►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Okay,
thank
you.
I
think
last
time
what
we
did
was
we
set
priority
that
we
wanted
to.
A
See
in
estimates
on,
I
think
it
was
the
top
10
projects
or
something
something
at.
A
Speak
about,
why
don't
we
display
the
projects
and
let's
go
ahead
and
get
right
into
it?.
E
What
the
numbers
are-
and
I
did
also
put
this
beth
rosenberger-
playing
a
transportation
staff.
E
E
A
Mr
copper
or
atten
whoever
wishes
to
walk
us
through
it
a
little
bit.
That
would
be
really
great.
F
I
guess
I
can
start
and
I'll
ask
mr
rayton
to
help
out
if,
if
necessary,
neil.
F
Copper
engineering
department-
thank
you,
mr
copper,
the
so
the
spreadsheet
set
up.
F
F
F
F
F
F
Things
to
you,
the
projects
within
the
top
ten
that
were
already
either
constructed
or.
F
We
recommend
not
paying
attention
to
those
lines.
You'll
notice
that
there's
more
than
10
there.
F
Different
prioritization
lists
kind
of
last
minute
that
went
to
the
last
council
meeting.
F
So
I
don't
know
what
the
exact
number
here
is,
and
I
want
to
point
out.
F
That
the
item
for
gourley
pike,
if
you
read
the
text
description,
it's
listed
as.
F
Map
that
was
created
for
that
that
project
it
shows
a
different
section
of
gorly
pike.
So
there's.
F
And
I
also
point
out
mitchell
street
down
there
at
the
bottom,
because
it
was
such
a
long
project.
E
G
Covered
it
well,
I
the
only
other
thing
that
I
would
mention.
I
guess.
G
Would
be,
I
think
we
had
some
comments
on
the
range
road
discovery.
The
new
road.
F
Roy,
I
think,
you're
alluding
to
range
road
there's
some
questions
as
to
whether
we
should.
F
F
F
E
The
challenge
is,
it
actually
would
or
south
overhill
sorry
drive.
Any
project
has
to
go.
E
Toward
the
outcomes
of
the
resident-led
traffic
funding
requests
and
also.
E
For
now
mia,
why
so
the
where
you
say
where
you.
E
Okay,
all
right
is:
is
it
appropriate,
then
oth.
Other
committee
members,
mr
sims.
B
I'm
sorry,
I
don't
mute
myself
I'll
jump
in
here
with
regard
to
the
kinser
pike
project
that
we.
B
E
Yes,
old
37
is
the
part
that
connects
to
college,
but
the
actual
connection
old,
37.
B
I
guess
my
question
is
on
the
top
five
projects
that
we
have
listed
here.
If
there
is
nothing.
B
Listed
in
the
right-of-way
category
does
that
indicate
there
is
actually
no
cost
for
that
or
no.
B
G
So,
okay
and
I'm
sure
we'll
talk
about
this
later
and
pro-
maybe
not
even
today,
but
with
the.
B
The
range
road
project
with
regard
to
the
east
and
north
portion,
I
think
it's
important.
B
And
and
of
course,
this
will
be
later
conversations
from
a
connectivity
standpoint
to
cross
over.
B
The
street
I'm
sure
that
that's
workable,
but
we
have
difficulty
with
getting
permission
and
right.
B
B
F
F
Think
that's
a
very
important
connection.
There's
a
number
of
unknowns
there
right
now.
F
Unfortunately,
including
indot
has
a
project
coming
up
in
a
couple
years
to.
F
F
F
F
But
yes,
it
is
important.
Okay
and
my
last
question
with
the
the
top
five
projects
that
are
listed.
B
The
total
project
costs
roughly
250
000
and
that's
to
be
funded
or
approved.
Funding
for.
B
To
the
left,
yeah
maxwell
street
14th
down
to
adams
and.
B
B
E
Maxwell
14th
and
moores
have
dedicated
funding,
so
I
believe
ryan
neal
highlighted
them
to
say.
D
The
two
sidewalk
projects,
the
south
walnut
street
sidewalk
and
the
adams.
E
D
I
see
correct
because
because
right-of-way
acquisition
is
needed
in
that
project
and
because.
E
E
And
also
sorry,
neil
and
roy,
if
you
would
rather
take
this,
that
that
will
take
additional
time.
E
E
D
Dunn
street
sidewalk
from
15th
to
16th
street
that
one
includes
the
estimated
right-of-way
as
well.
E
Yes,
the
resident-led
portion
of
it,
and
that
was
in
disclosure.
You
know
that
was.
A
Will
be
committed
for
the
2021
sidewalk
construction
and
design
projects
right
yeah,
so.
E
What
I
would
say
is
this:
is
the
staff
making
a
recommendation
to
you
all
as
a
sidewalk
committee.
E
E
B
On
this,
but
of
everything
that
we
just
talked
about
as
far
as
projects
and
design.
A
Miss
kate
rosenberger,
do
you
have
any
questions?
Thank
you
to
ask
or.
E
That's
correct
I'll,
just
add
it.
It's
very
tricky
and.
E
I
mean
you
could
look
at
changing
the
allocation
or
switching
some
things
up,
of
course,
but.
A
E
Okay,
so,
based
on
our
conversations
in
the
last
meeting,
we
basically
took
a
lot
of
data
from.
E
E
To
do
a
little
deeper
dive
into
different
areas
of
the
city,
with
like
geographic
data
like
this.
E
E
E
E
E
E
City
and
a
little
bit
beyond
because
census
block
groups,
don't
follow
the
city
boundaries
exactly.
E
E
A
Thank
you
very
much
thanks,
mr
sims,
do
you
have
a
question
about
what
was
just
shown.
A
Or
any
further
questions,
actually
thank
you,
chair
smith.
First
of
all,
we
I'm
not
so
do
we.
B
B
Copy,
so
I
could
look
at
it
further.
Thank
you
very
much
now
with
these
variables
that
we
just.
B
Our
criteria,
so
is
this
part
of
that
process
and
has
the
ratio
and
economic.
E
Previous
meetings,
and
just
I
guess,
maybe
gather
some
thoughts
and
input
on
a
system
like
this.
E
And
so
so
I
would
say:
no,
it's
not
completely
revamped,
but
this
just
highlights
some
options.
E
Final
blessing,
but
I
think
yes
like
we're
pretty
pretty
happy
to
move
in
that
direction.
Yes,.
B
A
A
Okay,
I
the
question
I
have
was.
A
So
the
map
you
showed
where
there
was
the
blue,
which
showed
the
priority
level.
A
Yeah
that
one,
so
I
don't
know
if
I
you
may
have
already
commented
on
this,
but.
A
Were
some
of
the
projects
that
were
selected,
those
were
the
blue.
E
E
It
shows
that
too,
so
the
light
blue
ones
like
19th
street
up
here
is
being
built
by
a
developer.
E
E
Were
in
the
top
ten
that
were
requested,
and
then
this
magenta
is
projects
that
were.
E
Funded
for
design
last
year,
but
you
know
up
for
consideration
for
funding
construction
or
not.
E
We
think
this
is
where
we
would
put
funding
so,
for
example,
adam
street
sidewalk.
Is
this.
E
Can
you
see
my
mouse
moving?
Yes,
ma'am?
Okay,
is
this
number
65?
So
that's
just
the
council
sidewalk.
E
E
E
E
A
The
there
were
none
in
it
and
it's
just
a
question
that
there
were
none
recommended
in
the
ones.
A
E
E
On
a
request
to
be
made
so
for-
and
we
know
this
is
key
request-
is
by
the
public.
Mr
rosenberg.
E
E
E
E
A
To
comment
or
question,
I
think
it
sounds
to
me
like.
The
next
thing
we
need
to
do
is.
B
Yes,
just
a
little
clarification
on
my
part,
and
I
believe
this
would
be
for.
B
Mitch,
rosenberger
beth
rosenberger,
but
with
the
variables
as
part
of
the
rating
system.
B
Is
baked
in
there
somewhere,
since
it's
not
a
separate
variable,
I
think.
B
Have
nothing
existing
with,
particularly
with
connectivity
and
some
you
know,
paid
issues.
B
E
E
Is
examined
and
then
the
way
that
it
might
be,
I
might
ask
mallory
if
she
could,
if
there
was
any.
E
E
The
short
answer
is
no,
that's
not
a
part
of
it,
maybe
to
the
extent
we're
picturing
right
now.
E
B
E
I
think,
and
what
I
mean
is
if
we
have
non-existing
sidewalks
in
an
area,
but
we.
B
B
B
A
Any
other
concerns
or
questions
from.
A
All
right,
mr
lucas,
help
me
out
here.
Is
it
time
to.
A
Take
a
vote
on
accepting
the
top
five
recommendations,
or
is
there
something.
A
Perhaps
right
now,
I'm
just
going
to
say
also
while
you're
looking
thanks
to
the
city
staff
for.
A
Doing
all
this
excellent
work
and
preparing
this
spreadsheet
and
map
maps
for
us
appreciate
it.
D
And
this
is
the
same
spreadsheet
with
less
information,
but
I
filled
in
what
I
think
is.
D
D
A
motion
along
those
lines
and
and
again
the
committee
is
not
you
know
bound
to
the.
A
Let's
say
we're
going
to
give
people
two
minutes
to
speak
and
say
what
they
want
to
say.
D
And
at
the
moment
I
see
two
two
folks
who
have
indicated
they'd
like
to
speak.
H
Great
thanks,
I'm
greg
alexander
about
a
month
ago,
at
a
city
council
meeting,
I
pointed
out.
H
H
H
H
D
I
I
I
I
More
time
to
integrate
that
kind
of
gis
technology
into
this
decision,
this
metric
this
matrix
and.
I
I
So,
thank
you
and
I
look
forward
to
this.
I
the
vote
tomorrow.
I
B
Projects
can
someone
clarify
on
if
I
were
to
make
a
motion
what
we
would
actually
be
approving.
A
C
Did
not
understand
with
mr
alexander's
comment?
Can
someone
weigh
in
on
a
staff
member
about
the.
E
Older
multi-family
developments
that
seem
to
predate
our
current
well,
the
current
udo
and.
E
E
C
Thank
you
yeah
all
right
and
miss
beth
rosenberger.
Would
you
like
to.
E
And
I'm
sorry
I
say
hopefully
because
it's
a
challenge
that
things
are
estimates
and
we.
E
E
There'll
be
some
wiggling
in
there
and
then
you'd
be
funding.
13
000
toward
resident,
led
traffic.
F
Just
to
add
one
thing
in
in
previous
years,
the
the
committee
has
ranked
their
priorities.
E
Steps
in
them
so
both
adam
straight
and
done
straight,
so
it
could
involve
specifying.
E
D
D
Resident-Led
side
of
the
traffic
common
and
greenways
program,
how
that
would
be
used.
E
E
I
think
mallory.
Could
you
describe
further
yeah,
so
we
the
way
that
the
resident-led
process
exists.
J
The
process
for
this
year,
and
so
then
after
the
letter
of
intent,
is
submitted,
we'll
have
a
general.
J
Idea
of
where
these
projects
are
and
and
we
can
start
pulling
the
metrics
that
we're
using
to
rank.
J
J
J
J
Is
is
essentially
what
I
think
we
can
expect
for
this
year
for
these
for
this
first
year,.
J
D
D
Okay,
thank
you
for
that
and
again
I
was
going
to
make
the
same
point
that
mr.
D
The
the
projects
and
we've
got
four
here
again,
the
committee.
You
know,
I
don't
know
if.
D
The
committee
will
want
to
recommend
these
same
projects,
but
staff
does
find
it
helpful
to
know.
B
B
Some
that
has
to
be
made
moving
forward,
there's
been
the
authority
given
and
mr
lucas.
B
Correct
me,
if
I'm
wrong,
that
the
chair
can
make
certain
decisions
with
regard
to
funding.
D
That
applies
and
the
committee
didn't
make
any
changes
to
that
policy.
I
believe
it
allows
for
up.
D
To
20
of
the
estimated
project
costs
to
be
shifted
from
one
project
to
another.
Up
to
I.
D
Believe
a
maximum
of
forty
five
thousand
dollars.
Neil
can
jump
in
if
I'm
misstating
that
but.
D
With
other
committee
members-
and
I
know,
staff
has
found
that
helpful
to
address
situations
that.
A
All
right
so
shall
we
talk
about
the
ranking
now
mr
sims
was
that
discussing
the.
B
Construction,
which
of
these
recommendations
are
closest
to
fruition
and
which
may
be.
F
I'll
start
to
answer
that
at
least
so
the
south
walnut
street,
which
is
you
know
the
largest.
F
Allocation
that
we
recommended
is
just
now
starting
design.
I
think
they're
doing.
F
And
knowing
an
actual
mountain
cumbering
until
you
know
the
summer
at
least.
F
F
Necessarily
a
clean
answer
there
it's
likely
that
if
there
are
shortfalls,
we
would
recommend.
F
Taking
it
from
you
know
the
right-of-way
piece
of
one
of
those
one
of
those
projects.
F
Way,
cost
will
be
so
that
might
be
one
that
could
be
prioritized
lower
without.
A
Dunn
street
I
mean
in
general,
I
would
want
to
start
the
design
early.
You
know
if
we.
F
Start
the
design
within
the
next
couple
months,
then,
by
the
time
we
get
to
2022
you're,
ready.
F
For
construction,
you
have
real
numbers,
so
I
wouldn't,
I
would
guess
I
would
put
that
one.
A
I'm
going
to
restate
this,
so
you
everybody
can
change
my
mind
or
disagree
with
that.
It
looks
like.
A
F
I
was
just
going
to
say
you
you
had
listed
done
as
number
one
adams
is
number
two
and.
F
F
If
you
wanted
to
be
sure
that
you
could
get
a
full,
you
know
construction
funding
for
walnut
and.
F
A
Okay,
well
I
I
I'm
listening
to
the
experts
who
know
what's
going
on
here,
mr
sims
or
I
would.
B
Okay,
I'm
okay;
okay!
Thank
you
dear,
but
one
of
the
things
as
mr
copper
was
speaking,
I
had.
B
Kind
of
written
my
priority
list,
and
it
mirrors
with
him
with
switching
south
walnut
and
adams.
B
A
D
D
D
D
D
Ten
thousand
dollars
the
third
project
would
be
remainder
of
design
and
right-of-way
acquisition.
D
D
The
transfer
traffic
calming
and
greenways
program
for
prioritized
resident-led
projects.
B
Well,
I
think
what
I
like
to
do
and
not
hearing
anything
else
from
staff
at
this
point.
B
2021
with
the
recommendations
from
number
one
two
and
three
and
four,
as
was
listed.
A
D
Committee
committee,
member
sims-
yes
rosenbarker,
yes,
smith,
yes
and
rollo-
is
absent.
D
Before
providing
it
to
council
staff
typically
prepares
that,
and
it
reflects
the
committee's.
D
Deliberations
over
the
past
a
couple
of
months
and
includes
the
the
formal
recommendation
so.
D
I
believe
so
I
I
think,
there's
one
other
item
of
business.
Yes,
sir,
that
I
I
may
need
your.
D
For
the
next
year's
funding
cycle,
I
don't
know
that
the
committee
will
want
to
do
that.
D
D
B
To
you,
council,
member
smith,
just
for
future
reference,
hopefully
go
either.
No,
that's.
B
Okay,
either
way,
but
you
know
I
think
that
will
be
more
appropriate.
Thank
you
do
we
do
we
have
an.
B
As
a
placeholder
understanding
that
with
the,
however,
we
work
out
with
the
resolution,
20
101.
D
D
Meetings
and
so
fitting
those
meetings
in
before
the
end
of
of
the
year
allows
staff
to.
D
Assuming
the
committee
exists
and
and
functions
the
same
way,
it.
A
Give
us
a
tuesday,
mr
lucas,
tuesday
november.
The
ninth
would
be
the
second
tuesday
november.
A
Pick
that
one-
and
we
can
finish
that
off,
do
we
need
a
motion
for
that.
Mr
lucas.
B
Any
good
of
the
order,
but
thank
you
for
your
leadership
council
member
smith
on
this,
and
I
am.
B
Also,
very
happy
and
glad
we
could
take
into
account
some
comments
from
the
public.
I
think.
B
A
A
I
appreciate
the
comments
from
the
public
too
really
helpful,
so
thank
you.