►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
L
A
N
N
A
Thank
you,
Communications
from
the
chair
and
vice
chair
I
would
just
welcome
Rachel
I
think
this
is
your
first
meeting
with
us.
So
we're
happy
to
have
you
and
I
know
Patrick's
thrilled
to
have
the
assistance
so
welcome
to
our
first
policy
meeting
with
you.
The
only
other
thing
I
would
probably
say
is
I
just
want
to
wish
everybody
a
Happy
Mother's
Day
weekend
and
Steve.
I
I
K
Hi
I'm
Rachel
Sargent
I've
met
some
of
you.
Some
of
the
faces
are
new
I
started
April
17th
as
the
mpo
transportation
planner
I
graduated
from
Indiana
University
with
a
bachelor's
of
public
affairs
and
then
also
a
master's
public
affairs
and
a
master's
of
Science
in
environmental
Sciences.
I
worked
in
sustainable
Consulting
for
about
a
year
and
a
half
and
I
am
excited
to
be
in
the
city
of
Bloomington.
Thanks.
P
I
have
Rachel
here.
The
yeah
I
have
a
memo
there
in
the
packet
on
the
college
and
walnut
Corridor
study.
This
comes
from
Beth
rosenbarger
city
of
Bloomington
is
conducting
a
corridor
study
of
college
and
walnut.
All
of
the
information
is
there,
including
links,
there's
a
link,
hot
link
or
a
hyperlink
to
the
corridor
study
website,
sign
up
for
email
updates,
also
for
if
you
wish
to
volunteer
to
be
appointed
to
the
study,
Community
steering
committee,
please
please,
please
volunteer
for
that.
Share
your
perspectives.
P
Sign
up
for
a
stroll,
And
discussing
event,
the
weather's
nice
now
and
Beth
would
love
to
see
you
and
that's
all
I,
oh
and
save
the
dates
here.
June
13th
June
15th
for
more
information
forthcoming.
Q
I
P
Well,
I,
don't
know
if
the
committee
is
closed
because
we
wrote
this
memo
on
April
21st
and
it
could
have
could
have
filled
up
prior
to
that
I
mean
there's,
there's
plenty
of
room
for
involvement.
If
you're
not
on
the
committee
itself,
I
would
contact
Beth
I.
I
P
G
P
Can
answer
the
first
question?
I
mean
second,
second
question:
first
policy
committee's
role
here
is
just
we're
advising
you.
This
is
a
city
of
Bloomington
project
city
of
Bloomington
initiative
done
by
the
planning,
transportation
department.
I
think
they
may
be
doing
it
in
conjunction
with
the
engineering
department.
I,
don't
know,
and
Andrew
may
be
able
to
tell
you
what
the
timeline
is.
We're
not
a
part
of
that
at
all.
It's
not
it's.
Not
an
mpo
study
is
what
I
want
to
say.
R
Hi
Ryan
Rowland
planning,
services
manager,
city
of
Bloomington
I,
can
answer
a
couple
of
those
questions.
The
timeline
is
Concrete
in
the
next
two
dates
which
are
June
12th
and
excuse
me
June,
13th
and
June
15th,
which
are
the
two
charette
dates.
We
encourage
everyone
to
show
up
and
have
your
voices
heard.
Those
will
start
at
6
p.m
and
end
roughly
at
7
30
p.m.
They
will
be
right
here
in
this
room
in
City
Hall.
R
So
those
are
the
next
two
concrete
dates,
after
that
it
gets
a
little
less
specific
as
things
take
time,
but
those
are
the
next
two
concrete
dates.
Thanks
thank.
G
P
Okay,
the
Indiana
Department
of
Transportation
central
office
asked
us
to
put
together
a
memo
to
distribute
this
out
to
everybody
and
all
the
Committees
which
we've
done.
It's
posted
on
the
State
website.
Also,
so
the
information
we
have
in
here
comes
straight
from
their
website.
We
also
have
Jay
Mitchell
with
us
in
a
virtual
manner.
Jay
works
for
Technical
Services
in
the
Indiana
Department
of
Transportation
central
office
Jay.
If
you'd
like
to
answer
any
questions,
anybody
may
have.
I
P
I
I'm
just
wondering,
since
we
seem
to
be
having
some
difficulty
with
the
step,
I'm
wondering
whether
anyone
at
any
of
these
public
open
houses
would
be
able
to
help
us
understand
why
we
are
having
difficulty
passing
things
locally
and
not
getting
any
response
at
the
state
level
and
having
very
long
delays
so
that
we're
losing
projects
and
losing
dates.
S
Well,
we
can
provide
you
with
a
little
more
information,
but
I
can
tell
you
that
your
mpo
is
not
alone.
This
affects
indot
projects
as
well.
S
What
has
happened
is
increased
scrutiny
from
our
federal
Partners,
who
do
oversight
of
the
step
itself
and
indot
has
been
changing
its
its
development
process
for
the
step
and
that
has
caused
delays
after
many
other
delays
and
there's
extreme
scrutiny
of
every
single
dip
Amendment,
whereas
before
we
were
on
a
process
where
we
would
make
a
step
Amendment
once
every
month
and
expect
approval
from
that
Amendment
within
a
reasonable
amount
of
time
about
15
days,
20
days
at
the
most
that
has
increased
over
the
recent
years
and
that's
why
we're
working
to
resolve
that
with
our
federal
Partners
at
this
time,
mainly
an
oversight
issue
more
than
anything
else,.
S
By
the
way,
we
do
hope
we
pack
and
probably
fill
you
in
a
little
more,
but
we
have
a
new
process
we're
putting
in
place
which
should
ease
one
of
the
major
problems
that
we
have
had.
One
of
the
major
problems
that
we
have
had
on
stiff
amendments
is
traditionally
indot
would
would
take
this
the
mpo's
tips
and
then
Place
those
into
the
step
itself
and
when
we
did
that
the
projects
had
to
match
verbatim
whatever
the
mpo
who
lists
in
its
tip
had
to
be
exactly
the
same
way
in
the
step.
S
Inevitably,
that
caused
typographical
errors,
some
other
minor
errors
and
things
of
that
nature
which
in
the
past
may
have
been
overlooked.
But
those
are
no
longer
overlooked
to
the
point
where
it
is
very
extreme
as
far
as
everything
matching
perfectly
so
what
we
have
done-
and
Pat
alluded
to
that
is-
we
have
chosen
another
option
which
we
can
under
the
regulations,
and
we
are
incorporating
mpo
tips
by
reference.
We
will
no
longer
duplicate
your
tip
itself,
so
that
should
eliminate
that
problem
and
speed
the
whole
process
up.
I
It
does
make
sense.
The
other
question
I
have
for
you
today
is
when
we
get
amendments
or
yes,
when
we
get
in
dots
recommendations
to
add
to
our
tip,
are
we
going
to
automatically
get
one?
Will
they
come
in
a
timely
fashion
so
that
we'll
have
ample
opportunity,
as
a
policy
committee
to
review
them
before
we
have
to
vote
on
them?
And
second,
will
you
automatically
give
us
references
so
that
we
can
find
them?
S
The
answer
to
that
is,
we
do
have
reference
posts
listed
and
also
longitude
and
latitude,
but
if
you
don't
have
the
software
capability
that
becomes
a
little
difficult
to
identify
that
in
a
map.
Sometimes
Pat
has
talked
to
us
about
this
issue
that
you
have
where
some
of
the
descriptions
are
vague
and
I
will
admit
some
of
the
some
not
just
some
are
vague
descriptions
and
we've
kind
of
process.
This
sort
of
in
place
where
a
pat
sees
anything
where
there
is
a
problem,
he
doesn't
understand
it.
S
He
can
reach
out
to
us,
and
then
we
can
identify
the
person
that
programmed
this
in
and
actually
reach
out
to
that
individual
and
get
a
little
more
detail,
perhaps
even
a
map
itself.
That
would
explain
where
the
project
is
in
a
little
better
description
of
exactly
what
we're
doing
a
lot
of
these
things
that
our
descriptions
in
the
tip
come
from
a
process
of
that
we
call
spms,
which
is
sort
of
the
programming
system
which
gives
you
drop
down
choices
which
doesn't
give
the
best
description
sometimes.
S
I
B
Another
question
I
have
is
at
least
the
material.
We
have
suggests
that
the
public
involvement
period
is
from
May
8th
to
June
22nd.
My
understanding
at
least
here
locally,
is
that
the
fiscal
year
starts
July
1st,
so
I'm
just
kind
of
curious
to
understand
what
the
process
and
timeline
is.
After
this
public
involvement
period
is
complete.
S
The
process
after
the
public
involvement
period
is
that
we
will
be
responding
to
responding
to
each
and
every
comment
that
is
received.
We
will
provide
a
synopsis
of
comments
received,
are
how
we
resolve
those
comments
that
will
be
incorporated
into
the
document.
The
document
will
then
go
through
one
final
review
at
indot,
signed
by
the
appropriate
individuals
and
then
transmitted
to
Federal
Highway,
the
Federal
Highway
Administration
and
Federal
Transit
Administration
for
their
final
review.
Federal
Highway
and
Federal
Transit
had
30
days
from
the
time
the
indot
submits.
S
That
request
to
either
approve
the
step
or
deny
this
step
or
ask
for
more
information.
We
anticipate
that
the
new
Step
will
be
approved
by
Federal
Highway,
at
least.
We
hope
I
think
we're
talking
August
of
this
year
now.
In
the
meantime,
we
have
a
strip
that's
in
place.
It
still
has
two
valid
years
left
on
that
step,
so
that
stipple
process
and
continue
to
move
forward.
So
there
shouldn't
be
major
slippages
of
projects.
A
Okay,
moving
on
to
Old
business,
the
Bloomington
Monroe
County
mpo
fiscal
year,
2023-2024
unified
planning,
work
program,
upwp.
P
Okay,
the
current
current
work
program
we
have
with
the
Indiana
Department
of
Transportation
Federal,
Highway
Administration
and
the
Federal
Transit
Administration
is
fiscal
year
23
and
24.
This
is
the
24
element,
only
we're
requested
to
do
policy
overview
and
that's
what
we're
providing
you
here
with
the
20
out.
Well,
the
question
was:
how
does
the
fiscal
year
24
unified
plan?
P
It
includes
a
description
of
the
planning
work,
resulting
projects
who
will
perform
the
work
time
frames
for
completing
the
work,
the
cost
of
the
work
and
the
source
of
the
funds.
The
24
element
differs
from
the
23
work
program.
In
several
ways
we
are
given
Federal.
What
I
would
call
planning
emphasis
areas
at
the
beginning
of
every
year,
usually
in
January
of
every
year,
those
planning
emphasis
areas
are
derived
from
a
national
level
and
they
trickle
down
to
us.
P
P
Translation
here
is:
electric
vehicles,
equity
and
Justice,
and
transportation
planning
complete
streets,
which
is
a
brand
new
emphasis
area
which
came
from
the
bipartisan
infrastructure
law.
We
have
had
complete
streets
here
in
Bloomington,
since
2009
public
involvement
of
the
Strategic
U.S
Department
of
Defense
coordination
that
doesn't
apply
to
us
because
we
don't
have
any
in
our
area:
Federal
Land,
Management
agency
coordination
again
that
doesn't
apply
to
us
because
we
don't
have
any
in
our
environmental
area
in
our
planning
area
planning,
environmental
linkages.
P
Those
are
what
I
would
call
normal
routine
activities
that
we
do:
data
and
Transportation
Planning
and
then
local
Focus
areas
are
the
Statewide
Transportation
Improvement
program,
which
we
just
noted
the
future.
Well,
the
current
and
future
Transportation
Improvement
program-
and
a
key
here
is
the
next
one-
is
the
establishment
of
the
Metropolitan
planning
and
urbanized
area
borders,
boundaries
resulting
from
the
2020
census,
we're
behind
a
full
year
on
that,
as
on
establishing
the
borders,
borders
are
important
because
they
Define
the
what
I
would
call
the
routes
or
the
facilities
that
are
eligible
for
federal
funding.
P
The
work
program
that
we've
got
this
year
allocates
resources
according
to
these
emphasis
areas,
national
and
local
emphasis
areas
and
the
only
real,
real
key
difference
here
between
the
current
work
program
and
the
proposed
one
which
we
have
here
before
you
is
that
we
will
update
we're
required
to
do
an
update
of
the
Metropolitan
Transportation
plan
from
2045
to
a
2050
Transportation
plan.
P
This
will
be
done
with
consultant
assistance,
unlike
the
previous
two,
which
were
done
with
100
staff
assistance.
We
would
use
a
consultant
with
this.
We've
approached
the
Monroe
County
Redevelopment
commission
about
becoming
a
partner
in
that
and
then
we'll
be
working
with
their
Council
and
their
their
body
in
the
near
future.
On
how
to
pay
for
the
project
we
anticipate
the
MTP
will
cost
somewhere
around
200
to
225
000.
this
this
plan.
P
This
program
we
have
here,
has
budget
of
a
hundred
thousand
in
it,
because
that
was
the
amount
given
to
us
by
the
city
council
and
what
we'll
be
doing
is
working
with
the
Redevelopment
commission
from
neuro
County
on
balancing
that
out.
So
that
way,
there's
an
equal
partnership
and
sharing
on
the
cost
of
that
Metropolitan
Transportation
plan.
P
P
And
that
shows
the
difference
in
the
different
work
program
categories
between
fiscal
year,
23
and
24,
and
as
you
see,
the
big
jump
here
is
in
400.
What's
called
long-range
planning
on
23
current
year,
it's
only
forty
thousand
in
in
New
Year.
Well,
the
fiscal
year
24
beginning
July
1st,
it
would
be
146
000
and
that's
totally
a
reflection
of
what
what
it
would
cost
for
a
consultant
to
come
in
for
well
half
the
cost
of
a
consultant
coming
in
to
do
it
other
than
that.
P
The
others
are
what
I
would
call
within
nominal
nominal
ranges
here
and
the
overall
cost
of
the
budget
for
fiscal
year,
24's
506,
507,
000
versus
424
in
previous
years.
I.
Q
P
The
back
of
the
document
here
as
soon
as
I
can
find
it
I'm.
Sorry,
oh,
we
also
had
a
public
review
comment
on
this.
There
were
no
comments
on
the
document
itself.
The
resolution
is
on
Bates
number
page
zero.
Eight
four.
A
D
P
Yes,
we're
currently
in
fiscal
year
23-
and
this
is
the
first
adoption
resolution
we've
done
in
this
fiscal
year-
we've
gone
almost
the
full
year
without
a
resolution.
Something
unusual.
So,
yes,
that's
why
it
says
fiscal
year,
23
-01
and
it
references
in
there
that
we
use
the
23
unified
planning
work
program
for
the
24
development.
J
M
A
P
Okay,
you,
you
will
find
this
application
on
page
Bates
number:
zero,
eight,
seven,
the
Indiana
Department
of
Transportation
approaches
on
this
project
several
months
ago.
This
is
a
closed
circuit
television,
Dynamic
messaging
system
along
the
interstate
69
Corridor.
You
can
see
that
preliminary
engineering
construct
well.
Preliminary
engineering
is
in
fiscal
year.
24
625
000
construction
doesn't
actually
happen
until
fiscal
year,
26
at
7.2
million.
P
If
you
go
to
Bates
number
well,
yeah
Bates
number
Pages,
zero,
nine
one,
there's
a
graphic
there
from
the
Department
of
Transportation
shows
where
the
cameras
would
be
located
and
then
also
where
the
message
boards
would
be
located.
I
believe,
yes,
yeah
yeah.
The
cameras
are
in
there
and
the
message
boards
too.
For
that
matter.
Message
boards
are
higher
up
northern
northern
part
of
Interstate
69
Corridor
and
then
it's
far
southern
end
of
the
corridor
itself.
C
Yeah
I
guess
I'm
wondering
if
in
doubt
has
been
building
I-69
all
this
time.
Why
wasn't
this
a
part
of
the
actual
construction
of
the
highway.
P
Good
question
I,
don't
know
they're
adding
well
I
mean
the
I
mean
the
answer.
That
I
know
is
that
they've
been
adding
to
the
system
continuously
across
the
state
for
quite
some
time,
I
believe
they're
just
now,
adding
on
the
western
portion,
Terre
Haute
area
and
then
also
on
the
Eastern
portion,
the
Richmond
area,
so
I
believe
they
they
concentrated
primarily
around
the
Indianapolis
metropolitan
area
and
then
also
on
the
Borman
Expressway
and
on
the
the
toll
road,
the
Indiana
toll
road
and
then
they've
been
working
their
ways
to
the
other
urbanized
areas.
That's
that's.
F
F
When
the
first
contracts
of
section
one
went
through
the
you
know
the
same
technology
that
we're
putting
out
now,
it
didn't
exist,
so
this
is
just
a
modernization
of
our
interstate
system.
Okay,
thank
you.
A
F
F
I
do
not
believe
they
do
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
they
have
that
capability.
The
cameras
that
I've
seen
don't
have
quite
the
resolution
that
yeah
now,
if
you
go
into
like
the
electronic
tolling
down
by.
N
F
Stuff
is
specifically
set
up
to
capture
license
plates
I.
Don't
I,
don't
believe
that
they
do.
Okay,
thank.
D
J
C
The
other
question,
I
guess,
would
be
so
there's
an
expense
to
installing
such
Communications
infrastructure.
Will
this
make
it
easier
in
the
future
to
upgrade
such
infrastructure
or
like
if
there's
ever,
it
needs
to
be
an
upgrade?
Will
it
require
this
expensive?
An
install
I
mean?
Are
we
running
conduit
and
I
mean
I,
don't
even
know
how
to
phrase
the
question.
F
A
P
Trying
to
see
the
baits
okay,
this
is
on
Bates
page
number:
zero.
Nine
two
received
this
from
Catherine
Seeley
in
the
central
office.
This
is
all
I
received.
I
didn't
receive
an
application.
P
It
doesn't
specify
where
those
are
that
could
be
anywhere
on
the
state
of
Indiana's
12
000
mile
Interstate
System
the
districts
very,
and
these
would
be
located
on
private
property,
not
on
state
of
Indiana's
property,
because
the
idea
is
to
bring
in
private
vendors
to
do
these,
and
you
can
see
we
have
some
very
big
numbers
out
there
for
fiscal
year,
24
of
21.2
million
fiscal
year,
25
21.2
million
and
then
fiscal
year,
26
21.2
million,
and
that's
that's
all
I
have
on
in
terms
of
information
on
this
particular
Amendment
request.
A
Q
D
P
P
D
A
Rope
roll
call
vote.
Please.
L
M
N
K
A
Q
P
On
base
number
page
093,
we
include
in
here
the
original
call
for
projects.
This
was
the
amended
or
the
updated
call
of
projects.
We
issued
the
call
for
projects
in
January
6th.
We
did
an
update
in
January
26
when
we
had
additional
information
on
funding
from
the
Department
of
Transportation
had
application
deadlines
here
in
in
February.
10Th
actually
is
when
it
was.
We
went
through
the
reviewing
and
scoring
process
the
we're
behind
schedule
here
by
two
months,
because
there
were
ongoing
discussions
among
the
lpas
to
achieve
fiscal
constraint.
P
P
I
might
note
that
fiscal
year,
27
and
28
are
considered
well.
27
should
be
considered
illustrative,
but
24,
25
and
26.
In
the
parlance
they
count.
So
those
were
the
numbers.
We
were
looking
at
around
4.6
4.7
4.8
million-
that
only
increases
four
percent
over
a
five-year
period.
So
it
doesn't
really
take
into
account
inflation.
P
I'll,
let
everybody
scroll
there.
We
gave
a
brief
policy
overview
of
what
the
transportation
Improvement
program
represents.
The
Strategic
Capital
planning
budgeting
document,
it's
a
subset
of
multimodal
transportation
systems
for
the
MP
Metropolitan
Transportation
plan
encompasses
five
years
with
a
list
of
high
priority
list
of
priority
projects
or
planning,
right-of-way
acquisition,
construction,
engineering,
construction,
Transit
operating
assistance
and
Transit
Capital
acquisitions,
and
then
it
specifies
the
timetable,
funding
sources,
agencies
and
who,
who
has
the
responsibilities
since
we're
behind
schedule?
What
I
of
what
was
initially
set
out?
P
I
want
to
note
that
we
had
a
legal
advertisement
published
today
in
The
Herald
Times,
which
opened
the
30-day
public
comment
period.
30-Day
public
comment
period
extends
until
June
10th.
We
will
submit
this
document
to
the
Federal
Highway
to
indot
in
the
Indiana
Department
of
Transportation
and
Federal
Highway
Administration,
the
Federal
Transit
Administration
on
Monday
of
next
week.
P
Indot
will
have
two
weeks
before
they
send
it
to
Federal,
Highway,
Administration
and
Federal
Transit.
They
have
30
days
review,
so
we're
looking
at
in
a
in
an
extended
scenario:
we're
looking
at
60-day
review,
I'm,
sorry,
a
six-week
review
period
for
the
transportation
Improvement
program,
and
that
would
put
us
into
July
or
so
in
a
worst
case
scenario.
Now
they
may
end
up
reviewing
it
faster
than
that.
K
Okay,
go
over
the
summary
so
for
Monroe
County
project
Old,
State,
Road,
37,
South
and
Dillman
Road
has
applied
for
funding
in
fiscal
years.
26
27
and
28.
The
Vernal
Pike
connector
has
applied
for
funding
and
funding
in
your
fiscal
year,
24
for
Fullerton
Pike
phase
three
roadway
as
well
as
Fullerton
Pike
phase.
Three
Bridge
has
both
applied
for
funding
in
fiscal
year.
24.
the
Liberty
Drive
connection
to
cars.
Trail
project
has
applied
for
funding
in
fiscal
year.
24.
K
K
The
Pedestrian,
Trail,
Crossing
Improvement
project
has
applied
for
funding
in
fiscal
year.
24.
Dillman
Road
Bridge
number
83
replacement
as
applied
for
funding
in
year,
2024
and
2027,
and
the
eagleson
avenue
bridge
over
the
Indiana
railroad
project
has
applied
for
funding
in
fiscal
years.
2024,
25
and
26..
Are
there
any
questions
about
the
Monroe
County
projects.
D
So
so
I
guess
I
have
a
question
about
the
procedure.
Given
what
what
you
had
just
said,
what
Pat
had
just
said
before?
Are
you
wanting
a
vote
on
this
today
or
do
we
vote
after
the
public
comment
period.
P
Submitted
submitted
as
a
draft
as
a
draft
with
the
understanding
that
there
will
be
a
review
and
comment
period
both
from
the
public
and
our
federal
and
state
partners,
and
that,
subject
to
revisions
of
those
comments,
we
will
bring
the
document
back
in
final
form
to
this
committee.
For
a
final,
formal
approval,
probably
in
July
August.
D
K
But
the
city
of
Bloomington
projects
include
the
High
Street
intersection,
modernization
and
multi-use
path
project
which
has
applied
for
funding
in
your
fiscal
year.
24
and
26..
The
covenants
are
protected,
bike
lanes
and
intersection.
Improvement
projects
has
applied
for
funding
for
you
fiscal
years,
24
25
and
27..
The
crosswalk
safety
improvements
project
phase
two
has
applied
for
funding
in
fiscal
year.
25
crosswalk
safety
improvements,
project
phase
three
has
also
applied
for
fiscal
for
funding
for
fiscal
year
25
the
downtown
curb
ramps
phase
four
project
has
applied
for
funding
in
fiscal
year.
K
24
the
downtown
curb
ramps
phase
five
project
has
applied
for
funding
in
fiscal
year.
26.
the
B-Line
Trail
connection
project
has
applied
for
funding
in
fiscal
year.
24
the
north
Dunn
Street
multi-use
Path
project
has
applied
for
funding
fiscal
year
24
and
26..
The
signal
timing
project
has
applied
for
funding
in
fiscal
year.
24.
K
K
Any
other
questions:
okay,
moving
on
to
rural
Transit,
there
are
two
projects
they
applied
for
so
the
four
camera
with
DVR
systems
for
10
rural
transits
has
applied
for
funding
in
fiscal
year
24
and
then
rural
Transit
operations
has
applied
for
funding
in
fiscal
year,
24
25,
26,
27
and
28.
any
questions
about
the
role
Transit
projects.
K
Okay,
moving
on
to
Bloomington,
Transit,
federal
state
and
local
assistance
for
the
services,
including
late
night
weekend,
service
has
applied
for
funding
for
fiscal
years.
2024
25,
26,
27
and
28..
The
purchase
of
a
40-foot
battery
electric
bus
and
charging
equipment
has
applied
for
funding
in
fiscal
years.
27
and
28
purchase
of
a
35-foot
electric
bus,
as
well
as
charging
stations
has
applied
for
funding
for
fiscal
years.
K
K
B
Just
a
question
earlier
in
today's
agenda,
we
had
a
discussion
about
the
step
and
its
schedule
of
being
adopted,
potentially
in
August
hearing
what
this
schedule
is:
I'm
just
curious,
how
they
intersect
and
when
this
may
get
adopted
by
us
and
ultimately
included
in
this
step.
Just
a
best
estimate
at
this
point.
P
Almost
simultaneously
I
mean
we're
behind
schedule,
two
months
and
they're
behind
schedule.
Two
to
three
months,
I
mean
yeah.
I.
Today
was
first
time.
I
had
heard
that
they
were
looking
at
August
for
their
adoption,
I
mean
conceivably.
We
could
have
ours
adopted
in
July
at
a
special
meeting
and
then
when
they
adopt
theirs
in
August,
ours
would
automatically
be
included
in
by
reference.
So,
therefore,
there
would
be
no
pause
so
to
speak
between
our
projects
and
their
projects.
P
On
automatically,
at
least
in
theory,
operation,
we
don't
know
because
this
hasn't
been
done
before,
but
yeah.
That's.
The
idea
is
to
to
save
literally
months,
because
we've
had
some
projects
that
have
taken
up
to
eight
months
to
have
the
Amendments
approved.
Others
have
taken
six
months
to
have
the
Amendments
approved
some
we
sent
in
in
February
and
have
yet
to
be
approved.
Yeah.
P
I
Q
P
Oh
sorry,
May
I
shouldn't
even
be
talking,
May,
22nd,
6
p.m,
to
8
o'clock
P.M
here
in
council
chambers,
and
no,
we
didn't
schedule
it
around
the
university
because
that
that
just
wasn't
possible
and
we've
always
had
challenges
with
the
Monroe
County
Library
in
terms
of
parking
availability
here
at
six
o'clock
to
eight
o'clock
ample
parking.
This
is
an
ADA
accessible
facility.
We've
got
all
the
electronics
and
everything
else
and
we'll
have
the
charette
display
boards
up
and
even
though
I
say
we'll
be
here
until
eight
o'clock
we'll
be
here
until
the
cows
go
home.
P
I
P
Okay,
I'm,
sorry,
let
me
well
I
I
had
referenced
Bates
page
number,
126.
P
I
think
I
referenced
126..
This
shows
the
different
funding
categories.
What
I
would
call
Highway
funding
categories.
The
big
thing
here
is
to
look
at
the
bottom
line
or
differences.
You
can
see
we've
balanced
the
requests
with
the
total
of
funding
availability
in
one
two,
three,
four:
five
different
categories:
six
different
categories
and
then,
if
you
go
to
Bates
number
page
128,
that
shows
a
summary
request
by
funding
program
for
Monroe
County
city
of
Bloomington,
rural
Transit
and
Bloomington
Transit,
so
we're
looking
at
Monroe
County.
P
This
includes
matching
funds
that
are
in
here
too,
because
the
city
and
the
county
are
both
grossly
overmatched
52
million
52
53
million,
actually
for
Monroe
County
city
of
Bloomington,
around
30
million
rural
Transit
about
10
million
in
Bloomington
Transit.
This
is
a
big
number
118.9,
or
at
0.9
million
and
Bloomington.
Transit's
number
is
very
large
if
you
dig
into
the
details
because
of
the
conversion
to
battery
electric
buses
with
the
fleet
replacement
and
that
goal
of
having
a
an
electric
Fleet
vast
majority
electric
field,
if
not,
the
total
Fleet
by
2028.
P
Those
buses
are
1.1.
1.2
million
dollars
a
piece
not
counting
the
car
charging
stations,
and
then
the
bigger
issue
is
size
and
area.
Bloomington
Transit
requires
an
expansion
of
the
existing
Grime
Lane
facility
and
with
that
expansion
will
come
architectural
and
engineering,
design
fees,
land
acquisition
fees
and
actual
construction
fees
and
Doug
horn
I'll.
Let
Doug
horn
add
to
that.
If
he
wants
to
on
any
of
that.
E
News,
it's
very
exciting
response
to
the
demand
for
a
generational
shift
in
How
We
Do
Transit,
an
expansion
of
of
service
and
and
ridership
in
a
general
change
of
of
overall
design.
E
It's
an
expensive
proposition,
their
options
are
are
still,
of
course,
on
the
table.
These
numbers
are
our
best
attempt
to
to
bring
that
to
paper.
At
this
point,.
P
Okay
and
then
we
have
project
details
which
began
on
Bates
number
page,
one
three
zero
beginning
with
Monroe
County
city
of
Bloomington
projects
or
on
Bates
number
page
133.
P
And
then
someone
will
probably
ask
What's
the
total
number
of
all
of
this.
The
number
we
have
right
now
is
358
million
dollars
and
that's
the
current
fiscal
year,
2022
2026
tip
is
only
202
million,
so
the
jump
here
is
reflective
of
not
only
the
Bloomington
Transit
Investments
Mega
Millions,
but
also
the
Indiana
Department
of
Transportation
investments
in
this
area
questions
anybody
may
have
I
and
the
appendices
are
all
back
there
too.
Those
begin
on
Bates,
page
148
148.
P
and
go
all
the
way
to
the
end.
Again.
The
public
comment
period
opened
today,
you
can
obtain
paper
copies.
If
you
wish
view
paper
copies
here
at
city
of
Bloomington
view
it
electronically
download
it
electronically,
we
will
have
a
you,
can
submit
email
comments
to
Rachel
and
I.
We
will
also
have
a
Google
doc
available,
which
you
can
also
submit
to,
as
we
haven't
had
time
to
put
this
up.
P
We
just
got
this
up
last
night
at
5
30.,
but
we'll
have
the
full
Suite
of
everything,
plus
the
public
information,
charette
meetings
that
we'll
have
too
ample
opportunity
for
everybody
to
comment
on
it.
This
is
around
the
edge
of
a
sea
change
is
what
I
want
to
say
with
the
conversion
of
The
Fleets
from
fuel
fossil
fuels
to
battery
Electric.
P
Bloomington
Transit
is
right
on
the
Leading
Edge,
if
not
the
bleeding
edge
I
mean
Indigo
Indianapolis
indigo
is
is
also
on
a
Leading
Edge,
but
in
terms
of
our
sheer
size
and
our
service,
the
the
number
of
passengers
Revenue
passenger
miles
that
we
have
here
in
Bloomington
Transit
we're
on
clearly
on
the
bleeding
edge
I,
don't
know
of
any
Doug
correct
me
here
if
I'm
wrong,
I,
don't
know
of
any
other
group,
two
mpos
where
their
transit
systems
have
made
a
formal
commitment
to
full
electric
Fleet
by
fiscal
year.
28.,
that's
extremely
aggressive.
P
Group
group,
two
videos
from
50
000
up
to
two
hundred
thousand
Bloomington
Transit,
is
right
up
there
with
Indigo
I
mean
in
terms.
If
you
look
at
the
annual
passengers,
they're
number
one
we're
number
two
in
the
state
of
Indiana.
We
have
a
very
high
proportion
of
the
student
population,
the
local
population
that
uses
public
transportation,
both
IU
Campus
bus
and
Bloomington
Transit,
and
that's
what
accounts
for
our
very
high
Revenue
passenger
mileage,
I.
P
C
P
A
Any
other
questions
on
Zoom
I
do
want
to
State
Sarah
I
did
take
your
comments
seriously
and
I
have
put
in
a
request
for
attendance
at
the
May
24th
CAC
to
discuss
that
project.
So
I
guess
we
would
need
a
motion
for
the
draft
I.
A
Thank
the
city
of
Bloomington
working
with
Monroe
County.
We
sat
down
a
few
times
to
agree
on
the
projects
and
the
timing,
and-
and
we
worked
really
well
together
on
making
the
numbers
come
out
even
and
I
think
it
took
a
little
pressure
off
Patrick
at
the
time
to
get
us
headed
in
the
right
direction.
To
get
this
moving
along
in
a
timely
manner
and
keep
the
projects
moving.
D
A
B
O
M
G
L
N
A
Thank
you.
Moving
on
public
comment
on
matters
not
included
on
the
agenda,
non-voting
items.
C
Yeah
I
just
wanted
to
note
that
I
have
scheduled
for
consideration
at
Council
in
June
at
least
I'm
trying
to
get
it
on
the
schedule,
a
resolution
to
discuss
the
design
and
funding
of
a
for
lack
of
a
better
phrase,
a
downtown
trolley,
a
downtown
circulator,
and
it's
a
just
a
resolution,
because
the
council
can't
initiate
appropriation
ordinances.
But
it's
intended
to
get
the
council
to
agreement
as
to
if
such
a
program
were
to
exist.
What
would
it
look
like
so
I?
C
G
Is
sort
of
related
to
upcoming
meetings
but
partly
reflects
the
other
mention
you
made
Pat
of
the
need
to
perhaps
to
convene
in
July
about
this
and
I
wonder
if,
if
the
June
meeting
that's
listed
here
for
the
policy
committee
is
correct,
I
was
just
looking
at
my
own
calendar
and
I
had
no
meeting
summer
recess,
not
that
I
was
planning
to
take
a
recess,
but
I
thought
that
was
originally
indicated
for
June.
So
I
just
wonder
if
we
could
clarify
what
we
really
need
to
focus
on
here.
P
Recess
too
versus
the
summer,
but
this
is
a
the
public
comment
period
ends
on
June
10th.
We
meet
on
June
9th
one
day,
but
then
the
bigger
issue
is
the
review
by
our
federal
Partners,
which
will
take
somewhere
around
six
weeks
or
so,
which
could
put
us
another
two
to
three
weeks
beyond
that.
June
9th
date
is
what
I'm
saying
so
we
may
have
to
have
a
special
meeting
in
June
deep
in
June
I
would
love
to
avoid
July
if
we
could,
but
then
it's
a
that.
P
G
P
Yeah
meeting
on
one
item:
it
would
be
approval
of
the
final
Transportation
Improvement
program
and
addressing
all
the
comments
from
the
federal
agencies
and
state
agents
State
and
from
the
General
Public
yeah.
It
should
be
five
minutes
and
done.
Type
of
thing.
I
would
hope
yeah,
but
we
would
have
to
have
you
know
sufficient
in-person
presence
and
that's
always
a
challenge
during
the
summertime.
Yes,.
C
C
C
I'm
asking
that.
M
P
C
P
H
A
A
H
A
E
E
Be
well
in
any
business
any
business
that
would
would
be
problematic
being
postponed
to
the
30th
from
June,
9th.
A
C
A
You
have
a
motion
in
a
second
any
discussion
on
this
motion
and
again,
if
you
can't
attend
just
do
the
appropriate
steps
to
have
a
proxy
on
that
date,
if
possible,
any
comments
online.