►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
C
Is
zoned
single-family,
residential
or
I'm
sorry
residential
medium
lot,
r2
and
it's
currently.
C
District,
the
em
in
order
to
allow
for
an
expansion
on
the
property
for
a
new
building.
C
Vehicles,
mechanicals
they've,
operated
on
the
site
for
20
some
odd
years,
perhaps
even
longer.
C
C
So
this
necessitates
the
the
rezoning
allow
in
order
to
allow
for
this
non-conforming
use
to.
C
Expand
or
to
construct
a
new
building
per
se,
so
the
petitioners
would
be
constructing
the.
C
Site
would
not
be
expanding.
You
know,
as
I
mentioned,
the
site
is
surrounded
by
various.
C
Mature
canify
trees
and
the
sinkhole,
so
these
would
be
set
aside
in
the
required
easements.
C
Not
really
expanding
in
terms
of
its
footprint,
so
the
comprehensive
plan
has
the
the
site
kind.
C
Of
split
in
terms
of
its
designation,
the
western
two
thirds
is
designated
as
employment.
C
And
the
eastern
one
third
is
designated
as
mixed
urban
residential,
the
majority
of
the
site
that.
C
C
C
D
D
And
I
think
it
has
to
do
with
the
granularity
of
the
future
land
use
map
in
the
comprehensive.
D
To
me,
like
in
the
proposed
currently
proposed
udo
map
update
that
whole
the
entire
seven
acre.
D
Parcel
would
be
zone
is
proposed
to
be
zoned
mixed-use
employment
is
that
is
that
right.
C
C
Analysis
where
we
looked
at
property
lines,
it
was
a
lot
more
kind
of
fuzzy
in
terms
of
just
kind.
C
Of
matching
uses
and
what's
on
the
ground,
so
yes,
so
you
know,
while
we
may,
we
may
have
proposed.
C
To
rezone
this
to
mix
mixed-use
employment,
the
employment
certainly
is
appropriate.
C
Here
as
well
and-
and
we
may
have-
you
know
done
that
before
this
petition
came
forward.
C
And
it
very
well
could
have
just
been
kind
of
a
coin.
Flip
of
you
know,
which
way
do
we
go.
D
I
thought
it
had
some
bearing
on
what
city
staff
has
been
thinking
about
this.
D
And
that
does
help
to
clarify
the
the
two-thirds
one-thirds
issue.
And
why
that.
D
That
occurred
that
initially
struck
me
as
odd.
Thank
you.
C
Use
variances,
so
we
are
at
this
time
the
city
is
actually
proposing
to
come
through
the.
C
Entire
corridor
and
install
a
multi-use
path
along
the
north
side.
This
would
be
an.
C
Extension
of
the
b-line
kind
of
spur,
so
we
are
proposing
to
do
a
multi-use
path
along
the
entire.
C
Fountain
drive
frontage
so
with
this
we've
already
discussed
it
with
with
the
petitioner.
C
They
would
be
required
to
remove
the
sidewalk
and
install
a
multi-use
path.
However,
in
situations.
C
C
A
A
C
Is
the
one
that
was
it's
a
site
plan
that
was
approved
with
the
2010
use
variants?
So
you.
C
C
Communication
towers,
that's
on
the
property,
so
they're,
basically
working
within
an
existing.
C
C
Use
to
allow
for
the
new
construction,
but
I
thought
you
had
said
that
the
footprint
of
the.
A
C
The
general,
the
general
and
I'm
going
to
just
use
the
word
campus,
but
the
area
that's
already.
C
A
A
And
so
they
are
not
disturbing
any
of
the
trees
on
the
property
correct.
They
are.
D
At
my
notes,
so
I'm
very
sorry
if
you
did
say
it,
but
there
was
reference
to
a.
D
Tower
that's
240
feet
tall
that
will
be
going
away
and
put
inside
a
building.
Is
I.
D
Structure
for
whatever
is
going
in
the
building.
I
just
wanted
to
confirm
this.
A
Apologize
for
that
is
there
somebody
from
the
petitioner
who
would
like
to
to
speak
and
give.
A
C
Yeah
so
andrew,
I
believe,
is
the
petition
of
representative
okay.
Let's
unmute.
A
Oh
well,
can
he
unmute
himself,
mr
lucas.
G
G
G
I
think
two
comcast
representatives
should
also
be
on
the
zoom
call
at
the
moment,
so.
G
They
can
fill
out
a
little
bit
more
in
relation
to
anything.
That's
comcast,
specific
and.
G
Less
construction
specific,
but
in
in
general,
eric's
got
the
the
basics
of
what
we're
doing.
G
G
The
the
purpose
of
the
the
project
is
to
create
a
building
that
is.
G
More
sturdy
is
not
exactly
the
right
word,
but
more
fire
resistant
and
environmentally.
G
G
More
liability
to
them
if
something
goes
wrong,
what
what
they
house
inside
there.
G
This
equipment,
while
keeping
it
operational
and
so
and
rather
than
tearing
the
building
down.
G
A
Thank
you,
mr
lucas,
can
you
please
unmute?
Is
it
d
copel
200.
F
H
Well,
first
of
all,
I
want
to
thank
you
all
for
going
through
all
this
and
and
still.
H
I'm
assuming
they
were
from
bloomington
because
the
signal
doesn't
travel
too
far
out.
So
what.
H
The
actual
channels
we
took
off
there
people
should
be
much
happier.
The
tower
remains.
H
Right
now
and
then
that's
what
we
wanted
to
do
is
move
it
at
one
point
to
see
if
we
could.
H
Get
it
a
little
larger
or
maybe
even
taller,
but
that
wasn't
an
option.
So
we
just
basically
moved.
H
In
green
castle,
so
it's
it's
closer
to
where
the
channels
we
bring
the
channels
in
so
it's.
H
I
Yes,
thank
you.
I
think
this
is
for
mr
grulick.
I
And
the
em
section
is
the
em
section,
part
of
the
property
or
just
an
adjacent
property.
I
And
but
I
mean
it
looks
like
it
that
building
is
similar
to
buildings
near
that
was
probably.
I
Built
residential
is
that
an
industrial
use
now
is
there
a
business
there
or
something.
C
Yes,
there's
an
industrial
workshop
that
is
there.
I
see
so
I
mean
this
kind
of
mixture
of
uses.
I
C
A
I
have
one
so
on
the
proposed
udo
map.
This
property
is
me,
which
is
mixed
use,
employment.
A
The
request
we
have
tonight
is
to
change
it
to
em,
which
is
employment
without
mixed
use.
A
C
Shop
or
building
trade
shop,
which
matches
this
exact
use,
you
know
like,
like
I
mentioned
the.
C
Zone
this
to
me
that
we
were
specifically
cognizant
that
that
use
wasn't
allowed
there.
C
Is
a
much
better
match,
but
they're
very
similar
in
terms
of
land
uses.
You
know
and
I'll
just.
C
C
Districts
as
a
possible
text
amendment
just
to
kind
of
sink
those
two
districts.
C
And
has
an
impact
because
the
building
supply
shop
is
not
a
permitted
use
in
the
me
district.
C
C
As
with
the
previous
use,
variances
under
the
old
code
buildings
building
trade
shop.
C
Is
what
the
udo
classified
this
use
as
we?
We
do
not
have
a
building
trade
shop
anymore.
C
Trade
or
business
well
hold
on
a
second,
that's,
not
right
either.
Sorry.
A
Okay
and
that's
the
reasoning
why
they
are
asking
for
em
instead
of
me,
correct.
A
Love
the
acronyms
okay!
Sorry!
No,
yes,
indeed,
are
there
any
other
questions
for
either
mr
garlic
or.
E
E
It
just
made
me
wonder:
I
just
feel
like
residential
properties,
you
have
to
pay
for
your.
C
So
the
so
the
rezoning
request.
Well
so
let
me
try
to
answer
the
first
part
of
the.
C
Section
requirements
so
because
there
is
a
multi-use
path
that
is
called
out
for
along
this.
C
So
the
petitioners
would
be
making
a
contribution
equal
to
what
it
would
have.
What
this
city.
C
C
D
I
think
there
was
there
was
a
reference
to
the
planning
department
working
with
the.
D
Petitioner,
to
identify
the
exact
preservation
area
prior
to
a
second
reading
or
second
hearing.
D
The
council
votes
on
its
legislation
yep
so
that
that
was.
That
was
something
that
we
were.
C
Had
been
recorded,
they
had
not
been
recorded.
So
that's
why
the
condition
of
approval
was
on
there.
C
C
C
A
Okay,
so
who
would
like
to
make
some
comments
on
this
petition
and
if
you
have
any.
A
Council
member
flaherty,
thank
you
thank
you
again
to
mr
gerlick
and
to
the
petitioner
and
and.
D
The
folks
here,
representing
petitioner
for
the
presentations
for
answering
questions
and.
D
For
bearing
with
us
tonight
as
as
we
went
a
bit
late,
I
am
ready
to
move
forward
with
this
and.
D
Recommendation
to
the
council
this
evening,
if
my
colleagues
are-
and
I
would
support.
D
D
Plan
calls
for,
as
well
as
the
anticipated
changes
in
the
udl
mapping,
exercise
we're
going
through.
D
Even
though
those
are
not
yet
complete-
and
I
think
there's
some
nice
benefits
to
this.
D
D
Practice
of
the
past,
so
this
makes
sense
to
me
and
I
will
be
supporting
it.
Thank
you.
A
A
A
We'll
forward
it
back
that
doesn't
really
make
sense,
but
we
will
return
this
to
the.
A
A
Mr
lucas,
did
you
have
any
anything
that
we
need
to
do
before
we
can
close
for
the
night.
F
So,
just
just
for
any
folks
who
are
on
the
call
for
the
administration
committee
meeting.