►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Okay,
great
we
just
made
quorum,
so
I'm
going
to
call
the
meeting
door
dave.
Can
you
do
the
call.
A
What
about
the
duncan's
here?
Also,
oh,
I'm
sorry
duncan
campbell.
A
He's
here
here,
thank
you
duncan
you're
welcome,
okay,
let's
go
on
to
the
approval
of
the.
B
B
C
Okay,
so
very
quickly.
The
first
step
of
staff
approval
is
for
2188
401,
north
morton
street.
C
The
shower
brothers,
furniture,
complex
historic
district,
so
this
the
request.
C
And
actually
the
photo
that
you
see
doesn't
look.
The
color
is
slightly.
C
610
southwestern
drive
at
a
non-contributing
structure.
This
is
for
the
removal
of
a
dying.
C
Silver
maple
tree
the
staff
commented
that
the
tree
is
not
within
the
city's
databases
of
city.
C
C
I'm
going
to
show
you
before
I
give
my
staff
recommendations.
Give
you
a
bit
more
context.
C
And
we
saw
the
windows
some,
some
of
so
where
the
windows
were
broken.
The
glass
is
gone.
C
Community
and
figure
out
what
would
be
most
appropriate
for
them
and
for
the
historic
fabric.
C
A
A
Questions
no
questions,
matt
yeah,
I'm
just
a
little
curious.
Does
the
class
block
have
to
be.
E
The
way
it
was
shown
in
the
sort
of
hypothetical
example
with
like
a
central
rectangular
block.
E
E
E
D
E
G
No
questions,
chris,
did
I
heard
that
you're
on?
Are
you
here
I'm
on?
Do
you
get
the
gist
of
this?
I.
H
H
I
I
Like
a
tempered
piece,
oh,
like
you'd,
use
for
a
tabletop
or
something
you
know,
car
window.
I
C
So
that
that
would
have
to
be
studied,
because
I
understand
that.
C
Regardless
of
what
path
is
taken
because
a
wired
glass
would
be
stronger.
C
Just
like
the
the
glass
blocks
and
just
like
putting
any
sort
of
grill
in
front
of.
I
I
I
Are
there
other
options
so
part
of
what
I
wanted
was
to.
C
Feel
secure
and
be
able
to
find
the
best
solution
for
their
windows.
They
need
to
change.
G
On
the
market,
where
one
could
achieve
both
ends,
you
know
preserving
the
historic.
G
Hear
the
concern
about
not
using
bars,
because
we
don't
want
it
to
look
like
a
prison.
G
But
I
appreciate
the
comments
made
with
regards
to
the
use
of
the
glass
block
being.
G
At
this
you
know
a
detraction
from
from
what
it's
supposed
to
look
like.
I
I,
I
suspect,
with.
J
Yeah,
I'm
kind
of
torn
on
this
I
mean
this
is
such
a
notable
building
and
I
know
they've
gone.
J
The
glass
block,
as
it's
shown
in
the
in
the
image
is
certainly
hopefully
I
mean
it's.
J
J
Glass,
I
really
doubt
it'll,
look
that
stark
and
that's
where
I'm
kind
of
torn,
because
I
also.
J
Understand
the
need
for
security
and
obviously
we're
already
seeing
the
the
result
of
that.
J
I'm
I'm
not
sure
which
way
to
go
on
this.
I
also
understand
I'm
not
a
big
fan
of
just
putting.
J
The
bars
over
it
because
I
I
agree
with
the
petition
that
it
would
make
it
look
more
like
a.
J
J
J
A
E
And
at
the
same
time,
you
know
he's
right:
the
the
original
windows
are
gone.
I
do
think
the
way.
E
E
If
you
have
a
difference
of
opinion,
my
my
gut
feeling
is
that
you
know
straight
up
glass
block.
E
With
with
maybe
more
of
a
gray
mortar
would
not
be
just
so
distracting
that
you
would
not.
E
A
John,
you
know
I
don't
kind
of
go
along
with
kind
of
a
fine
material.
A
That
that
the
glass
block
with
the
right
mortar
won't
be
as
noticeable
it's
an.
A
Easy
it's
a
simple
fix
for
them,
and
it's
reversible
bernard.
As
I
stated
before,
I.
G
Know
that
there
are
products
on
the
market
that
could
achieve
both
ends.
There
are
laminates.
G
That
can
be
placed
over
regular
glass
that
can
render
them
bulletproof.
So
I
believe,
with
a.
G
Could
be
found
to
fit
in
and
some
laminate
or
some
protective
product
place
over
it.
G
Preserving
the
the
historic
nature
of
the
building,
you
know
just
a
quick
google
search
brought
up.
A
Okay,
yeah,
I
tend
to
I
tend
to
agree
with
bernard's
point
of
view
here
and
I
I
think.
I
I
That
aluminum
one
on
the
bottom
left
and
then
the
upper
one.
I
I'm
not
sure
that's.
I
Regarding
the
idea
of
of
iron
bars,
I
I'm
sympathetic
to
the
church
members
comment.
I
About
prison,
but
I
live
in
an
1830s
house.
It
has
wooden
bars
on
the
basement
windows.
I
I
A
Okay,
any
comments
from
the
public.
A
Anything
else
from
the
petitioner
yeah,
I'm
really
concerned
about,
even
if
it's
decorative
iron.
D
Wrought
arm,
that
is
just
something
that
we're
not
in
agreement
with
at
all.
If
we
have
to
put
in.
D
The
regular
glass
that
was
there
I'd
rather
do
that
and
and
we've
already
had
60
days
plus.
D
H
Of
the
whole
unit
and
simple
and
double,
it
would
turn
that
into
a
double
pane.
H
Choice
of
waiting
forever
or
putting
in
an
inappropriate
in
solution
to
the
problem.
D
H
I
move
we
allow
staff
to
approve
an
appropriate
measure
for
these
windows.
I
The
way
you
spoke
about
it
should,
I
recommend
specifically
the
lexan
covering
the
glass.
Is
that.
H
A
lexan
that
is
breakable,
unbreakable
and
bulletproof
and.
B
B
Motion
carries
okay,
so
gloria
will
get
with
you
and
you
guys
can
work
this
out
thanks
for.
A
C
C
C
Their
house,
the
request,
is
for
the
redesign
of
the
porch,
replacing
the
roofing
material
and.
C
Replacing
the
siding,
so
there
are
three
different
elements
here
to
take
into
consideration.
I
did.
C
The
petitioner
submitted,
but
the
porch
has
been
altered
at
some
point.
It
is
not
the
original.
C
Porch
to
the
house,
the
porch
is
also
very
thin,
very
small
right
now,
and
the
owners
want
to
use.
C
It-
and
they
really
don't
have
they
really
can't
use
it
very
well,
as
it
is
at
the
moment.
C
The
proposed
roofing
and
cement
wait.
Sorry,
so
the
proposed
porch
is
in
keeping
with
the.
C
C
C
Altered
so
it
would
be,
the
part
would
be
pushed
frontward
and
it
would
be
asymmetrical.
K
Yes,
hi
thanks
so
much
gloria,
I
will
say
just
a
few
words:
we
have
been
unsuccessful.
K
At
finding
any
photographic
documentation
of
what
the
original
porch
looked
like,
the
owners.
K
Who
are
here
this
evening?
Didi
and
wayne
poole
have
been
in
touch
with
somebody
who
lived
there.
K
We
so
this
is
really
related
to
how
the
pools
want
to
better
use
this
porch
and
it's
a.
K
This
the
proportion
of
the
of
the
porch
right
now
is
quite
awkward,
so
this
essentially.
K
The
house
directly
to
the
north,
which
is
912.
It's
a
red
house,
that
house
sits
about
15.
K
Feet
proud
of
this
house
of
the
house
that
we're
talking
about
and
the
distillery
which
is.
K
Another
lot
916,
the
pool's
residence-
is
separated
from
the
the
next
closest.
K
Buildings
by
lots,
so
there
is
an
empty
lot
in
between
the
house
of
the
north
and
then.
K
Does
anything
to
negatively
impact
that
that
elevation
there,
so
that
was.
J
K
F
And
that's
why
you're
proposing
a
kind
of
a
torch
design?
That
is
how
it
is
described.
I
I
K
That
well,
we
actually
think
that
obviously,
the
the
base
of
the
porch
was
redone
entirely.
K
And
it's
primarily,
and
I
can't
tell
if
you
can
zoom
in
a
little
bit
on
this
front,
elevation.
K
I
don't
know
if
you
can
do
that
gloria,
but
it's
sort
of
this
very
mid-century
elongated.
K
To
speak
of
a
different
time
period
and
then
and
then
the
the
posts
on
the
ends
are
just.
K
Base
that
has
been
altered
significantly
and
it
has
a
concrete
porch
floor.
Currently
we
also.
K
K
Trim
door
and
window
trim
is
intact
under
the
siding
and
the
siding.
The
current
aluminum.
K
Goes
right
up
to
the
edge
of
the
windows
right,
so
we're
just
gonna
peel
back
and
kind
of
see.
J
Yeah,
I
I
I
don't
really
have
a
problem
with
this.
I
think
it's
it's
done
really
well.
J
It's
not
something
I'm
in
disagreement
with,
I
think
it's.
I
applaud
the
other
things
that.
J
They're
going
to
do
to
the
house
as
well
and-
and
I
think
it's
going
to
be
a
nice
project.
H
E
I
I
I
I
I've
given
more
space
and
they
could
read,
they
could
put
a
railing
on
like,
like
you're.
I
I
A
From
the
amendment,
I'm
not
yeah
sure
it's
an
option
right.
Yes,
it's
an
option.
C
C
The
garage
geometry
does
appear
in
the
1949
aerial
photo
of
bloomington,
and
I
just.
C
1940S,
I
think
it
was
47
or
49
as
well.
Sorry,
I'm
just
speaking
of
memory,
so.
C
C
Have
been
modified
at
least
on
one
location,
so
the
demolition
of
the
garage
does
not
impact.
C
The
built
fabric
or
the
rating
of
the
main
house-
and
it
has
so
it
has
been
altered
enough-
that.
C
When
this
was
a
cfa,
I
wanted
to
recommend
the
recycling
and
reuse
of
the
materials.
However,.
L
Only
that,
when
we
were
speaking
with
the
the
city
planning
department
about
the
possibility
of.
L
Onto
first
street
and
trying
to
do
curb
cuts
there,
so
we
did
try
to
explore
that
option.
L
Share
share
that
that's
a
path
that
we
did
explore,
but
it
wasn't
an
option
in
the
end.
L
L
So
it
would,
it
would
be
very
difficult,
I
think,
to
do
that
right
and
you're
wanting.
H
Yes,
we
do
have
to
move
it
back
from
the
alley,
so
we
will
be
losing
some
some
space
in
that
way.
L
We
we
we
didn't
end
up
needing
to
be
part
of,
but
those
were
part
of
the
the
packets
for.
C
So
there
were
two
things
to
take
into
consideration:
number
one:
the.
C
C
C
F
J
That
curb
cut
it's
not
going
to
work,
so
I
as
an
accessory
building.
I
guess
I
could
let
it
go
if.
I
Accessory
building,
especially
a
limestone
one,
I
I
I'm
also
a
little
upset
that
this
planting.
A
H
B
F
Okay,
thank
you
guys
are
we
moving
on
to
now
we're
moving
on
to
2017.,
okay,
demolition
delay,
2117.
C
Is
a
contributing
structure
located
on
1505
west
17th
street?
So
this
is
a
neocolonial.
C
Structure
that
was
built
around
1930,
and
we
had
seen
this
case
in
november
during
the
november.
C
18Th
meeting
so
this
is
a
continuation
staff
performed
a
site
visit
on
friday
december
3rd.
C
2021.
through
cursory
and
the
observations
that
found
the
building
to
be
stable,
so
I'm.
C
Not
I
didn't
do
an
engineering
you
know
report
on
it
to
determine
whether
it
was
falling
or
not.
C
C
C
Were
included
in
the
packet,
so
yeah,
so
staff
recommends
the
release
of
the
demolition
domain.
E
Nothing
that
nothing
that
hasn't
been
disclosed
actually.
H
C
Are
a
number
of
criteria,
the
building
itself,
so
normally
contributing
structures.
C
A
larger
context
so
other
contributing
buildings
in
the
zone,
along
with
no,
you
know
like,
like
a.
C
Multi-Building
historic
district
on
based
on
architecture
alone,
so
that
that
would
be.
C
You,
the
more
usual
path
to
take.
It
has
been
altered
quite
a
bit,
although
it
does
conserve.
C
Original
at
this
point,
the
father
of
the
owner
was
a
stone
mason.
He
bought
the
house.
C
He
didn't
build
up,
but
he
was
a
stone
mason
known
in
bloomington.
However,
that'll.
C
That's
kind
of
where
we're
at
it's
not
representing
the
vernacular
styles
of
bloomington.
A
Okay,
matt
no
questions
tom.
I
don't
have
any
questions
also
for
comments.
J
I
guess
that's
my
only
real
thought
on
this.
I
certainly
see
damage
to
this,
but
I
we've.
J
E
See
enough
here
to
to
propose
designating
this
individually,
so
I
agree
with
gloria.
A
And
it
does
have
that
estate
feel
and
there's
not
much
like
this
wound.
But
I
also.
G
I
I
have
no
comment:
okay
well,
just
in
response
to
chris
yeah,
I
mean
I
mean
the
context
here
is.
I
That
there
aren't
other
buildings
around
it
and
the
sighting
of
it
is
obviously
a
a
great
a
great.
I
I
I
I
But
let's
don't
forget
that
it's
referring
to
something
200
300
years
earlier,
so.
I
C
C
Being
petitioned
for
full
demolition,
this
is
a
cottage.
C
So
that
said,
I
also
looked
at
this
one
and
doesn't
meet
the
architectural.
N
Durgas
city
engineering
department,
representing
the
city
on
this
I.
N
I
I
guess
the
only
comments
I
have
regarding
this
is
I
the
packet.
I
included
some
details.
N
About
the
the
lead
and
the
asbestos
found
in
the
home,
just
as
a
additional
information.
N
Regarding
this
property,
also,
the
the
historic
aerials
and
the
insurance
maps
just.
N
To
give
a
context
to
the
area,
one
of
the
one
of
the
items
I
wanted
to
point
out
is
also
the.
N
The
environmental
borings
that
were
done
just
behind
this
house
in
the
parking
lot
there.
N
On
the
actual
parcel
itself,
so
I
can't
speak
to
if
we
will
be
remediating
on
the
parcel
itself,
but.
J
J
J
But
if
they
were
higher
rated-
and
I
guess
what
we've
done
in
the
past.
I
I
Did
that
ever
last
meeting
I
I
had
indicated
that
per
your
advice
to
reach
out
to
bri.
N
That
would
border
on
unfair
bidding
practices,
since
that
this
project
would
go
out
to
bid.
N
I
believe
john
zoete
did
have
a
discussion
with
bri
to
regarding
the
homes
and
maybe.
N
O
O
And
indicated
you
know
that
this
might
be
a
bidding
process
by
the
engineering
department.
If.
O
O
For
a
movement-
and
so
I
don't
want
to
get
out
of
blackwood's
procedure,
but
I
think
it
was
just.
O
Moving
there
are,
there,
obviously,
is
an
issue
with
where
the
homes
would
be
moved
to.
O
Right,
so
what
would
the
property
be
and
who
would
who
would
be
doing
the
own?
The
moving
based.
O
On
who
the
owner
was,
and
so
that's
something
steven
I
talked
about
a
little
bit.
I
hope
that.
O
We
don't
have
an
answer
for
you
that,
yes,
they
can
be
moved
or
no.
They
can't.
P
That
was,
even
you
know,
permitted
by
the
by
the
engineering
department
and
then
you'd
have
to
get.
P
It
get
a
new
site,
get
the
site
approved
by
planning
and
get
everything
done
all
by
what.
P
April-
it's
just
it's
just
not
possible,
but
I
I
did
suggest
to
to
to
john
zoete
that.
P
P
P
Q
Yeah,
I
believe
that
you
do.
I
think,
if
matt
is
going
to
abstain
from
the.
A
C
Elsa
cottage,
in
similar
footprint
and
overall
design,
it
has
been
a
little
bit
more
altered.
A
J
Yeah
my
comments
are
similar
on
this
one,
although
I.
J
Always
feel
like
our
hands
are
kind
of
tied,
so
I
guess
that's
all
my
comments.
A
Think
we
should
just
let
this
guy
bernard.
I
support
dogs
comments.
G
Two
options,
and
with
the
house,
this
that's
contributing.
Another
regulations
are
gonna.
G
A
All
right,
thank
you
all
right
today
regarding
the
property
located
at
313,
west,
2nd
street.
B
A
Okay,
let's
move
on
to
409
west
2nd
street
409
west
2nd
street.
This
is
for
demo
delay.
C
C
Staff
couldn't
find
that
again,
it's
reason
to
like
going
through
the
title.
Eight,
the.
C
Different
categories
for
elevation
and
yeah,
it
was
a
hard
determination,
but
staff
recommends.
N
I
wanted
to
add
on
this
one.
I've
started
with
my
design
team
discussing
this
one.
N
On
on
possibility
of
relocating
this
and
and
then
making
a
site
office.
N
So
that
there
would
be
time
for
that
process
to
actually
be
a
feasible
process.
N
I
like
to
restore
storehouses
in
my
spare
time
and
and
looking
at
the
the
back
porch.
I.
N
I
From
what
based
on
what
the
engineering
department
just
said,
I
would
say
that
we.
I
N
Would
not
be
able
to
withdraw
the
petition
just
because
we
are
still
looking
at
it.
N
N
Going
through
the
site,
remediation
just
toward
second
street,
the
cns
site.
N
N
Been
done,
but
we
need
the
option
available
if
we
need
to
get.
You
know
to
the
structure.
N
And
and
the
possibilities
with
that
so
and
then
the
other
aspect
is,
is
the
engineering
department.
C
So
I
added
the
start
date:
it's
10
october,
26
2021.
So
what
you
know
we're.
I
I
A
N
Not
have
a
different
answer
again.
We
can't
extend
it
up
to
six
months.
A
I
I
O
Engineering,
so
to
say
that
to
keep
the
project
on
schedule
as
well
as
so,
I
guess
patrick.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Demo,
delay
process
was
so
I
just
don't
want
timing
to
get
off
here
and
I'm
not
sure
we
have
a.
O
O
O
A
I
I
believe
it
will
be
probably
in
may,
and
so
it's
gonna
be
the
end
of
six
months,
yeah
that.
N
An
answer
because
that's
a
waste
of
ural's
time,
and
so
I
I
I
can
commit
that
the
engineering.
N
Is
with
the
rdc
who
owns
the
land
and
is
funding
the
project,
and
so,
when
I
put
this.
N
On
on
the
pricing,
and
so
so,
even
if
we
went
to
180
days
most
likely,
I
still
would
not
be
able
to.
N
Commit
to
anything
we
could
be
smarter.
I
could
tell
you
it's
definitely
in
the
bid,
but
I
couldn't.
G
May
ask
a
question:
john
saunders
has
his
hand
up
so
john
and
then
bernard.
So
why
can't
the.
F
City,
withdraw
this
demolition
of
this
property
for
whatever
period
of
time
and
bring
it.
F
N
And
I
I
also
it's
basically,
it's
engineering's
standard
policy
that
we.
N
At
risk,
then,
I
am
paying
the
contractor
for
for
them
not
able
to
do
the
work,
and
so
there's.
N
Permits
clear
when
we
did
the
project
and
so
it
I'm
I'm
not
trying
to
not
trying
to
not
give.
N
I'm
only
making
the
verbal
commitment,
but
it's
it's
really
the
best
that
I
am
able
to
do
so.
G
I
I
have
a
couple
of
questions.
Forgive
me
if
the
answers
lead
me
to
other
questions,
but.
G
G
Almost
urgency
font
of
a
better
word
to
have
this
thing
to
have
a
decision
made.
The.
G
Suggestion
was
made
that
it'd
be
withdrawn
and
brought
back.
That
seemed
to
be
a
problem.
G
Everything
at
once,
they're
used
they're
they're,
more
than
likely
some
sort
of
phasing
that's
gonna.
G
Demolish
his
property
or
not,
I
think
that's
my
first
question.
My
second
one
is:
if
we
decide
to.
G
Put
this
forward
to
have
it
designated
suspect
there
is
going
to
be
a
delay
just.
G
G
Decision
on
the
commission
is
to
submit
it
for
a
designation
and
if
some
adjustment
would.
G
I
I'm
I'm
trying
to
it's
almost
as
though
your
situation
situating
the
appreciation
you've
come.
G
G
So
you
know
I
voted
for
the
other
two
because
I
did
not
see
any
reason
based
on
the
res
on
the.
G
Where
there's
some
uniqueness
about
it,
where
that
would
be
a
possibility,
and
so
I'm
I'm
not.
A
Choice
and
we're
trying
to
save
this
house.
I
think
it's
not
realistic
to
save
this
house.
G
Why
there
can't
be
some
kind
of
delay
in
the
decision-making
process?
Well,
I
think
that's.
A
A
G
Please
correct
it
so
if
I
may,
for
a
second
patrick
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
but.
C
From
what
I
understood
hearing
the
timeline,
the
bidding
process
is
going
to
take
place
in.
C
May,
which
would
be
roughly
six
months
from
now
and
in
order
to
do
the
bidding
in
order
to
do
the.
N
That
that
is,
that
is
the
standard
engineering
process
and
that
that
is
what
we
would
want.
N
To
do
for
this
project,
just
because
we
do
not
want
a
contractor
on
site
and
and
not
able
to.
N
Perform
all
of
their
tasks
and
we
have
to
pay
them
for
their
delays
in
a
in
addition,.
N
To
renard's
question
the
honest
on
this
site:
the
most
cost
effective
solution.
N
That
way,
it
allows
us
to
play
a
little
bit
of
the
gc
and
not
pay,
because
basically,
the.
N
So
313
and
311,
and
then
both
of
the
iu
buildings
have
high
levels
of
well
not
high.
N
N
N
And
trucking
off
and
and
bringing
in
new
soil
is
typically
a
specialty
contractor.
Also.
N
Setup
of
the
project
and-
and
I.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
G
So
perhaps
you
know
patrick
can
answer
this
for
me
if
the
bidding
is
gonna
happen.
G
I
mean
how
far
before
this
bidding
process
is
it
necessary
to
to
to
have
these
permits.
N
Necessary
or
help
my
blood
pressure
necessary,
not
not
not
nice,
to
have.
N
You
know,
probably
if
everything
goes
correctly
end
of
may
and
and
so
the
rdc
would
then
have
the.
N
M
Yeah
hi,
thank
you
so
apologies
for
jumping
in
at
the
11th
hour,
but
it
feels.
M
Higher
standard
than
other
properties
that
we
have
held
to
the
standard,
it's
not
in
a
district.
M
It's
contributing,
and
you
know
we
often
give
people
the
option
of
moving
a
property
if.
M
Commissioner's
estimation,
I
I
don't
understand
why
we're
still
holding
this
back.
I
I
A
And
they're
not
gonna,
be
able
to
say
it
for
90
I
mean
nine
months,
probably.
I
I
I
I
I
A
F
We
have
emotion
on
the
table,
I
know
yeah.
I
thought
that
we
were
going
to.
F
C
Okay,
we
have
a
few
more
items
for
tonight.
Does
anybody
have
new
business.
C
No
okay
old
business,
so
I
brought
the
cascades
national
register
of
historic.
C
C
C
Shippo
and
to
the
corps
of
engineers,
who
are
the
ones
who
are
working
with
this
project,
yeah.
A
I
move
that
we
support
this
nomination
again.
B
C
So
updates
on
maple
heights
conservation
district
vote
in
the
last
few
months.
C
As
per
state
law
and
the
city
and
the
city's
ordinance
title
entitled,
eight.
C
The
city's
municipal
ordinances,
in
order
to
maintain
a
conservation
district,
a
majority
of.
C
C
167-53,
therefore,
maple
heights
will
be
elevated
to
a
historic
district
on
january
16.
C
20
22nd,
I
will
be
preparing
the
formal
letter
to
send
out
to
all
of
the.
C
Association
representatives
who
have
been
working
what's
going
on
with
the
process
so
maybe.
C
C
C
In
this
with
commissioner
input,
as
well
as
a
community
input
to
see
how
restrictive
or
how.
C
C
Emailed
some
of
the
community
members,
but
I
haven't
sent
out
the
formal
letter.
A
C
Is
going
through
common
council,
they
were
actually
going
to
meet
yesterday.
C
But
considered
the
in
order
to
nominate
put
it
in
a
subcommittee,
but
they
found
that
the.
C
Nomination
was
pretty
straightforward
and
therefore
they're
going
to
be
taking
their.
A
Any
announcements
jeff,
I
have
one
I
mean
so
let
the
commissioners
know
that
we
will
be.
O
O
You
know
to
start
the
demolition
process
of
the
site
and
that's
gonna
require
a
cla
to.
O
Let
everyone
know
that
that's
coming
and
that
those
discussions
about
the
core
building
and.
O
How
that
are
going
to
be
coming
down
like
for
the
hpcc
and
want
to
give
you.
O
January-
and
so
we
wouldn't
want
to
just
give
you
that
heads
up
before
the
holidays
here.
O
So
happy
to
talk
further
about
it
as
you
as
you
wish,
but
wanted
to
give
you
a
heads
up.
There.