►
From YouTube: Bloomington City Council, July 20, 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
C
C
A
D
And
I
expect
that
probably
the
caps
commission
is
also
familiar
with
this.
D
D
Brought
to
the
forefront
by
the
murder
of
george
floyd,
so
they
have
gotten
a
lot
of
press
and.
D
A
lot
of
interest
and
the
coots
pro
cahoots
program,
which
is
run
through
the
white
bird
clinic.
D
Actually
created
a
a
50-page
document,
because
they've
got
so
much
interest
which
I
do
have.
D
They
also
get
some
funding
from
the
oregon
health
plan,
which
is
the
medicaid
plan
in
oregon.
D
Their
911
number,
of
course,
now
we
have
988
so
we'll
see
how
that
develops,
but
their
911.
D
Number
for
decades
has
had
the
dispatchers
have
had
the
option
of
notifying
cahoots.
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
F
F
After
council
recess
been
about
five
weeks
or
so,
and
one
of
the
things
of
not
going
through.
F
F
F
A
C
A
In
the
labor-
and
you
know
the
firefighters,
labor
union,
and
so
again,
we
we
we
wish
his
family.
A
G
G
G
G
And
so
here
are
those
foci
specifically,
we
wanted
to
amplify
voices
continually.
G
H
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Mccallick
hello,
my
name
is
najla
routsong
and
I
am
a
caps
commissioner.
H
H
H
H
H
H
After
spending
after
due
after
conducting
decades
of
evidence-based
research
on
the.
H
H
H
About
whether
capps
is
researching
the
cahoots
program
in
eugene,
yes,
that's
one
of
the
top.
H
Five
programs
that
we
are
conducting
more
research
on
in
depth
at
this
moment
on
our
committee.
H
H
H
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
Effectiveness-
and
we
want
to
continue
to
highlight
or
hear
from
more.
G
And
so
there's
an
opportunity
here
for
advancing
follow-up
in
the
operations
of.
G
G
Right,
and
so
even
though
this
is
not
action
oriented,
we
want
to
explore
reasons
why
people.
G
G
Expressed
a
desire
for
community
living
spaces
that
support
each
other,
so
it's
an
intent
on.
G
Two
things
of
structural
limitation
on
26.
There
were
two
things
that
should
not
be.
G
G
G
Some
efforts
that
are
ongoing
on
the
next
page
27
is
accessibility,
and
so
we
know
that
many.
G
G
H
H
H
H
H
And
it's
it's
actu,
it's
not
it's
one
or
two
blocks
away
and
in
the
other
direction.
It's.
H
H
A
I
A
A
A
J
J
K
So
dave
askin
is
the
b-square
bulletin
posted
this
graph.
The
idea
is
that
his
audience,
what.
K
The
idea
is
that
his
audience
gets
to
guess
what
it
means.
I
don't
know
about
you
guys,
but.
K
I
love
data
I'll,
save
you
the
detective
work
and
tell
you
he
filed
a
public
records
request.
K
And
this
is
the
the
occupancy
at
the
fourth
street
parking
garage
from
january
to
june
of.
K
This
year,
the
first
six
months-
and
I
know
it's
a
lot-
I'm
just
going
to
rush
right
in
the.
K
K
K
K
K
Of
a
parking
garage
mostly
for
office
workers,
so
it
was
a
wednesday
afternoon
I
figured
I
could.
K
K
K
Fourth
street
garage
and
I
counted
147
cars
bingo
back
to
mr
mr
askin's
graph.
I
noticed
a
big.
K
K
K
K
It
and
I
assume
from
the
pattern
that
some
of
them
are
also
like
somebody-
buys
a.
K
Hundred
parking
passes
for
like
a
convention
or
something,
but
I
don't
know
it
golly.
I
wish
I
did.
K
A
L
L
L
L
L
A
J
On
zoom
there
there
may
be
individual
who'd
like
to
present
some
slides,
so
I
can
go
to
them.
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
President,
now,
how
much
that's
an
ordinance?
How
much
does
it
different
resolutions.
M
Which
was
very
successful,
I
thought
did
a
great
job,
not
same
political
party,
but
they
did
a.
M
M
M
M
N
N
I
wanted
to
share
a
few
photos
with
you.
Could
you
put
up
the
first
photo.
N
N
So
that's
7
25
next
picture,
please
that
was
at
7
26.
next
picture
at
7
38
next
picture.
N
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
P
P
P
P
P
P
Q
Q
I
want
to
know,
but
anyway,
also
who
closed
down
allen
street
in
between
what
is
that
morton
and.
Q
Q
Q
Because
when
they're
roaring
up
at
rogers
street
that
hunter
trying
to
get
to
house.
Q
Q
Q
Q
A
Q
Great
evening
and
welcome
back,
thank
you
all
right.
That
concludes
public
comment
this
evening.
A
Or
those
appointments
have
been
proposed
and
seconded
should
we
call
the
role.
A
That's
it
all
right,
very
good.
Moving
on
to
legislation
for
second
readings
and
resolutions.
T
A
B
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
J
T
A
T
Move
that
ordinance
20
to
15
be
introduced
in
red
by
the
clerk
by
title
synopsis.
A
B
B
B
J
Property
owner
here
with
us
and
eric
grulick
from
planning
and
transportation.
J
I
don't
know
if
eric
had
any
presentation
planned.
I
know
this
has
been
discussed.
J
Several
times
at
council
so
I'll
defer
to
eric
if
he
has
anything
to
report
at
this
time.
V
V
Plan
commission
petition
as
a
whole,
but
I
think
I
don't
know
if
that's
necessary
for
the
council.
A
Might
be
helpful
corporation
council
welcome
back
everyone,
so,
as
you
mentioned.
W
W
W
A
A
X
Can
you
hear
me
all
right?
Can
you
hear
me
yes,
okay,
great
so
yeah
after
having
discussions.
X
An
amount
that
this
project
can
can
really
afford
and
then
having
conversations
with.
X
Fall
just
north
of
the
historic
district
and
we
think
that
it's
an
appropriate
place
for
the
alley.
X
This
alley
in
similar
size
and
shape,
and
one
way
that
I've
been
told
that
that
could
be
done
is.
X
A
vote
on
vacating
this
evening
and
then
we
move
forward
again.
I
sort
of
said.
X
If
the
council
and
the
city,
or
whoever
wants
to
weigh
in
on
that,
would
like
this,
this.
A
I
From
a
bureaucratic
standpoint,
mr
cordero's
idea,
how
complicated
is
that
I
mean?
Are
you.
I
Concerned
about
the
process
or
or
is
it
safe
to
assume
that
if
the
developer
is
willing
to.
I
V
Commission
for
one
hearing
for
primary
plan
approval
that
then
could
be
delegated
to
staff.
V
I
I
would
say
we
probably
have
have
no
opinion
on
this.
You
know,
obviously,
the
vacation
of
the.
V
Alleyway
is
totally
at
the
discretion
of
the
council.
You
know
people
are
only
required.
V
I
Is
there
any
historic,
designation
issue
with
moving
the
alley
south,
which
is
it
looks
like.
I
One
alley
width
that
they're
planning
to
to
move
it
south
or
maybe
to
is
there
any
concern.
I
With
it,
is
there
a
potential
conflict
with
the
johnson
creamery
historic
district,
or
is
it
being.
I
Redefined
as
a
matter
of
this
proposal,
I'm
not
seeing
anything
moving
a
property
line.
V
Usually
doesn't
have
any
implications,
for
you
know
historic
districts,
histories,
districts.
V
V
I
D
D
Would
that
be
outside
the
historic
district?
Thanks
for
the
question,
councilmember,
piedmont.
Y
Smith,
john
zoe,
director
of
the
hand
department,
I
actually
corporation
council,
kate,
and
I.
Y
Y
Y
Y
Because
we
had
an
existing
right-of-way
here,
one
thing
that
sort
of
leads
us
to
that
question
is.
Y
Y
Under
and
so
a
coa
here,
we
don't
believe
in
conversations
with
the
legal
department
looking
at.
Y
Y
Y
Y
One
exists:
does
that
make
sense,
I
think
so.
Okay
did
I
answer
your
question.
I
I
do
want
to
go.
Look.
Y
Going
through
this
today,
because
we
did-
we
did
raise
that
question
internally
as
a
staff
to.
A
X
District
stopped
just
at
the
edge
of
the
parking
spaces
and
that's
sort
of
where
we,
where.
X
F
First
question
mr
zodi:
we've
been
in
recess
for
about
five
weeks
or
so
has
the
hpc
met
during
our.
F
F
Through
hpc
there
wasn't
so
there
would
be
no
real
questions
tonight
if
it
had
taken
that
route.
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Commission
during
recess
was
the
grant
regarding
the
the
engineering
study
that
was.
Y
F
Thank
you,
madam
sheriff.
I
mean
yes,
and
this
is
for
peerless
or
mr
cadero.
X
There's
no
recorded
ordinance
of
that
alley
being
vacated
so
thus
they're
denying
any
coverage.
R
May
I
ask
you
to
opine
on
how
this
how
this
impacts
the
impasse
be
for
the
public
art.
W
How
thank
you,
council,
member
smith,
how
the
new
proposal-
yes,
ma'am,.
W
Binding
commitment,
if
you
will
to
get
anything
in
exchange
ultimately
for
that,
so
that's
one.
W
W
W
It
encapsulated
the
stack
and
okay
yeah
there
so
anyway,
so
there's
that.
W
W
A
X
And
and
paid
for
full
sets
of
construction
drawings
twice
now,
so
there's
no
way
that.
X
We
can
afford
to
do
this
for
a
third
time
so
making
it
making
it
smaller
in
scale.
X
You
know
all
the
way
through
full
construction
drawings
and
that
you
know
each
each.
X
Go
around
is
hundreds
of
thousands
of
dollars,
so
that
really
would
not
be.
X
And
and
the
time
that
it
would
take
to
to
execute
on
that,
we
wouldn't
be
sitting.
X
Here
sort
of
next
year
in
the
same
position
at
a
race
against
the
clock
to
get
started
on
time.
E
Thank
you.
I
wanted
to
ask
a
question
about
the
first
point
that
miss
kate
made,
which
had.
E
To
do
with
the
fact
that
a
commitment
made
by
peerless
in
a
public
meeting
like
this
as
sort.
E
Of
a
condition
for
or
an
understanding
as
a
condition
for
approval
of
the
vacation
is
not
in.
E
E
Subdivision
and
planning
conditional
upon
later
approval
of
a
vacation
by
the
council,
such
that.
E
We
wouldn't
run
into
that
question
question
of
whether
or
not
anything
is
binding.
W
J
J
J
The
council
is
interested
in
in
entertaining
that
option.
I'd
certainly
recommend
the
council.
J
Not
vacate
not
approve
the
this
ordinance
tonight
and
again,
no
no
disrespect
to
the
petitioners.
J
But
there
may
be
issues
that
they're,
not
thinking
through
or
aware
of
that
could
come
up.
J
I'd
recommend
that
the
council
hold
off
on
on
any
vacation
until
a
new
plat
is
is
approved.
W
Okay,
I
wasn't
sure
if
you
were
raising
your
hand,
so,
yes,
I
mean
we've
discussed
this
a
little.
W
Bit
and
I
I
think
we
would
take
the
same
view
of
an
appropriate
or
if
this
were
something
that.
C
Just
to
confirm
my
understanding,
what's
being
proposed
by
the
petitioner
this
evening,
is
that
we.
W
Our
thinking
on
this
just
to
elaborate,
this
is
market
rate
housing.
That's
going
in.
W
W
I
An
image
on
the
screen
of
the
proposal
to
move
the
alley.
Does
anybody
have
that
image.
I
There
we
go
okay,
so
please
orient
us.
The
gray
area
is
the
existing.
I
Johnson
creamery
and
this
the
tower
is
where
this
circle
that
is
partially
located.
Yes,
in
the.
X
I
I
Project
in
the
history
of
this
project
and
then
sort
of
the
since
the
restoration
of
the.
Y
A
I
A
F
W
X
An
alley
that's
currently
not
in
use
and
putting
it
in
a
place
where
it
can
be.
You.
X
Know
put
to
use
so
we
feel
like
that
is
a
you
know:
a
one-for-one
exchange
of
value.
A
A
E
I
flaherty
I
had
an
additional
question.
Thank
you.
I
guess,
by
by
way
of
framing
it
or
a
preface,
I.
E
I
found
this
process
a
little
bit
odd,
both
in
thinking
about
what
our.
E
E
E
About
it
is
that
there's
this
negotiation
ongoing
between
the
administration
and
peerless,
but.
E
The
vacation,
so
the
council
is
actually
like
the
appropriate
body
to
be
negotiating
essentially.
E
Guess,
corporation
council
kate,
if,
if
that's,
if
my
understanding
in
that
respect
is
correct
or
has.
E
But
worked
with
other
council
members
to
think
about
what
would
be
appropriate
public
benefit.
E
Or
what
would
be
a
viable
option
that
the
council
might
support
with
respect
to
to.
E
The
request
to
vacate
maui
sure,
thanks
for
that
question
council
member
flaherty.
W
The
the
guidelines,
if
you
will
for
right-of-way
vacation,
to
seek
a
public
art
investment.
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
D
Yes,
so
corporation
counsel,
kate
referred
to
resolution
8702,
which
the
city
council
adopted.
D
D
I
mean,
I
don't
know
the
necessity
for
growth
of
the
city.
You
know
our
city
is
growing
left.
D
Really
have
to
have
a
very
loose
interpretation
and
I'm
sorry
this
is
developing
into
a
comment.
W
W
Advocacy
for
and
monitoring
of,
historic
structures
and
places
place
making
opportunities
for
art.
W
W
Is
to
consider
the
public
benefit
when
you
are
disposing
of
a
public
asset.
I
think
the
guidelines.
D
D
D
D
D
You
can't
go
all
the
way
through
and
the
second
is
necessity
for
growth
of
the
city
and
again.
D
D
D
T
Yes,
thank
you.
I
guess
I'm
still
trying
to
understand
the
administration's
perspective.
E
That
does
provide
a
public
benefit,
but
I
guess
I've
been
emphasizing
this
this
for
me,
my.
E
Understanding
of
the
language
that
there's
this
nexus
between
whether
or
not
the
I
guess
that.
E
So
I
so
my
question
is
a
hypothetical,
would
it
would
it
be
the
administration's
view
that
that.
E
A
request
for
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
public
art
on
kirkwood
street
would.
E
Be
appropriate
in
this
case,
as
opposed
to
a
public
part.
You
know
at
the
stack
because
it's
still
a.
E
Public
benefit,
it's
all
still,
you
know,
supported
by
the
comp
plan,
we're
giving
up
something
of.
E
Value
the
alley
but
and
we're
getting
something
in
exchange
public
benefit,
our
on
kirkwood
street.
E
Would
that
would
that
satisfy?
I
heard
kirkwood,
but
I
didn't
hear
I
think
you
said
a
figure.
W
W
W
W
Public
art
in
this
space
and
this
area
as
a
way
of
commemorating
and
honoring
the
johnson.
W
W
W
W
I
I
think
so,
if
I
could
follow
up
with
another
hypothetical,
what
about.
E
Is
is
that
something
that
the
administration
would
think
for
you
know
for
this
building
on
this.
E
Site,
essentially,
is
that
something
that
would
be
permissible
in
the
administration's
view
of.
E
The
guidance
for
right-of-way
vacation
well,
I
would
imagine
I
mean
again.
I
would
look
back
at.
W
W
Know
that
that's
out
of
bounds,
what
you're,
what
basically,
what
you
have
is
a
public
asset.
W
W
W
W
Know
our
thinking
on
things
like
green
roofs,
I'm
not
sure
anyone
was
talking
about.
A
A
I
I
Would
would
the
peerless
be
willing
to
to
commit
to
75
000
and
moving
the
outlay.
X
X
Dollars
to
put
up
a
plaque,
or
somebody
had
discussed
some
sort
of
info
board
or
something.
X
I
The
alley
being
moved
is
acceptable.
You
know
well
never
mind,
I'm
trying
to
make
a.
I
A
R
So
I
I've
either.
It
would
kind
of
be
probably
good
to
think
about
it
and
let
us.
R
Delay
our
decision,
but
I'm
just
one
of
nine.
So
that's
what
that's
my
current
thought.
R
I
Yeah,
I
kind
of
see
both
sides.
Here
I
get
what
the
administration
is
trying
to
do.
I
I
get
that
you
know
there
is
an
asset
that
is
worth
something:
councilmember,
piedmont,
smith,.
I
About
it
has
to
first
be
about
connectivity,
art
is
sort
of.
I
I
But
I
would
urge
everyone
here
to
let's
be
reasonable:
there's
a
smokestack
that
is
the.
I
Tallest
structure
in
the
city
and
has
been,
I
think,
it's
the
tallest
structure
in
the
city
ever.
I
Fact
that
we
discovered
it
so
late
in
this
process
is
unfortunate
for
everybody.
I
But
it's
clearly
not
that
important
and
we
have
a
chance
here.
I
think,
to
strike
a
compromise.
D
Any
other
hands
I
see,
councilmember
rallos,
please
go
ahead
colleague.
T
T
Imagine
a
benefit
exchange
cost-benefit
exchange
in
this
case.
Rather,
I
think
that.
T
We
should
keep
the
alley
and,
and
the
developer
can
live
within
that
those.
T
You
know
that
that
sort
of
geographic
constriction,
so
I
will
be
voting
against.
T
The
vacation
of
the
alleyway,
because
I
think
it's
important
not
to
have
large-scale
massing.
T
E
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
the
comments
from
from
my
colleagues
and
and
folks,
we've
heard.
E
Morale
just
just
shared
we've
had
some
extensive
conversation
and
discussion
about.
E
Connectivity,
I
mean
you're
you're
granting
access
here
with
an
alley.
E
To
the
buildings
to
parking
can
reduce,
drive
cuts,
you
can
control,
you
know,
building
scale.
E
And
max
kind
of
footprint,
so
all
those
benefits
are
real.
I
don't
think
I
agree,
though,
with
the.
E
Point
that
the
proposed
building
is
is
out
of
scale
or
not
human
scale.
You
know
it's
not.
E
By
a
pedestrian
from
any
angle,
you
know
you're
talking
a
building
that
is.
E
Ten
feet
less
wide
or
something
like
that.
So
it's
not
about
so
much
that
the
existing.
E
E
That,
for
me,
quite
hits
the
mark,
I
think
the
massing
is,
is
fine
and
I
think
you
know.
E
E
To
discount
that
value
in
public
benefit,
you
know
of
that,
but
by
its
own
virtue,
without.
E
Administration
has
negotiated
for
their
support
of
a
vacation,
really
makes
a
lot
of
sense
or
is.
E
Consistent
with
with
the
guidance
if,
if
there
was
a
big
public
art
display,
that
could
not
be.
E
Installed
unless
the
alley
was
vacated
because
it,
you
know
required
space
or
something
like
that.
E
But
here
we're
asking
what
I'm
trying
to
propose
is
that
we
would
vacate
an
alley
to.
E
E
More
units
than
you
would
get
if
the
alley
remained
in
place,
the
benefit
there
is
marginal.
E
E
Ago
I
thought
I
would
probably
vote
against
it
in
any
case,
regardless
of
the
public
art.
E
And
support
vacating
the
existing
alley,
subject
to
that
that
dedication
of
a
substitute
alley.
E
See,
but
I
would
certainly
advocate
for
the
approach
that
that
council
attorney
lucas
outlined.
E
E
E
View
that
they
would
be
willing
to
support
a
vacation
in
that
case
that
they
state
that.
E
Tonight,
if
they're
ready
to
state
that
that
conditional
vacation,
because
that
will
give.
E
Appropriate
guidance
and
assurance,
essentially
to
to
mr
cadero
and
peerless,
to
take
those.
E
A
Would
be
to
lay
the
ordinance
on
the
table
not
to
postpone?
Is
that
what
I'm
hearing
you
say.
E
Soon,
as
that
process
is
related
to
the
next
regular
session,
whereas
postponing
we're
going.
A
This
is
that
what
you're
kind
of
thinking
right
right
this
allows
allows
us
to
accommodate.
A
Got
it
okay,
I
see
hand
up
from
councilmember
rollo
again.
Does
anybody
else
have
a
comment.
A
Thank
you
and
then
a
lot
of
moving
parts
here.
F
F
F
One
thing
I
think
we
start
off
with
250
or
300
000
for
a
while
down
to
200
000.
F
F
F
F
F
C
Of
moving
parts
to
this-
and
there
are
a
lot
of
elements
to
this
conversation
that
make
it
awkward.
C
I
think
it's
awkward
that
this
right-of-way
would
the
need
to
vacate
a
right-of-way
was
not.
C
Discovered
in
time,
I
think
it's
awkward
that
peerless
has
a
dispute
and
needed
to
file
claim.
C
In
the
middle
of
it,
there
are
a
number
of
facts
here
that
are
awkward.
C
C
At
a
thousand
dollars
plus
a
bedroom,
I
think
affordable
housing
is
what
we.
C
C
I
am
not
at
all
comfortable
with
the
notion
that
we
could
vote
yes
on
this
right-of-way
vacation.
C
A
A
A
A
A
The
the
area
in
terms
of
putting
an
alley
where
maybe
it
would
get
better
better.
A
A
D
Had
a
first
round
question
or
comment,
so
I
I
echo
a
lot
of
what
has
been
said
already.
D
I
do
think
that
any
city
of
right-of-way
has
value.
I
do
want
to
say
hope,
however,
that.
D
I
am
inclined
to
I
can
envision
myself
supporting
the
vacation
of
the
alley
if.
D
Approvals
and
does
not
you
know,
run
into
any
snags.
I
do
feel
like,
as
council
member
council.
D
There
so
it
still
wouldn't
connect
all
the
way
to
the
b
line,
but
certainly
pedestrian.
D
Right
of
way
could
connect
there,
and
I
just
I
just
want
to
mention
in
regard
to
what.
D
Council
member
rallo
said
earlier
about
kind
of
massive
monolithic
buildings
along
the
b.
D
D
About
that
so
just
to
to
give
the
petitioner
a
sense
of
where
I
stand,
and
obviously
I
wanted.
D
D
D
T
Thank
you
good
discussion.
I
agree
with
my
colleague,
councilmember
scandaloury
that
this.
T
Does
have
value,
and
in
fact
I
I
would
still
maintain
that
it
has
a
value
with
respect
to.
T
West
facade
is
monolithic
and
is
again
the
length
of
small
wood.
So
if
that's
what
we're.
T
Can
affect
them,
and
in
this
case
that
is
what
we're
given
here,
because
of
a
the
public
asset.
T
Of
a
of
ali
right
away,
so
I
will
be-
I
won't
be
in
favor
of
postponing
to
move
the
alley.
A
I
Less
than
acceptable,
so
it
sounds
like
that
there
would
be
enough
votes
to
approve
it
if
a.
I
E
Thank
you,
madam
president,
just
two
clarifying
points.
One
is
that
I
I
think
I
share
the.
E
E
In
my
mind,
serves
an
equivalent
or
maybe
better
purpose.
So
it's
not
that
there's
not
value
in.
E
Respect
to
the
scale
of
design
small
world
is
small,
but
is
300
feet
long.
It
is
an
entire.
E
E
Both
the
longest
side
of
this
building
is
less
than
140
feet.
Less
than
half
the
size
of
smallwood.
E
So
it
again,
you
know,
fits
the
more
or
less
fits
the
the
space
of
a
of
a
half
block.
E
Ten
feet
because
of
this
historic
oversight
with
respect
to
the
right-of-way
et
cetera
et.
E
Cetera,
but
I
did
want
to
correct
the
record
for
that
point
and
that's
all
for
me.
Thank
you.
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
I
E
E
Wanted
to
note
that,
even
if
something
comes
up
in
in
second
reading,
if
that
is
the
first.
E
E
A
Councilmember
pretty
much
yes,
I
also
support
the
motion.
I
think
that
another
thing
to.
D
On
ps,
lit
matters
or
other
matters
that
we
are
working
on,
and
so
I
I
support
I'm
just.
B
Yes,
give
me
one:
second,
please,
council,
member
piedmont,
smith,
yes,.
T
A
J
Z
Z
Indiana
and
then
we've
had
a
couple:
more
people
get
hurt
on
those
standards.
You
got.
Z
Basketball
players
have
to
pee
and
drink
too,
so
those
things
seem
like
minor
things
that.
Z
We
can
probably
get
done
with
just
a
little
bit
of
elbow
grease.
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
A
Required
now,
I
I
think
a
motion
to
cancel
next
week's
committee.
The
whole
would
be
appropriate.
B
J
J
J
Appointment
undoing
that
appointment,
so
it
would
be
helpful
to
have
a
motion
so
that.
J
It
could
be
reflected
in
the
minutes,
so
a
motion
to
retract
might
be
appropriate
now,
based
on.