►
From YouTube: 2022.11.15 Planning Commission
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Hello:
everyone
welcome
to
the
November
meeting
of
the
city
of
Binghamton
Planning
Commission.
My
name
is
Nick
Corker
and
I'm.
Currently,
the
chairman
of
this
commission,
which
is
comprised
of
local
community
members,
tasked
with
reviewing
site
plans
and
special
use
permits
for
consistency,
see
what
the
standards
and
criteria
set
forth
in
the
city
of
Binghamton
code,
based
on
our
total
number
of
Planning
Commission
members.
Four
members
must
be
present
to
constitute
a
quorum
tonight.
A
A
Kelly
Weiss
is
not
going
to
be
here
tonight
and
Manny
priest
all
right,
so
that
means
we
have
six
members
all
right,
so
that
does
constitute
a
quorum
and
we
can
proceed
so
next.
Item
on
the
agenda
is
the
approval
of
the
October
meeting
minutes.
Anybody
see
anything
in
those
meeting
minutes
that
needed
to
be
revised.
Chris.
B
Yes,
we
need
to
amend
who
was
present
at
the
meeting.
That
is
not
Brian
Seacrest.
C
And
I
have
one
item:
two
Nick
yeah
in
the
part
where
I
brought
up
a
comment
about
the
parking
garage
with
Russ
corrodden.
The
applicant
didn't
make
a
response.
It
states
my
concern
but
I
think
for
the
record.
It
should
State
their
response
because
it's
left
open
but
I
just
said
that
and
they
they
responded.
C
Garage
this
is
a
important
issue
with
be
collapse
of
parking
garages
at
right
in
Johnson
City
at
at
Wilson
hospital
and
the
applicant
that
they're
taking
due
diligence
in
their
design
and
looking
at
all
that,
that
should
be
noted
that
they
did
that
and
not
that
it's
a
responsibility
of
this
group,
but
I
would
recommend
it
somewhere.
It
received
an
additional
set
of
eyes
when
their
prints
are
done
in
the
design
review.
C
I
mean
that's
business
collapse
in
Florida
of
a
building
and
the
parking
garage
and
Johnson
City,
so
they're
they're
very
thorough
in
their
approaching
their
plans.
But
that
should
be
noted
that
they
did
say
they
were
going
to
do
a
you
know,
review
and
whatever
they
said,
then,
let's
report
it
should
be
in
there.
E
F
A
A
All
right
in
this
portion
of
our
meeting,
the
Planning
Commission
will
be
reviewing
documentation
provided
by
applicants.
For
the
first
time,
applicants
will
be
called
to
the
microphone
where
they
will
be
asked
to
make
a
presentation
describing
their
plans
to
the
commission.
Commission
members
May
then
ask
questions
of
the
applicant
to
clarify
any
items
that
are
unclear
and,
after
all,
questions
have
been
answered.
The
commission
will
deliberate
and
then
either
set
a
public
hearing
date
for
the
project
or
request
additional
information.
A
So
tonight
our
first
secret
determination
is
for
the
applicant
Fairview
Recovery
Services.
The
project
address
is
110
Fairview
Ave.
This
is
a
site
plan
review
for
the
construction
of
a
12
750
square
foot,
building
with
20
sleeping
units
on
an
existing
Social
Services
campus
in
the
R2
one
and
two
unit
dwelling
District
welcome.
B
Nick
Chris
before
the
applicant
begins
because
I
live
within
a
very
close
Geographic.
Proximity
to
this
project,
I
have
been
advised
by
Brian
from
Corporation
Council
when
they
came
before
the
committee
previously
to
abstain
and
refrain
from
discussions
and
votes.
Okay,
so
I
will
be
doing
that
again
and
if
and
if
your
client
has
any
questions
about,
why
there's
nothing
nefarious
here
calling
to
Bob
Joseph
about
they
can
talk
to
us.
E
A
All
right
Brian
just
to
avoid
any
confusion.
We
asked
that
when
we're
in
person
that
anybody
recusing
goes
and
sits
in
the
crowd
or
just
to
make
sure
it's
clear
of
your
rule,
yeah
Sarah,
the
the
microphones-
are
pretty
tricky.
So
you
got
to
get
right
up
right
up
to
them
so
that
everybody
can
hear
and
is
the
is
it
green.
G
G
This
is
the
second
application
for
the
same
programmatic
project
at
you.
You
can
see
the
location.
This
is
on
the
existing
Campus
of
the
of
the
recovery
services,
and
this
is
an
application
for
new
construction
of
a
building
and
demolition
of
another
one.
G
It
is
not
a
crisis
center,
so
I
think
it's
very
important
to
make
that
instinction
right
off
the
back.
This
is
just
a
mission
to
continue
Fair
views
plan
and
existing
treatment,
but
adding
it
at
this
campus
to
consolidate
services
and
to
provide
a
more
complete
opportunity
for
those
seeking
those
services.
G
As
you
can
see,
we
or
maybe
I
shouldn't
pay,
as
we
can.
You
can
see,
as
as
you
will
note
from
the
application,
we
have
substantially
revised
the
plan
to
geographically
locate
the
new
building
within
the
parameters
of
the
existing
campus.
So
there's
no
expansion,
Beyond
on
the
previous
Plan
called
for
utilization
of
some
vacant
space
to
the
north,
and
so
we
have
listen
to
the
neighbors
and
and
to
your
comments
and
to
the
staff's
comments
and
brought
the
new
building
back
down
into
the
campus.
G
It's
sort
of
in
the
middle
of
the
existing
buildings,
and
you
know
it's
surrounded
by
it.
So
there's
a
lot,
a
lot
of
thought
was
put
into
how
we
could
achieve
the
goals
on
the
site,
which
is
not
particularly
flat
and
also
answer.
Some
of
the
concerns
that
that
were
raised
in
the
last
review
of
this
project.
I
think
I'll
just
turn
it
over
to
Ken
to
just
walk
you
through
quick
and
then
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have.
H
As
Sarah
mentioned
before,
we
had
the
building
up,
in
which
location
we
still
had
an
L
configuration
no
computer.
We
had
a
large
parking
area
up
here.
It's
been
away
with
those
in
this
proposal.
No
longer
left
or
they'll
be
entering
the
site.
The
parking
is
now
located.
H
As
Sarah
mentioned,
the
existing
building
right
here
will
be
removed
and
our
new
building
will
be
here
so
apparently
reducing
the
footprint
of
the
overall
site
and
addressing
some
of
the
concerns
the
the
neighbors
had
in
regards
to
grab
one
class
buildings
approximately
the
same
size.
Before
a
little
smaller
we've
been
able
to
consolidate
some
of
the
square
footage
down
and
programs,
but
it's
Sarah
mention
the
program
is
doing
the
same.
It's
the
employee
facility
right
now,
around
12
750.
H
We
have
parking
on
site
of
55
51
in
the
lower
parking
area
and
then
there
aren't
going
to
be
more
parking.
That's
up
here,
a
couple
of
things
we
did
address
in
this
and
it's
in
our
application
packages
lighting
the
owner
has
agreed
to
replace
all
the
lighting
that
was
causing
the
neighbor
some
concern
and
there's
touch
sheets
for
that
in
the
your
tactics
and
then
we've
also
designated
three
locations
here
here
and
here
that
are
designated
smoking
areas
that
there
was
concerned
about
the
the
residents
wandering
the
neighborhood
smoke.
G
I
think
that
again,
when
you
go
through
your
package,
you'll
see
that
there's
a
net
increase
in
parking
of
about
29
spaces.
That
was
also
something
that
was
raised
in
the
previous
go
around
that
employees
were
parking
on
the
street,
although
that's
not
prohibited,
we
certainly
want
to
discourage
that,
so
we
were
able
to
squeeze
in
an
additional
29
spaces,
and
this
is
a
completely
supervised
recovery
program.
There
is
no
unexported
individuals
walking
around.
G
They
are
always
in
the
presence
of
an
employee
so
and
focusing
the
building
in
the
middle
will
really
eliminate
the
need,
for
you
know
anyone
to
go
really
anywhere
else.
All
the
services
that
they
could
possibly
need
will
be
will
surround
the
building.
The
parking,
the
driveway
I'm
going
to
say
this,
but
I
could
be
wrong.
I
think
the
driveway
is
in
the
same
location
that
it
is
now
so
that
traffic
pattern
is
not
going
to
change.
G
You'll
you'll
see
in
one
of
the
attachments
to
our
application
that
the
volume
of
staff
is
very
low.
There's
there's
no
suggestion
that
there
would
be
any
sort
of
a
traffic
problem
in
that
area,
and
that
is
pretty
much.
It
I
noticed
on
the
staff
report
that
you'd,
like
a
landscaping
plan.
Obviously
that's
something
that
we
can
do
to
take
care
of
here
with
the
other
stuff.
G
Coming
for
I
I
note
the
comment
about
the
five
foot
landscape
buffer
around
the
parking
areas
and
that
offends
or
a
Dent
screening
be
installed
at
the
property
line
phase
and
clap
them.
We
certainly
can
modify
the
plan
to
address
those
problems.
E
G
That's
it
so
we're
just
really
asking
for
speaker
designation
tonight
and
for
you
to
follow
public
hearing
for
next
month.
All.
E
A
Appreciates
the
new
location
of
the
building-
oh
just
one
clarification
so
which
building
on
that
plan
is,
is
still
coming
down.
A
G
A
Okay,
all
right
I'll
make
a
motion
that
the
Planning
Commission
should
act
as
lead
agency
and
that
this
is
a
Seeker
unlisted
action
all
right,
second,
by
Manny,
all
in
favor
all
right.
Six
in
favor,
zero
opposed
and
I'll
make
a
motion
to
schedule.
A
public
hearing
for
the
project
at
five
20
at
our
December
meeting.
A
All
right
next
secret
determination
is
for
the
applicant
Chabad
house.
The
project
address
is
26
to
34
Wall
Street.
This
is
a
site
plan
review
and
special
use
permit
for
the
conversion
of
the
ground
floor
of
an
existing
office
building
and
a
place
of
worship
in
the
C2
downtown
business
district
foreign.
I
I
I
You
know,
let
me
know
what
you'd
like.
Would
you
like
me
to
just
share
about
our
plans
and
what
we'd
like
to
do
and
if
you
have
any
questions,
I
want
to
be
respectful
of
everyone's
time.
So,
whatever
it
is,
you
know
any
specific
questions,
but
I
guess
I'll
just
share
briefly
about
what
we'd
like
to
do.
I
Yes,
okay,
so
we
we've
been
in
the
area
for
38
years
servicing,
mainly
the
students
Binghamton
University,
as
well
as
local
community
members,
in
the
greater
Boone
County
area,
like
I,
said
that
our
our
main
location
is
in
Vestal
and
with
the
development
of
Binghamton
and
downtown
Binghamton
and
the
the
student
complex
and
student
housing.
I
As
we
all
know,
over
the
last
10
12
years
and
they're
being
a
lot
more
of
a
concentration
of
students
in
the
downtown
area,
we
were
receiving
more
interests
and
requests
to
expand
our
services
to
the
downtown
area.
To
this
to
the
the
students
and
some
community
members
living
in
this
area
downtown,
as
well
as
the
west
side
of
Binghamton
as
well.
What
we
do
is
we.
We
do
a
number
of
different
types
of
services.
I
Obviously,
I'm
Jewish
and
we
we
do
religious
Services,
we
do
classes,
we
do
philanthropy
events,
we
do
social
events,
one-on-one
counseling.
We
also
have
a
recreational
opportunities
for
students
to
get
involved
in
many
different
ways
and
that's
pretty
much
we
we
have.
You
know
we
have
Services.
We
have
meals
for
the
Jewish
traditional
celebrations
and
we
service
the
the
students
in
the
community
in
that
way.
I
I
Four
years
ago,
we
leased
our
own
space,
which
is
at
60
Henry
Street,
which
we're
in
currently
three
and
a
half
years
ago,
we're
in
our
fourth
year
of
the
lease
there,
and
it's
just
does
not
meet
the
needs
that
we
have
in
many
different
ways,
and
so
we
set
out
to
to
look
for
a
permanent,
permanent
adoption,
permanent
presence
to
be
able
to
respond
to
the
needs
of
the
students,
and
we
came
across
this
building.
I
The
legal
address,
I
believe
is
2634
Wall,
Street
and
Our
intention
and.
I
I
It
has
a
nice
big
parking
area,
I
think
there's
about
62
spaces
there.
Currently
it's
used
as
an
office
building
and
Our
intention
is
to
transform
the
first
floor
to
be
used
for
the
different
needs
for
our
Center
for
our
community
center
and
I'll
whip
it
over.
I
So
this
shows
you
a
landscape,
the
middle
areas,
the
main
area
where
we
have
those
when
the
students
are
here.
So
this
is
really
during
the
semesters,
because
it's
a
lot
quieter
during
the
breaks
and
during
the
summer,
but
we
have
the
weekly
assembly
area
where
we
have
the
services
and
then
we
have
the
the
the
area
where
we
have
the
meals
the
celebrations
every
weekend
and
then
there's
different
rooms
throughout
there's
a
Hospitality
Suites
area
for
religious
purposes.
We
don't
use
Electronics
or
travel
on
the
sabbaths
on
the
holidays.
I
So
when
we
have
people
visiting,
that's
where
they
would
stay
to.
D
I
To
do
that,
we
have
a
parsonage
residential
area
as
well
in
there
and
we
have
some.
We
have
a
commercial
kitchen,
a
programming
area,
classrooms,
Etc,
that's
pretty
much.
The
general
landscape
of
the
plan.
I
Yes,
yes,
so
the
outdoor
area.
Basically,
the
idea
was
to
create
a
space
where
students
can
do
work.
Hang
out
in
the
months
that
there
is
nice
weather,
which
you
know
this
year.
We
had
a
lot
more
of
that
than
we
expected.
I
So
that's
the
main
purpose
of
that
area
throughout
the
year
is
going
to
be
for
that
and
the
the
word
sukha
is
actually
a
that's
a
holiday
that
we
have
for
eight
days
of
the
year
when
we
have
a
sort
of
outdoor
patio
type
of
structure
that
we
put
up
a
temporary
structure
and
we
would
have
the
meals
out
there,
but
like
a
few
times
three
or
four
times
throughout
that
holiday.
So
but
the
main
usage
of
the
space
was,
the
idea
was
to
have
a
nice
little
area.
I
It's
also
right
near
the
water
so
to
have
just
and
that
we
thought
also
would
give
it
a
nicer
presence-
and
you
know
to
add,
there's
a
few
different
ideas
that
we
have,
that
we
can
do
with
that
seating
space.
You
know
to
have
outdoor
furniture,
permanent
outdoor
furniture,
where
students
can
hang
out
study,
learn
whatever
it
is.
They.
E
B
Rabbi,
one
of
the
questions
that
was
brought
up
in
the
staff
report
by
the
planning
department
was
updating
the
parking
diagram
to
revise
it,
to
show
compliant
Drive
aisles
and
no
stacked
spaces.
Can
that
be
done
before
the
next
public
hearing.
I
I
A
All
right,
actually
following
on
Chris's
comment,
is
the
the
number
of
parking
spaces
that
you
show
there
is
that,
based
on
the
number
that
you
need
for
something
or
that
you
were
just
maximizing
the
number
of
spaces
you
could
get
so.
I
E
I
Don't
think
we
need
that
much
much
practically
and-
and
you
know,
I
would
want
to
see
what
we
can
do
with
meeting
those
specifications,
but
no
I
mean.
Ideally
our
plan
is
just
to
have
it
for
usage
for
people
coming.
You
know
frequenting
the
center
during
the
week
you
know,
and
then
we
would
have
to
see
by
code
exactly
what
what
the
minimum.
J
I
D
Actually,
no
minimum
in
the
C2
for
an
existing
building,
so
he
he
has
options.
A
Okay,
all
right
should
be
pretty
easy,
then,
okay,
all
right
any
other
questions
or
comments.
A
The
planning
staff
did
ask
if
there
was
it
was
possible
to
show
bicycle
parking
somewhere
on
the
site
plan.
We
can
add
that
chart
another
easy
ad
yeah.
E
A
All
right,
no
other
questions
or
comments.
All
right,
I'll
make
a
motion
that
this
is
a
type
2
action
under
Seeker,
because
it
involves
the
ReUse
of
an
existing
building
and
that
no
further
environmental
review
is
required
all
right.
Second,
by
Chris,
all
in
favor,
six
in
favor,
zero
pose
and
I'll
make
a
motion
to
schedule.
A
public
hearing
for
this
project
at
5
25
at
our
December
meeting.
A
All
right
so
goodbye
Chris,
all
in
favor
all
right,
six
in
favor,
zero
post.
All
right!
So
we'll
see
you
back
in
December.
If
it's
possible
to
revise
the
site
plan
before
then.
So
we
could
see
what
the
plan
is
for
the
parking
lot.
That'd
be
great
and
we'll
have
a
public
hearing
and
hear
what
everybody
has
to
say
about
the
project.
Okay,.
E
A
Our
next
secret
determination
is
for
the
applicant
Faz
construction.
The
project
address
is
45,
Carroll,
Street
and
20
to
24
Lyle
Ave.
This
is
a
site
plan
review
and
special
use
permit
for
the
construction
of
a
five-story
social
services
facility
with
60
sleeping
units
and
a
Child
Care
Center
in
the
R3
multi-unit
dwelling
District.
E
L
Thank
you
so
much
good
evening,
commissioners,
it's
my
pleasure
to
be
here
tonight
to
talk
to
you
about
the
ywca's
proposed
intergenerational
campus,
which
will
be
located
at
45
Carroll,
utilizing,
34,
apparel
24.
Excuse
me:
34
Lyle,
24,
Lyle
and
20
and
22
Lyle
Avenue.
It's
five
properties
all
together
that
the
YWCA
recently
purchased
and
our
plan
is
to
open
what
we're
calling
an
intergenerational
campus.
It
will
comprise
of
68
units
of
affordable
housing
coupled
with
a
state-of-the-art
child
care
center.
L
We
are
stakeholders
in
the
Coalition
for
the
homes
of
the
Southern
Tier
and
have
been
for
many
many
years.
I
must
also
add
that
the
YWCA
was
incorporated
in
the
city
of
Binghamton
in
1892.,
and
we've
been
here
for
130
years,
providing
safe
housing
for
women.
So
we've
had
a
few
years
of
experience
doing
that
this
current
project
is
proposed
due
to
a
number
of
factors,
but
primarily
the
lack
of
affordable
housing.
L
That's
there
now
for
the
population
we
serve
below
to
very
low
to
no
income,
and
this
particular
project
will
add
68
units
of
affordable
housing
for
that
population,
with
a
set
aside
of
approximately
30
percent
for
domestic
violence.
Survivors
within
that
campus
I
have
with
me
this
evening,
the
architect
for
this
project,
Mr,
Richard,
bitto
and
he's
a
well-known
architect
in
circles
with
homeless
housing
and
Supportive
Housing
people
who's
got
plenty
of
experience.
H
Good
evening
you
have
a
small
plans:
I'm
sorry,
I,
I,
find
them
difficult
to
read.
I,
don't
know
guys
would
be
able
to
see
them.
The
site
is
at
the
corner
of
Lyle
and
Carol
Stream
and
comprises
several
Lots
include
the
the
old
Urban
League.
F
H
We
are
proposing
to
gut
and
stripped
down
to
the
case
structure
of
the
Urban
League
building
and
we'll
reconstruct
it
for
the
predominantly
all
of
the
classrooms
of
the
Young
Wonders
child
care,
center
field
and
new
building
residential
five-story
pie,
68th
unit
24-0
bedrooms,
36,
one
bedroom
apartment
and
eight
two
bedroom
apartments.
H
H
It
will
have
offices
and
support
space
for
the
residential
unit,
as
well
as
parent
services
and
you'll
also
have
a
portion
of
the
lower
the
lower
floor
will
have
a
portion
of
the
child
care
center
that
will
extend
to
while
the
building
is
approximately.
H
The
residential
building
is
around
a
little
over
43
000
square
feet.
The
child
care
center
will
be
around
11
000
square
feet.
There
will
be
outdoor
play
areas
for
different
children.
They
are
infants,
toddler,
preschool
and
after
school
classrooms.
H
Not
sure
what
else,
but
that's
pretty
much
it
if
you
go
through
the
plans
that
I
provided
there
was
a
partial,
the
after
the
site
plan.
There
is
a
seller
plan
that
shows
a
partial
seller.
The
rest
of
the
building
is
built
on
grade.
H
The
first
floor
shows
the
the
offices
and
tenants
pay
to
to
the
left
parking
area
in
the
middle
in
the
first
floor
and
of
the
child
care
center.
H
On
the
right
side,
and
then
the
Upper
Floor
shows
a
second
floor
of
the
child
care
center,
which
is
all
classrooms
and
the
typical
floor
plan
of
the
residential
unit.
That's
pretty
much
it.
H
And
my
name
is
Richard
Vito
v,
I
c
p
o
my
company
name
is
OCD
architect,
we're
located
at
401
Lafayette
Street,
New,
York,
New
York.
A
It
looks
like
an
excellent
project.
Any
questions
comments
start
off
with
Chris.
B
Hi
Carol,
one
of
the
questions
that
was
raised
by
the
planning
staff
in
their
their
staff
project
review
was
about
the
parking
there
are
21
spaces
in
the
plan.
Are
those
meant
for
staff
or
the
residents
or
both.
H
B
Okay,
if
you
are
able
to
finalize
that
mou
with
Lincoln
University
for
their
incubator
spots,
having
that
added
to
the
documentation
might
be
helpful
if
there
are
parking
concerns
about
this
project.
H
We
need
height
variants
currently,
where
the
high
allowed
in
the
district
in
45
feet
in
the
roof
line,
is
at
49.4
and
there
is
a
we
need
parking
and
we
do
at
the
corner
building.
There
is,
if
you
look
at
the
site
plan,
our
our
property
kind
of
wrapped
around
the
one
corner
building
that
was
built
full
on
the
site
and
we
have
partial
side
yards
on
each
side
of
that
property,
but
not
the
back
of
the
property.
H
F
F
F
A
Just
to
make
sure
you're
aware
the
applicant
will
need
a
Cod
review
Commission
on
architecture
and
Urban
Design.
Are
you
guys
you're
aware
of
that
Okay
so.
A
H
A
All
right
any
other
questions
or
concerns
all
right,
Tito,
just
a
question
for
you:
what
is
we
don't
often
see
a
type
1
action?
What
does
that
do
for
the
review
process.
D
D
They
won't
be
able
to
vote
on
the
variances
until
until
this
commission
concludes
Seeker,
but
that's
pretty
much
it
is
the
Seeker
becomes
coordinated
and,
and
the
zba
has
to
wait
for
you
all
to
to
conclude
secret
before
they
connect.
Okay,.
E
A
Right
I'll
make
a
motion
that
the
applicants
project
is
a
type
1
action
under
Seeker,
because
the
proposal
involves
the
construction
of
more
than
50
units
which
exceeds
25
percent
of
any
threshold
in
the
section
occurring
wholly
or
partially,
within
or
substantially
contiguous
to
any
publicly
owned
or
operated
Parkland
Recreation,
Area
or
designated
open
space,
including
any
site
on
the
register
of
national
historic
landmarks
pursuant
to
36
CFR
part
62,
which
is
type
1
action,
so
type
1
action
under
seeker
and
that
the
Planning
Commission
should
act
as
lead
Agency
for
review
all
right
seconded
by
Paul,
all
in
favor
all
right.
A
A
Our
last
secret
determination
tonight
is
for
the
applicant
James
Slocum
project
address
is
59
Court
Street.
This
is
a
site
plan
review
and
special
use
permit
for
the
conversion
of
the
upper
seven
floors
of
an
existing
office
building
into
57
dwelling
units
with
76
total
bedrooms
in
the
C2
downtown
business
district.
M
N
Good
evening
James
Slocum,
seven
Marion
cork
Binghamton.
N
And
here
tonight
seeking
a
site
plan
review
and
a
special
used
permit
for
59
to
61
Court
Street.
N
N
B
N
Yes,
I
I
do
realize
that
and
we're
gonna
work
with
the
local
garages
to
try
and
get
parking
where
we
can.
However,
we
are
limiting
the
size
of
the
units
to
one
two
and
three
bedroom
units,
because
you
know
it
lowers
the
the
need
for
parking
and
isn't
required.
Parking
isn't
required
in
the
seafood
District
or
one
two
and
three
bedroom
units.
D
A
Just
sticking
with
that
line
of
questions,
what
are
you
thinking
for
parking
I
can't
imagine.
Well,
maybe
are
there
a
lot
of
people
looking
for
apartments
and
they
just
legit,
don't
have
a
car
or
they
would
be
looking
for
an
apartment
that
came
with
a
parking
space?
Yes,.
N
There's
a
lot
of
people
that
are
looking
for
apartments
downtown
and-
and
you
know
to
be
totally
honest-
it's
not
a
whole
lot
different
than
running
to
offices.
The
same
you
know,
a
similar
amount
of
people
require
parking
to
get
to
and
from
work
as
well.
What
we've!
What
we
believe
is
is
that
a
lot
of
the
offices
aren't
going
to
make
a
full
comeback
after
Colvin
we're
finding
a
lot
of
that.
N
We
have
a
some
current
commercial
tenants
in
there
that
in
no
way
shape
or
form
are
we
planning
on
pushing
out?
But
you
know
a
lot
of
the
existing
ones
have
already
converted
their
office
into
kind
of
a
satellite
office
or
a
meeting
spot,
which
leads
us
to
believe
that
they
may
not
renew.
N
You
know
that,
on
top
of
the
existing
several
floors
that
have
been
vacant
for
a
number
of
years
already,
you
know
we
think
that
the
best
youth
sport
would
be
they're
converted
into
Apartments.
Okay,.
E
N
Project
itself,
the
building
is
eight
stories.
N
E
N
Yes,
absolutely
phase.
One
would
be
composed,
of
course,
six
seven
and
eight,
which
have
a
a
much
smaller
footprint
than
towards
one
through
four,
and
that
would
consist
of
18
units
and
and
24
backgrounds,
totem.
A
This
isn't
really
relevant
I'm.
Just
curious
I
was
noticing
that
the
one
bedroom
apartments
are
they're,
pretty
just
Stark,
it's
a
room
for
a
bed
and
a
couch
and
then
a
little
kitchenette
and
a
bathroom,
and
then
that's
pretty
much
it
are
you.
Is
there
a
lot
of
demand
for
that
small
size,
Department
right
now
or.
N
There's
a
ton
of
demand
for
that.
We
are
making
some
modifications
as
needed
to
make
them
a
little
bit
more.
You
know,
kind
of
long-term
long-term
oriented.
You
know,
I
think
that,
while
the
demand
is
there
for
something
like
that,
our
goal
is
to
get
you
know
lease
renewals
and
longer
term
tenants
and
I
I
think
that
adding
some
additional
space
may
take
away
a
bedroom
or
two
from
what
we're
coming
here
and
asking
for
tonight,
but
maybe
often
in
the
long
run,
okay.
N
No,
no
so
I
mean
we
do
a
lot
of
student
outs.
You
know
we
do
a
lot
of
housing
for
for
locals
as
well.
You
know,
I
think
that
the
one
two
and
three
bedroom
units,
specifically
the
one
and
two
bedroom
units,
are
very
much
interchangeable
between
students
and
young
professionals.
A
N
Area
or
there
there
is
amenity
space
on
the
second
floor,
they're
they're
the
section
of
the
second
floor
on
the
west
side,
where
it
butts
up
to
an
existing
building
and
there's
no
window
there.
So
that's
where
we're
going
to
locate
the
amenity
space
for
the
building.
N
This
is
the
proposed
floor
plan
for
the
second
floor.
This
is
the
the
west
side
of
the
building
that
that
butts
up
to
and
is
block
from
having
any
windows
with
the
building
next
door.
So
we
are
going
to
take
the
majority
of
the
section
on
the
west
side
of
the
second
floor
and
make
that
amenity
space
for
the
building.
N
Will
make
sure
to
get
you
a
updated
version.
E
A
N
A
All
right,
if
there's
no
other
questions
or
comments,
I'll
make
a
motion
that
the
proposal
involves
the
ReUse
of
an
existing
commercial
building,
which
is
a
type
2
action
under
seeker,
and
that
no
further
environmental
review
is
required
seconded
by
Joe,
all
in
favor
all
right.
Six
in
favor,
zero
opposed
and
I'll
make
a
motion
to
schedule.
A
public
hearing
for
the
me
for
this
project
at
5
35
at
our
December
meeting,
all
right
second,
by
Paul,
all
in
favor,
all
right,
six
in
favor,
zero
post.
All
right,
we'll
see
you
in
December.
A
In
this
portion
of
our
meeting
we'll
be
holding
open
public
hearings
to
obtain
public
opinion
in
regard
to
specific
projects
that
are
up
for
review,
applicants
will
be
asked
to
come
to
the
microphone
and
make
a
brief
presentation
describing
their
project
for
most
projects.
This
is
the
second
time
we're
reviewing
your
information,
so
it
would
be
very
helpful
if
you
could.
Please
give
us
a
brief
overview
of
your
project,
to
remind
us
what
you're,
planning
and
then
clearly
identify
any
changes
that
have
been
made
since
the
last
time.
A
We
saw
you
when
an
applicant
is
done
presenting
and
any
clarifications
have
been
reviewed.
We
will
open
the
public
hearing
and
allow
members
of
the
community
to
speak
about
the
applicant's
proposal
after
the
commission
has
heard
from
all
community
members
interested
in
speaking
tonight.
The
public
hearing
will
be
closed
and
the
commission
will
deliberate
to
our
applicants
when
your
project
name
is
called.
A
Please
come
to
the
microphone
and
start
off
by
giving
the
name
and
address
of
any
members
of
the
applicant's
team,
that's
planning
to
speak
and
to
anyone
from
the
community
that
will
be
speaking
in
regard
to
a
project.
Tonight,
please
also
start
off
by
stating
your
name
and
address
for
our
records
just
for
anyone,
unfamiliar
with
the
form
format
of
a
public
hearing,
we'll
be
opening
the
microphone
to
solicit
public
comment
about
a
specific
projects
that
are
up
for
review.
Public
comments
should
be
directed.
A
To
members
of
the
Planning
Commission
and
staff,
and
not
directed
towards
the
applicant
directly,
it's
not
acceptable
for
any
member
of
the
public
to
enter
into
any
form
of
discussion
with
the
applicant
directly.
During
the
meeting,
the
commission
members
will
take
note
of
any
specific
questions
or
comments
that
come
up
during
the
public
comment
portion
of
the
meeting
and
when
there
are
no
additional
community
members
wishing
to
speak
about
the
project,
the
public
hearing
portion
of
the
meeting
will
be
closed
and
the
applicant
will
be
giving
a
chance
to
respond.
A
The
commission
members
will
ask
the
applicant
to
comment
on
any
questions
that
were
brought
up
by
the
community.
If
they
are
relevant
to
our
review,
it
will
again
not
be
acceptable
for
any
member
of
the
public
to
empty
to
attempt
to
enter
into
a
dialogue
with
the
applicant
while
they
respond
to
questions
or
comments
that
arose
during
the
public
hearing
all
right.
So
our
first
public
hearing
tonight
is
for
the
applicant
Stonebridge
campus
living
project
address
is
221
Washington
Street.
A
E
O
O
Let
me
know
this
is
regarding
the
basement
amenity
space
at
221,
Washington
Street
for
Stonebridge,
my
client
just
to
give
a
brief
overview.
This
is
a
a
fairly
large
space.
Approximately
3
600
square
feet
has
a
lot
of
potential
and
there's
multiple
potential
uses
that
can
be
developed
with
the
space.
O
Currently
there's
already
laundry
in
that
area
and
a
gym
space.
There
was
a
recreational
space
that
is
no
longer
being
used,
and
we
would
like
to
continue
to
use
that
for
a
partial
recreational
space
as
well
as
a
study
space,
and
we
just
want
to
impress
upon
the
commission
and
the
public.
O
We've
heard
the
concerns
from
the
last
hearing,
and
we
want
to
express
that
there's
new
ownership
for
this
building
and
they
want
to
convey
that
they
are
responsible,
proactive
owners
and
they
want
to
really
deter
any
of
the
problems
that
have
been
expressed
through
monitoring
and
increased
presence
and
really
try
to
change
the
perception
of
how
this
space
is
used
and
how
this
building
generally
interacts
with
the
community.
O
So
if
anybody
has
any
specific
questions,
I'd
be
happy
to
address
those
from
the
commission.
I,
do
I
realize
that
the
county
has
recently
provided
their
view
on
the
project
and
have
not
stated
any
significant
impacts
to
the
community.
B
Two
questions:
you
mentioned
new
ownership.
How
long
has
Stonebridge
campus
living
been
in
been
an
owner
of
the
221
Washington
Street
problem?
Thank.
K
You
August
of
2021,
so
we
took
over
in
August
and
then
the
convention
happened
in
February.
B
Okay,
so
at
least
nothing
else
for
this
entire
school
year
so
far,
I
think
that's!
Okay,
that's
correct!
Okay!
Second
question!
I
know
for
many
of
us
a
significant
issue
is
the
official
letter
from
the
chief
of
police
expressing
his
uncomfortableness.
If
that's
the
right
word
with
this
project,
have
you
guys
met
with
the
Binghamton
PD
to
address
their
concerns
because
I'm
not
seeing
any
new
letters
from
them.
O
Correct
we
have
been
in
correspondence
with
the
police
department
and
trying
to
engage
with
them.
We
have
not
received
any
response
and
we
don't
think
that
that
should
be
construed
as
something
in
the
negative
and
we
do
reviewing
our
letter.
I
do
understand
their
viewpoint
and
having
to
police
and
from
what
I
can
tell
is
their.
O
H
O
Have
members
of
the
community
and
in
particular
the
owners
at
217
219,
we
went
at
length
about
problems
going
on
outside
of
the
building,
so
really
it
does.
It
does
feel
that
you're
getting
negative
feedback
from
police
who
are
just
trying
to
do
their
job
and
I
can
understand
their
concerns
and
you're
getting
some
kind
of
broad
sweeping
claims
about
activities
that
are
going
on
in
the
street.
O
Well,
there
isn't
a
common
space
in
this
building
right
now
and
based
on
my
just
listening
to
the
commission
and
hearing
that
amenity
spaces
are
desired,
maybe
perhaps
based
on
the
59
Park
project.
O
I.
Don't
think
this
is
a
problem
with
the
space
per
se.
It
may
make
policing
a
little
more
difficult
as
any
interior
space,
but
Community
spaces,
common
spaces
and
buildings
do
Foster
healthy
environments
when
they're
done
when
they're
managed
correctly
and
when
you
have
correct
procedures
in
place
to
make
sure
that
students
are
conducting
themselves
appropriately
and
I.
Think
that's
what
this
owner
is
trying
to
express
through
their
measures
that
they
would
like
to
take
upon
the
commission's
approval
and.
Q
If
I
can
just
interrupt
for
a
second
on
behalf
of
Corporation
Council,
we
would
advise
both
the
applicant
and
the
police
chief,
as
is
our
common
practice,
that
those
two
entities
should
not
communicate
about
the
project
while
it's
pending
before
the
commission.
So
that
should
not
be
construed
against
the
applicant
and
the
police
chief.
Whether
or
not
it's
this
project
just
for
the
applicant's
information
as
well
as
Corporation
Council,
always
cites
safety
concerns
associated
with
any
basement
or
underground
social
space,
and
that
includes
in
our
state
liquor,
Authority
applications.
Q
A
So
what
do
you
think?
Is
there
a
solution
to
make
it
so
that
the
site
plan
or
the
plan
that
we
see
in
front
of
us
that
we
could
feel
comfortable
approving,
could
not
host
120
students,
drunkenly
partying
in
the
basement?
Is
there
a
way
you
could
break
up
that
space,
throw
up
a
wall
somewhere?
That
makes
it
so
that
just
you
couldn't
physically
do
it.
O
Absolutely
I
visited
the
Space
prior
to
this
meeting
and
discussed
with
the
owner
about
the
potential
of
this
space
and
because
there
are
multiple
uses
that
can
be
that
can
be
comprised
in
the
space
that,
through
partitioning
of
the
space,
it
can
be
done
in
a
way
that
I
really
think
adds
a
lot
of
potential
value
for
the
experience
of
those
students,
both
recreational
and
educational.
O
Also,
our
owners
don't
want
what
has
been
construed
as
nightclub
activity
going
on
in
this
basement.
I,
don't
think
anybody
wants
that
again.
I
think
the
concern
is
the
lack
of
regulation
of
the
activity
that's
going
on
in
this
space
and
the
owner's
doing
everything
that
they
think
a
responsible
owner
should
do
and
monitoring
that
space
and
some
of
the
proposals
that
have
been
laid
forth
in
our
recent
letters,
such
as
video
cameras
in
the
basement,
there's
already
been
a
camera
installed
in
the
lobby
of
this
building.
O
Now
that
monitors
who's
coming
in
and
out
of
the
building,
as
well
as
who
there's
the
basement
access
right
there,
so
you
can
see
who's
going
into
the
basement.
There's
there's
other
entrances
and
exits,
of
course,
and
those
would
also
be
monitored
through
cameras,
keyless
key
fobs
and
locks
and
more
secure
locks,
and
if
there
is
in
criminal,
inappropriate
behavior
going
on
at
this
building
certainly
way.
O
The
owner
would
like
to
be
aware
of
that
and
wouldn't
want
to
hear
about
it
in
this
venue
from
a
neighbor
and
would
be
very
willing
to
work
with
their
neighbors
and
respond
to
any
additional
recommendations
or
feedback
from
Neighbors
and
the
police
to
make
sure
that
this
is
an
appropriate
space
for
young
students.
Okay,.
A
All
right
so
right
now
we
still
have
in
front
of
us
a
plan
that
shows
a
giant
opener.
It's
even
labeled,
open
area.
Would
you
be
willing
to
submit
a
new
plan
that
just
breaks
it
up?
I
mean
sometimes
the
things
that
get
alleviate
our
concerns,
our
plans
that
show
gym
equipment
in
a
certain
area
or,
if
you're
planning,
to
put
TVs
on
the
wall
that
so
it
has
a
specifically
designed
use
or
function
Furniture
layout,
if
you're
going
to
put
Furniture
in
there.
It's
also
something
that
the
planning
department
can
use
in
the
future.
A
So
potentially
the
person
that
owns
the
building
now
may
not
be
the
same
person
a
year
from
now,
and
if
it's
left
there's
an
open
area,
we
could
have
the
same
problem
with
the
new
owner,
because
maybe
they
won't
care
about
what's
going
on
there.
But
if
we
have
a
site
plan
that
shows
how
it
was
supposed
to
be
broken
up
and
the
new
owner
tears
down
those
walls
and
then
there's
a
police
call
they'd
be
in
violation
of
their
approved
plan,
and
then
we
have
at
least
some
standing
to
go
after
them.
O
Yeah
I
think
that's
a
very
reasonable
request.
If
we
haven't
submitted
anything
of
that
nature
and
you
need
more
specific
detail,
we
can
certainly
provide
that
and
we
feel
confident
that
you
know
a
lot
of
these
small
changes
will
make
a
big
difference
with
this
building
and
really
change
the
attitude
and
perception
of
what's
up
from
the
students
who
live
there
and
also
the
neighbors
who
live,
who
live
next
to
them.
Okay,.
A
All
right
so
you're
willing
to
do
that
all
right,
well,
I
was
just
reminded
that
I
think
we
have
a
public
hearing
to
to
do
for
this
to
see
if
anybody
wants
to
speak
about
it,
but
it's
probably
good
to
cover
that
before
we
open
the
public
hearing,
because
it
sounds
like
you're
headed
in
a
direction
that
some
people
might
be
happy
with.
A
So
from
my
memory
we
left
the
public
hearing
open
last
time.
That's.
A
Right,
so
this
is
a
continuation
of
the
public
hearing
from
the
last
meeting,
so
we'll
ask
you
guys
to
sit
off
to
the
side
and
we'll
open
the
microphone.
So
this
is
a
public
hearing
for
the
applicant
Stonebridge
campus
living
the
project
address
is
221
Washington
Street.
This
is
a
site
plan,
modification
to
add
basement
social
assembly
space
to
multi-unit
dwelling
with
12
existing
units
and
45
total
bedrooms
in
the
C2
downtown
business
district.
R
Hi
good
evening,
my
name
is
Thomas
matrevsky,
that's
m-a-r-c-z-e-w-s-k-I,
I
live
at
217,
Washington,
Street
and
I've
been
a
resident
there
for
about
four
years
now.
I
can
all
matters
inside
of
perception
and
attitude.
R
Our
hypothetical.
What
I
have
seen
and
experienced
is
not
hypothetical
they're,
not
perception,
they're,
not
attitudes.
They.
This
building
has
been
used
as
a
party
house,
and
it's
rented
out
to
students
who
like
to
party
and
they
party
hard
and
that
space
recreational
study.
They
are
not
watching
Alfred,
Hitchcock
movies
and
analyzing
the
cinematography.
This
is
not
going
to
happen.
R
This
is
not
what
these
students
are
interested
using
the
space
for
and
I've
seen
things
I,
don't
want
to
describe
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
really
really
want
to
make
sure
that
these
aren't
perceptions.
These
aren't,
oh,
they
just
think
they
have
a
misperception
that
this
will
go
away.
R
H
S
S
Thank
you
for
having
us
again.
I
just
want
to
show
our
faces
one
more
time
and
we'll
be
able
to
do
all
the
Commissioners
who
will
make
the
right
choice
and
listen
to
what
we
have
to
say
and
refer
to
all
the
documents
that
we
have
brought
submitted
previously.
S
Also,
there's
a
sorry
if
there's
a
proposal
to
change
the
space
or
or
how
would
I
raise
this
to
use
it
in
a
different
manner
than
it
was
used
so
far,
is
there
a
way
for
them
to
guarantee
that
there
will
be
no
alcohol
use
in
that
space
because
I
operate
a
similar
establishment,
but
I
also
answered
to
New
York
state
liquor,
Authority
and
also
New
York,
State,
Police
and
everybody
else
that
wants
to
come
in.
So
it's
one
of
my
concerns
all
right,
but.
F
S
Appreciate
your
time
and
thank.
A
E
F
E
A
Right
a
couple
of
a
couple
of
statements
there
and
then
a
few
from
the
last
meeting,
but
all
right
so
you're
running
a
party
house.
Do
you
wanna
respond
to
that
or.
N
J
O
This
this
building
has
a
history
of
that
activity
and
that's
something
that
this
owner
is
trying
to
change
through
some
of
these
mechanisms
and
measures.
Again,
some
of
the
ideas
that
have
been
proposed
by
the
applicant
has
been
designed
to
deter
some
of
that
activity
and
to
also
Monitor
and
document
any
inappropriate
activity
in
the
event
that
something
like
that
does
happen.
O
This
is
a
this
problem
of
underage
drinking
I.
Think
is
a
problem
of
all
college
campuses,
Beyond,
a
specific
building,
okay,.
O
Well,
the
tenants
are
are
aware
of
the
community
feedback:
okay,
the
fact
that
I'm
now
involved,
they
don't
want
to
lose
the
space
and
they
like
the
fact
that
this
could
be
a
really
a
potentially
great
space
for
them
to
use
and
I
think
would
be
fundamentally
unfair
to
deny
them
that
opportunity
to
have
this
space
now
with
those
those
measures
in
place,
such
as
better
security,
better
monitoring,
a
boost
coming
in
and
out
cameras,
I
think
we
all
agree
that
when
we're
on
camera,
you
behave
differently,
because
we
know
that
it
can
be
caught
if
we
do
something
wrong
and
I
think
that
that
would
have
a
significant
impact,
significant
impact
and
again
using
the
space
for
a
multi-purpose
venue
for
working
out
or
studying
or
watching
movies
for
hanging
out
and
using
it
as
a
recreational
basis
as
well.
O
That
really
does
kind
of
you
know
change
what
the
space
is.
Essentially,
it
really
does
and
looking
at
today,
I
went
down
there
today,
it's
it's
an
empty
room
and
it
looked
like
there
have
been
some
parties
down
there.
Well,
when
you
have
it
again,
I
think
if
you
subscribe
to
you
know
these
broken
window
theories
or
just
changing
the
perception
of
a
space
through
better
accommodations
and
do
better
ownership
and
management.
O
H
O
Owner
does
want
to
be
proactive
and
listen
to
this
commission
and
listen
to
The
Neighbors
on
what
reasonable
things
can
be
done
to
make
sure
that
this
space
is,
is
a
good
space
for
this
group
and
also
provides
a
healthy
learning
environment.
Okay,.
O
Was
a
oh
go
ahead?
One
final
comment
from
the
client
yeah
they've
been
since
this
space
has
been
condemned.
They've
been
just
on
this
point
of
Regulation
they've,
while
there's
laundry
in
the
building
just
so
just
to
demonstrate
how
important
it
is
to
make
sure
that
these
the
students
understand
that
they're
being
monitored
and
regulated,
they
can't
use
the
laundry
space
outside
of
regular
business
hours.
O
So,
if
they're
working
studying
late,
if
they're
not
getting
their
laundry
done
on
time-
and
they
want
to
do
laundry
in
the
middle
of
the
night
as
I
may
have
been
guilty
of
as
a
college
student,
they
don't
have
that
option
right
now.
Okay,
they
have
to
use
that
space
under
regular
business
hours
nobody's
allowed
in
that
space
right
now
outside
of
normal
business
hours,
and
there
will
be
a
regulated
hour
regulated
hours
at
some
point
once
this
space
is
approved
and
used.
O
O
I
think
that's
again,
I
think
that's
a
problem
with
any
environment,
whether
it's
a
bar,
whether
it's
a
hotel,
whether
it's
a
dorm
room
and
how
do
you?
How
do
you
prevent
that
again
through
monitoring
through
deterrence
through
being
a
proactive
responsible
owner
and
by
keeping
the
space
in
a
condition
that
makes
people
want
to
live
there
rather
than
party
there?
Okay,.
Q
O
Miss
anything
in
terms
of
proactive
monitoring
is
this
24
7
closed
circuit
camera
with
oh
I,
think
there's
a
seven
day,
I
believe
there
will
be
a
seven
to
seven
day
tape
record
to
go
back
and
again.
If
there's
an
issue,
we
can
look
and
see
what
happened.
Currently,
oh
I'm.
Sorry.
Q
I
do
if
that's
the
case
since
you're,
going
to
submit
a
revised
site
plan
with
some
of
the
furniture
or
televisions
or
whatever
else
you
you're
planning
on
using
for
the
space.
You
may
want
to
also
indicate
the
location
of
those
cameras,
whether
or
not
they're,
external
or
also
internal,
on
on
that
basement
space
that
we're
talking
about.
O
Correct
there
will
be
internal
and
there
is
already
an
external
camera
in
the
lobby.
I.
O
Q
F
O
O
That's
with
regulating
how
the
laundry
space
is
being
used
once
you
partition
this
space,
so
it
isn't
an
empty
room
and
once
you
have
cameras
inside
that
space,
I
really
think
that
that
sends
a
message
to
anyone
in
that
space
that
it's
designed
for
certain
activities
that
are
appropriate,
that
and
and
not
they're,
not
interested
in
continuing
activity
that
may
have
caused
some
of
the
issues
previously.
P
How
about
comment
about
you've
owned
it
for
just
over
a
year?
P
O
Yes,
either
I've
spoken
with
my
client
about
that,
because
I've
listened
to
a
lot
of
the
concerns
from
the
from
the
last
hearing
and
I
wanted
to
understand.
I've
seen
some
of
the
correspondences
that
we've
tried
to
have
with
the
police
department.
My
understanding
is
the
only
police
issues
that
have
transpired
relate
to
noise,
yeah
and
I
assume
that
that
had
to
do
with
again
parties
after
hours,
which
is
something
that
we're
trying
to
stop
with
some
of
our
measures.
But.
O
I've
been
told
that
the
last
time
was
in
February
yeah,
the
the
the
area
has
been
condemned
since
February,
and
also
the
this
just
by
the
way,
I
believe
the
the
basement
was
condemned,
not
for
the
partying,
but
because
there
was
a
problem
with
the
first
floor,
support
beams
and
an
inspector
needed
to
have
a
visual
inspection
of
those
by
going
into
the
basement
and
realized
that
the
basement
was
out
was
violating
code
and
without
a
certificate
of
occupancy,
and
so
it
wasn't
that
there
was
some
horrible
thing
that
had
happened
that
caused
the
basement
to
be
condemned.
O
It's
just
there's
been
some
history
of
complaints
from
some
of
the
neighbors,
but
nothing
recently
I've
heard
some
pretty
serious
allegations
being
made
about
what
has
happened
near
this
building
or
from
tenants
of
this
building.
I,
don't
know
if
that
is
actually
the
case.
O
If
you
can
tie
this
building
to
some
of
those
activities,
because
I've
been
I've,
heard,
references
to
kind
of
larger
events
such
as
Santa
Con
and
this
pub
crawl
and
I
believe
there
was
a
young
lady
who
ended
up
in
the
somewhere
and
so
I.
Don't
think
that
she
was
a
tenant
there.
O
Maybe
she
was
attending,
we
don't
know,
but
the
neighbors
who
have
raised
these
issues
again,
I
think
it's
just
this
perception
concern
that
continues
to
be
raised
without
concrete
examples,
but
if
there
are
concrete
examples
tied
to
the
tenets
of
this
building,
this
owner
is
going
to
be
very
proactive
in
making
sure
that
any
bad
apples
do
not
cause
systemic
problems
with
the
community
or
with
the
building
foreign.
E
A
Yeah
Mario
is
just
pointing
out
that
we
do
we
well
if
everybody's
in
agreement,
we
do
need
to
see
a
revised
plan
before
we
can
make
a
decision
anyway.
So
we're
probably
going
to
table
this
until
the
next
meeting.
C
A
couple
years
ago
we
had
I
think
I.
Think
a
couple
years
ago
before
this
group,
a
group
came
in
to
propose
a
project
at
the
corner
of
state
and
Court
was
a
hookah
bar
and
it
was
in
the
basement,
and
there
was
a
very
long
review
by
the
fire
marshal
and
the
police
department
and
I
think
in
the
end.
That
project
did
not
go
forward.
C
I
I,
don't
remember
if
we
what
our
vote
was,
but
any
my
view
of
a
project
that
would
be
in
the
basement
is
all
about
safety,
the
issues
of
what
the
the
perceptions
or
the
what
people
actually
saw
at
night
and
then
parties,
I,
I,
can't
personally
agree
or
disagree,
because
I
wasn't
there
to
see
anything
but
I
do
know,
as
perhaps
as
Dylan
would
remember
from
other
experiences
working
with
him.
C
If
this
were
on
the
first
or
first
floor
of
the
building,
where
there
were
windows
or
fire
escapes,
then
it's
a
different
issue,
but
any
group
of
50
or
100
people
in
the
basement
and
they
Luca
Bar
I-
think
he
had
two
or
three
exits
but
still
raised
and
again,
if
I'm
wrong
correctly
raised
a
lot
of
concerns
from
the
fire
marshal.
So
it
that
would
be
I
would
have
to
be
convinced
that
link
that
anything
that
you
propose
has
been
screened
through
every
possible
City
agency.
E
J
I
appreciate
the
applicant
coming
here
and
go
on
the
back
for
her
tenants,
but
this
is
the
second
month
in
a
row
that
you've
had
a
public
meeting
open
to
the
public
public
comment,
and
not
one
of
your
tenants
has
bothered
to
show
up
and
you've
repeatedly
said
how
important
this
is
to
them.
I
am
much
more
swayed
by
your
neighbors
who've,
taken
time
out
of
their
busy
schedules
to
come
down
to
voice
Therapies,
just
food
for
thought.
B
Q
From
as
a
general
matter-
and
this
is
going
to
sound,
very
lawyerly-
okay-
so
please
forgive
me-
I
I
typically
advise
the
police
chief
to
have
as
few
conversations
with
applicants
or
potential
applicants
as
possible
as
I.
Think.
The
commissioner
eloquently
stated
the
fire
marshal
office
of
Code
Enforcement.
Those
departments
that
have
jurisdiction
over
the
actual
structure
of
a
building
are
far
better
to
address.
Prospective
safety
concerns.
The
chief
can
speak
to
a
police
record
that
existed
in
the
past,
but
not
necessarily
to
how
it
exists
in
the
future.
Q
So
again,
I
can
speak
with
Brian
and
see
if
he
will
agree
with
me
about
that.
But
I
would
typically
advise
police
chief
zakoski
not
to
only
comment
on
documented
crimes
and
then
potential
safety
risks,
as
associated
with
like
a
basement
space,
as
we
would
in
an
SLA
application
and
to
speak
very
generally
about
that
structure,
not
specifically
about
a
particular
project.
If
that
makes
sense.
B
It
does
so
here's
my
question:
how
do
the
applicants
get
this
letter
to
go
away
or
is
this
is
the
correct
answer?
If
it's
in
the
basement,
the
letter
is
never
going
to
go
away,
I
think
we
should
we
shouldn't.
We
shouldn't
lead
the
applicant
on
that
dance
around
for
six
months
with
a
if
zakoski's
letter
will
never
go
away.
If
it's
a
question
of
the
police
will
always
object
to
a
basement
assembly
space,
we
should
make
that
clear
to
the
applicant,
so
they
don't
waste
their
high
priced
attorney's,
valuables
High.
B
Q
That
make
sense
it
does
with
all
due
respect
to
the
to
the
applicant
and
into
this
commission.
I.
Think
some
of
the
concerns
that
were
raised
by
the
commission
and
the
applicant's
ideas
about
how
to
enhance
safety
measures
at
property
right
might
influence
the
chief's
perspective
on
the
level
of
safety
risk.
I
would
never
pretend
to
speak
for
the
chief.
B
It
does
my
second
thought
is
this:
you
have
neighbors
who've
spoken
out
two
months
in
a
row,
and
I
want
to
be
very
fair,
but
whether
it's
you
as
the
owner
or
your
tenants
are
not
good
neighbors
right
now,
it
might
be
in
your
interest
to
be
a
better
neighbor
for
a
few
months,
so
these
people
are
happier
and
not
coming
to
meetings
expressing
these
concerns.
If
you
had
a
track
record
of
being
a
good
neighbor
over
a
course
of
months
or
a
year,
it
might
influence
how
we
view
these
concerns.
O
Addressing
any
other
yeah,
you
can
say
whatever
you
want.
Yeah,
okay,
I'm,
not
sure
that
some
of.
O
Raised
by
the
neighbors
are,
are
recent
concerns
I
think
some
of
them
may
date
back
to
years
prior
and
if
there
are
specific
concerns
that
have
occurred
recently,
I
certainly
like
to
be
made
aware
of
that,
as
well
as
the
applicant
to
try
to
address
those
concerns,
because
we
do
want
to
make
a
change
immediately
and
part
of
this
process
is
making
concrete
changes
to
this
space
and
to
the
gentleman
to
your
left
regarding
the
hookah
bar
I
think
basements
present
challenges.
O
No
doubt
I
think
the
only
difference
that
I
would
raise
with
this
particular
space
is
that
it's
not
a
commercial
space.
It's
not
for
public
use.
It's
not
going
to
be
used
as
a
party
house,
a
nightclub
or
anything
of
that
nature
and
there's
going
to
be
measures
taken
and
implemented
and
have
already
been
implemented
to
make
sure
that
doesn't
happen.
And
if
safety
is
the
primary
concern,
I
think
that's
valid
and
we
will
continue
to
work
with
the
agencies.
O
The
fire
department
I'm
not
sure
the
fire
department,
is
able
to
provide
an
opinion
on
the
space
until
it
is
approved,
but
we
will
continue
to
work
with
them
between
now
and
the
next
hearing
to
try
to
to
get
some
of
that.
Well,
I'll
also
speak
with
the
applicant
about
whether
or
not
some
of
the
tenants
can
come
down
so
that
they
can
explain
why
this
space
is
also
important.
I
think
that
that
would
be
helpful
to
this
commission
as
well.
O
O
And
if
there
are
any
other
safety
monitoring
deterrent
mechanisms
that
haven't
been
mentioned,
that
this
commission
would
like
to
include
in
any
potential
C
in
any
potential
new
site
proposal
or,
if
there's
any
concerns
that
were
expressed
from
the
public
generally,
that
you
would
like
to
see
included.
I
think
the
owner
would
be
very
open
and
accommodating
to
present
that,
so
that
this
commission
could
have
all
the
information
possible
to
make
a
fairer
grueling.
And
all
we're
asking
is
for
is-
is
that
the
process
proceed
in
a
fair
fashion.
E
A
All
right
in
the
interest
of
not
wasting
the
applicant's
time
is
a
revised
plan
worth
them
completing,
or
can
we
give
them
an
answer
now?
For
me,
a
revised
plan
certainly
would
be
worth,
but
I
would
potentially
change
my
mind.
Seeing
a
revised
plans.
Q
C
F
C
D
Can
be
a
similar
plan,
it
should
be
drawn
to
scale,
have
Dimension
show
Ingress
and
egress
of
the
space
Sharon
recommended
that
it
should
show
camera
locations.
D
And
then
one
thing
that
that
the
planning
department
would
like
to
see
is
that
if,
if
the
space
is
going
to
be
separated
into
different
uses
that
there
be
actual
physical
partitions
so
that
no
one
room
can
host
a
large
occupancy,
because
we've
had
issues
in
the
past
where
a
floor
plan
will
show
labels
for
different
types
of
uses
on
a
space.
But
it's
still
one
large
open
space,
and
then
that
becomes
a
party
room
in
the
future.
So
we
would
just
ask
that
the
different
uses
be
physically
partitioned.
C
Again,
just
excuse
my
ignorance
about
the
building.
Is
there
eating
or
cooling
boiler
in
the
basement
with
the
is
there
any
heating
or
cooling
boilers
in
the
basement
or
utilities,
natural
gas
that
might
require
firewalls
or
any
any
separation
from
a
space
I.
K
C
That
that's
the
kind
of
thing
that
might
be
on
a
drawing
that
might
help
them
review
if
you're
not
going
to
assembly
stationary
a
million
btu
gasps.
E
A
A
Right
so
I'm
going
to
make
a
motion
to
reopen
the
public
hearing
all
right,
second,
by
Chris,
all
in
favor,
all
right,
six
in
favor,
zero
opposed
all
right
and
I'll
make
a
motion
to
table
the
project
until
the
December
meeting
at
5
40ish
and
give
you
a
chance
to
resubmit
new
plans,
all
right
motion,
second
by
Manny,
all
in
favor,
all
right,
six
in
favor
zero
boost
all
right,
we'll
see
you
back
in
December!
A
F
A
Right,
so
our
next
public
hearing
is
going
to
be
for
the
applicant
Kearney,
Realty
and
Development
Group
project
address
is
162
180
and
184
to
186
Henry,
Street
and
77
Pine
Street.
This
is
a
site
plan
review
and
special
use
permit
for
the
construction
of
a
mixed
juice,
building
with
65
dwelling
units
and
4
300
square
feet
of
commercial
space
and
one
ancillary
parking
area
in
the
C4
neighborhood
commercial
district
and
R2.
One
and
two
unit,
dwelling
district
and
Mario
has
something
to
say.
P
Okay,
since
the
Dapper
young
man
sitting
in
front
of
us,
is
my
nephew,
I'm
gonna.
What's
that
that's
that's
kind
of
comfortable
I'm
going
to
recuse
myself
from
this
from
this,
this
guy
all.
D
E
H
So
I'm,
just
gonna
I'm,
not
gonna,
start
over
I.
Think
everybody
was
here
at
the
last
meeting,
but
I
do
want
to
highlight
the
changes,
most
of
which
were,
you
know,
discussed
proactively
a
month
ago,
so
first
before
I
forget
the
229
Court
Street
parcel
was
removed
from
the
application
only
because
it
was
ended
up
not
being
available
from
the
city,
so
that
costs
us
11
parking
spaces.
H
Three:
zero
three
zero
plus
we
still
have
the
10
on
Henry
Street
at
the
one
162
Henry
I,
think
it's
162
Henry
down
the
street.
That
was
part
of
the
original
application
we
saw
those
times.
So
we
have
a
total
of
40.
off-street
parking
spaces.
H
We
did
get
our
the
required
area.
Variances
were
granted
last
week
by
the
zoning
board.
H
Garbage
was
a
big
concern
both
here
and
at
the
zoning
board.
So
in
the
new
materials
we
submitted,
you'll
see
on
the
floor
plan
about
well
not
about
what
exactly
in
this
area
the
building
and
the
first
level,
the
first
residential
level
you'll
see
an
interior
garbage
space
and
we
added
the
retaining
wall
and
exit
on
the
east
side
of
the
building,
with
a
walkway
North
out
to
Henry
Street.
So
we
know
that
the
garbage
on
Pine,
you
know,
was
a
big
concern,
a
bolt
board
and
some
of
the
public
comment
that
was
made.
H
H
We
submitted
a
summary
and
report
of
our
findings
based
on
a
shade
study
we
did
and
I
will
get
into
details
of
basically
I
found
that
the
combination
of
removing
the
trees
required
for
the
new
building
construction
in
the
in
the
building
the
construction
of
the
new
building.
While
it
may
shade
those
panels,
some
there's
a
net
positive
effect
of
the
project
done
on
Mr
Leonard,
Mr,
Leonard,
solar
panel.
H
And
then
the
only
other
change
is
in
addition
to
the
interior
bike:
rack,
the
I'm,
sorry,
bicycle
storage,
room.
On
the
first
floor
of
the
building,
we
did
add
three
bike:
rack
stations
along
Henry
and
one
on
Pine
Henry.
You
know
we
thought
it
was
a
good
idea
and
agreed
with
the
board
and
the
staff
that
you
know
the
commercial
space
you
know
having
some
exterior
spots
and
Landing
spots
or
bicycles.
It's
a
good
thing,
so
those
have
been
added
other
than
that
I'll.
Take
any
questions
and
go
from
there.
B
Not
so
much
a
well
I
guess
a
question.
I
guess
I
mean
thank
you
for
working
with
the
rebel
ponies
that
memo
you
can
be
uploaded
and
sent
to
the
planning.
Maybe
it
was
and
I
missed
it.
Yeah.
B
H
J
H
So
the
way
the
zoning
board,
the
intent
is
that
they
would
maintain
the
30
spaces.
In
fact,
they
had
to
start
somewhere
in
about
15
years
with
the
long
enough
leaves,
as
you
can
see,
in
the
correspondence
provided,
it's
being
paid
for
up
front
and
it's
a
significant
cost.
So,
but
we've
also
talked
about,
as
other
Parcels
may
become
available
in
the
in
the
area.
There
may
be
opportunity
to
you
know,
obtain
additional
parts
or
obtain
additional
parcels
and
provide
additional
parking
that
they
directly
control,
at
which
point
I
think.
H
E
H
H
You
know
912
or
whatever
it
was,
and
you
can
see
in
the
materials
provided
we
did
it
once
with
actually
a
kind
of
a
conservative
tree
canopy
compared
to
what's
actually
there
at
some
assumed
height
for
those
trees.
We
were
conservative
on
that
as
well.
We
didn't
I,
didn't
climb
them
climb
them
with
a
tape
measure,
but
just
looking
off
Google
Earth
and
we
have
a
pictometry
program
as
well,
where
we
can
measure
some
things
off,
aerial
imagery.
H
You
know
we
got
a
conservative
tree
canopy
height,
so
we
put
that
in
that
mass
in
and
and
we
had
the
model
run
for
a
year,
and
it
basically
tells
you
know
what
what
is
the
output
of
the
panels
at
their
location
with
with
these
obstruction,
and
then
we
ran
it
again
with
those
trees
removed
with
the
building
inserted
the
new
building
inserted,
and
it
tells
us
basically
a
little
bit
different.
So
we
don't
have
the
specifics
on
on
Mr
Leonard's
panels.
H
So
we
couldn't
say
you
know,
we
I
can't
give
you
a
number
on
the
the
energy
production,
but
we
were
able
to
give
a
accurate
number
on
the
solar
access
of
the
site.
So
currently
it's
86,
86.4
percent
and
after
the
removal
of
the
trees
and
construction
of
the
building,
would
be
at
96.2
and
a
lot.
A
lot
comes
into
play
there,
for
instance,
a
lot
of
the
time
that
our
building
will
be
shading.
Those
panels
will
be
in
the
evening
and
the
sun's
very
low,
particularly
in
the
summer.
H
A
A
good
clarification
all
right,
any
other
questions
before
we
open
public
hearing
all
right.
So
let's
open
the
public
hearing
and
see
if
anybody's
here,
to
talk
about
the
project.
So
this
is
the
public
hearing
for
Kearney
Realty
and
Development
Group.
The
project
address
is
162,
180
and
184
to
186
Henry
Street,
as
well
as
77
Pine
Street.
This.
J
A
A
site
plan
review
and
special
use
permit
for
the
construction
of
a
mixed-use
building
with
65
dwelling
units
and
4
300
square
feet
of
commercial
space
and
one
ancillary
parking
area
in
the
C4
neighborhood
commercial,
district
and
r21,
and
two
unit
dwelling
District
all
right.
If
there's
anybody
who
would
like
to
speak
about
the
project,
please
come
to
the
microphone.
A
Looks
like
nobody's
here
to
speak
about
your
project,
Dominic,
all
right
in
that
case,
we'll
close
the
public
hearing
for
this
project.
Any
last
questions
comments,
concerns.
A
A
We
determined
this
was
a
Seeker,
unlisted
action
and
so
I
will
make
a
motion
for
a
negative
declaration
under
Seeker
based
on
the
following.
Will
the
proposed
action
create
a
material
conflict
with
an
adopted
land
use
plan
or
zoning
regulation?
No?
Well,
the
proposed
action
result
in
a
change
in
the
use
of,
or
intensity
of
use
of,
land,
a
no
or
small
impact
will
the
proposed
action
impair
the
character
or
quality
of
the
existing
community?
No
or
small
impact?
A
Will
the
proposed
action
have
an
impact
on
the
environmental
characteristics
that
cause
the
establishment
of
a
critical
environmental
area?
No
well.
The
proposed
action
result
in
an
adverse
change
in
the
existing
level
of
traffic
or
affect
existing
infrastructure
for
mass
transit
biking
or
walkway,
no
or
small
impact.
Will
the
proposed
action
cause
an
increase
in
the
use
of
energy
and
it
fails
to
incorporate
reasonably
available
energy
conservation
or
renewable
energy
opportunities?
No,
will
the
proposed
Action
Impact
existing
public
or
private
Water,
Supplies
or
public
or
private
wastewater
treatment
utilities?
No.
A
Will
the
proposed
action
impair
the
character
or
quality
of
important
historic,
archaeological,
architectural
or
aesthetic
resources?
Know
our
small
impact
with
a
proposed
action
result
in
an
adverse
change
to
Natural
Resources,
no
or
small
impact?
Well,
the
proposed
action
result
in
an
increase
in
the
potential
for
erosion,
flooding
or
drainage
problems.
No,
and
will
the
proposed
action
create
a
hazard
to
environmental
resources
for
human
health?
No
So,
based
on
all
those
I'll,
make
a
motion
for
a
negative
declaration
seconded
by
Joe,
all
in
favor
all
right.
A
A
All
right,
we
thought
it
would
never
happen,
but
we're
to
our
last
public
hearing
and
final
deliberation.
This
is
for
the
applicant
United
group,
Pike
development.
Joint
venture
project
address
is
183
Water
Street.
This
is
a
site
plan
review
and
special
use
permit
for
the
construction
of
a
10-story
building
with
a
549
vehicle,
public
parking
garage
and
120
upper
story.
Dwelling
units
in
the
C2
downtown
business
district.
H
O
Can
give
his
address
yeah
sorry
he's
had
to
grab
my
pen
there,
my
guest
Circle
Pike
development,
20,
Loudonville,
Road,
Albany,
New,
York.
H
E
H
So
I
don't
know
if
everyone
was
here
for
the
previous
presentation,
but
we
did
present
this
at
last
month's
meeting,
and
so
there
have
been
some
minor
changes
to
the
project.
Although
they
may
seem
significant
from
the
exterior.
H
H
F
S
H
A
H
So
the
variances
have
not
been
approved.
We
are
on
the
PCA
schedule
for
December,
6th
I,
believe
or
sorry
is
that
the
the
fifth
or
the
sixth.
D
It's
in
early
December,
but
as
far
as
the
procedure,
because
this
is
a
type
one
action
and
it's
coordinated
review,
the
Planning
Commission
at
this
point
would
be
able
to
vote
on
Seeker.
However,
a
final
decision
should
be
tabled
until
after
the
zba
makes
their
decision
and
they
haven't
been
able
to
make
a
decision,
because
secret
hasn't
been
done
by
you
all
so,
okay
sort
of
a
chicken
and
egg
thing
all
right.
So.
D
It
was
a
long
list
of
comments,
but
the
gist
of
it
was
that,
in
their
opinion,
the
Planning
Commission
should
hold
off
on
making
a
final
decision
which
again
you
can't
do
tonight
anyway
without
a
traffic
impact
study
and
documentation
that
the
design
conforms
that
the
city's
historic
design
guidelines
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
Cod
does
have
to
review
this
design,
and
so
they'll
have
to
document
that
to
Cod
that
they're
that
they're
meeting
that
they're
conforming
with
the
guidelines.
D
As
far
as
the
traffic
impact
study,
that's
a
recommendation
from
the
county
because
they
anticipate
over
a
hundred
trips
per
day
to
this
one
location
and
that's
sort
of
a
threshold
that
they
go
by,
but
again
that
that's
a
recommendation.
The
Planning
Commission
can
or
can
or
may
not
choose
to
to
ask
for
that
information.
Okay,.
E
J
A
B
Procedural
question
for
Sharon
Tito,
given
that
we
can't
make
a
final
deliberation
tonight
based
on
what
you
just
described,
should
we
close
the
public
hearing
or
should
we
be
tabling
it
to
the
impossibly
be
open
next
month
when
these
other
things
come
in?
If.
E
A
Right
all
right,
so
this
is
the
public
hearing
for
the
applicant
United
group,
slash
Pike
development.
Joint
venture
project
address
is
183
Water
Street.
This
is
the
site
plan
review
and
special
use
permit
for
the
construction
of
a
10-story
building
with
a
549
vehicle,
public
parking
garage
and
120
upper
story,
dwelling
units
in
the
C2
downtown
business
district.
A
A
D
When
there's
a
new
curb
opening,
the
city
has
to
amend
the
city's
traffic
code,
and
so
it
has
to
go
to
the
traffic
board.
For
that
purpose,
the
traffic
board
likes
to
have
the
planning
commission's
decisions
on
hand
when
they're
making
a
decision
so
I
don't
think
you
necessarily
have
to
rely
on
the
trapping
board.
Okay,.
A
All
right,
so
this
was
a
type
one
action
under
Seeker,
so
we'll
leave
a
slightly
different
checklist.
I'll
make
a
motion
for
a
negative
declaration
under
Seeker
based
on
the
following
number.
One
impact
on
land
proposed
action
may
involve
construction
on
or
physical
alteration
of
the
land
surface
of
the
proposed
site.
A
Yes,
but
it'll
have
a
no
or
small
impact
impact
on
geological
features.
The
proposed
action
may
result
in
the
modification
or
destruction
of
or
inhibit
access
to
any
unique
or
unusual
landforms
on
the
site,
no
impacts
on
surface
water.
The
proposed
action
may
affect
one
or
more
Wetlands
or
other
surface
water
bodies.
Nowhere
small
impact
impact
on
groundwater.
The
proposed
action
may
result
in
New
Or,
additional
use
of
groundwater
or
have
the
potential
to
introduce
contaminants
to
groundwater
or
an
aquifer,
no
impact
on
flooding.
H
I
believe
it's
in
the
500-year
floodplain,
okay.
A
So
the
answer
to
that
is
yes,
but
this
has
no
or
small
impact
on
that
impact
on
air.
The
proposed
action
may
include
a
state-regulated
air
emission
Source,
no
impact
impact
on
plants
and
animals.
The
proposed
action
may
result
in
a
loss
of
Flora
or
fauna.
Nowhere
small
impact
impact
on
agricultural
resources.
The
proposed
action
may
impact
agricultural
resources
No,
in
fact,
on
aesthetic
resources.
A
The
land
use
of
the
proposed
action
are
obviously
different
from
or
in
sharp
contrast
to
current
land
use
patterns
between
the
proposed
project
and
a
Scenic
or
aesthetic
resource,
no
impact
on
historic
or
archaeological
resources.
The
proposed
action
may
occur
in
or
adjacent
to
a
historic
or
archaeological
resource,
yes,
but
it
has
a
no
or
small
impact
on
that
resource.
A
Impact
on
open
space
and
Recreation,
the
proposed
action
may
result
in
a
loss
of
recreational
opportunities
or
a
reduction
of
an
open
space
resource.
That's
designated
in
an
adopted
Municipal,
open
space
plan,
no
impact
on
critical
environmental
areas.
The
proposed
action
may
be
located
within
or
adjacent
to
a
critical
environmental
area,
no
impact
on
Transportation.
The
proposed
action
may
result
in
a
change
to
existing
Transportation
Systems.
Nowhere
small
impact,
that's.
D
A
The
proposition
may
result
in
a
change
to
existing
Transportation
Systems.
So
yes,
but
it
will,
does
anybody
disagree
that
it'll
have
minimal
impact
no
or
minimal
impact,
or
do
you
want
to
talk
about
that?
Yeah
all
right
looks
like
everyone's
okay
with
that.
A
Almost
said
the
exact
same
thing
before
you
pop
down
the
microphone
all
right
impact
on
energy,
the
proposed
action
may
result
in
an
increase
in
the
use
of
any
form
of
energy,
no
or
small
impact.
A
In
fact,
noise
odor
and
light
the
proposed
action
may
result
in
an
increase
in
noise,
odors
or
outdoor
lighting,
potentially
with
outdoor
lighting,
but
it'll
have
no
or
minimal
impact,
because
it's
basically
replacing
the
exact
same
use
with
the
new
use
impact
on
human
health.
The
proposed
action
may
have
an
impact
on
human
health,
from
exposure
to
new
or
existing
sources
of
contaminants,
no
consistency
with
Community
plans.
The
proposed
action
is
not
consistent
with
adopted
land
use
plans.
A
A
C
The
existing
parking
garage
that
was
there
had
a
collection
system
for
when
snow,
melted,
taking
all
the
water
through
the
solar
system.
Are
you
going
for
like
a
lead
certification
or
what
are
you
going
to
do
with
the
Rook?
Well,
water?
Is
that
going
into
the
sewer
system,
or
are
you
gonna,
because
that
that's
something
that
would
be
in
it
a
benefit
that
that
was
not
all
going
back
the
same
way
so.
O
I'd
say
roughly
two-thirds
of
the
parking
garage
is
actually
going
to
be
covered
by
the
apartment
building.
That's
on
top
of
it.
So
there's
only
a
small
part
of
the
garage
that
will
be
exposed
to
the
snow
collection.
So
there's
no
plan
for
a
snowmelt
system.
The
snow
would
be
managed
in
coordination
with
the
city
and
you
know
stockpiled
as
appropriate,
but
all
the
runoff
would
be
similar
to
the
old
structure.
A
Right
all
right
so
negative
declaration
for
Seeker
for
a
second
second
by
Manny,
all
in
favor
all
right.
That's
six
in
favor,
zero
opposed
and
we've
been
advised
not
to
rule
on
the
site,
plan,
review
or
special
use
permit
until
after
the
zoning
board
has
made
their
decision.
So
I'll
make
a
motion.
Unless
anybody
has
anything
else,
they
want
to
add
all
right.
I'll
make
a
motion
to
table
the
project
until
the
next
meeting,
all
right.
Second,
by
Chris,
all
in
favor,
all
right.
Six
in
favor,
zero,
post.
H
A
All
right,
that's
everything
on
the
agenda,
except
for
other
business,
not
to
keep
us
here
too
long,
but
Tito.
What
is
going
on
with
the
car
repair
shop
as
you're
coming
into
Binghamton
on
Front
Street.
We
have
proved
their
plan
and
we've
sent
them
multiple
reminders
that
they're
not
supposed
to
be
storing
those
big
Wreckers
out
on
the
corner,
and
it's
you
can't
get
any
more
records
on
that
corner
right
now,
of
course
of
how
many
are
stored.
There.
D
In
violation
and
we're
in
the
process
of
sort
of
building
a
case
against
them,
okay,.
D
A
Right
any
other
new
business
other
business,
anything
they
want
to
talk
about
all
right.