►
From YouTube: Bloomington Board of Public Works, August 15, 2023
Description
Board of Public Works Documents:
https://bloomington.in.gov/boards/public-works/meetings
A
A
Seeing
none?
Next
is
petitions
and
remonstrances?
If
we
have
anyone
who
would
like
to
make
a
public
comment
about
something
that
is
not
on
the
agenda,
now
is
the
opportunity
to
do
so
again
if
you're
on
zoom
and
would
like
to
make
a
public
comment
on
something
not
on
the
agenda.
You're,
welcome
to
add
something
in
the
chat
or
use
the
raised
hand
function
so
that
we
can
acknowledge
you
if
you're
in
person,
you
are
welcome
to
approach
the
microphone.
B
C
A
And
we
discussed
this
during
the
work
session.
You
have
not
received
any
response.
B
A
B
And
that
is
also
me
so
I
initially
done
a
citation
on
7
18,
23,
725,
23
and
8
3
23.
Basically,
the
same
same
days
and
I
spoke
with
the
owner
the
first
day
and
I.
Don't
know
the
whole
back
story.
I
just
know
this
one's
the
one
that
has,
he
blames
the
city
for
work
that
they
have
done,
but
he
basically
told
me
he's
not
going
to
mow
it.
E
And
I'll
just
real
quick
comment
that,
yes,
the
board's
aware
of
a
history
with
this
property,
there
was
some
dispute
in
the
past
about
a
water
line
project
we've
met
on
site
with
the
owner
on
multiple
occasions
addressed
those
issues.
Last
year
the
what
what
was
brought
to
our
attention.
There
were
a
few
things
that
were
brought
to
our
attention
that
were
remedied
at
that
time,
but
this
is
just
a
complete
refusal
to
mow
the
property.
At
this
point,.
A
F
F
F
The
abatement
last
year
was
first
on
July
22nd
by
Trevor
Yoko
of
YOLO,
lawn
and
Order,
and
the
front
of
the
property
was
successfully
abated
using
a
continuous
track.
Kubota
continuous
strike
means
like
attack
with
the
front
end
bush
hog
capable
of
going
through
a
sapling
of
up
to
two
inches
in
diameter.
F
This
began
in
2021
prior
to
that
I
had
never
had
any
type
of
a
citation
for
anything
in
the
city,
especially
the
appearance
of
the
property.
You
guys
know
this
you've
been
contacted.
The
mayor
has
been
contacted.
Cpu
has
been
contacted
once
my
yard
is
in
a
mobile
state.
F
E
Were
on
site,
they
made
repairs
at
the
time
is
Roy
here.
No
on
several
occasions,
CBU
staff
and
City
engineering
staff
met
on
site
last
summer
as
part
of
this
process.
At
the
time
CBU
had
assured
and
has
assured
that
everything
was
repaired
to
the
standard
that
they
needed
to.
E
H
A
A
E
Part
two
of
the
packet
sorry
I,
was
navigating
through
the
three
parts
of
the
gigantic
packet
today,
again
Adam
wayson,
Public
Works,
director
for
the
city
of
Bloomington,
so
the
Board
of
Public
Works
has
the
power
and
responsibility
to
ask
a
person
to
leave
or
remove
a
person
from
property,
owned,
managed
or
operated
by
the
Board
of
Public
Works
or
the
public
works
department.
E
Similarly,
the
board
has
the
power
and
responsibility
to
suspend
a
person
from
use
or
entrance
of
publicly
owned
property
managed
or
operated
by
the
board
the
board
can
afford,
will
afford
suspended
individuals,
notice,
appeal
and
hearing
and
a
suspension
shell
range
from
seven
days
to
a
year,
so
we're
asking
for
your
support
and
passing
resolution.
23-50
2023-55.
E
This
all
comes
from
a
situation
from
situations
in
which
we've
had
individuals
on
Public
Works
property,
either
causing
criminal
damage
or
vandalism
in
different
ways
and
need
to
have
a
policy
on
the
books
that
we
do
have
a
suspension
policy.
So
this
is
mirrored
a
lot
after
what
parks
and
rec
has
for
suspension
from
Parks
facilities
for
violations
of
parks
policies.
This
would
come
into
play
when
you
know
when
we
have
situations
of
repeated,
disorderly
conduct,
repeated
vandalism,
other
types
of
criminal
mischief,
type
activities.
E
So
this
all
just
allows
I
as
a
public
works
director
to
issue
these
suspensions
as
needed,
with
obviously
in
coordination
with
City,
legal
and
possibly
the
police
department,
if,
if
it
Rose
to
that
level,
but
this
does
put
a
policy
on
the
books
that
gives
us
that
ability
happy
to
answer
any
questions
with
my
friends
from
City
legal.
A
H
A
E
Adam
weyson
Public
Works
director,
so
from
the
staff
report,
it
states
that
city
has
a
responsibility
to
ensure
that
the
Public's
right-of-way
is
accessible
and
available
to
all
members
of
the
Bloomington
Community.
To
that
end,
the
city
recommends
taking
steps
to
prevent
individuals
and
entities
from
to
prevent
individuals
from
impermissibly
obstructing
the
public.
E
These
aren't
you
know
these
are
this
is
being
brought
forward
and
for
reasons
that
you
know,
none
of
us
would
really
want
to
have
to
bring
forward
resolutions
like
this.
E
You
know
some
we've
had
some
specific
instances
of
late
and
over
the
last
we've
had
one
specific
instance
of
late,
where
this
really
kind
of
came
to
a
recognition
of
City
staff
that
we
needed
to
address
come
up
with
a
way
to
address
a
situation
that
is
both
within
that
that
meets
the
legal
requirements
of
issuing
trespass
orders
for
blocking
public
rights
of
way,
but
also
does
so
with
coordination
of
the
city,
legal
department,
the
prosecutor's
office,
the
police
department
and
others.
So
what's
before,
you
today
is
somewhat
modeled.
E
After
what
Indianapolis
has
created
to
address
situations
where
individuals
are
blocking
public
rights
of
way,
mainly
sidewalks
or
areas
where
pedestrians
are
going
to
travel,
but
we,
you
know
so
the
specific
instance
that
we
encountered
was
a
few
individuals
on
a
city
street
that
were
blocking
90
percent
of
the
public
right-of-way.
There
was
no
way
that
that
public
right-of-way
at
that
point
in
time
was
Ada
accessible.
E
There
was
no
way
it
was
passable
by
somebody
simply
walking
by,
and
you
know,
in
the
vast
vast
majority
of
the
instances
in
which
I've
been
in
that
situation
and
encountering
that
it's
simply
a
conversation
of
hey.
You
know
we
want
to
try
to
keep
the
sidewalk
clear.
Could
you
please,
you
know,
gather
your
things
and
you
know,
and
that's
usually
all
it
is:
we've
had
an
instance
where
that
was
pushed
to
no
I'm,
not
leaving
I'm
going
to
stay
here.
E
This
is
you
know,
and
we
in
conversation
with
our
Police
Department,
which
we
work
very
good
with
and
and
not
anything
against
their
actions
in
the
situation,
but
it
was
very
clear
in
their
conversations
with
the
prosecutors
office
and
others
that
we
didn't
really
have
the
ability
to
Simply
remove
for
trespass
for
this
exact
issue.
E
The
result
of
that
is
what's
before
you
today
we're
trying
to
come
up
with
what
we're
asking
is
that
you
would
pass
this
resolution,
which
then
recommends
to
the
city
council
to
take
up
an
ordinance
that
would
put
give
us
the
ability
to
to
handle
situations
of
this
nature.
So
again,
I
want
to
thank
you
for
the
conversation
yesterday.
E
It
really
helped
us
kind
of
reshape
and
think
about
some
of
the
other
extra
some
of
the
other
possible
interpretations
of
how
this
could
be
read
with
how
we
have
many
parts
of
our
code
that
address
the
use
and
the
use
of
or
improper
use
of,
the
Public's
right-of-way.
E
E
A
vegetation
and
overgrowth
title
15
would
be
a
car
blocking
a
sidewalk
Title
20
has
to
do
with
signs
in
the
right-of-way
there's
a
lot
of
different
title
12,
which
you
folks
see
often
is
the
you
know,
is
excavation
of
the
right-of-way
and
and
and
how
contractors
and
developers
use
the
right
way.
So,
while
there
are
a
lot
of
different
parts
of
the
code
that
address
specific
uses
of
the
right-of-way
in
different
ways,
we
needed
something
on
our
books
to
help
us
in
those
situations
that
we've
encountered
of
late.
E
So
with
all
that
said,
I
will
also
again
rely
on
my
on
our
friends
from
City
legal
to
help
answer
any
questions
you
have
but
I
appreciate
the
robust
discussion,
a
few
things
that
have
come
from
that
discussion,
we're
looking
we've
already
agreed
to
change
the
fine
structure
from
the
general
city
code
listed
fine
structure
for
improper
use
of
the
right
way.
You
know.
Yesterday
we
were
just
discussing
about
how
it
had
language
of
up
to
twenty
five
hundred
dollars.
E
That's
some
general
language
from
city
code,
on
how
fine
structures
are
levied
and
we've
agreed
to
modify
that
and
are
open
to
further
discussion
on
that
one.
We've
also
did
the
entities
language
on
and
we've
we've
been
discussing
language
in
the
resolution
about
entities
versus
individuals
and
I'd
ask
Mike
to
address
that
as
in
his
comments
as
he
comes
up,
but
the
robust
discussion
led
to
where
it
should
have
hopefully
a
better
product
for
everyone.
So
with
that
any
questions
from
the
board.
Thank.
A
D
A
Yeah
I
too
appreciate
the
conversation
that
we've
had
around
this
particular
issue.
As
a
the
public
knows,
anyone
who
has
watched
public
works
or
has
interacted
with
us.
We
deal
with
many
many
issues
related
to
the
right-of-way.
Our
this
board
takes
very
seriously
the
accessibility
of
the
right-of-way
and
are
very
mindful
when
we
do
Grant
use
of
the
right-of-way
for
specific
purposes,
of
course,
allowing
the
public
to
be
able
to
use
the
right-of-way
in
the
way
that
is
intended
so
that
people
can
pass
through
it
and
travel
through.
It
is
something
that's
top
of
mind.
A
Every
time
we
have
a
conversation
about
right-of-way
use,
whether
it's
construction
or
a
special
event.
This
board
often
asks
and
ensures
that
the
public
is
still
going
to
be
able
to
access
what
they
need
in
order
to
be
able
to
travel
through
the
area,
and
so
it
is
important
to
us-
and
this
is
one
element
of
the
that
we
are
considering
today
and
thinking
about
that
has
perhaps
not
been
addressed
by
other
elements
of
the
code.
A
In
that
conversation
about
the
way
that
the
that
the
proposal
is
written,
the
suggested
language
I
had
raised
the
question
about
the
wording,
the
included
entities,
because
we
do
actually
address
usage
of
the
right-of-way
by
entities
and
many
many
different
ways.
A
A
Likewise,
I
appreciate
we
had
really
good
conversation
about
the
the
fines
and
the
fact
that
there
is
sort
of
a
general
violation,
fine
language
that
exists
in
city
code
that
was
used
in
this
in
this
proposed
language,
but
it
seemed
incongruent
when
read
as
its
General
fine
language
to
some
other
finds
that
we
place
upon
different
entities
in
most
cases
for
violating
use
of
the
public
right-of-way
and
so-
and
it's
to
me
does
not
seem
like
the
fine
is
actually
the
critical
element
of
of
this
proposed
ordinance.
A
And
so
I
would
suggest
that
we
might
modify
this
language
to
not
include
reference
to
a
fine,
as
that
is
not
part
of
the
the
goal.
I
Thank
you
first
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I've
got
the
exact
modifications
that
you're
proposing
correct
so
that
we
all
know
what
we're
talking
about.
I
think
you're
talking
about
in
subpart
B
of
the
ordinance.
The
first
three
words
are
individuals
or
entities,
and
that
you
would
want
to
strike
through
the
words
or
and
entities
there
and
then
I
think
if
we
track
down
to
the
bottom.
A
Is
correct
and
there
is
another
reference
to
entities
or
entity
I
should
say
under
item
C,
individual
or
entity,
and
so
that
I
would
propose
that
we
remove
the
reference
to
entity
there.
I
Okay,
I
can
tell
you
from
staff's
perspective.
At
least
none
of
those
changes
are
objectionable.
Those
are
all
reasonable
if.
D
I
Yeah,
you
know
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
this
at
the
the
work
session.
This
is
not
a
revenue
generating
Initiative
for
the
city.
I
In
that
regard,
you
know
a
fine
really
is
not
a
useful
tool
at
all.
What
we
need
to
be
able
to
do
is
have
a
mechanism
to
remove
the
obstruction,
that's
in
the
right-of-way
and
that's
what
we're
trying
to
do
with
this.
This
proposed
ordinance.
A
And
just
to
clarify,
when
we
say
the
word
obstruction,
we
mean
items
like
you
know
we're
talking
about
things
like
you
know:
temporary
structural
items,
belongings,
things
that
are
occupying
the
space
when
we
when
we
use
the
word
obstruction.
So
a
person
you
know
sitting
on
a
bench
or
you
know
existing
in
the
right-of-way,
certainly
perfectly
fine.
A
But
it's
when
this
the
right-of-way
is
obstructed
by
material
items
that
are
not
allowing
for
the
public
to
use
it.
I'm.
I
Not
sure
if
you're
asking
a
question
or
not,
but
if
you
are
yes
absolutely
this
is
not
a
loitering
statute.
It's
about
or
excuse
me
ordinance.
It's
about
it's
about
obstructions
physical
obstructions
in
the
right
of
way.
A
J
Thank
you,
madam
president.
Eric
spoon,
more
greater
Bloomington
Chamber
of
Commerce
I
wanted
to
thank
the
board
and
staff
for
its
consideration
of
this
item
tonight.
J
It
very
clearly
states
the
objectives
and
all
of
which
we
agree
with
and
appreciate.
Mr
wayson's
remarks
and
City
legal's
remarks
to
kind
of
clarify
some
of
that.
If
there's
any
way
that
it
could
be
enhanced,
I
would
look
at
you
know
the
four
Criterion
that
are
outlined
under
subsection,
a
of
obstructing
the
right-of-way
to
me
in
reading.
It
is
not
100
clear
if
this
is
all
four
of
those
Criterion
have
to
be
met,
or
if
just
one
of
them
or
any
of
them
need
to
be
met.
J
So
I
would
encourage
the
board
to
add
some
additional
Clarity
in
there
to
say
that
if
any
one
of
these
Criterion
are
met,
then
that
would
be
a
violation
of
obstructing
the
right-of-way,
so
just
my
thoughts
and
wanted
to
bring
that
to
your
attention.
But
again,
thank
you.
So
much
for
considering
this,
the
chamber
supports
us
100.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
I'll
just
add
the
comment
that
which
I
don't
know
it
was
offered
in
your
staff
context,
I
think
as
well,
but
appreciate
that
note
about
the
language.
This,
of
course,
is
you
know,
a
resolution
that
we
would
be
sending
to
city
council
as
recommendation,
and
they
will
continue
to
potentially
refine
and
adjust
as
as
needed,
but
appreciate
that
comment
as
well.
E
The
four
criteria
and
Mike
Mr
Ricker-
please
help
me
if
I
I,
don't
say
this
right,
but
I
believe
the
language
with
the
if
or
language
does
mean
that
it
could
be
any
of
the
four
it's
not.
It
doesn't
need
to
be
a
combination
of
the
four
the
if
more
than
half
of
the
width,
that's
blocked
at
any
point
if
the
normal
flow
of
traffic
or
normal
flow
of
pedestrians
or
Vehicles
is
disrupted.
E
I
Michael
Rooker
City
attorney
I
think
I
forgot
to
introduce
myself
earlier
my
apologies
but
yeah
just
to
confirm
that
the
disjunctive
at
the
end
of
that
list
of
of
four
items
indicates
that
any
one
of
the
four
would
qualify
again.
If
it's
helpful,
we,
you
could
use
some
additional
language
at
the
top
of
it
to
say
if
any
of
the
following
criteria
and
then
do
the
list
there's
any
number
of
ways
to
be
clear
about
that,
and
so.
A
K
Hello,
my
name
is
Sydney
zulik
I
just
want
to
start
off
by
thanking
you
all
for
your
work,
but
I
discourage
you
passing
this
on
to
the
city
council
in
the
current
form
that
it
is
homeless.
People
have
stuff
we
all
have
stuff,
but
the
only
the
only
difference
between
them
and
people
who
do
have
homes
or
apartments
or
rent
anything
is
that
they
don't
have
a
place
to
put
their
stuff.
K
I
understand
that
this
is
an
issue
I'm,
the
only
city
council,
candidate
for
district
six,
so
in
three
and
a
half
months,
I
will
be
forced
to
reckon
with
this
issue,
like
the
rest
of
you
are
I
totally
get
it,
but
I
really
think
we
should
be
focused
on
legislation
that
helps
instead
of
hurts
and
in
three
and
a
half
months.
I
would
love
to
work
with
you
all
and
develop
a
solution.
That
is
maybe
a
little
more
helpful
and
a
little
less
hurtful.
K
So
if
you
do
chew
I'm,
so
sorry
I
keep
hitting
this.
If
you
do
choose
to
pass
this
ordinance,
I
encourage
you
to
include
wording
that
is,
opens
up
opportunity
to
create
spaces
for
homeless
people
to
put
their
stuff
like,
for
example,
lockers,
where
they
know
that
their
stuff
will
be
safe.
The
Shalom
Center
has
some
options,
but
not
as
many
people
are
aware
of
them.
K
I
really
believe
that
if
we
are
to
pass
something
like
this,
we
should
be
offering
Services
as
a
city
for
people
to
keep
their
stuff
safe
and
also
in
regard
to
obstructing
the
way.
We
should
really
be
looking
a
lot
more
at
Double
parking
if
you've,
if
you've
driven
down
Walnut
or
college
in
the
past
three
days.
You
know
it's
a
huge
safety
issue
for
traffic
I
drive
there
all
the
time
I
used
to
live
on
the
Square,
so
I'm
quite
familiar
with
it.
K
We
should
be
focusing
a
little
bit
more
on
that
and
a
little
less
on
demonizing
homelessness.
Thank
you,
and
once
again,
I
really
appreciate
all
of
your
hard
work.
L
Are
we
going
to
zoom
or
okay
good
evening
Dave
Askins
with
the
b-square
bulletin,
I
just
had
a
couple
of
procedural
questions
as
I
understand
it.
This
resolution,
if
it
were
to
be
passed,
would
be
conveyed
to
the
city
council
as
some
kind
of
a
communication,
and
at
that
point
you
know
a
city
council
member
could
decide
that
they
want
to
take
that
ordinance
and
Champion
it
and
sponsor
it
to
move
forward
through
the
city
council's
first
and
second
reading
process.
L
But
the
administration
often
also
just
ask
the
council,
on
its
own
initiative,
to
put
things
in
front
of
the
city
council.
So
I
guess
my
question
is:
what's
the
plan?
Is
it
the?
Is
it
the
hope
and
expectation
that
a
city
council
member
will
recognize
that
this
is
something
that
they
should
work
on
and
sponsor
it?
L
Or
will
the
administration
itself
ask
the
city
council
to
enact
this
ordinance
and
if
it's
the
administration,
I
guess
it's
fair
to
ask
what
the
the
timetable
would
be
for
the
other
scenario
predicting
the
actions
of
the
city
council,
you
know
that's
not
an
exact
science
but
predicting
the
actions
of
the
administration.
That's
a
fairer
question.
Thanks
thank.
E
Turn
between
conversations
of
the
administration
and
the
council
leadership
on
how
that
would
move
forward
the
timing
of
it.
This
is
just
a
first
step
asking
the
council
to
consider
ordinance
language,
so
that
would
be
the
intent
there
and
I'll
also
just
take
a
moment
to
address
the
previous
commenters.
A
few
of
the
previous
commenters
comments.
By
no
means
is
this
any
intent
to
demonize
homelessness,
as
was
suggested.
E
This
is
to
keep
public
rights
away,
free
and
clear
for
those
traveling
the
instances
that
were
specifically
spoken
about
tonight
and
in
past
that
has
really
brought
this
to
to
the
table
as
a
conversation
where
sidewalks
that
were
completely
inaccessible
to
anyone
walking
using
a
wheelchair
or
any
type
of
travel
on
that
sidewalk.
This
isn't
about
demonizing
homelessness.
This
is
about
us
trying
to
keep
public
rights
of
way
clear.
A
H
The
way
that
this
ordinance
has
been
written
specifically
because
it
doesn't
prevent
people
from
having
possessions
in
in
the
public
I
mean
around
the
public
right
away
near
the
public
right-of-way
as
long
as
they're,
not
obstructing
the
public,
right-of-way
and
I
I
do
recognize
that
people
have
things
and
they
need
to
have
a
place
to
put
things,
and
this
basically
says
just
not
so
that
you're
blocking
other
people's
ability
to
walk
through
the
thoroughfare
and
for
that
reason,
I
support
the
way
that
this
has
been
written
and
will
make
the
recommendation.
H
D
A
You
all
right,
if
we
have
no
other
public
comment
that
has
come
in.
Do
we
have
a
motion
on
this
item?
Do.
E
Amended
is
yeah
okay,
it
was
clearly
I
think
the
amen,
the
language
that
was
going
to
be
amended
and
was
confirmed
by
a
City
attorney
Rooker
with
President
Deckard,
is
acceptable.
So
I
think
you
could
make
the
motion
with
the
language
as
amended.
D
A
E
Me
take
a
moment
to
gather
myself
in
this
500
page
packet.
Fortunately,.
A
It
is
in
the
same
I
think
same.
E
Thing
April's
too
good
to
me.
She's
handed
me
printed
copies,
so
I
don't
have
to
scroll
anymore
Adam,
wasting
again
Public
Works
director
for
the
city
of
Bloomington.
We
have
Hank
Duncan
our
bicycle
and
pedestrian
coordinator
from
the
planning
and
transportation
department
here
as
well
tonight,
as
well
as
City
legal
and
some
representatives
of
the
various
scooter
companies.
So
I'll
just
start
off
with
some
general
comments
about
scooters
in
general
and
then
we'll
take
up.
Each
of
the
individual
licenses
license
applications
from
the
board.
E
So
again,
another
topic
that
has
gained
robust
discussion
and
I
want
to
thank
the
board
for
their
their
participation
in
those
discussions.
E
It's
I
think
going
to
lead
to
a
better
final
product
in
the
end
for
everyone
and
just
want
to
make
a
few
notes
about
why
we're
at
the
point
we
are
and
what
we're
asking
of
the
board
so
for
the
last
well,
several
months
and
probably
year,
plus
there's
been
a
lot
of
discussions
about
how
scooters
are
operated
in
Bloomington,
how
they
are,
where
they're
parked
and
general
just
the
general
usage
of
scooters
within
the
community
and
shared
Mobility
devices,
including
sit-down
scooters
and
e-bikes
shared
e-bikes
and
such
part
of
it
has
to
do
with
how
they
are
stored
in
the
public
right-of-way.
E
So
again,
you
know,
as
we
all
know,
that's
a
big
topic
of
discussion
with
our
last
item.
So
it's
not
only
how
they're
stored
in
the
public
right-of-way,
but
how
they're
used
within
the
public,
right-of-way
and
the
safety
of
those
devices
for
the
end
users.
A
lot
of
the
conversation
that
we've
been
having
has
been
the
result
of
conversations
we've
been
having
with
the
city
council
on
on
what
they
would
like
on
the
expectations
they
have
and
how
we
better
manage
the
scooter
fleets
throughout
the
community.
E
So
currently
we
have
three
operators,
vo
bird
and
lime,
that
are
operating
with
their
shared
Mobility
devices
within
the
community.
Those
conversation,
the
conversations
with
city
council,
has
led
staff
to
take
certain
steps
to
work
with
the
scooter
companies
and
also
improve
the
infrastructure
for
scooters
within
the
community
and
then
with
these
applications
and
with
the
program
going
forward,
allowing
us
not
allowing
us
but
having
staff,
put
forward
a
commitment
that
we
will
work
in
a
more
robust
way
on
enforcement
of
the
parking,
improper
parking
of
scooters
throughout
the
community.
E
So
some
of
the
things
that
we've
done
since
our
last
conversations
with
the
city
council
and
since
the
last
time
we
met
and
talked
about
the
actual
application
itself
with
the
board.
We
have
worked
to
install
I
think
as
of
today
we're
at
60
Corrals
parking
Corrals
throughout
the
geographic
area
that
includes
Third
Street
to
the
South
12th
Street
to
the
North
Morton
Street
right
out
front
of
City
Hall
here
to
the
west
and
Indiana
Avenue
adjacent
to
the
sample
gates
to
the
east
near
campus.
E
Those
have
all
been
geo-fenced
within
a
mapping
device
on
computers
that
will
populate
within
the
apps
to
inform
the
users
of
the
scooters
for
all
three
of
the
companies
that
if
they
are
starting
and
stopping
a
ride
within
that
geographic
area,
they
need
to
be
parked
in
and
around
those
Corrals
they're,
not
super
they're,
not
accurate
to
100
percent.
It
sounds
like
they're
five
anywhere
from
10
to
20
feet
accurate
within
that
area,
but
so
that
those
rides
would
have
to
stop
and
start
within
using
one
of
those
Corrals.
E
Additionally,
we've
been
working
very
closely
with
the
companies
we
sent
them
a
set
of
questions
yesterday
and
I'll.
Ask
that
the
companies
kind
of
address
those
individually
but
on
how
they
can
be
accountable
to
the
community
in
the
city
and
the
board
when,
when
their
scooters
are
in
part,
one
of
these
micro
Mobility
devices
are
improperly
parked
who
their
local
contacts
are,
how
we
can
work
together.
You
know
one
of
the
big
comments
from
the
board
yesterday.
That's
hit
home
to
me.
E
Is
you
know
why
haven't
we
kept
the
scooter
companies
more
accountable
throughout
these
last
few
years
and
I
think
the
answer
to
that
is
is
one
of
a
manner
of
resources
and
dedicated
resources,
but
it's
also
a
matter
of
and
I.
Don't
you
know,
I
I
say
this
with
a
little
reservation,
but
it's
it's
been
a
lack
of
City
staff
having
all
of
the
abilities
and
foresight
on
how
to
really
try
to
manage
these
things.
It
was
an
emerging
technology
and
it
was
one
when
you
have.
E
You
know
the
80
other
things
of
the
day
and
it
just
it.
We
didn't
do
a
good
enough
job
in
the
over
the
last
couple
years
of
making
sure
we
were
keeping
our
right-of-ways
accessible
of
from
blocked,
Micro,
movability,
Devices
Etc,
so
again,
I'm
just
We'll
be
asking
for
your
support
of
these
license.
Applications
with
these
new
approaches
to
how
we're
going
to
hopefully
work
better
with
all
of
the
scooter
companies,
micro,
Mobility
device
companies.
I'm.
E
Sorry
I,
keep
I
need
to
use
that
micro
Mobility
term,
but
you
know
so
we're
hopeful
that
you
know
these
changes,
and
these
updates
will
just
improve
the
overall
situation
with
the
scooters
throughout
the
community
outside
of
that
geographic
area.
What
we're
committing
to
well
actually
inside
that
geographic
area
and
then
outside
of
it
as
well.
We've
been
working
with
the
administration
as
part
of
our
2024
budget
request
to
add
additional
resources
within
the
parking
enforcement
area
of
our
parking
services.
Division.
E
So
we're
trying
to
take
some
proactive
steps
that
will
hopefully
just
improve
this
throughout
the
community
and
overall
I'll
turn
it
over
to
Hank.
If
Hank
wants
to
offer
anything
else
at
this
point
in
time-
and
this
would
be
the
what's-
this
renewal
application
for
Bert,
which
one
was
this
one
I'm
sorry,
which
was
first
first,
is
Bird
Okay.
Do
we
have
a
representative
of
bird
on
the
meeting
online.
E
Excellent,
all
right
so
Hank
do
you
have
anything
else
you
want
to
offer
at
this
time,
did
I
cover
it
all:
okay,
Hank's
shaking
his
head
from
the
back.
So
would
the
representative
of
bird
like
to
offer
any
comments
at
this
time.
M
Hello,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
This
is
Vaughn
Roland
senior
manager
of
government
Partnerships
with
bird
representing
the
Midwest
really
just
want
to
thank
the
city
and
thank
staff
for
really.
You
know
doing
a
lot
of
the
work
right
and
really
expecting
us
to
raise
the
bar
with
regards
to
safety
and
with
regards
to
just
the
overall
product,
that's
being
brought
to
Bloomington,
so
just
to
sort
of
hit.
Some
of
those
questions
that
were
that
were
asked
of
us
yesterday.
M
I
was
also
on
that
study
session
yesterday,
which
was
it
was
extremely
beneficial
and
I.
Think
a
lot
of
good
information
was
passed
along
there,
but
just
to
sort
of
walk
through
a
couple
of
those
a
few
of
those
questions
in
terms
of
what
we're
doing
to
improve
safety.
I
say
you
know
we're
doing
all
types
of
things,
one
we're
doing
things
on
the
tech
side.
M
So
if
that's,
if
a
lot
of
the
issues
have
to
do
with,
you
know
public
right-of-way,
riding
and
things
of
that
nature,
we're
working
on
technology
and
half
technology
now
to
deterior
individuals
from
riding
on
sidewalks
and
being
within
Ada
compliant
areas.
So
that's
something
that
we
take
extremely
serious:
it's
not
anything!
That's
you
know
unique
just
to
Bloomington
right.
M
We
see
these
in
pretty
much
every
major
city
that
we're
in
we're
constantly
trying
to
establish
relationships
with
the
Ada
Community,
to
figure
out
the
best
way
to
navigate
from
finding
Solutions
there.
M
I
would
also
add
that,
on
that
Tech
side
of
things
that
we're
doing,
we
have
things
like
safe
start
that
allows
for
individuals
that
have
to
take
a
small
quiz
actually
before
even
being
able
to
to
use
our
apps
and
go
in
and
say
all
right.
What
do
you
know?
Are
you
familiar
with
the
local
rules
and
regs
of
writing
in
this
area?
M
Are
you
able
to
pass
a
small
cognitive
test
to
deter
individuals
who
may
be
inebriated?
Also
we
have
things
like
selfies
helmet
selfies
to
ensure
that
individuals
are
encouraging
individuals
to
to
use
helmets.
So
there's
a
myriad
of
things
that
we're
doing
but
I
always
like
to
say
that
starting
with
education
and
Community
engagement
is
probably
our
number
one
effort,
so
I'll
be
in
town
myself.
M
This
Friday
on
the
campus
of
Illinois
University
for
their
sex
drugs
and
rock
and
roll
event,
which
is
promoting
Public,
Safety
and
public
health.
So
I'll,
be
there.
It's
a
table
event
table
of
the
Expo
event.
I
believe
I
have
a
small
amount
of
time,
also
to
expand
on
some
of
the.
You
know
how
to
ride
safety,
features
that
we're
working
on
and
maybe
be
able
to
have
some
time
to
really
talk
through
how
we
are
approaching
the
rules
and
Rigs
and
of
Bloomington.
M
So
those
are
things
that
are
extremely
important
to
us.
Like
I,
said
I'll,
be
there
on
Friday
this
coming
Friday.
You
know
on
the
campus.
For
that
event,
we're
expecting
to
have
more
events,
particularly
when
it
comes
to
you
know,
areas
that
are
high
traffic,
so
you'll
see
us
more
at
some
of
the
upcoming
football
games.
M
You'll
see
us
maybe
at
some
table
League
events
I'm
doing
a
basketball
season
I,
as
we
know
that
you
know
that
probably
won't
be
a
scooterizing
scooter
riding
season,
but
but
we
still
want
to
use
that
time
to
be
able
to
engage
the
demographics
and
be
able
to
educate
individuals
on
one
of
the
local
rules
and
also
just
safety
ways
and
safety
mechanisms.
M
We'll
also
be
passing
out
a
few
different
promo
codes
and
things
of
that
nature
too,
for
some
new
students
that
are
on
campus
to
take
advantage,
because
Equity
is
another
extremely
important
piece
for
us
to
ensure
that
everybody
has
access
to
our
service.
So
I'd
also
add
a
question.
Came
up
around
things
that
we're
doing
to
you
know
properly,
ensure
individuals,
Riders
are
are
parked
correctly.
M
So,
as
of
today,
all
of
the
the
new
zones
that
Hank
has
Hank
and
staff
have
provided
us
are
all
in
play,
so
they're
all
live
so
I
believe
it's
60
plus
parking
mandatory
parking
areas
within
that
downtown
and
some
of
the
outskirts
of
downtown
down
as
well.
So
that's
all
live
right
now,
so
we're
extremely
excited
about
that,
and
thank
you
again
for
the
partnership
from
the
city
on
that,
but
also
we
do
have
a
finding
structure
so
particularly
for
improper
parking.
M
We
have
a
finding
structure
for
unsafe
riding
and
we
also
have
a
finding
structure
for
illegal
and
unsafe
behavior
on
our
vehicles,
but
it's
typically
a
tiered
system,
so
one
offense
will
typically
be
x
amount
of
dollars.
Second,
offense
will
be
a
higher
amount
of
dollars
and
within
that
improper
parking,
third
offense
even
higher,
and
then
you
can
obviously
move
towards
an
area
where
your
account
is
terminated
and
that's
just
not
terminated
for
just
not
turning
it
for
your
for
your
one
cell
phone.
M
If
you
will
that's
a
that's
a
cross,
different
IP
addresses,
so
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
just
go
pick
up
another
phone
and
try
to
access
your
account
from
there.
So
those
are
things
that
we're
doing
in
terms
of
fines
and
again
we
have
in-app
messaging
to
to
sort
of
educate
our
Riders
around
what
safe
riding
looks
like
and
what
the
rule
of
the
road
are
within
that
particular
market.
So
I
definitely
wanted
to
ensure
that
that
was
that
was
addressed.
M
Additionally,
we
love
to
come
in,
come
and
come
in
town
I'm,
based
in
Chicago,
so
I'm,
not
far
at
all.
We
love
to
come
in,
along
with
our
local
operations
team,
to
to
meet
and
kind
of
talk
through
some
of
the
strategy
for
this
new
application
and
I
know.
That
was
a
request
as
well
to
be
able
to
meet
with
our
local
operations
team.
So
that's
something
we
would
100
like
to
do
and
just
sort
of
get
a
better
idea,
because
I
know
a
lot
of
these.
M
A
lot
of
these
locations
are
new
or
the
strategy
is
someone
new
in
terms
of
that
mandatory
parking.
So
it
would
be
great
for
us
to
be
able
to
come
in,
along
with
our
local
operations,
contacts
and
team
to
sort
of
just
walk
through
what
the
Corrals
look
like
the
management
and
just
the
overall
Logistics.
So
we
are
100
open
to
that
at
bird
and
we'll
look
for
Hank's
leadership
on
scheduling
that.
M
Lastly,
I
would
say
in
terms
of
how
quickly
we're
responding
to
improperly
Park
vehicle
schools
we
have
lately.
We've
issued
a
new
technology,
that's
focused
on
our
response
times
to
311
ticketing.
M
So
that's
basically
when
a
vehicle
is
reported
as
improperly
parked
within
within
within
the
Market
within
Bloomington,
and
then
our
our
local
FM
team,
our
local
operations
teams
receive
automatic
pings
as
to
where
those
vehicles
are
so
that
allows
us
allows
our
local
operations
team
to
respond
quicker,
as
opposed
to
just
sort
of
waiting
to
hear
from
a
city
representative
or
waiting
to
hear
from
Hank
and
his
team
as
to
them
receiving
photos
or
receiving
receiving
complaints
from
local
constituents
about
what
they're
seeing
so
that
allows
us
to
be
more
proactive
and
respond
in
a
in
a
time
in
a
matter
of
time.
M
That
is
much
quicker
and
to
be
able
to
rebalance
and
fix
the
issue
so
open
to
any
other
additional
questions.
Again.
I
like
to
thank
everyone,
I'd
like
to
thank
Hank
and
the
staff
and
the
rest
of
the
board
for
allowing
us
to
speak
on
this
matter
and
looking
forward
to
further
partnership
with
the
city
of
Bloomington.
E
I'll
just
a
couple
comments:
if
I
made
that
I
forgot
to
add
in
my
initial
comments,
one
of
the
things
we're
also
doing
is
asking
for
of
all
the
companies
is
to
really
hone
in
on
who
their
local
contacts
are
next
week.
We
are
really
going
to
try
to
schedule
time
where
we
can
meet
with
all
the
companies
in
the
downtown
discuss
some
of
the
issues,
some
of
the
things
we
could
foresee
with
some
of
the
parking
Corrals
and
things,
and
really
try
to
work
together
amongst
all
the
companies.
So
that's
one
of
them.
E
You
know.
The
other
thing
is,
is
that
you
know
we're
going
to
be
closely
monitoring
the
behavior
of
the
companies
and
and
their
users.
You
know,
we've
got
the
way
the
enforcement
works.
Is
it's
the
same
as
parking?
It's
the
same
software
we
use
for
parking
enforcement
for
vehicles,
it's
called
T2,
it's
a
system,
so
we're
going
to
be
able.
E
We
we've
got
good
data
already
on
our
pilot
project
of
of
looking
at
Scooter
parking
violations
since
last
fall,
but
with
that
data
we're
going
to
be
able
to
see
which
companies
are
being
very
responsive
which
companies
are
having
more
higher
levels
of
violations,
things
like
that
and
and
trying
into
really
work
on
it
through
that
angle
as
well.
E
You
know
it's
possible
that
there's
a
day
that
we
come
back.
You
know
in
next
year
or
in
the
foreseeable
future,
where
we
change
the
way
we
want
to
do
Scooters
or
multi
Mobility
micro
Mobility
devices
in
Bloomington.
It
could
be
that
we
would
move
to
more
of
an
RFP
process.
E
We've
seen
some
of
our
other
kind
of
college
driven
Metro
areas
that
they've
moved
to
an
RFP
process
where
they
have
anyone
that
wants
to
enter
into
a
competitive
process
to
provide
these
services
in
a
community
that
it
could
just
be
one
vendor
in
the
future.
So
you
know
there's
a
lot
of
moving
Parts
into
the
future
with
this,
but
we'll
certainly
be
collecting
data
we'll
certainly
be
issuing
fines
when
we're
finding
finding
the
improperly
parked
scooters.
E
A
A
So
on
the
bird
application,
what
happens
if
someone
takes
a
helmet
selfie.
M
G
M
You
can,
if,
after
you
receive
your,
you
can
incentivized
deals
as
well,
so
you
can
get
half
off
rides
you
get
up
to
up
to
half
off
rides
and
also
we'll
also
continue
an
additional
helmet
for
free
as
well.
So
there's
a
bunch
of
different,
smaller
sort
of
discount
promo
codes
that
we
that
we
send
out.
On
top
of
that,
just
encouraging
people
to
to
use
helmets.
Okay,.
A
And
I
noticed
the
the
plan
has
Outreach
events
happening
throughout
this
week.
I
think
the
14th
through
the
18th,
which
would
be
this
Friday.
You
mentioned
you're
coming
for
the
special
event
on
Friday.
Have
there
been
tables
out
handing
out
helmets
this
week.
M
M
M
That's
something
we
can
turn
on
whenever
cities
ask
us
to
so
now
under
the
new
under
our
new
application.
This
is
something
that
we're
that
we've
just
recently
turned
on.
So
when
students
weren't
weren't
there,
we
didn't
have
this
turned
on.
So
this
is
something
that,
through
conversations
with
Hank
and
staff
and
team
we've,
we've
decided
to
turn
on
immediately
now,
since,
under
the
new
program,
okay,.
H
So,
prior
to
this,
how
has
bird
worked
to
correct
behavior
for
people
who
are
not
parking,
the
scooters
correctly
or
using
scooters
correctly?
What
what
has
been
the
accountability
structure
up
until
this
new
finding
mechanism.
M
Yep,
so
typically
so,
let's
say
an
individual
rider
was
trying
to
end
the
trip
and
parked
in
a
way
that
was
not.
That
was
not
of
protocol.
They
wouldn't
be
able
to
in
the
trip
right.
So
that's
going
to
automatically
flag
for
our
operations
and
data
team
that
this
individual
is
not
one.
M
That's
you
know
that's
compliant
to
the
local
rules
and
ranks
there,
so
one
you're
you're
being
charged
a
it
could
be
a
awful
lot
of
money
for
your
improperly
parked
vehicle
and
also
it
Flags
it
on
our
end
as
well
to
follow
up
with
email
messaging
to
let
them
know
you're
riding
this
is
this
is
basically
the
score
card
or
report
card
of
your
ride
in
your
trip,
so
that,
if
that
continues
to
happen,
then
you
know,
obviously
it
can
move
swiftly
to
a
terminated
account.
M
But
now
we
have
more
of
a
structured
system
put
in
place
with
levels
of
fines
as
well
for
individuals
who
are
not
riding
or
parking
correctly.
H
H
Basically
put
I
guess
for
a
better
word:
Patrol
the
area
make
sure
that
your
scooters
and
and
motorbikes
are
being
parked
in
appropriate
manners
that
we're
not
having
Ada
related
issues
or
sidewalk
accessibility
issues.
Can
you
tell
me
about
what
your
staff
resources
have
been
up
to
that
point?
Up
to
this
point,.
M
Yeah,
of
course,
current
up
to
this
point,
we've
had
four
what
we
call
Fleet
managers
in
the
city
of
Bloomington
and
those
individuals
are
responsible
for
Diagnostics,
Logistics,
rebalancing
and
just
overall
upkeep
of
the
vehicles
and
ensuring
that
they're.
You
know
responding
in
a
quick
amount
of
time
with
regards
to
any
sort
of
three
or
one
request,
or
again,
improperly
parked
or
tipped
over
vehicles.
H
M
Much
of
that
is
in
their
app
in
their
app
that
we
have
specifically
for
our
Fleet
managers,
so
it
tells
them
when
they,
when
they
should
be
rebalancing
vehicles,
I
mean,
but
a
lot
of
that
is
also
left
up
to
the
local
operations
individual
in
terms
of
you
know
where
they
best
see
placing
vehicles
where
they
best
see
fit
to
place
these
vehicles
that
are
obviously
also
within
the
rules
and
regs,
of
course,
so
with
regards
to
how
proactive
they
are,
could
you
sort
of?
M
Could
you
elaborate
a
bit
more
as
to
what
you're
looking
for
there?
Are
you
saying
with
regards
to
maybe
trying
to
ensure
that
you
know
people
aren't
tipping
Vehicles
over
what?
What
exactly?
What
exactly
are
we
trying
to
get
to
there?
Well.
H
I
right
now,
the
city
Mr
wayson,
discussed
the
fact
that
the
city
is
putting
resources
toward
having
city
employees
be
out
on
the
streets
to
monitor
whether
or
not
scooter
users
are
are
complying
with
the
rules
that
are
required
and
I'm
I'm
wondering
where
your
company
is
in
doing
that
sort
of
work
as
well,
seeing
as
their
your
customers.
M
Yep
yeah,
so
I'd
say
that
a
lot
of
that
responsibility
is
indeed
on
on
our
Fleet
managers
to
ensure
that
vehicles
are
properly
parked.
Vehicles
are
in
places
where
they're
you
know,
compliantly
parked
in
zones
where
they're
supposed
to
be
they're,
not
in
Ada
areas
and
things
of
that
nature.
So,
like
I
said,
we
have
four
We've
operated
with
four
Fleet
managers
at
the
moment.
M
To
ensure
that
that
is
is
is
that
standard
is
kept
with,
but
I'll
I'll
definitely
say
this
given
given
some
of
the
the
new
regulations
within
within
this
program.
M
I
think
that
you'll
see
a
lot
more
of
our
local
operations
teams
just
around
the
city,
just
ensuring
that
our
vehicles
are
in
the
right
place
and
in
part
according
to
to
the
rules
and
ranks,
because
the
standard
is
again,
the
standard
is
higher
and
if
we
want
to
continue
to
be
able
to-
and
we
do
want
to
continue
to
be
in
in
the
city
of
Bloomington,
we
have
to
ensure
that
we
meet
that
standard
or
are
up
seating,
the
standard
of
which
you
guys
have
set
for
us.
M
So
you'll
you'll
definitely
be
seeing
more
of
those
of
our
local
operations
teams
and
again
have
the
opportunity
to
meet
them.
As
you
know,
as
that
scheduling
comes
up,
I
believe
I
heard
next
week.
So
if.
E
I
can
follow
up
on.
This
is
Adam
moyeson,
and
you
know
so
in
a
scenario
where
you're
one
of
your
Fleet
managers
is
out,
and
they
clearly
recognize
that
us,
you
know
they're
they're,
setting
up
the
the
PODS
of
the
the
devices
and
as
they're
headed
to
from
one
location
to
another.
They
they
see
a
a
bird
scooter
on
the
on
a
sidewalk
blocking
the
sidewalk.
Are
they
going
to
quickly
stop
a
vehicle,
find
a
parking
place
and
go
and
clear
that
obstruction.
E
And
then
just
kind
of.
M
In
the
beginning,
that's
in
there
I'm
sorry,
but
that's
in
their
app
as
well,
so
they
would.
They
would
see
that
and
plan
their
their
their
their
their
their
sort
of
strategy
for
the
day
to
rebalance
by
what
they're
seeing
within
that
app.
So
you
know
they
would
more
than
likely
see
that
vehicle.
That's
you
know
as
they
drive
by
it
should
already
be
within
their
app
to
be
able
to
to
have
them
come
and
rebalance,
and.
E
So
to
follow
up
there
does
the
technology
within
your
app.
So
as
a
you
know,
so
my
understanding
is
that
a
writer
wants
to
end
their
their
ride.
They're
gonna
have
to
take
a
picture
and
submit
that
and
show
you
how
it's
parked
is
there
features
within
the
app
or
are
the
is
there
monitoring
of
those
pictures
that
would
if,
if
a
a
a
Mobility
micro
Mobility
device
is
not
parked
properly
per
year,
standards
and
that's
pictures
submitted,
would
that
be
flagged
so
that
the
ride
cannot
end
or
would
it
be?
M
So
it
so
now
we're
getting
we're
getting
into
some
some
gray
there.
So
because,
obviously
you
know
a
vehicle
could
be
properly
parked
and
someone
else
could
come
by
and
knock
it
over
right.
So
so
then
you
don't
you
don't
want
to.
M
You
know:
blame
the
individual
who
didn't
properly
Park
will
follow
the
rules,
but
then
someone
else
came
along
and
knocked
it
over,
but
we
do
have
something
for
a
future
for
that
it's
called
tip
alert,
so
our
operations
team
would
then
get
a
alert
when
a
vehicle
has
been
improperly
pushed
or
tipped
over.
So.
E
I'm
thinking
more
of
an
actual,
so
on
a
sidewalk
where
you
know
the
the
the
device
is,
is
parked
in
such
a
way
that
maybe
up
to
two-thirds
of
the
sidewalk
is
blocked,
would
anything
how
would
that
be
addressed?
Yeah.
M
Those
are
those
are
typically
flagged,
so
one
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
end
the
trip,
so
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
end
the
trip.
If
you're,
you
know,
let's
say
your
your
vehicle
is
parked
in
the
middle
of
the
street,
not
the
street
I'm.
Sorry
in
the
middle
of
the
sidewalk.
You
wouldn't
be
able
to
in
your
in
your
trip
there,
because
that
that
wouldn't
be
ADA
Compliant.
But
if,
in
fact,
somehow
you
were
able
to
end
that
trip,
it
is
flag.
M
A
Other
questions
on
this
application,
a
quick
refresher
on
the
license.
I
know
there
are
a
lot
of
stipulations
stipulation
language
in
the
license
for
requirements
for
operators
and,
if
they're
not
fulfilled
the
city,
can
revoke
the
license.
There
is
somewhat
of
a
distinction
made
in
the
licensed
language
that
says.
In
the
event,
the
repeated
parking
violations
result
in
an
excessive
number
of
impoundments
of
the
operator
scooters
by
the
city
in
any
calendar
month.
A
The
city
May
order
a
reduction
in
the
number
of
standing
scooters
allowed
under
this
license.
The
determination
of
what
constitutes
an
excessive
number
of
impoundments
is
made
at
the
sole
discretion
of
the
city.
The
operator
May
petition,
the
city
for
a
review
of
the
number
of
allowed
scooters
after
30
days,
have
elapsed
from
the
date
of
an
order
of
reduction.
A
So
my
question
is:
is
it
at
the
determination
of
the
city
the
amount
of
reduction?
So
can
we
reduce
all
standing
scooters
in
a
situation
where
we
feel
that
the
violations
have
become
so
problematic,
yeah.
E
I
think
if
we
wanted
to
do
any
type
of
full
revocation,
we
would
definitely
be
coming
to
the
board
if
it
was
a
determination
of
the
staff.
We
would
be
doing
that
internally.
As
a
group,
you
know
if
we
currently,
if
we
wanted,
if
we
were
seeing
excessive
violations
of
the
licensing
agreement
with
parking
and
such
for
a
specific
scooter,
company
and
type
of
scooter
and
say
they
had
200
in
their
Fleet
right
now,
and
we
found
it
to
be
excessive
in
a
given
month.
I
think
we
would
internally
strategize.
E
Is
this
excessive
to
the
point
of
a
50
reduction
of,
but
I
think
that
would
be
kind
of
an
open
conversation?
I
think
the
next
couple
months
are
going
to
be
a
really
good
learning
experience
for
both
the
staff
and
the
companies.
You
know
to
really
kind
of
see
how
it
goes
with
these
new
measures
in
place,
and
then
you
know
if,
in
the
first
month
we
see
say
75,
violations
by
one
company
is
that
excessive
in
the
first
month,
I
think
we
would
give
it
a
basically
I
I'm.
E
Looking
at
this
fall
again
as
kind
of
an
extension
of
a
pilot
period
of
new
regulations
in
place
to
see
how
how
the
changes
are,
how
the
changes
in
the
language
of
the
application
or
of
the
licensing
impacts,
what
we're
seeing
on
the
streets
but
I
would
that
would
be
a
kind
of
a
group
decision
amongst
staff
and
in
coordination
with
City,
legal
and
others.
But
I
think
we
would
kind
of
look
for
that
time
period.
First
really
review
the
data.
E
A
Thanks
any
any
other
questions
on
this
license.
G
H
There
I'll
I'll,
put
them
in
here,
they're,
not
specific
to
bird,
but
they
apply
across
the
board
to
all
three
companies
who
are
before
us
this
evening.
I
really
appreciate
the
work
that
the
city
has
done,
and
particularly
the
public
works
department
to
address
issues
that
have
been
consistent
over
the
last
four
years.
H
With
these,
with
these
scooters,
I
I
think
that
the
things
that
the
city
is
putting
in
place
do
have
the
opportunity
to
make
a
difference
going
forward
in
how
scooter
parking
and
particularly
parking
in
the
way
that
obstructs
the
right-of-way
and
and
accessible
ramps.
H
The
opportunity
to
change
that
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
the
public
works
department
has
gone
to
the
length
of
getting
additional
budgetary
funding
to
do.
Enforcement
on
this,
but
I'm
also
extremely
frustrated
that
it
has
come
to
this,
that
these
expenditures
are
on
the
city
and
and
on
the
taxpayers
to
hold
companies
accountable
to
follow
through
on
making
sure
that
their
customers
are
using
their
product
appropriately.
H
The
things
that
that
we've
discussed
in
the
conversation
with
bird
and
which
I
expect
are
consistent
across
the
three
companies
are
that
the
the
company
has
the
ability
to
know
who
to
know
who
their
customer
is
to
find
their
customer
for
inappropriate
use
or
parking
of
the
equipment
and
has
staff
that
can
Patrol
to
make
sure
that
there
are
not
parking
issues
and
accessibility
issues.
H
But
despite
those
things,
we
have
gone
through
a
four-year
period.
With
these
scooters,
in
which
the
the
problems
we
have
keep
coming
up
again
and
again
and
again,
and
each
time
that
these
permits
have
come
up
for
renewal,
the
expectation
and
and
the
our
expectations
are
that
the
scooter
companies
are
going
to
comply
with
the
requirements
of
their
permits.
H
The
the
very
nature
of
this
business
of
this
concession
is
that
it
relies
upon
the
use
of
our
right-of-way
in
order
for
the
business
to
exist
and
I
would
think
that,
if
that's
the
case,
the
cost
of
doing
business
that
should
be
built
into
the
business
structure
is
to
make
sure
that
they
are
using
our
right-of-way
and
that
our
customers
are
using
the
right-of-way
in
a
way
that
respects
the
right
of
way
and
respects.
H
Its
purpose
for
the
citizens
of
our
community
and
the
citizens
who
are
getting
the
most
use
from
the
scooters,
tend
to
skew
toward
younger
customers
and
fully
abled
customers
and
the
citizens
who
are
being
hindered
by
this
tend
to
skew
towards
older
citizens
and
people
who
are
not
fully
abled.
H
And
there
seems
to
be
something
inherently
unfair
about
that
and
we
have
had
discussions
over
and
over
and
I
mentioned
this
at
the
work
session
yesterday
about
what
it
is
that
the
city
can
do
to
hold
the
scooter
companies
accountable
and
to
so
that
they
will
in
turn
hold
their
customers
accountable
for
the
use
of
the
equipment
in
the
right-of-way.
And
why
are
we
having
to
find
so
many
ways
to
make
that
happen?
H
So
with
that
being
said,
I'm
I
I
don't
support
the
renewals
and
again
this
is
not
specific
to
bird.
It's
across
the
board
for
all
three
companies.
L
L
First
of
all,
I
hope
that
some
clarity
can
be
given
about
where
we
sit
with
respect
to
the
process.
So
tonight,
as
I
understand
it,
a
license
is
being
approved
or
could
be
approved
for
each
of
the
companies.
L
Is
there
another
step
where
a
contract
is
then
approved
by
the
board,
or
is
the
contract
left
to
be
worked
out
by
the
administration
between
each
scooter
company,
based
on
the
fact
that
you
have
approved
a
license,
a
related
question?
The
current
cost
of
a
license
I
as
I
understand,
is
ten
thousand
dollars
and
then
there's
a
per
ride
payment
that
companies
make
based
on
usage.
L
Where
does
that
live?
Is
that
in
the
license
agreement,
or
is
that
in-city
code
I,
don't
think
it's
a
city
code
I
think
it's
in
the
license
agreement,
but
I'm
not
sure,
but
it
would
be
useful,
I
think
for
everyone
to
have
some
clarity
about
where
that
actually
lives.
L
The
answer
to
the
question
of
why
hasn't
there
been
enforcement
by
the
city
at
one
point
from
Alex
Crowley,
former
director
of
Economic
and
sustainable
development?
His
understanding
and
I
know
that
I
reported
his
understanding
correctly
or
inaccurately.
His
understanding
was
a
change
to
city
code
was
required
in
order
for
the
city
to
impose
a
fine
on
a
scooter
company,
as
opposed
to
an
individual
who
parked
incorrectly
so
to
plan
all
along
back
in
2019,
as
described
by
City
attorney
Mike
Rooker.
L
In
his
comments
to
the
city
council
was
the
city
would
be
finding
the
scooter
companies
and
they
could
choose
to
pass
that
fine
along
to
their
users
as
they
saw
fit,
but
the
city
couldn't
do
that
because
they
didn't
have
the
user
information
and
that
was
intentionally
that
way.
The
city
didn't
want
the
individual
user
information,
so
it
was
left
to
the
scooter
companies
to
pass
along
the
fines
that
the
city
was
going
to
impose
on
the
scooter
companies,
but
the
city
never
did
that.
L
So
what
I've
been
trying
to
figure
out
for
the
last
two
years
is
why
hasn't
the
city
imposed
fine
and
Mr
Crowley's
explanation,
I
mean
that
adds
up
I
mean
if
the
city
actually
had.
It
turns
out
no
legal
ability
to
impose
that
fine.
Well,
then,
it's
under
understandable
that
they
would
not
try
to
do
it.
L
The
other
change
in
the
city
code
that
I
think
just
has
to
be
done
is
to
refine
the
definition
of
a
motorized
scooter
so
that
the
suitable
vehicles
are
included
right
now.
Anything
with
a
seat
is
excluded
from
the
definition
of
a
motorized
scooter.
It's
spelled
out
in
city
code,
a
bicycle
whether
it's
motorized
or
not,
is
explicitly
excluded
from
the
definition.
L
So
the
idea
I
mean
I
I,
don't
understand
how
it
works
legally,
that
we're
issuing
licenses
for
companies
to
have
their
vehicles
in
the
public
right-of-way
and
these
vehicles
are
supposed
to
be
regularly
city
code,
but
a
certain
percent
of
their
Fleet
is
excluded
from
the
regulation
by
city
code.
So
I
wonder
what
happens
when
I'm,
probably
out
of
time
by
now,
I'm
sure
I'll
wrap
up.
L
You
can
imagine,
though,
that
as
a
scooter
company
like
lime,
that
has
the
bikes
a
bike
is
improperly
parked
and
the
city
comes
and
they
find
the
the
the
company
because
of
the
illegally
parked
bicycle.
Why
couldn't
they
say?
Well,
look
your
city
code
doesn't
even
apply
to
this
I
mean
not
that
they
would.
L
My
guess
is
they
would
say
well
shoot
we'll
eat
that
whatever
the
fine
is
I
think
it's
15
anyway,
that
that's
a
bunch
of
questions
and
I'm,
not
sure
if
they
can
all
be
answered
tonight,
there's
certainly
no
legal
requirement
that
you
answer.
Questions
from
the
public
Mike
I
understand
that
that's
fine,
but
I
think
that
those
questions
need
to
be
asked
in
public
and
that's
why
I
ask
them
things.
A
Thank
you.
We
appreciate
the
questions
I'll
defer
to
City
colleagues
for
some
of
the
context
or
the
answers
to
some
of
those
questions.
My
understanding
is
that
the
license
itself
is
the
agreement
with
the
scooter
company
that
that
is
where
it
is
enumerated,
the
fee
that
they
pay
and
all
of
the
details
of
the
the
license.
A
As
for
some
of
the
other
questions,
I
think
if,
if
we
have
information
on
any
of
the
other
questions,
be
good.
E
I
Sure
Michael
Rooker
City
attorney
for
the
city,
I
I'm,
not
sure
that
was
a
question
I
would
want
to
take
upstairs
and
talk
to
some
other
folks
about
I.
Don't
know
that
I
can
give
the
board
from
advice
on
some
of
the
questions
that
were
asked
and
I'm,
not
sure
which
question
you're
talking
about.
It
might
be
helpful
to
go
back
through
them
as
well,
but
I
can
I.
A
Think
and
I
was
looking
back
at
the
license.
While
we
were
talking
about
the
questions,
the
question
is,
you
know:
does:
does
the
city
ordinance
allow
for
the
city
to
assess
a
fee
to
the
scooter
companies
themselves,
as
opposed
to
it
being
some
sort
of
like
user?
Fine
that
gets
sort
of
translated
and
passed
on
to
the
individual
user?
A
I
hope
I'm
characterizing
that
question
properly
that
there
was
some
question
about
whether
the
city
could
actually
impose
a
fine
on
the
scooter
companies
as
opposed
to
the
end
user,
and
because
of
that
separation
of
information
of
end
user
information
from
the
city.
There
seemed
to
be
a
gray
area
there,
I'm
I'm,
looking
at
item
in
on
the
license,
and
it's
as
any
scooter
that
poses
a
hazard
to
public
health
and
safety
may
be
immediately
removed
and
impounded
by
the
city.
A
The
city
May
dispose
of
any
scooter
that
has
been
impounded
and
stored
by
the
city
for
a
period
of
180
days
or
more
180
or
more
days.
A
removal,
impoundment,
storage
and
disposal
of
a
shared
use.
Motorized
scooter
shall
be
a
Class
E
traffic
violation
and
subject
to
the
operator
to
penalties
set
forth
in
BMC
15
.64.010
e,
so
there
it
seems
to
spell
out
that
we
are
able
to
find
the
operators
directly
for
impoundment
I'm,
not
sure
if
I
see
the
user.
You
know
the
individual
improper
parking
in
the
license.
I
E
I
Was
there
was
some
generalized
changes
suggested
by
this
board
or
brought
to
this
board
that
were
made
to
scooters
in
the
I
want
to
say
late
winter
early
spring,
something
around?
Then
there
have
been
some
discussions
about
potentially
altering
the
municipal
code
in
response
to
some
of
those
suggestions.
I
don't
have
a
sense.
I
can't
tell
you
precisely
what
those
are
I
wasn't.
I
A
I'm
glad
that
you
mentioned
the
it's
the
shared
micro
Mobility
directives,
which
was
a
resolution
that
the
board
passed,
because
in
that
it
says,
once
the
city
and
operators
take
measures
to
promote
appropriate
parking,
which
we
can
say
have
been
done,
the
appropriate
measures
have
been
done.
Operators
with
vehicles
outside
the
designated
parking
area
may
be
fined.
A
N
Hi
thanks
yeah
I
was
actually
just
going
to
point
out
the
section
that
President
Decker,
just
referred
to
with
respect
to
the
fines
and
the
code
does
also
right
now
include
a
catch-all
provision
that
talks
about.
If
there
are
any
other
violations
it
leads.
You
want
to
our
standard,
binding
provisions
and
what
other
code
so
yes,
I,
think
just
to
add
on
to
what
Mr
worker
said
I
mean
we
are
discussing
a
bunch
of
potential
code
changes
that
were
kind
of
cleaning
up.
N
If
you
will
the
scooters
the
bikes
were
talking
about
that
right
now,
they
kind
of
bring
the
code
to
you
know
who
you
are
at
currently
and
so
we'll
be
having
further
conversations
about
that.
But
my
immediate
hand
raised
was
about
the
section
that
actually
we
just
read
out
so.
C
Raised
his
hand
earlier
and
I'm,
not
certain
if
he
wants
to
make
a
comment.
G
E
G
E
Okay,
it
appears
we
do
not
have
a
representative
of
lime
on
the
call.
E
E
O
O
So,
as
was
covered
earlier
this
past
spring,
we
worked
with
several
folks
within
the
city,
the
Department
of
Public
Works,
economic
and
sustainable
development,
folks,
as
well
as
they
were,
forming
their
recommendations
for
the
the
scooter
and
e-bike
program
moving
forward
here
in
Bloomington
and
I.
Think
as
was
mentioned
earlier
as
well.
You
know
we
stood
behind
that,
because
we
fully
believe
that
the
new
program
regulations
will
make
a
noticeable
difference
and
will
help
alleviate.
Many
of
the
concerns
about
the
program
that
currently
exists
within
the
community.
O
Vo
is
more
than
committed
to
a
long-term
partnership
with
Bloomington
we'd
really
like
to
be
here
for
the
Long
Haul
we've
been
here
since
2021,
and
as
part
of
that,
we
want
to
continue
to
build
a
scooter
program
that
works
for
folks,
whether
they're
writers
or
whether
they're
pedestrians
or
visitors,
to
to
the
city
as
well.
So
it's
really
exciting
to
see
that
the
new
parking
Corrals
are
being
installed
downtown.
O
From
our
perspective,
we
definitely
don't
want
the
work
to
stop
there
in
terms
of
addressing
some
of
the
parking
issues
that
have
been
brought
up.
We
would
like
to
continue
to
find
parking
Solutions,
particularly
for
outer
neighborhoods
or
residential
streets,
where
scooters
are
oftentimes
blocking
sidewalks
and
accessibility
can
become
a
real
issue
for
residents
in
those
areas.
So,
like
I
mentioned,
I
think
that
the
Downtown
parking
Corrals
will
go
really
really
far
in
helping
alleviate
the
any
issues
in
that
area.
O
But
I
think
the
next
step
is
for
us
to
turn
our
Focus
to
those
outer
areas.
I
know
internally
and
operationally.
We
will
be
setting
our
focus
and
the
technicians
of
our
the
technicians,
actually
patrolling
will
be
able
to
devote
more
time
to
those
areas.
Now
that
there's
required
parking,
Air
Force
parking
in
the
downtown
space.
O
So,
yes,
that
much
of
yesterday's
discussion
at
the
work
session
focused
on
the
need
for
greater
accountability
and
earlier
this
evening
as
well,
and
the
implementation
of
processes
that
keep
Bloomington,
sidewalks,
clear
of
scooters
and
e-bikes
and
and
really
prioritize
accessibility,
I
think
one
other
solution
that
we
wanted
to
bring
forth
here
and
that
we
haven't
started
engaging
with
the
city
on
yet
is
integrating
our
reporting
mechanism
for
improperly
parked
Vehicles
into
the
city's
u-report
system.
O
So
this
is
something
that
vo
has
partnered
with
other
cities
to
do
most
recently,
probably
Los
Angeles.
We
worked
with
them
to
integrate
it
into
their
3-1-1
reporting
system.
So
essentially
it
makes
it
easier
for
residents
to
actually
go
on
and
report
if
there's
an
issue
with
the
scooter
or
a
scooter
blocking
a
sidewalk,
something
like
that.
But
it
also
gets
the
issue
over
to
our
technicians
quicker.
O
So
that
is
something
we
would
be
very
interested
in
in
in
working
with
folks
here
to
to
do,
and
then,
when
it
comes
to
more
proactive
enforcement
I
mentioned
yesterday,
we
do
Implement
fines
here
and
I
have
numbers
as
well.
O
I
I
actually
sent
an
attachment
with
responses
that
were
more
detailed
to
some
of
the
concerns
that
came
up
during
yesterday's
work
session,
so
I
sent
it
over
to
Hank
earlier
and
we'll
make
sure
you
guys
get
a
copy
if,
if
you
haven't
received
it
yet,
but
those
have
those
numbers
as
well,
I
think
so
far.
We've
put
out
112
this
year
and
last
year
we
had
over
300
that
we
gave
out.
O
I
also
wanted
to
quickly
speak
to
the
question
earlier,
around
fines
being
issued
directly
to
the
company,
so
I
don't
have
any
insights
on
the
city's
ability
to
do
that
or
not,
but
I
will
say
that
IU
Bloomington
does
that
with
the
companies
directly.
So
that's
the
process
that
works
and
really
sort
of
has
influenced
our
relationship
with
the
university
in
that
we're
we're
implementing
Force
parking
proactively
on
campus
because
of
the
fines
that
are
in
place
whenever
they
impound
a
vehicle.
O
I
just
I
a
couple
other
things
to
highlight
from
the
document
that
I
sent
over
it.
It
was
kind
of
in-depth,
so
I'm,
not
really
I'm,
not
going
to
read
from
it,
but
I
did
just
want
to
mention
that
our
writer,
education
and
Outreach
efforts
in
2023
and
2024
are
specifically
going
to
focus
on
ensuring
that
Riders
are
using
scooters
and
e-bikes
in
a
way
that
doesn't
inhibit
pedestrians,
especially
when
they're
parking
their
vehicles
and
bringing
accessibility
to
the
Forefront.
O
It's
something
we've
started
to
do
in
other
markets,
including
holding
stakeholder
sessions
with
disabled
folks
in
markets
like
Seattle,
to
hear
perspectives
on
how
we
can
find
Solutions,
and
we
really
want
microbial
Mobility
to
be
successful.
I
think
that
the
city
of
Bloomington
has
gone
the
distance
in
terms
of
pushing
for
infrastructure.
That
makes
it
a
much
more
feasible
way
for
folks
to
get
around
and
I
think
internally.
O
As
a
company,
we
are
going
to
prioritize
the
accessibility
piece
in
our
Outreach
and
education,
in
addition
to
being
ready
to
tackle
other
Solutions
in
our
operations
like
with
parking
Corrals
or
with
integrating
into
the
city's
3-1-1
system.
Things
like
that
to
make
sure
that
we
go
beyond
the
downtown
sphere
to.
O
To
do
that,
so
the
only
other
thing
I'll
mention
is
that
I
included,
like
the
contact
information
for
our
local
operations
team
in
that
document.
I
think
that
the
folks
here
have
it
Hank
God
bless
him
meets
with
us
bi-weekly,
and
we
are
always
happy
to
pull
additional
folks
in
the
city
into
those
conversations.
O
Ideally,
we
would
be
able
to
hear
from
you
know,
folks,
from
the
police
department
and
other
departments
that
have
different
insights
on
what
they're
seeing
on
the
streets,
so
that
we
can
continue
to
tweak
our
operations
to
Target
issues
as
they
arise,
but
yeah.
The
regular
touch
point
is
in
place
and-
and
we
look
forward
to
expanding
that-
you
know
I
think.
A
E
I
just
want
to
thank
the
vo
team
and
Olivia
for
not
only
being
here
in
person
and
present,
but
also
with
their
interactions
with
City
staff.
They've
been
very
proactive
and
even
they're
I'm.
Not
do
you
call
them
Fleet
managers
as
well.
E
We've
I
personally
encounter
their
staff
on
a
regular
basis,
correcting
issues
they've
been
very
responsive.
The
gentleman
that
sets
up
their
pods
in
the
different
locations
has
was
was
very
proactive
as
soon
as
we
started,
putting
in
our
Corrals
of
making
sure
to
be
using
them.
So
I
do
want
to
thank
the
vo
team
for
their
responsiveness,
I
think
it
kind
of
setting
the
bar.
D
I
don't
have
a
question.
I
would
like
to
make
a
comment
in
line
with
Adams
that
in
my
time
on
the
board,
I
have
found
that
vo's
representation,
particularly
you
Olivia,
has
been
the
most
communicative
engaged
with
the
board.
Proactive,
collaborative
and
working
towards
what
I
do
feel
is
a
shared
solution
to
making
this
work
in
our
community.
A
O
We're
going
to
be
at
the
People's
Park
tomorrow,
we'll
have
folks
doing
like
ride
demonstrations
and
handing
out
swag
and
educational
material
as
well.
They
have
like
a
concert
series
throughout
the
summer,
so
we're
going
to
hit
one
of
the
final
concerts
that
they're
hosting
there.
A
And
do
you
does
vo
offer
a
discount
to
riders
that
demonstrate
that
they
are
using
helmets.
O
Helmets,
I,
we
don't
have
anything
in
place
for
that
right
now.
I
think
it's
probably
something
that
where
I
I
definitely
think
it's
something
that
we're
interested
in.
We
offer
discount
programs
and
incentives
for
folks
at
Park
correctly,
like
a
dollar
off
their
ride
or
something
like
that.
The
helmet
piece
we
don't
currently
utilize
like
selfie
technology
or
anything
like
that
to
check
in
with
folks
and
and
actually
verify
if
they're
wearing
the
helmets.
O
A
O
They
can
go
through
our
customer
support
if
anyone
is,
you
know
on
the
line
with
our
customer
support
team,
which
I
gotta
say
like
they're
really
great,
and
you
can
call
them
up
and
like
they'll,
always
answer
they're
really
patient
people,
but
they'll
help
get
a
free
helmet
over
to
someone
if
they
request
it
via
phone.
O
In
addition,
our
our
web
page
that's
devoted
to
Bloomington
and
the
like
specific
local
regulations
here,
has
details
on
how
folks
can
get
one
either
dropped
off
to
them
or
go
pick
one
up
at
the
warehouse.
It's
also
something
which
piece
of
information
we
try
to
disseminate
when
we're
out
and
about
doing
Outreach
with
Folks
at
different
events.
A
Thank
you
and
last
question
from
me:
vo
I
know,
has
the
seated
scooter.
Are
there
any
shared
e-bikes
from
vo,
yet.
O
So
we
currently
our
Fleet,
is
the
standing
scooter
and
the
seated
scooter.
Here
we
have
a
model
of
our
Cosmo.
It's
called
the
cosmo
e
and
that's
it's
an
e-bike
and
it
looks
very
similar
to
our
seated
scooter,
but
it
obviously
has
pedals
it's
not
something
that
we
currently
have
in
Bloomington,
but
I
think
we're
open
to
conversations,
especially
given
that
the
city
has
continued
to
prioritize.
L
Good
evening,
Dave
Askins
with
the
Beast
car
bulletin
same
questions
as
before,
I'm
going
to
enumerate
them
so
that
everybody
can
keep
track
and
apologies
to
Olivia
I'm
going
to
use
the
Orion
as
the
example.
L
L
L
L
A
A
Do
we
have
any
answers
from
staff.
A
I
will
say
from
a
from
my
perspective
on
the
board
according
to
the
language
and
the
license,
we
do
have
the
right
to
impose
the
fine
on
the
operator
for
the
specific
scenario
described,
because
we
would
impound
it
I
agree
with
that.
Okay,
all
right,
because
that's
what
I'm
hoping
to
see
if
we
do
have
a
violation.
Of
course
I
would
love
a
world
where
there
were
no
violations,
but
knowing
that
that's
probably
not
going
to
happen.
If
there
is
a
scooter
in
the
ramp
or
in
some
other,
egregious
location
that
is
blocking
the
right-of-way.
G
E
And
I
do
want
to
clarify
that
that
you
know
the
adding
of
the
staff
is
that
staff
member
being
added
is
intended
to
be
paid
for
through
the
fees
from
the
companies.
It's
not
I'm.
You
know
I'm
hoping
that
all
of
the
fee,
so
the
fees
up
until
now
have
been
being
used,
are
being
used
for
the
Corral
installations,
the
materials
the
labor
for
that
and
and
such
going
forward.
E
If
we
issue
a
fine
that
Revenue
will
more
than
likely
go
directly
to
the
general
fund,
as
that's
the
way
fines
work,
but
it's
the
intent
to
use
those
revenues
to
pay
for
the
position,
and,
yes,
that
is
the
intent
we
will
be
confirming
with
City,
legal
and
others
to
make
sure.
But
absolutely
I
agree
with
board
president
Decker
Cox
Decker
that
the
language
in
the
application
is
pretty
clear
to
me.
So
thank
you.
A
E
You
would
continue
that
to
a
subsequent
meeting
and
at
this
time
we
would
not
ask
that
you
would
take
any
action
on
their
license
application
without
a
representative
here
to
answer
their
questions.
Yeah.
A
E
I
do,
as
you
saw
I,
did
ask
engineering
staff
to
I'm
going
to
be
able
to
handle
all
their
items
this
evening,
so
that
is
no
problem.
On
my
end,
let
me
get
back
to
an
agenda
to
figure
out
where
I'm
at.
A
E
A
Yeah
I'll:
let
we're
just
going
to
take
a
second
here
to
get
adjusted
because
we're
in
a
couple
different
packets.
E
All
right,
so
this
project
will
improve
pedestrian
safety
and
accessibility
by
reconstructing
sidewalk
curb
ramps
in
the
downtown
area.
Specific
locations
will
be
prioritized
by
the
planning
and
transportation
department.
Both
design
and
construction
will
be
partially
funded
with
federal
funds.
Eagle
Ridge
was
selected
from
three
engineering
firms
that
responded
to
the
RFP
to
perform
preliminary
Engineering
Services
for
the
project.
The
total
contract
is
amount
is
set
to
be
to
not
exceed
the
amount
of
135
258
dollars.
Construction
of
the
project
is
anticipated
for
2028.
I'll.
E
Also
just
note
that
Neil,
copper
city
engineer
was
a
senior
project
engineer
with
the
city
informed
the
board
yesterday
that
Eagle
Ridge
has
actually
been
acquired
by
an
another
engineering
firm
and
that
that
contract
will
be
executed
through
in
that
regard.
So
we
would
ask
for
your
approval
of
this
item.
Thank.
E
At
moisten
again
so
this
is
near
the
inner
address
of
716
West
11th
as
part
of
the
project
in
this
area,
the
a
storm
water
inlet
was
removed
for
a
rain
Garden
that
was
to
be
constructed
when
that
was
removed.
There
was
a
hole
in
the
storm
water
pipeline
underneath
and
it
was
not
known
prior
to
the
con.
The
contract
being
awarded
EMB
Paving
was
on
site,
constructing
the
ring
garden
and
repaired
the
hole
in
the
storm
water
pipe
at
a
cost
of
1833.98,
and
we
asked
for
your
approval
of
that
change.
Order.
D
E
Well
again,
Adam
Wesson,
as
I
mentioned
yesterday.
This
was
a
little
bit
of
a
heartbreaker.
We
had
brand
new
fresh
pavement
down
on
the
200
block
of
East
Winslow
Road
on
July
13th,
when
a
water
main
break
occurred
underneath
the
road
a
milestone
was
Milestone
contractors
were
on
site,
repaving
and
making
improvements
to
that
area.
Knowing
that
CBU
was
able
to
fix
the
water
pipe
underneath
and
we
had
milestone
in
their
Paving
team
in
the
area
we
requested
that
they
repair
the
road
after
the
main
break
was
repaired.
E
D
D
A
E
Yes
again,
Adam
oason
we've
got
several
street
lights
in
the
area
that
are
beyond
their
useful
life
and
require
replacement
of
the
poles
and
lighting.
So
this
is
for
Duke
Energy
to
have
Lane
sidewalk
and
bike
lane
closures
as
part
of
those
Replacements
they'll
be
moving
from
light
to
light
in
this
area
between
High
Street
and
Roosevelt,
and
expect
that
it
should
be
less
than
30
days,
but
we've
built
in
a
little
additional
time
for
weather
possibilities
of
weather,
and
we
request
your
approval.
D
E
Been
having
a
very
extensive
conversations
with
Duke
Energy
to
make
sure
they're
working
with
MCCSC
Transportation
and
both
of
the
schools
there
and
their
administrators
at
the
school
there
for
anyone,
that's
experienced
pick
up
and
drop
off
time
on
East
2nd
Street
over
there.
It
can
be
a
little
a
bit
of
a
challenge.
So
yes,
they're,
very
well
aware
of
the
schools.
Yes
they're,
very
well
aware
of
the
fact
that
they
need
to
coordinate
with
not
only
Transportation,
but
actually
the
actual
schools
themselves.
D
H
A
Right,
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
I
will
call
the
roll
coron
I
Lloyd
aye
Cox
Deckard
I
motion
passes
Lane
and
sidewalk
closure
requests
from
Duke
Energy
on
West
13th
Street.
This
is
August
31st
2023
through
October
1st
of
2023.
E
Again,
this
is
Street
lighting
replacement
in
the
area
of
West
13th
Street
between
North
Illinois
and
North
summit
streets
and
very
similar
we're
replacing
outdated
equipment
in
the
area
same
time
frame
as
the
other
project
I
think
they'll
be
using
some
of
the
same
Crews
for
both
and
so
a
30-day
closure
with
some
additional
time.
Added
for
weather
delays,
pressure,
approval.
A
E
Just
make
a
general
comment
on
that:
we
we're
doing
a
monthly
coordination
meeting
between
Duke
Energy
city
of
Bloomington,
City,
Bloomington
utilities,
Monroe
County
government
and
all
those
entities
on
a
monthly
basis.
So
I
can
say
that
although
there
have
been
some
hiccups
in
some
of
the
communications
of
late
with
some
of
the
transmission
line
project,
we
do
have
very
good
Avenues
of
communication
with
them.
So
as
issues
arise,
if
the
school
were
to
bring
up
an
issue
we
would
be,
we
would
have
those
contacts
and
have
that
ability
to
communicate
issues
quickly.
A
Thank
you
all
right.
Any
public
comments
on
this
item.
A
E
Same
so,
this
is
Street
lighting
replacement
again
on
West
Allen
from
near
on
West
Allen
near
South,
Madison
Street,
and
this
will
actually
we're
hopeful.
This
will
start
up
in
early
September
and
take
less
than
15
days.
H
D
E
All
right,
so
this
is
a
request
from
AEG
for
Lane
and
sidewalk
closures
as
part
of
their
work
with
the
fiber
installation
project.
We've
got
areas
on
North
Lincoln,
Street,
West,
Smith,
Avenue,
West,
Dixie
Street,
that
are
all
included
in
this
request,
continuing
to
work
very
closely
with
AEG
on
a
daily
basis,
with
any
of
the
issues
that
arise
with
the
project
and
we
request
your
approval.
A
Thank
you
questions
on
this
item.
None.
This
was
just
to
recap
quickly.
Work
session
conversation
about
this
item.
I
had
asked
if
the
same
crew
moves
through
the
area
just
because
pedestrian
travel
in
that
particular
area
that
they're
requesting
will
be.
You
know
high
at
this
point
in
the
year,
and
we
were
discussing
the
fact
that,
generally
there
it's
one
crew,
that's
moving
through,
so
we
don't
have
multiple
places
where
there
are
right-of-way
areas
affected,
it's
typically
moving
throughout,
which
I
think
helps
in
addressing
some
of
those
obstructions.
N
A
E
All
right,
Miller
Pipeline
on
behalf
of
Centerpoint,
is
requesting
this
road
closure
and
it's
for
a
gas
line,
relocation
and
Improvement
project,
that's
associated
with
the
West's
first
street
portion
of
the
Hopewell
projects.
The
road
will
be
closed,
primarily
on
West
First,
outside
of
the
intersection
and
will
last
for
four
days
before
transitioning,
into
Lane
restrictions
for
the
rest
of
the
duration
of
the
project.
It's
expected
to
start
August,
21st
and
last
for
six
weeks
working
closely
with
Bloomington
Transit
and
other
local
Property
Owners
on
access
and
routes.
D
E
D
A
E
Yes,
so
this
is
the
project
that's
located
at
near
seventh
Longview,
it's
new
construction
for
the
curry,
Urban
apartment
complex,
and
so
this
is
an
a
request
for
Lane
and
sidewalk
closures
at
the
end
of
August
here,
and
it's
for
the
replacement
of
sidewalk
and
curb
restoration
and
repaving
of
7th
Street,
and
we
request
your
approval.
A
D
H
A
E
All
right,
Adam,
Wesson
again,
and
so
this
is
all
related
to
the
Sudbury
parcel
O's
parcel
o
phase,
one
sections
one
and
two:
the
developments
down
there
off
of
on
the
south
west
side
of
the
community
near
Sudbury
Parcels
near
the
Sudbury
properties.
E
So
this
is
accepting
phase
actually
I'm
just
going
to
read
the
last
paragraph
of
the
staff
report,
because
all
the
other
three
paragraphs
are
really
pretty
specific.
Basically
we're
accepting
the
we're
asking
the
board
to
accept
the
public
improvements
associated
with
phase
one
sections,
one
and
two:
this
is
sidewalks
Street,
trees,
streets,
Etc
and
also
authorizes
the
staff
to
release
the
performance
bonds
after
the
final
acceptance,
and
then
there
will
be
a
maintenance
Bond,
that's
kept
in
place
for
a
period
of
time.
A
Thank
you
questions
on
this
item.
No
any
public
comment
on
this
item
and
I
feel.
Like
I
haven't
said
this
in
a
while.
But
if
you
are
on
zoom
and
would
like
to
make
a
public
comment,
you
can
use
raised
hand
or
chat
I'm,
not
sure
if
we
have
anyone
on
Zoom
still
but
want
to
make
sure
people
know
how
to
interact.
E
All
right,
so
we've
got
exterior
awnings,
railings
and
Bollard
lights
at
Sea
Hall
that
are
in
need
of
a
Fresh
coat
of
paint.
We
asked
for
three
quotes
on
the
project
and
received
two
back
and
Chris.
Llc
was
the
low
quote
at
nine
thousand
six
hundred,
eighty
seven
dollars
and
twenty
cents,
and
we
request
your
approval.
D
E
Yes,
so
this
is
a
request
for
project
in
the
amount
of
63
328
dollars
for
exterior
exterior
repairs
to
the
sanitation
Garage
on
South
Walnut
Street
we
held
a
pre-mandatory
meeting
had
three
bids
that
we
received
for
the
project
and
with
some
alternative
pricing,
it
was
determined
that
anchors
was
the
low,
most
responsive
and
lowest
bidder
at
the
amount
of
63
328
dollars,
and
we
request
your
approval.
E
All
right,
so
this
is
a
ongoing
project
that
we've
been
working
very
closely
with
Landmark
construction
on
for
tie-ins,
with
some
of
their
water
main
and
storm
water
improvements.
So
there
were
some
unforeseen
changes
with
the
storm
water
infrastructure
and
they
were
not
able
to
get
the
work
fully
completed
by
August
11th.
We
had
asked
that
they
take
a
pause
on
that,
and
so
now
they
will.
E
A
D
Now
August
just.
D
D
A
E
Yes,
I
do
for
a
very
quick
staff
report,
congratulating
herb
Kinser
on
his
retirement.
Herb
was
a
long-standing
city.
Employee
started
his
employment
in
the
early
70s
with
Parks
and
Recreation,
and
has
now
retired
from
the
street
division
of
public
works
for
the
last
several
years,
he's
been
our
Paving
and
our
Paving
and
surf
our
Paving
supervisor
for
a
lack
of
better
terms
and
I
just
wanted
to
make
a
good
note
of
the
high
quality
of
work
that
herb
always
put
in.
He
was
the
type
of
staff
member.