►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
I
will
call
this
meeting
of
the
transportation
committee
to
order,
and
it
is
december
9th.
C
A
C
James
city
of
bloomington
utilities,
department:
okay,
all
right!
Thank
you.
A
And
would
shall
we
pull
up
the
exhibits
or
just
forge
on
committee
members
could
could.
B
B
I'm
particularly
interested
in
smith
and
moore's
pike
because
we
did
an
allocation
for.
B
That,
but
in
it,
as
far
as
I
can
tell,
there
were
just
walkway
stripes
done
and
I
wondered.
B
If
that
has
been
completed
or
so
forth,
so
could
could
we
just
have
a
brief
overview
of.
A
Think
that
will
take
care
of
that
sure
I
mean
whatever
order
you
want
to
do
it
in
just
so.
A
All
right,
so
I'm
just
gonna,
keep
forging
ahead
so,
and
we
will
get
to
that.
Mr
rowell.
A
So
let's
take
a
look
at
last
year's
allocation
and
who,
from
the
city
would
like
to.
A
In
2021,
we
had
000
that
we
were
working
with.
E
In
the
packet
just
to
know
which
one,
it
is
sorry
chair
smith,
it's
says,
exhibit
four.
F
Of
the
sidewalk
committee,
which
does
outline
what
the
committee,
how
the
committee.
F
Allocated
the
funds
in
for
2021,
can
you
pull
that
up
for
us
heather?
Oh,
I
can
sure
try.
G
E
If
you,
if,
if
you
wouldn't
mind
clarifying
our
agenda
item,
is
the
review
of
last
year's.
A
E
E
Or
roy
and
sorry
now,
I'm
I'm
awesome,
because
I
was
going
to
do
a
stash
report
under
item.
A
A
We
can
do
that
in
the
recommendations
that
we
looked
at
for
21..
So,
let's,
let's
go
to
item.
A
B
on
three,
which
is
we
utilized
a
criteria
for
selecting
psyduck
projects,
and
it
was
revised
and.
A
Miss
rickpile,
and
can
we
somehow
talk
about
begin
the
discussion
of
how
the
criteria
may.
A
Change
and
then
what
it
was
like
and
then
I
think
the
committee
needs
to
decide
if
we
want
to.
A
Forge
on
and
then
there's
a
choice
of
two
different
pathways
with
a
new
criteria.
A
Which
sidewalk
projects
to
select
or
to
recommend
so
maybe
is
it
beth?
Is
it
mallory.
D
The
criteria,
so
we,
as
you
may
recall,
in
the
sidewalk
equity
presentation
we
created
two.
D
Expressions
to
highlight
or
to
prioritize
which
projects
were
the
the
best
examples
of
that.
D
D
We
have
about
percentage
of
commuters
who
use
transit
percentage
of
commuters,
who
walk
to
work.
D
And
then
car
ownership
per
census
block
group
and
then
we
had
some
information
20,
which
looked
at.
D
The
width
and
the
speed
limit
of
the
streets
and
then
finally,
the
last
10,
was
based
on
equity.
D
D
D
Walk
potential,
so
each
of
those
were,
I
believe,
25
and
then
the
10
was
the
equity
that.
D
That
remained
the
same,
so
is
that
something
that
we
should
pull
up?
What
is
it
exhibit
eight.
A
That
was
that
was
very
helpful
for
me
to
look
at
when
reading
the
the.
D
Okay,
so
these
are
the
different
expressions
and
how
they're
calculated
and
there.
D
D
And
so
from
there,
that's
where
you
are
seeing
the
project
that
is
on.
For
example,
liberty,
drive.
D
D
D
Two
of
them
so
with
the
amount
of
funding
that
we
had
for
this
year
to
select
the
best.
D
Come
together
at
a
feasible
level
for
one
to
two
years
worth
of
funding.
A
Okay,
I
understand
that
now.
So,
okay
is
there
anything
else
that
you
would
like
to.
A
To
say
about
the
the
new
criteria
before
we
kind
of
just
forage
on.
A
If
we
can
have
a
city
representative
talk
about
the
new
and
old
projects
and
we
can
make
sure
we.
A
B
Okay,
I
think
another
consideration
that
that
bear
is
mentioning,
and
maybe
we
do
this
as
we
go.
B
Through
individual
projects,
but
the
redundancy
of
sidewalks,
so
if
we're
in
a
residential
area.
B
That
has
low
low
traffic
volume,
low
speeds
and
we
have
a
sidewalk
across
the
street
as.
B
Be
easy
filter
I
guess
to
find
out
what
streets
have
sidewalks
on
both
sides,
but.
B
Either
method
works
but
that's
just
something.
I
think
that
bears
consideration,
because.
A
A
Mr
vollen,
mr
chair,
I'd
appreciate
it
if
everyone
were
addressed
in
the
more
formal
way,
because.
I
It
it
you
know
it's
inappropriate
otherwise,
but-
and
I
would
like
to
hear
ms
rosenberger's.
I
I
Any
candidates,
high-ranking
candidates
for
sidewalks
that
might
also
be
redundant.
I
Method
for
sorting
the
priority
of
streets,
I
think,
is
pretty
thorough.
B
I
E
Okay,
I
was
just
going
to
respond.
I
I
think
I
understand
the
intent
is
about
prioritizing.
E
E
Directions,
we
don't
say
it's
redundant.
I
would
be
interested
in
that,
but
we
don't
currently
so.
E
Just
to
clarify,
but
I
I
believe
I
understand
the
intent
and
definitely
correct
me
if
I'm.
E
Wrong
that
it's
just
about
prioritizing
where
there
are
not
as
many
sidewalks
and
most.
E
E
E
E
E
So
I
I
think
that,
like
that,
there's
not
some
of
the
neighborhood
taken
into
account
thanks.
If
I.
D
Can?
Okay,
I
think,
that's
kind
of
a
failing
yeah
go
ahead.
Mailer
we
do
have
an
indicator
for
census.
D
Block
group
that
isn't
a
part
of
the
priority.
But
it's
something
that
we
looked
at,
which
is.
D
Percentage
of
missing
sidewalks
as
a
percentage
of
streets,
and
then
that
has
been
mapped
from.
D
This
is
a
newer
data
set,
so
it's
not
something
that
was
in
the
the
presentation,
but
we
do.
D
Have
sort
of
a
a
heat
map
based
on
census,
block
group
of
of
missing
sidewalks,
basically
density.
B
So
let
me
give
you
an
specific
order,
mr
chair.
B
I
I
I
Of
the
agenda,
I
think
mr
wallace
questions
are
appropriate
for
later
in
the
agenda
or
perhaps
for.
I
A
later
meeting,
but
I
thought
that
this,
the
the
point
here
was
just
to
sort
of
lay
out
the.
I
Staff
presentation-
am
I
correct
in
that,
or
can
you
tell
us
what
point
we're
on
we're
on
number.
A
Four,
we're
kind
of
in
number
three
headed
towards
number
four:
shall
we
just
move
on
to
number.
A
I
The
agenda,
which
is
why
I
had
this-
I
think
we
we
are
in
the
right
area,
for
a
criteria.
Okay,.
I
Thank
you
sure,
so
so
this
I'll
make
this
really
brief,
and
that
is
that
so
in
council
member.
B
Smith's
district
morningside
drive
is
a
street
that
is
receives
a
lot
of
traffic
because.
B
B
But
there
are
some
neighborhoods
like
that
that
have
no
sidewalks,
but
yet.
B
How
do
we
capture
that?
I
mean
it
seems
to
me
that
we
need
to
think.
A
For
that
kind
of
scenario,
miss
rosenberger
or
miss
rick
for
that
kind
of
scenario,
what.
D
Sure
so,
from
a
planning
perspective,
morningside
drive
is
designated
as.
D
Cost
significantly
less
than
sidewalk
facilities,
and
so,
from
our
perspective,
the
tool
that
we.
D
B
E
E
To
be
needed
the
most,
and
what
does
it
mean
to
be
serving
the
most
and
what
we've
put
together.
E
E
E
E
B
And
then
you
know
because
it's
it's
a
little
difficult
to
evaluate.
I
understand,
but
I
think.
B
That
I'll
elevate
them,
somehow
you
know
anyway,
is
there.
Is
there
I'm
going
to
ask
that.
A
E
Shall
I
start,
please
do
okay.
I
just
want
to
check
with
this
for
a
while,
I
would
say.
E
A
The
conversation
you're
on,
thank
you
happy
to
be
able
to
be
here
on
video.
C
Is
really
detailed,
and
I
can't
tell
you
how
much
I
appreciate
it.
I
would
love
to
see.
C
What
I
hear
you
all
saying
is:
council
member
rallo's
concerns
are
addressed
in
this
criteria.
C
C
Right
and
it
has
the
speed
humps
and
it
has
the-
I
don't
know
what
you
call
them-
those
things.
C
That
for
the
parking
spot
spots
that
pop
out
a
little
bit
super
safe,
like
door,
knocking
on.
C
C
40
miles
an
hour,
there's
no
public,
there's
no
green
space
in
between
that
sidewalk,
and
I
mean.
C
On
that
sidewalk-
and
I
know
that
pedestrians
die
like
that,
so
I
definitely
can
see.
C
That
it's
kind,
like
I
think
you
guys,
are
taking
you
all,
are
taking
in
so
much
here.
C
C
High
traffic
high
traffic
speeds
high
traffic
volumes,
I
mean,
I
think
we
were
talking.
I
think
one.
C
Example,
you
showed
was
patterson,
I
think
it's
it's
been
maybe
a
month
since
you
presented
that.
I
Again,
can
we
please
use
formalities.
A
Does
it
address
mr
rallo's
concerns
and
to
kate's
miss
kate
rosenberger's
point
I
well
the.
D
With
the
new
system
we're
using
to
create
the
map
of
like
what
projects
are,
are
looked
at.
D
Looked
at
through
the
same
level
of
criteria
and
the
and
the
data
that
we're
using
with
demand.
D
To
kind
of
help
us
to
plot
a
course
for
the
our
transportation
and
our
comprehensive
plan
goals.
D
D
Is
really
that's
to
help
us
to
understand
the
context
and
things
that
we
can
do
to
help
build.
A
Otherwise,
if
I
may
see
one
of
my
readings
of
this
and
with
this
process
of
that,
it
tended
to.
A
And
you
know
I
I
I
kind
of
thought
that
that
was
a
really
good
idea,
and
that
was
just.
A
That
was
that
was
good
to
do
we're
factoring
in
social
equity
and
equity,
and
and
so
not
that.
A
A
Making
it
more
objective
yeah,
mr
mr
chair,
just
to
say
that
I'm
all
for
objectivity
and
data.
B
Sidewalks
because
they
weren't
prioritized
when
the
the
you
know
in
this
neighborhood
built
out.
B
B
And
there
are
no
sidewalks,
but
there
is
a
collector
street
that
you
know-
and
this
is
very.
B
B
B
Know
kind
of
evaluate
at
some
point
you
know
if
conditions
arise
for
sidewalk
2
to
be
implemented.
B
Of
people
not
just
five
people,
I'm
going
to
ask
mr
ramo
a
question
then
do
you
have.
A
A
And
that
can
be
kind
of
noted
yep
and
I
think
they
they
occur
in
every
district,
but
district
six.
A
Okay,
I
I
think
that
would
be
great
to
do
that
and
I
think
miss
beth
rosenberger
and.
A
E
A
neighborhood
connector
a
main
street,
an
urban,
oh,
I
forget
what
we
call
it:
a
general
urban
street.
E
So
we
definitely
agree
with
that.
I
do
want
to
say:
there's
there's
no
way
for
us
to
account
for.
E
E
Because
what
she's
proposing
is
doing
that,
I
want
to
clarify
that
the
data
set
we've
used.
E
E
I
remember
like
a
month
or
two
ago,
so
it
is
a
challenge
to
incorporate
like.
E
Major
changes:
it
would
be
a
real
challenge
for
staff
to
do
that
right
now.
So
I'm
definitely
happy.
E
B
Suggesting
that
we
do
it
this
round,
so
I
I
appreciate
the
effort
that
you
that
you've
made.
B
And
the
criteria
you
developed,
I
think,
in
terms
of
missing
sidewalks.
It
would
probably
if
we.
B
A
Thank
you,
mr
rowland.
Thank
you
all
right.
Let's,
let's
have
a
discussion
of
if,
in
point,
four
in
our.
A
Agenda
evaluation,
old
and
new
proposed
projects-
perhaps
this
is
mr
copper
that
we
can
talk.
A
About
recently
completed
and
ongoing
sidewalk
projects-
and
you
can
take
us-
walk
us
through.
A
H
Are
questions
so
projects
that
saw
project
progress
in
the
past
year,
so
maxwell
street.
H
H
H
H
Dunn
street,
between
14th
and
15th,
that's
the
west
side
of
the
street.
That
project
is.
H
We
have
the
south
walnut
sidewalk
that
is
out
to
bid
for
construction.
That's
between
winslow.
H
And
ridgeview
on
the
east
side
of
the
street
bids
are
due
in,
I
don't
know
a
week
and
a
half
or.
H
Something
so
we
don't
know
final
price
on
that
yet,
but
we
will
shortly
the
adams
street
psych
walk.
H
From
kirkwood
to
fountains
the
west
side
of
adams,
there,
that
is
in
design,
we
have
applied
for.
H
Block
grant
funding
for
that
project.
We
won't
know
yet
whether
or
not
the
project
receives.
H
Traffic
calming
in
the
crestmont
neighborhood
12th
street
and
13th
street.
That
project
has
been.
H
I
think
table
table
two
on
page
overall
page
27
of
the
packet
gives
kind
of
an
estimate
of.
H
These
the
cost
for
the
current
year's
funding
again
many
of
these,
could
we
pull
that
up.
H
And
miss
lacy:
are
you
able
to
do
that
or.
A
What
page
was
that?
Mr
copper,
27
of
the
tournament
yeah.
H
H
H
H
H
South
walnut
street,
assuming
that
we
get
good
bids
back
adam
street
sidewalk,
we
put.
H
At
at
the
moment,
we've
put
a
partial
encumbrance
into
there.
We've
done
enough
of
the.
H
Through
all
of
the
right-of-way
services,
because
it's
listed
as
a
lower
priority
and
then.
H
Traffic
home,
you
haven't
put
any
money
into
it,
so
just
kind
of
the
summary
there
is.
You
know.
H
H
Money
can
be
moved
and
the
approval
is
required
for
it.
Basically
anything
anything
requires.
H
H
If
the
committee
is
comfortable,
I
think
you
know,
I
don't
know
if
you'll
be
able
to
vote
today.
H
Or
make
a
recommendation,
I
don't
know
if
it's
official,
though,
to
be
able
to
make
that
kind.
A
Do
I
remember
right,
mr
copper,
that
the
chair
has
the
authority
upon
consultation
with.
A
The
committee
members,
if
it's
40,
000
or
less
for
the
the
project
that
sounds
right,
40
or
45.
H
Wants
to
we,
don't
I
don't
honestly,
don't
know
why
you
you
wouldn't,
but
if,
for
some
reason,.
A
Thank
you,
and
I
know
there
was
a
question
earlier
that.
A
For
prior
projects,
do
you
have
an
estimate
on
that?
Unfortunately,
we
won't
really
know
that
for.
H
A
couple
more
weeks,
because
that
will
largely
depend
on
what
the
bids
for
south
walnut
look
like.
A
Okay,
yes,
mr
rallo,
mr
copper,
could
you
just
clarify
so
regarding
I
brought
up
earlier.
B
The
it's
actually
connectivity,
I
don't
know
how
it's
evaluated
in
previous
year's.
B
B
Could
you
sorry.
B
How
much
much
did
it
cost
sorry,
because
so
in
2020,
council
allocated
28
thousand
dollars
the.
B
B
Thousand
okay,
I'm
just
trying
to
wrap
my
head
around
the
cost
of
things.
That's
amazing.
A
Okay,
all
right
any
other
council
members
have.
A
Questions
for
mr
copper
about
the
old
and
new
projects.
A
From
anyone,
no-
and
so
the
last
item
on
this
is
to
discussion
of
sitelike
priorities.
A
So
I
was
wondering
miss
lazy.
F
Maybe
going
to
need
to
consider
revising
its
current
criteria
for
evaluation,
so
we
heard
today.
F
From
planning
and
transportation,
their
proposed
criteria
for
prioritizing
projects,
and
there.
F
A
Okay,
so
if
I
understand
right,
the
prioritization
list
that
we
have
in
this
packet
that.
F
Point
and
planning
and
transportation
has
given
the
presentation
for
revised
objective
criteria.
F
Where
they
gave
the
presentation
to
the
committee
several
months
ago
and
then
to
the
full
council.
A
Okay,
I
would
entertain
some
discussion
on
that
from
the
committee
members.
Do.
C
Decide
how
to
allocate
this
small
budget
based
on
equity
and
safety,
so.
C
A
Very
much
mr
rowla,
do
you
have
you
would
like
to
old
pine
on
that?
Yes,
I'm
good
with
the
great.
B
Can
you
hear
me
I'm
good
with
the
criteria,
with
the
caveat
that
we
also
evaluate
redundancy
and.
B
I
think
I've
already
explained
my
you
know
my
view
that
if
we
have
you
know,
we
don't
have
much.
B
In
the
way
of
the
budget,
we
want
it
to
go
far,
and
so,
if
there
are
sidewalks
on
both
sides
of
the.
B
B
Significantly
so
taking
that
into
account,
I'm
comfortable
with
adopting
these
criteria.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
I'm
very
comfortable
with
the
new
criteria,
I
think
is,
was
a
really
great.
A
F
Yes,
mr
rallo,
yes-
and
this
is
mr
smith-
and
I
will
say
yes
so
that
will
pass.
A
So
I
appreciate
miss
lacy
keeping
us
on
track
on
that.
A
And
the
yes
miss
beth
rosenberger
did
you
have
a
ques
I
apologize.
I
have
to
leave,
but
I'm.
E
A
F
Receipt
of
the
outstanding
bid,
which
may
inform
the
committee's
decision
making
mr
copper,
do.
H
I
just
I
also
want
to
add
in
that
currently
with
the
allocations
for
this
year's
funding.
H
H
Thousand
dollars,
if
chair
smith,
approves
it
or
if
the
committee
approves
either
a
larger
shift
or.
A
B
That
we
give
permission
to
chair
smith
to
evaluate
and
make
the
necessary
shifts.
C
H
A
I
will
vote
yes
as
well,
so
that
authority,
then,
in
consultation
with
mr
copper,
I
will
work
with.
A
A
All
right,
so,
if
I,
if
I'm
understanding
right,
miss
lacy,
the
next
thing
we
need
to
do
is
just.
A
You
going
to
work
here
from
mr
copper.
First
before
we
set
a
date.
H
Two
weeks
we
will
probably
have
numbers
available.
I
I
think
many
staff
are
going
to
be
out.
H
A
Something
similar
noon
on
thursday
january
6th
is
a
thursday
at
noon.
From
noon
to
one.
A
All
right,
let's
see,
do
we
have
anything
else
to
conclude.
A
F
Appear
on
the
agenda
for
the
january
6th
meeting,
which,
which
I
think
that.