►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
It's
five
o'clock,
so
we
have
a
another
large
agenda.
So
let's
get
started
and
do
we
have
d.
A
A
E
A
Great
so,
let's
move
on
to
toa
staff
of
google
go
ahead.
G
Sorry
so
there's
spots
right
under
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
all
of
the
scuppers
in.
G
A
lot
of
water
damage
happening
right
now,
so
staff
approved
of
coa
so
that
they.
G
A
From
the
commissioners
and
then
comments
from
the
public,
so
let's
move
forward
to
coa
21-62.
G
So
cra
2162
was
actually
submitted
for
the
last
meeting
and
the
the
petitioner
requested
to.
G
G
G
G
The
new
garage
all
of
this
again
is
in
the
back
of
the
structure
just
for
a
little
bit
more.
G
G
G
Be
obscured
by
the
right-of-way
due
to
the
height
differential,
due
to
the
lost
topography.
G
In
the
packet
I'm
going
to
read
the
last
line,
the
neighborhood
residence
to
prove
both
of
the.
G
H
Yeah,
just
very
briefly
in
terms
of
the
so
barry
clapper
from
spring
point,
architects
and
wayne
and.
H
This
property
is
comprised
of
two
parcels.
The
existing
house
sits
along
the
middle
property.
H
Which
would
meet
the
current
zoning
width
and
size?
That's
something
they
plan
to
do
in.
H
In
the
future,
and
then
there
is
a
in
addition
to
the
north
of
the
house,.
H
Planned
for
the
future
as
well,
so
that
is
why
the
garage
is
located
exactly
behind.
H
The
house
and
the
other
thing
I
just
wanted
to
bring
to
your
attention.
H
H
Having
to
physically
connect
the
garage,
so
that
is
condition
considered
an
addition,
so
that
was.
H
Just
another
little
point
I
wanted
to
to
make
and
then
we're
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
I
No
questions
sam.
What
portion
of
this
application
will
require
a
variant.
H
It's
seven
feet
right
now,
and
so
we
are
asking
for
a
five
five
foot,
rear
setback
variant.
So.
A
I
thought
I
heard
him
here
duncan
barry.
How
does
that
at
percentage.
H
Physically
attached
to
the
house,
you
are
allowed
to
increase
the
use,
so
the
owners
until.
H
H
The
original
west
face
of
the
house
is
about
measures
of
the
exposure
is
about
four
and
a
half.
A
Go
ahead,
elizabeth!
Yes,
this
is
elizabeth
cox,
ash
from
the
neighborhood
association.
L
L
A
Mr
comments,
lee
no,
no,
actually
it
looks
great.
I
I
think
it's
terrific
john.
F
Don't
need
to
work
on
your
volume,
matt
bernard
no
comment.
D
To
the
bza
that
we
are
also
in
support
of
it,
along
with
the
neighborhood.
A
Chris
yeah,
I
support
it
and
I
think
we
should
put
that
in
our
motion
that
we
approve
the
variance.
A
Go
ahead,
okay,
so
this
coa
21-61
is
also
just
to
preface
a
proposal
that
is
carrying
from
the.
G
Last
meeting
so
they're
also
reaching
their
30-day
limit,
so
208
e-16
street
is
in
the
garden
hills.
G
Historic
district,
the
petitioner
lisa
freeman,
is
petitioning
for
the
addition
of
a
second
floor.
G
G
G
The
changes
are
so
substantial,
however,
taking
that
and
taking
that
taking
all.
G
G
G
Aspects
and
needed
information
which
was
supplied
by
the
petitioner.
So
this
is
the
location.
G
Of
the
house,
within
the
property,
the
let
me
see
in
the
print
of
the
existing
building
and
then
the.
G
Addition,
it
does
grow
here
are,
this
is
all
the
proposed
area
upper
level
and
the
main
floor.
G
And
these
are
the
four
elevations,
so
looking
at
the
front
facade
as
staff,
I
was
considering
put.
G
G
To
scale,
I
believe
this
is
all
the
information
we
have.
As
of
now,
I
had
them
contact
the
garden.
G
Hills,
neighborhood
association.
If
any
of
them
are
here,
let
us
know
but
yeah,
that's
right.
G
P
I
do
have
a
3d
render
of
the
house
if
that
would
help.
I
could
share
my.
G
P
So
the
second,
the
half
story
here
would
cover
the
the
porch
and
then
we
would
kind
of
maintain.
P
P
The
front
section
another
thing
to
point
out
the
current
house
so
that
front
end
of
the
house.
P
So
to
gable
again
it
just,
you
know
better
benefit
to
the
overall
roof
line
and
such
and
know
if.
Q
Q
The
party
is
concerned
yet,
but
if
anybody
has
any
input
on
something
we
could
add.
Q
R
No,
I
don't
have
any
john.
What's
this
area
of
zone
as
it's
changed
to
mixed-use
student
housing.
J
J
P
We
did
include
that
in
the
packet,
so
we're
looking
to
do
vinyl,
siding
certainty,
mainstream.
P
Vinyl
siding
four
inch,
lap,
aluminum
soffit
on
the.
Let
me
see
here
the
windows
we
have
a.
P
A
black
color,
what
else
we're
looking
to
do?
Owens,
corning
duration,
asphalt,
shingles.
A
Yeah
noah
anything
I'm
missing
here
that
would
pretty
much
cover
the
majority.
Q
Of
it
I
mean
the
porch
isn't
getting
anything
very
special.
We
would
probably.
Q
Of
a
of
a
white
painted
wrapped
post
and
just
your
standard
gray,
concrete.
A
Anything
else
duncan
well,
I
I
I
don't
want
to
be
a
troublemaker,
but
I
mean
to
hold
people.
J
A
J
Three
times
because
it
kept
getting
amended,
but
I
just
I
just
want
to
know
that
we're.
S
That's
all
jeremy
yeah,
I'm
really.
D
Not
sure
why
we're
going
from
I
mean
I
wouldn't
recognize
this
house
at
all
when
they're
done.
D
With
it,
so
it
if
it
is
it's
in
a
historic
district
and
it
is
considered
contributing.
D
P
P
D
Well,
what
I
was
thinking
of
when
I'm
asking
these
questions
is
why
they
don't
just
tear
it.
P
You
know:
did
we
just
demo
the
existing
house
yeah?
We
we
chose
to
go
this
route.
Q
Just
for
we
had
a
structural
engineer
come
out
inspect
foundation.
Everything
is
sufficient.
Q
To
support
another
structure
with
with
some
added
beams
and
the
the
the
cost
is
dramatic.
K
Okay,
is
that
the
best
you
can
do
on
the
front?
Porch
is
my
first
question.
K
And
followed
up
the
closest
to
the
street
is
the
complete
blank
wall.
Q
K
Q
How
I
missed
that
too,
but
that
doesn't
I
agree
with
chris,
that
that
doesn't.
A
Don't
have
any
questions,
everybody
asked
them
all
any
questions
from
the
public.
A
U
U
V
Yes,
my
name
is
julia
dotson.
I
live
the
next
street
over
on
15th
street
and
I
am
wondering.
G
K
K
Up
to
the
up
to
the
walk
kind
of
about
about
where
the
tree
is
is
where
the.
X
A
Our
scope,
that
would
be
a
zoning
issue
I
mean
because
I
again
I
don't
live
in,
that
I
live
in.
X
X
M
Jeff
is
anybody
here
from
I
can
jump
in?
This
is
a
keegan
zoning
in
long
range.
Y
K
A
Side
of
the
site,
so
it
looks
like
it's
not
in
the
alley.
Just
one
moment.
Y
Y
You
know
you
can't
have
parking,
that's
maybe
not
fully
meeting
code
but.
Q
I
I
have
sent
the
plans
to
eric
brulich
and
I
think
lisa
has
emailed
some
to
somebody
else.
Q
Yeah,
we
just
haven't
heard
bad
kid,
gotcha
well
I'll,
pass
that
along
to
them
and
make
sure.
M
M
Into
consideration
about
what
the
neighborhood
association
has
said,
and
I
would
deny
this.
N
Doug
yeah,
you
know
I
was
kind
of
on
the
fence
about
this
at
the
last
meeting.
N
I
think
I
agree
with
some
of
what
duncan
is
saying
too.
You
know
seeing
a
little.
N
A
little
more
on
the
porch,
I
don't
know
you
know
seeing
the
pictures
I
think,
seeing
the
up
and.
N
The
the
other
part,
I
think
that
that
I'm
also
on
the
fence
about,
though,
is
that.
N
We
we
see
plenty
of
contributing
homes,
the
contributing
homes
are
set
up.
You
know
where
they.
N
They
don't
stand
necessarily
by
themselves
as
a
historic
property,
but
as
the
collection.
N
What
I
would
say
contributing
homes
here,
but
we've
had
plenty
of
contributing
homes
that
we.
N
N
Or
detail
we
we,
we
are
up
against
the
clock
on
this
one
right.
Yes,
this
is
the
okay.
A
A
N
E
Last
time
around
was
it
was
unclear
what
they
were
actually
doing.
So
this
proposal.
E
Is
very
clear:
having
said
that,
I
find
it
very
clear
that
a
lot
of
what
they're
doing.
E
Is
in
direct
contravention
to
both
the
letter
and
the
spirit
of
the
design
guidelines
and
given.
E
That
the
neighborhood
has
voiced
serious
opposition
to
this.
I
will
not
support
this.
A
Matt,
I
agree
with
what
sam
just
said
in
regard
to
the
design
guidelines.
Z
J
J
J
J
Any
sense
at
all
about
how
that
was
going
to
look,
there's
no
design
for
it
that
I
can
tell.
W
Okay,
well,
I
don't
think
we
should
ever
approve
anything
that
I'm
contributing
to
completely.
D
Non-Contributing,
I'm
a
non-voting
member
it.
It
just
does
not
seem
like
the
right
thing
to
do.
K
K
A
This
coa,
I
make
the
motion
to
disapprove.
This
application.
A
G
Just
for
warning
that
the
first
one
is
for
the
construction,
opening
yard
fence
and
the
staff.
G
Comments
are
mainly
just
from
from
the
own
heights
guidelines,
but
the
staff
consider
that.
G
The
word
fence,
option
treated
and
stained
varnish
complies
with
the
guidelines.
The
other
one
does.
G
Appears
as
well,
but
if
it's
aluminum,
not
iron,
this
would
be
the
location
for
the
fence.
It.
G
G
Proposing
to
put
a
wooden
shed
in
the
back
and
it
was,
it
was
suggested
that
it
was.
G
Stained
in
darker
wood
as
well,
and
that's
part
of
the
reason
why
the
staff
suggested
that.
G
A
Register
here
yes,
anything
to
add
yeah,
you
know
the
the
other
option
is
a
wrought
iron
fence.
AA
Which
I
didn't
bring
up
in
my
petition.
Just
because
I'm
trying
to
save
a
little
money
and.
AA
My
my
property
doesn't
have
that
so
I
was
trying
to
look.
I
thought
with.
AA
W
Okay,
commissioner,
questions
lee:
I
don't
have
any
questions,
john,
no
questions,
no.
I
I
assume
this
meets
the
materials
that
are
allowed
by
planning.
I
can't
say
that.
AA
AA
N
Sam,
he
answered
one
of
my
questions,
which
was
what
was
the
fence
at
the
back
and
that.
E
Sounds
like
you
have
a
preference
for
a
metal
fence
just
because
of
maintenance
costs.
AA
D
AA
E
E
E
K
A
Did
we
have
any
feedback
from
the
neighborhood
association?
I
sent
them
the
three
main
projects.
D
Metal
there
are
metal,
there's
no
aluminum
fences,
but
it's
like.
M
N
N
And
again,
this
is
something
that's
replaceable
that
that,
as
long
as
it.
J
I
actually
prefer
the
metal
fence,
and
the
reason
is
that
I
find
them
more
transparent.
J
Iron
fence
before
and
I
spent
an
inordinate
amount
of
time
getting
it
presentable,
basically
had
to.
K
E
B
B
G
G
Non-Contributing
structure
and
a
new
construction
for
townhouses
on
a
very
narrow
lot.
G
In
reference
to
the
neighboring
farm
stock
staff
recommends
approval
of
coa
2165..
I
was.
G
Contacted
by
eric
from
planning
college,
the
planning
hadn't
seen
the
plans
for
this
before
and.
G
There
are
issues
with
the
parking
on
their
end.
Maybe
someone
can
plan
from
planning
and
comment.
G
Once
they
see
the
the
plans
and
everything
the
neighborhood
also
sent
pointed
comments,
the.
G
There
might
be
some
additional
issues
so
that
the
neighborhood
associations,
construction.
G
Construction
supply
unanimously
opposes
the
project
so
for
more
context,
this
is
the
site.
G
The
side
elevations
have
sorry.
O
Yes,
I'm
here
anything
dad.
Actually
I
also
have
my
architect
here,
so
I
kind
of
I
would.
O
Prefer
for
him
to
stop
start,
but
probably,
more
importantly,
I'd
be
interesting,
interested
to
hear.
O
What
planting's
comments
were
regarding
parking?
Because
I
haven't
heard
that
before.
N
N
All
the
other
comments,
I
guess
that's
how
we've
done
it:
okay,
I'll
I'll,
add
a
few
things
is
that.
N
First
off
mr
pruitt
is
the
one
that
renovated
the
farm,
stop
just
next
door.
N
N
And
he's
renovated
it.
He
also
renovated
the
old
ladymans
he
renovated
of
the
building
there
at
108.
N
N
Kirkwood
plan
the
2002
kirkwood
plan,
if
you
haven't
seen
it
and
along
this
stretch
of.
N
N
N
N
Street
and
the
old
morrison's
building
we
looked
at
it
and
looked
at
the
plan
and
and.
N
N
And
paul
I'll
say
we
but
paul.
My
client
has
decided
to
spend
quite
a
bit
more
money
and
and.
N
N
Two-Story
town
home,
this
is
not
an
apartment
building.
These
are
small
two-bedroom
units.
A
A
And
are
you
there.
A
M
No
questions,
okay,
thanks
john,
do
you
have
anything
else,
yeah
I'll
just
I'll
just
say
that
a
couple.
N
Highly
trafficked
it
looks
at
it
as
a
that
this
needs
traditional
materials
to
minimize.
N
Want
to
take
up
too
much
time.
It
also
says
that
trying
to
do
things
that
are
pedestrian
friendly.
N
Structures,
many
of
those
along
the
street
are
commercial
use
too,
and
we
just
felt
like
that.
A.
N
A
Sam,
I
I'd
like
to
hear
what
planning
has
to
say
about
the
parking
situation.
E
They
are
sure
I
can
address
that
so
when
we
were
looking
at
it
earlier
today.
The
issue
is.
Y
Y
Y
So
I
think
that
was
the
the
parking
issue
that
gloria
was
referencing
gotcha.
I
mean.
A
Project
is
going
to
change
depending
on
what
planning
decides.
I
think
that,
maybe,
if
we
can.
D
Move
the
slide
back
one
until
you
can
see
both
properties,
both
the
store
and
the
there
we
go.
D
Could
move
the
property
line
on
one
of
these
towards
the
store
to
give
himself
more
room
to
do.
Y
Sure
it
sounds
like
to
do
something
like
that
would
require
a
lot
line.
Adjustment.
Y
Both
of
the
lots
would
have
to
meet
code,
so
we'd
have
to
just
take
a
look
at
it
and.
D
D
They
really
want
to
build
something
there
get
it
farther
away
from
the
house
next
door
to
it.
D
Doesn't
seem
to
have
enough
parking
even
for
downtown,
but
anyway
that
was
my.
That
was.
D
My
question
and
comment
thanks
chris
questions.
Yes,
I
want
to
ask
what
was
the
process
of.
G
Well,
at
least
on
my
part,
I
communicated
to
both
the
petitioner
in
the
neighborhood.
G
That
told
the
petitioner
to
send
them
the
information,
and
I
also.
O
AB
I'm
peter
dorff,
and
I
know
some
of
you,
but
just
by
way
of
an
introduction,
I'm
the
president
of
the.
AB
And
the
design
review
committee,
which
has
just
entered.
AB
AB
AB
AB
On
september
7th,
I
emailed
mr
pruitt
back
and
gave
him
my
impression
at
that
point.
It
was
we.
AB
Some
of
the
issues
that
the
application
raised,
I
had
a
subsequent
phone
conversation
with
gloria.
AB
In
which
she
informed
me
that
mr
pruitt
had
withdrawn
the
application,
this
package
that.
AB
I
didn't
hear
from
mr
pruitt
or
in
any
way
see
the
new
application
until
october
7th.
That's
a.
AB
Week
ago,
on
the
8th,
the
design
review
committee
met
on
the
ninth.
We
drafted
a
memo
which.
AB
Is
the
memo
that
is
part
of
this
meeting
packet?
You
have
tonight
that's
pages
67
and
68.
AB
And
that
was
later
added
to
this,
so
that's
where
we
are
tonight,
I
I
indicated
earlier.
I
was.
AB
And
we
added
it
because
we
recognized
that
those
were
high
traffic
areas
where.
AB
The
zoning
was,
was
there
were
multiple
types
of
zoning
along
those
stretches.
AB
Proposed
along
that
stretch,
actually
we
were
delighted
to
hear
that
the
morrison's
building.
AB
AB
AB
That,
mr
bruce
used,
it's
not
a
transition,
it's
an
abrupt
interruption
of
the
actual
context.
AB
Side
neighborhood
guidelines:
they
are
more
specifically
the
mass
of
the
building.
AB
AB
AC
I'm
on
the
design
review
committee
and
was
on
the
committee
that
drafted
the.
AC
The
guidelines,
in
addition,
I
was
a
very
a
thorough
participant
in
the
kirkwood
project.
AC
This
building
does
not,
as
as
peter
said,
meet
any
of
the
guidelines
for
that.
For,
for
the.
AC
Guidelines
across
the
street,
I'm
pretty
sure
it's
that
doesn't
need
any
of
those
either
the.
AC
And
I
do
not
have
a
copy
of
the
proposals
that
came
out
of
the
charrettes.
AC
For
developing
the
kirkwood
plan,
however,
I
am
absolutely
certain
that
this
does
not
in
any
way.
AC
We
didn't
anticipate
commercial
use
for
that
and
then
I
think
the
architects
who
worked
with.
AC
That
project
that
the
charrette
series
of
charits
actually
came
up
with
a
a
design.
AC
You
know
the
old
morrison's
building.
I
would
not
have
been
surprised.
AC
AC
Are
in
you
know,
certain
urban
areas
that
have
an
entry
from
the
street.
AC
This
proposal
does
not
have
any
of
those
there.
This
is
not
amenable
to
having
individually.
AC
AC
AC
We
probably
wouldn't
be
complaining,
but
this
is
not
what
they
came
up
with.
So
the
neighborhood.
A
Okay,
stephen,
my
comments
brief.
I'm
also
on
the
design
review
committee
and
I'll
just
say
that.
T
T
Many
of
us
felt
strongly
enough
to
show
up
to
the
meeting
and
and
wait
for
this
to
be
heard
so.
T
X
X
About
maintaining
consistency
with
their
guidelines
have
explained
it
very.
M
I'm
not
supportive
of
this.
I
I
agree
with
the
neighborhood
association
whether
he
needs
to
be.
E
I
won't
have
any
comments
until
we
hear
back
from
planning,
but
generally
I'm
in
favor
of
higher.
E
Density
housing,
but
in
an
historic
district
you
have
to
pay
attention
to
the
guidelines.
F
I,
the
developer
or
the
proponent,
is
clearly
a
good
actor.
Who's
done
a
lot
of
good
stuff
for.
F
Design
review
committee
that
this
doesn't
meet
the
guidelines,
then
I
would
not
support
it.
J
Yeah
I
I
support
the
design
committee
as
well,
and
I
was
I
was
active
in
consulting
with
this.
J
J
District
and
I
was
pretty
impressed
with
the
with
the
seriousness
of
their
of
their
intent
and.
K
K
K
Of
talking
about
working
out
a
process
that
it
works
together
with
the
neighborhood
and
the.
K
And
that's
something
that
cornett
did
about
well
quite
a
long
time
ago
for
his
the
project.
K
K
That
doesn't
create
antagonists
but
creates
people
working
for
the
same
end
to
cooperate,
and
you.
K
K
K
In
part
of
the
process,
it's
a
different
story
and
you
don't
just
have
to
say
no
or
yes,
you
can.
K
Thanks
chris,
I
I
would
like
to
echo
sam's
comments.
I'm
in
favor
of
dancer
development.
B
Who
made
the
motion?
I
did
okay.
O
K
O
O
To
historic
preservation
to
address
mr
abbas's
comment:
these
are
indeed
town
homes.
O
O
Town
homes,
I
probably
should
let
me
step
back
for
a
minute.
The
reason
that
the
reason
we're.
O
Proposing
four
town
homes
here
is
because
we
cannot
build
anything
on
that
site.
That
is.
O
O
And
that's
where
we
came
up
with
the
four
town
homes.
So
can
I
ask
you
a
question.
O
K
K
O
O
K
Anything
else
that
happens
yeah
a
few
things.
O
The
neighborhood
association-
you
know
they
said
that
they
thought
it
was
radically
out
of.
O
Scale
and
will
tower
over
the
small
house
next
door
and
other
structures.
O
O
With
farm
stop
and
putting
a
non-profit
in
there
and
as
a
result,
we
had
to
get
them
in
there
at.
O
O
22
to
24
foot
high,
so
I
don't
think
that
this
is
it's
just
simply
not
a.
O
On
the
width
of
the
building,
you
know
we,
we
narrowed
the
width
of
the
kirkwood.
O
Facade
to
23.67
feet,
I
think
it
is
which
is
significantly
narrower
than.
O
The
roof-
you
know
the
planting
issue,
this
kind
of
caught
me
by
surprise,
but
you
know.
O
O
So
that's
something
that
we
can.
We
can
try
to
work
out,
so
the
orientation
of
the
building
that.
O
O
Context,
I
just
don't
think
that's
completely
true
the
building
directly.
O
Homes
in
the
whole
neighborhood
or
at
least
on
kirkwood,
but
I
feel
like
we-
we
tried
to.
O
Orient
the
building
with
the
entry
facing
kirkwood
the
main
entry.
We
added
a
porch
to
try
to
play.
O
Off
of
you
know
the
other
things
along
the
street,
but
I
think
it
requires
with
the
the
farm
stop.
O
O
To
repurpose
them,
so
it's
not
going
away!
That
building
is
going
to
be
there
for,
as.
O
Long
as
I'm
around
probably
so
to
you
know,
it
requires
a
common
sense
approach.
I
think,
to
orient.
O
O
An
r3
district
which
it
is
to
the
west,
but
the
lot's
not
actually
43
feet.
It
is
40.8
feet.
O
O
They
had
issues
with
some
of
the
materials,
and
these
statements
are
just
very
simply
incorrect.
O
O
O
O
So
it
basically
looked
like
two
buildings
so
anyway,
those
are
comments
about
exterior
products.
O
This
is
just
the
second
phase
of
what
we
were
trying
to
do.
The
first
phase
was
to.
O
O
Of
morrisons,
it
just
didn't
seem
like
the
right
thing
to
do
so,
so
I
guess
I'm
a
little
bit.
O
O
Conservation
district,
a
couple
of
those
requirements
like
context:
those
are
subjective
so.
O
O
To
get
this
project
to
this
point,
feeling,
like
we've,
met
all
the
guidelines.
A
To
so
that
you
know,
I
think
you
made
some
great
points
and
and
having
that
discussion
with
them.
A
Happen,
this
is
peter
gorfman.
I
know
I'm
out
of
order,
but
could
I
just
throw
something
in
here.
AB
Sure
so
I
just
wanted
to
say
I
I
think
in
my
comments
in
particular
the.
AB
Comments
around
the
sequence
of
events
that
that
led
to
are
responding
to
this
application.
I.
AB
That
his
intentions
are
right,
and,
and
I
wanted
to
reiterate
that
that
that
section
of
the.
AB
AB
AB
AB
Something
out
so
I
just
wanted
to
invite
that
process.
Okay
soon,
so
here's
what
we're
going
to
do.
A
C
B
G
To
any
portions
of
the
facade
that
do
not
have
siding
underneath
painting
applying
some
wait.
G
G
Flashing
replacing
the
gutters
with
some
that
align
closer
to
the
start,
preservation.
G
Program
so
the
staff
comments
that
the
proposal
seeks
to
restore
the
house.
G
Us
through
one
of
hands
to
help
help
funding
repairs
so
john
has
been
helping
consult.
G
With
some
other
materials
to
be
used,
I
got
in
contact
with.
G
Design
review
committee,
okay,
so
the
greater
prospect
kills
design
review
committee.
G
The
neighborhood's
character
and
here's
some
images
there
are
more
in
the
packets.
G
So
I
like
these
two
images,
the
one
on
the
right.
There
is
the
original
siding
underneath.
G
The
yeah,
the
original
siding
the
original
walls
are
there,
and
so
those
are
going
to
be
stored.
S
Yeah,
I'm
I'm
here
anything
to
add
no
we're
just
hoping
to
restore
restore
the
look
of.
S
The
house
as
closely
as
we
can,
I
couldn't
find
any
pictures
of
of
our
house
from.
S
From
100
years
ago,
but
we'd
just
like
to
do
some
work,
that's
in
line
with.
S
K
A
Bring
none
twist
or
comments
lee
could
support
this.
I
have
a
comments
and.
J
Okay,
yeah,
I
I
think
again
here.
The
intention
is
the
right
one.
I
I
agree
with
chris,
though,
that.
J
And
and
maybe
a
directive
to
staff,
we
really
we
really
require
that
we
see
what's
going
to
be
done.
J
J
Visual
approval
of
a
known
redevelopment
and
not
not
a
sort
of
casual
well
we're
going
to.
J
J
J
J
J
J
D
Yeah,
I
was
just
wondering
I
wouldn't
comment
that
it
often
when
they
pull
off
the
sighting.
That.
D
They'll
find
indications
of
designs
on
there
and
it
would
be
nice
if
they
came
forward
to
the.
K
So
we
should
certainly
approve
this,
but
we
should
consider
whether
to
just
have
the.
A
Richard
lewis,
yes
thanks
jeff.
I
appreciate
that
richard
lewis,
I'm
a
prospect
hill.
AD
Committee
have
weighed
in
with
approval
of
this.
It
meets
part
of
our
hopes
that
we
maintain.
AD
Reasonable
and
common
sense
updates
and
repairs
to
their
homes,
and
also
that
we
do
support.
AD
AD
Final
comment:
we
do
not
regulate
or
restrict
color
choices
in
greater
prospect
hill,
so.
AD
That
that
is
not
an
item
for
concern.
You'll
you'll
find
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
different
color.
AE
Yes,
can
you
hear
me
so
I'm
I
am
the
program
manager
that
is
dealing
with
the.
AE
The
project
through
our
hud-funded
programs
in
this
particular
case
in
the
past,
the.
AE
AE
Comment
about
gloria:
it's
I'm
not
as
versed
in
what
needs
to
be
provided
to
you
guys.
AE
For
these
reviews,
so
I'm
willing
to
come
back
with
anything
any
information
you
need.
AE
Concerning
what
has
to
be
provided
for
the
design
review.
W
A
I'm
also
was
part
of
the
group
that
put
the
guidelines
together,
and
I
often
say
this:
this.
A
And
I'm
I'm
okay
with
maybe
requiring
some
further
things.
I
I
think
that
that
could
be.
K
G
Rogers
street
would
be
moved
to
this
campus.
The
staff
recognizes
that
the
structure
in
question
is.
G
G
Staff
does
recommend
approval
of
coa
2167..
The
mcdonald
gardens
neighborhood
mentioned.
G
The
following,
which
was
forwarded
to
everybody,
the
neighborhood,
approved
the
addition
of.
G
I
believe
I
recall
from
a
previous
conversation
that
those
tanks
had
been
removed,
but
that
can.
G
Be
confirmed
by
the
owner
or
petitioner
later
on
this
is,
I
have
two
copies
of
the
elevations.
G
Front
would
be
west
elevation.
The
back
part
is
somewhat
visible,
but
it
doesn't
interrupt.
G
The
following
comments:
just
to
make
sure
that
the
that
the
cleaning
is
less
abrasive.
AF
A
Regarding
this
one,
no
I,
as
as
we've
talked
before
this
is
a
a
three-prong.
AG
About
the
other
two
here
in
a
second,
but
I
think
this
is
a
restaurant.
You
know
it's
a.
AG
I
think
we
all
agree
it's
a
wonderful
example,
and
I
was
understanding
from
the
report.
It's
the.
N
Little
questions
sam
one,
quick
question
with
the
petitioner
remind
me
about
what
the
wall.
E
AG
Well,
I
guess
I
haven't
gotten
that
far
in
the
design
development,
but
it's
it's
that's.
It
could.
AG
Be
stud
construction
with
framing
and
lots
of
glass,
you
know
marvin
windows
or
something.
D
Planning
on
in
front
of
the
building
are
they
going
to
leave
the
concrete
there
or
are
they.
A
Go
ahead:
elizabeth,
okay,
the
first
we
heard
at
least
I
heard
of
this
project
was
when
I
went.
L
L
L
Preserving
and
keeping
this
historic
structure
a
little
thing
and
terry
didn't
tell
this.
L
L
L
R
But
how
big
is
that
addition
in
relationship
to
the
historic
gas
station,
I
didn't.
R
A
AG
AG
Of
the
edition
yeah
there
are
some.
I
think
you
have
a
couple
of
other.
AG
The
combined
buildings,
both
the
both
the
edition
and
the
and
the
house.
AG
Packet,
it's
in
the
it
was
in
the
most
recent
submittal
with
when
I
separated
the
three.
AG
AG
So
there
is
a
site
plan
that
shows
the
size
of
this
edition.
That's
in
the
packet
as
well.
AG
AG
AG
AG
R
AG
Well,
I
I'm
not
sure
what
those
pages
ref
I'll
have
to.
Let
me
see
if
I.
G
AG
That
one
there
is
a
it's
a
hip
roof
with
a
sort
of.
I
think,
if
there's
an
indication
there.
AG
Again,
I
was
working
from
the
assumption
that
this
is
an
energy
process
of.
R
The
details
are
kind
of
important
in
terms
of
approving
something
that's
visual.
R
And
also
I
mean
the
type
of
windows
are
really
important.
I
don't
know
if
we
know
what's
under
the.
AG
AF
A
This
really
doesn't
have
anything
to
do
with
what
we're
talking
about.
I.
AF
Stick
to
the
issues,
okay,
I
would
I
would.
I
have
to.
AG
Say
that
I
was,
I
wasn't
aware
of
the
I
was
at
the
august
hearing
initially
and
I
think.
AG
It
didn't
register
with
me
that
the
october
7th
neighborhood
meeting
it
didn't
register
with.
AG
AG
Out
of
town,
I
couldn't
have
gone
anyway,
but
it
that's
neither
here
nor
there.
T
I
don't
have
any
comments,
john
new
comments,
doug,
I'm
just
glad
to
see
that
somebody.
N
A
different
material
to
differentiate
between
the
two
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
see
something.
A
Damn
I
would
like
to
echo
doug's
comments
and
say
that
I'm
happy
to
see
something
happening.
E
Here
and
then
I
think
the
massing
is
appropriate.
The
roof
slopes
appropriate.
E
But
I'm
very
concerned
about
things
changing
a
lot
without
bringing
it
to
the
attention
of.
E
And
not
even
I
think
it
may
be
premature
to
issue
a
coa
until
we
have
all
of
the.
E
Materials
and
sizes
of
openings
and
openings.
F
Yeah,
I
I
think
I
love
the
spirit
of
this.
I
love
this
little
building
have,
since
I
first
saw.
F
It
I'm
thrilled
to
find
out
that
mr
bradbury
is
excited
about
restoring
it,
and
I,
like
the.
F
The
schematics
that
we've
seen
I
just
I'm
a
little
torn
because
I
agree
with
sam.
It
ought
to.
A
J
Too
long
ago
to
remember
even
but
I
I
so
I'm
really
happy
to
see
something
happen,
but
again.
J
J
Look
at
without
that
specificity
and
and
and
so
I
think
it
sounds
like
we're
going
to
be
happy
to.
J
D
D
D
More
specifics
nail
everything
down
and
then
that's
what
we
that's.
What
we
look
at
and
approve.
K
K
AG
I
was
never
un
unconfident
that
the
I
was
never
thought
that
we
couldn't.
AG
AG
Aware
that
all
of
this
takes
time
and
money
to
make
these
drawings
move
farther
along
and
if
we.
AG
If
we
can't
get
the
other
pieces
to
fit,
there's
no
sense
in
designing
addition
down.
AG
A
F
Upon
a
resubmission
with
all
the
detail,
oh
second
thing.