►
From YouTube: Annexation Interview with Tomi Allison
Description
Bloomington's mayor from 1983-1995, Tomi Allison led City government at a time of tremendous population growth and development. In this conversation, she discusses the roles good planning and periodic annexation have played in sharing limited resources and delivering services to this growing community.
A
Hi,
I'm
yael
cassander
communications
director
for
the
city
of
bloomington,
and
I'm
excited
to
be
here
today
with
tommy
allison,
who
was
mayor
of
bloomington
from
1983
to
1995,
and
she
served
on
the
city
council
from
1977
to
1982,
so
while
almost
two
decades
in
city
government
leadership.
What
what
a
proud
record
mayor
allison!
You
were
also
the
first
woman
to
have
been
elected
mayor
of
bloomington.
What
a
distinction!
So
I'm
honored
to
be
here.
Thank
you
for
being
here.
A
Me
well,
of
course,
we're
here
to
talk
about
annexation,
having
sort
of
an
ongoing
discussion
with
various
people
who've
who
have
a
great
deal
of
memory
about
bloomington's
history
of
annexation
and
can
contribute
to
the
conversation.
A
So
I'd
like
to
start
with
your
time
in
the
mayor's
seat,
and
so
during
your
administration,
you
refocused
energy
and
investments
in
our
historic
downtown,
our
downtown
really
blossomed.
During
that
time,
you
many
people
may
may
remember
that
you
oversaw
the
reuse
of
the
shower
building
for
city
hall,
you
created
a
master
plan
for
the
city
and
certain
beloved
traditions,
like
the
canopy
of
lights,
started
on
your
watch
as
well
or
restarted.
A
A
Maybe
we
can
begin
with
the
way
that
you
saw
annexation
figuring
into
the
planning
that
you
were
doing
in
coordination
with
the
county
when
you
were
mayor
such
things
as
the
way
that
city
and
county
officials
at
that
time
agreed
on
and
planned
for
such
things
as
the
two
mile
fringe
and
areas
intended
for
annexation.
B
Well,
first
of
all,
I'll
do
a
little
bit
of
history,
because
I
I
you
you
find
out
that
after
10
15
years,
a
lot
of
history
is
lost
just
because
people
didn't
live
it
you
know
and
and
they,
but
when
I,
when
the
time
that
I
was
in
office,
you
know
both
in
the
council
and
the
mayor's
office.
B
We
had
the
difficulty
that
there
was
not
sufficient
funds
to
provide
the
basic
services
you
sort
of
have
to
look
at
the
state
of
indiana
indiana.
You
have
your
constitutional
government
with
your
county
government.
Your
county
government
covers
your
rural
areas,
your
courts
and
your
welfare,
and
as
the
population
grew,
there
were
towns
and
then
cities,
because
that
was
more
concentrated
population
requiring
different
services.
B
But
in
all
these
cases
the
state
regulates
how
many
taxes
you
can
raise
sets
of
rules
in
effect.
Well,
bloomington
was
put
at
a
disadvantage
with
those
rules.
I
you
had
a
quarter
of
the
assessed
valuation
with
of
the
university,
which
is
a
boom
to
our
community
and
county,
but
they're
off
the
tax
rolls
and
the
city
was
caught
with
a
new
regulation
and
frozen
at
a
disadvantaged
part.
So
you
had
infrastructure.
B
B
And
if
you
look
at
things
in
a
overview
you
you,
then
you
look
at
what
is
the
most
cost
effective
way
to
to
provide
necessary
services
the
most
efficient
and
when
you
are
in
the-
and
you
talked
about
planning
now
in
our
planning,
we
saw,
we
were
growing
fast
and
we
didn't
want
urban
sprawl
any
more
than
the
county.
B
I
recently
we
did
a
lot
of
driving
around
the
city
to
see
what
was
developed
after
the
1995
passing
of
the
new
plant
master
plan,
and
you
will
see
townhouses,
duplexes
apartments,
adjacent
to
single
family,
all
part
of
the
same
development
with
well-built
streets,
the
right
size,
sidewalks,
all
the
services
on
bus
lines
and
all
the
lovely
trees
and
greenery
and
etc.
B
And
yet
and
no
a
peace
reigns.
You
know
because
it
was
developed
with
the
interests
of
these
people.
You
know
it
wasn't
done
willy-nilly
and
so.
A
Mayor
allison,
if
I
can
summarize,
I
guess
I
would
say
that
your
discussions
with
the
county
and
the
the
ability
to
plan
in
these
areas
that
were
you
know,
on
the
outer
fringes
of
the
city
allowed
for
those
planned
unit.
Developments
the
puds
to
be
undertaken
in
a
sustainable
way
and
in
a
way
that
limited
sprawl
and
maintained
compact
urban
form
and
had
other
benefits
in
terms.
B
Of
costs
you
know
to
supply
fire
protection,
you
made
sure
that
your
roads
and
your
water
supply
and
everything
you
could
protect,
give
fire
protection.
You
could
you
know
you
could
get
garbage
pick
up
because
the
trucks
could
get
in
and
out.
You
know
the
things
that
you
think
out
that
you
plan
about
gin
etc.
B
The
problem
with
this,
as
I
see
the
problem
now,
is
that
these
subdivisions
adjacent
to
the
city
often
were
planned
by
the
city
as
eventual
annexation.
B
The
the
developers
and
the
the
people
approaching
that
time
knew
that
they
would
be
annexed
and
and
the,
and
they
knew
that
they
could
would
not
be
able
to
develop
without
the
sewer
hook-ons
and
they
signed.
You
know
the
statement
that
they
would
not
object
to
annexation.
B
After
all,
if
you
have
been
getting
a
service
without
having
a
you
know,
add
to
certain
at
a
certain
level
with
that,
and
then
somebody
comes
to
you
and
says,
oh
by
the
way,
you're
not
going
to
have
to
pay
more
for
what
you've
been
getting
at
this,
this
particular
price
and
is
it
well,
they
say
I
don't.
I
don't
need
anything
more.
I
don't
need
anything.
I
don't
need
anything,
but
not
only
that.
I
think
that
fire
protection
is
another
one
that
is.
B
Is
it
shows
you
what
happens
when
there
is
not
the
vision
of
looking
to
what
I
would
say
you
you
need
to
plot.
You
need
to
provide
certain
services.
When
you
have
concentrated
population,
you
want
to
provide
it
cost
effective
and
efficiently
fire
protection,
fire
protection.
You
talk
to
any
professional
firefighter.
B
B
B
Township
fire
department
for
the
subdivisions,
not
the
rural,
which
was
volunteer
now
they're,
going
to
have
to
staff
up
to
365
days
a
year,
24
hours
a
day,
okay,
equipment
and
facilities.
Now
that
they
may
be
able,
to
put,
I
say,
with
the
facilities
right
there,
but
they
have
a
township
is
huge
right.
So
the
people
right
there
in
that
subdivision,
but
the
thing
of
it
is
the
city
taxpayer,
is
paying
county
taxes
and
part
of
that
fire
protection
in
those
subdivisions
outside
the
city
is
coming
out
of
that
city:
taxpayers
money.
B
B
B
What
you
have
is
people
distrustful
feel
put
upon
and
that
what
that,
and
rather
than
concentrating
our
thinking
about
the
real
issues
is
how
do
you
supply
necessary
services?
I'm
not
talking
about
what
you
would
like.
Like
you
know,
you
would
like
some
some
other
things.
These
are
necessary
services,
okay,
in
a
equitable
way,
an
efficient
way,
a
cost
effective
way
without
the
idea
of
is
somebody
getting
it
at
a
at
a
better
price.
Then
you
know
because
we're
talking
about
now
sovereign
people
and
their
government
right.
B
So
that's
that's
what
that's?
What
bothers
me
is
that
we'll
we'll
be
off
on
all
the
tangents
and
not
down
to
the
the
real.
B
What
I
would
think
say,
a
look
at
the
common
good
is
water
service
and
sewer
treatment
service
is
a
scarce
commodity.
In
monroe
county
we
don't
have
you
know
we
don't
have
a
natural
source,
we
don't
have
the
big
rivers
etc.
So,
there's
a
reason.
We
don't
have
a
lot
of
private
sewer
treatment
plants
or
you
have
a
lot
of
water
treatment
plants
or
something
like
that.
B
So
that's
that's
the
part
that
that
that
bothers
me.
It's
you
know,
annexation
is
a
lot
of
work.
You
know
it's
hard
to
do,
but
the
the
question
is,
you
know
in
terms
of,
if
you're
thinking
of
the
common
good
for
both
the
city
and
the
county,
then
you
look
at
it
as
a
whole
ahead
of
it
now.
The
the
part
that
is
is
the
elephant
in
the
room.
That's
never
talked
about
here.
Is
this.
B
Industry
is
the
driver.
Industry
is
the
jobs
in
the
community,
and
industry
absolutely
requires
sewers
and
they
require
other
services
as
well.
They
require,
you
know
fire
protection
of
a
a
higher
level
say
you
know
in
terms
of,
and
so
and
of
course
we
have
a.
You
know,
a
philosophy
that
if
you
can
get
away
with
not
paying
for
something,
that's
smart
business.
B
You
know
I
mean
you
know,
so
they
there's
there's
a
there's,
a
kind
of
a
thing
that
you
know
if
you
get
get
it
for
less
cost,
your
your
your
smart
business.
Well,
that's
fine,
but
somebody's
going
to
have
to
pay.
B
You
know
somebody
is
going
to
have
to
pay
for
those
those
services,
whether
it's
bus
transportation
for
your
workers
or
whether
it's
the
what
needed,
water
and
sewer,
and
so
a
lot
of
the
annexation
really
is
the
servicing
of
the
big
customers
you
know
and
that
the
servicing
of
of
subdivisions
is
just
about
a
wash.
B
What
you're
getting
taxes
is
about
what
you
have
to
pay
in
services,
but
you
know
in
in
terms
of
the
payback
in
in
that,
but
the
cost
of
a
above
industry
not
being
paying
for
their
services
can
pull
pull
down
quite
a
bit.
You
know
the
the
budget
of
the
government
that
has
to
service
them.
B
B
You
need
to
do
to
stop
the
the
the
idea.
It's
not
my
problem.
I
and
people
need
to
to
start
talking
about
the
commons.
These
are
basic
services
required
for
any
development.
B
B
Will
I
be
able
to
keep
chickens
in
the
subdivision
and
we
should
start
talking
about
how
are
we
going
to
peacefully
and
equitably
supplying
necessary
service
and
cost-effective,
not
that
we're
going
to
swap
it
off
on
another
taxpayer,
but
we're
going
we're
going
to
to
figure
out
how
we're
going
to
do
it.