assure
that
our
interests
were
protected
because
the
law
director
said
they
didn't
have
to
go
on
simultaneously
and
so
I
guess
I'm.
You
know,
as
the
person
who
went
out
and
sort
of
got
to
I
mean
this
was
in
the
original
plan.
First,
we
were
told
oh
well.
E
This
is,
although
use
land
that
then
come
to
find
out.
It
was
in
the
original
plat,
as
was
Mill
Street.
We
paid
to
have
that
survey
done
so
now
it's
ours
and
Ben.
We
also
were
told.
Well,
you
didn't
use
it
and
then
I
got
the
air
photos
improved.
We
did
use
it
in
fact,
and
so
you
know,
I
feel
like
I
have
a
little
bit
of
an
investment
in
this
and
I.
Think
that
I'd
like
to
see
a
little
bit
bigger
return.
E
Then
one
acre
of
what
seems
to
be
pretty
prime
real
estate,
then
in
exchange
for
one
third
of
an
anchor
which
can't
even
be
used-
and
you
know,
I-
don't
really
think
we're
going
to
exchange
it,
but
I'd
like
some
way
to
guarantee
that
our
open
space
there
and
I
don't
I,
never
heard
the
neighbors
as
Debbie
and
I
talked
to
them,
trying
to
reconcile
the
differences
that
there
were,
and
there
was
any
interest
in
taht
lot.
I
mean
I've
seen
what
I've
seen
use
to
that
area.
E
A
lot
would
be,
though
Ultimate
Frisbee
team
promote
you
and
another
use.
So
therefore,
I
guess
I
would
like
to
I
would
have
liked
to
have
this
kind
of
come
later,
because
the
land
swap
will
not
be
I
mean
the
land.
Lease
will
not
be
acted
on
until
April,
then,
once
they
started
working
on
it,
then
they'd
have
to
pay
some
attention
to
our
area
over.
There
are
setbacks.
E
You
know,
because
we'd
normally
have
30
feet
backyard,
but
in
this
case,
since
it's
a
PUD
anything's
the
limit,
you
can
practically
build
on
the
lot
line
and
then
we
have
no
no
guarantees
and
so
I
guess
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
that
and
I
remain
concerned.
Just
because
I
feel
our.
If
we
don't
look
out
for
our
interests,
who
will
I
mean?
Aren't
you
our
joint
interests,
and
it
seems
to
me
that
there
is
an
interest
in
trying
to
make
the
neighborhood
as
happy
as
it
can
be,
and
yet
have
the
project
go
forward?
E
You
know
I
guess
if
I
were
the
developer
and
I
actually
have
learned
to
like
Jarek
quite
a
bit.
Some
of
the
other
people
are,
you
know,
as
the
developers
go
they're
very
interesting
to
talk
to
they've
got
a
lot
of
good
ideas.
I
think
they
could
design
it
in
such
a
way
that
they
wouldn't
have
to
put
it
on
the
lot
line,
but
there's
no
pressure
on
them.
Now.
If
we
do,
this
so
I
mean
are
close
to
the
long
line
and
we
don't
have
plans.
Remember
we.
E
B
Ncr
national
church
residences
will
form
a
neighborhood
Advisory
Committee
prior
to
the
development
of
final
plans
to
include
residents
of
the
Near
East
Side
area,
not
to
include
residents
of
the
NCR
Planned
Unit
development
and
the
Advisory
Committee
shall
be
in
existence
for
as
long
as
NCR
manages
to
the
proposed
retirement
center.
This
Advisory
Committee
I,
assume,
will
talk
about
how
they
want
to
develop
this
recreational
area.
Heavens
Ward's
off
simply
mentioned
some
ideas
that
he
had.
He
would
be
involved.
B
E
Let
me
go
back
and
say
the
the
right-of-way
that
we
have
is
a
key
in
integral
part
of
phase
2
and
I.
Guess
that
I
mean
that,
certainly
as
a
hammer
that
we
could
use
and
say
you
know,
make
sure
you
give
us
the
proper
setback
and
I'm
not
sure,
as
I've
talked
to
the
people
on
the
east
side
and
everybody
gets
all
exercised
about
these
differences,
but
I
think
they
were
talking
about
green
space
and
that
you
know
didn't
have
to
be.
E
Recreation,
didn't
have
to
be
developed
a
place
to
do
pick
up
to
fly,
kites
and
things
like
that.
So
I
guess
I
I
kind
of
wish.
We
could
reconsider.
I
was
too
late
to
actually
have
any
input
on
I'm
putting
this
up,
but
I
do
feel
that
it
wouldn't
pose
any
major
limitation,
because
they'll
just
know
that
they
have
to
please
us.
The
alternative
is,
of
course
everybody
will
say.
E
How
close
this
could
literally
be
to
those
developments
that
many
people
on
the
east
side,
and
even
those
of
us
who
aren't
price
and
so
and
of
course
again
everybody
can
say
well,
council,
let
me
do
it
and
we're
letting
them
do
it.
I
guess
if
we,
if
we
pass
this
and
it's
not
going
to
be
a
hardship
to
the
people
involved,
that
I
see
the
people
who
are
who
are
I
mean
they'll,
get
there
they'll
get
their
parking
ordinance
they'll
get
their
bedroom,
so
you
mean
they'll
have
what
they
want.
E
G
To
me,
it
is
appropriate
that
these
go
parallel,
I'm,
somehow
it
to
me.
It
does
not
make
sense
to
kind
of
hold
up
a
portion
of
it
so
that
it
has
to
continue
in
the
same
ilk
that
we've
been
through
for
quite
a
while
I
feel
that
the
developers
have
shown
some
goodwill
in
accepting
the
concept
of
the
revocable
license,
as
opposed
to.
G
Please
give
us
the
land
and
also
I've
shown
themselves
to
be
very
cooperative
in
discussing
the
open
space
and
agreeing
to
try
to
do
many
things
that
make
the
neighbors
of
this
property
more
comfortable
and
I
feel
like.
If
people
really
want
all
of
those
conditions
to
go
with
the
ordinances,
we
need
to
have
a
supermajority
and
and
make
it
work
to
everyone's
advantage.
C
Paul
I'm
not
sure
we
should
have
them
at
the
same
time
again.
I
think
we
still
do
need
leverage.
As
far
as
I
understand
this
provider,
it's
going
to
go
into
negotiation
with
the
administration,
and
you
know
the
ministration
is
part-time,
we're
part-time
and
we're
gonna
lose
on
any
type
of
negotiation.
At
this
point,
I
don't
see
the
Advisory
Committee
having
any
capability
of
having
an
leverage
if
they
don't
get
what
they
want,
the
neighborhood
Advisory
Committee
except
being
bad
neighbors.
C
C
H
J
I'm
Chris
Paul
little
motel
I'm,
wondering
about
the
mechanics
of
how
exactly
a
revocable
license
would
work
in
future
for
future
administrations.
If
NCR
goes
out
of
business
and
the
land
use
is
proposed
to
change
or
changes.
Does
that
automatic
the
revocable
license
key
automatically
stops,
and
basically
the
buildings
that
are
built
on
the
right
away
are
now
trespassing
or
is
assumed
that
the
revocable
license
is
still
in
effect,
unless
the
Council
of
that
time
changes
things.
Do
you
see
how
those
two
things
are
very
different
and
I
think
that
what
people
were
concerned
about?
J
Council
is
going
to
be
under
pressure
at
the
time
to
say
well,
whatever
in
terms
of
my
son,
he's
always
saying
that,
but
there
needs
to
be
teeth
in
it,
because
there
is
this
huge
issue
of
parking,
and
if
that
land-use
changes
and
if
there
is
a
change,
it's
partly
because
something
goes
out
of
business
and
there's
going
to
be
a
push
to
change
it
there's
going
to
be
a
huge
problem,
so
it
needs
to
have
teeth
in
it.
That
says
it
evaporates.
J
You
need
to
go
and
renegotiate
and
and
I'd
like
to,
and
that's
the
only
way
to
protect
because
of
the
large
parking
variance.
That's
going
with
the
PUD
ordinance.
That's
the
only
way
to
protect
the
neighborhood,
that's
under
a
huge
amount
of
pressure
from
parking
and
traffic
as
it
is
now
so
it
needs
to
have
teeth.
It
needs
to
have
teeth,
spelled
out
in
it
that
it
just
evaporates.
It
has
to
be
renegotiated
so
I
think
that's
the
only
way
that
you
protect
neighborhoods.
B
And
that
is
the
intent,
and
actually
this
revocable
license
will
be
filed.
There
is
there's
language
in
the
ordinance
that
these
the
plans
that
building
plans
will
be
filed
with
the
County
Auditor,
along
with
the
license
copy.
This
revocable
license
so
that
if
ever
a
change
were
made
a
change
of
ownership,
a
change
of
plans,
if
they
were
it
would
be
flagged
that
way,
as
well
as
in
the
city
and
indeed
the
revocable
license
goes
away.
J
The
problem
is,
is
that
there's
buildings
built
up
on
it
I
think
there
has
to
be
even
more
of
a
penalty
if
they
don't
go
because
I
mean
this
happens
in
this
count
all
the
time
something
has
said.
Yes,
we
will
follow
through
on
it.
Developer
says:
yes,
we
will
follow
through,
they
don't
and
it
just
kind
of
slides
by
the
way.
Unless
citizens
have
a
recourse,
I
mean
I,
guess
citizens
could
say
Council
you're
not
going
and
doing
your
job.
J
Therefore
it
will
take
you
to
court,
but
it
has
to
be
a
put
some
kind
of
penalty
or
something
has
to
be
put
upon.
The
the
owner
of
those
buildings
be
a
you
know:
NCR
spin-off,
Ohio
University.
That
says,
if
you
change
land
use
from
the
point
where
you
change
land
use.
If
you
do
not
have
a
you
know,
if
you
have
not
read
ago,
she
ated
that
revocable
license,
you
will
be
fined.
J
You
know,
however,
many
dollars
a
day,
because
I
can
see
the
situation
where
it
would
just
kind
of
go
on
and
then
the
land
use
would
go
into
effect
and
council
would
say.
Well,
we
can't
do
anything,
people
are
living
in
it.
So
you
see,
the
teeth
is
not
there.
I
mean
the
idea
behind
it
is
is
appropriate,
but
the
teeth
are
not
there
and
in
the
future
we
have
seen
projects
go
in
this
town
come
and
go.
J
A
future
council
and
we're
not
giving
them
very
much
we're
not
giving
them
very
good
tools
to
work
with
you
know
either.
If
the
revocable
license
doesn't
disappear,
then
the
parking
variance
should
disappear.
If
the
land-use
changes,
maybe
they
need
to
be
coupled
in
some
way
so
because
you
know
I
can
see
you
know,
I
hate,
you
know,
oh
you,
just
it's
most
of
their
buildings.
You
know
it's
their
land.
If
something
happens,
they're
potentially
going,
they
could
potentially
inherit
all
those
buildings
and
then
they
would
just
say
well,
you
know
we're
using
it.
J
D
K
Me
out
with
national
church
residences,
if
I
could
go
over
a
couple
of
things
in
the
past
I'm
very
quick,
prepared
remarks,
something
to
make
sure
I
don't
miss
anything,
but
at
the
last
meeting
I
did
bring
up.
Some
information
didn't
have
a
chance
to
show
it
to
you.
But
again
it's
not
it's
nothing
that
you
haven't
already
seen
to
some
extent,
but
the
first
diagram
I'll
leave
my
front
so
the
obvious
review
it
just
shows
the
site
and
the
buildings
as
their
proposed
for
phase
one
and
phase.
Two.
K
H
K
I
believe
it's
both
parcels,
which
is
this
little
area
that
the
city
owns.
Also
you
get
up
to
0.44
acres,
it
is
a
small
parcel
and
if
there
was
some
way
to
to
do
more,
we
would
love
to
do
it,
but
that
just
shows
in
color
a
little
bit
of
the
of
the
process
and
then
a
second
board
that
I'll
leave
up
here
in
front
was
in
conjunction
with
mr.
K
Schwarzkopf,
was
just
what
each
of
the
park
areas
might
look
like
based
on
two
parcels,
whether
it
would
be
simply
the
parcel
that
Ohio
University
owns
or
would
include
the
small
parcel
that
the
city
owns,
which
would
be
a
larger
area
here.
So
I'll
just
leave
this
up
front.
If
I
could
make
a
little
comment,
I
appreciate
it.
K
First,
I
want
to
reiterate
our
interest
in
not
only
being
good
neighbors
but
good
citizens
in
the
Athens
community,
with
66
properties
in
2400
hi-oh
counties.
There
is
a
rich
heritage
of
NCR
presence
in
two
dozen
communities
across
the
state.
The
German
Village
Association,
which
vigorously
opposed
our
transitional
homeless
housing
project
in
Columbus,
appeared
to
present
an
almost
insurmountable
challenge
to
the
Commons
at
Grant
being
built,
but
I'm
pleased
to
say
that
today,
that
Association
has
nothing
but
good
things
to
say
about
our
four-year
relationship
in
that
community.
K
In
fact,
I
would
suggest
that
the
Columbus
City
Council
waiver
of
the
City
Council
Ross
County,
City
Council
and
others
could
clearly
could
test
to
our
commitment
to
their
communities.
We
desire
to
cooperate
with
the
council
on
their
vision
for
a
park.
We
would
welcome
expanding
the
proposed
acreage
with
support
from
the
city
on
their
adjacent
land.
We
believe
that
through
opportunities
for
intergenerational
programming,
employment
opportunities
and
regular
meetings
with
the
Neighborhood
Association,
both
before
and
after
construction,
we
can
further
personalize
this
project
and
make
it
unique
to
this
wonderful
community
on
July
8
2003.
K
We
finalized
an
agreement
with
the
city
of
Waverly
to
establish
a
community
park
adjacent
to
Bristol
Village
I
wish
we
had
a
similar
availability
of
land
that
we
had
in
southern
Ohio,
that
was
88
acres,
so
quite
a
bit
different
than
0.4.
Nevertheless,
the
project
has
been
a
phenomenal
success.
Finally,
we
are
willing
and
enthusiastic
to
meet
the
conditions
set
forth
in
the
ordinance
I
think
that
we've
talked
about
16
18,
whatever
it
is,
and
there
hasn't
been
anything
that
you've
asked
for
that.
We
haven't
agreed
to
and
I
think
that
they're
very
reasonable
requests.
K
There
are
things
I
think
Paul
would
understand
this,
that
there
are
things
that
you've
asked
for
we've
said
we
do,
but
we
understand
why
they're
in
writing,
because,
even
though
we
have
every
intention
of
doing
it,
I'm
not
sure
everybody
always
does
so.
We
don't
have
a
problem
with
that
and
understand
why
those
conditions
have
been
put
in.
K
In
my
experience,
that
is
how
you
demonstrate
in
actual
practice,
the
art
of
being
a
good
neighbor.
I
would
be
remiss
if
I
didn't
point
to
NCR
strong
financial
presence,
which
allows
us
to
borrow
money
at
lower
rates
than
market
and
to
provide
charitable
assistance.
We're
needed
through
our
foundation,
all
supported
by
our
44
year
track
record
I
wouldn't
want
to
be
dismissive
about
going
out
of
business,
but
we
have
been
around
for
44
years
and
I.
K
K
We
realize,
however,
that
the
relationship
is
ongoing
and
will
never
end
as
we
work
to
build
a
facility
in
its
programs
for
years
to
come
during
my
18
months
of
working
with
this
project,
I've
grown
to
respect
admire
the
members
of
this
council,
as
well
as
the
citizens
of
Athens
national
church
residences,
believes
that
competition
is
healthy
and
the
proposed
facility
presents
some
wonderful
benefits
to
the
city
of
Athens
and
its
residents.
Young
and
old
respectfully
ask
that
you
move
forward
on
approval
of
the
project
we
are
prepared
to
move
forward.
K
Likewise
in
the
file
design
over
the
early
spring,
in
conjunction
with
our
Eastside
neighbors,
the
Athens
CCRC
committee
and
Ohio
University,
it
would
be
our
plan
to
work
rather
closely
with
all
three
parties
over
the
next
90
120
days,
because
we
would
like
to
see
this
project
break
ground
late
summer.
Any
questions
just
kind
of
trying
to
touch
on
some
things
that
have
been
brought
up
in
the
past
I
know
that
it's
really
difficult
to
answer
some
of
nancies.
K
To
what's
been
common
for
you
to
have
to
approve
a
project
and
what
my
boss
and
my
architect
tell
me,
is
customary
and
the
other
projects
we
do
and
before
I
came
to
the
first
Planning
Commission
meeting
I.
Remember
after
that
means
driving
home
and
hearing
the
conversation
about
what
it
was
that
you
expect
or
what
they
expected
and
what
was
customary
for
us
to
do.
And
then,
as
we
move
months
into
it,
it
became
the
issue
of
yes.
K
We
paid
about
$10,000
for
the
additional
flood
modeling,
but
the
design
documents,
which
is
what
our
architect
and
my
boss
Thomas
lever
have
indicated,
is,
is
what
you're
really
looking
for.
It
is
about
a
fifty
to
seventy-five
thousand
dollar
production,
and
the
issue
is,
as
Jim
has
talked,
that
all
has
to
be
done
and
more
before
the
project
breaks
ground,
but
that
it
just
wasn't
NCR
never
felt
like.
K
K
E
E
Need
I
say
more
all
right,
so
it's
very
very
bad
building.
Now
you
guys
can
do
I
hate
saying
even
suggesting
cul-de-sac,
but
you
could
do
arrange
those
buildings
in
a
different
way,
so
it
wasn't
so
intrusive
on
the
bike
path.
I
think
the
access
to
the
bike
path
I
mean
there-
I
mean
you're,
talking
about
people
that
are
going
to
be
maybe
slightly
incompatible
with
the
children
running
around,
and
I
know
everybody
says.
Oh,
we
love
children,
but
you
know
I've
been
around
long
enough
to
know
that
there
might
be
someone
someday
who
doesn't.
K
It's
just
it's
interesting,
because
every
I
think
what
happens
sometimes
is
it's
not
that
something
new
comes
up
every
time.
It's
just
there's
so
much
to
discuss.
I,
don't
think
I
really
understood
until
today
that
the
proximity
of
the
cottages
to
the
bike,
that
was
a
big
issue,
I,
think
it
was
the
proximity
of
everything
to
everything.
D
K
E
K
D
K
Sixty
or
seventy
five
percent
single
and
again
part
of
the
reason
for
building
them,
you're
not
have
the
conversation
that
they
don't
add
a
tremendous
amount
of
the
financial
any
to
the
financial
viability
of
the
project.
It
has
just
been
something
that,
from
day
one
we
really
wanted
to
have
more
cottages
than
just
four
right
turned
out.
That
four
was
oh.
L
I
guess
I
would
like
to
add
with
that
that
part
of
the
negotiation
that
that
people
were
interested
in
there
was
not
only
the
park,
but
also
if
everything
on
that
side
of
the
drainage
structure
were
left
with
no
fill.
Then
some
of
the
concerns
about
the
possible
impacts
of
increased
flooding
in
the
neighborhood
would
be
mitigated
that
that
was
really
the
larger
concern
that
people
were
talking
about
when
they
said
what
about
not.
K
I
think
the
comment
was
made
earlier
about
what
what
NCR
was
a
lot
of
the
site
that
this
represents.
What
a
mr.
Schwarzkopf
had
talked
to
George
Berardi
about
putting
in
the
site
it
could
be
left.
Green
I
think
the
issue
was
was
this
was
what
he
told
us,
they'd
be
interested
in
and
then
XX
was
the
cost
that
it
would
cost
to
do
that
and
that's
how
we
came
up
with
those
pictures
and
that
$35,000
number
you.
B
M
Very
grim,
24
canterbury,
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
this
whole
process.
It
appears
to
me
that
it's
been
mistake.
On
top
of
mistake,
I
see
the
regarding
the
right
of
way.
I
see
the
first
mistake
as
when
it
was
discovered
that
there
was
not
just
a
single
owner
of
this
property,
but
rather
two
not
just
oh
you,
but
rather
oh
you
in
the
city.
M
Actually,
that
would
have
been
the
time
if
they
I
know
they
weren't
thinking
about
whether
no
one
probably
would
whether
this
is
acting
in
good
faith
or
not,
but
that
would
have
been
the
time
to
demonstrate
really
good
faith.
So
I'm
concerned
that,
if
you
move
ahead
with
this
right-of-way
thing,
all
you're
doing
is
adding
on
to
your
original
mistake,
because,
as
Nancy
was
pointing
out,
what
is
the
city
getting
in
return
for
giving
over
this
right-of-way
once
that
land
is
built
on
the
city?
Doesn't
have
access
to
it?
N
Good
evening
Council,
my
name
is
Linda
Clark
I
live
in
Albany
I
was
born
and
raised
in
Athens
and
been
a
lifetime
resident
of
Athens
County
I'm
here
in
support
of
the
reading
of
the
ordinance
tonight.
I
think
everybody's
acted
in
good
faith
and
that
there's
no
reason
to
hold
this
up.
We
have
a
lot
of
people
here
that
have
been.
N
Putting
a
lot
of
their
faith
in
this
construction
I
respect
the
people
on
the
side
that
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
done
the
best
way,
but
I
think
that
Ohio
University
and
the
council
and
NCR
have
really
come
together
and
try
to
come
up
with
the
best
plan
that
that
they
have
and
I
just
like
to
see
that
this
ordinance
be
read
tonight
and
read
the
second
night
and
I'd
like
to
ask.
What
claim
would
it
be
voted
on.
B
N
O
O
Simply
have
a
question
type:
for
example,
when
I
read
that
Dale
County
was
accused
of
these
interests,
whatever
I
thought
it
was
because
he
lived
on
Elmwood.
I
was
really
surprised
when
I
found
out
they
that
it
was
because
it
was
a
university
most
of
the
people
objecting
to
this
seemed
a
book
belongs
with
the
university
anyway,
and
I
cannot,
for
the
life
of
me
understand
why
they
had
to
consult
a
lawyer
about
this.
It
seems
to
meet
but
sort
of
a
ridiculous
situation.
I'm,
just
speaking
my
mind,.
P
My
name
is
Roland
Swardson
I
live
at
50,
Sunnyside
drive
and
I
walk
on
the
section
of
bike
path,
that's
in
question
every
morning
and
sometimes
I
have
ride
my
bicycle
down:
Morris
Avenue
and
onto
the
bike
path.
My
walk
is
in
that
same
direction
and
then
I
come
back
up
underneath
the
bridge
back
to
the
gas
station
to
buy
a
newspaper,
it's
about
a
mile
and
a
half,
and
most
of
it
is
there
along
the
bike.
Path
and
I've
been
doing
this
for
a
number
of
years
and
I
don't
understand.
P
The
problem
of
proximity
to
the
bike
path
is
an
interference
with
my
pleasure
I
try
to
picture
how
how
close
would
a
building
or
anything
have
to
be
for
me
not
to
enjoy
both
the
bike
path
for
both
those
reasons
with
the
been
built
for
I
go
underneath
the
overpass
and
I
have
concrete,
then
around
me
and
over
me,
and
that's
in
close
proximity
and
on
either
the
bicycle
or
walking
it
doesn't
interfere,
and
this
is
so.
This
is
an
issue
I,
don't
understand
who
don't
worry
about
the
buildings?
P
B
Q
My
name
is
Greg
Broadhurst
I
live
on
the
west
side
of
town
at
14,
Grandal
Avenue
I'll,
keep
it
pretty
short
and
sweet
counsel,
as
you
may
or
may
not
know,
depending
on
when
you
serve
on
council
has
been
hearing
me
talk
about
floodplain
management
since
about
1996,
and
one
thing
that
the
council
needs
to
be
concerned
about
concerns
to
the
health
safety
and
welfare
of
the
community.
Is
the
National
Flood
Insurance
Program?
B
B
E
B
L
Wasn't
here,
I
guess
I
feel
like
with
the
making
any
decision
about
the
right
of
way
should
happen.
After
there's
a
signed
lease,
there
was
a
resolution
authorizing
the
lease
that
was
in
existence
for
a
year
and
the
lease
was
never
signed.
L
Certainly
if
the
ordinance
around
the
Planned
Unit
development
were
to
be
approved,
Ojai
University
could
execute
the
lease
with
national
church
residences.
They
have
excellent
lawyers
and
they
can
write
it
in
such
a
way
that
if,
for
some
reason
the
revocable
license
didn't
get
approved,
that
the
lease
would
not
go
into
effect,
I'm
sure
they
can
handle
that.
But
I
think
because
we
have
experience
where
there
was.
L
B
F
R
Meeting
in
a
series
of
meetings
to
discuss
issues
with
storage,
parking
and
neighborhoods,
and
specifically
the
24-hour
restriction
on
parking
and
some
of
the
goals
of
what
we
have
been
talking
about,
is
to
make
it
so
residents
do
not
have
to
move
their
cars
every
24
hours.
People
who
live
in
neighborhoods
currently
have
to
move
their
car
every
day
and
I.
Don't
think
that
kind
of
goes
along
with
the
whole
goal
of
allowing
for
alternate
transportation
running
by
it's
walking
to
work
and
leaving
your
car
there.
R
If
you
do
go
on
vacation
and
live
in
a
neighborhood,
you
don't
have
off
street
parking.
Your
car
can't
remain
there
on
the
street,
so
that
was
one
major
goal
to
kind
of
make
changes
to
correct
that
and
then
also
to
discourage
the
bringing
of
cars
into
the
city
by
by
non
permanent
residents
or
people
who
don't
really
need
a
car
here
and
don't
have
a
parking
space.
R
There's
a
lot
of
offsite
parking
that
students
or
people
who
don't
have
a
shoe
parking
can
pay
for,
but
many
are
choosing
to
to
kind
of
take
the
free
alternative
route
by
parking
their
car
in
residential
neighborhoods,
and
this
is
something
we'd
also
like
to
eliminate.
So
out
of
all
of
our
discussions,
we
figured
that
this
problem
is,
you
can't
be
solved
with
one
simple
ordinance,
so
the
piece
we
chose
to
break
off
and
to
attack
is
the
24-hour
restriction
and
by
giving
presidents
with
proof
of
residents
a
parking
hangtag.
R
This
would
allow
a
resident
to
leave
their
car
on
the
street
for
more
than
24
hours,
not
having
forcing
them
to
move
it,
and
so
what
I'm
presenting
to
you
is
sort
of
the
options
that
we've
discussed
and
the
current
debate.
That
I'd,
like
all
of
your
input
on,
is,
should
it
be
one
part
permit
for
property
or
and
keeping
in
mind
that
the
hangtag
does
not
guarantee
a
parking
spot?
R
It's
sort
of
a
hunting
license
for
someone
to
park
their
car
in
the
neighborhood
and
it
really
doesn't
change
the
situation
that
occurs
now,
except
for
the
fact
that
residents
wouldn't
have
to
be
moving
the
car
every
day.
So
there's
some
of
the
listings
I've,
given
you
should
it
be
Street,
specific
or
sort
of
a
neighborhood
zone
where
you
could
park
on
any
Street
in
such
zone,
but
the
parking
tag
would
be
specific
to
the
zone
and
it
would
be
enforced
as
other
parking
enforcement
rules
apply
so
Carol.
R
G
And
it's
staggering.
There
are
many
places
where
a
street
is
short,
say:
50
spaces.
You
know
that
is
not
going
to
be
immediately
solved,
but
what
we
were
looking
at
is:
can
we
begin
to
address
it
and
perhaps
in
the
future,
work
with
it
further?
We
wanted
it
discussed
because
it
was
an
issue
that
came
up
frequently
during
campaigning
during
the
election
time,
and
so
we
felt
that,
regardless
of
what
council
feels
about
it,
that
it
was
time
to
discuss
it
again
and
it
was
discussed
approximately
10
years
ago,
95.
F
C
Okay,
I
did
I
forwarded
the
draft
to
some
of
the
ANA
members,
but
I
didn't
get
any
feedback.
I
did
talk
to
some
of
the
West
Side
native
association
members,
realizing
that
it's
not
a
hang
tag
that
requires
that
if
you're
parked
there
without
a
hang
tag,
you
you're
over
ticketed
I
mean,
unlike
a
permit
for
German
village
or
some
other
places
where
you
just
you
know,
if
you're
there
without
tagging
in
trouble.
C
This
really
would
give
the
ability
of
somebody
to
be
able
to
park
there
longer
than
24
hours
if
I'm
reading
this
correctly,
the
conversation
I
had.
That
point
is
that
the
people
who
have
these
tags
would
be
able
to
park
the
car,
and
you
know
they
have
the
option
of
driving
or
not
24
hours.
They
don't
so,
as
you
say,
walk
their
car
every
two
minute
rounds.
The
trend
would
be
everybody
who
has
to
move
their
cars
for
24
hours
would
eventually
actually
be
this
displaced,
but
cars
that
sit
there
longer.
C
Therefore,
the
conversation
I
got
to
was:
we
talked
about
zone
2
streets.
The
push
was
towards
streets
rather
than
zones,
which
kind
of
surprised
me.
Cuz
I
would
go
the
other
way
personally
at
the
same
time,
they're
saying
well,
it's
not
you
can't
mean
you
can't
park
on
that
street
with
you
don't
have
a
tag.
It
just
means
you
have
to
move
your
car
in
terms
of
where
who
to
give
the
permit
I
think
the
conversation
I
had
was
to
the
landlord
they're
in
charge
of
it.
C
G
G
G
Q
D
C
G
C
Part
of
the
other
problems,
of
course,
would
be
enforcement,
but
we
have
somebody
chopping.
The
tires
every
24
hours
already
I
remember
ray
has
given
us
as
owns
that
he
covers
already
so
there
it's
actually
in
progress
already
part
of
the
downside,
which
of
course
is
the
outcome
of
the
97
one
parking
space.
One
bedroom
thing
is
two
backyards
get
filled
up
with
cars.
This
may
also
end
up
having
cars
backyards
being
paved
over
the
gravel.
Some
more
I
can
see
that
being
an
outcome
I
like
what's
going
on.
G
C
Probably
get
more
storage
parking
as
results,
therefore,
the
the
the
shuffle
would
kind
of
stagnate
and
therefore
people
who
need
spaces
who
have
been
haphazardly
grabbing
spaces
home
we'd,
have
to
start
looking
for
other
places
and
they
might
actually
buy.
You
know
remote
parking,
maybe
not
I
could.
G
R
D
T
C
D
I
Think
having
it
run
with
the
property
is
people
that
mentioned
how
it
makes
the
most
sense.
If
you're
gonna
proceed
with
something
like
this
I
think
the
cost
is
probably
a
little
too
modest.
All
right
where
I've
lived,
I
lived
in
a
minute
in
a
twin
city,
sort
of
arrangement
Champaign
and
Urbana
and
Urbana
had
such
a
a
tag
system
and
they
charged
a
a
good
deal
more
for
that
and
I
mentioned.
There's
other
examples
of
that
as
well.
I
U
I
It's
kind
of
interesting
because
I
this
this
issue
is
the
first,
it's
the
first
sort
of
memory,
I
have
of
a
civic
issue,
it
happens,
I
mean
I,
hadn't
lived
here
very
long,
and
this
is
like
first
one.
First
things
I
was
thinking.
Jesus
is
kind
of
interesting,
so
it's
kind
of
weird
that
here
it
is
coming
up
now
so
because.
E
Sarah
I
think
there
are
two
things
that
I'd
like
to
see.
I
think
that
any
any
carte
blanche
parking
permit
should
include
a
section
for
street
sweeping
and
snow
emergency,
and
the
second
thing
is:
it
should
be
revenue
neutral,
and
that
means
you
should
probably
think
about
where
it's
gonna
be
housed
and
how
those
tags
will
be
replaced,
and
maybe
something
like
a
scanner
type
of
computer,
so
that,
if
one
is
lost,
quote
quote
and
it's
found
and
used.
C
R
C
R
R
G
C
I
see
Bill
wants
to
wrap
this
up.
I
have
one
more
miscellaneous
actually
in
effort
to
make
the
Comprehensive
Plan
talks
about
a
pedestrian
friendly,
City
I'd
like
to
see
the
snow
cleared
off
the
sidewalk
sometime
in
near
future,
or
maybe
citations
existing
one
way,
the
other.
It
seemed
to
be
a
lot
of
it
there
and
is
anything
else
for
missing
means
of
transportation
going
going
gone
bill.
It's
yours,
mine
call.
A
During
the
fiscal
year,
ending
December,
31st,
2006,
ordinance,
120
605,
an
ordinance
authorizing
staffing
levels
and
non-union
pay
scale
and
slotting
for
the
fiscal
year.
Ending
December,
31st,
2006,
refilling
all
ordinances
and
system
care
with
in
declaring
an
emergency
ordinance.
120
705
an
ordinance
authorizing
the
mayor
to
enter
into
a
contract
to
provide
financial
support
for
the
operation
of
the
Athens
Area
Chamber
of
Commerce
coordinates
120
805,
an
ordinance
authorizing
the
mayor
to
extend
the
current
contract
to
provide
financial
support
for
the
operation
of
the
Athens
County
Convention
and
Visitors
Bureau.
Mr.
C
G
Okay,
that
the
mayor
is
authorized
to
enter
into
a
contract
to
provide
financial
support
for
their
operation
of
Athens,
County,
Convention
and
Visitor's
Bureau
for
a
period
of
three
years
through
December
31st
2008,
a
said
copy
of
said.
Contract
has
attached
her
tone
incorporated
by
reference,
and
then
we
will
add
that
the
duties.
G
A
G
Having
a
little
difficulty
fixing
it
I
did
handle
hand
to
each
council
member
a
copy
of
Sally
dunkers
scope
of
services
for
the
Convention
and
Visitor's
Bureau.
Do
you
wish
to
have
that
entire
thing
read.
A
G
A
B
President,
this
is
the
ordinance
that
we
were
discussing
in
in
committee
regarding
the
revocable
license,
which
would
allow
national
church
residences
was.
The
development
of
a
Retirement
Center
proposed
for
the
Stimson
Avenue
area
would
allow
them
to
actually
utilize
probably
build
on
our
Morris
Avenue
right-of-way
through
there
I
think
we've
recently
talked
about
the
issues
regarding
that
and
actually
I
have
one.
H
B
B
B
F
E
L
The
reason
for
the
motion
is
that,
first
of
all,
I
think
it's
highly
unusual
for
council
to
discuss
something
in
committee
and
then
bring
it
up
the
same
evening
for
a
reading.
I
think
that
it
has
been
councils
general
practice
to
avoid
that
it's
even
in
our
rules,
I
think
that
it
does
a
disservice
to
the
community
when
there
is
a
high
degree
of
public
interest,
when
our
agenda
goes
out
to
the
media
on
Friday
to
bring
something
up
that
hasn't
really
been
covered
in
the
media.
L
You
know
that
it's
going
to
be
on
our
agenda.
In
that
way,
I
mean
it
is
announced.
We
followed
the
Sunshine
rules
that
you
know
it
was
going
to
be
on
tonight,
but
I
still
think
that
there's
a
lot
of
public
interest
in
this,
and
it
is
our
normal
practice
and
under
our
rules
to
have
this
come
up
on
a
different
night
than
when
we've
just
had
a
committee
meeting
and
secondly,
for
the
reason
that
I
stated
during
the
committee
meeting.
L
That
I
believe
that
there,
the
entity
that
we
are
discussing
in
this
ordinance
should
have
legal
control
of
the
land.
Before
we
vote
to
give
up
the
public's
interest
in
this
right-of-way
I
think
this
is
a
whole
different
ball
game
than
the
ordinance
around
approval
of
the
PUD.
We're
actually
giving
up
public
property
and
I
think
that
that
shouldn't
happen
until
the
developer
has
legal
control
of
the
land.
A
We
have
a
motion
and
a
second
to
table
ordinance,
130
305,
now
just
for
a
point
of
order
myself,
if
I'm
understanding,
correctly
Jim
you're
we're
not
going
to
say
substituting
volume
that
the
one
you
passed
out
here,
that
is
different
than
the
one
that
was
sent
out
and
as
attached
to
councils
agenda
tonight,
I
am
saying
the
one
you
passed
out
under
Section
three
has
a
third
point
or
their
other
I'm
having
trouble
understanding.
What
other
changes
are?
That's
it.
N
A
V
E
A
B
B
E
Reasons
that
I
mentioned
earlier
and
then
Jerry
happened
to
just
apply
to
me
so
nicely
that
I
think
that
there
are
some
unresolved
issues
surrounding
this
and
I
just
wish.
Instead
of
thinking
about
parallelism
and
other
things
that
are
sort
of
intellectual,
we
say
from
a
practical
point
of
view:
will
we
get
what
we
want,
and
my
argument
would
be
that
we
would
be
much
better
off
separating
the
two,
although
we'd
have
to
hear
so
many
more
versions
of
reality
again
and
again
and
again,
but
you
know
that
may
be
enough.
E
E
B
A
B
E
Let's
remember:
bang,
let's
just
put
it
in
perspective,
then.
What
we're
saying
is
those
people
are
voting
to
table
are
saying
we
would
prefer
to
even
though
we'll
take
much
more
intellectual
punishment
forth,
we
would
love
prefer
to
wait
until
we
have
a
executed
lease
and
until
we
have
plans
to
know
that
our
interests
are
preserved.
E
I
think
that's
what
we're
voting
on
here,
just
to
put
it
in
the
very
I
mean
what
we,
what
I
think
I
know,
and
there
are
six
other
versions
of
interest,
so
I
would
not
begin
to
speak
for
anybody
else
on
council,
but
you
know
you
know,
that's
what
I
am
voting
for
I'm
voting
for
it
too,
to
say
we'll.
Consider
it
later
very
important
to
me.
There.
A
I
Just
note
that
there
are
several
conditions
that
were
thoughtfully
included
in
the
in
the
ordinance
that
establishes
the
PUD
and
it's
mic,
and
it's
my
opinion
that
those
many
conditions
are
sufficient
and
because
they
were
thoughtfully
done,
they
are
sufficient
to
to
address
the
the
interests
that
have
been
expressed,
and
that's
why
I
would
suggest
that
we
move
these
move.
This
ordinance
along,
however,
I'm
fully
fully
aware
of
the
pending
limitations
on
my
ability
to
do
anything
about
this
yeah
yeah.
D
I
That's
what
I
mean
we're
here
to
do
business,
and
this
is
an
item
of
business.
Let's
proceed
with
the
item
of
business
and
we'll
either
vote
it
up
or
we'll
vote
it
down
for
the
reasons
that
people
have
said
and
if
it
has,
you
know
if
it
doesn't
have
sufficient
merit
to
pass,
then
it
won't.
And
then
you
know
the
whole
thing
will
go
away
or
maybe.
N
A
H
A
Q
Rogers
fortune
Grandal,
it's
interesting
that
these
kind
of
controversial
projects,
PU
DS
or
whatever
in
the
history
of
my
observation,
always
seem
to
appear
at
the
Senate
and
especially
in
times
when
things
seem
to
be
having
to
go
like
expedited.
You
know,
rather
than
I
mean
it's
not
that
we
haven't
had
enough
discussion
or
I
wouldn't
be
here
either,
but
you
know
III,
don't
I,
don't
see
it
why's
that
that
something
is
of
this
nature
should
go
forth
without
resolving
other
issues
having
to
do
with
city
property.
Q
D
J
Name
is
Chris
Bowen,
I'm
I'm,
very
much
in
line
with
Nancy's
thoughts,
because
at
this
point,
as
a
member
of
the
neighborhood
that
tried
to
negotiate
with
NCR
through
a
community
benefits
agreement
and
got
nowhere
about
this
issue,
I
have
a
hard
time
sitting
here,
saying
hearing
NCR
talk
about,
they
want
to
work
with
the
community.
They
want
to
work
with
the
neighbors.
They
want
to
work
with
this,
but
we
brought
up.
Does
community
benefits
agreement
that
would
no
place,
and
hence
we
have
all
the
conditions
on
the
PUD.
The
conditions
wouldn't
have
been
there.
J
If
the
community
benefits
agreement
had
gone
through
and
this
process,
probably
wouldn't
have
been
so
painful,
NCR
has
gone
from
having
an
acre
to
a
third
of
an
acre
to
well,
maybe
we'll
do
it
if
it's
passed
by
the
end
of
the
year.
Now
it's
back
to
a
third
of
an
acre.
So
the
problem
is:
is
that
there's
no
final
plans?
There
is
no
there's
some
drawings.
J
However,
we
don't
know
if
the
third
of
an
acre
is
going
to
have
a
slope
of
fill
in
the
middle
of
it,
because
we
don't
know
their
final
slope
plans
they
haven't,
provided
that
their
elevations
have
not
been
revised.
It
makes
a
difference
whether
there's
a
slope
of
fill
going
through
that
third
of
an
acre
there
may
be
because
of
how
the
land
is
situated.
We
don't.
D
J
We
don't
know
what
the
third
you
know,
we
don't
know
if
it's
going
to
be
a
third,
maybe
they'll
do
some
more
rigging
with
their
final
plans
and
it
may
be
a
quarter
of
an
anchor
we
don't
know.
The
fact
is
is
that
we
tried
in
good
faith
as
neighbors,
to
negotiate
through
this
process
through
a
community
that
it's
an
agreement.
They
said,
negotiate
with
the
city.
Now
the
city
is
going
through
it
now.
J
They're,
saying
trust,
trust
us,
but
I,
don't
necessarily
see
that,
because
I
want
the
city
to
protect
the
rights
of
the
citizens,
all
the
citizens
who
all
own
that
property,
the
property
is
going
to
be
converted
into
private
use.
And
if
the
city
doesn't
give
legally
binding
documents,
then
it
is
reneging
on
its
responsibility
to
all
citizens.
J
J
So
therefore,
there
is
no
legally
binding
agreement
right
now
between
the
city
and
you
know
the
developers
and
owed
you
least
of
all
the
neighbors
who
will
be
affected
most
by
the
availability
of
a
third
of
an
acre
or
quarter
of
an
acre
or
a
third
best
slope.
And
until
you
know,
if
council
passes
this
right-of-way
ordinance
without
legally
binding
documents,
they
are
going
to
turn
around
and
something
possibly
could
happen.
J
You
know
it's
happened
before
and
I
know
that
Carol
and
Jim
when
they
were
out
the
campus
meeting
with
the
Southside
Association
has
said
we
were
promised
with
university,
Commons
or
University
courtyard
about
having
a
nice
buffer
with
trees.
The
developers
promised
us
that
they
didn't
follow
through
and
that's
happened
over
and
over
again
in
Athens
and
I'm
saying
I
it's.
You
have
to
have
legally
binding
documents
before
you
go
through
with
this,
because
it
could
happen
over
and
over
again,
and
it
seems
that
you
guys
have
been
bit
once
you
know.
A
D
S
Knows
1/3
to
a
six
out
Dutch
Creek
Road
is
something
that
I
did
bring
up
at
one
point
in
front
of
the
Planning
Commission,
but
I've
not
heard
anybody
discuss
this
sense,
so
I
really
want
to
air.
This
issue
in
this
public
meeting
is
that
there
are
some
serious
deficiencies
in
the
configuration
of
the
bike
path
in
this
area,
and
not
only
does
this
project
not
constructively
address.
S
Those
in
fact
threatens
to
lock
into
place
those
deficiencies,
particularly
the
problems
of
access
to
and
from
Stimson
Avenue
and
other
roadways
in
the
adjacent
neighborhood
and
the
problem
of
crossing
the
ditch,
where
the
bike
path
really
should
be
rerouted
around
had
a
ditch
onto
the
old
railroad
grade
and
yeah
I
would
like
two
more.
You
know
this
set
of
issues
being
addressed
more
in
this
whole
project,
because
it
is
part
and
parcel
of
the
fabric
of
how
this
project
pursuing
executive.
W
I
have
a
new
suggestion
to
make
here
speak
this
evening,
especially
to
those
who
speak
in
favor
of
the
project
and
I.
Ask
that,
in
addition
to
giving
your
name
and
address
state
how
many
years
that
you've
lived
in
that
the
same,
but
I
suggest
this
as
it
needs
to
press
the
City
Council
the
importance
and
the
impact
of
years
that
the
focus
of
the
NCR
project
brought
to
the
life
development
improvement
of
our
city
of
Athens.
Theya
citizens
made
important
contributions
to
the
quality
of
life.
Here.
W
W
So
I
think
it's
time
for
all
citizens
of
our
community
to
importance
of
the
fact
that
you,
as
City
Council
members,
represent
the
entire
city
of
Athens,
not
simply
a
limited
area
of
constituents.
This
project
is
for
the
benefit
of
the
full
community
of
Athens
and
it
shouldn't
be
derailed
by
a
group
of
citizens
who
have
another
agenda.
W
Finally,
in
thinking
of
the
responsibilities
being
placed
before
you
as
members
of
City
Council,
I'm
reminded
of
the
John
F
Kennedy
Profile
in
Courage
Award,
that
was
given
each
year
and
I'd
like
to
read
just
a
brief
statement
continually
concerning
that
award
and
I
have
quote
it
is
presented
annually
to
a
public,
official
or
officials
at
the
federal
state
or
local
levels,
whose
actions
best
demonstrate
the
qualities.
A
political
courage
described
in
his
book
in
political
courage
has
many
meanings
as
used
by
President
Kennedy
Kennedy.
W
The
words
refer
refer
to
an
electorate
and
elected
officials
who,
acting
in
accordance
with
their
conscience,
risked
their
careers
by
pursuing
a
larger
vision
of
national
state
or
local
interest
in
opposition
to
powerful
pressures
from
their
constants
from
their
constituents.
The
need
for
this
kind
of
political
courage
is
especially
important.
Today,
too
often,
officials
are
captive
of
opinion
polls
reluctant
to
act
in
the
broader
public
interest
by
taking
an
unpopular
course
of
action
or
perhaps
offending
powerful
groups.
W
T
Thank
you
very
much.
I'm
gene
Wells
and
I
live
on
Forest
Street
up
on
North,
Hill
and
Nancy.
Is
my
council
person
and
I'd
like
her
to
hear
I
have
been
in
town
for
50
years
and
a
thirty
of
those
years.
I've
worked
for
housing
with
Athens
metropolitan
housing
fact
I
got
honored
today
with
with
Joann
Presley.
T
We
are
now
going
to
have
a
building
named
after
us
for
our
work
with
housing
and
so
I'm
also
interested
in
housing
for
senior
citizens
for
metropolitan
Housing,
and
also
pretty
soon
for
myself
and
having
lived
here
for
50
years.
I
don't
really
want
to
live
in
place
else,
but
neither
do
I
want
to
be
living
in
something
that
I,
don't
feel
is
home-like
and
nice
and
I've
been
in
many
homes
that
were
run
by
the
church
group.
That
is
thinking
about
building
here.
T
X
I'm
Diane
McVeigh,
my
address
is
83
Grosvenor,
Street
and
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
support
the
council
moving
ahead
on
this.
There
are
a
lot
of
valuable
resources
in
Athens
and
it
is
beautiful
that
we
have
green
space,
but
I
think
the
people
that
we
have
in
Athens
are
our
most
valuable
asset
and
when
you
look
around
the
room
at
people,
we
have
the
opportunity
to
keep
in
Athens
to
not
only
serve
on
volunteer
organizations
to
spend
their
money
here
to
pay
their
taxes
here.
X
I
think
our
most
valuable
resource
are
people
and
we
need
to
have
housing
here
to
keep
these
people
here.
Obviously,
these
people
are
very
dedicated
to
having
this
project
completed
and
I.
Think
that
we
have
had
a
lot
of
discussion.
You
have
been
very
open
to
hearing
a
lot
of
different
opinions
and
I
applaud
you
in
moving
ahead
on
the
one
ordinance
tonight
and
I
hope
you
continue
to
move
ahead
and
we
allow
this
project
to
go
ahead.
Thank
you.
H
I'm
Margaret
topping
I
live
at
178,
Long,
View,
Heights,
Road
and
we've
been
here
36
years
raised
five
kids
here,
I
just
wanted
to
clear
up
a
few
things.
Diane
kind
of
said
it
all
hasn't
ended
whether
to
come
up,
but
I
always
would
like
to
clarify
things
and
I
to
record.
You
know
come
in
all
of
you
for
the
work
she's
done
this
in
time.
You've
spent
I,
think
they've
been
very
true
anyway.
I
want
to
make
clear
that
the
owe
you
does
not
inherit
the
buildings.
H
H
These
land
is
the
thing
that,
oh,
you
would
still
have,
I
mean
if
it
went
through
Verdun,
also
the
ordinance
or
rather,
though,
there
was
some
reference
in
the
paper
as
to
the
developer,
having
the
contract
with.
Oh
you
that
is
not
true.
The
developer
has
the
contract
we
contracted
in
the
developer
and
again
it
was
just
the
lease
that
we're
talking
about.
It
was
our
project
and
we've
worked
very
hard
on.
H
The
other
thing
was
that
this
community
benefits
agreement
that
crisp
referred
to.
I'm.
Sorry,
neither
Jerry
nor
I
are
aware
of
that.
It
must
cheat.
You
must
have
talked
to
someone
else
at
NCR.
I.
Do
think
that
this
can
be
worked
out.
Maybe
with
this
committee
that
this
being
talked
about-
and
you
know
everything
if
anybody's
worked
a
lot
with
legal
agreements
which
my
entire
you
have
to
do,
some
things
on
faith,
that
is,
the
quality
of
people
you're
dealing
with
that
counts
and
truly
NCR
is
a
fine
organization
of
fine
people.
H
Y
We
live
in
the
university
community
and
I
suspect
that
almost
everyone
in
this
room
is
connected
with
the
University
in
one
way
or
another
to
one
degree
or
another.
Now,
of
course,
one
of
the
characteristic
things
of
university
communities
is
that
their
their
vocal
everyone
has
an
opinion
everyone
likes
to
talk.
Y
It
frequently
takes
a
great
deal
of
time
to
come
to
any
kind
of
conclusion,
as
the
chair
for
13
years
of
a
large
university
department
in
trying
to
achieve
something
that
went
on
and
on
and
on
and
on
with
new
concerns.
Constantly
popping
out
of
the
woodwork
I
was
reminded
by
a
former
chair
that
the
job
was
very
much
like
herding
cats,
as
he
put
it.
Y
In
short,
a
university
community
is
a
very
vocal
effect,
but
it
seems
to
me
that
if
government
is
to
be
government,
it
has
to
operate
within
certain
relatively
short
time
spans
first
to
the
essence
of
things
and
come
to
some
sort
of
decision.
The
question
has
been
raised
repeatedly:
why
is
everything
being
pushed
through
at
the
end
of
the
year?
Y
I
think
there's
no
one
in
the
room
who
is
ignorant
of
the
reasons
of
why,
after
so
many
months,
we
are
still
discussing
for
these
matters,
and
my
guess
would
be
that
if
the
present
council
does
not
choose
to
settle
the
matter
that
a
year
from
now,
the
cry
may
well
be
heard.
But
why
are
we
trying
to
hurry
through
approval
of
this
development?
Y
It's
possible
for
milk
matters
to
be
raised
endlessly
and
event.
Eventually,
one
has
to
ask:
are
they
being
raised
with
the
idea
of
perfecting
a
project
or
is
the
idea
simply
by
endless
iteration
to
defeat
the
project
again,
like
others,
I
would
ask
the
City
Council
to
act
on
this
matter
in
the
remainder
of
the
period
of
the
present
councils.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
Z
Z
First
I'd
like
to
point
out
that
this
is
not
going
to
be
a
continuing
care
retirement
center,
it's
going
to
be
Retirement
Center,
but
it
will
not
have
been
school
classified
as
a
continuing
care
retirement
center.
One
of
those
is
actually
going
to
be
built
on
the
other
side
of
the
river
on
the
west
side
by
the
West
West
State
fields,
and
the
way
that
this
is
being
railroaded
through
is
sloppy
and
it
does
a
disservice
to
the
citizens
of
Athens.
AA
My
name
is
Doug
ATSA
and
I
live
on
106
Maplewood,
Drive
I,
haven't
spoke
here
before
and
hopefully
bear
with
me
during
these
comments,
and
hopefully
they
won't
offend
anybody,
because
I
truly
like
seniors
as
I
think
most
some
people
on
both
sides.
The
issue
do
we
all
have
parents
who
are
older,
grandparents
or
younger,
but
and
somewhat
motivated
by
the
speech
with
the
courage
and
the
Kennedy
thing.
AA
I
thought
you
know
it
really
should
stand
up
and
say
what
I
think
so
so
somebody's
mentioned
the
fact
that
it's
not
going
to
be
a
CCRC
and
I
just
like
to
point
out
there.
That
puts
us
in
an
ironic
situation
where
the
group
who
calls
themselves
with
CCRC
is
actually
supporting
the
development
that
will
compete
with
the
CCR
city,
meaning
the
chances
of
having
two
cc's
are
seeing
a
little
bit
less.
If
you
support
this
because
it's
economically
challenging
the
other.
AA
The
other
point
I'd
like
to
make
is
that
the
people
that
are
against
the
or
not
against,
but
that
are
talking
about
the
Retirement
Center-
are
not
because
they're
anti
senior
it's
because
they're
very
passionate
about
what
they
feel.
I've
talked
to
a
lot
of
these
people,
and
Margaret
can
back
me
up
on
this
because
we've
spoken
about
it
before
or
she
may
not
remember
it,
but
not
not
because
she's
older,
because
we
talk
to
the
punch,
she's
never
talked
about
a
face
to
it,
but
but
people
have
shed
tears
over
this.
AA
Okay
people
are
shedding
their
shed
tears
over
the
fact
that
they
want
to
space
they're,
very
passionate
about
it.
I
believe
Margaret
relate
to
me
that
she'd
gone
to
a
meeting
with
Denis
reset
residents
and
they
were
very
upset.
People
were
crying
people
told
me
that
they'll
sleep
over
it,
educators
and
community
and
said
it's
bad
for
the
kids.
People
feel
very
strongly
about
this
and
they
feel
very
passionate
and
that's
what
we
have
this
vicen.
Yes,
it's
because
there
is
probably
50%
of
the
people,
and
it's
represented
here
on
council.
AA
It's
a
pretty
even
split
of
people
for
it
and
against
it.
People
are
truly
are
passionate
about
that
space
and
people
say
it's
not
been
used.
I've
been
there
where
there's
been
two
soccer
games
with
kids,
one
of
the
kids
one
with
adults
and
Ultimate
Frisbee
game
going
on
now.
If
you
drive
by
the
golf
course
this
winter
and
say
nobody's
using
it,
then
do
you
say:
well,
let's
build
something
on
it
and
everybody's
using
the
golf
birds.
AA
Okay,
we
understand
what
a
golf
course
is
about
in
the
same
way,
it's
a
football,
that's
what
a
floodplain
looks
like
it's
an
empty
space:
it
collects
water
when
it
floods,
it's
being
used,
that's
what
a
floodplain
is
so
and
finally,
I
would
like
to
comment
on
the
fact
that
this
is
the
the
ideal
location.
People
call
this
ideal
location
for
this
retirement
center
and
I
actually
disagree
with
that.
Although
I
live
on
the
east
side
and
I
do
enjoy
that
space.
I
also
noticed
that
there
was
a
smell
from
the
sewer.
AA
That's
there
when
they,
when
the
evening
is
calm,
especially
at
night,
you
can
smell
the
sewer.
It's
not
I'm.
Walk
fire
or
bite
by
their
order
to
go
to
the
pool,
and
you
can
definitely
smell
it.
That's
not
a
red
herring.
It's
on
a
floodplain,
it's
close
to
a
flood
way
and
I've
actually
asked
members
of
City
Council
I've
heard
from
members
of
City
Council
have
also
heard
from
talked
to
people
at
NCR
and
they've
said:
I
would
not
build
near
that
I
would
not
build
my
house
there.
Barra
recently
sold
property.
AA
They
had
less
of
a
flood
problem,
so
I
would
say
if
you're
going
to
vote
with
your
courage
and
what
you
feel
inside
you
think
about
what
you
would
do.
Would
you
build
a
house
there
if
the
answer's?
No,
then
perhaps
you
should
not
so,
for
this
is
also
a
four-lane
highway.
So,
finally,
the
last
thing
I'd
like
to
say
is
that
I
think
that
my
suggestion
would
be
that
I
think
that
we
should
all
get
behind
the
University
of
State's
project.
I.
Think
that's
much
better
for
the
city.
AA
It
keeps
everybody
happy
with
the
green
space.
The
city
gets
green
space.
We
get
to
our
CCRC.
Let's
all
push
for
that.
If
we're
not
going
to
do
that,
then
I
think
we
should
encourage
people
that
are
pushing
for
it
and
the
side
to
get
together
and
work
out,
something
that
makes
everybody
happy.
I,
think
market
and
I
talked
about
this
before
there
could
be
a
solution
that
makes
people
happy.
AA
A
AB
AB
AB
Well,
my
name
is
Pat
light
and
I
no
longer
live
in
the
city
of
Athens,
but
I
did
for
many
years.
I
think
I
came
here
in
1968
and
I
haven't
done.
The
math
I
bet
at
any
rate,
I
don't
live
in
the
city
limits
now.
I
live
outside
and
I
have
followed
this
issue
since
it
started
and
I
have
followed
the
course
of
other
attempts
to
try
to
get
housing
first
seniors,
appropriate
housing,
I
might
say
for
seniors
and
I
have
a
bunch
of
comments
that
I
would
like
to
make.
AB
AB
Because
to
me
it
seems
as
though,
if
the
university
could
unilaterally
build
on
that
property
and
no
one
could
have
a
say
one
way
or
the
other
about
it,
wouldn't
it
be
much
better
at
this
point
to
take
the
bird.
That's
in
our
hand,
I'm
talking
to
you,
people
who
live
on
that
we
find,
rather
than
perhaps
be
confronted
in
the
future,
by
something
the
university
might
build
there,
which
would
not
be
nearly
as
neighborhood
friendly
I
can
assure
you
as
having
a
group
of
older
people
who
love
this
town
love.
AB
AB
That
I'm,
aware
of
right
now
that
the
university
is
involved
in
which
is
building
on
similar
land,
and
no
one
here
that
I
know
has
been
complaining
about
that
and
I
think.
The
reason
is
because
they
know
they
can't
it
doesn't
make
any
difference
in
university,
we'll
be
able
to
do
what
it
wants
to
do.
So
there
are
other
things
that
I
could
say,
but
I
think
I'll
just
leave
it
at
that.
AB
If
it's
taken
mine
for
retirements
in
it
there's
a
more
significant
loss
in
my
opinion,
and
that
is
of
the
rights
to
the
rights
of
the
old
older
people
who
have
contributed
so
much
in
this
community,
you
can
say:
go
across
the
river.
Well,
when
you
lose
your
ability
to
drive,
it's
no
fun
to
be
across
the
river
and
not
be
able
to
get
into
town
this
this.
AB
A
V
Latino
Morris
Avenue,
now
that
we
have
proposed
a
very
large
Student
Development,
also
on
Stinson
Avenue
I,
see
Stimpson
Avenue
becoming
truly
a
mire
of
traffic
problems.
Already
it's
not
great
and
I
think
it
will
become
worse
with
five
hundred
plus
students
in
their
cars
and
anyone
who
is
living
in
the
Retirement
Center
of
its
building
I
believe
that's
been
a
call
for
traffic
lights
and
other
traffic
control
measures,
sidewalks
and
other
things
and
I.
Don't
know
where
the
money
is
going
to
come
from.
V
AC
Jeanne
Moreau
187
North
Congress,
just
one
I'd
like
to
bring
up
one
issue
that
I
haven't
heard,
addressed:
I,
guess
in
so
many
words,
and
that
has
to
do
with
the
fact
that
we
are
as
a
people.
As
pointed
out,
there's
our
community
of
people
we're
trying
to
do
the
best
we
can
to
preserve
the
community
for
all
of
people
in
deal
with
individual
needs.
At
the
same
time,
my
concern
I
guess.
AC
One
of
my
concerns
here
is
that
yes,
it's
true
that
the
university's
donation
of
the
land,
if
the
City
Council,
turns
over
the
right
away,
that
it
don't
reduce
the
cost
somewhat
compared
to
what
University
of
States
might
be
charging
for
the
equivalent
housing
I,
don't
know
what
those
numbers
are
and
I'd
like
to
see
even
ballpark
numbers
along
that
line.
I'm,
not
sure
what
this
difference
is.
It
might
be
significant.
It
might
not
be
in
the
end.
AC
At
the
same
time,
I
see
this
as
the
city
and
the
university
subsidizing.
A
certain
segment
of
the
population
and
I
think
that's
appropriate
to
decide
to
do
that
as
a
government.
Governments
need
to
decide
to
do
that
when
it's
appropriate,
but
I
also
question,
then
who's
getting
subsidized
and
I'm
concerned
that
this
kind
of
a
and
I
I
do
believe.
People
deserve
the
right
to
have
this
kind
of
facility
available
to
them
and
I.
Think
University
states
will
will
do
that.
AC
Who
are
we
subsidizing
here
and
really
subsidizing
after
by
Athens
standards
and
elite
and
I
feel
like
an
elite
but
I
understand
as
many
of
the
people
who
will
be
able
to
afford
this
kind
of
housing
or
I
wouldn't
be
able
to
afford
this
kind
of
housing?
Any
of
that,
okay
and
I
know
a
lot
of
other
people
that
wouldn't
be
able
to
afford.
AC
If
we,
if
we
wanted
it
we're
providing
not
alike
along
again
the
the
coastline
and
the
Gulf
of
Mexico
along
Louisiana
people
were
able
to
build
along
the
coastline,
people
that
have
the
means
to
do
so
when
the
flood
comes,
the
government
bails
them
out,
they'd
rebuild
the
infrastructure
and
they
can
build
back
on
their
land.
Again,
it's
subsidizing.
AC
An
elite
I'd
like
to
see
some
I
would
I
would
urge
people
that
want
this
project
to
find
a
way
to
perhaps
set
aside
the
certain
number
of
units
for
people
of
low
and
moderate
income
if
they're,
really
serious
about
getting
subsidized
by
this
by
Athens
and
by
the
university
in
their
plans
for
retirement
center,
I
lived
in
Boulder
Colorado.
This
was
a
feature
of
this
city
when
I
was
living
there,
that
if
somebody
wanted
to
put
in
an
apartment
complex,
they
had
to
give
so
many
units
over
to
low
and
moderate-income
people.
AC
A
I
I
I
That's
wrong
and
that's
a
line
that
we
don't
cross
very
often
around
here,
one
of
the
things
I
like
about
living
in
Athens,
because
people
passionately
believe
things
and
they
fervently
express
themselves
and
they're
very
eloquent,
but
to
sort
of
cross.
That
line
is
really
disappointing.
I'm.
Sorry,
it
happened.
I
hope
that
we
can
decide
this
matter
on
its
on
its
merits.
Now
that
may
not
happen.
I
Yes,
it's
in
the
it's
in
the
realm
of
the
Ethics
Commission
and
and
actually,
if
someone
suggested
to
me
that
that
the
ethical
thing
to
do
would
be
to
to
sort
of
not
participate
in
this
and
I
guess.
What
I
would
say
is
that
the
ethical
thing
to
do
is
to
is
to
make
the
heart
vote.
The
easy
thing
to
do
would
be
to
say:
geez
I
got
a
conflict,
I'm,
not
gonna,
be
him
I'm,
not
gonna,
be
involved
in
this.
That's
the
easy
thing
to
do.
That's
the
cop-out
thing
to
do
so.
I
I
I
D
F
Finally
stolen
my
husband,
I
had
lived
in
Athens
for
12
meters,
even
though
I
teach
death
and
dying
at
OU
year,
I
still
get
nervous
when
I
talk
in
front
of
a
crowd,
especially
people
that
are
somewhat
controversial,
I
just
wish
all
of
us
could
come
together.
I
do
want
to
thank
Council,
so
much
I,
don't
know
how
you
all
even
sit
up
now
up
here
without
all
meeting
you
know,
catheters
I,
don't
know
how
you
used
to
here
so
long.
F
And
and
I
have
aged
so
much
as
I've
since
I've
been
on
this
committee,
I've
been
blessed
to
work
with
Margaret
topping
for
three
and
a
half
years
again.
My
husband
I've
lived
here
for
12
years.
My
husband
grew
up
in
Athens,
so
he
was
here
from
about
1915
until
1978,
when
he
went
off
to
college
and
I've
just
been
really
blessed
to
be
on
this
committee
with
Margaret
I
want
to
just
real
quick
touch
on
the
point
of
the
CCRC
and
how
we
sort
of
came
up
with
our
name.
F
F
We
had
a
Dean
of
Health
and
Human
Services,
because
we're
so
hoping
that
students
will
be
able
to
use
our
facility
in
the
future
a
nurse,
a
physical
therapist
and
we
all
got
together
not
really
knowing
a
whole
lot
about
continuing
care
retirement
communities,
and
we
were
very
much
hoping
that
we
would,
in
the
end,
be
a
continuing
care
retirement
community.
All
of
us
were
not
aware
that
Ohio
had
a
moratorium
on
nursing
home
beds
at
that
time.
F
We've
all
become
very
knowledgeable
over
the
years
I
19
years,
and
we
have
been
so
blessed
also
to
have
NCR
stand
by
us
for
a
very
long
time.
My
husband
calls
the
the
guy
that
always
wants
you
to
go
to
the
dance
with
them
and
you
just
kind
of
always
put
them
on
hold
and
then
finally
use
it.
We
really,
you
know,
let's
go
to
the
dance
and
they've
been
there
behind
us.
F
You
know,
for
the
same
reason
that
maybe
you
don't
want
to
live
in
the
planks
or
maybe
you
know
you
don't
want
to
live
out
in
Albany
or
somewhere
else.
They
want
to
live
in
town,
because
so
many
of
them
have
have
lived
here,
their
lives,
and
so
thank
you
very
much
for
your
time
and
I'm
sure
we
all
need
a
restroom.
A
A
As
of
May,
the
three
of
us
were
informed
that
we
had
a
con
and
could
not
be
voting
on
the
one
issue
that
was
before
us
at
that
time.
For
those
reasons,
all
of
us
found
it
fairly
surprising,
but
then
I
also
was
told
that
having
a
conflict
is
not
a
bad
thing
in
a
small
town,
there
are
always
going
to
be
times
that
issues
will
come
before
council
that,
because
you
have
interest,
you
will
have
a
conflict.
A
It's
not
a
mean
thing:
it's
not
a
bad
thing,
because
you
have
interest,
you
will
occasionally
have
a
conflict
of
interest,
so
I
would
and
the
issue
of
does
somebody.
The
work
at
Ohio
University
have
a
conflict
on
all
the
myriad
of
things
that
could
come
before
this
council.
That's
something
several
members
of
this
council
have
discussed
for
years,
but
it's
never
been
brought
forth
publicly.
Now.
E
A
A
E
President
one
3405
was
discussed
several
weeks
ago
and
I
had
a
stack
of
things,
and
this
one
did
not
make
it
on.
This
is
the
first
of
what
may
be
several
increases.
This
one
is
to
allow
some
longer
term
planning
in
the
vicinity
of
Main,
Avenue,
Cable
Lane
and
some
other
things
to
happen,
as
well
as
the
ongoing
considerable
expenses
with
respect
to
wellness,
Road
and
FEMA,
and
there's
an
example
of
a
place
where
we
moved
it
after
the
flood.
E
But
anyway,
having
said
that,
we're
going
to
increase
the
base
rate
and
the
gallonage,
and
so
you
can
see
the
three
percenter
shown
it's
not
very
much,
but
it
does
end
up
tearing
up
over
time
notice
that
we
have
thousand
gallons
stepped
and,
as
you
get
to
the
larger,
the
monthly
rate
charge
is
considerably
more.
This
is
a
little
late
in
starting
I
apologize
for
my
blunder.
E
E
E
That
the
sewer
rates
are
gonna,
be
25%
more
than
the
water
rates,
and
so
if
you
are
a
big
water
user,
you
have
a
lot
of
teenagers
taking
showers
washing
their
hair,
it's
gonna
be
just
one:
one
will
do
it
or
if
you're
a
person
you're
going
to
have
a
higher
rate,
then
let's
say
mine
is
usually
in
the
vicinity
of
them.
Oh
so,
let's
say
10
and
12
10
and
13
for
the,
and
so
this
will
be
a
minor
change
and
it
probably
will
go
on
from
there.
I
You,
mr.
president,
this
is
an
ordinance
in
section
1
we're
allocating
$65,000.
This
is
the
lakefront
grant.
This
is
an
agency
fund,
which
means
we're
receiving
the
money
and
then
allocating
the
money,
and
this
$65,000
is,
let's
see,
paid
out
of
this
year's
funds,
but
not
reimbursed
through
the
grant
until
late
in
January.
So
the
idea
is
that
we
encumber
the
money
now,
and
so
we
can
pay
some
invoices
and
then
we'll
get
some
more
funds.
This
is
a
this
is
the
transit
system
that
comes.
E
A
B
President,
this
resolution
comes
after
council
has
received
a
report
from
the
Stroud
run
task
force.
We
spent
quite
a
bit
of
time
investigating
the
possibility
that
the
city
of
Athens
might
take
the
state
of
Ohio
up
on
his
offer
to
transfer
Strauss
run,
as
we
understand
it,
to
city
ownership
and
for
the
city
to
operate
a
couple.
B
The
city
can
ask
the
City
Council,
does
further
the
desires,
further
information
regarding
financing
such
a
venture
and
does
hereby
request
the
mayor
to
investigate
the
terms
and
conditions
of
the
land
transfer
and
funding
sources
in
order
to
provide
final
contractual
details.
Section
three.
This
resolution
does
not
approve
any
expenditure
of
funds.