►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting - 7/11/2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
D
E
C
A
I
want
to
announce
that
council
member
becker
is
the
way
for
work
purposes
and
he
is
asked
to
attend
remotely.
Can
I
have
a
motion
to
approve
that
so.
F
G
H
A
C
A
Public
comment
is
an
opportunity
for
speakers
to
provide
their
views
and
feedback
to
the
city
council.
It's
also
an
opportunity
for
the
city
council
to
listen
and
hear
diverse
points
of
view
to
maximize
the
impact
of
public
comment
and
show.
Respect
for
the
oppressed
expression
of
all
views.
Speakers
should
remain
should
maintain
civility
focus
on
city
issues.
A
Speakers
must
identify
themselves
for
the
record,
but
do
not
are
not
required
to
give
their
address.
Each
speaker
is
given
the
floor
for
three
minutes,
and
the
council
does
not
respond
or
engage
in
debate.
Any
speaker
that
engages
in
threatening
or
disorderly
behavior
will
be
deemed
out
of
order
in
their
time
of
faith.
H
H
If
220
000
were
2020
or
b4,
it
is
very
likely
that,
due
to
bloomington
normal
being
a
transitory
community,
we
have
two
large
schools,
people
coming
and
going.
We
have
a
few
large
businesses
again
people
coming
and
going
that
at
this
point,
if
you
have
not
collected
a
debt,
that's
over
90
days
or
prior
to
2020,
I
think
it's
time
to
turn
it
over
to
someone
professionally.
H
I
Good
evening
my
name
is
jennifer
weber,
I'm
a
ward,
1
citizen
of
bloomington,
I'm
here
tonight
to
speak
to
consent,
item
7j
on
today's
agenda
regarding
the
recommended
approval
of
the
expansion
of
the
liquor
license
for
cadillac
jax
at
both
public
hearings
related
to
the
recent
license.
Expansions
public
comments
have
been
submitted
with
concerns
about
noise
from
cadillac
jacks
and
the
impacts
to
nearby
residents.
I
The
recommendation
is
written
in
today's
agenda
is
to
move
forward.
Assuming
the
property
owner
ceases.
Outdoor
live
music
by
10
pm.
I
agree.
This
is
a
step
in
the
right
direction,
but
I
feel
like
there's
more.
That
can
be
done
saturday
july
9th
is
an
example
of
a
specific
recent
event.
Since
the
614
liquor
commission,
in
which
the
noise
levels
were
particularly
disruptive,
a
benefit
for
saint
jews
was
being
held
outdoors
on
the
premises.
I
I
It
did
quiet
down
for
some
time,
but
the
music
came
back
up
to
a
similar
level.
So
speaker,
noise
really
continued
to
be
an
issue
throughout
the
day.
Additionally,
they
had
set
up
motorcycle
burnout
pits
in
the
parking
lot
which
created
excessive
noise
and
tire
smoke
as
a
property
owner.
I
would
have
appreciated
a
direct
request
for
permission
or
direct
advance
notice
of
this
event
and
be
advised
of
the
potential
disruption.
I
I
J
Scott
steinle
ward,
five:
I
do
have
a
concern
regarding
the
fact
that
there
is
a
speed,
hump
downton
library.
I
saw
an
individual
trip
on
it,
bloody
his
nose
and
his
face
down.
Fortunately,
security
came
out
and
he
was
fine
that
he
didn't
need
to
be
transported,
but
I
would
think
that
something
like
this
would
really
be
of
grave
concern.
I
know
it
was
there
to
slow
the
cars
down
but
buy
a
gum.
It's
a
tripping
hazard
too.
J
The
other
thing
these
fireworks.
You
know.
I
know
it's
fine
to
have
the
parades
in
my
opinion,
but
I
wonder
how
mr
gleason
would
like
a
police
officer
discharging
a
firearm
right
next
to
his
ear,
with
no
hearing
protection.
That's
what
a
firecracker
sounds
like
to
a
dog.
J
You
know
I
would,
when
I
had
a
boarding
kennel.
That
was
the
one
holiday
I
dreaded
more
than
any,
not
because
of
what
happened
on
that
day,
but
those
lousy
fireworks.
Why
can't
we
take
that
same
money
and
put
that
into
the
roads
that
are
crumbling
under
our
eyes
tonight?
On
at
in
the
200
block
of
fleetwood
drive
there
are
places
that
the
level
grass
is
level
with
the
curb
there
is
places
on
washington
street
there's
places
all
over
the
city.
J
You
know
they
say
there
are
no
potholes
take
their
blinders
off.
I
mean
they're
potholes
all
over.
You
know
I
did
over
800
worth
of
damage
not
to
this
car,
but
another
car.
By
hitting
a
pothole
on
the
city
of
bloomington
street,
the
city
said
their
insurance
said.
No,
we
won't
cover
my
insurance
recovered
right
away,
less
a
deductible.
I
wonder
if
they
did
a
third
insurance
fraud.
J
That's
the
that's!
Basically,
everything
I've
got
to
say
the
sidewalks
are
not
ada
accessible.
I
saw
a
grandmother
years
ago
hiking
your
junior
high
granddaughter
in
a
wheelchair
up
over
the
curb
and
I
went
down.
I
said
you
are
out
of
your
mind
at
that
time.
Jim
karsh
was
the
public
works
director
and
I
told
her
I
said
I'd
call
jim
karsh
at
city
hall.
She
must
have
done
it
because
there
was
a
truck
out
there,
the
next
morning
at
8
o'clock,
to
put
that
sidewalk
in.
Thank
you.
K
Good
evening
I
live
at
1612
south
center
right
behind
cadillac
jacks.
The
noise
is
deafening,
sometimes
it'll
go
on
1
30
2
o'clock
in
the
morning.
I
call
the
police
every
weekend
every
weekend
because
he
violates
the
noise
violation.
You
can't
have
your
windows
open
on
a
nice
summer
evening.
You
can't
have
anybody
over
there.
He
disrespects
everybody,
and
I
don't
know
why
this
keeps
continuing
on
and
on
and
on.
It
has
got
to
stop
and
I
hope
that
you
don't
renew
his
liquor
license
because
obviously
he
has
not
learned
his
lesson.
K
That's
really
all
I
have
to
say
I'm
just
kind
of
tired
of
it.
You
know
you
can't
sleep
can't
do
anything.
I've
had
to
move
my
bedroom
to
the
front
of
the
house.
With
the
windows
closed
and
the
tv
up
pretty
loud.
You
can
hear
everything
I
would
invite
each
and
every
one
of
you
come
to
my
house
some
evening
on
a
friday
or
saturday
night,
unannounced,
of
course-
and
you
can
see
what
I
mean
all
the
neighbors
are
complaining.
K
C
G
Good
evening
my
name
is
deborah
johnson.
I
live
on
south
lee
street
south
lyndon
street
in
bloomington.
I
have
two
items
that
I
want
to
discuss
tonight.
My
first
item
is
the
linden
steep
street
traffic.
I
understand
that
that's
a
pretty
busy
street
lyndon
and
emerson,
but
being
a
resident
of
that
neighborhood.
G
I
am
very
concerned
about
the
speed
and
I
don't
know
what
the
protocol
is
to
petition
for
maybe
speed
bumps
or
traffic
bumps,
but
that
area
is
a
very
high
traffic
area
and
that's
a
very
dangerous
area,
and
I
would
like
for
to
be
considered
that
that
action
to
be
considered
because
I
would
invite
any
police
department
to
come
into
my
driveway
and
just
sit
and
I'm
sure
their
revenue
would
go
up
quite
a
bit
because
of
the
volume
of
traffic
and
the
speed
level.
G
That
is
on
that
in
that
neighborhood
and
my
second
agenda
item
of
concern
is
the
parking
enforcement,
I'm
very
concerned
about
bloomington's
method
of
satisfying
parking
tickets
by
giving
away
money
or
funds
that
these
people
owe-
and
I
I'm
just
concerned
about
that,
because
if
you
choose
to
forgive
parking
ticket
what's
next,
what
else
are
we
gonna,
forgive
and
with
taxpayers
money?
That
is
on
the
line?
I
think
that
money
could
be
collected
and
better
utilized
for
the
city
of
bloomington.
We
have
streets
that
need
to
be
repaired.
G
We
have
facilities
that
are
owned
by
the
city
that
needs
to
be
updated.
So,
instead
of
forgiving,
the
parking
collect
all
of
that
money
and
allocate
that
money
for
funds
that
can
be
utilized
somewhere
in
the
city
of
bloomington,
where
we
can
better
utilize
our
city-
and
I
am
really
concerned
about
the
pr
the
market
street,
take
that
money
and
take
it
just
take
a
walk
down
market
street
and
see
that
we
are
the
west
side
of
bloomington
is
the
gateway
to
offer
55
coming
into
the
city
of
bloomington.
G
A
Thank
you.
Next
up
is
recognition
and
appointments.
A
A
A
A
Okay,
we
will
have
a
discussion
once
we
make
motion
so
back
to
may
I
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent
agenda,
with
the
exception
of
7g
and
7j.
A
I'll
second,
okay
motion
by
councilmember,
crumpler
and
second
by
consumer
reward.
A
There
are
no
nonsense
to
it.
There
are
no
nays
to
announce.
Thank
you.
Wake
up!
Okay,
we'll
go
on
to
item
j
since
council
member
urban
pulled
it.
Let's
start
with
you,.
L
Sure,
thank
you.
I'm
actually
pulling
this
in
response
to
multiple
emails
that
I've
received
in
about
this,
as
well
as
in
response
to
the
public
comment
that
was
made
tonight,
I'm
pulling
it
because
I
think
I
want
to
make
a
motion
to
send
it
back
to
the
liquor
commission
and
I'm
just
encouraging
everyone
that
sent
me
an
email
or
spoke
at
public
comment.
L
It
is
imperative
that
when
you
get
involved
in
your
community
that
you
find
these
meetings
and
you
attend
those
meetings
and
make
your
voices
heard
there-
this
is
a
last
moment
type
scenario
here.
Once
we
get
to
the
council
meeting
and
yes
we're
going
to
rescue
it
this
time,
but
it's
just
really
important
for
everyone
to
be
involved
in
your
community,
attend
the
bloomington
101
classes
go
to
all
the
meetings
that
you
can
go
to.
L
N
N
Okay
and
I'm
I
support
sending
it
back
so
that
folks
can
have
an
opportunity
to
voice
concerns,
and
I
think
that
the
problem
of
making
that
neighborhood
well
comfortable
for
everyone
is
is
a
good
goal
and
we
should
keep
trying
to
find
other
ways
to
do
so.
A
A
O
I
actually,
if
you
don't
mind
mayor
pro
tem,
I
just
wanted
to
get.
Is
there
any
additional
clarification
from
clerk's
office
or
corporation
council?
The
clarification
by
alderwoman
emig
was
something
that
I
wanted
as
well,
but
is
there
anything
else
additional
to
say.
C
P
No,
the
only
other
thing
I
would
say
is
I
wouldn't
guaran,
I'm
not
sure
when
this
will
be
back
in
front
of
the
liquor
commission.
They
could
also
call
a
special
meeting.
I'm
not
sure
what
the
timeliness
of
this
is
so
check
our
website
and
then
they'll
also
give
out
the
notices
as
well
for
it.
So
just
that
clarification.
P
M
C
And
we're
going
to
go
ahead
and
put
the
vote
up,
but
just
so
that
you're
aware
nick
council
member
nick
becker
has
his
hand
raised
so
he
would
like-
and
we
were
kind
of
forgetting
him.
So
I
apologize
to
him
for
that
too.
I'm.
B
O
Thank
you
mayor
pro
tem
and
council.
This
is
one
that
we
had
enough
council
outreach
prior
to
the
meeting
that
we
pulled.
This
in
advance
asked
the
facility
director
russ
waller
to
come
and
speak
to
this
first
and
then
open
it
up
to
any
questions
or
comments
from
council
prior
to
the
item
being
called
russ.
S
Thank
you
see
you,
andrew
gleason
and
good
evening
council
on
broad
pro
temp,
I'm
going
to
give
a
quick
description
of
kind
of
how
we
got
to
where
we
are
tonight
I'll
make
it
brief.
So
I'm
probably
going
to
skip
some
questions
you
have
so
I'll
by
all
means.
Ask
when
I'm
done
so
back
in
2019,
we
hired
a
structural
engineer
to
do
an
evaluation
of
the
garage.
S
We
actually
did
the
arena
garage
at
the
same
time,
but
that's
outside
the
point
of
this
discussion,
so
market
garage,
they
came
with
their
evaluation
to
the
tune
of
almost
1.4
million
dollars
worth
of
work
that
needed
to
be
done.
S
After
discussions
with
the
administration,
we
were
asked
to
whittle
that
down
not
necessarily
to
the
bare
bare
minimum,
but
to
just
get
some
some
savings
out
of
that
and
not
do
as
much
so
we
put
out
to
bid
a
project
that
we
estimated
would
be
in
the
million
dollar
range
for
the
garage,
so
we
bid
that
in
2019
or
2020
actually
and
then
the
bids
we
got
in,
we
did
get
multiple
bids
that
ranged
anywhere
from
just
under
a
million
dollars
clear
up
to
almost
two
and
a
half
million
dollars
for
that
work.
S
We
awarded
that
work,
not
the
entire
amount,
but
based
on
the
bidding
based
on
some
consequences
of
covet
and
just
budgetary
constraints.
We
were
only
allowed
to
go
forward
with
500
000
worth
of
work,
so
the
essentially
the
estimate
of
just
under
a
million.
We
had
to
whittle
down
to
500
000,
and
that
was
true
structural
repairs
that
needed
to
be
done
to
keep
the
garage
open
and
operational.
S
We
did
that
work
that
work
did
take
a
little
longer
than
normal
and
we
just
completed
it
about
a
couple
months
ago.
They
finally
finished
up
that
work.
The
problem
is,
is
that
garage
continues
to
deteriorate
as
time
goes
by
it's
just
such
an
old
structure.
It
is
very
near
the
end
of
its
useful
life,
so
any
repairs.
S
We
do,
unfortunately,
a
couple
years
later,
we're
back
doing
more
repairs,
so
it's
kind
of
a
never-ending
battle,
but
we
are
back
tonight
basically
asking
for
an
additional
200,
almost
225
000,
to
kind
of
finish
that
major
structural
repair.
So
I
don't
know
if
anybody's
been
to
the
garage
but
there's
considerable
shoring
on
the
bottom
level,
primarily
the
bottom
level,
but
throughout
the
garage.
S
That
is
what
we're
asking
to
basically
repair
that
any
any
members
that
are
assured.
Essentially,
this
work
would
repair
those
members,
so
we
could
remove
that
shoring.
Keep
the
garage
safe
and
operational
for
a
few
more
years
until
we
work
out.
You
know
what
kind
of
replacement
facility
there's
several
discussions
in
play.
I
think
you're
all
aware
of
those
with
connect,
transit
potentially
taking
that
site,
but
we
also,
during
this
interim
we've,
also
done
a
study
on
downtown
parking,
the
needs.
S
What
where,
where
we
need,
how
much
parking
we
need
and
where
a
replacement
facility,
if
one
is
necessary
where
that
would
go,
that
report
is
almost
done,
not
100
done,
but
very
close
to
being
done.
The
connect
transit
issue
have
made
some
delays
in
that
and
they're,
basically
modifying
that
to
incorporate
some
of
the
changes
associated
with
that.
So
essentially,
what
we're
asking
tonight
is
what
I
call
kind
of
an
insurance
policy
that
work
needs
to
be
done
to
keep
the
garage
safe.
S
S
S
S
Unfortunately,
when
you
see
that
deterioration,
it's
actually
sometimes
very
severe,
and
you
need
to
get
shoring
in
there
very
very
quickly-
and
my
concern
is
continuing
with
this
ongoing
observation
and
trying
to
do
immediate
repairs
has
some
potential
consequences
that
are
worrisome
in
order
for
us
to
get
a
contractor
in
place
that
quickly
to
get
in
there
provide
shoring
it.
Just
it's
difficult
with
our
policies.
Even
if
we
did
an
emergency
operation
contractors
don't
respond
that
quickly.
S
Completed
kind
of
put
the
garage
back
on
track
for
another
two
to
three
years
of
continued
use
and
operation
makes
it
safe
and
then
essentially
by
then,
hopefully
we
have
a
better
understanding
of
what's
going
to
be
the
next
steps
you
know
what's
going
to
happen
to
that
garage,
do
we
turn
over
connect,
or
do
we
basically
replace
it
with
structure
so,
like
I
said,
I
look
it
as
an
insurance
policy
to
give
us
more
time
to
finish
out
the
studies,
to
finish
what
we're
going
to
do
and
then
essentially
the
shoring.
S
That's
there
any
additional
deterioration
which
probably
will
occur
between
now
and
then
we
have
the
shoring
we've
purchased
that
shoring
we
can
get
in
there
with
their
own
staff,
if
necessary,
to
put
shoring
up
into
new
places.
Right
now
we
have
no
shoring
left
if
new
deterioration
would
occur,
we
got
to
buy
more
shoring
or
higher
contractor
to
provide
that.
So
it
comes
with
the
consequences
of
essentially
what
I
just
explained
with
getting
a
contractor
in
there
quickly
will
be
a
problem.
S
M
Thank
you
mayor
pro
tem
russ,
thanks
for
coming
this
evening
before
council
really
appreciate.
You
know
the
updates
a
couple
of
things
I
just
wondered
about.
It
sounds
like
that,
while
you
were
while
you're
were
finishing,
these
last
repairs,
deterioration
was
continuing.
Would
that
be
fair
to
say.
S
M
Right
right-
and
you
talked
about
how
old
the
structure
is
you
know,
and
and
this
this
224
roughly
224
thousand
dollars
that
we
would
approve
this
evening-
your
estimation
that
that
will
extend
the
life
by
maybe
two
or
three
years.
That's.
M
Right,
you
know-
and
I
understand
that,
and
I
know
the
garage
needs
repairs
fairly
desperately.
M
It
looks
like
to
me,
but
I'm
wondering
at
the
end
of
those
two
next
two
years
down
the
road
or
three
years
down
the
road
or
whatever
that
time
frame
is
then
what
do
we
come
back
for
more
another
225
000.?
Would
it
would
it
be
reasonable
to
think
about
demolishing
that
garage
and
rebuilding
something
new?
I
know
that
you
know
the
connect
transit
discussions
continue.
I'm
just
wondering,
based
on
on
some
of
the
things
that
you
said
tonight,
you
talked
about
safety.
M
You
know
you
talked
about,
you
know
just
the
life
of
the
building
itself,
and
I
just
wonder
if
that
would
be
something
you
had
thought
about,
and
would
wonder
about
your
opinion
on
that.
S
Thank
you,
sir,
so
that
actually
plays
right
into
probably
a
presentation
we're
going
to
provide
later.
I
don't
go
too
far
into
that
tonight,
but
that
evaluation
we
had
at
downtown
parking
that
included
what
kind
of
replacement
what
size
type
of
replacement
facility
they
recommend
and
that
evaluation
they
do
recommend
not
necessarily
a
structure.
S
It
could
be
a
structure,
but
they
basically
gave
us
a
number,
and
that
number
is
about
350
spaces,
so
that
can
be
accomplished
in
a
couple
of
surface
lots.
It
can
also
be
accomplished
in
a
deck,
so
that
is
part
of
that
evaluation
and
once
that
report
is
finalized.
Obviously
we
would
share
that
with
council
and
provide
additional
information.
M
Just
real
quickly-
and
I
know
this
maybe
would
be
a
burden
on
the
city.
Have
you
thought
about
just
closing
the
garage
until
it's
safe
again?
Would
that
be
a?
Would
that
be
a
choice.
S
So
that's
definitely
a
choice,
but
I
don't
want
to
make
it
clear.
The
garage
is
not
necessarily
unsafe
right
now.
It's
still
open,
still
operational,
it's
just
the
shoring.
That's
there.
The
ongoing
deterioration
gives
us
concern
it's
still
safe,
so
park
in
there
I
go
down
there
basically
weekly
to
do
a
walk
through
and
inspect
it.
So
there's
no
concern
of
that
and
that's
why
we
have
the
consultant
come
back
regularly
to
do
inspections,
so
obviously
that
would
be
a
solution.
If
the
consultant
came
back
and
said,
hey
you've
got
a
serious
problem
here.
S
This
garage
you
either
need
to
get
this
repaired
immediately
or
shut
it
down.
That
would
be
a
solution
that
would
go
to
the
city,
count
the
city
administration
with
and
basically
say
we
need
to
shut
the
garage
down
and
we
could
make
that
happen
pretty
quickly.
Q
S
So
that's
difficult
to
determine
actually
it's
a
550
space
garage,
so
the
350
is
what
they're
saying
we
can
live
with
in
the
for
a
future
based
on
projections
and
stuff.
We
don't
do
counts
on
it.
Unfortunately,
the
way
we
operate
that
garage
with
the
gates,
the
gates,
are
currently
open,
we're
not
charging
because
of
all
the
ongoing
work
and
how
that
impacts
the
customers.
So
we
can't
count
how
many
people
are
using
it.
S
We
have
some
estimations
actually
did
some
reporting
and
then
part
of
that
analysis
was
done
as
they
estimated
it.
We're
saying
that
covid
really
took
a
knock
on
that
garage.
S
Some
estimates
that
they
provided
were
basically
down
to
the
200
250
space
range
and
some
of
their
predictions.
Some
of
that
report
is
that
it's
expected
to
return
just
don't
know
how.
Q
Okay,
what
would
the
cost
of
demolition
be.
S
Q
S
Correct
there's
some
additional
consequences.
I
think
of
closing
it
probably
not
severe,
because
we
do
have
a
tenant
in
the
in
one
corner
of
the
garage,
that's
the
post
office.
So
I
think
unless
the
structural
engineer
tells
me
otherwise,
you
know
that's
safe.
We
could
close
the
actual
parking
area
and
keep
the
the
the
tenant
where
they
are.
It's
just
the
you
know
you
lose
that
ability
to
have
people
park
in
the
garage
to
go
to
the
post
office,
so
you're
going
to
push
a
lot
of
people.
S
In
addition
to
you
know,
people
using
the
post
office
other
downtown
business
owners
you're
pushing
a
lot
of
those
people
to
somewhere
else
and
that's
somewhere
else.
We
really
don't
have
the
nearest
facility
that
would
basically
be
able
to
handle
that
would
be
either
the
lincoln
garage
or
the
bcpa
lots.
The
former
front
tier
locks
that
we
purchased
or.
S
The
ice
center
garage
is
not
that
close
people
would
not
be
willing
to
walk
that
distance.
In
fact,
the
analysis
that
was
done
by
the
consultant
says
they
would
not
even
be
willing
to
walk
from
the
lincoln
garage
down
to
the
vicinity
of
the
market
garage.
That's
too
far,
the
closest
one
that
some
people
majority
of
people
would
be
willing
to
walk
to
would
be
the
bcpa
lots.
T
F
You
pared
it
down
to
about
a
million
got
some
bids.
You
did
500
000
worth
of
work
and
now
we're
saying
we
only
need
another
225
000
to
bring
it
up.
So
we're
talking
750
000
out
of
a
million
that
we
were
thinking
two
years
ago
we
needed.
F
S
So
that
good
clarification
there,
the
the
225
000
are
the
bear,
bear
minimum.
The
structural,
severe
structural
deterioration-
that's
occurred.
That
is
all
that
is
going
to
repair
we're,
not
touching
the
drainage.
So
all
if
you've
gone
through
the
garage
you'll
see
all
the
drainage
pipes
hanging.
None
of
those
are
working
anymore.
Basically,
that
original
contract
of
1.4
million
dollars
was
going
to
go
through
that
garage
and
basically
bring
it
up
to
very
good
usable
conditions,
so
it
included
drainage
improvements,
included,
sealing
the
concrete
it
included,
replacing
all
the
joint
sealants.
S
S
We
whittled
it
down
to
the
500
000,
which
basically
was
structural,
no
drainage
improvements,
essentially
the
bare
bones
structural
improvements
that
need
to
be
done
beyond,
basically
not
including
what
the
the
current
remaining
work,
which
is
essentially
key
beamwork.
Basically,
the
t-beams
are
the
main
structural
components
of
that
garage
that
support
the
cars.
S
That
is
all
this
225
thousand
dollars.
It
finishes
out
the
structural
repairs
that
are
necessary
to
remove
that
shoring
in
place.
We've
estimated
that
to
go
back
to
include
all
those
additional
features
that
we
pulled
out
of
it
originally
you're.
Looking
at
an
eight
hundred
thousand
dollar
project,.
F
F
In
there
I
drove
through
there
yesterday,
it
looked
to
me
like
there's
well
over
a
hundred
shoring
jacks
in
there.
F
All
right-
and
so
this
is
all
just
structural-
it
doesn't
do
anything
for
the
drainage
issues
within
the
parking
garage.
It
doesn't
do
anything
about
sealing
the
concrete,
and
here
we
are
with
our
lovely
midwest
winter
spring.
Freezing
thaw
freezing
thaw
we're
going
to
keep
putting
water
and
ice
in
there
on
those
little
miniscule,
cracks
that
are
just
going
to
keep
so
two
to
three
years.
For
this
225
thousand
dollars
probably
isn't
realistic.
S
I'll
leave
that
to
the
structural
engineer,
that
is
a
recommendation
he's
providing
that
estimate
knowing
that
we're
not
going
to
do
the
ceiling.
So
this
the
company,
we
use
walker
consultants,
are
well
known
in
the
parking
industry.
That's
all
they
do.
They
don't
do
other
structural
work.
Basically
they
do
parking
garages.
S
S
L
Thank
you
so
much
for
coming
here
and
and
like
addressing
some
of
these
issues
with
us
and
I'm.
I
need
to
ask
some
tough
questions
so
feel
free
to
have
city
manager
jump
in.
If
you
need
him,
please,
if
we
decide
as
a
council
to
not
fund
any
more
repairs
for
the
garage,
because
our
appetite
is
to
tear
that
thing
down
and
build
up
a
green,
viable
working
space,
whether
that's
on
our
own
or
the
transit
or
whatever
we
decide
that
we
want
to
do.
L
O
This
is
an
interesting
topic
when
we
talk
about
the
market
street
garage
and
I'm
not
necessarily
saying
that
in
a
bad
way.
But
it's
one
where
you
know
russ
is
saying
that
for
200
plus
thousand
dollars.
O
You
know
this
is
an
insurance
policy
and
it
is,
but
it's
also
buying
us
some
time
in
terms
of
addressing
the
long-term
solution
for
the
downtown,
because
there
are
several
conversations
that
are
in
play.
Currently
we're
gonna
blink
in
two
or
three
years
have
gone
by
the
structural
engineers
have
provided
this
quote
for
an
amount
of
work
to
buy
us
that
time
and
that
insurance
policy.
O
O
They
would
be
up
in
arms,
even
the
conversation
with
connect
transit
as
that
location
being
a
possible
site
when
that
was
prematurely
released
to
the
community.
I
immediately
heard
from
some
of
the
downtown
users
of
the
market
street
garage,
and
I
had
to
address
that
saying
that
this
was
a
premature
conversation.
O
Council
has
not
decided
this
and
I
guarantee
that
parking
in
the
construction
phase,
whether
we
demo
and
rebuild
in
its
entirety.
You
know
entirely
on
our
own
or
whether
we
partner
with
the
opportunity
with
the
transfer
station
we
have
got
to
sit.
We
have
got
to
figure
out
what
the
interme,
what
the
interim
parking
solution
would
be
for
this.
O
E
E
However,
the
estimates
that
have
been
shared
in
terms
of
the
cost
to
demolish
and
rebuild
the
structure
would
allow
us
to
spend
a
quarter
of
a
million
dollars
a
year
in
maintenance
for
50
plus
years,
and
we
still
would
not
be
at
that
point
in
terms
of
the
cost
that
we're
talking
about.
So
I
I
just
wanted
to
to
share
that.
E
E
R
I'm
in
agreement
with
council
member
montney
on
the
the
maintenance
costs.
I
I
think
we
have
no
choice
but
to
do
this
right
now,
based
on
what
she
has
said
and
also
what
what
tim
said,
I
think
we
have
have
to
buy
ourselves
a
little
time
and
there's
no
the
the
risk
that
that
russ
stated
for
us
very
well.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your.
Your
information,
I
think,
would
be
too
great
to
existing
businesses
and
to
safety.
If
we
didn't
do
the
work.
A
I
think
I
would
like
to
make
a
comment.
I
have
heard
for
the
past
eight
years
and
I'm
sure
you're
aware
the
you
know
we're
gonna
fix
it
a
little
because
we
don't
know
what
we're
going
to
do
with
it,
and
I
also
remember
council,
member
matthew-
and
I,
both
three
years
ago
said.
A
You
know
we
really
need
to
bite
the
bullet,
but
the
thing
is
nearly
50
years
old.
It's
way
beyond
the
life
of
a
garage.
I
understand
that
you
need
to
do
this
band-aid
now,
but
I
do
think
maybe
at
the
visioning
retreat.
We
need
to
bite
the
bullet
or
at
least
address
that
issue,
so
that
you
can
begin
to
move
forward
with
the
actual
big
fix.
L
Yes,
thank
you,
so
I
I
just
want
to
make
in
my
own
yeah
okay,
so
I
just
want
to
make
one
comment
and
I
appreciate
your
presentation,
city
manager.
I
appreciate
your
input,
my
issue
in
my
heart
and
my
gut
is
this-
is
a
can
that
has
been
kicked
down
the
road
over
and
over
and
over
again
I
am
not
kicking
this.
L
Can
so
I'm
not
going
to
support
this,
I'm
going
to
say
no
and
I'm
saying
no,
not
because
I
don't
want
the
safety
of
the
garage,
not
because
none
of
those
reasons
I'm
saying
no,
because
the
can's
stopping
here
with
me,
I
will
not
kick
this
can
any
further.
If
I
had
my
way,
I
would
say:
get
a
new
place
there,
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
clear
that
it's
time
for
us
as
a
council,
the
time
for
me,
I'm
not
kicking
cans
anymore.
L
M
Yes,
thank
you
mayor
tim
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
this
item.
As
stated.
A
Okay
motion
by
council
member
crumpler,
second
by
council
member
emig,
can
you
vote.
A
B
Please
yes,
councilmember
urban,
councilmember,
walsh
and
councilmember
ward.
A
O
U
Thank
you,
city
manager.
This
is
a
somewhat
of
a
simple
agenda
item,
but
we
thought
we'd
take
the
opportunity
to
provide
just
an
update
on
our
investment
advisor
relationships.
This
is
not
meant
to
be
a
deep
dive,
we'll
we
will
be
inviting
those
investment
advisors
in
on
separate
occasions
to
do
presentations
to
council
and
really
kind
of
review,
the
investments,
the
strategy
etc.
U
U
The
the
interest
rate
environment
was
very
difficult
back,
then,
being
good
stewards
of
the
taxpayers
dollars.
We
thought
it
wise
to
engage
with
financial
advisors
at
that
time
to
assist
us
in
eking
every
ounce
of
return.
We
can
get
out
of
those
those
cash
reserves
that
we're
holding
the
the
council
memo
at
that
time.
Had
a
cap,
a
dollar
amount
cap,
we
were
going
to
invest
50
million
dollars.
U
The
fee
structure
was
about
.125
percent
of
assets
under
management,
so
that
was
going
to
be
about
sixty
two
five
sixty
two
thousand
five
hundred
per
year,
so
we
put
had
a
cap
on
the
memo
for
of
seventy
thousand
and
the
agenda
item
tonight
is
really
just
to
remove
that
dollar
cap
and
just
reference
the
agreement,
the
rates
within
the
agreements
with
the
advisors
so
that
we
don't
have
to
liquidate
the
portfolio
once
it
starts,
producing
better
returns
and
we
exceed
you
know
60
70
million
dollars
and
then
the
fee
is
going
to
go
up
substantially
because
of
that,
maybe
not
substantial.
U
But
because
of
that
and
then
one
additional
item
that
I
want
to
mention
is
that
we
have
close
on
the
library
slash
pool
bond,
so
we
have
pool
bond
cash
in
the
bank,
account
right
now.
Of
course
that's
going
to
get
spent
over
the
next
year,
but
we
also
have
arpa
funds,
so
we've
we've
realized
all
of
our
american
rescue
plan
act
dollars.
Council
is
reviewing
how
we
want
to
deploy
those,
but
in
the
meantime
we
have
excess
cash.
U
So
we
may
we
want
to
look
at
whether
or
not
we
want
to
utilize
the
advisors
for
that
as
well.
So
that's
another
reason
to
remove
this
cap
on
on
that
fee
structure.
So
this
slide
is
a
recap
of
some
of
the
items
I
just
mentioned
september.
21
council
approved
25
million
dollar
engagements
with
pfms
management
management
and
abuse
wealth
management.
U
At
that
time
we
the
illinois
funds,
that's
a
local
government
investment
pool.
Those
are
investment
funds
that
are
managed
by
state
treasurers,
and
we
use
that
kind
of
as
a
benchmark
for
our
cash
holdings
at
banks
for
our
sweep
accounts,
etc.
It
was
paying
less
than
one
half
of
one
percent.
U
So
that's
what
really
prompted
that
review
at
that
time
and
the
initial
goal
of
the
engagement
was
to
realize
an
extra
one
percent
return
a
via
these
professionally
managed
portfolios
having
eyes
on
expertise
constantly
looking
freeing
us
up
in
finance
to
do
other
operations
of
the
city.
So
an
extra
one
percent
would
realize
an
extra
half
million
dollars
even
netting
out
the
fees
would
be
400
000
better
off
next
slide,
please!
U
So
how
are
we
doing?
Just
from
a
very
high
level,
I
was
going
to
utilize
busy
wealth
management
to
kind
of
highlight
some
of
the
returns
we're
seeing
so
far
the
portfolios
they
didn't
get
fully
deployed.
The
cash
didn't
get
fully
deployed
until
through
in
a
year
rates
started
kind
of
going
crazy,
so
the
investment
advisors.
U
You
know
they
were
taking
their
time,
putting
some
cash
in
short
term
instruments
because
they
started
those
rates
going
up
so
each
each
month
we
kind
of
have
a
snapshot
of
what
our
average
yield
to
maturity.
U
The
market
value
of
those
instruments
is
going
to
go
down
we're
going
to
hold
these
instruments
until
maturity,
so
we're
looking
at
yield
to
maturity
and
comparing
that
to
what
we
would
have
realized
if
we
would
have
just
kept
our
cash
in
illinois
funds,
which
is
basically
a
money
market.
Short-Term
investment
fund
so
highlighting
what
bucy
pulled
together
for
us
here
in
april,
you
can
see
that
the
average
yield
to
maturity
was
2.4
percent.
Illinois
funds
was
paying
less
than
a
half
a
percent
of
interest
in,
as
of
may
2.6.
U
So
we've
had,
we
had
some
roll
offs
of
maturities.
They
reinvested
at
higher
rates
versus
0.795
for
illinois
funds
and
then,
as
of
june
3.5
percent
versus
1.1.
So
you
can
see
even
illinois.
Funds
is
going
up
very
significantly
month
over
month
as
the
fed
funds
rate
changes
and
the
and
the
federal
government
starts.
You
know
implementing
those
changes
to
try
to
slow
down
inflation,
so
we
are
experienced
so
a
significant
spread
between
what
we
would
have
been
in
the
cash.
U
So
from
a
summary
from
a
high
level,
the
advisors
are
performing
as
desired.
We
have
expertise
watching
our
cash
for
us
frees
up
finance
staff,
as
I
mentioned,
to
focus
on
operations
of
the
city
and
we're
realizing
better
returns
to
boot.
Next
slide.
Please
so
just
you
know
real
high
level.
Just
safety
is
number
one
in
our
investment
policy
right
and,
and
that
is
written
into
the
state
statute
as
well,
basically
dictates
what
municipalities
can
invest
in.
U
U
You
can
see
that
most
of
the
portfolio
is
in
double
a
plus
s:
p
500
rate
s,
p
rating
rated
companies,
or
you
know
agencies,
and
then
I
put
a
snippet
in
there
too
to
show
the
strategy
within
the
portfolio
forty
two
percent
of
portfolio
maturing
just
in
the
next
two
years.
So
you
know
they're
they're,
watching
the
yield
curves
they
understand.
You
know
the
fed
can
manipulate
or
control
things
in
a
way
and
they're
they're
trying
to
execute
and
acknowledge.
You
know
that
activity
next
slide
please.
U
So
this
is
pfm
asset
management.
You
can
see
that
they're
they're
a
little
bit
more
conservative.
They
have
71
percent
of
the
funds
in
treasuries
versus
53
for
bucy.
I
won't
go
through
the
performance.
They
did
not
provide
the
same
kind
of
slide
that
bucy
did
and
we'll
highlight
pfm
with
the
next
review,
pretty
similar
distribution
of
assets
and
pretty
similar
credit
quality
related
to
the
s
p.
Here
we
have
78
in
that
double
a
plus
category.
U
So
you
know
just
to
summarize,
as
I
opened,
our
adva
advisors
are
providing
expertise
in
diversification
rate
monitoring
as
we
desired.
That
was
the
intent
of
the
engagement.
We
had
very
competitive
fee
structure.
I
believe
pfm
asset
management
you
can
see
0
to
25
million,
is
at
0.1
percent.
You
see
0
to
50
million
point
one
five
percent
pf
m
asset
management
from
25.
To
fifty.
U
I
wanted
to
show
that
you
know
zero
to
fifty
range
is
at
.08,
so
they
have
a
tier
structure,
so
their
costs
are
a
little
lower
than
bucy,
but
we
wanted
to
go
with
the
local
presence
that
was
discussed.
You
know
at
the
time
we
brought
forward
the
recommendation
for
these
advisors,
so
my
recommendation
is,
to
you
know,
approve
the
resolution
so
that
we
don't
have
that
dollar
cap
limit
on
these
relationships.
We
can
let
the
portfolios
grow.
U
We
can
put
in
some
short-term
cash
if,
if
it
looks
like,
we
have
an
opportunity
to
gain
more
interest
because
the
illinois
funds
and
the
sweep
accounts
that
our
banks,
those
always
lag
significantly
on
some
of
the
the
rates
that
we
can
get
in
the
market,
even
with
short-term
treasuries,
t-bills
etc.
As
long
as
we
have
you
know
the
focus
on
and
watching
the
dollars
that
we
can
get
from
our
investment
advisors.
U
So
by
adopting
this
resolution,
we
can
put
additional
dollars
in
if
we,
if
we
deem,
that
a
wise
move,
you
know
in
the
short
term,
as
we
have
these
funds
just
sitting
in
our
bank
account
next
slide.
Please,
and
with
that
I'll
pause
for
questions
or
comments.
N
Thanks
for
the
report,
I
just
have
a
question
about
why
initially-
and
this
is
for
my
my
edification
and
perhaps
others
who
are
wondering-
did
we
limit
the
annual
fees
to
70
000
like
why?
Why
was
that
a
good
idea
to
do
so
back
then.
U
To
be
honest,
I'm
not
really
sure
we
when
we
were
doing
the
memo
it
was
62.5
was
the
blended
rate
and
it
just
it
seemed
like,
since
it
was
kind
of
a
large
step
for
the
community
and
for
council,
you
know
engaging
investment
advisors
at
you
know:
250
million
dollars
that
to
put
a
fee
cap
a
numeric
fee
cap
on
there
seems
like
a
conservative
approach,
but
in
retrospect
it
actually
is
limiting.
You
know
on
the
positive
performance
of
the
portfolios.
A
Anyone
else
I'd
like
to
make
a
comment,
I'm
very
happy
with
this,
and
those
advisors
are
forward-looking,
which
is
they
are
really
on
top
of
the
market
movement
and
they
can't
predict
the
future,
but
with
their
expertise
and
the
forward-looking.
A
Okay,
moved
by
councilmember
martin
ii
council
member
crumpler,
so
we
can
vote.
A
O
Thank
you
mayor
pro
tem
and
council.
This
agenda
item
actually
rolling
into
tonight's
meeting.
I
thought
we
were
gonna
be
taking
a
victory
lap
and
I
think
we're
gonna
be
talking
a
little
bit
more
about
about
this
agenda
item.
O
The
original
thought
was
it
and
again.
This
is
something
that's
evolved
over
the
last
couple
of
years,
as
we
have
as
a
city
have
gotten
more
aggressive
regarding
some
of
our
back
fees,
unpaid
fees,
by
entering
into
the
state's
eye
drop
program,
this
window
that
we're
proposing
I
had
prep
counsel
realize
that
we
have
received
since
the
agenda
was
posted,
that
the
council
members
have
heard
from
some
constituents,
and
if
tonight
we
halt
and
staff
are
asked
to
go
a
different
direction.
That's
completely
fine!
O
Amnesty
take
half
of
the
proceeds
that
were
collected
for
those
that
are
behind
in
paying
these
fees
and
partnering
with
a
program
to
provide
backpacks
and
such
to
district
87
and
unit
5
schools
for
the
back
to
school
program,
guarantee
that
if
we
take
if
this
is
approved
tonight-
and
we
take
that
more
aggressive
approach,
you
know
a
boot
on
some
of
the
vehicles
step.
This
up
a
notch.
We're
still
going
to
have
plenty
of
those
boots
to
deploy,
because
we're
not
going
to
have
everyone
take
advantage
of
this
30-day
amnesty
program.
O
But
we
look
to
counsel
for
direction
after
scott
rathbun's
brief
presentation
on
the
item.
Scott.
U
U
One
of
the
complexities,
the
issues
with
parking
debt
is
it's
a
it's
basically,
a
high
volume,
low
ticket
situation,
so
there's
there's
almost
10
000
citations
that
are
that
have
balances
due
last
full
report.
I
looked
at
it's
been
a
challenge
through
the
years
for
parking
enforcement,
that's
been
handled
by
facilities
and
police
going
through
the
years
to
collect
these
debts.
We
engaged
the
collections
side
of
the
the
software
provider
vendor
that
we
use
t2
ccs
and
for
a
collections
contract
in
2017..
U
My
understanding
is,
you
know,
looking
at
booting
towing
all
these
had
com
complexities
related
to
safety
of
staff,
notification
to
the
residents
ahead
of
time,
and
then
cars
can
be
moved
so
eye
drop
was,
I
think,
originated
a
few
years
ago.
I
began
hearing,
you
know
it
was
either
champagne
or
urbana
had
had
utilized
it
very
successfully.
U
So
we
started
looking
at
it
for
this
kind
of
debt.
So
you
know
it's
it's
kind
of
one
of
those
where
you
you
can
roll
all
the
debt
into
the
state's
program
via
just
an
upload,
so
you
know
high
volume
and
you
can
still
produce
results,
hopefully
without
having
to
touch
each
each
item.
So,
like
the
collections
firm
that
they
don't
contractually
are
not
contractually
obligated
to
execute
a
lot
of
activity
because
you
know
you
could
have
a
ticket
in
their
firm
or
in
their
system
for
38
dollars.
U
I
mean
that's
what
a
ticket
escalates
to
by
the
time
it
goes
to
collections.
So
there's
you
know
not
filing
enough
credit
activity
and
that
kind
of
thing
you
know
direct
calls
to
a
lot
of
individuals.
So
eye
drop
was
considered
to
be.
You
know
a
good
solution,
a
lot
of
municipalities
utilizing
it
successfully.
U
So
I
think
the
idea
was,
you
know
an
opportunity
before
we
launched
that
program
to
address
you
know,
potentially
maybe
some
residents
that
could
have
gotten
away
from
them
or
you
know
what
we
thought
might
be
a
benefit
to
the
community
from
a
charitable
stand
standpoint.
So
just
the
facts
going
forward
now
next
slide,
please
so
approximately
284
000
in
citation
debt
over
90
days
past
you.
U
I
want
to
emphasize
that
a
significant
amount
of
that
is
related
to
the
collections
fee
and
late
fees,
so
the
10
citation
escalates
to
38
by
the
time
it
goes
to
collections.
So
that
means
that
74
percent
of
that
balance
is
really
related
to
late
fees
and
the
collections
fee.
U
Cities
set
to
utilize
the
state's
local
debt
recovery
program,
also
known
as
eye
dropped,
augment
collection
efforts
on
this
debt.
This
would
be,
I
think,
a
very
significant
tool
in
addressing
this
high
volume,
low
value
debt
activity.
U
U
The
current
proposal
for
the
pr
amnesty
program
would
be
a
50
reduction
only
in
debt
for
debt.
That's
in
the
collections
system,
so
90
days
past
due
a
narrow
window,
as
the
city
manager
mentioned
july,
15
through
august
15th
we'd
be
looking
to
process
the
remaining
debt
through
the
eye
drop
program,
payments
must
be
paid.
U
So
if,
if
approved,
payments
must
be
paid
by
calling
or
visiting
the
city
customer
service
hub,
we
need
to
process
payment
activity
through
the
collections
vendor
and
then
just
you
know
a
little
run
down
adjusting
for
the
collection
agency
fees.
The
city
will
obtain
approximately
four
dollars
of
the
original
ten
dollar
citation
amount.
So
if
you
look
at
this
from
just
the
original
citation,
the
city
will
retain
about
four
or
forty
percent
of
that
original
citation
amount
after
donating
two
dollars
to
the
back
to
school
alliance.
U
So
that's
on
a
per
citation
basis,
and
again
you
can
see
here
if
just
for
the
collections
component,
I
mentioned
there's
almost
10
000
citations
that
are
due,
but
those
aren't
all
in
collections
that,
at
the
time
of
this
presentation,
was
put
together,
7,
000,
citations
or
90
days
passed
next
slide
please.
U
So
this
is
just
some
information
on
the
back
to
school
alliance.
The
goals
you
know
in
the
bottom
right
corner,
helping
kids
get
off
to
a
good
start.
School
begins,
putting
most
basic
tools,
hands
to
help
them
achieve
a
success
in
education,
creating
a
positive
experience
as
they
start
the
school
year.
U
So
again,
high
volume,
low
dollar
of
a
debt
need
to
find
a
kind
of
a
bulk
way
of
processing
it.
The
eye
drop
program,
I
think,
will
be
a
very
successful
approach
to
that.
Whether
this
program
is
approved
or
not,
questions
or
comments.
A
R
Yeah,
if
you
look
at
the
little,
I'm
raising
my
hand
when
I
need
to
say
something
in
the
zoom.
So
if
you
can
see
that
that
would.
R
Anyway,
the
only
question
I
have
for
scott
is
with
my
collections
experience
in
the
past
in
a
different
scenario,
I
find
often
the
cost
of
collections
and
that
this
seems
like
a
good
financial
deal
to
me.
So
I
just
want
to
ask
you
the
one
question
which
is:
if
we
go
through
collections,
what
percentage
do
you
think
we'll
end
up
getting
out
of
that
10?
Will
we
get
more
than
the
40
or
less
my
experience
would
be
less
so
we
wouldn't
really
be
giving
away
money
as
some
of
the
the
concerned.
R
U
Great
quest,
I
don't
have
statistics
as
far
as
an
expectation
for
my
drop.
I
know
it's
been
successful.
I
also
am
concerned,
though,
that
I
know
a
lot
of
individuals
manage
their
tax
returns,
their
tax
fines
et
cetera,
so
that
they
don't
do
they
don't
get
refunds,
and
so
the
idrop
program
is
based
on
dollars
being
held
back
by
the
state
from
tax
refunds
and
redirected
to
local
governments
for
this
program.
So
there
there's.
You
know
to
your
point.
R
Well,
no,
that
that
really
that
helps,
but
my
question
is:
if
you
just
forget
this
program
altogether,
if
you
just
send
these
all
out
to
collections
of
the
original,
you
know
10
or
whatever,
are
you
expecting
to
get
four
back?
Are
you
expecting
get
in
the
net?
Not
just
you
know,
what's
the
net
that
we
expect
we'll
get
back,
is
it
going
to
be
less
than
four.
R
So
the-
and
this
is
a
comment
now-
thank
you,
scott
good,
good
job.
As
always,
this
is
a
comment
to
those
that
are
concerned,
and
I'm
number
one
on
the
list
of
hold
people
accountable.
People
should
pay
their
debt.
A
I'm
sorry,
council,
member
ward,
emic
money
and
walsh.
N
Thank
you.
I
I
need
to
do
more
research,
but
I
think
there
is
some
data
where
it
demon.
We
see
that
parking
tickets
affects
a
certain
demographic
more
than
others,
and
in
that
way
it's
it's
considered.
Regressive
and
people
should
be
accountable,
but
perhaps
it's
this
provides
a
rescue
a
way
to
pay
something,
while
also
not
recouping
some
of
the
costs
that
that
we
haven't
been
able
to
recoup.
So
I'm
in
favor
of
this,
I
think
that
it's
limited.
N
I
think
that
it
addresses
an
opportunity
for
people
to
pay
some
of
their
debt
off.
The
fees
can
grow
exponentially
and
that
can
be
a
burden
for
some
to
pay.
I
really
like
that.
We're
donating
some
funds
to
the
back
to
school
alliance,
and
I
think
it
would
be
really
interesting
to
do
a
cost
analysis
after
one
month
to
see
what
we
have
recouped
and
then
I
think
it's
the
illinois
debt
recovery
offset
portal
is
that
eye
drop.
N
There
are
lots
of
eye
drop
acronyms
out
there
and
that's
the
one
that
you're
referring
to
and
that's
where
we
go
go
into
more
aggressive
tactics
to
recoup
dollars.
Is
that
right,
and
so
that
that
can
still
happen,
but
let's
give
folks
an
opportunity
to
to
pay
the
the
amount
of
the
initial
fee
at
least,
and
it
won't
be
reduced
less
than
fifty
percent,
as
I
read
it
correctly,
so
I
am
in
favor
of
this.
Thank
you.
E
Just
first
of
all
checking
this
backdrop.
This
statistic
that
was
sent
to
me
earlier
about
60
of
this
debt
is
about
50
individuals.
Is
that
correct,
280
53
people
owing
180
000
dollars?
Yes,
that's
correct!
Okay,
so
within
that
I
mean
that's
a
small
enough
population,
where
we
should
be
able
to
actually
develop
a
point
of
view
about
the
actual
demographics
and
income
level
of
these
folks.
E
E
That
means
that
ninety
percent
of
the
people
are
actually
actively
paying
their
tickets,
and
in
this
situation
we
would
be
removing
half
the
debt
of
53
people
potentially
if
they
pay
I'm
just
putting
that
out
there
in
terms
of
just
a
point
of
of
clarification,
as
we
think
about
that,
I
mean
that's,
like
thirty
3
400
a
person
for
53
people,
I'd
like
to
know
who
they
are,
you
know.
Perhaps
these
are
people
who
have
the
opportunity
to
pay
that
debt,
while
others
have
been
paying
that
debt.
E
F
Thank
you
he's
going
to
this
number
of
53
individuals
with
with
that
great
amount.
There
do
we
know
how
of
these
53
individuals,
how
many
of
them
have
multiple
citations.
F
Okay,
so
these
are
people
who
just
constantly
don't
care
that
we
have
parking
rules
and
regulations
that
they
have
to
follow
and
that
they
should
be
following,
and
that
here
we
are
we're
going
to
turn
around
and
and
we're
talking
about
giving
them
a
nice
little
reward
for
continuing
to
do
the
same
thing
over
and
over
again
with
this
amnesty
program,
how
would
it
be
advertised?
You
know
you
have
30
days
to
get
this
done.
How's
the
city
going
to
advertise
us.
U
We're
going
to
utilize
our
what's
catherine's
title.
U
Communication
is
an
external
affairs
manager,
so
we
we
would
utilize
all
social
media
website
et
cetera,
and
this
meeting
was
meant
to
be
as
also
kind
of
a
launching
point
or
a
way
of
pushing
out
the
information
on
it.
Would
there.
F
And
then
something
that
council
member
becker
was
touching
on
where
he
said
he
was
talking
about
the
forty
percent
versus
the
twenty
percent.
When
we
talk
about
submitting
the
dollars
for
collection,
we're
not
just
submitting
ten
dollars
for
each
individual,
we're
talking
about
submitting
ten
dollars,
plus
their
any
any
additional
fees,
any
additional
fines.
On
top
of
that
for
the
collections
is
that
correct.
U
Yes,
that's
correct.
The
the
escalation
is
a
ten
dollar
original
citation
and
there's
a
five
dollar
late
fee.
I
don't
remember
that
after
so
much
time,
then
a
10
late
fee,
so
it
escalates
to
25
and
then
when
it
goes
to
collection,
a
13
collection
fee
is
added.
On
top.
F
Okay,
so
there
we're
up
to
about
38,
so
we'd
be
submitting
38,
and
you
talk
about
the
25
return
on
that.
That's
a
little
bit
more
than
two
dollars
or
four
dollars
there
for
us.
C
H
H
R
M
A
E
Okay,
so
in
light
of
this
53
that
are
chronic
and
it's
my
understanding
that
these
are
long-term
chronic
issues.
Is
there
ability
here
for
us
to
not
make
this
and
all
or
nothing,
but
really
look
for
an
opportunity
to
honor
the
spirit
of
what
the
staff's
recommendation
is,
but
perhaps
carve
out
these
53
individuals
who
have
amassed
chronic
long-term
debt
through
repeated
parking
violations.
U
M
Councilmember
crumpler.
Yes,
thank
you
mayor
pro
tem,
thanks
scott.
For
for
your
insights.
As
always,
I
wonder,
do
you
see
this
as
a
one-time
program
or
something
we're
considering
doing
annually.
U
Personally,
I
saw
it
as
a
one-time
program
before
we
launched
the
eye
drop
program
which
we
would
we
would
continually
roll
debt
through
that
program.
We
were
talking
about
doing
it
once
a
year,
but
that
would
be
the
go-to
program
going
forward.
M
Okay,
thanks
and
my
second
question-
you
talked
about
four
dollars
of
that
original
10
citation
the
city
would
recover.
Will
that
offset
the
program
costs
of
the
of
the
administering
the
amnesty
program?
You
know
what
I
mean
well.
U
I
guess
it
depends
on
how
many
four
dollars
come
in,
but
administering
the
amnes
amnesty
program.
We
really
shouldn't
have
additional
direct
expenses
related
to
that
I
mean
the
the
the
activity
will
be
handled
by
our
hub
staff.
I
don't
foresee
this
driving
over
time.
M
And
then,
finally,
I've
heard
from
a
number
of
constituents
who
view
this
as
again
not
holding
people
accountable.
Do
you
think
this
action
sends
any
message
like
that
from
them
from
the
city
that
we're
really
letting
people
off
the
hook.
U
Personally,
I
think,
since
we
have
a
plan
on
the
other
side
of
this,
that
is
meant
and
driven
to
hold
people
accountable
and
to
process
that
debt
with
the
options
that
we
have
available
to
us
readily
like
the
eye
drop
program,
the
state
program,
I
think,
as
long
as
you
know,
we
have
a
set
plan
in
place
that
that
message
isn't
that
severe.
M
Thank
you
also
in
responding
to
council
member
councilmember
money.
I
would
be
interested,
I
mean
other
people's
thoughts
about
amending
this,
so
that
that
53,
I
hate
to
use
that
number.
But
you
know
I
I'm
concerned.
I
guess
that
you
know
individuals
who
have
the
ability
to
pay
and
just
choose
not
to
that
seems
to
me
to
be
a
different
demographic
than
those.
Perhaps
who
don't
have
the
means
to
pay
those
tickets
and
they
need
assistance.
So
I'm
in
response
to
your
question.
A
I
I
have
a
just
one
question:
what
is
the
success
rate
from
decatur
on
this
amnesty?
How
many
people
took
advantage
of
it.
U
I
don't
recall
the
the
we
shared
internally,
some
of
the
news
articles
and
the
memos
that
they
and
they
were
disappointed
in
their
amnesty
program.
They
did
not
get
the
results
that
they
were
expecting.
I
recall
that
they
they
had
twenty
thousand
dollars,
something
like
that
come
in,
but
I
think
they're
anticipating
it
to
be
a
much
larger
amount.
E
D
E
Question
what
is
the
reason
I
mean
given
again
this
example
of
this
long-term
chronic
amassing
of
disregard
to
the
city's
ordinances?
O
I'm
going
to
need
somebody
to
there,
we
go
russ,
I
don't
know
if
you
have
an
opinion
I'll
bring
you
up
to
the
podium.
If
you
want
to
share
your
thoughts
and
while
he's
coming
up
to
the
podium,
one
thing
that
I
would
share,
I
think
it
was
councilman
alderman,
crumpler's
question
you
know
of
scott.
You
know
this
is
not
a
perfect
item
where
we
have
this
overwhelming
belief
that
this
is
the
best
thing
that
we
should
do
and
we
do
think
it
sends
a
message.
O
Potentially
if
this
was
approved,
as
as
council
presented
it,
it
probably
does
send
a
bad
message.
You
know
in
this
one
specific
instance,
but
we
thought
that
there
might
be
enough
upside
with
what
was
being
presented,
that
this
is
something
that
the
council
is
a
one
time
could
approve.
So
it's
definitely
not
perfect
to
some
of
the
comments
that
have
been
made
during
this
discussion.
O
Public
comments,
but
thought
that
it
was
something
to
at
least
explore
so
appreciate
the
conversation
russ.
S
So
I
don't
remember
the
exact
date
or
the
year
that
I
was
inherited
the
parking
enforcement,
but
since
then
I've
spent
a
lot
of
time.
Looking
at
the
data
getting
the
citation
collection
services
implemented,
I
noticed
this
backlog
and
started
working
on
it
as
soon
as
I
took
over
that
program,
and
I
don't
have
any
demographics,
it's
really
tough
to
track
any
of
that
stuff.
S
We
are
very
limited
on
the
data
we
can
get.
So
we
use
a
program
that,
based
on
the
license
plate,
we
send
that
out
to
a
service
that
goes
to
all
the
dmvs
nationwide.
Some
dmvs
do
not
cooperate
with
that,
but
basically
then
they
come
back
with
the
owner
and
current
address
based
on
the
registration
of
that
vehicle.
That
is
all
the
information
we
get
and
a
lot
of
times
it's
incorrect.
S
So
a
big
majority
of
that
debt
is
either
one
not
associated
with
a
customer.
We
have
no
idea
who
that
person
is
because
we
never
get
anything
back
from
the
dmv
and
then
another
portion
of
that
debt
is
also
we
in
addition
to
this
original
citation,
we're
sending
out
notices.
S
So
we
sent
out
multiple
notices
and
to
the
address
that
the
registration,
a
lot
of
those
come
back
because
those
people
move.
So
we
have
a
very
very
hard
time
of
actually
placing
that
debt
with
the
rightful
owner
and
that's
probably
the
biggest
part
of
the
struggle
is
that
so,
if
you
take
it
beyond
that,
as
far
as
once,
it's
turned
over
collections,
then
they
take
over
that
initiation
and
research
trying
to
get
a
valid
address
or
trying
to
link
that
customer
that
card
to
the
owner.
S
Then
you
have
the
ones
that
are
constantly
getting
citations
that
don't
pay
and
those
the
challenge
we
have
there.
Is
they,
in
addition
to
the
issue
with
address
changes
and
stuff
like
that,
I
do
believe
you've
got
a
lot
that
basically
are
just
skirting
the
law.
They
basically
says:
I'm
not
gonna
pay
this.
I
haven't
paid
it
for
years
and
nothing's
ever
happened
to
me.
There
is
a
big
substantial,
I
believe.
That's
the
53
you're,
probably
talking
about
there
are
multiple
citations.
S
They've,
never
paid
a
1..
That
is
where
some
sort
of
a
program
which
modifying
our
tow
program
would
be
a
good
start
or
booty.
I'm
not
really
a
fan
of
booting
it
there.
You
are
putting
some
of
our
staff
in
danger,
because,
obviously,
if
you're
at
the
time
of
the
amount
of
time
it
takes
to
put
on
a
boot,
could
conceivably
have
the
that
customer
come
out
and
do
bodily
harm
to
the
person
putting
on
a
boot,
because,
obviously
that
would
be
you
know
very
detrimental
to
them
continuing
with
driving
and
not
getting.
S
You
know
away
with
not
paying
the
citation.
So
I
would
be
reluctant
to
that.
I
think
if
we
were
going
to
pursue
that,
we
would
have
to
look
at
you
know
who
performs
that
service?
Do
we
hire
it
out?
Do
we
turn
that
to
a
different
agency,
or
is
that
training
or
additional?
You
know
whatever
to
basically
do
that,
so
I'm
not
a
big
fan
of
the
boot.
S
P
I
look
at
this
as
this
is,
I
think,
as
russell
was
alluding
to
you
know,
there
were
no
enforcement
actions
going
on
related
to
this
for
some
period
of
time,
so
we've
got
to
start,
and
this
is
the
start
of
it-
we're
starting
with
eye
drop.
This
was
kind
of
another
program
easing
into
that,
so
to
speak,
but
this
is,
you
know
essentially
putting
the
community
on
notice.
A
N
Well,
I
was
well.
N
So
a
suggested
amendment
is
along
the
lines
of
what
older
woman
mountainy
was
suggesting
that
we
that
we
limit
the
debt
forgiveness
to
those
who
owe
less
than
one
thousand
is
that
right.
E
Well,
if
I'm
allowed
to
respond,
I
mean
in
hearing
the
additional
discussion.
I
I
don't
know
that
that
would
be
appropriate
for
our
community.
You
know
when
we
have
people
who
have
paid
tickets
all
along,
and
it
seems
that
there
are
a
lot
of
unanswered
questions
here
with
regard
to
the
prior
lack
of
enforcement.
E
So
you
know,
of
course,
if
that
motion
is
made
and
seconded
by
someone
else,
then
we'll
all
be
voting
on
it.
But
it's
not
a
motion
that
I
would
want
to
bring
forward
hearing
the
balance
of
the
discussion.
A
N
O
Thank
you
mayor
pro
tem
and
council.
Next
two
items
we
are
going
to
take
victory
laps
on
these.
O
These
are
collective
bargaining
agreements
with
the
laborers
international
two
separate
collective
bargaining
agreements
and,
what's
before
council
on
letter
c,
is
the
inspector
collective
bargaining
agreement
before
council,
three
percent
increases
effective,
may
first,
a
2022
three
percent
increase
in
may,
first
23
and
a
three
percent
increase
may
first
of
24.,
just
like
with
the
telecommunicators
a
couple
of
weeks
ago,
when
we
approved
that
collective
bargaining
agreement,
the
approach
has
been
to
add
additional
steps
early
on
in
a
career,
in
an
attempt
to
raise
the
newer
employees
up
to
a
higher
level
we're
seeing
that
trend
in
the
market.
O
We
have
extremely
valuable
employees
throughout
the
entire
organization,
but
the
inspector
inspection
group
is
one
that
we're
very
dependent
on
in
this
community
with
growth.
It's
a
conversation
that
has
been
had
many
times
about
doing
more,
increasing
our
efforts
and
then
also
the
capacity
out
in
the
community
has
driven
this
as
well.
So
this
is
a
group
that
came
to
the
table.
Negotiations
went
extremely
well.
O
This
is
economic
community
director,
melissa,
hahn's
team
negotiations
were
led
by
angie
brown,
the
assistant
human
resources
director,
and
you
know
you
always
work
towards
a
win-win,
and
this
is
exactly
what
is
before
council
for
approval
tonight.
The
laborers
international
representative,
ronnie
paul,
is
not
able
to
be
here
tonight.
I
believe
he's
traveling
work
related,
but
we
do
have
city
staff,
that's
set
on
the
negotiations
team
and
for
the
inspectors.
It's
tony
brown,
joe
fowler
gail
price
carl
fever,
and
for
you
that
I've
called
off.
O
N
A
Okay
motion
by
my
council
member
award,
second
by
council
member
emig,
any
discussion.
A
I
have
a
question:
could
you
address
sick
leave,
buyback.
O
Sick
leave,
buyback
in
all
of
the
contracts
have
been
addressed.
B
D
B
O
Thank
you
mayor
pro
tem
and
council
very
similar
comments.
O
Laborers
international
represents
the
support
staff
that
are
through
different
departments
in
the
organization,
a
very
similar
contract
proposal
before
council
tonight,
where
we've
added
additional
longevity
steps
again
trying
to
follow
that
trend
to
preserve
the
workforce.
Also,
three
percent
raises
increases
each
of
the
three
years
of
the
contract
contract.
Collective
bargaining
agreement
expired
april
30th
of
this
year,
so
the
new
one
went
into
effect.
O
With
back
pay
would
be
eligible
for
that
may
1st
at
22,
then
we
have
a
may
1st
23
and
a
may
first
24
increase
this
staff,
and
we
have
some
here
that
are
a
part
of
the
negotiating
team
support
staff
and
the
individual
departments
really
are
that
backbone
that
make
a
lot
of
things
happen
in
the
individual
departments
and
oftentimes?
O
They
don't
get
the
recognition
that
they
deserve.
So
I'm
going
to
do
that
publicly
tonight,
given
this
opportunity
with
the
collective
bargaining
agreement.
So
the
team
that
we
have
here
tonight
is
anastasia
shawbak,
go
ahead
and
stand
up.
She's
a
new
union
steward.
She
replaced
francis
watts
that
recently
retired
from
the
city.
We
also
have
kim
gibbons
and
doug
lancaster.
O
A
Excuse
me:
can
I
have
a
motion
to
approve
I'll
move.
E
O
T
Thank
you,
sir
mayor
pro
tem
and
members
of
of
council.
The
city
of
bloomington,
as
you
know,
was
one
of
the
communities
that
actually
saw
an
increase
during
the
last
census.
Count,
which
was
was
a
great
thing.
One
of
the
things
that
we've
also
seen
is
that
that
census
count
showed
that
there
was
a
shifting
of
population
leaving
two
wards,
that
being
ward,
seven
and
eight,
which
were
out
of
line
with
with
statutory
requirements
related
to
a
number
of
different
things,
but
most
mostly
population.
T
The
goal
is
to
have
each
ward,
have
roughly
8
700
residents
that
that
number
is
actually
8.
742
residents,
ward
7
had,
as
a
result
of
that
count
had
showed
7
711
residents
and
ward
8
had
10
973
residents,
it's,
which
has
led
to
a
need
for
us
to
draw
new
maps
for
your
consideration.
T
Those
new
boundaries,
in
addition
to
population,
also
have
to
meet
legal
requirements
for
for
compaction,
which
is
what
what
it
sounds
like,
but
also
contiguity,
meaning
the
borders
are
contiguous
and,
and
things
like
that,
so
the
city
staff
has
drawn
a
series
of
four
maps
that
we
presented
to
you
and
tonight
we're
actually
presenting
to
the
the
public
in
this
meeting.
T
T
The
goal
for
tonight
is
really
just
to
introduce
the
maps
we
have
had
them
on
the
city's
website,
so
that
people
could
could
take
a
look
and
we've
also
had
the
data
to
be
considered
as
part
of
the
website.
So
the
public
again
could
draw
maps
if
they
so
desire
and
again
we
had
one
person
to
submit
map
again.
The
goal
tonight
is
just
to
introduce
the
maps
openly
as
part
of
a
meeting.
T
We
would
have
a
more
in-depth
description
and
discussion
at
next
week's
committee
of
the
whole
meeting
with
a
hopeful
vote
here
in
in
the
near
future.
With
that
really
the
team
that
has
worked
on
this
has
been
obviously
jeff
jergens,
but
also
leslie
yokom,
our
city
clerk
and
troy
olsen,
who
was
a
part
of
our
engineering
team
and
they've
done
a
lot
of
work.
I
couldn't
have
imagined
there
was
that
much
work
that
had
to
go
into
doing
this,
but
there
was
so
with
that.
T
C
All
right,
thank
you,
billy
and
really
he
should
be
bragging
more
on
troy
elson
with
all
of
his
gis
knowledge,
because
he's
really
amazing.
In
that
sense,
if
we
can
go
to
the
next
slide,
please.
C
So,
as
billy
mentioned,
staff
put
together
four
different
maps
that
we've
got
here
and
if,
if
you're,
having
a
difficult
time
seeing
them,
they
are
available
on
the
city's
website
and
there's
a
banner
right
when
you
go
to
the
website
to
be
able
to
look
at
them
closer
along
with
the
data
and
additional
information
about
the
requirements
of
the
statute.
So
this
first
match
is
what
we
call
our
minimal
moves
map.
C
On
that
side,
the
minimal
moves
that
we
have
in
front
of
us
right
now
out
of
the
force
presented
by
staff,
this
one
actually
came
in
fourth
place
and
that's
for
compaction
and
population
deviation.
C
C
This
is
actually
number
one
for
compaction,
and
population
deviation,
so
out
of
our
four,
this
one
ranks
number
one
and
in
it
it
actually
accomplishes
the
best
population
deviation
as
well
for
the
upper
right
corner
for
wards
three
five
and
nine
and
takes
into
account
future
growth,
which
I
think
is
a
really
big
thing
that
we
should
consider
in
looking
at
these
as
well.
C
Next
map,
please
map
three
ranks.
Third
for
compaction
and
population
deviation,
and
it's
very
similar
to
map
2
before,
but
just
a
little
bit
of
change
in
the
southern
portion
at
the
bottom.
C
C
So
as
billy
mentioned,
we
had
one
resident
that
submitted
a
map
proposal
which
I
would
like
to
give
accolades
to
him
just
for
taking
the
time
out
to
do
it,
because
it's
not
an
easy
job,
as
we
were
saying,
and
so
he
provided
us
an
excel
document
with
his
numbers
and
then
troy
olsen
was
able
to
put
that
in
our
gs,
gis
mapping,
tool
that
we
received
from
esri,
and
we
actually
were
able
to
put
his
into
a
map
format
as
well.
Next
slide.
C
Please-
and
this
is
his
public
plan
that
was
submitted
and
what
I
would
basically
just
say
about.
It
is
that
it
does
meet
all
of
the
qualifications
just
the
same
as
the
statute
would
require,
and
that's
all
I
have
for
you
we'll
go
into
a
deeper
conversation
like
billy,
said
at
the
cal
meeting
and
provide
more
statistics
and
other
areas
of
conversation.
Thank
you.
O
O
O
Downtown
outdoor
farmers
market
continues
every
saturday
7
30
to
noon.
I
actually,
I
was
here
two
weeks
ago,
looked
like
the
crowds
were
even
larger,
and
I
just
heard
in
a
meeting
today
with
a
downtown
business
or
I'm
sorry,
a
business
owner
talking
about
how
the
numbers
were
even
larger
this
past
weekend,
so
just
a
great
opportunity
for
the
community
next
slide
bloomington
101
returns.
O
This
is
one
that
we're
going
to
be
messaging.
The
schedule
can
be
found
on
the
website,
as
we
finalize
that
application
period
is
july
to
august
12th
and
something
that
we're
excited.
You
know
getting
this
back
after
trying
to
get
beyond
coven,
so
it's
a
great
program
truly
encourage
the
residents
to
consider
doing
something
like
this
last
slide.
O
This
is
one
my
peer
city
manager,
gita
newkirk
up
in
highland
park.
We're
all
aware
that
july
4th
they
had
the
shooting
up
there
horrific
event
and
I've
had
enough
people
reach
out
and
ask.
How
can
we
support
so
I
reached
out
to
gita
and
asked
her
what
would
be
some
appropriate
websites
if
anybody
in
our
community
would
consider
funding
so
that
can
be
found
on
this
slide
as
well,
and
that's
all
I've
got
tonight.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
Thank
you
for
that.
The
only
the
only
thing
I
have
to
say
is
this.
Past
weekend
with
4th
of
july,
I
had
the
honor
of
participating
in
the
holiday,
spectacular,
celebrate
america,
and
if
any
of
you
have
an
opportunity
to
attend
that
it
was
on
saturday
and
sunday,
they
they
are
a
talented
group
of
people,
the
performance
and
the
program
was
inspirational
to
get
you
in
the
mood
for
the
fourth
of
july,
so
checking
out
next
year.
L
Council
member,
thank
you
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
I
let
westside
know
that
on
saturday
july,
23rd
from
5
to
9
00
pm,
the
wbrp
will
be
hosting
the
annual
west
fest
celebration.
This
is
an
annual
block
party
that
brings
together
community
and
we
just
celebrate
the
west
side.
The
event
itself
will
be
on
allen
street
between
front
and
washington
right
by
the
wbrp
building
and
you'll
see.
L
It
says
west
side
pride
right
on
the
side
of
that
building,
beautiful
mural,
and
it
would
just
it
would
be
great
to
see
everybody
come
out
and
celebrate
the
west
side
and
the
best
side,
and
and
and
show
our
pride
for
our
community.
That's
all
I
have
thank
you.
Thank
you.
F
You
I
just
wanted
to
to
bring
it
to
everybody's
attention
who
wasn't
aware
we
like
to
talk
about
our
streets
and
the
need
for
street
improvements.
Things
like
that
this
wednesday,
at
the
bloomington
junior
high
from
4
30
to
6,
30
illinois
department
of
transportation,
is
giving
a
presentation
on
the
route
9
improvements
through
town
route.
9
is
one
of
those
roads
that
we
can't
touch,
but
we
all
know
that
it
needs
a
wee
bit
of
help,
and
so
I
encourage
everyone
to
go
out.
F
Go
to
bloomington
junior
high
from
4
30
to
6
30..
It
looks
like
it's
an
open
house
type
of
thing.
I
don't
think,
there's
a
formal
presentation
and
so
go
see
what
idot
is
planning
give
a
little
input.
If,
if,
if
you
can
that
type
of
thing
this,
this
is
an
opportunity
for
us
to
see
what
is
going
to
be
going
on
and
as
I
think
we
can
all
imagine
once
they
start.
F
N
I
was
going
to
bring
that
up
too.
So
that's
that's
good.
Will
there
be
opportunity
for
input
at
this
meeting,
or
is
it
merely
a
presentation
of
what
they're
planning
to
do?
N
Does
anyone
know
input
great
good?
I
will
re-message
some
of
what
I've
communicated.
I
also
want
to
give
a
shout
out
to
the
west
side
miller
park
their
beautiful
mural
that
that
artelution
artolution
and
local
residents
and
organizations
illinois
art
station
bcai.
A
lot
of
groups
came
together
and
it's
just
stunning,
so.
A
R
You
know
I
I
do
have
one
comment
since
you
asked
on
it.
I
I
found
I
found
it
really
encouraging
tonight
we
had-
and
I
changed
my
mind
on
one
one
issue
from
the
time
the
discussion
right.
We
had
some
really
good
initial
public
comment
that
was
well
thought
out.
That
was
respectful.
That
really
gave
good
information
that
prompted
good
questions,
and
I
want
to
encourage
people
to
keep
doing
that
because
sometimes
we
just
get
a
pure
complaint
and
it's
hard
to
really
get
the
feel
for
what's
coming
from
the
community.