►
From YouTube: 2022.10.04 Zoning Board of Appeals
Description
Contents
0:00:15 Call to Order
0:05:10 Kearney Realty
0:19:00 Public Comment — Leonard
0:20:20 Public Comment — Staples
0:22:10 Public Comment — Kellum
0:25:10 Response to Comments
1:14:30 PIKE Development
B
B
B
The
floor
will
then
be
open
for
anyone
who
would
like
to
speak
in
favor
or
against
the
proposed
project.
Once
everyone's
had
an
opportunity
to
speak,
public
hearing
will
officially
be
closed
and
no
new
testimony
will
be
taken
yeah.
It
has
been
making
a
decision
on
each
case.
You're
welcome
to
stay
through
the
deliberations,
but
at
that
point
public.
If.
B
Those
applicants
who
wish
not
to
stay
through
the
deliberations
planning
department
staff
will
be
available
tomorrow.
With
the
board's
decisions
board.
Tonight
we
have
all
five
members
present
ing
a
quorum.
I
will
now
call
the
roll
Miss
basinetti
Mr
matzo
president
Ms
Lucci
Mr
Landers
Mr
Donovan
is
president.
B
Thankful
on
my
own
thing
here:
did
you
all
get
a
chance
to
look
at
the
meeting
minutes
from
last
month?
Did
you
have
any
changes
or
no
I'll.
B
D
D
B
D
B
D
B
Excuse
me
for
my
voice:
it's
coming
and
going
I'm
sure
it's
allergies,
I've
ruled
out
other
things,
so
we're
good
first
applicant
Carney,
Realty
and
Development
Group,
and
the
project
is
162:
180,
184,
186,
Henry,
Street,
77,
Pine,
Street
and
229
Court.
B
Where
20
is
the
minimum
77
73
lot
coverage
where
70
is
maximum
55
feet
in
height,
where
45
is
the
maximum
27
parking
spots
where
79
are
required
and
to
provide
parking,
256
feet
off
site
where
250
is
the
maximum
distance
allowed
I
believe
we
should
stay
we're
looking
at
these
as
two
two
different
variance
requests:
the
use,
variance
kind
of
separate
from
the
area
of
variances.
B
B
B
A
A
couple
couple
changes
one:
there
are
no
longer
any
two
bedroom
units
on
the
Pine
Street
piece,
that's
on
a
set
of
I
think
before
it
was,
it
was
9-1
bedroom
and
three
two
bedroom
units
that
would
be
constructed
on
the
within
the
R2
zoning.
It's
now
12
one
bedroom
units,
so
the
three
two
bedrooms
turned
into
one
bedroom
as
well.
A
That,
and
we
did,
there
have
been
you
know,
minor
incidental
changes
to
the
floor
plan
which
you
could
all
have
I
do
have
them
here.
If
you
want
a
Tim-
and
there
is
at
the
request
of
this
board
a
month
ago,.
A
B
A
With
the
two
adjacent
existing
properties
on
either
side,
we
also
added
a
the
architect
added
a
front
porch
element
to
that
side
of
the
building
just
to
help
it
blend
into
the
surrounding
environment
a
little.
You
know
a
little
better
that.
A
A
A
B
D
E
A
He
have
not
the
the
house
in
question
I
believe
you're,
two,
if
you're
looking
at
the
bank
to
elevate
and
you're
going
to
be
tuned
for
the
right
correct,
so
here's
how
the
vicinity
it
is.
It
is
a
little
taller
than
the
house
that
is
shown
immediately
adjacent
to
our
building,
but
the
other.
The
other
thing
to
keep
in
mind
there
and
again
we
haven't
done
any
detailed
solar
study.
A
Is
the
sun
is
shining
from
from
the
south.
So
you
know,
even
in
the
middle
of
summer,
the
sun
is
coming
in
at
some
Southern
Southern
angle,
not
directly
above
these
properties.
So
as
the
funds
that
to
the
West
I,
don't
know
that
you're
ever
going
to
get
100
blockage
from
from
the
new
building,
just
given
the
angle
of
the
Sun
and
that
would
go
down,
as
you
know,
as
the
year
goes
on,
and
winter
comes
up.
E
E
But
I
think
it's
a
legitimate,
but
you
don't
hate.
C
E
C
E
So
I
guess
my
question
to
you
then
would
be.
Is
there
an
intent
to
to
look
into
this
further
to
accommodate
the
neighbors.
A
There
there
wasn't
to
this
point:
it
wasn't
specifically
requested
by
the
by
the
board
per
se.
A
Would
that
would
that?
Let
me
ask
you
this:
would
that
fall
more
under
the.
A
Purview
of
the
area
variants
where
we're
requesting
a
height
variance,
it
probably
would
and
not
so
much
affect
the
use
variants
that
we're
talking
about
now.
Yeah.
B
That
would
have
more
impact
being
55
feet.
Tall
versus
45
feet.
45
feet
may
not
even
impact
more
than
the
building
right
beside
it.
A
It's
sport,
it's
55
on
Henry
Street,
but
we're
a
story
shorter
out
back
on
Pine
Street.
So
it's
actually
here
below
the
40
guys
actually
40
feet,
not
55
on
things
so.
C
A
Me
there
there
is
just
a
very
it
is
a
valid
point:
Pine
streets,
it's
about
actually
10
12
feet
higher
than
Henry
Street
in
this
location,
so
that
that
explains
the
the
roof
level,
doesn't
change
the
floor
level.
The.
B
The
actual
impact
I've
just
really
kind
of
more
from
the
area
variants.
Regarding
his,
so
you
know
we're
going
to
move
forward
on
the
use
variance
if
you
have
any
questions
based.
C
B
Any
other
questions
regarding
the
use
variance
just
to
keep
us
on
track
here.
D
A
E
A
A
You
look
on
the
on
drawing
A1
in
your
packet.
There's
a
breakdown
of
square
footage
they're
all
in
the
range
of
730
to
750
square
feet.
C
B
B
They
they
give
us
their
opinion
on
on
projects
review
pursuant
to
section
239
I
of
the
general
Municipal
law,
and
they
had
a
bunch
of
comments,
but
the
the
main
part
of
it
is
and
I'll
read
this
first
paragraph
planning
department
has
reviewed
the
above-sided
case
and
has
not
identified
any
significant,
county-wide
or
Inter-Community
impacts
associated
with
the
use
variants
alone.
However,
the
use
variance
is
tied
to
the
feasibility
to
site
plan
and
area
variances
as
a
whole
and
impacts
those
action.
F
We
we
received
that
today,
so
Dominic
has
not
seen
that
as
far
as
I
know,
but
most
of
the
comments
pertain
to
the
site
plan
and
the
area
variances,
so
we'll
send
that
to
you
as
far
as
the
use
variants
they
they
found
no
impact.
Okay,.
B
Okay,
so
at
this
point,
I
would
make
a
motion
to
open
the
public
hearing
portion
and
the
public
comment.
So
you
can
take
a
seat
and
I'd
invite
anyone
here
wishing
to
speak
in
favor
or
against
the
project.
One
at
a
Time
come
on
up
and
state
your
name
for
the
name
and
address
the
record
and
keep
in
mind
we
we
do
have
from
the
minutes
last
time.
Your
your
comments
from
last
time.
So
the
floor
is
yours.
G
My
name
is
Eric
Leonard
address
is
81
Pine
Street
Binghamton
right
I
still
have
the
same
concerns
I
have
from
last
time
and
I.
Think
one
of
the
other
concerns
that's
come
up
since
then.
That
I've
talked
with
Kathy
about
is,
in
the
revised
floor
plans
they're
actually
putting
dumpsters
on
that
side
of
the
street.
So
now,
not
only
are
we
getting
exhaust
vents,
we're
getting
dumpsters
on
our
street
and
that's
I
think
my
biggest
concern
with
this
entire
project
is
that
it
does
not
seem
to
be
bringing
anything
to
our
neighborhood.
G
It's
bringing
exhaust
vents
and
garbage
just
like
the
fire
station
is
bringing
generators
and
fuel
tanks
on
our
side
of
the
street.
So
you
know
we
keep
getting
all
the
the
butts
of
these
projects
and
not
the
cool
sides
of
them.
Not
that
necessarily
that
I
want
even
the
front
side
of
this
on
our
street.
You
know
it's
one
of
the
it's
a
single
and
dual
family
neighborhood.
This
is
not
cohesive
to
what
we
have.
You
know.
G
H
My
name's
Kathy
Staples
I
live
at
79,
Pine
Street,
the
tiny
house
torched
by
the
big
thing,
so
we're
doing
the
use
variance
correct,
currently
right
right,
so
we
had
said
at
planning
meetings.
We
need
more
family
housing
in
the
city,
and
so
we
heard
at
the
last
meeting
how
this
project
has
two-bedroom
apartments
for
families,
because
families
can
live
there.
E
H
It
Remains
the
Same
number
wise,
but
you'll
note
that
that
building
is
much
larger
than
the
other
buildings
around
it
I
mean
my
house,
isn't
the
largest
house
in
the
world,
but
even
the
two
family.
On
the
other
side,
it's
much
larger
than
that
and
they
had
said.
There's
gonna
be
a
10
foot
separation
but
in
the
planning
site
the
site
plans.
It
doesn't
look
like
that
continues
throughout.
I
What
my
concern
is
is
that
you
have
this
building
on
Henry
Street
with
limited
parking,
and
you
also
have
a
variance
for
the
land
down
the
street
of
200
and
50
SEC
57
50
256
feet
over
the
whatever.
Your
variance
is
my
biggest
concern.
I
I
really
think
that
that
these
people
will
not
abide
by
the
parking
areas
and
it'll
be
and
especially
on
fireworks
tonight,
they'll
be
over
there
and
people
have
to
or
the
rumble
ponies
will
have
to
start
towing
cars.
I
B
B
Then
I
guess
seeing
no
one
else:
I
would
move
to
close
the
public
hearing
for
the
use
variants
for
the
one
well
for
77
Pine
Street
can
I
get
a
second,
please,
second,
all
in
favor
all
right,
okay.
So
this
is
a
used
variance,
so
we
have
to
get
into
those
criteria.
Does
this
one
have
a
secret
part
connect.
A
A
Yeah
there's
no
required
setback
once
these
Parcels
are
combined,
but
we
do
have
greater
than
11
feet
on
the
east
side
and
greater
than
60
all
the
way
down
the
west
side
on
the
Pine
Street
joining
property.
A
So
just
clarify
that
the
other
thing
that
which
the
distances
to
the
parking
I
just
want
to
point
out
we're
not
asking
for
276
foot
variants.
We're
asking
for
the
code
is
250
feet,
we're
at
276
we're
asking
for
26
foot
bearings
and
a
25
foot
variance
on
the
other
lot.
So
I.
A
I
just
want
to
clarify
the
comments.
I
know
that
yeah
I
know
that
area
variance
and
as
far
as
the
the
rumble
ponies
I
I,
don't
want
to
speak
for
anybody,
but
I
do
believe.
The
rumble
ponies
ownership
is
on
board
in
favor
of
the
project.
I
think
they
posted
the
press
released
with
the
mayor
and
the
applicant
and
we're
in
favor
of
the
of
the
development
in
the
area.
I
understand
the
parking
concern
but
I
think
on
Game
Nights.
They
do.
You
know,
have
a
attendance
and.
B
Okay,
so
I
would
like
to
move
that
the
zba
lead
Agency,
for
this
action
can
I
get
a
second.
Second,
all
those
in
favor.
B
And
I
would
also
like
to
move
that
this
is
a
I,
don't
know
what
type
of
action
is
it
under
Seeker
I'm
listening.
Thank
you
right.
There
I'd
like
to
move
that
this
is
an
unlisted
action
procedure.
Can
I
get
a
second,
please
all
in
favor,
aye,
unanimous
again,
all
right
so
bear
with
me.
I
have
to
go
through
some
criteria
here,
and
the
staff
has
put
this
together
for
us
so
that
we
can
address
mainly
the
ones
that
are
in
question
and
bear
with
my
voice.
B
It
was
a
proposed
action,
create
a
material
conflict
with
an
adopted
land,
use,
planner
zoning
regulations
and
keep
in
mind
we're
talking
about
the
use,
variance
and
we're
looking
for.
Is
there
a
nowhere
small
impact
or
is
there
moderate
to
large
impact
by
granting
the
use
variants?
So
let
me
back
up
well,
the
proposed
action
create
a
material
conflict
with
an
adopted
land
use
plan
or
zoning
regulations.
B
B
By
the
granting
of
this
used
variance,
would
that
be
a
large
in
position
on
the
zoning
rules
of
the
exist?
I?
Don't
think
it's
a
large
imposition
on
the
zoning
rules,
but
I
think
it's
a
large
imposition
on
their
neighbors
they're,
very
young,
but
we're
talking
we're
talking
about
the
designing
rules
of
the
city.
I
understand
the
impact
on
the
individuals
and
that's
unfortunate.
B
C
J
B
Nothing
nearly
as
large
or
as
numerous
okay.
All
right,
then
I'm
gonna
I'm
gonna
check
that
in
the
small
impact.
Well,
the
proposed
action
result
in
a
change
in
the
use
or
intensity
of
use
of
land
shouldn't
change,
the
intensity
of
use.
The
proposed
action,
impair
the
character
or
quality
of
the
existing
Community.
That's
something
we
need
to
discuss
as
well.
B
F
Correct
and
then,
and
just
as
general
guidance
for
a
large
impact
you're
looking
at
things
that
are
really
significant.
So
for
the
first
question,
does
it
conflict
with
land
use
and
zoning
regulations?
It
would
be
something
that
is
significantly
like
a
very
big
departure
from
what's
there
so
like
a
factory
or
a
shopping
mall,
or
something
like
that
being.
E
I
think
it's
going
to
have
a
positive
effect
s
cellulite
the
condition
of
some
of
the
properties
on
that
street.
That's
my
point.
B
Okay,
anybody
have
a
huge
I
think
it's
a
big
problem.
No
I
don't
feel
it's
okay,
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
minimizing
your
situation
over
there
I.
That's
not
the
last
thing.
I
want
to
do
well.
Proposed
action,
have
an
impact
on
the
environmental
characteristics
that
cause
the
establishment
of
a
critical
environmental
area
No.
It
should
not,
with
the
proposed
action
result
in
adverse
changed
in
the
existing
level
of
traffic
or
affect
existing
infrastructure
for
mass
transit
biking
or
walkway.
B
Let
me
try
to
find
where
I'm
at
there
was
a
proposed
action,
cause
an
increase
in
the
use
of
energy,
and
it
fails
to
incorporate
reasonably
available
energy
conservation
or
renewable
energy
opportunities.
That
should
not
be
a
result
of
his
variance.
Will
the
proposed
Action
Impact
existing
public
or
private
Water,
Supplies,
public
or
private
wastewater
treatment
utilities
minimally?
B
It
shouldn't
have
an
effect
on
those
items
with
opposed
action
result
in
an
adverse
change
to
natural
resources,
for
example,
Wetlands,
water
bodies,
groundwater,
air
quality,
flora
and
fauna
should
not
have
an
effect
on
those
items.
Groundwater
I,
I
think
is
going
to
remain
pretty
much
the
same
after
the
project
is
complete.
B
Will
the
pose
action
result
in
an
increase
in
the
potential
for
erosion,
flooding
or
drainage?
Problems
should
not
affect
that?
Will
the
proposed
action
create
a
hazard
to
environmental
resources
or
human
health?
I
do
not
believe
so.
I
haven't
gone
through.
Those
I
would
move
that
we
have
a
negative
declaration
for
secret
and
I
have
a
second
please.
Second,
all
those
in
favor
all
right
that
gets
us
to
the
criteria
for
this
is.
This
is
all
just
laying
the
groundwork.
Now
we
have
to
discuss
the
criteria.
B
And
the
criteria
has
to
do
with
a
reasonable
return
for
the
project.
Is
it
unique?
B
C
Sorry,
my
microphone
on
which
whether
there
are
other
allowed
uses
that
would
allow
for
an
economic
return
in
the
problem
or
whether
this.
B
That's
a
that's
a
very
good.
There
are
other
uses,
but.
B
In
in
the
context
that
is
put
in
with
the
overall
scheme
or
ideas
for
the
development
of
that
area,
it
fits
in
with
the
overall
plan
so
to
fit
in
with
the
overall
plan.
I'm,
not
sure
there
would
be
any
other
types
of
projects
that
would
be
appropriate
that,
coupled
with
the
the
nature
of
the
project,
the
way
it's
gone
through
development,
the
the
funding,
the
it
was
a
very
complicated
process
to
get
you
sitting
right
there
at
this
point,
I'm
not
really
sure
how
to
was
there.
Was
there
a
reasonable
alternative?
B
C
I'm
just
going
to
stop
it
right
there.
Taxes
are
absolutely
irrelevant
to
youth
parents
and
area.
Fair.
Okay,
don't
talk
about
taxes,
that's
totally
relevant
you're.
Looking
at
the
development
or
the
way
the
project
is
designed
or
whether
there's
other
alternatives
for
that
site.
Taxation
is
not
relevant
to
zoning.
A
plan
on
gotcha.
A
B
B
B
Good
point:
it's
hard
to
it's
hard
to
wrap
your
arms
around
this
question
effectively.
D
B
E
B
E
I
would
I
would
like
to
raise
the
question
of
how
many
other
opportunities
for
the
city
has
anybody
presented
to
the
city.
B
C
C
But
I
think
that
they
have
been
that
before
they
were
demolished,
they
were
vacant
for
it.
Maybe
that
I've
been
working
here
for
20
years
I
think
it
may
have
been
the
entire
20
years
that
they've
been
making
the
banana
Factory
and
the
building
behind
was
was
vacant
for
a
long
time.
10
to
15
years,
at
least
I
would
say.
C
E
C
C
E
E
B
F
It
so
is
there
something
unique
about
this
property
that
warrants
allowing
the
applicant
to
use
it
as
something
that's
not
allowed
there.
Is
there
something
specific
to
this
property?
That's
different
from
other
properties
near
it.
B
Yeah,
the
contiguous
properties
that
are
going
to
be
put
into
one
property
for
the
creation
of
the
project
to
house
all
the
multiple
properties
in
one
building.
B
B
B
Foreign
to
me,
the
proposed
use
of
variants
of
it
does
fit
the
in
the
overall
character
of
the
neighborhood.
It
takes
some
unused
or
marginally
used
or
run
down.
I
think
it
takes
away
some
of
them
all
new
maintained
I
think
it
takes
away
some
of
the
blighted
property.
That's
that's
for
sure.
J
A
little
rusty
here
we
haven't
been
in
person
for
a
while
I
think
that
if
you
look
at
the
facade
of
the
Pine
Street,
drawing
I,
think
you
guys
have
done
a
good
job
trying
to
capture
some
of
the
essence
of
the
neighborhood
by
adding
that
porch
that
wasn't
there
before
I
think
at
the
previous
hearing.
Somebody
mentioned
that
they
had
a
porch
and
so
that
kind
of
brings
them
together.
So
I,
don't
necessarily
think
that
that
is
adverse
to
the
people
of
the
neighborhood.
E
B
B
To
to
be
built
and
the
funding
and
the
need
went
together
and
an
area
had
to
be
bound
for
it
to
be
developed
or
there
would
be
no
project,
so
I'm,
not
sure
I'm
I'm,
not
sure
I
would
call
that
self-created
other
than
the
applicant
and
the
city
were
trying
to
meet
a
need
of
Housing
and.
B
B
Okay,
all
right,
then,
having
gone
through
the
criteria
I
would
propose.
A
motion
to
to
the
group.
I
would
pause
a
motion
to
Grant
the
use
variants
for
77
Main
Street.
For
this.
B
B
A
Done
to
try
to
squeeze
it
and
minimize
the
impact
on
Pine
Tree
that
was
actually
done.
A
B
B
A
B
Motion
to
Grant
and
use
variance
for
77
Pine
Street
reconstruction
of
a
multiple
unit
dwelling
in
the
R2
District,
with
a
total
of
12
units
on
three
stories.
All
four
are
the:
let's
see
that
doesn't
have
that
factor
into
it.
That's
it.
B
Okay,
now
could
tonight
you
are
number
two
on
the
list
here
for
your
your
area.
Variances.
If
you
would
please
run
them
past
us
and
pass
the
gallery.
A
So
the
requested
area
variances
are
for
they're
all
four
bulk
requirements
of
the
C4
District,
because
the
four
properties
will
be
combined
and
take
on
the
zoning
requirements
of
C4.
A
So
maximum
maximum
permissible,
lock
coverage
is
70
percent,
we're
showing
72.4
so
slightly
more
than
the
allowable
overall.
Maximum
Building
height
is
45
feet.
We
are
at
55
feet,
but
again
that
is
only
at
Henry
Street.
A
As
you
go
up
each
side
of
the
building,
and
certainly
at
Pine
Street,
it's
less
than
that
required
parking
is
79
spaces,
we're
providing
21
spaces
distance
to
those
parking
spaces.
We
have
two
separate
Lots
one
at
162
Henry,
one
at
229
Port
the
distances
to
those
are
276
feet
and
275
feet
respectively,
when
the
allowable
distance
to
off
street
parking
is
215.,
so
we're
asking
for
25
and
a
26
foot
variant
by
moments,
Lots,
and
that
is
it
I'm.
Sorry,
minimum
rear
setback
requires
20
feet
and
we
are
requesting
4.69
feet.
B
B
E
B
A
B
C
C
B
Think
John
was
just
asking
if
the
if
they
thought
it.
If
anyone
had
thought
of
of
alternates.
B
J
Okay,
I
have
a
quick
question
for
you.
You
just
mentioned
21
parking
spaces
or
report,
says
27.,
which
is
correct.
A
B
Can
I
ask
you
one
of
the
comments
from
earlier
and
do
with
the
placement
of
the
dumpster?
Do
you
have
any
idea
where
the
dumpsters
are
going
to
be
placed
for
this
building.
A
So
where's
the
where's
the
pattern,
so
the
pad
is,
is
right
down
here
in
the
southeast
part
of
the
Pine
Street
parcel
we'll
have
a
you
know:
full
pad
and
enclosure.
A
A
A
Plastic
they're,
bigger
than
what
you
would
use
at
your
house,
they're
about
three
cubic
yards
they're.
Still,
a
probably
you
know
the
size
of
this
desk
and
five
five
and
a
half
feet
tall.
In
fact,
there's
one
similar
set
up
on
Lyle
Ave
or
by
Columbus
Park.
That
I
happen
to
notice.
Okay,
there's
one
out
back
there
from
Taylor.
That's
a
metal
one,
these
maybe
metal
or
plastic,
but
again
they'll,
be.
C
C
A
We
we
went
over
this.
Yes,
no,
it's
not
the
only
location
we
went
over
at
wink.
We
even
talked
about
interior
garbage
space,
which
it
you
know,
has
a
host
of
its
own
problems
and
and
given
on
this
site.
The
way
that,
if
you
look
at
the
floor
plans
all
of
the
commercials
in
the
might
all
of
the
commercial
spaces
on
Henry
Street
and
because
of
the
great
differences,
all
the
first
level
of
the
residential
space
is
actually
several
feet
higher
than
that.
A
So
there's
real,
no
connection
between
the
commercial
and
residential
spaces
at
the
garbage
wanted
to
be
taken
out
to
the
front.
Even
if
there
were
space
on
Henry
Street,
which
there's
there's
just
not.
A
A
E
A
E
Where's,
the
commercial!
What
about
the
commercial.
A
A
C
Not
me
so
if
I
live
on
the
Henry
Street
Chapin
quadrant
of
the
building,
or
that
the
Y
comes
into
the
side
on
Chapin
Street.
If
I
live
in
a
residential
structure,
I
have
to
I'm,
assuming
I
have
to
walk
a
hallway
that
goes
over
top
of
the
commercial
along
Henry
Street
and
then
walk
the
whole
length
of
the
building
to
get
back
to
garbage.
E
F
And
you
actually
can't
vote
on
this
tonight
because
we,
the
county,
needs
more
time
to
comment
on
the
area
variances
specifically,
so
we
have
to
give
them
more
time.
B
D
B
B
But
we
have
we
have
we
have
a
process
to
go
through
here
and
we'll
see
where
we
get
anyone
else
wishing
to
speak
in
favor
or
against
the
project
right
then
I
would,
at
this
point,
move
to
table
this
open
until
our
next
meeting,
which
will
be.
B
October
November.
A
C
J
C
C
Generally,
when
we
do
projects
with
the
dot
is
involved,
you
can
ask,
but
they
will
tell
you
no
and
there's
really
no
getting
around
that
they
just
say
no.
It
happened
with
the
gas
station
on
the
south
side
that
went
in
behind
number
five,
they
lobbied
and
lobbied
and
lobbied,
and
you
said
no
we're
not
doing
it.
A
I
I
don't
know
that
any
that
a
new
opening
on
Chapman
Street
is
going
to
help
us
to
be
honest
with
you,
I,
don't
because
we
don't
get
just
don't
get
your
unit
account.
Even
if
we
could
do
that,
we
would
lose
a
substantial
piece
of
the
building
and
we're
just
not
going
to
get
to
the
unit
counts.
That's
needed
and
explain
to
the
application
when.
J
A
So,
okay
I
should
clarify.
There's
if
you,
if
you
look
closely
I,
don't
know.
Okay,
it
looks
like
you
have
black
and
white,
but
if
you
want
to
come
up
here
there,
you
can
see
a
red
property
line
which
is
basically
along
Chapman
Street
with
the
property
line.
It's
the
face
of
the
building.
So
all
of
that
green
that
you're,
seeing
in
between
the
building
and
the
sidewalk,
is
city
right
away.
It's
New
Providence,
so
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
use
that
right
or
dump
search.
F
J
A
F
C
It
can
be
asked
you
can
ask
they're
very
protective
they're
right
of
us.
The.
C
That
it's
impossible!
The
other
alternative,
though,
that
you
have
for
the
garbage
dumpster
is,
you
said
you
explored.
It
is
having
it
stored
inside
or
doing
something
along
those
sides.
So
then,
instead
of
having
the
outside
exposure
neighbor's
house,
is
there
a
part
of
the
unit?
If
you
use
the
front
10
feet
of
the
building
or
something
inside
where
it
was
I
know
that
inside
storage
or
Garbage
had
its
own
issues,
but
so
that's
not
out
there
right
next
to
the
street
or
right
next
to
a
neighbor's
house.
A
It
brings
up
you
know,
building
code
issues
that
that
really
change
the
construction
of
the
building,
that
Dimension
space;
okay,
yeah
ventilation
and
fire
codes
and
all
kind
of
posts
of
other
things
that
it's
going
to
kind
of
trigger.
So.
A
C
C
C
F
B
Anything
else
you
wanted
to
probably
check
out
before
an
interview
absolutely.
A
F
It's
the
first
Monday
of
November,
so
it
is
the
seventh.
D
A
B
A
B
Site
go.
A
Ahead
to
answer
your
question:
have
we
know,
will
it
be
done
yes,
and-
and
it's
anticipated
that
most
of
that
retaining
law,
probably
all
that
retaining
wall
between
the
pine
tree
and
the
Henry
Street
in
our
inside
of
our
development-
is
going
to
be
rebuilt.
It's
going
to
it's
going
to
have
to
be
the
Dominique.
The
construction.
C
Just
so
that
even
people
on
the
board,
so
you
can
understand
generally
the
developer
when
they
come
to
us
at
this
point,
will
not
have
what
are
called
building
drawings
right
because
building
drawings
from
a
project
this
size
could
cost
you
several
hundred
thousand
dollars
you're
not
going
to
spend
several
hundred
thousand
dollars
until
you
know
that
you
can
build
it
so
or
not
know,
or
you
have
a
good
idea,
you
can
build
it.
So
what
they
build!
Us
are
the
conceptual
site
plan,
drawings
and
the
sort
of
the
shell
drawings.
C
Once
they
get
permission
to
do
that
before
they
can
get
their
building
permit,
though
they
will
have
to
submit
a
whole
sheep
of
drawings.
It
shows
electrical.
The
foundation,
work,
they're
I
mean
they're
soil
testing,
the
soil
boring
all
those
things
full
workup.
That's
what
and
that
gets
happens
after
zoning
and
planning
approvals
before
you
can
get
your
building.
B
B
Anything
you
get
submit
through
the
planning
yep.
If
we
have
anything,
we
will
go
through
yep
Tito's,
our
Point
liaison.
Yes,
thank
you
very
much
all
right.
Thank
you
all.
Are
we
openings?
Thank
you.
D
F
No
I
just
just
wanted
to
point
out
183
Water
Street
is
a
proposal
for
a
public
parking
garage
with
upper
story,
dwelling
units
and
the
purpose
of
it
being
on
the
agenda
tonight
is
we
need
the
zoning
board
to
make
a
motion
to
defer
to
the
Planning
Commission
as
lead
agency,
because
the
Planning
Commission
will
be
doing
Secret
for
this
project.
B
Have
a
problem
with
that,
so
how
about
a
motion?
Let's
move
to
differ,
Seeker
leadership
or
secret
responsibilities
to
the
Planning
Commission
for
pike
development,
183,
Water
Street
on
the
area.
Variances
could
I
get
a
second
all
in
favor,
aye,
aye,
okay,
it's
in
there
quote
just.