►
From YouTube: October 8, 2018 - City Council Meeting
Description
October 8, 2018 - City Council Meeting
http://www.cityblm.org
View meeting documentation:
http://www.cityblm.org/Home/Components/Calendar/Event/7964/17
Music by www.RoyaltyFreeKings.com
A
B
We're
gonna
go
ahead
and
call
the
meeting
of
the
city
of
Bloomington
City
Council
to
order
if
everyone
would
stand
for
the
pledge
allegiance
and
please
remain
moment,
standing
for
a
moment
of
silence.
Thank
you.
I
pledge
allegiance
to
the
flag
of
the
United
States
of
America
and
to
the
Republic
and
one
nation
under
God,
indivisible
with
liberty
and
justice
for
all.
E
C
B
Thank
you
very
much.
When
do
you
have
a
quorum,
we're
going
to
go
ahead
and
start
with
recognitions
and
appointments?
We
have
a
proclamation
for
declaring
the
175th
anniversary.
That
is
correct,
170
fifth
anniversary
of
the
women
african
methodist
church.
Is
there
someone
I
already
in
line
to
accept
this?
Please
come
forward
and
I
want
to
say
a
few
words
afterwards.
B
Bridget,
a
black
standing
right
in
front
of
me
and
whereas
Wayman
excuse
me,
Waymon
African,
Methodist,
Episcopal
Church
has
provided
religious
educational
and
recreational
support
and
programming
for
children
and
adults
in
Bloomington
for
a
hundred
and
seventy-five
years
and
whereas
Wayman
African
Methodist
Episcopal
Church
is
one
of
the
oldest
churches
still
in
existence
in
McLean.
County
today
and
supports
many
ministries
in
the
community,
and
it's
65
plus
members,
continue
to
honor
and
praise
God.
Now,
therefore,
I
urge
the
Bloomington
community
to
acknowledge
the
importance
of
women,
African
Methodist,
Episcopal
Church.
B
It
has
on
its
members
and
contributions
that
it
is
made
by
dedicated
individuals
and
helping
to
preserve
the
heritage
that
has
helped
to
shape
the
lives
of
the
community.
Therefore,
I'm
Terry
Renner
mayor
city
bloomed
to
Dubai
here
proclaim
October
21st
2018
as
women
African
Methodist
Episcopal
Church
day
dated
this
8th
day
of
October
2018.
Thank
you
so
much
and
congratulations.
F
We
have
been
on
a
jubilant
journey
and
will
continue
to
serve
God
and
the
people
of
Bloomington
Illinois
and
the
greater
McClain
County
Waymon
African
Methodist
Episcopal
Church
was
founded
as
African
Methodist,
education,
society
and
church.
It
was
organized
on
October,
10th
1843
by
Reverend
William,
Paul,
Quinn,
Moses,
Byrd,
Joseph,
Hobson
and
JW
healed
because
of
the
pressing
need
for
religion
and
education
among
the
Negroes
of
McClain
County.
Although
the
name
was
later
changed,
its
me
did
not.
We
have
maintained
a
ministry
presence
and
weather
the
changes
of
life
for
175
years.
F
B
G
I
know
that
the
council
members
have
heard
before,
but
the
beautification
every
year
takes
nominations
from
the
public
and
City
Council,
and
then
we
do
a
drive
around
and
all
the
members
vote,
and
then
we
collate
those
votes
and
the
houses
that
or
houses
or
businesses
that
come
out
on
top.
We
present
an
award,
and
these
are
the
homes
and
the
businesses
that
stand
out
on
a
block.
It's
the
one
that
you
might
do
a
little
double
take
as
you
drive
by
because
it
looks
nice,
but
the
with
that
I'm
going
to
get
started.
B
H
I
G
G
G
B
B
Now
we
move
to
public
comment
and
I'm
gonna
much.
Actually
that's
slightly
off
a
note
that
it's
beginning
and,
let's
just
say,
6:14.
If
you
want
to
actually
talk
about
specific
issues
and
get
responses,
we
do
have
the
mayor's
open
house
every
Friday
before
a
regular,
City,
Council
meeting
so
about
every
other
week
right
over
there
around
the
fishbowl,
and
we
can
try
to
get
you
answers
to
questions
or
try
to
get
problem
solved
directly.
Public
comment
is
our
general
policy
is,
of
course
not
to
directly
respond,
and
we
have
quite
a
few
here.
B
J
J
Those
16
illegal
docks
represent
about
5%
of
the
total
docks
on
the
lake.
So
my
question
to
the
Consul
is:
why
not
address
the
16
illegal
docks
and
leave
the
other
200-plus,
as
is
even
under
the
ordinance
that's
proposed
this
evening.
The
200
current
docks
would
be
grandfathered
in
so
nothing
is
being
changed
or
accomplished
by
including
them
in
the
proposed
ordinance.
J
If
we
look
outside
right
now
at
a
Main,
Street
or
Center
Street,
and
it's
highly
likely
that
more
than
5%
of
the
cars
running
up
and
down
that
street
or
speeding.
So
my
question
to
you:
would
it
be
fair
to
stop
each
vehicle
out
there?
That's
speeding,
absolutely
not
I,
think
we
would
all
agree
with
that.
So
why
should
we
ask
those
who
are
not
in
violation
to
be
penalized
and
occur
charge
because
of
the
5%
who
are
in
violation?
J
I
did
not
learn
of
this
potential
ordinance
change
until
Thursday
or
Friday
of
last
week
and
I
think
that's
true
for
many
of
the
residents
there
I
then
contacted
the
aldermen
assigned
as
our
contact
and
was
told.
I
am
only
the
informal
rep
for
Lake
Bloomington
I
have
no
official
standing
and
I
appreciate
a
response
and
not
blaming
that
on
her,
but
it
begs
the
question:
where
does
that
leave
us?
Who
do
we
go
to
for
issues
and
concerns?
We
have
no
representative
at
the
city,
yet
we're
governed
by
the
city.
J
Finally,
the
pantograph
reported
today
that
Michael
Philip
I,
a
Chicago
based
attorney
quote,
said,
thinks
the
proposal
is
a
good
resolution.
Mr.
Philip
I
said
I
was
fortunate
to
have
good
cooperative
meetings
with
the
city's
attorneys
and
ultimately
came
to
what
I
think
is
a
good
resolution
to
the
lake
lease
holders.
J
Two
things:
it's
important
to
note
that
mr.
Philip
I
owns
the
marina
at
Lake
Bloomington,
which
will
be
exempt
from
these
new
fees.
These
new
permitting
fees
per
Section
3
of
the
ordinance
that's
proposed
this
evening.
Secondly,
mr.
Philip
I
does
not
represent
me
or
the
other
approximate
90
percent.
Other
residents
at
the
lake
I
don't
have
to.
J
Wrap
up,
thank
you
so
mayor
and
council
in
closing
I,
just
ask
that
you
take
a
much
more
practical
and
customer
friendly
approach
to
this
issue
by
addressing
only
those
16
dock
owners
who
are
not
in
compliance
while
retaining
the
good
working
relationship
that
has
developed
over
the
years
with
the
other
200
plus
residents.
Thank.
K
K
This
is
now
morphed
into
what
is
going
to
be
a
$12,000
a
year
tax
on
all
of
the
residents
at
the
lake
that
it
just
seems
weird
that
it
starts
here
like
Kevin,
says
and
goes
where
now
the
city
is
benefiting
greatly
from
that,
but
everybody
else
is
paying
when
it
should
just
be.
You
know
this
little
situation
taken
care
of.
K
Additionally
in
this
ordinance,
it
looks
to
me
as
though
sea
walls
are
now
being
pulled
into
such
that
maintenance
of
these
sea
walls
is
going
to
be
inspected
and
required.
Maintenance
and
such
as
that
looks
to
me,
like
kind
of
a
backdoor
way,
to
get
a
hugely
expensive
undertaking
covered
at
the
expense
of
the
lease
holders.
The
lease
holders
have
been
doing
this
themselves
for
years,
and
it
is
I
know
one
of
my
neighbors
recently
had
a
seawall
put
in
it
was
over
$60,000.
This
is
not
cheap.
K
K
K
They
have
never
more
to
boat,
will
never
more
vote
yet
they're
identified
as
Ducks
and
I
just
use
that
as
an
example
of
where
they're
missing
on
many
many
fronts
on
this,
and
it
looks
like
we're
trying
to
rush
this
through.
We
are
identifying
a
dock
as
a
structure
that
houses
three
boats.
We
are
identifying
it
as
one
that
that
you
know
more's
one
boat
or
even
some
that
don't
more
any
boats,
so
I
just
I.
K
B
L
L
So
my
ask
is
that
when
you're?
Looking
at
all
of
this,
if
we
Dale
and
I
our
situation,
if
we
can
be
grandfathered
in-
and
this
has
been
our
original
ask
from
the
beginning-
and
if
you
would
again
take
a
look
at
our
documentation
that
we
have
shared
with
you
and
we
would
greatly
appreciate
it
again
our
lot,
we
look
at
it
as
green
space.
We
take
care
of
it
on
a
weekly
basis
or
more
often
as
needed
so
again,
I.
L
D
D
So
without
a
notice
and
without
a
hearing
what's
going
to
happen,
if
this
ordinance
passes
tonight
is
that
it
will
be
a
change
in
the
lease
without
an
opportunity
of
the
lease
holders
or
the
lessees
to
comment.
So
what
I'm
asking
this
council
to
do
is
to
set
off
for
60
or
90
days
so
that
there
can
be
a
hearing
I'm
not
trying
to
railroad
this
off
the
agenda,
I'm,
not
against
having
an
ordinance
I.
D
Think
it's
a
good
idea,
but
I
also
think
it's
also
appropriate
to
follow
the
terms
of
the
lease
so
that
there
is
in
fact
compliance
with
both
sides
of
this.
The
ordinance
and
the
lease
I
do
have
some
other
issues
with
the
ordinance
itself,
but
I
think
that's
that's
the
key
to
this
particular
document
and
in
the
action
that's
being
attempted
here
again,
it's
been
out
for
a
week.
I,
don't
know
that
everybody's
read
it
one
thing
I
did
note
in
here.
D
Is
this
there's
under
this
ordinance
it
is
prohibited
for
anyone
to
have
a
dock
that
meets
the
two
boundaries
of
their
property
and
I
would
say
to
you
if
you
are
out
at
Lake
Bloomington
that
affects
about
eighty-five
percent
of
the
people.
Most
of
the
people
at
Lake
Bloomington
have
a
dock
that
goes
from
boundary
to
boundary,
and
so,
if
this
ordinance
is
going
to
affect
all
of
those
people,
then
it's
going
to
make
a
big
change
for
everyone.
So
those
are
my
thoughts
about
it.
I
would
just
ask
this
council
to
table
this.
D
Allow
for
the
hearing
to
take
place,
certainly
notice
of
that
and
then
see
if
we
can,
as
the
others
have
talked
about,
have
some
consensus
about
this
particular
ordinance
again:
I'm,
not
against
having
an
ordinance
I,
think
it's
a
good
idea,
but
I
think
we
do
have
to
follow
what
the
dictate
is
of
the
lease
agreement.
Thank
you.
Thank.
M
Good
evening,
I'm
here
tonight
to
request
the
removal
on
the
consent
agenda
of
letter
I
for
the
gametime
Jim
for
the
liquor,
license
I'm
worried
about
having
a
safe
environment
for
our
children
and
concern
that
alcohol
is
playing
too
big
a
part
wherever
they
go.
This
I
looked
at
the
website
for
this
Jim
time.
Jim
game.
Good
I
can
talk
game
time.
Jim
and
the
website
shows
lots
of
pictures
of
children
grade
school
children.
M
It
doesn't
show
any
adults
playing
games
and
they
offered
lessons
and
games
and
tournaments,
and
it
includes
preschoolers
that
are
taking
lessons
in
the
evening
and
in
the
daytime.
I
don't
understand
why
parents
need
to
be
having
a
drink
to
watch
their
children
play
a
game.
They
do
enough
hooting
and
hollering
anyway,
and
alcohol
I'm
afraid
is
just
going
to
make
it
worse.
I
also
think
it
sets
a
bad
precedent
for
our
future
licenses
and
other
facilities.
I
mean
what
about
game
time.
Jen
asked
her
gymnastics,
etcetera,
that's
near
it.
M
M
We
already
have
258
terminals
each
bringing
in
five
hundred
and
eighteen
thousand
dollars
so
far
this
year,
that's
five
hundred
and
eighteen
thousand
dollars
from
each
terminal,
which
is
money
that
could
be
spent
in
our
city,
I,
think
it's
unhealthy
for
the
whole
community
and
I
hope
this
isn't
going
to
become
a
new
trend.
Thank
you.
Thank.
E
Hi,
my
name
is
neil
whit,
wood
and
I.
Just
my
wife
said
everything
that
I
needed
to
say
too.
So
that's
all
time
for
other
people.
Thank.
B
N
That's
many
times
greater
than
it
was
just
a
year
or
two
ago,
you're
dealing
with
the
inflation
of
in
many
many
instances,
you're
doing
a
good
job
and
I
think
that
I
have
to
say
to
you.
Your
experience
is
showing
up
nicely
and
the
importance
of
us
having
a
wonderful
Bloomington
Illinois
is
in
your
hands
and
I.
Thank
you
for
the
job
you're
doing.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
O
That's
in
sharp
contrast
to
the
last
council
meeting
or
this
council
made
a
gift
of
about
eighty
eight
thousand
spread
out
over
a
number
of
years
to
commercial
package.
You
had
nothing
to
do
with
acquisition
of
the
property
I'd
like
to
thank
both
halt,
Irwin
alderwoman,
painter
and
Schmidt
for
questioning
that
and
voting
no
on
it,
because
from
what
I
can
see
that
opens
the
door
when
they
asked
a
question
about
it.
They
said
that
was
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
not
adhering
to
any
rules
or
specifications
or
limitations
or
qualifications.
O
Has
political
paybacks
favors,
certainly
not
saying
any
of
that
happen,
but
the
potentials
there.
If
you're
going
to
have
a
procedure
for
giving
away
money,
then
we
need
to
have
one
that
works
out
to
about
about
a
dollar
per
resident
of
Bloomington,
and
you
have
decided
that
that
dollar
belongs
in
a
pocket
of
an
enterprising
businessman
rather
than
a
pocket
of
the
taxpayer.
Thank
You.
P
Setback
and
one
of
our
homeowners
is
a
hazard
house
for
sale.
It
really
says
if
you
read
specifically,
they
have
to
take
the
dock
out
and
make
it
conform.
I'm
sure
that's,
not
the
intent
of
the
city
and
further.
My
question
is:
is
there
an
appeal
process
to
be
able
to
leave
that
dock
in
place
for
a
new
homeowner?
And
that's
the
extend
my
comments?
Thank
you.
Thank.
Q
Scott's
timely
award
five:
my
concern
is
with
public
service
that
the
other
night
we
had
a
heavy
downpour.
The
water
came
running
down,
Fleetwood
Drive
it
had
that
intersection
flooded
the
drains
were
plugged.
There
was
no
way
to
get
a
hold
of
mr.
cars,
no
one
from
Public
Works,
you
know
I,
don't
know.
Maybe
they
worked
8:00
to
5:00
Monday
through
Friday,
and
they
don't
think
that
this
happens
on
weekends.
It
does
you
know,
I,
wonder
if
the
police
department
shut
down
to
eleven
o'clock
and
I,
don't
until
seven
o'clock
Monday
morning.
Q
You
know
the
lobbyist
closed
true,
but
the
police
department
is
there
I,
don't
think
much
of
it.
Terry
I!
Really
don't,
and
you
know
it's
a
safety
hazard.
You
know
there
is
absolutely
positively
no
reason
that
the
homeowners
deaths
go
out
and
clean
those
drains
out.
The
water
was
so
deep.
You
know
if
somebody
would
I
had
some
neighbors
come
out,
they
said
well,
I
can't
believe
you
were
out
there
cleaning
that
those
drains
out
I
didn't
want
my
house
to
flood.
It
was
coming
up
over
the
sidewalk
and
I
think
that's
absolutely
unforgivable.
Q
Maybe
we
need
to
put
money
more
money
in
the
streets
and
less
money
in
some
of
the
things
that
are
not
as
pressing,
because
the
the
people
are
gonna
leave
the
city
I
mean
they've
already
started
doing
it.
Do
you
want
more
to
leave
I
guess
the
the
thing
is
when
you
have
to
have
the
police
come
out
to
assess
it
and
they
said
yeah.
It
really
is
a
safety
hazard.
You
know
if
it
would
just
be
my
word
against
theirs.
You
know.
Q
As
far
as
let's
see,
if
you
recall
one
topic
Terry,
when
you
ran
for
another
term,
you
promised
that
you
would
hold
the
mayoral
open
houses.
There
was
one
mayoral
open
house.
Unfortunately,
I
got
a
call
from
a
staff
new
person
and
they
told
me
that
you
had
canceled
it
that
night,
you
didn't
even
have
they,
nobody
even
called
otherwise
they
did
just.
Let
me
show
up
and
nobody
would
have
been
there.
Q
You
know
I
wonder
if
you
know.
Maybe
this
is
your
way
of
getting
rid
of
the
people
that
don't
agree
with
you:
they're,
not
Pro
Terry
and
as
far
as
mr.
Gleeson
is
concerned,
I
really
don't
have
any.
You
know
any
time
that
he
moves
the
City
Council
meeting
up
from
7
o'clock
to
6
o'clock,
and
it
may
be
a
little
tiny
thing
in
the
paper
without
making
it
known.
I,
don't
think
much
that
either
the
other
thing
I
have
to
bring
up
is
on
the
agenda.
I'll
bring
it
up
later.
Thank
you.
Thanks.
B
R
R
It
gets
the
construction
permit
on
the
base
of
what
the
house
cost
to
build,
so
they're
already
getting
an
increase,
and
so
we're
just
going
to
double
down
on
it,
and
you
know
I'm
concerned
about
whether
my
grandchildren
will
ever
own
home
because
they
continue
to
rise,
and
it's
not
just
materials
that
the
last
one
we
get
down
to
the
twenty
twelve
building.
Building
Code
everything
changed
that
drove
the
cost
up.
R
We're
probably
20-30
percent
up
from
where
we
were
prior
to
that,
and
yet
there's
a
lot
of
things
having
to
do
with
that
and
I'm,
not
in
the
house.
Building
business
and
I
haven't
done
any
I've
got
a
new
home
in
20
years,
but
I
think
it's
something
you
need
to
look
at.
It's
a
downturn
right
now.
People
are
leaving
Illinois
they're,
leaving
Bloomington
and
we've
got
enough.
Other
issues
and
I
know
we.
R
S
B
B
I
see
is
our
attorney
mr.
Boyles,
not
here
I,
guess,
I.
Think
the
answer
to
that
question
is
Jeff.
Can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong?
Is
that
yes,
once
we
eliminate
excuse
me
once
we
lift
the
moratorium
than
anybody
who
has
a
liquor
license,
I
mean
some
businesses
like
Friday's
or
whatever
are
not
going
to
put
in
video
gaming,
but
video
gaming
could
go
anywhere.
Is
that
correct
mr.
Jergens
if
a
moratorium
are
lifted?
Yes,.
U
S
U
Know
we'd
have
to
evaluate
our
the
video
gaming
license
structure
that
we
put
into
place
recently
this
it's
not
going
to
look
at
a
comparison
like
that
and
I
haven't
I,
don't
have
a
pulled
up
what
I?
What
I
believe
we
did
is
you
know,
put
a
provision
in
that.
If
they
violate
that,
then
we
could
pull
the
liquor
license.
So
that's
not
something
we've
done
before
on
a
specific
case
like
that,
but
that
is
something
that
you
know
we
could
look
at,
but
we'd
have
to
evaluate
that
and
get
back
to
the
council.
If.
B
U
Thanks
and
so
we'd
have
to
kind
of
it
attack
that
on
the
back
end
and
if
we
were
going
to
try
and
do
that
as
a
specific
requirement
on
a
license,
you
know
that's
what
I'm
saying
I
think
we'd
have
to
look
at
the
structure
we
have
in
place.
We
might
need
some
modifications
to
that.
I,
wouldn't
recommend
that
we
add
a
condition
like
that
on
the
floor,
I'd
be
more
comfortable
with
tabeling
it
and
having
us
come
back
and
look
at
that
in
the
future.
Right.
S
W
S
I
X
B
Just
on
that,
we,
this
is
obviously
been
a
continuing
issue
and
Liquor
Commission,
and
there
are
several
things
that
communities
have
done
and
I
think
mr.
Jernigan
could
kind
of
clarify
that
you
can
put
you
can
say
no
more
than
258
terminals
or
you
could
there's
any
number
of
things
that
you
could
do.
You
could
prohibit
video
gaming
generally,
you
could
add
a
fee
to
it
there
any
number
of
things
that
that
communities
have
done
but
I.
B
If
my
understanding
was
that
it
once
she
gave
a
liquor
license,
it
would
be
very
difficult
to
do
what
all
the
woman
Bray
has
suggested
without
some
sort
of
concerns
about
whether
it's
legal,
because
there
have
been
many
times
where
we
have
thought
well,
can
we
give
this
license
and
not
give
them
the
authority
or
you
know,
to
to
have
video
gaming
or
video
poker
on
this
I
would
just
note
that
there
were
no
comments,
I
mean,
but
you
know
not,
everybody
can
come.
This
is
not
a
criticism.
B
I'm
talking
about
the
minutes
from
the
meeting.
There
were
no
comments
in
the
audience
either
for
or
against
this
particular
proposal
and
the
drinks
were
to
be
served
on
the
second
floor.
Not
necessarily
worthy
the
children
were
playing
old
woman.
Excuse
me,
I'm,
sorry,
did
you
have
preferred
to
follow
up
with
happen?
That's.
H
Kind
of
puzzled,
because
now
we're
talking
about
not
granting
any
further
liquor
licenses
until
we've
talked
about
video
gaming
machines
and
we
don't
even
have
that
on
our
swords.
I
know
it's
not
even
on
our
radar
right
now,
chuckle
I'm
concerned
about
what
Liquor
Commission
do
except
say
that
they
can
serve
beer
and
wine
Davis
lodge
for
wedington
me.
B
H
B
Clarify
this
is
an
entertainment
license.
Although
there
was
some
comparison
as
I
recall,
I,
don't
think
it's
in
the
minutes,
but
Chuck
geez.
It's
not
exactly
the
same
thing,
but
that
was
you
know
a
comparison.
You
know
in
the
process.
There
isn't
a
second
floor
of
Chuckie
Cheese.
This
is
a
different
type
of
business
model
and
it's
a
different
type
of
you
know:
environment
but
I'm.
Sorry,
you
still.
H
Y
And
I
think
Diana
I
think
you
make
a
good
point.
One
of
the
points
I
was
going
to
ask
about.
So
thanks
for
asking
that
I
mean
the
other
thing
I'm
interested
in
Terry,
as
is
how
has
a
Liquor
Commission?
Have
you
had
any
conversations
about
about
the
potential
of
the
situation
arising
and
about
which
potential
the.
B
The
million
Braves
put
on
almost
every
time,
almost
every
meeting
it
when
we
asked
people
whether
or
not
their
interest
with
it,
whether
they
would
include
video
gaming
in
their
business.
Now
we
as
I
understand
again
I'm
not
really
looking
at
I
am
look
at
mr.
Jergens,
but
mr.
Jergens
is
our
main
legal
counsel.
As
I
understand.
We
can
ask
that
question
and
we
were
very
happy
when
they
say
no,
but
that
we
cannot
insist
that
they
never
ever
have
sure.
So
a
video
poker.
Y
Y
You
know
barriers
control
around
around
the
serving
area,
I
mean
I
am
familiar
with
gametime
I
mean
my
my
kids.
You
know
played
there
so
and
I
think
if
this
is
the
upstairs
area,
where
I'm
talking
about
we're
talking
about
something,
that's
clearly
isolated
and
removed
from
from
the
larger
area,
and
so
I
guess
part
of
my
concern
is:
is
that
I
as
a
kid
again
I'm
not
intimately
familiar
with
this,
but
I?
Y
I,
don't
know
how
long,
but
you
know
we
have
a
business
owner
who's
committed
to
Bloomington,
who
is
who
is
who,
as
I
suspect,
trying
to
remain
competitive
in
a
changing
business,
landscape
and-
and
this
council
seems
to
be
suggesting
that
that
we're
not
going
to
support
economic
development
here
in
this
situation,
and
so
you
know,
I
have
some
concerns
about
that.
You
know
and
about
emotion,
to
table
that,
because
I
mean
we
either
want
to
try
to
extend
a
business
friendly.
Y
Z
Just
want
a
little
reminder
and
clarification
of
where
we
are
in
video
gaming,
because
it's
my
recollection
when
we
passed
the
one-year
moratorium
that
was
with
the
understanding,
we
will
be
having
a
conversation
about
looking
at
how
we
regulate
that
in
our
community
and
how
we
make
sure
that
you
know
it's.
Proliferation
is
consistent
with
what
we'd
like
to
see.
So.
Do
we
have
a
time
line
to
have
an
understanding
of
where
that's
going
to
go
because
I
agree
with
the
concerns
we
can't
just
you
know
indefinitely
withhold
liquor
licenses
on
that
basis,
just.
B
First
of
all,
we
when
we
haven't
been
withholding
liquor
licenses
and
mr.
Gleason
is
probably
getting
up
to
speed
because
he
wasn't
here
when
we
passed
that
and
then
forgotten
myself
exactly
when
it
was
earlier
this
year.
So
we
were
probably
five
months
away,
I'm
guessing
roughly
from
the
end
of
the
moratorium
on
new
video
gaming.
B
But
that
is
certainly
something
that
the
council
was
to
talk
about.
They
look
at
Commission
talks
about
it,
and
then
it
said
that
we've
been
talking
about
it
since
since
I've
been
mayor,
is
there
an
automatic
solution?
There
are
several
different
options
that
we've
all
talked
about
before
we
can
present
them
again
and
then
we
can
have
staff
ticketed
and
certainly
legal,
has
and
I'm.
Not
looking
at
look
at
mr.
Jergens,
but
I
wrote
I
really
mean
as
a
mr.
U
B
Right
and,
and
so
that
and
one
of
the
things
we
as
I
said
we
can
we'll
certainly
can
do
some
of
our
due
diligence
that
might
and
with
the
the
legal
group
that
would
take
some
of
the
burden
or
staff
in
having
to
try
to
bring
this.
You
know
to
us
not
that
they
wouldn't
be
doing
something,
but
that
the
options
are
finite
as
I
understand
them,
not
because
of
our
political
will,
but
because
of
state
of
Illinois
and
that
we're
in
a
subset
of
them.
Okay-
and
let's
see
all
the
woman.
Z
Works:
I'm,
sorry,
I
I.
What
I
did
want
to
hopefully
hear
from
alderman
Bray,
if
you
could
help
me
understand
why
this
particular
liquor
license
is
appropriate
for
it
for
holding
off
for
some
period
of
time,
because
I
think
I
understand
that,
given
the
nature
of
the
business
that
perhaps
it's
more
appropriate
here,
but
I
do
hope
that
you
have
the
opportunity
to
address
that
so
I
can
understand
and
make
a
decision.
Thank
you.
S
Of
motion
and
I
appreciate
the
input
of
my
colleagues
here
and,
as
we
try
to
sort
this
one
out
and
I
think
in
years
that
I'd
like
us
to
know
what
a
yes
vote
means,
and
it
sounds
like
we're
on
the
cusp
of
having
our
review
and
understanding
exactly
what
a
yes
means
are
we
saying
yes
to
both
alcohol
and
gaming
at
this
location,
because
that's
potentially,
what
what
a
liquor
license
could
mean
here
and
and
again
I
want
us
to
be
thoughtful.
Where
it's
located.
Is
this
the
vision
that
we
have
for
the
community?
S
It's
and
I
appreciate
the
the
input
about
the
question
about
whether
or
not
this
passes
a
vigorous
economic
development,
though,
if
you
will
I,
don't
see
it
as
that.
I
don't
see
this
as
squelching
economic
development.
I
just
see
this
as
getting
a
fully
informed
opportunity
before
voting
yes
or
no
about
what
will
happen
at
this
location
and
being
able
to
project
that
into
our
again
into
our
philosophy
regarding
our
community.
Thank.
W
W
This
is
not
the
first
instance
where
we've
had
a
business
that
has
come
to
us
and
they
have
specifically
wanted
a
liquor
license
so
that
you
know
well
I'm.
Sorry,
let
me
say
that
again,
this
business
came
to
us
and
they
asked
for
a
liquor
license,
but
we've
had
other
businesses
that
have
come
to
us
to
get
liquor
licenses
with
the
sole
intention
of
adding
gaming
to
their
location,
and
that's
where
I
we
had
the
last
conversation
and
where
my
bigger
concern
comes
from
is
the
addition
of
gaming
to
the
location.
W
B
U
And
I
think
I
may
be
found
the
answers.
I
refresh
my
memory
here
we
put
in
so
we've
got
the
license
requirements
which
we
enacted
back
in
earlier
this
this
year
and
those
who
do
not
comply
they're,
subject
both
to
a
daily
fine,
which
I
think
is
up
to
$500
per
day
and
their
machines
are
also
subject
to
seizure.
So
essentially
so,
even
if
they
get
the
license
from
the
state-
and
this
is
something
that
other
communities
and
approach
that
other
communities
have
done
as
well.
U
So,
even
if
they're
in
you
know
technically
entitled
to
a
license
because
they've
got
a
poor
license
and
they're
entitled
license
to
a
state.
If
they
don't
comply
with
our
permitting
requirements,
then
we
can
both
find
them
and
we
can
actually
seize
the
machines.
So
there's,
if
there's
not
a
there's,
not
really
a
good
way
for
somebody
to
get
a
to
maintain
video
gaming
at
their
establishment
until
we
lift
that
moratorium
and
start
issuing
more
video
gaming
licenses
right
that
helps
answer
or
clarifies
okay,
but.
B
U
H
They
were
pretty
specific
about
the
bans
and
it's
a
small
area
on
the
mezzanine-
that's
not
secluded
but
specific
to
that,
so
it
wouldn't
be
kids
coming
in
and
out
and
that
kind
of
thing
and
I'm.
Sorry,
not
wristbands,
I'm
stamps,
because
wristbands
could
I
guess
I,
don't
know
why
the
difference,
but
anybody
coming
in
to
get
beer
or
wine
would
would
have
to
have
that
stamp
on
their
hand,
so
I'm
not,
except
for
the
video
gaming
machines,
I'm,
not
sure
why
we're
questioning
this
okay.
I
You
and
I
guess
I'm
having
a
hard
time,
maybe
I'm
off-base
here,
and
why
this
conversation
is
being
imbued
with
video
gaming
I
get
the
potential
down
the
road,
but
from
where
I'm
seeing
I'd
the
conversation.
In
the
minutes
that
I
read
from
the
Liquor
Commission,
there
wasn't
a
whole
lot
of
discussion
about
video
gaming
terminals.
I
B
I
B
Just
also
clarify
that,
regardless
of
what
happens
this
evening,
we
have
a
future
conversation
on
video
poker
at
the
point,
certainly
as
we
begin
to
move
towards
the
point
where
the
moratorium
begins
to
expire
and
and
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
what
I
think.
Steve
and
I
talked
about
this
when
he
was
interim
when
the
moratorium
went
into
place.
But
you
know
we,
and
so
as
I
say,
the
Liquor
Commission
always
asks
that
question,
but
it's
it
was
not
on
our
immediate
radar
screen.
I
think
we
had
other
things
that
mr.
B
Z
One
more
question:
so
let's
assume
that
we
were
to
give
them
a
liquor
license
today
and
then
we
were
to
make
changes
to
our
gaming
ordinance
or
our
gaming
regulations.
Would
they
be
subject
to
those
changes?
Would
they
be
or
D
be
operating
under
the
current
paradigm?
Assuming
there
was
no
moratorium,
maybe.
Z
AA
Y
Z
Thank
you,
and
so
what
I'm
trying
to
get
to
is.
If
the
concern
is
the
question
of
whether
or
not
we
want
a
facility
like
this,
to
have
video
poker
gaming
available
to
them,
we're
not
risking
allowing
them
to
do
with
that
without
contemplation,
because
we'll
have
the
opportunity
to
make
any
changes
we
want
to
before
the
moratorium
is
lifted,
and
so
long
as
they
have
to
require
to
follow
those
regulations,
then
then
I
think
we're
okay.
We
don't
necessarily
have
to
take
a
stay
on
the
liquor
license.
They
were
comfortable
with
a
liquor
license.
J
U
I
think
if
I
understand
your
question,
I
mean
deep.
You
know,
obviously
it's
a
year-to-year
permit,
so
it
you
know
you
could
make
changes
to
any
of
them.
But
yes,
if
you
wanted,
if
you're
contemplating,
should
we
put
some
restrictions
in
here
as
to
who's
eligible?
That
type
of
thing
you
know,
I
would
foresee
that
as
something
that
could
be
doable.
Okay,.
B
AB
S
M
AB
S
B
V
S
B
Right
now
is
there
a
motion
to
an
alternative
motion
to
approve
the
the
liquor
a
license
as
presented
again
with.
We
do
understand
that,
no
matter
what
we
were
going
to
coming
back,
no
matter
what
we
do
this
evening,
we
are
coming
back
to
talk
about
video
gaming
before
the
moratorium
ends.
All
the
woman
helmet
I.
H
C
B
Passes,
thank
you.
It
passes
okay,
seven
to
one
there's
one
NATO
announce:
okay,
we
move
on
to
our
regular
agenda
and
we
start
out
with
a
ratification
of
the
collective
bargaining
agreement
between
the
International
Association
of
Machinists,
Aerospace,
Workers,
Lodge
1000
and
the
city
of
Bloomington
and
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
this
over
to
our
city
manager.
Mr.
Gleason
Thank.
X
You
mayor,
this
is
a
new
practice
that
we're
going
to
have
instead
of
collective
bargaining
agreements
being
on
the
consent
agenda,
which
has
been
the
history
of
this
council
in
the
past.
I'm
actually
going
to
take
the
opportunity
on
this
item
and
then
in
fact,
the
next
item
to
just
hit
some
high
points.
What
you'll
find
on
the
collective
bargaining
agreements
were
read
at
this
point.
X
X
We
actually
agreed
to
language
that
the
city
is
exclusive
right
to
make
changes
to
carriers
and
alter
or
amend
insurance
plans,
which
is
very
beneficial
to
the
city
and
then
also
implement
that
parties
agreed
that
spouses
and
domestic
partners
who
have
access
to
medical
insurance
will
be
ineligible
for
city
medical
insurance,
which
has
been
a
strategy
of
the
city
recently
other
items,
but
again
I
just
want
to
cover
some
of
the
high
points
very
quickly.
Thank
you.
It's.
B
V
B
X
You
mayor
very
quickly
another
one
when
we
believe
is
what's
being
presented
to
council
tonight.
This
was
a
one-year
reopener
with
the
local
$6.99
AskMe
group
and
it
was
on
wages
and
benefits.
The
wage
agreement
that
has
been
agreed
upon
and
before
council
tonight
for
approval
is
a
1.75
or
a
one
and
three-quarter
percent
pay
raise.
That
would
be
retroactive
to
may
1a
2018
and
then
also
of
note
on
the
health
insurance
plan
deductible,
it's
increased
to
$600
on
the
individual
and
$1200
on
the
family.
X
B
B
We
move
on
to
item
C,
8
C,
and
that
is
consideration
of
an
ordinance
adopting
chapter
23
of
the
city
code
to
implement
a
comprehensive
dock,
permitting
program
and
adopting
boat
dock
construction
standards,
as
requested
by
the
administration
and
the
water
departments,
and
we
start
out
with
a
10-minute
presentation
and
then
approximately
15
minute
council
discussion,
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
turn
this
over
to
mr.
Gleason
Thank.
X
You
mayor
I'll
turn
this
over
quickly
to
Geoff
Jergens,
there's
been
a
fair
amount
of
time
that
has
been
spent
on
this
I
think
it's
been
a
very
public
at
times.
A
very
public
discussion
over
the
last
three
years
go
ahead,
Jeff
and
we
think
that
we
have
brought
to
Council
a
very
fair
and
reasonable
approach.
X
U
City
manager
and
I'll
just
expand
upon
that
a
little
bit.
We're
actually
very
excited
to
be
in
front
of
you
tonight
on
this
I
know.
You've
heard
some
concerns
earlier.
It's
actually
we
are
here
to
make
things
better.
I
think
I'll
be
able
to
answer
a
lot
of
questions
that
address
a
lot
of
the
concerns
that
have
been
raised
here.
So
we're
actually
very
excited
about
this
and
we're
excited
to
work
with
the
people
who
have
the
lake
leases
and
these
docks
out
at
Lake
Bloomington.
U
One
of
the
things
I'll
talk
about
is
there
has
really
not
been
a
great
permitting
structure
out
at
the
lake
we
talked
earlier.
The
last
direction
that
the
council
gave
us
was
to
go
out
and
sing
compliance
order
to
about
I
think
there
may
be
about
twenty
four
or
so
different
docks
that
that
did
not
have
permits
out
there
that
there
were
some
issues
with.
U
We
did
that
we
then
engaged
in
conversations
with
their
counsel,
Mike
Philippe,
who
represents
a
large
number
of
them,
and
so
we
were
working
on
different
ways
to
address
all
of
this.
But
as
we
were,
we
were
working
on
this.
We
we
realized.
We
were
really
looking
at
kind
of
a
band-aid
approach
to
a
much
larger
problem
that
needed
to
be
addressed.
U
Although
the
city
code
states
that
permits
are
required,
as
I
mentioned,
there's
just
not
a
whole
lot
in
terms
of
process
that
has
ever
been
in
place
out
at
the
lake
and
not
a
lot
of
good.
You
know
different
things
that
have
taken
place.
Regarding
that
we
came
to
find
out
that
even
you
know,
we
were
going
out
and
sighting
a
lot
of
the
docks
that
we
talked
about.
U
That
did
not
have
permits
a
lot
of
the
docks,
even
with
some
of
the
lakefront
properties,
do
not
have
permits
some
do
have
building
permits,
but
others
do
not.
There's
not
kind
of
an
annual
process
related
to
any
of
that,
and
so
we
really
needed
to
engage
a
comprehensive
dock
permitting
structure
and
I
will
stress.
U
As
part
of
that,
we
are
trying
to
make
it
as
easy
as
possible
for
everybody
out
there
to
make
sure
that
they
can
come
into
compliance,
and
we
can
really
get
a
better
improve
situation
out
there
and
we
believe
once
we
do
that.
This
really
will
make
that
situation
better
at
the
lake
and
it'll
make
their
lives
easier
and
better,
and
so
we
are
really
excited
about
that.
U
But
just
as
an
example,
there
are
you
know
we'll
talk
about
they're
about
236
Doc's
that
we
think
would
immediately
come
into
compliance
with
this,
but
the
docs
out
there
they're
not
numbered
there's.
No,
you
know
structure
to
any
of
them.
There's
no!
You
know
annual
inspections,
there's
just
really
no
process
at
all
related
to
that.
So
this
comprehensive
system
is
really
going
to
address
a
lot
of
issues.
I'll
take
just
a
second
and
go
over
some
of
the
highlights
of
the
requirements.
The
first.
U
The
first
is
eligibility
who's
going
to
be
able
to
obtain
a
dock
permit
and
what
we
came
up
with
was
we
wanted
people
to
have
a
lake
lease
within
these
lake
leases
they
actually
have
access
easements
to
the
lake.
Nobody
actually
leases
property
that
touches
lake
water.
They
all
have
to
cross
some
sort
of
marginal
land
and
they
have
access
easements.
To
do
that,
so
we
thought
number
one.
That's
a
good
time.
That's
a
good
connection
to
the
city.
U
We
also
want
to
make
sure
that
the
these
eligibility
requirements
make
sure
they
have
a
proper
interest
in
what's
going
on
at
the
lake.
This
means
they're,
basically
neighbors
to
the
people
out
there.
This
is
going
to
help
with
some
of
the
quiet
enjoyment
activities.
You
know
that
we
talk
about
and
that
we're
wanting
to
ensure
ensure
that
they're
all
good
neighbors
with
one
another
and
sure
they
all
you
know,
know
each
other
and
they're
all
helping
each
other
with
this.
So
the
first
you
know.
U
U
You
cannot
block
public
access,
so
some
of
the
docks
do
come
off
some
of
these
public
access
points
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
they
don't
encroach
on
the
fifteen
fifteen
foot
setback
requirement
and
that
way,
if
other
people
want
to
access
the
lake
through
those
public
access
points,
they
can
clearly
do
so
now.
You
heard
some
conversation
about
people
who
are
concerned
that
you
know
their
lakefront
property
and
they're
concerned
they're
within
that
15
foot
setback.
That's
that
is
not
really
the
intention,
so
to
speak
of
the
city.
U
Ideally
you'd
be
15
foot
away.
You
know
always
from
that
lot
line,
but
really
what
we're
talking
about
we're
not
talking
about
the
boardwalk
there's
a
lot
of
boardwalk
out
there.
What
we
want
to
make
sure
is,
the
dock
is
15
foot
away
and
that's
so
that
the
boats
can
get
in
and
out
without
kind
of
encroaching
on
that
other
person's
lot
line.
So
it's
it's
not!
You
know
if
the
if
the
boardwalks
go
in
that
distance
of
the
of
that
marginal
land,
that's
not
an
issue
with
us.
U
We
just
want
to
make
sure
that
their
actual
dock
is,
is
15
foot
away.
Now,
let's
take
a
situation
where,
maybe
today
it's
not
15
foot
away
and
they're
one
of
those
lakefront
lease
holders
in
that
situation,
under
our
regulations
they
can
keep
that
dock,
as
is
they're
grandfathered
into
that
it's
only
if
they
have
to
do
kind
of
a
take
that
dock
out
and
a
complete
reconstruction,
then
we're
going
to
ask
them
to
put
that
at
least
15
feet
away
from
the
lot
line.
U
U
Of
course,
if
we
were
to
have
a
new
Lake
Lee's
come
in,
and
you
know
somebody
wanted
to
put
in
a
new
dock
out
there,
then
yeah,
we're
gonna,
say:
you've
got
to
be
at
least
15
foot
away
from
the
lot
line,
but
again,
if
they're,
not
15,
foot
and
they're,
not
on
a
public
access
point
they're
going
to
be
allowed
to
keep
their
dock,
as
is
a
lot
of
other
requirements.
Here,
we've
got,
you
know
we'll.
It
will
require
insurance
indemnity
language.
U
We've
got
we'll
have
be
able
to
have
on-site
inspections
again,
we'll
be
able
to
have
all
the
docks
numbered
and
the
permits
displayed
so
that
our
staff
can
actually
go
out
and
everybody
will
actually
have
a
number
right
now.
One
of
the
things
we've
already
started
doing
is
going
out
and
documenting
each
dock
out
there
you'll
see
in
our
group,
Exhibit
B
we've
started
to
label
where
we
think
all
those
docks
are
that
are
existing
and
that
will
be
out.
You
know
we
already
know.
U
We
think
these
will
be
eligible
for
a
permit,
and
so
we've
already
started
the
process
of
creating
files
on
all
these
docks.
They'll
have
to
make
sure
that
the
docks
are
kept
in
good
repair
again.
This
is
just
kind
of
a
standard
provision
and
really
what
should
be
a
benefit
to
the
entire
Lake
community
to
make
sure
there
are
not
docks
that
are
in
complete
disrepair
out
there
we'll
limit
what
can
be
on
a
dock
that
is
not
for
human
habitation.
U
Those
types
of
things
again
I
already
talked
about
this,
and
this
to
me
is
a
key
one.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
these
docks
are
not
being
used
to
interfere
with
the
peaceful
enjoyment
of
the
lake.
This
is
something
we've
heard:
a
concern
from
Lake
residents
before
we
want
to
make
sure
that
you
know
that
these
docks
are
being
used
for
their
intended
purpose
on
our
beautiful
lake.
U
Finally,
a
lot
of
provisions
in
the
ordinance
to
make
sure
that
the
dock
cannot
impact
water
quality
again,
so
that
there's
not
material
being
used
that
would
impact
water
quality
or
that
there
is
not.
You
know,
dumping
or
different
things
like
that.
Going
off
of
the
docks
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
construction
standards.
Again,
the
construction
standards
apply
to
the
new
docks,
so
somebody's
you
know,
got
a
newly
they
want
to
put
in
and
do
that.
U
New
dock
they've
got
now
construction
standards
telling
him
where
they're
going
to
come
in
what
type
of
material
you
know
they
can
use.
How
far
out
that
dock
and
extend
those
types
of
things,
but
if
they
already
have
a
dock
out
there
again
they're
going
to
be
grandfathered
in
it's
going
to
be,
as
is
I'll,
borrow
a
bad
line
from
President
Obama.
If
you
like,
your
docu
can
keep
your
dock.
U
Hopefully
I
can
stand
by
that
more
so,
and
I
have
to
attribute
that
a
line
originally
to
Steve
who
came
up
with
that
in
a
meeting,
but
but
that's
really
the
intent
here
we're
trying
to
make
this
as
easy
as
possible
for
the
people
at
the
lake
to
be
able
to
keep
the
docks
that
they
have
now
again.
If
your
dock
is
in
disrepair
or
something
like
that,
then
yeah
you've
got
you've
got
to
you
know,
put
your
dock
up
and
make
sure
it's
in
good
repair
we've
as
this.
U
In
relation
to
this,
as
is
type
situation,
we
still
are
going
to
allow
you're
not
going
to
have
to
get
a
new
dock.
You
know
I
can
have
to
get
a
new
permit
or
a
new
building
permit
if
you're,
just
replacing
Hardware,
if
you're
doing
some
sealing,
if
you're
doing
minor
decking
replacement
if
you're
replacing
handrails,
we
have
a
laundry
list
of
things
in
here
that
you
can
go
ahead
and
do
to
your
dock
to
maintain
your
dock
on
a
yearly
basis.
You
do
that!
That's
fine!
You
don't
need
a
building
permit.
U
You
don't
need
to
do
anything,
you're
good,
so
again
we're
trying
to
make
this
as
easy
as
possible
and
at
the
people
at
the
docks,
the
permitting
one
of
the
things
we
first
from
this
council,
one
of
the
things
we've
heard
from
the
water
department
is
we
want
to
stop
the
proliferation
of
docks
at
Lake.
Bloomington,
maybe
start
to
get
a
little
bit
of
a
handle
on
it.
So
we
have
a
limit
in
here
that
there's
only
going
to
be
two
hundred
two
hundred
and
forty-five
dock
permits
that
can
be
issued
right
now.
U
We
estimate
they're,
probably
about
two
hundred
and
thirty
six
docks
that
are
out
there
that
are
going
to
be
applying
for
a
dock
permit
and
eligible
under
the
criteria
that
we've
established.
We
know
that
there
are
probably
about
a
docks
still
left
to
address
and
we
will
continue
to
work
on
those.
The
the
process
is
that
current
dock
owners
will
apply
for
and
must
obtain
a
dock
permit
by
March
2019
thereafter.
This
will
be
on
a
calendar
year
kind
of
matching
what
they
have
to
do
to
apply
for
their
boat
registration
stickers.
U
We
just
to
note
here
the
council
can
obviously
come
back
and
let's
say,
we've
got
some
more
development
out
there
and
you
need
to
have
250
dock
permits.
Obviously
the
council
can
come
back
in
the
future
and
and
raise
that
number
as
you
seem
fit
and
as
you
deem
reasonable,
the
fees,
the
new
dock
fees
are
going
to
be
250
dollars.
The
renewal
is
going
to
be
$50.
We
in
the
provisions
we
are
going
to
treat
the
236
docks
that
we
believe
are
eligible
for
permits
to
come
in
under
that
renewal
fee
again.
U
Some
of
them
have
permits
some
of
them.
You
know,
do
not
we're
going
to
treat
them
all
as
renewal
and
charge
them
the
$50
renewal
fee.
You
know
this
is
not,
as
somebody
suggested,
necessarily
a
money
grab
or
attacks.
This
is
really
just
meant
to
be
a
nominal
fee
that
will
help
cover
the
cost
of
this
program.
It
is
going
to
cost
to
have
staff,
go
evaluate
all
of
these
docks
to
order
and
to
ensure
the
numbering
system
to
keep
track
of
these
docks.
U
To
respond
to
questions
to
respond
to
compliance
issues
we
do
not
anticipate
this
$50
fee
will
actually
cover
all
of
the
staff
time
involved
in
this,
but
this
will
certainly
go
to
help
I,
keep
in
mind,
there's
no
annual
fee
associated
with
any
of
these
docks
right
now,
so
staff
has
been
doing.
This
I
mean
intensive
work,
probably
more
intensive
than
anybody
can
imagine
working
on
all
of
these
Daka
shoes
over
the
last
two
or
three
years.
So
we
are
not
going
to
recover
going
forward.
U
You
know
based
on
an
annual
fee
of
$50,
but
it
certainly
will
help
come.
You
know
cover
some
of
the
cost
of
this
program.
The
removal
provisions
again.
This
will
just
help
provide
clarity.
It
will
make
sure
that
everybody,
you
know,
has
a
level
playing
ground
and
those
you
know
that
you
get
what
types
of
notices
you're
going
to
get
establishes
notices
and
removal
requirements.
U
You
know
one
of
the
big
questions
we
get
now.
Is
you
know
what
is
the
process
out
there
if
somebody's
doing
something
to
violate
something?
You
know?
How
do
we
address
that,
and
so
this
new
ordinance
clarifies
all
of
that
and
and
gives
a
good
framework
I
think
we've
got
30-day
requirements
in
there.
U
Everybody
will
have
ample
notice
received
a
couple
of
calls
about
this
on
Friday
afternoon,
and
one
of
the
guys
said
well,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
you
don't
come
out
and
rip
out
my
dock
and
no
that's
not
the
intent
of
the
city.
We
will
be
working
with
everybody
make
sure
that
that
we
help
get
them
into
compliance
and
that
type
of
thing
some
of
the
benefits
number
one
this.
This
ensures
that
the
dock
owners
have
proper
oversight
in
connection
to
the
city
and
again
we're
talking
about
that
eligibility.
U
We
want
people
that
have
very
clear
connections
both
to
the
city
and
to
their
docks
and
will
help
maintain
and
will
ensure
that
these
docks
are
kept
in
good
order
and
that
they
are
good
neighbors
to
everybody
else.
This
will
create
a
tracking
system
for
the
docks,
something
that
has
been
sorely
lacking
and
definitely
needed
at
Lake,
Bloomington
establishes
standards
and
requirements
to
help
protect
water
quality
again,
something
that's
a
concern
of
everybody
in
this
room.
U
It
establishes
clear
requirements
for
eligibility
and
removal
of
the
docks
nobody's
going
to
be
going
out
willy-nilly,
and
you
know
tearing
out
docks
or
doing
anything
like
that
helps
ensure
the
peaceful
enjoyment
of
the
lake.
Another
very
important
criteria
here
clarifies
all
the
requirements.
One
of
the
things
that
I
think
is
very
important
is
you
know,
for
the
first
time
we'll
have
the
insurance
and
indemnity
requirements.
We
have
this
already
for
boat
registration,
but
believe
it
or
not.
We
have
not
had
something
like
this
in
place
for
the
dock
permits.
U
So
again,
it's
just
these
are
things
that
are
sorely
needed
at
Lake,
Bloomington
I
think
they
are
things
that
can
be
really
a
benefit
to
everybody.
What
are
the
next
steps?
We
will
develop
the
application
and
the
related
permits.
Our
hope
is,
and
you'll
learn
a
little
bit
about
this
when
we
talk
about
business
registration
next,
but
our
hope
is
to
utilize
an
online
that's
being
created
for
business
registration
where
people
can
apply
for
their
dock
permits
and
hopefully
even
pay
for
them
online
again.
U
Making
this
aimless
and
seamless
for
the
people
that
are
out
there,
we
will
work
with
the
lease
holders
regarding
the
permitting
process.
Answer,
questions
I,
foresee
lots
of
you
know,
meetings
and
you
know:
we've
already
been
responding
to
emails
and
telephone
calls,
but
we're
gonna
have
to
do
a
complete
education
process
to
help
make
sure
that
everybody
understands
and
everybody
is
getting
what
they
need
from
those
residents
and
then
we
will
continue
to
work
with
the
non-compliant
docks
see.
What
can
be.
U
You
know,
accomplished
there
and
address
those
ones
that
don't
necessarily
fall
under
this
program.
I
will
say
you
know
there
were
a
couple
of
other
questions
that
were
raised
about
the
the
you
know.
What
was
a
public
hearing
necessary
and
there's
there's
a
difference
in
interpretation
on
this
mr.
Brandt
talked
about,
there
was
a
change
to
the
terms
of
the
lease
and
that
work
triggered
a
notice
and
a
public
hearing.
Our
stake
is
that
this
is
not
impact
the
leased
premises.
U
Yes,
those
that
that
have
leases
are
going
to
be
eligible
for
this
program,
but
this
is
not
something
that
requires
a
public
hearing,
so
you
know
this
is
one
of
those
things
where
this
is
the
city's
program.
This
is
the
city's
lake.
These
are
Doc's
that
we
want
to
make
sure
we
have
good
control
over
in
terms
of
not
interfering
with
water
quality,
not
interfering
with
the
different
things
going
out
of
there,
that
we
can
maintain
a
system
that
numbers
and-
and
we
can
process
these
docs
and
keep
control
of
them.
U
So
we
don't
have
wild
cat
docks
going
up
here
and
there
we
can
enforce
the
rules
of
the
provisions
of
the
ordinance
and
that
type
of
thing
so
I
understand
that
provision,
but
but
we
maintain
that
that's
not
the
case
and
in
fact
later
in
the
lease
it
talks
about,
the
city
can
also
establish
rules
and
regulations
for
swimming
and
those
types
of
things,
and
that
does
not
have
a
public
hearing
component
to
it.
I
would
argue
this
is
more
akin
to
that,
but
it
even
goes
further,
because
this
is
actually
a
permitting
structure.
U
U
If,
if
a
lots
too
small
or
if
the
neighbors
don't
disagree,
so
those
are
all
things
we
can
work
on,
and
this
is
this
is
really
kind
of
a
starting
point.
We
could
be
back
with
some
tweaks
to
this
as
we
engage
in
different
conversations,
but
overall,
we're
really
excited
about
this
staff
has
worked
very
hard
on
coming
up
with
these
provisions.
We
did
have
you
know
some
conversations
with
Mike
Philippe
about
what
what
we
thought
might
work
with.
U
Some
of
the
non-compliant
docks
were
really
excited
to
get
those
into
a
forum
where
we
think
they
can
fit
well
at
Lake
Bloomington,
but
I
will
say
that
we,
he
did
not
see
an
advance
copy
of
this
ordinance.
We
sent
this
both
to
Mike
Philippe
and
the
lake
Bloomington
Association,
both
at
the
same
time
on
Monday.
So
no
one,
you
know
no
one
had
favorable
treatment
here.
We
really
wanted
to
come
together
and
figure
out
a
system
that
we
thought
would
work
best
for
the
city.
With
that
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions,
questions.
H
Really
a
question,
but
thanks
for
the
clarification,
because
you
did
answer
my
my
questions
that
I
had
this
is
not
a
perfect
ordinance
to
be
sure,
but
each
situation
is
different,
and
so
there
cannot
really
be
a
perfect
ordinance.
This
effort
begins
the
process
of
getting
some
order
in
a
situation.
There's
been
left
unattended
for
far
too
long.
H
AB
B
Second,
by
alderman
Miller,
one
way
because
he
hit
the
button.
Okay,
I
noticed
Oldman
Mattie
Jeff.
W
During
public
comment,
we
had
somebody
who
asks
a
question
about
sale
of
property,
so
I
know
that
the
stance
of
the
water
department
before
has
been
that
permits
for
docks,
do
not
transfer.
However,
if
somebody
sold
a
property
and
the
dock
was
grandfathered
in
and
there
was
no
substantive
changes
of
that,
would
that
dock
stand
and
continue
to
be
grandfathered
until
such
a
time
that
it
need
to
be
replaced
or
with
the
switch
of
owner?
Is
it
the
dock,
grandfathered
or
the
owners?
Grandfathered
I
guess
is
the
question
yeah.
U
That's
a
great
question
and
that's
something
we
considered.
We
have
something
in
here:
that's
called
kind
of
a
I
forget
what
the
exact
language
we
used,
but
they
basically
a
you,
can
apply
for
a
transfer
permit.
So
if
you're
selling
it
then
you
can,
we
can
start
the
paperwork
and
yes,
that'll
go
over
again,
as
is
so
there.
U
W
And
something
that
you
and
I
talked
about
a
little
bit
offline
is.
There
was
also
concern
from
people
about
the
requirement
of
minor
decking
repairs
versus
the
total
decking
and
yet
being
held
to
a
maintenance
standard
on
those
and
I
think
we
had
a
good.
You
know
that
is
very
similar
to
the
way
that
we
would
treat
buildings
in
the
city
that
decking
repairs
could
happen
over
multiple
years.
That
would
not
trigger
differences
of
a
pain
and
I
think
it's
kind
of
where
we
came
to
on
that
one
yeah.
U
And
that's
another
thing
that
we
spent
a
lot
of
time
on,
because
you
know
it's
not
our
intent
to
kind
of
nickel
and
dime
people
and
say
gotcha
now
you
got
a
you
know,
get
a
new
permit
or
you
got
to
replace
your
dock.
We
actually
want
to
encourage
routine
maintenance
and
upkeep
of
these
docks.
So
those
types
of
things
you
can
you
can,
you
know,
continue
to
do
without
getting
a
new
permit
or
having
any
issues
with
the
city
when
it
comes
to
the
decking.
We
also
understand
that
you
know
there
might
be
some.
U
You
know
minor
decking
that
you're
replacing
from
time
to
time.
I
think
I
think
the
way
the
city
is
going
to
look
at.
That
is,
if
you're,
if
you're
completely,
you
know
removing
your
structure,
that's
when
this
is
going
to
apply,
if
you're
doing
you
know
maybe
75%
of
the
decking.
You
know
one
year,
that's
fine!
If
you
want
to
finish
the
next
the
next
year
or
something
we
understand,
that's
going
to
happen,
but
it's
it's
that
opportunity.
I!
U
Think
if,
if
you've
got
it,
if
your
dock
is
in
such
disrepair,
that
you
want
it,
you
need
to
take
the
whole
thing
out
and
I'll
explain
the
reason
for
this.
The
reason
at
that
point
in
time
that
we
want
a
building
permit
and
make
sure
the
construction
standards
are
applicable,
because
at
that
point
in
time
we
can
actually
make
sure
that
that
you're
doing
it
to
the
standards
that
we
want
and
that's
you
know
that's
the
right
time
to
maybe
have
that
conversation,
but
if
you're
just
replacing
the
decking.
No,
that's
that's.
W
And
then
the
final
thing
is
just
as
more
of
a
clarification
statement
is
that
there
were
I
think
there
were
some
people
that
were
under
the
impression
that
the
water
department
thought
that
docks
contributed
to
poor
water
quality,
and
we
got
clarification.
That's
not
true.
My
understanding
from
talking
to
mr.
Yale
is
that
it's
not
the
docks.
It's
the
number
of
boats
and
the
engines
of
the
boats
that
stir
up
silt.
W
U
Only
other
thing
I
would
add
to
that
is
my
understanding
is
that
there
can
also
be
concerns
with
the
type
of
material
you
for
docs.
So
I
think
there
are
some
prohibit
prohibitions
here
on
some
types
of
materials
that
that
we
don't
necessarily
want
in
the
water
and
then
also
obviously
you
know,
we
don't
want
people
dumping
their
trash
or
you
know
pouring
gas
or
that
type
of
thing
off
of
a
dock.
So
so
those
types
of
things
that
yeah
we're
we
were
addressing
in
terms
of
the
dock
in
the
water
quality,
okay,.
W
U
And
just
again
for
clarification,
we
anticipate
maybe
the
permitting
process,
starting
you
know
in
January,
maybe
maybe
a
little
before
and
then
going
through
March
and
our
hope
is
to
have
this
system
up
in
place
before
the
next
boating
season.
That
will
give
us
time
to
work
with
all
the
people
out
there
and
get
you
know
really.
My
hope
is
to
get
all
of
their
concerns
addressed
and
really
work.
You
know
with
with
the
the
people
that
have
these
dogs
yeah.
V
B
Motion
carries
8
to
0.
There
are
no
nays
to
announce
madam
clerk,
and
we
move
on.
Thank
you,
mr.
Jorgensen
Thank
You
mr.
Rasmussen,
another
and
mr.
policeman
for
all
the
work
that
you've
done
on
this.
We
move.
Excuse
me
now
to
item
8
D
consideration
of
an
ordinance
amending
chapter
11
in
the
Bloomington
City
Code
to
establish
business
registration
requirements
as
required
by
police,
fire
finance
information
services
and
community
development
departments
and
the
city's
office
of
economic
development,
and
we
have
a
brief
presentation.
Mr.
mr.
X
Thank
You
mayor
staff
was
directed
by
this
council
in
March
of
this
year
to
bring
what
is
a
final
product
for
consideration.
A
night
I
believe
there
were
three
additional
options
that
were
presented
at
that
time
for
the
registration
fee
component,
whether
there
be
zero,
$50
annual
with
a
$50
wreath
renewal
and
then
a
$50
excuse.
B
X
AA
Evening,
mayor
and
council,
thank
you,
city
manager,
Gleason
for
the
introduction
and
like
stickers,
opportunity
to
think
a
police
chief
wheeler
assistant,
police
chief
Bay's
fire
chief,
more
finance
director,
Rathlin
and
Community
Development
Director
Bob
Mart,
for
their
assistance
with
this
project.
As
you
can
see,
we
have
a
number
of
departments
listed
here
in
relation
to
the
proposed
business
registration
program.
AA
This
type
of
registration
program
has
been
desired
by
these
city
departments
for
many
years
as
it
will
enable
city
staff
to
more
efficiently
provide
services
to
the
city's
business
community
and
in
turn
the
city's
residents
and
visitors,
as
the
the
city
manager
alluded
to.
It
was
back
in
the
budget
setting
process
for
FY
2019
that
the
City
Council
directed
staff
to
come
back
with
a
business
registration
ordinance,
a
one-time
fee
of
$50
to
cover
the
costs
of
administration
of
the
program
with
an
estimated
cost
recovery
of
FY
4
FY
2019
of
$200,000.
AA
Since
that
time,
staff
has
conducted
research
into
business,
registration
programs
and
ordinances
and
communities
across
Illinois
nationwide
and,
of
course,
right
here
in
McLean
County,
all
in
an
effort
to
determine
best
practices
for
such
a
program
and
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
the
business
registration
program
being
proposed
tonight
will
enable
multiple
city
departments
to
more
efficiently
serve
the
city's
business
community.
So,
let's
take
a
look
at
some
of
those
examples.
I
had
a
lot
of
fun
on
Google
Images,
pulling
off
some
very
descriptive
pictures
here.
AA
So
in
this
image
we
see
that
a
car
is
accidentally
crashed
into
an
insurance
agents
office.
Imagine
that
this
happened
on
a
late
summer
Sunday
afternoon.
All
the
businesses
in
the
shopping
center
are
course
closed
for
the
day,
including
the
insurance
agents
office.
The
police
are
called
out
to
the
scene
by
a
passerby
and
when
they
arrive,
they
assist
the
driver
and
wait
for
a
tow
truck
with
the
driver.
The
responding
officers
try
to
call
the
insurance
agents
office
using
the
publicly
listed
phone
number,
but
they
get
voicemail
because
office
is
closed.
It's
a
Sunday.
AA
The
responding
officers
then
have
to
spend
additional
time
on
the
scene
trying
to
track
down
the
building
owner
and
the
insurance
agent,
so
that
one
or
both
of
them
can
come
over
and
secure
the
property
and
then
so
that
the
police
can
leave
and
get
back
to
their
patrol
with
the
business
registration
program
is
proposed.
The
police
department
would
already
have
the
property
owners,
business
owners,
emergency
contact
information
readily
available
and
could
potentially
make
contact
more
quickly
and
be
back
out
on
patrol
more
quickly.
AA
AA
Appropriate
staff
from
the
fire
department
could
contact
and
visit
the
newer,
existing
business
and
consult
on
appropriate
safety
measures,
potentially
including
the
installation
of
Hazard
placards
outside
the
business
like
those
pictured
on
the
right.
This
type
of
communication
early
and
often
facilitated
by
the
proposed
business
registration
program,
could
help
the
fire
department
choose
the
right
equipment,
we're
responding
to
an
emergency
and
help
keep
our
first
responders
safe.
In
this
image
we
see
an
extreme
case
of
a
building
safety,
property
maintenance
problem
on
private
property.
A
sinkhole
has
developed
in
a
private
parking
lot.
AA
The
parking
lot
should
be
closed
off
by
the
property
owner
and
the
underlying
issue
addressed
immediately,
but
perhaps
the
part-time
employee
on
duty
at
the
tanning
salon
does
not
know
the
name
or
number
of
the
landlord
and
the
salon
owner,
maybe
is
on
vacation.
So
currently,
the
only
public
record
that
the
city
has
for
the
property
owner
is
the
mailing
address
on
file
with
the
County
Treasurer
for
property
tax
purposes.
If
this
was
your
building,
would
you
want
to
be
notified
of
this
issue
by
the
city
through
the
snail
mail?
AA
Or
would
you
appreciate
a
phone
call
on
the
emergency
contact
number
your
tenant
has
on
file
with
her
business
registration,
one
common
issue
that
the
city's
finance
department
encounters
is
new
food
and
retail
businesses
that
opened
in
the
city,
but
don't
first
register
with
the
city's
finance
department.
Even
though
the
State
Department
of
Revenue
requires
businesses
to
collect
and
remit
the
city's
Home
Rule
sales
tax.
Often
these
food
retail
type
businesses
are
not
aware
of
or
forget
to
collect
the
city's
local
2%
prepared
food
and
beverage
tax.
AA
This
error
can
cause
in
a
few
months
of
lost
tax
revenue
to
the
city
and
also
create
an
unfair
competitive
advantage
for
this
retailer
compared
to
other
existing
retailers
who
are
properly
collecting
the
city's
tax.
Once
the
city
is
made
aware
of
the
food
and
beverage
retail
business
operating
or
soon
to
operate,
the
retailer
is
responsible
for
repaying
the
city,
any
unpaid
sales
tax,
and
this
potentially
can
create
an
economic
hardship
for
that
retailer.
AA
If
they
had
not
been
collecting
that
tax
from
their
customers
through
the
proposed
business
registration
program,
the
finance
department
can
be
proactive
and
reach
out
to
new
businesses.
As
they
register
before
opening
to
inform
the
business
of
the
city's
local
taxes
and
I
receive
calls
in
my
office
at
least
once
a
week
of
a
new
business,
that's
looking
to
open
in
the
city,
and
they
say
what
kind
of
business
registration
or
licensing
program
do
you
have
can
I
register
how
do
I
get
registered
when
I
tell
them.
We
don't
currently
have
a
program.
AA
Some
of
them
are
sometimes
a
little
surprised
because
they're
so
used
to
having
something
like
that
and
other
communities
in
L
annoy
or
elsewhere,
where
they
operate,
and
one
of
the
potential
advantages
of
instituting
a
program
like
this
is
the
city's
ability
to
import
and
export
out
of
this
registration
database
and
into
our
cities
GIS
system,
where
we
could
associate
business
contact
information
with
Geographic
points.
Gps
coordinates
through
the
GIS.
AA
So
potentially,
if
we
have
a
situation
where
there's
a
upcoming
construction
project
or
a
utility
issue,
even
with
one
of
our
partners
like
I,
dot
or
Ameren,
we
can
highlight
in
a
draw
a
circle
in
the
GIS
system
and
export
out
of
that
contact.
Information
that
could
be
then
used
either
via
email
or
automated
phone
calls
again
things
that
would
be
a
low
staff
outreach
time
commitments
to
notify
these
businesses
of
these
potential
issues.
Now
a
staff
did
a
research
on
other
communities,
business,
registration
programs.
AA
We
found
that
the
Global
Entrepreneurship
Research
Association
did
a
study
and
found
that
69%
of
businesses
started
in
the
home
and
59%
of
established
home-based
businesses
more
than
three
and
a
half
years
old
continue
to
operate
from
the
home.
So
really
your
home-based
occupations
are
your
entrepreneurs,
and
so
staff
is
proposing
that
we
include
home-based
occupations
in
our
proposed
business
registration
program.
AA
The
way
that
we
envision
this
working
is
a
very
streamlined
and
consumer
customer
friendly
business
friendly
online
registration
program.
What
we
found
is
that
we
have
existing
capability
within
the
cities,
Tyler
munis
program,
to
be
able
to
assist
businesses
with
registering
online
24
hours
a
day
through
the
city's
website.
We're
of
course,
notify
businesses
of
the
need.
If,
if
the
program
is
adopted
to
register
and
direct
them
to
do
so,
I
can
show
you
just
a
couple
of
quick
screenshots
of
how
this
would
work.
AA
This
is
a
webpage
that
we
currently
have
set
up
on
the
city's
website
through
the
munis
self-service
portal.
We're
currently
using
one
of
the
modules
for
this
for
vendor
self-service
for
the
businesses
that
we
do
business
with,
but
new
businesses
would
be
able
to
see
a
little
icon
would
pop
up
on
the
right
side
of
the
screen
and
here's
some
screenshots
for
the
way
that
would
that
it
would
work
basically
the
business
types
and
their
information
who
the
ownership
of
the
business.
AA
That
then
creates
a
what-what
in
the
Tyler
munis
realm
calls
a
business
license,
but
we're
using
this
as
a
business
registration.
They
would
then
add
in
some
additional
information
about
where
they're
located.
We
can
have
that
tie
in
again
with
the
GIS
system
and
populate
there,
potentially
their
parcel
number
or
autocorrect
their
address,
similar
to
if
you're
shipping
a
package
through
the
mail
or
us
our
UPS
or
FedEx,
then
the
license
would
then
be
created
and
they
could
verify
their
information
and
and
then
submit
it
now.
AA
What
we're
proposing
for
charges
for
these
registrations
again
directed
by
the
City
Council,
a
one-time,
$50
registration
fee
and
then
annual
renewals
at
no
charge.
We
believe
that
we
can
leverage
the
Tyler
munis
by
accepting
credit
cards
on
lines
to
begin
to
be
very
customer
friendly,
and
this
also
opens
once
we
have
this
system
in
place
and
up
off
the
ground
opens
the
ability
for
the
city
to
leverage
this
same
platform
and
tool
for
many
of
the
other
cities,
license
programs
and
other
ways
that
we
collect
payments
from
businesses.
AA
So
we
really
see
this
as
just
the
first
step
in
being
a
more
business
business
friendly
and
customer
friendly
City.
By
being
able
to
take
these
payments
online
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
about
the
ordinance
would
want
to
add,
though,
that
the
home-based
businesses
and
also
not-for-profits
would
be
exempt
from
paying
the
fifty
dollar
registration
fee.
AA
However,
as
is
outlined
in
the
ordinance,
there
would
be
late
fees
or
penalties
for
not
registering
or
not
keeping
the
registration
up
to
date,
and
those
penalties
would
apply
equally
to
the
for-profit
businesses
and
the
not-for-profit
and
the
home-based
businesses.
We
want
to
ensure
that
the
businesses,
when
they
register,
come
back
annually
even
that,
even
though
there's
no
charge
to
ready
to
re
renew,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
they
keep
that
information.
Evergreen.
H
AA
Staff
looked
at
a
number
of
different,
similar
programs
in
other
cities.
We
found
multiple
municipalities
that
had
minimum
annual
annual
reoccurring
annual
fees
of
two
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
annual
fees
of
five
hundred
dollars
up
to
twenty
five
hundred
dollars,
based
on
square
footage
of
the
building.
So,
of
course,
bigger
businesses
would
pay
a
higher
fee.
AA
H
AA
Fee
revenue
would
go
into
the
general
fund
and
would
help
to
offset
the
cost
to
implement
the
program
and
maintain
it
on
an
annual
basis.
Some
of
the
different
data
sharing
that
I
referenced
will
certainly
have
a
cost
to
get
set
up
and
established.
You
know
leveraging
the
technology
whether
or
not
we
bring
in
an
outside
vendor
for
that
or
a
dedicate
staff
time
to
it.
You.
B
H
AA
H
AA
Yeah,
we've
and
again,
we've
looked
at
established
programs
and
another
number
of
communities
I've,
seen
examples
where
certain
communities
will
definitely
leverage
it
for
specific
economic
development
purposes.
They'll
put
in
a
little
flyer
in
the
annual
renewal
and
say
tell
us
how
your
business
is
going.
Our
is
your
business
growing.
Are
you
thinking
of
hiring
more?
Are
you
looking
to
expand
so
there's
a
lot
of
opportunity
that
once
you
collect
that
contact
information
initially
over
the
years,
you
can
ask
new
and
different
questions.
Those
can
potentially
be
optional.
AA
AA
AA
B
W
You
so
my
first
question
regarding
to
what's
generally
referred
to
as
passive
income
businesses.
So
if
I
owned
an
old
house
that
I've
cut
up
into
two
apartments
and
made
it
a
duplex
in
there
technically
I'm
filing
business
taxes
on
that
because
I'm
running
it
as
a
business,
am
I
registering
a
business
with
the
city
in
that
regard?
Well,
and
the
coupling
on
that
on
the
commercial
side
is,
if
I
a
lot
of
businesses
in
town
there.
They
have
two
separate
corporations,
one
owns
the
property
and
a
separate
one
owns
the
actual
business.
W
AA
Well,
in
the
definition
of
physical
location,
we
basically
try
to
define
that
if
it's
a
location
where
business
is
being
conducted,
then
that
needs
to
be
registered.
So
in
the
example
you
provided
where
a
residential
apartment
building
has
four
units,
if
there's
no
business
being
conducted
there,
then
there
would
be
no
registration
needed
for
that.
Now.
If,
on
the
ground
floor,
there
was
the
landlord's
office
where
they
were
inviting
the
public
in
to
learn
about
opportunities
for
apartments
for
rent
either
in
that
building
or
in
other
buildings
across
the
community.
AA
W
Okay,
yeah
I.
Thank
you
for
clarifying
that,
because
my
concern
was,
is
the
act
of
then
there
being
a
tenants
in
those
apartment
is
doing
business
right
there.
So
thank
you
for
clarifying
that.
One
of
the
other
questions
that
I
had
reading
through
this
was
there
was
a
separate
place
where
it
said
for
each
location.
So
if
we
have
businesses
that
have
multiple
locations
across
town
is
that
one
registration
for
their
entire
entity
is
that
one
per
physical
location
they
have
it.
AA
Would
be
one
per
physical
location?
So
if
you
have
a
fast-food
franchise
group
that
owns
five
retail
units
in
five
different
locations,
each
of
those
constitutes
a
physical
location.
They
could
so
that
each
five
would
need
to
be
registered
in
their
beat
to
need
to
be
a
separate
fee
for
each
of
those.
The
reasoning
for
that
is
because
you
could
have
different
landlords
or
different
property
owner
contact.
AA
Information
for
each
of
those,
so
we'd
want
to
be
sure
that
we
collect
that,
even
if
the
business
owner
information
would
be
the
same
across
all
five
or
so
locations
and
you
could
have
different
property
owner
contacts.
The
other
issue
is
that
you
from
a
technical
standpoint
could
get
pretty
tricky
with
establishing
parent-child
relationships
between
the
main
primary
account
and
the
sub
accounts,
and
if,
in
the
event,
you
know,
the
franchisee
sells
off
three
of
them
to
some
other
entity,
then
when
it
comes
time
for
renewal.
AA
If,
if
we
just
charge
one
fee
for
all
of
them,
then
we
wouldn't
necessarily
know
that
we
should
now
charge
a
different
fee
for
some
of
them,
because
they've
been
sold,
so
it
would
get
quite
a
bit
more
technically
complicated
and
and
more
burdensome
for
staff
to
administer.
If
we
tried
to
do
you
know
a
situation
like
that.
Okay,
thank.
W
Well,
I've
had
my
water
bill
automated
using
the
city's
website
for
three
years
and
I
haven't
seen
an
insert
ever
because
they
don't
come
through
when
you
pay
online
with
automated
process.
So
I
guess
I
just
have
some
concerns
as
how
we're
going
to
find
these
businesses
and
somebody
who
doesn't
see
articles
and
with
the
media
or
something
of
that
nature.
W
Z
Had
a
question
about
notice,
because
I
think
in
some
instances
it
may
be
difficult
and
people
may
be
inadvertently
violating
this
if
we
pass
it
not
because
of
any
lack
of
due
diligence
on
their
part,
but
because
it's
hard
sometimes
just
to
disseminate
information.
So
I
wanted
to
have
a
question
about
the
penalty
section
and
whether
that
applies
in
a
situation
where
someone
is
not
aware,
because
the
way
I
read
it
and
I'm
not
sure
this
is
correct.
That
penalties
would
only
accrue
after
after
notice
has
been
given
that
they're
in
violation.
Z
AA
AB
U
Z
T
You
I'd
like
to
speak
to
Jamie's
concern
as
well.
How
long
have
we
been
working
on
the
one-stop
shop,
the.
AA
AA
Project
review
group
is
an
ongoing
weekly
meeting.
That's
held
every
Wednesday.
We
encourage
developers
to
pre-scheduled
appointments,
so
they
can
have
privacy
when
they
come
in
and
meet
with
staff.
So
that
way
they
can
present
their
project
to
staff
and
get
quick
and
early
and
often
feedback
about
what
it
is
that
they're
proposing
whether
it's
a
land,
development
property
redevelopment
acquisition
of
multiple
properties
and
wondering
how
to
interact
with
the
city.
There's
representatives
from
the
city's
water
department,
building
official
Planning
and
Zoning
parts.
T
Because
I
know
several
small
businesses
that
have
tried
to
open
here
recently
and
they've
had
big
problems,
and
it
doesn't
seem
to
be
working.
The
way
that
I
had
envisioned
it
would
I
was
thinking
something
along
the
lines
of
we
would
have
something
on
our
website.
That
would
tell
different
businesses
all
the
different
kinds
of
licensing
fees
and
regulations
that
they
would
have
to
abide
by
and
how
you
know
allow
them
to
pay
for
them
from
the
comfort
of
their
own
home.
Are
you
working
towards
that?
We.
AA
Already
haven't
have
had
for
a
number
of
months,
a
guide
to
doing
business
guide
to
starting
a
business
in
Bloomington
document
is
available
under
the
economic
development
section
of
the
city's
website.
But,
as
we
mentioned,
the
city
does
not
currently
have
the
ability
to
accept
online
payments
for
the
different
various
licenses
like
a
liquor
license
or
different
permits,
and
things
like
that.
So
that
would
be
something
that
we
would
hope
that
we
could
leverage
Philips
starting
this
program.
Yeah.
W
T
We're
going
to
have
to
convince
these
people
that
they're
getting
something
for
their
money
and
to
me
I
think
if
we
could
roll
out
the
fee
in
lockstep
with
that
sort
of
you
know,
business
registration,
convenience,
I
think
that
that
would
be
a
really
good
thing.
That
would
make
the
rollout
for
this
easier
and
since
it's
been
worked
on
for
over
two
years,
I
think
I
would
hope.
We're
about
ready
to
wrap
that
up.
Well,.
AA
The
project
review
group-
the
one-stop
shop-
is
completely
separate
from
from
this
business
registration
program
and
and
online
visas.
Again,
it's
really
an
opportunity
for
business
owners
developers
to
come
in
and
sit
down
and
meet
face
to
face
with
staff
to
flesh
out
the
details
of
their
proposed
projects.
Okay,.
AA
Encourage
them
to
send
us
conceptual
plans
ahead
of
the
meeting
that
we
can
review.
So
the
meeting
is
more
productive,
but
really
often
a
lot
of
the
nuances
involved
in
site
development.
Real
estate
development
is
I.
Think
it's
probably
going
to
be
one
of
the
last
things
to
be
a
robot
and
computer.
Automated
it
takes
each
site
is
unique:
okay,.
T
Well,
I
mean
that
is
what
needs
to
be
told
to
people.
You
know
that
they're
getting
something
for
their
money
and
I
would
hope
that
the
process
would
improve,
because
I've
heard
several
complaints
about
it.
So
anyway,
I
think
I'm
for
this,
because
I
can't
believe
we
haven't
had
business
registration
for
all
this
time.
T
I
The
men
black,
thank
you
and
thank
you,
Austin
and
staff
from
putting
all
this
together.
I
know
when
we
talked
about
this
at
a
conceptual
level
number
of
months
ago.
It
was
kind
of
you
know,
30,000
foot
and
now
we're
kind
of
seeing
the
nuts
and
bolts
nonetheless,
I
remain
totally
unconvinced
that
this
is
a
staff
driven
initiative
that
we
need
to
be
doing.
I
think
we
should
be
taking
things
off
of
staffs
plate,
and
this
is
in
addition
to
the
current
work
that
we're
doing
so
I'll
be
voting
no
on
this.
B
V
AB
AB
AB
Y
Yeah
thanks
invoker,
because
I
was
going
to
highlight
that
at
that
point,
exactly
I
mean
I
appreciate
a
couple
things
I
saw
happen
after
the
conversation
with
the
council.
We
went
back
and
I
think
addressed
what
was
a
concern
for
me.
It
was
this
kind
of
ongoing
feed
collection
and
that
change
has
been
made
to
make
this
a
one-time
registration
fee.
I.
Y
Like
the
principle
of
saying
that
you
know
you
don't
have
to
pay
any
more
and
less
unless
we
know
that
you're
intentionally
not
complying,
and
then
there
will
be
some
fees
associated
with
that
or
some
fines,
but
at
in
bocas
point
we're
calling
the
conversation
we
had
about
this
a
while
back
and
it.
For
me
it
was
this
issue
of
related
to
the
safeguarding
of
our
first
responders
and
going
into
those
situations.
You
know
both
police
and
fire.
Y
That
I
think
it's
it's
a
a
worthy
fee
and
I'm,
not
not
one
to
be
in
favor,
just
arbitrarily
of
fees,
I,
don't
think
any
of
us
are,
but
but
that
particular
issue
I
think
is
important
for
our
first
responders
to
be
able
to
have
some
information
at
their
fingertips
before
even
they
get
to
location,
but
maybe
certainly
after
they
get
there
as
well.
So
thank
you
all
right.
B
B
Thank
you
very
much.
The
next
in
our
last
item
on
our
regular
agenda
is
consideration
of
an
ordinance
adopting
a
schedule
of
fees
for
the
city
and
amending
various
chapters
within
the
city
code
regarding
fees,
as
a
requested
by
the
city
manager
and
I'm,
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
this
over
to
our
city
manager,
and
we
have
about
proximately,
20,
minute
presentation
and
approximately
20
minute
council
discussion.
Mr.
Gleason.
X
Thank
You
mayor
this
also
is
a
product
of
the
March
2018
council
meeting
that
directed
staff
to
look
into
this
and
bring
a
final
product.
The
fees
are
not
the
enterprise
fund
fees
that
we
have
Bob
Mart
is
going
to
make
a
quick
presentation
and
and
then
open
this
up
to
question
or
comments
from
Council
and
then
hopefully
approve
the
staff
recommendation.
X
AC
Thank
you
mayor
and
city
council
and
city
manager,
Gleason
I'd
also
like
to
acknowledge
assistant
city
manager,
Rasmussen
I
think
he
gave
city
city
staff,
the
nudge
we
needed
to
finally
look
at
codes
that
have
not
earth
fees
that
we
have
not
addressed
since
the
early
70s,
so
I
think
I
think
that's
important
that
we
didn't.
We
had
that
opportunity.
We
got
that
support
to
move
forward
on
those
those
feet.
AC
During
discussions
for
the
fiscal
year
2019
budget,
the
City
Council
directed
staff
to
study
and
revise
the
various
fees
detailed
in
the
city
code,
while
the
city
administration
had
previously
contact
contracted
for
the
service
cost
study
in
the
fall
of
2015,
it
does
not
appear
that
that
study
was
ever
implemented.
The
most
recent
fee
adjustments
were
made
in
2016
to
the
liquor
licenses
and
for
the
rental
inspection
program.
Zoning
building
and
signage
were
addressed
in
2012.
AC
AC
So
there
is
a
need
for
what
we're
calling
a
schedule
of
fees
that
you'll
see
in
many
municipalities
throughout
the
state
and
we're
right
now
we
have
a
wide
range
of
fees
collected
by
multiple
departments
and
divisions
throughout
the
city.
Fees
are
scattered
throughout
the
45
chapters
of
the
municipal
code
and,
if
you
note
under
sever,
seen
our
municipal
code,
it's
four
or
three
actually
volumes
of
four-inch
books,
and
it's
very
massive.
AC
So
can
you
imagine
a
staff
member,
even
a
developer,
trying
to
determine
what
their
fees
are
based
on
a
leafing
through
that
entire
book
to
find
out
what
their
project
will
cost
them?
We
also
have
an
outdated
fee
structure
in
comparison
to
other
similar
sized
communities,
and
we
have
a
historically
inconsistent
approach
to
adjustment
of
fees
over
time.
So
you
might
have
a
request
by
one
department
thing:
I
want
to
adjust
my
fees,
but
it
wasn't
a
comprehensive
effort
to
really
look
at
all
the
fees
throughout
all
the
city
departments.
We
also
and
is
again.
AC
This
is
a
standard
forma
format
from
throughout
the
state.
These
are
the
types
of
City
fees
we
have
right
now.
There
are
codified
fees
within
the
municipal
code
and
those
do
require
City
Council
approval.
Those
include
building
permits,
liquor,
licenses,
emergency
medical
service
fees,
and
they
would
also
include
our
enterprise
zone
fees.
AC
So
there's
two
ways
that
we
have
at
our
Mizpah
code
looks
at
addressing
our
existing
fees.
One
is
the
automatic
adjustment
of
fees
and
that's
automatic
per
the
municipal
code,
but
even
that's
showing
some
flaws.
So
under
our
city,
annexation,
I'm
gonna
call
that
your
development
impact
people
per
lot.
AC
That's
based
on
the
Consumer
Price
Index
for
that
year
and
so
we're
having
to
go
back
in
every
year
and
calculate
the
increase
from
when
that
program
was
adopted
in
2003,
so
we're
consistently
having
to
go
back
into
that
into
that
cycle
of
applying
the
Consumer
Price
Index
onto
a
fee
to
raise
that
fee
annually.
Every
year,
the
emergency
medical
services
fees
that
Brian
works
with
every
day
those
are
adjusted
by
the
Municipal
Code
by
a
three
percent
standard.
AC
Those
were
sequentially
increased
as
part
of
the
code
revision
back
in
2016,
so
you're
going
to
see
the
fees
for
2017,
2018
2019
and
it's
eaten
up
more
space
in
the
Municipal
Code,
but
it
also
it
shows
that
progression
of
fee
increases
over
time
and
I.
Think
at
least
we
took
that
step
to
to
show
that
those
fees
were
ever
increasing,
but
we
could
have
maybe
done
in
a
different
way.
As
far
as
we
look
at
these
adjusting
or
automatic
fees,
the
ones
we're
dealing
with.
AC
AC
So
we're
looking
at
a
proposed
fee
schedule
ordinance
and
that
ordinance
allows
the
way
it
was
originally
structured
back
in
our
meeting
in
March.
Was
that
we're
looking
at
an
ordinance
that
allows
for
up
to
a
5%
biannual
adjustment?
We'd
have
a
phase
approach
to
the
fee
adjustment,
starting
in
May
of
twenty
twenty?
Twenty-One
and
the
fees
adjusted
based
upon
departmental
need
and
cost
increases.
Also,
the
City
Council
may
amend
the
scheduled
fees
by
approval
of
an
ordinance
from
time
to
time.
AC
So,
under
the
current
review
process,
we
conducted
a
comprehensive
review
of
the
entire
medical
code
to
locate
all
fees
within
the
45
separate
chapters
to
develop
a
schedule
of
fees
there.
The
schedule
of
ski
fees
includes
approximately
350,
separate
fees
and
roughly
a
hundred
of
those
were
actually
adjusted.
So
many
of
our
fees,
even
though
it's
been
shown
on
the
schedule
of
fees
listing.
If
we,
if
we
were
able
to
refer
to
the
the
comparable
chart
in
your
ordinance,
you'll,
see
that
many
of
those
fees
were
actually
not
jested.
AC
What
we
discovered
was
that
there
are
several
fees
that
are
codified
but
no
longer
administered
by
the
city,
so
we
have
a
code
in
from
developed
in
1981
and
that's
for
the
payment
for
the
city
attorney
if
they
were
serving
on
on
a
trial
case.
For
one
day,
they
were
to
receive
$25
we're
striking
that
from
the
code,
because
it'd
be
very
difficult
to
find
an
attorney
that
would
work
for
$25
a
day.
I,
don't
know
if
they
would
work
that
way
in
1981,
but
it
seems
pretty
cheap.
AC
Even
then,
we
also
have
some
outdated
codes
that
reflect
back
to
our
time
in
1974
and
that
deals
with
night
scavengers.
We
have
a
whole
chapter
on
scavengers
so
the
day.
Scavengers
are
those
folks
that
are
wandering
around
with
wagons,
picking
up
appliances
throughout
our
community
and
those
are
to
be
licensed,
and
we
also
have
night
scavengers
that
probably
came
from
the
turn
of
the
century
on
those
people
that
come
back
at
the
night
time
and
clean
out
your
privies.
AC
So
that's
also
supposed
to
be
licensed,
but
you
have
these
outdated
codes
and
until
you
do
a
comprehensive
review
of
the
entire
code,
you're
never
going
to
find
these
hidden
way
in
different
chapters.
The
other
one
that
we
have
is
this
in
the
codified
version
showed
the
original
cost,
but
not
the
CPI.
AC
Guess
they
don't
call
them
jukeboxes
anymore,
but
this
is
what
a
jukebox
is
in
a
tavern
or
something
like
that
and
the
see
here
is
requested
to
go
from
thirty
six
dollars
to
thirty
eight
and
that's
a
five
point.
Five
increase.
This
is
a
Community
Development
fee
for
a
plumbing
fee,
a
bathtub
with
or
without
a
shower,
and
the
community
development
going
from
$13,
which
is
the
resident
current
residential
rate
to
$15,
which
is
a
represents
a
15%
increase
in
that
plumbing
fee.
I
would
like
to
tell
you
this.
AC
We
had
two
there's
two
scales
on
the
plumbing
permits
within
the
Community
Development
Department.
We
have
a
commercial
fee
which
is
the
higher
of
the
two
fees
and
the
residential
fee,
so
our
current
residential
fee
is
$13
for
a
fixture,
whether
that's
a
faucet
or
a
toilet,
or
something
like
that,
and
so
that
fee
is
$13
for
the
residential
user
and
$15
for
the
commercial
user,
and
so
you
can
imagine
when
we're
trying
to
process
these
app
Asians
that
are
coming
through
fast
through
our
support
staff.
They've
got
to
figure
out.
AC
Was
it
a
commercial
job
or
residential
job
which
fee
schedule
should
I
jump
to,
and
so
what
we're
recommending
in
this
case
is
an
increase
that
represents
tying
those
two
prices.
Those
two
plumbing
permit
costs
to
the
same,
so
we're
still
we're
working
off
of
one
schedule
in
our
office,
so
both
the
commercial
property
owner
would
be
paid
$15
as
with
the
residential
property
owner.
AC
So
what
you're
seeing
is
an
increase
on
the
residential
side
for
this
fee,
but
the
commercial
fee
stays
the
same
and
that's
more
to
bring
it
in
line
for
efficiency
of
the
division.
Sign.
Permit
fees
less
than
one
thousand
dollars
we're
asking
at
that
fee,
go
from
$14
as
the
base
fee
to
$15
and
that's
a
7%
increase
public
sidewalk
construction.
This
is
through
public
works
in
engineering
it.
AC
AC
I
will
say
this
that
if
you
look
at
the
Consumer
Price
Index
the
average
consumer
price
index
over
the
last
10
years,
it's
averaging
about
1.9
percent
per
year
and
some
of
these
fees,
primarily
through
the
community
development
apartment,
we're
looking
at
that
7%
and
but
we
had
adopted
those
fee
increases
back
in
2012.
Many
of
these
other
departments
had
not
adjusted
their
fees
forever
and
so
I
think
it's
important
to
you.
AC
We
asked
about
how
do
we
compare
ourselves
with
other
communities
and
and
I'll
be
honest
with
you.
This
is
very
difficult
because
each
community
has
their
own
needs
or
in
their
own
sources
of
revenue
different
from
another
community,
so
I
I
struggled
to
find
fees
that
are
comparable
between
both
the
town
of
normal
and
the
city
of
Bloomington.
So
the
first
one
is
the
false
alarm
fee
that
that
is
administered
through
our
fire
department.
AC
So,
under
our
current
proposal,
we're
asking
that
the
false
alarm
fees,
the
first
three-
are
free
to
kind
of
get
that
property
owners
like
okay,
we,
you
know
something
went
wrong,
we're
there
and
Brian.
You
probably
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
that,
but
after
the
fourth
and
fifth
you're
charged
a
$75
fee
after
the
sixth
and
seventh
you're
charging
a
$100
fee
after
the
eighth
and
ninth
three
charges,
two
hundred
and
it's
incrementally
more
stringent
on
those
those
fees.
AC
But
if
you
apply
the
fee
that
town
of
normal
has
at
$75
per
fee,
if
you
took
your
full
ten
I
think
pound
of
normal.
If,
if
somebody
had
ten
false
alarms,
they're
paying
roughly
six
seventy
five
and
with
the
city
of
Bloomington
under
this
proposal,
they'd
be
at
ten
fifty.
So
it's
a
little
bit
more
stringent
I
will
say
this.
AC
The
town
of
normal
has
a
license
fee
for
towing
companies.
We
do
not.
The
town
of
normal
has
a
terminal
fee
for
video
gaming.
We
do
not.
If
the
next
comparable
one
is
on
junk
dealers,
we
charge
$100
annual
fee,
they
charge
a
$50
annual
fee,
so
they're
not
there's
not
really
that
apples
and
oranges.
The
only
way
we
really
tried
to
get
hit
hit.
AC
So
some
of
the
benefits
for
the
city
of
Bloomington
is
future
revenues
to
support
our
existing
programs,
ease
of
access
for
citizen
developers
for
feed
information
and
I.
Think
what
I'd
like
to
you
know.
Johnny!
You
had
made
a
reference
to
our
one-stop
shop
and
I.
Think
the
most
important
thing
is
that
the
developers
need
to
know
the
cost,
the
true
costs
of
their
development
and,
if
I
told
them
well.
AC
If
they
came
in
and
said,
what's
it
going
to
cost
me
to
develop
in
your
community
right
now,
I'm
going
to
have
to
pretty
much
send
them
to
the
multiple
departments
or
get
them
in
the
same
room.
The
PRG
meeting
room
to
kind
of
go
over
their
costs
or
they're.
Looking
online
chapter
after
Chapter
after
Chapter
to
find
out
well
I
need
to
get
as
a
rezoning,
then
I
need
to
get
a
building.
Permit
then
I
needed
to
get
a
driveway
permit.
AC
AC
What
the
schedule
of
fees
does
it
took
it
watered
down
45
chapters
of
the
municipal
code
into
25
pages,
and
now
what
we
can
do
is
if
you
came
in
and
your
restaurant
or
I
can
go
through
here
and
start
highlighting,
hey
you're
gonna
have
you're
gonna
have
two
handicap
accessible.
Restrooms
you're
gonna
have
two
fixtures
per
each
bathroom
boom
boom
you're
gonna
you're
you're,
going
to
put
in
a
million
to
building
your
fees.
AC
AC
On
our
permit
hand,
them
this
and
they're
walking
out
the
door
with
going
to
their
finance
here
to
find
out
how
they
can
move
this
project
forward,
and
so
that's
a
lot
different
than
what
we
had
before
of
hey
here's
45
chapters
do
your
best
and
even
staff
doesn't
know
where
most
of
these
fees
are
hidden
to,
let
somebody
know
and
and
I
there's
one
thing
that
I
don't
like
about
development
is
peeling
an
onion.
Oh,
did
you
forgot
about
that
Oh?
What
about
this?
It's
not
how
we
operate
in
our
department.
AC
We
need
these
people
need
to
know
exactly
what
they
what
they
need
to
to
move
their
project
forward,
and
this
is
a
good
first
step
for
the
city
to
look
at
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
I'm
most
familiar
with
the
community
development
side.
I
got
a
good
handle
on
some
of
the
other
departments,
but
I
could
certainly
try
to
answer
the.
B
H
B
B
X
There
we
go
upcoming
events
here
in
the
city,
then
also
just
announced
very
quickly
on
the
committee
the
whole
next
week
and
Monday
night.
We're
gonna
have
a
quick
presentation
from
J
Tesla
on
the
O'neill
Park
and
pool
also
there'll,
be
a
library
presentation,
just
a
quick
update
from
Genie.
That
shows
where
they've
been
with
a
Farnsworth
update.
Since
the
last
time
they
presented
to
Council
and
then
I'm
going
to
do
a
quick,
3-month
city
manager
update
some
things
that
will
be
implemented
here
in
very
short
order:
Thank
You,
meryt,
okay,.
B
B
jordan,
jim
jordan,
who
has
been
on
the
Liquor
Commission
in
the
past
so
and
and
I
think
all
the
woman
Hellman
knows
this,
but
I
meant
to
mention
this
last
in
our
last
exciting
episode
and
I
apologize
and
I
also
would
like
to
lament
the
passing
of
one
of
our
great
local
artists,
Harold
Gregor
other
than
that.
That's
all.
I
have
and
I
will
start
over
here
with
all
on
mullen.
One
way.
AB
Y
You
Oldman
sage,
so
not
to
look
for
you
in
a
mosh
pit
over
there
and
a
concert
for
some
of
those
memories
right,
Jeff
I
just
wanted
to
say
to
Jeff
and
I
know.
Jeff
there's
been
up,
there
was
a
tremendous
amount
of
other
staff
involved
with
the
the
dock
ordinance,
but
but
that
was
really
excellent.
Work
and
and
I
know,
Bob
was
involved.
I
know
there
were
a
number
of
staff
people
that
was
a
very
time-consuming
effort
and
inside
just
wanted
to.
Y
H
Y
I
thought
maybe
had
a
rapidly
accelerating
cataract
or
something
like
that
man,
because
I
wasn't
sure
the
more
I
said
here
you
know
just
did
just
seem
to
get
a
darker
and,
and
so
do
we
have
Lexus
some
control
or
something
where
we
can
bring
that
back
up.
Is
there
something
behind
Scott
over
there
or
God's?
Looking
so
all
right,
you
get
the
light
over
there
or
we
can
go
over
there.
All
right
thanks,
I,
just
wanted
to
clarify
there.
W
Alderman
sage
took
about
a
lot
of
exactly
what
I
was
going
to
say.
Everybody's
been
doing
that
all
night
tonight
about
the
docks.
I
know
was
a
tremendous
amount
of
working.
Thank
you
to
everybody
worked
on
that
I
also
wanted
to
just
let
you
know
that
I
will
not
be
in
attendance.
Next,
Monday
I
will
be
on
an
airplane
I'm
way
to
a
conference,
so
you
guys
have
fun
without
me.
H
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
chief
more
got
his
due
here
for
that
yeah.
On
a
personal
note,
this
is
October
I.
Think
if
I
remember
breast
cancer
awareness
month,
if
you
got
them,
take
care
of
them.
Okay,.
B
On
that
note,
is
there
a
motion
to
adjourn?
Thank
you
accident
not
not
to
trivialize
me.
Yeah
lost
a
mother
and
a
grandmother
to
breast
cancer,
but
is
there
a
motion
to
adjourn
moved
by
alderman
black?
Is
there
a
second
second
by
all
the
woman
Brae,
all
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
return?
Thank
you.