►
From YouTube: 2022.03.10 Traffic Board
Description
Chapters
00:00 Call to Order
01:00 Public Comments
09:20 Traffic Board Determinations
33:08 Discussions
A
A
D
A
E
A
E
E
We
con
the
broome
county
and
members
of
the
previous
board
conducted
a
traffic
study
on
the
in
the
noma
area,
highlighting
north
street
because,
as
you
know,
it
is
a
major,
thorough
view,
thorough
way
for
trying
to
avoid
main
street,
as
many
may
be
aware,
and
the
comments
from
the
neighborhood
as
well
as
the
report
from
that
traffic
survey
were
submitted
in
january.
As
you
recall,
there
was
a
meeting
to
review
the
feedback
from
that
study.
E
The
meeting
was
announced
as
cancelled
then
subsequently
rescheduled
for
the
same
day,
and
it
unfortunately
caused
a
lot
of
the
the
community
that
intended
to
participate
to
no
longer
be
able
to
participate
because
it
was
cancelled.
So
I
encourage
everyone
on
this
board
to
please
look
at
the
notes
from
that
traffic
study.
Do.
Does
everyone
have
a
copy
of
that
that
summary
report
that
was
presented
in
january
wait
who's
that
I'm
sorry
it.
E
A
No,
I
don't
believe,
that's
that's
common
practice.
We've
received
the
minutes.
They've
been
shared
with
the
board
members,
although
it
just
went
out.
We
just
received
them
this
morning,
so
I'm
not
sure
that
all
board
members
have
had
an
opportunity
yet
to
review
them.
They
are
in
receipt
of
them,
though,
and
they
will
also
be
included
as
part
of
the
minutes
for
this
meeting.
E
Okay,
thank
you
and
again,
yes,
the
timing
of
it,
but
I
sent
it
this
morning
so
that
I
could
capture
as
many
responses
as
possible
in
time
for
this
meeting
again.
Many
people
also
reported
this
morning
the
frustration
of
not
knowing
where
this
would
be
placed
on
the
agenda
if
there
would
be
a
public
comment,
because
the
agenda
was
not
posted
prior
to
the
meeting.
Thank
you.
A
F
F
C
A
A
That
first
item
is
the
the
flashing,
the
flashing
light
at
the
intersection
of
marine
north
streets.
So
I
know
we
had
a
handful
of
people
on
today
to
comment
on
this.
I
had
reached
out
to
councilman
riley
after
our
meeting
on
february
10th
to
let
her
know
that
the
traffic
board
had
voted
to
accept
the
recommendations
from
the
bmts
and
the
traffic
division
for
north
street,
based
on
that
walking
tour
and
road
assessment
study.
H
I
think
that's
the
only
thing
cindy
paddock
from
vmps.
I
think
the
only
thing
I
would
add
is
when
we
did
the
walking
a
roadway
assessment
out
there.
There
were
some
people
who
said
that
the
way
the
light
was
now
was
confusing,
with
flashing
yellow
on
north
street
and
flashing
red
on
murray,
murray,
yes,
and
the
way
that
it
is
now
it's
a
two-way
stop
murray
stops
north.
You
don't
have
to
stop
the
signal.
H
We
thought
because
it's
so
old
was
a
holdover
from
the
time
when
it
was
probably
a
three
color
signal
at
one
time.
I
don't
know
when
that
was.
I
don't
know
when
it
changed,
but
that's
my
guess
there,
and
maybe
somebody
else
on
the
board
knows
it
was
just
getting
very
old.
So
by
taking
the
signal
out
the
control
at
that
intersection
wasn't
changing
at
all.
H
H
H
H
A
A
Okay,
so
it's
my
opinion
that
that,
given
the
input
from
from
residents
that
we
heard
today,
and
also
the
the
point
that
I
think
cindy
just
raised-
that
not
really
doing
any
harm
to
have
the
flashing
light
there,
nothing
would
necessarily
change
with
this.
But
given
the
input
that
we
received
from
residents,
I
would
recommend
that
the
ford
refrain
from
acting
on
this
at
this
time
keep
the
flashing
light
there.
B
A
A
A
Okay,
so
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
traffic
light
review
at
robinson
street
and
mason
avenue.
This
is
the
item
that
councilman
scanlan
spoke
about
and
it's
one
of
the
traffic
lights
that
the
mts
recommended
for
removal
in
its
2016
traffic
signal
report.
The
traffic
board
is
at
the
point
of
revisiting
this.
After,
as
councilman
scanlan
said
that
light
went
down
last
year,
do
we
have
any
discussion
or
comment
from
the
board
on
this.
I
I
think
the
only
discussion
that
we
had
is
that
the
traffic
division
and
vnps
did
go
out
and
review
the
intersection,
and
it
was
a
situation
where,
based
on
the
traffic
light
not
functioning
for
a
period
of
time
there
and
stop
signs
being
installed
that
the
in
the
intersection
appeared
to
be
operating.
Okay.
I
However,
there
was
concern
a
couple
concerns,
one
being
a
building
that
the
north
west
corner,
causing
the
line
of
sight
issue.
The
other
was
his
concern.
Was
that
again,
with
the
schools
in
the
neighborhood?
Being
that
close,
they
both
were
discussed,
and
we
that's
why
we
thought.
Maybe
what
we
should
do
is
maybe
do
it
like
if
we
were
going
to
take
it
out,
maybe
do
a
90-day
study
that
would
be
required
and
then
see
what
the
input
was
from
that
to
see
if
it
would
qualify
to
be
taken
out.
I
C
C
B
H
H
If
that
should
happen,
one
of
the
things
that
could
be
considered
at
that
time,
just
keep
in
mind,
would
be
what's
called
the
hawk
signal,
and
that's
like,
what's
out
on
state
street
in
front
of
the
city
hall,
that
you
can
push
the
button,
it
stops.
Traffic
and
pedestrians
will
have
access.
That's
a
much
cheaper
alternative.
H
If
the
signal
should
need
to
be
replaced
in
the
future,
because
it
would
be
difficult
and
the
city
gets
federal
aid
money
for
some
signal
replacements
and
we
can't
replace
them
if
they're
not
warranted.
But
I
guess
just
keep
in
mind
if
that
should
occur,
that
there
is
an
alternative
that
you
would
still
have
a
signal
there
for
pedestrians
and
that
we
really
had
just
looked
at
it
because
of
the
signal
being
down
over
the
summer.
A
A
B
I
I
I
A
A
Okay,
then,
we'll
put
this
item
on
hold
until
if
and
when
we
hear
back
from
from
the
armory
on
this.
Thank
you,
okay.
The
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
hardly
road,
ardsley
road,
the
review
of
one
side
street
parking
here,
so
this
came
to
the
traffic
board
at
our
last
meeting
at
the
request
of
councilman
scanlon
dan.
Would
you
like
to
just
remind
us
of
the
traffic
divisions,
findings
and
recommendations
on
this.
I
Yeah
the
traffic
division.
I
responded
to
that
location
after
receiving
a
request
from
the
councilman
and
the
street
is
a
narrow
street
and
the
complaint
was
is
that
it
came
from
the
dpw
is
that
trucks
are
having
a
hard
time
passing
through
the
area.
Cars
are
parked
on
both
sides
of
the
street
and
councilman
scanlon
was
concerned
that
if
emergency
vehicles
had
to
respond
up
there
with
cars
parked
on
both
sides
of
the
street,
that
access
may
not
be
accessible,
and
so
his
concern
was
to
this.
I
We
did
agree
that
probably
one
side
to
the
other
side,
and
we
recommended
that
you
know
that
the
the
north
side,
I
believe
this
with
the
fire
hydrants,
be
the
side
that
be
posted,
there's
no
parking,
but
with
the
final
suggestion
coming
from
it,
he
should
probably
meet
with
his
constituents
to
review
the
suggestion
and
see
what
side
of
the
street
that
they
would
prefer
to
have
no
parking
on.
We
have
not
heard
back
from
him
yet.
A
I
can
provide
an
update
on
that.
I
spoke
to
councilman
stanley
yesterday
or
the
day
before,
and
I
had
also
asked
him
after
our
last
meeting
at
the
request
of
the
traffic
division
to
to
make
sure
there
was
resident
input
on
this
councilman
scanlon
and
the
residents
in
that
neighborhood
are
in
favor
of
this
and
I'm
moving
forward
with
the
traffic
division's
recommendation
to
make
the
street
parking
on
on
just
one
side.
Only
do
we
have
any
any
comment
or
discussion
on
this.
A
A
J
A
J
J
J
J
Yeah
we
can
talk
to
the
site
designer
about
how
necessary
that
is
or
what
what
their
rationale
was
for
providing
that
driveway
entrance.
I
think
kianis
anderson
came
up
with
this
preliminary
site
plan,
but
yeah.
We
can
ask
that
question.
I'm
I'm
not
sure
off
the
top
of
my
head.
Why
that
third
entrance
was
proposed.
I
A
A
A
A
I
Yeah,
we
received
a
request
through
the
police
administration
that
there
was
insufficient
parking
on.
Excuse
me
on
state
street
for
the
cac
parking
cac
is
a
program,
that's
where
the
the
regional
crime
analyst
center
risk
analysis
center
is
and
outside
agencies
that
attend
that
that
building
periodically
they
have
to
park
somewhere,
and
the
problem
is
that
there's
only
four
parking
spaces
designated
for
that
that
location
at
the
present
time.
I
It's
requesting
that
we
increase
the
amount
of
parking
on
state
street
to
to
facilitate
access
for
the
out
of
town
vehicles
that
come
in
here,
as
well
as
for
the
police,
binghamton
police
vehicles
that
are
assigned
to
that
through
that
division,
and
presently
the
this
location
that
we're
talking
about
will
be
taking
away
official
vehicle
parking
only
for
binghamton
vehicles
anyhow,
so
it's
not
gonna
be
interfering
with
public
parking.
It's
just
official
vehicles
that
park
there.