►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
City
zoning
maps
by
amending
the
district
ordinance
for
thompson
pud
regarding
300
west.
A
Both
items
so
mr
garlic,
as
soon
as
you're,
ready
with
ordinance
2107,
you
can
go
right
ahead.
B
That
some
things
are
working
in
this
world,
so,
as
you
mentioned,
this
is
a
request.
B
Well,
as
a
small
parking
lot
on
the
south
side,
and
then
it
also
encompasses
a
small
lot.
B
Just
a
surface
parking
lot,
so
the
petitioner
is
requesting
to
amend
the
thompson
pud.
B
B
B
Buildings
is
the
architecture
and
I'll
go
through
some
renderings
in
just
a
minute
to.
B
Side
of
the
site
that
would
kind
of
buffer
these
buildings
between
the
mcdonald,
neighborhood.
B
With
that
extension
is
that,
when
that
warehouse
to
the
north,
possibly
redevelop
sometime
in
the.
B
Future
that
that
extension
could
be
extended
all
the
way
through
to
grimes
lane
to
the
north.
B
B
Is
actually
to
facilitate
emergency
vehicle
access,
emergency
vehicles,
specifically
fire
trucks,.
B
Allows
for
traffic
fire
trucks
in
order
to
be
able
to
navigate
and
exit
the
site
should.
B
They
have
to
enter
in
the
the
parking
area
so
moving
south
building
two
as
they've
labeled.
B
It
is
a
five-story
building
that
would
have
a
ground
floor,
commercial
component
as
well
as.
B
Apartments
above
it
with
some
parking
within
the
building
that
building
would
have
approximately.
B
32
units
on
56
bedrooms
and
16
of
the
parking
spaces
that
are
on
that
surface
parking
area.
B
Would
be
designated
for
that
building
so
that
would
have
a
approximately
five
0.58
parking
ratio.
B
B
With
54
bedrooms,
in
that,
with
the
parking
spaces
that
are
on
site
and
within
the
building.
B
B
B
B
The
entire
east
property
line
of
this
site,
but
also
it
was
very
important
to
connect
this
site
to.
B
Stepped
through
some
renderings
of
the
site
and
then
specific
buildings,
so
this
is
a
rendering.
B
B
Associated
with
the
switch
art
park
and
then
on
the
the
kind
of
right
side
of
the
screen,
you.
B
And
right
and
then
moving
to
the
right,
you've
got
the
mixed
use
buildings,
as
you
kind
of
look.
B
To
the
right
looking
south,
so
this
is
another
rendering
again
looking
west,
so
you
can
see
the.
B
B
B
B
That
are
in
the
background,
so
the
site
design.
You
know,
as
I
kind
of
mentioned,
with
the
town.
B
B
That
kind
of
buffers
those
buildings
between
this
project
and
the
mcdonald
neighborhood.
B
Planting
with
landscaping
to
help
buffer
the
parking
spaces
from
their
neighborhoods.
B
To
the
west,
so
the
the
parking
area
and
the
buffer
yard
helps
accomplish
a
pretty
big.
B
Spatial
distance
between
these
buildings
and
neighborhood
that
helps
accomplish.
B
B
West
granted,
the
buildings
that
are
to
the
west
of
this
are
are
only
two
and
they're.
B
Two-Story
structures,
but
we
were
concerned
with
the
impact
of
the
massing
of
building
7.
B
Story
to
help
break
up
the
massing
along
the
buildings
to
the
west
of
this,
so
I'll
kind
of.
B
Step
through
a
little
bit
more
of
the
renderings
of
the
proposed
buildings,
so
this
on
the
the.
B
B
Would
have
apartments
on
the
upper
three
floors,
the
parking
garage
on
the
bottom
two
floors.
B
Is
to
facilitate
access
to
the
crossing
warehouse,
so
while
that
easement
is
there,
you
know
an.
B
Important
thing
that
I
need
to
point
out
and
that
we
mentioned,
I
think,
with
the
plan
commission.
B
B
B
So
a
minimum
of
that
site
would
be
landscaped,
while
this
particular
rendering
doesn't
show
that.
B
Doesn't
give
that
appearance
as
it
appears
to
be
a
hundred
percent,
the
district
ordinance
that.
B
So
moving
north,
you
can
see
the
next
mixed-use
building.
Petitioners
have
kind
of
carved
out.
B
You
can
see
the
four
floors
of
apartments
that
would
be
above
that.
B
B
Of
the
building
to
provide
some
pedestrian
orientation
along
the
building,
as
well
as
canopies.
B
B
B
Purposes
as
well
as
just
to
provide
a
you
know,
great
amenity
and
incentive
for
folks
that
are.
B
Of
the
screen
and
then
mixed
use
buildings
go
on
the
the
left
side
of
the
screen.
There.
B
B
Of
these
buildings
from
the
from
the
switch
yard
part,
so
with
that
the
plan
commission
did.
B
And
the
conditions
that
are
listed
on
the
screen
here,
you
know
I'll
certainly
just
take
a
minute.
B
To
point
out
that
the
buildings
within
the
area
within
this
development
would
be
leed
certified.
B
Leed
certification
and
then
the
the
two
mixed
use
buildings
to
the
south
would
be.
B
Of
all
of
the
units
within
this
project
to
meet
the
affordability
guidelines
that.
B
Are
outlined
in
the
udo,
so
those
are
certainly
very
substantial
elements
to
this
project
as.
A
Thank
you,
mr
garlic.
I
wonder
if
you
could
unshare
your
screen.
A
A
A
In
our
packet
number,
two
says
that
the
district
ordinance
shall
be
amended
to
allow
maximum
eighty.
A
A
maximum
height
shall
be
limited
to
four
stories
or
fifty
feet,
but
in
the
text
of
your
memo.
A
It
says
65
feet
but
step
back
on
the
on
the
west
side
of
the
building,
so
which
is
the
actual.
A
Height
limit,
yes,
so
the
the
height
limit
for
the
building
was
approved
at
65
feet.
B
Accordingly,
so
in
the
in
the
packet,
you
should
have.
B
The
district
ordinance
labeled
thompson
tract
epud
amendment
zoning
rules
of
revision.
Three
one.
B
A
B
B
That
to
reflect
the
condition
that
got
modified
from
the
plan
commission,
I
apologize.
A
Okay,
just
so
as
we're
clear
all
right,
yes,
can
we
hear
from
the
petitioner?
Yes,
I.
A
Was
just
getting
to
that?
Thank
you
thanks
for
the
reminder,
would
the
petitioner
like
to.
A
Mr
doug
bruce
was
there
at
plan
commission.
Do
I
see
him
here.
B
Okay,
hello
yeah,
I
believe
doug
bruce
is
unmuted
now,
or
can
I
mute
himself?
Okay,
thank
you.
C
C
A
good
job
of
presenting
the
the
project
we've
worked
on
for
quite
some
time.
I
think.
C
There's
some
you
know:
we've
made
quite
a
few
changes
that
we've
as
we
have
worked
with.
C
C
Building
you
know,
we've
had
no
real
discussions
with
with
mr
shreve
on
his
portion
of
the
building.
C
Proposed
a
project
that
was
a
pretty
I'll
say,
a
medium
density.
The
city
had
had
a
plan.
C
Put
together
that
wasn't
released
that
had
showed
quite
high
density
in
a
few
parking.
C
Family
homes
on
this
site,
so
it
was
quite
the
discussion
on
getting
to
this
point.
We
initially.
C
C
Further
north
on
the
trail,
norton
I'd
say
closer
to
cardinal
spirit,
so
there
was
a
fear.
C
That
we
had
is
that
that
this
development,
which
right
now
most
the
south
hillside
lot,
which.
C
C
C
And
and
others
that
want
to
retire
or
live
next
to
the
park
in
an
affordable
setting.
But
we
did.
C
Need
to
to
keep
the
commercial,
let's
say
to
make
it
something
that
will
work
because
really.
C
The
park
from
november
through
march
is
a
pretty
inactive
place
because
of
cold
weather
snow.
C
In
the
summer
and
decide
they
want
to
drive
and
visit
something
in
the
in
the
winter.
C
Already
have
30
spaces
in
that
building
that
are
taken
through
other
agreements.
Mr
shreve.
C
C
To
the
west
of
lot
for
the
the
tall,
the
taller
building,
there's
ten
spaces
leased
to
them.
C
To
use
as
well
those
aren't
single
family
homes,
those
are
more
apartments
or.
C
C
C
Add
mr
tom
brennan,
the
owner
of
of
this
part
of
the
site,
is
on
this
call
and
jeff
daniel
our.
C
Civil
engineer
is
also
here
to
answer
questions
as
well.
What
I
would
end
with
is
that
we
tried.
C
C
The
way
on
on
each
lot,
as
well
as
coming
forth
with
something
with
standards
set
so
high
for
our.
C
C
C
So
it
is
our
hope
that
that
you
find
everything
that
we've
done
here
to
your
liking
and
and.
C
And
we
can
try
to
to
come
up
with
something
that
will
work
for
everybody
and
make
this
a
nice.
C
A
Thanks,
mr
bruce
all
right:
do
my
colleagues
have
questions
either
for
the
petitioner
or.
D
The
the
non-town
home
buildings
will
they
be
apartment
buildings?
Will
they
be
condos.
C
C
Put
together
with
zero
lot
lines
between
the
units,
so
those
will
be
units
that
could
be
sold.
D
C
D
C
D
D
C
C
That's
a
good
question:
does
it
have
to
be
hillside
drive
or
can
the
street
address
literally.
D
B
Drive
address
but
call
that
parking
lot
give
that
a
street
name
just
for
addressing
purposes.
D
Front
doors
are
facing
the
beeline
trail,
I
you
know
so.
I've
got
more
questions
but
I'll
follow.
D
Up
I
want
I
want,
I
just
wanted
to
put
that
out
there
for
people
to
think
about.
Thank
you.
E
Sure
I
I
have
a
bunch
so
I'll,
just
kind
of
jump
in
somewhere
too,
and
thank
you
again.
E
Yet
to
mr
gurlick
and
the
petitioner
for
your
presentation
so
far
and
answering
our
questions.
E
I
guess
I'll
ask
about
the
affordable
units.
First,
it
looks
like
15
of
the
units
in
both.
E
Okay
and
related
to
that
there's
a
a
portion
of
the
udo
that
provides
a
number
of
of.
E
They
should
be
approved
and
let
me
let
me
see
if
I
can
pull
up
the
right
spot
here.
E
What
the
incentives
in
the
affordable
housing
incentives
are
by
some
amount.
I
think
it's
either.
E
10
more
units
or
10
lower
ami
than
the
udo
incentives
and
for
affordable
housing
incentives.
B
Is
certainly
dealing
with
the
establishment
of
new
puds,
so,
as
certainly
you
guys
are
aware.
B
This
thompson
beauty
is
an
existing
beauty,
so
for
amendments
for
some
of
the
amendments
that
we.
B
Mixed
use
within
the
pud,
you
know
elevated
standards
for
sustainable
design,
affordable.
B
B
B
This
same
standard
here
and
again,
you
know,
while
that
petition
itself
wasn't
a
mixed
use.
B
You
know
it
was
an
improvement
within
the
pud,
so
we
just
used
the
section
that
I
just.
B
Referenced
regarding
the
15,
so
the
section
that
you
looked
at
councilmember
flaherty.
B
Would
absolutely
be
something
we
look
at
when
we
are
establishing
a
brand
new
pud?
Okay,
so
the.
E
F
Thanks
this
is
going
back
to
the
sidewalk
on
hillside
drive
that
is
getting.
F
How
long
is
it
smaller
and
like
exactly?
Why
does
it
have
to
be
smaller,
so
the
current
standard.
B
Out
for
six
foot
sidewalks
within
the
community
and
then
you
know
a
minimum
seven
foot
tree
plot.
B
You
know
we
we
try
to
balance,
you
know
the
tree
plot
with
the
sidewalk
width
as
best
as
possible.
B
B
Street,
it's
very
narrow,
hillside
drive
is
not
centered
in
that,
so
it
it's.
It's
it's
become.
B
B
Less
than
what
would
be
required
to
squeeze
in
everything
so
and
again,
you
know,
like
I.
B
B
A
Building
seven,
the
one
south
of
hillside
drive,
which
has
that
easement.
A
I'm
wondering
about
what
it's
going
to
look
like
for
pedestrians,
walking.
A
By
it
I
know
downtown,
we
we
require
parking
garages
first
floor
parking
garages
to
have.
A
You
know
some
kind
of
interest
for
pedestrians,
you
know
art
or
some
kind
of
decorative
surface.
A
Covering
or
something
like
that,
could
you
speak
to
what
is
planned
for
this
building.
A
Well,
I
guess,
mr
garlic,
if
you
could
start
by
what's
required
and
then
maybe.
A
The
petitioner
could
talk
about
what's
planned,
to
make
this
attractive
from
a
ground
level.
B
See
the
aerial
of
this
building
7
site
with
a
red
box
around
the
petitioners
portion,
so
there.
B
That
separates
this
lot
from
the
switch
yard
park.
So,
ordinarily,
you
know
if
you
know,
for.
B
B
Between
this
and
the
trail,
you
know
it
made
that
a
little
bit
more
difficult.
They
do
still.
B
Does
that
answer
questions
so
you
had
sent
me
some
details
from
the
udo
on
primary.
A
This
might
look
like
to
people
passing
by
sure.
First
again,
you
know
our
our
our.
C
C
Commission,
I
I
believe
or
planning
would
have
a
review
on
it,
but
in
the
beginning
we
won't
just.
C
C
C
C
C
C
A
Yes,
indeed,
it
does.
Thank
you
other
questions
from
committee
members,
council,
member
bowling.
G
Thank
you,
so
I'm
trying
to
understand
the
practical
parking
ratio
collectively
on
this.
D
Placed
here
with
an
offside
agreement
with
storage
express
is
that
right.
C
C
D
D
C
C
D
What
are
your
goals
for
for
parking
when
you
say
enough,
you
know
like
I'd
like
to
be
more.
D
Specific,
in
other
words,
you
know
like
who
is
going
to
manage
the
parking
for
residents,
are.
D
They
reserved
for
residents
or
can
the
parking
for
residents
also
be
used
by
customers
like
how.
C
D
C
It's
possible,
yes,
I
think
jeff
fano
did
our
parking
numbers,
our
ratio
numbers
for
us.
C
C
C
C
D
Of
your
parking,
in
other
words,
that
you
want
commercial
customers
to
be
using
the.
D
D
Parking
and
is
there
anything
we
can
do
to
make
sure
that,
because
I
mean
there's
also
going.
D
D
Gates
may
not
be
necessary
if
you've
got
effective
towing.
You
know
and
patrol
of
your
of.
A
Councilmember
rosenberger
did
you
have
other
questions?
You
know
I
had.
F
Can
you
can
we
know?
I
have
not
watched
the
plan
commission
meeting
so
just
curious
as
to
why.
F
One
person
voted
against
this
at
plan.
Commission.
I
think
it
was
a
7-1
vote.
To
be
honest,
I
really.
B
B
That
now
there
was
playing
commissioner
herrera
and
he
did
not
give
any
comments.
I
I
don't
know.
F
Okay,
thank
you,
councilmember
flaherty,
let's
see
if
we
can
hear
you.
Yes
can
you
hear
me
now.
E
Yes,
very
good
when
I
have
too
many
things
running
on
my
computer
on
occasion,
the
audio.
E
Planning
staff
is
that
most
puds
in
the
city
are
being
brought
into
alignment
with
some.
E
E
Comes
with
some
different
requirements
than
than
what
the
proposed
pd
zoning
rules
are
here.
B
Our
list
of
one
of
the
prospective
puds
to
rezone
to
a
current
zoning
district.
I
believe
the.
B
We
went
with
that
guidance
from
the
administration,
okay,
I'll
ask
a
related
follow-up
and
I
guess.
E
To
me
that
has
some
bearing
on
I'm
gonna,
have
to
think
more
about
this
and
ask
some
questions.
E
Of
our
council,
attorneys
and
and
and
staff
probably,
but
to
your
earlier
comment
about.
E
E
Think
the
fact
that
this
could
be
rezoned
to
an
existing
zoning
district
in
the
in
the.
E
Be
kind
of
functionally
a
new
pud
or
a
new
zoning
district,
but
there's
another
alternative
which.
E
Is
to
rezone
it
to
mixed-use,
neighborhood
scale
or
mixed-use
medium
scale?
I
I
think
I
would.
E
E
In
the
in
the
udo
that
that
dictates
how
we
consider
planned
unique
developments,
that's.
E
A
max
impervious
surface
percentage
of
60
percent-
here
we
have
80,
at
least
in
a
number.
E
Of
on
a
number
of
the
lots,
I
think
there's
probably
a
number
of
implications
to
that
things.
E
I
can
think
of
are
drainage,
heat
island
effects
and
and
also
what
the
existing
use
is.
I.
E
Mean
since
it
is,
you
know
almost
100
impervious
right
now,
as
the
petitioner
noted.
So
what
is.
E
E
Districts
in
the
udo,
and
is
that
mitigated
in
any
way
by
a
park
nearby
or
green
roofs
like.
E
B
Large,
the
largest
park
within
the
community,
so
certainly
on
every
single
given
property.
B
B
B
Property
to
maximize
density
and
the
proximity
of
this
to
neighborhood
park
kind
of
helps
offset.
B
B
E
Correct
that
was
not
an
adopted
plan
and
if
maybe,
if
perhaps
the
petitioner
could
speak
to.
E
E
Or
that
they've
looked
at
sure
I
mean
I
could,
I
could
add
part
of
it,
at
least
for
the
lead
part.
C
C
A
live
roof
on
them,
but
these
will
certainly
be
roofs
that
will
reduce
heat
island
effect.
C
If
we
can,
it
would
be
nice
again
to
gain
points
and
do
live.
Roofs
on
the
multi-family.
C
C
C
C
C
C
Large
green
space
that
we
didn't
need
to
be
held
to
the
same
standard
as
places
where
they're.
C
They
may
not
have
anything
near
them
that
are,
you
know
the
the
kind
of
impervious
surface
we.
C
This
large
green
space
that
the
city
has
that
allows
us
to
take
advantage
of
that
that
this
is.
C
C
B
B
You
know
so
in
a
given
situation.
If
this
was
a
straight
zoning
district,
you
know
if
it
was.
B
Of
the
comprehensive
plan,
so
that's
that's
where
the
pud
process
gives
more
flexibility
for.
B
Accomplishes
what
we're
looking
to
achieve
thanks
all
right!
I
wanted
to
follow
up
on
that
with
mr.
A
A
B
A
Okay,
all
right,
if
my
colleagues
don't
mind,
I
it's
6
34
and
we
have
one
other.
A
I
I
did
have
one
request
in
chat
from
jefferson,
shreve,
and
so
I'm
I
believe
that
he.
A
And
mr
shreve,
if
you'd
like
to
go
ahead
and
state
your
name
for
the
record
and
then
you'll.
A
I
I
You
wish
to
enable
that,
however,
you
want
to
you
want
to
handle
that
we
haven't
heard
from.
I
Petitioner
directly
tonight,
I
I
characterize
myself
at
this
point
as
a
remonstrator
as
the.
I
Owner
of
the
property
to
the
north
and
the
the
leaseholder
of
the
parking
spaces
to
the
south.
I
The
system
I
appreciate
your
wrestling
with
this
complicated
layered
petition,
both
at
council.
I
Case
to
advance
from
planned
commission
to
to
to
council
member
rosenberger's
question.
I
Is
so
capable
of
this
sort
of
work
as
well
as
jeff
daniel,
as
well
as
mr
grulick,
in
planning.
I
Professional
help-
and
I
don't
mean
council
but
but
but
but
but
legal
counsel
in
the
form
of.
I
I
This
location
and
if
I
could
offer
my
time
to
mr
mcbride
I'd
appreciate
that
sure,
we'll
we'll.
J
I
think
it's
blocking
me
from
that.
I
appreciate
the
committee
and
council
members
time.
J
And
everyone
else's
time
here
today
my
client
storage
express
holdings
which.
J
J
J
Of
the
total
property
and
there's
egress
and
ingress
rights
over
the
west
side
of
that.
J
J
And
so
what
we
don't
have
before
us
and
what
we
haven't
been
told
yet.
J
J
J
Everyone's
time
sure
next
it
looks
like
we
have,
ms
cox
ash
is
that
that
is
correct
and
then.
A
Just
one
side
note,
ian
andrew
gunther
would
also
like
to
speak.
He
sent
a
message
in
the.
A
Should
be
able
to
unmute
themselves
now,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
okay,
we
paul
ash
and
elizabeth
cox.
K
K
K
K
K
It's
far
too
dense
for
this
area.
Infrastructure
infrastructure
as
well.
K
A
Thank
you,
miss
cox,
ash,
mr
gunther
would
be
next.
I
believe
he
should
be
able
to
unmute
himself.
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
A
D
D
M
Thank
you
very
much.
My
name
is
tom
brennan,
I'm
basically,
I
would
say
a
lifelong.
M
Resident
of
bloomington
I've
had
a
number
of
businesses
that
I've
started
and
and
and
run.
M
For
periods
of
time
so
and
so
forth,
and
and
this
this
project
is
something
entirely
new
to
me
as.
M
M
Being
a
little
bit
of
a
railroad,
buff
myself,
I
suppose,
but
as
things
have
evolved,
the.
M
Beeline
trail
was
a
major,
a
major
factor
in
what
is
actually
happening
now.
M
And
when
the
b-line
was
originally
built,
it
was.
It
was
interesting
because.
M
People
took
a
new
interest
in
in
renting
space
in
my
building,
particularly
some.
You
know.
M
Tech
companies,
home
healthcare
businesses,
just
a
variety
of
different
things,
a
crossfit.
M
But
beyond
that,
I'm
not
a
developer.
I
find
that
as
we
go
through
life,
we
find
ourselves
in
new.
M
Situations
that
we
try
to
adapt
to
and
make
the
best
out
of
them,
and
and
this
is.
M
Quite
a
process
I
must
say
and-
and
I
do
appreciate
everybody's
concerns.
M
I
think
it's
important
that
that
all
points
of
view
be
aired
and
and
we've
adapted
to.
M
Been
addressed
and
and
and
beyond
that,
I
did
want
to
speak
just
briefly
about
the.
M
Because
it
currently
is
two
distinct
properties,
the
only
thing
that
we
really
share
together.
M
Is
a
common
roof
that
they
are
to
the
north
sourcing?
For
us
they
are
responsible
for
their.
M
That
consists
of
four
large
columns
that
support
the
roof
structure
of
both
buildings.
M
Our
intent
going
forward
would
simply
be
in
terms
of
preserving
the.
M
The
integrity
of
of
storage,
express's
portion
of
the
building
of
their
building
would
be
to
go.
M
Would
ultimately
anticipate
deeding
an
extra
foot
about
12
inches
on
the
south
side
of.
M
The
structural
elements
of
their
roof
and
and
building
essentially
would
be
entirely
preserved.
M
We
would
also
anticipate
since
the
facade
of
the
south
end
of
their
building
would
be
facing.
M
To
the
people
that
that
would
be
potentially
living
in
in
this
new
development,
so
I
I
hope.
M
And
and
also
elevations
and
drainage,
and
things
like
that,
but
I
just
want
to
say
one
thing
that.
M
And
that
is
that,
when
I
bought
the
building,
we
essentially
had
over
time
thousands
of
semi.
M
Trucks
coming
and
going
to
the
property
to
the
building,
to
the
loading
docks
and
so
on
and.
M
So
forth
and
and
we've
never
had
any
real
real
issues
I
mean,
I
don't
ever
believe
anybody's
ever.
M
Complained
about
all
the
trucks
coming
and
going
and
if
I
suppose
we
have
a
delivery
truck.
M
Coming
in
and
dropping
off
some
you
know
food
items
or
whatever
to
one
of
the
commercial.
M
I'd
like
to
let
jeff
fanier
go
ahead
and
speak
if
he's
interested
in
picking
it
up.
A
A
N
N
The
what
used
to
be
called
the
administrative
building
council
doug
can
tell
me
what
it
is
now.
N
N
The
flow
to
the
east
towards
the
our
property
into
bios
whales
and
then
then
discharge.
N
Into
an
existing
swale
that
runs
parallel
to
the
beeline
trail,
the
storm
water
runoff
is.
N
N
About
that
plan,
commission,
as
well
as
tonight,
about
the
sanitary
sewer
in
the
area
blowing
up.
N
The
the
city
utilities
just
spent
somewhere
around
10
million
dollars,
improving
the
sanitary.
N
Sewer
in
in
the
switzerland
park
area,
increasing
its
capacity
and
reducing.
N
So
that
should
not
be
an
issue
anymore.
We
did
a
turning
traffic
turning
analysis.
N
N
I
believe
that
I'm
I've
covered
the
issues
that
deal
with
the
civil
part
of
things.
N
There
has
been
talk
that
look
that
we
need
to
increase
the
amount
of
increase
the
amount.
N
Dense
more
urban
project
similar
to
downtown,
which
has
higher
impervious
surface
areas
and.
N
A
Would
my
colleagues
be
averse
to
just
moving
to
comment
and
then
picking
up
with.
M
M
To
the
east,
where
the
elevation
is
probably
22
feet
next
to
the
trail
very
good.
Thank
you.
D
Some
outstanding
questions
that
I'd
like
to
be
able
to
ask,
but
I'm
trying
to
be
mindful
of
time.
D
Increase
in
height
overlooking
their
neighborhood.
I
am
sympathetic
to
this
idea.
D
To
you
know
not
build
a
residential
project,
but
I
would
like
to
to
think
more
about
that.
D
And
but
in
general
I
have
some,
you
know
like
narrow
and
broad
questions.
I
keep.
D
D
Thing
because
it's
not,
but
we
would
have
more
control
over
student
housing
if
we
had
left
as
a.
D
So
I'm
curious
about
that
in
general
from
the
administration.
As
far
as
this
project
goes.
D
You
know
I
I
do
have
a
minor
concern
about
the
naming
like.
I
would
like
the.
D
Directly
facing
hillside
can
remain
300
and
301
west
hillside,
if
they,
you
know,
were
to
name.
D
Where
does
a
pizza
driver
go
to
deliver
pizza
and
so
on?
The
I've
got
a
lot
of
thoughts
here.
D
I'm
really
concerned
about
parking.
I
don't
have
enough
information
yet
about
how
the
0.58.
D
Ratio
was
calculated.
I
understand
that
there's
pre-existing
parking
agreements
that
the.
D
Developer
wants
to
to
retain
that's
fine,
especially
considering
that
that's
that.
D
This
property
shareability
is
is
is
of
paramount
importance,
and
I
definitely
believe
that
that.
D
Number
should
be
below
0.5.
If
it's
already
that
way,
then
I'd
like
to
see
that
demonstrated.
D
D
D
Will
they
actually
be
opened
and
used
by
people?
That's
one
thing
I
wanted
to
find
out
about.
D
On
a
hill
very
distant,
and
so
I
wondered
you
know
like.
D
I
I
couldn't
quite
tell
what
the
ground
floor
I
mean
it
just
looks
like
a
big
sidewalk
or
patio
or.
D
D
Few
close-up
views
of
the
west
side
of
the
proposed
buildings.
You
know,
that's
the.
D
The
west,
all
we
saw
were
the
facades
to
the
east,
how
the
they
would
you
know
appear
on
the.
D
D
The
buildings
that
they
propose
to
build,
so
I
I
expect
to
see
renderings
as
detailed
on
the.
D
D
Drive
up
and
park
in
the
building,
if
they're
using
their
car,
you
know
what
is
the
the
detail.
D
Of
the
facade
that
faces
hillside
on
you
know,
building
six
and
seven
and
finally,
I
would
say.
D
I
mean
I
for
one
have
had
enough
of
drone
views
of
properties.
It
was
mentioned
earlier
that.
E
Public
for
commenting
and
presenting,
I
have
a
number
of
questions
I'll
be
following
up
with
via.
E
E
E
Amendment
I
we've
heard
some
comment.
You
know
some
comments
from
the
petitioner
and
and
from.
E
In
some
respects,
are
you
know,
depending
on
your
perspective,
better,
so
definitely.
E
Something
I
want
to
think
more
about
a
few
possible
reasonable
conditions
that.
E
Related
to
some
of
these
concerns
that
I
think
we
could
consider
and
would
like
to
get
feedback.
E
Discuss
and
have
those
ahead
of
our
next
committee
meeting
one
small
thing:
I
I
it's
a
little.
E
Disappointing
to
me
that
the
town
homes
don't
connect
directly
each
one
to
the
b
line
in.
E
The
form
of
like
a
sidewalk
or
or
or
path
in
a
similar
way
to
the
houses
that
are
south
of.
E
Their
individual
path
from
their
front
door
to
the
b
line,
and
I
think,
if
we're
trying
to
encourage.
E
That
as
a
front
and
encourage
interaction
with
the
b
line,
it
would
be
better
to
have
each.
E
E
Path,
if
there's
concerns
about
you,
know
privacy
and
security,
and
that
sort
of
thing
I
think.
E
Kind
of
afterthought
in
that
regard,
I
wonder
I
I
share
concerns
about
the
street.
E
An
idea
that
it
might
extend
to
the
north,
you
know
if,
if
the
other
warehouse
property.
E
Redevelops
at
some
point
in
the
future,
and
I
wonder
if
having
angled
parking
or
even
back-end,.
E
In
any
adopted
plan,
it's
it's
just
sort
of
the
direction
they
would
like
to
take.
It.
E
I
think
we
need
to
keep
thinking
about
it,
but
I
I
don't
think
we
actually
have.
E
Explicit
guidance
saying
that
should
be
the
case
and
I
certainly
welcome
staffer
to.
E
Correct
me
on
that
again,
following
up
the
email,
if
I'm
misunderstanding,
but
I'll
leave.
E
It
at
that
for
now.
Thank
you
again
to
all
who
spoke
tonight
and
I'll
be
following
up
soon.
A
A
All
right
and
I'll
just
add
a
few
things
I
I
walked
the
area
last
weekend
and.
A
You
know
kind
of
peering
from
madison
street
through
between
the
houses.
A
A
Your
back
property
line
to
the
new
multi-family
housing,
so
I
know
that
the
multi-family
housing
is.
A
So
I'm
a
little
torn
on
this.
As
far
as
the
impervious
surface,
I
I
agree
with
the.
A
A
Of
kind
of
a
post-industrial
space,
and
they
need
to
also
make
their
figures,
add
up.
A
And-
and
you
know,
have
a
certain
number
of
units,
so
I
would
normally
just.
A
A
And
a
variety
of
housing
types
close
to
where
people
play
work
and
live
so
that.
A
A
To
pour
this
to
a
second
committee
discussion
so
moved
to
the
meeting
of.
A
March
24th
and
so
I'll
just
go
down
the
row
here:
council,
member
flaherty.
Yes,.
A
A
A
rezone
very
southern
end
of
city
of
bloomington
city
limits.
B
Thank
you.
So
this
is
a
request
from
bill
brown
for
a
property
that
is
at.
B
3100
west
fullerton
prank-
this
is
on
the
very
far
southern
outskirts
of
the
city.
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
Propose
to
exclude
those
from
the
the
list
of
uses,
so
I
do
have
a
slide
or
two
here
outlining.
B
B
Big
box
retails
vehicle
fleet
operations,
so
some
of
the
uses
that
we
really
found.
B
B
So
the
employment
district,
as
you
can
see
here,
stretches
along
for
the
most
part
along
this.
B
B
Around
that
were
approved
for
other
office
park
uses,
so
one
of
the
the
things
that
we
certainly.
B
Wanted
to
point
out,
and
that
are
important
to
point
out
from
the
comprehensive
plan
that
deal.
B
B
B
B
See
a
lot
of
overlap,
you
see,
uses
that
do
occur
in
both
districts
and
certainly
while
there
be.
B
B
Uses
or
other
employment
uses
will
go
in
there,
so
you
know,
as
you
have
restaurants
come
in
as
you.
B
B
B
B
B
Land
designated
for
those
uses,
especially
at
this
location,
you
know
as
well
as
we're
concerned.
B
With
setting
a
precedent
for
other
land
that
is
designated
as
employment,
that's
zoned
as
mixed.
B
This
property
is
not
easily
accessible
from
the
internal
streets
from
the
community
within.
B
Bloomington
fullerton
pike,
you
know
possibly
could
possibly
connect
to
adjacent
roads
in
the.
B
B
B
At
making
amendments
that
will
hopefully
be
coming
to
the
planning
commission,
the
council,
to.
B
However,
playing
commission
and
staff
did
not
feel
that
it
was
appropriate
to
rezone
this.
B
To
the
mixed
use
corridor
district,
so
the
the
planning
commission
had
a
wide
range
of
opinions.
B
List
of
uses
to
give
better
marketability
and
possible
redevelopment
for
this
piece
of
property.
B
So
they
did
vote
to
forward
this
to
you
with
no
recommendation
with
the
hopes
that.
B
Conversations
would
continue
to
happen
on
this
property
at
the
council
level
and
so
that.
B
Is
that
is
how
it
left
the
planning
commission.
So
with
that
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
A
Thanks,
mr
garlic,
do
we
have
somebody.
O
Thank
you.
Well,
there
are
several
things
to
talk
about
and
a
couple
of
comments.
I
guess
I
want
to.
O
O
O
Very
small,
but
this
is
the
comparison
there
had
it
that
pulled
from
the
table
of
uses.
The
use
is.
O
O
To
the
end,
you
have
the
wind
energy,
not
a,
not
a
use,
that's
going
to
happen
at
this
site.
O
So
this
is
not
a
question
of
what
is
lost
from
going
with
mc
compared
to
the
me,
because.
O
O
Is
the
pud
in
the
list
of
permitted
uses
from
the
in
the
pud
and
in
those
permitted
uses.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
In
property
taxes
that's
generated
through
the
development
of
the
area
and
relies
on
that.
O
Infrastructure
that
tif's
not
going
to
get
used
out
here,
we
know
that
it's,
it
hasn't
happened.
O
O
O
O
Ground,
more
marketable,
more
likely
to
develop
even
for
the
the
employment-based
uses
is,
is.
O
O
O
Use
in
both
zones
manufacturing
arson,
both
zones,
contractors
yard
permitted
in
both
zones.
O
O
The
concern
that
staff
staff
is
expressed
that
eric
commented
on
earlier
is
that
the
if.
O
O
O
Development
of
the
properties
he
owns,
it's
not,
and
so
this
is
just
the
next
one
and
and.
O
O
O
O
O
O
Would
come
there,
they
will
be
bringing
in
trainee
students
from
a
regional
area.
That's
why.
O
O
O
O
A
From
the
committee
members
on
2108,
yes,
council,
member
volun.
D
On
this,
but
like
I
mean
I'm
trying
to
grasp
the
issues
that
the
plan
commission.
B
The
gist
of
it
there
you
know,
we
have
certain
land
and
let
me
share
my
screen
again
and.
B
I
can
just
kind
of
show
you
what
we're,
what
we're
looking
at
with
the
overall
comprehensive
plan.
B
Aside
for
that,
so
you
can
see
this
strip
of
area
along
I-69.
You've
got
the
area
on
the
west
side.
B
Of
69
over,
I
believe,
that's
where
sam's
club
and
where
park
37
is
you've,
got
the
areas
along.
B
West
fountain
drive
and
then
the
thompson
pd
and
then
some
of
the
areas
around
the
patterson.
B
Park
patterson
point
pud,
just
as
south
south
of
that,
where
landmark
is,
when
you
say.
D
B
No
I'm
so
well,
so
let
me
I
apologize.
Let
me
clarify
so
employment-centered
designations.
B
Office
park
uses
certainly,
as
I
mentioned
as
you
look
along
I-69
along
the
south
side.
You've.
B
B
B
B
D
B
B
B
Some
restaurant
uses,
however,
all
of
the
area
that
are
designated
as
employment
center
within.
B
B
D
D
O
O
Hearing
believing
there
was
a
consensus
on
that
issue,
that's
why
they
ended
up
with
the
vote
that.
O
O
O
D
To
smallwood,
which
is
now
the
avenue
on
college,
and
that
was
approved
in
2003
before
the
udo.
D
O
O
Understand
that
so
back
to
just
to
wrap
up
on
your
question
where
we
started
mr
vollen
is,
is
I.
O
O
A
E
And
ms
gruliff
for
your
presentations,
I
was
looking
for
a
little
clarification
on.
E
Actually,
just
the
restaurant
discussion,
I
I
you
know,
I'm
looking
at
the
udo
as
we're
talking.
E
And
some
other
things-
and
I
just
see
restaurant
as
a
permitted
use
for
both
districts.
But
there
is.
E
Or
clarify
with
regard
to
the
restaurant
use
as
allowed
as
permitted
in
the
me
zone,
and
what.
B
That
asterisk
refers
to
that
you
specific
standard
which
limits
it
to
2500
square
feet.
E
B
An
office
park
that
wanted
to
have
some
kind
of
a
food
establishment
in
there.
You
know
they
wanted.
B
That
was
going
to
come
in
and
develop
a
building
on
a
standalone
property
by
itself.
E
Hotels
and
motels
or
hotels,
I
suppose,
would
that
be
subject
to
the
same
square
foot.
E
Requirement,
even
if
it's
located
within
a
hotel
well
without
saying
100
certainty,
you
know
so.
B
B
To
make
the
classification
that
this
restaurant
is
only
serving
the
hotel,
so
it's
an
accessory
use.
B
Really
interpretation
that
we
would
have
to
make
so
in
this
case
here
with
the
me
district.
E
Okay,
so
did
that
answer
your
question
matt?
I
think
so
so,
even
even
though
in
other
contexts,
when.
E
Hotels
and
and
restaurants
are
both
permitted
uses
and
it
doesn't
come
up
in
this
context.
Me.
E
If
a
restaurant
was
to
be
situated
within
the
hotel,
it
would
your
interpretation.
E
A
Other
questions:
oh,
go
ahead;
actually
just
a
quick
follow-up
on
related
uses,
yeah
with
with.
E
Mr
carmen
you'd
mentioned
a
training
center
and
I
know
this
is
all
preliminary
and
just.
E
Expressions
of
interest
with
that,
do
you
believe
that
would
be
a
you
know:
a
permitted.
O
O
E
Training
center
a
permitted
or
conditional
use
within
the
me
district.
I
think
I,
as
I.
O
F
Like
wrap
my
head
around
it
still
like
is
the
problem.
You
are
not
getting.
O
Look
closely,
the
emmy
uses
at
least
those
that
are
being
really
touted
as
part
of
the
enemy
use.
O
O
Amenities
available
on-site
for
their
attendees
just
more
general
than
the
mc
zone
with
the.
F
In
it
no
well,
no,
there
has
not
been
when
I
say
that
the
development's
been
dormant.
O
O
A
study
and
analysis
of
this
property
and
there's
pretty
favorable
analysis
in
terms
of.
O
Statewide,
it
nothing
came
from
it
a
lot
of
time
and
effort
when
that
and
a
lot
of
effort.
O
Over
an
extended
period
of
time,
that's
why
we're
in
part
looking
to
to
kick-start
it.
O
F
Okay,
thank
you.
If
I
could
just
do
a
follow
up
for
my
follow-up,
I
mean:
do
you
think,
there's.
F
O
O
O
A
All
right,
well,
I
wanted
to
ask
mr
garlic
more
about
two
things.
First
of
all,
the
road.
A
Extension
requirement
and
secondly,
the
the
tif
district:
if
could
you
provide
more
information.
A
About
those
two
items,
please,
yes,
certainly
so
the
transportation
plan
does
have
a
road.
B
Being
shown
going
through
this
property,
so
that
would
be
required
with
a
subdivision.
B
A
Or
partially
fund
the
road
extension
not
not
to
my
direct
knowledge
and
also
like
I
said,
I'm.
B
Not
sure
how
much
money
is
honestly
in
that
tif
fund
a
large
substantial
amount
that
was
used
for.
B
Switchard
park:
okay,
all
right!
That's
something
I
could
inquire,
maybe
with
the
controller
about.
D
D
So
I
guess
I
would
say
that
the
six
voted
neutrally.
Essentially,
they
abstained
of
the
two.
D
B
I
I
don't
have
that
vote
sheet
in
front
of
me,
some,
the
the
main
gesture.
The
concern
was
that
the.
B
So
those
two
folks
are
the
one,
the
two
and
the
one
that
abstain.
You
know
the
the
sentiment.
B
Was
you
know,
let's,
let's
send
at
least
some
some
general
recommendation
of
the
council
rather.
B
Than
nothing
so
that
was
the
concern
was
just
that
the
plane
commission
didn't
then
want
to
you.
D
Recommendation
neither
positive
nor
negative
to
characterize
it,
as
no
recommendation
is
confusing.
D
But
I
mean
they
they're
simply
neutral
on
this.
They
they
didn't,
have
a
yes
or
no
opinion.
B
D
D
B
E
Oh
gosh,
I
guess
just
a
sort
of
a
a
small
matter.
This
will
be.
E
Udo
mapping
that
has
now
been
kicked
off
at
the
plant
commission
is
that
right.
Mr
hurley.
B
Yes,
okay
and
is
the
petitioner
I
imagine
any,
does
it
not
get
to
this
level
of
granularity
at.
E
E
E
E
Things
in
progress
leading
to
development-
this
is
seemingly
a
fair
bit
more
speculative.
I'm.
E
Take
its
course
and
kind
of
see
see
where
we
were,
but
I
don't
know,
maybe
that's
all.
E
I
don't
know
if
you
have
thoughts
on
that,
mr
gurlick,
but
well,
and
I
don't
want
to
speak.
B
B
You
know
it
is,
I
guess,
somewhat
helpful
to
have
a
meeting
or
hearing
specifically
for
this
site
in.
B
B
B
General
they
wanted
to
initiate
this
faster
and
sooner
because
it
was
the
uncertainty
of
how.
O
Plan,
commission,
I
think
it's
due
march
29th
will
be
considered
ordinance
10,
which
is
all
the.
O
O
O
O
E
I
have
another
counsellor
piedmont
smith.
If,
if
it's
okay
to
follow
up,
yes
go
ahead,
it
has
to.
E
Do
with
more
more
again
with
the
the
road
that
would
be
triggered
by
subdivision
of
property.
E
Let's,
let's
say
a
training
center
hotel
and
restaurant
of
some
kind
are.
B
B
B
B
Property
and
any
rezoning
on
that
and
comments
heard
to
be
to
be
heard,
discussion
if
needed.
E
Okay,
thank
you,
and-
and
so
am
I
sort
of
misremembering
that
I
feel
like
some
other.
E
Thompson
pud
there's
a
question
of
how
and
when
it.
If
we,
if
we
would
develop
a
road
incrementally.
B
Limitations,
you
know
most
of
the
time
with
puds.
There
is
a
development
that
is
coming
forward,
that.
B
You
know
the
great
opera.
A
great
example
of
this
is
the
sudbury
pud.
B
Forward
it
was
very
speculative
in
nature,
so
there
were
just
different
triggers
that
were
set.
B
At
which
time
you
know,
each
pd
is
kind
of
different.
You
know,
like
renwick,
you
know.
B
D
Yeah
so,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure,
mr
grulick,
that
I
have
this
idea
down
right.
D
Mr
carmen's
concern
seems
to
be
if
an
individual
property
owner
doesn't
like
the
way
their.
The.
D
All
properties
at
once,
there's
no
way
for
one
property
to
be
amended,
at
least
not
at
the
council.
D
B
Yes,
that
is
correct
by
the
time
it
gets
to
council.
The
council
can
only
vote.
A
B
So
amendments
can
certainly
happen
during
the
plane.
Commission
hearings.
B
You
know
if
somebody
brings
forward,
you
know
a
a
disagreement
or
a
recommendation.
A
Ordinance
2108
the
rezone
at
fullerton
pike.
Please
use
the
raise
hand,
function.
A
A
Host
all
right,
seeing
none
we'll
go
back
to
committee
members.
D
D
Is
that
correct,
mr
grulick,
correct
okay,
so
basically
the
council
would
have
to
vote.
D
The
council
can't
really,
if
the
council
punts,
also
if
the
council,
you
know,
for
some
reason,
doesn't.
D
A
All
right,
it
is
almost
8
15
and
I
was
hoping
to
wrap
this
up
by
8
30.
So
unless
we
have.
A
Are
there
any
other
urgent
questions
at
this
point,
or
can
we
move
to
committee
member
comments.
A
Council,
member
of
olin,
I
mean
I'll
go
first,
I
am
as
ambivalent
as
the
plan
commission
is.
D
The
ask
here
because
it
is
based
on
a
lot
of
conditionals.
Well,
like
you
know,
do
we.
D
How
do
we
as
a
city
want
the
property
to
develop
the
comprehensive
plan,
since
we
want
it
to
be.
D
The
administration's
overall
sort
of
emphasis,
like
I
said
with
the
previous
petition.
D
D
D
Acceptable
in
a
place
like
this-
it's
not
explained-
I
I
don't
understand
it,
so
I
find
sort
of
an.
D
D
Very
good
arguments,
but
I
don't
know
that
it's
necessarily
the
council's
job
to.
D
35
years
you
know,
I'm
not
sure,
that's
our
problem,
you
know
it
really
depends
on
the
kind
of.
D
Would
really
like
to
hear
more
from
entities
who
are
not
directly
related
to
planning
or
the.
D
Petitioner,
so
you
know,
did
we
have
I
don't?
I
don't
even
know
if
there's
an
environmental.
F
F
Meetings
is
also
appropriate
here
and
planning
commission,
of
course,
and
I
mean
that's
what.
F
E
Thanks
and
my
colleagues
haven't
mentioned
yet
whether
they
would
like
to
go
to
another.
E
Committee
meeting
or
put
a
recommendation
tonight,
I
don't
have
particularly
strong.
E
E
But
but
it
is
perhaps
a
pretty
high
hurdle
to
to
sort
of
overcome
to
to
say
we
shouldn't.
E
Be
following
what
the
comprehensive
plan
suggests.
I
remember
deputy
mayor
eisen
once
talked
about.
E
Well
sure,
technically,
but
I
aspire
to
meet
it
and
I
feel
like
the
most
of
our
plans.
We.
E
To
bring
a
a
reason
petition
for
for
mc
asserting
that
me
won't
be
adequate
based
on.
E
On
the
past,
but
I
I
do
think
I-69
has
changed
the
context.
I
think
we
are
probably
looking
at.
E
E
Possible
that
areas
adjacent
to
this
will
will
be
annexed,
maybe
not,
but
that
could.
E
E
Developments
that
are
ready
to
go,
they
are
people
trying
to
move
forward
with
a
particular.
E
That
that's
an
argument
that
kind
of
cuts
both
ways
in
that
if
the
city
is
supposed
to
front.
E
We
are
going
to
see
development
that
will
increase
the
the
tax
our
tax
base
and
and
pay
for
that.
E
E
Sure
that
case
has
been
made
strongly
enough
yet,
and
I
think
likewise,
what
I've
heard
from.
E
Of
lean
against
a
positive
recommendation
on
the
on
the
the
the
proposed
rezone.
So
if.
A
I
started
the
evening
very
ambivalent
about
this
project,
but
the
more
I
think
about
it.
A
The
more
I
think
this
is
just
from
its
location,
this
is
sprawl
and
I
would
actually
prefer
not.
A
Drive
to
get
there
and
it'll
probably
be
you
know,
largely
people
from
outside
our
community.
A
I
default
to
the
comp
plan
and
I'm
not
really
inclined
to
to
make
development
on
this
parcel.
A
On
the
outskirts
of
the
city
easier,
I
also
don't
want
to
fund
infrastructure.
That
is
just.
A
Enabling
sprawl
development
now
I
do
realize
that
you
know
about
half
or
even
two-thirds
of.
A
The
site
has
already
been
scraped,
so
it's
not
like
a
total
green
space.
New
development.
A
And
that's
that's
not
a
great
great
development,
in
my
view,
so,
like
other
colleagues
have
said,
I.
D
Sorry
about
that
this
has
been
an
interesting
discussion
and
I'm
glad
to
have
heard
my.
D
Colleagues,
opinions
on
it,
I
I
don't
think
the
question
is,
I
mean
this
is
literally
not
sprawl.
D
D
I
find
to
be
just
almost
an
impossibility,
like
this
property
will
develop
eventually,
and
I.
D
Don't
have
a
particular
sympathy
for,
however
long
mr
brown
has
held
the
property,
who
knows.
D
D
It's
it
should
be
an
employment
center
like
I
I
I
still
know
what
what
it
practically
means.
D
I
mean:
are
we
envisioning
a
big
factory
and
that
we're
trying
to
keep
this
big.
D
Necessarily
industrial
per
se,
but
corporate
headquarters
or
something-
and
I
just.
D
Know
we'll
see
what
happens,
but
I
I
still
would
like
to
hear
from
other.
D
Like
you
know,
have
we
committed
all
the
money
in
the
immediate
future
to
to
other
places
in
the.
D
City,
you
know,
is
there
anything
more
specific
that
the
administration
really
does
want
to
see.
D
Here,
over
and
above
what
the
udo
and
the
map
say
is
allowed,
are
they
are
trying
to
focus
a.
D
D
G
You
know,
but
I
I
don't
want
my
opinion
to
be
mistaken-
for
sort
of
a
a
primary
concern
for
roi.
D
Had
more
time,
I
think
you
know
we
could
start
digging
into
that
question
some
more
but
I'll.
D
A
Right
well
we're
at
three
hours.
So,
let's
see,
if
there's
a
motion
out
there,
we
can
vote
on.
A
Anybody
move
do
pass
son
committee's
recommendation
for
ordinance,
2108.
A
Second,
all
right,
so
I'll
just
go
down
the
the
list
here.
Council,
member
rosenberger.
A
We
will
send
this
ordinance
2108
back
to
the
full
council,
with
a
do
pass
recommendation.