►
From YouTube: 2022.04.14 Traffic Board
Description
Chapters
00:00 Call to Order
01:00 State Street Plan Review
03:30 Conklin Avenue and Telegraph Street
04:24 Tompkins and Webster Streets
06:06 Livingston Street at St. John School
15:50 28 Riverside Drive
20:50 Vestal Avenue at Chadwick
24:25 Kane Avenue Parking
28:50 Susquehanna Street Diagonal Parking
34:30 2 Goethe Street
35:30 21 Elm Street
37:40 Other Business — Collier Street
38:40 West Middle School Complaints
40:40 116 West Glenwood Avenue Parking Spot
A
A
A
A
Okay,
so
we'll
move
on
to
the
traffic
board
determinations
first
item
on
our
list.
Is
this
street
plan
review
for
state
street?
This
is
part
of
the
deco
district
construction.
Crews
are
expected
to
start
mobilizing
there
next
week
with
construction
expected
to
start
the
following
week.
My
understanding,
it's
fact:
reconstruction
they're
in
contact
with
the
business
owners
over
there
and
we'll
just
hold
this
for
for
further
input
once
that
project
gets
underway.
B
A
A
A
Okay-
and
we
can
go
ahead
now
to
530
state
street-
the
one
update
I
have
on
that
dan
is,
I
heard
from
scott
matson
yesterday
after
he
met
he
asked
for
this
to
be
removable
from
the
traffic
board
agenda
and
planning
commission
agenda.
So
this
is
another
one
that
I
know
we
are
waiting
for
more
information
from
them,
but
we
can.
We
can
remove
that
for
the
time
being
too.
Okay.
A
D
Telegraph
street,
what
we
did
there
is.
We
did
remove
that
because
there
we
had
this
discussions
on
that
already
and
we
felt
that
that
location,
as
is,
is
one
of
its
appropriate
with
the
trap
light
being
remaining
there
and
so
that
it
it
should
not
be
removed
and
that
the
continue
watching
over
the
years
and
if
there's
a
need
to
make
a
change
and
at
that
time
make
a
change
so
that
that
street
should
be
removed
from
the
agenda.
D
Jonkin
street
and
webster
street
cindy-
and
I
have
been
reviewing
that
and
right
now,
our
feeling
is
that
it
remain
for
a
couple
reasons:
number
one:
the
volume
of
traffic
traveling
through
there
is
sufficient
to
handle
the
traffic
light.
The
number
of
pedestrians
passing
through
the
intersection
is
not
that
heavy
that
that
question.
B
Pedestrians
is
one
of
the
reasons
we
decided
to
leave
that
one
before
was
because
there
used
to
be
a
signal
at
tompkins
and
jackson
and
tompkins
and
webster
thompson
jackson
got
removed
the
topkins
of
webster.
It's
like
the
only
signalized
intersection
along
that
old
stretch
of
tompkins
street.
So
there
is
a
decent
amount
of
traffic
coming
off
of
webster,
but
also
we
thought
felt
before
that
that
one
should
stay
for
the
pedestrian
access
pretty
wide
street.
D
D
A
A
The
next
on
the
agenda
is
livington
street
near
st
john's
school,
the
traffic
division.
Well,
this
this
review
came
in
at
the
request
of
a
resident.
There
are
speeding
concerns
in
the
area
and
the
traffic
division
went
out,
they've
been
out
multiple
times
as
my
understanding,
but
they
went
out
again
just
recently
to
take
a
look
dan.
If
you
can
just
update
us
on
traffic
divisions,
findings
and
recommendations,
there.
D
You
have
all
the
people
exiting
the
church
from
the
parking
lot
in
the
rear
of
the
church,
using
that
street
to
go
one
way,
residents
on
the
street.
That
would
be
required
to
go
one
way
and
it
it
just
would
be
forcing
everybody
to
go
out
and
go
down
to
pachmann.
They
have,
which
is
a
heavily
traveled
street
and
important
additional
traffic
on
the
conglomerate.
Instead
of
sharing
it
between
both
vessel
lab
and
conklin.
D
We
thought
that
there
was
a
no
parking
signs
that
were
placed
in
front
of
the
the
crosswalk,
but
upon
following
up
with
that.
We
find
that
there
are
no
crosswalks
and
reviewing
it
again.
Cindy
myself
responded
over
there
for
the
the
traffic
sergeant
jasmine
and
notice
at
the
curb
line
on
the
west
side
of
the
street.
D
B
A
E
E
E
D
Okay,
the
concern
about
speeding,
making
a
one-way
street.
How
would
that
address
the
speeding
issue
if
they're
speeding
over
there?
It's
the
first
thing
that
you
ask,
and
the
second
thing
is
who's
who's,
determining
that
people
are
speeding
over
there.
We
don't
have
any
reports
any
any
anything
coming
in
from
either
the
police
department
or
or
any
other
city
related
people
that
that
there
is
feeding
over
there.
E
Yeah,
I
could
also
speak
to
that
is
I
I
don't
you
know
with
all
respect.
I
don't
I
don't
sit
there
with
one
of
the
things
that
measures
speed,
but
I
think
that
asparans
as
parents,
we
have
a
pretty
good
sense.
We
see
vehicles
zooming
down
the
street
and
I
know
I'm
being
kind
of
vague
right
now,
but
you
know
the
reality
is
that
there
are
vehicles
there
they're
going
at
a
much
higher
speed
that
they
ought
to
be
going,
and
you
know
I
can't
give
you
an
obviously
what
that
number
is.
E
Additionally,
I
don't
know
that
making
it
a
one-way
street
would
would
fix
the
problem.
You
might
be
100
right
that
maybe
it
doesn't
I'm
just
suggesting
that
we
pay
a
lot
of
attention
to
this
street,
because
the
stakes
are
very
high.
We're
talking
about
small
children,
who,
I
believe
are
in
danger
pretty
much
every
day
over
there.
D
A
D
A
A
F
F
B
A
D
Weird,
I
guess
the
best
way
to
describe
it,
because
it's
there's
no,
even
though
it's
a
corner
property
there's
no
access
off
from
oak
street
onto
the
property,
the
only
access
is
from
riverside
drive,
the
property
line
between
28
riverside
drive
and
30
riverside
drive.
It's
a
narrow
property
line.
Running
between
the
two
houses.
D
28
riverside
drives,
that's
lower
than
30
riverside
drive.
So
what
the
request
is
is
that
the
a
driveway
could
be
put
along
the
west
side
of
the
of
the
property
of
28
riverside
drive,
which
sets
lower
than
30
riverside
drive,
and
so
they
probably
have
to
dig
out
the
side
along
the
side
of
the
house,
which
is
probably
maybe
eight
or
nine
feet
wide,
maybe
10
feet
at
the
most
and
the
the
request
is
being
made
for
a
eight
by
ten
foot
driveway
cut
into
that
property
line.
D
Our
concern
is
coupled
number
one
is
that
the
location
of
it
coming
onto
riverside
drive?
There
is
close
to
the
crosswalk.
The
second
is
that
the
the
drive
would
cut
itself.
If
it
is
put
in
there,
they
would
have
to
put
the
dig
into
the
slope
of
the
the
grade
of
the
property
between
28
and
30,
which
might
have
a
structural
concern
for
the
property
of
30..
D
D
D
But
prob,
yes,
that's
well!
That's
what
our
final
thought
was
is
that
maybe
engineers
could
take
a
look
at
it,
make
a
determination
whether
or
not
it
could
be
done
safely
and
without
causing
structural
damage
to
the
property
of
30
rivers.
I
drive
because
you'd
probably
have
to
have
a
slope
coming
between
the
two
properties.
D
B
A
D
D
An
additional
one
was
added
on
the
north
side
of
vesta
lab
across
from
the
southwest
corner
of
vessel
lab.
The
problem
is
it's
not
directly
across
the
street
from
the
the
earth
ada
crossing,
it's
more
because
of
underground
water
lines,
it's
more
almost
mid
block
or
mid-intersection.
I
should
say
of
the
of
the
intersection
there.
D
D
The
two
would
you
know
would
be
a
good
idea
would
be
more
perfect
if
it
was
a
direct
90
degree
cut
across
the
street,
but
it's
not
so
we're
requesting
that
a
crosswalk
we
put
in
and
then
at
each
location
of
the
crosswalk
on
the
westbound
and
on
the
eastbound
lane
of
vessel
curb
lines,
the
two-sided,
crosswalk
signs.
We
posted
alerting
motors
that
there's
a
pedestrian
crosswalk
there
and
also
put
advanced
warning
signs,
one
being
about
125
feet,
west
of
the
intersection,
the
other
about
175
feet.
D
B
A
B
A
D
Yeah,
this
idc
was
passed
around
everybody
already,
I
don't
know,
get
a
chance
to
review
it
or
not,
but
basically
kane
up
on
the
south
side
runs
between
morgan,
road
and
woodland
nav
at
the
narrow
street.
It's
about
24
feet
wide,
there's
parking
on
both
sides
of
the
street
at
this
time,
and
the
constituents
apparently
contacted
the
councilman
in
that
district
to
alert
him
that
there's
concern
pretty
much
like
created.
D
Arsley
road
there's
concern
about
the
emergency
access
to
that
location
as
well,
as
you
know,
garbage
truck
pickup
and
any
other
kind
of
a
truck
traffic
coming
through
that
area
that
it
would
be
obstructed
or
slowed
down.
If,
if
there's
parking
on
both
sides,
we
did
respond
to
that
location
and
reviewed
at
the
traffic
division
and
the
bmps,
and
we
agree
that,
based
on
the
width
of
the
street,
the
parking
should
probably
probably
be
limited
to
one
side
of
the
street.
D
D
D
F
Afterthought
from
that,
idc
is
the
grade
of
that
road,
which
I
guess
would
be
up
to
the
residents.
What
they
feel
would
be
safer
as
well.
I
thought
of
this
after
reviewing
it
as
far
as
the
winter
months,
with
inclement
weather,
as
far
as,
if
they
wanted
to
park
facing
down
a
hill
or
up
there's
an
incline
there
somewhat
just.
A
Okay,
anything
else,
okay,
so
I
think
what
we
did
with
arleigh
road
and
what
we
can
do
this
time
is
just
pass.
This
recommendation
back
to
the
councilman.
Ask
him
to
reach
out
to
his
constituents,
make
sure
that
they're?
Okay
with
that,
if
we
post
to
no
parking
it's
on
the
east
side
of
the
road
with
the
fire
hydrants
in
mind
and
also
the
grade
of
the
road
there,
we
can
put
this
on
hold
and
come
back
to
it
at
the
next.
A
A
A
F
A
D
D
D
Feet
yeah.
So
if
we
went
ahead
and
did
what
the
you
know,
the
mayor
is
suggesting
it's
going
to
create
a
very
tight
passageway
through
there.
If
there's
going
to
be
a
two-way
street
going
back
and
forth,
and
so
with
that
in
mind,
cindy
found
out
some
additional
information
that
for
future
construction
in
that
area,
and
if
you
want
to.
B
Did
pull
out
the
alternatives
that
are
in
the
363
gateway
project
that
the
one
alternative
was
going
to
impact
some
of
the
parking
behind
the
arena,
the
other
one
just
that
whole
area
is
changing
as
far
as
being
signalized
on
state
street.
So
I
don't
I'm
not
sure
which
alternative
is
actually
going
to
be
put
in
place
in
back
the
arena,
but
that
could
make
a
difference.
One
of
them
did
have
additional
parking.
B
B
B
F
I
will,
I
would
have
concern
too,
or
it's
worthy
to
investigate
truck
traffic
downtown
for
large
truck
delivery,
whether
it's
after
hours
or
even
during
business
hours.
They,
you
do
utilize
that
to
then
reroute
their
trucks
to
go
back
into
downtown
now,
with
fire
headquarters
closed
as
well.
I
know
for
years
I
think
this
was
considered
prior
and
the
curb
side
parking
only
was
the
only
option
because
of
the
fire
apparatus
coming
from
headquarters
to
service
the
west
side.
F
B
F
D
B
D
A
All
right
does
anyone
else,
have
questions
or
comments
on
the
all
right,
then.
What
I'd
suggest,
then,
is.
Let
me
just
take
this
back
to
the
mayor.
I
filled
him
in
briefly
after
our
discussion
on
tuesday,
but
let
me
give
him
the
latest
information
if
we
could
just
keep
it
on
hold
and
revisit
it
at
the
next
at
the
next
meeting.
A
A
D
Yes,
the
previous
owner
of
that
property
to
goldy
street,
they
sold
the
property,
we
did
get
a
hold
of
the
both
the
the
previous
owner
and
the
president
owner
and
the
traffic
did
change
hands
the
previous
owner
at
the
actual
handicapped
person
did
pass
about
six
months
ago,
so
they
sold
the
property
and
the
new
people.
Every
question
that
the
handicapped
parking
zone
be
removed.
A
F
D
D
Person
requesting
a
handicap
spot
in
front
of
that
location
says
well.
Her
husband
has
been
parking
there
for
years
without
getting
the
ticket,
so
we
may
have
to
surprise
her
and
follow
up
with
the
ticket
that
location,
if
that's
happening,
but
very
request
that
the
handicapped
parking
spot
in
front
of
that
location
be
inserted,
has
to
be
denied
because
of
the
fire
hydrant.
They
do
have
a
driveway
touch
that
runs
between
the
house
and
the
house
next
door.
D
However,
the
property
line
again
a
situation
where
the
two
houses
are
within
just
a
few
feet
of
each
other.
I
don't
know
where
the
property
line
is
exactly,
but
there
is
a
driveway
cut
there,
and
if
the
two
neighbors
can
work
it
out,
you
know
to
how
the
property
driveway
cuts
going
to
be
so
be
it.
But
as
far
as
the
request
for
the
handicapped
parking
lot
be
denied.
A
F
A
D
D
D
D
I've
seen
your
moment
here,
ellen
helen
street,
thank
you
and
but
there's
the
signs
only
at
each
end
of
the
street.
There's
nothing
in
between.
So
what
we're
going
to
do
is
it's
in
the
traffic
code
we're
just
going
to
reinsert
the
additional
signs
for
no
parking
a
couple
additional
signs.
The
signs
are
good
for
100
feet
in
each
direction
of
the
signs.
D
F
D
Yes,
one
additional
thing:
116
glen
would
have
this
came
through
the
councilman
giovanni.
It's
very
winky
regards
to
the
the
new
liquor
store
that
was
open
at
the
corner
of
glenwood
and
prospect
street
back
in
august
12
20
2021,
a
15-minute
parking
zone
was
proposed
and
approved
on
the
east
side
of
glenwood
have
100
feet
south
at
prospect.
140
feet.