►
From YouTube: Planning Commission 2023.06.06
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
All
right,
hello,
everyone
welcome
to
the
June
meeting
of
the
city
of
Binghamton
Planning
Commission.
My
name
is
Nick
Corcoran
I'm.
Currently
the
chairman
of
this
commission,
which
is
comprised
of
local
community
members,
to
ask
the
reviewing
site
plans
and
special
use
permits
for
consistency
with
the
standards
and
criteria
set
forth
in
the
city
of
Binghamton
code,
based
on
our
total
number
of
Planning
Commission
members.
Four
members
must
be
present
to
constitute
a
quorum
tonight.
We
have
five
members,
which
means
we
do
have
a
quorum
and
can
proceed.
First.
A
Item
on
our
agenda
is
roll
call,
Mario,
defolvio,
Joe
D'angelo
is
absent,
Chris
and
judge
eats
fantastic
Kelly
Weiss
is
absent,
Manny
priest
all
right
and
Steve
C
Prasad
all
right.
A
All
right,
second
item
on
the
agenda
is
election
of
chair
and
vice
chair,
but
I
think
we're
going
to
push
that
to
the
end
of
the
meeting.
Nobody
objects.
All
right
next
item
would
be
approval
of
minutes.
A
B
C
D
Should
we
vote
on
the
minutes
from
oh
sorry,
that's.
A
A
Vote:
April,
okay,.
D
A
A
All
right
next
item
on
the
agenda
are
secret
determinations.
We
have
no
secret
determinations,
so
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
public
hearings
and
Final
deliberations
in
this
portion
of
our
meeting,
we'll
be
holding
open
public
hearings
to
obtain
public
opinion
in
regard
to
specific
projects
that
are
up
for
review,
applicants
will
be
asked
to
come
to
the
microphone
and
make
a
brief
presentation
describing
their
project
for
most
projects.
This
is
the
second
time
we're
reviewing
your
information,
so
it
would
be
very
helpful
if
you
could.
A
Please
give
us
a
brief
overview
of
your
project,
to
remind
us
what
you're
planning
and
then
clearly
identify
any
changes
that
have
been
made
since
the
last
time.
We
saw
you
when
the
applicant
is
done
presenting
and
any
clarifications
have
been
reviewed.
We
will
open
the
public
hearing
and
allow
members
of
the
community
to
speak
about
the
applicant's
proposal
after
the
commission
has
heard
from
all
community
members
interested
in
speaking
tonight.
The
public
hearing
will
be
closed
and
the
commission
will
deliberate
to
our
applicants
when
your
project
name
is
called.
A
Please
come
to
the
microphone
and
start
off
by
giving
the
name
and
address
of
any
members
of
the
applicant's
team
that
are
planning
to
speak
for
a
public
record
and
anyone
from
the
community
that
will
be
speaking
in
regards
to
a
project
tonight.
Please
also
start
off
by
stating
your
name
and
address
for
our
records.
A
A
E
Good,
thank
you.
So
my
name
is
Thomas
Grosso.
My
address
is
14
Priory,
Court,
Melville,
New
York
and
we're
here
for
approval
for
concrete
housing
permit
for
the
property
33
Pine
Street.
So
this
is
in
regards
to
the
Redevelopment
of
bulk
31
and
33
Pine
Street.
E
In
our
last
meeting,
we
provided
the
site
plan
which
we
reviewed
with
the
committee.
We
have
adequate
parking,
garbage
removal,
space,
snow
removal,
space
and
there's
been
no
changes
to
the
plan.
Other
than
a
slight
alteration
of
the
parking
lot
parking
parking
space
15
was
moved
down
towards
the
bottom
of
the
lot
and
that's
a
handicap.
Space.
D
A
F
There
you
go
question
for
the
applicant
I'm,
looking
right
now
on
page
two
of
the
site
plan
and
I
guess
I'd
like.
Could
you
give
some
clarification,
I
see
on
both
the
first
floor
and
the
second
floor?
There
are
some
hashed
off
areas,
labeled
rest
area.
What
are
the
rest
areas?
It.
E
Sure
my
engineer
Brian
doeck.
He
he
made
this
plan
and
called
it
a
rest
area.
It
could
be
used
as
a
dining
room
area
or
just
an
extension
of
the
living
room.
C
F
The
reason
I'm
bringing
this
up,
maybe
for
Tito
and
for
others
on
staff
I'm,
especially
nervous
that
the
one
on
the
first
floor,
it's
got
three
walls
around
it.
It
looks
to
be
of
a
nearly
identical
set
of
Dimensions
to
a
bedroom.
I
am
worried
that
these
could
be
nothing
else.
The
applicant,
but
maybe
the
app
a
successor
owner,
could
turn
these
into
illegal
unauthorized
bedrooms.
If
we're
not
careful,
so
I'm,
not
sure
if
something
could
be
done
in
a
potentially
revised
floor
plan
like,
for
example,
moving
or
removing
that
closet.
F
So
this
is
not
so
easily
marked
off
and
you
throw
up
some
plywood
and
some
drapes
and
bang
you
got
another
illegal
bedroom.
That's
my
concern
with
the
current
floor
plans.
Absolutely
nothing
against
you
personally,
but
once
we
approve
these
things,
who
knows
what
future
owners
will
do?
G
F
F
In
the
rest
area,
if
the
yeah,
so
if
it's
moved
to
the
north
wall,
which
is
the
South
Wall
of
rust
area
10.,
that
would
eliminate
my
concern.
Some
future
person
turning
rest
area
10
into
bedroom
number
45.
and
likewise
on
the
second
floor,
moving
the
door
on
bedroom
21.
F
G
I
think
that
makes
sense.
That's
something
that
if
the
Planning
Commission
wants
to
request
that
you
could
vote
tonight,
subject
to
a
revised
floor
plan
showing
those
changes
where
those
bedrooms
are
accessed
from
the
rest
area,
that's
something.
E
You
can
do
the
only
comment
that
I
would
have
is,
if
that's
the
recommendation
of
the
board
I
would
do
that,
but
it
would
render
that
space
almost
useless,
because
you
would
only
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
utilize
that
wall
either
for
a
couch
or
a
TV
or
some
sort
of
furniture
that
tenants
would
be
able
to
use,
since
there
would
be
a
door
there.
E
That
would
be
the
only
concern.
But
again,
if
it's
the
recommendation,
then
we
can
alter
the
plan.
A
All
right,
any
other
questions
comments
before
we
open
a
public
hearing.
A
B
A
A
site
plan
review
and
special
use
permit
for
a
congregate,
living
facility
and
ground
floor
office
use
in
an
existing
mixed-use
building
in
the
C4
neighborhood
commercial
District.
If
there's
anyone
who
would
like
to
speak
about
the
project,
please
come
to
the
microphone.
H
C
G
Yeah,
so
the
building
on
the
corner
had
a
had
a
commercial
space
on
the
ground
floor.
That's
going
to
remain
commercial,
the
rest
of
the
that
building
is
residential,
and
then
the
house
on
the
adjacent
lot
will
remain
residential.
G
No,
it's
just
an
interior
remodel,
okay!
Okay,
there
is
work
on
the
parking
lot
as
well.
A
All
right
seeing
nobody
else
and
Tito
we
didn't
get
any
letters
submitted
for
this
project,
all
right,
I'll
close
the
public
hearing.
If
you
come
back
up.
A
All
right,
Anybody
Everybody
agreed
with
Chris's
conditional
approval.
D
A
D
And
I
believe
we
discussed
requiring
that
the
parcels
are
combined
as
well.
Yeah.
A
I
I
guess
at
this
point
it's
a
question
for
you.
Would
you
be
opposed
to
that
being
a
requirement.
E
The
only
the
only
downside
of
that
would
be
with
potential
financing
in
the
future.
Having
them
combine,
it
would
be
much
difficult
than
Upstate
areas
to
get
financing
on
two
properties
versus
two
separate
or
owning
one
outright,
and
just
financing
one
okay.
F
G
A
E
And
just
just
some
additional
comment
that
I
did
not
mention
earlier
we're
not
making
any.
This
isn't
a
proposal
to
change
the
current
layout
of
the
building,
so
this
building,
probably
for
the
last
25
or
30
years,
has
been
operated
illegally
or
unless
it
was
legal
back,
then
I
don't
know.
So
this
is
the
current
layout
that
we're
trying
to
get
approval
for
so
we
can
redo
it,
as
is
so
we're
not
making
any
changes
per
se
to
the
layout
of
the
structure.
E
Yeah,
so
this
building
has
been
operated,
I
believe
it's
the
13
bedrooms
where
legally,
it
should
have
only
had
I,
think
three
and
then
it
was
changed
to
four
per
unit.
So
that's
what
this
application
is
for
for
the
congregate
to
make
the
current
structure
illegal.
C
I
Steve,
just
a
question
I
seem
to
remember
from
last
time
that
a
variance
of
some
sort
was
needed
for
this
property
was
that
granted
by
zba.
That.
G
Was
not
granted
because
that
meeting
had
to
be
postponed,
and
so,
if
the
Planning
Commission
wants
to
make
a
decision,
you
can
make
it
subject
to
the
variance
being
granted
next
week.
Okay,.
G
Sure
it
was
for
Drive
aisle
with
for
the
parking
lot
it's
a
little
too
narrow,
but
the
preference
is
a
narrow,
Drive
aisle
with
enough
parking
spaces,
and
then
the
other
variance
was
for
part
of
the
ground
floor
facing
Pine
Street
to
be
residential.
Okay,
the
code
requires
a
full
30
feet
along
the
whole
Assad,
so
he's
just
doing
part
of
it
as
commercial
part
of
it
is
residential.
Okay,.
A
C
A
So,
let's
see
so
this
one
was
a
type
two
right
for
redoing.
Okay,
all
right
Chris!
You
want
to
make
the
motion
Explorer
site
plan,
review
and
special
use
permit
or.
A
A
Let's
see
so
the
door
leading
into
bedroom
11
is
shifted
to
the
wall
along
the
rest
area
10.,
and
that
the
bedroom
21
door
is
shifted
to
the
wall
along
rest
area,
20
on
the
floor
plans
and
contingent
on
the
applicant
receiving
zba
approval
for
the
variances,
all
right,
all
right
so
again
by
Chris
all
in
favor,
all
right,
that's
five
in
favor,
zero
opposed
all
right.
Thank
you.
Good
luck!.
A
All
right,
our
last
public
hearing
tonight
is
for
the
applicant
wallaceon
Corp
project
address
is
191
Front
Street.
This
is
a
site
plan
review
and
special
use
permit
for
the
construction
of
one
mixed-use
building
with
6
000
square
feet
of
ground
floor
drive
through
commercial
space
and
two
Studio
units,
58,
one
bedroom
units
and
16,
two
bedroom
units
and
the
construction
of
one
four-story
multi-unit
dwelling
with
64
one-bedroom
units
and
16
two
bedroom
units
in
the
C4
neighborhood
commercial
districts.
J
Good
afternoon,
thank
you
for
having
me,
would
you
like
me
to
where
would
you
like
me
to
begin
with
from
the
beginning,
or
what
would
you
like
me
to
describe
if.
G
J
So
you
previously
granted
approval
on
this
project
on
March
21st
2021
for
125
dwelling
units
and
12
000
square
feet
of
commercial
ground
floor
space
in
two
four-story
structures.
J
Since
then,
our
reason
for
coming
here
last
time
was
to
change
the
unit
count
in
one
of
the
buildings,
which
is
the
one
on
Front
Street,
so
the
other.
The
unit
count
for
the
other
building
remains
unchanged.
So
the
building
on
Oak
Street
will
contain
a
total
of
80
units,
as
as
previous
as
before,
and
64
of
those
are
one
bedroom
and
16
of
those
are
two
bedrooms.
It's
an
all.
J
The
count
of
that
is
irrelevant.
Now
it's
not
important,
like
I'm
sure
I
have
it
so
now.
What
we
are
asking
for
is
that
the
Front
Street
Building
to
now
have
two
Studio
units,
58
one
bedroom
units
and
16,
two
bedroom
units
for
a
total
of
76
residential
units
and
we're
reducing
the
commercial
space
from
12
000
square
feet
to
six
thousand
square
feet
containing
one
of
the
you
know
containing
a
drive-through.
J
So
that's
we.
So
we
are
calling
that
the
main
unit
myths.
So
that's
our
main
goal
where
so,
if
you
want
I
can
I
can
just
run
through
the
main
main
unit
mix
again
for
the
two
buildings
or
sure
yeah.
J
So
the
main
unit
makes
for
the
Front
Street
building,
which
is
building
a
located
to
be
located
at
191
Front
Street.
The
main
proposed
unit
mix
is
two
Studios
58
one
bedrooms,
16
two
bedrooms:
76
total
units
and
6
000
square
feet
of
commercial.
J
J
We
have
enough
parking
for
this
unit
mix.
In
addition,
we
are
asking
for
an
alternate
unit
mix
and
the
so
it
will
be
one
or
the
other.
So
the
alt
for
the
alternate
unit
makes
our
engineers
and
Architects
have
looked
at
it.
That
we
have
the
locations
of
the
building
will
stay
the
same.
The
footprints
of
the
building
will
stay
the
same
and
we
have
enough
parking
for
the
alternate
unit
mix
and
in
the
alternate
unit
mix.
J
We
are
asking
for
the
following
in
for
building
a
to
be
located
at
191
Front
Street,
we're
asking
for
35
one
bedroom
units
and
32
two-bedroom
units
for
a
total
of
68
residential
units
and
six
thousand
square
feet
of
ground
floor
commercial
containing
a
drive-through
and
for
Building
B
to
be
located
at
170
Oak
Street.
We're
asking
for
an
alternate
unit,
makes
of
36
one
bedroom
units
and
36
two-bedroom
units
for
a
total
of
72
residential
units.
J
J
In
addition,
six
thousand
square
feet
of
ground
floor,
commercial
space
containing
a
drive-through,
and
we
have
enough
parking
for
this
and
we
for,
for
both
buildings,
combined
buildings,
A
and
B,
we're
asking
for
an
alternate
unit
mix
containing
71
one
bedroom
units,
69
two-bedroom
units
for
a
total
of
140
residential
units
and,
in
addition,
six
thousand
square
feet
of
ground
floor
commercial
with
a
drive
through,
and
we
have
enough
parking
for
that.
Also
that's
the
summary.
G
A
All
right
have
you
already
filed
for
your
variances
or
that'll,
be
next.
J
I'm
not
sure
our
attorney
has
given
paperwork
I.
A
J
I,
don't
I
don't
know
specifically
if
she
has
file
pro
variance,
but
I
think
that's
part
of
this,
because
the
you
can
see
that
the
only
variance
I
see
is
the
in
the
in
the
parking
spaces.
So,
for
instance,
for
total
buildings,
A
and
B
combined,
we
need
188
parking
spaces.
That's
this
is
summarized
in
The
Architects
letter
that
we
submitted.
C
J
We
for
buildings,
A
and
B,
combined
under
the
main
unit
mix.
We
need
a
total
of
188
parking
spaces.
We
are
providing
187,
so
that
would
mean
requesting
a
variance
or
one
less
parking
space
for
the
alternate
unit
mix.
We
need
a
total
of
191
parking
spaces.
We
are
providing
187,
so
we
are
requesting
a
variance
of
four
less
parking
spaces.
Okay,.
A
Tito,
if,
if
we
were
wanted
to,
could
we
do
the
like
a
five
percent
reduction,
so
they
don't
need
variances?
A
Is
anybody
opposed
to
us
granting
a
reduction
so
they
don't
need
to
do
these
variances
I
mean
for
this
number
of
parking
spaces
seems
like
it'd,
be
great
to
get
less
parking
and
more
green
space.
Are
you
do
you
have
any
objection?
If
we
do
so,
the
Planning
Commission
has
the
ability
to
reduce
your
required
number
of
parking
spaces
by
a
certain
percentage.
A
Okay,
does
five
percent
give
us
the
anybody,
do
that
math
in
their
head.
J
That
again
for
the
total
main
unit
mix,
we
need
a
variance
for
only
one
one
less
parking
space
and
for
the
alternate
unit
mix
in
we
need
a
variance
for
only
four
less
parking
spaces.
So
if
you
grant
us
five
percent,
what
that
will
do
is
that
it
would
just
add
Green
Space.
J
G
A
A
Right
all
right
any
questions
or
comments
before
we
open
a
public
hearing
all
right.
So
let's
open
the
public
hearing
and
see,
if
anybody's
here
to
speak
about
the
project,
all
right.
So
this
is
the
public
hearing
for
the
applicant
wallison
Corp
project
address
is
191
Front
Street.
K
K
Obviously,
we've
got
some
vested
interest
in
this
project
as
well
and
by
the
way,
we're
excited
about
the
prospect
of
improving
our
city
and
improving
that
space
and
improving
the
value
of
our
land
so
forth,
but
environmentally
and
I'm
just
jumping
in
here
now,
because
I
I
do
not
know
the
background
of
what
has
been
done.
Previous
to
get
us
to
this
point
has
either
a
phase
one
or
phase
two
been
done.
Environmental
assessment
on
this
project.
A
A
That
yeah,
that's
fine!
Okay,
just
to
if
I
could
ask
you,
if
you
don't
mind,
are
you
suspect
that
there's
a
reason
for
needing
a
phase
one
or
phase
two?
You
know
the
chemical
spills
or.
K
No
I
mean
there's
no
yeah,
there's
nothing
that
I
know.
However,
there
is
a
concern
you
know:
I
mean
obviously,
even
on
our
property.
There
was
a
body
shop.
Over
there
there
was
a
body
shop,
environmentally,
we
weren't
exactly
friendly
back
in
the
60s
and
70s,
and
so
this.
F
K
Yeah
I
mean
you
know:
we've
both
been
here
for
a
long
time,
so
we
we
do
have
that
and
and
along
with
that,
if
the
studies
have
been
done,
are
they
available
to
even
look
at
that's
something
we'd
be
interested
in,
in
particular,
for
the
groundwater
and
and
how
and
how
the
flow
of
the
water
goes.
If
there
was
a
study
made,
there
should
be
something
either
it
flows
South,
it
flows
north.
It
flows
towards
the
river.
K
It
flows
away
from
us,
whatever
that
that
is
somewhat
of
a
concern,
and-
and
we
were
just
interested
if
it
was-
if
so,
if
there
was
a
contamination
as
a
part
of
the
Brownfield
program
which
I
don't
know,
but
also
you
know,
we've
been
in
business
for
about
a
hundred
years.
Obviously
I
haven't
been
there
for
100
years,
but
we
we
went
through
a
project
in
the
renewal
project
on
Front
Street,
where
there
was
a
tremendous
amount
of
construction,
a
tremendous
amount
of
dirt
and
disruption
to
our
business.
K
K
Have
there
been
any
traffic
studies
done?
What
is
the
net
effect
after?
This
is
done
as
far
as
the
traffic
flow
this
this
type
of
thing
is
is
concerning
to
us,
because
between
us
and
Gerard
street
is
our
major
Arts
delivery
area.
It's
where
vehicles
are
dropped
for
our
dealership,
and
you
know
that
could
be
an
issue
for
us
if
we're
going
to
see
disruption,
it's
it's
just
something
that
I
think
that
everybody
needs
to
be
aware
of,
and
it
it
we
just
don't
need
any
more
negative
effect.
K
F
B
K
B
K
And
I
wasn't
the
only
business
the
fact
that,
obviously,
from
from
us
all
the
way
to
17
Route
17,
you
know
the
Red
Oak
Diner,
all
those
businesses
down
there.
That
was,
it
was
a
disaster
for
us.
I
K
Well
that
answers
my
question
sure
and,
and
really
you
know,
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
the
feasibility
of
doing
something
is
you're
going
to
be
moving
a
lot
of
dirt
and
what
have
you
going
forward?
I
would
think
that
would
be
of
some
concern
instead
of
planning's
work,
the
the
other
thing
is,
and
there
again
I
may
be
ignorant
in
this.
But
the
is:
is
this
project
going
to
be
more
directed
towards
student
housing,
or
is
it
more
for
community
housing?
If
so,
as
there
are,
are
there
any
restrictions?
K
As
far
as
parties,
loud,
noise,
Etc
being
consideredness.
G
Just
two
quick
comments:
as
far
as
road
closures,
the
applicant
would
need
a
street
work
permit
for
any
of
the
sidewalk
work.
That's
being
done
and
as
part
of
that
process,
the
city
can
ensure
that
that
neighboring,
Property
Owners
would
maintain
access
the
Front
Street
Project's
a
little
different,
because
that
was
the
Reconstruction
of
the
actual
Road
itself.
G
In
this
case,
the
work
should
be
contained
to
the
parcel
and
the
sidewalks
and
in
the
engineering
department
would
would
in
granting
that
street
work
permit
would
make
sure
that
access
is
an
obstructed
long-term
to
any
neighbors
and
then
the
other
question
about
pollution
and
water.
This
project
does
require
storm
water
pollution
prevention
plan.
C
F
Right,
Chris
I'm,
not
sure
this
will
answer
the
question
from
the
from
Mark,
but
I
will
say:
I'm
not
sure
how
accessible
this
would
be.
But
I
do
see
as
part
of
the
stuff
that
we
were
provided.
F
There
are
letters
from
swbr
I
think
that's
an
engineering
firm
out
of
Rochester
and
a
second
letter
out
of
pagan
Engineers,
which
is
I,
don't
know
where
they're
from
which
talk
about
one
of
them
talk
about
storm
water
and
there
is
some
I,
don't
call
it
a
traffic
study,
but
they
there's
a
traffic
discussion
at
least
I'm,
not
sure
if
they
give
you
the
the
answers
you'd
like
would
want,
but
somebody
at
least
was
doing
some
home.
Okay.
A
All
right,
while
he's
doing
that,
is
there
anybody
else
who
would
like
to
speak
about
the
project.
All
right
come
on
up.
L
Thank
you
for
advising
us
about
this
meeting.
I'm
Cecily,
O'neal
and
I
live
at
184,
Helen
Street,
but
I
own,
the
house
at
184,
Front,
Street,
directly
opposite
from
where
this
project
is
being
discussed
and
I've
also
been
involved
in
activities
around
the
community,
where
I've
seen
the
urgent
need
for
decent
housing
and
I'm
glad
that
someone
is
taking
the
initiative
to
provide
housing,
better
quality
housing
in
our
community.
That
I
hope
will
be
affordable
for
Working
Families
I.
Do
trust
that
the
Planning
Commission
will
dot
all
the
eyes
and
possibilities
about
environmental
concerns.
L
So
I
just
want
to
say
I
think
it
will
be
a
great
improvement
from
an
empty
Car
Lot
covered
with
blacktop,
even
the
black
top
is
eroding,
and
that
can't
be
a
good
environmental
situation
for
any
of
us
or
for
the
Shenango
River.
So
thank
you
for
your
time
and
I
wish.
The
project
goes
well.
H
My
name
is
John
Patterson
184,
hello,
Street-
that
was
my
wife.
We
own
184.,
Front
Street,
which
is
across
the
street
from
botniks
and
I,
really
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
come
to
your
speak.
I
really
believe
this
project
is
going
to
be
really
great
for
the
neighborhood
and
for
the
city,
so
I'm
really
encouraged
about
it.
Although
I
do
have
some
questions,
I
I've
been
in
planning
before
and
and
real
estate
development.
H
So
just
some
basic
questions
first
off
is
you've
got
a
lot
of
living
units
in
that
area
going
to
be
coming
there.
A
lot
of
people
is
the
waste
water
system
ready
for
that,
or
does
that
have
to
be
redone
you're
going
to
have
a
lot
of
people
parking
there?
H
H
Third
is
I
haven't
heard
any
discussions
on
creating
green
space
in
the
in
that
a
lot
at
all,
maybe
some
nice
green
space
between
the
sidewalk
and
the
parking
lot
would
be
very,
very
nice.
H
Some
some
trees
that
get
are
small
trees
that
don't
get
real
over
huge
things
of
that
nature,
trees
and
bushes
do
help
our
environment
and
do
self
the
sound
of
the
traffic
going
by
and
the
other
thing
again
is
because
our
property
is
across
the
cat
corner
across
the
street
from
where
this
is
going
to
be
developed
we
are
concerned
about.
Is
the
street
going
to
be
dug
up
in
our
front
of
our
neighborhood
in
front
of
our
house?
Excuse
me,
because
we
do
have
tenants
living
there
and
that's
gonna.
H
Is
it
good
to
enter
the
access
to
that
our
parking
lot
and
so
again,
I
haven't
seen
any
of
the
plans.
I
don't
know,
but
people
have
to
come
and
go
in
the
parking
lot.
There's
no
other
place
to
park
on
that
street
yeah.
There's
no
parking
there
is
a
bus
stop
right
there,
and
so
there
is
a
lot
of
pedestrian
traffic
goes
by
because
of
that
bus
stop,
and
so
what
I
am
concerned
along?
That
is
any
runoff.
This
comes
off
of
the
construction.
H
It
will
flow
right
onto
our
lawn
space,
so
I'd
like
to
see
that
somewhere
addressed
not
necessarily
at
this
meeting,
but
you
know
the
planning
Engineers.
Look
at
that,
but
I
really
encouraged
about
this
and,
like
my
wife
said,
we
really
need
Low
Middle
income
housing,
and
this
is
a
great
opportunity
in
the
commercial
space.
My
and
it's
got
nothing
to
do
with
planning
but
I
love
to
see
some
type
of
eating
establishment
in
there,
whether
it's
a
small
coffee
shop
or
anything,
because
there's
nothing
in
that
area.
H
A
G
And
they
think
that
the
amount
of
curb
Cuts
could
be
further
reduced
from
surrounding
streets
and
that
internal
circulation
should
be
used
to
move
across
the
parking
lot.
I'm,
assuming
as
opposed
to
coming
in
off
of
Gerard
an
oak.
A
A
All
right,
so
a
few
questions
came
up
all
right,
so
we'll
just
start
at
the
beginning.
Environmentally.
At
this
point,
has
anybody
done
an
environmental
assessment
phase
one
or
phase
two
investigation?
Yes,.
J
In
oh
very
beginning,
when
we
took
on
this
project
we
so
our
we
have
a
very
strong
team,
which
is
so
we
hired
a
national
firm,
called
AEI
Consultants
they're,
all
over
the
United
States,
but
mostly
on
the
East
Coast.
So
we
had
them
do
phase
one
phase
two
and
we
also
had
them
do
an
estimate
for
remediation.
We
needed
all
this
information
for
us
for
our
financing
great.
So
there
is
from
the
state
government
to
the
federal
government.
There
is
nobody
more
reliable
and
better
in
environmental
than
AI
Consultants
great.
J
The
our
other
team
members
are
swbr
Architects
out
of
Rochester
they're,
very
well,
respected
in
the
affordable
housing
space,
the
state
showcases
and
loves
all
of
their
work
projects
and
for
engineering
we
hired
fragrant
Engineers
from
Elmira
and
they're,
also
very
good
and
actually
vegan
Engineers
was
chosen
by
swbr
as
their
contractor.
You
can
say
great,
so,
yes,
phase,
one
and
phase
two
are
done
and
stack
about
this.
Stick.
You
know,
including
detailed
estimates
on
remediation
now.
F
J
I
would
like
to
yeah
I
would
like
to
say
that
if
you
can,
let
us
be.
Let
us
retain
let
us
not
having
to
release
that
to
the
public,
because
it
is
proprietary
information
like
it
is
for,
but
we
can
certainly
share
that
with
you,
but
not
to
be
made
available
to
the
to
the
public.
J
But
I
can
tell
you
this
much
that
when
you
see
it,
you'll
see
that
it's
minimal
I
wanted
to
just
mention
that
the
most
important
part
of
that
is
the
summary,
which
is
that
the
remediation
that's
there
is
minimal,
okay,
which
we
were
very
happy
to
see
and
when,
when
we
saw
that,
then
we
closed
on
the
site,
because
we
still
had
the
option
of
not
closing
on
the
site
if
the
environmentals
were
not
satisfactory.
Yeah.
C
J
So
it's
very
minimal
work.
Okay,
even
though
it
was
in
a
previously
a
car
dealership.
One
thing
I'd
like
to
mention
before
I
forget:
is
the
one
I'm
really
happy
to
see
our
neighbors
so.
J
And
also
Mark
is
our
neighbor.
I
have
corresponded
with
him
when
there
was
a
snow
like
two
or
three
storms
this
past
winter,
so
he
was
all
always
like
offering
up
his
pickup
truck
to
see
if
we
needed
any
cleaning
yeah.
J
So
I
I've
been
in
communication
with
him
over
the
storm
like
three
or
four
times
right
one
time
he
let
us
know
that
somebody
was
trying
to
break
in
and
the
door
was
open,
so
I'm
very
happy
to
see
with
our
to
hear
from
our
neighbors
I
appreciate
all
of
the
comments,
so
I
I
will
be
happy
to
share
with
you
the
phase
one
and
phase
two,
but
my
request
is
not
to
make
it
public.
J
G
If
the
Planning
Commission
requests
that
that
study
be
done
because
you
have
environmental
concerns
as
part
of
Seeker
or
you
issue
a
positive
declaration
and
state
that
you
have
concerns
about
serious
adverse
impacts
and
require
that
they
do
a
phase
one
as
part
of
the
environmental
impact
statement,
then
that
would
become
public
at
that
point.
G
F
C
G
A
A
J
Can
tell
you
I
can
tell
you
what,
because
naturally
I
would
speak
truthfully
and
I
have
papers
to
back
it.
So
previously
a
negative
Declaration
was
issued
for
this
project.
Our
Engineers
have
done
so.
Swpp
came,
swpp
came
up,
and
so
that
was
submitted
already.
The
Fagan
Engineers
did
that
and
fig
and
Engineers
also
did
a
long
form:
environmental,
okay.
So
so,
and
a
negative
sector
decoration
was
issued.
J
There
was
a
little
bit
of
contaminated
soil
up
toward
the
northern
part
of
the
property,
like
in
the
middle
to
Too
Close
to
the
train
tracks,
and
we
have
an
estimation
on
the
remediation.
It's
a
small
portion,
so
it's
very
minimal.
Okay
I
even
have
like
I,
said,
cost,
estimate
and
summary,
and
we
were
not
concerned.
It
was
so
minimal
that
we
decided
to
close
on
the
property.
Okay.
A
So
do
you
mind
if
I
ask
so
normally
the
remediation
plan
would
be
either
you
don't
touch
that
section
of
the
site
and
you
leave
it
alone,
so
that
it
remains
undisturbed
or
you
have
to
deal
with
it.
You
truck
it
to
a
special
facility
and
they
deal
with
it,
which
one
are
you
planning
to
do
for
that?
The.
J
A
A
Okay,
all
right,
so
that's
great
I
guess
the
other
couple
of
questions.
So
without
getting
into
too
much
detail.
You
have
done
a
full
stormwater
management
plan
or
you
will
complete
just
so.
Everybody
knows
as
part
of
the
review
process.
They
will
have
to
submit
their
stormwater
plan,
which
will
be
in
compliance
with
the
New
York
State
Department
of
Environmental
Conservation,
or
they
would
not
be
able
to
get
their
permits
to
do
their
construction.
A
J
A
a
very
thick
report
swpp
was
previously
was
given
with
the
previous
approval,
and
it
was
said
that
when
you
do
the
like
give
a
final
one
when
you
come
for
the
final
parameters
at
that
time,
yeah.
C
A
C
J
Should
not
be
that
different
from
what
was
initially
issued,
yeah.
A
Okay,
so
you've
got
a
full
full
storm
water
plan
parking
spaces,
so
Tito
just
so
everybody
knows.
If
anybody
wants
to
see
a
copy
of
the
plans,
how
would
they
do
that?
They.
G
Can
send
an
email
to
planning
cityofbinghamton.gov
and
we
can
show
them
the
plans.
We
could
also
share
the
narrative
provided
by
the
applicant,
which
talks
about
some
of
the
questions
that
were
asked
today
about
water
service
in
the
capacity
for
water
and
sanitary
IT
addresses
traffic.
It's
not
a
full
traffic
study,
but
it
doesn't
address
projected
traffic.
G
It
addressed.
It
addresses
storm
water,
runoff
control,
so
the
narrative
addresses
a
lot
of
these
questions,
and
so,
if
somebody
wants
to
see
those
documents
they
can
email,
planning
and
city
of
binghamton.gov
and
make
that
request.
A
Okay,
perfect,
all
right
so
that
that
kind
of
covers
parking
spaces,
green
space,
trees,
street
closures,
Tito
already
talked
about
that-
would
have
to
be
approved
by
the
city
and
most
likely
would
not
be
approved.
It
would
disrupt
disruption,
for
your
project
has
to
stay
on
your
site.
Understood,
run
off.
That's
storm
water.
A
Laughs
there
was
a
question
about
who
your
intended
rentals
are
for
right.
A
And
even
though
it's
not
for
students
there's
a
question
about
parties
and
noise
in
the
building,
you
would
have
a
manager
or
there's.
J
Managers
in
the
house
we've
already
are
speaking
with
property
managers,
actual
firms
that
will
be
managing
the
property,
so
they
will
have
on-site
presence
in
the
you
know,
form
of
building
superintendents
and
property
manager
on
site.
So
that
will
not
be.
This
will
be
very
well
managed
properties
correct.
We
want
to
make
it
a
an
example.
All.
C
A
G
Tito,
just
one
more
thing:
yeah
they're,
showing
eight
spaces
in
the
queue
for
the
drive-through
room
for
eight
vehicles.
G
Right
now
is
proposed
to
be
General
retail
in
that
six
thousand
square
feet,
but
is
that
is
your
plan
to
change
that
use
in
the
future?
Because
if
it's
sort,
if
it's
a
drive-through
restaurant
or
like
a
Dunkin,
Donuts
or
a
chain
along
those
lines,
you
may
need
more
than
eight
spaces
and
we
have
problems
traffic
problems
at
other,
Dunkin,
Donuts
and
other
drive-through
locations
throughout
the
city.
G
So
that's
just
something
that
we
wanna
clear
up
now
I
would
think
is,
if
that's
going
to
be
a
restaurant,
especially
a
fast
food
restaurant.
At
any
point,
you
may
need
more
than
eight
spaces
in
that
queue.
J
Okay,
thanks
for
bringing
that
up
right
now,
we
haven't
started
marketing
the
commercial
spaces,
but
we
were
hoping
that
some
some
business
like
that
would
will
be
a
good
anchor
tenant.
But
we
can
come
to
you
like
once
we
have
solid
interest
on
it
like
who's
going
to
take
it,
then
we
can
come
to
you
if
there's
any
change
needed
and
while
I
was
our
engineer
is
listening
to
live
to
the
meeting
he's
from
Almira,
so
he
texted
me
a
few
things
about
traffic
studies.
I
J
It
would
take
that
so,
let's
say:
if
business
comes
along
like
a
Walgreens
or
something,
and
they
say
we
want
all
six
thousand
square
feet.
Beautiful.
A
single
tenant
is
better
than
two
different
tenants.
J
G
I
would
just
point
out
that
if
it's
anything
other
than
retail,
then
you
would
have
to
come
back
for
that
portion.
So
if
it
is
a
restaurant,
you
would
have
to
come
back
for
a
review
of
that
of
that
portion.
Once
you
have
a.
F
F
C
B
C
C
C
D
G
What
I
would
recommend
is,
as
you
go
down
the
items
you
can
ask
for
comments
or
discussion
on
each
item.
Chris
can
State
his
concerns
when
he
has
concerns
for
a
particular
item
and
then
once
it's
time
to
vote,
he
can
vote.
No,
that's
if
that's
what
he
thinks
after
going
through
the
list,
but
you
don't
need
to
vote
for
each
item
you,
but
you
should
discuss
each
item.
Okay,.
J
A
Yeah,
let's,
let's
see
what
happens
and
then
we
could
kind
of
talk.
A
All
right
so
I'll
make
a
motion
for
a
negative
declaration
based
on
the
following
items,
so
impact
on
land
proposed
action
may
involve
construction
on
or
physical
alteration
of
the
land
surface
of
the
proposed
site.
So
yes,
but
I
would
say
it
has
a
small
or
no
impact
for
environmental
review
impact
on
geological
features.
The
proposed
action
may
result
in
the
modification
or
destruction
of
or
inhibit
access
to
any
unique
or
unusual
landforms
on
the
site,
no
impacts
on
surface
water.
A
A
Gotcha
all
right
so
I'm
going
to
say
in
this
motion,
I'll,
say
small
impact
on
that
and
that's
where
we
can
agree
to
disagree.
G
A
The
the
stormwater
pollution
prevention
plan
and
the
remediation
practices
that
were
described
by
the
applicant,
but
for
those
reasons
I'd
say
it
is
a
small
impact.
Okay
impact
on
flooding.
The
proposed
action
may
result
in
development
on
lands
subject
to
flooding.
Yes,
but
I
would
say
it's
a
small
impact
impact
on
air.
The
proposed
action
may
include
a
state-regulated
air
emission
Source,
no
or
small
impact
impact
on
plants
and
animals.
The
proposed
action
may
result
in
a
loss
of
Flora
or
fauna,
no
or
small
impact
impact
on
agricultural
resources.
A
The
proposed
action
may
impact
agriculture,
agricultural
resources,
no
impact
on
aesthetic
resources.
The
land
use
of
the
proposed
action
is
obviously
different
from
or
in
sharp
contrast
to
current
land
use
patterns
between
the
proposed
project
and
a
Scenic
or
aesthetic
resource.
Nowhere,
small
impact
impact
on
historic
or
archaeological
resources.
The
proposed
action
may
occur
in
or
adjacent
to
a
historic
or
archaeological
resource.
Nowhere,
small
impact
impact
on
open
space
and
Recreation.
The
proposed
action
may
result
in
a
loss
of
recreational
opportunities
or
a
reduction
of
an
open
space
Resource
as
designated
in
any
adopted.
A
Municipal
open
space
plan
no
impact
on
critical
environmental
areas.
The
proposed
action
may
be
located
within
or
adjacent
to
a
critical
environmental
area,
no
impact
on
Transportation.
The
proposed
action
may
result
in
a
change
to
existing
Transportation
Systems,
so
I
would
say
yes,
but
it
has
no
or
small
impact
to
transportation
systems
and
stop
me
if
anybody
wants
to
discuss
any
of
these
impact
on
energy.
The
proposed
action
may
result
in
an
increase
in
the
use
of
any
form
of
energy,
no
or
small
impact
impact
on
noise,
odor
and
light.
A
A
All
right
so
for
this
motion,
I'll
say
it
will
have
no
or
small
impact
again
based
on
the
remediation
plan
that
was
described
tonight
by
the
applicant
consistency
with
Community
plans.
The
proposed
action
is
not
consistent
with
adopted
land
use
plans,
so
I
would
say
that's
inaccurate
and
it
is
consistent
with
adopted
land
use
plans,
so
it
has
no
or
small
impact
and
consistency
with
Community
character.
The
proposed
action
is
inconsistent
with
the
existing
Community
character.
I
would
say
that
that
is
not
true.
A
It
is
consistent
with
the
existing
Community
character,
so
it
has
no
or
small
impact
all
right
so,
based
on
all
of
those
items
on
the
checklist,
I'll
make
a
motion
for
a
negative
declaration
for
Seeker
review
for
a
second
all
right
seconded
by
Manny,
all
in
favor,
all
right
all
opposed
all
right.
So
it's
three
in
favor
two
opposed.
G
You
could
make
a
motion
for
a
positive
declaration
under
Seeker,
which
would
require
an
environmental
impact
statement,
which
is
a
process
that
we
would.
We
would
have
to
go
through.
A
Tito,
what
is
the
the
vote
needed
for
this
to
pass?
What
would
the
vote
numbers
mean
for?
We
would
need
four
and
at
the
next
meeting,
if,
if
everybody
was
present,
so
there
were
seven
people
present.
This
is
still
four.
A
It's
it's
playing
a
game
of
of
numbers
so
that
so
based
on
that
it
did,
it
did
not
pass.
The
vote
did
not
pass
no.
J
A
I
Can
I
just
say
a
few
things
you
know
I'm
trying
to
be
respectful
of
the
fact
that
this
did
come
before
the
Commission
in
2021
and
was
approved
at
the
same
time.
You
know
I,
wasn't
part
of
the
group
when
that
happened.
You
know
and
I
feel
like
trying
to
make
a
decision
not
be
totally
Bound
by
that
and
otherwise
you
know
it's
just
easy
enough
to
rubber
stamp
it
and
some
serious
concerns
have
been
brought
up,
and
you
know
this
is
literally
the
difference.
I
If
you
look
at
the
numbers
of
who's
here
of
this
thing,
passing
or
not,
you
know
and
I'm
not
opposed
to
it.
I
want
to
see
it
happen.
You
know
I'm
in
the
neighborhood
a
lot
and
the
existing
site
is
quite
ugly.
You
know,
and
I
would
like
to
see
something
of
the
quality
level
of
50
Front
Street
up
the
street
at
this,
this
other
location,
so
I
mean
the
hold,
is
sort
of
close
to
the
vest
and
say
well.
I
We
can
give
phase
one
and
phase
two,
but
it's
proprietary,
and
you
know
we
don't
want
to
release
it.
I
I
respect
on
some
level,
but
you
know
if,
if
that
information
could
be
provided
to
us
with
the
sense
of
information
that
you
feel
would
be
not
advantageous
to
release,
have
that
withheld.
I
J
I
see
so
I
have
to
do
comments
on
it
like
so,
if
my
engineer
is
is
on
call
like
if
we
can
definitely
have
him
on,
he
has
all
this
information.
My
architect
has
all
the
information
based
on
phase
two
and
everything
I'm
building
used
is
true
and
accurate,
because
it's
some
black
and
white
estate
has
it
it's.
Those
studies
are
step
one
we
always
like
before
we
decide
to
close
on
a
site.
J
First
thing
we
do
is
phase
one
phase
two,
but
we
go
even
a
step
further
that
we
get
an
estimate
yeah.
Normally,
that's
not
open
to
the
public,
so
I'm
happy
to
share
with
any
member
of
the
board.
That's
my
request
was
not
to
that
normally
I've
not
seen
that
made
public
where
it's,
because
it's
just
information
that
is
seen
by
lenders
is
seen
by
state
Federal
sources
and
Banks.
J
They
see
this
information
all
the
time,
but
I
don't
think
public
sees
it
so
I'm
open
to
giving
it
right
away.
I've
been
nothing
to
hide
in
there.
We
are
very
satisfied
with
it.
That's
why
we
closed
on
the
property
and
I
have
like
if
it
helps
I
have
my
engineer,
an
architect
on
call
like
I
can
just
dial
them
in
and
or
they
can
call
into
the
call-in
number
and
answer
any
questions
about
it,
environmentally
or
anything
like
okay,.
I
I
mean
I
can't
speak
for
anybody
else,
and
you
know
how,
if
somebody
wants
to
go
yes
on
it
tonight,
I
certainly
respect
that.
But
you
know
certain
discomfort
level
I
have
and
oh
yeah
we've
got
it.
You
know,
I
haven't
seen
it
but
I'm
going
to
vote
Yes,
for
it
is
kind
of
a
tough.
It's,
a
tough
ask
and
I
I
can't
speak
for
Chris.
Maybe
that's
where
you
land
with
it
as
well,
but
that's
where
I
land.
J
And
I
guess
my
question:
is
that
it
just
then
hypothetically
because
even
my
attorneys
on
she's
not
available,
she
had
a
personal
obligation.
Otherwise
she
would
be
here
also
sure,
and
she
has
been
involved
from
the
beginning
of
the
project.
So
he
has
all
the
all
that
information
too
yeah.
So
my
question
is
that
even
if
so,
if
I
had
that
stack
of
reports
tonight
there
with
me,
would
that
have
help
anybody.
A
We
probably
would
need
time
to
to
digest
it
I
think
that's
the
problem.
You
know
I'm
not
not
being
able
to
read
through
it.
Okay,
let
me
ask
you
this:
if,
if
the
applicant
were
to
submit
a
summary
of
what
all
of
that
says
by
his
engineer,
instead
of
the
full
all
of
that
information,
that
I
could
understand
why,
by
somebody
a
developer
would
not
want
that
to
become
public
record
or
the
news
gets
a
hold
of
it.
It
becomes
something
that
it's
not,
but
they
need
to
sell
newspapers
if.
F
F
F
A
J
Would
definitely
be
better
than
putting
draw
reports
because
it's
raw
data-
and
so
the
attorney
has
seen
it.
The
engineer
has
seen
it
architect
has
seen
his
state
has
seen
his
but,
like
everybody
has
seen,
lending
institutions
have
seen
it
and
they'll
and
they're
always
see
this
information.
Okay,
and
what
I'm
telling
you
is
that
it's
nothing
that
I'm
concerned
about
yeah,
but
it's
just
I
think
it'll
be
better
like
a
a
summary
from
an
architect
or
an
engineer.
Yeah
would
be
better.
J
Okay
and
I
think
that
that
was
done
already
by
the
engineer
when
we
did
the
swpp
and
that
long
environmental
form
the
the
long
AF
that
he
submitted.
He
knew
upon
the
examination
of
everything
so
I
think
that
we've
already
crossed
that.
But
if
it
helps
satisfy
you,
then
I
can
I
would
speak
with
Sarah
when
she
comes
back
on
Monday
that
maybe
we
can
do
have
the
engineer,
do
a
summary
and
I
think
that
will
be
best
because
it
will
be
based
on.
A
A
J
A
J
It
because
I
thought
that
we
had
covered
all
these
steps
already
and
so
that.
L
I
just
wondered
what
your
thoughts
are
and
just
moving
for
a
positive
decoration.
A
Well,
asking
somebody
to
do
an
environmental
impact
statement.
It's
expensive,
if
you
I
mean
I,
would
assumed
you
would
want
to
do
it
correctly
and
hire
an
engineer
to
to
do
that.
That's
a
lot
of
work
and
a
lot
of
time
and
I
just
would
hate
to
do
that.
If,
if
a
summary
letter
could
satisfy
a
summary
letter
and
a
delay
until
the
next
meeting
could
satisfy
that.
D
A
So
I
guess
the
only
other
option
then
would
be
a
special
meeting
to
speed
things
up.
I
Before
you
get
into
that
and
I
want
to
make
it
messy,
because
I
feel
like
there's
one
motion
on
the
table
already
and
I
scramble
it
up
with
a
different
option.
But
you
know:
could
we
give
approval
to
night
conditional
on
having
summary
letter
by
X
date,
like
whatever
makes
sense
to
us.
G
C
A
Is
July
11th
if
we
had
to
wait
until
July
11th,
so
between
now
and
July
11th,
you
submit
the
summary
everybody
reviews
it
in
theory,
they're
comfortable
with
whatever
you've
you've
presented,
and
we
would
do
this
again
and-
and
perhaps
the
vote
is
different
in
your
favor
and
you
move
forward,
but
that
delays
you
to
July
11.
I.
J
Like
your
idea
of
the
special
meeting,
if
that
can
be
done,
okay,
and
that
will
save
us
the
time,
okay,.
G
Yeah
we
would
have
to
redo
public
noticing,
because
there's
new
information
being
provided,
and
so
that
would
make
the
earliest
we
can
meet
again,
would
be
the
19th.
G
That
would
be
that
would
be
the
20th
I'm
just
trying
to
make
sure
that
the
16th
can't
be
done.
C
F
F
C
F
A
C
A
J
Have
one
question:
sorry,
but
I'm
not
trying
to
force
your
hand
or
anything
but
I
know
it's
so
minimal.
Would
it
help,
since
we
are
meeting
tonight
that
if
I
was
to
get
my
engineer
online,
who
has
on
the
architect
both
who
have
who
they
can
testify
that
you
know
that
they
have
these
reports
and
then
they
have
seen
it
and
they
can
even
open
up
on
the
computer
and
read
you
the
facts
of
it
or
the
summary?
If
that
helps.
F
A
F
J
C
J
James
Scandal
just
emailed
me:
oh
he's
so
nice,
okay,
so
he
well
because
he's
watching
it
live.
He
just
emailed
me
and
I'll
be
happy
to
show
it
to
you.
He
just
emailed
me
the
summary
just
now
as
I'm
speaking
with
you,
that's
great
so
I'm
going
to
this
is
a
three-page
letter
which
I'll
be
happy
to
show
to
you
with
the
site
plan
attached
at
the
end
of
it
and
I'm
going
to.
Would
you
like
me
to
read
the
entire
letter.
J
J
J
The
buildings
are
constructed
on
S
slab
on
grade
the
site
is
currently
vacant,
but
is
proposed
for
development
as
multi-family
residential
housing
through
demolition
of
existing
on-site
structures
and
construction
of
one
multi-story
building,
Associated
support
facilities
and
Landscaping.
The
next
section
is
title:
environmental
investigation,
findings
and
recommendation.
J
The
keywords
did
not,
therefore,
no
additional
investigation
of
the
area
appears
warranted
the
next
bullet
point.
The
analytical
results
did
not
indicate
the
presence
of
contaminants
in
soil,
soil,
vapor
or
groundwater
greater
than
the
applicable
New
York
State
Department
of
Environmental
conservation,
nysdec,
restricted
residential
soil
cleanup
objectives
and
therefore
should
not
preclude
development
of
the
site
for
its
intended
use.
I.E
multi-family,
residential
housing
with
Municipal
supplied
potable
water.
J
However,
volatile
organic
compounds
vocs
one
comma
one,
comma
1
dash
try
in
and
one
comma
two
comma
four
try
methylbenzene
were
detected
in
soil
at
one
location,
sb-11
at
levels
that
exceed
their
respective
NYS
DEC
protection
of
groundwater
ny-pgw
standards.
This
suggests
a
potential
for
these
constituents
to
Leach
from
the
soil
and
impact
groundwater.
J
Aei
also
noted
the
presence
of
a
former
painting
booth
and
vent
structure
present
at
the
existing
Elizabeth
Street
Building.
Although
no
contamination
was
detected
above
applicable,
NYS
DEC
OS
in
the
soil
sample
Collective
collected
within
the
paint
booth
area
and
no
obvious
signs
of
contamination
associated
with
the
exterior
portion
of
the
paint
boost
structure
were
identified.
J
Dismantling
of
the
paint
boot
structure
and
off-site
disposable
of
the
vent
structure
and
other
component
warrants
the
use
of
Pest
management
practices
during
demolition
based
on
the
localized
presence
of
vocs
in
soil
at
sb11,
where
boc
impacts
above
ny-pgw
standards
were
detected,
removal
of
impacted
soils
in
the
immediate
area
of
sb11
is
recommended
to
prevent
further
to
protect
to
prevent
potential
future
groundwater
impacts.
Next
section
estimated
remediate
remedial
activities
and
costs
bullet
point
number
one
recommended
impact:
soil
removal
and
backfilling
at
soil,
boring
location,
SB
11.
J
J
Two
optional
bullet
point
number
two
optional
site
management
plan:
AEI
will
review
the
site,
Redevelopment
plans
provided
by
the
client's
site,
civil
engineer
or
architect
to
identify
site
engineering
controls
that
will
limit
human
exposure
to
impacted
or
potentially
impacted
soils.
Aei
will
then
prepare
SMP
for
use
by
the
client
that
includes
the
following.
J
The
estimated
cost
to
complete
the
s
p
is
three
thousand
one
hundred
dollars
note
that
this
letter
has
been
prepared
for
information
purposes
only
based
on
the
results
presented
in
aei's
March,
2020
phase,
one
Esa
and
may
2020
limited
Phase,
2,
subsurface
investigation
reports
and
subject
to
the
limitations
and
relying
presented
bearing.
Please
do
not
hesitate
to
contact
the
undersign
at.
J
J
Our
records
yes,
I,
can
I'm
open
to
forwarding
it.
I
myself
am
a
civil
engineer
by
education
graduate
of
Polytechnic
University,
which
is
now
a
part
of
NYU
from
the
summary
of
it.
What
he's
saying
is
that
an
area
boarding's
location,
sb11
15
feet
by
15
feet
by
10
feet
deep
scoop.
It
up
fill
it
up
with
clean
dirt
and
we
will
do
the
site
management.
C
J
A
All
right,
yeah,
all
right,
so
there
do
I
need
to
read
that
whole
thing
again.
The
Seeker
or.
K
A
A
All
right
so
based
on
the
the
previous
motion
and
the
new
information
provided
by
the
applicant
I'll
re-motion
the
negative
declaration
for
secret
review.
Second,
all
right,
second,
by
Steve,
all
in
favor
all
right.
Look
at
that
five
in
favor,
zero
opposed
all
right
should
we
still
meet
in
July
or
June
20th,
just
for
just.
B
A
A
All
right,
so
that's
a
five
to
zero
approval
for
Seeker
and
then
you
know
you
want
to
jump
in.
F
A
All
right
so
I'll
make
a
motion
that
the
requirements
for
site
plan,
review
and
special
use
permit
have
been
met,
contingent
on
a
reduction
of
four
parking
spaces
or
with
the
inclusion
of
a
Planning
Commission
approved
reduction
of
four
parking
spaces,
all
right,
second,
by
Chris,
all
in
favor
all
right,
all
right.
That's
five
in
the
favor
zero
opposed.
J
J
C
J
A
G
A
Right
Chris.
A
Second,
thank
you.
Second,
by
Steve,
do
I
vote
or
all
right
all
in
favor
of
that
hi
I'll
pay
Mario
after
the
meeting
all
right,
that's
five
in
favor,
zero
post!
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
that.
A
So
Joe
is
currently
our
vice
chair,
but
if,
if
somebody
else
is
open
to
this,
Joe's
schedule
is
getting
a
little
bit
more
wonky
unpredictable,
so
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
nominate
Chris
as
our
vice
chair.
If
he's
okay,
with
that,
okay
Sorry
seconded
by
Steve,
all
in
favor
aye
same
thing,
another
20
come
in
Mario's
way,
all
right.
That's
five
in
favor,
zero,
a
post
all
right!
A
A
All
right,
I'll
send
it
I'll,
send
it
your
way
all
right.
So
that's
election
of
chair
and
vice
chair
any
other
business
yeah.
G
They
have
asked
the
question
whether
or
not
the
Planning
Commission
would
be
okay
with
those
partitions
that
were
required
being
eight
feet
tall,
which
does
not
reach
the
ceiling
in
the
basement.
The
reason
why
is
that,
if
they
make
those
floor-to-ceiling,
they
need
to
redo
redesign
their
fire
suppression
system?
If
they
keep
those
walls
at
eight
feet,
then
the
sprinklers
could
hit
what
they
need
to
hit.
G
The
question
is:
is
the
commission
okay,
with
those
walls
being
eight
feet,
or
do
you
think
that
that
does
not
meet
the
goals
of
those
walls,
which
is
to
keep
it
from
being
a
communal
one,
large
communal
space,
the
study
rooms
and
everything
the
floor
plan?
As
we
see
it
would
remain
the
same
so
where
there
are
doors
that
can
be
closed,
those
are
still
there.
The
locations
of
the
walls
are
still
there.
The
question
is:
is
eight
feet
enough.
A
Good
question:
I'm:
okay
with
eight
eight
foot
but
how's
everybody
else
feel
would.