►
From YouTube: Bloomington Plan Commission, March 29, 2021, Part 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Okay,
commissioners,
if
you
could
just
turn
your
cameras
on
once
you're.
A
A
Looks
like
we
do
have
quorum,
so
we
will
continue.
B
Infrastructure,
can
anybody
speak
on
that.
A
C
With
vic
kilson,
the
director
of
city,
bloomington
utilities
department
on
a
variety.
C
Sewer
basin,
so
if
you
know
the
community
there
are
several
sanitary
sewer
basins,
there's.
C
Two
treatment
facilities,
one
to
the
north
and
one
to
the
south.
Again,
you
know
current
and
future.
C
C
Point
with
the
storm
sewer
infrastructure,
a
lot
of
the
older
areas
of
the
community
don't
have.
C
That
infrastructure
but
cbu
does
review.
You
know
new
developments
in
income.
C
From
cbu
I
wanted
to
offer
that
comment.
I
do
think
there
are
some
other
comments
about.
C
You
know
roads
and
infrastructure,
you
know
if
you
look
at
our
transportation
plan
in.
C
C
C
Again,
that's
the
infrastructure.
I
think
those
were
the
points
that
you.
A
Thank
you,
scott.
Does
that
answer
your
question
flavia.
D
Question
for
staff-
and
I
don't
know
if
this
is
a
scott
question
or
my
question,
but
there
have.
D
C
C
C
C
E
F
Thank
you
any
additional
comments
or
questions.
Commissioner
kinsey
go
ahead.
G
One
question
about
the
discrepancy
or
the
stated
discrepancy
or.
G
C
Scott,
would
you
like
to
try
to
tackle
that
we
were
trying
to
figure
out
where
that.
C
Number
came
from
in
those
comments,
the
data
that
we've
been
looking
at.
C
Units
versus
bedrooms-
sometimes
we
track
number
of
bedrooms
versus
units.
The
udo
doesn't
do
that.
C
Approved
projects
is
different
than
actually
what's
being
constructed.
C
Pipeline
before
there's,
actually,
you
know
ready
to
move
in.
So
quite
honestly,
I'm
not
sure
where.
C
That
4000
number
has
come
from
compared
to
the
other
data
sources
that
we
have.
A
Go
ahead,
chris.
H
H
H
A
Commissioner
kinsey
go
ahead.
I
have
final
comments
about
the.
G
G
All
been
kind
of
studying
it
and
learning
more
about
this,
as
we've
been
working
through
these.
G
G
G
G
Younger
people
and
the
renter's
views
that
have
represented
here
tonight
so
to
me,
that's
also.
G
G
G
Perhaps
single
home,
so
the
the
idea
of
wanting
more
options
is
really
persuasive
to
me
and.
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
A
D
D
D
D
D
A
I
I
I
just
really
want
to
say
through
the
conversation
I
heard
terms
like
lack
of
respect.
I
I
Valid
reasons-
and
I
I
guess
just
for
me-
I
I
will
be
voting
no
on
this
amendment.
I
J
J
Community
knows
what
it's
getting
in
this
particular
instance.
I'm
persuaded
that
the.
J
Figure
out
where
we
go
next,
we'll
you
know
kind
of
take
us
to
whatever
the
next
stage
is.
J
A
All
right,
I
will
add
my
two
cents
or
maybe
three
cents,
but
first
I
just
you
know
I
want
to.
A
Echo
what
others
have
said
and
just
thank
everyone
for
for
their
patience
and
for
their
input
here.
A
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
emotion
on
all
sides
of
this.
I
do
want
to
take
a
minute
just
to
respond.
A
A
That
we
need
to
pay
greater
attention
and
give
greater
weight
to
those
residents.
And-
and
I
and
I.
A
Certainly
appreciate
those
folks
who
have
been
here
a
long
time,
but
the
the
assertion
that.
A
Less
important
that
their
opinions
don't
carry
as
much
weight.
I
I
just
have
to
reject
and.
A
A
A
A
We
welcome
you
and
we
embrace
you
and
secondly,
I
just
I
quickly
wanted
to
just
respond
to.
A
A
The
real
estate
market
on
this
commission
is
as
an
asset
that
that
is
as
a
feature
not
a
bug.
A
Housing,
I
don't
think,
there's
much
disagreement
on
that
and
I
think
really.
The
question
at
hand
is.
A
Neighborhoods,
not
just
you
know,
on
the
fourth
floor
of
a
new
five-story
building
or
out
on
the.
A
Outskirts
miles
from
the
closest
amenities,
duplexes
are
really
the
only
responsible
way.
A
A
A
A
Make
it
easy
adus
are
proof
that
we
not
only
need
to
make
it
legal.
We
need
to
make
it
easier.
A
For
this
type
of
housing
to
enter
the
market,
if
you
turn
on
hgtv
right
now,
you
won't
have.
A
A
To
be
overrun
with
new
rentals,
I
just
I
just
don't
think
that's
reality.
I
think.
A
A
All
right,
I
don't
know
if
jackie's
back
or
ryan
is
still
with
us,
but
it's
still
me.
Okay,.
A
Ryan,
would
you
call
the
role
please
on
amendment
number,
two
to
zero
zero
9-21
kinsey?
Yes,
kate,.
K
K
Passes
5'4
all
right.
Thank
you
very
much
so
with
that
we
have
two
more
amendments,
but.
A
I'm
not
sure
if
they're
necessary
to
proceed.
I
believe
that
both
of
those
would
would
be.
A
Rendered
moot
by
the
passage
of
amendment
two,
but
I'm
certainly
open
to
discussion
on
that.
Maybe.
A
Three,
my
interpretation
or
assumption
would
be
that
if
plexus
are
by
right.
A
Then
the
the
proximity
limitations
are
therefore
no
longer
in
effect.
Would
that
be.
A
Correct
no,
so
amendment
number
two
actually
addressed
the
the
you.
K
K
The
certificate
of
zoning
appliance
so
mike
might
want
to
weigh
in,
but
you
this
amendment.
K
Would
still
be
valid?
Okay,
so,
even
though
it's
by
right
that
that
that
150
foot
limitation.
A
Is
would
would
still
apply
even
though
it's
by
right,
correct,
okay,
I
would
love
to
hear.
E
Talking
about
this,
just
just
before
you
voted
on
the
amendment,
so
that's
correct.
Okay,.
A
Well
then,
if
that
is
the
case,
I
would
like
to
go
ahead
and
introduce
amendment
number
three.
A
Our
rule
is
that
we
don't
introduce
new
business
after
9
p.m.
So
if
we
introduce
this.
A
Number
three
to
zeo09-21,
which
remove
the
150-foot
proximity
restriction.
A
A
That
I
think
it's
just
kind
of
unfair.
It
sets
a
standard
that
one
person's
property.
A
Has
certain
rights
and
others
do
not
have
the
same
rights
simply
by
their
proximity,
so
I.
A
A
A
Serve
to
exacerbate
that,
because
if
you
are
the
type
of
you
know
out
of
town
property
owner.
A
That
that
might
wanna
take
advantage
of
building
a
plex.
You
got
to
get
it
done
before
your.
A
I
think
the
the
consequence
might
be
the
opposite
and
at
any
rate,.
A
You
don't
have
the
same
rights
as
your
neighbor
just
because
they
got
there
first.
A
Minute
to
adopt
amendment
number
three
to
009-21.
Is
there
a
second
a
second.
A
All
right,
so
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second.
Is
there
any
any
questions
for
myself
for
staff.
A
To
suspend
the
rules,
I
think
what
would
be
appropriate
is
to
you
know,
either
set
up.
A
We
need
to
be
specific
about
when
we're
when
we
intend
to
to
end
the
meeting
tonight.
A
G
A
second
okay:
let's,
let's
go
ahead
and
call
the
roll
on
this.
This
motion
the.
A
Motion
is
to
keep
going
tonight
until
we've
voted
on
amendment
number
three.
K
I
got
passes
five
three
or
five,
four:
okay,
with
apologies
to
the.
A
Women's
basketball
team:
we
will,
we
will
continue
this
and
I'll
have
to
watch
it
on
on
replay.
A
When
we
get
home
later,
but
let's
go
back
to
the
discussion
well,
I
think
we
were
at
questions.
G
From
staff
their
their
intent-
and
you
know
for
kind
of
keeping
this
in
here
to
begin
with.
C
The
idea
being
is
this:
allows
us
to
monitor
the
evolution
or
reintroduction
of
duplexes
throughout.
C
The
community,
the
amendment
that
just
passed,
we
are
still
able
to
do
that.
Just
the
conditional.
C
Use
process
has
been
removed
again.
The
time
is
something
that
we
used
with
a
similar
process.
C
With
accessory
dwelling
units,
we
gave
that
a
trial
period
for
a
couple
years
and
now
that's.
C
By
right,
it
doesn't
have
those
same
conditions,
so
I
believe
that
that's
a
good
model
for
us
to.
C
The
timing,
you
know,
establishment
and
spacing
to
tie
on
criteria
for
the
plexes
so
that.
C
It
does
allow
for
a
gradual
pace
to
re,
introduce
plexus
staff
has
ability
to
report
back
to
plan.
C
C
Sort
of
where
our
position
is
right
now
we
don't
support
it
mostly
because
we
don't
want.
C
A
So
again,
we're
still
on
amendments
here,
so
there
are
comments,
are
limited
to
three
minutes
now.
A
K
Peter
yes,
hi
peter
dorfman,
near
west
side,
speaking
from
one
of
the
densest
areas
in
the
city.
M
Amendment,
even
though
I
think
the
provision
that
you're
proposing
to
take
away
is
terribly.
M
M
This
resolution,
this
approach,
that
planning
is
laid
out,
fails
or
refuses
to
recognize
that
there.
M
M
M
M
M
Than
nothing,
and
I
suggest
that
you
keep
it
and
oppose
the
current
amendment.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
N
N
O
For
plexus
we've
been
talking
about
this
about
increasing
density
using
missing
middle
housing.
O
O
O
O
Out
to
more
than
a
year,
bcl
recently
acquired
another
property
that
they
are
developing
into.
O
O
O
O
O
B
Fleshman
hello:
this
is
dave
warren
again,
thanks
again
for
for
sticking
around.
I
would
like
to.
P
Support
this
amendment,
eliminating
the
the
150-foot
rule
for
for
three
reasons,
one.
P
P
Live
on
the
the
other
half
of
the
in
the
other
half
of
the
duplex,
if
your
your
neighbor
or.
P
P
P
P
Home
to
a
duplex
or
triplex,
because
this
is
this
rule
can
can
be
gamed.
Finally,
I
just.
P
P
Buy
or
a
place
to
rent
and
tens
of
thousands
of
those
people
have
not
even
been
born
yet.
P
And
so
just
keep
that
in
mind.
Zoning
is
it's
a
long-term
planning
tool
to
make
things
better.
P
From
from
here
on
out,
but
let's
let's
not
lose
sight
of
that
and
let's
let's.
P
Stop
using
the
zoning
code
for
things
it
just
is
not
intended
to
do.
Thank
you.
R
Prior
speaker,
zoning
does
affect
people
right
in
the
here
and
now
and
that's
why
so
many.
R
Game
changers,
so
some
of
the
the
comments
that
mr
warren
made
is
that
those
with
the.
R
Deepest
pockets
will
happen
to
be
the
ones
who
profit
from
this
news.
Zoning
from
the.
R
R
R
That
prior
argument
that
I
would
like
to
just
clarify
some
of
the
numbers
that
I
came
up
with.
R
And
the
hand
database
is
only
in
bedrooms.
The
standard
for
multi-family
housing
is
units.
R
Not
bedrooms,
and
so
just
tonight
there
was
a
just
another
discussion
with
trinitas
for
yet.
R
R
R
R
4098
units,
excluding
the
trinitas
property
that
was
just
discussed
tonight,
excluding
the
mcdole.
R
Are
proposing
over
there
by
switchyard
park,
I'm
firm
in
my
numbers.
Those
are
multifamily
units.
R
R
S
To
think
of
polite
and
reasoned
responses
to
this
amendment,
to
which
I
am
opposed,.
S
S
I
know
that
the
chair
mentioned
that
this
is
in
the
interest
of
equitable
treatment.
S
The
west
side,
shortly
after
a
highway
was
you
know,
developers
were
attempting
to
build
a
highway.
S
S
S
Our
neighborhood
helped
sponsor
a
developer,
who
worked
on
grants
to
build
the.
S
Affordable
southern
knolls
apartments
that
are
within
our
neighborhood
just
west
of
walker,.
S
S
T
Yes,
I
don't
like
being
talked
down
to
and
I've
I've
seen
four
different
comprehensive
plans.
T
T
T
T
T
T
U
U
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
Q
A
bond
binder,
hey
everyone,
yeah,
thanks
for
sticking
this
out
and
listening
to
public.
W
Comment
again,
I
just
I
want
to
tell
a
quick
story,
because
I
I
think
it
is
kind
of
relevant.
W
When
I
was
a
kid
in
the
bronx,
my
family
lived
in
a
duplex
and
our
our
landlady
and
her
brother.
W
Lived
upstairs
and
my
parents
and
I
lived
on
the
ground
floor
and
yeah,
especially
at
that.
W
City,
because
I
mean
we
weren't
renting
an
entire
row
house
that
really
would
have
been
totally.
W
That
I
went
to
high
school
with
still
do
live
there
and
a
lot
of
them
own.
A
duplex
or.
W
W
W
W
W
W
To
make
the
same
mistake
with
with
duplexes
thanks,
thank
you,
dave
weaver,.
X
X
X
Doesn't
seem
fair
to
you
know
various
types
of
homeowners
and
just
as
a
quick
aside,
we.
X
X
Have
a
great
place
to
live
but
save
some
money,
great
tax
advantages
to
that.
So.
X
X
Y
Y
We've
already
heard
at
least
a
few
homeowners
in
the
corn
neighborhoods
be
in
favor
of
density.
Y
And
I'll
add
my
voice
to
that.
I'm
frankly
offended
by
comments
about
students
living
in.
Y
What
was
said
about
adus,
I
do
wish
like
people,
would
use
adus.
But
if
you
read
the
udo,
the
adus.
Y
Have
have
limits
and
those
limits
can
prevent
them
from
being
a
true
duplex.
Y
Addition
to
duplex
and
then
the
very
first
thing
that
came
to
my
mind
when
I
read
that.
Y
The
150-foot
thing
was
the
gaming
thing
that
dave
warren
mentioned.
I
mean
if
there
are
no
fees.
Y
Y
Those
things
really
strike
me
as
super
unfair
and
super
exclusionary,
and
I
wholeheartedly
hope.
Z
Z
These
that
put
you,
know,
time
and
space
separation
requirements.
I
think
we
would
find.
Z
It
very
odd
if
we
regulated
any
other
good
any
other
commodity
in
such
a
manner,
especially.
Z
Something
that
it's
as
crucial
that
we
have
enough
of
it
as
housing,
an
area
where
it's
so.
Z
You
know,
duplexes
are
not
brown
fields
and
they
do
help.
People
live
in
areas
that
will.
Z
Help
them
live
their
lives,
and
so
people,
you
know,
should
have
the
freedom
and
the
right
to
do.
Z
AA
Thank
you
so
much.
I
just
want
to
quickly
say
that
I'm
a
30
year
renter
and
it's
only.
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
F
F
And
I
would
ask
you
to
vote
note
on
this
particular
amendment.
The
elimination.
F
F
F
Possible
place
that
it
can
be,
and
I
think
we
need
to
be
careful
and
proceed
incrementally.
F
So
please
keep
the
150-foot
rule
for
now.
If
it
turns
out
that
it
doesn't
work
in
the
future.
AB
I
have
heard
over
and
over
that
we
don't
need
to
worry.
I
live
in
elm
heights
and
that.
AB
That
hasn't
really
been
fleshed
out.
It's
hard
to
you
know:
we've
already
voted
against
the
plexes.
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AC
AC
AC
Uncontrolled
or
unlimited
duplexes
in
the
court
can
be
a
problem,
so
please
keep
that.
AC
AC
AC
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AE
Hi,
it's
late
I'll,
keep
it
short.
I
just
want
to
express
my
voice
in
favor
of
this
amendment.
AE
Again,
as
as
dave
warren
said
earlier,
about
pitting
neighbors
against
neighbors
and
binder,
we
don't.
AE
Have
time
to
make
mistakes?
And
finally,
karen
saint
john
go
big
or
go
home,
you
know
we
just
need
to.
AE
AE
AE
And
live
with
a
roommate
in
half,
he
doesn't
have
to
live
with
his
parents.
His
whole
life.
AE
And
that
way
he
gets
some
independence
and
we
do
too
so
there's
lots
of
people
out.
AE
A
Thank
you,
okay.
I
think
pam
spoke
already,
but
I'm
gonna
double
check
again.
Y
A
A
Like
to
make
public
comments,
I
do
see
one
more
hand
here
russkiva
here
you
should
be
unmuted.
AF
Yes
hi:
this
is
russ
skiba
from
the
hoosier
acres,
neighborhood
and
you'll
be
pleased
to.
AF
Know
that
the
iu
women
are
doing
very
well,
the
score
is
tied
at
19
to
19,
with
about
five.
AF
AF
The
plan
commission
for
this
opportunity
to
speak,
as
I
said,
I
also
represent,
go
farther
together.
AF
AF
AF
AF
AF
Not
a
real
organization
but
an
organization,
that's
been
pulled
from
other
organizations.
AF
And
it's
kind
of
just
kind
of
emerged
overnight
to
take
this
on,
I'm
just
making
the.
AF
AG
Related
today,
I
I
have
some
comments,
then
about
the
about
this
proposal.
I
would
echo
margaret.
AF
Clement's
comments
about
zoning
zoning
is
a
protection,
and
this
amendment,
like
the
previous.
AF
Amendment
takes
away
some
of
those
protections.
We
consider
ourselves
a
progressive
community.
AF
But
removing
more
and
more
protections
from
regulation
is
not
protecting
our
community.
AF
Host
of
other
issues,
I
would
point
you
to
the
current
umb
act
in
congress
being.
AF
AF
To
consider
where
these
ideas
come
from
in
the
long
term,
thank
you
very
much.
AF
AG
L
Park,
neighborhood
association-
I
wouldn't
applaud
everyone
for
their
patience
tonight
and.
AH
AH
For
so
long,
I
want
to
say
that
I
support
this
amendment
and
racial
restrictions.
AH
AJ
AJ
AJ
What
is
the
criteria
for
success?
I
think
if
we,
if
we
remove
opportunities
to.
AJ
Anyway,
I
would
ask
you
to
to
vote
no
on
the
amendment
to.
A
For
final
comment
on
amendment
number,
three,
any
commissioners
like
to
make
a
final
comment.
A
Commissioner,
kate
yeah
I
when
I
first
saw
the
150
foot
buffer
in
the
year.
I
had
some.
J
J
Against
neighbor,
although
I
will
say
that
to
some
extent
that
concern
and
also
the
the
concern.
J
About
people
sort
of
rushing
in
kind
of
sits
uneasily
with
earlier
statements
about
there's.
J
Sense
is
this:
is
you
know,
and
we
know
because
they've
told
us
it's
the
staff's
effort
to
try
to.
J
Move
in
a
somewhat
more
cautious
direction
and
take
you
know
some
time
to
figure
out
what.
J
J
That
could
change
with
time
and
need
might
be
a
better
approach,
but
I
you
know
I
I.
J
Am
thinking
that
at
least
retaining
some
ability
to
kind
of
gauge
over
a
couple
year.
J
Period
how
this
is
going
makes
sense,
I
mean
I'm
out,
I
don't
love
it,
I'm
not
sure
anyone
loves
it.
J
This
or
they
want
to
do
this,
but
at
the
same
time,
when
we're
hearing
that
you
know
building.
J
Takes
time
and
the
you
know,
this
isn't
going
to
happen
overnight
anyway,
I
guess
I
wonder
how.
J
J
Way
to
try
to
measure
this
movement,
but
at
this
point
I'm
inclined
to.
J
Vote
against
the
amendment
and
retain
some
sort
of
buffer
and
and
then,
if
that
could.
J
Arbitrariness
of
it,
if
you
will,
and
about
the
the
potential
to
incentivize
people,
to
rush
in.
J
With
something
else,
then
I'd
probably
prefer
to
see
that
happen
and
replace
this.
J
D
If
that's
okay,
is
it
such
that
with
that
provision
that
someone
can
I
I
know,
we've.
D
AG
The
other
side
envelops
you
in
a
buffer
that
starts
in
april
of
23,
then
yes,
you're.
J
Oh
sorry,
can
you
say
a
little
bit
more
about
the
process
so
that
we
can
have
a
sense
of
how.
J
Dedicate
some
too
much
time,
effort,
money,
resources,
etc
and
go
through
the
process
enough
to.
AG
Give
you
my
answer.
The
conditional
use
approval
is
all
that's
required
right.
So
when
you
go
to
the.
AG
AG
Can
meet
those
you
know
without
expending
money
for
design
of
a
house.
You
know
beyond.
AG
AG
AG
To
take
to
the
point
of
zoning
fields,
you're
more
serious
about
just
creating.
AG
A
freeze
in
your
area,
you
know,
then
you
could
probably
get
an
approval
with
by
spending.
J
AG
Was
away,
but
I
did
know
that
apologies
thank
you
for
heart
to
me
on
that
yeah.
So
it'll
be.
AG
Whether
or
not
you
can
meet
those
requirements
and
in
order
to
pull
your
building
permit,
you.
AG
Actually
will
need
realized
plans,
so
in
reality
it
would
probably
actually
be
more
expensive
than.
AG
AG
Ability
to
put
separate
two
meters
in
it's
actually
probably
a
higher
threshold
for.
AG
For
like
kind
of
a
faux
approval
for
a
new
build
I'd,
say.
A
Thank
you
any
additional
questions
or
final
comment
from
commissioners.
H
H
H
H
A
Right,
I
believe
that
yeah,
I
I'm
in
favor
of
having
more
opportunities
housing,
but
I
believe.
AK
This
is
the
this
would
be
an
implementation
of
something
new,
and
I
would
like
to
to
see
first,
an.
AK
An
assessment
of
how
this
goes
first,
instead
of
just
rushing
in
in
and
releasing
options.
AK
For
the
free
option,
I
I
am
in
favor
of
having
some
kind
of
of
a
cap
or
regulation.
AK
AK
But
I
I
would
like
to
see
first,
an
assessment
than
going
just
for
all
in
in
without
knowing,
if.
AK
There
is
any
potential
consequence
so
once
again,
I'm
I'm
in
favor
of
housing,
as
I
mentioned.
AK
In
the
in
the
beginning,
but
at
the
same
time
we
will
need
some
kind
of
caution
to
not
be
to.
AK
Regret
if
we
just
release
in
open
summer
of
the
of
the
citizen,
mentioned
open
it
up
just
this
fast.
G
G
G
Conditional
use
in
mind-
I
don't
know
if
anybody
has
a
comment
about
that.
Let
me
see
if
I
can.
AG
AG
A
Okay,
well,
I
will
just
kind
of
add
my
final
comment,
which
is
just
to
say:
I
I'm.
A
Really
afraid
that
this
particular
provision
is
is
almost
a
bit
of
a
poison
pill.
If
we.
A
A
Who
lives
in
their
home
who's?
Considering
adding
a
second
unit,
they've
got
to
save
the
money
to.
A
Plan
for
that
they've
got
to
save
the
money
for
architect,
architecture
and
and
for
building.
A
A
Of
properties
and
has
a
big
account
with
with
cash
in
it,
for
for
renovations
and
and.
A
You're
buying
architecture
services
in
bulk.
It's
a
much
much
easier
decision.
A
And
so
my
fear
is
that
if
this
provision
is
in
there,
you're
going
to
see.
A
That
would
be
a
much
much
fairer
approach
than
to
say
whoever
gets
there
first
gets
to
build.
A
A
Amendment
to
put
some
sort
of
uniform
cap
in
the
zone
or
or
or
even
you
know,
even
at
a.
A
A
I
think
is
just
the
the
wrong
way
to
try
to
restrain
growth.
So
obviously
my
amendment.
A
I'll
I'll
vote
to
support
it,
but,
oh
I
see
commissioner
kate,
you
have
kind
of.
J
Think
that
talking
about
some
overall
cap
would
be
a
better
way
to
go,
and
so
that's
something
that.
J
I
will
take
up
with
the
staff
and
with
you
all
after
this,
to
see
about
an
additional
amendment.
I.
J
How
you
know
that
could
aid
the
ongoing
monitoring
of
this,
I
think
it's
worth
looking
at.
A
Okay,
seeing
none,
I
think,
we're
ready
for
a
vote.
Q
AG
A
We
we
did
suspend
the
rules
to
allow
debate
to
continue
on
that
unless
there
is
another.
A
Motion
to
further
suspend
the
rules
and
continue
debate.
We
are
going
to
adjourn
by
by
the.
A
Way,
I
do
want
to
make
sure
you
continue
the
petition
to
to
the
next
meeting.
However,.
A
Right
so
yeah,
so
I
have
a
question
so
there.
What
was
a.
J
Just
a
quick
question
to
should
I
just
go
ahead
and
withdraw
my
amendment,
or
is
that.
A
Irreconcilable
differences,
I
think,
but
we
can,
I
think,
discuss
offline
and
if
there's
another.
A
A
Introduce
that
amendment
or
some
you
know
some
variation
thereof.
If
you
still
like
to.
A
At
the
next
meeting,
what
amendment
is
done?
I
think,
based
on
our
vote
on
doing
this
by
right.
U
A
On
the
airpods
here,
yeah,
I
think,
would
be
appropriate.
Now.
A
To
have
a
motion
to
continue
the
discussion
consideration
of
20.
A
009-21
to
our
next
meeting,
which
will
be
thursday.
A
A
Comment
period
as
the
rules
stand
right
now
that
would
leave
a
comment
period
of
five.
A
Minutes
per
person
on
our
on
our
final
recommendation,
so
that's
probably.
A
Then
move
on
to
consideration
of
the
map
itself,
so
zeo10-21
so
yeah.
So
a
vote
for.