►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting - 7/1/19
Description
City of Austin, Minnesota
A
C
B
A
A
D
D
Thank
you
well
thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
come
here
tonight,
but
also
thank
you
for
all
the
hard
work
that
Austin
does
we'll
be
talking
about
this
a
little
bit
later,
but
as
I
was
just
explaining
to
the
mayor
and
Craig
this
every
year
we
give
awards
away
at
our
annual
conference
for
people
who've
shown
outstanding
service
to
the
coalition
and
the
work
we
do
this
year.
For
the
first
time
ever
we're
actually
giving
an
award
to
a
city.
D
We
decided
that
the
efforts
of
Austin
that
were
just
you
know
just
sort
of
as
a
whole
as
a
team,
we're
so
helpful
to
what
we
were
doing
that,
rather
than
just
recognizing
one
or
two
individuals.
We
actually
created
a
new
category
of
awards
for
cities.
So
we've
only
appreciate
everything.
Austin
does,
and
you
know
what
you
know
faces
on
the
audience
just
so
just
so.
You
know
what
the
coalition
is.
We
are
a
group
of
97
cities
across
the
state.
D
We
work
on
issues
that
particularly
affect
Greater
Minnesota,
including
local
government
aid,
economic
development,
annexation,
transportation
and
environmental
regulation.
I
specialize
on
in
the
environmental
stuff,
just
to
give
you
before
we
dive
into
this
session,
want
to
give
you
a
little
bit
of
background
in
terms
of
you
know
where
we
were
at
when
the
sessions
started,
and
you
probably
remember
we
had
an
election.
D
The
last
fall
that
it
seems
many
months
ago
and
it
kind
of
create
a
situation
where
we
had,
for
the
first
time
in
many
years,
a
DFL
governor
from
Greater
Minnesota
when
we
had
the
the
DFL
took
over
the
house.
But
you
know
in
a
turn,
from
what
we've
seen
in
the
past,
it
was
dominated
not
by
rural
or
by
the
the
inner
core
of
a
town,
a
note
about
suburbs
and
the
Senate
remained
in
GOP
control.
So
we
basically
have
the
oil
divided
governor.
Excuse
me
only
divided
legislature
in
the
the
country.
D
So
another
backdrop
to
that
is
that
the
public,
when
he
was
pushing
this
year
for
transparency
bipartisanship
and
an
end
to
the
acrimony
we'd
seen
the
last
couple
years.
This
was
a
budget
year
every
two
years.
The
state
is
required
by
the
Constitution
to
put
together
its
budget.
If
they
don't,
we
have
a
shutdown,
but
what
we
saw
was:
is
there
a
competing
visions
of
how
we
should
actually
be
dealing
with
the
budget
and
taxes
together
and
agreed
that,
even
though
we
had
a
budget
surplus,
it
probably
wasn't
going
to
be
there
forever.
D
In
fact,
we
saw
it
sort
of
shrink
in
the
forecast
from
1.5
billion
to
1
billion.
The
challenge
was
is
that
we
had
two
very
different
views
of
how
we
should
approach
that
the
DFL
believed
that
basically,
this
sort
of
disappearing,
a
budget
surplus
was
a
revenue
problem
and
they
proposed
a
variety
of
new
automobile,
related
taxes
and
an
extension
of
the
provider
tax.
D
The
GOP
view
from
the
Senate
was
that
it
was
actually
a
spending
problem,
and
so
they
proposed
spending
and
tax
cuts,
as
you
might
guess,
that
sort
of
tension
between
the
two
really
affected
the
discourse
and
what
happened
now
the
goals
for
this
you
were
pretty
straightforward.
We
wanted
to
restore
LGA
to
the
2002.
We
were
pushing
for
a
big
bonding
bill
with
money
for
child
care
facilities,
wastewater
and
economic
development.
We
want
to
child
care
grants
for
training
and
business
development
and
a
comprehensive
transportation
package.
We
don't
want
much.
D
Thing
I
think
that
we
really
need
to
talk
about.
First
is
the
LGA
and
you
know
I
think
it
is
pretty
a
pretty
big
achievement.
We
got
LJ
back
to
the
2002
level
for
those
of
you,
who've
been
watching
this
for
a
number
of
years,
LGA
hit
its
high
mark
back
in
2002
and
564
million
dollars.
It
was
cut
by
a
hundred
million
dollars
the
next
year
and
then
just
sort
of
you
know
death
by
slow
slices.
D
You
know
in
the
coming
years
down
to
425
by
2012,
we
had
been,
you
know,
obviously
pushing
back
against
those
cuts,
but,
more
importantly,
when
we
relentlessly
pursuing
that
sort
of
restoration
of
that
decline,
and
we
were
able
to
achieve
that
in
this
year's
tax
bill
I'm
going
into
the
session.
However,
there
was
no
guarantee
of
success
on
the
plus
side.
D
One
of
the
things
that
we
do
every
election
season
in
well
in
advance
of
the
election
is,
we
really
get
to
know
the
candidates,
and
so
we
really
spent
a
lot
of
time
reaching
out
to
different
different
gubernatorial
candidates
and
governor
also
really
took
our
message
on
LGA
to
heart,
and
he
you
know
once
I
understood
it
really
started
champion
and
became
a
goal
for
him
in
his
new
administration.
The
other
benefit
we
had
was.
Is
that
long
time
a
tax
chair,
Paul
Marquart,
was
a
big
LGA
champion.
D
He
used
to
be
the
mayor
of
Dilworth
and
understands
what
it
means
to
cities.
On
the
negative
side,
we
had
a
Senate
tax
chair
who
just
doesn't
like
LGA,
and
you
know
it
originally
floated
an
idea
that
he
was
gonna
increase
LGA,
but
only
for
cities
under
5,000
and
then
in
his
bill.
He
didn't
include
any
increases
on
the
other
challenge
and
it
was
one
we
weren't.
You
know
we
don't
seize
often,
but
I
think
releasing
more
frequently
is
that
some
of
the
legislators
wanted
to
seek
other
forms
of
property
tax
relief.
D
They
wanted
to,
for
example,
put
more
money
into
a
renter
and
homeowner
property
tax
refunds,
but
well
I
want
to
overcome
these
obstacles
with
a
lot
of
work,
a
little
group
work
and
we
proposed
a
thirty
point:
five
million
dollar
increase.
You
know
what
a
media,
statewide
guest
columnist,
press
conferences
with
the
media,
really
high
member
engagement
through
Action,
Alerts
and
legislative
action
days,
and
then
our
lobbyists
were,
you
know
very,
very
busy
on
this.
D
You
know
meeting
with
legislators
throughout
the
session
on
this
and
as
a
result,
we
were
able
to
restore
lg8
of
thirty
million
dollars,
okay,
that
last
thirty
million
dollars.
This
is
what
it
looks
like
for
Austin.
The
one
thing
our
mission
is
that
the
thirty
million
dollars
is
twenty.
Six
million
dollars
goes
into
effect.
D
D
D
Increased
to
the
2002
level,
but
that
does
not
include
inflation.
So
that's
going
to
be
one
of
the
next
fronts
and,
as
you
know,
economic
downturns
happen
and
LGA
is
often
a
target
for
cuts,
and
so
we
are
always
prepared
to
play
defense
as
well
as
offense
the
rise
of
suburban
legislators
within
the
sort
of
the
power
circle
that
the
capital
is
going
to
be
make
LG
a
bit
more
of
a
challenge
and
I
guess
the
other
thing
I'd
mention
is
that
the
you
know
it's
been
talked
about
a
formula
update.
D
We
will
be
discussing
that
before
and
during
the
legislative
session.
You
know
not
a
wholesale
change,
but
you
know
looking
at.
Are
there
things
that
can
be
made
better,
but
rest
assured
we
remain
committed
to
preserving
and
strengthening
LGA
now.
The
next
big
issue
is
something
we've
just
started
working
on
over
the
last
couple
years
and
I
know
that
my
understanding
is
it's
a
big
issue
for
Austin
there's
a
childcare
crisis
in
the
states,
particularly
hitting
Greater
Minnesota
and
Greater
Minnesota.
D
That's
not
35,000
statewide,
that's
35,000
slots
that
we
have
a
shortage
of
in
Greater
Minnesota
and
the
challenge
with
it
is
is
well
there's
number
of
challenges,
but
it
does
hamper
economic
growth.
You
know,
employers
make
it
hard
to
hire
a
return,
retain
workers
and
families
leave
our
communities.
D
We
came
up
with
a
framework
in
terms
of
you,
know,
lesson
policies
and
we
thought
would
be
addressing
it.
First.
We
have
proposed
three
million
dollars
for
the
six
initiative
foundations
who
have
a
deep
expertise
in
this,
but
not
enough
money
to
get
everything
done.
They
were,
you
know,
provide
training
and
business
assistance,
facilitate
polling,
engage
the
private
sector
and
recruit
providers.
I
also
proposed
10
million
dollars
in
the
bonding
bill
for
new
facilities,
grant
program
masako
motion,
but
we
led
the
advocacy
effort.
They're
building,
you
know,
coalition
of
business
leaders
and
childcare
advocates.
D
We
even
got
the
chamber
on
board.
They
don't
always
the
statewide
chamber,
don't
always
see
eye
to
eye
with
us,
but
they
we
worked
with
them
on
this.
This
activity
extensive
media
coverage
throughout
this
state-
and
we
had
quite
a
large
number
of
maybe
editorial
endorsements
from
legislators.
Multiple
legislative
hearings
and
grassroots
organizing,
with
lots
of
contacts
with
the
governor
and
legislative
leaders
I
also
want
to
point
out
that
we
partnered
with
the
Greater
Minnesota
Economic
to
create
a
Minnesota
partnership
and
which
Austin's
a
member.
D
We
really
appreciate
their
efforts
as
well
and
it
did
pay
off
and
we
didn't
get
everything
I
want
attended,
I
didn't
get.
You
know,
made
some
significant
advances
with
money
for
both
the
initiative
foundations
and
for
addy
childcare,
grant
that
at
least
60%
will
go
to
Greater
Minnesota.
There
was
10
million
dollars
for
the
facility
grants
in
the
house
bonding
bill,
but,
as
you
know,
wouldn't
have
a
bonding
bill.
This
year
we
are
I
have
to
say
that's
probably
one
of
our
biggest
end
of
session
disappointments.
You
know
the
house
put
together
a
bill.
D
It
was
in
that
house.
Bill
sent
never
really
was
not
excited
about
it,
and
even
though
the
final
proposed
budget
dil
suggested
there
would
be
a
bonding
more
it
just
it
didn't
it
kind
of
fell
by
the
wayside
at
the
end
of
session,
but
I
think
we've
laid
the
groundwork
to
started
trusting
this
childcare
issue,
it's
sort
of
raised
and
in
sort
of
terms
of
people's
minds,
and
so
we've
really
laid
the
groundwork
for
more
on
the
future.
D
Some
other
economic
development
wins
one
point:
eight
million
dollars
for
the
PDP,
our
money
for
broadband
mine
for
the
job
training
incentive
program
and
then
the
brand
new
airport
infrastructure
grant
program
first
with
$750,000
the
next
big
thing
and
I
spent
quite
a
bit
of
time.
Working
with
Craig
on
this
issue
is
particularly
the
beginning
of
the
year
was
clementa
money
and
I'm
sure
you
all
are
well
aware.
That
said,
in
turn,
the
2018
bonding
bill
contained
a
hundred
and
twenty
three
million
dollars
for
wastewater
and
water
infrastructure.
D
Unfortunately,
fifty
nine
million
dollars
of
that
was
backed
by
these
new
environmental
trust,
fund
bonds
and
very
controversial
there's
a
lawsuits
that
basically
stopped
them
in
their
tracks.
From
being
sold
in
October,
causing
multiple
projects,
including
one
of
Austin's
projects,
our
basic
sort
of
we
really
tried
not
to
take
a
position
in
this
because
we
didn't
want
to
get
caught
between
the
Republicans
and
the
Democrats
on
this.
Basically,
we
said
you
want
me
to
resolve
the
lawsuit.
All
I
need
to
replace
the
bonds
spend
a
lot
of
time.
D
We
actually
got
a
lot
of
really
good
media
attention.
Had
a
you
know,
a
big
column
in
the
Star
Tribune
in
the
country
replicated
statewide
the
governor
was
paying
attention
or
Slayers
were
paying
attention.
Yet
nothing
happened
until
the
sessions
started.
We
did
introduce
a
bill
with
your
representative
gene
poppy
as
our
chief
anchor
in
the
House
for
128
million
dollars.
That
would
do
two
things
cover
those
bonds
that
were
held
up
as
well
as
trying
to
cover
some
of
the
additional
2019
meets
now
they're.
D
So
you
know
a
full-court
press
I'm,
getting
all
that
money
through
and
in
March
the
governor
and
legislature
finally
agreed
to
fix
the
problem
from
last
year,
which
we
are
very
grateful
for,
but
of
course
we
weren't
going
to
leave
it
at
that.
So
I've
been
thinking
the
legislators
we
reminded
them
that
they
needed
to
give
a
you
know
we
really
needed
the
other
67
million
dollars
and
that
proposal
was
included
in
the
house
bonding
proposal.
But
again,
as
I
mentioned,
the
House
bonding
bill
failed.
D
Our
final
area,
we
spent
a
lot
of
time
on
is
transportation,
and
you
know
you're,
really
hoping
that
you
know
the
in
the
discussion.
It
really
sounded
like
people
really
want
to
do
something
about
transportation,
and
we
were
thinking
okay.
This
is
perfect.
We
can
get
some
of
our
goals
done.
You
know
our
comprehensive
package
that
we
were
pushing
for
was
fifty
million
dollars
for
city
streets.
D
You
know
25
million
dollars
for
cities
under
five
thousand
twenty
five
million
dollars
for
larger
cities
and
then
also
money
for
quarters
with
commerce,
including
the
twenty
five
million
dollars
in
cash.
Unfortunately,
houses
Senate,
very,
very
different
philosophies
and
the
house
wanted
to
you
know:
do
a
comprehensive
approach
with
an
increase
in
gas
tax.
Tab
fees
that
would
establish
permanent
funding
for
small
cities
include
fifty
million
more
than
50
million
dollars
for
larger
cities
like
Austin
and
then
money
for
corridors
of
Commerce
Senate
took
the
opposite
approach:
no
more
investment.
D
They
actually
wanted
to
cut
twenty
five
million
dollars
from
corridors
of
Commerce
and
they
had
put
pony
up
so
money
for
small
cities,
but
it
was
$250,000
and
that
equals
about
$350
I'm
guessing
you
know,
I
think
you
know
you
know
the
city
could
probably
fill
a
pothole
or
something
like
that.
So
wasn't
a
great
proposal.
Unfortunately,
you
know
we
thought
there
was
gonna.
The
final
deal
really
that
lost
that
opportunity
and
the
interest
in
getting
something
done
more
comprehensive
package.
I
mean
what
really
happened
was
as
the
GOP
drew
the
road
line.
D
D
We
were
able
to
fend
off
the
cuts
to
corridors
of
Commerce,
and
even
if
it
wasn't
funding
funded
this
year,
we
think
it's
really
important
and
significant
that
the
house
does
include
that's
that
historic
amount
of
money
for
city
streets
in
their
bill
and
we
are
going
to
be
pushing
for
that
next
year.
So
I
guess
I
had
Shane
describe
this
session.
For
me
in
one
sentence,
and
he
said
it
was
that
the
session
was
defined
by
both
proposals
and
little
willingness
to
compromise.
F
D
We've
gained
into
sort
of
the
the
various
folks
that
were
having
to
deal
with
at
the
legislature
with
the
suburban
land
house
DFL.
We
are
willing
to
invest
money
into
critical
programs.
One
of
the
challenges
we're
seeing
is
that
there
are
a
little
less
likely
to
support
Greater
Minnesota,
specific
programs.
On
the
flip
side,
the
Senate
doesn't
want
to,
though
I
should
say
they're
less
interested
in
new
spending,
but
they
are
more
willing
to
recognize
that
Greater
Minnesota
does
need
specific
solutions
in
some
situations.
D
Looking
ahead
to
2020,
as
I
mentioned,
we're
going
to
potentially
be
discussing
LGA
formula
changes.
Probably
the
biggest
thing
is,
though,
bonding
though
really
major
focus
again
trying
to
get
money
for
child
care,
PFL
funding
and
all
other
economic
development
issue
initiatives.
They
would
like
a
comprehensive
transportation
solution.
It
is
still
needed.
We
are
not
optimistic,
however
I'm
just
gonna,
you
know
be
real
here.
D
Our
expectation
is,
is
if
there's
more
money
for
transportation,
it's
going
to
come
through
the
bonding
bill,
and
basically
both
sides
are
going
to
use
transportation
funding
as
an
issue
in
the
upcoming
election
and
next
year
is,
as
you
know,
an
election
year,
and
we
will
continue
to
do
as
we
have
in
years.
Past
educate
can't
the
candidates
in
public
on
our
issues,
because
we
find
when
we
get
them
early,
recognizing,
what's
important
and
that's
when
we
can
really
make
a
difference
at
the
Capitol,
so
it
begins
now
for
a
successful
session.
D
Upcoming
events
we
have
our
summer
conference
coming
at
the
end
of
the
month.
Stoller's
registration
still
open
them.
If
any
of
you
can
join
us,
I
know
a
couple
of
you
are
coming,
but,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
we
are
going
to
recognizing
the
city
at
this
conference
at
our
awards
ceremony
that,
like
I,
said
their
first
ever
award
for
a
city
just
for
all
of
the
work
that
you
guys
put
into
you
know
our
efforts
at
Greater
Minnesota
it
really.
D
It
really
didn't
make
a
difference,
and
so
big
thank
you
to
all
of
you
and
we
have
a
full
conference,
which
is
a
great
event,
one
of
the
one
of
the
more
popular
ones
up
every
year
and
that's
an
Alexandrian
that
gets
ready
for
the
session
and
then
our
legislative
action
day
is
March
11th.
We
just
booked
the
room
on
that.
That's
also
an
extremely
popular
event.
It's
gotten
so
large.
We
had
to
move
it
out
of
our
offices
over
to
the
Best
Western.
So
really
we're
again.
Thank
you
I.
Thank
you.
D
Thank
you
for
all
that
Austin
does
to
really
help
us
be
successful
at
the
legislature.
I
appreciate
you
allowing
me
to
speak
and
I
just
want
to
point
out
to
you
that
if
you
have
any
questions
and
I'm
sorry
I
don't
have
the
packet.
It's
you
in
advance.
We
were
just
putting
the
finishing
touches,
you're
our
first
city
visit.
So
far,
so
there
is
a
listing
of
all
of
the
environment
I
work
on
there
and
I'm
the
one
that
handles
all
that.
So
have
you
any
questions
about
that
or
any
of
the
other
areas
do.
D
G
A
C
This
is
what
we
reviewed
at
the
last
work
session.
This
would
be
for
drivers
for
transportation
companies
such
as
uber
and
lyft
to
be
able
to
operate
within
the
city.
We
had
to
modify
some
of
our
small
vehicle
passenger
ordinance
just
to
make
those
specifications
just
for
the
transportation
companies,
so
we
would
request
that
the
council
support
it.
We've
already
got
the
applications
already,
so
this
ordinance
would
be
in
effect
after
publication.
If
council
adopts
it
tonight,.
A
A
A
F
H
We
discussed
at
the
last
work
session
session
as
part
of
our
dnr
grant
application.
We
have
to
meet
certain
requirements,
there's
a
checklist
involved
with
that.
We
have
gone
through
that
process
and
we
believe
we
have
completed
all
the
necessary
documentation
and
we
request
a
motion
from
the
council
accepting
the
environmental
documents
and
authorizing
us
to
move
forward
with
the
project.
A
A
E
A
A
A
E
The
Serb
Lake
does
return
to
regular
duty
in
the
contract
that
school
does
pass.
Ninety
percent
of
one
salary,
because,
just
with
the
changing
school
year
and
the
the
demands
the
school
has
Lunt,
spends
a
lot
of
his
summers
actually
still
working
in
the
school
handling.I
issues
with
summer
school
and
some
of
their
forty
five,
fifty
mostly
at
the
high
school
crack.
Yes,.
A
C
This
is
an
event
application
kind
of
relating
to
the
outside
sales
and
community
events
that
we've
been
talking
about
recently,
so
I
wanted
to
bring
this
to
your
attention
and
not
have
it
on
the
consent
agenda.
But
mr.
Sorenson,
who
is
in
here
in
the
public
or
in
the
audience,
is
tonight
he
is
requesting
to
do
an
event
on
July
20th
in
the
city
parking
lot
kind
of
behind
the
bakery.
C
You
can
see
that
he
has
kind
of
set
forth
the
his
plan
for
it
when
things
would
be
closed,
how
he's
going
to
fence
off
the
area?
This
event
would
be
completely
fenced
off
with
security,
and
he
also
has
the
signature
of
all
the
adjacent
downtown
businesses
that
they
would
agree
that
they
have
no
issue
with
fencing
off
and
closing
that
parking
lot
during
that
time.
So
I'm,
like
I,
said
just
because
we've
talked
about
these
events
so
much
recently,
I
wanted
to
bring
it
to
council's
attention
specifically
if
they
had
any
questions.
I
I
I
Right
approving
master
services
agreement
with
Stan
Tech,
so
this
came
out
of
our
small
area
plan
that
we've
been
working
on
and
trying
to
find
some
funding
for
in
working
with
Stan
Tech.
On
that
small
area
plan
and
discussions
about
possible
funding
sources,
we
talked
about
some
of
the
difficult
locations
we
have
in
that
corridor
and
in
other
areas
in
Austin
that
have
had
some
contamination
considered
a
brownfield
site
that
would
need
some
investigation
and
cleanup
before
they
could
be
redeveloped.
I
They
came
up
with
a
plan
for
applying
and
implementing
a
EPA
brownfields
assessment
grant.
The
maximum
amount
available
is
$300,000
and
that
would
be
used
over
a
three-year
period,
but
this
is
right
now
this
master
services
agreement
is
solely
for
the
application
part
they
will
apply
for
fiscal
year
2020.
If
that's
not
successful,
they
will
apply
again
in
20.
Twenty-One
and
that's
at
no
cost
to
the
city.
I
I
G
A
A
A
I
So
this
is
a
second
phase
of
the
original
nature
ridge
project,
the
at
the
May
14
2009
teen,
meeting
of
the
Austin
Planning
Commission,
the
Commission
reviewed
the
nature
Ridge
second
plat
and
development
agreement
related
to
this
subdivision
development.
The
area
consists
of
13
Lots,
covering
approximately
five
acres,
and
this
is
just
west
of
the
normal
nature.
Center
after
review
was
7
Planning
Commission
members
present.
I
They
voted
unanimously
to
approve
the
subdivision
with
conditions
that
the
plat
can
form
with
our
subdivision
ordinance
regarding
to
corner
Lots,
which
would
be
adding
additional
width
to
those
Lots
and
then
approving
our
pedestrian
plan,
as
proposed
by
the
City
Engineer
and
shown
in
their
construction
plans.
They
continued
this
meeting
and
reschedule
it
tonight.
The
developers
did
to
allow
for
them
to
make
those
changes,
so
they
have
have
made
those
changes
and
have
conformed
with
the
conditional
approval
recommendation
by
revising
the
plat
and
making
sure
it's
compliant
with
the
required
pedestrian
plan.
I
F
H
A
H
H
We
worked
with
this
developer
for
probably
six
months
on
different
details
of
the
project.
We
worked
with
them
to
narrow
down
the
roadways
to
meet
some
of
our
Complete
Streets
designs.
We've
we've
added
sidewalk
to
the
neighborhood
it'll
include
street
lighting
as
part
of
the
development,
so
really
a
hundred
percent
of
the
construction
cost
to
bring
it
up
to
city
standards.
You
know
we
talk
about
that,
a
lot
with
assessments
and
annexation
areas.
H
We
just
talked
about
that
with
6th
Street,
North,
East
I
think
it
was
this
this
year,
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
point
where
here's
a
developer
that
were
we're
working
with
them
to
to
pay
for
all
those
costs
their
own
and
we're
trying
to
be
consistent,
as
we
have
new
neighborhoods
that
come
into
town
through
annexation
or
whatever
trying
to
keep
be
consistent
with
these
same
policies.
No
matter
what
the
situation.
A
A
A
H
So
what
we
have
done
is
we
have
gotten
a
price
from
American
engineering
and
testing
in
the
amount
of
twenty
two
thousand
seven
hundred
seventy
six
dollars
to
do
a
couple,
different
things
to
monitor
vibration
around
these
homes
and
make
sure
that
it
fits
within
allowable
standards.
They
will
also
be
monitoring
any
settlement
that
may
occur
by
establishing
control
point
elevations
around
these
homes
and
make
sure
that
there
isn't
a
settlement
that
occurs
and
as
part
of
it,
they
will
also
do
a
condition.
H
Survey
of
of
the
homes,
the
the
ten
homes
that
we
are,
the
closest
working
in
relation,
the
closest
to
they'll,
go
through
the
homes
document,
any
existing
cracks
that
may
be
there.
Maybe
it's
cracks
in
the
concrete
driveway
or
the
the
walls
any
of
those
existing
things
to
document
that
so
that,
if
a
new
crack
show
up,
we've
got
everything
documented
of
what
the
the
original
baseline
of
that
home
was.
H
So
this
is
we've
done
this
before,
on
the
north
main
flood
control
project,
there
were
a
couple
historic
properties
along
North,
Main
Street,
and
we
had
to
do
a
condition
survey
of
those
make
sure
that
they
weren't
impacted
by
the
overall
project.
So
we
feel
this
is
a
good
measure
to
protect
both
the
property
owners
and
also
the
city
from
any
future
issues
is
to
have
everything
documented
ahead
of
time.
So
we
would
recommend
approving
this.
This
work
with
American
engineering
and
testing
Council.
A
B
A
G
F
A
G
The
only
thing
I
had
we
did
to
get
a
letter
from
the
chamber
and
concerns
with
the
Freedom
Fest
I
think
we've
kind
of
touched
on
this
a
little
bit
here.
They
want
to
have
a
discussion
on
the
18th
of
July
discussion
on
passing
on
Freedom
Fest
to
another
organization,
and
it's
a
significant
concern
for
us,
but
just
did
want
to
bring
that
to
your
attention.
Yeah.
A
They're
gonna
I
don't
know
meeting
on
the
18th
if
anybody's
concerned.
It
should
obviously,
if
they're
looking
for
another
organization
cities
always
in
everybody's
crosshairs,
so
we'll
have
to
pay
close
attention
to
this.
Okay.
Other
than
that,
we
need
a
motion
to
adjourn
until
Monday
July
15
2019
at
5:30,
so
moved
favor.